From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 00:01:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 20:01:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441415] Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806010001.m5101Gxo017058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441415 ------- Additional Comments From bochecha at no-log.org 2008-05-31 20:01 EST ------- I reworked it a little, trying to take into accounts remarks that were made to me in adonthell review. SPEC: ftp://91.121.156.173/pub/wastesedge.spec SRPM: ftp://91.121.156.173/pub/wastesedge-0.3.4-0.5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 00:25:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 20:25:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449234] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-Cookie - Maintain session IDs using cookies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806010025.m510Psi2020730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-Cookie - Maintain session IDs using cookies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449234 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |449251 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 00:25:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 20:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449251] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449251 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Catalyst-Plugin- Authentication/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication-0.10006-1.fc9.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication.spec Description: The authentication plugin provides generic user support for Catalyst apps. It is the basis for both authentication (checking the user is who they claim to be), and authorization (allowing the user to do what the system authorises them to do). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 01:03:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 21:03:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441415] Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806010103.m5113J0I026239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441415 ------- Additional Comments From bochecha at no-log.org 2008-05-31 21:03 EST ------- My bad, I uploaded the old SRPM. Here is the good one: SRPM: ftp://91.121.156.173/pub/wastesedge-0.3.4-0.6.fc9.src.rpm Spec file was right though, but it's always better to have the two of them in the same comment: SPEC: ftp://91.121.156.173/pub/wastesedge.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 02:35:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 22:35:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449251] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806010235.m512ZcUQ026670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449251 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 02:39:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 22:39:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449234] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-Cookie - Maintain session IDs using cookies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806010239.m512dRC8026954@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-Cookie - Maintain session IDs using cookies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449234 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-05-31 22:39 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=638376 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM but NOT for RPM. perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-Cookie.src:38: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep FOO=`perl -p -e 's|%{buildroot}%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}\S+||'` $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. ==> I think this will not be a problem. + source files match upstream url 0eb184e081051ca284c2952ba6db59f7 Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-Cookie-0.09.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=32, 3 wallclock secs ( 1.16 cusr + 0.21 csys = 1.37 CPU) + Package perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-Cookie-0.09-1.fc10 => Provides: perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Session::State::Cookie) = 0.09 Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Session) >= 0.19 perl(Catalyst::Utils) perl(NEXT) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 02:48:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 22:48:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448949] Review Request: guidance-power-manager - KDE Power Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806010248.m512mO9U009316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guidance-power-manager - KDE Power Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448949 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-05-31 22:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > targetted for F9+ (requires kdebindings version 4) I'll keep this in mind First glance looks good :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 02:54:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 22:54:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447567] Review Request: msort - Sort files in sophisticated ways In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806010254.m512steA029083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: msort - Sort files in sophisticated ways https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447567 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-05-31 22:54 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=638847 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM andfor RPM. + source files match upstream url aa84730eae0691341919db244f821c68 msort-8.46.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + No desktop file installed. + GUI interface is available. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 03:31:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 23:31:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448949] Review Request: guidance-power-manager - KDE Power Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806010331.m513V44l002346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guidance-power-manager - KDE Power Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448949 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dev at nigelj.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-05-31 23:31 EST ------- Y/N/- MUST: Y: rpmlint on each package --------------- guidance-power-manager.x86_64: W: no-documentation guidance-power-manager.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/kde4/apps/guidance-power-manager/powermanage.py 0644 guidance-power-manager.x86_64: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/bin/guidance-power-manager /usr/share/kde4/apps/guidance-power-manager/guidance-power-manager.py guidance-power-manager.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/xf86misc.py 0644 guidance-power-manager.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.0-0.1.20080529svn 0.1-0.1.20080529svn.fc9 guidance-power-manager-debuginfo.x86_64: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet guidance-power-manager-debuginfo-0.1-0.1.20080529svn.fc9.x86_64.rpm --------------- Y: Meets Package Naming Guidelines Y: Spec file name matches base package name Y: License field is valid Y: Meets Packaging Guidelines -: License included in package (if included in source) Y: Spec file written in en_US Y: Spec file is legible -: Sources match upstream source Y: Source URL 'sane' Y: Compiles successfully - [F9 - x86_64, Rawhide(koji) - *] -: ExcludeArch required? Y: All Build Dependencies Listed -: Handles locales sanely -: Library packages run ldconfig Y: Package is not relocatable Y: Package owns all directories created Y: No duplicate file listings Y: defattr set correctly Y: %clean is used Y: Macro use conisistant Y: Contains Code/Content that is allowed -: Large Documentation in -doc subpackage Y: %doc must not affect package runtime -: Header files in -devel -: Static libraries in -static -: pkgconfig files require pkgconfig -: Library files are located in correct package -: -devel requires base package w/ fully versioned dependency Y: Packages do not contain .la (libtool) archives -: GUI Apps have .desktop files Y: No duplicate directory ownerships Y: %install cleans buildroot Y: Filenames are valid UTF-8 SHOULD: -: Description/Summary sections contain translations Y: Builds in mock/koji Y: Builds on all architectures -: Scriptlets are sane -: Subpackages require base package -: pkgconfig.pc files in -devel -: File dependencies should only be in /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin Looking at the rpmlint errors: README should at the very least be included in %doc, you should ask upstream to include a copy of GPLv2 as well. Version in ChangeLog should be 0.2-0.1.20080529svn debuginfo pkg name is very long, should be safe to ignore, I don't think many make CDs of debuginfo packages :) I'm stamping this with the big green APPROVED stamp on the basis that %doc gets sorted out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 04:00:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 00:00:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449234] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-Cookie - Maintain session IDs using cookies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806010400.m5140TG0019812@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-Cookie - Maintain session IDs using cookies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449234 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 04:00:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 00:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449234] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-Cookie - Maintain session IDs using cookies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806010400.m5140SCJ019782@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-Cookie - Maintain session IDs using cookies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449234 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-06-01 00:00 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-Cookie Short Description: Maintain session IDs using cookies Owners: cweyl Branches: F-7, F-8, F-9, devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 04:11:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 00:11:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448901] Review Request: nled - Simple curses-based text editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806010411.m514BNj6008468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nled - Simple curses-based text editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448901 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-01 00:11 EST ------- nled-2.52-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 04:24:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 00:24:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441098] Review Request: python-dictclient - Python client for DICT protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806010424.m514OKdC023365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-dictclient - Python client for DICT protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441098 rickyz at cmu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rickyz at cmu.edu 2008-06-01 00:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Package Name: dictclient Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: dictclient Argh, I'm really sorry, that should have been "python-dictclient", not "dictclient". I haven't committed/built anything yet, so hopefully, it can be renamed. Sorry for the trouble. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 05:45:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 01:45:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448949] Review Request: guidance-power-manager - KDE Power Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806010545.m515jYHi003379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guidance-power-manager - KDE Power Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448949 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-06-01 01:45 EST ------- thanks! Yeah, the doc situation is due to this really being pre-release software atm, but I'll make sure to include README (duh, can't believe I missed that). New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: guidance-power-manager Short Description: KDE Power Manager Owners: rdieter Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 07:13:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 03:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448422] Review Request: trophy - Car racing game with special features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806010713.m517Drdr002798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trophy - Car racing game with special features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448422 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-06-01 03:13 EST ------- this package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 07:37:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 03:37:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448422] Review Request: trophy - Car racing game with special features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806010737.m517bT91019807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trophy - Car racing game with special features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448422 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-01 03:37 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: trophy Short Description: Car racing game with special features Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 07:55:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 03:55:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441098] Review Request: python-dictclient - Python client for DICT protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806010755.m517tTHd009437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-dictclient - Python client for DICT protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441098 rickyz at cmu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From rickyz at cmu.edu 2008-06-01 03:55 EST ------- Thanks, Toshio! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 08:18:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 04:18:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441098] Review Request: python-dictclient - Python client for DICT protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806010818.m518IN0i013989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-dictclient - Python client for DICT protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441098 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-01 04:18 EST ------- python-dictclient-1.0.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 08:18:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 04:18:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441098] Review Request: python-dictclient - Python client for DICT protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806010818.m518IHVB027483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-dictclient - Python client for DICT protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441098 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-01 04:18 EST ------- python-dictclient-1.0.1-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 08:34:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 04:34:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442854] Review Request: psiconv : A conversion utility for Psion files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806010834.m518YuAd013494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psiconv : A conversion utility for Psion files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442854 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-01 04:34 EST ------- Closing as this is in the repo now (atleast for rawhide). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 08:47:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 04:47:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441415] Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806010847.m518lAXN015812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441415 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-01 04:47 EST ------- Full review done, results: Must Fix -------- * The GPL version to use does not get specified anywhere, so the correct License tag is GPL+ not GPLv2+ * Drop the obsolete Encoding and Version entries from the .desktop file Should Fix ---------- * Drop the #%files line (why is that there anyways?) * Add INSTALL="install -p" as argument to make install to preserve the timestamps of the files getting installed * Install icons in freedesktop.org icon standard location (/usr/share/pixmaps is deprecated) : mv wastesedge_16x16.xpm /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/wastesedge.xpm mv wastesedge_32x32.xpm /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/wastesedge.xpm Add a "Requires: hicolor-icon-theme" for icon dirs ownership Add ican-cache update scriptlets from: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GTK.2B_icon_cache Change Icon line in .desktop to just "Icon=wastesedge" One all that is done its time for the next step as described in my initial comment: "The next step then is for you to either package one or two more packages, for example from these lists: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games/WishList http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList Or you can do some reviews of other people packages, when you do this please add a note that it is not an official review as you aren't a contributer yet. The purpose here is for you to show a good understanding of the packaging guidelines. Once you've done a couple of good reviews and / or submitted one or two more good packages, then you can apply for cvsextras membership in the account system and I'll sponsor you." So I would like you to either create one more package, or do 2 good reviews of other peoples submissions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 09:39:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 05:39:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442280] Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806010939.m519dfRC005334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442280 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-01 05:39 EST ------- squirrel-2.2.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 09:40:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 05:40:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442280] Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806010940.m519eOJ6025135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442280 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-01 05:40 EST ------- squirrel-2.2.1-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 10:11:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 06:11:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447567] Review Request: msort - Sort files in sophisticated ways In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806011011.m51ABvql030223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: msort - Sort files in sophisticated ways https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447567 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-06-01 06:11 EST ------- > APPROVED. Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: msort Short Description: Sort files in sophisticated ways Owners: terjeros Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 11:04:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 07:04:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448582] Review Request: automoc - KDE4 Automoc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806011104.m51B4slb018531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: automoc - KDE4 Automoc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448582 lvillani at binaryhelix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 13:33:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 09:33:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433045] Review Request: php-pear-propel_generator - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806011333.m51DXI1E010919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-propel_generator - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433045 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2008-06-01 09:33 EST ------- Updated Spec URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-propel/php-pear-propel_generator.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-propel/php-pear-propel_generator-1.3.0-0.1.rc1.fc9.src.rpm Changes: - update to 1.3.0-rc1 - ownership of %%{pear_phpdir}/propel now claimed by both -runtime and -generator packages - dependencies update -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 13:32:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 09:32:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266841] Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806011332.m51DWcxG010841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266841 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2008-06-01 09:32 EST ------- Updated Spec URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-propel/php-pear-propel_runtime.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-propel/php-pear-propel_runtime-1.3.0-0.1.rc1.fc9.src.rpm Changes: - update to 1.3.0-rc1 - ownership of %%{pear_phpdir}/propel now claimed by both -runtime and -generator packages - dependencies update The license issue should now be fixed, license tag has changes to LGPLv3+ according to http://propel.phpdb.org/trac/wiki/Users/Introduction/License Jason and Hans, please confirm this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 13:37:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 09:37:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441415] Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806011337.m51Dbxjb011835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441415 ------- Additional Comments From bochecha at no-log.org 2008-06-01 09:37 EST ------- About the icons location, I looked for it so I could have discuss this upstream, and I found this in the Freedektop Icon Theme Spec (http://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-theme-spec/latest/ar01s03.html): > Icons and themes are looked for in a set of directories. By default, apps > should look in $HOME/.icons (for backwards compatibility), in > $XDG_DATA_DIRS/icons and in /usr/share/pixmaps (in that order). Are you sure it has been deprecated ? Do you have another link explaining it so I can sell this point upstream for future release ? Another question, you said: > mv wastesedge_16x16.xpm /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/wastesedge.xpm > mv wastesedge_32x32.xpm /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/wastesedge.xpm So I assume I should do that in a %post section, is that the preferred method over simply patching the Makefile so that it installs in the right place ? I corrected the "install -p" point, but you didn't make this remark in my other submission. Is there a reason why I should do this in this package and not in the other ? Or should I correct it in adonthell too ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 14:17:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 10:17:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448250] Review Request: nautilus-sound-converter - nautilus extension to convert audio files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806011417.m51EHPN8018262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-sound-converter - nautilus extension to convert audio files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448250 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-06-01 10:17 EST ------- + There remains an issue with mixed use of spaces and tabs: [rishi at ginger SRPMS]$ rpmlint nautilus-sound-converter-0.5.0-2.fc9.src.rpm nautilus-sound-converter.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 24) [rishi at ginger SRPMS]$ + Also are these versioned BuildRequires really needed? Even F-7 seems to have versions newer than these. BuildRequires: nautilus-devel >= 2.12.0 BuildRequires: gstreamer-devel >= 0.10.3 According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Requires : "... if the lowest possible requirement is so old that nobody has a version older than that installed on any target distribution release, there's no need to include the version in the dependency at all. In that case we know the available software is new enough. ... As a rule of thumb, if the version is not required, don't add it just for fun." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 14:50:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 10:50:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448250] Review Request: nautilus-sound-converter - nautilus extension to convert audio files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806011450.m51Eodb0023638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-sound-converter - nautilus extension to convert audio files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448250 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2008-06-01 10:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > + There remains an issue with mixed use of spaces and tabs: > [rishi at ginger SRPMS]$ rpmlint nautilus-sound-converter-0.5.0-2.fc9.src.rpm > nautilus-sound-converter.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, > tab: line 24) Is this *really* a blocker? I could care less about mixing space & tabs. > + Also are these versioned BuildRequires really needed? Even F-7 seems to have > versions newer than these. > BuildRequires: nautilus-devel >= 2.12.0 > BuildRequires: gstreamer-devel >= 0.10.3 And again I ask is this really a blocker for not approving a package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 15:27:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 11:27:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448250] Review Request: nautilus-sound-converter - nautilus extension to convert audio files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806011527.m51FRIC0016044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-sound-converter - nautilus extension to convert audio files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448250 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-06-01 11:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Is this *really* a blocker? I could care less about mixing space & tabs. > [...] > And again I ask is this really a blocker for not approving a package? Although none of them are blockers, they are too trivial to be not fixed. :-) In any case, I leave it to your discretion. +---------------------------------+ | This package is APPROVED by me. | +---------------------------------+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 15:30:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 11:30:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226115] Merge Review: m4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806011530.m51FUque016704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: m4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226115 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-06-01 11:30 EST ------- MUST Items: xx - rpmlint is unclean on RPM + [rishi at ginger x86_64]$ rpmlint m4-1.4.11-1.fc8.x86_64.rpm m4.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/m4-1.4.11/COPYING [rishi at ginger x86_64]$ OK - follows Naming Guidelines OK - spec file is named as %{name}.spec xx - package does not meet Packaging Guidelines + According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make you should use 'make %{?_smp_mflags}' whenever possible. In this case since upstream supports parallel builds (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=639507) you should use it. + To preserve timestamps you could consider using: make install INSTALL="%{__install} -p" DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT OK - license meets Licensing Guidelines OK - License field meets actual license OK - upstream license file included in %doc OK - spec file uses American English OK - spec file is legible OK - sources match upstream sources OK - package builds successfully OK - ExcludeArch not needed OK - build dependencies correctly listed OK - no locales OK - no shared libraries OK - package is not relocatable OK - file and directory ownership OK - no duplicates in %file xx - file permissions set properly + The COPYING file's permissions need to be set to 644. You could do that in %prep. + The preferred attribute definition is: %defattr(-,root,root,-) OK - %clean present OK - macros used consistently OK - contains code and permissable content OK - -doc is not needed OK - contents of %doc does not affect the runtime OK - no header files OK - no static libraries OK - no pkgconfig files OK - no library files OK - -devel is not needed OK - no libtool archives OK - %{name}.desktop file not needed OK - does not own files or directories owned by other packages OK - buildroot correctly prepped OK - all file names valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - upstream provides license text xx - no translations for description and summary OK - package builds in mock successfully OK - package builds on all supported architectures OK - package functions as expected OK - scriptlets are sane OK - subpackages are not needed OK - no pkgconfig files OK - no file dependencies outside /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 15:31:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 11:31:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226115] Merge Review: m4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806011531.m51FVDLc030053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: m4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226115 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 17:18:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 13:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806011718.m51HIh4t014234@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 claudio at claudiotomasoni.it changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From claudio at claudiotomasoni.it 2008-06-01 13:18 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qtoctave Short Description: fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets Owners: claudiotomasoni Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 17:23:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 13:23:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439100] Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806011723.m51HNtfD001495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439100 claudio at claudiotomasoni.it changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From claudio at claudiotomasoni.it 2008-06-01 13:23 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: octaviz Short Description: 3D visualization system for Octave Owners: claudiotomasoni Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 17:28:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 13:28:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439100] Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806011728.m51HSpPR002245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439100 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-01 13:28 EST ------- We are no longer doing F-7 branches. Do you really not want t F-9 branch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 17:28:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 13:28:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806011728.m51HSQph002207@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-01 13:28 EST ------- We are no longer doing F-7 branches. Do you really not want t F-9 branch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 17:30:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 13:30:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447567] Review Request: msort - Sort files in sophisticated ways In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806011730.m51HUqEh016235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: msort - Sort files in sophisticated ways https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447567 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-01 13:30 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 17:33:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 13:33:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448901] Review Request: nled - Simple curses-based text editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806011733.m51HXotv003135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nled - Simple curses-based text editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448901 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-01 13:33 EST ------- nled-2.52-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 17:32:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 13:32:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448422] Review Request: trophy - Car racing game with special features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806011732.m51HW2KU002973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trophy - Car racing game with special features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448422 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-01 13:32 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 17:33:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 13:33:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448949] Review Request: guidance-power-manager - KDE Power Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806011733.m51HXU1N003097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guidance-power-manager - KDE Power Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448949 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-01 13:33 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 17:35:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 13:35:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449234] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-Cookie - Maintain session IDs using cookies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806011735.m51HZ8It017002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-Cookie - Maintain session IDs using cookies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449234 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-01 13:35 EST ------- cvs done. (Except for F-7, as we are no longer doing F-7 branches.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 17:44:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 13:44:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448250] Review Request: nautilus-sound-converter - nautilus extension to convert audio files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806011744.m51HiFKm018292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-sound-converter - nautilus extension to convert audio files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448250 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2008-06-01 13:44 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nautilus-sound-converter Short Description: Nautilus extension to convert audio files Owners: bpepple Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 17:56:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 13:56:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286851] Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806011756.m51Hum9T020251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286851 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2008-06-01 13:56 EST ------- Updates files can be downloaded from: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/kaya/kaya.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/kaya/kaya-0.5.0-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 18:12:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:12:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449234] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-Cookie - Maintain session IDs using cookies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806011812.m51ICDgu022938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-Cookie - Maintain session IDs using cookies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449234 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-06-01 14:12 EST ------- Imported and built for rawhide. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 18:12:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:12:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449251] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806011812.m51ICEGH022962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449251 Bug 449251 depends on bug 449234, which changed state. Bug 449234 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-Cookie - Maintain session IDs using cookies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449234 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 18:25:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:25:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443467] Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806011825.m51IPOU2024903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443467 silfreed at silfreed.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2008-06-01 14:25 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ale Short Description: Combines multiple inputs of the same scene Owners: silfreed Branches: F-8, F-9 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 18:24:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:24:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443468] Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806011824.m51IOJTf024487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443468 silfreed at silfreed.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2008-06-01 14:24 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hdrprep Short Description: Align digicam images and fix EXIF information Owners: silfreed Branches: F-8, F-9 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 19:17:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 15:17:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441415] Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806011917.m51JHsIj019920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441415 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-01 15:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > About the icons location, I looked for it so I could have discuss this upstream, > and I found this in the Freedektop Icon Theme Spec > (http://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-theme-spec/latest/ar01s03.html): > > Icons and themes are looked for in a set of directories. By default, apps > > should look in $HOME/.icons (for backwards compatibility), in > > $XDG_DATA_DIRS/icons and in /usr/share/pixmaps (in that order). > > Are you sure it has been deprecated ? Do you have another link explaining it so > I can sell this point upstream for future release ? > Well I don't have a document saying so, but /usr/share/pixmaps is the old way of installing icons. It does not allow for theming, nor does it allow installing multiple sizes of an icon in such a way that a using application (like the gnome/kde/xfce applications menu)?can automatically use the correct size depending upon the size it needs. With the /usr/share/icons way, if you have a large panel and place a launcher there you will automatically get the more detailed 32x32 icon, with the /usr/share/pixmaps way you are stuck to whatever size you've hardcoded in the .desktop file (as the size now is encoded into the name you've specified in the .desktop file). But as said this is a should, so if you feel this is not worth the trouble you do not have todo this. > Another question, you said: > > mv wastesedge_16x16.xpm /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/wastesedge.xpm > > mv wastesedge_32x32.xpm /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/wastesedge.xpm > > So I assume I should do that in a %post section, is that the preferred method > over simply patching the Makefile so that it installs in the right place ? > Indeed it is not necessary to patch the makefiles, but using things like mv in %post is a really bad idea, just move the files to the new location in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %install (after calling "make install") > I corrected the "install -p" point, but you didn't make this remark in my other > submission. Is there a reason why I should do this in this package and not in > the other ? Or should I correct it in adonthell too ? You should correct it in adonthell too, I realised this myself too when making the remark here, but with adonthell its less important as AFAIK no datafiles are installed there, only compiled files which will have the time of build as timestamp anyways, so preserving there timestamp is not really important, but for autoxxx generated makefiles you should really _always_ specify INSTALL="install -p" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 19:18:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 15:18:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448949] Review Request: guidance-power-manager - KDE Power Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806011918.m51JIfUf000966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guidance-power-manager - KDE Power Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448949 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-06-01 15:18 EST ------- imported, building. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 19:44:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 15:44:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448949] Review Request: guidance-power-manager - KDE Power Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806011944.m51Ji8ia024005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guidance-power-manager - KDE Power Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448949 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-01 15:44 EST ------- guidance-power-manager-0.1-0.2.20080529svn.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 21:50:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 17:50:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449251] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806012150.m51LomaQ024730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449251 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-06-01 17:50 EST ------- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=639940 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 1 22:37:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 18:37:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433925] Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806012237.m51MbQxa018921@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433925 rayvd at bludgeon.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 00:10:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 20:10:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266841] Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806020010.m520Ah7W014286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266841 ------- Additional Comments From hans at velum.net 2008-06-01 20:10 EST ------- Confirmed from our side. We've never specified a version & have updated our licensing to reflect the current version of LGPL. We intend to always use the latest version of the LGPL, but have indicated in the licensing that we are using v3 or later. While we recognize that there is some disagreement between Apache and FSF on the compatibility of LGPLv2 with Apache license, it is clear that everyone agrees in the compatibility of LGPL v3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 03:30:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 23:30:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443467] Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806020330.m523UYYg014038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443467 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-01 23:30 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 03:33:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 23:33:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448250] Review Request: nautilus-sound-converter - nautilus extension to convert audio files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806020333.m523X9h2001469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-sound-converter - nautilus extension to convert audio files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448250 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-01 23:33 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 03:31:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 23:31:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443468] Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806020331.m523VxwZ014322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443468 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-01 23:31 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 04:04:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 00:04:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226339] Merge Review: Pyrex (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806020404.m5244bZ2019716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: Pyrex (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226339 kylev at kylev.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From kylev at kylev.com 2008-06-02 00:04 EST ------- Hope this is ok. Pyrex has been updated since this bug was opened, and F-7 is nearly EOL. No reason for this review anymore. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 445289 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 04:30:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 00:30:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449251] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806020430.m524UDFr011550@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449251 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-02 00:30 EST ------- rpmlint output says perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication.src:42: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep %{__perl_provides} `perl -p -e 's|%{buildroot}%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}\S+||'` $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication.src:50: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep %{__perl_requires} `perl -p -e 's|%{buildroot}%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}\S+||'` $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. Also, Can you add POD test checking also? t/pod.................. skipped all skipped: Test::Pod 1.14 required t/pod_coverage......... skipped all skipped: Test::Pod::Coverage 1.04 required All tests successful, 2 tests skipped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 04:54:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 00:54:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 411551] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806020454.m524sonf028015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper Alias: perl-DBIx-Class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411551 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-02 00:54 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock. koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=640082 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 5b7eee3c1ddf6f865c816cde9e9bdf62 DBIx-Class-0.08010.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful (7 subtests UNEXPECTEDLY SUCCEEDED), 15 tests and 18 subtests skipped. Passed TODO Stat Wstat TODOs Pass List of Passed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t/81transactions.t 13 7 55 59 61-65 Files=106, Tests=2568, 48 wallclock secs (39.58 cusr + 4.35 csys = 43.93 CPU) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 04:57:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 00:57:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447293] Review Request: hunspell-ml - Malayalam Hunspell Dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806020457.m524voTf016046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ml - Malayalam Hunspell Dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447293 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-02 00:57 EST ------- I see that this package already built for F8,F9,rawhide. Therefore closing this review now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 05:24:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 01:24:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433223] Review Request: gstreamermm - C++ wrapper for GStreamer library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806020524.m525OYD2020832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstreamermm - C++ wrapper for GStreamer library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433223 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2008-06-02 01:24 EST ------- Brian, thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 06:48:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 02:48:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449317] New: Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449317 Summary: Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.sylvan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/games/gamazons.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/games/gamazons-0.83-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Amazons is a game played on a 10x10 chess board. Each side has four pieces (amazons) that move like chess queens (in a straight line in any direction). Instead of capturing pieces like in chess, the game is determined based on who moves last. Each move consists of two parts. First an amazon moves to a new square and then fires an arrow to another square (the arrow is fired in a straight line in any direction from the square the amazon landed on). The square the arrow lands on becomes a permenant block for the rest of the game. No one can move over it, or fire an arrow over it. Every turn an amazon must move and fire an arrow, so every turn there is one less square available on the board. Try and block in your opponent or section off a good chunk of the board for yourself. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=640110 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 08:17:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 04:17:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449328] New: Review Request: cluttermm - C++ wrapper for clutter library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449328 Summary: Review Request: cluttermm - C++ wrapper for clutter library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: denis at poolshark.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/cluttermm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/cluttermm-0.5.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Cluttermm is a C++ wrapper library for clutter: an OpenGL-based library for creating fast, visually rich and animated graphical user interfaces. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 08:24:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 04:24:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449328] Review Request: cluttermm - C++ wrapper for clutter library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806020824.m528OFnK022904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cluttermm - C++ wrapper for clutter library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449328 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2008-06-02 04:24 EST ------- Patch filed upstream at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=536181 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 09:27:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 05:27:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806020927.m529RfZa003790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 ------- Additional Comments From claudio at claudiotomasoni.it 2008-06-02 05:27 EST ------- Oops, sorry! My fault. New Package CVS Request ======================= Branches: F-8 F-9 The same for octaviz. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 09:27:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 05:27:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439100] Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806020927.m529Rdts016010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439100 ------- Additional Comments From claudio at claudiotomasoni.it 2008-06-02 05:27 EST ------- Oops, sorry! My fault. New Package CVS Request ======================= Branches: F-8 F-9 The same for qtoctave. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 09:46:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 05:46:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442875] Review Request: virt-ctrl - Graphical management app for virtual machines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806020946.m529kFV6007661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-ctrl - Graphical management app for virtual machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442875 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-06-02 05:46 EST ------- Unfortunately it's not straightforward to backport this package to F-8. Lablgtk / Gtk has added new features and we rely on Gtk >= 2.10.0. Possibly when this package has been reviewed, I will add a big patch to hack out the parts which need Gtk >= 2.10 just for F-8. I strongly suggest you look at virt-manager (http://virt-manager.org/). Not only is virt-manager currently much more featureful, but it's also available right now in F-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 09:46:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 05:46:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442507] Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806020946.m529k6Sp007611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507 ------- Additional Comments From jroth at linux.vnet.ibm.com 2008-06-02 05:46 EST ------- The latest version can be found at: Spec URL: ftp://testcase.software.ibm.com/fromibm/linux/libspe2.spec SRPM URL: ftp://testcase.software.ibm.com/fromibm/linux/libspe2-2.2.80.95-2.src.rpm Thanks to the extensive help from Robert. At least one point is open for discussion. We are used to put include files for our spu compiler into /usr/spu/include. Many tools (e.g. our Cell SDK3 make files) have this path hardcoded. The question now is if we can continue to use the path /usr/spu/include for SPU related include files. Thanks for your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 09:52:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 05:52:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449339] New: Review Request: wine-doors - One-click Windows application installer / Wine frontend Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449339 Summary: Review Request: wine-doors - One-click Windows application installer / Wine frontend Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pablo.martin-gomez at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/~tsi30161/wine-doors.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/~tsi30161/wine-doors-0.1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Wine doors is an application designed to assist users in obtaining, installing, uninstalling and working around the caveats associated with wine applications. Although wine doors is intended to be a replacement for winetools it is not limited to release cycles for the applications available to install, instead a web service will be provided, this web service or repository will serve XML Pack Lists as an index of applications and Application Packs which provide information about specific applications as well as various other resources. As this software is useful and requested in the wish list, I've package it. There are still two problems: - rpmlint returns warnings cause of absolute links : wine-doors.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/pixmaps/wine-doors.png /usr/share/wine-doors/pixmaps/wine-doors.png wine-doors.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/bin/wine-doors /usr/share/wine-doors/src/winedoors.py wine-doors.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/pixmaps/wine-doors.svg /usr/share/wine-doors/pixmaps/wine-doors.svg - the setup.py doesn't find a dependence which is installed (the same code in a python shell and in the setup.py doesn't return the same output) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 10:23:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 06:23:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445347] Review Request: python-shout - python binding for libshout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021023.m52ANZHM015115@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-shout - python binding for libshout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445347 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2008-06-02 06:23 EST ------- Thanks Kevin. Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 10:47:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 06:47:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226271] Merge Review: perl-Net-IP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021047.m52Alk54000761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Net-IP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226271 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-06-02 06:47 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Net-IP New Branches: EL-4 Updated EPEL Owners: kasal mmaslano Updated EPEL CC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 12:19:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 08:19:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449360] New: Review Request: python-jcc - C++ code generator for calling Java from C++/Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449360 Summary: Review Request: python-jcc - C++ code generator for calling Java from C++/Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: felix.schwarz at oss.schwarz.eu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.felix-schwarz.name/files/misc/2008/python-jcc/1.9-4/python-jcc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.felix-schwarz.name/files/misc/2008/python-jcc/1.9-4/python-jcc-1.9-4.fc9.src.rpm Description: JCC is a C++ code generator for producing the glue code necessary to call into Java classes from CPython via Java's Native Invocation Interface (JNI). JCC generates C++ wrapper classes that hide all the gory details of JNI access as well Java memory and object reference management. JCC generates CPython types that make these C++ classes accessible from a Python interpreter. JCC attempts to make these Python types pythonic by detecting iterators and property accessors. Iterators and mappings may also be declared to JCC. Special notes: This package is not perfect yet but I need some input from other developers. The main problem is that it uses rpath. This is because java-1.6.0-openjdk does add libjvm.so and libjava.so to the general linker config in /etc/ld.so.conf.d/. What should we do in this case? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 13:28:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 09:28:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448311] Review Request: lostlabyrinth - Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021328.m52DSOgU000486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth - Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448311 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-06-02 09:28 EST ------- I'll do this one once elice finished. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 13:39:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 09:39:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449367] New: Review Request: tuxcmd - File manager with 2 panels side by side using GTK2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449367 Summary: Review Request: tuxcmd - File manager with 2 panels side by side using GTK2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tbzatek at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~tbzatek/tuxcmd/tuxcmd.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~tbzatek/tuxcmd/tuxcmd-0.6.36-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Tux Commander is open-source file manager with 2 panels side by side written for GTK2. The main goal of this project is to create powerful user-friendly file manager for Linux. Some functions are inspired by famous Total Commander. This project was started due to lack of quality mc-like file manager for X. Some notes: - application uses FreePascal compiler (package 'fpc') - target architectures are restricted to i386 and x86_64, it's upstream restriction -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 14:01:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 10:01:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449367] Review Request: tuxcmd - File manager with 2 panels side by side using GTK2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021401.m52E19bW026209@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxcmd - File manager with 2 panels side by side using GTK2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449367 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2008-06-02 10:01 EST ------- > This project was started due to lack of quality mc-like file manager for X. This is BS -- try krusader. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 14:17:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 10:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021417.m52EHnbF010474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 ------- Additional Comments From dhollis at davehollis.com 2008-06-02 10:17 EST ------- Updated package and spec available at: http://web.davehollis.com:81/packages/php-pear-Auth.spec http://web.davehollis.com:81/packages/php-pear-Auth-1.6.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm It now Requires: all optional elements that enhance functionality though this does mean that it pulls in a bunch of other packages to install and I can imagine some folks getting a little peeved at that. If it is a large enough issue, maybe a simple way to keep it from requiring 100 packages and to prevent 100 sub-packages, have php-pear-Auth include the most typical functionality - LDAP, MDB2 and maybe another one or two and then creating a sub-package that includes the somewhat more obscure containers and has more of the dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 14:42:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 10:42:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443850] Review Request: pywebkitgtk - Python Bindings for WebKit-gtk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021442.m52EgjL3015063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pywebkitgtk - Python Bindings for WebKit-gtk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443850 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-02 10:42 EST ------- Okay. -------------------------------------------------------------- This package (pywebkitgtk) is APPROVED by me -------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 14:48:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 10:48:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445224] Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021448.m52EmWdQ016215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445224 dcnltc at us.ibm.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Platform|All |ppc64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 15:11:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 11:11:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445224] Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021511.m52FBM4s007647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445224 dcnltc at us.ibm.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 15:16:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 11:16:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445224] Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021516.m52FGhS7021872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445224 dcnltc at us.ibm.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 15:25:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 11:25:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226339] Merge Review: Pyrex (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021525.m52FP8SM023296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: Pyrex (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226339 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|DUPLICATE | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-02 11:25 EST ------- Please remember that these merge review tickets are open because the packages which were in Fedora Core have not undergone any formal review and they really should all be reviewed at some point. Bug 445289 doesn't seem to contain any hint of an actual package review, so I'm re-opening. If you can point to another ticket where Pyrex is reviewed, then please re-close this as a duplicate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 15:27:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 11:27:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226271] Merge Review: perl-Net-IP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021527.m52FRnIo010558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Net-IP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226271 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-02 11:27 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 15:24:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 11:24:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021524.m52FOP1b009685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2008-06-02 11:24 EST ------- Do you know which Requires brings in the most packages? Also, does it make sense to require both DB and MDB2? I will take a closer look at this over the next day or two. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 15:30:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 11:30:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021530.m52FULwo024297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-02 11:30 EST ------- Thanks. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 15:31:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 11:31:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439100] Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021531.m52FViLm011500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439100 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-02 11:31 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 15:52:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 11:52:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449367] Review Request: tuxcmd - File manager with 2 panels side by side using GTK2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021552.m52FqDid029138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxcmd - File manager with 2 panels side by side using GTK2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449367 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-06-02 11:52 EST ------- Format review: OK source files match upstream: 4eb4cb6b033b68bfc86dc21fabdead8255118683 tuxcmd-0.6.36.tar.bz2 OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (GPLv2+). License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent (W: executable-stack is an issue of fpc). OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK is a GUI app, desktop file is installed This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 16:02:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 12:02:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449393] New: Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449393 Summary: Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SPEC: http://fedora.roving-it.com/rawhide/prism.spec SRPM: http://fedora.roving-it.com/rawhide/prism-0.9-0.1.cvs20080416.fc9.src.rpm This is my first hack at getting prism for Fedora. The spec file is based on a very hacked up copy of the firefox.spec file. It includes a full copy of the mozilla source code (like xulrunner and firefox) as you need the mozilla build system to be able to build it (see b.m.o # 381900 for details) and a horrid install section as the mozilla build system returns "Prism can't be installed directly." on a 'make install' although I can't be sure that's not due to my patches to allow the build of prism without doing a full mozilla build. Loads of feedback welcome :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 16:04:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 12:04:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226079] Merge Review: libxml2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021604.m52G4up4031533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226079 ------- Additional Comments From veillard at redhat.com 2008-06-02 12:04 EST ------- Incredible ... okay thanks for doing this ! I still think you're wrong in your 'ISO-8859-X is dead' stance, maybe you think it's dead for Fedora, or maybe Linux. But please remember that Linux/Fedora is still a relatively modest part of the computing ecosystem. From a libxml2 perspective, it's very probable there is more user on Windows than on Linux for example. Still the offer is too good to drop and I just commited this upstream: Mon Jun 2 17:39:42 CEST 2008 Daniel Veillard * ChangeLog: patch from Hans de Goede to switch the file to UTF-8 * doc/news.xsl: switch to generate the NEWS file in UTF-8 instead of ISO-8859-1 My main issue now is how to make sure Changelog will stay UTF-8 over the edits, I also added a comment at the end # # vim: set enc=utf-8 # hopefully this will help ensure the file stay UTF-8 over the edits by other commiters, as each time I will edit the file, vim should do the check and hopefully report problems. Daniel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 16:06:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 12:06:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434614] Review Request: cdcat - Hyper's CdCatalog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021606.m52G6uWd019366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdcat - Hyper's CdCatalog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434614 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-02 12:06 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 16:09:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 12:09:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444134] Review Request: spe - Python IDE editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021609.m52G9MPH019677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spe - Python IDE editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444134 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(jonathan.mercier at h | |otmail.fr) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-02 12:09 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 16:12:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 12:12:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446160] Review Request: file-browser-applet - File Browser Applet for the GNOME Panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021612.m52GCGgN020476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: file-browser-applet - File Browser Applet for the GNOME Panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446160 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(dakingun at gmail.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-02 12:12 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 16:14:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 12:14:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449367] Review Request: tuxcmd - File manager with 2 panels side by side using GTK2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021614.m52GEHcK001048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxcmd - File manager with 2 panels side by side using GTK2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449367 tbzatek at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tbzatek at redhat.com 2008-06-02 12:14 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tuxcmd Short Description: GTK2 file manager with 2 panels side by side Owners: tbzatek Branches: devel InitialCC: tbzatek Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 16:15:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 12:15:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225657] Merge Review: cpufreq-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021615.m52GFWFh021499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cpufreq-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225657 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2008-06-02 12:15 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: cpufreq-utils I want to rename the package to cpufrequtils, to match the upstream package name. http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/cpufreq/cpufrequtils.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 16:39:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 12:39:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446160] Review Request: file-browser-applet - File Browser Applet for the GNOME Panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021639.m52GdgGe005972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: file-browser-applet - File Browser Applet for the GNOME Panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446160 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(dakingun at gmail.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2008-06-02 12:39 EST ------- I've actually dealt with the above issues, see below. But I was waiting to hear back from upstream, hoping they'll readily sign on to changes I made to fix the directory ownership issue. Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/fba/file-browser-applet.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/fba/file-browser-applet-0.5.6-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 16:57:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 12:57:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 411551] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021657.m52GvEup029938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper Alias: perl-DBIx-Class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411551 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 16:57:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 12:57:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 411551] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021657.m52GvCVf029909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper Alias: perl-DBIx-Class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411551 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-06-02 12:57 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-DBIx-Class Short Description: Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper Owners: cweyl Branches: F-8, F-9, devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 17:07:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 13:07:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226079] Merge Review: libxml2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021707.m52H7Ltp012297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226079 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-02 13:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > Incredible ... okay thanks for doing this ! Your welcome. > Still the offer is too good to drop and I just commited this upstream: > > Mon Jun 2 17:39:42 CEST 2008 Daniel Veillard > > * ChangeLog: patch from Hans de Goede to switch the file to UTF-8 > * doc/news.xsl: switch to generate the NEWS file in UTF-8 instead of > ISO-8859-1 > Thanks!! > My main issue now is how to make sure Changelog will stay UTF-8 over the > edits, I also added a comment at the end > # > # vim: set enc=utf-8 > # > hopefully this will help ensure the file stay UTF-8 over the edits > by other commiters, as each time I will edit the file, vim should do the > check and hopefully report problems. > Yes, keeping it UTF-8 might be a problem, but if it becomes non UTF-8 I'm sure it can be fixed again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 17:19:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 13:19:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021719.m52HJM1D001968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 ------- Additional Comments From dhollis at davehollis.com 2008-06-02 13:19 EST ------- It looks like Crypt-CHAP may be responsible for a decent number of the requirements. That could get split out into the subpackage. As for DB vs MDB2, that would really be more of an issue as to what the developer is currently using for their DB. With DB being marked deprecated, that could be thrown into the subpackage as well with no problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 17:45:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 13:45:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226079] Merge Review: libxml2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021745.m52HjoSH006989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226079 ------- Additional Comments From veillard at redhat.com 2008-06-02 13:45 EST ------- Side note, could you point Toshio Kuratomi to XML specification appendix F. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#sec-guessing-with-ext-info He seems unaware that the software can expect XML files to be in a specific encoding - contextual metadata which can't be preserved when saved on a POSIX filesystem - and that this external information do override both the autodetection and the encoding declaration. So basically by converting a XML file blindly you can break it in context even if it looks legit say from an out of context xmllint checking. i.e. his suggestion here https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2008-May/msg00071.html is just broken, sorry. (me being 'chilling' is probably right in perspective but that's not a technical issue !) And just in case I may sound stupid, please remember that UTF-16 is the most common encoding for XML internal processing, on Windows, on the Web (DOM imposes UTF-16) and in Java, which represent a huge subset of the XML computing world. Daniel P.S.: It's not that i agree with appendix F-2 (I tried to get rid of it, failed) or with the use of UTF-16 (or derivative) over UTF-8, but that's just the way things are defined now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 18:16:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 14:16:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351531] Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021816.m52IG2jf025028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351531 ------- Additional Comments From stephan at xfce.org 2008-06-02 14:16 EST ------- @Christoph and Patrice: Could you please analyze which library is different on your systems? Something must be up, since it works for Christoph, and for most other mainstream distributions. (inc Gentoo, Debian and OpenSuSE) They don't seem to have these problems, so I tend to believe it is an environment issue. Something with one of the underlying libs (the way they are compiled for example). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 18:19:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 14:19:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449360] Review Request: python-jcc - C++ code generator for calling Java from C++/Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021819.m52IJCJW013090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-jcc - C++ code generator for calling Java from C++/Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449360 felix.schwarz at oss.schwarz.eu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |449456 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 18:30:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 14:30:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446160] Review Request: file-browser-applet - File Browser Applet for the GNOME Panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021830.m52IUQNM016245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: file-browser-applet - File Browser Applet for the GNOME Panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446160 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-02 14:30 EST ------- Well, on rawhide i386 when I - Click mouse right button on gnome-panel, select "Add to panel", then choose "File Browser" and click "Add" - On gnome-panel click mouse right button on File browser applet and choose "Remove from panel" Then gnome-panel always crash, while trying with other applets gnome-panel does not crash.... very strange.... Are you also seeing the issue this?? Note: debugging gnome-panel on rawhide does not work for now due to bug 449457 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 18:41:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 14:41:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446160] Review Request: file-browser-applet - File Browser Applet for the GNOME Panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021841.m52IfWQq018651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: file-browser-applet - File Browser Applet for the GNOME Panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446160 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2008-06-02 14:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Well, on rawhide i386 when I > - Click mouse right button on gnome-panel, select "Add to panel", > then choose "File Browser" and click "Add" > - On gnome-panel click mouse right button on File browser applet > and choose "Remove from panel" > > Then gnome-panel always crash, while trying with other applets gnome-panel > does not crash.... very strange.... > > Are you also seeing the issue this?? I'm not seeing any such issue on x86_64 F-9; adding and removing the applet works just fine without crashing gnome-panel. > Note: debugging gnome-panel on rawhide does not work for now due to > bug 449457 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 18:57:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 14:57:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449151] Review Request: pyodbc - Python DB API 2.0 Module for ODBC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021857.m52Ivu6M021668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyodbc - Python DB API 2.0 Module for ODBC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449151 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ondrejj at salstar.sk Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2008-06-02 14:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > Spec URL: http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/pyodbc/pyodbc.spec > SRPM URL: http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/pyodbc/pyodbc-2.0.58-1.src.rpm Looks OK for first look. rpmlint is clean, spec file is simple. But does not build in mock: DEBUG: /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.46918: line 27: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory I think python-devel or something similar is missing from BuildRequires. Please fix this. > Questions: > - Should I included text of the MIT license even though source package doesn't > include it? I think no. You should ask developers to add license into package, but do not include other license files into rpm. - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 19:04:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 15:04:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226339] Merge Review: Pyrex (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021904.m52J4ZM7002162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: Pyrex (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226339 ------- Additional Comments From kylev at kylev.com 2008-06-02 15:04 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=307551) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=307551&action=view) Patch to devel .spec file to fix many rpmlint warnings, update %file list Pyrex had lots of rpmlint warnings, this patch cleans many of them. We should also mind bug 447778 which requests an update to the newest version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 19:05:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 15:05:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446160] Review Request: file-browser-applet - File Browser Applet for the GNOME Panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021905.m52J5FR1002600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: file-browser-applet - File Browser Applet for the GNOME Panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446160 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-02 15:05 EST ------- Okay, now I assume this is gnome-panel side bug and I will approve this package. ------------------------------------------------------------------ This package (file-browser-applet) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 19:08:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 15:08:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 411551] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021908.m52J8B5s023977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper Alias: perl-DBIx-Class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411551 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-02 15:08 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 19:05:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 15:05:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225657] Merge Review: cpufreq-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021905.m52J5XAw023523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cpufreq-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225657 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-02 15:05 EST ------- We dislike doing renames of packages with history... Would you be ok with adding the new package name and following the http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife procedure on the old package? That way people can find the old package, and know what happened to it more clearly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 19:10:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 15:10:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449367] Review Request: tuxcmd - File manager with 2 panels side by side using GTK2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021910.m52JASfq003766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxcmd - File manager with 2 panels side by side using GTK2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449367 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-02 15:10 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 19:25:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 15:25:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449151] Review Request: pyodbc - Python DB API 2.0 Module for ODBC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021925.m52JPLm0006969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyodbc - Python DB API 2.0 Module for ODBC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449151 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2008-06-02 15:25 EST ------- I'll poke upstream on this and add it when they do. Updated files: http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/pyodbc/pyodbc.spec http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/pyodbc/pyodbc-2.0.58-2.src.rpm (This builds for me in mock for EL5-i386, my Fedora mock setup is broken currently) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 19:55:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 15:55:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449151] Review Request: pyodbc - Python DB API 2.0 Module for ODBC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021955.m52JtgA9013202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyodbc - Python DB API 2.0 Module for ODBC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449151 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2008-06-02 15:55 EST ------- Although there are many of warnings compiling on Fedora 9, I can build it for F8 and F9. This is a warning on F9: cursor.cpp:1159: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*' You can send this warning upstream, may be they know how to fix this. Please, remove Buildrequire for python, it is automatically required by python-devel, which is enough. Just fix this in spec file and I will approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 19:58:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 15:58:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449504] Review Request: ranpwd - A program to generate random passwords In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021958.m52JwS8P014332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ranpwd - A program to generate random passwords https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449504 rafalzaq at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kurzawax at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2008-06-02 15:58 EST ------- *** Bug 436930 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 19:57:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 15:57:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448422] Review Request: trophy - Car racing game with special features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021957.m52JvkxI014138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trophy - Car racing game with special features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448422 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-02 15:57 EST ------- Imported and build, updates pushed for F-8 and F-9, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 19:58:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 15:58:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436930] Review Request: ranpwd - A program to generate random passwords In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021958.m52JwRuk014311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ranpwd - A program to generate random passwords https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436930 rafalzaq at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2008-06-02 15:58 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 449504 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 19:57:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 15:57:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226002] Merge Review: libevent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806021957.m52JvTsD014020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libevent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226002 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide yaneti at declera.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |yaneti at declera.com ------- Additional Comments From yaneti at declera.com 2008-06-02 15:57 EST ------- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exclusion_of_Static_Libraries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 19:57:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 15:57:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449504] New: Review Request: ranpwd - A program to generate random passwords Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449504 Summary: Review Request: ranpwd - A program to generate random passwords Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rafalzaq at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/ranpwd/ranpwd.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/ranpwd/ranpwd-1.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: A program to generate random passwords using the in-kernel cryptographically secure random number generator. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 20:07:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 16:07:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225657] Merge Review: cpufreq-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806022007.m52K72PA007796@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cpufreq-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225657 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-02 16:07 EST ------- Per irc conversion, I have created the new cpufrequtils package, and you can end of life the old cpufreq-utils package. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 20:12:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 16:12:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441415] Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806022012.m52KCg8S022260@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441415 ------- Additional Comments From bochecha at no-log.org 2008-06-02 16:12 EST ------- Corrected the 5 points. Here are the new files. SRPM: ftp://91.121.156.173/pub/wastesedge-0.3.4-0.7.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: ftp://91.121.156.173/pub/wastesedge.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 20:18:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 16:18:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429882] Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806022018.m52KIn4t025090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429882 ------- Additional Comments From dwayne at translate.org.za 2008-06-02 16:18 EST ------- Spec URL: http://translate.sourceforge.net/releases/testing/fedora/python-Levenshtein-0.10.1-5.spec SRPM URL: http://translate.sourceforge.net/releases/testing/fedora/python-Levenshtein-0.10.1-5.fc9.src.rpm Nothing has changed since last release, simply rebuilt on fc9 and built using mock. mock rebuild -r fedora-devel-i386 python-Levenshtein-0.10.1-5.fc9.src.rpm All works correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 20:38:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 16:38:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446160] Review Request: file-browser-applet - File Browser Applet for the GNOME Panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806022038.m52Kc9J4002583@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: file-browser-applet - File Browser Applet for the GNOME Panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446160 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2008-06-02 16:38 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ffile-browser-applet Short Description: File Browser Applet for the GNOME Panel Owners: deji Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 20:44:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 16:44:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 411551] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806022044.m52KiALj026383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper Alias: perl-DBIx-Class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411551 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-06-02 16:44 EST ------- Imported and build in devel. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 20:44:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 16:44:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429081] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Oracle - Parse and format Oracle dates and timestamps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806022044.m52KiDwk026408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Oracle - Parse and format Oracle dates and timestamps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429081 Bug 429081 depends on bug 430352, which changed state. Bug 430352 Summary: DateTime::Format::Builder -- update to 0.7901 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430352 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 20:56:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 16:56:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449151] Review Request: pyodbc - Python DB API 2.0 Module for ODBC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806022056.m52KuJ06008863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyodbc - Python DB API 2.0 Module for ODBC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449151 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2008-06-02 16:56 EST ------- Thanks Jan; d'oh on the python BuildRequire. This has been addressed. http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/pyodbc/pyodbc.spec http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/pyodbc/pyodbc-2.0.58-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 21:23:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 17:23:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449595] New: Review Request: gnome-applet-grandr - GNOME panel applet for XrandR Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449595 Summary: Review Request: gnome-applet-grandr - GNOME panel applet for XrandR Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lxtnow at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/gnome-applet-grandr/gnome-applet-grandr.spec SRPM URL: http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/gnome-applet-grandr/gnome-applet-grandr-0.4.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: GrandrApplet is a simple gnome-panel front end to the xrandr extension found in XFree86 4.3+ releases. + current rpmlint output: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gnome-applet-grandr-0.4.1/NEWS --> harmless. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 20:08:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 16:08:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806022008.m52K8b6N020170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2008-06-02 16:08 EST ------- Okay, it is probably best to require both DB and MDB2 since these packages don't bring in too many extras, and we want this to work out of the box for as many people as possible. Please update the spec to make a -samba subpackage. Also, change the Requires lines to look like: Requires: php-pear(File_Passwd) >= 1.1.0 Instead of: Requires: php-pear-File-Passwd >= 1.1.0 Is dos2unix brought in automatically? Please modify the spec file so that you accomplish the same results using only the tools listed here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions Modifications of this type are better suited in the %prep section of the spec file. Please try to accomplish this there, or if not possible explain why. Shorten the %description section. The first paragraph is ample, and you don't want to keep updating it every time a new feature is added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 21:32:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 17:32:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806022132.m52LWAm4006412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From joost at cnoc.nl 2008-06-02 17:32 EST ------- Now it doesn't build because the symlink /usr/lib64/libglib.so does not exist. But an /usr/lib/libglib.so does exist. Afaik this file was part of the glibc-devel package but now it isn't anymore. I have to find out what happened and where this file is now. You could try to build it yourself: http://www.cnoc.nl/fpc/lazarus-0.9.24-3.fc9.src.rpm I'm off on vacation tomorrow. I'll be back june 20th -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 21:37:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 17:37:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448491] Review Request: cgroup-lib - A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806022137.m52LbvFm007846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgroup-lib - A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448491 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-06-02 17:37 EST ------- OK, two more issues (sorry I didn't catch them last time). 1. You need to make sure that the devel package Requires the main package explicitly. Currently, you have: Requires: libcgroup >= 0.1b This should be : Requires: libcgroup = %{version}-%{release} 2. You need to have %post and %postun sections which call ldconfig. This way, the shared library will get added to the system cache and be immediately available. Just add these lines below your %clean section %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig I'll go ahead and do the rest of the review, but please make a -3 package and upload it. REVIEW ======= Good: - rpmlint checks return: Nothing - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (LGPLv2+) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream (5eebc14487c4e7c05808d60b86151d9881828eb3) - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR (well, coreutils is questionable, but harmless) - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - no .la files X post/postun ldconfig missing X missing proper devel requires of base n-v-r -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 22:32:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 18:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446134] Review Request: jsr-305 - reference implementation of JSR-305 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806022232.m52MWxkQ031314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jsr-305 - reference implementation of JSR-305 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446134 ------- Additional Comments From loganjerry at gmail.com 2008-06-02 18:32 EST ------- Upstream has been active recently. The patches from my original submission have been accepted. Unfortunately, there is still no license file. New versions of the spec and srpm are here: Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jsr-305/jsr-305.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jsr-305/jsr-305-0-0.1.20080527svn.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 22:44:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 18:44:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449667] New: Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449667 Summary: Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-yenc.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-yenc-0.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: yEnc decoding library for Python. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 23:10:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 19:10:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448250] Review Request: nautilus-sound-converter - nautilus extension to convert audio files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806022310.m52NA2wu025301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-sound-converter - nautilus extension to convert audio files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448250 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2008-06-02 19:10 EST ------- Debarshi, thanks for the review. built for devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 23:33:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 19:33:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445224] Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806022333.m52NX7Cc009589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445224 ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at gmail.com 2008-06-02 19:33 EST ------- A couple of brief questions: Is the .h file really needed at runtime? If not, it should likely be in a -devel subpackage. Does the package not build at all on x86, or is it a matter of missing tapsets? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 23:43:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 19:43:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448661] Review Request: u-boot-tools - contains mkimage a tool to create kernel bootable images for u-boot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806022343.m52Nhubi011176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: u-boot-tools - contains mkimage a tool to create kernel bootable images for u-boot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448661 ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at gmail.com 2008-06-02 19:43 EST ------- As weird as this sounds, you'll probably want to ExcludeArch the sparc, ia64, s390, etc architectures that this won't build on. Or provide configs for them, or ExclusiveArch the ones that work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 2 23:53:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 19:53:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445224] Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806022353.m52NrZX0012855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445224 ------- Additional Comments From dcnltc at us.ibm.com 2008-06-02 19:53 EST ------- When you run the Systemtap translator, stap, it builds a kernel module, compiles it and runs it. The usr_itrace.h is needed to compile the generated kernel module. The package has not been developed for x86, although part usr_itrace.stp tapset was developed and tested somewhat on x86. I'm just not sure if there pieces missing for x86 due to lack of development/testing on x86. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 00:24:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 20:24:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030024.m530Oinh009988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-02 20:24 EST ------- Actually that package seems to build OK for me in current rawhide, except that things crap out at the very end of the process: extracting debug info from /var/tmp/lazarus-0.9.24-3.fc10-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/lazarus/tools/svn2revisioninc extracting debug info from /var/tmp/lazarus-0.9.24-3.fc10-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/lazarus/lazarus /usr/lib/rpm/debugedit: canonicalization unexpectedly shrank by one character which is completely bewildering, but according to comments in bug 304121 it's caused by a doubled slash somewhere making it into the debug data. I removed the trailing slash from the FPCDIR export in the %build section and it builds fine now. Honestly all of my complaints have been taken care of. The newly-enabled debuginfo package doesn't actually include the source, probably due to many complaints like the following: /usr/lib/rpm/debugedit: /var/tmp/lazarus-0.9.24-3.fc10-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/lazarus/lazarus: Wrong directory table index 3 but honestly I'm not going to hold this up because fpc and rpm-build disagree on how to extract debuginfo data. Maybe you can figure out what's going on after this is imported. Honestly, the only issue I can see is that trailing slash, which you can trivially fix up when you check in. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 00:55:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 20:55:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436930] Review Request: ranpwd - A program to generate random passwords In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030055.m530t4Xu015199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ranpwd - A program to generate random passwords https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436930 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 01:06:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 21:06:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445224] Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030106.m5316a50017406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445224 ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at gmail.com 2008-06-02 21:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > When you run the Systemtap translator, stap, it builds a kernel module, compiles > it and runs it. The usr_itrace.h is needed to compile the generated kernel module. Ah, yes. Ok, makes sense. > The package has not been developed for x86, although part usr_itrace.stp tapset > was developed and tested somewhat on x86. I'm just not sure if there pieces > missing for x86 due to lack of development/testing on x86. Hm. Ok. We'll come back to that in a bit. More questions: This looks like a subset of the dpiperf.dynamic package. It seems to contain a newer (?) version of the dpiperf.dynamic tarball that has simply been rebranded to stapitrace-.tar.gz in the SPEC file. Is this a CVS snapshot of the dpiperf tarball? I ask because if it is, you should probably follow the snapshot guidelines[1] instead of creating a tarball that can't actually be downloaded from the project site. One of the review criteria is that the package has verifiable source: "- MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this." [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 01:59:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 21:59:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449707] New: Review Request: gambit-c - Gambit-C Scheme programming system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449707 Summary: Review Request: gambit-c - Gambit-C Scheme programming system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.sylvan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/lang/gambit-c.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/lang/gambit-c-4.2.8-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Gambit-C includes a Scheme interpreter and a Scheme compiler which can be used to build standalone executables. Because the compiler generates portable C code it is fairly easy to port to any platform with a decent C compiler. The Gambit-C system conforms to the R4RS, R5RS and IEEE Scheme standards. The full numeric tower is implemented, including: infinite precision integers (bignums), rationals, inexact reals (floating point numbers), and complex numbers. (based on earlier third-party package by Gerard Milmeister) Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=642058 Note that this is not for the submitted package; I've since split out the HTML and PDF documentations into a -doc subpackage (almost 2 MB) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 03:27:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 23:27:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446160] Review Request: file-browser-applet - File Browser Applet for the GNOME Panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030327.m533R1Ub012481@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: file-browser-applet - File Browser Applet for the GNOME Panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446160 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-02 23:27 EST ------- Would you check the Package Name? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 04:24:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 00:24:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449151] Review Request: pyodbc - Python DB API 2.0 Module for ODBC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030424.m534O1Vh021837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyodbc - Python DB API 2.0 Module for ODBC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449151 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2008-06-03 00:24 EST ------- Thank you for new package. :-) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 04:57:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 00:57:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449151] Review Request: pyodbc - Python DB API 2.0 Module for ODBC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030457.m534vNO9001576@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyodbc - Python DB API 2.0 Module for ODBC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449151 rayvd at bludgeon.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2008-06-03 00:57 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pyodbc Short Description: Python DB API 2.0 Module for ODBC Owners: rayvd Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 05:07:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 01:07:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449251] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030507.m53576E4029557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449251 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-06-03 01:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > rpmlint output says > > > perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication.src:42: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep > %{__perl_provides} `perl -p -e 's|%{buildroot}%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}\S+||'` > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it > will break short circuiting. > > perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication.src:50: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep > %{__perl_requires} `perl -p -e 's|%{buildroot}%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}\S+||'` > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it > will break short circuiting. Addressed. > Also, > Can you add POD test checking also? > t/pod.................. > skipped > all skipped: Test::Pod 1.14 required > t/pod_coverage......... > skipped > all skipped: Test::Pod::Coverage 1.04 required > All tests successful, 2 tests skipped. Pod tests are currently failing, so I'm allowing them to skip (not setting TEST_POD=1). SRPM URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication-0.10006-2.fc9.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 05:14:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 01:14:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448491] Review Request: cgroup-lib - A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030514.m535E3So004758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgroup-lib - A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448491 ------- Additional Comments From dhaval at linux.vnet.ibm.com 2008-06-03 01:14 EST ------- thanks for the comments. I have uploaded the changed specfile and src RPM http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libcg/libcgroup.spec?use_mirror=osdn (1971 bytes) http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libcg/libcgroup-0.1b-3.fc8.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn (64646 bytes) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 05:46:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 01:46:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446160] Review Request: file-browser-applet - File Browser Applet for the GNOME Panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030546.m535kJ6e003368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: file-browser-applet - File Browser Applet for the GNOME Panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446160 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2008-06-03 01:46 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: file-browser-applet Short Description: File Browser Applet for the GNOME Panel Owners: deji Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 05:58:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 01:58:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449667] Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030558.m535wJHU011968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449667 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dev at nigelj.com ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-06-03 01:58 EST ------- Hi, I just had a quick look, it looks _ok_ but I think it needs some extra work before it can be approved etc etc etc The method you have used is acceptable for Fedora 8 but the powers that be changed the SOP/best practice for handling eggs & setuptools, check out http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs#Providing_Eggs_using_Setuptools for an example, or have a look at python-dictclient's SPEC file - http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/python-dictclient/F-8/python-dictclient.spec?rev=1.1&view=markup - which was recently accepted into Fedora for a practical example. I'm not sure if I'd be able to do a full review, it depends how much time I have/if anyone else jumps in ahead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 06:00:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 02:00:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449328] Review Request: cluttermm - C++ wrapper for clutter library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030600.m5360V3d005591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cluttermm - C++ wrapper for clutter library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449328 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-06-03 02:00 EST ------- package doesn't build in mock: ... checking for CLUTTERMM... configure: error: Package requirements (gtkmm-2.4 >= 2.10.9 clutter-0.6) were not met: No package 'gtkmm-2.4' found ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 06:04:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 02:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448661] Review Request: u-boot-tools - contains mkimage a tool to create kernel bootable images for u-boot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030604.m5364IlP013220@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: u-boot-tools - contains mkimage a tool to create kernel bootable images for u-boot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448661 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-06-03 02:04 EST ------- I didn't want to comment on this package, but I am having this issue with u-boot ever since it exists: "mkimage" is a very bad choice to name a program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 06:13:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 02:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449667] Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030613.m536DrCF007905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449667 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-06-03 02:13 EST ------- Alright, sorry if it's not quite kosher yet. I was working off of the rpmdev- the references you cited. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 06:13:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 02:13:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449328] Review Request: cluttermm - C++ wrapper for clutter library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030613.m536DYvx014954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cluttermm - C++ wrapper for clutter library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449328 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2008-06-03 02:13 EST ------- Well that was embarassing. Here's the fix. Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/cluttermm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/cluttermm-0.5.1-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 06:17:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 02:17:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442507] Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030617.m536HX9c008705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-06-03 02:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > We are used to put include files for > our spu compiler into /usr/spu/include. Many tools (e.g. our Cell SDK3 make > files) have this path hardcoded. > > The question now is if we can continue to use the path /usr/spu/include > for SPU related include files. Are these headers part of a cross-toolchain targetting bare-metal (no OS, no libc), spu-cpus (In GNU terms, canonicalization tripple == "spu")? If yes, then this would match existing practice of installing cross-GCC, even though this strictly speaking, would violate the FHS. If no, then this issue requires further discussion. For native headers, this location is non-acceptable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 06:19:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 02:19:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449667] Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030619.m536JKoH015860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449667 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-06-03 02:19 EST ------- Apparently lost a line somewhere. "I was working off of the rpmdev-newspec python- template and Packaging/Python and I'm going to take a look at the references you cited." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 06:35:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 02:35:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443355] Merge Review: gnumeric In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030635.m536ZqLP018583@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnumeric https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443355 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-06-03 02:35 EST ------- Do we still need this open (just checking)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 06:38:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 02:38:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249929] Review Request: dynagen - Dynamips Hypervisor Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030638.m536cNpq018961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dynagen - Dynamips Hypervisor Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249929 Bug 249929 depends on bug 246150, which changed state. Bug 246150 Summary: Package Review: dynamips - Powerful Cisco IOS Emulator/Hypervisor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246150 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 06:38:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 02:38:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246150] Package Review: dynamips - Powerful Cisco IOS Emulator/Hypervisor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030638.m536cNS7018928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: dynamips - Powerful Cisco IOS Emulator/Hypervisor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246150 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-06-03 02:38 EST ------- About time I closed this, doesn't meet entry requirements (binary blobs, ios etc etc) - closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 06:37:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 02:37:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249929] Review Request: dynagen - Dynamips Hypervisor Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030637.m536bGWA018839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dynagen - Dynamips Hypervisor Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249929 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-06-03 02:37 EST ------- About time I closed this, doesn't meet entry requirements - closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 07:15:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 03:15:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444257] Review Request: nted - Musical score editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030715.m537FJpC018680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nted - Musical score editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444257 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(michel.sylvan at gmai| |l.com) | ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-03 03:15 EST ------- Incorporated all the changes requested: - uses $RPM_OPT_FLAGS - documentation now in %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}, de and en pages tagged - compiler warnings fixed Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/music/nted.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/music/nted-0.22.3-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 07:28:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 03:28:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441098] Review Request: python-dictclient - Python client for DICT protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030728.m537Sse4027972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-dictclient - Python client for DICT protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441098 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-03 03:28 EST ------- python-dictclient-1.0.1-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 07:30:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 03:30:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441098] Review Request: python-dictclient - Python client for DICT protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030730.m537UPVe028656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-dictclient - Python client for DICT protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441098 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-03 03:30 EST ------- python-dictclient-1.0.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 07:30:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 03:30:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436568] Review Request: supybot - Cross-platform IRC bot written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030730.m537Uef5028734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: supybot - Cross-platform IRC bot written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436568 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-03 03:30 EST ------- supybot-0.83.3-6.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 07:28:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 03:28:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448901] Review Request: nled - Simple curses-based text editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030728.m537S83Z027834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nled - Simple curses-based text editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448901 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-03 03:28 EST ------- nled-2.52-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update nled'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-4814 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 07:31:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 03:31:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448901] Review Request: nled - Simple curses-based text editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030731.m537VvW0022015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nled - Simple curses-based text editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448901 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-03 03:31 EST ------- nled-2.52-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 07:29:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 03:29:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431161] Review Request: mathmap - A gimp plugin and commandline tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030729.m537TVnC020919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mathmap - A gimp plugin and commandline tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431161 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-03 03:29 EST ------- mathmap-1.2.4-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 07:30:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 03:30:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448745] Review Request: ext3grep - Recovery tool for ext3 filesystems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030730.m537UoR0021705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ext3grep - Recovery tool for ext3 filesystems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448745 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-03 03:30 EST ------- ext3grep-0.6.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 07:33:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 03:33:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448745] Review Request: ext3grep - Recovery tool for ext3 filesystems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030733.m537X2wf022235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ext3grep - Recovery tool for ext3 filesystems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448745 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-03 03:33 EST ------- ext3grep-0.6.0-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 07:33:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 03:33:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443303] Review Request: notification-daemon-engine-nodoka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030733.m537XgV2022372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: notification-daemon-engine-nodoka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443303 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-03 03:33 EST ------- notification-daemon-engine-nodoka-0.1.0-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 07:29:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 03:29:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431161] Review Request: mathmap - A gimp plugin and commandline tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030729.m537TXTQ020954@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mathmap - A gimp plugin and commandline tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431161 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |1.2.4-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 07:30:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 03:30:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448745] Review Request: ext3grep - Recovery tool for ext3 filesystems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030730.m537UqSt021744@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ext3grep - Recovery tool for ext3 filesystems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448745 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.6.0-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 07:30:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 03:30:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441098] Review Request: python-dictclient - Python client for DICT protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030730.m537UR93021581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-dictclient - Python client for DICT protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441098 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |1.0.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 07:35:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 03:35:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436568] Review Request: supybot - Cross-platform IRC bot written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030735.m537Z5ZV030334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: supybot - Cross-platform IRC bot written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436568 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-03 03:35 EST ------- supybot-0.83.3-6.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 07:36:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 03:36:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448650] Review Request: gmm - C++ library for sparse, dense and skyline matrices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030736.m537a4iO030749@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmm - C++ library for sparse, dense and skyline matrices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448650 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-03 03:36 EST ------- gmm-3.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 07:34:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 03:34:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442280] Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030734.m537YWw3029907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442280 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-03 03:34 EST ------- squirrel-2.2.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 07:35:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 03:35:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448650] Review Request: gmm - C++ library for sparse, dense and skyline matrices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030735.m537ZigN030535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmm - C++ library for sparse, dense and skyline matrices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448650 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-03 03:35 EST ------- gmm-3.0-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 07:33:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 03:33:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442280] Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030733.m537XQbC029707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442280 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-03 03:33 EST ------- squirrel-2.2.1-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 07:31:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 03:31:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448901] Review Request: nled - Simple curses-based text editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030731.m537VxxO029396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nled - Simple curses-based text editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448901 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |2.52-3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 07:33:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 03:33:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442280] Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030733.m537XS3J029742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442280 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |2.2.1-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 07:35:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 03:35:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436568] Review Request: supybot - Cross-platform IRC bot written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030735.m537Z7DP023437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: supybot - Cross-platform IRC bot written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436568 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.83.3-6.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 07:35:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 03:35:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448650] Review Request: gmm - C++ library for sparse, dense and skyline matrices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030735.m537ZknK023720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmm - C++ library for sparse, dense and skyline matrices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448650 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |3.0-3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 07:37:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 03:37:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444817] Review Request: Spicebird - Collaboration Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030737.m537b9ub024019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Spicebird - Collaboration Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444817 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-03 03:37 EST ------- spicebird-0.4-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update spicebird'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-4960 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 08:41:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 04:41:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449367] Review Request: tuxcmd - File manager with 2 panels side by side using GTK2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806030841.m538fMUA011950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxcmd - File manager with 2 panels side by side using GTK2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449367 tbzatek at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tbzatek at redhat.com 2008-06-03 04:41 EST ------- Package imported to cvs and built successfully. Thanks for the cooperation. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 10:12:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 06:12:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442329] Review Request: gnome-lirc-properties - Infrared Remote Controls setup tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031012.m53ACgn4024656@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-lirc-properties - Infrared Remote Controls setup tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442329 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2008-06-03 06:12 EST ------- Updated packages: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/gnome-lirc-properties/gnome-lirc-properties.spec http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/gnome-lirc-properties/gnome-lirc-properties-0.2.7-1.fc9.src.rpm Code patches are in (include support, resume irrecord support), remote DB is at a static location. Just missing some initscripts and sysconfig changes from bug 442341. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 10:26:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 06:26:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441415] Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031026.m53AQBXF027216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441415 ------- Additional Comments From bochecha at no-log.org 2008-06-03 06:26 EST ------- Just had a revelation: I forgot the icon-cache update scriptlet :S I'm terribly sorry about that. I'll update this tonight (in France) as I can't rebuild it from work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 11:20:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 07:20:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441415] Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031120.m53BKSZE004222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441415 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-03 07:20 EST ------- Ok, I'll wait for the next version then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 11:40:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 07:40:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444763] Review Request: vaspview - VASP Data Viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031140.m53BekkC008278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vaspview - VASP Data Viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444763 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-06-03 07:40 EST ------- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 11:48:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 07:48:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439263] Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031148.m53BmuZt016600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439263 jtulach at netbeans.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(jtulach at netbeans.o| |rg) | ------- Additional Comments From jtulach at netbeans.org 2008-06-03 07:48 EST ------- Resend5: Cannot proceed with JavaHelp Od:Jaroslav Tulach Komu: fedora-devel-java-list Kopie: Andrew Overholt , Dalibor Topic Dne Saturday 24 May 2008 07:24:20 Jaroslav Tulach napsal(a): > Dne Monday 19 May 2008 20:02:20 Jaroslav Tulach napsal(a): > > Dne Monday 12 May 2008 20:48:07 Jaroslav Tulach napsal(a): > > > Hello guys, > > > I need help with fedora-cvs, it yields: > > > > > > Error: Permission denied (publickey,keyboard-interactive). > > > cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages > > > if any) > > > > > > I guess that will be because missing .ssh directory, but when following > > > the page > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join > > > there was no instruction to create .ssh/id_dsa! Or is it there and I am > > > just too blind to find it? > > > > Please advice. > > -jst -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 12:13:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 08:13:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448661] Review Request: u-boot-tools - contains mkimage a tool to create kernel bootable images for u-boot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031213.m53CDFvM015104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: u-boot-tools - contains mkimage a tool to create kernel bootable images for u-boot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448661 ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at gmail.com 2008-06-03 08:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > I didn't want to comment on this package, but I am having this issue with u-boot > ever since it exists: > > "mkimage" is a very bad choice to name a program. It is, yes. I'm not entirely sure what can be done about it until upstream changes though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 13:11:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 09:11:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442507] Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031311.m53DBW6V026584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507 ------- Additional Comments From a.j.delaney at brighton.ac.uk 2008-06-03 09:11 EST ------- To use this package a version of gcc-spu is required. Is there one upstream in Fedora? I've been hacking on my own gcc-spu and this would help me a lot. I have a binutils package at the following location: http://blogs.linux.ie/balor/2008/06/02/fedora-9-cell-processor-packages/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 13:46:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 09:46:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442507] Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031346.m53Dklk6008635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507 ------- Additional Comments From jroth at linux.vnet.ibm.com 2008-06-03 09:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > To use this package a version of gcc-spu is required. Is there one upstream in > Fedora? It is not necessarily required but very useful. We have plans to maintain spu-gcc, spu-binutils and spu-newlib in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 13:48:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 09:48:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439263] Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031348.m53DmT8j001988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439263 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2008-06-03 09:48 EST ------- Jaroslav: perhaps you missed it, but David told you what to do in an email: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/2008-May/msg00026.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 13:44:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 09:44:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442507] Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031344.m53DinMS000977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507 ------- Additional Comments From jroth at linux.vnet.ibm.com 2008-06-03 09:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Are these headers part of a cross-toolchain targetting bare-metal (no OS, no > libc), spu-cpus (In GNU terms, canonicalization tripple == "spu")? Yes, exactly, that is the case. I just had a look at the libspe packages in gentoo and ubuntu. Ubuntu put them in /usr/spu/include and gentoo in /usr/spu-elf/include. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 14:16:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 10:16:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434861] Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031416.m53EGsPa008486@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434861 ------- Additional Comments From ivaxer at gmail.com 2008-06-03 10:16 EST ------- Spec URL: http://spaconf.sgu.ru/rpm/python-tftpy.spec SRPM URL: http://spaconf.sgu.ru/rpm/python-tftpy-0.4.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Update to upstream (0.4.5) and rebuild for f9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 14:50:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 10:50:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435572] Review Request: gnome-hearts - Hearts game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031450.m53EoQ68022211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-hearts - Hearts game for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435572 caillon at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From caillon at redhat.com 2008-06-03 10:50 EST ------- packages built, closing out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 15:31:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 11:31:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449784] New: Review Request: rpmreaper - A tool for removing packages from system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449784 Summary: Review Request: rpmreaper - A tool for removing packages from system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mlichvar at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mlichvar.fedorapeople.org/rpmreaper/rpmreaper.spec SRPM URL: http://mlichvar.fedorapeople.org/rpmreaper/rpmreaper-0.1.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: rpmreaper is a simple ncurses application with a mutt-like interface that allows removing unnecessary packages and their dependencies from the system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 16:10:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 12:10:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226339] Merge Review: Pyrex (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031610.m53GAuvn007550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: Pyrex (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226339 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |notting at redhat.com, fedora- | |package-review at redhat.com QAContact|fedora-package- |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |review at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 16:10:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 12:10:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226339] Merge Review: Pyrex (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031610.m53GAlb8000362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: Pyrex (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226339 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From mbarnes at redhat.com 2008-06-03 12:10 EST ------- Thanks Kyle. I applied your patch to the Pyrex package and also upgraded to 0.9.8.2 to cover bug #447778. New package is Pyrex-0.9.8.2-1.fc10. I assume there's no ABI or API breakage in this upgrade? Not sure whether to push this to Fedora 9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 16:11:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 12:11:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226339] Merge Review: Pyrex (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031611.m53GBH5L007800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: Pyrex (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226339 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mbarnes at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 16:12:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 12:12:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447778] Review Request: Pyrex - Update to upstream 0.9.8.2, some cleanups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031612.m53GC2qB007906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pyrex - Update to upstream 0.9.8.2, some cleanups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447778 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From mbarnes at redhat.com 2008-06-03 12:12 EST ------- Folding this into the Pyrex package review bug. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 226339 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 16:12:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 12:12:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226339] Merge Review: Pyrex (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031612.m53GC3vB007935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: Pyrex (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226339 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kylev at kylev.com ------- Additional Comments From mbarnes at redhat.com 2008-06-03 12:12 EST ------- *** Bug 447778 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 16:19:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 12:19:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446160] Review Request: file-browser-applet - File Browser Applet for the GNOME Panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031619.m53GJQng009291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: file-browser-applet - File Browser Applet for the GNOME Panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446160 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-03 12:19 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 16:24:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 12:24:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449151] Review Request: pyodbc - Python DB API 2.0 Module for ODBC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031624.m53GOEbt010364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyodbc - Python DB API 2.0 Module for ODBC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449151 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-03 12:24 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 17:24:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:24:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226339] Merge Review: Pyrex (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031724.m53HOLSo021844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: Pyrex (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226339 ------- Additional Comments From kylev at kylev.com 2008-06-03 13:24 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=308269) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=308269&action=view) Fix rpmlint warnings and .egg-related build error. In 0.9.7 he introduced a deprecation of a particular loop form, but un-deprecated it later. It's compatible and should be fine to push to all active branches. However, your current devel/ spec doesn't build on my F-8 system. Pyrex doesn't use "eggy" setuputils, it uses old school distutils, thus the build fails: RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/Pyrex-0.9.8.2-1.fc10-root-kylev/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/*.egg-info make: *** [noarch] Error 1 Removing that line, there are still some rpmlint errors, so I've fixed the Summary lines as well (warnings were about lacking capitalization and having trailing dot). (I'm happy to help you maintain this package, too). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 17:30:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:30:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226339] Merge Review: Pyrex (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031730.m53HUjqn015208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: Pyrex (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226339 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-03 13:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > However, your current devel/ spec doesn't build on my F-8 system. Merge review must be done on rawhide machine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 17:35:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:35:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449595] Review Request: gnome-applet-grandr - GNOME panel applet for XrandR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031735.m53HZflo016151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-applet-grandr - GNOME panel applet for XrandR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449595 yaneti at declera.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |yaneti at declera.com ------- Additional Comments From yaneti at declera.com 2008-06-03 13:35 EST ------- Perhaps you mean grandr-applet and URL: http://dekorte.homeip.net/download/grandr-applet/ Source0: http://dekorte.homeip.net/download/grandr-applet/grandr_applet-0.4.1.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 17:44:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:44:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226339] Merge Review: Pyrex (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031744.m53HiW3x017624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: Pyrex (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226339 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-03 13:44 EST ------- Well, not necessarily, but if the branches aren't synchronized then you may not really have much choice. There's not much point in reviewing the F-8 branch if the maintainer is doing their work on the devel branch how, and you can't really expect what's in devel/ to build on F-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 17:57:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:57:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226339] Merge Review: Pyrex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031757.m53HvCuw020260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: Pyrex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226339 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: Pyrex (not |Merge Review: Pyrex |started) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 17:56:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226339] Merge Review: Pyrex (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031756.m53HuwuH028197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: Pyrex (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226339 ------- Additional Comments From mbarnes at redhat.com 2008-06-03 13:56 EST ------- The spec file may have to be modified separately on the F-9 branch if we upgrade there. I don't plan to upgrade this package for Fedora 8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 18:00:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 14:00:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226339] Merge Review: Pyrex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031800.m53I0Ymi021218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: Pyrex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226339 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-03 14:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Well, not necessarily, but if the branches aren't synchronized then you may not > really have much choice. Of course I mean what you say. i.e. usually we cannot expect that spec file targeted for devel branch also builds on F-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 18:32:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 14:32:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448491] Review Request: cgroup-lib - A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031832.m53IWYqh027182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgroup-lib - A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448491 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-06-03 14:32 EST ------- Looks good, package is approved. Thanks for your patience here, you guys did a wonderful job of resolving the issues. I will sponsor you, Dhaval. You need to continue in the process here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 18:44:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 14:44:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226339] Merge Review: Pyrex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031844.m53Ii7dg004001@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: Pyrex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226339 kylev at kylev.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #308269|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From kylev at kylev.com 2008-06-03 14:44 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=308275) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=308275&action=view) Fix rpmlint warnings and .egg-related build error, take 2 Understood. In this particular instance, just using %{python_sitelib}/Pyrex* in the %files section will catch the .egg that gets auto-built on rawhide and also works if we want to push the update to both F-8 and F-9. I don't want to start much of a debate, I'm mostly just trying to understand the ins and outs of when and where we can easily keep one spec file around and push updates to all branches with the easy "copy the .spec from devel to F-8 and F-9" method. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 18:48:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 14:48:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434727] Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031848.m53Ima3P004892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434727 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-06-03 14:48 EST ------- Just checking in, I haven't see you apply for cvsextras in the Fedora Account System... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 18:58:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 14:58:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441415] Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031858.m53IwONe006801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441415 ------- Additional Comments From bochecha at no-log.org 2008-06-03 14:58 EST ------- Sorry for forgetting something that was written black on white here -_- SPEC: ftp://ks359320.kimsufi.com/pub/wastesedge.spec SRPM: ftp://ks359320.kimsufi.com/pub/wastesedge-0.3.4-0.8.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 19:01:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 15:01:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441411] Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031901.m53J1MEN007668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441411 ------- Additional Comments From bochecha at no-log.org 2008-06-03 15:01 EST ------- I added the -p option to the install call, as indicated in the wastesedge submission. SPEC: ftp://ks359320.kimsufi.com/pub/adonthell.spec SRPM: ftp://ks359320.kimsufi.com/pub/adonthell-0.3.5-0.3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 19:14:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 15:14:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226547] Merge Review: x86info In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031914.m53JEaqt003154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: x86info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226547 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |notting at redhat.com, fedora- | |package-review at redhat.com AssignedTo|rafalzaq at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org QAContact|fedora-package- |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |review at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 19:29:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 15:29:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448491] Review Request: cgroup-lib - A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031929.m53JTERF006079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgroup-lib - A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448491 ------- Additional Comments From balbir at linux.vnet.ibm.com 2008-06-03 15:29 EST ------- Thanks! That's great news Tom. Could you sponsor me as well, I intend to co-maintain this package with Dhaval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 19:53:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 15:53:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448491] Review Request: cgroup-lib - A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806031953.m53JrJRd011189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgroup-lib - A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448491 ------- Additional Comments From dhaval at linux.vnet.ibm.com 2008-06-03 15:53 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libcgroup Short Description: A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers Owners: dhavalgiani, balbirsingh Branches: F-9, devel InitialCC: spot Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 20:04:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 16:04:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446160] Review Request: file-browser-applet - File Browser Applet for the GNOME Panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806032004.m53K4xYA019688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: file-browser-applet - File Browser Applet for the GNOME Panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446160 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2008-06-03 16:04 EST ------- Thank you Mamoru for another excellent review. Package imported and built for rawhide, F-8, and F-9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 20:15:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 16:15:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 421241] Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806032015.m53KF4XE015503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421241 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2008-06-03 16:15 EST ------- Hi Jess, this is my status: Current packages (base) demos tests Cache-Backend-Memcached Cache-Backend-Sqlite Db-Adapter-Mysqli Db-Adapter-Db2 Db-Adapter-Firebird Db-Adapter-Oracle Feed Gdata (why doesn't this exist as a service component?) Pdf Search-Lucene Services There are some issues here: Cache-Backend-Sqlite requires php-sqlite but this is not available in Fedora's PHP build, it was disabled Mon Nov 8 2004 by Joe Orton, most probably in favor of pdo-sqlite. Can the back end handle pdo-sqlite instead of sqlite? If not we probably have to exclude it. Db-Adapter-Db2, Db-Adapter-Firebird and Db-Adapter-Oracle require extensions that must be compiled in while having the respective database software installed, in case of DB2 and Oracle this is impossible for Fedora since they are proprietary software, I don't know about InterBase/Firebird however it's also missing. We can of course offer Zend's adapters but the user is required to compile PHP and enable the affected dependencies himself. Feed has been separated because it requires mbstring; same goes for Pdf because of GD, Search-Lucene because of bitset; Locale-Math has _not_ been separated as planned since Date uses bcmath as well and cannot be separated as a major dependency for other base components. About mime_magic: I've checked our PHP build, the extension was disabled Wed Mar 21 2007, indeed in favor of Fileinfo. I'd really appreciate Fileinfo support from your side! A wrapper functions sounds completely reasonable. The total list of extensions required for the base framework package as of now: bcmath, ctype, curl, dom, hash, iconv, json, pcre, posix, reflection, session, simplexml, spl, zlib. Only two of them, bcmath and dom, require additional extensions to be pulled in which is pretty acceptable. About the getTmpDir() issue: Please keep in mind you're targeting a multi-user platform, setting a fixed value in a configuration file can still create clashes, especially if no cleanup is performed afterwards. Given both choices only, I'd rather go with the environment variable; if you want a much more flexible solution involving the configuration file, I suggest append a hash, timestamp or the uid to the base path given. Actually this is what I do in my tests :) Alternatively, you could go with world writable modes for all files and directories created during the tests. @Gianluca Thanks in advance for volunteering! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 20:44:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 16:44:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449840] New: Review Request: trac-spamfilter-plugin - Spam-Filter plugin for Trac Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449840 Summary: Review Request: trac-spamfilter-plugin - Spam-Filter plugin for Trac Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jkeating at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/review/trac-spamfilter-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/review/trac-spamfilter-plugin-0.2.1-0.1.20080603svn6990.fc9.src.rpm Description: Trac plugin for spam filtering. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 20:50:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 16:50:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449842] New: Review Request: trac-xmlrpc-plugin - XML-RPC plugin for Trac Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449842 Summary: Review Request: trac-xmlrpc-plugin - XML-RPC plugin for Trac Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jkeating at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/review/trac-xmlrpc-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/review/trac-xmlrpc-plugin-0.1-0.1.20080528svn3074.fc9.src.rpm Description: This Trac plugin provides support for xmlrpc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 20:52:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 16:52:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448491] Review Request: cgroup-lib - A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806032052.m53Kq9uP021761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgroup-lib - A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448491 dhaval at linux.vnet.ibm.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dhaval at linux.vnet.ibm.com 2008-06-03 16:52 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libcgroup Short Description: A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers Owners: dhavalgiani, balbirsingh Branches: F-9 devel InitialCC: spot Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 21:21:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 17:21:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448491] Review Request: cgroup-lib - A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806032121.m53LLTBb001417@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgroup-lib - A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448491 ------- Additional Comments From dhaval at linux.vnet.ibm.com 2008-06-03 17:21 EST ------- Balbir still does not have cvsextras membership, so removing his name from owners for now. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libcgroup Short Description: A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers Owners: dhavalgiani Branches: F-9 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 21:47:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 17:47:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434996] Review Request: certmaster - a certificate distribution system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806032147.m53LlrKD032037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: certmaster - a certificate distribution system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434996 mdehaan at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |WORKSFORME ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2008-06-03 17:47 EST ------- Confirmed. Built a long time ago, just not closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 21:55:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 17:55:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449840] Review Request: trac-spamfilter-plugin - Spam-Filter plugin for Trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806032155.m53LtNbS007327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-spamfilter-plugin - Spam-Filter plugin for Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449840 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dev at nigelj.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-06-03 17:55 EST ------- I'll pick up this review, I believe you need to depend on python-setuptools-devel now (per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs#Providing_Eggs_using_Setuptools) for F9+ Ricky's python-dictclient spec file recently passed review w/ it doing this way (http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/python-dictclient/F-8/python-dictclient.spec?rev=1.1&view=markup) as an example. Full review coming up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 21:55:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 17:55:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449842] Review Request: trac-xmlrpc-plugin - XML-RPC plugin for Trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806032155.m53Lteb8007373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-xmlrpc-plugin - XML-RPC plugin for Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449842 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dev at nigelj.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: trac-xmlrpc-|Review Request: trac-xmlrpc- |plugin - XML-RPC plugin for |plugin - XML-RPC plugin for |Trac |Trac Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-06-03 17:55 EST ------- Per comment on Bug #449840: I'll pick up this review, I believe you need to depend on python-setuptools-devel now (per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs#Providing_Eggs_using_Setuptools) for F9+ Ricky's python-dictclient spec file recently passed review w/ it doing this way (http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/python-dictclient/F-8/python-dictclient.spec?rev=1.1&view=markup) as an example. Full review coming up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 22:20:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 18:20:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224458] Review Request: libsilc (dependency of gaim) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806032220.m53MKu1P011367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsilc (dependency of gaim) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224458 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stu at nosnilmot.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-03 18:20 EST ------- CC'ing Stu, who seems to be the current maintainer of this package. I think this does still need a review, because it's still required by libpurple which in turn is needed by a pile of things. I'll take a look. First off, let's look at the rpmlint complaints: libsilc-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation Yeah, the documentation is in the -doc package. libsilc.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libsilcclient-1.1.so.2.0.1 /lib64/libdl.so.2 Not a huge deal, you might be able to fix this with the libtool tweak from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CommonRpmlintIssues#unused-direct-shlib-dependency if it bothers you. Then there are 249 of these: libsilc.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsilcclient-1.1.so.2.0.1 silc_hash_ptr libsilc.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsilcclient-1.1.so.2.0.1 silc_packet_set_keys It seems that libsilcclient doesn't actually link against libsilc, which would seem to be a bug to me. Am I missing something? Anyway, those don't stop me from doing a full review. The way dependencies are filtered is a bit fragile because it ignores any rpmbuild customizations involving the dependency generator. I don't think it's a significant issue, but something akin to what many Perl modules which generates the filter on the fly might work better. There's some discussion at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Filtering_Requires:_and_Provides In any case, could you add a comment to the spec with a note on why you need to filter the dependencies? >From the README file I'd expect to see silc and silcd binaries somewhere, and something other than libsilc packages to hold them, but the source doesn't seem to include any actual applications. I guess if it grew some then the base package would be misnamed but we don't usually worry about naming issues in merge reviews unless there are egregious issues. It might be nice to clarify the meaning of SILC in %description. Currently you either have to install the package and read the docs or search the network to figure out just what this package is supposed to do. * source files match upstream: fcfb34cd0bb858a711ba0af4a2fce60ae64e485b35c67dcdad764cc6a5feac1f silc-toolkit-1.1.7.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. ? description could use some clarification. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. ? rpmlint has several possibly valid complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: libsilc-1.1.7-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm libsilc-1.1.so.2()(64bit) libsilcclient-1.1.so.2()(64bit) libsilc = 1.1.7-1.fc10 = /sbin/ldconfig libsilc-devel-1.1.7-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm pkgconfig(silc) = 1.1.7 libsilc-devel = 1.1.7-1.fc10 = libsilc = 1.1.7-1.fc10 pkgconfig libsilc-doc-1.1.7-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm libsilc-doc = 1.1.7-1.fc10 = * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * shared libraries present; ldconfig called properly. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets OK (ldconfig) * code, not content. * %docs are in a -doc subpackage. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel subpackage. * pkgconfig files are in the -devel subpackage. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 22:21:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 18:21:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224458] Review Request: libsilc (dependency of gaim) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806032221.m53ML8Hg005782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsilc (dependency of gaim) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224458 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 22:23:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 18:23:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449842] Review Request: trac-xmlrpc-plugin - XML-RPC plugin for Trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806032223.m53MN8XJ005947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-xmlrpc-plugin - XML-RPC plugin for Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449842 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-06-03 18:23 EST ------- MUST: Y: rpmlint on each package trac-xmlrpc-plugin.noarch: W: no-documentation Y: Meets Package Naming Guidelines Y: Spec file name matches base package name Y: License field is valid Y: Meets Packaging Guidelines -: License included in package (if included in source) Y: Spec file written in en_US Y: Spec file is legible Y: Sources match upstream source Y: Source URL 'sane' Y: Compiles successfully - [F9 (noarch), Rawhide (noarch)] -: ExcludeArch required? Y: All Build Dependencies Listed -: Handles locales sanely -: Library packages run ldconfig Y: Package is not relocatable -: Package owns all directories created Y: No duplicate file listings Y: defattr set correctly Y: %clean is used Y: Macro use conisistant Y: Contains Code/Content that is allowed -: Large Documentation in -doc subpackage Y: %doc must not affect package runtime -: Header files in -devel -: Static libraries in -static -: pkgconfig files require pkgconfig -: Library files are located in correct package -: -devel requires base package w/ fully versioned dependency -: Packages do not contact .la (libtool) archives -: GUI Apps have .desktop files Y: No duplicate directory ownerships Y: %install cleans buildroot Y: Filenames are valid UTF-8 SHOULD: -: Description/Summary sections contain translations Y: Builds in mock/koji Y: Builds on all architectures -: Scriptlets are sane -: Subpackages require base package -: pkgconfig.pc files in -devel -: File dependencies should only be in /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin Same moans as with Bug #449840, lack of COPYING file but this time, no documentation at all, non blocker though. It'd be nice to see python-setuptools-devel pulled in by BR but as mentioned, it doesn't block the build. Here's your APPROVED ticket, please take it to the next counter (CVS). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 22:19:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 18:19:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449840] Review Request: trac-spamfilter-plugin - Spam-Filter plugin for Trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806032219.m53MJvfX005242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-spamfilter-plugin - Spam-Filter plugin for Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449840 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-06-03 18:19 EST ------- Okay, everything was happy without the Providing Eggs using Setuptools bit, so I'm happy, I think that's something on the 'would be nice' list though. :) MUST: Y: rpmlint on each package Y: Meets Package Naming Guidelines Y: Spec file name matches base package name Y: License field is valid Y: Meets Packaging Guidelines -: License included in package (if included in source) Y: Spec file written in en_US Y: Spec file is legible Y: Sources match upstream source Y: Source URL 'sane' Y: Compiles successfully - [F9 (noarch)] -: ExcludeArch required? Y: All Build Dependencies Listed -: Handles locales sanely -: Library packages run ldconfig Y: Package is not relocatable -: Package owns all directories created Y: No duplicate file listings Y: defattr set correctly Y: %clean is used Y: Macro use conisistant Y: Contains Code/Content that is allowed -: Large Documentation in -doc subpackage Y: %doc must not affect package runtime -: Header files in -devel -: Static libraries in -static -: pkgconfig files require pkgconfig -: Library files are located in correct package -: -devel requires base package w/ fully versioned dependency -: Packages do not contact .la (libtool) archives -: GUI Apps have .desktop files Y: No duplicate directory ownerships Y: %install cleans buildroot Y: Filenames are valid UTF-8 SHOULD: -: Description/Summary sections contain translations -: Builds in mock/koji Y: Builds on all architectures -: Scriptlets are sane -: Subpackages require base package -: pkgconfig.pc files in -devel -: File dependencies should only be in /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin Only issues to me is: No copying file, the source points to http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracLicense which is all fine and dandy, but it'd be nice to ask Upstream to include it in SVN sometime :) Here's your APPROVED ticket, please take it to the next counter (CVS). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 22:26:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 18:26:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232790] Review Request: ming - SWF output library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806032226.m53MQ07w006526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ming - SWF output library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232790 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-03 18:25 EST ------- Well, it's been a couple of months; are they actually making any progress or have things stalled out again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 23:03:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:03:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449328] Review Request: cluttermm - C++ wrapper for clutter library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806032303.m53N3c07017833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cluttermm - C++ wrapper for clutter library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449328 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2008-06-03 19:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Well that was embarassing. Here's the fix. Hate to say it, but it still fails to build. Looks like a file your trying to package as documentation doesn't exist. Here's a link to a scratch build log: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=644003&name=build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 23:22:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:22:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448558] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunbw2 - sunbw2 x.org driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806032322.m53NMFO7015303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunbw2 - sunbw2 x.org driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448558 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-03 19:22 EST ------- scratch build http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=59417 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 23:23:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:23:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448565] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunffb - X driver for sunffb hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806032323.m53NNGV7015413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunffb - X driver for sunffb hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448565 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: xorg-x11- |Review Request: xorg-x11- |drv-sunffb - X driver for |drv-sunffb - X driver for |sunffb hardware |sunffb hardware ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-03 19:23 EST ------- scratch build http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=59198 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 23:25:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:25:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448567] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suntcx - X driver for suntcx hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806032325.m53NP1IO021029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suntcx - X driver for suntcx hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448567 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: xorg-x11- |Review Request: xorg-x11- |drv-suntcx - X driver for |drv-suntcx - X driver for |suntcx hardware |suntcx hardware ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-03 19:25 EST ------- Scratch build http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=58928 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 23:24:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:24:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448566] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunleo - X driver for sunleo hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806032324.m53NO3qx020964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunleo - X driver for sunleo hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448566 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: xorg-x11- |Review Request: xorg-x11- |drv-sunleo - X driver for |drv-sunleo - X driver for |sunleo hardware |sunleo hardware ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-03 19:24 EST ------- scratch build http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=59165 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 23:28:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:28:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448559] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suncg3 - x driver for suncg3 hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806032328.m53NSYGT021743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suncg3 - x driver for suncg3 hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448559 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-03 19:28 EST ------- Scratch build http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=58924 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 23:29:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:29:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448561] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suncg6 - X driver for suncg6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806032329.m53NTOOn016243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suncg6 - X driver for suncg6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448561 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-03 19:29 EST ------- scratch build http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=58925 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 3 23:30:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:30:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448563] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suncg14 - X driver for suncg14 hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806032330.m53NU7fF016632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suncg14 - X driver for suncg14 hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448563 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: xorg-x11- |Review Request: xorg-x11- |drv-suncg14 - X driver for |drv-suncg14 - X driver for |suncg14 hardware |suncg14 hardware ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-03 19:30 EST ------- scratch build http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=58923 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 00:18:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 20:18:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257701] Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040018.m540I0md023843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257701 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-06-03 20:17 EST ------- I'm concerned about the lack of licensing here. Given the source (NOAA.gov), it is likely that it is Public Domain, but it is possible the author was only a consultant, so it is not safe to assume this. You should email NCEP.NCO.GRIB at noaa.gov to confirm the licensing of that code (and ask them to note it somewhere). A copy of an email confirming the license/copyright status will suffice to clear this. Blocking FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 00:21:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 20:21:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226547] Merge Review: x86info In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040021.m540L5rS029953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: x86info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226547 davej at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |davej at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 00:20:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 20:20:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226547] Merge Review: x86info In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040020.m540KqOo024498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: x86info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226547 davej at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|davej at redhat.com | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 00:37:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 20:37:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226547] Merge Review: x86info In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040037.m540bc22032428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: x86info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226547 davej at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From davej at redhat.com 2008-06-03 20:37 EST ------- The only thing rpmlint warns about in the current spec file is.. $ rpmlint -v x86info.spec x86info.spec:13: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes kernel-utils which I think is justified. it does obsolete every version of kernel-utils, so it shouldn't be versioned. Marking this as done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 00:47:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 20:47:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449869] New: Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 Summary: Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dkaylor at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kaylor.info/fedora/SPEC/tasque.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kaylor.info/fedora/SRPM/tasque-0.1.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Tasque is a task management program that can work with rememberthemilk.com. I didn't see it in the repo, so I thought I would try contributing a package (this is the first time for me). More info on the app is available at http://live.gnome.org/Tasque and http://code.google.com/p/tasky/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 01:19:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 21:19:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448567] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suntcx - X driver for suntcx hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040119.m541J6T6000560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suntcx - X driver for suntcx hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448567 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2008-06-03 21:19 EST ------- MD5Sum: 779a31151e44d2fd2a5ee1794f836889 xf86-video-suntcx-1.1.0.tar.bz2 Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Make succeeds even when %{_smp_mflags} is defined * Files have appropriate permissions and owners Bad: * rpmlint produces the following error: xorg-x11-drv-suntcx.sparc64: W: invalid-license MIT/X11 Looking at the license matrix, it looks like it should just be MIT. You can fix this when you import this into CVS. Note: I don't have the hardware to verify that this driver works, but from a packaging standpoint this package looks fine. +1 APPROVE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 01:34:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 21:34:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448567] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suntcx - X driver for suntcx hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040134.m541YHN3002842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suntcx - X driver for suntcx hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448567 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 01:34:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 21:34:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448559] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suncg3 - x driver for suncg3 hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040134.m541Y9hd008685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suncg3 - x driver for suncg3 hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448559 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2008-06-03 21:34 EST ------- MD5Sum: b9cb8cfb6a4234bebc434f744af53208 xf86-video-suncg3-1.1.0.tar.bz2 Good: Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Make succeeds even when %{_smp_mflags} is defined * Files have appropriate permissions and owners Bad: * rpmlint produces the following error: xorg-x11-drv-suncg3.sparc64: W: invalid-license MIT/X11 Looking at the license matrix, it looks like it should just be MIT. You can fix this when you import this into CVS. Note: I don't have the hardware to verify that this driver works, but from a packaging standpoint this package looks fine. +1 APPROVE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 01:44:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 21:44:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448561] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suncg6 - X driver for suncg6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040144.m541iamN010295@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suncg6 - X driver for suncg6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448561 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2008-06-03 21:44 EST ------- MD5Sum: aa6b7836fe6ccc99994bf15ff2b74e86 xf86-video-suncg6-1.1.0.tar.bz2 Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Make succeeds even when %{_smp_mflags} is defined * Files have appropriate permissions and owners Bad: * rpmlint produces the following errors which should be fixed: xorg-x11-drv-suncg6.sparc64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man/man4 xorg-x11-drv-suncg6.sparc64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man xorg-x11-drv-suncg6.sparc64: W: invalid-license MIT/X11 Looking at the license matrix, it looks like it should just be MIT. You can fix this when you import this into CVS. And the directory errors can also be fixed at import time. Note: I don't have the hardware to verify that this driver works, but from a packaging standpoint this package looks fine. +1 APPROVE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 02:36:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 22:36:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449393] Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040236.m542a3CD019361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449393 ------- Additional Comments From chris at tylers.info 2008-06-03 22:36 EST ------- "gecko-devel-unstable" is a BuildRequires, but where is it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 02:41:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 22:41:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449328] Review Request: cluttermm - C++ wrapper for clutter library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040241.m542fwjY020528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cluttermm - C++ wrapper for clutter library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449328 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-03 22:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Well that was embarassing. Here's the fix. > > Hate to say it, but it still fails to build. Looks like a file your trying to > package as documentation doesn't exist. Here's a link to a scratch build log: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=644003&name=build.log This seems "touch" problem we are discussing on fedora-devel-list starting on: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-June/msg00153.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 02:46:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 22:46:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448567] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suntcx - X driver for suntcx hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040246.m542klwj021600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suntcx - X driver for suntcx hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448567 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-03 22:46 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xorg-x11-drv-suntcx Short Description: X driver for suntcx Owners: ausil spot jima pjones Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 02:53:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 22:53:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448559] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suncg3 - x driver for suncg3 hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040253.m542rQrw016482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suncg3 - x driver for suncg3 hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448559 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-03 22:53 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xorg-x11-drv-suncg3 Short Description: X driver for suncg3 Owners: ausil spot jima pjones Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 02:54:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 22:54:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448561] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suncg6 - X driver for suncg6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040254.m542sZ1A022791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suncg6 - X driver for suncg6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448561 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 02:54:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 22:54:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448561] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suncg6 - X driver for suncg6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040254.m542sGwS022738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suncg6 - X driver for suncg6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448561 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-03 22:54 EST ------- Package Name: xorg-x11-drv-suncg6 Short Description: X driver for suncg6 Owners: ausil spot jima pjones Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 02:55:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 22:55:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448874] Review Request: pyroom - PyRoom is a full screen text editor and a clone of Writeroom In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040255.m542tGMU017126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyroom - PyRoom is a full screen text editor and a clone of Writeroom https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448874 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.sylvan at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-03 22:55 EST ------- Mamoru, are you officially reviewing this? In which case, please assign the bug to yourself and set the fedora-review flag to "?". Otherwise I'll take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 03:01:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 23:01:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257701] Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040301.m5431bCk018512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257701 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-03 23:01 EST ------- I'll go ahead and review this in preparation for the necessary licensing bits to be in place. I wonder if there's any point in having a debuginfo package if it's going to end up empty. It doesn't look like that rpm bug is ever going to be fixed, so this package should probably just turn it off. Could you perhaps define GRIB in the %description? This from wikipedia seems useful: GRIB (GRIdded Binary) is a mathematically concise data format commonly used in meteorology to store historical and forecasted weather data. That's about all I have to add. * source files match upstream: 15ec3353247105367342eb52c658b33568c995c65754363718b34ab447be49ea w3lib-1.6.tar * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. ? description could use a little clarification. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. ? no licensing information whatsoever. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. X debuginfo package is completely empty. X rpmlint complains about the debuginfo package. * final provides and requires are sane: w3lib-devel-1.6-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm w3lib-static = 1.6-1.fc10 w3lib-devel = 1.6-1.fc10 = * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * static libraries present: no dynamic libs present, so the statics are OK in the -devel package. -static provide is present. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 03:15:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 23:15:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448874] Review Request: pyroom - PyRoom is a full screen text editor and a clone of Writeroom In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040315.m543F7RR027120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyroom - PyRoom is a full screen text editor and a clone of Writeroom https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448874 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-03 23:15 EST ------- The runtime dependency should be on gnome-python2-gtksourceview, not pygtksourceview (the latter provides the gtksourceview2 module, but pyroom uses gtksourceview instead). Since pyroom does not do any syntax highlighting (it's monochrome), any idea what they actually use it for? Oh, would be nice to have a desktop file to go with it too. Thanks, -- Michel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 03:28:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 23:28:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449879] New: Review Request: Zile - Zile Is Lossy Emacs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449879 Summary: Review Request: Zile - Zile Is Lossy Emacs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rakesh.gnulinuxcentar.org/zile.spec SRPM URL: http://rakesh.gnulinuxcentar.org/zile-2.2.59-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Zile is a small Emacs clone. Zile is a customizable, self-documenting real-time open-source display editor. Zile was written to be as similar as possible to Emacs; every Emacs user should feel at home. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 03:31:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 23:31:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449879] Review Request: Zile - Zile Is Lossy Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040331.m543VKDp029582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Zile - Zile Is Lossy Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449879 rakesh.pandit at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rakesh.pandit at gmail.com 2008-06-03 23:31 EST ------- This is my third package and I am still seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 03:47:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 23:47:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445140] Review Request: lxtask - Lightweight and desktop independent task manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040347.m543lQkl025651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxtask - Lightweight and desktop independent task manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445140 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.sylvan at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 03:47:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 23:47:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445140] Review Request: lxtask - Lightweight and desktop independent task manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040347.m543l7jO025579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxtask - Lightweight and desktop independent task manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445140 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-03 23:47 EST ------- Looks fine -- approved. Note that you can drop the version number from the BR on gtk2-devel; no currently-supported release of Fedora or RHEL has an older GTK+ than the version required. APPROVED MUST ? rpmlint: clean ? package name: ok ? spec file name: ok ? package guideline-compliant: ok ? license complies with guidelines: ok ? license field accurate: ok ? license file not deleted: ok ? spec in US English: ok ? spec legible: ok ? source matches upstream: ok ? builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded: ok ? build dependencies complete: ? locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale: ok ? own all directories: ok ? no dupes in %files: ok ? permission: ok ? %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT: ok ? macros used consistently: ok ? Package contains code: ok ? desktop file uses desktop-file-install: ok ? clean buildroot before install: ok ? filenames UTF-8: ok SHOULD ? desc and summary contain translations if available: no (optional) ? package build in mock on all architectures: ok http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=644423 ? package functioned as described: ok ? scriplets are sane: ok ? require package not files: ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 03:59:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 23:59:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447766] Review Request: mathomatic - Small, portable symbolic math program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040359.m543xjqg001268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mathomatic - Small, portable symbolic math program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447766 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.sylvan at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 04:06:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 00:06:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447766] Review Request: mathomatic - Small, portable symbolic math program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040406.m5446JTI028927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mathomatic - Small, portable symbolic math program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447766 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-04 00:06 EST ------- Looks good so far; could you update to 14.0.4 and then I can do a full review? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 04:08:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 00:08:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449339] Review Request: wine-doors - One-click Windows application installer / Wine frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040408.m5448AUv003190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wine-doors - One-click Windows application installer / Wine frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449339 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.sylvan at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-04 00:08 EST ------- Regarding the symlinks, can't you relink them after 'make install'? In all cases, both the source and target will be under $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 04:38:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 00:38:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449879] Review Request: Zile - Zile Is Lossy Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040438.m544cR89007486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Zile - Zile Is Lossy Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449879 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |447125 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 06:15:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 02:15:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449784] Review Request: rpmreaper - A tool for removing packages from system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040615.m546Fhp0018511@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmreaper - A tool for removing packages from system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449784 xjakub at fi.muni.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |xjakub at fi.muni.cz Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 06:25:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 02:25:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443850] Review Request: pywebkitgtk - Python Bindings for WebKit-gtk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040625.m546Paf0026476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pywebkitgtk - Python Bindings for WebKit-gtk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443850 ivazqueznet at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ivazqueznet at gmail.com 2008-06-04 02:25 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pywebkitgtk Short Description: Python Bindings for WebKit-gtk Owners: ivazquez Branches: F-8 F-9 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 06:56:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 02:56:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449784] Review Request: rpmreaper - A tool for removing packages from system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040656.m546u6Pv031930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmreaper - A tool for removing packages from system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449784 xjakub at fi.muni.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From xjakub at fi.muni.cz 2008-06-04 02:56 EST ------- MUST items, if applicable: [OK] rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. (no output) [OK] The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [OK] The spec file is named correctly. [OK] The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. As you are upstream, please consider using the DESTDIR macro in your Makefile and changing "%makeinstall" into "make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install" in the future. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used for details. [OK] The package has approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [OK] The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [OK] The License file packaged as %doc. [OK] The spec file must be written in American English. [OK] The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [OK] The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source. MD5sum: be1f31514368fab7f80a8ee5631a0388 rpmreaper-0.1.3.tar.gz [OK] The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=643921 [OK] All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [OK] A package must own all directories that it creates. [OK] A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [OK] Permissions on files must be set properly. [OK] Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [OK] Each package must consistently use macros. [OK] The package must contain code, or permissable content. [OK] If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [OK] Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [OK] At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot}. [OK] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD items, if applicable: [OK] The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [OK] The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [OK] The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 07:52:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 03:52:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 421241] Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040752.m547qC15004351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421241 ------- Additional Comments From jess at zend.com 2008-06-04 03:52 EST ------- Hi Alexander, About SQLite and the proprietary DB extensions, I think it's perfectly OK for the user to take care of the missing deps should he so desire. The unit tests themselves always check whether the extensions required are loaded and throw an exception if they're not so the user can easily tell what's required and take care of it. I see no problem with it as there are over 100 PHP extensions, naturally you can't provide them all. About getTmpDir(), I suggested: return getenv('TMPDIR').DIRECTORY_SEPARATOR . 'zend_cache_tmp_dir_'.date("mdyHis"); This way, the directory will be created with a timestamp which will avoid conflicts just as you suggested. I have also submitted a wrapping function to the ZF developers and am now waiting for them to apply both the getTmpDir() patch and this wrapper. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 08:14:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 04:14:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436831] Review Request: gbrainy - Gbrainy is a brain teaser game and trainer to keep your brain trained In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040814.m548E2w7015979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gbrainy - Gbrainy is a brain teaser game and trainer to keep your brain trained https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436831 sereinity at online.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 08:21:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 04:21:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449904] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-Template-Pro - Perl/XS module to use HTML Templates from CGI scripts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449904 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Template-Pro - Perl/XS module to use HTML Templates from CGI scripts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-HTML-Template-Pro.spec OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-HTML-Template-Pro.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/mock-results/perl-HTML-Template-Pro-0.69-1.el5.i386/perl-HTML-Template-Pro-0.69-1.el5.src.rpm mock: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/mock-results/perl-HTML-Template-Pro-0.69-1.el5.i386/ Description: A fast and lightweight C/Perl+XS HTML Template engine implementation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 08:28:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 04:28:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449906] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449906 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-Test-Harness.spec SRPM:http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/mock-results/perl-Test-Harness-3.10-1.el5.noarch/perl-Test-Harness-3.10-1.el5.src.rpm mock:http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/mock-results/perl-Test-Harness-3.10-1.el5.noarch/ Description: Run Perl tests and output formatted results with statistics. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 08:25:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 04:25:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449905] New: Review Request: perl-Object-MultiType - Perl Objects as Hash, Array, Scalar, Code and Glob at the same time Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449905 Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-MultiType - Perl Objects as Hash, Array, Scalar, Code and Glob at the same time Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-Object-MultiType.spec OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-Object-MultiType.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/mock-results/perl-Object-MultiType-0.05-1.el5.noarch/perl-Object-MultiType-0.05-1.el5.src.rpm mock: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/mock-results/perl-Object-MultiType-0.05-1.el5.noarch/ Description: This module return an object that works like a Hash, Array, Scalar, Code and Glob object at the same time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 08:26:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 04:26:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445977] Review Request: ikiwiki - A wiki compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040826.m548QMrm018567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ikiwiki - A wiki compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445977 ------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny at gmx.de 2008-06-04 04:26 EST ------- Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/ikiwiki.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/ikiwiki-2.48-1.fc9.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Jun 2 2008 Thomas Moschny - 2.48-1 - Update to 2.48. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 08:31:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 04:31:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449907] New: Review Request: perl-XML-Smart - Implementation of XML parser and writer for Perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449907 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Smart - Implementation of XML parser and writer for Perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-XML-Smart.spec OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-XML-Smart.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/mock-results/perl-XML-Smart-1.6.9-1.el5.noarch/perl-XML-Smart-1.6.9-1.el5.src.rpm mock: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/mock-results/perl-XML-Smart-1.6.9-1.el5.noarch/ Description: This module uses tree of hashes and arrays as representation of XML data, which enables the programmer to access it easily, taking advantage of standard Perl language facilities. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 08:38:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 04:38:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449784] Review Request: rpmreaper - A tool for removing packages from system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040838.m548c8Tn013702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmreaper - A tool for removing packages from system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449784 ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2008-06-04 04:38 EST ------- Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 08:39:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 04:39:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449393] Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040839.m548dapX020447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449393 ------- Additional Comments From pbrobinson at gmail.com 2008-06-04 04:39 EST ------- Not sure what you mean by "but where is it?". Do you mean where is the package, where is it required as a BuildReq or something else? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 08:44:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 04:44:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449907] Review Request: perl-XML-Smart - Implementation of XML parser and writer for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040844.m548iukB021361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Smart - Implementation of XML parser and writer for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449907 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 08:44:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 04:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449906] Review Request: perl-Test-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040844.m548ijZT014769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449906 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 08:44:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 04:44:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449904] Review Request: perl-HTML-Template-Pro - Perl/XS module to use HTML Templates from CGI scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040844.m548iQ5D014697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Template-Pro - Perl/XS module to use HTML Templates from CGI scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449904 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 08:44:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 04:44:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449905] Review Request: perl-Object-MultiType - Perl Objects as Hash, Array, Scalar, Code and Glob at the same time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040844.m548iZ92014733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-MultiType - Perl Objects as Hash, Array, Scalar, Code and Glob at the same time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449905 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 08:58:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 04:58:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448874] Review Request: pyroom - PyRoom is a full screen text editor and a clone of Writeroom In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040858.m548wS1F017131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyroom - PyRoom is a full screen text editor and a clone of Writeroom https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448874 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-04 04:58 EST ------- Sorry for delay. Michel, if you want please assign this bug to yourself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 09:18:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 05:18:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040918.m549IXuT027746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-06-04 05:18 EST ------- Another one Ping! ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 09:17:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 05:17:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449328] Review Request: cluttermm - C++ wrapper for clutter library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806040917.m549Hc7U027608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cluttermm - C++ wrapper for clutter library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449328 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2008-06-04 05:17 EST ------- Right, no koji builds until this is fixed. For the record, it builds for me on F-9 i386, F-9 x86_64 and F10 i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 10:00:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 06:00:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449927] New: Review Request: imsettings - Delivery framework for general Input Method configuration Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449927 Summary: Review Request: imsettings - Delivery framework for general Input Method configuration Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tagoh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/imsettings/imsettings.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/imsettings/imsettings-0.100.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: IMSettings is a framework that delivers Input Method settings and applies the changes immediately. so it will takes an effect without restarting applications and the desktop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 10:02:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 06:02:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449927] Review Request: imsettings - Delivery framework for general Input Method configuration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041002.m54A2iUa004068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imsettings - Delivery framework for general Input Method configuration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449927 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2008-06-04 06:02 EST ------- imsettings is a separate project from im-chooser now. so those packages would replaces the existing imsettings* packages. that should be no problem for the upgrading path. FYI. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 10:08:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 06:08:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449928] New: Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449928 Summary: Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: atorkhov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://purple.worldforge.org/~alex/fedora/libwfut.spec SRPM URL: http://purple.worldforge.org/~alex/fedora/libwfut-0.2.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: libwfut is the WorldForge Update Tool (WFUT) client side implementation in C++ for use directly by WorldForge clients. Here is conversation with wfut (it's old java implementation) package maintainer: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-games-list/2008-June/msg00001.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-games-list/2008-June/msg00003.html where we decided to leave current java wfut package while there exist package (sear) that is using it. It's my first package though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 10:09:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 06:09:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449928] Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041009.m54A9jZc005110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449928 atorkhov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 11:55:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 07:55:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449393] Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041155.m54Btagt023009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449393 ------- Additional Comments From chris at tylers.info 2008-06-04 07:55 EST ------- Sorry, Peter -- I meant that that "gecko-devel-unstable" doesn't seem to exist in the Fedora universe. I tried building and it failed due to that BuildReq, and I can't find that package in the repositories, Koji, or as a review request. Building in mock with that line disabled fails. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 11:53:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 07:53:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435542] Review Request: xdemorse - GTK based application for decoding and displaying Morse code signals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041153.m54BrrJT022475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdemorse - GTK based application for decoding and displaying Morse code signals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435542 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(bob at fedoraunity.or | |g) ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-06-04 07:53 EST ------- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 12:22:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 08:22:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449784] Review Request: rpmreaper - A tool for removing packages from system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041222.m54CMKfc023349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmreaper - A tool for removing packages from system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449784 mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2008-06-04 08:22 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rpmreaper Short Description: A tool for removing packages from system Owners: mlichvar Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 12:24:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 08:24:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449393] Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041224.m54COo3S023617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449393 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-04 08:24 EST ------- gecko-devel-unstable is provided by xulrunner-devel-unstable, only available on F-9+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 12:32:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 08:32:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449393] Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041232.m54CW7UR025104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449393 ------- Additional Comments From pbrobinson at gmail.com 2008-06-04 08:32 EST ------- Its provided by xulrunner-devel-unstable and is the naming convention that is used by the firefox spec so that why I used it as opposed to xulrunner-devel-unstable [root at euuklonw7300b1n ~]# yum whatprovides gecko-devel-unstable Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit, refresh-updatesd xulrunner-devel-unstable.x86_64 : Development files for Gecko, which are not considered stable xulrunner-devel-unstable.x86_64 : Development files for Gecko, which are not considered stable -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 12:39:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 08:39:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447559] Review Request: perl-GO-TermFinder - Identify GO nodes that annotate a group of genes with a significant p-value In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041239.m54CdhkC032388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GO-TermFinder - Identify GO nodes that annotate a group of genes with a significant p-value https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447559 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-06-04 08:39 EST ------- Pushed to updates/ and epel-testing. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 12:42:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 08:42:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257701] Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041242.m54Cg0qh027064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257701 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-04 08:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > You should email NCEP.NCO.GRIB at noaa.gov to confirm the licensing of that code > (and ask them to note it somewhere). A copy of an email confirming the > license/copyright status will suffice to clear this. The mail clarifying the license for all the NCEP website is in g2clib. Should I copy iyt in this package, or just use a comment in the spec? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 12:56:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 08:56:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226547] Merge Review: x86info In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041256.m54Cusg7003561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: x86info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226547 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|RAWHIDE | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-04 08:56 EST ------- The bug should be closed only after the package has been reviewed and accepted, reopening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 13:00:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 09:00:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449595] Review Request: gnome-applet-grandr - GNOME panel applet for XrandR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041300.m54D0cHO030612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-applet-grandr - GNOME panel applet for XrandR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449595 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2008-06-04 09:00 EST ------- yeah but, it's an addon package. So, the naming is correct for fedora inclusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 13:16:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 09:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232790] Review Request: ming - SWF output library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041316.m54DGbmv008045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ming - SWF output library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232790 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-04 09:16 EST ------- There are progresses. But still no release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 13:24:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 09:24:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257701] Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041324.m54DOvlC009130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257701 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-06-04 09:24 EST ------- Please copy it in the package. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 13:45:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 09:45:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257701] Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041345.m54Djeem007045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257701 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-04 09:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > I wonder if there's any point in having a debuginfo package if it's going to end up empty. It doesn't look like that rpm bug is ever going to be fixed, so this package should probably just turn it off. I don't think that unuseful complexity should be added in spec file to work around rpmbuild bugs except when this leads to really problematic issues (which is not the case here). > Could you perhaps define GRIB in the %description? This from wikipedia seems useful: > GRIB (GRIdded Binary) is a mathematically concise data format commonly used in > meteorology to store historical and forecasted weather data. I have added the explanation of the acronym such that it isn't mistaken for something else, but people using GRIB should know what it is. %description is now: This library contains Fortran 90 decoder/encoder routines for the GRIB (GRIdded Binary) data format edition 1, general date manipulation routines, and a Fortran 90 interface to "C" language I/O routines. The user API for the GRIB1 routines is described in file "grib1.doc". And Summary: Summary: GRIB1 (GRIdded Binary) encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines (both for devel and main package since only the devel package is present). http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/w3lib-1.6-2.fc10.src.rpm http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/w3lib.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 13:58:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 09:58:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225784] Merge Review: gdbm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041358.m54Dw9R6009246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdbm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225784 ------- Additional Comments From sds at gnu.org 2008-06-04 09:58 EST ------- fc9 comes with gdbm 1.8.0 which is 9 years old and has known bugs, fixed in 1.8.3 (the latest version, released 5.5 years ago). please upgrade! also, please change "component" to "gdbm" also, please change "version" to "9" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 14:10:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 10:10:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444788] Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041410.m54EAfXf012323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444788 ------- Additional Comments From lokthare at gmail.com 2008-06-04 10:10 EST ------- Hi, the packager did not respond for a month now and a new release has been published. Is it possible to closed this bug so i can work on a package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 14:16:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 10:16:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449393] Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041416.m54EGYh4013373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449393 ------- Additional Comments From chris at tylers.info 2008-06-04 10:16 EST ------- Build fails in mock with F9 profile. Adding BuildRequires for these packages allows the mock build to succeed: python, gtk2-devel, dbus-glib-devel, libIDL-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 14:47:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 10:47:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449393] Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041447.m54ElQYw018595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449393 ------- Additional Comments From pbrobinson at gmail.com 2008-06-04 10:47 EST ------- I thought there might be some BuildReq issues as I trimmed some of them out from the original firefox spec as wasn't sure whether they'd be needed. Python's an interesting one. Will update the spec soon. Thanks for the update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 14:50:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 10:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449962] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449962 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: danken at cs.technion.ac.il QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~danken/texlive-fonts-hebrew.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~danken/texlive-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc9.src.rpm Description: Support using the Culmus Hebrew fonts in TeXLive! (minor conversion of tetex-fonts-hebrew) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 14:53:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 10:53:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449962] Review Request: texlive-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041453.m54ErWuc019799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449962 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-04 10:53 EST ------- The naming of tex packages is now tex-fonts-hebrew -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 14:52:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 10:52:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449962] Review Request: texlive-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041452.m54EqRdm019694@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449962 danken at cs.technion.ac.il changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts | |in TeXLive -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 14:55:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 10:55:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449393] Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041455.m54Etcnu026885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449393 ------- Additional Comments From david.humphrey at senecac.on.ca 2008-06-04 10:55 EST ------- The mozilla build system increasingly uses python (moz2 even more so), so not that unusual. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 14:57:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 10:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444788] Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041457.m54EvKkU020850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444788 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-04 10:57 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 15:07:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:07:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449962] Review Request: texlive-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041507.m54F7qhc023459@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449962 ------- Additional Comments From danken at cs.technion.ac.il 2008-06-04 11:07 EST ------- Thanks, but why do http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os/Packages/texlive-2007-31.fc10.x86_64.rpm and its likes suggest otherwise? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 15:08:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:08:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444788] Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041508.m54F8nX1023533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444788 dpierce at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From dpierce at redhat.com 2008-06-04 11:08 EST ------- I've decided not to maintain a package for this product since I have never received a response from the authors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 15:50:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:50:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041550.m54FoLuW032200@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-06-04 11:50 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=308361) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=308361&action=view) Init Script Patch for speech-dispatcher -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 15:57:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:57:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041557.m54FvliG006734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-06-04 11:57 EST ------- Hi :-) SPEC File for revision 7 - http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/speechd-rpm/speech-dispatcher.spec SRPM - http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/speechd-rpm/speech-dispatcher-0.6.6-7.fc7.src.rpm (In reply to comment #24) > For 0.6.6-6: > > * License > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines > - I checked the license of speech-dispatcher and > * The base license of this is GPLv2+ > * src/c/clients/spdsend/spdsend.h in the tarball is under > GPL, which makes %_bindir/spdsend to be GPLv2: > > So > * Please change the license tag of all packages except > speech-dispatcher (main) pkg to "GPLv2+" > * For speech-dispatcher, write in the spec file like below: > ----------------------------------------------------------- > Group: System Environment/Libraries > # Almost all files are under GPLv2+, however > # src/c/clients/spdsend/spdsend.h is licensed under GPLv2, > # which makes %%_bindir/spdsend GPLv2. > License: GPLv2+ and GPLv2 > URL: http://www.freebsoft.org/pub/projects/speechd/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- Done. > > * Requires(%post,etc) > - Why are /sbin/chkconfig, /sbin/service needed for > Requires(%post,etc)? I wanted to add an init script to auto-start the speech-dispatcher daemon. Hence the need for chkconfig. I've included the init script as a patch in the latest revision. > > * %install process > - Would you clean up %install scripts (like following)? > ----------------------------------------------------------- > for dir in \ > config doc src/audio c ..... > do > pushd $dir > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT > popd > done > ----------------------------------------------------------- Neat :). Done > * Documents > - Adding "COPYING" to %doc is rather mandatory if it exists. Done > * rpmlint issue > ----------------------------------------------------------- > speech-dispatcher-doc.i386: W: file-not-utf8 > /usr/share/info/speech-dispatcher-cs.info.gz Still to be resolved. Wondering how to go about this one (:-?) > speech-dispatcher-devel.i386: W: no-documentation > speech-dispatcher-python.i386: W: no-documentation Is this warning very important, as most of the documentation has been included in a separate doc pacakge? > speech-dispatcher.i386: E: non-empty-%postun /sbin/ldconfig Fixed. > speech-dispatcher-python.i386: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/speechd/_test.py 0644 > speech-dispatcher.i386: E: postun-without-ldconfig /usr/lib/libspeechd.so.2.0.5 Fixed > * Binary name > - IMO the names of the binaries > ----------------------------------------------------------- > %_bindir/long_message > %_bindir/run_test > ----------------------------------------------------------- prefixed spd_ to each file. I hope that is fine? Any other suggestion that you have for the file name? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 16:18:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 12:18:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443850] Review Request: pywebkitgtk - Python Bindings for WebKit-gtk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041618.m54GIR69010735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pywebkitgtk - Python Bindings for WebKit-gtk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443850 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-04 12:18 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 16:24:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 12:24:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449784] Review Request: rpmreaper - A tool for removing packages from system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041624.m54GO9AO005901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmreaper - A tool for removing packages from system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449784 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-04 12:24 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 16:23:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 12:23:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448491] Review Request: libcgroup - A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041623.m54GN4LK011550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcgroup - A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448491 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Summary|Review Request: cgroup-lib -|Review Request: libcgroup - |A collection of tools and |A collection of tools and |libraries to control and |libraries to control and |monitor control groups the |monitor control groups the |associated controllers |associated controllers Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-04 12:23 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 16:45:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 12:45:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449328] Review Request: cluttermm - C++ wrapper for clutter library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041645.m54GjcNn010217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cluttermm - C++ wrapper for clutter library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449328 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-04 12:45 EST ------- By the way coreutils-6.12-1.fc10 is now untagged and I guess now koji build succeeds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 16:45:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 12:45:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449994] New: Review Request: lua-expat - SAX XML parser based on the Expat library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449994 Summary: Review Request: lua-expat - SAX XML parser based on the Expat library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tim at niemueller.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/luastuff/lua-expat.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/luastuff/lua-expat-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: LuaExpat is a SAX XML parser based on the Expat library. Website: http://www.keplerproject.org/luaexpat/ Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=645512 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 16:53:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 12:53:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442507] Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041653.m54GrP16011363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507 asayama at sm.sony.co.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |asayama at sm.sony.co.jp ------- Additional Comments From asayama at sm.sony.co.jp 2008-06-04 12:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) It seems strange that elfspe is built only for ppc (%ifarch ppc) and that adabinding-devel is built only for ppc64 (%ifarch ppc64). I think they should be built regardless of target architecture. Could you compare your libspe2.spec with SF.net subversion? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 17:07:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 13:07:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041707.m54H7S3n018935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-04 13:07 EST ------- Please try to build on koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 17:13:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 13:13:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041713.m54HDU8G019881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-04 13:13 EST ------- Henry, if you want I will once close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 17:12:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 13:12:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257701] Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041712.m54HC62J019735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257701 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-04 13:12 EST ------- This package is ready to go, but I can't approve it as long as it generates an empty debuginfo package or there's some indication that the rpm issue will be fixed in the near term. We have to work with the tools that we have, rpm brokenness included, and if you won't add a single line plus a comment then you're just being hilariously inflexible. It's not even clear that the rpm folks consider this a bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 17:15:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 13:15:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444952] Review Request: tlock - terminal lock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041715.m54HFPAq020410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tlock - terminal lock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444952 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(pj.pandit at yahoo.co | |.in) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-04 13:15 EST ------- If you have submitted another review request (or have done a pre-review of other person's review request). please let me know it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 17:20:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 13:20:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041720.m54HK9dQ021337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 ------- Additional Comments From victor.lazzarini at nuim.ie 2008-06-04 13:20 EST ------- I will. I just have been unable to work on this, as I have been busy with University stuff admin and marking. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 17:28:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 13:28:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449339] Review Request: wine-doors - One-click Windows application installer / Wine frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041728.m54HSBKU022939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wine-doors - One-click Windows application installer / Wine frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449339 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-06-04 13:28 EST ------- This package seems to request info (xml form) form a website... At first sight this doesn't seems safe to me. This package may have a fedora?review flag set to "-" I will do more indeep investigation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 17:30:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 13:30:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257701] Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041730.m54HUNMQ018502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257701 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-04 13:30 EST ------- I am not familiar with this package itself, but /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh does nothing for static archives. So as far as I see this package the only option for this package is just not to create debuginfo rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 17:34:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 13:34:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041734.m54HYaZL023948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2008-06-04 13:34 EST ------- Or, since Henry is busy, you can switch over to my version: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/xmms-pulse.spec http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/xmms-pulse-0.9.4-5.fc10.src.rpm I've bumped the release to be higher than Henry's latest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 17:41:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 13:41:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449994] Review Request: lua-expat - SAX XML parser based on the Expat library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041741.m54Hf5ma020380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-expat - SAX XML parser based on the Expat library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449994 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: lua-expat - |Review Request: lua-expat - |SAX XML parser based on the |SAX XML parser based on the |Expat library |Expat library Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 17:52:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 13:52:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447766] Review Request: mathomatic - Small, portable symbolic math program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041752.m54HqouA027366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mathomatic - Small, portable symbolic math program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447766 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(terjeros at phys.ntnu | |.no) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 17:58:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 13:58:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444763] Review Request: vaspview - VASP Data Viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041758.m54HwIZ5028380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vaspview - VASP Data Viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444763 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2008-06-04 13:58 EST ------- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vaspview Short Description: VASP Data Viewer Owners: rathann Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 18:03:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:03:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448565] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunffb - X driver for sunffb hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041803.m54I31gG024146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunffb - X driver for sunffb hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448565 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 18:02:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:02:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448558] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunbw2 - sunbw2 x.org driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041802.m54I2GbV024062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunbw2 - sunbw2 x.org driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448558 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 18:03:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:03:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448566] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunleo - X driver for sunleo hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041803.m54I3Jv4029646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunleo - X driver for sunleo hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448566 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 18:02:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:02:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448563] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suncg14 - X driver for suncg14 hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041802.m54I2fPQ029581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suncg14 - X driver for suncg14 hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448563 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 18:16:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:16:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445140] Review Request: lxtask - Lightweight and desktop independent task manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041816.m54IGGLZ026811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxtask - Lightweight and desktop independent task manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445140 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-06-04 14:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Note that you can drop the version number from the BR on > gtk2-devel; no currently-supported release of Fedora or RHEL has an older GTK+ > than the version required. Right, thanks a lot for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lxtask Short Description: Lightweight and desktop independent task manager Owners: cwickert Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 18:54:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:54:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041854.m54IsOQP007451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-04 14:54 EST ------- Well, for 0.9.4-5: * Comments for libtool ---------------------------------------------------------- # On Fedora x86_64 some libtool archives get created even with --disable-static ---------------------------------------------------------- - Usually --disable-static is for not creating static archives and it is usual that libtool .la files are installed even with --disable-static ... And on some softwares these libtool files are really needed (e.g. ImageMagick) Other things are okay. ----------------------------------------------------------- This package (xmms-pulse) is APPROVED by me ---------------------------------------------------------- Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 18:54:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:54:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449994] Review Request: lua-expat - SAX XML parser based on the Expat library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041854.m54IshLQ007578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-expat - SAX XML parser based on the Expat library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449994 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-04 14:54 EST ------- Looks pretty good; only a few of things worth mentioning. There seems to be at least a small test suite in the tests directory; is it possible to run it at build time? There's no need for the explicit build dependency on /usr/bin/iconv; it's part of glibc so you can expect it to be there, although it doesn't hurt anything. You should use either $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS or %{buildroot} and %{optflags}; currently they're mixed. It's not a really big deal in a package this small but it is explicitly prohibited by the guidelines. * source files match upstream: 9d709ddc606630f9b9dc3f3aafcb2a7c1fcb2675000c09978d8a37974e74effd luaexpat-1.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named and is cleanly written. X specile does not use macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license ("same as lua" == MIT) * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: lxp.so.1.1.0()(64bit) lua-expat = 1.1-1.fc10 = libexpat.so.1()(64bit) lua >= 5.1 ? %check is not present, but there seem to be some tests in the source. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 19:08:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:08:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450013] New: Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 Summary: Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dmalcolm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/testopia.spec SRPM URL: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/testopia-3.0.4-1.tr2.0_RC1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Testopia is a test case management system built as an extension of Bugzilla, allowing test plans and result reporting to be integrated into the Bugzilla web UI. This package is a version of Bugzilla built with the Testopia extensions; if you wish to deploy Testopia, install this package rather than "bugzilla". As with the regular "bugzilla" package it requires a database engine installed - either MySQL or PostgreSQL. Without one of these database engines, Testopia will not work. Testopia (http://www.mozilla.org/projects/testopia/) is an extension of Bugzilla (http://www.bugzilla.org/) that adds test-case management, allowing test plans and result reporting to be integrated into the Bugzilla web UI. It patches the core of Bugzilla, and hence has to be built as part of the core package, rather than a separate srpm. Not all Bugzilla deployments will want Testopia, so for now I'm packaging Testopia in Fedora as a separate package. The "testopia" package is deliberately as close as possible to the "bugzilla" package for simplicity's sake; it is intended that a sysadmin will install one or the other, and hence the testopia package conflict with bugzilla packages. See bug 449401 for a discussion of this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 19:08:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:08:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224458] Review Request: libsilc (dependency of gaim) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041908.m54J8nOo010853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsilc (dependency of gaim) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224458 ------- Additional Comments From stu at nosnilmot.com 2008-06-04 15:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > CC'ing Stu, who seems to be the current maintainer of this package. Thanks! > From the README file I'd expect to see silc and silcd binaries somewhere, and > something other than libsilc packages to hold them, but the source doesn't seem > to include any actual applications. I guess if it grew some then the base > package would be misnamed but we don't usually worry about naming issues in > merge reviews unless there are egregious issues. This is due to the slightly odd way upstream creates 3 separate packages (silc-client, silc-server and silc-toolkit/libsilc) from the same source tree. Would you prefer me to patch the README to exclude mention of the client and server, just drop the README, or do nothing? I assume for fixes to the other issues I should just commit them to CVS? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 19:16:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:16:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450013] Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041916.m54JGoVa013001@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 ------- Additional Comments From dmalcolm at redhat.com 2008-06-04 15:16 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=308382) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=308382&action=view) For reference, patch showing what I did to bugzilla.spec to get to testopia.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 19:20:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:20:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448236] Review Request: xfbib - Lightweight BibTeX editor for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041920.m54JKZwI008625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfbib - Lightweight BibTeX editor for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448236 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.sylvan at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-04 15:20 EST ------- desktop-file-install should probably be called with --vendor="fedora", not "" ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 19:28:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:28:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257701] Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041928.m54JSoMw015668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257701 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-04 15:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > This package is ready to go, but I can't approve it as long as it generates an > empty debuginfo package or there's some indication that the rpm issue will be > fixed in the near term. We have to work with the tools that we have, rpm > brokenness included, and if you won't add a single line plus a comment then > you're just being hilariously inflexible. It's not even clear that the rpm > folks consider this a bug. I can't see why I am inflexible. I think that shipping empty debuginfo packages or not should be left to the packager. Apart from the rpmlint output I can't see any issue with having empty debuginfo packages. Ignoring empty debuginfo packages is also a way to work with the tools that we have, rpm brokenness included. The choice to add a single line plus a comment or not should be left to the packager in my opinion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 19:37:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:37:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257701] Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041937.m54JbIsx012652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257701 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-04 15:37 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Debuginfo_packages " Packages should produce useful -debuginfo packages, or explicitly disable them when it is not possible to generate a useful one but rpmbuild would do it anyway. " -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 19:35:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:35:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257701] Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041935.m54JZikj012370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257701 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-04 15:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > you're just being hilariously inflexible. And it is not hilarious. Opposing to having unimportant things forced upon maintainers is important. I am not criticizing you, if you find that not having empty debuginfo is important, I completly understand that you insist on avoiding empty debuginfo. But it is also important to me since it is not the only package I own with empty debuginfo package and I am not willing to fix them (in addition to thinking that this should be up to the maintainer). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 19:43:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:43:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450013] Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041943.m54JhZ9r013915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 ------- Additional Comments From dmalcolm at redhat.com 2008-06-04 15:43 EST ------- Successful scratch build here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=646051 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 19:48:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:48:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226339] Merge Review: Pyrex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041948.m54JmIpD014904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: Pyrex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226339 ------- Additional Comments From mbarnes at redhat.com 2008-06-04 15:48 EST ------- Looks good. Built your patch unmodified. Should be in tomorrow's Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 19:48:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:48:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257701] Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041948.m54JmfaQ014958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257701 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-06-04 15:48 EST ------- Patrice, what possible value does an empty debuginfo package serve? It will only confuse people who think they need it for debugging. Please either rationalize the need to keep it, or explicitly disable it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 19:53:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:53:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448236] Review Request: xfbib - Lightweight BibTeX editor for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806041953.m54Jrssv021380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfbib - Lightweight BibTeX editor for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448236 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-06-04 15:53 EST ------- We are not using "vendor" for the other Xfce packages as well (except for xfce4-taskmanager), but I can change it if you like. Thinking about this a little more I tend to agree with you: fedora-xfbib.desktop is better than xfbib.desktop, because xfbib has no "xfce" prefix. Do you want me to change this now or after/during review? BTW: I just found another trivial error in %changelog: "Initial Fedora _Extras_ package" of course is wrong because there are no Extras any longer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 20:02:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 16:02:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257701] Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806042002.m54K2QpB023118@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257701 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-04 16:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > Patrice, what possible value does an empty debuginfo package serve? It will only > confuse people who think they need it for debugging. I can't really see who could be confused. Unless I am wrong the static libs are not stripped so the symbols are in, and the empty debuginfo is unneeded anyway. And in my opinion no debuginfo package is not very less confusing than an empty debuginfo package. > Please either rationalize the need to keep it, or explicitly disable it. No rational. It is just that to me it should not be a requirement. It adds unnecessary work for the packager, unnecessary clutter in the specfile for no practical gain. And the bug is in rpmbuild. Anyway since this is already in the guidelines (but I think this is an unneeded rule, should only be a recommendation), updated src.rpm at: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/w3lib-1.6-3.fc10.src.rpm http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/w3lib.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 20:54:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 16:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435016] Review Request: mmdb - MMDB coordinate library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806042054.m54KsWgd031538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mmdb - MMDB coordinate library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435016 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-06-04 16:54 EST ------- Well, looking at this, it looks like both the 1.09.1 fork and the 1.10 version are under Free licenses (LGPLv2 and LGPLv3 respectively). Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 20:55:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 16:55:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433422] Review Request: perl-IP-Country - Fast lookup of country codes from IP addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806042055.m54KtY0v026942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IP-Country - Fast lookup of country codes from IP addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433422 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 20:57:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 16:57:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436677] Review Request: xxdiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806042057.m54Kvvbd027188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xxdiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436677 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-06-04 16:57 EST ------- Yes, that would be the best approach here, to clean them from the tarball. Just add comments to the spec file explaining how you get from the original tarball to the clean tarball (or write a little script if you're feeling ambitious). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 21:15:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 17:15:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447766] Review Request: mathomatic - Small, portable symbolic math program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806042115.m54LFUpL003447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mathomatic - Small, portable symbolic math program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447766 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(terjeros at phys.ntnu| |.no) | ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-06-04 17:15 EST ------- > Looks good so far; could you update to 14.0.4 and then I can do a full review? Sure: spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/mathomatic/mathomatic.spec srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/mathomatic/mathomatic-14.0.4-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 21:29:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 17:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444763] Review Request: vaspview - VASP Data Viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806042129.m54LTFKt032526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vaspview - VASP Data Viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444763 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-04 17:29 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 21:25:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 17:25:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224458] Review Request: libsilc (dependency of gaim) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806042125.m54LPOHh032271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsilc (dependency of gaim) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224458 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-04 17:25 EST ------- I don't think there's any point in fixing the README; it was just mildly confusing to me and as long as it actually applies to this package then it should be included. Just commit any fixes you'd like to make to CVS and add a note here. You don't have to build or anything like that unless you want to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 21:30:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 17:30:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445140] Review Request: lxtask - Lightweight and desktop independent task manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806042130.m54LUfYg005812@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxtask - Lightweight and desktop independent task manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445140 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-04 17:30 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 21:32:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 17:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428413] Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806042132.m54LWxtS006217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428413 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 21:32:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 17:32:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266841] Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806042132.m54LW2FG006076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266841 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-06-04 17:32 EST ------- Indeed, there is no problem for LGPLv3 and Apache that I am aware of. LGPL is almost always compatible with things. :) Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 21:52:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 17:52:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447567] Review Request: msort - Sort files in sophisticated ways In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806042152.m54LqvQW009860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: msort - Sort files in sophisticated ways https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447567 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-06-04 17:52 EST ------- Built and pushed for F-8, F-9 and rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 22:30:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 18:30:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449393] Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806042230.m54MUF1x016259@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449393 ------- Additional Comments From pbrobinson at gmail.com 2008-06-04 18:30 EST ------- There is now a new prism.spec in the same location as the old one. I'm currently having issue getting the new srpm up there. There's no others changes so it can just go over the other one. I'll upload another srpm tomorrow when I have more bandwidth. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 22:31:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 18:31:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806042231.m54MVNwd011055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 ------- Additional Comments From avl at l14.ru 2008-06-04 18:31 EST ------- what next? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 22:50:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 18:50:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450050] New: Review Request: cgilib - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450050 Summary: Review Request: cgilib - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mike at flyn.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/cgilib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/cgilib-0.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The cgilib library provides a C library for creating Common Gateway Interface (CGI) programs. The CGI is a way to create dynamic web pages. It defines rules for interaction between a program and the web server while the server talks to the client. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 4 23:16:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 19:16:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450054] New: Review Request: liblinebreak - A Unicode line-breaking library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450054 Summary: Review Request: liblinebreak - A Unicode line-breaking library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.sylvan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/libs/liblinebreak.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/libs/liblinebreak-0.9.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: liblinebreak is an implementation of the line breaking algorithm as described in Unicode 5.0.0 Standard Annex 14, Revision 19, available at http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr14/tr14-19.html This package currently only provides a static library, and as such should not be a runtime dependency. ( build dependency of newer versions of fbreader, please review ASAP. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=646642 ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 00:47:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 20:47:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448563] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suncg14 - X driver for suncg14 hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806050047.m550lKg8008183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suncg14 - X driver for suncg14 hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448563 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2008-06-04 20:47 EST ------- MD5Sum: 9e25784e912cb2f0493b87431fd60773 xf86-video-suncg14-1.1.0.tar.bz2 Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Make succeeds even when %{_smp_mflags} is defined * Files have appropriate permissions and owners Bad: * rpmlint produces the following error: xorg-x11-drv-suncg14.sparc64: W: invalid-license MIT/X11 Looking at the license matrix, it looks like it should just be MIT. You can fix this when you import this into CVS. Note: I don't have the hardware to verify that this driver works, but from a packaging standpoint this package looks fine. +1 APPROVE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 00:58:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 20:58:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448565] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunffb - X driver for sunffb hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806050058.m550wMg9003760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunffb - X driver for sunffb hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448565 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2008-06-04 20:58 EST ------- Good: * Verified source tarball against git. * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Make succeeds. * Files have appropriate permissions and owners Bad: * rpmlint produces the following error: xorg-x11-drv-sunffb.sparcv9: W: invalid-license MIT/X11 Looking at the license matrix, it looks like it should just be MIT. You can fix this when you import this into CVS. Note: I don't have the hardware to verify that this driver works, but from a packaging standpoint this package looks fine. +1 APPROVE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 01:08:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 21:08:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252049] Review Request: asm2 - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806050108.m5518bVQ005711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asm2 - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252049 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-04 21:08 EST ------- Any response to Rajeesh's commentary? Any chance of getting this updated to our current Java guidelines? (No javadoc scriptlets, no jpp tag in the Release:, etc.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 01:06:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 21:06:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448566] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunleo - X driver for sunleo hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806050106.m5516fE7011555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunleo - X driver for sunleo hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448566 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2008-06-04 21:06 EST ------- Good: * Verified source tarball against git. * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Make succeeds. * Files have appropriate permissions and owners Bad: * rpmlint produces the following error: xorg-x11-drv-sunleo.sparc64: W: invalid-license MIT/X11 Looking at the license matrix, it looks like it should just be MIT. You can fix this when you import this into CVS. Note: I don't have the hardware to verify that this driver works, but from a packaging standpoint this package looks fine. +1 APPROVE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 01:17:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 21:17:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448558] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunbw2 - sunbw2 x.org driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806050117.m551HXHK007080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunbw2 - sunbw2 x.org driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448558 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2008-06-04 21:17 EST ------- Good: * Verified source tarball against git. * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Make succeeds even when %{_smp_mflags} is defined * Files have appropriate permissions and owners Bad: * rpmlint produces the following error: xorg-x11-drv-sunbw2.sparc64: W: invalid-license MIT/X11 Looking at the license matrix, it looks like it should just be MIT. You can fix this when you import this into CVS. Note: I don't have the hardware to verify that this driver works, but from a packaging standpoint this package looks fine. +1 APPROVE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 01:16:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 21:16:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444428] Review Request: ocaml-cmigrep - Search OCaml compiled interface (cmi) files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806050116.m551Gnnr013098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cmigrep - Search OCaml compiled interface (cmi) files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444428 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-04 21:16 EST ------- Well, I can build it now, but this rpmlint complaint confuses me: ocaml-cmigrep.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/cmigrep I don't recall seeing this with ocaml executables in the past. It might be new with recent versions of rpmlint, but I'm not sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 01:43:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 21:43:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449328] Review Request: cluttermm - C++ wrapper for clutter library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806050143.m551hjfZ017173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cluttermm - C++ wrapper for clutter library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449328 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2008-06-04 21:43 EST ------- MD5Sum: 74ea582eccf312885bd190758018b5a2 cluttermm-0.5.1.tar.bz2 Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Valid license tag * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Make succeeds even when %{_smp_mflags} is defined * Files have appropriate permissions and owners * Rpmlint produces the following warnings that can be ignored: cluttermm-cairo.i386: W: no-documentation cluttermm-gtk.i386: W: no-documentation * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly Bad: * Looking at the pkg-config files for some of your devel subpackages, it looks like your missing a couple of requires. The cluttermm-cairo-devel package looks like it's missing a requires on cairomm-devel. The cluttermm-gtk-devel package looks like it's missing a requires on gtkmm24-devel. Please verify this before importing it into CVS. +1 APPROVE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 02:12:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 22:12:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449393] Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806050212.m552CANS016640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449393 chris at tylers.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From chris at tylers.info 2008-06-04 22:12 EST ------- Will continue review when the srpm is up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 02:12:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 22:12:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449393] Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806050212.m552CWaj022918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449393 chris at tylers.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris at tylers.info -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 04:17:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 00:17:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449328] Review Request: cluttermm - C++ wrapper for clutter library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806050417.m554HcY6008217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cluttermm - C++ wrapper for clutter library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449328 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2008-06-05 00:17 EST ------- Yes, you're correct on the missing requires. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cluttermm Short Description: C++ wrapper for clutter library Owners: denis Branches: F-8 F-9 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 04:34:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 00:34:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806050434.m554YqcX010898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-06-05 00:34 EST ------- You shoud raise fedora-cvs flag to "?" and create "New Package CVS Request", as described here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 05:12:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 01:12:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448236] Review Request: xfbib - Lightweight BibTeX editor for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806050512.m555C5sS017199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfbib - Lightweight BibTeX editor for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448236 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-05 01:12 EST ------- In case where the vendor is not already set, then yes, adding "fedora" is probably the thing to do (or add "xfce" instead? I'll leave it to your discretion). And yes, the "Extras" thing can be done without. As it turns out, there are a couple of other problems, all easily fixable. Need to ask a small favour -- could you review a couple of my requests in turn? Much obliged: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?query_format=&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=Fedora&version=&component=Package+Review&query_format=advanced&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=NEEDINFO&bug_status=MODIFIED&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&fixed_in_type=allwordssubstr&fixed_in=&qa_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&qa_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&emailreporter1=1&emailtype1=exact&email1=michel.sylvan%40gmail.com&emailtype2=exact&email2=&votes=&changedin=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&type0-0-0=notsubstring&value0-0-0=fedora-review MUSTFIX: ? own all directories: FAIL installs files in %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor: need to require hicolor-icon-theme SHOULDFIX: ? scriplets are sane: add vendor (fedora or xfce) MUST, passed: ? rpmlint: clean ? package name: ok ? spec file name: ok ? package guideline-compliant: ok ? license complies with guidelines: ok ? license field accurate: ok ? license file not deleted: ok ? spec in US English: ok ? spec legible: ok ? source matches upstream: ok ? builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded: ok ? build dependencies complete: ok ? locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale: ok ? no dupes in %files: ok ? permission: ok ? %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT: ok ? macros used consistently: ok ? Package contains code: ok ? desktop file uses desktop-file-install: ok ? clean buildroot before install: ok ? filenames UTF-8: ok SHOULD ? desc and summary contain translations if available: ok ? package build in mock on all architectures: ok http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=647081 ? package functioned as described: ok ? require package not files: ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 07:52:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 03:52:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449784] Review Request: rpmreaper - A tool for removing packages from system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806050752.m557qdn5012490@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmreaper - A tool for removing packages from system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449784 mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 09:10:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 05:10:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449393] Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806050910.m559An4L030446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449393 ------- Additional Comments From pbrobinson at gmail.com 2008-06-05 05:10 EST ------- New srpm and spec now both uploaded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 09:12:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 05:12:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806050912.m559CZ8h030726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 ------- Additional Comments From avl at l14.ru 2008-06-05 05:12 EST ------- >You shoud raise fedora-cvs flag to "?" Flag Modification Denied You tried to request fedora-cvs. Only an authorized user can make this change. Logged In avl at l14.ru | My Front Page | Log Out -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 09:17:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 05:17:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806050917.m559HVF0031984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 ------- Additional Comments From avl at l14.ru 2008-06-05 05:17 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tktray Short Description: System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 Owners: avl,lemenkov Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: lemenkov Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 09:20:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 05:20:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806050920.m559KY0L000600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 ------- Additional Comments From avl at l14.ru 2008-06-05 05:20 EST ------- To accomplish the tasks described here, you need to be a member of the fedorabugs group. ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 09:44:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 05:44:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806050944.m559if2B012148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-06-05 05:44 EST ------- Weird. Is it your first package submitted to Fedora? Are you already sponsored? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 09:47:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 05:47:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449317] Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806050947.m559lYGv006746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449317 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 09:46:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 05:46:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448236] Review Request: xfbib - Lightweight BibTeX editor for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806050946.m559kVuo012871@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfbib - Lightweight BibTeX editor for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448236 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-06-05 05:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > could you review a couple of my requests in turn? Of course, I will see what I can do. > MUSTFIX: > ? own all directories: FAIL > installs files in %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor: need to require hicolor-icon-theme Really? We already have an dependency on hicolor-icon-theme, although we don't require it explicitly: $ rpm -q --requires xfbib | grep gtk libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 $ rpm -q --whatprovides libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 gtk2-2.12.9-5.fc9.i386 $ rpm -q --requires gtk2 | grep hicolor hicolor-icon-theme I used to think that this kind of dependency chain is enough. > SHOULDFIX: > ? scriplets are sane: add vendor (fedora or xfce) Will do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 10:01:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 06:01:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051001.m55A1tRB010032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 ------- Additional Comments From avl at l14.ru 2008-06-05 06:01 EST ------- >Is it your first package submitted to Fedora? Yes. This is my first package. >Are you already sponsored? o0 What do you mean? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 10:11:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 06:11:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051011.m55ABtkH011966@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-06-05 06:11 EST ------- Ehhh... Right now you stopped at this point http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Create_Your_Review_Request (Read from the exclamation mark and below) Sadly, I can't sponsor you, so we need to wait until someone sponsors you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 10:20:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 06:20:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446976] Review Request: tkabber - Tkabber is a Free and Open Source client for the Jabber instant messaging system. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051020.m55AKTcx013574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tkabber - Tkabber is a Free and Open Source client for the Jabber instant messaging system. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446976 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 10:30:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 06:30:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051030.m55AUXDI021092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-05 06:30 EST ------- I'll try to look at the lastest srpm as one of sponsor members later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 10:39:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 06:39:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051039.m55AdPw4016275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 ------- Additional Comments From avl at l14.ru 2008-06-05 06:39 EST ------- ok. Thank You. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 11:18:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 07:18:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051118.m55BIG5r023217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 11:48:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 07:48:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449994] Review Request: lua-expat - SAX XML parser based on the Expat library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051148.m55BmDNU028221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-expat - SAX XML parser based on the Expat library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449994 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-06-05 07:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Looks pretty good; only a few of things worth mentioning. > > There seems to be at least a small test suite in the tests directory; is it > possible to run it at build time? Yes, for this one it is possible. Added %check macro. > There's no need for the explicit build dependency on /usr/bin/iconv; it's part > of glibc so you can expect it to be there, although it doesn't hurt anything. I keep this one as it seems to be the right thing to me. > You should use either $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS or %{buildroot} and > %{optflags}; currently they're mixed. It's not a really big deal in a package > this small but it is explicitly prohibited by the guidelines. Fixed. New SRPM at http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/luastuff/lua-expat-1.1-2.fc9.src.rpm, spec file at the original URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 12:06:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 08:06:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051206.m55C6KFP006075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-05 08:06 EST ------- ! Note: - Please change the version number every time you modify your spec to avoid confusion. Well, for 1.1-1: * First of all, this does not build. - On i386 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=647411 build.log shows that libXext-devel is missing from BuildRequires (also libX11-devel can be added to BuildRequires explicitly) - On x86_64 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=647385 build.log shows tclConfig.sh cannot be found (also tkConfig.sh is not found). Actually on x86_64 t{k,tl}Config.sh are under /usr/lib64, but configure does not try to search into the directory. Adding "--with-tcl=%{_libdir} --with-tk=%{__libdir}" to configure option is needed. * optflags http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#CompilerFlags - Fedora specific compilation flags are not correctly honored. Due to this issue, the current debuginfo rpm is useless. * This can be fixed by using %configure macro as ------------------------------------------------------------- %build %configure \ --libdir=%{tcl_sitearch} \ --with-tcl=%{_libdir} \ --with-tk=%{_libdir} make %{?_smp_mflags} ------------------------------------------------------------- Check what %configure actually does by `rpm --eval %configure` . * License - This is MIT, not BSD. * Timestamps - To keep timestamps on the installed files as much as possible, consider to use: ------------------------------------------------------------- make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" install ------------------------------------------------------------- This method usually works for recent autotool-based Makefiles. - Also, please keep the timestamp on the source tarball in srpm, too. Please re-download the source tarball by ------------------------------------------------------------- $ wget -N http://www.sw4me.com/tktray1.1.tar.gz ------------------------------------------------------------- for example. Actually the "correct" timestamps for tktray1.1.tar.gz is "2006-01-07 03:08 UTC", where the tarball in srpm shows "2008-05-16 18:11 UTC". * ABI virtual dependency http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Tcl - For directory ownership issue (and so on), the following virtual dependency must be added ------------------------------------------------------------- Requires: tcl(abi) = 8.5 ------------------------------------------------------------- * defattr - We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) * Documents - Please consider to add "ChangeLog" to %doc (with permission fixed) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 12:13:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 08:13:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051213.m55CDfYK001155@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-05 08:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > ! Note: > - Please change the version number every time you modify your > spec to avoid confusion. Should be read as "Please change the *release* number", sorry... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 12:20:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 08:20:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051220.m55CKc5t002855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-05 08:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > Actually on x86_64 t{k,tl}Config.sh are under /usr/lib64, but ... Actually on x86_64 t{k,cl}config.sh are .... > configure does not try to search into the directory. > Adding "--with-tcl=%{_libdir} --with-tk=%{__libdir}" to ... Adding "--with-tcl=%{_libdir} --with-tk=%{_libdir}" ... Sorry again... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 12:29:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 08:29:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444760] Review Request: obm - Open Business Management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051229.m55CTcNr010241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obm - Open Business Management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444760 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2008-06-05 08:29 EST ------- well, http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/obm/obm.spec http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/obm/obm-2.1.9-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 12:40:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 08:40:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051240.m55Cem8t012574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 ------- Additional Comments From avl at l14.ru 2008-06-05 08:40 EST ------- fixed ftp://ftp.l14.ru/pub/repo/FC/9/SPECS/tktray.spec ftp://ftp.l14.ru/pub/repo/FC/9/SRPMS/tktray-1.1-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 12:55:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 08:55:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051255.m55CtRbd009134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-05 08:55 EST ------- Oh. one more thing: * optflags again From http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=647741&name=build.log ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 225 gcc -pipe -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"tktray\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"tktray\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"1.1\" -DPACKAGE_STRING= \"tktray\ 1.1\" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_LIMITS_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_PARAM_H=1 -DUSE_THREAD_ALLOC=1 -D_REENTRANT=1 -D_THREAD_SAFE=1 -DTCL_THREADS=1 -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE=1 -DTCL_WIDE_INT_TYPE=long\ long -DHAVE_STRUCT_STAT64=1 -DHAVE_TYPE_OFF64_T=1 -DUSE_TCL_STUBS=1 -DUSE_TK_STUBS=1 -I"/usr/include" -I"/usr/include/tk-private/generic" -I"/usr/include/tk-private/unix" -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -Wno-implicit-int -fPIC -c `echo tktray.c` -o tktray.o ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Compiler option "-fomit-frame-pointer" is forbidden on Fedora because this makes debugging very difficult - Also I guess "-Wno-implicit-int" should be removed (I think this is somewhat dangerous) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 13:17:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:17:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450110] New: Review Request: perl-XML-Atom-SimpleFeed - No-fuss generation of Atom syndication feeds Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450110 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Atom-SimpleFeed - No-fuss generation of Atom syndication feeds Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-XML-Atom- SimpleFeed.spec OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-XML-Atom-SimpleFeed.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/mock-results/perl-XML-Atom-SimpleFeed-0.8-1.el5.noarch/perl-XML-Atom-SimpleFeed-0.8-1.el5.src.rpm mock: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/mock-results/perl-XML-Atom-SimpleFeed-0.8-1.el5.noarch/ Description: This module provides a minimal API for generating Atom syndication feeds quickly and easily. It supports all aspects of the Atom format, but it has no provisions for generating feeds with extension elements. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 13:19:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:19:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051319.m55DJka5013918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 ------- Additional Comments From avl at l14.ru 2008-06-05 09:19 EST ------- fixed ftp://ftp.l14.ru/pub/repo/FC/9/SPECS/tktray.spec ftp://ftp.l14.ru/pub/repo/FC/9/SRPMS/tktray-1.1-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 13:35:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:35:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434727] Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051335.m55DZphJ024072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434727 ------- Additional Comments From carl at five-ten-sg.com 2008-06-05 09:35 EST ------- Sorry, I got way to busy this week. This is on my list for this weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 13:35:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:35:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051335.m55DZv0k017509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 ------- Additional Comments From avl at l14.ru 2008-06-05 09:35 EST ------- sorry I think, this is bad idea to hardcode options to CFLAGS_DEFAULT. fixed. ftp://ftp.l14.ru/pub/repo/FC/9/SPECS/tktray.spec ftp://ftp.l14.ru/pub/repo/FC/9/SRPMS/tktray-1.1-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 13:37:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:37:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051337.m55Db8Cb017663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-05 09:37 EST ------- Okay. --------------------------------------------------------------- This package (tktray) is APPROVED by me --------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor. At the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 13:44:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:44:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449906] Review Request: perl-Test-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051344.m55Difrn025659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449906 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-06-05 09:44 EST ------- perl-Test-Harness is part of the main perl-package. Under current Fedora policies it is not permitted to replace a package from the main perl package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 13:47:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:47:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051347.m55DlNK1019737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 ------- Additional Comments From avl at l14.ru 2008-06-05 09:47 EST ------- >Please follow the procedure written on: >http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join >from "Get a Fedora Account". I'm already have fedora account "avl". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 14:02:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 10:02:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444257] Review Request: nted - Musical score editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051402.m55E28R4022859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nted - Musical score editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444257 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rhbugs at n- | |dimensional.de) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 14:01:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 10:01:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439337] Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051401.m55E1jig022784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439337 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-05 10:01 EST ------- Thanks, %{pyver} must have been a leftover from the default spec. Will double-check when committing New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-sphinx Short Description: Python documentation generator Owners: salimma Branches: EL-5 F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 14:27:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 10:27:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442329] Review Request: gnome-lirc-properties - Infrared Remote Controls setup tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051427.m55ER9Mm028118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-lirc-properties - Infrared Remote Controls setup tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442329 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2008-06-05 10:27 EST ------- We also need the patch from http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=536811 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 14:46:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 10:46:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051446.m55EkXUE007172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-05 10:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > I'm already have fedora account "avl". It is not enough. Please follow "Join" wiki again. At least you must request for cvsextras membership. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 15:18:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 11:18:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450110] Review Request: perl-XML-Atom-SimpleFeed - No-fuss generation of Atom syndication feeds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051518.m55FIKbu013295@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Atom-SimpleFeed - No-fuss generation of Atom syndication feeds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450110 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 15:21:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 11:21:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442507] Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051521.m55FLm5A007929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507 ------- Additional Comments From jroth at linux.vnet.ibm.com 2008-06-05 11:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > It seems strange that elfspe is built only for ppc (%ifarch ppc) and that > adabinding-devel is built only for ppc64 (%ifarch ppc64). I think they should be > built regardless of target architecture. Could you compare your libspe2.spec > with SF.net subversion? I'll investigate that together with Dirk. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 15:43:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 11:43:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450148] New: Review Request: jedit - short java editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450148 Summary: Review Request: jedit - short java editor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: luca at foppiano.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://lfoppiano.fedorapeople.org/jedit.spec SRPM URL: http://projects.byte-code.com/pub/bytecode/fedora9/SRPMS/jedit-4.3pre14-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Hi all, this is the proposal for mantain jedit. Jedit is a simple java editor which support some languages like python, groovy, c, java, and so on. I have a lot of packages I want to submit. This is my first packaging review and I need a sponsor. Luca -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 16:01:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 12:01:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051601.m55G1o4I026345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 ------- Additional Comments From avl at l14.ru 2008-06-05 12:01 EST ------- https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/members/cvsextras avl None 2008-06-05 19:59:45 MSD None unapproved user ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 16:08:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 12:08:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446976] Review Request: tkabber - Tkabber is a Free and Open Source client for the Jabber instant messaging system. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051608.m55G8eKl027610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tkabber - Tkabber is a Free and Open Source client for the Jabber instant messaging system. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446976 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|177841 | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-05 12:08 EST ------- Removing NEEDSPONSOR. I am sponsoring Alexey. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 16:17:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 12:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439337] Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051617.m55GHnej029217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439337 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-05 12:17 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 16:19:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 12:19:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449328] Review Request: cluttermm - C++ wrapper for clutter library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051619.m55GJTHh018896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cluttermm - C++ wrapper for clutter library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449328 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-05 12:19 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 16:26:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 12:26:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051626.m55GQ1uG020656@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 avl at l14.ru changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From avl at l14.ru 2008-06-05 12:26 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tktray Short Description: System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 Owners: avl Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: lemenkov Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 16:39:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 12:39:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051639.m55GdFsH022877@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 ------- Additional Comments From ken+5a4 at bonsai.com 2008-06-05 12:39 EST ------- This is my first package; I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 16:39:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 12:39:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442507] Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051639.m55GdFfp022857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507 ------- Additional Comments From asayama at sm.sony.co.jp 2008-06-05 12:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > I'll investigate that together with Dirk. Thanks. I talked with Gerhard about this before. He said: elfspe: There is no benefit seen in having a 64 bit elfspe binary. But I think that Fedora has ppc64 repository, so we should have 64 bit elfspe. libspe-adabinding: Because ppu-gnat creates 64bit binaries. It seems to be an IBM Cell SDK specific reason. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 16:34:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 12:34:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] New: Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 Summary: Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ken+5a4 at bonsai.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dist.bonsai.com/ken/ace_tao_rpm/SRC/5.6.5-5/ace-tao.spec SRPM URL: http://dist.bonsai.com/ken/ace_tao_rpm/SRC/5.6.5-5/ace-tao-5.6.5-5.fc9.src.rpm Description: The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) is a freely available, open-source object-oriented (OO) framework that implements many core patterns for concurrent communication software. ACE provides a rich set of reusable C++ wrapper facades and framework components that perform common communication software tasks across a range of OS platforms. The communication software tasks provided by ACE include event demultiplexing and event handler dispatching, signal handling, service initialization, interprocess communication, shared memory management, message routing, dynamic (re)configuration of distributed services, concurrent execution and synchronization. TAO is a real-time implementation of CORBA built using the framework components and patterns provided by ACE. TAO contains the network interface, OS, communication protocol, and CORBA middleware components and features. TAO is based on the standard OMG CORBA reference model, with the enhancements designed to overcome the shortcomings of conventional ORBs for high-performance and real-time applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 16:07:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 12:07:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051607.m55G7aPG017232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-05 12:07 EST ------- Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 16:41:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 12:41:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051641.m55GfDWe023634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 ken+5a4 at bonsai.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 16:47:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 12:47:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442507] Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051647.m55GlXBU002374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507 ------- Additional Comments From asayama at sm.sony.co.jp 2008-06-05 12:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) No static library is included in the devel package. Gerhard said that it is because of IBM's internal users' request, not because of technical reason. I suggest including the static library in the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 16:48:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 12:48:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449994] Review Request: lua-expat - SAX XML parser based on the Expat library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051648.m55Gm2a4002449@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-expat - SAX XML parser based on the Expat library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449994 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-05 12:48 EST ------- This version elicits an additional rpmlint complaint: lua-expat.src:60: W: macro-in-%changelog check You should double percent signs in your %changelog; the result isn't what you expect because macros are expanded there: - Added %check unset DISPLAY macro to execute tests Otherwise everything looks fine. I have to wonder as to your definition as "the right thing", though; if you're going to have a build dependency on /usr/bin/iconv, why don't you also have dependencies on, say, gcc or /usr/bin/make? But in the end it's your decision. APPROVED; just escape that macro in the changeloog when you check in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 16:54:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 12:54:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286851] Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051654.m55Gs6Zh003416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286851 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-05 12:54 EST ------- This package has already been approved; you can make your CVS request whenever you like. But I did build the -3 package and unfortunately it failed its tests: Differences in test048: 1a2,5 > Test 1 (Sets) success > Test 2 (Hash Sets) success > > All tests pass so you'll have to deal with that before you can build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 17:37:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 13:37:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432808] Review Request: figtoipe - FIG to IPE conversion tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051737.m55HbnPD001060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: figtoipe - FIG to IPE conversion tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432808 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-06-05 13:37 EST ------- I'm closing since a rawhide build has been done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 17:44:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 13:44:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449393] Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051744.m55HiI1T002162@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449393 ------- Additional Comments From chris at tylers.info 2008-06-05 13:44 EST ------- rpmlint -v prism.spec: prism.spec:46: W: unversioned-explicit-provides webrunner Mock build with F9 profile is successful (on x86_64). The generated package doesn't run: $ prism /usr/bin/prism: line 181: /usr/lib64/prism-0.9/run-mozilla.sh: No such file or directory /usr/bin/prism: line 181: exec: /usr/lib64/prism-0.9/run-mozilla.sh: cannot execute: No such file or directory run-mozilla.sh is not included in the package: $ rpm -ql prism | grep -c run-mozilla.sh 0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 17:53:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 13:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442507] Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051753.m55HrjRV003837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2008-06-05 13:53 EST ------- Well, static libraries are not really wished in Fedora anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 17:55:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 13:55:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443850] Review Request: pywebkitgtk - Python Bindings for WebKit-gtk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051755.m55HttIF004515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pywebkitgtk - Python Bindings for WebKit-gtk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443850 ivazqueznet at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From ivazqueznet at gmail.com 2008-06-05 13:55 EST ------- Built on F-8, F-9, and Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 17:56:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 13:56:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051756.m55HuFQE014862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 ------- Additional Comments From avl at l14.ru 2008-06-05 13:56 EST ------- CVSROOT=:ext:avl at cvs.fedoraproject.org:/cvs/pkgs/ CVS_RSH=ssh cvs co tktray Permission denied (publickey,keyboard-interactive). cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any) rsa-key was generated as describes in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cryptography#Creating_SSH_Keys public key id_rsa.pub was uploaded to my profile. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/view/avl -------------------------- ssh -2 -vvv avl at cvs.fedoraproject.org sleep 1 OpenSSH_5.0p1, OpenSSL 0.9.8g 19 Oct 2007 debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config debug1: Applying options for * debug2: ssh_connect: needpriv 0 debug1: Connecting to cvs.fedoraproject.org [209.132.176.51] port 22. debug1: Connection established. debug3: Not a RSA1 key file /home/avl/.ssh/id_rsa. debug2: key_type_from_name: unknown key type '-----BEGIN' debug3: key_read: missing keytype debug3: key_read: missing whitespace debug3: key_read: missing whitespace debug3: key_read: missing whitespace debug3: key_read: missing whitespace debug3: key_read: missing whitespace debug3: key_read: missing whitespace debug3: key_read: missing whitespace debug3: key_read: missing whitespace debug3: key_read: missing whitespace debug3: key_read: missing whitespace debug3: key_read: missing whitespace debug3: key_read: missing whitespace debug3: key_read: missing whitespace debug3: key_read: missing whitespace debug3: key_read: missing whitespace debug3: key_read: missing whitespace debug3: key_read: missing whitespace debug3: key_read: missing whitespace debug3: key_read: missing whitespace debug3: key_read: missing whitespace debug3: key_read: missing whitespace debug3: key_read: missing whitespace debug3: key_read: missing whitespace debug3: key_read: missing whitespace debug3: key_read: missing whitespace debug2: key_type_from_name: unknown key type '-----END' debug3: key_read: missing keytype debug1: identity file /home/avl/.ssh/id_rsa type 1 debug1: identity file /home/avl/.ssh/id_dsa type -1 debug1: Remote protocol version 1.99, remote software version OpenSSH_3.9p1 debug1: match: OpenSSH_3.9p1 pat OpenSSH_3.* debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_5.0 debug2: fd 3 setting O_NONBLOCK debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256,diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1,diffie-hellman-group14-sha1,diffie-hellman-group1-sha1 debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: ssh-rsa,ssh-dss debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour128,arcfour256,arcfour,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,rijndael-cbc at lysator.liu.se,aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes256-ctr debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour128,arcfour256,arcfour,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,rijndael-cbc at lysator.liu.se,aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes256-ctr debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: hmac-md5,hmac-sha1,umac-64 at openssh.com,hmac-ripemd160,hmac-ripemd160 at openssh.com,hmac-sha1-96,hmac-md5-96 debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: hmac-md5,hmac-sha1,umac-64 at openssh.com,hmac-ripemd160,hmac-ripemd160 at openssh.com,hmac-sha1-96,hmac-md5-96 debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: none,zlib at openssh.com,zlib debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: none,zlib at openssh.com,zlib debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: first_kex_follows 0 debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: reserved 0 debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1,diffie-hellman-group14-sha1,diffie-hellman-group1-sha1 debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: ssh-rsa,ssh-dss debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,rijndael-cbc at lysator.liu.se,aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes256-ctr debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,rijndael-cbc at lysator.liu.se,aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes256-ctr debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: hmac-md5,hmac-sha1,hmac-ripemd160,hmac-ripemd160 at openssh.com,hmac-sha1-96,hmac-md5-96 debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: hmac-md5,hmac-sha1,hmac-ripemd160,hmac-ripemd160 at openssh.com,hmac-sha1-96,hmac-md5-96 debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: none,zlib debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: none,zlib debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: first_kex_follows 0 debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: reserved 0 debug2: mac_setup: found hmac-md5 debug1: kex: server->client aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none debug2: mac_setup: found hmac-md5 debug1: kex: client->server aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REQUEST(1024<1024<8192) sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP debug2: dh_gen_key: priv key bits set: 130/256 debug2: bits set: 510/1024 debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY debug3: check_host_in_hostfile: filename /home/avl/.ssh/known_hosts debug3: check_host_in_hostfile: match line 1 debug3: check_host_in_hostfile: filename /home/avl/.ssh/known_hosts debug3: check_host_in_hostfile: match line 1 debug1: Host 'cvs.fedoraproject.org' is known and matches the RSA host key. debug1: Found key in /home/avl/.ssh/known_hosts:1 debug2: bits set: 518/1024 debug1: ssh_rsa_verify: signature correct debug2: kex_derive_keys debug2: set_newkeys: mode 1 debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS debug2: set_newkeys: mode 0 debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent debug2: service_accept: ssh-userauth debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received debug2: key: /home/avl/.ssh/id_rsa (0xb8d3cc20) debug2: key: (0xb8d3f760) debug2: key: /home/avl/.ssh/id_dsa ((nil)) debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,keyboard-interactive debug3: start over, passed a different list publickey,keyboard-interactive debug3: preferred gssapi-with-mic,publickey,keyboard-interactive,password debug3: authmethod_lookup publickey debug3: remaining preferred: keyboard-interactive,password debug3: authmethod_is_enabled publickey debug1: Next authentication method: publickey debug1: Offering public key: /home/avl/.ssh/id_rsa debug3: send_pubkey_test debug2: we sent a publickey packet, wait for reply debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,keyboard-interactive debug1: Offering public key: debug3: send_pubkey_test debug2: we sent a publickey packet, wait for reply debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,keyboard-interactive debug1: Trying private key: /home/avl/.ssh/id_dsa debug3: no such identity: /home/avl/.ssh/id_dsa debug2: we did not send a packet, disable method debug3: authmethod_lookup keyboard-interactive debug3: remaining preferred: password debug3: authmethod_is_enabled keyboard-interactive debug1: Next authentication method: keyboard-interactive debug2: userauth_kbdint debug2: we sent a keyboard-interactive packet, wait for reply debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,keyboard-interactive debug3: userauth_kbdint: disable: no info_req_seen debug2: we did not send a packet, disable method debug1: No more authentication methods to try. Permission denied (publickey,keyboard-interactive). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 18:05:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 14:05:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051805.m55I5H4T006898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 ------- Additional Comments From avl at l14.ru 2008-06-05 14:05 EST ------- solved. next problem. fedora-cvs tktray Checking out tktray from fedora cvs: Error: cvs server: cannot find module `tktray' - ignored cvs [checkout aborted]: cannot expand modules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 18:10:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 14:10:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051810.m55IARMY017914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-05 14:10 EST ------- Please wait until cvsadmins changes fedora-cvs flag to plus. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 18:14:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 14:14:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449906] Review Request: perl-Test-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051814.m55IEIQh018315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449906 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-05 14:14 EST ------- Ralf: Are you sure? [lkundrak at localhost ~]$ rpm -ql perl |grep Harness [lkundrak at localhost ~]$ rpm -ql perl |grep TAP [lkundrak at localhost ~]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 18:33:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 14:33:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449906] Review Request: perl-Test-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051833.m55IXDnQ011262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449906 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-06-05 14:33 EST ------- $ rpm -qf /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Test/Harness.pm perl-Test-Harness-2.56-39.fc8.x86_64 $ rpm -q --qf="%{SOURCERPM}\n" perl-Test-Harness perl-5.8.8-39.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 18:38:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 14:38:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449906] Review Request: perl-Test-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051838.m55Ic8lE012165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449906 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-05 14:38 EST ------- Thanks, Ville this sounds fair -- Closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 18:50:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 14:50:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442507] Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051850.m55IoGVX025146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507 ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at gmail.com 2008-06-05 14:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > Well, static libraries are not really wished in Fedora anyway. Correct. They require exceptions from FESCo, unless the package _only_ provides a static library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 18:58:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 14:58:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051858.m55IwlPH016095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 ------- Additional Comments From avl at l14.ru 2008-06-05 14:58 EST ------- ??, thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 18:58:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 14:58:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286851] Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051858.m55Iw4FF015992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286851 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2008-06-05 14:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kaya Short Description: A Statically typed, imperative programming-language Owners:s4504kr Branches: F-9 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 19:07:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 15:07:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442507] Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051907.m55J7bFW029396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507 ------- Additional Comments From stenzel at de.ibm.com 2008-06-05 15:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > (In reply to comment #18) > > I'll investigate that together with Dirk. Thanks. > > I talked with Gerhard about this before. He said: > > elfspe: There is no benefit seen in having a 64 bit elfspe binary. But I think > that Fedora has ppc64 repository, so we should have 64 bit elfspe. As long there is the understanding that only one elfspe binary, either 32bit or 64bit, can be installed, I don't think there is a real issue. > libspe-adabinding: Because ppu-gnat creates 64bit binaries. It seems to be an > IBM Cell SDK specific reason. My understanding is, that the ADA compiler can produce either 32bit or 64bit binaries depending on how the ADA compiler itself was built. >From that perspective, choosing the 64bit seems the better choice. But I don't have neither a strong opinion nor a strong background in this area. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 19:13:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 15:13:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447285] Review Request: libx86 - library for making real-mode x86 calls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051913.m55JD8EM019325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libx86 - library for making real-mode x86 calls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447285 ajax at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From ajax at redhat.com 2008-06-05 15:13 EST ------- Built in rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 19:11:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 15:11:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 421241] Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051911.m55JBckZ030225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421241 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2008-06-05 15:11 EST ------- Hi Jess, I will ask on fedora-devel how to handle absent or unavailable package requirements when providing the requiring package makes sense. Could be that it is not possible to provide the affected extensions at all because I (as the would-be package maintainer) cannot provide support (verifying/fixing bugs etc.) for them without non-Fedoran packages. Your getTmpDir() solution looks perfectly suitable to solve all issues identified so far, thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 19:15:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 15:15:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448236] Review Request: xfbib - Lightweight BibTeX editor for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051915.m55JF6NT019902@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfbib - Lightweight BibTeX editor for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448236 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-05 15:15 EST ------- Ah yes. Good point -- hicolor-icon-theme is in the dependency chain, so I'll approve this review and you can add the vendor when uploading. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 19:24:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 15:24:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450189] New: Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450189 Summary: Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lokthare at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/guake.spec SRPM URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/guake-0.2.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Guake is a drop-down terminal for Gnome Desktop Environment, so you just need to press a key to invoke him, and press again to hide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 19:27:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 15:27:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450189] Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051927.m55JRiAH000852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450189 lokthare at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dpierce at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From lokthare at gmail.com 2008-06-05 15:27 EST ------- *** Bug 444788 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 19:27:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 15:27:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444788] Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051927.m55JRhNI000804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444788 lokthare at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From lokthare at gmail.com 2008-06-05 15:27 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 450189 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 19:40:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 15:40:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450189] Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051940.m55JeLKn024784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450189 ------- Additional Comments From nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com 2008-06-05 15:40 EST ------- Informal comments : It seems that you need to build a -devel package and use %config for guake.schemas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 19:50:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 15:50:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806051950.m55Johek005100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2008-06-05 15:50 EST ------- Great to see this getting some traction :-) Did you package everything or is this merely the core ACE+TAO part? Thanks a lot for doing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 20:08:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 16:08:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806052008.m55K8xL4030293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 ------- Additional Comments From ken+5a4 at bonsai.com 2008-06-05 16:08 EST ------- Here is the subpackage list: ace ace-devel ace-flreactor ace-flreactor-devel ace-kokyu ace-kokyu-devel ace-qtreactor ace-qtreactor-devel ace-tao-debuginfo ace-tkreactor ace-tkreactor-devel ace-xml ace-xml-devel ace-xtreactor ace-xtreactor-devel tao tao-cosconcurrency tao-cosevent tao-cosnaming tao-cosnotification tao-costrading tao-devel tao-flresource tao-flresource-devel tao-qtresource tao-qtresource-devel tao-rtevent tao-tkresource tao-tkresource-devel tao-xtresource tao-xtresource-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 20:34:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 16:34:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806052034.m55KYLNa013533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.sylvan at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 20:40:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 16:40:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806052040.m55Kesj7014759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-06-05 16:40 EST ------- Neal, could you please consider branching this package for EPEL? I've tweaked a bit the spec available in rawhide and it builds and runs without any problems in Centos-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 20:43:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 16:43:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806052043.m55KhsON004016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-06-05 16:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=308486) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=308486&action=view) add a conditional BR, allowing build in EPEL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 20:51:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 16:51:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806052051.m55KpXK7016532@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-05 16:51 EST ------- Requires: on python unnecessary (automatically picked up by RPM, in a stricter form: python(abi) = 2.5 Missing Requires: on pygame (used in image.py and play.py, listed on website) The debug lines are harmless. debuginfo packages are only automatically generated for C/C++ applications. In %changelog, you mean to say using desktop-file-install to install desktop file, not to install an icon, right? Looks like your other questions have been answered on fedora-devel, but do ask if you have any other question. Awaiting updated SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 21:05:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 17:05:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224365] Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806052105.m55L5iuS019068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224365 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 22:28:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 18:28:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450148] Review Request: jedit - short java editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806052228.m55MSA2D032081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jedit - short java editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450148 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-06-05 18:28 EST ------- For a start, your spec has two errors. The smaller one is the URL used as %source. You should not use a specific sourceforge mirror, but the more general http://downloads.sourceforge.net/. In your case, the correct URL would be http://downloads.sourceforge.net/jedit/jedit4.3pre14source.tar.bz2. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Referencing_Source for details. The major error is that you are trying to package the prebuilt binary (jar) file, instead of building the program from source. This is not acceptable in Fedora. You might wish to take a look at and/or adapt the work done by the jpackage guys ( http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/jpackage/1.6/generic/free/SRPMS/jedit-4.2-3jpp.src.rpm ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 22:52:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 18:52:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257701] Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806052252.m55MqicM024982@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257701 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-05 18:52 EST ------- Looks good to me now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 22:59:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 18:59:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248432] new package request: sphinxbase [spec attached] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806052259.m55Mxsst004505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: new package request: sphinxbase [spec attached] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248432 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-05 18:59 EST ------- So, is there actually a package to review here? Marius, if you want to submit a package (and maintain it in Fedora), please supply links to a specfile and src.rpm. If someone else wants to submit this package, please go ahead and open a ticket of your own. If nobody has an actual package that's ready to be reviewed, then this ticket should be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 23:08:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 19:08:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450223] New: Review Request: mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki - An extension to provide an interwiki management system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450223 Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki - An extension to provide an interwiki management system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dev at nigelj.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki-0-0.1.20080606svn.fc9.src.rpm Description: Interwiki management extension allowing the viewing and management of InterWiki links for Mediawiki preventing the need for direct database access. Forgot to include comment on the tar.gz file, Just a case of grabbing the 1.10 version files from http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Special_page_to_work_with_the_interwiki_table#Download and targz'ing them. Can't use SVN HEAD due to the version (grr). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 23:23:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 19:23:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450223] Review Request: mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki - An extension to provide an interwiki management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806052323.m55NN4E0030303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki - An extension to provide an interwiki management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450223 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 23:33:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 19:33:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806052333.m55NXQxT031830@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ndbecker2 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2008-06-05 19:33 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: [New Branches: EL-5] [Updated Fedora Owners: ] [Updated Fedora CC: ] [Updated EPEL Owners: ] [Updated EPEL CC: ] [Updated Description: ] [Updated Cvsextras Commits: ] [add any required explanatory text here] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 23:45:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 19:45:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450189] Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806052345.m55Njoge012216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450189 ------- Additional Comments From lokthare at gmail.com 2008-06-05 19:45 EST ------- Spec URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/guake.spec SRPM URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/guake-0.2.2-2.fc9.src.rpm - Fix gconf schema install - Disable static library Has i undestand in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exclusion_of_Static_Libraries, i should build a devel package for %{_libdir}/guake/globalhotkeys.la, right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 23:55:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 19:55:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450226] Review Request: blueproximity - bluetooth proximity detector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806052355.m55NtnmY013815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blueproximity - bluetooth proximity detector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450226 nunotavares at hotmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 23:52:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 19:52:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450226] New: Review Request: blueproximity - bluetooth proximity detector Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450226 Summary: Review Request: blueproximity - bluetooth proximity detector Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nunotavares at hotmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://sparks.sr.dri.pt/~nmct/rpms/SPECS/blueproximity.spec SRPM URL: http://sparks.sr.dri.pt/~nmct/rpms/SRPMS/blueproximity-1.2.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This software helps you add a little more security to your desktop. It does so by detecting one of your bluetooth devices, most likely your mobile phone, and keeping track of its distance. If you move away from your computer and the distance is above a certain level (no measurement in meters is possible) for a given time, it automatically locks your desktop (or starts any other shell command you want). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 5 23:57:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 19:57:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430429] Review Request: python-storm - An object-relational mapper (ORM) for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806052357.m55Nv1pH003096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-storm - An object-relational mapper (ORM) for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430429 dtimms at iinet.net.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dtimms at iinet.net.au Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 00:11:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 20:11:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450223] Review Request: mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki - An extension to provide an interwiki management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060011.m560BZhW005631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki - An extension to provide an interwiki management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450223 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-06-05 20:11 EST ------- Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki-0-0.2.20080606svn.fc9.src.rpm I've done away with the tarball (how silly) and managed to do everything else, I forgot to cleanup %prep though, I'll do this during import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 00:32:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 20:32:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228255] Review Request: grub2 - The GRand Unified Bootloader 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060032.m560WjXD008497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grub2 - The GRand Unified Bootloader 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228255 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-05 20:32 EST ------- If there's no package to review and the submitter has indicated that they no longer want to submit this, there's no reason to keep this ticket open. If someone later wants to submit a grub2 package for review, please open a fresh ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 00:33:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 20:33:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 376321] Review Request: perl-Net-Packet-Target - An object for all network related stuff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060033.m560XqRm019595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Packet-Target - An object for all network related stuff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=376321 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 00:33:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 20:33:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239156] Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060033.m560Xps8019575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects Alias: DBIx-SQLite-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239156 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 00:33:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 20:33:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239162] Review Request: perl-Net-Packet - A framework to easily send and receive frames from layer 2 to la yer 7 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060033.m560XrYM019632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Packet - A framework to easily send and receive frames from layer 2 to la yer 7 Alias: perl-Net-Packet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239162 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 00:33:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 20:33:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239164] Review Request: perl-Net-SinFP - Full operating system stack fingerprinting suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060033.m560Xovi019559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SinFP - Full operating system stack fingerprinting suite Alias: perl-Net-SinFP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239164 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(sindrepb at fedorapro| |ject.org) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 00:37:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 20:37:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450226] Review Request: blueproximity - bluetooth proximity detector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060037.m560bZJB020419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blueproximity - bluetooth proximity detector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450226 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-05 20:37 EST ------- Why did you close this review request immediately? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 01:58:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 21:58:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450189] Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060158.m561wlJ1022085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450189 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: guake - |Review Request: guake - |Drop-down terminal for GNOME|Drop-down terminal for GNOME -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 01:57:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 21:57:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450223] Review Request: mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki - An extension to provide an interwiki management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060157.m561vtIL001081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki - An extension to provide an interwiki management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450223 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-05 21:57 EST ------- A three-file package; not much to it. All I can say is that %prep can go entirely, and the Source files should be commented with the URLs. (I know you can't provide the URLs directly on the Source: lines due to URL parameters needing to be passed.) Trivial issues; fix them up when you import. * source files match upstream (checked by manually downloading from upstream website) * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * BuildRequires are proper (none; nothing to build) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki = 0-0.2.20080606svn.fc10 = mediawiki < 1.11 * %check is present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 02:06:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 22:06:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435835] Review Request: perl-RPC-XML - Set of classes for core data, message and XML handling In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060206.m5626U0H023800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPC-XML - Set of classes for core data, message and XML handling Alias: perl-RPC-XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435835 ------- Additional Comments From nsboyle at gmail.com 2008-06-05 22:06 EST ------- Sorry for the long delay in getting these issues fixed: New version: Spec URL: http://nboyle.fedorapeople.org/perl-RPC-XML.spec SRPM URL: http://nboyle.fedorapeople.org/perl-RPC-XML-0.59-5.fc8.src.rpm (In reply to comment #6) > There's a test suite included; any reason why it's not being run? Of course, > when you do run it, you'll find out why Chris was telling you about missing > build dependencies, because most of the tests will fail without Test::More and > XML::Parser. Note that pretty much any reviewer will consider it a blocker to > fail to run the test suite without a good reason. Chalk this up to my inexperience with packaging Perl modules. I didn't realize this module had a unit tests with it... I've since added both missing build dependencies. > Also, is there any particular reason why you didn't just use cpanspec to > generate the package? While there's nothing specifically wrong with rolling > your own by hand, it's a good but more difficult to review since it doesn't look > anything like essentially all of the other Perl packages in the distro. Again, inexperience (you've got to start somewhere though, right?). I wasn't even aware of such a tool. I had originally adopted this spec from Dries, although admittedly by this point it's almost a complete rewrite. My thoughts are that at this point, it's best to just leave it as-is and keep this tool in mind for future packagings. If it still makes more sense to redo it using cpanspec, I'll gladly do that. Let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 02:11:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 22:11:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450223] Review Request: mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki - An extension to provide an interwiki management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060211.m562B3RP024624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki - An extension to provide an interwiki management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450223 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora_requires_release_note | |? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 02:10:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 22:10:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450223] Review Request: mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki - An extension to provide an interwiki management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060210.m562AAsN024379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki - An extension to provide an interwiki management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450223 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-06-05 22:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > A three-file package; not much to it. > > All I can say is that %prep can go entirely, and the Source files should be > commented with the URLs. (I know you can't provide the URLs directly on the > Source: lines due to URL parameters needing to be passed.) Trivial issues; fix > them up when you import. > Yeah, I noticed them when I uploaded that revision, just cosmetic :) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki Short Description: An extension to provide an interwiki management system Owners: nigelj Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 02:20:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 22:20:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444264] Review Request: usb_modeswitch - brings umts / 4g cards into operational mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060220.m562KKnF026388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: usb_modeswitch - brings umts / 4g cards into operational mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444264 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 02:23:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 22:23:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444735] Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose trace file library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060223.m562N4QK005634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose trace file library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444735 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 02:38:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 22:38:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450223] Review Request: mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki - An extension to provide an interwiki management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060238.m562cIZg029382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki - An extension to provide an interwiki management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450223 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora_requires_release_note|fedora-cvs? |? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 03:07:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 23:07:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444735] Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose trace file library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060307.m56378ZF014178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose trace file library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444735 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-05 23:07 EST ------- I'll assume the changed name throughout. It's not a big deal, but reading the summary makes me think that this parses output from strace or something. Perhaps you could elaborate on "trace file", maybe adding something like "gene sequencing machine" before it if that's actually appropriate. It looks like 1.11.2 is currently available, although it doesn't seem like anything significant has changed so I see no reason to wait for you to update the package before I look at it. I have to say, "libread" is a rather unfortunate name for a library. Is there any possibility of renaming it to something more unique? It should be pretty easy to do this given the -config binary. * source files match upstream: 3fc0f26aff8e95b7f37f55c4bcf6c462f413a0488a4b8ee1c3a81e3db7f591a4 io_lib-1.11.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summaries are OK. * descriptions are OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: io_lib-1.11.0-0.fc10.x86_64.rpm io_lib = 1.11.0-0.fc10 = libcurl.so.4()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) io_lib-devel-1.11.0-0.fc10.x86_64.rpm io_lib-static = 1.11.0-0.fc10 io_lib-devel = 1.11.0-0.fc10 = /bin/sh io_lib = 1.11.0-0.fc10 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I haven't a clue how to test this. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * no pkgconfig files. * static libraries are present: no dynamic libraries, so static libs are OK in the -devel package. -static provide is present. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 04:06:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 00:06:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449879] Review Request: Zile - Zile Is Lossy Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060406.m5646RcX023045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Zile - Zile Is Lossy Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449879 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841, 447125 | nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-06 00:06 EST ------- A zile package already seems to be in the distribution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 04:23:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 00:23:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448558] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunbw2 - sunbw2 x.org driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060423.m564NUG1014023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunbw2 - sunbw2 x.org driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448558 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-06 00:23 EST ------- Package Name: xorg-x11-drv-sunbw2 Short Description: X driver for sunbw2 Owners: ausil spot jima pjones Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 04:24:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 00:24:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448563] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suncg14 - X driver for suncg14 hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060424.m564OOoQ014111@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suncg14 - X driver for suncg14 hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448563 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-06 00:24 EST ------- Package Name: xorg-x11-drv-suncg14 Short Description: X driver for suncg14 Owners: ausil spot jima pjones Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 04:25:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 00:25:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450054] Review Request: liblinebreak - A Unicode line-breaking library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060425.m564PUwn014649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblinebreak - A Unicode line-breaking library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450054 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-06 00:25 EST ------- I note that the debuginfo package comes out empty; it seems that you can't generate useful debuginfo for static libraries, so you should probably just disable the debuginfo generation. If you're providing static libraries and no dynamic libraries are present, the statics can live in the -devel package but you need to provide -static so that packages can BuildRequire: it. Finally, I have vague unease about this package putting everything in the main package and having that provide the extra symbols. I think libassuan is in pretty much the same situation, with no non-devel files; it just produces a libassuan-devel package, and provides -static, with no main package. (It also has only a static library, and disables the -debuginfo package.) I'm not saying that what you're doing is wrong; it just looks odd to me. If you have an example of another package which does the same thing then let me know so I can look at the review discussion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 04:26:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 00:26:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448565] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunffb - X driver for sunffb hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060426.m564Qdnv025959@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunffb - X driver for sunffb hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448565 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-06 00:26 EST ------- Package Name: xorg-x11-drv-sunffb Short Description: X driver for sunffb Owners: ausil spot jima pjones Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 04:29:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 00:29:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448566] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunleo - X driver for sunleo hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060429.m564T560026099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunleo - X driver for sunleo hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448566 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-06 00:29 EST ------- Package Name: xorg-x11-drv-sunleo Short Description: X driver for sunleo Owners: ausil spot jima pjones Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 04:29:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 00:29:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442507] Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060429.m564TWrb014970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507 ------- Additional Comments From asayama at sm.sony.co.jp 2008-06-06 00:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > (In reply to comment #21) > > Well, static libraries are not really wished in Fedora anyway. > > Correct. They require exceptions from FESCo, unless the package _only_ provides > a static library. Ah, I see. That is mentioned in the packaging guideline. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 04:38:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 00:38:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442507] Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060438.m564cA77027625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507 ------- Additional Comments From asayama at sm.sony.co.jp 2008-06-06 00:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > As long there is the understanding that only one elfspe binary, either 32bit or > 64bit, can be installed, I don't think there is a real issue. It looks like the same situation as other executable packages, such as bash, coreutils, ppc64-utils, etc. The ppc64 repository (development/ppc64/, releases/9/Everything/ppc64/, etc) have only ppc64 packages, so I thought that the ppc64 package should be built for ppc64 targets. Is it unnecessary to care about this case? > My understanding is, that the ADA compiler can produce either 32bit or 64bit > binaries depending on how the ADA compiler itself was built. > From that perspective, choosing the 64bit seems the better choice. But I don't > have neither a strong opinion nor a strong background in this area. Hmm, the Fedora's ppc repository provides only 32bit version of libgnat, and the ppc64 repository provides no libgnat, though the gnat compiler seems to be able to generate both of 32bit and 64bit object files... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 04:55:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 00:55:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449879] Review Request: Zile - Zile Is Lossy Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060455.m564tpGh019100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Zile - Zile Is Lossy Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449879 ------- Additional Comments From rakesh.pandit at gmail.com 2008-06-06 00:55 EST ------- >A zile package already seems to be in the distribution. distribution version is 2.2.19 and this on is 2.2.59 It was packaged long time back and after pinging to maintainer there was no response. See: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-June/msg00023.html and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447125 So, going by Non-responsive Maintainer Policy I have packaged zile and posted bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 05:23:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 01:23:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449667] Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060523.m565N5vc023358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449667 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-06-06 01:23 EST ------- OK, I'm having it build an egg now. New URLs: Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-yenc.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-yenc-0.3-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 05:24:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 01:24:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449667] Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060524.m565OAtH023457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449667 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-06-06 01:24 EST ------- Ugh, Konqueror in kde4 seems a bit fragile. Actual URLs: Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-yenc.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-yenc-0.3-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 05:24:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 01:24:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449667] Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060524.m565Orxd002195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449667 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-06-06 01:24 EST ------- Ugh, this is very frustrating. I'm sorry for so many comments (and incorrect links) but my browser seems pretty broken. Please try and click the correct ones :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 05:37:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 01:37:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439263] Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060537.m565buEk004479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439263 jtulach at netbeans.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jtulach at netbeans.org 2008-06-06 01:37 EST ------- Yes, I have missed that advice. Thanks, but it is not enough, key is uploaded and still: ~/src$ fedora-cvs javahelp2 Checking out javahelp2 from fedora cvs: Error: Permission denied (publickey,keyboard-interactive). cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any) $ ll ~/.ssh/ total 24 -r-------- 1 jarda jarda 1675 2008-05-03 11:46 id_rsa -rw-r--r-- 1 jarda jarda 409 2008-05-03 11:46 id_rsa.pub -rw-r--r-- 1 jarda jarda 246 2008-05-03 10:30 known_hosts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 05:48:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 01:48:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449879] Review Request: Zile - Zile Is Lossy Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060548.m565mi3S027328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Zile - Zile Is Lossy Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449879 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 05:46:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 01:46:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449879] Review Request: Zile - Zile Is Lossy Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060546.m565kZEn005917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Zile - Zile Is Lossy Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449879 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |447125 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 06:14:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 02:14:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450243] New: Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 Summary: Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.sylvan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/web/google-gadgets.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/web/google-gadgets-0.9.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Google Gadgets for Linux provides a platform for running desktop gadgets under Linux, catering to the unique needs of Linux users. It is compatible with the gadgets written for Google Desktop for Windows as well as the Universal Gadgets on iGoogle. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 06:36:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 02:36:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449328] Review Request: cluttermm - C++ wrapper for clutter library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060636.m566aEi8002554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cluttermm - C++ wrapper for clutter library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449328 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2008-06-06 02:36 EST ------- Brian, thanks for the quick review again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 07:37:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 03:37:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449994] Review Request: lua-expat - SAX XML parser based on the Expat library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060737.m567bMYx012680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-expat - SAX XML parser based on the Expat library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449994 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-06-06 03:37 EST ------- I'm going to fix the changelog entry. Ok, I see the point and will remove the iconv BR as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 07:41:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 03:41:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449994] Review Request: lua-expat - SAX XML parser based on the Expat library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060741.m567ftbC013538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-expat - SAX XML parser based on the Expat library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449994 tim at niemueller.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-06-06 03:41 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lua-expat Short Description: SAX XML parser based on the Expat library Owners: timn Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 08:04:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 04:04:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444264] Review Request: usb_modeswitch - brings umts / 4g cards into operational mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060804.m5684uZZ030598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: usb_modeswitch - brings umts / 4g cards into operational mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444264 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-06-06 04:04 EST ------- Version and Release are wrong: Version should be 0.9.4 and then Release will become 0.1.beta2%{?dist} A new release of the same package will become 0.2.beta2%{?dist} and when 0.9.4 becomes stable you switch to 1%{?dist}. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages Description needs line breaks after 79 characters. You can remove "Requires: libusb", rpm will pick this up automagically: $ rpm -qp --requires usb_modeswitch-0.9.4beta2-1.fc9.i386.rpm libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libusb <--this is from the Requires: libusb-0.1.so.4 <--from rpm rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) Don't use compile.sh because it doesn't honor compiler flags, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags Use gcc $RPM_OPT_FLAGS -l usb -o usb_modeswitch usb_modeswitch.c instead. rpmbuild will take care of and stripping the binaries, so this should not be done in compile.sh ether. The rest looks good to me. Please fix the errors I mentioned above in a new 0.2.beta2 package and then I'll do the final review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 08:13:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 04:13:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448236] Review Request: xfbib - Lightweight BibTeX editor for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060813.m568DD1a023058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfbib - Lightweight BibTeX editor for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448236 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-06-06 04:13 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xfbib Short Description: Lightweight BibTeX editor for the Xfce desktop environment Owners: cwickert Branches: F-8 F-9 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 08:13:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 04:13:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448236] Review Request: xfbib - Lightweight BibTeX editor for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060813.m568DSLM032407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfbib - Lightweight BibTeX editor for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448236 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 09:50:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 05:50:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442507] Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806060950.m569oMYQ019356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507 ------- Additional Comments From jroth at linux.vnet.ibm.com 2008-06-06 05:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > It looks like the same situation as other executable packages, such as bash, > coreutils, ppc64-utils, etc. The ppc64 repository (development/ppc64/, > releases/9/Everything/ppc64/, etc) have only ppc64 packages, so I thought that > the ppc64 package should be built for ppc64 targets. Is it unnecessary to care > about this case? Yes, I think so because elfspe is just a wrapper which calls starts SPU binaries. And SPU binaries are executed in 32bit mode only. There can be only one elfspe binaries which is either ppc or ppc64. And as mentioned above ppc would make more sense. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 10:39:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 06:39:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442507] Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061039.m56AdWJb027357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507 ------- Additional Comments From asayama at sm.sony.co.jp 2008-06-06 06:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > (In reply to comment #25) > > It looks like the same situation as other executable packages, such as bash, > > coreutils, ppc64-utils, etc. The ppc64 repository (development/ppc64/, > > releases/9/Everything/ppc64/, etc) have only ppc64 packages, so I thought that > > the ppc64 package should be built for ppc64 targets. Is it unnecessary to care > > about this case? > > Yes, I think so because elfspe is just a wrapper which calls starts SPU > binaries. And SPU binaries are executed in 32bit mode only. I can't understand that. If we use the 64bit elfspe to run an SPU program, it will be executed in 64bit mode. > There can be only one elfspe binaries which is either ppc or ppc64. And as > mentioned above ppc would make more sense. I thought that the ppc64 repository consisted of only the ppc64 packages for 64 bit only userland, while the ppc repository contained 32bit packages for default runtime environment and additional ppc64 packages for 64bit user programs. Is it my misunderstanding? Don't we need to consider the 64bit only environment? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 11:38:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 07:38:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061138.m56BcYuK004941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 ------- Additional Comments From dhollis at davehollis.com 2008-06-06 07:38 EST ------- Updated package and spec now available: http://web.davehollis.com:81/packages/php-pear-Auth.spec http://web.davehollis.com:81/packages/php-pear-Auth-1.6.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm A little bit of refactoring was needed to get the documentation and examples included properly. I'm not certain if that was a 1.5 -> 1.6 thing or if it actually wasn't quite right to begin with. Using the info from the wiki, I'm able to do the dos2unix thing on the doc file with a bit of sed magic and rpmlint has no issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 12:02:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 08:02:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442507] Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061202.m56C2Z9U000378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507 jroth at linux.vnet.ibm.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jroth at linux.vnet.ibm.com 2008-06-06 08:02 EST ------- > I can't understand that. If we use the 64bit elfspe to run an SPU program, it > will be executed in 64bit mode. Only the 64bit elfspe will run in 64bit. The SPE application will always run in 32bit. So I suggest to use one of the two following possibilities for elfspe: 1. Build a ppc and a ppc64 package of elfspe. - the problem here would be that if one installs both packages on one system the elfspe binary will be overwritten. 2. Build the ppc64 package only. - Binaries in Fedora should be 64bit on a 64bit architecture. The libspe2-adabinding-devel package contains only include files for developing ada based SPE applications. Therefore I'd say that we should use either build a ppc or a ppc64 package only. As libgnat is available for ppc only it might make sense to build the libspe2-adabinding-devel package for ppc as well. Are there any opinions, suggestions? What is the correct way of handling this in Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 12:17:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 08:17:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435303] Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061217.m56CHGvC003390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435303 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-06 08:17 EST ------- perl-File-LibMagic-0.85-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 12:22:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 08:22:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439263] Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061222.m56CMQ7T004391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439263 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2008-06-06 08:22 EST ------- ssh -v to your fedorapeople account and paste the output here -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 12:22:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 08:22:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244593] Review Request: postgresql-pgbouncer - Lightweight connection pooler for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061222.m56CMx06004479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-pgbouncer - Lightweight connection pooler for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244593 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-06 08:22 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 12:33:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 08:33:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450275] New: Review Request: sysklogd - System logging and kernel message trapping daemons Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450275 Summary: Review Request: sysklogd - System logging and kernel message trapping daemons Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/sysklogd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f10/SRPMS/sysklogd-1.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The sysklogd package contains two system utilities (syslogd and klogd) which provide support for system logging. Syslogd and klogd run as daemons (background processes) and log system messages to different places, like sendmail logs, security logs, error logs, etc. Additional information: Based on the removed f7 sysklogd (1.4.2rh) package -this is a new upstream version-, which which was obsoleted by rsyslog, and subsequently dropped from the release, while this package may be needed/desired for successors of the current Enterprise Linux products. It explicitly conflicts with rsyslog and syslog-ng (as these packages do one conflict with each other). rpmlint is silent. koji scratch builds complete: - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=650114 (dist-f8-updates-candidate) - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=650119 (dist-f9-updates-candidate) - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=650124 (dist-f10) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 12:36:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 08:36:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445105] Review Request: milkytracker - SDL clone of the Fasttracker II module tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061236.m56Cajui015688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: milkytracker - SDL clone of the Fasttracker II module tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445105 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-06 08:36 EST ------- In the case that the above scratch build is removed from koji server, I uploaded the proposal srpm on the following: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/milkytracker/milkytracker.spec http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/milkytracker/milkytracker-0.90.80-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 12:50:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 08:50:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442507] Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061250.m56CoJHx009133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507 ------- Additional Comments From asayama at sm.sony.co.jp 2008-06-06 08:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > > I can't understand that. If we use the 64bit elfspe to run an SPU program, it > > will be executed in 64bit mode. > > Only the 64bit elfspe will run in 64bit. The SPE application will always run in > 32bit. That is not correct. Your term "32bit" just means "SPE uses LP32 program model and 32bit ABI", I think. But if an SPE program is run by the 64bit mode PPE process, for example, the SPE can access whole of the process's 64bit effective address space as well as the PPE. That is the meaning of my term "64bit mode". Anyway, that is not a reason why I suggest building the 64bit elfspe. I'm just saying to follow the same manner as other executable packages, as below. > > So I suggest to use one of the two following possibilities for elfspe: > > 1. Build a ppc and a ppc64 package of elfspe. > - the problem here would be that if one installs both packages on one system the > elfspe binary will be overwritten. I don't think there is such a problem if we follow the same manner as other executable packages. That is, the ppc repository has only the 32bit elfspe package and the ppc64 repository has only the 64bit elfspe package. See the development/ppc directory and the development/ppc64 directory. The ppc directory has both of 32bit libraries and 64bit libraries, however only 32bit executables. The ppc64 directory has only 64bit binaries. > > 2. Build the ppc64 package only. > - Binaries in Fedora should be 64bit on a 64bit architecture. > > > The libspe2-adabinding-devel package contains only include files for developing > ada based SPE applications. Therefore I'd say that we should use either build a > ppc or a ppc64 package only. > As libgnat is available for ppc only it might make sense to build the > libspe2-adabinding-devel package for ppc as well. I don't know why libgnat is available only for 32bit ppc... is it because of a technical reason? > Are there any opinions, suggestions? What is the correct way of handling this in > Fedora? I'd like to know that, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 13:51:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 09:51:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061351.m56Dp3n7028717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 colding at omesc.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |colding at omesc.com ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2008-06-06 09:51 EST ------- What about tao-idl? Or is that included in "tao"?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 13:52:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 09:52:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061352.m56Dq8tP020231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2008-06-06 09:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > What about tao-idl? Or is that included in "tao"?? Sorry, I meant "tao-devel". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 14:11:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:11:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224458] Review Request: libsilc (dependency of gaim) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061411.m56EBQxY024219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsilc (dependency of gaim) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224458 ------- Additional Comments From stu at nosnilmot.com 2008-06-06 10:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > libsilc.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency > /usr/lib64/libsilcclient-1.1.so.2.0.1 /lib64/libdl.so.2 > Not a huge deal, you might be able to fix this with the libtool tweak from > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CommonRpmlintIssues#unused-direct-shlib-dependency > if it bothers you. Fixed in CVS (don't link libsilcclient to libdl) > Then there are 249 of these: > libsilc.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol > /usr/lib64/libsilcclient-1.1.so.2.0.1 silc_hash_ptr > libsilc.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol > /usr/lib64/libsilcclient-1.1.so.2.0.1 silc_packet_set_keys > It seems that libsilcclient doesn't actually link against libsilc, which would > seem to be a bug to me. Am I missing something? Fixed in CVS, no you are missing nothing, that was a bug. > The way dependencies are filtered is a bit fragile because it ignores any > rpmbuild customizations involving the dependency generator. I don't think it's > a significant issue, but something akin to what many Perl modules which > generates the filter on the fly might work better. There's some discussion at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Filtering_Requires:_and_Provides I changed the filtering to use a dynamically generated script similar to the example. > In any case, could you add a comment to the spec with a note on why you need to > filter the dependencies? It was mentioned in the %changelog, but I've copied that comment to the body of the spec file too. The filtering is to fix bug #245323. > It might be nice to clarify the meaning of SILC in %description. Currently you > either have to install the package and read the docs or search the network to > figure out just what this package is supposed to do. I've updated the description in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 14:18:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:18:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450275] Review Request: sysklogd - System logging and kernel message trapping daemons In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061418.m56EIaBA001543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysklogd - System logging and kernel message trapping daemons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450275 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-06-06 10:18 EST ------- How would a package that is (essentially) an explicit subset of rsyslog useful? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 14:32:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061432.m56EWxRA004207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 ------- Additional Comments From ken+5a4 at bonsai.com 2008-06-06 10:32 EST ------- Yes, tao_idl is in the tao-devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 14:37:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:37:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061437.m56EbRl7005078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2008-06-06 10:37 EST ------- This is looking better. It should be a -2 release however, and you should document all your changes in the changelog section of the spec file. Please also do not forget to add a -samba subpackage which requires the SMBpasswd module (you can remove crypt-chap from the requires since this is redundant). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 14:40:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:40:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450275] Review Request: sysklogd - System logging and kernel message trapping daemons In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061440.m56Ee7SO029785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysklogd - System logging and kernel message trapping daemons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450275 ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-06-06 10:40 EST ------- Assuming you are asking whether having sysklogd in Fedora makes any sense since we have rsyslog; - sysklogd is six times smaller then rsyslog without any sub-packages - it is licensed differently (GPLv2 vs GPLv3+) - it has been around for ages and ages and is still the default in the yet-to-be-supported-for-another-couple-of-years enterprise line of systems - i like it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 14:50:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:50:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061450.m56EoZuF007490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2008-06-06 10:50 EST ------- The IFR (and related packages) would be nice too... :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 14:58:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:58:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061458.m56EwTCQ009267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2008-06-06 10:58 EST ------- Dave, please also investigate making a -radius subpackage as well which Requires Auth_Radius. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 15:15:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 11:15:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448702] Review Request: SndObj - The Sound Object Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061515.m56FF7oL012931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SndObj - The Sound Object Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448702 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-06 11:15 EST ------- Ralf, thank you for the patch. Well, even after applying the patch in comment 9, the build still fails (due to another reason) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=650441 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 15:35:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 11:35:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061535.m56FZDPZ016284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-06 11:35 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 15:37:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 11:37:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286851] Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061537.m56Fbl8m016721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286851 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-06 11:37 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 15:43:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 11:43:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448236] Review Request: xfbib - Lightweight BibTeX editor for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061543.m56Fhvrt009161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfbib - Lightweight BibTeX editor for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448236 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-06 11:43 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 15:42:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 11:42:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061542.m56FgkE8009044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-06 11:42 EST ------- cvs done (except for the CC, as lemenkov doesn't seem to be a valid username) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 15:45:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 11:45:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449994] Review Request: lua-expat - SAX XML parser based on the Expat library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061545.m56FjdSj018382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-expat - SAX XML parser based on the Expat library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449994 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-06 11:45 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 15:48:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 11:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450223] Review Request: mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki - An extension to provide an interwiki management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061548.m56FmJ7A010304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki - An extension to provide an interwiki management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450223 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-06 11:48 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 15:48:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 11:48:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061548.m56FmB6K018941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 ------- Additional Comments From avl at l14.ru 2008-06-06 11:48 EST ------- ok, Thank you, Kevin! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 16:10:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 12:10:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448072] Review Request: spin-kickstarts - Kickstarts and templates for creating custom Fedora Spins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061610.m56GArrT023374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spin-kickstarts - Kickstarts and templates for creating custom Fedora Spins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448072 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-06 12:10 EST ------- I thought I was going to say that this is the easiest package ever, but then it failed to build: configure: error: no suitable Python interpreter found I added a build dependency on python and it built fine. I'm sort of confused as to why python is needed or what actually gets built here. It looks like you could just copy the files from the tarball into place and dispense with configure altogether, although I guess you could in the future do some kind of processing. rpmlint says: spin-kickstarts.src: W: strange-permission spin-kickstarts.spec 0600 No idea why this happens to some packages; I think the permissions get set weirdly like that if you use rpmbuild -ta. It's not worth fixing this as it's not really a problem. (It's not mode 666 or anything like that.) spin-kickstarts.noarch: W: no-documentation As expected; not a problem. You should probably terminate the sentence in %description with a period. You should include the COPYING file as %doc. (Which conveniently will eliminate the rpmlint complaint.) Checklist: * source files match upstream: 1c09ef032526f232246ccd83d1aae5645788ade5386b15ee512cdb3cf1a1271d spin-kickstarts-0.01.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK (well, could use a period) * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. X license text upstream but not included in package. * latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires missing python. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (after fixing BuildRequires) * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: spin-kickstarts-0.01-1.fc10.noarch.rpm spin-kickstarts = 0.01-1.fc10 = * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 16:25:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 12:25:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444735] Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061625.m56GPfjj025887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444735 christian.iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: staden- |Review Request: staden- |io_lib - General purpose |io_lib - General purpose |trace file library |library to handle gene | |sequencing machine trace | |files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 16:35:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 12:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 394871] Review Request: automaton - a Java finite state automata/regular expression library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061635.m56GZMdl019556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: automaton - a Java finite state automata/regular expression library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394871 ------- Additional Comments From loganjerry at gmail.com 2008-06-06 12:35 EST ------- Here is a new package reflecting an upstream release that fixes a bug: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/automaton/automaton.spec http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/automaton/automaton-1.10r4-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 16:38:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 12:38:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439337] Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061638.m56GcvR2019939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439337 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-06 12:38 EST ------- Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 17:21:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:21:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450323] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: amdunn at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ninth-circle.dnsalias.com/~adunn/coq/coq.spec SRPM URL: http://ninth-circle.dnsalias.com/~adunn/coq/coq-8.1pl3-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system I packaged up the formal proof management system Coq and would appreciate a review. This is my first package contribution, and I am in need of a sponsor. Coq is a formal proof management system. It allows for the development of theorems through first order logic that are mechanically checked by the machine. Sets of definitions and theorems can be saved as compiled modules and loaded into the system. Coq is based off of OCaml. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 17:22:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:22:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061722.m56HMbVO027555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-06-06 13:22 EST ------- Hi Stefan, This is not a formal review but only a pre-review of your package. I am not entitled to Sponsor you however, someone else will. 1] Please perform rpmlint on every package that you create. The following rpmlint errors must be resolved --------------------------------------------------- bpanel.i386: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/fbpanel/plugins/dclock.so fbpanel.i386: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/fbpanel/plugins/space.so fbpanel.i386: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/fbpanel/plugins/tray.so fbpanel.i386: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/fbpanel/plugins/pager.so fbpanel.i386: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/fbpanel/plugins/launchbar.so fbpanel.i386: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/fbpanel/plugins/deskno2.so fbpanel.i386: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/fbpanel/plugins/wincmd.so fbpanel.i386: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/fbpanel/plugins/test.so fbpanel.i386: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/fbpanel/plugins/taskbar.so fbpanel.i386: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/fbpanel/plugins/cpu.so fbpanel.i386: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/fbpanel/plugins/image.so fbpanel.i386: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/fbpanel/plugins/tclock.so fbpanel.i386: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/fbpanel/plugins/icons.so fbpanel.i386: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/fbpanel/plugins/separator.so fbpanel.i386: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/fbpanel/plugins/menu.so fbpanel.i386: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/fbpanel/plugins/deskno.so ---------------------------------------------------- 2]Please note : Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig 3] Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail here http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 17:23:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:23:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061723.m56HNMtU003571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 amdunn at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 17:24:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:24:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061724.m56HOgbF027755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-06-06 13:24 EST ------- Hi, I did a pre-review of #448292. I'll write a few more pre-reviews and/or submit additional packages for consideration soon. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 17:27:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:27:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061727.m56HR1JT004334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 amdunn at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 17:40:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:40:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448458] Review Request: postal - mail server benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061740.m56HeMsp006664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postal - mail server benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448458 ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-06-06 13:40 EST ------- Hi Russell, I am only performing a pre-review (not formal) of your packaging request. I am not entitled to sponsor you, however someone else will in due time. 1] There seems to be a version inconsistency. The hyperlink for the source version 0.70 leads to source version 0.69. Kindly check with upstream. I have changed the version to 0.69 for further testing. 2] The RPM package fails to build due to a build error during compilation of the program (please take a look at the log file attached) Instead of --------------------------------------- %configure --prefix=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} --------------------------------------- It is preferable to use -------------------------------------- %configure --disable-static -------------------------------------- 3]Kindly avoid using hardcoded paths for %files section. Use macros as much as possible. They are defined here : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros Example: /usr/sbin/rabid will become %{_sbindir}/rabid and so on 4] Kindly include the %dist tag with your release number as : Release: 2%{?dist} for your future releases. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 17:41:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:41:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061741.m56Hfqqg031267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-06-06 13:41 EST ------- Hi again, I have also done a pre-review of #448458. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 17:41:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448458] Review Request: postal - mail server benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061741.m56Hf0qS031083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postal - mail server benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448458 ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-06-06 13:40 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=308552) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=308552&action=view) Postal Build Fail LOG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 17:40:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:40:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439337] Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061740.m56HeOcN031014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439337 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-06 13:40 EST ------- python-sphinx-0.3-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 17:41:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:41:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061741.m56HfMZ2031136@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 ------- Additional Comments From avl at l14.ru 2008-06-06 13:41 EST ------- bug in tcl-devel in fedora-8? In file included from /usr/include/tk-private/generic/tkPort.h:34, from /usr/include/tk-private/generic/tkInt.h:27, from tktray.c:3: /usr/include/tk-private/generic/../unix/tkUnixPort.h:210:20: error: tclInt.h: No such file or directory tcl-devel i386 1:8.4.17-1.fc8 build 139 k tk-devel i386 1:8.4.17-2.fc8 build 460 k -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 17:41:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:41:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439337] Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061741.m56HfYom006953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439337 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-06 13:41 EST ------- python-sphinx-0.3-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 17:48:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:48:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061748.m56Hmg1s032426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-06 13:48 EST ------- For -7: * First of all this does not build. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=650399 - Again please fix %_infodir/dir issue - For the issue: -------------------------------------------------------------- File listed twice: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/speechd/_test.py -------------------------------------------------------------- This file is actually listed twice as -------------------------------------------------------------- /%{python_sitelib}/speechd/* %attr(0755,root,root) /%{python_sitelib}/speechd/_test.py -------------------------------------------------------------- which is wrong. If you want to change the permission, change the permision by not using %attr but by using "chmod" at %install. * init scripts patch - Don't create init script by patch but rather include the script directly in the srpm as %SOURCEx. * Duplicate Requires(%post) etc http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscript_packaging - For example --------------------------------------------------------------- Requires(post): /sbin/chkconfig /sbin/install-info Requires(post): chkconfig --------------------------------------------------------------- Here /sbin/chkconfig is added to Requires(post), which is provided by chkconfig rpm. So "Requires(post): chkconfig" is a duplicate (redundant) Requires. * Some script writing issue -------------------------------------------------------------- for dir in \ $PRESENT_DIR/config/ $PRESENT_DIR/doc/ ...... -------------------------------------------------------------- - The preceding "$PRESENTDIR/" are all unneeded. * Timestamps - To keep timestamps on installed files, please use -------------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" -------------------------------------------------------------- This method usually works for recent autotool-based Makefiles. - When using "install" or "cp" commands, add "-p" option to keep timestamps. * Macros - Please use macros consistently. -------------------------------------------------------------- mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/ mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d install $PRESENT_DIR/speech-dispatcherd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir}/ -------------------------------------------------------------- Use "mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir}" - And /usr/bin must be %{_bindir} * Forbidden commands on scriptlets - Calling iconv on scriptlets is forbidden. Converting encodings must be done before %install ends. * Preceding slash - Preceding slashs like ------------------------------------------------------------- /%{python_sitelib}/speechd/* ^ ------------------------------------------------------------- are all not needed. * Some rpmlint issue ------------------------------------------------------------- speech-dispatcher.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/speech-dispatcherd ------------------------------------------------------------- - Installed service must not be enabled by default. You should change the line ------------------------------------------------------------- 6 # chkconfig: 2345 13 87 ------------------------------------------------------------- to ------------------------------------------------------------- # chkconfig: - 13 87 ------------------------------------------------------------- ! By the way - I guess the speech-dispatcherd init script is completely broken. For example ------------------------------------------------------------- 19 start() { 20 [ -x $exec ] || exit 5 21 [ -f $config ] || exit 6 22 echo -n $"Starting $prog" 23 retval=$? 24 echo 25 [ $retval -eq 0 ] && touch $lockfile 26 return $retval 27 } ------------------------------------------------------------- .... What does this do? This just - check if speech-dispatcher can be executed and config file exists - then echo some message - touch lockfile - then return This actually does nothing... (In reply to comment #28) > > * rpmlint issue > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > speech-dispatcher-doc.i386: W: file-not-utf8 > > /usr/share/info/speech-dispatcher-cs.info.gz > > Still to be resolved. Wondering how to go about this one (:-?) - See above. iconv must be used before %install ends. > > speech-dispatcher-devel.i386: W: no-documentation > > speech-dispatcher-python.i386: W: no-documentation > > Is this warning very important, as most of the documentation has been included > in a separate doc pacakge? - As in comment 24, I didn't mention this issue (i.e. not important) > > * Binary name > > - IMO the names of the binaries > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > %_bindir/long_message > > %_bindir/run_test > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > prefixed spd_ to each file. I hope that is fine? Okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 17:59:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:59:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196617] Review Request: perl-File-chdir - Perl module for local chdir() In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061759.m56HxaZT009685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-chdir - Perl module for local chdir() https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196617 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide ianburrell at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ianburrell at gmail.com 2008-06-06 13:59 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-File-chdir New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 18:00:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:00:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225366] Review Request: perl-Module-Depends - Identify the dependencies of a distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061800.m56I0UHe010120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Depends - Identify the dependencies of a distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225366 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide ianburrell at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ianburrell at gmail.com 2008-06-06 14:00 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Module-Depends New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 18:01:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:01:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445027] Review Request: dnrd - A caching, forwarding DNS proxy server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061801.m56I100O002476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnrd - A caching, forwarding DNS proxy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445027 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-06 14:00 EST ------- This fails to build for me in mock: + dos2unix COPYING /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.50471: line 39: dos2unix: command not found mock (and hence the Fedora buildsystem) will build packages in a minimal environment, consisting of a few packages (listed in the Exceptions section of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRequires) plus any packages listed in your BuildRequires:. This means that if you want to call something like dos2unix, you need to specify a dependency on it manually: BuildRequires: dos2unix or you can use sed -i 's/\r//' COPYING instead which has no dependencies. The package builds fine if I make either of those two changes. It's strongly preferred that if your going to use macro forms like %{__install} (on the make install line) that you use them everywhere. Alternately, just using: make install INSTALL="install -p" DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT works fine and is less typing, although to be honest I don't actually see any dfference when I change that to: make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT Perhaps I'm missing something. I'm confused about how dnrd itself is to be used. If it's a system daemon, shouldn't it have initscripts and such? The executable will expect to see configuration files in /etc/dnrd, so I'd expect that this package would provide that directory. Is it possible to provide any kind of initial configuration file that would be useful? Perhaps a caching-only server if one can be setup without requiring local customization. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 18:01:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:01:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196629] Review Request: perl-SVK - A Distributed Version Control System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061801.m56I1tVw010561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVK - A Distributed Version Control System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196629 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide ianburrell at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ianburrell at gmail.com 2008-06-06 14:01 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-SVK New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 18:08:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:08:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196627] Review Request: perl-SVN-Mirror - Mirror remote repository to local Subversion repository In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061808.m56I8chS003729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVN-Mirror - Mirror remote repository to local Subversion repository https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196627 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide ianburrell at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ianburrell at gmail.com 2008-06-06 14:08 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-SVN-Mirror New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 18:14:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:14:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061814.m56IEUJ9004524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From kylev at kylev.com 2008-06-06 14:14 EST ------- Note, your %files section for the python package could be as simple as this: %{python_sitelib}/speechd* This gets the directory ownership right and also grabs the auto-created egg info on F-9 and later. Minor nit: when creating directories hierarchies, use mkdir -p. If you move your init script to "Source1:", you could simply do this: mkdir -p %{_initrddir} cp -p $SOURCE1 %{_initrddir} You can also use the mkdir -p trick in your "build the python libs" section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 18:28:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:28:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061828.m56ISj2R007108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 dwheeler at dwheeler.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwheeler at dwheeler.com ------- Additional Comments From dwheeler at dwheeler.com 2008-06-06 14:28 EST ------- This is excellent - I'm glad to see this package!!! I have a nit about this description, I think it needs to be clearer. I realize it's similar to the Debian text, but I think the Debian text isn't clear at all. Also, Coq is an _interactive_ prover, not an automatic prover, and I think it's important to note that. How about this description instead (starting with the text on their website, but changing "done with" to "interactively developed using", and adding in the stuff from the submitted description): *** Coq is a formal proof management system: a proof interactively developed using Coq is mechanically checked by the machine. In particular, Coq allows users to define functions or predicates, to state mathematical theorems and software specifications, to develop interactively formal proofs of these theorems, and to check these proofs by a relatively small certification "kernel". Sets of definitions and theorems can be saved as compiled modules and loaded into the system. Coq has been used to formally prove claims about real programs (see the Coq website for more). Coq uses first order logic, and is implemented with OCaml. *** Thanks!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 18:27:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:27:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061827.m56IRYLE006995@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Alias: ntop_package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-06 14:27 EST ------- Just to recap our recent discussion on IRC: You can drop the %if 0%{?fedora} >= 7 conditional stuff, since we no longer support any release where it would trigger. The specfile should consistently use either the macro forms like "%{__mv}" or the regular "mv"; I personally prefer the non-macro forms because it's less typing, but it's up to you. I went ahead and built the package; rpmlint has many complaints. Ignoring non-standard-{gid,dir-perm,executable-perm} and such, I see: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/sbin/ntop ['/usr/lib64'] E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libntopreport-3.3.so ['/usr/lib64'] These need to be fixed. The information at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath should help. W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libntopreport-3.3.so static_ntop W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libntopreport-3.3.so welcome W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libntopreport-3.3.so setAdminPassword W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libntopreport-3.3.so usage W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libntopreport-3.3.so welcome W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libntopreport-3.3.so showUsers W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libntopreport-3.3.so addURL W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libntopreport-3.3.so doAddURL W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libntopreport-3.3.so doChangeFilter W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libntopreport-3.3.so addUser W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libntopreport-3.3.so doAddUser W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libntopreport-3.3.so deleteUser W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libntopreport-3.3.so showURLs W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libntopreport-3.3.so deleteURL W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libntopreport-3.3.so addDefaultAdminUser W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libntopreport-3.3.so changeFilter W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libntopreport-3.3.so handleNtopConfig W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libntop-3.3.so static_ntop W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libntop-3.3.so welcome W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libntop-3.3.so setAdminPassword W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libntop-3.3.so usage W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libntop-3.3.so welcome It seems that libntopreport isn't linked against libntop, and libntop isn't linked against some other library. Which seems odd, but isn't necessarily problem as long as all of the executables that use them are linked properly or provide the proper symbols. W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libntopreport-3.3.so /lib64/libpcre.so.0 W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libntopreport-3.3.so /usr/lib64/mysql/libmysqlclient_r.so.15 W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libntopreport-3.3.so /lib64/libnsl.so.1 W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libntopreport-3.3.so /usr/lib64/libsensors.so.4 W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libntopreport-3.3.so /usr/lib64/libnetsnmp.so.15 W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libntop-3.3.so /usr/lib64/librrd_th.so.2 W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libntop-3.3.so /lib64/libcrypt.so.1 W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libntop-3.3.so /lib64/libnsl.so.1 W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libntop-3.3.so /lib64/libssl.so.7 W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libntop-3.3.so /usr/lib64/libsensors.so.4 These indicate that the ntop libs are linked against various other libraries but don't actually call them. It's not strictly necessary to fix these as they're only inefficient, but there's some info at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CommonRpmlintIssues#unused-direct-shlib-dependency if you're interested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 18:26:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:26:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450226] Review Request: blueproximity - bluetooth proximity detector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061826.m56IQkQT014966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blueproximity - bluetooth proximity detector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450226 nunotavares at hotmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | ------- Additional Comments From nunotavares at hotmail.com 2008-06-06 14:26 EST ------- I'm sorry for it, it must have been my st*pid mouse. I reopened the bug. Care to do the review? :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 18:29:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:29:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444735] Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061829.m56ITqH1015288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444735 ------- Additional Comments From christian.iseli at licr.org 2008-06-06 14:29 EST ------- Thanks for looking into this, tibbs. Here is an updated version: http://c4chris.fedorapeople.org/staden-io_lib-1.11.2.1-0.fc8.src.rpm http://c4chris.fedorapeople.org/staden-io_lib.spec Version updated to latest upstream Summary changed, as suggested Name changed libread changed to libstaden-read io_lib-config changed to staden-io_lib-config and changed to output the proper lib name I hope I nailed them all... :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 18:38:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:38:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196625] Review Request: perl-SVN-Simple - a simple interface to subversion's editor interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061838.m56IcXEq009088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVN-Simple - a simple interface to subversion's editor interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196625 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide ianburrell at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ianburrell at gmail.com 2008-06-06 14:38 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-SVN-Simple New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 18:41:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:41:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061841.m56If3dq018033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From kylev at kylev.com 2008-06-06 14:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #32) > mkdir -p %{_initrddir} > cp -p $SOURCE1 %{_initrddir} Sorry, that should have been: mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_initrddir} cp -p $SOURCE1 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_initrddir} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 18:41:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:41:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449339] Review Request: wine-doors - One-click Windows application installer / Wine frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061841.m56IfchQ018428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wine-doors - One-click Windows application installer / Wine frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449339 ------- Additional Comments From pablo.martin-gomez at laposte.net 2008-06-06 14:41 EST ------- Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/~tsi30161/wine-doors.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/~tsi30161/wine-doors-0.1.2-2.fc9.src.rpm I have fixed the relative symlinks issue and the package now use "desktop-file-install" (thanks to the help of the different fedora's chan); rpmlint doesn't return errors or warnings any longer. For requested info from a website, I will contact upstream for more information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 18:48:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:48:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061848.m56ImHWD011718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-06 14:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #41) > bug in tcl-devel in fedora-8? > > In file included from /usr/include/tk-private/generic/tkPort.h:34, > from /usr/include/tk-private/generic/tkInt.h:27, > from tktray.c:3: > /usr/include/tk-private/generic/../unix/tkUnixPort.h:210:20: error: tclInt.h: No > such file or directory Seems a bug in tk 8.4, fixed in tk 8.5 (i.e. F-9+). I applied a workaround for F-8 tktray (1.1-4.fc8.1) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=51923 Please check the change in CVS. Now for F-8/9 please submit a request for pushing rpms to the repository i.e. visit: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ After requesting, you can close this bug as NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 18:53:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:53:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061853.m56IrS3O012611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-06 14:53 EST ------- Oops, F-8 tcl is 8.4 so one more fix is needed. Fixed in 1.1-4.fc8.2 (please check later) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 18:58:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:58:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196617] Review Request: perl-File-chdir - Perl module for local chdir() In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061858.m56IwhGO013434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-chdir - Perl module for local chdir() https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196617 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-06 14:58 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 18:59:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:59:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196625] Review Request: perl-SVN-Simple - a simple interface to subversion's editor interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061859.m56Ixa15021929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVN-Simple - a simple interface to subversion's editor interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196625 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-06 14:59 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 19:00:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 15:00:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196627] Review Request: perl-SVN-Mirror - Mirror remote repository to local Subversion repository In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061900.m56J0aAK022404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVN-Mirror - Mirror remote repository to local Subversion repository https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196627 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-06 15:00 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 19:01:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 15:01:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196629] Review Request: perl-SVK - A Distributed Version Control System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061901.m56J1Umi014357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SVK - A Distributed Version Control System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196629 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-06 15:01 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 19:02:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 15:02:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225366] Review Request: perl-Module-Depends - Identify the dependencies of a distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061902.m56J2cCg014589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Depends - Identify the dependencies of a distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225366 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-06 15:02 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 19:12:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 15:12:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435015] Review Request: libGPP4 - LGPL CCP4 library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061912.m56JCqY2016268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGPP4 - LGPL CCP4 library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-06 15:12 EST ------- I'm wondering if it wouldn't just be simpler to call the package libgpp4 and save yourself the trouble. As it is, get things like this nice long %description which doesn't actually make it into any of the packages. Plenty of rpmlint spew worth looking at: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/libgpp4-devel-1.0.4/doc/latex/csym_f_page.tex doxygen creates this; I'm not sure if it's worth converting or if it even matters. There are several complaints about the contents of the "test" directory being packaged as documentation, which I think is particularly ill-advised. Why aren't the tests just called at build time in a %check section? W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libgpp4-devel-1.0.4/test/load_syminfo W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libgpp4-devel-1.0.4/test/.libs/load_syminfo rtld(GNU_HASH) W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libgpp4-devel-1.0.4/test/.libs/load_syminfo libc.so.6()(64bit) W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libgpp4-devel-1.0.4/test/.libs/load_syminfo libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libgpp4-devel-1.0.4/test/.libs/load_syminfo libm.so.6()(64bit) W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/libgpp4-devel-1.0.4/test/.libs W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/libgpp4-devel-1.0.4/test/.deps E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/doc/libgpp4-devel-1.0.4/test/load_syminfo.o E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/doc/libgpp4-devel-1.0.4/test/.libs/load_syminfo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 19:34:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 15:34:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061934.m56JYWbI028162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 avl at l14.ru changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From avl at l14.ru 2008-06-06 15:34 EST ------- Thanks, Mamoru! Requests for F-9 and F-8 done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 19:34:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 15:34:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446976] Review Request: tkabber - Tkabber is a Free and Open Source client for the Jabber instant messaging system. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061934.m56JYXRm028195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tkabber - Tkabber is a Free and Open Source client for the Jabber instant messaging system. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446976 Bug 446976 depends on bug 446978, which changed state. Bug 446978 Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 19:59:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 15:59:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449707] Review Request: gambit-c - Gambit-C Scheme programming system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806061959.m56JxeCc032757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gambit-c - Gambit-C Scheme programming system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449707 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-06 15:59 EST ------- This builds OK; rpmlint has several devel-file-in-non-devel-package complaints, which can be ignored because this is a compilation system. There are also these: gambit-c-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/gambc-v4_2_8/lib/mem.c gambit-c-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/gambc-v4_2_8/lib/setup.h which aren't a big deal but trivially fixed with a chmod in %prep if you care. I'm not sure about the license. ASL 2.0 is certainly correct, but it seems to me that they allow LGPLv2+, not just LGPLv2. Am I missing something? I don't see anywhere in the source that a specific LGPL version is specified, and if you click the link on their web site you go to FSF's LGPLv3 page. Perhaps you could get them to clarify. There seems to be a test suite present which isn't called. I added %check make check and it runs fine, ending with: ============ ALL TESTS SUCCESSFUL Note that /usr/bin/six conflicts with the existing (and completely unrelated) six package. Is there any possibility of renaming it? Did you consider moving the info documentation and the examples to gambit-c-doc as well? The examples, at least, are almost another megabyte, although that's dwarfed by the rest of the package. * source files match upstream: e07d0031e434fc98a8b3ac136fe2426280cc342b8e3b3a325c7348938d5bae11 gambc-v4_2_8.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. ? license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has trivial complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: gambit-c-4.2.8-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm gambit-c = 4.2.8-1.fc10 = /bin/sh gcc info libutil.so.1()(64bit) libutil.so.1(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) gambit-c-doc-4.2.8-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm gambit-c-doc = 4.2.8-1.fc10 = gambit-c = 4.2.8-1.fc10 X %check is not present, but a functional test suite exists. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. O file perms in the -debuginfo package are a bit odd; everything else is OK. * scriptlets OK (install-info). * code, not content. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers present, but OK since this is a compiler. * no pkgconfig files. * static libraries present, but OK since this is a compilation system. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 20:04:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 16:04:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450050] Review Request: cgilib - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806062004.m56K4W5r025485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgilib - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450050 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-06 16:04 EST ------- This fails to build in mock for me: + aclocal /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.72081: line 30: aclocal: command not found error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.72081 (%build) If you're going to run the autotools, you at least need to have a build dependency on them. The autotools patch seems significant, renaming a bunch of documentation files. Is there any point to it? It seems like a gratuitous difference from upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 20:26:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 16:26:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235929] Review Request: postgresql-odbcng - PostgreSQL ODBCng driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806062026.m56KQ11V029751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-odbcng - PostgreSQL ODBCng driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235929 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(devrim at commandprom| |pt.com) | ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2008-06-06 16:26 EST ------- Spec and SRPM updated: SRPM: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/postgresql-odbcng/postgresql-odbcng-0.90.101-1.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/postgresql-odbcng/postgresql-odbcng.spec I'm pushing it for build. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 20:34:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 16:34:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449037] Review Request: afio - cpio compatible archiver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806062034.m56KYWkK006588@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: afio - cpio compatible archiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449037 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-06 16:34 EST ------- I agree with Kyle that its easier on the reviewers if you don't require them to download and unpack your src.rpm to take a quick look at your spec. I guess it depends on how much you really want to have your software reviewed. Now, I did unpack and build it. First, the rpmlint output: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/afio.1.gz There's no reason for the manpage to be executable. W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/afio-2.5/script2/restore W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/afio-2.5/script3/gnupg_read W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/afio-2.5/script3/pgp_read W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/afio-2.5/script3/pgp_write W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/afio-2.5/script4/tapechange W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/afio-2.5/script3/gnupg_write W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/afio-2.5/script2/backup It's not necessarily a blocker for documentation to be executable, but you should consider whether you expect that anyone will need to call those scripts, because you shouldn't expect people to have to run things out of /usr/share/doc. W: invalid-license GPL Please read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing and choose an appropriate License: tag. W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/afio-2.5/script2/backup /bin/bash This shouldn't be an issue if those scripts actually belong in the documentation. We will avoid the case that documentation brings in significant additional dependencies, but bash isn't problematic. Other comments: Please be consistent in macro use in the spec; if you're going to use "%{__rm}" then you need to use "%{__mkdir}", "%{__mkdir_p}", "%{__install}", etc. Or you can just use the non-macro versions throughout and save the typing. It's up to you, but you must be consistent. You must not hardcode ".fc9". Please use the %{dist} tag appropriately: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag Is ftp.project-builder.org really the canonical upstream for the source? It seems like the URL you provide doesn't point to that site at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 20:43:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 16:43:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230250] Review Request: gtkhtml38 - GtkHTML 3.8 compatibility library & devel bits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806062043.m56KhJNf032295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkhtml38 - GtkHTML 3.8 compatibility library & devel bits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230250 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-06-06 16:43 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gtkhtml38 New Branches: EL-5 Requesting to add to EL-5, as the gtkhtml3 ABI was changed in 5.2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 20:52:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 16:52:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230250] Review Request: gtkhtml38 - GtkHTML 3.8 compatibility library & devel bits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806062052.m56Kq7QN009613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkhtml38 - GtkHTML 3.8 compatibility library & devel bits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230250 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-06 16:52 EST ------- As I said on the epel mailing list, isn't that package conflicting with a package in RHEL (and it is forbidden)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 21:03:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 17:03:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230250] Review Request: gtkhtml38 - GtkHTML 3.8 compatibility library & devel bits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806062103.m56L3tMj003979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkhtml38 - GtkHTML 3.8 compatibility library & devel bits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230250 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-06-06 17:03 EST ------- It will not conflict with anything in RHEL 5.2. If it's decided to add something like this to a later RHEL update, it can then be retired... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 21:05:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 17:05:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235929] Review Request: postgresql-odbcng - PostgreSQL ODBCng driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806062105.m56L5xlP012384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-odbcng - PostgreSQL ODBCng driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235929 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 21:34:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 17:34:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806062134.m56LYkJw016943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 ------- Additional Comments From dwheeler at dwheeler.com 2008-06-06 17:34 EST ------- Oh, one additional thing to add to the description (say, to the end of it): Coq is pronounced "coke". It's hard to talk about a package without knowing how to pronounce it. Coq is the French word for "rooster", e.g., "Coq au vin". Here are some justifications for this pronunciation: http://tastingspoons.blogspot.com/2008/02/quick-modern-coq-au-vin.html http://www.bigoven.com/72191-Coq-Au-Vin-recipe.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 21:44:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 17:44:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448558] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunbw2 - sunbw2 x.org driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806062144.m56Li0Vc010648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunbw2 - sunbw2 x.org driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448558 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-06 17:44 EST ------- imported and built thanks for the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 21:43:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 17:43:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448566] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunleo - X driver for sunleo hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806062143.m56LhILE010587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunleo - X driver for sunleo hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448566 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-06 17:43 EST ------- imported and built thanks for the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 21:46:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 17:46:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448567] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suntcx - X driver for suntcx hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806062146.m56LkAES019024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suntcx - X driver for suntcx hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448567 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-06 17:46 EST ------- imported and built thanks for the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 21:47:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 17:47:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230250] Review Request: gtkhtml38 - GtkHTML 3.8 compatibility library & devel bits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806062147.m56LlIiD011645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkhtml38 - GtkHTML 3.8 compatibility library & devel bits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230250 ------- Additional Comments From mbarnes at redhat.com 2008-06-06 17:47 EST ------- Bug #345531 was the original ticket I opened for adding this package to RHEL 5.2. I closed it as WONTFIX since nothing in RHEL needs it and I thought it would be easier to just add it to EPEL ("easier" meaning less red tape). Are we looking to add it to RHEL after all? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 21:44:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 17:44:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448561] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suncg6 - X driver for suncg6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806062144.m56Linid010864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suncg6 - X driver for suncg6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448561 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-06 17:44 EST ------- imported and built thanks for the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 21:44:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 17:44:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448559] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suncg3 - x driver for suncg3 hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806062144.m56LiPA3010775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suncg3 - x driver for suncg3 hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448559 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-06 17:44 EST ------- imported and built thanks for the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 21:45:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 17:45:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448565] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunffb - X driver for sunffb hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806062145.m56Ljg6T011437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-sunffb - X driver for sunffb hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448565 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-06 17:45 EST ------- imported and built thanks for the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 21:45:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 17:45:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448563] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suncg14 - X driver for suncg14 hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806062145.m56LjDl3011255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-suncg14 - X driver for suncg14 hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448563 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-06 17:45 EST ------- imported and built thanks for the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 22:11:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 18:11:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435303] Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806062211.m56MBJfc023634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435303 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-06 18:11 EST ------- perl-File-LibMagic-0.85-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-File-LibMagic'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-5078 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 22:38:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 18:38:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806062238.m56McIXk027646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 ------- Additional Comments From dwheeler at dwheeler.com 2008-06-06 18:38 EST ------- Subpackage "coq-coqide" should be renamed to "coqide", i.e., change: %package coqide to: %package -n coqide Normally I'd suggest naming this "coq-ide", but since the Ubuntu/Debian package is named "coqide", I'd use the same name they do (as I think you intended to do). The "coqide" package doesn't seem to create a GUI icon (desktop entry). You need to create a small "desktop entry" file as part of the build and install it, as discussed here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files Here's the desktop entry spec: http://standards.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/latest/ If glade2 is installed, you can look here at another example: /usr/share/applications/gnome-glade-2.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 23:04:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:04:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447766] Review Request: mathomatic - Small, portable symbolic math program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806062304.m56N44PC031657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mathomatic - Small, portable symbolic math program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447766 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-06 19:04 EST ------- Only one small problem: desktop-file-install is used without a vendor tag. Could you make it desktop-file-install --vendor="fedora" ... ? (the exception is for packages that have their own vendor tags, e.g. KDE, GNOME, XFCE) APPROVED ? rpmlint: clean ? package name: ok ? spec file name: ok ? package guideline-compliant: ok ? license complies with guidelines: ok ? license field accurate: ok ? license file not deleted: ok ? spec in US English: ok ? spec legible: ok ? source matches upstream: ok ? builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded: ok ? build dependencies complete: ok ? own all directories: ok ? no dupes in %files: ok ? permission: ok ? %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT: ok ? macros used consistently: ok ? Package contains code: ok ? large docs => -doc: small enough ? desktop file uses desktop-file-install: ok -- note: vendor tag missing ? clean buildroot before install: ok ? filenames UTF-8: ok SHOULD ? desc and summary contain translations if available ? package build in mock on all architectures: none ? package functioned as described: ok ? scriplets are sane: ok (see note on vendor tag) ? other subpackages should require versioned base: ok (though in this case it seems functionally independent) ? require package not files: ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 23:14:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:14:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447766] Review Request: mathomatic - Small, portable symbolic math program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806062314.m56NEaDY025804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mathomatic - Small, portable symbolic math program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447766 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-06 19:14 EST ------- Actually we're trying to reword the guideline about --vendor so that it's clear just what's supposed to be done with it. It seems that --vendor=fedora is rarely the right thing to do. Check the discussion starting here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Minutes20080603#t12:15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 23:31:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:31:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449994] Review Request: lua-expat - SAX XML parser based on the Expat library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806062331.m56NVYxC003621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-expat - SAX XML parser based on the Expat library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449994 tim at niemueller.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-06-06 19:31 EST ------- Updates push pending. Thanks for the review, Jason! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 6 23:40:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:40:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449667] Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806062340.m56NeB7M029903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449667 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-06 19:40 EST ------- Looks mostly OK. rpmlint says: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/_yenc.so 0775 which seems a bit odd; on my system all such python loadable modules are mode 755, mode 655, or mode 555. It's probably best to clean this up; we don't know how people might use group root. W: summary-not-capitalized yEnc Module for Python This is OK; yEnc is the appropriate spelling. Normally I'd suggest that you refer to the actual upstream for this module (http://golug.cc.uniud.it/yenc.html) instead of another project which merely keeps a copy, but I can't get to the actual upstream at the moment so perhaps it's gone away. I don't see the point of indicating in the %description that the module is used by "hellanzb"; it's somewhat of a non sequitur since there's nothing to indicate what hellanzb is, there's no guarantee that nothing else will use it, and if someone wants to see what uses this module, they need only use the package's dependency information. It might be nice to define yEnc in the %description, though. This, from wikipedia, seems appropriate: yEnc is a binary-to-text encoding scheme for transferring binary files in messages on Usenet or via e-mail. For some reason all of the compiler flags appear either twice or three times when gcc is called. I have no idea why this is. The tripled flags come from extra_compile_args in setup.py, I think, but I don't know where the others come from. Anyway, it doesn't seem to cause any problems, and almost certainly isn't a bug in this package anyway. There's some kind of test suite present; can you see if it's runnable? I think it should be if you set PYTHONPATH properly. * source files match upstream: fb04fea7c5821345608fa01728ce5356b6dfb2d3e469e59e3fd31b88f45fb313 yenc-0.3.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. X description could use a couple of tweaks. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint has a valid complaint. * final provides and requires are sane: _yenc.so()(64bit) python-yenc = 0.3-2.fc10 = libpython2.5.so.1.0()(64bit) python(abi) = 2.5 ? %check is not present but there seems to be a test suite present. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. X file permissions on _yenc.so are odd. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 00:04:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 20:04:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806070004.m5704QLC000870@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 ------- Additional Comments From amdunn at gmail.com 2008-06-06 20:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Subpackage "coq-coqide" should be renamed to "coqide", i.e., change: > %package coqide > to: > %package -n coqide I was just trying to emphasize that it is indeed a subpackage of coq; if that's not proper it can certainly be changed. > Normally I'd suggest naming this "coq-ide", but since the Ubuntu/Debian package > is named "coqide", I'd use the same name they do (as I think you intended to do). Also, coq-coqide matches both coqide and ide text-wise, but coq-ide does not match coqide text-wise. I was afraid searches for the text coqide could potentially mess up. > The "coqide" package doesn't seem to create a GUI icon (desktop entry). > You need to create a small "desktop entry" file as part of the build > and install it, as discussed here: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files > Here's the desktop entry spec: > http://standards.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/latest/ > If glade2 is installed, you can look here at another example: > /usr/share/applications/gnome-glade-2.desktop This part I admittedly missed, and will fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 00:15:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 20:15:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449667] Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806070015.m570FvD5010229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449667 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-06-06 20:15 EST ------- Thanks for the quick response! New URLs: Spec: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-yenc.spec SRPM: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-yenc-0.3-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 00:38:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 20:38:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449962] Review Request: texlive-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806070038.m570cWSh005855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449962 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-06 20:38 EST ------- Well, texlive is itself a distribution and has many subpackages, but this is not a texlive subpackage. Previously Fedora used tetex, and thus you will see many tetex-* package still in the distribution, but due to the change we prefer to have a tex-distribution-neutral naming scheme; hence, tex-fonts-hebrew. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Minutes20071002 for the packaging committee decision. Unfortunately I think this fell through the cracks and wasn't ever written into the guidelines anywhere; if you'd prefer to to wait until that is done and I can refer you directly to the guidelines, I'd understand. Anyway, this package builds OK; rpmlint has the following complaints: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/texlive-fonts-hebrew-0.1/hebhello.tex Normally we fix these up, but I'm not sure what to do with tex files. W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/culmus ../../../../fonts/culmus W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/texmf/fonts/afm/public/culmus ../../../../fonts/culmus It's OK to have links to files in other packages as long as they're pulled in via dependencies, which is the case here since fonts-hebrew, a dependency, will pull in culmus-fonts. W: invalid-license GPL Please use an appropriate License: tag from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing. W: obsolete-not-provided tetex-fonts-hebrew If you want to replace the existing tetex-fonts-hebrew package, you need to provide a proper upgrade path. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Freplacing_existing_packages for more information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 01:01:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 21:01:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806070101.m5711xLc016954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 ------- Additional Comments From cheekyboinc at foresightlinux.org 2008-06-06 21:01 EST ------- Thank you Hemant for your feedback! Here is my new version. Spec URL: http://files.spielen-unter-linux.de/repository/fedora/9/SRPMS/ fbpanel.spec SRPM URL: http://files.spielen-unter-linux.de/repository/fedora/9/SRPMS/ fbpanel-4.12-2.fc9.src.rpm Changelog: - fixed rpmlint errors, new .desktop file, cleanup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 01:07:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 21:07:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806070107.m5717P7w017915@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 ------- Additional Comments From cheekyboinc at foresightlinux.org 2008-06-06 21:07 EST ------- Sorry for that, broken links.... http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/fbpanel.spec http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/fbpanel-4.12-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 01:11:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 21:11:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430429] Review Request: python-storm - An object-relational mapper (ORM) for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806070111.m571B0Ox011186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-storm - An object-relational mapper (ORM) for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430429 ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2008-06-06 21:10 EST ------- [OK] source in .src.rpm matches upstream md5sum: md5sum storm-0.11.tar.bz2.from_source_url ../../src/redhat/SOURCES/storm-0.11.tar.bz2 348cdc3b0d857bd7b5f8524e8337c44c storm-0.11.tar.bz2.from_source_url 348cdc3b0d857bd7b5f8524e8337c44c ../../src/redhat/SOURCES/storm-0.11.tar.bz2 [ !] Latest upstream release: It seems that you created the review just a day before upstream released a new version 0.12. From memory there is a requirement to package the most recent upstream release. Would you like to update to the current version ? {if not why not ?} Also from memory, there is a suggestion to join upstream mailing lists / forums, so that issues / release notifications will be seen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 01:19:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 21:19:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449667] Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806070119.m571JScC019390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449667 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-06 21:19 EST ------- Unfortunately the new ones don't build. The tests fail because they can't import the yenc module directly, since it's not installed. That's why I mentioned messing with PYTHONPATH. Are you testing builds in mock or koji? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 01:36:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 21:36:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449667] Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806070136.m571apNA014730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449667 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-06-06 21:36 EST ------- Ah, my mistake. I didn't try it in mock or koji, oops. New SRPM (spec hasn't moved): http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-yenc-0.3-4.fc9.src.rpm Builds on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=651477 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 02:02:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 22:02:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444735] Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806070202.m5722loX026027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444735 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-06 22:02 EST ------- Did you also change the license? rpmlint is yelling about it now and I don't think it complained previously. It seems to now be "BSD-like" when it doesn't actually seem to be BSD-like at all. I think you used to have MIT, which is correct. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT#Minimal_variant_.28found_in_io_lib.29 which happens to have the license verbatim. Besides the license I think this is fine; I'll approve this and you can change it back when you check in. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 02:25:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 22:25:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446993] Review Request: liblicense - License for storing and retrieving license information in media files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806070225.m572P8jX022308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblicense - License for storing and retrieving license information in media files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446993 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-06 22:25 EST ------- Looks like this is Asheesh's first package and so he'll need a sponsor. I'm not sure if Dennis intended to do that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 02:54:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 22:54:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806070254.m572sHNE002217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2008-06-06 22:54 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=308584) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=308584&action=view) attempt at wrapper script (In reply to comment #4) > Requires: on python unnecessary (automatically picked up by RPM, in a stricter > form: python(abi) = 2.5 Thanks, done. > Missing Requires: on pygame (used in image.py and play.py, listed on website) Done. The optional pymedia would seem to use mpeg libraries, and hence isn't in fedora, and can't be required. > The debug lines are harmless. debuginfo packages are only automatically > generated for C/C++ applications. OK. > In %changelog, you mean to say using desktop-file-install to install desktop > file, not to install an icon, right? Yes, I see what you mean and updated that changelog line. > Looks like your other questions have been answered on fedora-devel, but do ask > if you have any other question. For my purposes, the .desktop pointing to the site-packages path starts the gui app fine. None of the 3x tool work from the command line: * vnc2swf.py - Recorder * edit.py - Movie editor (This is NOT a general SWF file editor. It only supports movies generated by vnc2swf.) * play.py - Simple movie viewer Which method is considered most appropriate for making these tools easily usable ?: - bash script - exec python the tool path - python script - to retrieve the correct 32/64 bit path, and invoke. - adding *.pth to the site-packages directory - moving these three .py scripts to /usr/bin/ I have attached my attempt, but this is unsuccessful; since the pymedia is not found the wrapper bombs out with: ./vnc2swf libpath=/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyvnc2swf Traceback (most recent call last): File "./vnc2swf", line 35, in execfile(get_python_lib() + "/pyvnc2swf/vnc2swf.py") File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyvnc2swf/vnc2swf.py", line 32, in from movie import SWFInfo ImportError: No module named movie Any ideas on how to ignore the import - and why when vnc2swf.py is called directly, that it works, even without pymedia installed ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 03:33:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 23:33:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450366] New: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Client - Easy way to perform multiple HTTP requests and process their results Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450366 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Client - Easy way to perform multiple HTTP requests and process their results Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://xulchris.fedorapeople.org/packages/php-pear-HTTP-Client.spec SRPM URL: http://xulchris.fedorapeople.org/packages/php-pear-HTTP-Client-1.1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The HTTP_Client class wraps around HTTP_Request and provides a higher level interface for performing multiple HTTP requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 03:38:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 23:38:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806070338.m573cE2h001660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP Alias: php-pear-Auth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |php-pear-Auth -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 03:36:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 23:36:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806070336.m573a20x001525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |450366 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 03:38:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 23:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806070338.m573cgWU009142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP Alias: php-pear-Auth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 05:28:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 01:28:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450371] Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806070528.m575STIF017644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 mathstuf at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 05:28:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 01:28:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450371] New: Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 Summary: Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mathstuf at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec link: http://www.hypersonicsoft.org/projects/downloads/Pok?Gen/nightly/pokegen.spec SRPM link: http://www.hypersonicsoft.org/projects/downloads/Pok?Gen/nightly/pokegen-0.0.1-3.fc9.src.rpm Description: A highly customizable game engine for RPG/strategy games. I need sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 07:46:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 03:46:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444735] Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806070746.m577kk3K005216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444735 ------- Additional Comments From christian.iseli at licr.org 2008-06-07 03:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Did you also change the license? Yes, I goofed... :-( I'll fix it, glad you noticed. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 07:57:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 03:57:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447766] Review Request: mathomatic - Small, portable symbolic math program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806070757.m577vfm7014156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mathomatic - Small, portable symbolic math program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447766 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-06-07 03:57 EST ------- > Only one small problem: desktop-file-install is used without a vendor tag. > Could you make it desktop-file-install --vendor="fedora" ... ? Will have a look, thanks for comments tibbs. > APPROVED Thanks for the review. (fedora-review flag should be changed?) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mathomatic Short Description: Small, portable symbolic math program Owners: terjeros Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 08:30:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 04:30:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449962] Review Request: texlive-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806070830.m578UAkr020182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449962 ------- Additional Comments From danken at cs.technion.ac.il 2008-06-07 04:30 EST ------- Thanks for the quick review. I think I answer your comments in http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~danken/tex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc9.src.rpm and http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~danken/tex-fonts-hebrew.spec Please tell me if you find somthing to the contrary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 08:42:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 04:42:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450148] Review Request: jedit - short java editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806070842.m578genX014806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jedit - short java editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450148 ------- Additional Comments From luca at foppiano.org 2008-06-07 04:42 EST ------- ok, thanks for your help :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 09:38:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 05:38:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806070938.m579cSCa024127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-06-07 05:38 EST ------- BTW great work! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 09:48:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 05:48:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448072] Review Request: spin-kickstarts - Kickstarts and templates for creating custom Fedora Spins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806070948.m579mjQa032767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spin-kickstarts - Kickstarts and templates for creating custom Fedora Spins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448072 ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-06-07 05:48 EST ------- - There's was a renegade AM_PATH_PYTHON in configure.ac which I've fixed; - Including the COPYING file (as well as NEWS AUTHOR and README) New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/spin-kickstarts.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/spin-kickstarts-0.01-2.fc9.src.rpm rpmlint is now "silent" and keeps complaining about the weird permissions for the .spec file in the source rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 13:05:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 09:05:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806071305.m57D5nox025091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 ------- Additional Comments From dwheeler at dwheeler.com 2008-06-07 09:05 EST ------- > I was just trying to emphasize that it is indeed a subpackage of coq; > if that's not proper it can certainly be changed. Oh! I see! That's a good idea. In that case, I suggest documenting that in the spec file as a comment, e.g.: # The IDE's package name will become "coq-coqide". That way, searching for # either "coqide" (the Ubuntu/Debian package name) or "coq" will find this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 15:24:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 11:24:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449707] Review Request: gambit-c - Gambit-C Scheme programming system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806071524.m57FOvXI012997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gambit-c - Gambit-C Scheme programming system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449707 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-07 11:24 EST ------- Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/lang/gambit-c.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/lang/gambit-c-4.2.8-2.fc9.src.rpm Suggestions implemented, thanks. I also removed some of the symlinks that turns out to be superfluous -- only gsi, gsc and six are really needed. six just links to gsi anyway (gsi switches to infix mode if it's called as six, so I've created a wrapper script, gsix, that invokes the six symlink from %{_libdir}) Will check with upstream on the license question. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 15:51:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 11:51:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806071551.m57FpNDx024132@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP Alias: php-pear-Auth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2008-06-07 11:51 EST ------- David, please subscribe to the fedora php mailing list[1] if you havn't already done so and introduce yourself. We need to have a quick discussion on the mailing list regarding how to handle Provides for pear packages which have subpackages like Auth. I have also whipped up a quick HTTP_Client package which we can add to the Requires for Auth once it's approved. [1] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-php-devel-list -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 16:38:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 12:38:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230316] Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806071638.m57Gc7oU030852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230316 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bjohnson at symetrix.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2008-06-07 12:38 EST ------- I don't have time to properly review this package anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 17:15:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 13:15:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806071715.m57HFdf9029644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 goyal.hemant at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #308361|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-06-07 13:15 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=308616) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=308616&action=view) Init Script for speech-dispatcher -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 17:19:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 13:19:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806071719.m57HJBU1029881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-06-07 13:19 EST ------- Hi :-) SPEC File for revision 8 - http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/speechd-rpm/speech-dispatcher.spec SRPM - http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/speechd-rpm/speech-dispatcher-0.6.6-8.fc7.src.rpm (In reply to comment #31) > * First of all this does not build. > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=650399 > - Again please fix %_infodir/dir issue Hmmm, I have included the file, but rpmlint reports an error on doc package ================================================================= speech-dispatcher-doc.i386: E: info-dir-file /usr/share/info/dir ================================================================= > -------------------------------------------------------------- > File listed twice: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/speechd/_test.py > -------------------------------------------------------------- Resolved Now. Thank you for the solution. > * init scripts patch > - Don't create init script by patch but rather include the script > directly in the srpm as %SOURCEx. I have added it as Source1 now. > * Duplicate Requires(%post) etc Resolved. I noticed it by the time you had already written the review. Sorry about such a mistake. > * Some script writing issue > -------------------------------------------------------------- > for dir in \ > $PRESENT_DIR/config/ $PRESENT_DIR/doc/ ...... > -------------------------------------------------------------- > - The preceding "$PRESENTDIR/" are all unneeded. Okay, somehow it was not working before. It seems to work without $PRESENTDIR/ now however :P. > * Timestamps I have added time stamping to all files EXCEPT the python files. I cannot somehow find a way to add such an option to the command for installing the python module. Should I write a patch to modify the python script that installs the module?? > * Macros > - Please use macros consistently. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/ > mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d > install $PRESENT_DIR/speech-dispatcherd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir}/ > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Use "mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir}" > - And /usr/bin must be %{_bindir} Sorry again :-/. Fixed now. > * Forbidden commands on scriptlets > - Calling iconv on scriptlets is forbidden. Converting encodings > must be done before %install ends. Right, iconv was not even working back then, the UTF-8 encoding error stands resolved now. Convert the speech-dispatcher-cs.info file to UTF-8 in the prep section. > * Preceding slash Okay removed now. > > * Some rpmlint issue > ------------------------------------------------------------- > speech-dispatcher.i386: W: service-default-enabled > /etc/rc.d/init.d/speech-dispatcherd > ------------------------------------------------------------- > - Installed service must not be enabled by default. > You should change the line > ------------------------------------------------------------- > 6 # chkconfig: 2345 13 87 > ------------------------------------------------------------- > to > ------------------------------------------------------------- > # chkconfig: - 13 87 > ------------------------------------------------------------- Hmmm, okay I had explicitly added that to start the service by default. Thank you for the solution, have fixed it now. > ! By the way > - I guess the speech-dispatcherd init script is completely broken. > For example > ------------------------------------------------------------- > 19 start() { > 20 [ -x $exec ] || exit 5 > 21 [ -f $config ] || exit 6 > 22 echo -n $"Starting $prog" > 23 retval=$? > 24 echo > 25 [ $retval -eq 0 ] && touch $lockfile > 26 return $retval > 27 } > ------------------------------------------------------------- > .... What does this do? This just > - check if speech-dispatcher can be executed and config file exists > - then echo some message > - touch lockfile > - then return > This actually does nothing... Okay I have fixed it now, thank you for explaining what was actually happening in the script. I have made the necessary modifications to make the script work. One error however: The script works perfectly when I start it, however after that I consistently receive ========================================== speech-dispatcherd dead but subsys locked ========================================== I must manually remove the lockfile to resolve this error. Cannot figure out what is wrong here :-? > > > speech-dispatcher-doc.i386: W: file-not-utf8 > > > /usr/share/info/speech-dispatcher-cs.info.gz Fixed. > > > speech-dispatcher-devel.i386: W: no-documentation > > > speech-dispatcher-python.i386: W: no-documentation > > > > Is this warning very important, as most of the documentation has been included > > in a separate doc pacakge? > > - As in comment 24, I didn't mention this issue (i.e. not important) Cool :-) @Kyle VanderBeek - Thanks for the tweaks :-). I have incorporated them! Thanks, Hemant (prays there are no more errors :P) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 17:29:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 13:29:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806071729.m57HTA4v031453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-07 13:29 EST ------- Before checking -8: (In reply to comment #35) > (In reply to comment #31) > > * First of all this does not build. > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=650399 > > - Again please fix %_infodir/dir issue > > Hmmm, I have included the file, but rpmlint reports an error on doc package > > ================================================================= > speech-dispatcher-doc.i386: E: info-dir-file /usr/share/info/dir > ================================================================= - No! This file must be removed. You must explicitly write ------------------------------------------------------------------ rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_infodir}/dir ------------------------------------------------------------------ Please upload your srpm with this issue fixed (with release -9). Then I will check another issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 17:47:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 13:47:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450013] Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806071747.m57HlXDZ001902@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 jonstanley at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jonstanley at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From jonstanley at gmail.com 2008-06-07 13:47 EST ------- taking review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 19:25:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:25:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806071925.m57JPpr5016625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 ------- Additional Comments From amdunn at gmail.com 2008-06-07 15:25 EST ------- I fixed the desktop entry issue and also packaged the documentation for Coq in subpackage coq-doc. The new files are in place of the original files, and the original files can still be reached by appending ".v1" to each of the original URLs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 19:31:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:31:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450013] Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806071931.m57JVLn0017384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 jonstanley at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jonstanley at gmail.com 2008-06-07 15:31 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK? - Spec file matches base package name. OK Spec has consistant macro usage. OK Meets Packaging Guidelines. SEE NOTES - License MUSTFIX - License field in spec matches MUSTFIX - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 29847f8f095d56212e167a0bde1b2d70 testopia-2.0-RC1.tar.gz 29847f8f095d56212e167a0bde1b2d70 ../build/SOURCES/testopia-2.0-RC1.tar.gz -- f55a3f3cde9cf1bf56492d18c8f7afe4 ../bugzilla-3.0.4.tar.gz f55a3f3cde9cf1bf56492d18c8f7afe4 ../build/SOURCES/bugzilla-3.0.4.tar.gz N/A - Package needs ExcludeArch OK - BuildRequires correct N/A - Spec handles locales/find_lang N/A - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) OK- Package is code or permissible content. OK - Doc subpackage needed/used. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. N/A - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. N/A - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun N/A - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig N/A - .so files in -devel subpackage. N/A - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A - .la files are removed. N/A - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. SEE NOTES - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK- Package owns all the directories it creates. SEE NOTES- No rpmlint output: [jstanley at rugrat testopia]$ rpmlint testopia-3.0.4-1.tr2.0_RC1.fc10.noarch.rpm testopia.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/bugzilla/cron.daily 0644 testopia.noarch: E: non-standard-gid /etc/bugzilla apache testopia.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/bugzilla 0750 testopia.noarch: W: invalid-license MPL OK - final provides and requires are sane: (include output of for i in *rpm; do echo $i; rpm -qp --provides $i; echo =; rpm -qp --requires $i; echo; done manually indented after checking each line. I also remove the rpmlib junk and anything provided by glibc.) testopia-3.0.4-1.tr2.0_RC1.fc10.noarch.rpm config(testopia) = 3.0.4-1.tr2.0_RC1.fc10 perl(Bugzilla) perl(Bugzilla::Attachment) perl(Bugzilla::Attachment::PatchReader) perl(Bugzilla::Auth) perl(Bugzilla::Auth::Login) perl(Bugzilla::Auth::Login::CGI) perl(Bugzilla::Auth::Login::Cookie) perl(Bugzilla::Auth::Login::Env) perl(Bugzilla::Auth::Login::Stack) perl(Bugzilla::Auth::Persist::Cookie) perl(Bugzilla::Auth::Verify) perl(Bugzilla::Auth::Verify::DB) perl(Bugzilla::Auth::Verify::LDAP) perl(Bugzilla::Auth::Verify::Stack) perl(Bugzilla::Bug) perl(Bugzilla::BugMail) perl(Bugzilla::CGI) perl(Bugzilla::Chart) perl(Bugzilla::Classification) perl(Bugzilla::Component) perl(Bugzilla::Config) perl(Bugzilla::Config::Admin) perl(Bugzilla::Config::Attachment) perl(Bugzilla::Config::Auth) perl(Bugzilla::Config::BugChange) perl(Bugzilla::Config::BugFields) perl(Bugzilla::Config::BugMove) perl(Bugzilla::Config::Common) perl(Bugzilla::Config::Core) perl(Bugzilla::Config::DependencyGraph) perl(Bugzilla::Config::GroupSecurity) perl(Bugzilla::Config::L10n) perl(Bugzilla::Config::LDAP) perl(Bugzilla::Config::MTA) perl(Bugzilla::Config::PatchViewer) perl(Bugzilla::Config::Query) perl(Bugzilla::Config::ShadowDB) perl(Bugzilla::Config::Testopia) perl(Bugzilla::Config::UserMatch) perl(Bugzilla::Constants) perl(Bugzilla::DB) perl(Bugzilla::DB::Mysql) perl(Bugzilla::DB::Pg) perl(Bugzilla::DB::Schema) perl(Bugzilla::DB::Schema::Mysql) perl(Bugzilla::DB::Schema::Pg) perl(Bugzilla::Error) perl(Bugzilla::Field) perl(Bugzilla::Flag) perl(Bugzilla::FlagType) perl(Bugzilla::Group) perl(Bugzilla::Hook) perl(Bugzilla::Install) perl(Bugzilla::Install::DB) perl(Bugzilla::Install::Filesystem) perl(Bugzilla::Install::Localconfig) perl(Bugzilla::Install::Requirements) perl(Bugzilla::Keyword) perl(Bugzilla::Mailer) perl(Bugzilla::Milestone) perl(Bugzilla::Object) perl(Bugzilla::Product) perl(Bugzilla::Search) perl(Bugzilla::Search::Quicksearch) perl(Bugzilla::Search::Saved) perl(Bugzilla::Series) perl(Bugzilla::Template) perl(Bugzilla::Template::Plugin::Bugzilla) perl(Bugzilla::Template::Plugin::Hook) perl(Bugzilla::Template::Plugin::User) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Attachment) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Build) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Category) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Classification) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Constants) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Environment) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Environment::Category) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Environment::Element) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Environment::Property) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Environment::Xml) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Product) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Report) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Search) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Table) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::TestCase) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::TestCaseRun) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::TestPlan) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::TestRun) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::TestTag) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Util) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Xml) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::XmlReferences) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::XmlTestCase) perl(Bugzilla::Token) perl(Bugzilla::Update) perl(Bugzilla::User) perl(Bugzilla::User::Setting) perl(Bugzilla::User::Setting::Skin) perl(Bugzilla::Util) perl(Bugzilla::Version) perl(Bugzilla::WebService) perl(Bugzilla::WebService::Bug) perl(Bugzilla::WebService::Bugzilla) perl(Bugzilla::WebService::Constants) perl(Bugzilla::WebService::Product) perl(Bugzilla::WebService::Testopia::Build) perl(Bugzilla::WebService::Testopia::Environment) perl(Bugzilla::WebService::Testopia::Product) perl(Bugzilla::WebService::Testopia::TestCase) perl(Bugzilla::WebService::Testopia::TestCaseRun) perl(Bugzilla::WebService::Testopia::TestPlan) perl(Bugzilla::WebService::Testopia::TestRun) perl(Bugzilla::WebService::User) perl(Bugzilla::WebService::XMLRPC::Transport::HTTP::CGI) perl(Support::Files) perl(Support::Systemexec) perl(Support::Templates) testopia = 3.0.4-1.tr2.0_RC1.fc10 = /bin/sh /bin/sh /usr/bin/env /usr/bin/perl config(testopia) = 3.0.4-1.tr2.0_RC1.fc10 mod_perl patchutils perl >= 0:5.008 perl >= 0:5.008001 perl(AnyDBM_File) perl(Apache2::Const) perl(Apache2::ServerUtil) perl(Apache2::SizeLimit) perl(Bugzilla) perl(Bugzilla::Attachment) perl(Bugzilla::Attachment::PatchReader) perl(Bugzilla::Auth) perl(Bugzilla::Auth::Login::Stack) perl(Bugzilla::Auth::Persist::Cookie) perl(Bugzilla::Auth::Verify::Stack) perl(Bugzilla::Bug) perl(Bugzilla::BugMail) perl(Bugzilla::CGI) perl(Bugzilla::Chart) perl(Bugzilla::Classification) perl(Bugzilla::Component) perl(Bugzilla::Config) perl(Bugzilla::Config::Common) perl(Bugzilla::Constants) perl(Bugzilla::DB) perl(Bugzilla::DB::Schema) perl(Bugzilla::Error) perl(Bugzilla::Field) perl(Bugzilla::Flag) perl(Bugzilla::FlagType) perl(Bugzilla::Group) perl(Bugzilla::Hook) perl(Bugzilla::Install::Filesystem) perl(Bugzilla::Install::Localconfig) perl(Bugzilla::Install::Requirements) perl(Bugzilla::Keyword) perl(Bugzilla::Mailer) perl(Bugzilla::Milestone) perl(Bugzilla::Product) perl(Bugzilla::Search) perl(Bugzilla::Search::Quicksearch) perl(Bugzilla::Search::Saved) perl(Bugzilla::Series) perl(Bugzilla::Template) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Attachment) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Build) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Category) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Classification) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Constants) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Environment) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Environment::Category) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Environment::Element) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Environment::Property) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Environment::Xml) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Product) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Report) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Search) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Table) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::TestCase) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::TestCaseRun) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::TestPlan) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::TestRun) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::TestTag) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Util) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::Xml) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::XmlReferences) perl(Bugzilla::Testopia::XmlTestCase) perl(Bugzilla::Token) perl(Bugzilla::Update) perl(Bugzilla::User) perl(Bugzilla::User::Setting) perl(Bugzilla::Util) perl(Bugzilla::Version) perl(Bugzilla::WebService) perl(Bugzilla::WebService::Constants) perl(CGI) perl(Class::CSV) perl(Class::Struct) perl(Cwd) perl(DBD::Pg) perl(DBI) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Date::Format) perl(Date::Parse) perl(Email::Address) perl(Email::MIME) perl(Email::MIME::Attachment::Stripper) perl(Email::MIME::Modifier) perl(Email::Reply) perl(Email::Send) perl(Encode) perl(Encode::MIME::Header) perl(Errno) perl(Exporter) perl(Fcntl) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Find) perl(File::Path) perl(File::Spec) perl(File::Spec::Functions) perl(File::Temp) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(Hash::Util) perl(IO::Dir) perl(IO::File) perl(IO::Handle) perl(JSON) perl(List::Util) perl(MIME::Base64) perl(MIME::Parser) perl(ModPerl::RegistryLoader) perl(Net::LDAP) perl(POSIX) perl(Pod::Usage) perl(Safe) perl(Socket) perl(Storable) perl(Template::Stash) perl(Test::Harness) perl(Text::Diff) perl(Time::Zone) perl(XML::Twig) perl(XMLRPC::Transport::HTTP) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(diagnostics) perl(fields) perl(integer) perl(lib) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) perl-Email-Address perl-Email-MIME perl-Email-MIME-Attachment-Stripper perl-Email-MIME-Modifier perl-Email-Reply perl-Email-Send perl-Email-Simple perl-MIME-tools perl-SOAP-Lite perl-Template-Toolkit rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 smtpdaemon webserver which SHOULD Items: OK- Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. SHOULDFIX - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. License tag is not correct. Should be at least MPLv1.1, if not 'MPLv1.1 and GPLv3' 2. Licensing is a bit murky. Testopia uses EXT-JS to provide the Ajax web interface, and it is dual-licensed commercial and GPLv3. Bugzilla is not a Mozilla tri-licensed product per http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/#source-code so I'm not sure what they're doing here. 3. There are several 'error' outputs from rpmlint that I think are OK - /etc/bugzilla contains passwords, etc. 4. Change the cron.daily script to be executable per the rpmlint output Blocking FE-LEGAL due to item 2, hopefully this can be resolved quickly. Maybe just a quick note to upstream will help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 19:37:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:37:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450013] Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806071937.m57JbVDg025356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 ------- Additional Comments From jonstanley at gmail.com 2008-06-07 15:37 EST ------- Some things I forgot :) 5. The package owns directories that the bugzilla package proper owns, however, there's a Conflicts, so I don't think that's a big problem. 6. The license text is not included as a %doc in the package 7. The subpackages don't require the base package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 20:25:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 16:25:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] New: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/trickle.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/trickle-1.06-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: trickle is a portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper. It can run in collaborative mode (together with trickled) or in stand alone mode. trickle works by taking advantage of the unix loader preloading. Essentially it provides, to the application, a new version of the functionality that is required to send and receive data through sockets. It then limits traffic based on delaying the sending and receiving of data over a socket. trickle runs entirely in userspace and does not require root privileges. rpmlint is OK on rpm, debuginfo and src.rpm. Package build is OK under mock. This is my 3rd package but I'm still seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 21:44:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 17:44:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450410] New: Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450410 Summary: Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: guido.ledermann at googlemail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.soglatec.de/fedora/multiget.spec SRPM URL: http://www.soglatec.de/fedora/multiget-1.2.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: multiget is an easy-to-use GUI file downloader. It's programmed in C++ and has a GUI based on wxWidgets. It supports HTTP/FTP protocols which covers the requirements of most users. It supports multi-task with multi-thread on multi-server. It supports resuming downloads if the Web server supports it, and if you like, you can reconfig the thread number without stopping the current task. It's also support SOCKS 4,4a,5 proxy, ftp proxy, http proxy. There has already been a review for a previous version: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231786 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 21:41:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 17:41:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] New: Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 Summary: Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hedayat at grad.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://assembla.com/file/hedayat/1_rcssserver3d.spec SRPM URL: http://assembla.com/file/hedayat/1_rcssserver3d-0.5.9-1.fc9.src.rpm (Notice: "1_" prefix to file names have been added by assembla.com. The original files didn't have this prefix.) First Package: This is my first package and so I should be sponsored. Description: The RoboCup Soccer Simulator is a research and educational tool for multi-agent systems and artificial intelligence. It enables for two teams of 11 simulated autonomous robotic players to play soccer (football). This package contains the 3D version of the simulator. Some comments: I've read the packaging guidelines and other related documents. These are what I think I should mention: 1. rpmlint is silent about my spec file & srpm 2. rpmlint prints a warning about a non config file in etc: "/etc/ld.so.conf.d/rcssserver3d.conf" but I think it's OK according to other packages. 4. I've included some .so files in the main package because the binary looks for them at run time. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 21:46:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 17:46:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806072146.m57LkIkR011985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 hedayat at grad.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 21:53:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 17:53:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450013] Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806072153.m57LrNca012863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 jonstanley at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |450411 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 21:59:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 17:59:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806072159.m57LxJbr006465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 ------- Additional Comments From hedayat at grad.com 2008-06-07 17:59 EST ------- Hopefully, these links should work with correct names: SPEC: http://www.assembla.com/spaces/hedayat/documents/axOSo-nh4r3AKnab7jnrAJ/download/rcssserver3d.spec SRPM: http://www.assembla.com/spaces/hedayat/documents/d5v4D4nh0r3yoaab7jnrAJ/download/rcssserver3d-0.5.9-1.fc9.src.rpm Sorry for the problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 21:55:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 17:55:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445977] Review Request: ikiwiki - A wiki compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806072155.m57Lt6vP006126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ikiwiki - A wiki compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445977 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2008-06-07 17:55 EST ------- + rpmlint: ok, warnings are about %{_exclude} sections ikiwiki.src:100: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/w3m/cgi-bin/ikiwiki-w3m.cgi ikiwiki.src:102: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/ikiwiki/plugins + Naming: ok + License: ok, GPLv2+ + Source file: ok, matches upstream: 6b293f6e8a08578533d0268b25dae5b3 ikiwiki_2.48.tar.gz There was a new release just now: http://git.ikiwiki.info/?p=ikiwiki;a=commitdiff;h=77edb81bee5a2c4966591d7ba1f3c83e31de272f + compiles on F8: ok + BuildRequires: ok, builds in F9 mock + Locale handling: ok, uses %find_lang + Libraries: ok, there are none + Directory Ownage: ok + Permissions: ok + %clean: ok + %install: ok - License included: not ok, the license is included in ikiwiki/doc/GPL but not in %doc - Perl Requires: not ok perl(File::MimeInfo) is twice in the requires of the rpm, it is added manually in the spec, which I guess can be removed. Also I would probably package ikiwiki-w3m.cgi, because it seems to be useful. Another isssue is, that the directory %{_prefix}/lib/ikiwiki/plugins should be probably created, to allow addon packages, that contain ikiwiki modules. Or would the need the perl(RPC) dependency? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 21:59:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 17:59:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450013] Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806072159.m57LxDIb013613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 jonstanley at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |450412 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 22:08:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 18:08:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450013] Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806072208.m57M8FLD008284@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 ------- Additional Comments From jonstanley at gmail.com 2008-06-07 18:08 EST ------- This particular package doesn't actually install and work. I've e-mailed Davve about it, it exhibits various states of fail (though maybe it's the operator) :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 7 23:57:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 19:57:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273301] Review Request: perl-Class-CSV - Class based CSV parser/writer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806072357.m57Nvac5031052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-CSV - Class based CSV parser/writer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273301 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide dmalcolm at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dmalcolm at redhat.com 2008-06-07 19:57 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Class-CSV New Branches: EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: dmalcolm, jstanley -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 00:32:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 20:32:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450013] Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806080032.m580Wlkr029329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 ------- Additional Comments From dmalcolm at redhat.com 2008-06-07 20:32 EST ------- No, it was me; I broke the schema installation of the testopia-specific tables; I'd only been testing on pre-created databases. Will investigate; sorry -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 00:36:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 20:36:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449317] Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806080036.m580a6Uq030133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449317 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-06-07 20:36 EST ------- Review for ead55a82f610dc729519bfc5de1abab0 gamazons-0.83-1.fc9.src.rpm OK - MUST: rpmlint silent on all packages OK - MUST: package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package name OK - MUST: meets the Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: licensed GPLv2 and meets the Licensing Guidelines OK - MUST: license field in the package spec file matches actual license OK - MUST: source package includes the text of the license and it is correctly included in %doc OK - MUST: spec written in American English OK - MUST: spec is legible OK - MUST: sources match the upstream source by md5 33c2b373fd7fff25282eae56d5926a7a OK - MUST: package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i386 OK - MUST: no known ExcludeArchs OK - MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires OK - MUST: spec file handles locales properly with %find_lang OK - MUST: package is not relocatable OK - MUST: owns all directories that it creates OK - MUST: no duplicate files in the %files listing OK - MUST: permissions on files are set properly, correct %defattr OK - MUST: package has a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} OK - MUST: macro usage consistent OK - MUST: package contains code, no content OK - MUST: no large docs for a -doc subpackage OK - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application OK - MUST: no header files for a -devel package OK - MUST: no static libraries for a -static package OK - MUST: package does not contain any .la libtool archives OK - MUST: GUI application includes a %{name}.desktop file, that is properly installed with desktop-file-install OK - MUST: package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK - MUST: 'rm -rf %{buildroot}' at the beginning of %install OK - MUST: all filenames are valid UTF-8 OK - SHOULD: package builds in mock with fedora-9-i386.cfg. With fedora-devel-i386.cfg avahi is broken ATM but this is not an issue here OK - SHOULD: latest stable version OK - SHOULD: functions as described FIX - MINOR: Please include src/thots in %doc since it contains the usual TODO list. FIX - MINOR: Please include src/gamazon.bugs in %doc ?? - MINOR: You can remove the requirement for yelp, see bug # 243390 comment # 2 for example I can't find no blockers, so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 00:57:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 20:57:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806080057.m580vl6A007775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-06-07 20:57 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=308625) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=308625&action=view) failed build while using mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 00:57:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 20:57:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806080057.m580vCxP007705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-06-07 20:57 EST ------- The srpm you have submitted does not build for me in mock. I'll attach the build log. Just for the record: 10 months ago I've packaged trickle too, and following some links from Mandriva I have found out that http://monkey.org/~marius/trickle/trickle-1.07.tar.gz gives a newer version of the software. I know that it's not listed in the main web page of the project but it's been available for a very long time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 01:16:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 21:16:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806080116.m581GdEd011306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-06-07 21:16 EST ------- build also fails in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=652376 (scratch build, started at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=652374 ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 01:20:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 21:20:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450410] Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806080120.m581KtPX011908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450410 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-06-07 21:20 EST ------- Guido, once a program has been accepted in Fedora, the review for newer versions is not usually needed. You should get in touch with multiget's Fedora maintainer and ask him to update to the newer version and / or offer co-maintainership. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 01:36:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 21:36:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806080136.m581aMMu014221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 ------- Additional Comments From nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com 2008-06-07 21:36 EST ------- thx for your comments. It seems that build fails only on x86_64 (I only have a 32bits computer). I'll try to find a computer on x86_64 to test build and use 1.07 version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 01:59:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 21:59:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449707] Review Request: gambit-c - Gambit-C Scheme programming system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806080159.m581xZAd017420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gambit-c - Gambit-C Scheme programming system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449707 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-07 21:59 EST ------- FYI, I'm also packaging gambit-termite (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450417), the same Gambit-C with the Termite distributed programming system patched in. I've packaged it to be completely parallel-installable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 01:56:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 21:56:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450417] New: Review Request: gambit-termite - Gambit-C Scheme programming system, with Termite Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450417 Summary: Review Request: gambit-termite - Gambit-C Scheme programming system, with Termite Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.sylvan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/lang/gambit-termite.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/lang/gambit-termite-4.2.8_0.9-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Termite is an Erlang-like distributed programming system written in Scheme. It requires the latest version of Gambit-C. Gambit-C includes a Scheme interpreter and a Scheme compiler which can be used to build standalone executables. Because the compiler generates portable C code it is fairly easy to port to any platform with a decent C compiler. The Gambit-C system conforms to the R4RS, R5RS and IEEE Scheme standards. The full numeric tower is implemented, including: infinite precision integers (bignums), rationals, inexact reals (floating point numbers), and complex numbers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 02:37:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 22:37:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806080237.m582buXV016106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.sylvan at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-07 22:37 EST ------- Another alternative is to call it coq-ide and make it Provides: coqide = %{version}-%{release} ? I was hoping to see coq packaged for Fedora -- great to see this coming along (alas, I can't sponsor). Have you sent a mail to fedora-devel? It's easy for a package to get lost in the submission queue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 02:47:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 22:47:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806080247.m582lrxi017663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-07 22:47 EST ------- Server appears to be down. To make reviewing easier, could I suggest that you attach the spec file as an attachment? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 03:48:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 23:48:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226046] Merge Review: libsoup (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806080348.m583mkEA026597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libsoup (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226046 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |debarshi.ray at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 03:53:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 23:53:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806080353.m583ro84027396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-07 23:53 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=308631) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=308631&action=view) Patch to compile also on ppc64 for 1.06 Just having tried to compile this package. - srpm on comment 0 does not build even on i386: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=652380 - This is due to parallel make issue, removing %{?_smp_mflags} will pass compilation on i386/x86_64/ppc, not on ppc64 - With the attached patch 1.06 builds 1.06 also on ppc64. (No problem with this patch also on i386/x86_64/ppc) - For 1.07. parallel make still fails (at least for -j4). The attached patch seems no longer needed. Again I just tried to compile this package. I would appreciate it if Wolfy would continue to review this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 07:42:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 03:42:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450410] Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806080742.m587gUpl004093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450410 ------- Additional Comments From guido.ledermann at googlemail.com 2008-06-08 03:42 EST ------- Manuel, the package is orphaned and Mamoru Tasaka, asked if I could take the package, agreed. Furthermore there were significant changes to the spec necessary to get 1.2.0 work. Christoph Wickert offered sponsorship to me and this should be the first Package for me to maintain (though there has been no development in recent days). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 08:48:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 04:48:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450189] Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806080848.m588mS4C012566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450189 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2008-06-08 04:48 EST ------- Correction: #001: guake should _NOT_ own /etc/gconf/schemas/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 08:47:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 04:47:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450189] Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806080847.m588lfj0012479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450189 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2008-06-08 04:47 EST ------- #001: /etc/gconf/schemas/ should _NOT_ own /etc/gconf/schemas/ chitlesh(~)[0]$rpm -qf /etc/gconf/schemas/ GConf2-2.22.0-1.fc9.i386 guake-0.2.2-2.fc9.i386 #002: chitlesh(~)[0]$rpmlint guake guake.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/guake-0.2.2/NEWS guake.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gconf/schemas/guake.schemas #003: I would suggest a -libs subpackage rather than -devel subpackage. This -libs should entail all entries under /usr/lib/ #004: In general, packagers are strongly encouraged not to ship static libs unless a compelling reason exists. delete %{_libdir}/guake/globalhotkeys.la after make install. Then ensure that guake still works without the *.la file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 10:43:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 06:43:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806081043.m58AhZ5Q022980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 ------- Additional Comments From amdunn at gmail.com 2008-06-08 06:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=308652) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=308652&action=view) The main coq spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 11:09:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 07:09:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806081109.m58B9AYR002142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 ------- Additional Comments From amdunn at gmail.com 2008-06-08 07:09 EST ------- Given that access to the server seems to be flakier/slower than I anticipated, I put up an alternate site: The URLs http://www.duke.edu/~amd34/coq/coq-8.1pl3-1.fc9.src.rpm http://www.duke.edu/~amd34/coq/coq.spec will also work, and may actually give better performance. (The corresponding ".v1" URLs will also be active, but are currently uploading.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 11:16:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 07:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445604] Review Request: Tennix! - A funny 2D tennis game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806081116.m58BGvm1003455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tennix! - A funny 2D tennis game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445604 pablo.martin-gomez at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pablo.martin- | |gomez at laposte.net ------- Additional Comments From pablo.martin-gomez at laposte.net 2008-06-08 07:16 EST ------- Some comments about your spec: * The compilation succeed with "make %{?_smp_mflags}" (-j3 for me) as well with X86_64 than i386, without warnings. * Attention with "%{_datadir}/applications/*.desktop", you are owning all the desktop files, just put "fedora-%{name}.desktop" at the end. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 11:32:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 07:32:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806081132.m58BWCHe005881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 ------- Additional Comments From nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com 2008-06-08 07:32 EST ------- Spec updated : http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/trickle.spec New SRPM : http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/fc9.i386/trickle-1.07-1.fc9.i386.rpm I'm now using version 1.07 and I removed %{?_smp_mflags}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 12:50:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 08:50:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450189] Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806081250.m58CoMF6011303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450189 ------- Additional Comments From lokthare at gmail.com 2008-06-08 08:50 EST ------- Spec URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/guake.spec SRPM URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/guake-0.2.2-3.fc9.src.rpm - Don't own /etc/gconf/schemas/ - Don't replace /etc/gconf/schemas/guake.schemas config file - Remove globalhotkeys.la About the third point in comment #4, i don't think a -lib subpackage is needed. Others comments should be fixed now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 14:17:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 10:17:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444257] Review Request: nted - Musical score editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806081417.m58EHljk024824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nted - Musical score editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444257 rhbugs at n-dimensional.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(rhbugs at n- | |dimensional.de) | ------- Additional Comments From rhbugs at n-dimensional.de 2008-06-08 10:17 EST ------- Review Guidelines MUST items: OK: rpmlint produces no output OK: naming guidelines OK: %{name}.spec OK: Packaging Guidelines OK: Licensing Guidelines All the source files seem to be GPLv2+. Help->About dialog is GPLv2+. HTML manuals are GFDLv1.2+ COPYING is GPLv3. Ergo: Multiple licenses, but conforms to Fedora Licensing Guidelines. FAIL: License field match Does not cover HTML manuals. Use "License: GPLv2+ and GFDL"? FAIL: %doc COPYING "If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc." OK... as the shipped COPYING file is GPLv3+, which none of the files in the source package is licensed under, the source package does NOT include the text of the licenses in its own file. So we just can NOT %doc COPYING to technically satisfy the guidelines. Probably upstream has just shipped the default COPYING file autoreconf automatically adds to the source tree. We should to confirm this with upstream. OK: spec file in en_US OK: legible spec file OK: Sources match upstream OK: Compiles and builds on i386, x86_64, ppc, ppc64: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=594520 N/A: Builds on all arches OK: All build deps listed OK: Uses %find_lang N/A: no shared libs N/A: not relocatable OK: owns all created dirs OK: no duplicate files in %files OK: proper file permissions OK: %clean with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT OK: consistent use of macros OK: packagecontains code OK: Those two HTML manuals are not necessarily "large docs" for a -doc pkg. Oh, and they are needed as online help at runtime. OK: %doc files must not affect runtime... The "Help->Documentation" menu item just shows an untitled dialog window +---------------------------------------------+ | Excuse! The documentation is not available | | due to an installation error | | [ OK ] | +---------------------------------------------+ Apart from this, nted works like a charm with or without docs. N/A: No header files N/A: no static libs N/A: no foo.pc file N/A: no libfoo.so.1.1 N/A: devel package N/A: no .la files OK: desktop file OK, but German translations to go with the German manual would be nice. OK: Does not own other apps' files or dirs OK: %install starts with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT OK: All filenames are valid ASCII and thus UTF-8 Review Guidelines SHOULD items: FAIL: No COPYING for GPLv2 OK: Are Summary(de) and %description(de) available? Yes, now. OK: Builds in local mock OK: Builds in Fedora koji on i386, x86_64, ppc, ppc64 OK: Appears to function as described. N/A: No scriptlets N/A: no subpackages N/A: no foo.pc N/A: no file deps Packaging Guidelines: OK: Uses standard compiler flags now. OK: All docs in /usr/share/doc/%{name}-%{version} now. SUMMARY: FAIL License: ignores HTML manual license FAIL We need to NOT "%doc COPYING". Just ignore the COPYING file. SHOULDFIX Docs: Are installed to a place where nted cannot find it. I have a patch. OPTIONAL Add lang(de) versions for Summary: and Description: OPTIONAL Assist upstream with cleaning up nted's configure.in OPTIONAL The code is still full of ugly compiler warnings. I'd say upstream should fix that, possibly with some help. See http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/nted/0.22.3-2.4.fc9/ for my suggested fixes for the first four three of these. When you have a fix for the first three, I'll approve the package, unless you want to update to the nted-0.24.1 release before review completion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 14:43:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 10:43:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450442] New: Review Request: rubygem-tiddlywiki_cp - Copy tiddlers to files and vice versa Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450442 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-tiddlywiki_cp - Copy tiddlers to files and vice versa Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jkeating at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/review/rubygem-tiddlywiki_cp.spec SRPM URL: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/review/rubygem-tiddlywiki_cp-0.5.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Copy tiddlywiki tiddlers to files and vice versa. This was generated with gem2spec. The rpmlint errors about zero length stuff I do believe is OK because it's part of the test/example stuff. However I'm in communication with upstream to clarify. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 15:50:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 11:50:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806081550.m58FoBIu013509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 ------- Additional Comments From mike at miketc.com 2008-06-08 11:50 EST ------- >From the changelog section in the spec file.. %changelog * Wed Jun 14 2008 Alan Dunn 8.1pl3-1 - Initial version. Initial version? Maybe "Initial Fedora rpm/package" or something along those lines maybe since it's at version 8 already? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 16:10:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 12:10:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445151] Review Request: merkaartor - openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806081610.m58GAGY9009262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: merkaartor - openstreetmap editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445151 ------- Additional Comments From pablo.martin-gomez at laposte.net 2008-06-08 12:10 EST ------- I've checked the package, and I have some remarks : * "BuildRequires: gcc gcc-c++" is unneeded ( see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions ) * Always use the %{name} instead of merkaartor (except in %description, %changelog and in the header) * With "%{_datadir}/pixmaps/*.xpm", you are owning all the xpm files, use %{name}.xpm instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 16:48:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 12:48:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806081648.m58Gmxml014424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 ------- Additional Comments From dwheeler at dwheeler.com 2008-06-08 12:48 EST ------- It's too bad rpm doesn't have a "Suggests:" tag. Perhaps the description could add: "coqtop users may want to install and use rlwrap, e.g., 'rlwrap coqtop', or use an IDE." Basically, coqtop doesn't include readline (for history and line editing), which makes it annoying to use directly. Installing and using rlwrap fixes that, but it's not _required_ so rlwrap shouldn't be a dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 17:20:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 13:20:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806081720.m58HK7Yx026986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-06-08 13:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #36) > - No! This file must be removed. You must explicitly write > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_infodir}/dir > ------------------------------------------------------------------ Aaah I see.. Okay done now. The relevant links are : SPEC File for revision 8 - http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/speechd-rpm/speech-dispatcher.spec SRPM - http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/speechd-rpm/speech-dispatcher-0.6.6-9.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 17:49:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 13:49:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436831] Review Request: gbrainy - Gbrainy is a brain teaser game and trainer to keep your brain trained In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806081749.m58HnxLN031068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gbrainy - Gbrainy is a brain teaser game and trainer to keep your brain trained https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436831 sereinity at online.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(sereinity at online.f| |r) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 17:53:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 13:53:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230250] Review Request: gtkhtml38 - GtkHTML 3.8 compatibility library & devel bits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806081753.m58HrNit024210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkhtml38 - GtkHTML 3.8 compatibility library & devel bits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230250 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-08 13:53 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 17:54:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 13:54:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273301] Review Request: perl-Class-CSV - Class based CSV parser/writer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806081754.m58HsrQd031901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-CSV - Class based CSV parser/writer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273301 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-08 13:54 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 17:55:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 13:55:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447766] Review Request: mathomatic - Small, portable symbolic math program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806081755.m58HtrCv024779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mathomatic - Small, portable symbolic math program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447766 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-08 13:55 EST ------- Michel: Can you set the fedora-review flag? Just want to make sure all is approved from your end. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 17:57:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 13:57:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450455] New: Review Request: Cython - A compiler/language for writing Python extension modules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450455 Summary: Review Request: Cython - A compiler/language for writing Python extension modules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.sylvan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/python/Cython.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/python/Cython-0.9.6.14-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Cython is a language that makes writing C extensions for the Python language as easy as Python itself. Cython is based on the well-known Pyrex, but supports more cutting edge functionality and optimizations. The Cython language is very close to the Python language, but Cython additionally supports calling C functions and declaring C types on variables and class attributes. This allows the compiler to generate very efficient C code from Cython code. This makes Cython the ideal language for wrapping for external C libraries, and for fast C modules that speed up the execution of Python code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 18:10:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 14:10:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450455] Review Request: Cython - A compiler/language for writing Python extension modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806081810.m58IAqWP002448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Cython - A compiler/language for writing Python extension modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450455 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-08 14:10 EST ------- Also uploaded under alternate naming; this makes it explicit it's Python-related, gets rid of the capitalization and the later part matches the naming under Debian http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/python/python-cython.spec http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/python/python-cython-0.9.6.14-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 18:19:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 14:19:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450226] Review Request: blueproximity - bluetooth proximity detector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806081819.m58IJlan003535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blueproximity - bluetooth proximity detector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450226 sereinity at online.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sereinity at online.fr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 18:17:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 14:17:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450226] Review Request: blueproximity - bluetooth proximity detector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806081817.m58IHppq003450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blueproximity - bluetooth proximity detector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450226 ------- Additional Comments From sereinity at online.fr 2008-06-08 14:17 EST ------- First, please use rpmlint and fix problems : blueproximity.src:22: W: setup-not-quiet blueproximity.src: W: no-%build-section blueproximity.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 5) blueproximity.src: E: description-line-too-long This software helps you add a little more security to your desktop. It does so by detecting one of your bluetooth devices, most likely your mobile phone, and keeping track of its distance. If you move away from your computer and the distance is above a certain level (no measurement in meters is possible) for a given time, it automatically locks your desktop (or starts any other shell command you want). blueproximity.src: W: invalid-license GPL blueproximity.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/blueproximity/proximity.glade blueproximity.noarch: E: description-line-too-long This software helps you add a little more security to your desktop. It does so by detecting one of your bluetooth devices, most likely your mobile phone, and keeping track of its distance. If you move away from your computer and the distance is above a certain level (no measurement in meters is possible) for a given time, it automatically locks your desktop (or starts any other shell command you want). blueproximity.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL blueproximity.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/blueproximity.mo blueproximity.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/en/LC_MESSAGES/blueproximity.mo blueproximity.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/blueproximity.mo blueproximity.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/fa/LC_MESSAGES/blueproximity.mo blueproximity.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/hu/LC_MESSAGES/blueproximity.mo blueproximity.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/blueproximity.mo blueproximity.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/blueproximity.mo blueproximity.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/blueproximity.mo blueproximity.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/th/LC_MESSAGES/blueproximity.mo Secondly have a look here : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432905 and here : http://repo.awardspace.com/contrib/blueproximity.spec (the last release of Nicolas Corrarello) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 18:34:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 14:34:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435090] Review Request: Cython - This is a development version of Pyrex, a language for writing Python extension modules. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806081834.m58IY9N4030453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Cython - This is a development version of Pyrex, a language for writing Python extension modules. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435090 jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.sylvan at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2008-06-08 14:34 EST ------- *** Bug 450455 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 18:34:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 14:34:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450455] Review Request: Cython - A compiler/language for writing Python extension modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806081834.m58IY8eO030429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Cython - A compiler/language for writing Python extension modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450455 jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2008-06-08 14:34 EST ------- Please try another one, this one is already in Fedora. :-) I did not consider this to be a python library so the naming scheme does not apply. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 435090 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 19:00:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 15:00:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239435] Review Request: Gnome Network Monitor - A Network Monitor for the GNOME Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806081900.m58J0hIv002155@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Gnome Network Monitor - A Network Monitor for the GNOME Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239435 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2008-06-08 15:00 EST ------- Bacause I didn't see any action for the last 5 month, I may close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 19:08:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 15:08:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450189] Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806081908.m58J8FbX011122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450189 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2008-06-08 15:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > About the third point in comment #4, i don't think a -lib subpackage is needed. Mind to explain me how your decision will solve multi-libs issues ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 20:14:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 16:14:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450013] Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806082014.m58KEtRg013294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 Bug 450013 depends on bug 450411, which changed state. Bug 450411 Summary: please build in EL-5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450411 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 20:58:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 16:58:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449317] Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806082058.m58Kwp4C019957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449317 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-08 16:58 EST ------- Thanks. Will make the changes before uploading. The yelp question is bizarre, as yelp is the only package that owns /usr/share/gnome/help. Will ask in the mailing list about that. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gamazons Short Description: GNOME Amazons Owners: salimma Branches: EL-5 F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 21:07:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 17:07:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449317] Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806082107.m58L7Afj028945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449317 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 21:19:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 17:19:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] New: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user- uploaded video hosts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/clive.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/clive-0.4.14-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: clive is a video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts such as Youtube, Google Video, Dailymotion, Guba, Metacafe and Sevenload. It can be chained with 3rd party tools for subsequent video re-encoding and and playing. It's my 4th package, but I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 21:49:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 17:49:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449317] Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806082149.m58LnTqM027489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449317 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-06-08 17:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Thanks. Will make the changes before uploading. The yelp question is bizarre, as > yelp is the only package that owns /usr/share/gnome/help. Will ask in the > mailing list about that. I agree with Kevin's answer on the list: If you drop the requirement on yelp you should IMO own /usr/share/gnome/help. Duplicate ownership is better than an unowned directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 21:51:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 17:51:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449037] Review Request: afio - cpio compatible archiver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806082151.m58LpeZR002988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: afio - cpio compatible archiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449037 ------- Additional Comments From bruno.cornec at hp.com 2008-06-08 17:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I agree with Kyle that its easier on the reviewers if you don't require them to > download and unpack your src.rpm to take a quick look at your spec. I guess it > depends on how much you really want to have your software reviewed. First sorry for the fact I didn't answer to Kyle. I just didn't receive a mail warning me of his answer :-(. I have no problem providing the .spec file of course. > Now, I did unpack and build it. First, the rpmlint output: > W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/afio.1.gz > There's no reason for the manpage to be executable. Yep. Fixed. > W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/afio-2.5/script2/restore > W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/afio-2.5/script3/gnupg_read > W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/afio-2.5/script3/pgp_read > W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/afio-2.5/script3/pgp_write > W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/afio-2.5/script4/tapechange > W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/afio-2.5/script3/gnupg_write > W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/afio-2.5/script2/backup > It's not necessarily a blocker for documentation to be executable, but you > should consider whether you expect that anyone will need to call those scripts, > because you shouldn't expect people to have to run things out of /usr/share/doc. In fact those are set up by the upstream make install procedure because those are scripts given as example. That way you just have to copy them to be able to use them. Let me know if you think It would be better to change that in the spec file. > W: invalid-license GPL > Please read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing and choose an appropriate > License: tag. Oops. More over it's LGPL in fact. So used LGPLv2+ > W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/afio-2.5/script2/backup /bin/bash > This shouldn't be an issue if those scripts actually belong in the > documentation. We will avoid the case that documentation brings in significant > additional dependencies, but bash isn't problematic. So I think I can let it like that ? > Other comments: > Please be consistent in macro use in the spec; if you're going to use "%{__rm}" > then you need to use "%{__mkdir}", "%{__mkdir_p}", "%{__install}", etc. Or you > can just use the non-macro versions throughout and save the typing. It's up to > you, but you must be consistent. Ok I remove the %{__rm} and use rm > You must not hardcode ".fc9". Please use the %{dist} tag appropriately: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag Ok, done. > Is ftp.project-builder.org really the canonical upstream for the source? It > seems like the URL you provide doesn't point to that site at all. The canonical upstream is what is mentioned in the Url: tag Should I also use it for the Source: tag (I used the place where I store a copy alongside the packages I made). Thanks for your help. Newet build is at the same place, + spec file: ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/9/afio-2.5-1.fc9.src.rpm ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/9/afio.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 22:06:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 18:06:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806082206.m58M6Tso030453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 ------- Additional Comments From nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com 2008-06-08 18:06 EST ------- Updated (remove ffmpeg dependancy that only provides more options) : spec : http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/clive.spec srpm : http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/clive-0.4.14-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 22:15:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 18:15:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450470] New: RDMA kernel stack initializing package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450470 Summary: RDMA kernel stack initializing package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: noarch URL: http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/f10/noarch/ rdma-1.0-1.fc10.noarch.rpm OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dledford at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com This package provides an init script and a config file and an awk script and some udev rules that are needed to properly setup the kernel InfiniBand/iWARP modules at bootup or anytime someone wants to reload the stack. It's generally needed in order to get all the proper modules loaded for things like IPoIB to work smoothly as there is no good means of mapping from things like ib0 network configuration to actual hardware module without hacking up modprobe to know things about the IB stack like it does about the SCSI stack (such as loading sdX devices requires scsi_hostadapter* to be loaded too, same goes here, loading ib* devices would require the addition of an rdma_hostadapter concept to modprobe). It seems a better idea to implement the logic here than to add another specific hack to modprobe et. al. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 22:17:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 18:17:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450470] RDMA kernel stack initializing package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806082217.m58MHMQR031898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RDMA kernel stack initializing package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450470 ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2008-06-08 18:17 EST ------- Package can be found under http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/f10/noarch/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 22:17:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 18:17:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434727] Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806082217.m58MHsUv006985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434727 carl at five-ten-sg.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From carl at five-ten-sg.com 2008-06-08 18:17 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libpst Short Description: Utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats Owners: carllibpst Branches: F-10 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 22:25:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 18:25:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442917] [FEATURE] Create ofed-udev-rules package for Infiniband support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806082225.m58MPowB000865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [FEATURE] Create ofed-udev-rules package for Infiniband support Alias: ofed_fedora_10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442917 ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2008-06-08 18:25 EST ------- The package review bug for the package I have is bug 450470 and there is a pointer to a package there if anyone needs it or wants to review it. This is *just* the base package that does the kernel module init. All the user space libraries and such are in other packages and will be coming up for review shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 23:27:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 19:27:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 388541] Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh - Flying High wallpapers for GNOME (slideshow) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806082327.m58NRIjJ010007@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh - Flying High wallpapers for GNOME (slideshow) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=388541 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(liviopl.pl at gmail.c| |om) | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2008-06-08 19:27 EST ------- No response from submitter. Closing bug as NOTABUG. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 23:27:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 19:27:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 380161] Review Request: gtk-aurora-engine - Aurora GTK engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806082327.m58NRdrp017181@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-aurora-engine - Aurora GTK engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=380161 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(liviopl.pl at gmail.c| |om) | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2008-06-08 19:27 EST ------- No response from submitter. Closing bug as NOTABUG. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 8 23:38:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 19:38:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450470] RDMA kernel stack initializing package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806082338.m58NcFBF018626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RDMA kernel stack initializing package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450470 ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2008-06-08 19:38 EST ------- src rpm can be found under http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/f10/SRPMS/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 00:00:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 20:00:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450470] RDMA kernel stack initializing package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090000.m590008b021775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RDMA kernel stack initializing package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450470 dledford at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |450476 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 00:00:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 20:00:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450476] New: InfiniBand Connection Management library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450476 Summary: InfiniBand Connection Management library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/f10/SRPMS/l ibibcm-1.0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dledford at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #450470 +++ This package provides the libibcm library that offloads much of the low level work associated with bringing up a connection between to infiniband hosts. SRPM available at: http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/f10/SRPMS/ Prebuilt x86_64 rpms at: http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/f10/x86_64/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 00:00:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 20:00:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450470] RDMA kernel stack initializing package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090000.m5900uSN015396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RDMA kernel stack initializing package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450470 dledford at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |450477 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 00:00:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 20:00:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450477] New: RDMA Connection Management library/API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450477 Summary: RDMA Connection Management library/API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: noarch URL: http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/f10/SRPMS/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dledford at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #450470 +++ This package provides an init script and a config file and an awk script and some udev rules that are needed to properly setup the kernel InfiniBand/iWARP modules at bootup or anytime someone wants to reload the stack. It's generally needed in order to get all the proper modules loaded for things like IPoIB to work smoothly as there is no good means of mapping from things like ib0 network configuration to actual hardware module without hacking up modprobe to know things about the IB stack like it does about the SCSI stack (such as loading sdX devices requires scsi_hostadapter* to be loaded too, same goes here, loading ib* devices would require the addition of an rdma_hostadapter concept to modprobe). It seems a better idea to implement the logic here than to add another specific hack to modprobe et. al. -- Additional comment from dledford at redhat.com on 2008-06-08 18:17 EST -- Package can be found under http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/f10/noarch/ -- Additional comment from dledford at redhat.com on 2008-06-08 19:38 EST -- src rpm can be found under http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/f10/SRPMS/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 00:02:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 20:02:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450477] RDMA Connection Management library/API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090002.m5902t8Y015764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RDMA Connection Management library/API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450477 ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2008-06-08 20:02 EST ------- Er, meant to edit comment text and accidentally triggered the web browser to post early instead. Anyway, this is the librdmacm library. It's the most commonly used user space API for abstracting out the InfiniBand connection process and making it act, as much as possible, like a normal sockets based connection. It's highly useful and make RDMA programming not quite so horrible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 00:40:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 20:40:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444257] Review Request: nted - Musical score editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090040.m590ebZN028400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nted - Musical score editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444257 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-08 20:40 EST ------- Incorporated your changes, and updated to 0.24.1 . Fixed the obvious compiler warnings, but the warnings about uninitialized variables are probably better left to upstream -- I've sent him the updated patches. Updated SRPM: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/music/nted-0.24.1-1.fc9.src.rpm (patches are available in the same directory) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 00:41:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 20:41:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449317] Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090041.m590fcwP028627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449317 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-08 20:41 EST ------- Yup. Which means filing bugs against a lot of GNOME packages -- nobody depends on yelp yet everyone dumps files there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 01:09:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 21:09:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450481] New: libibcommon package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450481 Summary: libibcommon package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: noarch URL: http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/f10/SRPMS/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dledford at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #450470 +++ This package is a pre-cursor, helper package to opensm, the InfiniBand subnet manager. src rpm can be found under http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/f10/SRPMS/ x86_64 rpms can be found under http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/f10/x86_64/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 01:09:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 21:09:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450470] RDMA kernel stack initializing package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090109.m591916R025613@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RDMA kernel stack initializing package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450470 dledford at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |450481 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 01:10:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 21:10:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450482] New: libibcommon package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450482 Summary: libibcommon package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: noarch URL: http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/f10/SRPMS/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dledford at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #450481 +++ +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #450470 +++ This package is a pre-cursor, helper package to opensm, the InfiniBand subnet manager. It relies upon the libibcommon package this bug was cloned from. src rpm can be found under http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/f10/SRPMS/ x86_64 rpms can be found under http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/f10/x86_64/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 01:10:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 21:10:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450481] libibcommon package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090110.m591A2pM000672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libibcommon package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450481 dledford at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |450482 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 01:10:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 21:10:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450482] libibumad package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090110.m591AfGj026155@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libibumad package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450482 dledford at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|libibcommon package |libibumad package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 01:11:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 21:11:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450483] New: libibmad package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450483 Summary: libibmad package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: noarch URL: http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/f10/SRPMS/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dledford at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #450482 +++ +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #450481 +++ +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #450470 +++ This package is a pre-cursor, helper package to opensm, the InfiniBand subnet manager. It relies upon the libibumad package this bug was cloned from. src rpm can be found under http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/f10/SRPMS/ x86_64 rpms can be found under http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/f10/x86_64/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 01:11:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 21:11:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450482] libibumad package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090111.m591BM2C000923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libibumad package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450482 dledford at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |450483 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 02:12:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 22:12:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450484] New: Review Request: telepathy-sofiasip - SIP connection manager for Telepathy Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450484 Summary: Review Request: telepathy-sofiasip - SIP connection manager for Telepathy Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bdpepple at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/telepathy-sofiasip.spec SRPM URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/telepathy-sofiasip-0.5.8-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: telepathy-sofiasip is a SIP connection manager for the Telepathy framework based on the SofiaSIP-stack. Note: this package contains 2 header files which would normally go into a devel subpackage, but I decided against that since that's all it would contain. Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=653004 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 03:16:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 23:16:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444134] Review Request: spe - Python IDE editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090316.m593GoFo012497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spe - Python IDE editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444134 jonathan.mercier at hotmail.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(jonathan.mercier at h| |otmail.fr) | ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.mercier at hotmail.fr 2008-06-08 23:16 EST ------- i put the new spec and src.rpm this week -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 03:50:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 23:50:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434727] Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090350.m593oGL7024418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434727 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-08 23:50 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 03:51:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 23:51:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449317] Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090351.m593pv8H017821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449317 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-08 23:51 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 04:16:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 00:16:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449928] Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090416.m594GOhM021987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449928 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2008-06-09 00:16 EST ------- This fails to build for me on F-9: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/libwfut-build.log Oddly enough, the build failure isn't 100% reproducible. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. I suspect that maybe it's not safe with %{?_smp_mflags} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 04:27:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 00:27:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449928] Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090427.m594R5bq023651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449928 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2008-06-09 00:27 EST ------- Minor point: If you add --disable-static to the %configure statement, then you won't have to remove the .a files later on, though you still have to remove the .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 04:44:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 00:44:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449928] Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090444.m594iAQi032340@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449928 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2008-06-09 00:44 EST ------- It also appears that the system-tinyxml.patch is not working as expected. To verify, try adding this to the end of %prep and rebuilding: rm -f libwfut/tiny* I think the problem is that you are patching configure.ac, but the changes are never propogated to the configure script itself. To make the changes take effect, you will have to either patch the configure and Makefile.in files in addition to configure.ac (preferred), or run autoconf/automake in %prep to regenerate the files at build time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 05:00:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 01:00:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449317] Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090500.m5950ERl028564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449317 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-09 01:00 EST ------- Package built, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 05:15:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 01:15:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449317] Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090515.m595FPXJ031227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449317 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-09 01:15 EST ------- gamazons-0.83-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 05:30:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 01:30:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449317] Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090530.m595UTC7007547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449317 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-09 01:30 EST ------- gamazons-0.83-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 05:32:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 01:32:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447766] Review Request: mathomatic - Small, portable symbolic math program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090532.m595WK3d001361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mathomatic - Small, portable symbolic math program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447766 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-09 01:32 EST ------- Ah yes, sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 06:40:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 02:40:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444257] Review Request: nted - Musical score editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090640.m596efsT011971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nted - Musical score editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444257 ------- Additional Comments From rhbugs at n-dimensional.de 2008-06-09 02:40 EST ------- Watching the diffs, I find: - Upstream COPYING is unchanged. Good. - Upstream file licenses are unchanged. Good. - You have made sure configure does not reset CXXFLAGS. Good catch. - You are resetting icondir from $(datadir)/icons to $(datadir)/pixmaps for some reason. Makes no difference to me. - You have fixed a bunch more compiler warnings. Good. (Have you sent this upstream?) - More translations for nted.desktop. Good. - po/nted.pot is now broken with CVS merge conflicts. Does not affect us. - You have removed the "Requires: yelp". Hmm... whatever. "Help|Documentation" will still need yelp, won't it? - You also install the Italian manual. Good. So there remains a single issue now that you are changing configure.in... rebuilding the RPM from the SRPM appears to re-run aclocal, automake, autoconf, autoheader, and we'd like to avoid this. Looks like adding something like sleep 1 find . -type f -name Makefile.in | xargs touch touch aclocal.m4 config.h.in configure at the end of %prep prevents automake&Co re-runs. When this last one is done, I'll finally shut up and approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 07:22:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 03:22:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449928] Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090722.m597M7s6018598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449928 ------- Additional Comments From atorkhov at gmail.com 2008-06-09 03:22 EST ------- Thanks, I'll check these issues. (In reply to comment #3) > It also appears that the system-tinyxml.patch is not working as expected. To > verify, try adding this to the end of %prep and rebuilding: > > rm -f libwfut/tiny* I'm patching this file libwfut/tinyxml.h to include system . So, if you remove it, you will get errors indeed. I'm doing so because this patch has been merged upstream, so it has to mainain compatibility with systems where are no system-wide tinyxml installed. One thing that could be done - is patch removing tinyxml sources from tinyxml* to ensure that we are not building against it. > I think the problem is that you are patching configure.ac, but the changes are > never propogated to the configure script itself. To make the changes take > effect, you will have to either patch the configure and Makefile.in files in > addition to configure.ac (preferred), or run autoconf/automake in %prep to > regenerate the files at build time. Yes, I thought about this, but autotools is smart thing - in Makefile it is checking if configure.ac or Makefile.in changes and then rebuild configure or Makefiles. So in our case it's running configure twice - yes, this is uneffective but working. Anyway, I'll make patch on configure and Makefile.in in some future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 07:27:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 03:27:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449928] Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090727.m597RN3q025873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449928 ------- Additional Comments From atorkhov at gmail.com 2008-06-09 03:27 EST ------- Um, I looked in build log and find that tinyxml patch is not working for some reason (had to do this before) - will investigate it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 08:08:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 04:08:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439263] Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090808.m5988IJJ001354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439263 ------- Additional Comments From jtulach at netbeans.org 2008-06-09 04:08 EST ------- I've connected to fedorepeople and I've also just got the CVS. Looks like there was some delay between getting the key and being able to use it. Now I think I will proceed with the upload. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 08:33:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 04:33:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449393] Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090833.m598XE1J005693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449393 ------- Additional Comments From pbrobinson at gmail.com 2008-06-09 04:33 EST ------- There's another srpm/spec up now with the fix for run-mozilla.sh in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 08:37:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 04:37:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439263] Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090837.m598bqiK000323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439263 ------- Additional Comments From jtulach at netbeans.org 2008-06-09 04:37 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=308671) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=308671&action=view) Commited, what next? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 08:41:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 04:41:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090841.m598f5Mn007111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rjones at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-06-09 04:41 EST ------- In reply to comment 12: I think you should just Require: rlwrap It's not a big package, just 49K, and rlwrap really improves usability of coq (and OCaml). I'm taking this package for review now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 08:42:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 04:42:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090842.m598gRTo007293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |436875 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 08:56:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 04:56:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449928] Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090856.m598u0fj003777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449928 ------- Additional Comments From atorkhov at gmail.com 2008-06-09 04:55 EST ------- Spec URL: http://purple.worldforge.org/~alex/fedora/libwfut.spec SRPM URL: http://purple.worldforge.org/~alex/fedora/libwfut-0.2.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Updated tinyxml patch to solve build problem. The problem was that sometimes config.h.in wasn't rebuild and therefore HAVE_LIBTINYXML was not defined. May be it's a bug in automake making makefile unsuitable with %{?_smp_mflags}. Any suggestions, should we report it? New patch, first, patches configure and Makefile.in so there will be no need to run autoconf/automake. And second, removes tinyxml sources so there will never be intention to build against it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 09:09:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 05:09:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090909.m5999x1T012123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(amdunn at gmail.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 09:09:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 05:09:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090909.m5999hiO012076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-06-09 05:09 EST ------- These bits of the spec file are all wrong: # Test for emacs site_lisp directory, if so, add relevant files to roster, else, don't try and install ... # Test for tex directory, if so, add relevant files to roster, else, don't try and install ... It's not acceptable to have different RPMs being produced depending on what happens to be installed at the time. Instead, assume those directories / packages are installed and ensure this by having a complete list of BuildRequires. Your BuildRequires is missing at least emacs, texlive-latex, another texlive-* package which provides /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/misc (I couldn't find which one). Once you think you've got a complete list of BuildRequires, you should then scratch-build the package in koji: koji build --scratch dist-f10 coq-8.1pl3-1.fc9.src.rpm This will almost certainly fail, but it should fail in a way which tells you which extra BuildRequires you are missing and any other problems that you'll encounter in the real build. When you have a successful scratch-build in Koji, please attach a link to the Koji build here. Next thing you should do is to run rpmlint on all the RPMs (source and binary RPMs). rpmlint output should be nil for this package. Another thing I notice in the spec file: %{_bindir}/parser %{_bindir}/parser.opt # I suppose technically we might not have built parser.opt, but my efforts to fix this problem re: accounting for this in the file manifest have failed This is against the OCaml packaging policy which requires that you package the best possible binary (ie. native, if available, else bytecode). You can easily do this by testing for the presense of ocamlopt. See the first line of our sample specfile: http://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/5/5c/Packaging_OCaml_ocaml-foolib.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 09:43:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 05:43:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447599] Review Request: immix - image mixer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090943.m599hwGM012048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: immix - image mixer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447599 nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 09:45:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 05:45:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090945.m599j0MW018421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 09:45:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 05:45:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806090945.m599jgtR018852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 10:22:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 06:22:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091022.m59AMVjV018837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 amdunn at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(amdunn at gmail.com) | ------- Additional Comments From amdunn at gmail.com 2008-06-09 06:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) Thanks for looking at the package. I have some questions and comments about what you said. > These bits of the spec file are all wrong: > > # Test for emacs site_lisp directory, if so, add relevant files to roster, else, don't try and install > ... > # Test for tex directory, if so, add relevant files to roster, else, don't try and install > ... > > It's not acceptable to have different RPMs being produced depending on what > happens to be installed at the time. Instead, assume those directories / packages > are installed and ensure this by having a complete list of BuildRequires. > > Your BuildRequires is missing at least emacs, texlive-latex, another texlive-* > package which provides /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/misc (I couldn't find > which one). I put things the way I did in the spec file to attempt to reduce the list of BuildRequires. It seems a bit odd to require someone to have emacs installed just to put a .el file in the appropriate place. What if, for the sake of argument, the user is a vi person and doesn't feel like installing emacs? However, you are right, it would certainly affect the built binary RPM. Is there a way to do what I would actually like here? I suppose things like that could be subpackaged, but that seemed excessive for such a low number of files. > Once you think you've got a complete list of BuildRequires, you should then > scratch-build the package in koji: > > koji build --scratch dist-f10 coq-8.1pl3-1.fc9.src.rpm > > This will almost certainly fail, but it should fail in a way which tells you which > extra BuildRequires you are missing and any other problems that you'll > encounter in the real build. Just to clarify, you're saying that you think that when I change to acting as though the person has TeX and emacs installed that I'll be missing appropriate BuildRequires, right? As is, I did a test build with mock to see if the BuildRequires were appropriately satisfied, and things seemed to work. > When you have a successful scratch-build in Koji, please attach a link to > the Koji build here. > > Next thing you should do is to run rpmlint on all the RPMs (source and binary > RPMs). rpmlint output should be nil for this package. I knew that there was a bit of rpmlint output - it fell into three categories, two of which are related: 1) One of the graphics files appears to be corrupted 2) Some of the text files are not in UTF-8 I could repackage the main coq source, but I wasn't sure if this was a good idea as this changes the signature of the main source, thus denying anyone the ability to check for a match. I thought a solution would be to include a separate icon and I wasn't sure how necessary the UTF-8 conversion is - perhaps I should be including separate versions of those files too? 3) Inclusion of .cmxa files in a "non-devel" package I'm not sure about that one. I didn't think it was really appropriate to make a separate package for those. > Another thing I notice in the spec file: > > %{_bindir}/parser > %{_bindir}/parser.opt > # I suppose technically we might not have built parser.opt, but my efforts to fix this problem re: accounting for this in > the file manifest have failed > > This is against the OCaml packaging policy which requires that you package the > best possible binary (ie. native, if available, else bytecode). You can easily do > this by testing for the presense of ocamlopt. See the first line of our sample > specfile: > > http://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/5/5c/Packaging_OCaml_ocaml-foolib.spec Their main configuration file always attempts to build with the best possible binary. I originally was just trying to check whether their setup in doing so (by checking whether a parser.opt file was created), but was having a bit of a time doing that. Is checking for ocamlopt what I should be doing? Just because there is an ocamlopt program available doesn't necessarily mean that their setup was able to detect everything properly and build using it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 10:40:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 06:40:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091040.m59AeLPp021704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-06-09 06:40 EST ------- > I put things the way I did in the spec file to attempt to reduce the list of > BuildRequires. It seems a bit odd to require someone to have emacs installed > just to put a .el file in the appropriate place. What if, for the sake of > argument, the user is a vi person and doesn't feel like installing emacs? > However, you are right, it would certainly affect the built binary RPM. Is there > a way to do what I would actually like here? I suppose things like that could be > subpackaged, but that seemed excessive for such a low number of files. The purpose of BuildRequires is a complete list of build requirements so that an identical binary package can be built on any system. The current spec file would build different binary RPMs depending on whatever happened to be installed on the build system. (And in fact it fails if that tex.../misc directory is missing). Don't worry about "reduc[ing] the list of BuildRequires". In fact you should be doing just the opposite. The issue of what a user needs at install time is completely different. Provide a coq-emacs subpackage which contains the emacs components. Users can optionally install this depending on their editor choice. > Just to clarify, you're saying that you think that when I change to acting as > though the person has TeX and emacs installed that I'll be missing appropriate > BuildRequires, right? As is, I did a test build with mock to see if the > BuildRequires were appropriately satisfied, and things seemed to work. I think you're misunderstanding the difference between the build (which happens once, on Fedora's Koji build system) and what users install (those binary packages built by Koji). > 1) One of the graphics files appears to be corrupted > 2) Some of the text files are not in UTF-8 > > I could repackage the main coq source, but I wasn't sure if this was a good idea > as this changes the signature of the main source, thus denying anyone the > ability to check for a match. I thought a solution would be to include a > separate icon and I wasn't sure how necessary the UTF-8 conversion is - perhaps > I should be including separate versions of those files too? No don't rebuild any tarballs. Add a line to your %prep section to fix these, eg: %prep mv text-file text-file.old iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 < text-file.old > text-file rm bad-binary.gif If the changes are more significant, use a patch instead. > 3) Inclusion of .cmxa files in a "non-devel" package > > I'm not sure about that one. I didn't think it was really appropriate to make a > separate package for those. Does coq ship libraries? If so you should follow the OCaml package policy for libraries, which would mandate a separate -devel subpackage. The generic 'foolib' spec file above is a good starting point for packaging libraries. > Their main configuration file always attempts to build with the best possible > binary. I originally was just trying to check whether their setup in doing so > (by checking whether a parser.opt file was created), but was having a bit of a > time doing that. Is checking for ocamlopt what I should be doing? Just because > there is an ocamlopt program available doesn't necessarily mean that their setup > was able to detect everything properly and build using it. It's not "build with the best possible binary". Fedora packages should ship the best possible binary of each program. So you'll need something like this: %install %if %opt install parser.opt %{_bindir}/parser %else install parser %{_bindir}/parser %endif BTW having a binary called /usr/bin/parser is probably a bad idea. How do Debian package this file? They usually rename such generic names ('coqparser' or the like). If Debian rename it, then we should do so too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 10:44:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 06:44:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091044.m59AiBA2028061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-06-09 06:44 EST ------- BTW, I had a look at the Debian package and they're applying no fewer than 7 patches. You might want to check if any of those are relevant to Fedora. Also they ship parser as /usr/bin/parser, so I guess we can leave that for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 10:47:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 06:47:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091047.m59Al4KV022658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-06-09 06:47 EST ------- Link to Debian package: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-ocaml-maint/trunk/packages/coq/trunk/debian/?rev=0&sc=0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 12:11:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 08:11:21 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_450527=5D_New=3A_Review_Request=3A_libkni_?= =?iso-8859-1?q?-_C++_library_f=C3=BCr_the_Katana_robot_arm?= Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 Summary: Review Request: libkni - C++ library f?r the Katana robot arm Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tim at niemueller.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/robotics/libkni.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/robotics/libkni-3.9.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Katana Native Interface is a C++ library for programmers who would like to write their own programs, but don't want to implement the protocol and device stuff katana is using. Website: http://www.neuronics.ch/cms_en/web/index.php?id=284&s=software_kni Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=653541 Additional notes: The package has been tested here with a Katana 6M180 robotic arm and is working just fine. There is no other way besides real hardware to test this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 12:56:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 08:56:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091256.m59Cu4w9021764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2008-06-09 08:56 EST ------- Building on x86_64 gives the following error during rpmbuild: error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/zypp/zypp-query-pool -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 12:58:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 08:58:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091258.m59CwnMF014009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2008-06-09 08:58 EST ------- Sorry, the above comment should have been on libzypp, not sat-solver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 12:58:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 08:58:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447738] Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091258.m59Cwj1c022111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2008-06-09 08:58 EST ------- Building on x86_64 gives the following error during rpmbuild: error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/zypp/zypp-query-pool -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 13:37:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 09:37:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450539] New: Review Request: service-discovery-applet - Service discovery applet based on Avahi for the Gnome panel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450539 Summary: Review Request: service-discovery-applet - Service discovery applet based on Avahi for the Gnome panel Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tim at niemueller.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/misc/service-discovery-applet.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/misc/service-discovery-applet-0.4.5-0.2.svn20080609.fc9.src.rpm Description: The service discovery applet lists all available services which are published through Avahi/Rendezvous/Bonjour/ZeroConf and allows to run actions on that service. Website: has none, mentioned on http://avahi.org/wiki/AdministrativeAvahiApplication, SVN at http://svn.0pointer.de/viewvc/trunk/?root=service-discovery-applet Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=653703 Subversion package contains more functionality than latest release (very old), thus svn-version is packaged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 14:19:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 10:19:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450470] RDMA kernel stack initializing package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091419.m59EJUDb029291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RDMA kernel stack initializing package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450470 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-06-09 10:19 EST ------- Not necessarily *package* review comments: - The udev in Fedora is new enough that you should be able to do add --attr-match or --subsystem-match to your udevtrigger call so it doesn't cause a retrigger of everything. - Shouldn't those chipset errata be in PCI quirks (and the MTRR in DMI quirks)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 14:44:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 10:44:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449842] Review Request: trac-xmlrpc-plugin - XML-RPC plugin for Trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091444.m59EiHiA001388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-xmlrpc-plugin - XML-RPC plugin for Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449842 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2008-06-09 10:44 EST ------- After investigation, it is no longer necessary to pull in python-setuptools-devel. That's only necessary if you want the command line executed easy_install, which we do not need since we're using python setup.py and setuptools directly. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: trac-xmlrpc-plugin Short Description: XML-RPC plugin for Trac Owners: jkeating Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 14:44:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 10:44:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449840] Review Request: trac-spamfilter-plugin - Spam-Filter plugin for Trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091444.m59EirJr009979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-spamfilter-plugin - Spam-Filter plugin for Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449840 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2008-06-09 10:44 EST ------- After investigation, it is no longer necessary to pull in python-setuptools-devel. That's only necessary if you want the command line executed easy_install, which we do not need since we're using python setup.py and setuptools directly. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: trac-spamfilter-plugin Short Description: Spam-Filter plugin for Trac Owners: jkeating Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 15:26:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 11:26:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444428] Review Request: ocaml-cmigrep - Search OCaml compiled interface (cmi) files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091526.m59FQR81018365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cmigrep - Search OCaml compiled interface (cmi) files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444428 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |450551 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-06-09 11:26 EST ------- Bug filed: bug 450551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 15:40:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 11:40:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450553] Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091540.m59FebvB020684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450553 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-09 11:40 EST ------- Note that this is perl Test-Harness 3.10 package, stripped of Test::Harness compatibility module, because older version of Test::Harness is included in perl package (and perl-Test-Harness since Fedora 9). This means that packages that rely on Test::Harness interface won't be affected by this package, and only TAP::Harness is provided by this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 15:37:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 11:37:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450553] New: Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450553 Summary: Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-TAP-Harness.spec OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package- review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com,tcallawa at redhat.com SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-TAP-Harness.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/mock-results/perl-TAP-Harness-3.10-1.el5.noarch/perl-TAP-Harness-3.10-1.el5.src.rpm mock: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/mock-results/perl-TAP-Harness-3.10-1.el5.noarch/ Description: Run Perl tests and output formatted results with statistics. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 15:46:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 11:46:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450553] Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091546.m59FkDsI021882@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450553 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-06-09 11:46 EST ------- I am very strongly opposed to letting this package in and am leaning to reject it. What is the issue you are trying to solve? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 16:22:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 12:22:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439263] Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091622.m59GMPwj020833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439263 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-09 12:22 EST ------- Jaroslav: Looks like you are at this step: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Request_Builds I am going to clear the cvs flag here as CVS is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 16:25:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 12:25:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447766] Review Request: mathomatic - Small, portable symbolic math program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091625.m59GPZlv021599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mathomatic - Small, portable symbolic math program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447766 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-09 12:25 EST ------- thanks. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 16:46:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 12:46:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450553] Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091646.m59Gkogf001025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450553 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-09 12:46 EST ------- Ralf: The issue I am trying to solve is lack of TAP::Harness module in Fedora. Could you please name specific reasons against letting the package in Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 17:32:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 13:32:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091732.m59HWTwv001253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-09 13:32 EST ------- For -9: * Source file -------------------------------------------------------------- 1038719 2008-02-16 15:54 speech-dispatcher-0.6.6-7.fc7/speech-dispatcher-0.6.6.tar.gz 1039765 2008-06-08 00:04 speech-dispatcher-0.6.6-9.fc7/speech-dispatcher-0.6.6.tar.gz -------------------------------------------------------------- * Requires(preun) duplicates -------------------------------------------------------------- Requires(preun): /sbin/chkconfig /sbin/service /sbin/install-info initscripts -------------------------------------------------------------- - Here "/sbin/service" and "initscripts" are duplicates. * _sourcedir, %_builddir -------------------------------------------------------------- cp %{_sourcedir}/speech-dispatcherd . iconv -f WINDOWS-1252 -t UTF-8 %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/doc/speech-dispatcher-cs.info > %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/doc/speech-dispatcher-cs.info -------------------------------------------------------------- - Please don't use %_sourcedir, %_builddir * Don't use %_sourcedir but specify source files by %SOURCEx as -------------------------------------------------------------- install -p -m 0755 %SOURCE1 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir}/ -------------------------------------------------------------- This is a must. ("cp"ing %SOURCE1 to %_builddir is not needed, just install directly. Also please don't forget to add "-p" when using cp or install) - Also, when %setup is done, the working directory is %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}, so just -------------------------------------------------------------- iconv -f WINDOWS-1252 -t UTF-8 speech-dispatcher-cs.info > ... -------------------------------------------------------------- is sufficient. * iconv usage - Then -------------------------------------------------------------- iconv -f ... -t .... speech-dispatcher-cs.info > speech-dispatcher-cs.info -------------------------------------------------------------- as you write now destroys this info file. * INSTALL= option on make install -------------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT -p -------------------------------------------------------------- - This is wrong ("-p" is treated just as a option of make, see "man make", also please check build log to see what is happening). (This executes "make" command, not "install" command) (In reply to comment #31) > - To keep timestamps on installed files, please use > -------------------------------------------------------------- > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" > -------------------------------------------------------------- * Macros in %changelog -------------------------------------------------------------- * Sun Jun 08 2008 Hemant Goyal 0.6.6-9 - removed %{_infodir}/dir file -------------------------------------------------------------- - "rpm -q --changelog speech-dispatcher" shows that this %{_infodir} macro is expanded, which should not be. To avoid macros expansion, please use %%, i.e. -------------------------------------------------------------- - removed %%{_infodir}/dir file -------------------------------------------------------------- for example. (In reply to comment #35) > One error however: > The script works perfectly when I start it, however after that I consistently > receive > > ========================================== > speech-dispatcherd dead but subsys locked > ========================================== > > I must manually remove the lockfile to resolve this error. Cannot figure out > what is wrong here :-? - daemon name is wrong ;) From %_initrddir/speech-dispatcherd: --------------------------------------------------------------- 11 exec="/usr/bin/speech-dispatcher" 12 prog="speech-dispatcherd" --------------------------------------------------------------- - Also "speech-dispatcher -d" seems to create %{_localstatedir}/run/speech-dispatcher.pid, however "service speech-dispatcher stop" does not delete this file, which needs fixing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 17:46:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 13:46:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 427718] Review Request: Megazeux - Text-character driven game creation system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091746.m59Hkck5011970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Megazeux - Text-character driven game creation system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427718 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-09 13:46 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 17:50:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 13:50:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091750.m59Hovi5012732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 ------- Additional Comments From lvillani at binaryhelix.net 2008-06-09 13:50 EST ------- SPEC URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/SPECS/libs/sat-solver.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/SRPMS/sat-solver-0.9.0-1.fc9.src.rpm * Mon Jun 09 2008 Lorenzo Villani - 0.9.0-1 - Version bump -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 17:50:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 13:50:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450013] Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091750.m59HojNd012678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 ------- Additional Comments From dmalcolm at redhat.com 2008-06-09 13:50 EST ------- Problem was in my patching of bz_locations; extensionsdir was pointing at: /var/lib/bugzilla/extensions (empty) rather than: /usr/share/bugzilla/extensions (which has testopia/code/db_schema-abstract_schema.pl); hence not finding the testopia extenstion and thus not extending the schema to cover the Testopia tables in Bugzilla/DB/Schema.pm:_initialize Working on a revised version, and on the other issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 17:47:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 13:47:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450470] RDMA kernel stack initializing package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091747.m59HluUa012096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RDMA kernel stack initializing package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450470 ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2008-06-09 13:47 EST ------- OK, I'll look into the match options with udev. As for the chipset errata, I'll look into it. As for the MTRR, I don't have anywhere near an exhaustive list of machines that do this, and since it only shows up as bad performance on ib_ipath or on a mmaped video frame buffer, I doubt I'm going to get an exhaustive list. So, the awk script works, and it's not tied to a list of machines, and it also allows people to test if it helps since I wasn't 100% sure of the correctness of doing this on all machines that punch out mtrr holes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 17:54:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 13:54:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447738] Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091754.m59HsaJk013237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 ------- Additional Comments From lvillani at binaryhelix.net 2008-06-09 13:54 EST ------- Can you try to build against this release, please? I don't have an x86_64 machine to test it, however I'm going to try a scratch build with koji against dist-f10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 17:52:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 13:52:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447738] Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091752.m59HqOf9013057@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 ------- Additional Comments From lvillani at binaryhelix.net 2008-06-09 13:52 EST ------- Spec URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/SPECS/libs/libzypp.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/SRPMS/libzypp-5.0.0.0-2.fc9.src.rpm * Mon Jun 09 2008 Lorenzo Villani - 5.0.0.0-2 - Version bump (source checkout updated) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 17:53:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 13:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447740] Review Request: zypper - easy to use command line package manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091753.m59HrOcf013175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zypper - easy to use command line package manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447740 ------- Additional Comments From lvillani at binaryhelix.net 2008-06-09 13:53 EST ------- Spec URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/SPECS/system/zypper.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/SRPMS/zypper-0.12.0-1.fc9.src.rpm * Mon Jun 09 2008 Lorenzo Villani - 0.12.0-1 - Version bump -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 18:05:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 14:05:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091805.m59I584a007264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 18:11:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 14:11:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445224] Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091811.m59IBTdD008637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445224 ------- Additional Comments From dcnltc at us.ibm.com 2008-06-09 14:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > > More questions: > > This looks like a subset of the dpiperf.dynamic package. It seems to contain a > newer (?) version of the dpiperf.dynamic tarball that has simply been rebranded > to stapitrace-.tar.gz in the SPEC file. Is this a CVS snapshot of the > dpiperf tarball? The tarball is one that was created for me by the Performance Inspector(PI) maintainer which includes the modifications that I need to their source. My changes have been comitted into CVS, just not available yet on the PI web site. The maintainer assures me that a newer tarball containing my source mods will be available on the PI web site in July. Is it possible to specify the URL for the tarball on the PI web site in the spec file? I think I tried setting the URL and Source0 variables in the spec file to point to a tarball on the PI website, but my recollection is that it looked for Source0 in the SOURCES directory anyways. I thought the URL variable in the spec file was just supposed to name the project web site where documentation can be found. When the updated tarball is available, should I set the URL variable to be the path that would be used by wget to get the tarball? In that case should I change the Source0 variable to use that same name as indicated in the URL variable? > > I ask because if it is, you should probably follow the snapshot guidelines[1] I was planning on somehow pointing to the publicly available tarball with my source changes in it, but I wonder if I wouldn't be better off referencing cvs since it is probably inevitable that the review process will turn up something that I need to change. Would I just manually grab a CVS snapshot and build my own tarball with YYYYMMDDcvs in the name and reference it from the Source0 variable? e.g. Dpiperf-YYYYMMDDcvs.tar.gz (Dpiperf is a PI naming convention) Do you think I should make this a pre-release package with an "alpha" in the Release name? > instead of creating a tarball that can't actually be downloaded from the project > site. One of the review criteria is that the package has verifiable source: > > "- MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, > as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no > upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL > Guidelines for how to deal with this." > > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 18:39:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 14:39:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444428] Review Request: ocaml-cmigrep - Search OCaml compiled interface (cmi) files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091839.m59IdSkL013845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cmigrep - Search OCaml compiled interface (cmi) files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444428 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-06-09 14:39 EST ------- I've verified that this warning can be removed. However you need to rebuild ocaml (3.10.2-4), ocaml-findlib and ocaml-pcre, then cmigrep, because any object file which wasn't built with the non-executable-stack patch 'infects' the resulting binary. Given that, it's probably worth just ignoring the warning for now. $ rpmlint /home/rjones/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ocaml-cmigrep-1.5-2.fc10.src.rpm /home/rjones/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/ocaml-cmigrep-1.5-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm ocaml-cmigrep.src:66: W: configure-without-libdir-spec 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Here's a new package which also fixes the ppc64 build problem. Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-cmigrep.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-cmigrep-1.5-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Search OCaml compiled interface (cmi) files * Mon Jun 9 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 1.5-2 - Include ppc64 compiler patch. - Include MAP_32BITS compiler patch. - Include no-executable-stack compiler patch. - Rebuild for OCaml 3.10.2-4 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444428#c5) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 18:51:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 14:51:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447766] Review Request: mathomatic - Small, portable symbolic math program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091851.m59Iprc4024819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mathomatic - Small, portable symbolic math program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447766 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-06-09 14:51 EST ------- Thanks guys, package built and pending for testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 18:53:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 14:53:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091853.m59IrUY0024944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |fedora-review?, needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2008-06-09 14:53 EST ------- Good: + Local build works fine on x86_64 + Rpmlint on source package is quite + Consistent macro usage + package use a OSS license + Tar archive in the package matches with upstream (md5sum: 52bc1b0309812eead630f8dfe795c923) + Rpmlint is quite on sat-solver package + File permissions seems ok. + Package seems not to have files own by other packages. + Local install and uninstall works fine. + Package build fine in mock (xu6_64, ppc64 and ppc, devel) Bad: - %{_includedir]/satsolver should be own by the package - Package should not contains static libraries - Package doesn't contains license text, but upstream package contains a verbatin copy of the license. - Rpmlint complaints on devel package: $ rpmlint sat-solver-devel-0.9.0-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm sat-solver-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation - Package seems not to use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS Questions: ? Why you remove the testsuite. From my point of view this may be helpful to ensure the QA of the package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 19:36:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 15:36:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450054] Review Request: liblinebreak - A Unicode line-breaking library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091936.m59JaWWf001150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblinebreak - A Unicode line-breaking library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450054 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-09 15:36 EST ------- Ah yes, providing -static is definitely a good idea. Perhaps I can just call the package liblinebreak-devel and have it provide liblinebreak-static? If liblinebreak in the future ships a shared library, our package name in CVS will the be wrong... Just checked with Toshio on #fedora-admin and he OK-ed it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 19:47:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 15:47:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450054] Review Request: liblinebreak - A Unicode line-breaking library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806091947.m59JloSJ003135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblinebreak - A Unicode line-breaking library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450054 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-09 15:47 EST ------- Disabled empty -debuginfo package (with comment), renamed package to liblinebreak-devel and make it Provides: liblinebreak-static = %{version}-%{release} http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/libs/liblinebreak-devel-0.9.6-2.fc9.src.rpm http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/libs/liblinebreak-devel.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 20:23:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 16:23:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806092023.m59KNoSt002107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 lvillani at binaryhelix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From lvillani at binaryhelix.net 2008-06-09 16:23 EST ------- Before uploading a new version of the package I need something to be explained: Bad things: - %{_includedir}/satsolver: As far as I know, %{_includedir}/satsolver/* gives ownership to directory-contained files - static libraries: as far as i know, upstream build system (based on cmake) only produces static library archives and not shared objects and it seems that other packages depending on this library statically link the library in their final executable - verbatim copy of the license: I included that in both packages using %doc - rpmlint warning with sat-solver-devel: the inclusion of the verbatim copy of the license should fix this - $RPM_OPT_FLAGS: This is due to usage of cmake, afaik, using -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=FEDORA is sufficient, I added that to the cmake line And now the questions: I removed the *huge* testsuite (nearly 50MiB of stuff -compressed-) just to save bandwidth (yes, I'm lazy), If needed I can keep the testsuite inside the tarball but this will make the review process much slower because i'll have to upload ~100MiB of compressed tarballs (~50MiB of .src.rpm and ~50MiB of packaged snapshot). Side notes: As far as I know both sat-solver, libzypp and zypper can be retrieved only from upstream' subversion (or by 'extracting' source tarball from SuSE' .src.rpm) so the source archive is just a local subversion checkout with SCM directories stripped out (ie: tar'ed using --exclude-vcs) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 20:42:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 16:42:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436677] Review Request: xxdiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806092042.m59KgE9b013995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xxdiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436677 ------- Additional Comments From cattelan at xfs.org 2008-06-09 16:42 EST ------- Well still no response from author, I guess it's time to simply remove the screenshots from tarball. http://xfs.org/~cattelan/xxdiff-3.2-8.fc9.src.rpm http://xfs.org/~cattelan/xxdiff.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 21:34:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 17:34:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243501] Review Request: qtiplot-doc - Documentation of qtiplot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806092134.m59LYPSf023274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot-doc - Documentation of qtiplot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243501 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2008-06-09 17:34 EST ------- I just realized, that I totally neglected this review request. I noticed however, that there is now a new release of the manual. I just tried the new version, the Sources needs to be adjusted and the dos2unix invokation does not work. The upstream tarball contains .svn directories, which creates a huge rpmlint warning. Imho they should be removed. Also the specfile contains both space and tabs, only after the Buildroot and the Group tag are spaces, after the other tags are tabs. I would only use spaces, but you need to choose one method to align the tags. If you still want to get this package in, please reply with a new spec and I will try very hard to complete this review soon after your reply. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 21:36:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 17:36:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435015] Review Request: libGPP4 - LGPL CCP4 library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806092136.m59La4mL023858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGPP4 - LGPL CCP4 library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 ------- Additional Comments From fenn at stanford.edu 2008-06-09 17:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > I'm wondering if it wouldn't just be simpler to call the package libgpp4 and > save yourself the trouble. As it is, get things like this nice long > %description which doesn't actually make it into any of the packages. > I agree - I'll try to get this change made upstream, along with the others I've gathered here. > Plenty of rpmlint spew worth looking at: > > W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/libgpp4-devel-1.0.4/doc/latex/csym_f_page.tex > doxygen creates this; I'm not sure if it's worth converting or if it even matters. > Not sure what the best course of action is here - could just have doxygen spit out the html docs... > There are several complaints about the contents of the "test" directory being > packaged as documentation, which I think is particularly ill-advised. Why > aren't the tests just called at build time in a %check section? > For now I've removed the test directory from the -devel package, and I'll make some suggestions upstream to move the test folder to TESTS in automake. updated spec: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/gpp4.spec updated srpm: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/gpp4-1.0.4-8.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 22:03:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 18:03:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450013] Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806092203.m59M3YoF030068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 ------- Additional Comments From dmalcolm at redhat.com 2008-06-09 18:03 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=308756) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=308756&action=view) extjs license as it appears in testopia tarball The testopia/extjs/LICENSE.txt license as it appears in the testopia tarball seems to indicate that it is LGPLv3. However the license text on http://extjs.com/products/license-faq.php seems to indicate GPLv3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 22:09:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 18:09:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450470] RDMA kernel stack initializing package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806092209.m59M9Y4C031277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RDMA kernel stack initializing package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450470 ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2008-06-09 18:09 EST ------- I've uploaded a new version of the package. One of the pci errata things could be done as a quirk (but isn't yet), the other I'm not so sure about as it would require looking for a specific model and revision of hardware behind a specific model of pci bridge and then applying the quirk, most of the kernel quirks don't like being tied combinationally like that. The udevtrigger line now works (and what to match against is a bit obtuse, but I got it working and it now only does a trigger on pci based devices with no driver and that are either class NETWORK or INFINIBAND). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 22:12:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 18:12:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450483] libibmad package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806092212.m59MCKFF024272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libibmad package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450483 dledford at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |450616 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 22:12:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 18:12:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450616] New: opensm package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450616 Summary: opensm package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: noarch URL: http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/f10/SRPMS/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dledford at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #450483 +++ +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #450482 +++ +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #450481 +++ +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #450470 +++ This is the Open Fabrics Alliance Infiniband Subnet Manager (OpenSM). It's responsible for assigning a link ID to all members of the fabric, determining routing via one of several routing algorithms, and other tasks. If you have an IB fabric with a dumb switch (meaning one without a built in SM, or one where the SM is turned off), then you must have opensm (or another SM) up and running on the fabric in order to be able to communicate with other hosts. As such, this is an essential element of the IB network stack. This package relies upon the libibumad package this bug was cloned from. src rpm can be found under http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/f10/SRPMS/ x86_64 rpms can be found under http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/f10/x86_64/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 22:50:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 18:50:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450621] New: Review Request: itaka - On-demand screen capture server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450621 Summary: Review Request: itaka - On-demand screen capture server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/itaka.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/itaka-0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Itaka is an on-demand screen capture server featuring a polished and easy to use interface with a robust backend HTTP server. The concept is : a request to your computer by a user displays an image of your screen in the user's web browser. rpmlint output : [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint -i itaka-0.2-1.fc9.noarch.rpm [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint -i itaka-0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm [builder at FEDOBOX tmp] src.rpm build under mock is OK. It's not my first package but I'm seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 22:52:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 18:52:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450621] Review Request: itaka - On-demand screen capture server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806092252.m59Mq45x030833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: itaka - On-demand screen capture server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450621 nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 23:45:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 19:45:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450050] Review Request: cgilib - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806092345.m59Nj48W014013@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgilib - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450050 ------- Additional Comments From mike at flyn.org 2008-06-09 19:45 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/cgilib.spec SRPM URL:http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/cgilib-0.6-2.fc9.src.rpm This version simplifies the autotools patch. It no longer attempts to conform to GNU's standards. The package also now BuildRequires the autotools programs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 9 23:54:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 19:54:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806092354.m59NsfKf007743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 ------- Additional Comments From nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com 2008-06-09 19:54 EST ------- Update (add sed for Makefile because of "hardcoded" /lib/) : Spec URL : http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/clive.spec SRPM URL : http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/clive-0.4.14-3.fc9.src.rpm rpmlint output : [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint -i clive-0.4.14-3.fc9.src.rpm [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint -i clive-0.4.14-3.fc9.noarch.rpm [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ The src.rpm rebuild under mock is OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 01:13:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 21:13:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225621] Merge Review: bluez-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806100113.m5A1Doex029165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bluez-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225621 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide CC|dwmw2 at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 01:13:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 21:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225886] Merge Review: hfsutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806100113.m5A1DrpL002627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hfsutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225886 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide CC|dwmw2 at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 01:13:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 21:13:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226097] Merge Review: linux-atm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806100113.m5A1Dt6T002636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: linux-atm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226097 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide CC|dwmw2 at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 02:05:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 22:05:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449840] Review Request: trac-spamfilter-plugin - Spam-Filter plugin for Trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806100205.m5A25nCt012939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-spamfilter-plugin - Spam-Filter plugin for Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449840 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 02:05:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 22:05:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449842] Review Request: trac-xmlrpc-plugin - XML-RPC plugin for Trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806100205.m5A25bcM012900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-xmlrpc-plugin - XML-RPC plugin for Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449842 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 02:12:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 22:12:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450013] Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806100212.m5A2C0jF014285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 ------- Additional Comments From dmalcolm at redhat.com 2008-06-09 22:11 EST ------- Updated SRPM here: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/testopia-3.0.4-1_1.tr2.0_RC1.fc10.src.rpm and specfile at: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/testopia.spec This is still a work-in-progress, I'm afraid; it uses the correct extensions location and thus correctly populates the schema, but seeing some issues trying to actually creating test plans and cases. Fixing the extensions location revealed that Testopia adds a hard requirement on GD-Graph3D which stops checkinstall.pl It appears to only be referenced in the code at ./template/en/default/testopia/reports/completion.png.tmpl: USE my_graph = GD.Graph.bars3d(275,250); i.e. in one particular report, so shouldn't impact full functionality of the package beyond that. The above srpm patches out the requirement for now. perl-GD-Graph3D doesn't seem to be packaged for Fedora yet. Probably should fix that before clearing review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 02:14:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 22:14:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450013] Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806100214.m5A2Ef95008432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 ------- Additional Comments From dmalcolm at redhat.com 2008-06-09 22:14 EST ------- Issue with extensionsdir filed against bugzilla package as bug 450636 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 03:42:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 23:42:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806100342.m5A3g8M2025753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jspaleta at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 05:02:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 01:02:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444257] Review Request: nted - Musical score editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806100502.m5A52l5s011840@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nted - Musical score editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444257 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-10 01:02 EST ------- Ah. the configure.in patch is really only needed for upstream, I can just not patch it (configure is patched by hand) Requires: yelp was removed because there are still disagreements about whether it should be depended on -- no core GNOME applications require it, for instance, and the problem is that it pulls in a lot of dependency for people who don't already run GNOME. Compiler warnings are sent to upstream, yes. Re-uploaded; same file names -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 05:12:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 01:12:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430429] Review Request: python-storm - An object-relational mapper (ORM) for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806100512.m5A5CCqY013383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-storm - An object-relational mapper (ORM) for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430429 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-10 01:12 EST ------- No reason not to update; the review request has just been languishing without attention. Updated package should be done by tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 07:04:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:04:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449927] Review Request: imsettings - Delivery framework for general Input Method configuration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806100704.m5A741CF024946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imsettings - Delivery framework for general Input Method configuration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449927 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-06-10 03:04 EST ------- Thanks for the submission. Basically looks ok to me but a few things I noticed: - should BR gamin-devel I think - rpmlint output: imsettings.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/none.conf imsettings.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/xim.conf imsettings-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on imsettings - I think some requires are needed for running alternatives in %post and %postun - should it be "imsettings-reload -f" in %postun? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 07:08:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449927] Review Request: imsettings - Delivery framework for general Input Method configuration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806100708.m5A78Mbd025759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imsettings - Delivery framework for general Input Method configuration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449927 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-06-10 03:08 EST ------- How about writing the common text for the Description as: """ IMSettings is a framework that delivers Input Method settings and applies the changes so they take effect immediately without any need to restart applications or the desktop. """ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 07:41:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:41:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444735] Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806100741.m5A7fIet031207@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444735 christian.iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 07:40:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:40:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444735] Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806100740.m5A7ex9g031143@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444735 ------- Additional Comments From christian.iseli at licr.org 2008-06-10 03:40 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: staden-io_lib Short Description: General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files Owners: c4chris Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 08:28:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 04:28:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 421241] Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806100828.m5A8S0Uq014152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421241 ------- Additional Comments From jess at zend.com 2008-06-10 04:27 EST ------- Hi Alexander, Are there any additional extensions are you missing in the FC repo besides mime_magic and third party, non open DB vendors? About the getTmpDir() function, it has been patched but unfortunately not quite as I suggested, it's pretty close to my original suggestion but it only supports exporting TMPDIR for now, my config.ini idea, where a directive could be set to use an alternative tmpdir is not yet implemented. I think this will do for now but I hope it can be implemented in the future. For now, we could just export TMPDIR. The change is available from ZF's SVN trunk: http://framework.zend.com/svn/framework/standard/trunk/ About mime_magic vs. fileinfo, my wrapper function was not yet applied but I will become a ZF committer soon and just apply it myself. Please let me know how you did with getTmpDir(). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 09:11:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 05:11:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449904] Review Request: perl-HTML-Template-Pro - Perl/XS module to use HTML Templates from CGI scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806100911.m5A9BKvw022489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Template-Pro - Perl/XS module to use HTML Templates from CGI scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449904 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-06-10 05:11 EST ------- This package looks sane. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 09:21:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 05:21:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449905] Review Request: perl-Object-MultiType - Perl Objects as Hash, Array, Scalar, Code and Glob at the same time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806100921.m5A9LiT3018096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-MultiType - Perl Objects as Hash, Array, Scalar, Code and Glob at the same time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449905 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-06-10 05:21 EST ------- This package looks sane, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 09:33:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 05:33:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450110] Review Request: perl-XML-Atom-SimpleFeed - No-fuss generation of Atom syndication feeds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806100933.m5A9XPWZ020417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Atom-SimpleFeed - No-fuss generation of Atom syndication feeds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450110 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-06-10 05:33 EST ------- This package looks sane, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 09:47:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 05:47:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449907] Review Request: perl-XML-Smart - Implementation of XML parser and writer for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806100947.m5A9lkVO023127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Smart - Implementation of XML parser and writer for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449907 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-06-10 05:47 EST ------- This package looks sane, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 09:50:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 05:50:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449905] Review Request: perl-Object-MultiType - Perl Objects as Hash, Array, Scalar, Code and Glob at the same time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806100950.m5A9oLa3029841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-MultiType - Perl Objects as Hash, Array, Scalar, Code and Glob at the same time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449905 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |449907 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 09:50:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 05:50:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449907] Review Request: perl-XML-Smart - Implementation of XML parser and writer for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806100950.m5A9oKQS029807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Smart - Implementation of XML parser and writer for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449907 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |449905 Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 10:12:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 06:12:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449927] Review Request: imsettings - Delivery framework for general Input Method configuration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101012.m5AACq28001609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imsettings - Delivery framework for general Input Method configuration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449927 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2008-06-10 06:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > - should BR gamin-devel I think Doh. actually imsettings doesn't use gamin directly. I have to get rid of the dependency check from configure. > imsettings.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/none.conf > imsettings.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/xim.conf I'm aware of those. but I don't think it's the kind of the conffile. > imsettings-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on imsettings Because the necessary library files are in imsettings-libs. I think that could be ignored. > - I think some requires are needed for running alternatives in %post and %postun Ok. missed that. will update. > - should it be "imsettings-reload -f" in %postun? Initially it was there. but I thought it may be failed when package is removed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 10:50:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 06:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449905] Review Request: perl-Object-MultiType - Perl Objects as Hash, Array, Scalar, Code and Glob at the same time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101050.m5AAoneZ008106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-MultiType - Perl Objects as Hash, Array, Scalar, Code and Glob at the same time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449905 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-10 06:50 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Object-MultiType Short Description: Perl Objects as Hash, Array, Scalar, Code and Glob at the same time Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 10:49:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 06:49:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450553] Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101049.m5AAnPe6001227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450553 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-06-10 06:49 EST ------- I don't see anything wrong with this package, it looks sane. approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 10:51:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 06:51:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449907] Review Request: perl-XML-Smart - Implementation of XML parser and writer for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101051.m5AAp6DC001916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Smart - Implementation of XML parser and writer for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449907 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-10 06:51 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-XML-Smart Short Description: Implementation of XML parser and writer for Perl Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 10:50:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 06:50:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450110] Review Request: perl-XML-Atom-SimpleFeed - No-fuss generation of Atom syndication feeds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101050.m5AAotK8001868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Atom-SimpleFeed - No-fuss generation of Atom syndication feeds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450110 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-10 06:50 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-XML-Atom-SimpleFeed Short Description: No-fuss generation of Atom syndication feeds Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 10:50:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 06:50:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449904] Review Request: perl-HTML-Template-Pro - Perl/XS module to use HTML Templates from CGI scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101050.m5AAokQb001804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Template-Pro - Perl/XS module to use HTML Templates from CGI scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449904 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-10 06:50 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-HTML-Template-Pro Short Description: Perl/XS module to use HTML Templates from CGI scripts Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 11:13:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 07:13:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450553] Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101113.m5ABDUQV012160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450553 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-10 07:13 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-TAP-Harness Short Description: Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 12:01:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:01:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339631] Review Request: tcputils - Utilities for TCP programming in shell-scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101201.m5AC184l022134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcputils - Utilities for TCP programming in shell-scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339631 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide allisson at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From allisson at gmail.com 2008-06-10 08:01 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: tcputils New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 12:05:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:05:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450553] Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101205.m5AC5XRK023178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450553 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-06-10 08:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > I don't see anything wrong with this package, it looks sane. approved. I do see many issues a) This package is not a CPAN distro, it's a submodule of Test::Harness b) This package doesn't install correctly - It wants to replace Test::Harness c) This package will collide with a future upgrade of Test::Harness You are outsmarting yourselves. DISAPPROVING. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 12:10:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:10:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450553] Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101210.m5ACAKsh018013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450553 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 12:12:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:12:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450013] Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101212.m5ACC7rk018304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 ------- Additional Comments From jonstanley at gmail.com 2008-06-10 08:12 EST ------- I don't think the fact that it doesn't work is entirely your fault :). I found (via filing at b.m.o) that the latest version of perl-JSON doesn't work with Testopia. Greg is aiming to having this resolved by the time 2.0 final comes out, but it's a little hairy, In the meanwhile, I've posted F9 and EL-5 versions of what does work at http://i.am.jds2001.org/temp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 12:14:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:14:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450013] Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101214.m5ACEI7x025218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 ------- Additional Comments From jonstanley at gmail.com 2008-06-10 08:14 EST ------- Oh, and the install at http://i.am.jds2001.org/bugzilla/ is alive and kicking with this new module (and you have admin rights to that bugzilla installation). The one thing that I've found is that if you add a component to an environment, for some reason you can't rename it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 12:20:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:20:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450013] Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101220.m5ACK9xl026784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 ------- Additional Comments From jonstanley at gmail.com 2008-06-10 08:20 EST ------- Oh, and it's too early iin the morning - perl-GDGraph3d-0.63-9.fc9.noarch is packaged for Fedora. $ rpm -q --provides perl-GDGraph3d-0.63-9.fc9.noarch perl(GD::Graph3d) = 0.63 perl(GD::Graph::axestype3d) = 0.63 perl(GD::Graph::bars3d) = 0.63 perl(GD::Graph::cylinder) = 0.63 perl(GD::Graph::cylinder3d) = 0.63 perl(GD::Graph::lines3d) = 0.63 perl(GD::Graph::pie3d) = 0.63 perl-GD-Graph3d = 0.63-9.fc9 perl-GDGraph3d = 0.63-9.fc9 $ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 13:04:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:04:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450553] Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101304.m5AD4gt7002409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450553 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-10 09:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) > > I don't see anything wrong with this package, it looks sane. approved. > I do see many issues > > a) This package is not a CPAN distro, it's a submodule of Test::Harness Could you please point me to the part of Perl packaging guidelines that you believe to be violated by this? > b) This package doesn't install correctly - It wants to replace Test::Harness How? I've double chcecked that this package don't have a single common provide with anything that is in RHEL5 with EPEL and Fedora 9. The SPEC file contains no Replaces nor Obsoletes tag. I also believe there is no file conflict. If you feel that there is a flaw in how I ensured to neither conflict with anything, nor replace anything please be more specific, e.g. provide a specific example. > c) This package will collide with a future upgrade of Test::Harness There is a mechanism to deal with this -- I was asked to file a bug against F10 perl, so that included Test-Harness will be upgraded to TAP::Harness based version 3.10. I will do so shortly. There will be no need for this package to ever make it into F10 Rawhide then. Only possible problem I can imagine would be a case where a hypothetical package would require perl-TAP-Harness instead of perl(TAP::Harness). In that case it is not a problem of this package, nor an unsolvable problem. > You are outsmarting yourselves. Thanks for being polite and concentrating on providing well-verified facts. > DISAPPROVING. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 13:05:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:05:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447757] Review Request: mediawiki-ParserFunctions - Enhances the Mediawiki parser with logical functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101305.m5AD5lp8028827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-ParserFunctions - Enhances the Mediawiki parser with logical functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447757 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dev at nigelj.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-06-10 09:05 EST ------- Hi Ian I'll take this review :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 13:14:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:14:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450685] New: Review Request: R-DBI - Database Interface for R Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450685 Summary: Review Request: R-DBI - Database Interface for R Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dev at nigelj.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/R-DBI.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/R-DBI-0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm A plain ol' database interface for R, required by R-SQLite & other database variants. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 13:15:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:15:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450686] New: Review Request: R-RSQLite - SQLite Interface for R Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450686 Summary: Review Request: R-RSQLite - SQLite Interface for R Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dev at nigelj.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/R-RSQLite.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/R-RSQLite-0.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Read/Write SQLite interface for R, allowing manipulation of database objects for statistically purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 13:40:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:40:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444952] Review Request: tlock - terminal lock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101340.m5ADe5JK003793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tlock - terminal lock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444952 pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(pj.pandit at yahoo.co| |.in) | ------- Additional Comments From pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in 2008-06-10 09:40 EST ------- Hello Mamoru, I'm very sorry man, was a bit too busy last whole week. Yes, I'm almost done with the move package, and shall create a review request in couple of days and let you know immediately. Once again I'm really very sorry! Thanks!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 14:05:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:05:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450685] Review Request: R-DBI - Database Interface for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101405.m5AE5gKE009676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-DBI - Database Interface for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450685 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |450686 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 14:05:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:05:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450686] Review Request: R-RSQLite - SQLite Interface for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101405.m5AE5f9q009655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-RSQLite - SQLite Interface for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450686 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |450685 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 14:06:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:06:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450484] Review Request: telepathy-sofiasip - SIP connection manager for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101406.m5AE61MP009762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-sofiasip - SIP connection manager for Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450484 mcepl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mcepl at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 14:53:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:53:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450484] Review Request: telepathy-sofiasip - SIP connection manager for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101453.m5AErnNh019854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-sofiasip - SIP connection manager for Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450484 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2008-06-10 10:53 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=308820) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=308820&action=view) spec file with fixed TABS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 14:53:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:53:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450484] Review Request: telepathy-sofiasip - SIP connection manager for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101453.m5AErFEg025620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-sofiasip - SIP connection manager for Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450484 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2008-06-10 10:53 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistent macro usage. OK - Has dist tag OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (LGPLv2+) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: [matej at viklef redhat]$ md5sum SOURCES/telepathy-sofiasip-0.5.8.tar.gz 023dceb1d48f34b7a9d5614cfda25907 SOURCES/telepathy-sofiasip-0.5.8.tar.gz [matej at viklef redhat]$ md5sum ~/telepathy-sofiasip-0.5.8.tar.gz 023dceb1d48f34b7a9d5614cfda25907 /home/matej/telepathy-sofiasip-0.5.8.tar.gz [matej at viklef redhat]$ See below - BuildRequires correct (build in koji) Not Sure - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. %{_includedir}/%{name}-0.6/ do we have to have the number written there -- could not it be at least macro somewhere in the top of the file? Or it won't change? OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Builds in mock (koji) OK - Builds on all supported archs OK - final provides and requires are sane Rpmlint is not silent!!! [matej at viklef redhat]$ rpmlint -i RPMS/i386/telepathy-sofiasip-0.5.8-1.fc9.i386.rpm telepathy-sofiasip.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/telepathy-sofiasip-0.6/tpsip/event-target.h A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. telepathy-sofiasip.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/telepathy-sofiasip-0.6/tpsip/sofia-decls.h A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. [matej at viklef redhat]$ Well I know it is intentional -- but I really think making -devel package is not that big deal, and I am quite sure there will be more devel files coming (they always come). Are you sure about this? and (cosmetic) [matej at viklef redhat]$ rpmlint -i SRPMS/telepathy-sofiasip-0.5.8-1.fc9.src.rpm telepathy-sofiasip.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 18) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. [matej at viklef redhat]$ Just did :set et | retab | write in vim and attaching new .spec file Conclusion: I won't reject the review on the missing -devel package, but please consider once again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 15:11:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:11:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450484] Review Request: telepathy-sofiasip - SIP connection manager for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101511.m5AFBMDL023854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-sofiasip - SIP connection manager for Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450484 mcepl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2008-06-10 11:11 EST ------- Persuaded on IRC about missing -devel package being The Right Thing? APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 15:11:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:11:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450484] Review Request: telepathy-sofiasip - SIP connection manager for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101511.m5AFBXmn030154@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-sofiasip - SIP connection manager for Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450484 mcepl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 15:20:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:20:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450553] Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101520.m5AFK94g025752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450553 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(rc040203 at freenet.d | |e) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 15:32:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:32:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450484] Review Request: telepathy-sofiasip - SIP connection manager for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101532.m5AFWJYC028730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-sofiasip - SIP connection manager for Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450484 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2008-06-10 11:32 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: telepathy-sofiasip Short Description: SIP connection manager for Telepathy Owners: bpepple Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 15:51:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:51:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450713] New: Review Request: virt-mem - Management tools for virtual machines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450713 Summary: Review Request: virt-mem - Management tools for virtual machines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/virt-mem.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/virt-mem-0.2.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Management tools for virtual machines These are a collection of monitoring and management tools for virtual machines. Commands we support at the moment include: virt-uname 'uname' command, shows OS version, architecture, etc. virt-dmesg 'dmesg' command, shows kernel messages The general idea is that they allow you to monitor virtual machines without needing to log in to the machine itself or install any extra software inside the virtual machine. At the moment we only support virtual machines running Linux kernel >= 2.6, but we expect to support other operating systems in the future. The commands use libvirt to access the underlying virtualization system, so we support a variety of different systems such as Xen, QEMU and KVM, and more can be added just by adding support to libvirt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 15:53:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:53:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450713] Review Request: virt-mem - Management tools for virtual machines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101553.m5AFr9Zw007364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-mem - Management tools for virtual machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450713 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-06-10 11:53 EST ------- rpmlint output: virt-mem.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/virt-dmesg virt-mem.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/virt-uname This is fixed, but waiting on upstream (bug 450551) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 15:53:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:53:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450713] Review Request: virt-mem - Management tools for virtual machines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101553.m5AFrhIk007462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-mem - Management tools for virtual machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450713 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-06-10 11:53 EST ------- Package file listing: /usr/bin/virt-dmesg /usr/bin/virt-uname /usr/share/doc/virt-mem-0.2.4 /usr/share/doc/virt-mem-0.2.4/COPYING /usr/share/doc/virt-mem-0.2.4/ChangeLog /usr/share/doc/virt-mem-0.2.4/README /usr/share/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES/virt-mem.mo /usr/share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES/virt-mem.mo /usr/share/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/virt-mem.mo /usr/share/man/man1/virt-dmesg.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/virt-mem.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/virt-uname.1.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 15:55:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:55:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450713] Review Request: virt-mem - Management tools for virtual machines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101555.m5AFtWRJ001475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-mem - Management tools for virtual machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450713 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-06-10 11:55 EST ------- Package requires: rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libvirt.so.0()(64bit) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 16:07:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:07:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339631] Review Request: tcputils - Utilities for TCP programming in shell-scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101607.m5AG7GM1010348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcputils - Utilities for TCP programming in shell-scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339631 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-10 12:07 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 16:39:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:39:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444735] Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101639.m5AGdenq015899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444735 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-10 12:39 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 16:40:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:40:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449840] Review Request: trac-spamfilter-plugin - Spam-Filter plugin for Trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101640.m5AGefbS016390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-spamfilter-plugin - Spam-Filter plugin for Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449840 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-10 12:40 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 16:59:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:59:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449842] Review Request: trac-xmlrpc-plugin - XML-RPC plugin for Trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101659.m5AGx7L5013050@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-xmlrpc-plugin - XML-RPC plugin for Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449842 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-10 12:59 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 17:01:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:01:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449904] Review Request: perl-HTML-Template-Pro - Perl/XS module to use HTML Templates from CGI scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101701.m5AH1KW8013948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Template-Pro - Perl/XS module to use HTML Templates from CGI scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449904 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-10 13:01 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 17:09:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:09:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450484] Review Request: telepathy-sofiasip - SIP connection manager for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101709.m5AH9HMX015240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-sofiasip - SIP connection manager for Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450484 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-10 13:09 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 17:05:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:05:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449905] Review Request: perl-Object-MultiType - Perl Objects as Hash, Array, Scalar, Code and Glob at the same time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101705.m5AH5v33014979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-MultiType - Perl Objects as Hash, Array, Scalar, Code and Glob at the same time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449905 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-10 13:05 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 17:07:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:07:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450110] Review Request: perl-XML-Atom-SimpleFeed - No-fuss generation of Atom syndication feeds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101707.m5AH7lo2021493@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Atom-SimpleFeed - No-fuss generation of Atom syndication feeds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450110 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-10 13:07 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 17:06:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:06:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449907] Review Request: perl-XML-Smart - Implementation of XML parser and writer for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101706.m5AH6mQO021378@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Smart - Implementation of XML parser and writer for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449907 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-10 13:06 EST ------- Marek: can you set the fedora-review flag to + if you approve? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 19:05:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:05:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448072] Review Request: spin-kickstarts - Kickstarts and templates for creating custom Fedora Spins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101905.m5AJ5W9u011684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spin-kickstarts - Kickstarts and templates for creating custom Fedora Spins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448072 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-10 15:05 EST ------- Looks good: license text is in the package and python is no longer required to build. %description still isn't a complete sentence, but that's no big deal. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 19:13:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:13:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449907] Review Request: perl-XML-Smart - Implementation of XML parser and writer for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101913.m5AJDZts013003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Smart - Implementation of XML parser and writer for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449907 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-06-10 15:13 EST ------- Kevin: done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 19:18:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:18:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429037] Review Request: isns-utils - Daemon and tools for iSNS management. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101918.m5AJIS7A013940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isns-utils - Daemon and tools for iSNS management. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429037 mchristi at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |F-9 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(mchristi at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From mchristi at redhat.com 2008-06-10 15:18 EST ------- Built into koji and getting ready for a release, so closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 19:36:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:36:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224458] Review Request: libsilc (dependency of gaim) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101936.m5AJaiXr017583@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsilc (dependency of gaim) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224458 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-10 15:36 EST ------- Thanks for doing this. rpmlint has much less complaining to do now; just the bogus "no-documentation" warning for the -devel package. Everything I could find to complain about is fixed. APPROVED Note that there's no need for you to do anything at all since the package is already in the distro; this just gets the review cleared out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 19:55:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:55:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449667] Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806101955.m5AJtun0014700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449667 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-10 15:55 EST ------- Actually that chmod should be "g-w" if you want to fix up the "strange permission" complaint, but it's not a really big deal. Everything else looks good to me; the tests seem to run fine. APPROVED; you can fix up the permission bit, if you want to, when you check in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 20:05:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:05:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449667] Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806102005.m5AK5xdj023606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449667 konrad at tylerc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-06-10 16:05 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-yenc Short Description: yEnc Module for Python Owners: konradm Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 20:13:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449707] Review Request: gambit-c - Gambit-C Scheme programming system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806102013.m5AKDrqu025323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gambit-c - Gambit-C Scheme programming system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449707 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-10 16:13 EST ------- Hmm, this one didn't build for me: + chmod +x gsix chmod: cannot access `gsix': No such file or directory Oh, that needs to be: chmod +x $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/gsix Otherwise (fixing the above so that it builds), things look good. The test suite is run and passes; the conflict with /usr/bin/six is gone, and the weird permissions are fixed up. I guess we're just waiting on the license. I don't know if it's something that should hold up this package, so I'll approve it and you can check in when you get an answer. If you don't, it seems clear due to the "any later version" language that LGPLv2+ is correct here. APPROVED An odd question, perhaps, but have you considered just having this package generate gambit-termite as well? I guess that might be a weird build process, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 20:25:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:25:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444257] Review Request: nted - Musical score editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806102025.m5AKPlLo028240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nted - Musical score editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444257 rhbugs at n-dimensional.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rhbugs at n-dimensional.de 2008-06-10 16:25 EST ------- ACCEPT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 20:39:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:39:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450013] Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806102039.m5AKdYt3023688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 dmalcolm at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug| |http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/ Tracker URL| |show_bug.cgi?id=409309 ------- Additional Comments From dmalcolm at redhat.com 2008-06-10 16:39 EST ------- Thanks; the bug you filed on mozilla.org _was_ the issue I'm seeing; for later reference you filed it on b.m.o as 437828, resolved as dup of 409309; adding reference to latter to this bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 21:16:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:16:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351531] Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806102116.m5ALG1Sf007273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351531 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-10 17:16 EST ------- I'll go ahead and take this for review. Look for a full review later today hopefully... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 21:18:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:18:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450775] New: Review Request: perl-Panotools-Script - Panorama Tools scripting Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450775 Summary: Review Request: perl-Panotools-Script - Panorama Tools scripting Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bruno at postle.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bpostle/reviews/perl-Panotools-Script/perl-Panotools-Script.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bpostle/reviews/perl-Panotools-Script/perl-Panotools-Script-0.14-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: I'm also upstream for this CPAN perl module, which is intended to be complementary to the hugin package already in fedora. It falls into three parts: A fairly standard set of .pm library modules. Some command-line tools using various aspects of the library modules. Some gui scripts using zenity, these are not so pretty internally, but they all have .desktop entries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 21:37:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:37:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442329] Review Request: gnome-lirc-properties - Infrared Remote Controls setup tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806102137.m5ALbilj011060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-lirc-properties - Infrared Remote Controls setup tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442329 Bug 442329 depends on bug 442248, which changed state. Bug 442248 Summary: Add patches necessary for gnome-lirc-properties https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442248 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 22:48:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:48:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351531] Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806102248.m5AMmjPZ023137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351531 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-06-10 18:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #45) > @Christoph and Patrice: > Could you please analyze which library is different on your systems? Do you have any special packages in mind? As Fedora 9 has just been released there shouldn't be much difference between F9 and Rawhide ATM and others also reported ristretto to crash on the Rawhide that has now become F9. I have switched back to i386 when I installed F9, so maybe this only happens on x86_64? rpm -qa libxfce\* gtk\* glib\* | sort glib-1.2.10-29.fc9.i386 glib2-2.16.3-5.fc9.i386 glib2-devel-2.16.3-5.fc9.i386 glibc-2.8-3.i686 glibc-common-2.8-3.i386 glibc-devel-2.8-3.i386 glibc-headers-2.8-3.i386 glibmm24-2.16.0-1.fc9.i386 gtk+-1.2.10-61.fc9.i386 gtk2-2.12.10-2.fc9.i386 gtk2-devel-2.12.10-2.fc9.i386 gtk2-engines-2.14.2-1.fc9.i386 gtk-doc-1.9-4.fc9.noarch gtkglext-libs-1.2.0-6.fc9.i386 gtkhtml2-2.11.1-3.fc9.i386 gtkhtml3-3.18.2-1.fc9.i386 gtkmm24-2.12.5-1.fc9.i386 gtk-nodoka-engine-0.7.0-1.fc9.i386 gtk-sharp2-2.10.3-3.fc9.i386 gtksourceview-1.8.5-4.fc9.i386 gtksourceview2-2.2.1-1.fc9.i386 gtkspell-2.0.11-8.fc9.i386 libxfce4mcs-4.4.2-2.fc9.i386 libxfce4mcs-devel-4.4.2-2.fc9.i386 libxfce4util-4.4.2-2.fc9.i386 libxfce4util-devel-4.4.2-2.fc9.i386 libxfcegui4-4.4.2-2.fc9.i386 libxfcegui4-devel-4.4.2-2.fc9.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 22:36:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:36:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450781] New: Can not add/rm software after installing live CD to disk Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450781 Summary: Can not add/rm software after installing live CD to disk Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: james_avera2 at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com The fc9 live cd boots and the desktop has an icon "install to hard drive", which invokes a process which copies data from the live CD to hd partitions. After doing that, System->Add/Remove Software results in a dialog with a list of package sets ("Gnome desktop", "KDE desktop", etc.). Clicking on any of the package sets first says "downloading file lists" in the status bar, but then an error dialog pops up saying: The group was not found comps categories could not be loaded Then the program is stuck forever with "Querying" in the status bar and the status indicator running back and forth, but nothing further happens. Internet connectivity is not the problem (I am typing this on the same system which can not install new software). I am behind a NAT firewall, but fc7 had no trouble installing/updating. Question: Is add/remove software supposed to work on systems installed form the live CD, or must the regular install DVD be used for a fully- functional system? My guess is that install-from-live-CD omits something critical needed by the application started by System->Administration->Add/Remove software. I'm marking this bug 'urgent' because the live CD is supposed to be the easy way to try out Fedora and install it on hard disk if you like it. But the result is a system which gives this unhelpful error when trying to add packages not on the live CD. If the problem can not be fixed then the "install to hard drive" option should either be removed from the live cd or made to warn the user that the resulting system does not support 'add/remove software'. ------- Additional Comments From james_avera2 at yahoo.com 2008-06-10 18:36 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=308871) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=308871&action=view) screen shot of the error -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 10 23:18:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 19:18:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 425762] Review Request: trac-xmlrpc-plugin - Allows Trac plugins to export their interface via XML-RPC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806102318.m5ANIusH020226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-xmlrpc-plugin - Allows Trac plugins to export their interface via XML-RPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425762 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: trac-xmlrpc |Review Request: trac-xmlrpc- |- Allows Trac plugins to |plugin - Allows Trac plugins |export their interface via |to export their interface |XML-RPC |via XML-RPC ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-10 19:18 EST ------- Changing summary to match the package name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 00:11:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 20:11:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450484] Review Request: telepathy-sofiasip - SIP connection manager for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806110011.m5B0BUvk004655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-sofiasip - SIP connection manager for Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450484 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2008-06-10 20:11 EST ------- Matej, thanks for the reivew! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 00:45:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 20:45:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450410] Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806110045.m5B0jq0j002225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450410 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 03:21:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:21:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449927] Review Request: imsettings - Delivery framework for general Input Method configuration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806110321.m5B3LOjJ004007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imsettings - Delivery framework for general Input Method configuration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449927 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-06-10 23:21 EST ------- > I'm aware of those. but I don't think it's the kind of the conffile. Yes, I agree it can be waived. > Because the necessary library files are in imsettings-libs. I think that could > be ignored. Yep > > - should it be "imsettings-reload -f" in %postun? > > Initially it was there. but I thought it may be failed when package is removed? I mean in the version you posted %postun has: imsettings -f > /dev/null 2>&1 || : but I guess you mean imsetting-reload? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 05:49:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 01:49:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450781] Can not add/rm software after installing live CD to disk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806110549.m5B5ndtB027768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Can not add/rm software after installing live CD to disk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450781 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-package- |rnorwood at redhat.com |review at redhat.com | Component|Package Review |PackageKit ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-11 01:49 EST ------- Not sure why this was filed under Package Review; unfortunately the package reviewers can't really help here. This sounds like either a gnome-packagekit or PackageKit issue; I'll reassign to gnome-packagekit, but it's quite possible that this will need to be reassigned again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 06:42:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 02:42:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200245] Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806110642.m5B6gw8G029134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200245 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide psatpute at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |psatpute at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From psatpute at redhat.com 2008-06-11 02:42 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: scim-sayura New Branches: devel upstream has changed the name of package 'scim-sinhala' so changing the name of package 'scim-sinhala' to 'scim-sayura' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 08:00:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:00:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450816] New: Review Request: alevt - Teletext decoder/browser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450816 Summary: Review Request: alevt - Teletext decoder/browser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cooly at gnome.eu.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/alevt.spec SRPM URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/alevt-1.6.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This program decodes and displays Videotext/Teletext from a /dev/vbi device. Notes: Default target for pixmap file was wrong so it had to be patched. Also default build didn't produce any debug info so I had to override OPT variable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 08:21:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:21:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806110821.m5B8LgtR014663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 alex.smith.ixium at googlemail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alex.smith.ixium at googlemail. | |com ------- Additional Comments From alex.smith.ixium at googlemail.com 2008-06-11 04:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #51) > Updated to latest SVN > Added build requirements > Added a fedora specific patch for menu items/schemas > Added a temporary patch to reverse recent changes to network status agent > preventing broken build on fedora, patch can be removed when network manager in > fedora is updated. > > spec: http://www.wine-doors.org/rpm/gnome-main-menu.spec > rpm: http://www.wine-doors.org/rpm/gnome-main-menu-0.9.11-1.i386.rpm > src: http://www.wine-doors.org/rpm/gnome-main-menu-0.9.11-1.src.rpm > dev: http://www.wine-doors.org/rpm/gnome-main-menu-devel-0.9.11-1.i386.rpm > dbg: http://www.wine-doors.org/rpm/gnome-main-menu-debuginfo-0.9.11-1.i386.rpm > (In reply to comment #51) > Updated to latest SVN > Added build requirements > Added a fedora specific patch for menu items/schemas > Added a temporary patch to reverse recent changes to network status agent > preventing broken build on fedora, patch can be removed when network manager in > fedora is updated. > > spec: http://www.wine-doors.org/rpm/gnome-main-menu.spec > rpm: http://www.wine-doors.org/rpm/gnome-main-menu-0.9.11-1.i386.rpm > src: http://www.wine-doors.org/rpm/gnome-main-menu-0.9.11-1.src.rpm > dev: http://www.wine-doors.org/rpm/gnome-main-menu-devel-0.9.11-1.i386.rpm > dbg: http://www.wine-doors.org/rpm/gnome-main-menu-debuginfo-0.9.11-1.i386.rpm > The link to the source RPM down :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 09:10:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 05:10:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252084] Review Request: jgraph - JGraph Diagram Component In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806110910.m5B9AC8V031113@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jgraph - JGraph Diagram Component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252084 balbir at linux.vnet.ibm.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |balbir at linux.vnet.ibm.com ------- Additional Comments From balbir at linux.vnet.ibm.com 2008-06-11 05:10 EST ------- Hi, I just reviewed the package and found that the request was submitted in August 2007. Is this package still interesting? My review comments below (anyway). Please run rpmlint on the source package. You'll find 1. The license is not correct 2. The group selected in not standard Please remove things you don't need like #%patch0 -b .sav %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/LICENSE Should use %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 09:13:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 05:13:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448491] Review Request: libcgroup - A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806110913.m5B9DjLv024887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcgroup - A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448491 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-11 05:13 EST ------- libcgroup-0.1c-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 12:28:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:28:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450850] New: Review Request: move - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450850 Summary: Review Request: move - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SPEC URL: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/move.spec SRPM URL: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/move-1.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: move moves the named file(s) to the ~/.trash directory. Trash is located under the home directory of a user. It is a simple console based utility, I wrote after deleting some files, which I couldn't retrieve back. Move can also restore file(s) back to there original location. It has really proved very handy to me. This is my second fedora package, and am looking for a sponsor for this and my earlier package tlock. I'd really appreciate if somebody could come forward for the sponsorship. tlock: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444952 Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 12:35:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:35:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444952] Review Request: tlock - terminal lock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806111235.m5BCZT0t003027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tlock - terminal lock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444952 ------- Additional Comments From pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in 2008-06-11 08:35 EST ------- Hello Mamoru, I've created a new package review request for move at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450850 Please have a look at let me know if any changes are required. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 13:04:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:04:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449927] Review Request: imsettings - Delivery framework for general Input Method configuration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806111304.m5BD445g008092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imsettings - Delivery framework for general Input Method configuration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449927 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2008-06-11 09:04 EST ------- Ok, revised one is: Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/imsettings/imsettings.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/imsettings/imsettings-0.101.0-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 13:17:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:17:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447285] Review Request: libx86 - library for making real-mode x86 calls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806111317.m5BDHcTu011035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libx86 - library for making real-mode x86 calls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447285 mjg at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mjg at redhat.com 2008-06-11 09:17 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libx86 New Branches: F-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 14:08:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:08:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448311] Review Request: lostlabyrinth - Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806111408.m5BE8mxV020439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth - Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448311 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-06-11 10:08 EST ------- rpmlint clean. Source URL is 404. Also, new verison is out. Do you want to update? Can't do a mock build until elice is available. Otherwise, good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 16:20:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:20:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441570] Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806111620.m5BGKrHb015667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441570 ------- Additional Comments From goldschr at cshl.edu 2008-06-11 12:20 EST ------- Updated to 0.18-2, with the following changes: - Removed most of the defines except for %dnxrundir and %dnxlogdir. Moved users to nagios. - No longer dump things in nagios directories. /etc/dnx, /var/lib/dnx, etc. are now used. - Corrected a typo in specfile that would have added wrong group name. - Change to init script to keep it from spitting out startup info. I don't think the Nagios 3.0 support poses a real problem -- it's not a substantial amount of cruft (five lines in total) which doesn't pollute the script in a way such that it prevents it from being readable in any way. In addition, it documents exactly what changes need to be made when compiling with Nagios 3.0 support, if and when the project makes that change. Finally, it allows the same Fedora specfile to be used by people who are already running Nagios 3.0 in their environments -- they just need to pass a -D'nagios_version 3' when rebuilding the SRPM. New files: - http://neckbeard.info/packages/fedora/dnx.spec - http://neckbeard.info/packages/fedora/dnx-0.18-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 16:45:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:45:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200245] Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806111645.m5BGjWcF020532@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200245 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-11 12:45 EST ------- We don't like to typically re-name packages once they have been imported/built. Has this already been built/pushed out? If so, I can create the new package name for you and you can import into that and follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife on the old package name. Does that sound good? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 16:48:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:48:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449667] Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806111648.m5BGmXuV014555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449667 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-11 12:48 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 16:47:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:47:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447285] Review Request: libx86 - library for making real-mode x86 calls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806111647.m5BGlMIq020843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libx86 - library for making real-mode x86 calls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447285 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-11 12:47 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 16:49:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:49:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449907] Review Request: perl-XML-Smart - Implementation of XML parser and writer for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806111649.m5BGniKx021004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Smart - Implementation of XML parser and writer for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449907 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-11 12:49 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 17:01:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:01:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806111701.m5BH1RAN018469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 ------- Additional Comments From amdunn at gmail.com 2008-06-11 13:01 EST ------- Thanks for all the comments. I thought I'd let all interested know that I'm currently working on addressing these points, and will try and have a new version ready as soon as possible. (In reply to comment #18) > Link to Debian package: > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-ocaml-maint/trunk/packages/coq/trunk/debian/?rev=0&sc=0 > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 17:20:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:20:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450553] Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806111720.m5BHKbcZ022914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450553 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-06-11 13:20 EST ------- Ralf? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 17:29:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:29:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351531] Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806111729.m5BHTOsw029948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351531 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-11 13:29 EST ------- ok, just tried on rawhide here (x86_64) and I can get it to segfault by just loading a folder and then trying to zoom in. Here's the backtrace: (gdb) where #0 0x0000000000410c0e in rstto_picture_viewer_set_scale (viewer=0x1c80c30, scale=1.2) at picture_viewer.c:552 #1 0x0000003a8240b72d in g_closure_invoke () from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #2 0x0000003a8242144b in ?? () from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #3 0x0000003a82422ad6 in g_signal_emit_valist () from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #4 0x0000003a82422e44 in g_signal_emit_by_name () from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #5 0x0000003a8826b98a in ?? () from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #6 0x0000003a8240b72d in g_closure_invoke () from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #7 0x0000003a8242144b in ?? () from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #8 0x0000003a82422ad6 in g_signal_emit_valist () from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #9 0x0000003a82423053 in g_signal_emit () from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #10 0x0000003a8808c322 in gtk_button_clicked () from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #11 0x0000003a8808daf2 in ?? () from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #12 0x0000003a8240b72d in g_closure_invoke () from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #13 0x0000003a82420d69 in ?? () from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #14 0x0000003a82422ad6 in g_signal_emit_valist () from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #15 0x0000003a82423053 in g_signal_emit () from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #16 0x0000003a8808c28b in gtk_button_released () ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #17 0x0000003a8808d825 in ?? () from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #18 0x0000003a881689a3 in ?? () from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #19 0x0000003a8240b72d in g_closure_invoke () from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #20 0x0000003a8242112f in ?? () from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #21 0x0000003a8242298d in g_signal_emit_valist () from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #22 0x0000003a82423053 in g_signal_emit () from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #23 0x0000003a882d14c7 in ?? () from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #24 0x0000003a882d0fe9 in gtk_widget_event () from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #25 0x0000003a88166c53 in gtk_propagate_event () from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #26 0x0000003a88165766 in gtk_main_do_event () from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #27 0x0000003a87860323 in ?? () from /usr/lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 #28 0x0000003a7c4373fa in g_main_context_dispatch () from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 #29 0x0000003a7c43ab00 in ?? () from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 #30 0x0000003a7c43afcd in g_main_loop_run () from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 #31 0x0000003a88164ebd in gtk_main () from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #32 0x00000000004080cc in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fff2927d698) at main.c:343 Happy to provide more info. I ran through my review checklist and everything else is just fine. I would approve this, but it would be nice to get it working for rawhide if possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 18:25:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:25:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351531] Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806111825.m5BIPf78003069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351531 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-06-11 14:25 EST ------- So can anybody test this on i386 rawhide? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 18:29:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:29:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450013] Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806111829.m5BITLfY003435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 ------- Additional Comments From dmalcolm at redhat.com 2008-06-11 14:29 EST ------- Re perl-GD-Graph3d: doh! Updated specfile at same location: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/testopia.spec and SRPM: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/testopia-3.0.4-1_2.tr2.0_RC1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 18:48:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:48:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449667] Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806111848.m5BImf24013092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449667 konrad at tylerc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-06-11 14:48 EST ------- Built in rawhide (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=657964). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 19:20:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:20:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444574] Review Request: pidgin-lastfm - Display informaiton form Last.fm profile in Pidgin status message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806111920.m5BJKTMI014038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-lastfm - Display informaiton form Last.fm profile in Pidgin status message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444574 ------- Additional Comments From natureshadow at gmail.com 2008-06-11 15:20 EST ------- I'm afraid I can't cope with all that packaging - is there any way of having this package maintained by someone else? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 19:29:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:29:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444574] Review Request: pidgin-lastfm - Display informaiton form Last.fm profile in Pidgin status message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806111929.m5BJTGmI015321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-lastfm - Display informaiton form Last.fm profile in Pidgin status message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444574 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-11 15:29 EST ------- If you can find someone else who wants to maintain this package then they're welcome to submit a review ticket for it. Otherwise, the only thing I can see to do is to put this package on the wishlist at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList and if someone has free time they can package it up. But if you don't want to continue with this review then I suppose this ticket should be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 19:28:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:28:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450850] Review Request: move - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806111928.m5BJSaUM021196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: move - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450850 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-06-11 15:28 EST ------- Some remarks: 1. I do not consider this application to be useful, because it aims at implementing "yet another backing-up mv" replacement, using the "n-th" non-standardized mechanism. 2. Naming an application "move" is a bad choice, because it's such a general name that it's likely colliding with many other applications/scripts users may have installed. Provided this, I am not interested in formally reviewing this packages (This shouldn't preventr others from doing so.). Some technical remarks: * The package doesn't acknowledge CFLAGS. The cause is this bug in Makefile: --- Makefile.am~ 2008-06-11 21:18:07.000000000 +0200 +++ Makefile.am 2008-06-11 21:18:07.000000000 +0200 @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ ## 6. automake -ac --foreign ## -CFLAGS = -D_GNU_SOURCE +AM_CPPFLAGS = -D_GNU_SOURCE bin_PROGRAMS = move move_SOURCES = move.c movedb.c move.h movedb.ham: * The spec file uses /sbin/install-info => Missing: Requires(pre) etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 20:10:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:10:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450938] Review Request: fs_mark - Benchmark synchronous/async file creation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806112010.m5BKAU5S029738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fs_mark - Benchmark synchronous/async file creation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450938 ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2008-06-11 16:10 EST ------- scratch koji build on f-10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=658025 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 20:06:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:06:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450938] New: Review Request: fs_mark - Benchmark synchronous/async file creation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450938 Summary: Review Request: fs_mark - Benchmark synchronous/async file creation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: esandeen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://sandeen.fedorapeople.org/fs_mark/fs_mark.spec SRPM URL: http://sandeen.fedorapeople.org/fs_mark/fs_mark-3.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: The fs_mark program is meant to give a low level bashing to file systems. The write pattern that we concentrate on is heavily synchronous IO across mutiple directories, drives, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 20:13:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:13:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450553] Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806112013.m5BKDkaj030153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450553 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-06-11 16:13 EST ------- FWIW, I disagree entirely with Ralf. Setting review back to +. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 20:17:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:17:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450553] Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806112017.m5BKHo59030961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450553 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 21:44:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:44:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435508] cpdup not 64-bit clean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806112144.m5BLiCJ9007994@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: cpdup not 64-bit clean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435508 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-11 17:44 EST ------- cpdup-1.11-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 21:45:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:45:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435508] cpdup not 64-bit clean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806112145.m5BLjuGd014469@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: cpdup not 64-bit clean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435508 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-11 17:45 EST ------- cpdup-1.11-2.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 21:42:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:42:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435508] cpdup not 64-bit clean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806112142.m5BLgP1p013822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: cpdup not 64-bit clean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435508 fedora-triage-list at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |9 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-triage-list at redhat.com 2008-05-14 01:42 EST ------- Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-11 17:42 EST ------- cpdup-1.11-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 22:37:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:37:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 421241] Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806112237.m5BMbqWo023485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421241 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2008-06-11 18:37 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309009) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309009&action=view) Test run on ZendFramework 1.5.2 with PHPunit PHP 5.2.5 (cli) (built: Apr 24 2008 10:37:47) PHPUnit 3.2.19 shell$ phpunit -d memory_limit=512M --verbose AllTests.php \ > ~/ZendFramework-1.5.2-testall-$(date +%F)-tap.log 2>&1 All packages and dependencies identified so far were installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 22:45:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:45:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 421241] Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806112245.m5BMjQkl024886@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421241 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2008-06-11 18:45 EST ------- Hi Jess, as you can see in above's comment I've attached the log from a complete 1.5.2 test run, maybe this is helpful to you. (In reply to comment #25) > Are there any additional extensions are you missing in the FC repo besides > mime_magic and third party, non open DB vendors? Surprisingly, yes: php-bitset (php-pecl-bitset) is not available for Fedora. Pecl says someone from Zend maintains it but there has never been an update after initial release in 2005. What are the drawbacks of using Search_Lucene without bitset? Is it still considered maintained? If not, becoming the packager of php-pecl-bitset would also mean becoming the maintainer in Fedora World and I don't have any spare capacities to cope with this. Otherwise, i.e. if Zend is still maintaining it, I'd package it. > About the getTmpDir() function, it has been patched but unfortunately not quite > as I suggested, it's pretty close to my original suggestion but it only supports > exporting TMPDIR for now, my config.ini idea, where a directive could be set to > use an alternative tmpdir is not yet implemented. I think this will do for now > but I hope it can be implemented in the future. For now, we could just export > TMPDIR. This improves our situation of testing most components properly right now but I wouldn't consider it the final solution. Our goal should be to have a blank PHPunit run on AllTests.php walk through after a fresh installation without any failures and/or errors. > The change is available from ZF's SVN trunk: > http://framework.zend.com/svn/framework/standard/trunk/ I've just checked out the trunk but will make an inspection and test run tomorrow. > About mime_magic vs. fileinfo, my wrapper function was not yet applied but I > will become a ZF committer soon and just apply it myself. Sounds good. > Please let me know how you did with getTmpDir(). Will do next time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 23:05:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:05:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448236] Review Request: xfbib - Lightweight BibTeX editor for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806112305.m5BN51eH021636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfbib - Lightweight BibTeX editor for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448236 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-06-11 19:05 EST ------- Packages for all branches have been build successfully. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 23:33:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:33:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437046] Review Request: mod_bw - Bandwidth Limiter For Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806112333.m5BNXR38026058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_bw - Bandwidth Limiter For Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437046 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-11 19:33 EST ------- mod_bw-0.8-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 23:34:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:34:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448236] Review Request: xfbib - Lightweight BibTeX editor for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806112334.m5BNY9mv032480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfbib - Lightweight BibTeX editor for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448236 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-11 19:34 EST ------- xfbib-0.0.2-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 23:33:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:33:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437046] Review Request: mod_bw - Bandwidth Limiter For Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806112333.m5BNXTeL032381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_bw - Bandwidth Limiter For Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437046 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.8-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 23:31:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:31:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445140] Review Request: lxtask - Lightweight and desktop independent task manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806112331.m5BNVMsd032162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxtask - Lightweight and desktop independent task manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445140 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-06-11 19:31 EST ------- Packages for all branches have successfully been build. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 23:35:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448491] Review Request: libcgroup - A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806112335.m5BNZrr1000609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcgroup - A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448491 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-11 19:35 EST ------- libcgroup-0.1c-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libcgroup'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-5252 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 23:35:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:35:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448236] Review Request: xfbib - Lightweight BibTeX editor for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806112335.m5BNZZFN027119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfbib - Lightweight BibTeX editor for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448236 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-11 19:35 EST ------- xfbib-0.0.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 23:35:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:35:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437046] Review Request: mod_bw - Bandwidth Limiter For Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806112335.m5BNZDbK026892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_bw - Bandwidth Limiter For Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437046 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-11 19:35 EST ------- mod_bw-0.8-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 23:37:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:37:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445140] Review Request: lxtask - Lightweight and desktop independent task manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806112337.m5BNbmtc001044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxtask - Lightweight and desktop independent task manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445140 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-11 19:37 EST ------- lxtask-0.1-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 23:38:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:38:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445140] Review Request: lxtask - Lightweight and desktop independent task manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806112338.m5BNcrVC001148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxtask - Lightweight and desktop independent task manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445140 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-11 19:38 EST ------- lxtask-0.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 11 23:47:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:47:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444817] Review Request: Spicebird - Collaboration Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806112347.m5BNlNMm002615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Spicebird - Collaboration Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444817 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-11 19:47 EST ------- spicebird-0.4-4.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 00:20:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:20:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196620] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-Annotate - represent a series of changes in annotate form In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120020.m5C0K3Tb007906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-Annotate - represent a series of changes in annotate form https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196620 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide ianburrell at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ianburrell at gmail.com 2008-06-11 20:20 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Algorithm-Annotate New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 00:22:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:22:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196619] Review Request: perl-Data-Hierarchy - Handle data in a hierarchical structure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120022.m5C0MZvr002151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Hierarchy - Handle data in a hierarchical structure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196619 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide ianburrell at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ianburrell at gmail.com 2008-06-11 20:22 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Data-Hierarchy New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 00:21:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:21:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225364] Review Request: perl-App-CLI - Dispatcher module for command line interface programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120021.m5C0LLOZ008164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-App-CLI - Dispatcher module for command line interface programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225364 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide ianburrell at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ianburrell at gmail.com 2008-06-11 20:21 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-App-CLI New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 00:27:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196621] Review Request: perl-IO-Digest - Perl module to calculate digests while reading or writing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120027.m5C0RBso008960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Digest - Perl module to calculate digests while reading or writing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196621 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide ianburrell at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ianburrell at gmail.com 2008-06-11 20:27 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-IO-Digest New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 00:30:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:30:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225367] Review Request: perl-Path-Class - Cross-platform path specification manipulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120030.m5C0U0RQ009090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Path-Class - Cross-platform path specification manipulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225367 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide ianburrell at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ianburrell at gmail.com 2008-06-11 20:30 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Path-Class New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 00:33:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:33:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196623] Review Request: perl-PerlIO-via-dynamic - dynamic PerlIO layers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120033.m5C0XlXY009892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PerlIO-via-dynamic - dynamic PerlIO layers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196623 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide ianburrell at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ianburrell at gmail.com 2008-06-11 20:33 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-PerlIO-via-dynamic New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 00:32:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:32:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196624] Review Request: perl-PerlIO-via-symlink - PerlIO layers for creating symlinks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120032.m5C0Wmo3009824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PerlIO-via-symlink - PerlIO layers for creating symlinks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196624 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide ianburrell at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ianburrell at gmail.com 2008-06-11 20:32 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-PerlIO-via-symlink New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 00:31:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:31:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196622] Review Request: perl-PerlIO-eol - PerlIO layer for normalizing line endings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120031.m5C0VSTJ009685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PerlIO-eol - PerlIO layer for normalizing line endings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196622 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide ianburrell at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ianburrell at gmail.com 2008-06-11 20:31 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-PerlIO-eol New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 01:10:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:10:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450975] New: Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450975 Summary: Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lpoetter at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://0pointer.de/public/libcanberra.spec SRPM URL: http://0pointer.de/public/libcanberra-0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: A portable sound event library, implementing the freedesktop.org/XDG sound theming/naming specifications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 01:18:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:18:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200245] Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120118.m5C1IfFk017197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200245 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-06-11 21:18 EST ------- Ok then, Pravin, can you put in the new package cvs request, and we can take it from there. Thanks, Kevin, for clarifying the process. :) Is is documented someone on the wiki? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 01:38:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:38:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447948] Review Request: R-lmtest - Testing Linear Regression Models for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120138.m5C1cA62020806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-lmtest - Testing Linear Regression Models for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447948 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-11 21:38 EST ------- Builds fine; rpmlint notices that the license tag needs tweaking: finds a bunch of utf8 complaints: W: invalid-license GPL I believe that, according to the COPYRIGHTS file, this is GPLv2 only. rpmlint also complains about a bunch of non-utf8 files: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/lib64/R/library/lmtest/man/lmtest.Rd.gz W: file-not-utf8 /usr/lib64/R/library/lmtest/latex/bondyield.tex and various other tex files. These all seem to come to one name, "Kr?mer", in 8859-1. I think it's worth converting these, since none of the produced documentation files carry any encoding information. rpmlint also has the two expected complaints about R-make-search-index.sh, which can be ignored. You should probably include the COPYRIGHTS file as %doc. * source files match upstream: 884e9eb00874c4221e50be02e07db10e054241f1466b25017c3f9b296edbd636 lmtest_0.9-21.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field isn't valid. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint has valid complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: lmtest.so()(64bit) R-lmtest = 0.9-1.fc10 = /bin/sh R libR.so()(64bit) libgfortran.so.3()(64bit) * %check is present and all tests pass. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 01:41:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:41:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450685] Review Request: R-DBI - Database Interface for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120141.m5C1fEgf014892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-DBI - Database Interface for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450685 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 02:21:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 22:21:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450685] Review Request: R-DBI - Database Interface for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120221.m5C2L8KE021769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-DBI - Database Interface for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450685 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-11 22:21 EST ------- Builds fine; rpmlint has the expected R complaints plus this: E: zero-length /usr/share/R/library/DBI/doc/DBI.R Honestly I'm not sure what this is for or even where it comes from. Perhaps an R expert can tell us what's up, but I don't think this is a significant issue. I would recommend using http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/DBI/index.html for the upstream URL; it's a bit better than an index page full of unrelated directories and tarballs. The description could use a little attention. I'd recommend stealing something like the following from upstream: A database interface (DBI) definition for communication between R and relational database management systems. * source files match upstream: 91a5e5492e1731c122e43581db9d3c486b189b7d6aa79a9d0c5ccaa42b839751 DBI_0.2-4.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. ? description could use a bit of fleshing out. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: R-DBI = 0.2-1.fc10 = /bin/sh R * %check is present and all tests pass * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is most of the package, but the package is small so there's no point in splitting it. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 02:26:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 22:26:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450775] Review Request: perl-Panotools-Script - Panorama Tools scripting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120226.m5C2QNeg029296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Panotools-Script - Panorama Tools scripting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450775 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 03:43:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:43:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449907] Review Request: perl-XML-Smart - Implementation of XML parser and writer for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120343.m5C3hX7h003357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Smart - Implementation of XML parser and writer for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449907 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-11 23:43 EST ------- Thanks for the review Marek, thanks for CVS nirik. Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 03:43:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:43:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450110] Review Request: perl-XML-Atom-SimpleFeed - No-fuss generation of Atom syndication feeds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120343.m5C3hVW3009905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Atom-SimpleFeed - No-fuss generation of Atom syndication feeds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450110 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-11 23:43 EST ------- Thanks for the review Marek, thanks for CVS nirik. Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 03:43:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:43:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449904] Review Request: perl-HTML-Template-Pro - Perl/XS module to use HTML Templates from CGI scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120343.m5C3hdL2010024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Template-Pro - Perl/XS module to use HTML Templates from CGI scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449904 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-11 23:43 EST ------- Thanks for the review Marek, thanks for CVS nirik. Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 03:43:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449905] Review Request: perl-Object-MultiType - Perl Objects as Hash, Array, Scalar, Code and Glob at the same time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120343.m5C3hahj009943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-MultiType - Perl Objects as Hash, Array, Scalar, Code and Glob at the same time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449905 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-11 23:43 EST ------- Thanks for the review Marek, thanks for CVS nirik. Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 03:43:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449907] Review Request: perl-XML-Smart - Implementation of XML parser and writer for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120343.m5C3haqD009971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Smart - Implementation of XML parser and writer for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449907 Bug 449907 depends on bug 449905, which changed state. Bug 449905 Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-MultiType - Perl Objects as Hash, Array, Scalar, Code and Glob at the same time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449905 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 04:09:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 00:09:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450775] Review Request: perl-Panotools-Script - Panorama Tools scripting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120409.m5C49RnP007566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Panotools-Script - Panorama Tools scripting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450775 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-12 00:09 EST ------- Builds fine; rpmlint does spit this out E: explicit-lib-dependency libpano13-tools but I think it's bogus; rpmlint just complains whenever you have an explicit dependency on any package starting with "lib". The Source0 URL doesn't seem to be correct; http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Panotools doesn't seem to exist. I was able to fetch the source from the search.cpan.org page. I'm not sure I can understand what this package does given the %description you have. Unfortunately I don't really understand enough about this package to suggest anything which might be more descriptive. Why do you have a runtime dependency on desktop-file-utils? * source files match upstream: 797a78beecd76a95d26d6a7c794d2b6ee3b7bf90eb439354101ee1f66c21fcfe Panotools-Script-0.14.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. ? not sure about the description. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. ? final provides and requires: perl(Panotools::Matrix) perl(Panotools::Script) = 0.14 perl(Panotools::Script::Line) perl(Panotools::Script::Line::Control) perl(Panotools::Script::Line::ControlMorph) perl(Panotools::Script::Line::Image) perl(Panotools::Script::Line::ImageMetadata) perl(Panotools::Script::Line::Mode) perl(Panotools::Script::Line::Option) perl(Panotools::Script::Line::Output) perl(Panotools::Script::Line::Panorama) perl(Panotools::Script::Line::Variable) perl-Panotools-Script = 0.14-1.fc10 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/perl ImageMagick autotrace ? desktop-file-utils enblend hugin-base libpano13-tools perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Copy) perl(File::Spec) perl(File::Temp) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(GraphViz) perl(GraphViz) >= 1 perl(Image::Size) perl(Image::Size) >= 2.9 perl(Math::Trig) perl(Panotools::Matrix) perl(Panotools::Script) perl(Panotools::Script::Line) perl(Panotools::Script::Line::Control) perl(Panotools::Script::Line::ControlMorph) perl(Panotools::Script::Line::Image) perl(Panotools::Script::Line::ImageMetadata) perl(Panotools::Script::Line::Mode) perl(Panotools::Script::Line::Option) perl(Panotools::Script::Line::Output) perl(Panotools::Script::Line::Panorama) perl(Panotools::Script::Line::Variable) perl(Pod::Usage) perl(Storable) perl(bytes) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) zenity * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=11, Tests=79, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.50 cusr + 0.08 csys = 0.58 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (update-desktop-database) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * desktop files valid and installed properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 04:30:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 00:30:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449251] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120430.m5C4UHdt017612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449251 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-12 00:30 EST ------- sorry for late review. I was on vacation. I am unable to download SRPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 05:25:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:25:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444574] Review Request: pidgin-lastfm - Display informaiton form Last.fm profile in Pidgin status message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120525.m5C5PcPW019913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-lastfm - Display informaiton form Last.fm profile in Pidgin status message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444574 ------- Additional Comments From natureshadow at gmail.com 2008-06-12 01:25 EST ------- No, the current version is OK. Updates should then be done by someone else ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 05:51:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:51:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120551.m5C5p6gV030364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rnorwood at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-12 01:51 EST ------- Robin, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 05:59:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:59:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200245] Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120559.m5C5x4nA031519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200245 ------- Additional Comments From psatpute at redhat.com 2008-06-12 01:59 EST ------- Thanks kevin and Jens i will do that :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 06:00:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 02:00:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434906] Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120600.m5C60paN025323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434906 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-12 02:00 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 06:06:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 02:06:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445105] Review Request: milkytracker - SDL clone of the Fasttracker II module tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120606.m5C665xO000824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: milkytracker - SDL clone of the Fasttracker II module tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445105 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(muepsj at gmail.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-12 02:06 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 06:01:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 02:01:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120601.m5C61MQW032357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(seefeld at sympatico. | |ca) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-12 02:01 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 06:04:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 02:04:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120604.m5C64jZc025841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(claudio at claudiotom | |asoni.it) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-12 02:04 EST ------- Well, * Please rebuild this package also on dist-f10. * For F-9/8 packages, please submit a request to push those packages to the repositories at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 06:13:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 02:13:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200245] Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120613.m5C6DOpb001886@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200245 psatpute at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From psatpute at redhat.com 2008-06-12 02:13 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: scim-sayura Short Description: Sinhala Trans IME for SCIM Owners: pravins Branches: devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 06:30:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 02:30:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448310] Review Request: elice - Elice is a PureBasic to c++ translator / compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120630.m5C6Usdr030229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elice - Elice is a PureBasic to c++ translator / compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448310 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-12 02:30 EST ------- Erm, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 06:54:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 02:54:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200245] Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120654.m5C6sSC9008370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200245 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-06-12 02:54 EST ------- new package added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 06:59:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 02:59:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450410] Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120659.m5C6xh8c009334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450410 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-12 02:59 EST ------- The package on comment 0 does not build. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=658540 I just tried to rebuild this package, however - This package seems to apply a patch on Makefiles after calling configure, which is not good in general. You should apply a patch against "Makefile.in"s. Also, $RPM_OPT_FLAGS differs between on i386 system and on x86_64 system. - The line like "#%configure" does not prevent configure from being executed (actually from build.log you can see that configure is actually called). This is rpm "feature". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 07:03:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 03:03:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120703.m5C73K7v002996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-12 03:03 EST ------- Your package does not build (build stops at the very early stage) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=658547 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 07:02:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 03:02:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450850] Review Request: move - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120702.m5C72eYA010350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: move - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450850 ------- Additional Comments From pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in 2008-06-12 03:02 EST ------- Hello Ralf, thanks for the technical comments. I've replaced CFLAGS with the AM_CFLAGS. Please see the new files at SPEC: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/move.spec SORC: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/move-1.2.tar.gz SRPM: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/move-1.2-2.fc8.src.rpm > * The spec file uses /sbin/install-info > => Missing: Requires(pre) etc. About this Requires(pre), is it necessary if there is no %pre section in the spec file? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 07:52:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 03:52:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 421241] Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120752.m5C7qZEv019187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421241 ------- Additional Comments From jess at zend.com 2008-06-12 03:52 EST ------- Hi Alexander, About bitset, the person listed as maintainer no longer works at Zend. I don't believe it will be maintained further. However, the use of bitset is not mandatory. Comment in library/Zend/Search/Lucene/Index/SegmentInfo.php on line 167 reads: bitset if bitset extension is loaded or array otherwise. Therefore it is possible to use w/o having bitset loaded. This is also true to mime_magic, BTW. I will review your log and see what I can do about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 08:14:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 04:14:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 421241] Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120814.m5C8EVV3016339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421241 ------- Additional Comments From jess at zend.com 2008-06-12 04:14 EST ------- Hello again, I reviewed the log and the good news are most of the problems are mostly around the same lines of the getTmpDir(), that is, the tests are trying to create and manipulate files within the ZF tree which a normal user cannot do if the tree is located under /usr/share. The problem here is more vast than just getTmpDir() it appears as though the entire concept was not considered when the tests were designed. I will discuss it with the ZF developers and see how fast we can address this. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 08:22:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 04:22:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449927] Review Request: imsettings - Delivery framework for general Input Method configuration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120822.m5C8M2k1025923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imsettings - Delivery framework for general Input Method configuration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449927 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-06-12 04:22 EST ------- Taking this review. Here is my review: +:ok, ?:needs attention, -:needs fixing MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. See above. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. 364c8e176bd26008c9c12f8978ed4379 imsettings-0.101.0.tar.bz2 [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [+] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. [+] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [=] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Just wondering if the xfce subpackage should explicitly require libxfce4mcs for %{_libdir}/xfce4/mcs-plugins/, but I don't think it is a blocker given that it is already implicitly required. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [-] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [+] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} See above. [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [?] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. I haven't been time to rebuild im-chooser yet to test this package. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 09:47:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 05:47:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450410] Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806120947.m5C9lDgX001739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450410 ------- Additional Comments From guido.ledermann at googlemail.com 2008-06-12 05:47 EST ------- Thanks for your comments, Mamoru. I've changed the spec and the patch. You can find them at Spec URL: http://www.soglatec.de/fedora/multiget.spec SRPM URL: http://www.soglatec.de/fedora/multiget-1.2.0-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 11:44:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:44:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451012] Review Request: pspp - program for statistical analysis of sampled data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121144.m5CBiI9r022470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pspp - program for statistical analysis of sampled data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451012 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2008-06-12 07:44 EST ------- Has been successfully built in koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=658938 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 11:43:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:43:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451012] New: Review Request: pspp - program for statistical analysis of sampled data Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451012 Summary: Review Request: pspp - program for statistical analysis of sampled data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mcepl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/pspp.spec SRPM URL: http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/pspp-0.6.0-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: PSPP is a program for statistical analysis of sampled data. It interprets commands in the SPSS language and produces tabular output in ASCII, PostScript, or HTML format. PSPP development is ongoing. It already supports a large subset of SPSS's transformation language. Its statistical procedure support is currently limited, but growing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 11:56:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:56:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225625] Merge Review: bridge-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121156.m5CBuBBN024919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bridge-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225625 nelhawar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rwheeler at redhat.com |dwmw2 at infradead.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 11:58:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:58:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451012] Review Request: pspp - program for statistical analysis of sampled data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121158.m5CBw339025859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pspp - program for statistical analysis of sampled data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451012 ------- Additional Comments From dhorak at redhat.com 2008-06-12 07:58 EST ------- There are wrong scriptlets for installing the info files and also missing Requires: - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Texinfo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 11:56:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:56:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226511] Merge Review: unifdef In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121156.m5CBukJU025639@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: unifdef https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226511 nelhawar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rwheeler at redhat.com |dwmw2 at infradead.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 12:54:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:54:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451012] Review Request: pspp - program for statistical analysis of sampled data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121254.m5CCsNei004909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pspp - program for statistical analysis of sampled data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451012 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2008-06-12 08:54 EST ------- Updated. .spec file is in the same URL, src.rpm is http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/pspp-0.6.0-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 13:29:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:29:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444735] Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121329.m5CDT7Zm017639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444735 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-12 09:29 EST ------- Just a question: Why does this package need to call configure twice? (#%configure does not suppress configure call as: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=659093&name=build.log ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 13:51:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:51:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444735] Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121351.m5CDpYpo016706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444735 ------- Additional Comments From christian.iseli at licr.org 2008-06-12 09:51 EST ------- Oh dear, I forgot about the RPM macro expansion weirdness again... Thanks for catching this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 14:12:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:12:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449927] Review Request: imsettings - Delivery framework for general Input Method configuration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121412.m5CECvt6021415@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imsettings - Delivery framework for general Input Method configuration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449927 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2008-06-12 10:12 EST ------- Updated. Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/imsettings/imsettings.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/imsettings/imsettings-0.101.1-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 14:15:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:15:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121415.m5CEFiRV028308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-06-12 10:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #36) > No. I'm waiting to push pgpool-ha. > > Regards, Devrim -ha has been pushed, and this package has even been updated a few times. Closable? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 14:20:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:20:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450975] Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121420.m5CEKfBv029463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450975 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 14:23:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:23:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444735] Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121423.m5CENJYK023845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444735 ------- Additional Comments From christian.iseli at licr.org 2008-06-12 10:23 EST ------- Imported. Built in F-8. Can't build in F-9 and devel yet, due to BZ #450889 getting gcc ICE on ppc machines. Leaving open, waiting to see what happens with gcc on ppc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 14:23:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:23:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175896] Review Request: perl-SQL-Statement - SQL parsing and processing engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121423.m5CENGsC023799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SQL-Statement - SQL parsing and processing engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=175896 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kanarip at kanarip.com ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-06-12 10:23 EST ------- *** Bug 447900 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 14:35:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:35:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449927] Review Request: imsettings - Delivery framework for general Input Method configuration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121435.m5CEZ2GE032464@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imsettings - Delivery framework for general Input Method configuration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449927 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2008-06-12 10:35 EST ------- For testing packages: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/imsettings/tests/i386/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 14:26:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:26:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175895] Review Request: perl-DBD-XBase - Perl module for reading and writing the dbf files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121426.m5CEQYgw024722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBD-XBase - Perl module for reading and writing the dbf files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=175895 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 14:53:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:53:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121453.m5CErwGH030077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(rnorwood at redhat.co|fedora-cvs? |m) | ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2008-06-12 10:53 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xmms-pulse Short Description: XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server Owners: rnorwood Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 15:04:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:04:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450975] Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121504.m5CF4wns005835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450975 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-06-12 11:04 EST ------- Builds fine in mock. rpmlint says: [mclasen at localhost ~]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/*.rpm libcanberra.i386: W: no-documentation You should include at least %doc README LGPL libcanberra.i386: E: no-changelogname-tag This is odd. Maybe my rpmlint is broken, since there clearly is a %changelog libcanberra.i386: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libcanberra-pulse.so libcanberra-pulse.so libcanberra.i386: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libcanberra-null.so libcanberra-null.so libcanberra.i386: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libcanberra-alsa.so libcanberra-alsa.so Are these plugins ? if so, they should not live in /usr/lib libcanberra-devel.i386: W: non-standard-group Development/C Should just be Development/Libraries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 15:07:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:07:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444735] Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121507.m5CF7Tex000707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444735 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-12 11:07 EST ------- Somehow I missed the extra configure run; thanks to Mamoru for spotting it. If I see Ville around I'll ask him how hard it would be to detect commented-but-not-really macros in rpmlint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 15:12:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:12:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450975] Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121512.m5CFC3WO001679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450975 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-06-12 11:12 EST ------- I'll do a formal review in a bit, probably have to leave the office before the fedora wiki page loads :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 15:13:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:13:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450410] Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121513.m5CFDCtR007567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450410 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-12 11:13 EST ------- Well, from where can we confirm the license of this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 15:17:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:17:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450410] Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121517.m5CFH5sZ008321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450410 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-12 11:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Well, from where can we confirm the license of this package? Scratch this comment :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 15:28:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:28:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450850] Review Request: move - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121528.m5CFSIGN004495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: move - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450850 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-12 11:28 EST ------- Well, now the package itself seems okay (althogh I recommend to use ------------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" ------------------------------------------------------------- to keep timestamps on installed file), however I also think that the name "move" is too generic... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 15:25:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:25:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450975] Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121525.m5CFPZ4X004243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450975 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-06-12 11:25 EST ------- going down the checklist: package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: see above for things rpmlint found. beyond that, the devel package needs to require pkg-config because it contains pc files and gtk-doc because it contains stuff in /usr/share/gtk-doc/help license: ok license field: ok license file: must be included spec file language: ok spec file legibility: ok upstream sources: ok buildable: yes excludearch: n/a build deps: ok locale handling: ok ldconfig: ok relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok duplicate files: ok file permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: consistent content: permissible large docs: ok %doc content: ok headers: ok static libs: n/a pc files: must add Requires: pkgconfig to -devel shared libs: see above, libcanberra-foo.so should be moved out of /usr/lib devel deps: ok libtool archives: ok gui apps: n/a file ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 15:28:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:28:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450975] Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121528.m5CFSpX1010211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450975 ------- Additional Comments From lpoetter at redhat.com 2008-06-12 11:28 EST ------- > [mclasen at localhost ~]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/*.rpm > libcanberra.i386: W: no-documentation > > You should include at least > %doc README LGPL Fixed. > libcanberra.i386: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libcanberra-pulse.so > libcanberra-pulse.so > libcanberra.i386: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libcanberra-null.so libcanberra-null.so > libcanberra.i386: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libcanberra-alsa.so libcanberra-alsa.so > > Are these plugins ? if so, they should not live in /usr/lib Yes, they are plugins. Moving plugins to other directores is a pain to do in a thread-safe manner with the mess that is ltdl, because you need to patch the search path. I'd prefer leaving it the way it is for now. We can move that around whenever we want in the future. Also, with the names chosen we shouldn't be in risk of namespace clashes. And finally, having them in /usr/lib also allows us to make use of the ld cache. Unless you really insist I'd prefer to leave it the way it is right now. > libcanberra-devel.i386: W: non-standard-group Development/C > > Should just be Development/Libraries Oops, seems to be a mandrivaism left-over from the original spec file I based my work on. Fixed, too. Spec file is now updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 15:34:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:34:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444952] Review Request: tlock - terminal lock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121534.m5CFYIMI011226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tlock - terminal lock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444952 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-12 11:34 EST ------- Okay for this package. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (tlock) is APPROVED by me --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor. At the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 15:35:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:35:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200245] Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121535.m5CFZBjS006120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200245 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-12 11:35 EST ------- Yeah, not sure it's documented, but I can add it to the cvsrequest page on the wiki at least. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 15:36:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:36:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450975] Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121536.m5CFamYh006438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450975 ------- Additional Comments From lpoetter at redhat.com 2008-06-12 11:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > packaging guidelines: see above for things rpmlint found. beyond that, the > devel package needs to require pkg-config because it contains pc files > and gtk-doc because it contains stuff in /usr/share/gtk-doc/help Fixed. > license: ok > license field: ok > license file: must be included Fixed. > pc files: must add Requires: pkgconfig to -devel Fixed. > shared libs: see above, libcanberra-foo.so should be moved out of /usr/lib See my earlier comments about this. I uploaded an updated spec/srpm, but didn't bump the revision. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 15:54:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:54:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196619] Review Request: perl-Data-Hierarchy - Handle data in a hierarchical structure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121554.m5CFs6qZ009460@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Hierarchy - Handle data in a hierarchical structure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196619 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-12 11:54 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 15:55:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:55:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196621] Review Request: perl-IO-Digest - Perl module to calculate digests while reading or writing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121555.m5CFtQQY015274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Digest - Perl module to calculate digests while reading or writing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196621 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-12 11:55 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 15:55:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:55:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444735] Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121555.m5CFtha4010116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444735 ------- Additional Comments From christian.iseli at licr.org 2008-06-12 11:55 EST ------- yeah, that would be good to have in rpmlint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 15:57:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:57:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196623] Review Request: perl-PerlIO-via-dynamic - dynamic PerlIO layers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121557.m5CFvevp010372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PerlIO-via-dynamic - dynamic PerlIO layers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196623 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-12 11:57 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 15:54:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:54:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196620] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-Annotate - represent a series of changes in annotate form In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121554.m5CFsstt009595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-Annotate - represent a series of changes in annotate form https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196620 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-12 11:54 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 15:55:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:55:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196622] Review Request: perl-PerlIO-eol - PerlIO layer for normalizing line endings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121555.m5CFtwTl010175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PerlIO-eol - PerlIO layer for normalizing line endings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196622 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-12 11:55 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 15:58:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:58:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196624] Review Request: perl-PerlIO-via-symlink - PerlIO layers for creating symlinks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121558.m5CFwMIr010444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PerlIO-via-symlink - PerlIO layers for creating symlinks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196624 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-12 11:58 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 15:59:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:59:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225364] Review Request: perl-App-CLI - Dispatcher module for command line interface programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121559.m5CFxQrd015896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-App-CLI - Dispatcher module for command line interface programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225364 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-12 11:59 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 16:00:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:00:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225367] Review Request: perl-Path-Class - Cross-platform path specification manipulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121600.m5CG0Teo011157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Path-Class - Cross-platform path specification manipulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225367 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-12 12:00 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 16:03:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:03:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121603.m5CG3HoD017215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-12 12:03 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 16:05:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:05:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450553] Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121605.m5CG5IEq017926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450553 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-12 12:05 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 16:25:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:25:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448310] Review Request: elice - Elice is a PureBasic to c++ translator / compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121625.m5CGPujd021720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elice - Elice is a PureBasic to c++ translator / compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448310 ------- Additional Comments From ivazqueznet at gmail.com 2008-06-12 12:25 EST ------- Sorry, I missed the links at the bottom. - Release should be 0%{?dist}.2.svn%{svn_revision} ? make check runs, but I'm not convinced it does anything Other than those, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 16:25:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:25:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450938] Review Request: fs_mark - Benchmark synchronous/async file creation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121625.m5CGPR2S016350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fs_mark - Benchmark synchronous/async file creation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450938 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-12 12:25 EST ------- gdal-1.5.1-13.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 16:53:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:53:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450410] Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121653.m5CGr86j026705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450410 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-12 12:53 EST ------- Well, after all the license issue is pending. It seems that this package is licensed under at least GPLv2, however now we distinguish between GPLv2 and GPLv3 and GPLv2+. Would you ask the upstream to clarify under what license this package is released? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 17:10:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:10:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450410] Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121710.m5CHAVSl030382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450410 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-12 13:10 EST ------- One of the reason I am asking is that while some files (including src/mainframe.cpp ) says that they are licensed under GPLv2+, src/mainframe.cpp also includes: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 /* 10 * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify 11 * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by 12 * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or 13 * (at your option) any later version. 1235 info.SetVersion(wxT("v1.2.0")); 1236 info.SetLicence(wxT("GPLv2")); 1237 info.SetWebSite(wxT("http://multiget.sourceforge.net")); ------------------------------------------------------------------------ which seems to be saying as "GPLv2" (although the header of the file also says GPLv2+....) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 17:13:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:13:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450410] Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121713.m5CHDjhc025294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450410 ------- Additional Comments From guido.ledermann at googlemail.com 2008-06-12 13:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > One of the reason I am asking is that while some files (including > src/mainframe.cpp ) says that they are licensed under GPLv2+, > src/mainframe.cpp also includes: I see. I've just sent an email and will get back when I have some news. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 17:16:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:16:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448310] Review Request: elice - Elice is a PureBasic to c++ translator / compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121716.m5CHGcf4026146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elice - Elice is a PureBasic to c++ translator / compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448310 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-12 13:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Sorry, I missed the links at the bottom. > NP. > - Release should be 0%{?dist}.2.svn%{svn_revision} Erm, where did you get that from ?? [hans at localhost ~]$ rpm -qa | grep svn qimageblitz-0.0.4-0.4.svn706674.fc9.x86_64 kdnssd-avahi-devel-0.1.3-0.6.20080116svn.fc9.x86_64 NetworkManager-vpnc-0.7.0-0.7.7.svn3502.fc9.x86_64 libflashsupport-000-0.3.svn20070904.i386 libnetfilter_conntrack-0.0.89-0.1.svn7356.fc9.x86_64 [hans at localhost ~]$ rpm -qa | grep cvs mdbtools-devel-0.6-0.4.cvs20051109.fc9.x86_64 xmldb-api-sdk-0.1-0.2.20011111cvs.1jpp.2.fc9.x86_64 xu4-1.1-0.4.cvs20070510.fc9.x86_64 Also from: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag "Basically, follow the ["Packaging/NamingGuidelines"] for how to set the value for Release, then append %{?dist} to the end." Notice the "append %{?dist} to the end." > ? make check runs, but I'm not convinced it does anything It does I wasn't convinced either and I checked, its just very quiet when everything goes ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 17:24:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:24:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196620] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-Annotate - represent a series of changes in annotate form In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121724.m5CHOibU027405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-Annotate - represent a series of changes in annotate form https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196620 herrold at owlriver.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |herrold at owlriver.com ------- Additional Comments From herrold at owlriver.com 2008-06-12 13:24 EST ------- Kevin -- I see this is closed, but CPAN carries this as license 'Unknown' at one point, and Artistic down in the footer to the POD explosion sub-page see: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Algorithm-Annotate/ Is this a problem? -- Russ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 17:34:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:34:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196620] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-Annotate - represent a series of changes in annotate form In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121734.m5CHYMgs029020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-Annotate - represent a series of changes in annotate form https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196620 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-12 13:34 EST ------- At the bottom of the POD you see: " Copyright 2003 by Chia-liang Kao . This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. " This is "GPLv2+ or Artistic" which is valid for software in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 17:34:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:34:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450553] Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121734.m5CHYnXY029089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450553 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(rc040203 at freenet.d| |e) | ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-12 13:34 EST ------- Thanks for assistance, Tom; Thanks for review, Marek; Thanks for CVS, Kevin; and thanks for constructive criticism, Ralf. Imported and built. Followup in bug #451078. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 17:39:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:39:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450553] Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121739.m5CHdwiO002829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450553 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 17:49:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:49:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450410] Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121749.m5CHn7jI004606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450410 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-12 13:49 EST ------- Thanks. Then for 1.2.0-2: Except for license issue: * Source3 - Please specify the URL of Source3 (or write as a comment how you received Source3) * Buildroot - Please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot * BuildRequires - Currently gtk2-devel seems to pull automake, however for fixing broken install-sh symlink I think explicitly adding "BuildRequires: automake" is preferred. * Perl module BRs: - For perl modules BuildRequires, please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#requiresandprovides (In short, "BuildRequires: perl-XML-Parser" must be "BuildRequires: perl(XML::Parser)" ) * Patch0 vs %optflags vs %configure - You seem to add %Patch0 to honor %optflags, however this Patch0 is not needed. The reason your srpm does not honor %optflags is that %configure is called at %prep, not at %build. Actually %configure sets CPPFLAGS, however written at %prep, all those variables are reset. Move %configure to %build and then Patch0 is no longer needed. * Macros - Use macros. /usr/share must be %{_datadir}. * Timestamps - When using "cp" or "install" commands, add "-p" option to keep timestamps on installed files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 18:59:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:59:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451095] New: libcxgb3 hardware driver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451095 Summary: libcxgb3 hardware driver Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dledford at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com The Chelsio T3 network hardware is iWARP capable 10GigE hardware. In order to actually use the iWARP capability from user space, you need the appropriate hardware driver for use with the libibverbs library. This package provides that driver. Source rpm at: http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/f10/SRPMS Binary rpms at: http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/f10/x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 19:20:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:20:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450410] Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121920.m5CJKPNj026589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450410 ------- Additional Comments From guido.ledermann at googlemail.com 2008-06-12 15:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > * Source3 > - Please specify the URL of Source3 (or write as a comment > how you received Source3) Wrote a comment in the spec. Actually there isn't an icon provided within the source of 1.2.0. So I took the one from 1.1.4 > * Buildroot > - Please follow > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot Done. > * BuildRequires > - Currently gtk2-devel seems to pull automake, however > for fixing broken install-sh symlink I think explicitly > adding "BuildRequires: automake" is preferred. Fixed. > * Perl module BRs: > - For perl modules BuildRequires, please follow > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#requiresandprovides > (In short, "BuildRequires: perl-XML-Parser" must be > "BuildRequires: perl(XML::Parser)" ) Fixed. Will be carefully done in future packages. > * Patch0 vs %optflags vs %configure > - You seem to add %Patch0 to honor %optflags, however this Patch0 > is not needed. > The reason your srpm does not honor %optflags is that %configure > is called at %prep, not at %build. Actually %configure sets > CPPFLAGS, however written at %prep, all those variables are > reset. > Move %configure to %build and then Patch0 is no longer needed. Okay. Got it. So this patch is obsolete now. > * Macros > - Use macros. /usr/share must be %{_datadir}. Done. > * Timestamps > - When using "cp" or "install" commands, add "-p" option to keep > timestamps on installed files. Fixed. Find the latest here: Spec URL: http://www.soglatec.de/fedora/multiget.spec SRPM URL: http://www.soglatec.de/fedora/multiget-1.2.0-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 19:25:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:25:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451095] libcxgb3 hardware driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121925.m5CJP5iq027508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libcxgb3 hardware driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451095 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2008-06-12 15:25 EST ------- Providing a specfile separately would make reviewer's life easier. Partial specfile review below. > License: GPL/BSD Invalid License tag. Should be: License: GPLv2 or BSD > BuildRequires: libibverbs-devel >= 1.1, autoconf, libtool libtool requires autoconf > ExclusiveArch: i386 x86_64 ia64 ppc ppc64 Do you know for certain it doesn't work on sparc/sparc64? > Obsoletes: %{name}-devel Why? There's no libcxgb3-devel in Fedora. > %install > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > %makeinstall Don't use %makeinstall, use %{__make} install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT instead (and make sure the Makefile supports DESTDIR for install target). > install -m 644 -D %{SOURCE1} ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_sysconfdir}/modprobe.d/libcxgb3.conf Use install -p to preserve source timestamps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 19:43:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:43:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806121943.m5CJhd1w031303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 ------- Additional Comments From hedayat at grad.com 2008-06-12 15:43 EST ------- First, thank you very much for the test. I'm sorry about it. I've forgot to include libtool as a build dependency. Also I should than Tim for his comments on my package (https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-robotics-list/2008-June/msg00002.html) After fixing the mentioned problems (as far as I could!), I've uploaded new spec and srpm files. Hopefully, they'll be in a better shape. It would be really nice if you could have a look again: SPEC: http://www.assembla.com/spaces/hedayat/documents/dC7Shyoh0r3z6aab7jnrAJ/download/rcssserver3d.spec (Or if that doesn't work: http://www.assembla.com/file/hedayat/1_rcssserver3d.spec) SRPM: http://www.assembla.com/spaces/hedayat/documents/dZMbxQohOr3yDvab7jnrAJ/download/rcssserver3d-0.5.9-1.20080611cvs.fc9.src.rpm (Or: http://www.assembla.com/file/hedayat/1_rcssserver3d-0.5.9-1.20080611cvs.fc9.src.rpm) Some of the changes include: - addition of a -doc subpackage - added libtool as a build time dependency - removed rcssmonitor3D-lite from built binaries - using CVS sources which include my patches for Fedora packaging (I'm an upstream contributor) Thanks again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 20:05:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:05:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451095] libcxgb3 hardware driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806122005.m5CK5sf6003275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libcxgb3 hardware driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451095 ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2008-06-12 16:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Providing a specfile separately would make reviewer's life easier. Partial > specfile review below. specfile now available in the SRPM directory. > > License: GPL/BSD > > Invalid License tag. Should be: > License: GPLv2 or BSD Fixed > > BuildRequires: libibverbs-devel >= 1.1, autoconf, libtool > > libtool requires autoconf Fixed > > ExclusiveArch: i386 x86_64 ia64 ppc ppc64 > > Do you know for certain it doesn't work on sparc/sparc64? No, but I also don't know that it *does* work on sparc/sparc64, and this isn't your run of the mill user space package, it is a hardware driver in user space. Regardless though, I removed the ExclusiveArch. > > Obsoletes: %{name}-devel > > Why? There's no libcxgb3-devel in Fedora. Because the upstream people distribute a package called libcxgb3-devel that's really nothing but a .a static lib, and we put that in the -static file. This prevents conflicts when upgrading from the libcxgb3 included as part of the OFED-1.3.tar.gz package by upstream to this package. > > %install > > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > > %makeinstall > > Don't use %makeinstall, use %{__make} install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT instead > (and make sure the Makefile supports DESTDIR for install target). Fixed. > > install -m 644 -D %{SOURCE1} > ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_sysconfdir}/modprobe.d/libcxgb3.conf > > Use install -p to preserve source timestamps. Fixed. I updated over the top of the previous package (aka, I built with the same n-v-r, not a bumped one) so to get the new srpm you might have to force a refresh if you are behind a proxy cache. Otherwise, the specfile is now available and includes the fixes listed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 20:22:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:22:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444574] Review Request: pidgin-lastfm - Display informaiton form Last.fm profile in Pidgin status message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806122022.m5CKMB6b005796@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-lastfm - Display informaiton form Last.fm profile in Pidgin status message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444574 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-12 16:22 EST ------- This package won't be allowed into the distribution without someone to maintain it. If you're not that person, then whoever will be the maintainer needs to at least announce that it this ticket. Otherwise this ticket should be closed and the package added to the wishlist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 20:27:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:27:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443741] Review Request: jna-posix - POSIX APIs for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806122027.m5CKR1Jg006630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jna-posix - POSIX APIs for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443741 konrad at tylerc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-06-12 16:27 EST ------- Has this not been closed yet? I think it's been pushed to updates. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 20:27:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:27:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806122027.m5CKR2je006655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 Bug 417511 depends on bug 443741, which changed state. Bug 443741 Summary: Review Request: jna-posix - POSIX APIs for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443741 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 20:40:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:40:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445105] Review Request: milkytracker - SDL clone of the Fasttracker II module tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806122040.m5CKe01Z009246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: milkytracker - SDL clone of the Fasttracker II module tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445105 muepsj at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(muepsj at gmail.com) | ------- Additional Comments From muepsj at gmail.com 2008-06-12 16:39 EST ------- I'm sorry, but I'm not exactly sure about what to check the new release for. The new release works for me and I understand the changes in milkytracker-0.90.80-use-system-library.patch mostly, but I certainly couldn't have done them myself. Did you actually modify the configure script yourself, or was it regenerated after the modifications to configure.in? If you feel I should read some stuff, I'd like some pointers :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 21:09:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:09:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450775] Review Request: perl-Panotools-Script - Panorama Tools scripting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806122109.m5CL9vHq008453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Panotools-Script - Panorama Tools scripting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450775 ------- Additional Comments From bruno at postle.net 2008-06-12 17:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > The Source0 URL doesn't seem to be correct; http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Panotools doesn't seem to exist. Fixed, www.cpan.org doesn't host all CPAN modules, but cpanspec thinks it does. > I'm not sure I can understand what this package does given the %description you have. I've changed it to something more appropriate both in the SPEC file and upstream SVN (this module has changed purpose somewhat since it was first created): "Library and utilities for manipulating project files created by the hugin photo stitching software." > Why do you have a runtime dependency on desktop-file-utils? %post/%postun both run update-desktop-database, but I see from the ScriptletSnippets page that I don't need to put it in the SPEC, fixed. Updated files: http://fedorapeople.org/~bpostle/reviews/perl-Panotools-Script/perl-Panotools-Script.spec http://fedorapeople.org/~bpostle/reviews/perl-Panotools-Script/perl-Panotools-Script-0.14-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 22:11:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:11:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451120] New: Review Request: lua-lpeg - Parsing Expression Grammars for Lua Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451120 Summary: Review Request: lua-lpeg - Parsing Expression Grammars for Lua Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tim at niemueller.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/luastuff/lua-lpeg.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/luastuff/lua-lpeg-0.8.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: LPeg is a new pattern-matching library for Lua, based on Parsing Expression Grammars (PEGs). Website: http://www.inf.puc-rio.br/~roberto/lpeg.html Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=660005 (Changed summary after scratch build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 22:22:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:22:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806122222.m5CMMMVX020692@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 ------- Additional Comments From hedayat at grad.com 2008-06-12 18:22 EST ------- I was able to successfully build the packages at home using mock. Currently, I don't know if I can do anything with rpmlint warning/errors on -devel package: W: dangling-relative-symlink: These symlinks point to libraries which are available in the main package. I've tried using absolute path for the links but rpmlint says that they must be relative. E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib: I've put some .so symlinks in /usr/lib and I don't know what should I do with this error since I don't see any binary files which I can put in this directory in the -devel package. Thanks in advance, Hedayat -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 22:24:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:24:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450775] Review Request: perl-Panotools-Script - Panorama Tools scripting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806122224.m5CMOAne020817@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Panotools-Script - Panorama Tools scripting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450775 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-12 18:24 EST ------- Note that if you needed a runtime dependency on update-desktop-database, you'd have to use Requires(pre): and Requires(post): to ensure that the package would be there when the scriptlets are executed. Since you don't need it at all, things are fine now. I haven't noticed a module that isn't hosted at www.cpan.org before; it might be possible to enhance cpanspec to handle that situation. Everything looks good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 22:39:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:39:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451120] Review Request: lua-lpeg - Parsing Expression Grammars for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806122239.m5CMd6jA023523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-lpeg - Parsing Expression Grammars for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451120 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 23:01:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:01:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451142] Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806122301.m5CN1SAh027766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451142 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 23:00:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:00:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451142] New: Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451142 Summary: Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bos at serpentine.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://core.serpentine.com/haddock09.spec SRPM URL: http://core.serpentine.com/haddock09-0.9-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: Haddock is a tool for automatically generating hyperlinked documentation from annotated Haskell source code. We already package Haddock 2.0, but Haddock 0.9 is required for building GHC and a number of other Haskell packages. This spec file is a revival of the last version of Haddock 0.9 that we packaged, in late 2007. I have tweaked it minimally to fix up the naming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 23:49:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:49:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451120] Review Request: lua-lpeg - Parsing Expression Grammars for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806122349.m5CNnCvT002480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-lpeg - Parsing Expression Grammars for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451120 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-12 19:49 EST ------- Builds fine and rpmlint is silent. I see two issues, one minor and one major. The minor one: the sed and chmod at the end of %install seem to me to make more sense in %prep. The major one: You need to be consistent about using macros like %{__cc}; you need to use %{__rm}, %{__mkdir}, %{__chmod} and %{__sed} instead. Or just use the non-macro forms everywhere. * source files match upstream: 8859c3dbd1d3dfd21c422362a66ad7c3c2c840fbbd47c7b806a5ba0c0013514a lpeg-0.8.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named and is cleanly written. X specfile does not use macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: lpeg.so.0.8.1()(64bit) lua-lpeg = 0.8.1-1.fc10 = lua >= 5.1 * %check is present and all tests pass. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 23:52:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:52:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806122352.m5CNqCRP003243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 dkaylor at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 12 23:55:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:55:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447367] Review Request: onboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806122355.m5CNtcmQ010917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: onboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447367 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 00:37:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:37:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130037.m5D0bTfp010828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ETL - Extended Template Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-06-12 20:37 EST ------- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 00:34:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:34:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443467] Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130034.m5D0Yx2a010071@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443467 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-06-12 20:34 EST ------- This package (ale) with hasn't been imported into the cvs yet... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 00:36:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:36:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444763] Review Request: vaspview - VASP Data Viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130036.m5D0agW4010720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vaspview - VASP Data Viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444763 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-06-12 20:36 EST ------- This package (vaspview) with hasn't been imported into the cvs yet... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 00:35:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:35:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443468] Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130035.m5D0ZAVo010449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443468 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-06-12 20:35 EST ------- This package (hdrprep) with hasn't been imported into the cvs yet... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 00:40:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:40:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451012] Review Request: pspp - program for statistical analysis of sampled data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130040.m5D0eWbL018185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pspp - program for statistical analysis of sampled data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451012 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 00:48:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:48:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451150] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-HPDF Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451150 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-HPDF Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/HPDF OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Description of problem: Haskell PDF generation library. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.4 How reproducible: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/HPDF/1.4/HPDF-1.4.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached ghc-HPDF*.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba rpmbuild/SPECS/ghc-HPDF*.spec Actual results: You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. Expected results: -- Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess; I tested on Fedora-8). 2. Requries ghc-binary and ghc-zlib to build and install. ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-12 20:48 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309153) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309153&action=view) ghc-HPDF-1.4-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 01:16:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 21:16:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200245] Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130116.m5D1Gjfe024231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200245 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-06-12 21:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Yeah, not sure it's documented, but I can add it to the cvsrequest page on the > wiki at least. Thanks. I added a sentence at the bottom of CVSAdminProcedure and sent a mail to f-d-l suggest it be documented more carefully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 01:28:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 21:28:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451152] New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130128.m5D1SVgm025822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451152 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-12 21:28 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309156) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309156&action=view) ghc-hsql.1.7.cabal.patch Copy this patch file to SOURCES folder before compiling ghc-hsql. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 01:26:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 21:26:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451152] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451152 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/hsql OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/hsql/1.7/hsql-1.7.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached ghc-hsql*.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy attached ghc-hsql.1.7.cabal.patch file to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba rpmbuild/SPECS/ghc-hsql*.spec Actual results: You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. Expected results: -- Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess; I tested only on Fedora-8). 2. The hsql.cabal file needs to have the following 2 lines modified in order to compile successfully: build-depends: base, old-time ghc-options: -fglasgow-exts This is done by the patch file. ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-12 21:26 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309155) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309155&action=view) ghc-hsql-1.7-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 01:34:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 21:34:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451153] New: Review Request: mapbender - Geospatial portal for OGC OWS architectures Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451153 Summary: Review Request: mapbender - Geospatial portal for OGC OWS architectures Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rezso at rdsor.ro QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/mapbender.spec SRPM URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/mapbender-2.4.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Mapbender is the geospatial portal site management software for OGC OWS architectures.Mapbender comes with a data model to manage interfaces for displaying, navigating and querying OGC compliant web map and feature services (WMS and transactional WFS). Authentication and authorization are used by the OWS Security Proxy and management interfaces for multi client capable user, group and service administration. The embedded metadata component follows ISO 19119 specification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 01:37:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 21:37:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451153] Review Request: mapbender - Geospatial portal for OGC OWS architectures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130137.m5D1b9bB020552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapbender - Geospatial portal for OGC OWS architectures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451153 ------- Additional Comments From rezso at rdsor.ro 2008-06-12 21:37 EST ------- This package is very similar to squirrelmail. These rpmlint are waveable, 640/root-apache since it contain sensitive info: root - edit/write. apache - must read it only. else - cannot read. mapbender.noarch: E: non-standard-gid /etc/mapbender/digitize_default.conf apache mapbender.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/mapbender/digitize_default.conf 0640 mapbender.noarch: E: non-standard-gid /etc/mapbender/poi.conf apache mapbender.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/mapbender/poi.conf 0640 mapbender.noarch: E: non-standard-gid /etc/mapbender/wfs_default.conf apache mapbender.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/mapbender/wfs_default.conf 0640 mapbender.noarch: E: non-standard-gid /etc/mapbender/mapbender.conf apache mapbender.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/mapbender/mapbender.conf 0640 mapbender.noarch: E: non-standard-gid /etc/mapbender/gazetteerSQL.conf apache mapbender.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/mapbender/gazetteerSQL.conf 0640 mapbender.noarch: E: non-standard-gid /etc/mapbender/session.conf apache mapbender.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/mapbender/session.conf 0640 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 02:04:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:04:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248067] Review Request: opie -- One-time Passwords In Everything In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130204.m5D24Ngq032511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opie -- One-time Passwords In Everything https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248067 nelhawar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReportedBy|rwheeler at redhat.com |dwmw2 at infradead.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 02:19:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:19:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445021] Review Request: python-routes - A RoR-like routes library for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130219.m5D2J7f4028084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-routes - A RoR-like routes library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445021 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-12 22:19 EST ------- python-routes-1.8-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 02:18:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:18:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448236] Review Request: xfbib - Lightweight BibTeX editor for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130218.m5D2II5Y003198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfbib - Lightweight BibTeX editor for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448236 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-12 22:18 EST ------- xfbib-0.0.2-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 02:21:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:21:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448606] Review Request: subtitleeditor - GTK+2 tool to edit subtitles for GNU/Linux/*BSD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130221.m5D2LFNA004389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: subtitleeditor - GTK+2 tool to edit subtitles for GNU/Linux/*BSD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448606 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-12 22:21 EST ------- subtitleeditor-0.21.1-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 02:22:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:22:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445020] Review Request: python-mako - The Mako template system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130222.m5D2M1nw029304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mako - The Mako template system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445020 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-12 22:22 EST ------- python-mako-0.1.10-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 02:19:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:19:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448606] Review Request: subtitleeditor - GTK+2 tool to edit subtitles for GNU/Linux/*BSD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130219.m5D2Jg7C028325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: subtitleeditor - GTK+2 tool to edit subtitles for GNU/Linux/*BSD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448606 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-12 22:19 EST ------- subtitleeditor-0.21.1-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 02:20:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:20:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445024] Review Request: python-webhelpers - Helper routines for writing web applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130220.m5D2KvX6029107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-webhelpers - Helper routines for writing web applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445024 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-12 22:20 EST ------- python-webhelpers-0.3.4-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 02:19:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:19:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435508] cpdup not 64-bit clean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130219.m5D2JsNw028364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: cpdup not 64-bit clean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435508 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-12 22:19 EST ------- cpdup-1.11-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update cpdup'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-5265 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 02:21:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:21:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445140] Review Request: lxtask - Lightweight and desktop independent task manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130221.m5D2LSXu004708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxtask - Lightweight and desktop independent task manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445140 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-12 22:21 EST ------- lxtask-0.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 02:21:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:21:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445021] Review Request: python-routes - A RoR-like routes library for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130221.m5D2LNWc004549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-routes - A RoR-like routes library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445021 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-12 22:21 EST ------- python-routes-1.8-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 02:22:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:22:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448531] Review Request: pyrenamer - A mass file renamer written in PyGTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130222.m5D2MZAV005208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyrenamer - A mass file renamer written in PyGTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448531 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-12 22:22 EST ------- pyrenamer-0.5.0-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 02:25:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:25:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445024] Review Request: python-webhelpers - Helper routines for writing web applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130225.m5D2PDhu006206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-webhelpers - Helper routines for writing web applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445024 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-12 22:25 EST ------- python-webhelpers-0.3.4-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 02:22:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:22:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448531] Review Request: pyrenamer - A mass file renamer written in PyGTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130222.m5D2MbFq005244@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyrenamer - A mass file renamer written in PyGTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448531 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.5.0-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 02:27:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:27:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445018] Review Request: python-beaker - WSGI middleware for sessions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130227.m5D2Rx9s031771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-beaker - WSGI middleware for sessions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445018 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-12 22:27 EST ------- python-beaker-0.9.4-4.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 02:25:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:25:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445018] Review Request: python-beaker - WSGI middleware for sessions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130225.m5D2PfTR030921@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-beaker - WSGI middleware for sessions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445018 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-12 22:25 EST ------- python-beaker-0.9.4-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 02:26:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:26:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445140] Review Request: lxtask - Lightweight and desktop independent task manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130226.m5D2QKjV031028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxtask - Lightweight and desktop independent task manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445140 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-12 22:26 EST ------- lxtask-0.1-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 02:24:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:24:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448236] Review Request: xfbib - Lightweight BibTeX editor for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130224.m5D2OoBU030230@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfbib - Lightweight BibTeX editor for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448236 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-12 22:24 EST ------- xfbib-0.0.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 02:28:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:28:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445020] Review Request: python-mako - The Mako template system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130228.m5D2S51t007753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mako - The Mako template system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445020 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-12 22:28 EST ------- python-mako-0.1.10-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 02:34:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:34:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449927] Review Request: imsettings - Delivery framework for general Input Method configuration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130234.m5D2Yd7Q009262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imsettings - Delivery framework for general Input Method configuration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449927 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-06-12 22:34 EST ------- Thanks. I tried the test packages and it seems to be work well. Package is APPROVED for inclusion in fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 04:22:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:22:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446993] Review Request: liblicense - License for storing and retrieving license information in media files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130422.m5D4MSVI027833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblicense - License for storing and retrieving license information in media files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446993 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-13 00:22 EST ------- [dennis at bratac ~]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock//fedora-9-x86_64/result/*rpm liblicense.src:92: E: files-attr-not-set liblicense.src:95: E: files-attr-not-set liblicense.src:98: E: files-attr-not-set liblicense.src:99: E: files-attr-not-set liblicense.src:100: E: files-attr-not-set liblicense.src:103: E: files-attr-not-set liblicense.src:104: E: files-attr-not-set liblicense.src:105: E: files-attr-not-set liblicense.src:106: E: files-attr-not-set liblicense.src:107: E: files-attr-not-set liblicense-cli.x86_64: W: no-documentation liblicense-cli.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/license ['/usr/lib64'] liblicense-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation liblicense-modules.x86_64: W: no-documentation liblicense-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation liblicense-python.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/liblicense/liblicense.so ['/usr/lib64'] 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 12 errors, 4 warnings. I had intended to sponsor Asheesh. it builds fine in mock but we have a few things to fix still -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 05:05:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 01:05:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451012] Review Request: pspp - program for statistical analysis of sampled data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130505.m5D55hLs002100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pspp - program for statistical analysis of sampled data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451012 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-13 01:05 EST ------- It looks odd to have the name of the package in the summary, since we already have the package name. I'd suggest just "A program for statistical analysis of sampled data". I don't think it's a particularly big deal, though. There's a complete test suite included; I can't see any reason not to run it as it works fine with: %check make check after the %install section. I'm pretty sure a GUI is included; shouldn't this have a desktop file so that it will show up in the menus? A couple of .la files are installed; generally these aren't shipped. Are they needed for something? Both versioned and unversioned .so files are included in the base package. Generally when both are present, the unversioned .so files are put in the -devel package, but there's not really anything else that would be in a -devel package. Are the unversioned .so files used for something? They seem to be plugins of some sort. This package should own /etc/pspp. * source files match upstream: 8c85ada08e2133846efc221d88b6b3abd9a525587b1630b246a1887120d0804e pspp-0.6.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. ? summary is odd. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: config(pspp) = 0.6.0-3.fc10 libpsppire.so.0()(64bit) libpsppwidgets.so.0()(64bit) pspp = 0.6.0-3.fc10 = /bin/sh config(pspp) = 0.6.0-3.fc10 info libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglade-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgsl.so.0()(64bit) libgslcblas.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libncurses.so.5()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libplot.so.2()(64bit) libpsppire.so.0()(64bit) libpsppwidgets.so.0()(64bit) libreadline.so.5()(64bit) libtinfo.so.5()(64bit) libxml2.so.2()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) X %check is not present, but a test suite seems to exist. no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. X owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. X scriptlets are OK (info installation) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. X libtool .la files are installed. X no desktop file, but one should be there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 05:21:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 01:21:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450553] Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130521.m5D5LqmR028775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450553 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-06-13 01:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > FWIW, I disagree entirely with Ralf. Setting review back to +. OK, once more @RH's are abusing their positions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 06:29:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 02:29:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237041] Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130629.m5D6TqDr015802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) Alias: perl-JSON https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237041 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonstanley at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-06-13 02:29 EST ------- Please branch for EL-5; Jon Stanley (fas id jstanley) will be the owner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 08:19:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 04:19:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451120] Review Request: lua-lpeg - Parsing Expression Grammars for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130819.m5D8JcMC002753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-lpeg - Parsing Expression Grammars for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451120 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-06-13 04:19 EST ------- I've fixed both of these issues. New SRPM is at http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/luastuff/lua-lpeg-0.8.1-2.fc9.src.rpm. You almost got me there now, to obey the guidelines ;-) Thanks for the review, wanna hop on to bug #450527 or bug #450539 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 08:23:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 04:23:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435508] cpdup not 64-bit clean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130823.m5D8NpcF003581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: cpdup not 64-bit clean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435508 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 08:27:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 04:27:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451150] Review Request: ghc-HPDF - Generation of PDF documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130827.m5D8RfT8027790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-HPDF - Generation of PDF documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451150 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-HPDF - |HPDF |Generation of PDF documents -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 08:29:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 04:29:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451152] Review Request: ghc-hsql - Simple library for database access from Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130829.m5D8TVKA027941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hsql - Simple library for database access from Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451152 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-hsql - |hsql package |Simple library for database | |access from Haskell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 08:54:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 04:54:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444952] Review Request: tlock - terminal lock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130854.m5D8sfHn032117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tlock - terminal lock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444952 ------- Additional Comments From pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in 2008-06-13 04:54 EST ------- Hey Mamoru, Thank you so much! I'm really very happy. :) I'll go through the links and follow them. Thanks! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 09:24:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 05:24:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441415] Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130924.m5D9OoOY014255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441415 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-13 05:24 EST ------- Sorry for the long delay, I git hit by a wall / mountain of work, but I've managed to get over the top now :) Anyways this package is approved! Given the good work you've done here I'm ready to sponsor you now. Head over the the fedora account system, and apply for cvs extra membership there. Once you've done that add a comment here where you tell me your fas username, then I can sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 09:26:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 05:26:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450850] Review Request: move - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130926.m5D9QnMX014965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: move - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450850 ------- Additional Comments From pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in 2008-06-13 05:26 EST ------- Hello Mamoru, thanks for the comments. I've made the changes. Please see the latest files at SPEC: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/move.spec SRPM: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/move-1.2-3.fc8.src.rpm > however I also think that the name "move" is too generic... I do understand; But I really don't think it's practical to rename it..is it that big a hurdle? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 09:47:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 05:47:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448310] Review Request: elice - Elice is a PureBasic to c++ translator / compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130947.m5D9lO26019005@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elice - Elice is a PureBasic to c++ translator / compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448310 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-13 05:47 EST ------- I've just read a mail from upstream that they are making available tarballs now, so here is a new version which uses a tarbal instead of an svn snapshot: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/elice.spec http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/elice-0.258-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 09:57:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 05:57:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444763] Review Request: vaspview - VASP Data Viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130957.m5D9va9n011569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vaspview - VASP Data Viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444763 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-13 05:57 EST ------- vaspview-1.05-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 09:57:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 05:57:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444952] Review Request: tlock - terminal lock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806130957.m5D9vfgR011604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tlock - terminal lock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444952 ------- Additional Comments From pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in 2008-06-13 05:57 EST ------- Hello Mamoru, I've already created the FAS account, my username is: pjp. I've also applied for the membership to cvsextras group, but that is not yet approved. Could you please approve it? Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 10:00:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 06:00:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444763] Review Request: vaspview - VASP Data Viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806131000.m5DA0QEu021385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vaspview - VASP Data Viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444763 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-13 06:00 EST ------- vaspview-1.05-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 10:17:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 06:17:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444952] Review Request: tlock - terminal lock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806131017.m5DAHwSx014985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tlock - terminal lock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444952 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-13 06:17 EST ------- Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" page again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 10:49:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 06:49:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449927] Review Request: imsettings - Delivery framework for general Input Method configuration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806131049.m5DAnSxa029015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imsettings - Delivery framework for general Input Method configuration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449927 tagoh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2008-06-13 06:49 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: imsettings Short Description: Delivery framework for general Input Method configuration Owners: tagoh Branches: devel F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 10:48:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 06:48:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451189] New: Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 Summary: Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: aage at thaumaturge.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://files.thaumaturge.org/users/dante/rancid/rancid.spec SRPM URL: http://files.thaumaturge.org/users/dante/rancid/rancid-2.3.2a8-0.1.src.rpm Description: RANCID monitors a router's (or more generally a device's) configuration, including software and hardware (cards, serial numbers, etc) and uses CVS (Concurrent Version System) or Subversion to maintain history of changes. This is my first package and I'm looking for a sponsor. I'm not quite sure how this will work with the licensing. They are in the file "COPYING" and URL http://www.shrubbery.net/rancid/LICENSE.txt. For some reason this is not the same license. "COPYING" came with the source and is newer but the developers website state that the URL is the license for Rancid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 11:00:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:00:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451190] New: Review Request: gl2ps - An OpenGL to PostScript printing library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451190 Summary: Review Request: gl2ps - An OpenGL to PostScript printing library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/gl2ps.spec SRPM URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/gl2ps-1.3.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: GL2PS is a C library providing high quality vector output for any OpenGL application. The main difference between GL2PS and other similar libraries is the use of sorting algorithms capable of handling intersecting and stretched polygons, as well as non manifold objects. GL2PS provides advanced smooth shading and text rendering, culling of invisible primitives, mixed vector/bitmap output, and much more... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 11:19:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:19:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806131119.m5DBJmNS024715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2008-06-13 07:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Which method is considered most appropriate for making these tools easily > usable ?: > - bash script - exec python the tool path I asked on fedora-list, and received a tip that I can use a bash script to invoke python to get the site-lib directory, and then exec the required .py within that path. Updated: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/pyvnc2swf/pyvnc2swf.spec http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/pyvnc2swf/pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-1.fc9.src.rpm That hopefully covers all the reviewer notes so far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 11:39:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:39:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444574] Review Request: pidgin-lastfm - Display informaiton form Last.fm profile in Pidgin status message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806131139.m5DBdYr0005203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-lastfm - Display informaiton form Last.fm profile in Pidgin status message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444574 natureshadow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 11:46:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:46:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444574] Review Request: pidgin-lastfm - Display informaiton form Last.fm profile in Pidgin status message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806131146.m5DBkLhc006782@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-lastfm - Display informaiton form Last.fm profile in Pidgin status message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444574 ------- Additional Comments From natureshadow at gmail.com 2008-06-13 07:46 EST ------- Would someone be so kind as to add the item to the wishlist then? It appears to me that I can't do that myself (Login/Create account takes me to an HTTP login dialog ...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 12:00:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:00:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450850] Review Request: move - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806131200.m5DC0qJV009912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: move - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450850 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-13 08:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > I do understand; But I really don't think it's practical to rename it..is it > that big a hurdle? Yes, it is. Did you approach upstream to ask them why they used such a generic name? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 13:07:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:07:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450850] Review Request: move - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806131307.m5DD7cl8013109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: move - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450850 ------- Additional Comments From pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in 2008-06-13 09:07 EST ------- > Yes, it is. Did you approach upstream to ask them why they used such > a generic name? Well, when I wrote Move it seemed like a sensible name, and it still does to me. It speaks about it's action, and is intuitive that way. Why is it that big a deal? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 13:14:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:14:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450850] Review Request: move - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806131314.m5DDEWRw014411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: move - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450850 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-13 09:14 EST ------- It is too generic. Many programs can do the same than yours, none should be called move, except if there is a standard endorsing the name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 13:30:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:30:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806131330.m5DDUp43018148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 13:43:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:43:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449842] Review Request: trac-xmlrpc-plugin - XML-RPC plugin for Trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806131343.m5DDhIDm020507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-xmlrpc-plugin - XML-RPC plugin for Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449842 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2008-06-13 09:43 EST ------- Turns out this was already in Fedora, closing it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 14:10:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:10:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451012] Review Request: pspp - program for statistical analysis of sampled data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806131410.m5DEARtc003402@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pspp - program for statistical analysis of sampled data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451012 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2008-06-13 10:10 EST ------- Fixed src.rpm is on http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/pspp-0.6.0-2.0.tofail.fc9.src.rpm (this time) Fixed spec is on the same URL as before. Build in koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=660596 (note, the -devel has not been made as I found all libraries to be private only, so no .so files are provided). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 14:09:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:09:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448310] Review Request: elice - Elice is a PureBasic to c++ translator / compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806131409.m5DE94Un002932@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elice - Elice is a PureBasic to c++ translator / compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448310 ivazqueznet at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ivazqueznet at gmail.com 2008-06-13 10:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Also from: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag > > "Basically, follow the ["Packaging/NamingGuidelines"] for how to set the value > for Release, then append %{?dist} to the end." Notice the "append %{?dist} to > the end." Interesting. It could be interpreted as conflicting with https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Minor_release_bumps_for_old_branches then. Oh well, a moot point now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 14:47:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:47:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806131447.m5DElfej009533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 ------- Additional Comments From dwheeler at dwheeler.com 2008-06-13 10:47 EST ------- Glad to see this! Google Gadgets was featured as the front-page article in the June 12 lwn.net: http://lwn.net/Articles/285099/ I'd add to the description something about this supporting "cross-platform development". "Compatible with" could just mean that it has a common format for data files, but it appears that Google gadgets provides a limited "write once, run everywhere" platform for some kinds of apps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 14:57:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:57:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806131457.m5DEvfBP001594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-13 10:57 EST ------- FYI the newest is 0.9.3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 15:10:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:10:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450975] Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806131510.m5DFAWdM004319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450975 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-06-13 11:10 EST ------- > Yes, they are plugins. Moving plugins to other directores is a pain to do in a > thread-safe manner with the mess that is ltdl, because you need to patch the > search path. Sounds like another good reason not to use ltdl, if you ask me. > I'd prefer leaving it the way it is for now. We can move that > around whenever we want in the future. I'd be more inclined to agree if this was legacy code. But this is brandnew. If we don't get it right now, it'll likely broken forever. Don't you think ? Also, with the names chosen we shouldn't be in risk of namespace clashes. And finally, having them in /usr/lib also allows us to make use of the ld cache. Unless you really insist I'd prefer to leave it the way it is right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 16:38:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:38:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449927] Review Request: imsettings - Delivery framework for general Input Method configuration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806131638.m5DGcxXu029693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imsettings - Delivery framework for general Input Method configuration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449927 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-13 12:38 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 16:37:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:37:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237041] Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806131637.m5DGbxfO029568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON - Parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) Alias: perl-JSON https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237041 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-13 12:37 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 17:07:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:07:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445105] Review Request: milkytracker - SDL clone of the Fasttracker II module tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806131707.m5DH7Lcs025415@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: milkytracker - SDL clone of the Fasttracker II module tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445105 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-13 13:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Did you actually modify the configure script yourself, or was it regenerated > after the modifications to configure.in? I re-generated configure from modified configure.in. Well, as I said in comment 2, I am now waiting for your another review request or your pre-review of other person's review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 17:34:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:34:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450410] Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806131734.m5DHYMtY031063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450410 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-13 13:34 EST ------- Okay, as it seems that at least this is licensed under GPLv2 (however I really want the reply from the upstream), this package itself is okay. Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few (or no) work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 17:38:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:38:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451280] New: Review Request: xqf - A server browser for many popular games Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451280 Summary: Review Request: xqf - A server browser for many popular games Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cheekyboinc at foresightlinux.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/xqf.spec SRPM: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/xqf-1.0.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: XQF is a network game browser (e.g. Quake, Unreal, etc.). It helps you locate and connect to game servers. It has configurable server and player filters so you can find a server running your favorite game type or that has a buddy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 17:40:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:40:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451280] Review Request: xqf - A server browser for many popular games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806131740.m5DHe99R000393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xqf - A server browser for many popular games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451280 cheekyboinc at foresightlinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 17:46:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:46:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450013] Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806131746.m5DHkAuB010613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 Bug 450013 depends on bug 450412, which changed state. Bug 450412 Summary: please build in EL-5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450412 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WORKSFORME -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 18:54:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451298] New: Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 Summary: Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: edouard.bourguignon at oxalya.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/pidgin-msn-pecan.spec SRPM URL: http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/pidgin-msn-pecan-0.0.13-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: msn-pecan is a pidgin plugin adding extra fixtures to enhance the msn protocole. Features include: * Support for personal messages * Server-side storage for display names (private alias) * Partial direct connection support * Improved network IO * Improved error handling * Network issues tested with netem * GObject usage more info http://code.google.com/p/msn-pecan/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 19:05:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:05:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451302] New: Review Request: kopete-bonjour Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451302 Summary: Review Request: kopete-bonjour Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tejasdinkar at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tejas.fedorapeople.org/src/kopete-bonjour.spec SRPM URL: http://tejas.fedorapeople.org/src/kopete-bonjour-1.0.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is the bonjour (iChat) protocol plugin for Kopete, which is KDE's instant messenger. The Code is hosted in KDE Extragear. I am the maintainer for the same. The code is GPLv2 (or later) As this is a plugin for kopete, there is very little user documentation or translation needed. -- RPMLINT OUTPUT $ rpmlint kopete-bonjour-1.0.0-1.fc9.i386.rpm kopete-bonjour.i386: W: no-documentation kopete-bonjour.i386: W: no-version-in-last-changelog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 19:19:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:19:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450975] Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806131919.m5DJJD64030063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450975 ------- Additional Comments From lpoetter at redhat.com 2008-06-13 15:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > > Yes, they are plugins. Moving plugins to other directores is a pain to do in a > > thread-safe manner with the mess that is ltdl, because you need to patch the > > search path. > > Sounds like another good reason not to use ltdl, if you ask me. This code is supposed to be portable. To have plugins working in a portable way is either using ltdl or glib. To appease the KDE people and ease porters to windows I kept glib out. So I am stuck with stupid ltdl, and I am not going to maintain my own replacement for ltdl. > > I'd prefer leaving it the way it is for now. We can move that > > around whenever we want in the future. > > I'd be more inclined to agree if this was legacy code. But this is brandnew. If > we don't get it right now, it'll likely broken forever. Don't you think ? Hmm, you might be right on that one. I will try to fix this. It's going to be messy though. I am not really how the solution for this I use in PulseAudio works. But in PA the races don't really matter since it is not a library, and I have perfect control from where i call the ltdl functions. But yepp. I'll fix it. Stay tuned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 20:55:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:55:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448310] Review Request: elice - Elice is a PureBasic to c++ translator / compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806132055.m5DKta8b018089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elice - Elice is a PureBasic to c++ translator / compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448310 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-13 16:55 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: elice Short Description: Elice is a PureBasic to c++ translator / compiler Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 21:31:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:31:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450775] Review Request: perl-Panotools-Script - Panorama Tools scripting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806132131.m5DLVsY0025966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Panotools-Script - Panorama Tools scripting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450775 bruno at postle.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bruno at postle.net 2008-06-13 17:31 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Panotools-Script Short Description: Panorama Tools scripting Owners: bpostle Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 21:36:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:36:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442473] Review Request: parcellite - A lightweight GTK+ clipboard manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806132136.m5DLaO6u027294@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: parcellite - A lightweight GTK+ clipboard manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442473 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 23:26:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:26:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450975] Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806132326.m5DNQi7G000393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450975 ------- Additional Comments From lpoetter at redhat.com 2008-06-13 19:26 EST ------- Ok, all fixed now. Spec file at same place, srpm is new since i released a new upstream version 0.3 for this: http://0pointer.de/public/libcanberra-0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 23:25:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:25:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168178] Review request: perl-Class-Autouse - Run-time class loading on first method call In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806132325.m5DNP1kO032267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: perl-Class-Autouse - Run-time class loading on first method call https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168178 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide ianburrell at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ianburrell at gmail.com 2008-06-13 19:25 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Class-Autouse New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: iburrell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 13 23:37:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:37:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196621] Review Request: perl-IO-Digest - Perl module to calculate digests while reading or writing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806132337.m5DNbAog014101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Digest - Perl module to calculate digests while reading or writing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196621 ianburrell at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ianburrell at gmail.com 2008-06-13 19:37 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-IO-Digest New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 I don't see the EL-4 and EL-5 branches for perl-IO-Digest and it has been a whole day. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 00:59:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:59:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451394] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-mysql package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451394 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-mysql package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/hsql-mysql OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.7 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/hsql-mysql/1.7/hsql-mysql-1.7.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. Expected results: -- Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-13 20:59 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309311) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309311&action=view) ghc-hsql-mysql-1.7-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 01:01:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:01:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451394] New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-mysql package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806140101.m5E116fs014810@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-mysql package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451394 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-13 21:01 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309312) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309312&action=view) hsql-mysql.cabal.patch Updates the package.cabal with additional build options. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 01:02:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:02:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451394] New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-mysql package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806140102.m5E12TeD027106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-mysql package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451394 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-13 21:02 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309313) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309313&action=view) hsql-mysql.Setup.lhs.patch Fixes compiler errors in Setup.lhs due to the newer Cabal APIs with GHC 6.8.2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 01:17:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444817] Review Request: Spicebird - Collaboration Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806140117.m5E1HnSw017081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Spicebird - Collaboration Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444817 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-13 21:17 EST ------- spicebird-0.4-5.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 01:40:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:40:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451397] New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-odbc package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806140140.m5E1es9s032401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-odbc package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451397 fedora at krishnan.cc changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|http://hackage.haskell.org/p|http://hackage.haskell.org/c |ackages/archive/hsql- |gi-bin/hackage- |odbc/1.7/hsql-odbc- |scripts/package/hsql-odbc |1.7.tar.gz | Summary|hsql-odbc-1.7.tar.gz |New RPM SPEC file for ghc- | |hsql-odbc package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 01:38:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:38:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451397] New: hsql-odbc-1.7.tar.gz Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451397 Summary: hsql-odbc-1.7.tar.gz Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/hsql- odbc/1.7/hsql-odbc-1.7.tar.gz OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.7 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/hsql-odbc/1.7/hsql-odbc-1.7.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). 2. Depends on: unixODBC (and -devel), ghc-hsql ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-13 21:38 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309314) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309314&action=view) ghc-hsql-odbc-1.7-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 01:42:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:42:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451397] New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-odbc package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806140142.m5E1gKRf020557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-odbc package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451397 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-13 21:42 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309315) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309315&action=view) hsql-odbc.cabal.patch Updates the cabal file with extra GHC build options. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 01:42:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:42:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450975] Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806140142.m5E1ggam020605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450975 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-06-13 21:42 EST ------- Almost perfect now. Just add %dir %{_libdir}/libcanberra and then you are good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 01:43:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:43:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451397] New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-odbc package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806140143.m5E1hQjn032747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-odbc package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451397 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-13 21:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309316) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309316&action=view) hsql-odbc.Setup.lhs.patch Fixes warning due to depracated Distribution.Setup due to API changes in newer Cabal APIs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 01:56:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:56:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451397] New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-odbc package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806140156.m5E1uqbx022789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-odbc package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451397 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-13 21:56 EST ------- Please create a srpm and upload it, not attaching each patches. By the way, is this a review request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 02:42:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 22:42:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451398] New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-postgresql package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806140242.m5E2ga9c030380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-postgresql package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451398 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-13 22:42 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309318) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309318&action=view) ghc-hsql-postgresql.cabal.patch Added additional ghc related build options. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 02:41:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 22:41:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451398] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-postgresql package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451398 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-postgresql package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/hsql-postgresql OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.7 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/hsql-postgresql/1.7/hsql-postgresql-1.7.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). 2. Depends on: postgresql (and -devel), ghc-hsql ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-13 22:41 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309317) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309317&action=view) ghc-hsql-postgresql-1.7-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 02:43:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 22:43:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451398] New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-postgresql package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806140243.m5E2hhLG009934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-postgresql package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451398 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-13 22:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309319) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309319&action=view) ghc-hsql-postgresql.Setup.lhs.patch Fixed compiler errors due to recent changes in the Cabal APIs that Setup.lhs uses. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 02:48:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 22:48:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451398] New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-postgresql package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806140248.m5E2mm4S031434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-postgresql package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451398 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-13 22:48 EST ------- Again, is this a review request or a RFC for a package already in Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 03:13:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 23:13:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451400] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-sqlite3 package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451400 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-sqlite3 package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/hsql-sqlite3 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.7 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/hsql-sqlite3/1.7/hsql-sqlite3-1.7.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). 2. Depends on: postgresql (and -devel), ghc-hsql ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-13 23:13 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309320) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309320&action=view) ghc-hsql-sqlite3-1.7-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 03:14:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 23:14:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451400] New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-sqlite3 package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806140314.m5E3E1uK015350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-sqlite3 package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451400 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-13 23:14 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309321) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309321&action=view) ghc-hsql-sqlite3.cabal.patch Added additional GHC related compiler options. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 03:15:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 23:15:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451400] New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-sqlite3 package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806140315.m5E3FDLo015777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-sqlite3 package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451400 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-13 23:15 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309322) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309322&action=view) ghc-hsql-sqlite3.Setup.lhs.patch Fixed compiler errors due to recent changes in Cabal APIs with GHC 6.8.2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 03:28:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 23:28:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451400] New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-sqlite3 package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806140328.m5E3SdVd005507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hsql-sqlite3 package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451400 fedora at krishnan.cc changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #309320|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-13 23:28 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309323) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309323&action=view) ghc-hsql-sqlite3-1.7-2.spec Updated the .spec with Requires and BuildRequires dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 04:18:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 00:18:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444763] Review Request: vaspview - VASP Data Viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806140418.m5E4IJ9A013155@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vaspview - VASP Data Viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444763 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-14 00:18 EST ------- vaspview-1.05-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 04:16:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 00:16:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444763] Review Request: vaspview - VASP Data Viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806140416.m5E4GlZE012910@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vaspview - VASP Data Viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444763 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-14 00:16 EST ------- vaspview-1.05-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 04:18:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 00:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444763] Review Request: vaspview - VASP Data Viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806140418.m5E4ILWp025383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vaspview - VASP Data Viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444763 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |1.05-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 05:43:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 01:43:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449251] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806140543.m5E5huK6026335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449251 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-06-14 01:43 EST ------- Odd, that. Should be working now... SRPM URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication-0.10006-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 07:07:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 03:07:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451406] New: Review Request: python-tempita - A very small text templating language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451406 Summary: Review Request: python-tempita - A very small text templating language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rickyz at cmu.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/python-tempita/python-tempita.spec SRPM URL: http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/python-tempita/python-tempita-0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Tempita is a small templating language for text substitution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 07:07:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 03:07:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451405] New: Review Request: python-weberror - Web Error handling and exception catching middleware Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451405 Summary: Review Request: python-weberror - Web Error handling and exception catching middleware Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rickyz at cmu.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/python-weberror/python-weberror.spec SRPM URL: http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/python-weberror/python-weberror-0.8-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: WebError is WSGI middleware that performs error handling and exception catching. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 07:07:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 03:07:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451407] New: Review Request: python-webtest - Helper to test WSGI applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451407 Summary: Review Request: python-webtest - Helper to test WSGI applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rickyz at cmu.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/python-webtest/python-webtest.spec SRPM URL: http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/python-webtest/python-webtest-1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: WebTest wraps any WSGI application and makes it easy to send test requests to that application, without starting up an HTTP server. This provides convenient full-stack testing of applications written with any WSGI-compatible framework. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 07:12:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 03:12:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451407] Review Request: python-webtest - Helper to test WSGI applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806140712.m5E7CcEZ019042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-webtest - Helper to test WSGI applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451407 ------- Additional Comments From rickyz at cmu.edu 2008-06-14 03:12 EST ------- This will depend on WebOb (which hasn't been submitted yet). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 07:12:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 03:12:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451405] Review Request: python-weberror - Web Error handling and exception catching middleware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806140712.m5E7CEjm018970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-weberror - Web Error handling and exception catching middleware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451405 rickyz at cmu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |451406 ------- Additional Comments From rickyz at cmu.edu 2008-06-14 03:12 EST ------- Add dependency on the python-tempita review bug (#451406). This will also depend on WebOb (which hasn't been submitted yet). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 07:12:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 03:12:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451406] Review Request: python-tempita - A very small text templating language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806140712.m5E7CFlp018995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tempita - A very small text templating language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451406 rickyz at cmu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |451405 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 07:30:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 03:30:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451408] New: Review Request: python-wsgiproxy - HTTP proxying tools for WSGI apps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451408 Summary: Review Request: python-wsgiproxy - HTTP proxying tools for WSGI apps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rickyz at cmu.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/python-wsgiproxy/python-wsgiproxy.spec SRPM URL: http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/python-wsgiproxy/python-wsgiproxy-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: WSGIProxy gives tools to proxy arbitrary(ish) WSGI requests to other processes over HTTP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 07:53:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 03:53:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257701] Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806140753.m5E7rQ5O024990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257701 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-14 03:53 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: w3lib Short Description: GRIB1 (GRIdded Binary) encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines Owners: pertusus Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 08:38:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 04:38:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416471] Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806140838.m5E8cxOZ021706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416471 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-14 04:38 EST ------- Henry, are you ready to be sponsored? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 08:38:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 04:38:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451410] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-bzlib package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451410 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-bzlib package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/bzlib OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.4.0.3 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/bzlib/0.4.0.3/bzlib-0.4.0.3.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). 2. Depends on: bzip2 (and -devel) ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-14 04:38 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309331) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309331&action=view) ghc-bzlib-0.4.0.3-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 08:46:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 04:46:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451411] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-Codec-Compression-LZF package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451411 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-Codec-Compression-LZF package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/Codec-Compression-LZF OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.2 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/Codec-Compression-LZF/0.2/Codec-Compression-LZF-0.2.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-14 04:46 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309332) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309332&action=view) ghc-Codec-Compression-LZF-0.2-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 08:45:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 04:45:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448311] Review Request: lostlabyrinth - Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806140845.m5E8jLO9023078@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth - Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448311 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-14 04:45 EST ------- Appearantly upstream removes older versions when new versions come out, how nice. Anyways here is a new version updated to the latest upstream, no other changes: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/lostlabyrinth.spec http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/lostlabyrinth-3.0.0-1.fc9.src.rpm I'll take a look at cylindrix today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 09:01:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 05:01:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806140901.m5E91SOl026045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 ------- Additional Comments From karl at qdh.org.uk 2008-06-14 05:01 EST ------- Sorry I've uploaded the src.rpm now :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 10:02:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 06:02:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451413] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-compression package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451413 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-compression package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/compression OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.1 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/compression/0.1/compression-0.1.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). 2. CAUTION: In the file Compression/Deflate/Inflate.hs, I modified the last line of repeat_w32s function from: return $ BS.fromChunks [fromForeignPtr fp len'] to: return $ BS.fromChunks [fromForeignPtr fp 0 len'] in order to get this thing to compile. I don't know if that is the right thing to do or if this would break the algorithm. 3. In file Utils.hs, I got rid of the LazyByteString and LPS usage as they don't seem to be available in the bytestring library anymore. ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-14 06:02 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309337) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309337&action=view) ghc-compression-0.1-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 10:03:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 06:03:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451413] New RPM SPEC file for ghc-compression package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806141003.m5EA3jDM014735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-compression package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451413 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-14 06:03 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309338) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309338&action=view) ghc-compression.cabal.patch Added FlexibleInstances compiler option to .cabal file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 10:05:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 06:05:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451413] New RPM SPEC file for ghc-compression package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806141005.m5EA5fBp015199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-compression package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451413 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-14 06:05 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309340) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309340&action=view) ghc-compression.Utils.hs.patch Modified code to fix compiler errors, as the underlying bytestring APIs have changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 10:04:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 06:04:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451413] New RPM SPEC file for ghc-compression package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806141004.m5EA4vXh003582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-compression package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451413 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-14 06:04 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309339) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309339&action=view) ghc-compression.Inflate.hs.patch Modified code to get this thing to compile, as the underlying bytestring APIs seem to have changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 10:22:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 06:22:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806141022.m5EAMtHV017703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 ------- Additional Comments From karl at qdh.org.uk 2008-06-14 06:22 EST ------- Minor update: * Removed network manager patch, as latest fedora network manager works with upstream * Updated to upstream SVN, upstream changelog notes a fix for multiple monitors spec: http://www.wine-doors.org/rpm/gnome-main-menu.spec rpm: http://www.wine-doors.org/rpm/gnome-main-menu-0.9.11-2.i386.rpm src: http://www.wine-doors.org/rpm/gnome-main-menu-0.9.11-2.src.rpm dev: http://www.wine-doors.org/rpm/gnome-main-menu-devel-0.9.11-2.i386.rpm dbg: http://www.wine-doors.org/rpm/gnome-main-menu-debuginfo-0.9.11-2.i386.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 14:40:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:40:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451095] libcxgb3 hardware driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806141440.m5EEexXI026481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libcxgb3 hardware driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451095 dledford at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |450470 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 14:40:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:40:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450470] RDMA kernel stack initializing package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806141440.m5EEew2E026457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RDMA kernel stack initializing package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450470 dledford at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |451095 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 14:40:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:40:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444134] Review Request: spe - Python IDE editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806141440.m5EEeh35026424@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spe - Python IDE editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444134 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2008-06-14 10:40 EST ------- Hi I faced the problem on the ln -s in one of my package (pype) recently. Instead of using the ln -S which I am not really fond of I used: mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/ echo "#!/bin/sh exec python %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/pype.py" >> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/%{name} chmod +x $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/%{name} I do not know what is the best solution, but I prefered that one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 15:20:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 11:20:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451413] New RPM SPEC file for ghc-compression package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806141520.m5EFKnD6021333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-compression package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451413 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-14 11:20 EST ------- Let's hold on for a bit here. You've opened very many tickets like this one, but there are several issues. 1) Are these your first Fedora packages? I don't see you in the account system, which suggests that you need a sponsor. Is this the case? 2) You really need to provide us with a link to an actual src.rpm that can be reviewed. There are simply not enough package reviewers to expect us to be able to assemble your packages for you. 3) Fedora is unfortunately lacking in guidelines for packaging Haskell packages. Someone was working to develop guidelines but they stopped and at the moment we have nothing. We will at least need to consult the packaging committee (of which I'm a member) on whether we want to permit Haskell packages to enter the distribution in the absense of guidelines. I'd suggest that you stop adding new haskell package review tickets until that's decided. 4) While the specfiles don't seem too bad, I'd suggest several cleanups: - Don't include %define'd macros that aren't actually used in the spec. - The large comment blocks describing things like scriptlet ordering are somewhat distracting and unnecessary. - I don't understand the need for a code block like this: setup=Setup.lhs [ -f $setup ] || setup=Setup.hs [ -f $setup ] || { echo "No Setup in package root! Aborting."; exit 1; } Surely the package builds, so the final line shouldn't be necessary. Surely one of the two initial lines is appropriate for this package; why not just use the right one? - The string "(package for GHC Haskell)" in the Summary: should be unnecessary. There may be a better way to word this if you really want to include "GHC" in the summary instead of having it be obvious from the name of the package; I suggest running " yum info perl-\*|grep Summary for some suggestions. - License: OtherLicense is invalid; you must either choose an applicable License: tag from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing or talk to the legal folks about obtaining a new tag which better fits the license in use. - The spec needs to choose either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and use them consistently; they should not both appear in the same specfile. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Macros - Your %description seems to have been line-wrapped somehow. If you agree with the above, please go ahead and make the applicable changes in all of the packages you have submitted, post links to actual src.rpms and I'll take the the issue of Haskell packaging in general to the committee. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 15:25:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 11:25:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451413] New RPM SPEC file for ghc-compression package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806141525.m5EFPu9x022064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-compression package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451413 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-14 11:25 EST ------- Also, could I ask that you submit your reviews through the form at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&format=extras-review or at least get the Summary for the tickets set properly as Review Request: package-name - Package summary We have scripts which parse these out so it's easier for you to receive a review if you use the standard format. Could you fix up the tickets you've opened? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 15:31:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 11:31:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444134] Review Request: spe - Python IDE editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806141531.m5EFVr78022978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spe - Python IDE editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444134 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-14 11:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > I faced the problem on the ln -s in one of my package (pype) recently. > Instead of using the ln -S which I am not really fond of I used: > > mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/ > echo "#!/bin/sh > exec python %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/pype.py" >> > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/%{name} > chmod +x $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/%{name} > > I do not know what is the best solution, but I prefered that one. So... how does your comment of this related to this review request? I don't know what problem you had on your package, and are you sure that the problem you saw on your package also applies to this package? (although I am not familiar with this package...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 16:14:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 12:14:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806141614.m5EGEDvi029577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP Alias: php-pear-Auth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2008-06-14 12:14 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 16:48:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 12:48:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450975] Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806141648.m5EGmYu0013537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450975 ------- Additional Comments From lpoetter at redhat.com 2008-06-14 12:48 EST ------- srpm and spec file updated. Everything good to go? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 16:49:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 12:49:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444134] Review Request: spe - Python IDE editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806141649.m5EGnigS013623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spe - Python IDE editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444134 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2008-06-14 12:49 EST ------- well because the same thing can be applied to this package instead of the ln -s. Up to both of you to see which one you prefer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 17:07:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 13:07:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449207] Review Request: notify-sharp - A C# implementation for Desktop Notifications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806141707.m5EH7XYg016978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: notify-sharp - A C# implementation for Desktop Notifications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449207 sindrepb at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From sindrepb at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-14 13:07 EST ------- I'm taking this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 17:09:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 13:09:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451012] Review Request: pspp - program for statistical analysis of sampled data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806141709.m5EH9CIv017090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pspp - program for statistical analysis of sampled data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451012 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-14 13:09 EST ------- For some reason this one didn't build for me. configure: error: The following required prerequisites are not installed. You must install them before PSPP can be built: libglade 2.0 v2.6.0 or later (or use --without-gui) This is confusing to me as it sure looks like it's been installed, and of course koji works. However, the failure is repeatable. This also doesn't look like the version that was built in koji; you linked to -2.0.tofail.fc9 but koji built -4.fc9. I downloded -4 and it builds fine. Everything I found is fixed: - Summary is good. - Test suite is run (the skipped test requires a postgres server) All 158 tests passed (1 tests were not run) - /etc/pspp is owned now. - I don't know why I X'ed the scriptlets; they seem fine to me now. - .la files are gone. - desktop file is installed now and looks OK. - unversioned .so files are gone. However, because you have both: %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/pspp/* and %{_sysconfdir}/pspp you get several errors like these: warning: File listed twice: /etc/pspp/psfonts warning: File listed twice: /etc/pspp/psfonts/Courier-Bold.afm at the end of the build. You should replace that second line with %dir %{_sysconfdir}/pspp and things should be OK. You can make that fix when you check in. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 17:30:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 13:30:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450975] Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806141730.m5EHUaJo020552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450975 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-06-14 13:30 EST ------- Yes, approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 18:20:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:20:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447159] Review Request: ocsinventory - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806141820.m5EIKo3D028645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447159 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-06-14 14:20 EST ------- Patch for new path merged upstream. New version : Spec : http://remi.fedorapeople.org/ocsinventory.spec SRPM : http://remi.fedorapeople.org/ocsinventory-1.02-0.5.rc2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 18:20:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:20:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447159] Review Request: ocsinventory - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806141820.m5EIKTJv028591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447159 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-06-14 14:20 EST ------- Patch for new path merged upstream. New version : Spec : http://remi.fedorapeople.org/ocsinventory-agent.spec SRPM : http://remi.fedorapeople.org/ocsinventory-1.02-0.5.rc2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 18:28:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:28:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448748] Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806141828.m5EISIBf018245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448748 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-14 14:28 EST ------- Full review done, must fix: * You don't BuildRequire anything you need at least allegro-devel * Currently you copy everything to %{_datadir} and then remove what you don't need, thats really the wrong way around, esp you mostly need to copy a few dirs. * crashes on x86_64 (I'll investigate this and see if I can come up with a fix) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 18:29:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:29:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448748] Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806141829.m5EITgKV018371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448748 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-14 14:29 EST ------- More must fix: * Remove bogus ChangeLog INSTALL NEWS README files from %doc, they are all useless. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 18:35:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:35:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451120] Review Request: lua-lpeg - Parsing Expression Grammars for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806141835.m5EIZmge031488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-lpeg - Parsing Expression Grammars for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451120 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-14 14:35 EST ------- Still builds fine; the issues I had are fixed, although I admit that I can't figure out why anyone would prefer "%{__rm}" to "rm". In the end it's up to you. APPROVED I'll try to look at libkni; service-discovery-applet is a bit beyond my regular knowledge as I don't even run gnome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 19:09:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 15:09:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451190] Review Request: gl2ps - An OpenGL to PostScript printing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806141909.m5EJ97hC004856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gl2ps - An OpenGL to PostScript printing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451190 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 19:15:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 15:15:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451012] Review Request: pspp - program for statistical analysis of sampled data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806141915.m5EJFpHE026858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pspp - program for statistical analysis of sampled data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451012 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2008-06-14 15:15 EST ------- Sorry, my stupid mistake -- the correct URL is http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/pspp-0.6.0-4.fc9.src.rpm (the other one -- as its name indicates -- was supposed to fail to show related bug in gsl library). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 19:42:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 15:42:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451012] Review Request: pspp - program for statistical analysis of sampled data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806141942.m5EJgt5Z030750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pspp - program for statistical analysis of sampled data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451012 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-14 15:42 EST ------- Yes, that's the one I downloaded and approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 19:51:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 15:51:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445151] Review Request: merkaartor - openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806141951.m5EJpvM4032349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: merkaartor - openstreetmap editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445151 ------- Additional Comments From sven at lank.es 2008-06-14 15:51 EST ------- Thanks for your comments. Fixed in: Spec URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SPECS/merkaartor.spec SRPM URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SRPM/merkaartor-0.0.10-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 19:53:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 15:53:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451190] Review Request: gl2ps - An OpenGL to PostScript printing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806141953.m5EJrgMK032482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gl2ps - An OpenGL to PostScript printing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451190 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-14 15:53 EST ------- builds fine; rpmlint says: W: invalid-license GL2PS This is OK; the GL2PS license was recently added to the Licensing page and rpmlint simply hasn't caught up. gl2ps-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation Not a problem. I'm not really sure why a static package is needed, but that's up to you. This package is kind of odd, lacking any kind of build system. It seems to me that what you have is fine. There are a few options which you might consider turning on, like ZLIB and PNG support, though. Again, completely up to you. Unfortunately I can't comment on the Polish documentation at all. The BuildRoot is incorrect; it must at least include %{release}, and should be one of the recommend versions from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag * source files match upstream: 97bbca9974291e1cc4d173890ef5265eb5f050ad8b48125992f321215c905cfb gl2ps-1.3.2.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. X build root lacks %{release}. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: libgl2ps.so.0()(64bit) gl2ps = 1.3.2-1.fc10 = /sbin/ldconfig libGL.so.1()(64bit) libgl2ps.so.0()(64bit) gl2ps-devel-1.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm gl2ps-devel = 1.3.2-1.fc10 = gl2ps = 1.3.2-1.fc10 libGL-devel libgl2ps.so.0()(64bit) gl2ps-static-1.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm gl2ps-static = 1.3.2-1.fc10 = gl2ps-devel = 1.3.2-1.fc10 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * shared libraries installed; ldconfig is properly called. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets OK (ldconfig) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * no pkgconfig files. * static libraries are in the -static package. * no libtool .la files. Honestly my only real complaint is the BuildRoot, which is a trivial fix. Please fix it when you check in. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 19:58:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 15:58:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450366] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Client - Easy way to perform multiple HTTP requests and process their results In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806141958.m5EJwi68000831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Client - Easy way to perform multiple HTTP requests and process their results Alias: pear-HTTP-Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450366 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 20:02:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 16:02:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806142002.m5EK20JJ001707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-14 16:01 EST ------- Before I can review this: During license check, I found that the following files are licensed under "NVIDIA license": -------------------------------------------------------------- lib/kerosin/sceneserver/helper/NVMeshMender.cpp lib/kerosin/sceneserver/helper/NVMeshMender.h lib/kerosin/sceneserver/helper/nv_algebra.cpp lib/kerosin/sceneserver/helper/nv_math/ --------------------------------------------------------------- which does not contain explicit permission to copy/modify/(re)distrubute this codes and regarded as NON-Free (see: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-June/msg00015.html ) Please contact the upstream to how to deal with these files (or if you can remove these files and repackage the source). Once setting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 20:33:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 16:33:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450366] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Client - Easy way to perform multiple HTTP requests and process their results In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806142033.m5EKXAD2006297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Client - Easy way to perform multiple HTTP requests and process their results Alias: pear-HTTP-Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450366 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-14 16:33 EST ------- Not much to say here. * source files match upstream: 225545e5ba27401c0f83d943a19d0cd51813f72524ad075104892e2e9c6d2128 HTTP_Client-1.1.1.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(HTTP_Client) = 1.1.1 php-pear-HTTP-Client = 1.1.1-1.fc10 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear php-pear(HTTP_Request) >= 1.2 php-pear(PEAR) * %check is not present; not test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets OK (pear module installation) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 20:45:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 16:45:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450366] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Client - Easy way to perform multiple HTTP requests and process their results In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806142045.m5EKjXxV019541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Client - Easy way to perform multiple HTTP requests and process their results Alias: pear-HTTP-Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450366 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2008-06-14 16:45 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-HTTP-Client Short Description: Easy way to perform multiple HTTP requests and process their results Owners: xulchris Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 20:52:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 16:52:05 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_450527=5D_Review_Request=3A_libkni_-_C++_l?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ibrary_f=C3=BCr_the_Katana_robot_arm?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806142052.m5EKq53o009083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libkni - C++ library f?r the Katana robot arm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-14 16:52 EST ------- I note the following from rpmlint: libkni-doc.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libkni-docs-3.9.2/html/Timer_8h__incl.map libkni-doc.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libkni-docs-3.9.2/html/MathHelperFunctions_8h__incl.map Any idea what these are? libkni-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation libkni-examples.x86_64: W: no-documentation libkni-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation These are OK. There are a bunch of these: libkni.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libKNI_LM.so.3.9.0 _ZN7CKatana12waitForMotorEsiisi libkni.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libKNI_LM.so.3.9.0 _ZN8CKatBase7recvGMSEv libkni.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libKNI_InvKin.so.3.9.0 _ZN7CKatana14moveRobotToEncEN9__gnu_cxx17__normal_iteratorIPKiSt6vectorIiSaIiEEEES7_bii libkni.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libKNI_InvKin.so.3.9.0 _ZN8CKatBase7recvMPSEv Name mangling makes it a bit tough for me to understand what's going on here, but something doesn't seem to be linked properly. You probably want to s/f?r/for/ in the Summary. What is the KatanaNativeInterface-v3.9.2.exe file in the tarball? It seems to be a complete waste of space. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 20:52:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 16:52:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449207] Review Request: notify-sharp - A C# implementation for Desktop Notifications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806142052.m5EKqd6c020537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: notify-sharp - A C# implementation for Desktop Notifications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449207 ------- Additional Comments From sindrepb at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-14 16:52 EST ------- Nytt notat 262 I'm taking this. Passed: MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. notify-sharp.i386: E: no-binary notify-sharp.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib These can be ignored for mono packages. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the [wiki:Self:Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines] ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ([wiki:Self:Packaging/Guidelines#UsingBuildRootOptFlags or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT] ). - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the [wiki:Self:Packaging/Guidelines#macros macros section of Packaging Guidelines] . - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the [wiki:Self:Packaging/Guidelines#CodeVsContent code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines] . - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ([wiki:Self:Packaging/Guidelines#UsingBuildRootOptFlags or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT] ). See [wiki:Self:Packaging/Guidelines#PreppingBuildRootForInstall Prepping BuildRoot For %install] for details. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Doesn't apply: - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the [wiki:Self:Packaging/Guidelines#desktop desktop files section of Packaging Guidelines] . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. So, mostly good. The URL doesn't work for me though, is this the new url for the project: http://www.ndesk.org/NotifySharp You should also include a comment on how to reproduce your tarball so one can check if the source matches upstream easily. I couldn't find the svn repository this is taken from to verify. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 21:19:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 17:19:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451012] Review Request: pspp - program for statistical analysis of sampled data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806142119.m5ELJm7a024392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pspp - program for statistical analysis of sampled data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451012 mcepl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2008-06-14 17:19 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pspp Short Description: A program for statistical analysis of sampled data Owners:mcepl Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits:yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 14 21:55:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 17:55:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449928] Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806142155.m5ELtcZh029579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449928 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wart at kobold.org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2008-06-14 17:55 EST ------- The builds seem to be working fine now with configure and Makefile.in patched, even with %{?_smp_mflags}. Feel free to report it upstream, but I'm not going to let it block this review. Good ==== * rpmlint output ok (missing docs for -devel and -python ok) libwfut-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation libwfut-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation * Package named appropriately * LGPLv2+ license ok * spec file legible and in Am. English * Compiles and builds on {F-8, F-9, F-10}-{i386,x86_64} * Source matches upstream: caf063321410318602bc2afc3a8e046f libwfut-0.2.0.tar.gz * ldconfig called in %post/%postun as necessary * Owns all directories that it creates * No duplicate %files * Macro use consistent * Contains code, not content * -devel subpackage contains appropriate contents CHECK ===== * BuildRequires: libtool does not appear to be necessary. It's recommended to remove it if it's really not needed. Don't forget to bump the release number for every new spec file, even during the review. It makes it easier to compare differences between files during the review process. Please go ahead and continue with the 'Get a Fedora Account' section of the new contributors process: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join. I'll be your sponsor after you request access to the 'cvsextras' group. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 00:27:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:27:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451498] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-Crypto package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451498 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-Crypto package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/Crypto OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.1.0 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/Crypto/4.1.0/Crypto-4.1.0.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-14 20:27 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309380) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309380&action=view) ghc-Crypto-4.1.0-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 00:34:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:34:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451499] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-dataenc package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451499 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-dataenc package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/dataenc OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.11 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/dataenc/0.11/dataenc-0.11.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-14 20:34 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309381) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309381&action=view) ghc-dataenc-0.11-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 00:42:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:42:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451500] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-encoding package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451500 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-encoding package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/encoding OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.4.1 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/encoding/0.4.1/encoding-0.4.1.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-14 20:42 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309382) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309382&action=view) ghc-encoding-0.4.1-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 00:47:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:47:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451501] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-HCodecs package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451501 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-HCodecs package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/HCodecs OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.0.3 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/HCodecs/0.0.3/HCodecs-0.0.3.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-14 20:47 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309383) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309383&action=view) ghc-HCodecs-0.0.3-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 00:58:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:58:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451502] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hogg package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451502 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hogg package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/hogg OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.3.0 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/hogg/0.3.0/hogg-0.3.0.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-14 20:58 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309384) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309384&action=view) ghc-hogg-0.3.0-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 01:27:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:27:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451280] Review Request: xqf - A server browser for many popular games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806150127.m5F1RQEh016657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xqf - A server browser for many popular games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451280 ------- Additional Comments From cheekyboinc at foresightlinux.org 2008-06-14 21:27 EST ------- Spec: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/xqf.spec SRPM: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/xqf-1.0.5-2.fc9.src.rpm Changelog: - Add desktop-file-install for the .desktop file - Add BuildRequires: GeoIP-devel, qstat - Remove the dummy libGeoIP.so - Remove Requires: GeoIP -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 01:36:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:36:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806150136.m5F1aeRr029310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 ------- Additional Comments From dwheeler at dwheeler.com 2008-06-14 21:36 EST ------- I suggest doing the following, which implements history and line editing in coqtop (as well as justifying a dependency on rlwrap): Inside the directory "/etc/profile.d", install 2 trivial files "coq.sh" and "coq.csh", with the trivial contents shown below. Then, when you log into a shell you'll get aliases that enable history and line editing. Make sure that the files are readable (and executable) by all. {bash invokes this via /etc/bashrc.} :::::::::::::: coq.sh :::::::::::::: # coq initialization alias coqtop='rlwrap coqtop' 2>/dev/null :::::::::::::: coq.csh :::::::::::::: #! /bin/csh -f alias coqtop 'rlwrap coqtop' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 01:59:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:59:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450975] Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806150159.m5F1xjIR020919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450975 lpoetter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lpoetter at redhat.com 2008-06-14 21:59 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libcanberra Short Description: Portable Sound Event Library Owners: lennart Branches: devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 02:14:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 22:14:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451505] New: Review Request: phonon - Multimedia framework api Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451505 Summary: Review Request: phonon - Multimedia framework api Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec,SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/phonon/ Description: Multimedia framework api Needed for future kde-4.1+ builds scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=662394 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 04:35:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 00:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451509] New: Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451509 Summary: Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: livinded at deadbytes.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.deadbytes.net/packages/fedora/specs/sleuthkit/sleuthkit.spec SRPM URL: http://www.deadbytes.net/packages/fedora/specs/sleuthkit-2.52-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The Sleuth Kit (TSK) is a collection of UNIX-based command line tools that allow you to investigate a computer. The current focus of the tools is the file and volume systems and TSK supports FAT, Ext2/3, NTFS, UFS, and ISO 9660 file systems. A more detailed description can be found here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 04:41:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 00:41:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451509] Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806150441.m5F4fQio023342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451509 ------- Additional Comments From livinded at deadbytes.net 2008-06-15 00:41 EST ------- SRPM URL: http://www.deadbytes.net/packages/fedora/srpms/sleuthkit-2.52-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 05:24:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 01:24:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226046] Merge Review: libsoup (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806150524.m5F5Oele017888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libsoup (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226046 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-06-15 01:24 EST ------- MUST Items: OK - rpmlint is clean OK - follows Naming Guidelines OK - spec file is named as %{name}.spec xx - package does not meet Packaging Guidelines + BuildRoot MUST contain at least %{name}, %{version} and %{release}. Recommended values can be found at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag in decreasing order of preference. + According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make you should use 'make %{?_smp_mflags}' whenever possible. In this case since upstream supports parallel builds you should use it. + According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used %makeinstall macro should not be used. To also preserve timestamps you could consider using: make install INSTALL="%{__install} -p" DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT (Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=662427) + Looks like http://live.gnome.org/LibSoup would be a better choice for the URL. + Why is disable-gtk-doc used? The Fedora 8 package does not use it. Maybe you could put a comment explaining it. + Why not include the ChangeLog in %doc? OK - license meets Licensing Guidelines OK - License field meets actual license OK - upstream license file included in %doc OK - spec file uses American English OK - spec file is legible OK - sources match upstream sources OK - package builds successfully OK - ExcludeArch not needed OK - build dependencies correctly listed OK - no locales OK - no shared libraries OK - package is not relocatable OK - file and directory ownership OK - no duplicates in %file OK - file permissions set properly + The preferred attribute definition is: %defattr(-,root,root,-) OK - %clean present OK - macros used consistently + While %{name} is used at other places, libsoup is used in the %setup and %files stanzas. You could consider using %{name} in those places too. OK - contains code and permissable content OK - -doc is not needed OK - contents of %doc does not affect the runtime OK - header files in -devel OK - no static libraries OK - -devel has *.pc file and requires pkgconfig OK - library files without suffix in -devel OK - -devel requires base package OK - no libtool archives OK - %{name}.desktop file not needed OK - does not own files or directories owned by other packages OK - buildroot correctly prepped OK - all file names valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - upstream provides license text xx - no translations for description and summary OK - package builds in mock successfully OK - package builds on all supported architectures OK - package functions as expected OK - scriptlets are sane OK - subpackages other than -devel are not needed OK - pkgconfig files in -devel OK - no file dependencies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 07:59:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 03:59:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226046] Merge Review: libsoup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806150759.m5F7x0NN008319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libsoup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226046 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: libsoup (not |Merge Review: libsoup |started) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 08:34:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 04:34:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226138] Merge Review: metacity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806150834.m5F8Y5ZO011536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: metacity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226138 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-06-15 04:34 EST ------- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 08:45:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 04:45:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449928] Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806150845.m5F8jTcW024943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449928 ------- Additional Comments From atorkhov at gmail.com 2008-06-15 04:45 EST ------- Spec URL: http://purple.worldforge.org/~alex/fedora/libwfut.spec SRPM URL: http://purple.worldforge.org/~alex/fedora/libwfut-0.2.0-2.fc9.src.rpm Removed libtool from deps. (It was needed before, when tinyxml patch was regenerating configure) Also, added --disable-static to %configure, as was previously suggested. > Please go ahead and continue with the 'Get a Fedora Account' section of the new > contributors process: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join. > I'll be your sponsor after you request access to the 'cvsextras' group. Applied to cvsextras. I'd be glad if you also co-maintained the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 08:47:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 04:47:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225855] Merge Review: gphoto2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806150847.m5F8lDoS013753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gphoto2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225855 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |debarshi.ray at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 09:44:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 05:44:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 401101] Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806150944.m5F9iG4j023011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=401101 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |livinded at deadbytes.net ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-15 05:44 EST ------- *** Bug 451509 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 09:44:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 05:44:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451509] Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806150944.m5F9iFf4022987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451509 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-15 05:44 EST ------- This would seem to be a duplicate of bug 401101. Please work with the submitter of that ticket to get this package into Fedora. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 401101 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 09:41:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 05:41:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451498] New RPM SPEC file for ghc-Crypto package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806150941.m5F9fSZJ001858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-Crypto package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451498 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-15 05:41 EST ------- Why did you submit more of these after it was requested that you stop to address the issues that have already been raised? Honestly unless you are going to post proper packages for review, I am considering just closing all of these tickets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 10:20:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 06:20:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416471] Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806151020.m5FAKZv9028967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416471 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-15 06:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > Henry, are you ready to be sponsored? At least I am _not_ sponsoring Henry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 11:48:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 07:48:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434614] Review Request: cdcat - Hyper's CdCatalog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806151148.m5FBmpO0009256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdcat - Hyper's CdCatalog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434614 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-15 07:48 EST ------- I will close this bug if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 11:46:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 07:46:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244593] Review Request: postgresql-pgbouncer - Lightweight connection pooler for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806151146.m5FBkoVZ009128@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-pgbouncer - Lightweight connection pooler for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244593 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-15 07:46 EST ------- ping again?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 11:47:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 07:47:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806151147.m5FBlSv5020310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-15 07:47 EST ------- Please rebuild this package also on F-9 and submit a push request on bodhi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 11:51:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 07:51:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444134] Review Request: spe - Python IDE editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806151151.m5FBpA74009893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spe - Python IDE editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444134 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(jonathan.mercier at h | |otmail.fr) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-15 07:51 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 11:58:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 07:58:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244593] Review Request: postgresql-pgbouncer - Lightweight connection pooler for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806151158.m5FBwDPU010861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-pgbouncer - Lightweight connection pooler for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244593 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(devrim at commandprom| |pt.com) | ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2008-06-15 07:58 EST ------- Please wait, I'm working on about 50 packages nowadays (mostly pg related), and I'll respond as soon as I finish working on them. FWIW, the many of the changes are done already... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 12:08:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 08:08:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441415] Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806151208.m5FC8P8S024356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441415 ------- Additional Comments From bochecha at no-log.org 2008-06-15 08:08 EST ------- Hi, Thanks a lot for the review. I just applied for cvsextras in FAS, my user name is bochecha. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 12:31:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 08:31:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449207] Review Request: notify-sharp - A C# implementation for Desktop Notifications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806151231.m5FCVO2O028329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: notify-sharp - A C# implementation for Desktop Notifications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449207 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-06-15 08:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > So, mostly good. The URL doesn't work for me though, is this the new url for the > project: http://www.ndesk.org/NotifySharp No, it'd appear that is an old URL for the project, the URL in the SPEC file still works for me. > > You should also include a comment on how to reproduce your tarball so one can > check if the source matches upstream easily. I couldn't find the svn repository > this is taken from to verify. Argh, how silly of me, I'll update this 'soon'. I'm currently a little too busy to provide an update now but hopefully have one by Friday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 12:57:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 08:57:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451540] New: Review-Request: perl-String-Random - Perl module to generate random strings based on a pattern Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451540 Summary: Review-Request: perl-String-Random - Perl module to generate random strings based on a pattern Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-String-Random.spec OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-String-Random.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/perl-String-Random-0.22-1.el5.src.rpm Description: This module makes it trivial to generate random strings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 12:57:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 08:57:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451542] New: Review-Request: perl-Algorithm-Permute - Handy and fast permutation with object oriented interface Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451542 Summary: Review-Request: perl-Algorithm-Permute - Handy and fast permutation with object oriented interface Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-Algorithm-Permute.spec OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-Algorithm-Permute.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/perl-Algorithm-Permute-0.12-1.el5.src.rpm Description: This handy module makes performing permutation in Perl easy and fast, although perhaps its algorithm is not the fastest on the earth. It supports permutation r of n objects where 0 < r <= n. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 12:57:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 08:57:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451541] New: Review-Request: perl-Authen-Captcha - Perl extension for creating captcha's to verify the human element in transactions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451541 Summary: Review-Request: perl-Authen-Captcha - Perl extension for creating captcha's to verify the human element in transactions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-Authen-Captcha.spec OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-Authen-Captcha.spec SRPM:http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/perl-Authen-Captcha-1.023-2.el5.src.rpm Description: Authen::Captcha provides an object oriented interface to captcha file creations. Captcha stands for Completely Automated Public Turning test to tell Computers and Humans Apart. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 13:46:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 09:46:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806151346.m5FDk9eg029269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-15 09:46 EST ------- Well, for 1.07-1: * License - Many codes are licensed under 4 clause BSD, so the license tag must be "BSD with advertising". * Parallel make - Please write a note on the spec file that this package is parallel make unsafe. * ldconfig - Calling /sbin/ldconfig on scriptlets are not needer for this package. trickle-overload.so is not under default library search paths, and it is only dlopen'ed. * 64 bit issue - (Although I have 32 bit machine only) I guess this package doesn't work on 64 bit machine. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ configure: ---------------------------------------------------- 21008 clibdir="$prefix/lib/trickle" 21009 21010 cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF 21011 #define SYSCONFDIR "$csysconfdir" 21012 _ACEOF 21013 21014 cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF 21015 #define LIBDIR "$clibdir" 21016 _ACEOF ---------------------------------------------------- trickle.c: ---------------------------------------------------- 40 #define LIBNAME "trickle-overload.so" 51 char *trypaths[] = { 52 LIBNAME, 53 LIBDIR "/" LIBNAME, 54 NULL 55 }; 103 for (pathp = trypaths; *pathp != NULL; pathp++) 104 if (lstat(*pathp, &sb) == 0) 105 break; 106 107 path = *pathp; 108 if (path == NULL) 109 errx(1, "Could not find overload object"); ---------------------------------------------------- trickle.spec: ---------------------------------------------------- 59 %{_bindir}/trickled 60 %{_libdir}/%{name}/trickle-overload.so 61 %{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1.gz ---------------------------------------------------- On 64 bit machine, %_libdir is /usr/lib64. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 14:03:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:03:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806151403.m5FE38sa010318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-15 10:03 EST ------- The srpm on comment 3 does not build. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=662736 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 14:21:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:21:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806151421.m5FELW1l002081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2008-06-15 10:21 EST ------- Yes, fbpanel-4.12-libs.patch seems a bit broken, tries %{_libdir} rather $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir} or so. Stefan, you're replacing "$(PREFIX)/share/fbpanel/plugins" by "/usr/lib/fbpanel/ plugins" but you should try "(PREFIX)/lib/fbpanel/plugins" instead for example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 14:27:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:27:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806151427.m5FERUru002811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2008-06-15 10:27 EST ------- Oh, I forgot: This doesn't solve /usr/lib vs. /usr/lib64 anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 17:50:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 13:50:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449962] Review Request: texlive-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806151750.m5FHos72010601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449962 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 19:13:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 15:13:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806151913.m5FJDTLn013594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 ------- Additional Comments From hedayat at grad.com 2008-06-15 15:13 EST ------- WOW thanks! It seems that these files are part of NVidia SDK (I've searched a little for them), which is under this license AFAIK: http://developer.download.nvidia.com/licenses/general_license.txt (NVMeshMender: http://developer.nvidia.com/object/NVMeshMender.html) Anyway, I'm waiting for upstream developers' answer(s) about the actual source of these codes and its license. But I think there will be no legal problem here, and maybe the review can be continued while we are waiting for clarification. Thanks a lot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 19:14:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 15:14:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806151914.m5FJETrB013665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2008-06-15 15:14 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309404) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309404&action=view) fbpanel-4.12-libdir.patch This patch should solve all issues regarding libraries in %{_datadir} and the correct usage of %{_libdir} regarding /usr/lib vs. /usr/lib64. I think, I have written it sane enough, so that maybe upstream also applies it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 19:49:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 15:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806151949.m5FJn4K4019172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 ------- Additional Comments From cheekyboinc at foresightlinux.org 2008-06-15 15:49 EST ------- SPEC: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/fbpanel.spec SRPM: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/fbpanel-4.12-3.fc9.src.rpm Changelog: - Solved build failure and broken libs-patch with patch from Robert Scheck Thank you Robert and Mamoru for your feedback! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 20:07:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 16:07:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443468] Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806152007.m5FK7KVS022401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443468 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2008-06-15 16:07 EST ------- slow packager; just got back from Vacation, will try to get to it this week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 20:07:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 16:07:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443467] Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806152007.m5FK7RDi032267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443467 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2008-06-15 16:07 EST ------- slow packager; just got back from Vacation, will try to get to it this week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 21:14:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:14:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451502] New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hogg package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806152114.m5FLEnMC009570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hogg package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451502 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-15 17:14 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309410) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309410&action=view) ghc-hogg.cabal.patch Patch that fixes the Cabal file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 21:21:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:21:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451564] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-mime package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451564 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-mime package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/mime OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.2 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/mime/0.2/mime-0.2.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-15 17:21 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309412) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309412&action=view) ghc-mime-0.2-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 21:23:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:23:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806152123.m5FLN1MT001258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 ------- Additional Comments From nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com 2008-06-15 17:23 EST ------- Updated : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/trickle.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/trickle-1.07-2.fc9.src.rpm Changelog : * Sun Jun 15 2008 Nicoleau Fabien 1.07-2 - Licence changed - ldconfig no more used - dir macro used for libdir/name - config.h file modified (/lib/ hardcoded) With config.h modification, I think that this package can run udner x86_64 rpmlint output : [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ ls trickle-1.07-2.fc9.i386.rpm trickle-1.07-2.fc9.src.rpm trickle-debuginfo-1.07-2.fc9.i386.rpm [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint -i *.rpm [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ src.rpm rebuild under mock is OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 21:34:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:34:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451565] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-base64-string package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451565 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-base64-string package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/base64-string OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.1 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/base64-string/0.1/base64-string-0.1.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-15 17:34 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309413) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309413&action=view) ghc-base64-string-0.1-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 21:45:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:45:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448748] Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806152145.m5FLjVd5014411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448748 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-15 17:45 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309415) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309415&action=view) cylindrix-1.0-fix-packing.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 21:46:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:46:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448748] Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806152146.m5FLk9VU014562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448748 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-15 17:46 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309416) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309416&action=view) cylindrix-1.0-arch-independ-file-read.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 21:43:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:43:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451566] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-iconv package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451566 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-iconv package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/iconv OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/iconv/0.4/iconv-0.4.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-15 17:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309414) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309414&action=view) ghc-iconv-0.4-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 21:48:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:48:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806152148.m5FLmNOA004983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-06-15 17:48 EST ------- Unfortunately your patch for x86_64 does not work correctly. Here is the result of running trickle on an x86_64 system (tested in F7, but I am almost sure the same behaviour happens in newer fedoras): [wolfy at wolfy tmp]$ trickle --d 100 wget http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/trickle-1.07-2.fc9.src.rpm trickle: Could not find overload object and the reason is probably here: [wolfy at wolfy tmp]$ strings `which trickle`|grep overload.so /usr/lib/trickle/trickle-overload.so trickle-overload.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 21:44:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:44:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448748] Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806152144.m5FLiZ5U004352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448748 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-15 17:44 EST ------- OKay, I now have it working on x86_64, and with these it should work on ppc too, I've already submitted these patches upstream. cylindrix-1.0-fix-packing.patch: Change #ifdef so that packing of applicable structures gets enabled, remove PACKED_STRUCT macro from struct members which have 1 byte alignment by default to shut up warnings. This fixes playback of the cylindrix logo fli on startup cylindrix-1.0-arch-independ-file-read.patch: reading a memory dump of a struct from disk, will only work on the same machine as the struct was created, replace the simple fread(struct) calls with code which knows the data on disk is an intel struct dump and reads it in such a way it will work on any platform cylindrix-1.0-use-int-not-long.patch: cylindrix uses longs all over the place in the sourcecode where it wants 32 bits integers, however longs are 64 bit on 64 bit machines wrecking havoc, this patch replaces all use of long with int. Note, Even with these we are still not good to go, I need to also make the writing of the overal stats system independent and currently saving any settings / stats will not work at all when run as user, because you are starting cylindrix under /usr/share/cylindrix where it cannot write its settings. Instead from the script you should create a ~/.cylindrix, symlink the relevant data dirs under there, and copy the config / pilot files, so that they can be overridden and then start cylindrix-bin under ~/.cylindrix. I'll be waiting for a new version from you to review with all the mentioned Must FIX items fixed, these patches applied and the startup script modified so that settings cna be saved. Once that is done I'll start working on making the overal stat saving platform agnostic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 21:46:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:46:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448748] Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806152146.m5FLkRaQ014655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448748 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-15 17:46 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309417) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309417&action=view) cylindrix-1.0-use-int-not-long.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 22:22:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:22:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806152222.m5FMMH7w010265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 ------- Additional Comments From nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com 2008-06-15 18:22 EST ------- I don't understand where this path is written. Perhaps in libtool or ltmain.sh. I saw differents RPMs of trickle for other distributions that uses /usr/lib64, but nothing is done in the spec file to use it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 15 23:52:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:52:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806152352.m5FNqI4b000427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-06-15 19:52 EST ------- On my system config.h has (taken from /var/lib/mock/fedora-7-x86_64/root/builddir/build/BUILD/trickle-1.07/config.h after the build): #define LIBDIR "/usr/lib/trickle" even if your sed command is not applied. (I have no idea why the config.h file is generated with /usr/lib instead of /usr/local/lib) Everything works Ok on my system if I replace your sed line with: %{__sed} -i -e s@"LIBDIR \"\/usr\/lib\/trickle\""@"LIBDIR \"%{_libdir}/%{name}\""@ config.h I've tested on F7/x86_64 and devel/i386&x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 00:12:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 20:12:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451413] New RPM SPEC file for ghc-compression package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806160012.m5G0CHFS026346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-compression package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451413 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-06-15 20:12 EST ------- Please also cc fedora-haskell-list on all haskell package reviews. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 00:50:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 20:50:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451581] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-nano-md5 package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451581 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-nano-md5 package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/nano-md5 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.1.2 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/nano-md5/0.1.2/nano-md5-0.1.2.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-15 20:50 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309425) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309425&action=view) ghc-nano-md5-0.1.2-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 00:46:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 20:46:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451580] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-nano-hmac package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451580 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-nano-hmac package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/nano-hmac OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.2.0 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/nano-hmac/0.2.0/nano-hmac-0.2.0.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-15 20:46 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309422) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309422&action=view) ghc-nano-hmac-0.2.0-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 01:03:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 21:03:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451582] New: Review Request: kvirc - themeable qt based irc client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451582 Summary: Review Request: kvirc - themeable qt based irc client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: smparrish at shallowcreek.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec file and SRPM can be found here http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/kvirc/ Description: QT based IRC Client Build logs here F8 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=663016 F9 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=663021 F10 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=663032 Project homepage is here http://www.kvirc.net/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 01:46:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 21:46:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451584] New: fc8 packages in fc9 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451584 Summary: fc8 packages in fc9 Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: raytodd at kiva.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Has anyone noticed that the release of fc9 has a lot of rpm packages which are labeled as fc8. Since part of the instructions for doing an in place upgrade is to go in afterwards are remove the *fc8* packages and replace them with logically consistent packages from fc9 this can be quite confusing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 01:56:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 21:56:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451585] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-omnicodec package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451585 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-omnicodec package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/omnicodec OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.2 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/omnicodec/0.2/omnicodec-0.2.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-15 21:56 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309430) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309430&action=view) ghc-omnicodec-0.2-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 02:01:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 22:01:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451584] fc8 packages in fc9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806160201.m5G21wIZ010282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: fc8 packages in fc9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451584 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-15 22:01 EST ------- Not sure why this was opened as a new package review ticket, but I can assure you that it is completely intentional that there are packages with the "fc8" dist tag in F9. Those packages simply didn't need to change between releases. I'm not sure which instructions you're referring to for doing an "in place upgrade"; documented procedures as far as I can see are either to boot the installer or to use preupgrade; even the "outdated, not recommended and unsupported" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Tools/yum/YumUpgradeFaq page doesn't indicate that such packages should be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 02:04:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 22:04:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451587] New: Review Request: sound-theme-freedesktop - the default sound theme for the X sound theming spec Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451587 Summary: Review Request: sound-theme-freedesktop - the default sound theme for the X sound theming spec Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lpoetter at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://0pointer.de/public/sound-theme-freedesktop.spec SRPM URL: http://0pointer.de/public/sound-theme-freedesktop-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The default sound theme of the X sound theming spec This is all kinds of sounds stolen from gnome-audio, KDE, Ekiga, Pidgin/Purple, ALSA, put together as XDG sound theme. This goes well along with libcanberra. Licenses vary, the README lists them. Predominantly GPLv2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 02:06:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 22:06:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451587] Review Request: sound-theme-freedesktop - the default sound theme for the X sound theming spec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806160206.m5G26TDe021098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sound-theme-freedesktop - the default sound theme for the X sound theming spec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451587 lpoetter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From lpoetter at redhat.com 2008-06-15 22:06 EST ------- Assigning to Mathias, since he already reviewed libcanberra (#450975) and this package kind of belongs to libcanberra. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 02:11:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 22:11:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451589] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-tar package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451589 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-tar package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/tar OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.1.1.1 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/tar/0.1.1.1/tar-0.1.1.1.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-15 22:11 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309432) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309432&action=view) ghc-tar-0.1.1.1-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 02:09:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 22:09:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451588] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-unix-compat package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451588 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-unix-compat package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/unix-compat OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.1.2.1 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/unix-compat/0.1.2.1/unix-compat-0.1.2.1.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-15 22:09 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309431) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309431&action=view) ghc-unix-compat-0.1.2.1-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 02:16:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 22:16:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451590] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-utf8-string package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451590 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-utf8-string package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/utf8-string OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.3.1 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/utf8-string/0.3.1/utf8-string-0.3.1.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-15 22:16 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309433) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309433&action=view) ghc-utf8-string-0.3.1-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 02:34:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 22:34:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451594] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-scc package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451594 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-scc package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/scc OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.1 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/scc/0.1/scc-0.1.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-15 22:34 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309435) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309435&action=view) ghc-scc-0.1-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 02:40:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 22:40:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451595] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-category-extras package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451595 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-category-extras package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/category-extras OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.53.1 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/category-extras/0.53.1/category-extras-0.53.1.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-15 22:40 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309436) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309436&action=view) ghc-category-extras-0.53.1-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 02:46:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 22:46:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451596] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hopenssl package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451596 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-hopenssl package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/hopenssl OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.0 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/hopenssl/1.0/hopenssl-1.0.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-15 22:46 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309437) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309437&action=view) ghc-hopenssl-1.0-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 02:52:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 22:52:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451597] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-HsOpenSSL package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451597 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-HsOpenSSL package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/HsOpenSSL OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.4.2 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/HsOpenSSL/0.4.2/HsOpenSSL-0.4.2.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-15 22:52 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309439) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309439&action=view) ghc-HsOpenSSL-0.4.2-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 02:59:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 22:59:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451600] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-pkcs1 package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451600 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-pkcs1 package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/pkcs1 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.0.2 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/pkcs1/1.0.2/pkcs1-1.0.2.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-15 22:59 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309440) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309440&action=view) ghc-pkcs1-1.0.2-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 03:03:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 23:03:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451601] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-pureMD5 package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451601 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-pureMD5 package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/pureMD5 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.2.1 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/pureMD5/0.2.1/pureMD5-0.2.1.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-15 23:03 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309441) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309441&action=view) ghc-pureMD5-0.2.1-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 03:09:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 23:09:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451587] Review Request: sound-theme-freedesktop - the default sound theme for the X sound theming spec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806160309.m5G39UI1030801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sound-theme-freedesktop - the default sound theme for the X sound theming spec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451587 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-06-15 23:09 EST ------- "Builds" fine in mock.rpmlint is silent. I'll do a formal review in a bit, for now just this: you need to list all the licenses in the license field, ideally with a comment that points to README for details what files each one covers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 03:10:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 23:10:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451602] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-syb-with-class package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451602 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-syb-with-class package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/syb-with-class OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.4 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/syb-with-class/0.4/syb-with-class-0.4.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-15 23:10 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309442) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309442&action=view) ghc-syb-with-class-0.4-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 03:13:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 23:13:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451605] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-uuid package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451605 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-uuid package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/uuid OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.1.0 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/uuid/0.1.0/uuid-0.1.0.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-15 23:13 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309443) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309443&action=view) ghc-uuid-0.1.0-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 03:35:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 23:35:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451413] New RPM SPEC file for ghc-compression package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806160335.m5G3ZZiv024696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-compression package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451413 ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-15 23:35 EST ------- Also, this is not the right compression library to be packaging. Please don't waste time on it, as it is unlikely to be approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 03:46:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 23:46:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449928] Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806160346.m5G3kuOa003880@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449928 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2008-06-15 23:46 EST ------- I can't seem to reach purple.worldforge.org at the moment. Is this available from another location? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 04:17:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:17:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449251] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806160417.m5G4H8PH030768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449251 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-16 00:17 EST ------- with above srpm I see tests failed so build also failed. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=663169 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 05:03:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 01:03:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451413] New RPM SPEC file for ghc-compression package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806160503.m5G53KEM005193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-compression package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451413 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-16 01:03 EST ------- At this point I'm not sure that the person submitting these tickets is even reading the comments, as there has been no response to any commentary and new tickets continue to pour in with the same mistakes. I'm beginning to think these are just drive-by submissions, with no intention of actually listening to any comments or maintaining these packages in Fedora. They need to stop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 05:33:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 01:33:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451413] New RPM SPEC file for ghc-compression package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806160533.m5G5XrhT009650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-compression package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451413 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-16 01:33 EST ------- I guess we should close all of these. As Jason says it seems the submitter will never have intention to react to us (also see bug 451397, bug 451398) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 06:14:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 02:14:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441415] Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806160614.m5G6E2ar016165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441415 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-16 02:14 EST ------- Ok, I've sponsored you, now you can do yhe cvs requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 06:43:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 02:43:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451413] New RPM SPEC file for ghc-compression package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806160643.m5G6hTje020594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-compression package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451413 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-06-16 02:43 EST ------- Ok has someone contacted the submitter? I can try to contact them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 07:02:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 03:02:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806160702.m5G72YSG001238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 ------- Additional Comments From nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com 2008-06-16 03:02 EST ------- ok, then I'll try to have a more "generic" sed line to handle all possible cases, something like : %{__sed} -i -e s@"LIBDIR \".*/trickle\""@"LIBDIR \"%{_libdir}/%{name}\""@ config.h -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 08:11:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 04:11:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451120] Review Request: lua-lpeg - Parsing Expression Grammars for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806160811.m5G8B1Jf003803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-lpeg - Parsing Expression Grammars for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451120 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-06-16 04:11 EST ------- I used it because I didn't want to hardcode gcc but use %{__cc} instead. If I have to be consistent I'll rather use the macros for *this* package... Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 08:12:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 04:12:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451120] Review Request: lua-lpeg - Parsing Expression Grammars for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806160812.m5G8CFun013772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-lpeg - Parsing Expression Grammars for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451120 tim at niemueller.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-06-16 04:12 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lua-lpeg Short Description: Parsing Expression Grammars for Lua Owners: timn Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 08:11:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 04:11:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445977] Review Request: ikiwiki - A wiki compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806160811.m5G8BZYY013691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ikiwiki - A wiki compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445977 ------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny at gmx.de 2008-06-16 04:11 EST ------- Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/ikiwiki.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/ikiwiki-2.50-1.fc9.src.rpm %changelog * Sun Jun 15 2008 Thomas Moschny - 2.50-1 - Update to 2.50. - Move ikiwiki-w3m.cgi into a subpackage. - Add ikiwiki's own documentation. - Remove duplicate requirement perl(File::MimeInfo). - Minor cleanups. (In reply to comment #3) > + Source file: ok, matches upstream: > 6b293f6e8a08578533d0268b25dae5b3 ikiwiki_2.48.tar.gz > There was a new release just now: Updated to 2.50. > - License included: not ok, the license is included in ikiwiki/doc/GPL but not > in %doc Forgot to add ikiwiki's own documentation, fixed (html dir in %doc). This also includes the GPL file. > - Perl Requires: not ok > > perl(File::MimeInfo) is twice in the requires of the rpm, it is added manually > in the spec, which I guess can be removed. Fixed. > Also I would probably package ikiwiki-w3m.cgi, because it seems to be useful. Included in a subpackage now. > Another isssue is, that the directory %{_prefix}/lib/ikiwiki/plugins should be > probably created, to allow addon packages, that contain ikiwiki modules. Or > would the need the perl(RPC) dependency? Yes it would. This directory is for non-perl plugins ikiwiki talks to using xmlrpc, as far as I understood. As soon as there is perl(XML), I'm going to include that dir and probably the demo plugins. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 08:51:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 04:51:55 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_450527=5D_Review_Request=3A_libkni_-_C++_l?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ibrary_f=C3=BCr_the_Katana_robot_arm?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806160851.m5G8ptjB022593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libkni - C++ library f?r the Katana robot arm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-06-16 04:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I note the following from rpmlint: > > libkni-doc.x86_64: E: zero-length > /usr/share/doc/libkni-docs-3.9.2/html/Timer_8h__incl.map > libkni-doc.x86_64: E: zero-length > /usr/share/doc/libkni-docs-3.9.2/html/MathHelperFunctions_8h__incl.map > Any idea what these are? These are autogenerated by doxygen, and for some reasons it makes them zero bytes long. I still want to keep those just in case they are not zero-bytes in another release... > libkni-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation > libkni-examples.x86_64: W: no-documentation > libkni-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation > These are OK. > > There are a bunch of these: > libkni.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libKNI_LM.so.3.9.0 > _ZN7CKatana12waitForMotorEsiisi > libkni.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libKNI_LM.so.3.9.0 > _ZN8CKatBase7recvGMSEv > libkni.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libKNI_InvKin.so.3.9.0 > _ZN7CKatana14moveRobotToEncEN9__gnu_cxx17__normal_iteratorIPKiSt6vectorIiSaIiEEEES7_bii > libkni.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libKNI_InvKin.so.3.9.0 > _ZN8CKatBase7recvMPSEv > > Name mangling makes it a bit tough for me to understand what's going on here, > but something doesn't seem to be linked properly. How did you get these? If I rpmlint the main package everthing is quiet. I've also downloaded the x86_64 package from the mentioned scratch build and can't see anything. Are you on rawhide? I've checked that the very last symbol (CKatBase::recvMPS()), it is in the base lib. But the InvKin lib is not linked directly against the base lib, so maybe this is the problem. But before trying a fix I'd like to know how to produce these errors... > You probably want to s/f?r/for/ in the Summary. Indeed :-) > What is the KatanaNativeInterface-v3.9.2.exe file in the tarball? It seems to > be a complete waste of space. Agreed. I have contacted Neuronics about it (and sent them the patches). They told me basically that usual customers are dumb and would call support because they downloaded the very first file and then wondered where the Windoze drivers were... So they just do it to get rid of these calls. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 10:06:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 06:06:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449927] Review Request: imsettings - Delivery framework for general Input Method configuration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161006.m5GA660W025237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imsettings - Delivery framework for general Input Method configuration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449927 tagoh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2008-06-16 06:06 EST ------- Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 10:47:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 06:47:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451152] Review Request: ghc-hsql - Simple library for database access from Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161047.m5GAlMXN010146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hsql - Simple library for database access from Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451152 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |451394 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 10:50:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 06:50:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451152] Review Request: ghc-hsql - Simple library for database access from Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161050.m5GAo5xS010634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hsql - Simple library for database access from Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451152 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |451397 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 10:47:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 06:47:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451394] Review Request: ghc-hsql-mysql - MySQL driver for HSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161047.m5GAlLtX010121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hsql-mysql - MySQL driver for HSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451394 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |451152 Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-hsql- |hsql-mysql package |mysql - MySQL driver for | |HSQL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 10:50:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 06:50:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451397] Review Request: ghc-hsql-odbc - ODBC driver for HSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161050.m5GAo48b010609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hsql-odbc - ODBC driver for HSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451397 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |451152 Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-hsql- |hsql-odbc package |odbc - ODBC driver for HSQL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 10:51:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 06:51:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451152] Review Request: ghc-hsql - Simple library for database access from Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161051.m5GApvHO032299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hsql - Simple library for database access from Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451152 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |451398 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 10:53:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 06:53:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451152] Review Request: ghc-hsql - Simple library for database access from Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161053.m5GArtod032458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hsql - Simple library for database access from Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451152 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |451400 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 10:53:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 06:53:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451400] Review Request: ghc-hsql-sqlite3 - SQLite3 driver for HSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161053.m5GArtjG032434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hsql-sqlite3 - SQLite3 driver for HSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451400 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |451152 Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-hsql- |hsql-sqlite3 package |sqlite3 - SQLite3 driver for | |HSQL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 10:51:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 06:51:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451398] Review Request: ghc-hsql-postgresql - PostgreSQL driver for HSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161051.m5GApuNB032274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hsql-postgresql - PostgreSQL driver for HSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451398 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |451152 Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-hsql- |hsql-postgresql package |postgresql - PostgreSQL | |driver for HSQL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 10:56:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 06:56:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451410] Review Request: ghc-bzlib - Compression and decompression in the bzip2 format (package for GHC Haskell) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161056.m5GAu5QS011536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-bzlib - Compression and decompression in the bzip2 format (package for GHC Haskell) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451410 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-bzlib - |bzlib package |Compression and | |decompression in the bzip2 | |format (package for GHC | |Haskell) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 11:02:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:02:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451411] Review Request: ghc-Codec-Compression-LZF - LZF compression bindings for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161102.m5GB22gM001912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-Codec-Compression-LZF - LZF compression bindings for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451411 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-Codec- |Codec-Compression-LZF |Compression-LZF - LZF |package |compression bindings for GHC | |Haskell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 11:07:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:07:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451413] Review Request: ghc-compression - Common compression algorithms for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161107.m5GB7HT2013722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-compression - Common compression algorithms for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451413 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc- |compression package |compression - Common | |compression algorithms for | |GHC Haskell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 11:09:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:09:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451498] Review Request: ghc-Crypto - Misc Crypto support for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161109.m5GB9vcg003305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-Crypto - Misc Crypto support for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451498 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-Crypto - |Crypto package |Misc Crypto support for GHC | |Haskell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 11:11:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:11:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451499] Review Request: ghc-dataenc - Data encoding library for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161111.m5GBBHqs003864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-dataenc - Data encoding library for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451499 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-dataenc |dataenc package |- Data encoding library for | |GHC Haskell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 11:12:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:12:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451500] Review Request: ghc-encoding - A library for various character encodings for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161112.m5GBCdWo014704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-encoding - A library for various character encodings for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451500 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-encoding |encoding package |- A library for various | |character encodings for GHC | |Haskell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 11:14:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:14:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451501] Review Request: ghc-HCodecs - Library to read, write and manipulate MIDI, WAVE, and SoundFont2 files GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161114.m5GBECmR014806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-HCodecs - Library to read, write and manipulate MIDI, WAVE, and SoundFont2 files GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451501 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-HCodecs |HCodecs package |- Library to read, write and | |manipulate MIDI, WAVE, and | |SoundFont2 files GHC Haskell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 11:15:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:15:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451502] Review Request: ghc-hogg - Library and tools to manipulate the Ogg container format for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161115.m5GBFOet004628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hogg - Library and tools to manipulate the Ogg container format for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451502 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-hogg - |hogg package |Library and tools to | |manipulate the Ogg container | |format for GHC Haskell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 11:17:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:17:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451564] Review Request: ghc-mime - MIME library for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161117.m5GBHQQ5015490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-mime - MIME library for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451564 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-mime - |mime package |MIME library for GHC Haskell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 11:18:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:18:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451565] Review Request: ghc-base64-string - Base64 library for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161118.m5GBIwc8015673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-base64-string - Base64 library for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451565 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-base64- |base64-string package |string - Base64 library for | |GHC Haskell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 11:20:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:20:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451566] Review Request: ghc-iconv - String encoding conversion for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161120.m5GBKHtt005462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-iconv - String encoding conversion for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451566 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-iconv - |iconv package |String encoding conversion | |for GHC Haskell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 11:21:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:21:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451580] Review Request: ghc-nano-hmac - Bindings to OpenSSL HMAC for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161121.m5GBLkD2016362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-nano-hmac - Bindings to OpenSSL HMAC for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451580 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-nano- |nano-hmac package |hmac - Bindings to OpenSSL | |HMAC for GHC Haskell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 11:23:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:23:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451581] Review Request: ghc-nano-md5 - Efficient ByteString bindings to OpenSSL for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161123.m5GBN4Ht016505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-nano-md5 - Efficient ByteString bindings to OpenSSL for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451581 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-nano-md5 |nano-md5 package |- Efficient ByteString | |bindings to OpenSSL for GHC | |Haskell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 11:25:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:25:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451585] Review Request: ghc-omnicodec - Data encoding and decoding command line utilities for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161125.m5GBP6X3006272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-omnicodec - Data encoding and decoding command line utilities for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451585 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc- |omnicodec package |omnicodec - Data encoding | |and decoding command line | |utilities for GHC Haskell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 11:26:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:26:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451588] Review Request: ghc-unix-compat - Portable POSIX-compatibility layer for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161126.m5GBQgUH006496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-unix-compat - Portable POSIX-compatibility layer for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451588 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-unix- |unix-compat package |compat - Portable POSIX- | |compatibility layer for GHC | |Haskell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 11:28:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:28:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451588] Review Request: ghc-unix-compat - Portable POSIX-compatibility layer for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161128.m5GBSHZt017388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-unix-compat - Portable POSIX-compatibility layer for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451588 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |451589 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 11:28:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:28:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451589] Review Request: ghc-tar - Library for reading and writing TAR archives for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161128.m5GBSGkl017364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-tar - Library for reading and writing TAR archives for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451589 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |451588 Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-tar - |tar package |Library for reading and | |writing TAR archives for GHC | |Haskell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 11:31:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:31:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451594] Review Request: ghc-scc - Streaming component combinators for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161131.m5GBVJAn007404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-scc - Streaming component combinators for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451594 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-scc - |scc package |Streaming component | |combinators for GHC Haskell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 11:33:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:33:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451596] Review Request: ghc-hopenssl - FFI bindings to OpenSSL's EVP digest interface for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161133.m5GBXuUN007679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hopenssl - FFI bindings to OpenSSL's EVP digest interface for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451596 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-hopenssl |hopenssl package |- FFI bindings to OpenSSL's | |EVP digest interface for GHC | |Haskell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 11:29:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:29:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451590] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support for reading and writing UTF8 strings for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161129.m5GBTdJP006848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support for reading and writing UTF8 strings for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451590 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-utf8- |utf8-string package |string - Support for reading | |and writing UTF8 strings for | |GHC Haskell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 11:32:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:32:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451595] Review Request: ghc-category-extras - Various modules and constructs inspired by category theory for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161132.m5GBWhk6007538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-category-extras - Various modules and constructs inspired by category theory for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451595 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc- |category-extras package |category-extras - Various | |modules and constructs | |inspired by category theory | |for GHC Haskell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 11:35:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:35:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451597] Review Request: ghc-HsOpenSSL - (Part of) OpenSSL binding for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161135.m5GBZ8eB008215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-HsOpenSSL - (Part of) OpenSSL binding for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451597 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc- |HsOpenSSL package |HsOpenSSL - (Part of) | |OpenSSL binding for GHC | |Haskell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 11:36:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:36:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451600] Review Request: ghc-pkcs1 - RSA encryption with PKCS1 padding for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161136.m5GBaQbi018912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-pkcs1 - RSA encryption with PKCS1 padding for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451600 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-pkcs1 - |pkcs1 package |RSA encryption with PKCS1 | |padding for GHC Haskell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 11:37:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:37:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451601] Review Request: ghc-pureMD5 - MD5 implementations for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161137.m5GBbVlr019048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-pureMD5 - MD5 implementations for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451601 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-pureMD5 |pureMD5 package |- MD5 implementations for | |GHC Haskell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 11:39:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:39:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451602] Review Request: ghc-syb-with-class - Scrap Your Boilerplate With Class for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161139.m5GBd6FZ019213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-syb-with-class - Scrap Your Boilerplate With Class for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451602 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-syb- |syb-with-class package |with-class - Scrap Your | |Boilerplate With Class for | |GHC Haskell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 11:40:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:40:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451605] Review Request: ghc-uuid - Haskell bindings to libuuid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161140.m5GBe3FZ009089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-uuid - Haskell bindings to libuuid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451605 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-uuid - |uuid package |Haskell bindings to libuuid -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 12:59:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 08:59:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448311] Review Request: lostlabyrinth - Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161259.m5GCx5Ok024501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth - Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448311 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-06-16 08:59 EST ------- Good to go once elice shows up in rawhide and I can do a mock test. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 12:59:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 08:59:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451643] New: Review Request: libmusicbrainz3 - Library for accessing MusicBrainz servers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451643 Summary: Review Request: libmusicbrainz3 - Library for accessing MusicBrainz servers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/libmusicbrainz3/libmusicbrainz3.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/libmusicbrainz3/libmusicbrainz3-3.0.1-1.src.rpm Description: The MusicBrainz client library allows applications to make metadata lookup to a MusicBrainz server, generate signatures from WAV data and create CD Index Disk ids from audio CD roms. parallel-installable with libmusicbrainz v2, currently in fedora. dist-f10 scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=663548 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 13:03:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:03:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161303.m5GD33o3025667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 ------- Additional Comments From hedayat at grad.com 2008-06-16 09:03 EST ------- OK, It is confirmed by one of the upstream developers that these files are from nvidia SDK. And it seems that the license is free(?!) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 13:08:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:08:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451587] Review Request: sound-theme-freedesktop - the default sound theme for the X sound theming spec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161308.m5GD8tap026889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sound-theme-freedesktop - the default sound theme for the X sound theming spec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451587 ------- Additional Comments From lpoetter at redhat.com 2008-06-16 09:08 EST ------- Licenses are fixed now. spec and srpm are at the same place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 13:32:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:32:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451587] Review Request: sound-theme-freedesktop - the default sound theme for the X sound theming spec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161332.m5GDWgc7000301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sound-theme-freedesktop - the default sound theme for the X sound theming spec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451587 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-06-16 09:32 EST ------- Formal review: rpmlint is silent package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: ok license file: ok spec file language: American English spec file legibility: excellent upstream sources: ok buildable: yes ExcludeArch: n/a BuildRequires: ok locale handling: ok shared libs: ok relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok, but I notice that /usr/share/sounds seems to be owned by both alsa-utils and kde-filesystem. Might be worthwhile to move that to the filesystem package, now that it is needed by yet another package. Can you initiate that (ie file bugs) ? duplicate filenames: ok file permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: consistent content: permissible large docs: n/a %doc content: ok headers: n/a static libs: n/a pc files: n/a shared libs: n/a devel package: n/a libtool archives: n/a gui apps: n/a file ownership: ok utf8 filenames: ok Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 13:40:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:40:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451587] Review Request: sound-theme-freedesktop - the default sound theme for the X sound theming spec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161340.m5GDe2bN011052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sound-theme-freedesktop - the default sound theme for the X sound theming spec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451587 lpoetter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lpoetter at redhat.com 2008-06-16 09:40 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sound-theme-freedesktop Short Description: The default sound theme of the XDG sound theming spec Owners: lennart Branches: devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 14:15:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:15:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451655] Review Request: kdeplasmoids - Additional plasmoids for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161415.m5GEFsWb018062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeplasmoids - Additional plasmoids for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451655 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |451505 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 14:15:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:15:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451505] Review Request: phonon - Multimedia framework api In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161415.m5GEFsPE018082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phonon - Multimedia framework api https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451505 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |451655 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 14:15:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:15:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451655] New: Review Request: kdeplasmoids - Additional plasmoids for KDE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451655 Summary: Review Request: kdeplasmoids - Additional plasmoids for KDE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/kdeplasmoids/kdeplasmoids.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/kdeplasmoids/kdeplasmoids-4.0.82-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Additional plasmoids for KDE. Upstream renamed extragear-plasma -> kdeplasmoids No scratch build (yet), depends on kde-4.0.82, which requires phonon (pending review, bug #451505) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 14:20:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:20:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 409401] Review Request: extragear-plasma - Additional plasmoids for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161420.m5GEKMaO009865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: extragear-plasma - Additional plasmoids for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409401 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-06-16 10:20 EST ------- Reopening to reassign. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 14:20:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:20:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 409401] Review Request: extragear-plasma - Additional plasmoids for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161420.m5GEKs1a009991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: extragear-plasma - Additional plasmoids for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409401 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|fedora at deadbabylon.de |mmaslano at redhat.com Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-06-16 10:20 EST ------- Please keep review requests assigned to the reviewer, not the submitter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 14:28:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:28:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161428.m5GESQAA011128@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-16 10:28 EST ------- Would you show us the main(?) you actually received from the upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 14:32:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:32:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451505] Review Request: phonon - Multimedia framework api In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161432.m5GEWHKr011959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phonon - Multimedia framework api https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451505 lvillani at binaryhelix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lvillani at binaryhelix.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lvillani at binaryhelix.net 2008-06-16 10:32 EST ------- Package builds properly but: - The patch listed in the .spec file is not applied (and rpmlint warns about it) - phonon.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 4.2-0.1 4.2-0.1.20080614svn820634.fc9 Although it's not strictly required, documentation is missing from the -devel subpackage: - phonon-devel.i386: W: no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 15:31:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:31:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161531.m5GFVjjj022485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-16 11:31 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309512) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309512&action=view) Patch to fix dlopened module path Please don't fix config.h but fix configure{,in}. As I already wrote in comment 7, clibdir is defined in configure{,.in}. configure creates config.guess and config.guess creates config.h The attached patch should fix dlopen'ed module path issue on 64 bit machine. Also, to aviod autotool automated call, the following line is needed after applying the attached patch: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ touch -r configure aclocal.m4 Makefile.in stamp-h.in ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 15:41:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:41:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451302] Review Request: kopete-bonjour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161541.m5GFfK6A032732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kopete-bonjour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451302 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 15:42:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:42:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451302] Review Request: kopete-bonjour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161542.m5GFgJvu000431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kopete-bonjour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451302 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-06-16 11:42 EST ------- Can this be built against kdenetwork-4.1 or 4.0 or both? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 15:58:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:58:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196621] Review Request: perl-IO-Digest - Perl module to calculate digests while reading or writing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161558.m5GFwX2Y003298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Digest - Perl module to calculate digests while reading or writing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196621 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-16 11:58 EST ------- sorry about that... try now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 16:03:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:03:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448310] Review Request: elice - Elice is a PureBasic to c++ translator / compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161603.m5GG3UH8004637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elice - Elice is a PureBasic to c++ translator / compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448310 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-16 12:03 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 16:02:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:02:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448748] Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161602.m5GG2Q2Z004487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448748 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-06-16 12:02 EST ------- All the above addressed. Thanks for the massive amount of work! SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/cylindrix/cylindrix-1.0-2.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/cylindrix/cylindrix.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 16:02:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:02:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257701] Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161602.m5GG2RTI004517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257701 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-16 12:02 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 16:04:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:04:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450366] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Client - Easy way to perform multiple HTTP requests and process their results In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161604.m5GG4bP8004730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Client - Easy way to perform multiple HTTP requests and process their results Alias: pear-HTTP-Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450366 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-16 12:04 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 16:09:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:09:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450975] Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161609.m5GG95XW029187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450975 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-16 12:09 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 16:06:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:06:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450775] Review Request: perl-Panotools-Script - Panorama Tools scripting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161606.m5GG6wYi029047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Panotools-Script - Panorama Tools scripting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450775 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-16 12:06 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 16:10:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:10:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451012] Review Request: pspp - program for statistical analysis of sampled data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161610.m5GGAECE006109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pspp - program for statistical analysis of sampled data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451012 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-16 12:10 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 16:12:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:12:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451302] Review Request: kopete-bonjour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161612.m5GGC3qs029931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kopete-bonjour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451302 ------- Additional Comments From tejasdinkar at gmail.com 2008-06-16 12:12 EST ------- It builds with trunk so I'm sure that it'll be able to build with kdenetwork 4.1 as well. It uses mostly Qt APIs, and extends a few kopete classes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 16:11:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:11:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451120] Review Request: lua-lpeg - Parsing Expression Grammars for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161611.m5GGBXnr006438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-lpeg - Parsing Expression Grammars for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451120 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-16 12:11 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 16:18:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:18:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161618.m5GGIG7w007500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-16 12:18 EST ------- xmms-pulse-0.9.4-5.fc9.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 16:20:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:20:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451587] Review Request: sound-theme-freedesktop - the default sound theme for the X sound theming spec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161620.m5GGKUCv008068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sound-theme-freedesktop - the default sound theme for the X sound theming spec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451587 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-16 12:20 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 16:38:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:38:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 401101] Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161638.m5GGcXU7011317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=401101 ------- Additional Comments From livinded at deadbytes.net 2008-06-16 12:38 EST ------- I was wondering what the status was of this package. I created a spec and submitted it for review not knowing one already existed, and was wondering if this is still being worked on. If it is, what still needs to be done before it can be approved and if it's not could I take it over? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 17:10:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:10:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451142] Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161710.m5GHAKJj007526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451142 ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-16 13:10 EST ------- *bump* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 17:13:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:13:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225635] Merge Review: cairo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161713.m5GHDxoV007948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225635 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 17:15:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:15:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225875] Merge Review: gtksourceview In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161715.m5GHF7Md008463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gtksourceview https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225875 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rstrode at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-06-16 13:15 EST ------- stalled review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 17:16:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:16:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449251] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161716.m5GHGj2j008706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449251 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-06-16 13:16 EST ------- Test::Exception added as a BR. (Note, also filed upstream as http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=36339) Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=664106 SRPM URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication-0.10006-3.fc8.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 17:26:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:26:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161726.m5GHQ2iS019977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-16 13:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Would you show us the main(?) you actually received from the upstream? Would you show us the mail(?) ... sorry -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 17:22:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286851] Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161722.m5GHMCd4019356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286851 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2008-06-16 13:22 EST ------- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 17:29:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:29:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451681] New: Review Request: sk2py - Migrates Cadence Skill based PCells to Python PyCells Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451681 Summary: Review Request: sk2py - Migrates Cadence Skill based PCells to Python PyCells Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/sk2py.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/sk2py-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Sk2Py is an wxPython-based IDE which assists in the migration of Cadence Skill(tm)-based PCells to Python PyCells for use in all Open Access environments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 17:43:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:43:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451587] Review Request: sound-theme-freedesktop - the default sound theme for the X sound theming spec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161743.m5GHhmcx012976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sound-theme-freedesktop - the default sound theme for the X sound theming spec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451587 lpoetter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lpoetter at redhat.com 2008-06-16 13:43 EST ------- Imported to CVS and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 17:43:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:43:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226343] Merge Review: python-ldap (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161743.m5GHh794022700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: python-ldap (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226343 kylev at kylev.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kylev at kylev.com BugsThisDependsOn| |451684 ------- Additional Comments From kylev at kylev.com 2008-06-16 13:43 EST ------- I was going to start this review, but python-setuptools is broken slightly with (I think) the current Pyrex version. There's an incompatibility that the newer python-setuptools fixes. We'll need that to be able to review that or build this module with current (updated) Pyrex. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 18:05:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:05:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451681] Review Request: sk2py - Migrates Cadence Skill based PCells to Python PyCells In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161805.m5GI5bDr026708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sk2py - Migrates Cadence Skill based PCells to Python PyCells https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451681 thibault.north at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |thibault.north at gmail.com Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From thibault.north at gmail.com 2008-06-16 14:05 EST ------- - Output of rpmlint says that the sk2py.png permissions are wrong (0755). Should be 0644. - No licence in the source tree. Would be better to have, even if this is really under the GPLv2 licence. - -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 18:06:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:06:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450975] Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161806.m5GI6Num017129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcanberra - Portable Sound Event Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450975 lpoetter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lpoetter at redhat.com 2008-06-16 14:06 EST ------- Imported to CVS and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 18:07:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:07:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451681] Review Request: sk2py - Migrates Cadence Skill based PCells to Python PyCells In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161807.m5GI7hZt017221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sk2py - Migrates Cadence Skill based PCells to Python PyCells https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451681 thibault.north at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From thibault.north at gmail.com 2008-06-16 14:07 EST ------- Seems to work well here. Builds and runs without problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 18:08:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:08:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448748] Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161808.m5GI8fNc017275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448748 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-16 14:08 EST ------- Much better, but still needs a tiny bit of work: MUST FIX -------- * Don't install cylindrix.rc, cylindrix.dsp and cylindrix.ico, those are visual studio project files * When an icon is installed in the fdo icon hierarchy it should be named without extension in the .desktop file * Apply one more patch to fix writing of overal stats on non i386 machines (I'll start working on this now, so don't expect it to be attached immediately). SHOULD FIX ---------- * Change: 'make CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS"' to 'make CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -Wno-pointer-sign"' This way only the usefull warnings remain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 18:27:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:27:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161827.m5GIRReL030358@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-16 14:27 EST ------- If no one beats me, I will try to look at this package tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 18:29:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:29:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451693] New: Review Request: garmin-sync - Utility for syncing data from Garmin Edge/Forerunner devices Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451693 Summary: Review Request: garmin-sync - Utility for syncing data from Garmin Edge/Forerunner devices Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: katzj at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://katzj.fedorapeople.org/review/garmin-sync/garmin-sync.spec SRPM URL: http://katzj.fedorapeople.org/review/garmin-sync/garmin-sync-0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: garmin-sync allows you to download information from your Garmin Edge and Forerunner devices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 18:27:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451692] New: Review Request: pyusb - python bindings for libusb Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451692 Summary: Review Request: pyusb - python bindings for libusb Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: katzj at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://katzj.fedorapeople.org/review/pyusb/pyusb.spec SRPM URL: http://katzj.fedorapeople.org/review/pyusb/pyusb-0.4.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Python bindings to libusb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 18:30:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:30:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451681] Review Request: sk2py - Migrates Cadence Skill based PCells to Python PyCells In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161830.m5GIUoXP031011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sk2py - Migrates Cadence Skill based PCells to Python PyCells https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451681 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2008-06-16 14:30 EST ------- Why this package review is closed as a 'Not a bug' ? As for the minor rpmlint, I'll update/correct it once the package review is completed ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 18:30:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:30:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448748] Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161830.m5GIUVKS021202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448748 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-06-16 14:30 EST ------- Corrected VS files, icon extension, cflags. SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/cylindrix/cylindrix-1.0-3.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/cylindrix/cylindrix.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 18:30:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:30:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451692] Review Request: pyusb - python bindings for libusb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161830.m5GIUWYC021227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyusb - python bindings for libusb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451692 katzj at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |451693 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 18:30:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:30:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451693] Review Request: garmin-sync - Utility for syncing data from Garmin Edge/Forerunner devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161830.m5GIUVW4021176@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: garmin-sync - Utility for syncing data from Garmin Edge/Forerunner devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451693 katzj at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |451692 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 18:32:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:32:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161832.m5GIWqXw021461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 ------- Additional Comments From hedayat at grad.com 2008-06-16 14:32 EST ------- The mailing list archive in sourceforge.net is not visible for public. I can paste the mail content here (and my reply). : Subject: Re: [simspark-devel] NVidia files license?! Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 22:29:38 +0200 From: Markus Rollmann To: Hedayat Vatankhah CC: Simspark Devel ML References: <48556306.3010705 at aim.com> Hi, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: > A little question: please let me know about the license of the files at > lib/kerosin/sceneserver/helper/. > It seems that they are from NVidia SDK right? Yes these are from the NVDIA SDK [1]. > It would be nice if someone could send the information. I should clarify > their license status for my rcssserver3d package to be accepted in Fedora. I think the applicable license is found at [2]. The NVIDIA MeshMender is a helper tool for per pixel lightning that was part of the original fancy lighting implementation that is currently unused or commented out completely in the OpenGLServer. Therefore I think we could also remove the NVIDIA files from the CVS if necessary. cheers, Markus [1] http://developer.nvidia.com/object/NVMeshMender.html [2] http://developer.download.nvidia.com/licenses/general_license.txt ------------------------------------------------------------------------- My Reply: Subject: Re: [simspark-devel] NVidia files license?! Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:16:47 +0430 From: Hedayat Vatankhah To: Markus Rollmann CC: Simspark Devel ML References: <48556306.3010705 at aim.com> <48557BB2.2020802 at uni-koblenz.de> Hi Markus, Thanks for your answer. I've tried removing these files from server, but they are used by voidmeshimporter plug-in. Anyway, I think the license should be acceptable as a free license. It seems that voidmeshimporter is not used currently right?! So in the worst case I should be able to remove this plugin from the package (?). Thanks again, Hedayat Markus Rollmann wrote on 06/16/2008 12:59:38 AM: > Hi, > > Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: >> A little question: please let me know about the license of the files at lib/kerosin/sceneserver/helper/. >> It seems that they are from NVidia SDK right? > > Yes these are from the NVDIA SDK [1]. > >> It would be nice if someone could send the information. I should clarify their license status for my rcssserver3d package to be accepted in Fedora. > > I think the applicable license is found at [2]. > > The NVIDIA MeshMender is a helper tool for per pixel lightning that was part of the original fancy lighting implementation that is currently unused or commented out completely in the OpenGLServer. > > Therefore I think we could also remove the NVIDIA files from the CVS if necessary. > > cheers, > Markus > > [1] http://developer.nvidia.com/object/NVMeshMender.html > [2] http://developer.download.nvidia.com/licenses/general_license.txt > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 18:38:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:38:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451681] Review Request: sk2py - Migrates Cadence Skill based PCells to Python PyCells In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161838.m5GIcbAm022565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sk2py - Migrates Cadence Skill based PCells to Python PyCells https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451681 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2008-06-16 14:38 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sk2py Short Description: Migrates Cadence Skill based PCells to Python PyCells Owners: chitlesh Branches: F-8, F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: No -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 18:39:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:39:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451681] Review Request: sk2py - Migrates Cadence Skill based PCells to Python PyCells In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161839.m5GIdCIC032544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sk2py - Migrates Cadence Skill based PCells to Python PyCells https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451681 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 18:44:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:44:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451012] Review Request: pspp - program for statistical analysis of sampled data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161844.m5GIiXdL001036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pspp - program for statistical analysis of sampled data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451012 mcepl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2008-06-16 14:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > cvs done. Thanks. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=664341 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 19:06:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:06:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451505] Review Request: phonon - Multimedia framework api In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161906.m5GJ69Xp005749@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phonon - Multimedia framework api https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451505 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-06-16 15:06 EST ------- The patch could be applied unconditionally, seems to fix a problem when building on f9 with cmake-2.4. f10/cmake-2.6 is fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 19:09:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:09:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161909.m5GJ9oaH006087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-16 15:09 EST ------- For 4.12-3: * License - Well, actually I cannot understand why the upstream ships MIT license text... ------------------------------------------------------------ bg.c LGPLv2+ bg.h LGPLv2+ ev.c LGPLv2+ ev.h LGPLv2+ gtkbar.c LGPLv2+ gtkbar.h LGPLv2+ gtkbgbox.c LGPLv2+ gtkbgbox.h LGPLv2+ plugins/cpu.c GPLv2+ plugins/pager.c GPLv2+ systray/eggtraymanager.c LGPLv2+ systray/eggtraymanager.h LGPLv2+ systray/fixedtip.c GPLv2+ systray/fixedtip.h GPLv2+ ------------------------------------------------------------ I have not analysed how these codes are used/linked yet, however from a quick glance, the license tag must be ------------------------------------------------------------ Group: User Interface/Desktops # %%{_bindir}/fbpanel and almost all plugins are under LGPLv2+ # Some plugins (cpu.so, pager.so, tray.so) are under GPLv2+ License: LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+ URL: http://fbpanel.sourceforge.net ------------------------------------------------------------ * SourceURL http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge - Please follow above. * SOURCE2 - Write the full URL of SOURCE2, or write as a comment how you received Source2. * Redundant BuildRequires - gtk2-devel Requires atk-devel, pango-devel, cairo-devel so all these 3 BuildRequires are redundant. * Timestamp - When using "cp" or "install" commands, add "-p" option to keep timestamps on installed files, like ------------------------------------------------------------ install -p -m 0644 %{SOURCE2} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps ------------------------------------------------------------ - Also, as this package installs many image files and so on which are actually not modified during build, keeping timestamps on those files are also perferred. To do so, please consider to use below: ------------------------------------------------------------ sed -i.stamp -e 's|install -m|install -p -m|' \ Makefile */Makefile ------------------------------------------------------------ at %prep stage. * Debuginfo rpm missing - rpmlint complains about debuginfo rpm as below: ------------------------------------------------------------ fbpanel-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package ------------------------------------------------------------ debuginfo rpm is not created correctly. Several reasons are related to this. * Fedora specific compilation flags are not honored correctly. Check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#CompilerFlags ! To check if compiler flags are correctly honored, please make build log more verbosely. The outputs like ------------------------------------------------------------ 74 CC systray/eggtraymanager.o 75 DEP plugins/space.dep 76 DEP plugins/pager.dep 77 DEP plugins/launchbar.dep 78 CC systray/fixedtip.o 79 CC plugin.o 80 CC gtkbar.o ------------------------------------------------------------ is not useful. * Makefile "strip" binaries to be installed. /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh strips installed binaries correctly and Makefiles themselves must not strip binaries. * Installed plugin objects has 0644 permission. As these objects are dlopened so these should work, however as find-debuginfo.sh strips binaries only with executable permissions, on Fedora these must have 0755 permission. The following will fix these 4 issues (please check what these changes actually do) ------------------------------------------------------------- %prep %setup -q %patch -p1 -b .libdir sed -i.strip -e 's|strip|true strip|' \ Makefile */Makefile sed -i.stamp -e 's|install -m|install -p -m|' \ Makefile */Makefile %build ./configure --prefix=%{_prefix} --libdir=%{_lib} make \ %{?_smp_mflags} \ Q= \ CFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT make install PREFIX=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix} ....... ....... install -p -m 0644 %{SOURCE2} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/%{name} -name \*.so -print0 | \ xargs -0 chmod 0755 %clean ....... ------------------------------------------------------------- * /sbin/ldconfig call - Calling /sbin/ldconfig on scriptlets is not needed for this package as no "libraries" are installed under default ldconfig paths. * Icon cache update - As icons are installed under %_datadir/icons/hicolor, please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GTK.2B_icon_cache -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 19:13:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:13:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226138] Merge Review: metacity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161913.m5GJDCUi029960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: metacity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226138 ------- Additional Comments From sandmann at redhat.com 2008-06-16 15:13 EST ------- I am happy enough for someone to just go ahead and fix these things. I don't believe metacity has any ACL's. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 19:15:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:15:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446993] Review Request: liblicense - License for storing and retrieving license information in media files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161915.m5GJFA3Y007430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblicense - License for storing and retrieving license information in media files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446993 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dennis at ausil.us Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-16 15:15 EST ------- one last issue with the spec file you posted in irc liblicense.src: E: invalid-spec-name liblicense-0.7.0-3.spec please name the spec liblicense.spec and post here. things should then be ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 19:16:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:16:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446639] Review Request: gupnp - GUPnP is an framework for creating UPnP devices & control points In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161916.m5GJGNNW007689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gupnp - GUPnP is an framework for creating UPnP devices & control points https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446639 ------- Additional Comments From pbrobinson at gmail.com 2008-06-16 15:16 EST ------- Updated to the latest release. Spec URL: http://fedora.roving-it.com/rawhide/gupnp.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.roving-it.com/rawhide/gupnp-0.12-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 19:23:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:23:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448748] Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161923.m5GJNK4s008852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448748 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-16 15:23 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309525) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309525&action=view) cylindrix-1.0-arch-independ-file-write.patch More MUST FIX: -------------- * The "if [ ! -a ~/.cylindrix ]; then" line in cylindrix.sh should be if [ ! -d ~/.cylindrix ]; then Now it tries to create all the symlinks each time flooding the terminal with errors * gamedata should be copied and not symlinked, as it contains various files which are written More should fix: ---------------- * It would be better to at the end of cylindrix.sh, not use: 'cylindrix-bin' but instead use: exec cylindrix-bin "$@" The exec stops from a useless sh process hanging around and the "$@" passes any options passed to the script to the executable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 19:32:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:32:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448748] Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161932.m5GJWeGm010372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448748 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #309525|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-16 15:32 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309526) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309526&action=view) cylindrix-1.0-arch-independ-file-write.patch New version, which does not mess up the displaying of the filenames in the menu, please use this version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 19:38:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:38:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446993] Review Request: liblicense - License for storing and retrieving license information in media files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161938.m5GJc6as001918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblicense - License for storing and retrieving license information in media files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446993 ------- Additional Comments From redhat at asheesh.org 2008-06-16 15:38 EST ------- SRPM: http://labs.creativecommons.org/~paulproteus/liblicense/0.7.0-3/liblicense-0.7.0-3.src.rpm spec: http://labs.creativecommons.org/~paulproteus/liblicense/0.7.0-3/liblicense.spec The SRPM has the .spec embedded with the name, "liblicense.spec". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 19:36:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:36:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161936.m5GJaTo0001743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 ------- Additional Comments From nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com 2008-06-16 15:36 EST ------- Updated : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/trickle.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/trickle-1.07-3.fc9.src.rpm Package now contains Mamoru Tasaka's patch and provides a configuration example. [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint -i trickle-1.07-3.fc9.i386.rpm [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint -i trickle-debuginfo-1.07-3.fc9.i386.rpm [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint -i trickle-1.07-3.fc9.src.rpm [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ Rebuild under mock is OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 19:40:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:40:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444601] Review Request: pem - Pem is personal expenses manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161940.m5GJej1u011735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pem - Pem is personal expenses manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444601 kushaldas at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(kushaldas at gmail.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From kushaldas at gmail.com 2008-06-16 15:40 EST ------- Sorry for the delay. Rawhide build failed, other F9,F8,EPEL were successful http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=664148 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 19:47:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:47:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448748] Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161947.m5GJlSDJ012949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448748 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-06-16 15:47 EST ------- All addressed, with new patch. SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/cylindrix/cylindrix-1.0-4.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/cylindrix/cylindrix.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 19:51:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:51:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451505] Review Request: phonon - Multimedia framework api In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161951.m5GJpooR013804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phonon - Multimedia framework api https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451505 lvillani at binaryhelix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lvillani at binaryhelix.net 2008-06-16 15:51 EST ------- I don't see any MUST/blocker. The items listed above are just SHOULD/warnings so... Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 19:58:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:58:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359911] Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806161958.m5GJw9Na005508@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359911 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-06-16 15:58 EST ------- Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-views/drupal-views.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-views/drupal-views-6.x.2.0-0.beta4.fc9.src.rpm Updated for drupal 6.0, ready to review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 20:04:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:04:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359921] Review Request: drupal-cck - Allows you create and customize fields using a web browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162004.m5GK4YiH015974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-cck - Allows you create and customize fields using a web browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359921 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-06-16 16:04 EST ------- Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-cck/drupal-cck.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-cck/drupal-cck-6.x.2.0-0.beta.fc9.src.rpm Updated for Drupal 6.x, ready to review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 20:05:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:05:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448312] Review Request: lostlabyrinth-sounds - Lost Labyrinth sounds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162005.m5GK5uHI007361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth-sounds - Lost Labyrinth sounds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448312 Bug 448312 depends on bug 448310, which changed state. Bug 448310 Summary: Review Request: elice - Elice is a PureBasic to c++ translator / compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448310 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 20:04:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:04:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448748] Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162004.m5GK4w5Z006733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448748 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-16 16:04 EST ------- Perfect: approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 20:05:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:05:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448313] Review Request: lostlabyrinth-graphics - Lost Labyrinth graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162005.m5GK5td0007315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth-graphics - Lost Labyrinth graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448313 Bug 448313 depends on bug 448310, which changed state. Bug 448310 Summary: Review Request: elice - Elice is a PureBasic to c++ translator / compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448310 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 20:05:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:05:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448311] Review Request: lostlabyrinth - Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162005.m5GK5tKU007340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth - Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448311 Bug 448311 depends on bug 448310, which changed state. Bug 448310 Summary: Review Request: elice - Elice is a PureBasic to c++ translator / compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448310 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 20:05:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:05:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448310] Review Request: elice - Elice is a PureBasic to c++ translator / compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162005.m5GK5sXJ007290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elice - Elice is a PureBasic to c++ translator / compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448310 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-16 16:05 EST ------- Imported and build. For F-8 and F-9 ?'ve requested tagging into the buildroot-verride tag, once lostlabyrinth is build I will push an elice update together with lostlaby. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 20:06:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:06:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448310] Review Request: elice - Elice is a PureBasic to c++ translator / compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162006.m5GK6OJw016598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elice - Elice is a PureBasic to c++ translator / compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448310 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-16 16:06 EST ------- p.s. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 20:07:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:07:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359931] Review Request: drupal-date - This package contains both the Date module and a Date API module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162007.m5GK7eBH016756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-date - This package contains both the Date module and a Date API module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359931 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-06-16 16:07 EST ------- Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-date/drupal-date.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-date/drupal-date-6.x.2.0-0.beta3.fc9.src.rpm Updated for Drupal 6.x, ready to review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 20:09:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:09:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451505] Review Request: phonon - Multimedia framework api In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162009.m5GK9k8K016889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phonon - Multimedia framework api https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451505 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-06-16 16:09 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: phonon Short Description: Multimedia framework api Owners: rdieter Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 20:12:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:12:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359941] Review Request: drupal-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162012.m5GKC2TN008335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359941 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-06-16 16:12 EST ------- Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-calendar/drupal-calendar.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-calendar/drupal-calendar-6.x.2.0-0.beta3.fc9.src.rpm Updated for Drupal 6.x, ready for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 20:13:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:13:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443469] Review Request: pytrainer - A tool to log all your sport excursions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162013.m5GKDSpJ008644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pytrainer - A tool to log all your sport excursions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443469 ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2008-06-16 16:13 EST ------- Okay, doing some playing today with this in rawhide and I get things to work properly with $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9pre/ MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9pre/ python ./pytrainer.py And without the patch that's in the package. The license looks like the big thing to get to the bottom of and then we should be able to get this in. And then I can write the plugin to have it use the garmin-sync stuff I just submitted for review to sync all of the data off of a Garmin Edge or Forerunner :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 20:15:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:15:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445027] Review Request: dnrd - A caching, forwarding DNS proxy server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162015.m5GKFdpO018410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnrd - A caching, forwarding DNS proxy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445027 ------- Additional Comments From rakesh.pandit at gmail.com 2008-06-16 16:15 EST ------- >or you can use > sed -i 's/\r//' COPYING >instead which has no dependencies. Done. > make install INSTALL="install -p" DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT >works fine and is less typing, although to be honest I don't actually see any >dfference when I change that to: > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT >Perhaps I'm missing something. Done (make install INSTALL="install -p" DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT) As http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps using 'install -p' saves files' timestamps. Dnrd has to be used with command line arguments, it does not have any configuration files as such now. It just uses master and blacklist files for master DNS and blocking respectively. There are only few values like cache marks, or DNRD chroot directory which are configurable. No configuration file is supported right now. New SPEC: http://rakesh.gnulinuxcentar.org/dnrd.spec New SRPM: http://rakesh.gnulinuxcentar.org/dnrd-2.20.3-1.fc8.src.rpm > expect package would provide that directory (/etc/dnrd/) Done -- Rakesh Pandit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 20:15:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:15:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359961] Review Request: drupal-service_links - Enables admins to add links to a number of sites In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162015.m5GKFF2a009346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-service_links - Enables admins to add links to a number of sites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359961 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-06-16 16:15 EST ------- Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-service_links/drupal-service_links.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-service_links/drupal-service_links-6.x.1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Updated for drupal 6.x, ready to review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 20:18:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:18:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448748] Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162018.m5GKIfA7009651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448748 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-06-16 16:18 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cylindrix Short Description: 3 degrees of freedom combat game Owners: limb Branches: devel F-9 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 20:36:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:36:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237332] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162036.m5GKaImj022129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237332 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2008-06-16 16:36 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 20:35:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:35:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237331] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162035.m5GKZWGZ021932@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237331 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2008-06-16 16:35 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 20:37:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:37:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237334] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162037.m5GKbQnw022335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237334 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 20:36:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:36:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237334] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162036.m5GKasDw022278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237334 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2008-06-16 16:36 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 20:42:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446993] Review Request: liblicense - License for storing and retrieving license information in media files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162042.m5GKgDZI023197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblicense - License for storing and retrieving license information in media files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446993 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-16 16:42 EST ------- Looks good, now. builds cleanly. Approved please follow the cvs procedure https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSAdminProcedure and apply for cvsextras in the accounts system and i will sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 20:47:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:47:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451505] Review Request: phonon - Multimedia framework api In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162047.m5GKl0pg014971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phonon - Multimedia framework api https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451505 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-16 16:46 EST ------- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 20:48:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:48:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448748] Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162048.m5GKmVMM024180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448748 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-16 16:48 EST ------- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 20:53:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:53:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237334] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162053.m5GKrK4g016113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237334 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-16 16:53 EST ------- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 20:52:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:52:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237331] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162052.m5GKq1eM015983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237331 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-16 16:52 EST ------- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 20:50:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:50:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451681] Review Request: sk2py - Migrates Cadence Skill based PCells to Python PyCells In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162050.m5GKoDiI015696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sk2py - Migrates Cadence Skill based PCells to Python PyCells https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451681 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-16 16:50 EST ------- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 20:52:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:52:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237332] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162052.m5GKqj5D025053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237332 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-16 16:52 EST ------- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 21:28:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:28:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448717] Review Request: gnome-rdp - rdesktop front end In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162128.m5GLSnZx022384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-rdp - rdesktop front end https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448717 ------- Additional Comments From janderson at eragen.com 2008-06-16 17:28 EST ------- Added macros to %files section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 21:27:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:27:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450775] Review Request: perl-Panotools-Script - Panorama Tools scripting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162127.m5GLRYFG022268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Panotools-Script - Panorama Tools scripting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450775 bruno at postle.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 21:29:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:29:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441415] Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162129.m5GLTMAn022418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441415 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 21:29:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:29:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441411] Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162129.m5GLTACX031287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441411 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-16 17:29 EST ------- Sponsored, approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 21:34:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:34:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162134.m5GLYPYj023470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-06-16 17:34 EST ------- Works perfectly for me in F7/x86_64, C5.2/x86_64 and C4/x86_64 (using libevent from epel), rpmlint has no complains. Nicoleau, could you please consider bilding this package in EPEL, too ? I'll be glad to [co-]maintain it for EPEL [together with you, or even alone if you are not interested in EPEL). Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 21:46:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:46:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162146.m5GLknDZ002208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 ------- Additional Comments From nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com 2008-06-16 17:46 EST ------- manuel wolfshant, thanks for your comment. trickle seems working fine, but I don't know if the package can be considered as finished (It could be great to have an init file for trickled). As I said in my First comment, It's my third package (actually I have 5 packages in review) and still need a sponsor. I'm quite "new" in packaging, but I'm very intersting in packagin trickle for EPEL (I'm CentOS) user too. So I'm okay to build it for EPEL with you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 21:54:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:54:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 401101] Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162154.m5GLsmDq027030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=401101 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-06-16 17:54 EST ------- Looks like no one ever reviewed it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 22:07:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:07:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441411] Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162207.m5GM7Mdq029721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441411 bochecha at no-log.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bochecha at no-log.org 2008-06-16 18:07 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: adonthell Short Description: A 2D graphical RPG game Owners: bochecha Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 22:23:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:23:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435835] Review Request: perl-RPC-XML - Set of classes for core data, message and XML handling In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162223.m5GMNCRW032404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPC-XML - Set of classes for core data, message and XML handling Alias: perl-RPC-XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435835 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2008-06-16 18:23 EST ------- two minor issues: - imho you should add "-p" to the %{__cp} of Source1 to preserve the timestamp - You should add README.license to %doc of the main package, otherwise there is no need to cp it ;-) maybe one major issue: - I guess you need to add the testsuite to %check in the spec, but I do not really know anything, because I did not read anything about testsuites in any Fedora guideline, but only in some reviews that there was no need for %check, because there was no testsuite. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 22:33:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:33:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441415] Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162233.m5GMXmW6010022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441415 bochecha at no-log.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bochecha at no-log.org 2008-06-16 18:33 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wastesedge Short Description: Official game package for Adonthell Owners: bochecha Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 23:36:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:36:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451692] Review Request: pyusb - python bindings for libusb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162336.m5GNaA7C011966@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyusb - python bindings for libusb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451692 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 23:46:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:46:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451692] Review Request: pyusb - python bindings for libusb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162346.m5GNksde013598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyusb - python bindings for libusb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451692 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2008-06-16 19:46 EST ------- MD5Sum: 9576c3e471e40e021fa44f36712bbd04 pyusb-0.4.1.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Valid license tag * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Files have appropriate permissions and owners * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly Minor (Non-blocker): * rpmlint produces the following error, which should be pretty easy to fix: pyusb.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/pyusb-0.4.1/README +1 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 16 23:49:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:49:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451693] Review Request: garmin-sync - Utility for syncing data from Garmin Edge/Forerunner devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806162349.m5GNnq2Z013859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: garmin-sync - Utility for syncing data from Garmin Edge/Forerunner devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451693 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 00:07:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:07:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451693] Review Request: garmin-sync - Utility for syncing data from Garmin Edge/Forerunner devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170007.m5H07xNs025492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: garmin-sync - Utility for syncing data from Garmin Edge/Forerunner devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451693 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2008-06-16 20:07 EST ------- MD5Sum: 230074f770e02c91875bf372363f9853 garmin-sync-0.3.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Valid license tag * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Files have appropriate permissions and owners * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly * rpmlint produces no errors or warnings. Note: I don't have a Garmin GPS unit, so I'm unable to verify that it works correctly, but from a packaging standpoint it's fine. +1 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 00:10:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:10:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451643] Review Request: libmusicbrainz3 - Library for accessing MusicBrainz servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170010.m5H0AnoL017752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmusicbrainz3 - Library for accessing MusicBrainz servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451643 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 00:14:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:14:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447844] Review Request: krazy2 - KDE code checking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170014.m5H0EQmb026433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: krazy2 - KDE code checking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447844 ------- Additional Comments From mathstuf at gmail.com 2008-06-16 20:14 EST ------- The spec and SRPM have been relocated: http://www.hypersonicosft.org/temp/krazy2-1.11-1.fc9.src.rpm http://www.hypersonicsoft.org/temp/krazy2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 00:36:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:36:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448661] Review Request: u-boot-tools - contains mkimage a tool to create kernel bootable images for u-boot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170036.m5H0a98X021625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: u-boot-tools - contains mkimage a tool to create kernel bootable images for u-boot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448661 jwboyer at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 00:34:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:34:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451643] Review Request: libmusicbrainz3 - Library for accessing MusicBrainz servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170034.m5H0YhhR021104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmusicbrainz3 - Library for accessing MusicBrainz servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451643 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2008-06-16 20:34 EST ------- MD5Sum: d42110ae548dae1eea73e83b03a1a936 libmusicbrainz-3.0.1.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Valid license tag * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * Make succeeds even when %{_smp_mflags} is defined * Files have appropriate permissions and owners * Rpmlint produces only the following warning, which can be safely ignored: libmusicbrainz3-devel.i386: W: no-documentation * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly Bad: * Missing BR on libdiscid-devel. * It looks like your missing a requires on neon-devel & libdiscid-devel for the devel subpackage. Please verify if this is correct before importing into cvs. Minor (Non-blocker): * I noticed there are some tests in the tarball, which might be worthwhile to run in the building process w/make check. +1 APPROVED, once bad items are looked at. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 00:49:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:49:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451406] Review Request: python-tempita - A very small text templating language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170049.m5H0n7uA023470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tempita - A very small text templating language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451406 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 00:47:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:47:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451692] Review Request: pyusb - python bindings for libusb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170047.m5H0lWuB032075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyusb - python bindings for libusb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451692 katzj at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2008-06-16 20:47 EST ------- Will fix up on import; thanks for the quick review New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pyusb Short Description: Python bindings for libusb Owners: katzj Branches: devel F-9 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 00:49:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:49:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451693] Review Request: garmin-sync - Utility for syncing data from Garmin Edge/Forerunner devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170049.m5H0n14c032190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: garmin-sync - Utility for syncing data from Garmin Edge/Forerunner devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451693 katzj at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2008-06-16 20:49 EST ------- Thanks for the quick review -- function seems okay in some basic testing, although there's definitely room for it to be nicer New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: garmin-sync Short Description: Download data from Garmin fitness computers Owners: katzj Branches: devel F-9 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 01:01:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451406] Review Request: python-tempita - A very small text templating language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170101.m5H11VJU025919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tempita - A very small text templating language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451406 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2008-06-16 21:01 EST ------- MD5Sum: 9097cf47905489af1f16b5a2d8025369 Tempita-0.2.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Files have appropriate permissions and owners * Rpmlint does not find problems * Builds fine in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=664932 * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly +1 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 01:05:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:05:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451505] Review Request: phonon - Multimedia framework api In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170105.m5H15NNS026730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phonon - Multimedia framework api https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451505 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-06-16 21:05 EST ------- imported, built for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 01:05:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:05:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451655] Review Request: kdeplasmoids - Additional plasmoids for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170105.m5H15OW8026750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeplasmoids - Additional plasmoids for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451655 Bug 451655 depends on bug 451505, which changed state. Bug 451505 Summary: Review Request: phonon - Multimedia framework api https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451505 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 01:04:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:04:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451643] Review Request: libmusicbrainz3 - Library for accessing MusicBrainz servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170104.m5H14Yqk026230@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmusicbrainz3 - Library for accessing MusicBrainz servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451643 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-06-16 21:04 EST ------- Thanks, I'll verify those items you id'd before building. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libmusicbrainz3 Short Description: Library for accessing MusicBrainz servers Owners: rdieter Branches: F-9 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes (any interested comaintainers welcome) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 01:06:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:06:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445224] Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170106.m5H16b2s026830@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445224 jwboyer at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jwboyer at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at gmail.com 2008-06-16 21:06 EST ------- source files match upstream: ab74f8ed90b8ba9a1d3904892622fc80 (tarball matches tarball found in upstream SRPM) specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. dist tag is present. build root is correct license field matches the actual license. (though itrace.c has GPL v2.1 listed, which doesn't exist. That should probably be fixed upstream) license is open source-compatible. license text not included upstream. latest version is being packaged. BuildRequires are proper. compiler flags are appropriate. %clean is present. rpmlint is silent. owns the directories it creates. doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. no duplicates in %files. file permissions are appropriate. no scriptlets present. code, not content. documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. no headers. no pkgconfig files. no libtool .la droppings. Needs fixing: package meets naming and versioning guidelines. package builds in mock: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=664952&name=build.log package installs properly. (couldn't check) debuginfo package looks complete. (couldn't check) final provides and requires are sane (couldn't check) if shared libraries are present, make sure ldconfig is run -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 01:17:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:17:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451408] Review Request: python-wsgiproxy - HTTP proxying tools for WSGI apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170117.m5H1H0XL006241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-wsgiproxy - HTTP proxying tools for WSGI apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451408 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 01:19:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:19:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451406] Review Request: python-tempita - A very small text templating language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170119.m5H1JTYc006865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tempita - A very small text templating language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451406 rickyz at cmu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rickyz at cmu.edu 2008-06-16 21:19 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-tempita Short Description: A very small text templating language Owners: ricky Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 01:32:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:32:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451408] Review Request: python-wsgiproxy - HTTP proxying tools for WSGI apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170132.m5H1WPc4010973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-wsgiproxy - HTTP proxying tools for WSGI apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451408 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2008-06-16 21:32 EST ------- MD5Sum: f1d6cb20b6a1a9991fc2da4cc3e7f2e8 WSGIProxy-0.1.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Valid license tag. * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Files have appropriate permissions and owners * Rpmlint produces no errors or warnings. * Package builds fine. * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly +1 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 01:47:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:47:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451741] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-HDBC package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451741 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-HDBC package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/HDBC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.10 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/haskelldb/0.10/haskelldb-0.10.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-16 21:47 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309561) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309561&action=view) ghc-HDBC-1.1.4-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 01:50:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:50:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448661] Review Request: u-boot-tools - contains mkimage a tool to create kernel bootable images for u-boot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170150.m5H1ohb3017061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: u-boot-tools - contains mkimage a tool to create kernel bootable images for u-boot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448661 jwboyer at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jwboyer at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at gmail.com 2008-06-16 21:50 EST ------- source files match upstream: 6ee26954bb548ad90392cd329ab5cc4c package meets naming and versioning guidelines. specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. dist tag is present. license field matches the actual license. license is open source-compatible. license text included in package. latest version is being packaged. BuildRequires are proper. compiler flags are appropriate. %clean is present. package builds in mock. package installs properly. debuginfo package looks complete. rpmlint is silent. final provides and requires are sane no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. no duplicates in %files. file permissions are appropriate. no scriptlets present. code, not content. documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. no headers. no pkgconfig files. no libtool .la droppings. Needs fixing: build root is correct. (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) is the recommended value, but not the only one) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 01:54:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:54:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451408] Review Request: python-wsgiproxy - HTTP proxying tools for WSGI apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170154.m5H1s2sL008712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-wsgiproxy - HTTP proxying tools for WSGI apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451408 rickyz at cmu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rickyz at cmu.edu 2008-06-16 21:54 EST ------- Thanks again! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-wsgiproxy Short Description: HTTP proxying tools for WSGI apps Owners: ricky Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 01:54:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451743] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-HDBC-odbc package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451743 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-HDBC-odbc package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/HDBC-odbc OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.1.1.4.4 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/HDBC-odbc/1.1.4.4/HDBC-odbc-1.1.4.4.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-16 21:54 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309563) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309563&action=view) ghc-HDBC-odbc-1.1.4.4-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 01:55:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:55:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451744] New: Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 Summary: Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: juanucleus at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com This is my first package submitted for review. I am looking for a sponsor. Spec URL: http://www.jlab.org/~cornejo/fedora/root/root.spec SRPM URL: http://www.jlab.org/~cornejo/fedora/root/root-5.19.04-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The ROOT system provides a set of OO frameworks with all the functionality needed to handle and analyse large amounts of data in a very efficient way. Having the data defined as a set of objects, specialised storage methods are used to get direct access to the separate attributes of the selected objects, without having to touch the bulk of the data. Included are histograming methods in 1, 2 and 3 dimensions, curve fitting, function evaluation, minimisation, graphics and visualization classes to allow the easy setup of an analysis system that can query and process the data interactively or in batch mode. Thanks to the builtin CINT C++ interpreter the command language, the scripting, or macro, language and the programming language are all C++. The interpreter allows for fast prototyping of the macros since it removes the time consuming compile/link cycle. It also provides a good environment to learn C++. If more performance is needed the interactively developed macros can be compiled using a C++ compiler. The system has been designed in such a way that it can query its databases in parallel on MPP machines or on clusters of workstations or high-end PC's. ROOT is an open system that can be dynamically extended by linking external libraries. This makes ROOT a premier platform on which to build data acquisition, simulation and data analysis systems. After running rpmlint on the 3 main package ( source, main, and devel), both source and the main package produced no output, and devel produced these warnings: root-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation root-devel.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/root/cint/include/stdcxxfunc.dll root-devel.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/root/cint/include/stdfunc.dll root-devel.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/root/cint/include/posix.dll root-devel.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/root/cint/include/ipc.dll root-devel.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/root/cint/stl/list.dll root-devel.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/root/cint/stl/exception.dll root-devel.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/root/cint/stl/vectorbool.dll root-devel.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/root/cint/stl/queue.dll root-devel.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/root/cint/stl/climits.dll root-devel.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/root/cint/stl/multimap.dll root-devel.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/root/cint/stl/stdexcept.dll root-devel.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/root/cint/stl/complex.dll root-devel.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/root/cint/stl/stack.dll root-devel.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/root/cint/stl/valarray.dll root-devel.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/root/cint/stl/multiset.dll root-devel.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/root/cint/stl/set.dll root-devel.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/root/cint/stl/map.dll root-devel.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/root/cint/stl/multimap2.dll root-devel.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/root/cint/stl/vector.dll root-devel.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/root/cint/stl/deque.dll root-devel.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/root/cint/stl/map2.dll root-devel.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/root/cint/lib/posix/mktypes Some issues: 1) The name is very generic, simply called root in upstream. I understand that system administrators may be weary of installing and running a program called root. Specially since it includes 3 daemons: rootd, xrootd, and prootd, which a system admin might not like seeing running. Name can be changed, and I am open to suggestions. 2) One of the included features of ROOT is the internal C/C++ interpreter called CINT. CINT uses, as shared libraries, DLL's. As of now I do not understand why, but these produce the majority of the warnings in rpmlint. From the packaging mailing list two suggestions were brought up: a) Change the stripping script so that it includes files ending in .dll b) Change CINT so that it can read .so files, even dll.so similar to how wine handle's DLL's. 3) Based on my experience from running and using ROOT, I strongly suspect that CINT requires the .h files to function properly. I recall receiving a lot of errors when these were not present, particularly when I was forced to compile the code inside of root to get templates to work. So ideally, one will also need to install the -devel package along with the main package. If I include it, it produces an error in rpmlint. I have to admit, that I don't know how to approach this problem. 4) Not an issue, but I will mention it upfront. Upstream includes the MS TrueType fonts and some binary dll files, which I've removed and documented. It is from my experience that Fedora already includes the necessary fonts to properly display any GUI that root produces. 5) The main component of ROOT is terminal based, though, during use various GUIs do pop up. One is also free to code in GUI using the ROOT API. Does this constitute as a GUI and as such a proper .desktop file must be written and included? 6) This is almost a plain ROOT build, missing most of the extra plug-ins that ROOT includes. One of the main features I guess are the Qt bindings, as well as the MySQL drivers. I will be more than happy to include these, and encourage their inclusion. I was just eager to get, at the very least, a fully working copy of ROOT into Fedora. Though, if the review goes well, I will look into properly packaging and including all plug-in components. Thank you all for your time. I hope that ROOT may be made fit for inclusion in Fedora, and that it may be helpful for others. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 02:03:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:03:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448661] Review Request: u-boot-tools - contains mkimage a tool to create kernel bootable images for u-boot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170203.m5H23N0e012390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: u-boot-tools - contains mkimage a tool to create kernel bootable images for u-boot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448661 ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at gmail.com 2008-06-16 22:03 EST ------- A couple comments that are pretty minor: - The way the package is done at the moment, it doesn't enable use of mkimage for cross building. Overall, that isn't a big deal as Fedora doesn't have in-distro cross compilers but if some show up it might be a good idea to see if we can provide that. - This will fail on sparc, s390, MIPS, ia64, or ARM. Those aren't currently official secondary arches for Fedora, however work is on-going for all those at the moment. It might be good to eventually have ExcludeArch directives for them (or work with the secondary architecture teams to enable building there). Aside from the minor buildroot issue, I don't see anything that would prevent this package from being approved. Be sure to apply for cvs_extras in the Fedora Accounts System so that you can be sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 02:57:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:57:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451749] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-HDBC-postgresql package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451749 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-HDBC-postgresql package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/HDBC-sqlite3 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.1.1.4.0 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/HDBC-sqlite3/1.1.4.0/HDBC-sqlite3-1.1.4.0.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 3. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-16 22:57 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309564) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309564&action=view) ghc-HDBC-sqlite3-1.1.4.0-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 03:25:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 23:25:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451751] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-greencard package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451751 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-greencard package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/greencard OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 3.0.1 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/greencard/3.0.1/greencard-3.0.1.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 4. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-16 23:25 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309565) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309565&action=view) ghc-greencard-3.0.1-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 03:42:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 23:42:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451752] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-curl package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451752 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-curl package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/curl OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.3.2 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/curl/1.3.2/curl-1.3.2.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 4. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-16 23:42 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309566) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309566&action=view) ghc-curl-1.3.2-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 03:53:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 23:53:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447429] Review Request: matchbox-keyboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170353.m5H3r6vO018559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: matchbox-keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447429 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-06-16 23:53 EST ------- It has been built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 05:20:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 01:20:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444952] Review Request: tlock - terminal lock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170520.m5H5KGJu022559@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tlock - terminal lock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444952 ------- Additional Comments From pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in 2008-06-17 01:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #31) > Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" page again. Hey, thank you so much. I'll do that. :) Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 05:22:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 01:22:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450850] Review Request: move - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170522.m5H5MkYT022828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: move - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450850 ------- Additional Comments From pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in 2008-06-17 01:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > It is too generic. Many programs can do the same than yours, none should > be called move, except if there is a standard endorsing the name. What name would you suggest? Trash?? $ trash -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 06:47:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 02:47:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445027] Review Request: dnrd - A caching, forwarding DNS proxy server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170647.m5H6l4DA003528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnrd - A caching, forwarding DNS proxy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445027 ------- Additional Comments From rakesh.pandit at gmail.com 2008-06-17 02:47 EST ------- dnrd does not resolve dns lookups. It only forwards the requests to an upstream server. So, we cannot have a default config for dnrd. User needs to set up upstream DNS server from ISP. Yes it should have init.d script as it is a daemon I will get one init.d script in package ASAP -- Rakesh Pandit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 07:22:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 03:22:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450850] Review Request: move - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170722.m5H7MUsx009674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: move - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450850 ------- Additional Comments From lokthare at gmail.com 2008-06-17 03:22 EST ------- > What name would you suggest? Trash?? > > $ trash > I have a package (not yet reviewed) that already use $ trash See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122448122 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 07:46:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 03:46:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444601] Review Request: pem - Pem is personal expenses manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170746.m5H7kJQF024032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pem - Pem is personal expenses manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444601 ------- Additional Comments From pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in 2008-06-17 03:46 EST ------- > Rawhide build failed, other F9,F8,EPEL were successful Hey, please check out the latest release of Pem-0.7.2 at: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/pem-0.7.2.tar.gz I've fixed the info dir entry problem. Please let me know in case of any other issues. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 08:22:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 04:22:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450850] Review Request: move - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170822.m5H8Misn031496@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: move - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450850 ------- Additional Comments From pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in 2008-06-17 04:22 EST ------- > I have a package (not yet reviewed) that already use > $ trash Gawd...will ptrash do? I cann't believe I'm haggling for a name now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 08:25:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 04:25:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451741] Review Request: ghc-HDBC - Haskell Database Connectivity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170825.m5H8P8UB021390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-HDBC - Haskell Database Connectivity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451741 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-HDBC - |HDBC package |Haskell Database | |Connectivity ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2008-06-17 04:25 EST ------- You really need to start addressing the issues raised in Bug #451413 before submitting any more of these packages or you're just going to find they all get closed summarily. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 08:29:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 04:29:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451743] Review Request: ghc-HDBC-odbc - ODBC driver for HDBC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170829.m5H8Tv2v021911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-HDBC-odbc - ODBC driver for HDBC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451743 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-HDBC- |HDBC-odbc package |odbc - ODBC driver for HDBC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 08:33:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 04:33:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451752] Review Request: ghc-curl - Haskell binding to libcurl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170833.m5H8XVxE022669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-curl - Haskell binding to libcurl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451752 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-curl - |curl package |Haskell binding to libcurl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 08:31:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 04:31:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451749] Review Request: ghc-HDBC-postgresql - Sqlite v3 driver for HDBC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170831.m5H8VR9V022493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-HDBC-postgresql - Sqlite v3 driver for HDBC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451749 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-HDBC- |HDBC-postgresql package |postgresql - Sqlite v3 | |driver for HDBC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 08:32:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 04:32:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451751] Review Request: ghc-greencard - A foreign function interface pre-processor for Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170832.m5H8WaNA000717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-greencard - A foreign function interface pre-processor for Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451751 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc- |greencard package |greencard - A foreign | |function interface pre- | |processor for Haskell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 09:37:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:37:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447457] Review Request: gupnp-av - UPnP-AV is a collection of helpers for building AV upnp apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170937.m5H9bjPU014010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gupnp-av - UPnP-AV is a collection of helpers for building AV upnp apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447457 ------- Additional Comments From pbrobinson at gmail.com 2008-06-17 05:37 EST ------- New SRPM. Spec file is the same location SRPM: http://fedora.roving-it.com/rawhide/gupnp-av-0.2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 09:42:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:42:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447456] Review Request: gupnp-tools: a collection of dev tools utilising GUPnP and GTK+ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170942.m5H9g8KE004294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gupnp-tools: a collection of dev tools utilising GUPnP and GTK+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447456 ------- Additional Comments From pbrobinson at gmail.com 2008-06-17 05:42 EST ------- New version, new srpm. Spec is the same location SRPM URL: http://fedora.roving-it.com/rawhide/gupnp-tools-0.6-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 09:40:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:40:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451752] Review Request: ghc-curl - Haskell binding to libcurl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170940.m5H9eXou004108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-curl - Haskell binding to libcurl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451752 balbir at linux.vnet.ibm.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |balbir at linux.vnet.ibm.com ------- Additional Comments From balbir at linux.vnet.ibm.com 2008-06-17 05:40 EST ------- Please check the process https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines. You need to bundle the SPEC file and the SRPM for review. I see the SPEC file, please also point us to the source RPM. Other things to take care of "Ensure you run rpmlint before uploading the source RPM" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 09:49:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451768] New: go-home-applet: applet for gnome Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451768 Summary: go-home-applet: applet for gnome Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loupgaroublond at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SPEC File: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo/go-home-applet.spec SRPM File: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo/go-home-applet-0.1ubuntu10-1.fc9.src.rpm This is one of five components needed to respin NetBookDora. This applet is a supercharged 'show desktop' applet that interacts with ume-launcher. Please note that this spec file is probably really bad. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 09:51:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:51:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449251] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806170951.m5H9pKQ1016901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449251 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-17 05:51 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=664106 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url dbc176a55ba2b7ef2bfd0980f1772c50 Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication-0.10006.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test All tests successful, 2 tests skipped. Files=8, Tests=70, 2 wallclock secs ( 1.07 cusr + 0.08 csys = 1.15 CPU) + Package perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication-0.10006-3.fc10 => Provides: perl(Catalyst::Authentication::Credential::Password) perl(Catalyst::Authentication::Realm) perl(Catalyst::Authentication::Realm::Compatibility) perl(Catalyst::Authentication::Store::Minimal) perl(Catalyst::Authentication::Store::Null) perl(Catalyst::Authentication::User) perl(Catalyst::Authentication::User::Hash) perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Authentication) = 0.10006 perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Authentication::Credential::Password) perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Authentication::Store::Minimal) perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Authentication::User) perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Authentication::User::Hash) Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Catalyst::Authentication::Realm) perl(Catalyst::Authentication::User::Hash) perl(Catalyst::Exception) perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Session) >= 0.10 perl(Catalyst::Runtime) perl(Class::Inspector) perl(Digest) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Tie::RefHash) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 09:54:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:54:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451769] New: libfakekey: a library for generating key events Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451769 Summary: libfakekey: a library for generating key events Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loupgaroublond at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SPEC File: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo/libfakekey.spec SRPM File: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo/libfakekey-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Libfakekey is one of five components needed to build NetBookDora. It is a dependency of Maximus, the window manager addon. Libfakekey's primary role is to generate key events in the X server. It is a component of the Matchbox window manager project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 09:59:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:59:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451772] New: ume-launcher: a full screen application launcher for gnome Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451772 Summary: ume-launcher: a full screen application launcher for gnome Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loupgaroublond at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SPEC File: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo/ume-launcher.spec SRPM File: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo/ume-launcher-0.3ubuntu3-1.fc9.src.rpm UME-Launcher is a launcher that sits on top of the root window and provides a clean full screen interface for launching applications and other system tools. It is designed for small screens and touch screens in particular. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 09:58:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:58:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451771] New: maximus: an addon for metacity Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451771 Summary: maximus: an addon for metacity Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loupgaroublond at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SPEC File: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo/maximus.spec SRPM File: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo/maximus-0.3ubuntu2-1.fc9.src.rpm Maximus is an addon for Metacity that keeps certain types of windows always maximised and titlebar-less. It is a component of the NetBookDora respin. It depends on libfakekey to do its magic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 10:00:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:00:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450850] Review Request: move - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171000.m5HA0eEW008279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: move - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450850 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-17 06:00 EST ------- ptrash would be perfect in my opinion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 10:01:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:01:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451773] New: window-picker-applet: an alternative window chooser for small screens Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451773 Summary: window-picker-applet: an alternative window chooser for small screens Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loupgaroublond at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SPEC File: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo/window-picker-applet.spec SRPM File: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo/window-picker-applet-0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm window-picker-applet is an applet for the Gnome Panel that provides an alternate window chooser for small screens. It displays a small single icon button for each window and combines a title button for the currently active window. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 10:02:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:02:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171002.m5HA25N2019474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trash - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-17 06:02 EST ------- The name of this package is also a bit too generic, though not that much. Could upstream change it to be less generic? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 10:12:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:12:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171012.m5HACR5G021455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 lvillani at binaryhelix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From lvillani at binaryhelix.net 2008-06-17 06:12 EST ------- A reviewer assigned this package to himself, then he didn't reply to my questions. Releasing the package and restoring the fedora-review flag to empty value. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 10:39:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:39:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444952] Review Request: tlock - terminal lock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171039.m5HAdloG014544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tlock - terminal lock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444952 ------- Additional Comments From pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in 2008-06-17 06:39 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tlock Short Description: terminal lock Owners: pjp Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: pjp Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 10:41:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:41:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444952] Review Request: tlock - terminal lock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171041.m5HAfqiH026505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tlock - terminal lock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444952 pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 10:50:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:50:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171050.m5HAoeZQ028141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan at danny.cz ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-06-17 06:50 EST ------- Reviewing a package is a volunteer process, so you cannot expect that there are no delays in the communication. So removing a reviewer is at least unpolite. Now some answers - %{_includedir}/satsolver - this includes both the directory and the files in the directory (and any deeper hierarchy), so use it - $RPM_OPT_FLAGS - there should be a way how to pass own CFLAGS into the compile process done with cmake, I think/hope :-) - static libraries - then you should investigate, how to enable building of shared libraries, using static libs is allowed only in very very special cases -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 10:58:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:58:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171058.m5HAwdTd017709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 ------- Additional Comments From lvillani at binaryhelix.net 2008-06-17 06:58 EST ------- If I remember correctly he assigned then de-assigned the bug to himself (or he didn't assign the bug to himself at all!) but he left the fedora-review flag to '?'. The reviewers guidelines state that the reviewer must set fedora-review to '?' AND assign the bug to himself. This bug was not assigned to anybody but the flag was set to '?', as a consequence I restored the default value for fedora-review flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 11:28:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 07:28:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449393] Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171128.m5HBSfSp002293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449393 ------- Additional Comments From pbrobinson at gmail.com 2008-06-17 07:28 EST ------- Updated to the latest svn snapshot. Chris did the last update fix the issue you were seeing? SPEC: http://fedora.roving-it.com/rawhide/prism.spec SRPM: http://fedora.roving-it.com/rawhide/prism-0.9-0.2.cvs20080617.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 12:57:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:57:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451771] maximus: an addon for metacity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171257.m5HCvFk0007999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: maximus: an addon for metacity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451771 loupgaroublond at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |451769 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 12:57:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:57:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451769] libfakekey: a library for generating key events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171257.m5HCvFtM008024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libfakekey: a library for generating key events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451769 loupgaroublond at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |451771 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 13:08:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:08:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448748] Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171308.m5HD8oUA022101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448748 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-17 09:08 EST ------- cylindrix-1.0-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 13:06:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:06:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448311] Review Request: lostlabyrinth - Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171306.m5HD6N6u021803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth - Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448311 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-17 09:06 EST ------- Note: elice has just become available in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 13:10:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:10:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448748] Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171310.m5HDAdgL022664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448748 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-06-17 09:10 EST ------- Imported, built, updates submitted. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 13:09:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:09:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448748] Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171309.m5HD9tHC010421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448748 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-17 09:09 EST ------- cylindrix-1.0-4.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 13:17:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:17:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448311] Review Request: lostlabyrinth - Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171317.m5HDHTQW024432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth - Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448311 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-06-17 09:17 EST ------- I saw that, but mock still can't find it. I'll try wiping out my caches and ty again. . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 13:26:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:26:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448311] Review Request: lostlabyrinth - Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171326.m5HDQmIR026254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth - Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448311 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-17 09:26 EST ------- Maybe your mirror needs some time to sync? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 13:37:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:37:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448311] Review Request: lostlabyrinth - Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171337.m5HDbXGl029014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth - Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448311 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-06-17 09:37 EST ------- Wouldn't be the first time I've had a "404: Overeager" error. :) I'll keep trying and keep you posted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 13:42:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:42:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448313] Review Request: lostlabyrinth-graphics - Lost Labyrinth graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171342.m5HDg3Nc017108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth-graphics - Lost Labyrinth graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448313 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-06-17 09:42 EST ------- Does this need to be updated to the new version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 13:41:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:41:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448312] Review Request: lostlabyrinth-sounds - Lost Labyrinth sounds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171341.m5HDfcXp030050@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth-sounds - Lost Labyrinth sounds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448312 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-06-17 09:41 EST ------- Does this need to be updated to the new version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 13:42:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:42:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448312] Review Request: lostlabyrinth-sounds - Lost Labyrinth sounds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171342.m5HDg9qm030121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth-sounds - Lost Labyrinth sounds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448312 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 14:08:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:08:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171408.m5HE8hwo022499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 ------- Additional Comments From cheekyboinc at foresightlinux.org 2008-06-17 10:08 EST ------- Wow, so... Here is the new package. SPEC: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/fbpanel.spec SRPM: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/fbpanel-4.12-4.fc9.src.rpm Changelog: - Add correct url for Source: - Add gtk-update-icon-cache - Add timestamps - Add missing debuginfo rpm - Changed licence, MIT to LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+ - Remove unneeded ldconfig - Remove redundant BuildRequires: atk-devel, pango-devel and cairo-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 14:10:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:10:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448311] Review Request: lostlabyrinth - Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171410.m5HEAX4b003589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth - Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448311 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-06-17 10:10 EST ------- Mock build successful, all BRs OK. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 14:15:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:15:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451768] go-home-applet: applet for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171415.m5HEF0QU004419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: go-home-applet: applet for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451768 ------- Additional Comments From pbrobinson at gmail.com 2008-06-17 10:15 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309617) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309617&action=view) spec file cleanup Attached is an initial patch to cleanup the spec file somewhat. With this the srpm created passes rpmlint. It probably needs some extra build reqs. You also need to change the name/email in the Changelog entry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 14:24:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451768] go-home-applet: applet for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171424.m5HEOjpd006242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: go-home-applet: applet for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451768 ------- Additional Comments From pbrobinson at gmail.com 2008-06-17 10:24 EST ------- BTW not sure what the policy is with 'ubuntu' in the package name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 14:34:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:34:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451772] ume-launcher: a full screen application launcher for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171434.m5HEYduR027604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: ume-launcher: a full screen application launcher for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451772 ------- Additional Comments From pbrobinson at gmail.com 2008-06-17 10:34 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309618) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309618&action=view) spec file cleanup Attached is an initial patch to cleanup the spec file somewhat. With this the srpm created passes rpmlint. It probably needs some extra build reqs. You also need to change the name/email in the Changelog entry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 15:11:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:11:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171511.m5HFBEP2004274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at krishnan.cc ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-17 11:11 EST ------- *** Bug 451149 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 15:13:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:13:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451280] Review Request: xqf - A server browser for many popular games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171513.m5HFDEgJ016999@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xqf - A server browser for many popular games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451280 ------- Additional Comments From cheekyboinc at foresightlinux.org 2008-06-17 11:13 EST ------- Spec: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/xqf.spec SRPM: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/xqf-1.0.5-3.fc9.src.rpm Changelog: - Add --enable-bzip2 for bzip2 data compression - Add --enable-externalrco (Remote server administration tool) - Add BuildRequires: readline-devel - Add correct url for Source: - Add gtk-update-icon-cache -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 15:29:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:29:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171529.m5HFTiCe020247@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-06-17 11:29 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309625) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309625&action=view) patch for speechd configuration file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 15:28:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:28:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171528.m5HFSwUr020086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-06-17 11:28 EST ------- > * Source file > -------------------------------------------------------------- > 1038719 2008-02-16 15:54 > speech-dispatcher-0.6.6-7.fc7/speech-dispatcher-0.6.6.tar.gz > 1039765 2008-06-08 00:04 > speech-dispatcher-0.6.6-9.fc7/speech-dispatcher-0.6.6.tar.gz > -------------------------------------------------------------- Okay this is perhaps because the (cs).info file is destroyed. > * Requires(preun) duplicates Fixed now. > * _sourcedir, %_builddir > -------------------------------------------------------------- > install -p -m 0755 %SOURCE1 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir}/ > -------------------------------------------------------------- Okay now it is fixed. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > iconv -f ... -t .... speech-dispatcher-cs.info > speech-dispatcher-cs.info > -------------------------------------------------------------- > as you write now destroys this info file. I have written to the speech-dispatcher community to find the correct encoding of this file. I think I am not able to correctly determine the encoding of the (cs) file which is resulting in the file's corruption. > (In reply to comment #31) > > - To keep timestamps on installed files, please use > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" > > -------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed. > * Macros in %changelog > -------------------------------------------------------------- > - removed %%{_infodir}/dir file > -------------------------------------------------------------- > for example. Okay i have fixed it for all macro occurrences in the changelog. > > ========================================== > > speech-dispatcherd dead but subsys locked > > ========================================== > - Also "speech-dispatcher -d" seems to create > %{_localstatedir}/run/speech-dispatcher.pid, however > "service speech-dispatcher stop" does not delete this file, which > needs fixing. Hmm, right I have modified the init script and instructed speech-dispatcher to create the pid file in /var/lock/subsys/$prog now. Start/stop/restart etc are now functioning as expected. i have named the prog speech-dispatcherd on purpose to distinguish between the binary and daemon. (if thats what you mean by daemon is wrong?) There was a problem with the logs being outputted on the console every time. So I have modified speechd.conf (/etc/speech-dispatcher/speechd.conf) for two things: 1] Changed the log directory to /var/log/ 2] Starting only espeak module by default. (Please see the speechd.patch attached.) Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 15:33:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:33:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171533.m5HFXvmC021786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-06-17 11:33 EST ------- p.s. : The relevant links are : SPEC File for revision 10 - http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/speechd-rpm/speech-dispatcher.spec SRPM - http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/speechd-rpm/speech-dispatcher-0.6.6-10.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 15:40:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:40:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451150] Review Request: ghc-HPDF - Generation of PDF documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171540.m5HFea99023421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-HPDF - Generation of PDF documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451150 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 15:43:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:43:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451394] Review Request: ghc-hsql-mysql - MySQL driver for HSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171543.m5HFhfBX011393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hsql-mysql - MySQL driver for HSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451394 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 15:40:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:40:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451152] Review Request: ghc-hsql - Simple library for database access from Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171540.m5HFenQh010811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hsql - Simple library for database access from Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451152 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 15:44:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:44:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451400] Review Request: ghc-hsql-sqlite3 - SQLite3 driver for HSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171544.m5HFiBOO024295@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hsql-sqlite3 - SQLite3 driver for HSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451400 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 15:43:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:43:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451397] Review Request: ghc-hsql-odbc - ODBC driver for HSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171543.m5HFhoAb024153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hsql-odbc - ODBC driver for HSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451397 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 15:44:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:44:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451398] Review Request: ghc-hsql-postgresql - PostgreSQL driver for HSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171544.m5HFi0Ar024260@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hsql-postgresql - PostgreSQL driver for HSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451398 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 15:59:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:59:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451498] Review Request: ghc-Crypto - Misc Crypto support for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171559.m5HFxFq1015462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-Crypto - Misc Crypto support for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451498 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 15:59:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:59:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451499] Review Request: ghc-dataenc - Data encoding library for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171559.m5HFxN3g015510@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-dataenc - Data encoding library for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451499 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 15:59:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:59:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451500] Review Request: ghc-encoding - A library for various character encodings for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171559.m5HFxTRM015578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-encoding - A library for various character encodings for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451500 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:00:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:00:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451564] Review Request: ghc-mime - MIME library for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171600.m5HG07U6028310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-mime - MIME library for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451564 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:00:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:00:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451565] Review Request: ghc-base64-string - Base64 library for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171600.m5HG0E59028353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-base64-string - Base64 library for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451565 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 15:59:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:59:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451413] Review Request: ghc-compression - Common compression algorithms for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171559.m5HFx97X027675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-compression - Common compression algorithms for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451413 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 15:59:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:59:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451501] Review Request: ghc-HCodecs - Library to read, write and manipulate MIDI, WAVE, and SoundFont2 files GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171559.m5HFxZCT027866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-HCodecs - Library to read, write and manipulate MIDI, WAVE, and SoundFont2 files GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451501 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 15:59:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:59:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451411] Review Request: ghc-Codec-Compression-LZF - LZF compression bindings for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171559.m5HFx1oQ027616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-Codec-Compression-LZF - LZF compression bindings for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451411 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 15:58:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:58:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451410] Review Request: ghc-bzlib - Compression and decompression in the bzip2 format (package for GHC Haskell) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171558.m5HFws3b027587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-bzlib - Compression and decompression in the bzip2 format (package for GHC Haskell) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451410 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:03:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:03:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451741] Review Request: ghc-HDBC - Haskell Database Connectivity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171603.m5HG3BWq017021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-HDBC - Haskell Database Connectivity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451741 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:03:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:03:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451743] Review Request: ghc-HDBC-odbc - ODBC driver for HDBC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171603.m5HG3Feu017049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-HDBC-odbc - ODBC driver for HDBC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451743 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:00:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451580] Review Request: ghc-nano-hmac - Bindings to OpenSSL HMAC for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171600.m5HG0Sl1016392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-nano-hmac - Bindings to OpenSSL HMAC for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451580 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:00:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:00:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451566] Review Request: ghc-iconv - String encoding conversion for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171600.m5HG0L9o016353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-iconv - String encoding conversion for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451566 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:02:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:02:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451600] Review Request: ghc-pkcs1 - RSA encryption with PKCS1 padding for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171602.m5HG2eRu016967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-pkcs1 - RSA encryption with PKCS1 padding for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451600 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:01:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:01:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451589] Review Request: ghc-tar - Library for reading and writing TAR archives for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171601.m5HG1kL0016699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-tar - Library for reading and writing TAR archives for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451589 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:02:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:02:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451596] Review Request: ghc-hopenssl - FFI bindings to OpenSSL's EVP digest interface for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171602.m5HG2OjJ016914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hopenssl - FFI bindings to OpenSSL's EVP digest interface for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451596 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:00:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:00:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451581] Review Request: ghc-nano-md5 - Efficient ByteString bindings to OpenSSL for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171600.m5HG0hDY016448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-nano-md5 - Efficient ByteString bindings to OpenSSL for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451581 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:01:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451585] Review Request: ghc-omnicodec - Data encoding and decoding command line utilities for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171601.m5HG1VUO016657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-omnicodec - Data encoding and decoding command line utilities for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451585 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:02:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:02:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451595] Review Request: ghc-category-extras - Various modules and constructs inspired by category theory for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171602.m5HG2HmI016861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-category-extras - Various modules and constructs inspired by category theory for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451595 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 15:59:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:59:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451502] Review Request: ghc-hogg - Library and tools to manipulate the Ogg container format for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171559.m5HFxhjL015750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hogg - Library and tools to manipulate the Ogg container format for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451502 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:03:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:03:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451752] Review Request: ghc-curl - Haskell binding to libcurl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171603.m5HG3fKI029668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-curl - Haskell binding to libcurl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451752 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:03:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:03:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451605] Review Request: ghc-uuid - Haskell bindings to libuuid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171603.m5HG33dh029550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-uuid - Haskell bindings to libuuid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451605 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:02:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:02:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451594] Review Request: ghc-scc - Streaming component combinators for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171602.m5HG24Ir029238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-scc - Streaming component combinators for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451594 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:03:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:03:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451749] Review Request: ghc-HDBC-postgresql - Sqlite v3 driver for HDBC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171603.m5HG3R8v029606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-HDBC-postgresql - Sqlite v3 driver for HDBC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451749 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:02:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:02:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451601] Review Request: ghc-pureMD5 - MD5 implementations for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171602.m5HG2mLm029488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-pureMD5 - MD5 implementations for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451601 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:02:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:02:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451597] Review Request: ghc-HsOpenSSL - (Part of) OpenSSL binding for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171602.m5HG2U6A029434@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-HsOpenSSL - (Part of) OpenSSL binding for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451597 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:03:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:03:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451751] Review Request: ghc-greencard - A foreign function interface pre-processor for Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171603.m5HG3XtH029636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-greencard - A foreign function interface pre-processor for Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451751 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:01:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:01:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451590] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support for reading and writing UTF8 strings for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171601.m5HG1ujG029168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support for reading and writing UTF8 strings for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451590 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:02:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:02:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451602] Review Request: ghc-syb-with-class - Scrap Your Boilerplate With Class for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171602.m5HG2uto029518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-syb-with-class - Scrap Your Boilerplate With Class for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451602 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:01:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:01:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451588] Review Request: ghc-unix-compat - Portable POSIX-compatibility layer for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171601.m5HG1c66029107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-unix-compat - Portable POSIX-compatibility layer for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451588 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:04:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:04:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449251] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171604.m5HG4FHK029749@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449251 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:04:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:04:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449251] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171604.m5HG4EM8029721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449251 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-06-17 12:04 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication Short Description: Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework Owners: cweyl Branches: F-8, F-9, devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:10:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:10:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451769] Review Request: libfakekey - a library for generating key events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171610.m5HGAW8s031341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libfakekey - a library for generating key events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451769 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|libfakekey: a library for |Review Request: libfakekey - |generating key events |a library for generating key | |events -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:10:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:10:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451772] Review Request: ume-launcher - a full screen application launcher for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171610.m5HGAuEN031400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ume-launcher - a full screen application launcher for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451772 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|ume-launcher: a full screen |Review Request: ume-launcher |application launcher for |- a full screen application |gnome |launcher for gnome -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:11:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:11:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451773] Review Request: window-picker-applet - an alternative window chooser for small screens In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171611.m5HGB8uY031537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: window-picker-applet - an alternative window chooser for small screens https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451773 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|window-picker-applet: an |Review Request: window- |alternative window chooser |picker-applet - an |for small screens |alternative window chooser | |for small screens -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:10:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:10:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451771] Review Request: maximus - an addon for metacity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171610.m5HGAiIS018946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maximus - an addon for metacity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451771 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|maximus: an addon for |Review Request: maximus - an |metacity |addon for metacity -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:10:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:10:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451768] Review Request: go-home-applet - applet for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171610.m5HGA9jE018723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: go-home-applet - applet for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451768 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|go-home-applet: applet for |Review Request: go-home- |gnome |applet - applet for gnome ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-17 12:10 EST ------- Scripts parse these tickets; please either use the submission template or keep the same format for the summary as the other review tickets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:13:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451769] Review Request: libfakekey - a library for generating key events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171613.m5HGDrXV032033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libfakekey - a library for generating key events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451769 ------- Additional Comments From pbrobinson at gmail.com 2008-06-17 12:13 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309632) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309632&action=view) spec file cleanup Attached is an initial patch to cleanup the spec file somewhat. With this the srpm created passes rpmlint. It probably needs some extra build reqs. You also need to change the name/email in the Changelog entry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:18:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:18:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451190] Review Request: gl2ps - An OpenGL to PostScript printing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171618.m5HGIsJC020337@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gl2ps - An OpenGL to PostScript printing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451190 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2008-06-17 12:18 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gl2ps Short Description: An OpenGL to PostScript printing library Owners: rathann Branches: F-9 F-8 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:18:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:18:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451771] Review Request: maximus - an addon for metacity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171618.m5HGIp1A020301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maximus - an addon for metacity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451771 ------- Additional Comments From pbrobinson at gmail.com 2008-06-17 12:18 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309633) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309633&action=view) spec file cleanup Attached is an initial patch to cleanup the spec file somewhat. With this the srpm created passes rpmlint. It probably needs some extra build reqs. You also need to change the name/email in the Changelog entry. I think there possibly should also be some post install gconf stuff too but need to check that out further. Someone in the know should be able to confirm it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:19:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451190] Review Request: gl2ps - An OpenGL to PostScript printing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171619.m5HGJ3dP000545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gl2ps - An OpenGL to PostScript printing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451190 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2008-06-17 12:19 EST ------- I'll fix that and talk to upstream about at least a Makefile if not a full-fledged build-system. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:25:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:25:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451773] Review Request: window-picker-applet - an alternative window chooser for small screens In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171625.m5HGPfgD021849@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: window-picker-applet - an alternative window chooser for small screens https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451773 ------- Additional Comments From pbrobinson at gmail.com 2008-06-17 12:25 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309634) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309634&action=view) spec file cleanup Attached is an initial patch to cleanup the spec file somewhat. With this the srpm created passes rpmlint. It probably needs some extra build reqs. You also need to change the name/email in the Changelog entry. I think there possibly should also be some post install gconf stuff too but need to check that out further. Someone in the know should be able to confirm it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:29:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:29:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171629.m5HGTLnf022144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-17 12:29 EST ------- Well, + This package itself is okay now. + You have some other review requests, which seem good (to some extent) for first quick glance Some miscs. * Commenting out macros ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- # Parallel make is unsafe for this package, so %{?_smp_mflags} is not used ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- - In comments, use %% to avoid macros expansion like ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- # Parallel make is unsafe for this package, so %%{?_smp_mflags} is not used ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- (In reply to comment #16) > (It could be great to have an init file for trickled). I will leave it you for now. If you write a draft for init script for trickled and you feel you need a help, please open a new bug against trickle (once trickle is imported into Fedora) and add me to cc list. Or I guess wolfy will help you a lot. By the way, you can start from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (trickle) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor. At the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 17:01:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:01:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441415] Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171701.m5HH1Ljb028230@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441415 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-17 13:01 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 16:59:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:59:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441411] Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171659.m5HGxZmG027420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441411 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-17 12:59 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 17:00:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:00:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 401101] Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171700.m5HH0arH028004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=401101 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-06-17 13:00 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/sleuthkit.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/sleuthkit-2.52-1.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm Description: The Sleuth Kit (TSK) This packages doesn't currently works and have showed some strange issues that didn't appeared when and was used (instead of using the appropriate AFFLIB_CFLAGS). Problem is: /usr/include/afflib/afflib_i.h:343: error: redefinition of typedef 'AFFILE' /usr/include/afflib/afflib.h:102: error: previous declaration of 'AFFILE' was here *** [libtskimg_la-img_open.lo] Error 1 * This can be solved inside the afflib package by removing the AFFILE occurence at l.383 of afflib_i.h * On the other hand, this file is not meant to be used by the dependent application, despite the dual header include ( and ) was submitted by the afflib developer to the sleutkit one. * For some reasons, the linking properties of the libtsk.la are inherited by the different binaries. I don't know how this can be avoided. This make the binaries linked to unneeded library, and suggest that srch_strings (which is GPLv2+) is linked against afflib (which is BSD with advertising), which is forbidden (even if it probably don't use it directly). Patch have been submitted to the different upsteam for advices. @livinded Your help would be welcome to maintain this package. I hope to have most of the patches merged so the update will be easier. But a good reviewer is still missing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 17:07:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:07:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444952] Review Request: tlock - terminal lock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171707.m5HH7RDK029313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tlock - terminal lock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444952 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-17 13:07 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 17:09:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:09:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449251] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171709.m5HH9C8T009799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449251 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-17 13:09 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 17:11:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:11:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451190] Review Request: gl2ps - An OpenGL to PostScript printing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171711.m5HHB0Yk030089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gl2ps - An OpenGL to PostScript printing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451190 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-17 13:10 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 17:13:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:13:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451406] Review Request: python-tempita - A very small text templating language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171713.m5HHDiuY010640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tempita - A very small text templating language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451406 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-17 13:13 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 17:14:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:14:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451408] Review Request: python-wsgiproxy - HTTP proxying tools for WSGI apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171714.m5HHExeW010711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-wsgiproxy - HTTP proxying tools for WSGI apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451408 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-17 13:14 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 17:19:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:19:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451693] Review Request: garmin-sync - Utility for syncing data from Garmin Edge/Forerunner devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171719.m5HHJP09031192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: garmin-sync - Utility for syncing data from Garmin Edge/Forerunner devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451693 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-17 13:19 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 17:16:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:16:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451643] Review Request: libmusicbrainz3 - Library for accessing MusicBrainz servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171716.m5HHGan9030934@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmusicbrainz3 - Library for accessing MusicBrainz servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451643 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-17 13:16 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 17:18:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:18:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451692] Review Request: pyusb - python bindings for libusb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171718.m5HHIG9o011526@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyusb - python bindings for libusb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451692 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-17 13:18 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 17:29:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:29:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171729.m5HHT2F8013922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP Alias: php-pear-Auth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 ------- Additional Comments From dhollis at davehollis.com 2008-06-17 13:29 EST ------- Ok, I've split-off -samba and -addons and set the appropriate requires. http://web.davehollis.com:81/packages/php-pear-Auth.spec http://web.davehollis.com:81/packages/php-pear-Auth-1.6.1-2.fc9.src.rpm I did have to deal with the CRLF in the README.AUTH in the %install portion rather than %prep because modifying the file changed the MD5 sum and prevented the PEAR install from doing it's thing. I am using sed now instead of dos2unix so there aren't any undesirable dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 17:41:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:41:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448313] Review Request: lostlabyrinth-graphics - Lost Labyrinth graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171741.m5HHfR5j016736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth-graphics - Lost Labyrinth graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448313 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-17 13:41 EST ------- No, the sounds / resources only change once every so often (I do need to check them each release as this is not documented and I've done that for the latest release). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 17:41:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:41:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448312] Review Request: lostlabyrinth-sounds - Lost Labyrinth sounds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171741.m5HHfbOZ016769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth-sounds - Lost Labyrinth sounds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448312 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-17 13:41 EST ------- No, the sounds / resources only change once every so often (I do need to check them each release as this is not documented and I've done that for the latest release). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 17:54:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449251] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171754.m5HHs0Zf005844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication - Infrastructure plugin for the Catalyst authentication framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449251 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-06-17 13:53 EST ------- Imported and building. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 18:05:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:05:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448312] Review Request: lostlabyrinth-sounds - Lost Labyrinth sounds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171805.m5HI5HeF021600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth-sounds - Lost Labyrinth sounds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448312 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-06-17 14:05 EST ------- Very simple package. Passes full review. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 17:46:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:46:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171746.m5HHkLYY017708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-17 13:46 EST ------- For 4.12-4: * License analysis - Please also write license analysis I wrote on comment 10 as comments in the spec file. * Again Source2: -------------------------------------------------------- # image taken from the fbpanel source /config/images/star.png Source2: %{name}.png -------------------------------------------------------- - Okay, then you don't have to add this file seperately to srpm. The following will be enough. -------------------------------------------------------- install -p -m 0644 config/images/star.png \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/128x128/apps/%{name}.png -------------------------------------------------------- ! Note: This file has 128x128 size, not 32x32. Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 18:18:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:18:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448313] Review Request: lostlabyrinth-graphics - Lost Labyrinth graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171818.m5HII9Oc024008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth-graphics - Lost Labyrinth graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448313 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 18:24:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:24:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448313] Review Request: lostlabyrinth-graphics - Lost Labyrinth graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171824.m5HIOXBd012023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth-graphics - Lost Labyrinth graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448313 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-06-17 14:24 EST ------- Passes full review. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 19:09:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:09:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449928] Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171909.m5HJ9LQ1020839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449928 ------- Additional Comments From atorkhov at gmail.com 2008-06-17 15:09 EST ------- purple.worldforge.org is back now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 19:25:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:25:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448312] Review Request: lostlabyrinth-sounds - Lost Labyrinth sounds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171925.m5HJPB2U005120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth-sounds - Lost Labyrinth sounds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448312 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-17 15:25 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lostlabyrinth-sounds Short Description: Lost Labyrinth sounds Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 19:24:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:24:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448311] Review Request: lostlabyrinth - Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171924.m5HJOikR024001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth - Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448311 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-17 15:24 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lostlabyrinth Short Description: Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 19:25:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:25:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448313] Review Request: lostlabyrinth-graphics - Lost Labyrinth graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171925.m5HJPWc0024546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth-graphics - Lost Labyrinth graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448313 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-17 15:25 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lostlabyrinth-graphics Short Description: Lost Labyrinth graphics Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 19:29:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:29:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451847] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-polyparse package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451847 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-polyparse package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/polyparse OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.1 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/polyparse/1.1/polyparse-1.1.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 4. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-17 15:29 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309665) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309665&action=view) ghc-polyparse-1.1-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 19:49:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:49:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225307] Merge Review: awesfx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171949.m5HJnAhX029108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: awesfx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225307 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 19:49:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:49:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226125] Merge Review: man-pages-it In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171949.m5HJnKFL029171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: man-pages-it https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226125 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 19:48:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:48:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174883] Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171948.m5HJmgHm029026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=174883 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 19:51:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:51:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226266] Merge Review: perl-IO-Zlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171951.m5HJp9UU011334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-IO-Zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226266 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 19:48:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:48:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218256] Review Request: audacious-itouch-control - iTouch keyboard control plugin for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171948.m5HJmvxH010655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-itouch-control - iTouch keyboard control plugin for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218256 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 19:50:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:50:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226147] Merge Review: mktemp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171950.m5HJowSH029980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mktemp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226147 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 19:52:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:52:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227121] Review Request: wstx-2.9.3-1jpp - Woodstox Stax Implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171952.m5HJqnoM030239@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wstx-2.9.3-1jpp - Woodstox Stax Implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227121 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 19:52:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:52:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226402] Merge Review: SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171952.m5HJqU4c030168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226402 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-17 15:52 EST ------- Hans, it seems that you closed this but fedora-review is still set to '?'. I'm guessing you intended to set it to '+'; I'll do that now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 19:54:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231011] Review Request: cowpatty - Audit Wpa pre-shared keys In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171954.m5HJsWYZ011958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cowpatty - Audit Wpa pre-shared keys https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231011 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 19:53:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:53:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227122] Review Request: xmlbeans-2.1.0-3jpp - XML-Java binding tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171953.m5HJrAc8011732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlbeans-2.1.0-3jpp - XML-Java binding tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227122 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 19:51:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:51:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451857] New: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-HaXml package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451857 Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-HaXml package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/HaXml OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.19.4 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/HaXml/1.19.4/HaXml-1.19.4.tar.gz to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder. 2. Copy attached -.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder. 3. Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any). 4. Execute: rpmbuild --clean --target=$(uname -i) -ba \ rpmbuild/SPECS/-.spec Actual results: -- Expected results: 1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective folders. 2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant module: $ ghci ghci> :m + Additional info: 1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on Fedora-8). ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-06-17 15:51 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309669) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309669&action=view) ghc-HaXml-1.19.4-1.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 19:58:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:58:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451857] New RPM SPEC file for ghc-HaXml package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171958.m5HJw62k031596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-HaXml package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451857 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 19:59:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:59:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449906] Review Request: perl-Test-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171959.m5HJxG7P031771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Harness - Run Perl standard test scripts with statistics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449906 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 19:59:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:59:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445980] Review Request: odpdom - Oversized Document Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171959.m5HJxbn1013278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: odpdom - Oversized Document Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445980 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 20:00:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:00:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428413] Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172000.m5HK0LLF013810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428413 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 19:57:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:57:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451847] New RPM SPEC file for ghc-polyparse package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171957.m5HJv5pC012883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New RPM SPEC file for ghc-polyparse package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451847 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 20:00:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:00:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433094] Review Request: watsup - System monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172000.m5HK0Bea013757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: watsup - System monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433094 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 19:59:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:59:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434585] Review Request: python-flickrapi - python interface to flickr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806171959.m5HJxq2v013332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-flickrapi - python interface to flickr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434585 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 20:00:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:00:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433161] Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172000.m5HK03If013704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433161 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 20:00:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:00:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 383271] Review Request: b43-firmware - V4 firmware for Broadcom wireless devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172000.m5HK0qXq013969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: b43-firmware - V4 firmware for Broadcom wireless devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=383271 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 20:01:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:01:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 350341] Review Request: postfix-logwatch - A postfix log analyzer for logwatch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172001.m5HK10fe014024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postfix-logwatch - A postfix log analyzer for logwatch Alias: postfix-logwatch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=350341 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 20:01:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:01:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287431] Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172001.m5HK17tu014180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287431 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 20:00:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:00:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 383281] Review Request: b43legacy-firmware - V3 firmware for Broadcom wireless devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172000.m5HK0aHP013918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: b43legacy-firmware - V3 firmware for Broadcom wireless devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=383281 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 20:32:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:32:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172032.m5HKWaAG021136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 ------- Additional Comments From nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com 2008-06-17 16:32 EST ------- Thx for help mtasaka. I confirm that I am requesting for sponsorship. My FAS name is 'eponyme'. PS : must I rebuild a -4 for trickle to set %%{?_smp_mflags} instead of %{?_smp_mflags} in comment ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 21:14:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:14:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172114.m5HLEIaT028440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 ------- Additional Comments From amdunn at gmail.com 2008-06-17 17:14 EST ------- I created a new version of this package, available at http://www.duke.edu/~amd34/coq/coq.spec http://www.duke.edu/~amd34/coq/coq-8.1pl3-1.fc9.src.rpm Among the things changed: - Fixed tex, emacs directory issues (by changing BuildRequires) - Fixed bugs I noticed with stripping exactly when appropriate, documentation directory permissions In order to fix the stripping issue, I had to disable the creation of debug info and change the post install script (as indicated at the top of the spec file) - I didn't see any other way. - Made desktop icon, menu entry - Looked at Debian patches, applied when appropriate (documented in the spec file) This new version builds on Koji for i386: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=666435 but appears to fail for ppc64 (as part of:) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=666507 I'm working on this - the exact reason isn't clear to me. I've run rpmlint on all the packages - the main output is about non-stripped binaries that are bytecode compilations -> shouldn't really be stripped. Sorry things took so long! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 21:31:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:31:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451142] Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172131.m5HLVj74032023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451142 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |451872 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 21:48:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:48:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449928] Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172148.m5HLmHhQ019148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449928 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2008-06-17 17:48 EST ------- Looks good. This is APPROVED. Go ahead follow the procedure to import this into CVS and build: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure I'd be happy to comaintain this with you. You do realize that I'm planning to draft you as a comaintainer for the other WorldForge packages too, right? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 21:58:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:58:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451142] Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172158.m5HLwxm9003832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451142 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-17 17:58 EST ------- I pinged the selinux folks about the %post scriptlet and they indicated that that's definitely not the proper way to do things. For example, a relabel will render things inoperable. At minimum it's necessary to use semanage to add a context pattern and then use restorecon, but preferable that policy is updated to supply the proper context for that executable (or, of course, to fix things so that the special context isn't needed). https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-selinux-list/2008-June/msg00077.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 22:03:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:03:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451681] Review Request: sk2py - Migrates Cadence Skill based PCells to Python PyCells In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172203.m5HM3Ah3021883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sk2py - Migrates Cadence Skill based PCells to Python PyCells https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451681 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-17 18:03 EST ------- sk2py-0.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 22:02:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:02:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451681] Review Request: sk2py - Migrates Cadence Skill based PCells to Python PyCells In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172202.m5HM2JGa021786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sk2py - Migrates Cadence Skill based PCells to Python PyCells https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451681 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 22:13:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:13:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172213.m5HMDAvM006511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-06-17 18:13 EST ------- Nicoleau: neah, just fix the spec and cvs commit the fixed version (when times come...). Please don't forget to ask for epel branches when you make the request for branch creation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 22:33:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:33:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451142] Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172233.m5HMXaDj026772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451142 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|451877 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 22:31:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:31:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451142] Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172231.m5HMVIYr026494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451142 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |451877 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 22:32:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:32:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451847] Review Request: ghc-polyparse - A variety of alternative parser combinator libraries for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172232.m5HMWT6O009513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-polyparse - A variety of alternative parser combinator libraries for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451847 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |451857 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 22:32:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:32:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451857] Review Request: ghc-HaXml - Utilities for manipulating XML documents with GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172232.m5HMWSeB009488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-HaXml - Utilities for manipulating XML documents with GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451857 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |451847 Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc-HaXml - |HaXml package |Utilities for manipulating | |XML documents with GHC | |Haskell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 22:36:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:36:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450013] Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172236.m5HMaDdY010147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 ------- Additional Comments From dmalcolm at redhat.com 2008-06-17 18:36 EST ------- I've been experimenting with the python client-side helper module for XML-RPC interface in the contrib subpackage, and moved it to its own -python subpackage, installing it to site-libs so that it's accessible easily with "import testopia" in client code. Some notes on doing this are at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Testopia/XmlRpc Updated specfile at same location: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/testopia.spec and SRPM at: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/testopia-3.0.4-1_3.tr2.0_RC1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 22:32:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:32:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451847] Review Request: ghc-polyparse - A variety of alternative parser combinator libraries for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172232.m5HMW1QM009430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-polyparse - A variety of alternative parser combinator libraries for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451847 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New RPM SPEC file for ghc- |Review Request: ghc- |polyparse package |polyparse - A variety of | |alternative parser | |combinator libraries for GHC | |Haskell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:02:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:02:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 401101] Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172302.m5HN2wjp014281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=401101 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-06-17 19:02 EST ------- Just for the sake of correctness: "The Sleuth Kit (TSK) is an open source digital investigation tools (a.k.a digital forensic tools)" is not proper English, the singular "an" being incongruous with the plural "tools". I'll try to help in review once you fix the build issue (actually I've reviewed macrobber with the intent to push sleuth kit forward) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:10:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:10:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448312] Review Request: lostlabyrinth-sounds - Lost Labyrinth sounds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172310.m5HNAiCQ015587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth-sounds - Lost Labyrinth sounds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448312 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-17 19:10 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:12:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:12:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448313] Review Request: lostlabyrinth-graphics - Lost Labyrinth graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172312.m5HNCNuu001028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth-graphics - Lost Labyrinth graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448313 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-17 19:12 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:09:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:09:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448311] Review Request: lostlabyrinth - Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172309.m5HN9lob000395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth - Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448311 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-17 19:09 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451581] Review Request: ghc-nano-md5 - Efficient ByteString bindings to OpenSSL for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNQNd002838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-nano-md5 - Efficient ByteString bindings to OpenSSL for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451581 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:23 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451150] Review Request: ghc-HPDF - Generation of PDF documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNWfh002988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-HPDF - Generation of PDF documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451150 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:23 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451589] Review Request: ghc-tar - Library for reading and writing TAR archives for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNUCB002931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-tar - Library for reading and writing TAR archives for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451589 Bug 451589 depends on bug 451588, which changed state. Bug 451588 Summary: Review Request: ghc-unix-compat - Portable POSIX-compatibility layer for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451588 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451566] Review Request: ghc-iconv - String encoding conversion for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNVTJ002959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-iconv - String encoding conversion for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451566 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:23 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451588] Review Request: ghc-unix-compat - Portable POSIX-compatibility layer for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNTRM002907@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-unix-compat - Portable POSIX-compatibility layer for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451588 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:23 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451589] Review Request: ghc-tar - Library for reading and writing TAR archives for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNXxd003016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-tar - Library for reading and writing TAR archives for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451589 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:23 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451857] Review Request: ghc-HaXml - Utilities for manipulating XML documents with GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNcPJ003126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-HaXml - Utilities for manipulating XML documents with GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451857 Bug 451857 depends on bug 451847, which changed state. Bug 451847 Summary: Review Request: ghc-polyparse - A variety of alternative parser combinator libraries for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451847 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451594] Review Request: ghc-scc - Streaming component combinators for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNaFn003074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-scc - Streaming component combinators for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451594 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:23 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451605] Review Request: ghc-uuid - Haskell bindings to libuuid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNele003185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-uuid - Haskell bindings to libuuid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451605 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:23 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451394] Review Request: ghc-hsql-mysql - MySQL driver for HSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNfJ1003214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hsql-mysql - MySQL driver for HSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451394 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:23 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451847] Review Request: ghc-polyparse - A variety of alternative parser combinator libraries for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNbPk003102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-polyparse - A variety of alternative parser combinator libraries for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451847 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:23 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451590] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support for reading and writing UTF8 strings for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNS3L002868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support for reading and writing UTF8 strings for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451590 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:23 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451596] Review Request: ghc-hopenssl - FFI bindings to OpenSSL's EVP digest interface for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNdxF003154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hopenssl - FFI bindings to OpenSSL's EVP digest interface for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451596 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:23 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451500] Review Request: ghc-encoding - A library for various character encodings for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNYio003045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-encoding - A library for various character encodings for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451500 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:23 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451600] Review Request: ghc-pkcs1 - RSA encryption with PKCS1 padding for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNhDC003242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-pkcs1 - RSA encryption with PKCS1 padding for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451600 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:23 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451397] Review Request: ghc-hsql-odbc - ODBC driver for HSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNrPk003489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hsql-odbc - ODBC driver for HSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451397 Bug 451397 depends on bug 451152, which changed state. Bug 451152 Summary: Review Request: ghc-hsql - Simple library for database access from Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451152 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451398] Review Request: ghc-hsql-postgresql - PostgreSQL driver for HSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNpZY003465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hsql-postgresql - PostgreSQL driver for HSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451398 Bug 451398 depends on bug 451152, which changed state. Bug 451152 Summary: Review Request: ghc-hsql - Simple library for database access from Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451152 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451752] Review Request: ghc-curl - Haskell binding to libcurl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNnrO003388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-curl - Haskell binding to libcurl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451752 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:23 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451400] Review Request: ghc-hsql-sqlite3 - SQLite3 driver for HSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNoJu003440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hsql-sqlite3 - SQLite3 driver for HSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451400 Bug 451400 depends on bug 451152, which changed state. Bug 451152 Summary: Review Request: ghc-hsql - Simple library for database access from Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451152 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451394] Review Request: ghc-hsql-mysql - MySQL driver for HSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNsEn003514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hsql-mysql - MySQL driver for HSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451394 Bug 451394 depends on bug 451152, which changed state. Bug 451152 Summary: Review Request: ghc-hsql - Simple library for database access from Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451152 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451580] Review Request: ghc-nano-hmac - Bindings to OpenSSL HMAC for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNjA9003299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-nano-hmac - Bindings to OpenSSL HMAC for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451580 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:23 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451749] Review Request: ghc-HDBC-postgresql - Sqlite v3 driver for HDBC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNkTK003327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-HDBC-postgresql - Sqlite v3 driver for HDBC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451749 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:23 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451499] Review Request: ghc-dataenc - Data encoding library for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNlFn003355@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-dataenc - Data encoding library for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451499 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:23 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451595] Review Request: ghc-category-extras - Various modules and constructs inspired by category theory for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNirf003270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-category-extras - Various modules and constructs inspired by category theory for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451595 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:23 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451397] Review Request: ghc-hsql-odbc - ODBC driver for HSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNta0003571@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hsql-odbc - ODBC driver for HSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451397 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:23 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451597] Review Request: ghc-HsOpenSSL - (Part of) OpenSSL binding for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNsMd003542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-HsOpenSSL - (Part of) OpenSSL binding for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451597 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:23 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451152] Review Request: ghc-hsql - Simple library for database access from Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNoKX003416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hsql - Simple library for database access from Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451152 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:23 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:24:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:24:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451741] Review Request: ghc-HDBC - Haskell Database Connectivity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172324.m5HNO2J1003743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-HDBC - Haskell Database Connectivity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451741 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:24 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451400] Review Request: ghc-hsql-sqlite3 - SQLite3 driver for HSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNuQO003600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hsql-sqlite3 - SQLite3 driver for HSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451400 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:23 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451398] Review Request: ghc-hsql-postgresql - PostgreSQL driver for HSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNxeX003657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hsql-postgresql - PostgreSQL driver for HSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451398 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:23 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:23:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:23:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451601] Review Request: ghc-pureMD5 - MD5 implementations for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172323.m5HNNvOG003629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-pureMD5 - MD5 implementations for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451601 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:23 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:24:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:24:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451857] Review Request: ghc-HaXml - Utilities for manipulating XML documents with GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172324.m5HNO4jT003801@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-HaXml - Utilities for manipulating XML documents with GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451857 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:24 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:24:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:24:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451743] Review Request: ghc-HDBC-odbc - ODBC driver for HDBC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172324.m5HNO7lO003858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-HDBC-odbc - ODBC driver for HDBC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451743 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:24 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:24:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:24:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451411] Review Request: ghc-Codec-Compression-LZF - LZF compression bindings for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172324.m5HNO6IG003829@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-Codec-Compression-LZF - LZF compression bindings for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451411 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:24 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:24:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:24:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451602] Review Request: ghc-syb-with-class - Scrap Your Boilerplate With Class for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172324.m5HNOFEr004077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-syb-with-class - Scrap Your Boilerplate With Class for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451602 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:24 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:24:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:24:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451565] Review Request: ghc-base64-string - Base64 library for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172324.m5HNO8WJ003886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-base64-string - Base64 library for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451565 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:24 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:24:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:24:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451564] Review Request: ghc-mime - MIME library for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172324.m5HNOAAN003959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-mime - MIME library for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451564 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:24 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:24:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:24:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451501] Review Request: ghc-HCodecs - Library to read, write and manipulate MIDI, WAVE, and SoundFont2 files GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172324.m5HNO3ea003772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-HCodecs - Library to read, write and manipulate MIDI, WAVE, and SoundFont2 files GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451501 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:24 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:24:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:24:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451413] Review Request: ghc-compression - Common compression algorithms for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172324.m5HNO9Mi003918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-compression - Common compression algorithms for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451413 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:24 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:24:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:24:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451751] Review Request: ghc-greencard - A foreign function interface pre-processor for Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172324.m5HNO1QI003714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-greencard - A foreign function interface pre-processor for Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451751 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:24 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:24:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:24:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451410] Review Request: ghc-bzlib - Compression and decompression in the bzip2 format (package for GHC Haskell) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172324.m5HNO0tG003686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-bzlib - Compression and decompression in the bzip2 format (package for GHC Haskell) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451410 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:23 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:24:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:24:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451498] Review Request: ghc-Crypto - Misc Crypto support for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172324.m5HNOCct003987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-Crypto - Misc Crypto support for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451498 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:24 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:24:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:24:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451502] Review Request: ghc-hogg - Library and tools to manipulate the Ogg container format for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172324.m5HNOE4l004048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hogg - Library and tools to manipulate the Ogg container format for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451502 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:24 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:24:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:24:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451585] Review Request: ghc-omnicodec - Data encoding and decoding command line utilities for GHC Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172324.m5HNODe8004019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-omnicodec - Data encoding and decoding command line utilities for GHC Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451585 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:24 EST ------- I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not follow any of the packaging guidelines. Do not attempt to reopen them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:33:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:33:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451142] Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172333.m5HNXsuB006294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451142 ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-17 19:33 EST ------- OK, I've gotten rid of the %post script. I also cleaned up the spec file so that source and binary RPMs pass rpmlint, the thing is built with optimisation (!), and the generated binary is properly stripped (brp-strip doesn't touch the symbols). Spec: http://core.serpentine.com/haddock09.spec Patch0: http://core.serpentine.com/haddock-O2.patch SRPM: http://core.serpentine.com/haddock09-0.9-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:42:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:42:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445027] Review Request: dnrd - A caching, forwarding DNS proxy server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172342.m5HNgLoR020429@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnrd - A caching, forwarding DNS proxy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445027 ------- Additional Comments From rakesh.pandit at gmail.com 2008-06-17 19:42 EST ------- >Yes it should have init.d script as it is a daemon >I will get one init.d script in package ASAP Updated with init.d script and an example conf sample file New SRPM: http://rakesh.gnulinuxcentar.org/dnrd-2.20.3-1.fc8.src.rpm New SPEC http://rakesh.gnulinuxcentar.org/dnrd.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:45:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:45:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441899] Review Request: inadyn-mt - Dynamic DNS Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172345.m5HNjJLJ020914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inadyn-mt - Dynamic DNS Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441899 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-06-17 19:45 EST ------- there seems to be somethibg wrong with the src.rpm. rpm crashes while doing rpm -i and mc reports "Premature end of CPIO archive" The file I get is -rw-rw-r-- 1 wolfy wolfy 213465 Jun 18 02:45 inadyn-mt-2.12.01-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 17 23:58:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:58:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451280] Review Request: xqf - A server browser for many popular games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806172358.m5HNwDhv009918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xqf - A server browser for many popular games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451280 ------- Additional Comments From cheekyboinc at foresightlinux.org 2008-06-17 19:58 EST ------- Spec: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/xqf.spec SRPM: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/xqf-1.0.5-4.fc9.src.rpm Changelog: - Add new .desktop file source - Remove BuildRequires: gtk+-devel, glib2-devel - Remove desktop-file-install --remove-category=X-SuSE-Core-Game and {name}.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 00:00:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180000.m5I00O0j010572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 ------- Additional Comments From cheekyboinc at foresightlinux.org 2008-06-17 20:00 EST ------- SPEC: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/fbpanel.spec SRPM: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/fbpanel-4.12-5.fc9.src.rpm Changelog: - Add comment about the license - Remove redundant Source2: You can find another package (review request) here: XQF - A server browser for many popular games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451280 Thank you Mamoru for your helpfull overview about the review process and all the other things. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 00:16:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:16:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450371] Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180016.m5I0GqGk025827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 cheekyboinc at foresightlinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cheekyboinc at foresightlinux.o | |rg ------- Additional Comments From cheekyboinc at foresightlinux.org 2008-06-17 20:16 EST ------- These links are broken. You need to fix these 2 links so that someone can look at it! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 00:56:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:56:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450371] Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180056.m5I0uDjr019139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 ------- Additional Comments From mathstuf at gmail.com 2008-06-17 20:56 EST ------- Ah, yes. I recently changed the name of the project from Pok?Gen to Pok?gen. Forgot about that here. I also have a new build of it. I'll update as soon as I commit my latest changes and build the RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 01:23:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:23:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450371] Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180123.m5I1Nfrj023290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 ------- Additional Comments From mathstuf at gmail.com 2008-06-17 21:23 EST ------- I've run through the review checklist myself, but I probably missed something. Definitely better than before :) . New SRPM: http://hypersonicsoft.org/projects/downloads/Pok?gen/nightly/pokegen-0.0.2-0.3.f New SPEC: http://hypersonicsoft.org/projects/downloads/Pok?gen/nightly/pokegen.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 01:38:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:38:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451903] Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180138.m5I1cVtE005825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451903 kylev at kylev.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |451900 Summary|Review Request: perl-Mail- |Review Request: perl-Mail- |DKIM - Sign and verify |DKIM - Sign and verify |Internet mail with |Internet mail with |DKIM/DomainKey signatures |DKIM/DomainKey signatures ------- Additional Comments From kylev at kylev.com 2008-06-17 21:38 EST ------- Adding (soft) block on bug 451900 since users won't be able to enable the SpamAssassin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM plugin successfully until it is resolved (or if they manually install the missing Bignum module). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 01:36:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:36:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451903] New: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451903 Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kylev at kylev.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kylev.fedorapeople.org/RPM/perl-Mail-DKIM.spec SRPM URL: http://kylev.fedorapeople.org/RPM/perl-Mail-DKIM-0.32-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: DKIM and Domain Keys are two methods for authenticating email being adopted by the likes of Gmail, Yahoo, and many large banks. Having this package installed allows users to turn on a SpamAssassin plugin to detect fraud and phishing as well as sign your outbound messages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 01:44:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:44:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451903] Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180144.m5I1itb2006680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451903 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-17 21:44 EST ------- This would seem to be a duplicate of bug 250634, but I'm not sure if that ticket is actually going to move forward. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 01:53:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:53:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250634] Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Perl module for DKIM support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180153.m5I1rqbJ028133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Perl module for DKIM support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250634 ------- Additional Comments From kylev at kylev.com 2008-06-17 21:53 EST ------- Looks like I created a duplicate bug 451903, but I'm an active contributor. If this bug has gone dormant, perhaps we can proceed with mine? Mine builds in mock and I'm familiar with the packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 01:54:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:54:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450371] Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180154.m5I1s2jq008260@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 ------- Additional Comments From mathstuf at gmail.com 2008-06-17 21:54 EST ------- Gah. Konqueror is weird :( . Hopefully this one isn't screwed up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 01:51:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:51:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450371] Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180151.m5I1plJX008039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 ------- Additional Comments From mathstuf at gmail.com 2008-06-17 21:51 EST ------- URL got cut off :( . http://www.hypersonicsoft.org/projects/downloads/Pok?gen/nightly/pokegen-0.0.2-0http://www.hypersonicsoft.org/projects/downloads/Pok?gen/nightly/pokegen-0.0.2-0.3.fc9.20080617svn210.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 03:14:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 23:14:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180314.m5I3Ehw3024524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-17 23:14 EST ------- xmms-pulse-0.9.4-5.fc9.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xmms-pulse'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-5418 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 03:15:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 23:15:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448748] Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180315.m5I3F5iL011889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448748 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-17 23:15 EST ------- cylindrix-1.0-4.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 03:16:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 23:16:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448748] Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180316.m5I3GVgO012224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cylindrix - 3 degrees of freedom combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448748 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-17 23:16 EST ------- cylindrix-1.0-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 03:19:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 23:19:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180319.m5I3JM84012377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-17 23:19 EST ------- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 04:08:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:08:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449962] Review Request: texlive-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180408.m5I48uf9001505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449962 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 00:08 EST ------- Sorry for taking so long; I was distracted by another project. At least I remember why this seems so familiar; I reviewed tetex-fonts-hebrew a couple of years ago. We have a few new guidelines since then, and I might have missed a couple of things, so there are a few issues even though this package is mostly the same. rpmlint is down to the file-not-utf8 and two dangling-relative-symlink complaints. I think these are all OK. I know you're maintaining the tarball yourself; we have a guideline about that now. Please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL (the "We are Upstream" section). I'm not sure the License: is correct. There is a GPL notice, but as far as I can tell, nothing in the package specifies a version, so by the language in the GPL notice any GPL version is acceptable (and hence the License: tag should contain GPL+). Also, the file "hebrew.ldf" seems to be under the LPPL. If that's correct then it seems to me that you should have: License: GPL+ and LPPL with a comment before that indicating which parts are under which license. But I could be missing something. The Summary isn't actually correct on F9 at least, because teTeX isn't in use there. The /usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/culmus directory seems to be unowned. X source files can't be compared with upstream sources. * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. X summary shouldn't mention tetex. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field doesn't seem to match the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: tetex-fonts-hebrew = 0.1-9.fc10 tex-fonts-hebrew = 0.1-9.fc10 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/texhash /usr/bin/updmap-sys fonts-hebrew texlive X fails to own /usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/culmus * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 04:17:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:17:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180417.m5I4Hw5G021719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-18 00:17 EST ------- Nicoleau: Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 04:21:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:21:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180421.m5I4LI7F003732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-18 00:21 EST ------- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR: sponsored by me) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 04:20:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:20:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447599] Review Request: immix - image mixer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180420.m5I4KOOp022397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: immix - image mixer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447599 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-18 00:20 EST ------- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR: sponsored by me) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 04:19:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:19:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447104] Review Request: qdevelop - development environment for QT4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180419.m5I4JaQ8021885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qdevelop - development environment for QT4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447104 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-18 00:19 EST ------- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR: sponsord by me) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 04:22:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:22:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450621] Review Request: itaka - On-demand screen capture server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180422.m5I4M0R0022570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: itaka - On-demand screen capture server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450621 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-18 00:22 EST ------- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR: sponsored by me) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 04:39:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:39:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451406] Review Request: python-tempita - A very small text templating language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180439.m5I4dEAk025053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tempita - A very small text templating language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451406 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-18 00:39 EST ------- python-tempita-0.2-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-18 00:39 EST ------- python-tempita-0.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 04:39:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:39:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451406] Review Request: python-tempita - A very small text templating language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180439.m5I4dDvL006231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tempita - A very small text templating language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451406 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-18 00:39 EST ------- python-tempita-0.2-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 04:40:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:40:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451408] Review Request: python-wsgiproxy - HTTP proxying tools for WSGI apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180440.m5I4e8En006626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-wsgiproxy - HTTP proxying tools for WSGI apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451408 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-18 00:40 EST ------- python-wsgiproxy-0.1-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 04:40:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:40:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451408] Review Request: python-wsgiproxy - HTTP proxying tools for WSGI apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180440.m5I4eA0O025468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-wsgiproxy - HTTP proxying tools for WSGI apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451408 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-18 00:40 EST ------- python-wsgiproxy-0.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 07:08:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 03:08:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225671] Merge Review: curl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180708.m5I78omx016551@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: curl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225671 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-18 03:08 EST ------- curl-7.18.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 07:27:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 03:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441899] Review Request: inadyn-mt - Dynamic DNS Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180727.m5I7RBoU000865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inadyn-mt - Dynamic DNS Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441899 ------- Additional Comments From bhoover at wecs.com 2008-06-18 03:27 EST ------- Greetings! There's a new version too: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/inadyn-mt/inadyn-mt.v.02.12.18.tar.gz?modtime=1212990322&big_mirror=0 I don't plan adding anything in the immediate future. Though I'm trying to decide about a cross platform library/wrapper for an optional GUI. These are the Linux related changes since 2.12.01: -forced update period adjusted accordingly in event of USR1 -- failed user signaled update will cause forced updates to be late by time took to do user signaled updates -main loop iterations condition rendered so increment, and related exit, on success only, as in original inadyn -added ip update trigger, via SIGUSR1 -Executibles, output, and docs changed from inadyn to inadyn-mt to reflect program version. -updated inadyn-mt man files' original inadyn homepage to http://www.inatech.eu/inadyn/ -changed default config file from /etc/inadyn.conf to /etc/inadyn-mt/inadyn-mt.conf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 07:42:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 03:42:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436677] Review Request: xxdiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180742.m5I7gbDk003294@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xxdiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436677 ------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny at gmx.de 2008-06-18 03:42 EST ------- [x],[~] = ok, [!] = problem, [-] = not applicable [x] package meets naming guidelines [x] specfile is encoded in ascii or utf-8 [x] specfile matches base package name [~] specfile uses macros consistently could use %{name} in some more places [~] specfile is written cleanly could have some more explaining comments, e.g. - upstream status for patch? - removal of shebang lines [x] specfile is written in AE [x] changelog is present and has correct format [x] license matches actual license [x] license is open source-compatible [x] license text is included in package [~] source tag has correct url ok, has been discussed in the review [~] source files match upstream ok, has been discussed [x] latest version is packaged [x] summary is concise [x] dist tag is present [x] buildroot is correct [x] buildroot is prepped [x] %clean is present [x] proper build requirements [x] proper requirements [x] uses %{?_smp_mflags} [x] uses %{optflags} [x] doesn't use %makeinstall [x] package builds at least on one architecture tested on: fedora-9-x86_64 [x] packages installs and runs at least on one architecture tested on: fedora-9-x86_64 [x] rpmlint is quiet [x] final provides/requires look sane [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required [x] code, not content [x] file permissions are appropriate [x] debuginfo package looks usable [-] config files marked as %config(noreplace) [x] owns all the directories it creates [-] static libraries in -devel subpackage [-] header files in -devel subpackage [-] development .so files in -devel subpackage [-] pkgconfig files in -devel subpackage, requires pkgconfig [-] no .la files [-] doesn't need a -docs subpackage [x] relevant docs are included [x] doc files are not needed at runtime [~] provides a .desktop file, build-requires desktop-file-utils ok, has been discussed in the review [-] uses %find_lang, build-requires gettext APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 08:00:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 04:00:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225252] Merge Review: apmd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180800.m5I80o1Y006563@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: apmd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225252 ------- Additional Comments From zprikryl at redhat.com 2008-06-18 04:00 EST ------- I'm not sure, so I should commit only spec file with additional notes in the changelog, right?. And do I have to build a new package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 08:12:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 04:12:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451925] New: Review Request: synce-hal - Connection framework and dccm-implementation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451925 Summary: Review Request: synce-hal - Connection framework and dccm-implementation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/synce-hal.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/synce-hal-0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Synce-hal is a connection framework and dccm-implementation for Windows Mobile devices that integrates with HAL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 08:22:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 04:22:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451925] Review Request: synce-hal - Connection framework and dccm-implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180822.m5I8MGL6030119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-hal - Connection framework and dccm-implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451925 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2008-06-18 04:22 EST ------- Rawhide scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=667706 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 08:53:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 04:53:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451925] Review Request: synce-hal - Connection framework and dccm-implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180853.m5I8rFf2017257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-hal - Connection framework and dccm-implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451925 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-18 04:53 EST ------- Review:- + package builds in mock. + You like to use macros in Source URL http://downloads.sourceforge.net/synce/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 77ea51506ac4ef2bdb81ba7f5c609d2b synce-hal-0.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 08:58:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 04:58:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449962] Review Request: texlive-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180858.m5I8wtp2004704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449962 ------- Additional Comments From danken at cs.technion.ac.il 2008-06-18 04:58 EST ------- Don't worry about small delays; now that I have this package working on my own machine I'm in no hurry. I hope that I answered all your comments. (mainly added comments to the spec...) Please review the same URLs again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 09:00:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:00:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447406] Review Request: libfakekey In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180900.m5I90FWt019040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libfakekey https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447406 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |loupgaroublond at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-18 05:00 EST ------- *** Bug 451769 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 09:00:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:00:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451771] Review Request: maximus - an addon for metacity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180900.m5I90G1N019088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maximus - an addon for metacity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451771 Bug 451771 depends on bug 451769, which changed state. Bug 451769 Summary: Review Request: libfakekey - a library for generating key events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451769 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 09:00:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:00:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451769] Review Request: libfakekey - a library for generating key events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180900.m5I90EWH019005@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libfakekey - a library for generating key events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451769 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-18 05:00 EST ------- As I can see this package already in rawhide I think I should close this. Look http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6218 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 447406 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 09:10:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:10:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180910.m5I9AQfF021591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com 2008-06-18 05:10 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: trickle Short Description: Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper Owners: eponyme Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: mtasaka Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 09:17:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:17:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180917.m5I9Hpok022846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-18 05:17 EST ------- I guess wolfy (FAS name) want to be in CC members. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 09:29:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:29:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180929.m5I9Tcln025217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-18 05:29 EST ------- Okay. + This package itself is good now + Your anothre review request seems good to some extent at a quick glance. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This package (fbpanel) is APPOVED by me ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor. At the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 09:37:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:37:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451925] Review Request: synce-hal - Connection framework and dccm-implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180937.m5I9bpKV026960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-hal - Connection framework and dccm-implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451925 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2008-06-18 05:37 EST ------- Thanks for the quick review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: synce-hal Short Description: Connection framework and dccm-implementation Owners: awjb Branches: F-8 F-9 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 09:59:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:59:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451541] Review-Request: perl-Authen-Captcha - Perl extension for creating captcha's to verify the human element in transactions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806180959.m5I9xcjI016383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-Authen-Captcha - Perl extension for creating captcha's to verify the human element in transactions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451541 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review-Request: perl-Authen-|Review-Request: perl-Authen- |Captcha - Perl extension for|Captcha - Perl extension for |creating captcha's to verify|creating captcha's to verify |the human element in |the human element in |transactions |transactions Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-18 05:59 EST ------- rpmlint gave me perl-Authen-Captcha.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/perl-Authen-Captcha-1.023/license.txt This file has wrong end-of-line encoding, usually caused by creation or modification on a non-Unix system. It could prevent it from being displayed correctly in some circumstances. perl-Authen-Captcha.noarch: E: summary-too-long Perl extension for creating captcha's to verify the human element in transactions The "Summary:" must not exceed 79 characters. perl-Authen-Captcha.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.023-1 1.023-2.fc10 The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 10:02:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 06:02:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451540] Review-Request: perl-String-Random - Perl module to generate random strings based on a pattern In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181002.m5IA2vk4017502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-String-Random - Perl module to generate random strings based on a pattern https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451540 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review-Request: perl-String-|Review-Request: perl-String- |Random - Perl module to |Random - Perl module to |generate random strings |generate random strings |based on a pattern |based on a pattern Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-18 06:02 EST ------- build failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=667772 check for missing BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 10:00:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 06:00:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451542] Review-Request: perl-Algorithm-Permute - Handy and fast permutation with object oriented interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181000.m5IA0uTY017081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-Algorithm-Permute - Handy and fast permutation with object oriented interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451542 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review-Request: perl- |Review-Request: perl- |Algorithm-Permute - Handy |Algorithm-Permute - Handy |and fast permutation with |and fast permutation with |object oriented interface |object oriented interface Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-18 06:00 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=667767 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 93c9e11af9511390379720fe046fb960 Algorithm-Permute-0.12.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test are ok with some tests got skipped + Package perl-Algorithm-Permute-0.12-1.fc10 => Provides: Permute.so perl(Algorithm::Permute) = 0.12 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(AutoLoader) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 10:18:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 06:18:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450226] Review Request: blueproximity - bluetooth proximity detector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181018.m5IAIO60001495@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blueproximity - bluetooth proximity detector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450226 ------- Additional Comments From nunotavares at hotmail.com 2008-06-18 06:18 EST ------- Hi Beno?t Marcelin, wouldn't it be better to mark this bug as a DUPLICATE and follow Nicolas' work? I did search for 'blueproximity' and didn't find anything before creating this one, though... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 10:32:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 06:32:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446993] Review Request: liblicense - License for storing and retrieving license information in media files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181032.m5IAWX5X003925@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblicense - License for storing and retrieving license information in media files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446993 ------- Additional Comments From redhat at asheesh.org 2008-06-18 06:32 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: liblicense Short Description: The liblicense package contains a library, bindings, CLI utilities and license files for accessing license metadata in various file formats Owners: asheesh,dgilmore Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes When I try to set fedora-cvs to "?" I am told by Bugzilla: "You tried to request fedora-cvs. Only an authorized user can make this change." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 10:42:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 06:42:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450226] Review Request: blueproximity - bluetooth proximity detector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181042.m5IAgMj2023880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blueproximity - bluetooth proximity detector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450226 sereinity at online.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From sereinity at online.fr 2008-06-18 06:42 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 432905 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 10:42:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 06:42:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432905] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181042.m5IAgMgF023912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432905 sereinity at online.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nunotavares at hotmail.com ------- Additional Comments From sereinity at online.fr 2008-06-18 06:42 EST ------- *** Bug 450226 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 10:53:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 06:53:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181053.m5IArvDa007087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 ------- Additional Comments From nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com 2008-06-18 06:53 EST ------- oups, sorry wolfy. Should I also add wolfy in EPEL owners too ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 11:00:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 07:00:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181100.m5IB03pI008419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-18 07:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > oups, sorry wolfy. > Should I also add wolfy in EPEL owners too ? Ah.. sorry I meant I guess wolfy wants to be in Owners list, so yes (not CC list) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 11:03:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 07:03:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181103.m5IB3CmG027569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-06-18 07:03 EST ------- %changelog * Wed Jun 18 2008 Hemant Goyal 0.6.6-11 - fixed encoding of speech-dispatcher-cs.info file to UTF-8 SPEC File for revision 11 - http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/speechd-rpm/speech-dispatcher.spec SRPM - http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/speechd-rpm/speech-dispatcher-0.6.6-11.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 11:03:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 07:03:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 427121] Review Request: grib_api - ECMWF encoding/decoding GRIB software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181103.m5IB3unL009198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grib_api - ECMWF encoding/decoding GRIB software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427121 Bug 427121 depends on bug 373861, which changed state. Bug 373861 Summary: add fortran modules macro and FFLAGS switch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=373861 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 11:05:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 07:05:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181105.m5IB5kfn009741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 ------- Additional Comments From nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com 2008-06-18 07:05 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: trickle Short Description: Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper Owners: eponyme,wolfy Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: mtasaka Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 11:03:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 07:03:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257701] Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181103.m5IB3vLn009227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257701 Bug 257701 depends on bug 373861, which changed state. Bug 373861 Summary: add fortran modules macro and FFLAGS switch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=373861 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 11:03:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 07:03:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257761] Review Request: g2lib - GRIB2 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181103.m5IB3wgZ009259@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g2lib - GRIB2 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257761 Bug 257761 depends on bug 373861, which changed state. Bug 373861 Summary: add fortran modules macro and FFLAGS switch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=373861 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 11:12:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 07:12:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450226] Review Request: blueproximity - bluetooth proximity detector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181112.m5IBCNgm029117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blueproximity - bluetooth proximity detector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450226 ------- Additional Comments From sereinity at online.fr 2008-06-18 07:12 EST ------- But you can continue, because Nicolas A. Corrarello leave it (he didn't find any sponsor), and you use a newer version of blueproximity ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 11:43:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 07:43:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181143.m5IBhRCF016047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-06-18 07:43 EST ------- Thank you, Tasaka-san. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 11:58:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 07:58:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181158.m5IBwW1G018635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 ------- Additional Comments From cheekyboinc at foresightlinux.org 2008-06-18 07:58 EST ------- I finished the procedure in May. I am member of cla_done and have requested the membership of cvsextras. My FAS name is "cheekyboinc" ------ Okay, I will look at the koji and Bodhi system! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 12:21:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:21:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451280] Review Request: xqf - A server browser for many popular games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181221.m5ICLCRh024188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xqf - A server browser for many popular games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451280 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-18 08:21 EST ------- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR, sponsored by me) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 12:20:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:20:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448808] Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181220.m5ICKhWP024007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448808 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-18 08:20 EST ------- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR, sponsored by me) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 12:19:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:19:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181219.m5ICJxNv009034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-18 08:19 EST ------- Now I am sponsoring you. please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 12:43:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225252] Merge Review: apmd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181243.m5IChEhb013055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: apmd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225252 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-06-18 08:43 EST ------- Correct. And build just for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 12:45:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:45:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449928] Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181245.m5ICjB78028098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449928 ------- Additional Comments From atorkhov at gmail.com 2008-06-18 08:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > I'd be happy to comaintain this with you. You do realize that I'm planning to > draft you as a comaintainer for the other WorldForge packages too, right? :) Yes, I had a guess :) And in turn will be happy too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 12:45:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:45:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449928] Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181245.m5ICjdep013628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449928 atorkhov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From atorkhov at gmail.com 2008-06-18 08:45 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libwfut Short Description: update tool implementation in C++ for use directly by WorldForge clients. Owners: atorkhov,wart Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 12:46:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:46:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449928] Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181246.m5ICk2mn013685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449928 atorkhov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 12:59:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:59:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225252] Merge Review: apmd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181259.m5ICxwhP015892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: apmd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225252 ------- Additional Comments From zprikryl at redhat.com 2008-06-18 08:59 EST ------- Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 13:03:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:03:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181303.m5ID3jTA031668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-18 09:03 EST ------- I get this on $ rpm -Uvh ~/tmp/root-5.19.04-1.fc9.src.rpm 1:root warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root ########################################### [100%] error: unpacking of archive failed on file /home/dumas/RPM-fc/SOURCES/root_v5.19.04-clean.source.tar.gz;485906b9: cpio: read And rpm2cpio | cpio -i also fails. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 13:13:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:13:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225252] Merge Review: apmd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181313.m5IDDGQd018733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: apmd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225252 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-06-18 09:13 EST ------- Works for me. Approved. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 13:13:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:13:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449928] Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181313.m5IDDCqe000953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449928 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 13:17:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:17:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181317.m5IDH184019557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP Alias: php-pear-Auth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2008-06-18 09:17 EST ------- Dave, please make the following changes: 1. Instead of making an -addons package, simply rm or %exclude those files or include them in the main package. 2. Make a -radius subpackage which Requires: Auth_Radius and include RADIUS.php in the %files. 3. Remove the %exclude line, it is not needed. 4. Move the sed line back into %prep and supply a patch for the MD5SUM, see http://xulchris.fedorapeople.org/packages/php-pear-HTTP-Client.spec as an example 5. I will add php-pear-HTTP-Client today, please add this to the Requires 6. Perform steps I outlined in comment #20 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 13:37:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:37:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250634] Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Perl module for DKIM support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181337.m5IDbDE3023004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Perl module for DKIM support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250634 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(lmb at biosci.ki.se) | ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2008-06-18 09:37 EST ------- It's been 5 months since I commented that we needed to get this review moving. I'd call that a stalled review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 13:39:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:39:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451903] Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181339.m5IDdOK5005604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451903 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve at silug.org ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2008-06-18 09:39 EST ------- Please go ahead with this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 13:59:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:59:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181359.m5IDx48n026959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 cheekyboinc at foresightlinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cheekyboinc at foresightlinux.org 2008-06-18 09:59 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fbpanel Short Description: a lightweight X11 desktop panel Owners: cheekyboinc Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 14:23:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:23:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451655] Review Request: kdeplasmoids - Additional plasmoids for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181423.m5IEN1JL032102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeplasmoids - Additional plasmoids for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451655 lvillani at binaryhelix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lvillani at binaryhelix.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lvillani at binaryhelix.net 2008-06-18 10:23 EST ------- Package builds fine but: - Missing ldconfig call in %post and %postun The package seems fine, if you fix these things at import time I can approve it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 14:27:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:27:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451655] Review Request: kdeplasmoids - Additional plasmoids for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181427.m5IERlqQ000761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeplasmoids - Additional plasmoids for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451655 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-06-18 10:27 EST ------- nevermind, I'm blind, ok, I'll add that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 14:27:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:27:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451655] Review Request: kdeplasmoids - Additional plasmoids for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181427.m5IERMIp015422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeplasmoids - Additional plasmoids for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451655 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-06-18 10:27 EST ------- why is ldconfig needed? I don't see any shlibs here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 14:40:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:40:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225752] Merge Review: filesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181440.m5IEe93W003274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225752 ------- Additional Comments From pknirsch at redhat.com 2008-06-18 10:40 EST ------- Ok, homepage created and added the specfile and the language exception file: https://fedorahosted.org/filesystem/wiki As soon as git is working properly for the project i'll add both files to git there and remove the attachments from the wiki page. Thanks a lot, Read ya, Phil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 14:53:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:53:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225752] Merge Review: filesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181453.m5IErcrI020153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225752 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-06-18 10:53 EST ------- Awesome. Minor nitpick, though. Source0: should have the full URL to lang-exceptions, i.e. https://fedorahosted.org/filesystem/attachment/wiki/WikiStart/lang-exceptions Once that's updated, you can have the git version as well, but that will need to stay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 15:15:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:15:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448205] Review Request: php-pear-Net-IPv4 - IPv4 network calculations and validation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181515.m5IFF1Qf024619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-IPv4 - IPv4 network calculations and validation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448205 steven.moix at axianet.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 15:19:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:19:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451655] Review Request: kdeplasmoids - Additional plasmoids for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181519.m5IFJ1Ft010829@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeplasmoids - Additional plasmoids for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451655 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-06-18 11:19 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kdeplasmoids Short Description: Additional plasmoids for KDE Owners: rdieter Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 15:15:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:15:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448204] Review Request: php-pear-Net-DNS - Resolver library used to communicate with a DNS server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181515.m5IFFAeT010435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-DNS - Resolver library used to communicate with a DNS server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448204 steven.moix at axianet.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 15:16:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:16:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451655] Review Request: kdeplasmoids - Additional plasmoids for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181516.m5IFGoa3025255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeplasmoids - Additional plasmoids for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451655 lvillani at binaryhelix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lvillani at binaryhelix.net 2008-06-18 11:16 EST ------- Ok to do an import-time fix. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 15:29:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:29:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451996] New: Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 Summary: Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: timc at inf.ed.ac.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/timc/prover9/prover9.spec SRPM URL: http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/timc/prover9/prover9-200805a-1.src.rpm I am seeking a sponsor! This is a port of the Debian equivalent package. This version supercedes an earlier version that was submitted for review named LADR (#428410) Description: This package provides the Prover9 resolution/paramodulation theorem prover and the Mace4 countermodel generator. Prover9 is an automated theorem prover for first-order and equational logic. It is a successor of the Otter prover. Prover9 uses the inference techniques of ordered resolution and paramodulation with literal selection. The program Mace4 searches for finite structures satisfying first-order and equational statements, the same kind of statement that Prover9 accepts. If the statement is the denial of some conjecture, any structures found by Mace4 are counterexamples to the conjecture. Mace4 can be a valuable complement to Prover9, looking for counterexamples before (or at the same time as) using Prover9 to search for a proof. It can also be used to help debug input clauses and formulas for Prover9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 15:30:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:30:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181530.m5IFUBHc013478@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 timc at inf.ed.ac.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 15:51:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:51:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248432] new package request: sphinxbase [spec attached] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181551.m5IFp7RC000416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: new package request: sphinxbase [spec attached] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248432 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 15:56:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:56:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224458] Review Request: libsilc (dependency of gaim) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181556.m5IFuZoM001569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsilc (dependency of gaim) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224458 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 16:02:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:02:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441899] Review Request: inadyn-mt - Dynamic DNS Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181602.m5IG2SPX020179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inadyn-mt - Dynamic DNS Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441899 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2008-06-18 12:02 EST ------- Thank you for your information. I dislike your decission to change the name of the configuration file, but I have create a symbolic link from the new file name to the old one to ensure the compatiblity to the old releases. New Upload: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/inadyn-mt/inadyn-mt.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/inadyn-mt/inydyn-mt-2.12.18-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 16:13:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:13:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181613.m5IGDxOC005105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 ------- Additional Comments From juanucleus at gmail.com 2008-06-18 12:13 EST ------- Patrice: My apologies for this, I do not know what the issue was. I changed the name of the source file to prevent the use of a dash and this seems to have done the trick. These are the new spec and source files: Spec URL: http://www.jlab.org/~cornejo/fedora/root/r2/root.spec SRPM URL: http://www.jlab.org/~cornejo/fedora/root/r2/root-5.19.04-2.fc9.src.rpm By the way, this is for all. There is also a good API documentation available, which I have not yet packed because of the exceedingly large size. It's something like 200+ MB. Should I attempt to pack this, or just point people to the appropriate on-line source? Also, right now I am packaging the development branch, but that's because the production version (5.20.00) should be out on the 25th of this month. Thank you all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 16:30:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:30:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449962] Review Request: texlive-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181630.m5IGUnnZ025492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449962 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 12:30 EST ------- Things look good to me: /usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/culmus is owned properly. The License: looks good. Summary looks good. Lack of upstream sources is commented properly. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 16:49:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:49:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449707] Review Request: gambit-c - Gambit-C Scheme programming system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181649.m5IGnP0h028511@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gambit-c - Gambit-C Scheme programming system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449707 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-18 12:49 EST ------- That's a thought, that way they can just share documentation. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gambit-c Short Description: Gambit-C Scheme programming system Owners: salimma Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 16:49:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:49:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449707] Review Request: gambit-c - Gambit-C Scheme programming system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181649.m5IGncXA011324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gambit-c - Gambit-C Scheme programming system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449707 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 16:46:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:46:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430429] Review Request: python-storm - An object-relational mapper (ORM) for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181646.m5IGkW8c011037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-storm - An object-relational mapper (ORM) for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430429 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-18 12:46 EST ------- OK, sorry for the delay; here it is. Bumped up version, touched up the description a bit to match that on the home page. I just put it through the upstream tutorial, using the SQLite backend. Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/python/python-storm.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/python/python-storm-0.12-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 17:00:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:00:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451903] Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181700.m5IH0cp2030706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451903 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 17:15:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:15:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452010] New: New branch request for pgadmin3 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452010 Summary: New branch request for pgadmin3 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: devrim at commandprompt.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: pgadmin3 New Branches: EL-4, EL-5 I want to maintain pgadmin3 for EPEL, too, per requests from users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 17:16:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:16:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452010] New branch request for pgadmin3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181716.m5IHGMIb016697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New branch request for pgadmin3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452010 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 17:41:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:41:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451142] Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181741.m5IHf8An021128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451142 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 13:41 EST ------- I don't see any changes; the new package still has the same rpmlint complaints. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 17:38:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:38:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451903] Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181738.m5IHc4Us020463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451903 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 13:38 EST ------- Builds fine; rpmlint has several complaints in two classes: spurious-executable-perm complaints on /usr/share/doc/perl-Mail-DKIM-0.32/test_nowsp_rsa_sha1.pl, dkimverify.pl, dkimsign.pl, test_bare_rsa_sha1.pl, and test_canonicalization.pl doc-file-dependency complaints on the various dependencies of those executable docfiles. Executable documentation isn't necessarily problem; what you need to avoid is dependencies caused solely by the documentation. In this case, the following dependencies come only from those executable docfiles: /usr/bin/perl perl(Getopt::Long) perl(Mail::DKIM::Signer) perl(Mail::DKIM::TextWrap) perl(Mail::DKIM::Verifier) perl(Pod::Usage) Some of them are obviously not problematic (/usr/bin/perl and the ones satisfied by the package iteslf) but I'd suggest either adding 'chmod -x scripts/*' at the end of %prep, or installing the scripts you expect people to want to call into %{_bindir}. * source files match upstream: cb871f5f0c1ec125ca7d691d42a041ecd85d969a209c5fc070d6c3d626d9cb6e Mail-DKIM-0.32.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. X rpmlint has some valid complaints. X final provides and requires: perl(Mail::DKIM) = 0.32 perl(Mail::DKIM::Algorithm::Base) perl(Mail::DKIM::Algorithm::dk_rsa_sha1) perl(Mail::DKIM::Algorithm::rsa_sha1) perl(Mail::DKIM::Algorithm::rsa_sha256) perl(Mail::DKIM::Canonicalization::Base) perl(Mail::DKIM::Canonicalization::DkCommon) perl(Mail::DKIM::Canonicalization::DkimCommon) perl(Mail::DKIM::Canonicalization::dk_nofws) perl(Mail::DKIM::Canonicalization::dk_simple) perl(Mail::DKIM::Canonicalization::nowsp) perl(Mail::DKIM::Canonicalization::relaxed) perl(Mail::DKIM::Canonicalization::simple) perl(Mail::DKIM::Common) = 0.32 perl(Mail::DKIM::DNS) perl(Mail::DKIM::DkSignature) perl(Mail::DKIM::DkimPolicy) perl(Mail::DKIM::Key) perl(Mail::DKIM::KeyValueList) perl(Mail::DKIM::MessageParser) perl(Mail::DKIM::Policy) perl(Mail::DKIM::PrivateKey) perl(Mail::DKIM::PublicKey) perl(Mail::DKIM::Signature) perl(Mail::DKIM::Signer) = 0.32 perl(Mail::DKIM::SignerPolicy) perl(Mail::DKIM::TextWrap) perl(Mail::DKIM::Verifier) = 0.32 perl-Mail-DKIM = 0.32-1.fc10 = /usr/bin/perl perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA) perl(Digest::SHA) X perl(Getopt::Long) perl(MIME::Base64) perl(Mail::Address) perl(Mail::DKIM::Algorithm::dk_rsa_sha1) perl(Mail::DKIM::Algorithm::rsa_sha1) perl(Mail::DKIM::Algorithm::rsa_sha256) perl(Mail::DKIM::Canonicalization::dk_nofws) perl(Mail::DKIM::Canonicalization::dk_simple) perl(Mail::DKIM::Canonicalization::nowsp) perl(Mail::DKIM::Canonicalization::relaxed) perl(Mail::DKIM::Canonicalization::simple) perl(Mail::DKIM::DNS) perl(Mail::DKIM::DkSignature) perl(Mail::DKIM::DkimPolicy) perl(Mail::DKIM::Policy) perl(Mail::DKIM::PrivateKey) perl(Mail::DKIM::PublicKey) perl(Mail::DKIM::Signature) perl(Mail::DKIM::Signer) perl(Mail::DKIM::TextWrap) perl(Mail::DKIM::Verifier) perl(Net::DNS) X perl(Pod::Usage) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=8, Tests=162, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.63 cusr + 0.07 csys = 0.70 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 17:48:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:48:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181748.m5IHmTrs022322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-18 13:48 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309770) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309770&action=view) Slightly modified init script For -11: * Source tarball (In reply to comment #39) > > * Source file > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > 1038719 2008-02-16 15:54 > > speech-dispatcher-0.6.6-7.fc7/speech-dispatcher-0.6.6.tar.gz > > 1039765 2008-06-08 00:04 > > speech-dispatcher-0.6.6-9.fc7/speech-dispatcher-0.6.6.tar.gz > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Okay this is perhaps because the (cs).info file is destroyed. - It is not the point. The problem is that you are not using the source tarball written as %SOURCE0. ------------------------------------------------------------------ 1038719 2008-02-13 19:31 speech-dispatcher-0.6.6.tar.gz 1039765 2008-06-08 00:04 speech-dispatcher-0.6.6-11.fc7/speech-dispatcher-0.6.6.tar.gz ------------------------------------------------------------------ The former is what I downloaded from the URL written as %SOURCE0 The latter is what you are using now, please don't. - Also, change the permissions of the file in srpm (i.e. %SOURCEx) to 0644. * iconv > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > iconv -f ... -t .... speech-dispatcher-cs.info > speech-dispatcher-cs.info > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > as you write now destroys this info file. > > I have written to the speech-dispatcher community to find the correct encoding > of this file. I think I am not able to correctly determine the encoding of the > (cs) file which is resulting in the file's corruption. - The corruption is not due to the reason you wrote here. The reason is that iconv does not support redirection to its original file directory (which you modified in -11). So now iconv usage is okay, however build log says: ------------------------------------------------------------------- 754 if /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/speech-dispatcher-0.6.6/missing --run makeinfo -I . \ 755 -o speech-dispatcher-cs.info speech-dispatcher-cs.texi; \ 756 then \ 757 rc=0; \ 758 cd .; \ 759 else \ 760 rc=$?; \ 761 cd . && \ 762 $restore $backupdir/* `echo "./speech-dispatcher-cs.info" | sed 's|[^/]*$||'`; \ 763 fi; \ 764 rm -rf $backupdir; exit $rc 765 /builddir/build/BUILD/speech-dispatcher-0.6.6/missing: line 52: makeinfo: command not found 766 WARNING: `makeinfo' is missing on your system. You should only need it if 767 you modified a `.texi' or `.texinfo' file, or any other file 768 indirectly affecting the aspect of the manual. The spurious 769 call might also be the consequence of using a buggy `make' (AIX, 770 DU, IRIX). You might want to install the `Texinfo' package or 771 the `GNU make' package. Grab either from any GNU archive site. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Now BuildRequires: makeinfo is missing. * Macros expansion in %changelog > > * Macros in %changelog > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > - removed %%{_infodir}/dir file > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > for example. > > Okay i have fixed it for all macro occurrences in the changelog. - Actually more fixes are needed. Please use "rpmlint" ------------------------------------------------------------------ speech-dispatcher.src:279: W: macro-in-%changelog version ------------------------------------------------------------------ * Initscripts - Current initscript seems good, however as I guess showing the status to terminal is preferred, I modified your script a bit. > i have named the prog speech-dispatcherd on purpose to distinguish between the > binary and daemon. (if thats what you mean by daemon is wrong?) - Sorry, for this part it seems I was just being confused. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 17:53:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:53:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181753.m5IHrEEL007781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove Alias: perl-XML-Grove https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |skasal at redhat.com Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(rnorwood at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 13:53 EST ------- I note that rnoorwood doesn't own this package. CC'ing the current owner; hopefully we can get this merge review cleared up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 17:53:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:53:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181753.m5IHrhgd023564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-18 13:53 EST ------- By the way, as this is NEEDSPONSOR ticket, please re-read my comment 23 ( NOTE: Before being sponsored: ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 18:02:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:02:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451903] Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181802.m5II2hOc010394@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451903 ------- Additional Comments From kylev at kylev.com 2008-06-18 14:02 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kylev.fedorapeople.org/RPM/perl-Mail-DKIM.spec SRPM URL: http://kylev.fedorapeople.org/RPM/perl-Mail-DKIM-0.32-2.fc8.src.rpm Updated to include the example scripts/*.pl files as valuable/useful, but non-executable and therefore not dependancy creating. rpmlint now silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 18:00:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:00:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451142] Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181800.m5II0okV025442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451142 ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-18 14:00 EST ------- Sorry, forgot to correct the release number in the SRPM after I cut and pasted. Here's the corrected link: http://core.serpentine.com/haddock09-0.9-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 18:07:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:07:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441899] Review Request: inadyn-mt - Dynamic DNS Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181807.m5II7x8O011436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inadyn-mt - Dynamic DNS Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441899 ------- Additional Comments From bhoover at wecs.com 2008-06-18 14:07 EST ------- Mmm. Well, I changed the name of the program when forked, so I figured it would be best to change related items - though I'm happy to abide by whatever the convention in such cases. Neither inadyn-advanced, nor inadyn authors were responsive to patching before hand. I'm open to suggestions. Presently, sourceforge has a hosted inadyn which is designated as a uCLinux port, so I could not rename it inadyn. I don't know if you were aware that there was this sourceforge hosted inadyn. As such, I imagine, among your deliberations, you may want to consider that as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 18:14:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:14:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451903] Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181814.m5IIELrm012413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451903 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 14:14 EST ------- Yep, looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 18:46:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:46:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443467] Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181846.m5IIkQGa001792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443467 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-18 14:46 EST ------- ale-0.9.0.1-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 18:50:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:50:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443467] Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181850.m5IIoYGd020043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443467 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-18 14:50 EST ------- ale-0.9.0.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 18:52:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:52:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443468] Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181852.m5IIqoaO020320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443468 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-18 14:52 EST ------- hdrprep-0.1.2-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 18:54:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:54:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443468] Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181854.m5IIsf6o003071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443468 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-18 14:54 EST ------- hdrprep-0.1.2-4.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 18:55:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:55:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181855.m5IIte4g003515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP Alias: php-pear-Auth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 ------- Additional Comments From dhollis at davehollis.com 2008-06-18 14:55 EST ------- 1) Removed -addons package 2) Added -radius packages 3) Moved line-feed stuff back to %prep 4) Added HTTP_Client req Did need to use the %exclude in the main package to keep the sub-package files from being included there. The -radius package has a req on php-pear(Auth_Radius) though that package does not currently exist in F9 that I see. http://web.davehollis.com:81/packages/php-pear-Auth.spec http://web.davehollis.com:81/packages/php-pear-Auth-1.6.1-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 19:00:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:00:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252049] Review Request: asm2 - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181900.m5IJ0q2t021961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asm2 - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252049 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(viveklak at gmail.com | |) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 19:01:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:01:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451903] Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181901.m5IJ1NcC004705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451903 kylev at kylev.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kylev at kylev.com 2008-06-18 15:01 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Mail-DKIM Short Description: Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures Owners: kylev Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 19:09:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:09:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451142] Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181909.m5IJ9JSc006547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451142 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 15:09 EST ------- Oh, heh, browser caching. It seems odd to use the name of the package in the summary, since you get things like: haddock09 - Haddock documentation tool... but it's no big deal. Otherwise everything looks good to me. * source files match upstream: beefd4a6da577978e7a79cabba60970accc5cd48fbb04c424a6b36ace3a9f8d0 haddock-0.9.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: haddock09 = 0.9-3.fc10 = libgmp.so.3()(64bit) libutil.so.1()(64bit) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 19:16:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:16:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448205] Review Request: php-pear-Net-IPv4 - IPv4 network calculations and validation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181916.m5IJGVIG008477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-IPv4 - IPv4 network calculations and validation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448205 ------- Additional Comments From dhollis at davehollis.com 2008-06-18 15:16 EST ------- I can't sponsor you, I'm currently in the same boat as you currently but I did review the package. rpmlint showed no issues except for the lack of documentation. I don't see any issues with the packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 19:17:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:17:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448613] Review Request: perl-EV - Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181917.m5IJH71j008551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-EV - Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448613 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 19:25:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:25:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451142] Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181925.m5IJPneF026434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451142 ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-18 15:25 EST ------- Wonderful, thanks. I'll change the summary to something more sensible :-) Summary: Haskell documentation tool for annotated source code -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 19:29:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:29:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451142] Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181929.m5IJTOuI026682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451142 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-18 15:29 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: haddock09 Short Description: Haskell documentation tool for annotated source code Owners: bos,petersen Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 19:42:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:42:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448205] Review Request: php-pear-Net-IPv4 - IPv4 network calculations and validation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806181942.m5IJgLa5029489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-IPv4 - IPv4 network calculations and validation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448205 ------- Additional Comments From steven.moix at axianet.ch 2008-06-18 15:42 EST ------- There is no documentation in the upstream code, so this should be normal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 20:01:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:01:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448613] Review Request: perl-EV - Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806182001.m5IK1D04000669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-EV - Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448613 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 16:01 EST ------- rpmlint says this: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/EV/ev.h W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/EV/EVAPI.h but these are normal for binary Perl packages. I'm not sure about the license. libev itself has a (2-clause) BSD licence, but the Perl module is the usual GPL+ or Artistic. libev seems to be built internally, and I've no idea whether it could be built standalone. So I'm not at all sure what the final license is. I'll ask the Legal folks to take a look. * source files match upstream: 53e061fad687087e857f66a380eac2d39a9536542b84150ce4a7a3e209fe1245 EV-3.42.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. ? license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: EV.so()(64bit) perl(EV) = 3.42 perl(EV::MakeMaker) perl-EV = 3.42-1.fc10 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Config) perl(XSLoader) perl(base) perl(strict) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=10, Tests=6823, 7 wallclock secs ( 0.18 cusr + 0.05 csys = 0.23 CPU) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are OK in the main package. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 20:08:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:08:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806182008.m5IK8BuY002059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trash - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 ------- Additional Comments From lokthare at gmail.com 2008-06-18 16:08 EST ------- Ok, i have asked the author, it's seems possible to change the name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 20:11:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:11:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448867] Review Request: perl-parent - Establish an ISA relationship with base classes at compile time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806182011.m5IKBi27003049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-parent - Establish an ISA relationship with base classes at compile time Alias: perl-parent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448867 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 16:11 EST ------- Really nothing to say here. * source files match upstream: a04211e6fb2bf12913c63f904483550554013737ed8e1302fcbadca22ed3509e parent-0.221.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(parent) = 0.221 perl-parent = 0.221-1.fc10 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=34, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.13 cusr + 0.03 csys = 0.16 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 20:26:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:26:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439240] Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806182026.m5IKQ2g4022299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache Alias: perl-Cache-FastMmap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439240 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(simon at sxw.org.uk) | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 16:26 EST ------- This has been in needinfo for over two months now; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 20:27:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:27:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441830] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806182027.m5IKRdhK005773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI Alias: perl-DBD-ODBC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441830 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 16:27 EST ------- I'm just fixing up the flags here, but I note that it's been two months without any response from Xavier. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 20:33:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:33:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806182033.m5IKXIl1006783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 16:33 EST ------- The "Show Bug Activity" link should tell you everything you need to know about the history of this ticket. As far as I can tell, this ticket has never been assigned to anyone and Jochen isn't even CC'd on this ticket so he wouldn't see any of the remarks. Note that we do have some cmake information: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/cmake I would not approve this package without the test suite being included and run at build time unless that's just not possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 20:35:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:35:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447599] Review Request: immix - image mixer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806182035.m5IKZK2Z024012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: immix - image mixer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447599 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 16:35 EST ------- Please remember to set the flags properly when you begin a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 20:35:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:35:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447607] Review Request: abgraph - ABGraph is a simple tool to benchmark webservers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806182035.m5IKZdrU007565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abgraph - ABGraph is a simple tool to benchmark webservers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447607 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 16:35 EST ------- Please remember to set the flags properly when you begin a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 20:35:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:35:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447104] Review Request: qdevelop - development environment for QT4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806182035.m5IKZ2r0007382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qdevelop - development environment for QT4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447104 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 16:35 EST ------- Please remember to set the flags appropriately when you begin a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 20:46:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:46:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448867] Review Request: perl-parent - Establish an ISA relationship with base classes at compile time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806182046.m5IKk2D3009391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-parent - Establish an ISA relationship with base classes at compile time Alias: perl-parent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448867 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 20:46:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:46:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448867] Review Request: perl-parent - Establish an ISA relationship with base classes at compile time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806182046.m5IKk1Rh009362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-parent - Establish an ISA relationship with base classes at compile time Alias: perl-parent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448867 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-06-18 16:46 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-parent Short Description: Establish an ISA relationship with base classes at compile time Owners: cweyl Branches: F-8, F-9, devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 20:48:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:48:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442507] Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806182048.m5IKmouB026144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507 ------- Additional Comments From adrian at lisas.de 2008-06-18 16:48 EST ------- The reason why libgnat is only available for ppc and not ppc64 can be seen here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241098 Concerning the include directory: I would go for /usr/include/spu. That seems to make the most sense for me. For now. Right now this is a ppc/ppc64 only package and has nothing to do with cross compiling in the traditional meaning. Including it that way would enable Fedora installations on PS3 to easily have libspe2 available. To make the complete spu buildchain available for other platforms is probably a much bigger discussion which does not really belong here in the review request for libspe2 on ppc/ppc64. If there is no one against this I would be willing to sponsor Jochen (after a few more little changes to the spec file). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 21:07:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:07:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806182107.m5IL7Jrt029970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 21:17:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:17:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449962] Review Request: tex-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806182117.m5ILHjj7015438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449962 danken at cs.technion.ac.il changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: texlive- |Review Request: tex-fonts- |fonts-hebrew - Support |hebrew - Support using |using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts |(Culmus) Hebrew fonts in |in TeXLive |TeXLive Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From danken at cs.technion.ac.il 2008-06-18 17:17 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tex-fonts-hebrew Short Description: Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive Owners: danken Branches: F-9 InitialCC: danken Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 21:31:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:31:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441899] Review Request: inadyn-mt - Dynamic DNS Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806182131.m5ILVWrQ001953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inadyn-mt - Dynamic DNS Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441899 ------- Additional Comments From bhoover at wecs.com 2008-06-18 17:31 EST ------- Oh, yeah though, I do see that I could set it up for backward compatibility -- to look for old file name(s) -- that's no problem. Any thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 21:38:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:38:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806182138.m5ILcj2M019058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-06-18 17:38 EST ------- Yes, I should check the bug history and not blindly trust the comment #7. But I think all my points are still valid. Our Wiki has a lot of answers for technical questions. And I have a personal experience with Jochen as reviewer and I know that it can take weeks before he returns to the review. The tests could be perhaps omitted for package iterations that should clean the general packaging issues but then they should be added back. Reduced size can really help both sides when they are using e.g. ADSL. But I agree with Jason - if they can be run, they must be included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 22:59:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:59:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444428] Review Request: ocaml-cmigrep - Search OCaml compiled interface (cmi) files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806182259.m5IMx3bI016060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cmigrep - Search OCaml compiled interface (cmi) files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444428 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 18:59 EST ------- I guess selinux will probably become annoyed by the executable stack, but as long as the package isn't broken in general I don't see a need to wait until everything rebuilds. That hasn't happened so far, so I won't wait any longer. I don't think it's particularly pretty to have to include the entire compiler source, but I've had to do the same thing and I don't see an alternative other than waiting for the one you mention in the spec to happen. Besides, there really isn't much to this package, just a lot of build time for one file. You should probably include the COPYING file as %doc as well. That's really the only nit I see to pick. * source files match upstream: e420d4ad1ebf062bb4d02028fadccd11a6c5cf7ddde159ebb607f2fefa4ea989 cmigrep-1.5.tar.bz2 3755a32da1a7490d47fff7838c12c754d3fcfe69d7c9ff2358704259dc477c58 ocaml-3.10.2.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: ocaml-cmigrep = 1.5-2.fc10 = libpcre.so.0()(64bit) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 23:25:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:25:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450938] Review Request: fs_mark - Benchmark synchronous/async file creation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806182325.m5INPIAw004548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fs_mark - Benchmark synchronous/async file creation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450938 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 19:25 EST ------- Someone must have typoed a bug number in bodhi.... I would suggest using URL: http://developer.osdl.org/dev/doubt/fs_mark (since it actually has some useful content) and Source0: http://developer.osdl.org/dev/doubt/fs_mark/archive/%{name}-%{version}.tgz The proper compilers aren't passed to the compiler, which results in a broken debuginfo package (among other things). You can fix this by changing the make line to: CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" make %{?_smp_mflags} Everything else seems to be fine. * source files match upstream: ff6cdb29f55d3ea9dfd0261faeb1f65e35ea7092605cb330e77f4b1d6bebd87b fs_mark-3.2.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none). X compiler flags are not correct. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. X debuginfo package does not include source. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: fs_mark = 3.2-1.fc10 = (no non-glibc dependencies) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 23:50:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:50:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450938] Review Request: fs_mark - Benchmark synchronous/async file creation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806182350.m5INo3VI024096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fs_mark - Benchmark synchronous/async file creation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450938 ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2008-06-18 19:50 EST ------- Ok, updated files at http://sandeen.fedorapeople.org/fs_mark/ Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 23:53:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:53:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444744] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Preferred - Perl extension to choose a language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806182353.m5INrcVc008376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Lingua-Preferred - Perl extension to choose a language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444744 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 19:53 EST ------- It doesn't look like the CPAN issues are fixed, but I don't think that should prevent approval of this package. It can still be downloaded so the only thing missing is the URL; I'd say just comment it out and add an explanatory comment to the spec. This will elicit a "no-url-tag" complaint from rpmlint but I don't see a better alternative; having an incorrect URL tag seems worse. The Summary: is a bit content-free. CPAN seems to use "Pick a language based on user's preferences" which seems better to me. Honestly both of these are trivial fixes; you can make them when you check in. * source files match upstream: fa58c4fac6b676f78caad6b472a785dd0c8fa67004a62294fbcfa3a3eb243c83 Lingua-Preferred-0.2.4.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. ? summary is kind of lame. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Lingua::Preferred) = 0.2.4 perl-Lingua-Preferred = 0.2.4-2.fc10 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(AutoLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 23:56:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:56:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450938] Review Request: fs_mark - Benchmark synchronous/async file creation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806182356.m5INuB4a025092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fs_mark - Benchmark synchronous/async file creation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450938 esandeen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2008-06-18 19:56 EST ------- oh, and koji build of the above at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=669624 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 23:55:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:55:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450938] Review Request: fs_mark - Benchmark synchronous/async file creation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806182355.m5INtTg7008958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fs_mark - Benchmark synchronous/async file creation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450938 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 19:55 EST ------- Looks good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 23:58:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:58:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232790] Review Request: ming - SWF output library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806182358.m5INwNdV025328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ming - SWF output library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232790 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 18 23:57:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:57:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450938] Review Request: fs_mark - Benchmark synchronous/async file creation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806182357.m5INvo0r025270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fs_mark - Benchmark synchronous/async file creation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450938 esandeen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2008-06-18 19:57 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fs_mark Short Description: Benchmark synchronous/async file creation Owners: sandeen Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 00:05:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:05:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230316] Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806190005.m5J05toP010863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230316 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 20:05 EST ------- Unfortunately, while the above specfile link works, the link to the src.rpm is 404. I grabbed http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/jbrout-0.2.187-1.fc7.src.rpm instead; is that one OK? Unfortunately it doesn't build; desktop-file-install fails (sorry for horrible wrapping): + desktop-file-install --dir /var/tmp/jbrout-0.2.187-1.fc10-UhhP3w/usr/share/applications --vendor=fedora --add-category=X-Fedora --delete-original /var/tmp/jbrout-0.2.187-1.fc10-UhhP3w/usr/share/applications/jbrout.desktop /var/tmp/jbrout-0.2.187-1.fc10-UhhP3w/usr/share/applications/fedora-jbrout.desktop: error: value "0.2" for key "Version" in group "Desktop Entry" is not a known version Error on file "/var/tmp/jbrout-0.2.187-1.fc10-UhhP3w/usr/share/applications/jbrout.desktop": Failed to validate the created desktop file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 00:13:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:13:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428686] Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806190013.m5J0Dc6N027934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428686 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(jamatos at fc.up.pt) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 20:13 EST ------- Anything happening with this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 00:24:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:24:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806190024.m5J0Ovsh029477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 20:24 EST ------- Doesn't look like Ritesh is in cvsextras yet. This package builds fine and rpmlint only complains about the lack of docs in librep-devel. /usr/share/aclocal seems to be unowned. I think the -devel package needs a dependency on automake. If you're going to package a subversion checkout, please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL for info on including instructions for duplicating the checkout. I need to be able to check out my own copy of the upstream source by following information in the specfile. Honestly I'd say this package is pretty close now, but I haven't done a complete review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 00:30:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:30:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806190030.m5J0US4s030726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-18 20:30 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 00:32:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:32:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450938] Review Request: fs_mark - Benchmark synchronous/async file creation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806190032.m5J0WSts014793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fs_mark - Benchmark synchronous/async file creation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450938 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review?, fedora-cvs? |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 20:32 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 00:32:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:32:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448867] Review Request: perl-parent - Establish an ISA relationship with base classes at compile time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806190032.m5J0WrCp014864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-parent - Establish an ISA relationship with base classes at compile time Alias: perl-parent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448867 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 20:32 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 00:32:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:32:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449962] Review Request: tex-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806190032.m5J0Whuo031083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449962 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 20:32 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 00:47:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:47:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451142] Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806190047.m5J0lOiB017072@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451142 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 20:47 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 00:45:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:45:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452010] New branch request for pgadmin3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806190045.m5J0jfVw016950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New branch request for pgadmin3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452010 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WORKSFORME Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 20:45 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 00:47:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:47:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451903] Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806190047.m5J0lagU000949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451903 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 20:47 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 01:51:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:51:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451142] Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806190151.m5J1pqiR011268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haddock09 - documentation tool for annotated Haskell source code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451142 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-06-18 21:51 EST ------- Thanks for all the help, tibbs! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 02:07:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:07:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447367] Review Request: onboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806190207.m5J27DhV030161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: onboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447367 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mclasen at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 02:15:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:15:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447367] Review Request: onboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806190215.m5J2Fgir031663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: onboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447367 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 02:52:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:52:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449928] Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806190252.m5J2qQKV005816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449928 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 22:52 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 02:52:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:52:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806190252.m5J2qcCe005878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 22:52 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 02:52:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:52:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451655] Review Request: kdeplasmoids - Additional plasmoids for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806190252.m5J2qFNb022731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeplasmoids - Additional plasmoids for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451655 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 22:52 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 02:52:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:52:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449707] Review Request: gambit-c - Gambit-C Scheme programming system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806190252.m5J2q4nZ022674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gambit-c - Gambit-C Scheme programming system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449707 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 22:52 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 02:52:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:52:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451925] Review Request: synce-hal - Connection framework and dccm-implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806190252.m5J2qoej022822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-hal - Connection framework and dccm-implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451925 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-18 22:52 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 03:39:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 23:39:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450366] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Client - Easy way to perform multiple HTTP requests and process their results In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806190339.m5J3dPuB031309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Client - Easy way to perform multiple HTTP requests and process their results Alias: pear-HTTP-Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450366 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2008-06-18 23:39 EST ------- Build successful on all branches. Thanks for the review. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 03:39:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 23:39:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806190339.m5J3dQPW031337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP Alias: php-pear-Auth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 Bug 438804 depends on bug 450366, which changed state. Bug 450366 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Client - Easy way to perform multiple HTTP requests and process their results https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450366 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 04:19:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:19:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450938] Review Request: fs_mark - Benchmark synchronous/async file creation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806190419.m5J4JV8p020433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fs_mark - Benchmark synchronous/async file creation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450938 esandeen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2008-06-19 00:19 EST ------- Thanks everybody! Building now & closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 05:58:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 01:58:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451925] Review Request: synce-hal - Connection framework and dccm-implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806190558.m5J5wbnx020652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-hal - Connection framework and dccm-implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451925 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 06:11:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 02:11:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225671] Merge Review: curl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806190611.m5J6BpG7005868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: curl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225671 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-19 02:11 EST ------- curl-7.18.2-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 07:49:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 03:49:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452078] New: Review Request: node - Simple node front end, modelled after the node shells of TheNet and G8BPQ nodes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452078 Summary: Review Request: node - Simple node front end, modelled after the node shells of TheNet and G8BPQ nodes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cooly at gnome.eu.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/node.spec SRPM URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/node-0.3.2-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is a simple node frontend for Linux kernel AX.25, NETROM, ROSE and TCP. It's based on pms.c by Alan Cox (GW4PTS) but has been heavily modified since. It's probably not very well tested, not pretty, not very flexible and it is certainly not ready! However I think it's already somewhat usable Few notes: This package is not under active development. We need to provide this package because all AX25-HOWTO refers it, and I think it would help users. rpmlint is silent with a few exceptions: E: zero-length /var/ax25/node/loggedin this is an empty file node cannot create on it's own W: non-standard-dir-in-var ax25 /var/ax25 this is the standard location directory for ax25 applications. I think we should get an exception for that in rpmlint. Package does not have a standard configure script, here configure is just a bash script. so "sh configure" was put to inhibit rpmlint warning of not using %configure macro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 08:33:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 04:33:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445687] Review Request: portreserve - TCP port reservation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806190833.m5J8XmQM015082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: portreserve - TCP port reservation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445687 ------- Additional Comments From twaugh at redhat.com 2008-06-19 04:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > - Build on mock (x86_64) failed: I just tried a mock build of portreserve-0.0.1-2.fc8 for fedora-9-x86_64 and it built fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 08:41:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 04:41:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444257] Review Request: nted - Musical score editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806190841.m5J8fqkR016701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nted - Musical score editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444257 ------- Additional Comments From rhbugs at n-dimensional.de 2008-06-19 04:41 EST ------- Ping? Michel, you can proceed now with the CVS stuff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 09:03:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 05:03:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452087] New: Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452087 Summary: Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kzak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~kzak/collectl.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~kzak/collectl-2.6.4-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: A utility to collect linux performance data -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 09:07:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 05:07:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452087] Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806190907.m5J97QCm021879@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452087 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 09:24:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 05:24:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452087] Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806190924.m5J9OMiE024799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452087 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-06-19 05:24 EST ------- OK source files match upstream: 4b90523b13cfb5f7c41bfa4fe07c542ed8150b67 collectl-2.6.4-1.src.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License texts are included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. N/A compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). N/A debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. N/A no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK correct "initscript" scriptlets are present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. this package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 09:30:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 05:30:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452087] Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806190930.m5J9UlOw026283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452087 kzak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kzak at redhat.com 2008-06-19 05:30 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: collectl Short Description: A utility to collect linux performance data Owners: kzak, sharkcz Branches: InitialCC: sharkcz Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 09:38:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 05:38:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806190938.m5J9cBGx027539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 ------- Additional Comments From amdunn at gmail.com 2008-06-19 05:38 EST ------- Build failure is limited to ppc64 architecture, potential fix for now would be an architecture exclusion, like with: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=670200 (That version was made with an altered SPEC file that just includes the line ExcludeArch ppc64.) Perhaps the problem is with OCaml support on ppc64? I remember reading that there were some difficulties about this in the recent past. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 10:52:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 06:52:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444744] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Preferred - Pick a language based on user's preferences In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191052.m5JAq9oi023119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Lingua-Preferred - Pick a language based on user's preferences https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444744 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: perl-Lingua-|Review Request: perl-Lingua- |Preferred - Perl extension |Preferred - Pick a language |to choose a language |based on user's preferences ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-06-19 06:52 EST ------- Thx for the review, I will update the Summary, but i didn't get what to with the URL. If I stay as it is, maybe it can get fixed later. But if I comment the URL, this suggest the problem in is the spec (missing URL field) whereas the problem seems releated to CPAN... This is my point of view. But I will follow advices. I have email cpan admin, but without answer yet. I will resent a mail to the owner of the module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 10:54:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 06:54:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444744] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Preferred - Pick a language based on user's preferences In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191054.m5JAsHwn007297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Lingua-Preferred - Pick a language based on user's preferences https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444744 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-06-19 06:54 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Lingua-Preferred Short Description: Pick a language based on user's preferences Owners: kwizart Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 11:58:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:58:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448613] Review Request: perl-EV - Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191158.m5JBwPLZ018473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-EV - Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448613 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-06-19 07:58 EST ------- I've got an answer from the upstream developer. perl-AnyEvent doesn't need need any dependencies (some will need to be filtered). So I guess perl-EV will BR perl-AnyEvent (or at least Requires at runtime). Once perl-EV is installed, perl-AnyEvent will elect this module (instead of perl(Glib) or others ,because it is the fastest. And I guess the dependent modules will only requires perl(AnyEvent), so i still need to sort this out, and submit perl-AnyEvent for review first... About the libev be built internally, here is the upstream answer: ---------------------- EV comes with it's own copy of libev and cannot possibly links against a preinstalled system libev (they are ABI-incompatible). Therefore, EV itself has no external dependencies (but of course it is arch-dependent). ---------------------- I don't know if it is how perl arch dependant modules will works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 12:45:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:45:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191245.m5JCjElU011182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 joost at cnoc.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From joost at cnoc.nl 2008-06-19 08:45 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lazarus Short Description: Lazarus Component Library and IDE for Freepascal Owners: joost Branches: F-9 InitialCC: joost Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 13:04:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:04:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452105] New: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-RADIUS - Wrapper Classes for the RADIUS PECL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452105 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-RADIUS - Wrapper Classes for the RADIUS PECL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://xulchris.fedorapeople.org/packages/php-pear-Auth-RADIUS.spec SRPM URL: http://xulchris.fedorapeople.org/packages/php-pear-Auth-RADIUS-1.0.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Wrapper Classes for the RADIUS PECL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 13:05:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:05:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191305.m5JD5iBf031430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP Alias: php-pear-Auth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |452105 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 13:19:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:19:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191319.m5JDJfGg002501@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 ------- Additional Comments From lvillani at binaryhelix.net 2008-06-19 09:19 EST ------- I can include them and remove that patch that disables the test suite at import-I can include them and remove that patch that disables the test suite at import-time, if needed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 13:26:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:26:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191326.m5JDQvnp019265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 ------- Additional Comments From lvillani at binaryhelix.net 2008-06-19 09:26 EST ------- Uhm, sorry for the weird comment.. it seems that konqueror4 is not much usable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 13:33:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:33:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452108] New: Review Request: cfdg-fe - A frontend for cfdg Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452108 Summary: Review Request: cfdg-fe - A frontend for cfdg Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/cfdg-fe/cfdg-fe.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/cfdg-fe/cfdg-fe-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm A front end to cfdg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 13:33:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:33:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452108] Review Request: cfdg-fe - A frontend for cfdg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191333.m5JDXR6O005076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cfdg-fe - A frontend for cfdg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452108 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |452107 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 13:33:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:33:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452107] Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191333.m5JDXSKI005097@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |452108 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 13:31:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:31:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452107] New: Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 Summary: Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/cfdg/cfdg.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/cfdg/cfdg-2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Context Free is a program that generates images from written instructions called a grammar. The program follows the instructions in a few seconds to create images that can contain millions of shapes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 14:44:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:44:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191444.m5JEibq0020050@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-19 10:44 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 14:49:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452087] Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191449.m5JEn6qf021108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452087 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-19 10:49 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 14:47:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:47:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444744] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Preferred - Pick a language based on user's preferences In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191447.m5JElUaG020934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Lingua-Preferred - Pick a language based on user's preferences https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444744 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-19 10:47 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 16:03:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:03:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191603.m5JG3HLG018507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-06-19 12:03 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309861) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309861&action=view) removing two lines from doc/nl/index.docbook allows build in C4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 16:01:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:01:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191601.m5JG1UhW018136@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-06-19 12:01 EST ------- Quick and dirty patched spec which allows build for EL-4. Works for me in C4.6/i386. Explanation: build fails due to doxygen failing to understand "something" in doc/nl/docindex. I've just removed the offending two lines. I apologize towards .nl users and I would be happy to see a proper fix. I simply was in need of a functional C4 version, I have no idea about proper doxygen usage and this hack looked cleaner than removing the whole translation (in this language). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 16:04:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:04:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443469] Review Request: pytrainer - A tool to log all your sport excursions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191604.m5JG4f7P003114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pytrainer - A tool to log all your sport excursions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443469 silfreed at silfreed.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(silfreed at silfreed.| |net) | ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2008-06-19 12:04 EST ------- Spec URL: https://rpm.silfreed.net:8002/index.cgi/file/beb4427ffcf1/pytrainer/pytrainer.sp SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/pytrainer/pytrainer-1.5.0.0.1-3.s %changelog * Thu Jun 19 2008 Douglas E. Warner 1.5.0.0.1-3 - updating to support xulrunner or firefox - removing empty doc line - added patch to use sqlite3 I've emailed the maintainer about adding a LICENSE or COPYING file; I'll let you know once that's in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 16:21:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:21:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448312] Review Request: lostlabyrinth-sounds - Lost Labyrinth sounds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191621.m5JGLaBX021969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth-sounds - Lost Labyrinth sounds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448312 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-19 12:21 EST ------- Thanks for the review! Imported, build and pushed as F-8 and F-9 update, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 16:23:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:23:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448311] Review Request: lostlabyrinth - Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191623.m5JGN6XH022120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth - Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448311 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-19 12:23 EST ------- Thanks for the review! Imported, build and pushed as F-8 and F-9 update, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 16:22:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:22:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448313] Review Request: lostlabyrinth-graphics - Lost Labyrinth graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191622.m5JGMol7006426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth-graphics - Lost Labyrinth graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448313 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-19 12:22 EST ------- Thanks for the review! Imported, build and pushed as F-8 and F-9 update, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 16:49:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:49:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191649.m5JGnMws026577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-19 12:49 EST ------- fbpanel-4.12-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 16:50:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452150] New: Review Request: swarp - Tool that resamples and co-adds together FITS images Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452150 Summary: Review Request: swarp - Tool that resamples and co-adds together FITS images Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sergio.pasra at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/swarp.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/swarp-2.17.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: SWarp is a program that resamples and co-adds together FITS images using any arbitrary astrometric projection defined in the WCS standard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 16:53:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:53:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191653.m5JGrEL4027603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-19 12:53 EST ------- fbpanel-4.12-5.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 17:10:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:10:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445224] Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191710.m5JHARDk031169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445224 ------- Additional Comments From dcnltc at us.ibm.com 2008-06-19 13:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > source files match upstream: > ab74f8ed90b8ba9a1d3904892622fc80 (tarball matches tarball found in upstream SRPM) > specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. > dist tag is present. > build root is correct > license field matches the actual license. (though itrace.c has GPL v2.1 listed, > which doesn't exist. That should probably be fixed upstream) > license is open source-compatible. > license text not included upstream. > latest version is being packaged. > BuildRequires are proper. > compiler flags are appropriate. > %clean is present. > rpmlint is silent. > owns the directories it creates. > doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. > no duplicates in %files. > file permissions are appropriate. > no scriptlets present. > code, not content. > documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. > %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. > no headers. > no pkgconfig files. > no libtool .la droppings. > > Needs fixing: > > package meets naming and versioning guidelines. > package builds in mock: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=664952&name=build.log > package installs properly. (couldn't check) > debuginfo package looks complete. (couldn't check) > final provides and requires are sane (couldn't check) > if shared libraries are present, make sure ldconfig is run So, the only issue under the "Needs fixing" category is the build error you got in mock. I'll look into that one. Also, did you have any response to my questions (in previous comment) about how I should be referencing the source: tarball vs. CVS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 17:16:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:16:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448867] Review Request: perl-parent - Establish an ISA relationship with base classes at compile time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191716.m5JHGW5E032266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-parent - Establish an ISA relationship with base classes at compile time Alias: perl-parent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448867 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-06-19 13:16 EST ------- Imported and building. Thanks for the review :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 17:22:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:22:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191722.m5JHMFku000856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 seefeld at sympatico.ca changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(seefeld at sympatico.| |ca) | ------- Additional Comments From seefeld at sympatico.ca 2008-06-19 13:22 EST ------- Sorry for being late again. I'm presently being stuck, waiting for my sys admin to resolve an issue on the machine hosting the Synopsis project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 17:27:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:27:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443469] Review Request: pytrainer - A tool to log all your sport excursions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191727.m5JHR7wI017789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pytrainer - A tool to log all your sport excursions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443469 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2008-06-19 13:27 EST ------- Recently changed my paths around a bit; new Spec URL: https://rpm.silfreed.net:8002/file/beb4427ffcf1/pytrainer/pytrainer.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 17:42:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:42:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191742.m5JHgTfo020396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-19 13:42 EST ------- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 18:05:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:05:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450410] Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191805.m5JI5BDJ009501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450410 ------- Additional Comments From guido.ledermann at googlemail.com 2008-06-19 14:05 EST ------- >From the reply of the upstream we can admit that this program is licensed under GPLv2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 18:40:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:40:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445151] Review Request: merkaartor - openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191840.m5JIeTaI015578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: merkaartor - openstreetmap editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445151 ------- Additional Comments From pablo.martin-gomez at laposte.net 2008-06-19 14:40 EST ------- Ok, some other points which I've not pointed out before : * qt4 is a Requires, not a BuildRequires. * Mock build perfectly without "BuildRequires: xorg-x11-proto-devel xorg-x11-xtrans-devel", are they usefull ? * The software doesn't use make install, so you can remove this line : "make INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 18:50:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:50:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191850.m5JIoexE000579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 ------- Additional Comments From lvillani at binaryhelix.net 2008-06-19 14:50 EST ------- SPEC URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/SPECS/libs/sat-solver.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/SRPMS/sat-solver-0.9.0-3.fc9.src.rpm * Thu Jun 19 2008 Lorenzo Villani - 0.9.0-3 - Using %%cmake properly - Proper handling of %%{_includedir}/satsolver -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 18:53:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:53:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447738] Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191853.m5JIrqXl017861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 ------- Additional Comments From lvillani at binaryhelix.net 2008-06-19 14:53 EST ------- Spec URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/SPECS/libs/libzypp.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/SRPMS/libzypp-5.0.0.0-3.fc9.src.rpm * Thu Jun 19 2008 Lorenzo Villani - 5.0.0.0-3 - Using %%cmake properly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 18:54:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:54:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447740] Review Request: zypper - easy to use command line package manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191854.m5JIsiUR001119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zypper - easy to use command line package manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447740 ------- Additional Comments From lvillani at binaryhelix.net 2008-06-19 14:54 EST ------- Spec URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/SPECS/system/zypper.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/SRPMS/zypper-0.12.0-2.fc9.src.rpm * Thu Jun 19 2008 Lorenzo Villani - 0.12.0-2 - Using %%cmake to build - Using %%find_lang -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 19:15:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:15:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191915.m5JJFcjV005293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-19 15:15 EST ------- trickle-1.07-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 19:17:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:17:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191917.m5JJH6sA005640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-19 15:17 EST ------- trickle-1.07-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 19:36:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:36:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226309] Merge Review: postgresql-jdbc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191936.m5JJaT8R025884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: postgresql-jdbc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226309 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide chris at hubick.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chris at hubick.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 19:56:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:56:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449339] Review Request: wine-doors - One-click Windows application installer / Wine frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806191956.m5JJuTTM029625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wine-doors - One-click Windows application installer / Wine frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449339 pablo.martin-gomez at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag| |fedora-review- ------- Additional Comments From pablo.martin-gomez at laposte.net 2008-06-19 15:56 EST ------- As Nicolas said, the package : - have to download scripts to works, it's quite dangerous and a sign that the method is not "mature" (well, it's a choice) - conduce the user to keep Windows' software and don't search open sourced alternatives which could be considered as against the Fedora's philosophy so, I decided to drop the review and send the package upstream for people who really want it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 19:57:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:57:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452172] New: Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452172 Summary: Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ville.skytta at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/mysqltuner.spec http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/mysqltuner-0.9.1-1.src.rpm MySQLTuner is a MySQL high performance tuning script written in perl that will provide you with a snapshot of a MySQL server's health. Based on the statistics gathered, specific recommendations will be provided that will increase a MySQL server's efficiency and performance. The script gives you automated MySQL tuning that is on the level of what you would receive from a MySQL DBA. Note: intentionally not using %{?dist} as there's nothing really to build in the package that would change between rebuilds on different distros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 20:06:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:06:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452087] Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806192006.m5JK6fVp031715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452087 kzak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 20:35:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:35:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449962] Review Request: tex-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806192035.m5JKZkw0020025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449962 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-19 16:35 EST ------- tex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 20:44:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:44:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450470] RDMA kernel stack initializing package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806192044.m5JKiG1o005410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RDMA kernel stack initializing package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450470 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ed at eh3.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2008-06-19 16:44 EST ------- I built, installed, and tested this package on an F8 x86_64 system and it seems to work correctly. I do *not* understand udev well enough to say whether the rules are correct but they do look reasonable -- esp. compared the the OFED docs. Here is a quick review: GOOD: + rpmlint reports a few ignorable warnings and an error: rdma.noarch: W: no-documentation rdma.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rdma/fixup-mtrr.awk rdma.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/udev/rules.d/90-rdma.rules rdma.noarch: W: no-url-tag rdma.noarch: E: malformed-line-in-lsb-comment-block # + naming looks OK + license is OK and correctly not included + spec is legible, macros look sane + compiles and installs on F8 x86_64 + dir ownership looks OK NEEDSWORK: + please remove the "blank" line which fixes the rpmlint error: === trivial patch === --- rdma.ORIG 2008-06-19 16:29:58.000000000 -0400 +++ rdma 2008-06-19 16:30:18.000000000 -0400 @@ -12,7 +12,6 @@ # Required-Stop: $network $srpd $opensm # Short-Description: Loads and unloads the InfiniBand and iWARP kernel modules # Description: Loads and unloads the InfiniBand and iWARP kernel modules -# ### END INIT INFO CONFIG=/etc/rdma/rdma.conf === trivial patch === -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 21:03:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:03:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434727] Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806192103.m5JL3EK1024697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434727 ------- Additional Comments From carl at five-ten-sg.com 2008-06-19 17:03 EST ------- ./common/cvs-import.sh /tmp/libpst-0.6.14-1.src.rpm cd devel; make build That worked, but trying to import into the F-10 branch does not: ./common/cvs-import.sh -b F-10 /tmp/libpst-0.6.14-1.src.rpm Checking out module: 'libpst' ERROR: "libpst/F-10" does not exist! Is that supposed to work, or is there some other requirement? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 21:13:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:13:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434727] Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806192113.m5JLDjrl010727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434727 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-06-19 17:13 EST ------- There is no F-10 branch because there is no F-10 release. devel is a "magic" branch because it is always there, but right now, it is what will become F-10. F-8 and F-9 are the other active branches right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 21:22:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:22:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450476] InfiniBand Connection Management library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806192122.m5JLMnl2012307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: InfiniBand Connection Management library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450476 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ed at eh3.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2008-06-19 17:22 EST ------- Here is a quick review: GOOD: + source matches upstream (SHA1SUM): bd18cd1c105275feb25461f659a3ad94e7c5db8c libibcm-1.0.2.tar.gz bd18cd1c105275feb25461f659a3ad94e7c5db8c libibcm-1.0.2.tar.gz.UP + license is correct and correctly included + builds in mock for F8 x86_64 + rpmlint output is just some ignore-able warnings: libibcm.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libibcm-1.0.2/ChangeLog libibcm-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation libibcm-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation + naming OK + spec legible and macros look sane + shared libs (ldconfig) looks good + permissions OK + dir ownership OK + static libs are correctly in *-static I don't see any blockers here so its APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 21:25:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:25:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450476] InfiniBand Connection Management library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806192125.m5JLPLUV028698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: InfiniBand Connection Management library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450476 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2008-06-19 17:25 EST ------- Ooops, I overlooked the empty ChangeLog file! Please just remove it from the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 22:46:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:46:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806192246.m5JMkBZk025660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From joost at cnoc.nl 2008-06-19 18:46 EST ------- Thanks for all the help, especially to Jason Tibbitts, offcourse. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 22:50:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:50:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806192250.m5JMoXpG009825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-19 18:50 EST ------- lazarus-0.9.24-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 23:19:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:19:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452172] Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806192319.m5JNJB9N014386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452172 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 23:28:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:28:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806192328.m5JNSGWR015923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 hedayat at grad.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From hedayat at grad.com 2008-06-19 19:28 EST ------- OK! I've updated my package to the latest CVS code. It doesn't have any NVidia licensed files anymore, so the legal problem is resolved now! So, FE-Legal should not be needed anymore (?!). SRPM: http://www.assembla.com/spaces/hedayat/documents/dOrnuopLqr3BySab7jnrAJ/download/rcssserver3d-0.6-0.1.20080620cvs.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.assembla.com/spaces/hedayat/documents/dC7Shyoh0r3z6aab7jnrAJ/download/rcssserver3d.spec ( OR SRPM: http://assembla.com/file/hedayat/1_rcssserver3d-0.6-0.1.20080620cvs.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://assembla.com/file/hedayat/2_rcssserver3d.spec ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 19 23:36:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:36:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430429] Review Request: python-storm - An object-relational mapper (ORM) for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806192336.m5JNaLKs017344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-storm - An object-relational mapper (ORM) for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430429 ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2008-06-19 19:36 EST ------- ! needs work. OK no problemo ?? can't say/don't understand. [OK] rpmlint .src.rpm = quiet $ rpmbuild -ba: + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh /home/davidt/src/redhat/BUILD/storm-0.12 find: debug: No such file or directory from what others have indicated, this is normal for no-arch python. [OK] rpmlint /home/davidt/src/redhat/RPMS/noarch/python-storm*.rpm python-storm-mysql.noarch: W: no-documentation python-storm-postgresql.noarch: W: no-documentation python-storm-sqlite.noarch: W: no-documentation [OK] included source matches upstream: md5sum storm*bz* python-storm-0.12-1.fc9.src/storm-0.12.tar.bz2 976a332dadd214612c359df63360fc51 storm-0.12.tar.bz2.from_www 976a332dadd214612c359df63360fc51 python-storm-0.12-1.fc9.src/storm-0.12.tar.bz2 [OK] package name proceeded with python since it;s a python library. [OK] spec named %name.spec [OK] source tarball contains no prebuilt binaries/libraries. [OK] files placed into FHS locations {x4 rpms} [OK] changelog in standard format [OK] correctly omits Packager, vendor, copyright, prereq , includes license tag. [OK] summary <80 chars, no ending period [OK] source0 is correct: http://launchpad.net/storm/trunk/0.12/+download/storm-0.12.tar.bz2 [OK] buildroot set at second most proferred location. [OK] %install correctly erases buildroot before build [OK] mock build succeeds. [OK] rpmdiff between default build and mock build shows only time {T} differences for folders and the pre-compiled .py[co] files [OK] description is column limited to <80 chars, no manual/doc info. [OK] charset is ascii [OK] docs {license, readme, todo} included. readme points to web for docs. [OK] debuginfo not expected in noarch application. [OK] no static libraries, rpath, self copies of already packaged libaries etc, since pure python project. [OK] no config, initscripts, desktop files since it's a db devel library. [OK] variable style is used consistently [OK] not multilingual [OK] timestamps are kept [OK] make is python based, so smp_flags not required. [OK] no scriptlets, no conditional dependencies [OK] is library code not content [OK] provides backend for each of the backend subpackages seems to make sense. [OK] dirs/files owned by main package, except the individual backend files {whose directory is created by the main package}. [OK] not a web app, shoudln't conflict with other packages. [OK] python sitelib is correctly included at top of spec. [OK] eggs are build [OK] no files in %{_bindir} and %{_sbindir}. [OK] %install setup.py install -O1 --skip-build. as requested for python packages. ===== [? ] license indication matches upstream web site "Storm is licensed under the [WWW] LGPL 2.1. Contributions must have copyright assigned to Canonical." - copyright assigned seems to infer additional requirements ? - "... Lesser General Public License as # published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of # the License, or (at your option) any later version" so LGPLv2+ seems correct. - eg: cache.py has no licence header - should it be requested ? - tz.py: "PSF License" not sure what that is ? not in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing [??] %files: perhaps should own only it's python-storm dir and below, according to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python %{python_sitelib}/modulename/*.py [??] python eggs: do we need to do anything with them ? [??] are/should the unit tests be run as part of the package build ? upstream suggests these as important, but is that something fedora packages usually do ? [??] %files: %exclude %{python_sitelib}/storm/cextensions.c is this the accepted way to do this ? [ !] the main package includes the same files that are in the 3 backend sub packages [ !] description missed a 't' in 'erm maintainability'. [??] no time yet to test built package installation functionality aka: "- SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example." Michel: pretty close, just a fwe minor tweaks, I think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 01:18:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:18:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450470] RDMA kernel stack initializing package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806200118.m5K1IHiA032680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RDMA kernel stack initializing package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450470 ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2008-06-19 21:18 EST ------- New rpm uploaded over the top of the old rpm (meaning you might need to flush your web cache/proxy to get the new rpm) that solves the rpmlint error (empty line removed from rdma.init). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 01:20:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:20:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450476] InfiniBand Connection Management library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806200120.m5K1KkvE016663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: InfiniBand Connection Management library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450476 ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2008-06-19 21:20 EST ------- ChangeLog file removed from %doc list. New packages uploaded over top of the old packages, so you might need to refresh your web/proxy cache to get the new files from the site. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 01:44:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:44:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452172] Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806200144.m5K1iL7W019844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452172 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-19 21:44 EST ------- This package is about as simple as you can get; a single file. I guess you know that's not what the dist tag is about, but I assume you can keep the versioning straight. Only one observation: The applied patch seems to be a good idea, except that if you actually pass the --skipversion option you are warned about it. Perhaps it would be better to accept and ignore it. I don't think this is a blocker, though, since things still run. * source files match upstream: 6d13fdfda710c5d1ef777a31177f31fb691af11a4f953e9fed07a6cdceff7a32 mysqltuner.pl.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none). * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: mysqltuner = 0.9.1-1 = /usr/bin/perl mysql perl(Getopt::Long) perl(diagnostics) perl(strict) perl(warnings) which * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. Seems to run OK, but I didn't let it mess with my database server. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 01:49:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:49:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452150] Review Request: swarp - Tool that resamples and co-adds together FITS images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806200149.m5K1nwJW004803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swarp - Tool that resamples and co-adds together FITS images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452150 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 01:49:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:49:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452150] Review Request: swarp - Tool that resamples and co-adds together FITS images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806200149.m5K1nlH8020685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swarp - Tool that resamples and co-adds together FITS images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452150 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 02:03:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 22:03:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452150] Review Request: swarp - Tool that resamples and co-adds together FITS images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806200203.m5K23Bdb023368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swarp - Tool that resamples and co-adds together FITS images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452150 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-19 22:03 EST ------- Two observations: The pdf file is 1.5MB and three times the size of the rest of the package. Did you consider putting it in a separate package? I don't think it's a requirement but you know best how this package will be used. %{__mkdir_p} %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name} at the end of %install seems to be superfluous, as that directory is created (and swarp.xsl is installed there) by the install process. It seems to be harmless, though. I don't think either of these are blockers, though. * source files match upstream: 34e815d44f3b1c3c7bfdeb01bbdcf32d1eac239527a0937c3ed2b6f7be34bcee swarp-2.17.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. build root is OK. license field matches the actual license. license is open source-compatible. license text not included upstream. license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none). * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: swarp = 2.17.1-1.fc10 = (no non-glibc dependencies) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. There is a test directory containing one fits file, but it's not immediately clear what should be done with it. I ran the executable and gave it the test file and it did... something, without crashing, and didn't complain about it. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. ? documentation is 3x the rest of the package. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 02:40:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 22:40:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452195] New: Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452195 Summary: Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: supersonicandtails at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.hypersonicsoft.org/projects/downloads/Presto/misc/presto.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hypersonicsoft.org/projects/downloads/Presto/misc/presto-0.1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Presto is a general-use tilemap engine coded in C that uses Allegro for graphics rendering, and therefore is intended for use in games using Allegro. It can handle rectangular tiles of any height and width (and different height from width), loading tilemaps from files, tile blending, and the capability to change most of these elements on the fly. This is my first package, and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 02:42:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 22:42:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452195] Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806200242.m5K2gjl6014438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452195 supersonicandtails at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 03:06:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 23:06:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452195] Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806200306.m5K36GKM002945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452195 ivazqueznet at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ivazqueznet at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 03:21:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 23:21:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452195] Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806200321.m5K3LQCg021569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452195 ------- Additional Comments From supersonicandtails at gmail.com 2008-06-19 23:21 EST ------- I forgot to mention that I'm the upstream developer for this package. I have a project page on my website for the library, found here: http://www.hypersonicsoft.org/projects/showproject.php?id=29. I'm an experienced C programmer, and I definitely appreciate anyone who is willing to help me with this first package! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 03:59:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 23:59:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452195] Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806200359.m5K3x9vK010987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452195 ------- Additional Comments From ivazqueznet at gmail.com 2008-06-19 23:59 EST ------- - Descriptions should be wrapped at 79 characters - Examples, README, and COPYING should be in %doc - Changelog entries should be separated by a newline - Fails to build in mock on F8/i386 and F9/i386 - -devel is missing a Requires of allegro-devel, and should have no BuildRequires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 04:01:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:01:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 427718] Review Request: Megazeux - Text-character driven game creation system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806200401.m5K41jWk028665@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Megazeux - Text-character driven game creation system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427718 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |201449 nThis| | Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(ssalevan at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-20 00:01 EST ------- Why on earth is this ticket private? In any case, it's been way too long without any response. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 05:11:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:11:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450476] InfiniBand Connection Management library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806200511.m5K5B2A6022744@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: InfiniBand Connection Management library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450476 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2008-06-20 01:11 EST ------- Thank you -- its APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 06:05:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 02:05:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806200605.m5K65dt6015249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 ------- Additional Comments From hedayat at grad.com 2008-06-20 02:05 EST ------- Oh, sorry. While the files are not part of the build process, I forgot to remove them from the source package contained in the SRPM. Those files can be removed safely from the package. I'll upload a new SRPM soon, but the resulting rpms will be the same as this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 06:40:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 02:40:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452150] Review Request: swarp - Tool that resamples and co-adds together FITS images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806200640.m5K6e2L9021336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swarp - Tool that resamples and co-adds together FITS images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452150 sergio.pasra at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From sergio.pasra at gmail.com 2008-06-20 02:40 EST ------- Thanks, I will separate docs in the next release of the package New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: swarp Short Description: Tool that resamples and co-adds together FITS images Owners: sergiopr Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 07:30:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:30:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452172] Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806200730.m5K7U7lx029326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452172 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-06-20 03:30 EST ------- Worked fine for me on mysql-4.1.20-3.RHEL4.1.el4_6.1 (Centos 4.6) and mysql-5.0.45-1.el5.remi.x86_64 (Centos 5.1) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 07:33:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:33:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436677] Review Request: xxdiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806200733.m5K7XOSO012614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xxdiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436677 thomas.moschny at gmx.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny at gmx.de 2008-06-20 03:33 EST ------- Forgot to update the fedora-review flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 07:33:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:33:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806200733.m5K7X8Hc029702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-20 03:33 EST ------- Okay, now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 07:44:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:44:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450189] Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806200744.m5K7iBIq014284@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450189 ------- Additional Comments From lokthare at gmail.com 2008-06-20 03:44 EST ------- Can you clarify what you mean by multi-libs issues ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 07:43:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:43:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 390951] Review Request: clive - Video extracting tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806200743.m5K7hv1Q014244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extracting tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390951 mnowak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mnowak at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 07:43:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:43:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 390951] Review Request: clive - Video extracting tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806200743.m5K7hBZ6014201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extracting tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390951 mnowak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|CANTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 07:44:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:44:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 390951] Review Request: clive - Video extracting tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806200744.m5K7ivui031347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extracting tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390951 ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-06-20 03:44 EST ------- ffmpeg is now optional, will provide new spec file to current upstream version soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 07:53:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:53:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 390951] Review Request: clive - Video extracting tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806200753.m5K7raYV016009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extracting tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390951 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 07:50:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:50:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806200750.m5K7okVD015739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |440volt.tux at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-20 03:50 EST ------- *** Bug 390951 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 07:50:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:50:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 390951] Review Request: clive - Video extracting tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806200750.m5K7ojWb015710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extracting tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390951 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-20 03:50 EST ------- Sorry, however now new submitter already appears. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 450466 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 08:11:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 04:11:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450189] Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806200811.m5K8BxT6020624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450189 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-20 04:11 EST ------- Just a note: We consider gconf schemas files (under %_sysconfdir/gconf/schemas) as _not_ config files (perhaps should be moved under %_datadir, however on Fedora they are put under %_syscondir). So usually we don't make gconf schemas files have the attribute of %config (even if rpmlint warns about it). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 08:50:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 04:50:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806200850.m5K8ogI1011935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 mnowak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mnowak at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-06-20 04:50 EST ------- Is this being worked on by anyone? Otherwise I can take it and proceed in spec file creation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 08:48:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 04:48:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452211] New: spu-binutils: Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 Summary: spu-binutils: Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: a.j.delaney at brighton.ac.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package- review at redhat.com,jroth at linux.vnet.ibm.com,notting at redha t.com Spec URL: http://foss.it.brighton.ac.uk/downloads/spu-binutils.spec SRPM URL: http://foss.it.brighton.ac.uk/downloads/spu-binutils-2.18.50.0.6-1.src.rpm These are based on the standard binutils package found in Fedora. I envisage it being updated in lock-step with the vanilla binutils package. It's called spu-binutils (rather than binutils-spu) in following with the convention set by avr-binutils and arm-gp2x-linux-binutils. Description: This package contains the assembler and linker for ELF binaries on the SPU architecture found in the IBM Cell processor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 09:00:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 05:00:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452212] New: Review Request: heimdal - Heimdal Kerberos libraries and KDC Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452212 Summary: Review Request: heimdal - Heimdal Kerberos libraries and KDC Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: abartlet at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://abartlet.net/heimdal-rpm/heimdal.spec SRPM URL: http://abartlet.net/heimdal-rpm/heimdal-1.2-1.src.rpm Description: Heimdal is a Kerberos distribution, distinct from MIT's krb5. Heimdal is a free implementation of Kerberos 5. The goals are to: - have an implementation that can be freely used by anyone - be protocol compatible with existing implementations and, if not in conflict, with RFC 1510 (and any future updated RFC) - be reasonably compatible with the M.I.T Kerberos V5 API - have support for Kerberos V5 over GSS-API (RFC1964) - include enough backwards compatibility with Kerberos V4 - IPv6 support I'm packaging it for Fedora because I would like Samba4 to depend on a system-provided krb5, rather than rely on it's internal copy of Heimdal. (I also happen to think it's a better Kerberos package :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 09:23:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 05:23:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806200923.m5K9NEna017850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-06-20 05:23 EST ------- Hi, SPEC File for revision 12 - http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/speechd-rpm/speech-dispatcher.spec SRPM - http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/speechd-rpm/speech-dispatcher-0.6.6-12.fc7.src.rpm (In reply to comment #43) > Created an attachment (id=309770) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309770&action=view) [edit] > Slightly modified init script Thanks for the modification :) > For -11: > > * Source tarball > (In reply to comment #39) > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > 1038719 20013 19:31 speech-dispatcher-0.6.6.tar.gz > 1039765 2008-06-08 00:04 > speech-dispatcher-0.6.6-11.fc7/speech-dispatcher-0.6.6.tar.gz > ------------------------------------------------------------------ OH okay, now I am using the correct tarball as available online. > - Also, change the permissions of the file in srpm (i.e. %SOURCEx) > to 0644. I have changed the permissions of the following files to 0644: 1] speech-dispatcher-0.6.6.tar.gz 2] speech-dispatcher.spec 3] speechd.patch 4] speech-dispatcherd (with execute capability however) > Now BuildRequires: makeinfo is missing. Okay had to add BuildRequire : texinfo for makeinfo > - Actually more fixes are needed. Please use "rpmlint" > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > speech-dispatcher.src:279: W: macro-in-%changelog version > ------------------------------------------------------------------ Yes :) I did not spot a few macros. (should ve run rpmlint before reporting back) > * Initscripts > - Current initscript seems good, however as I guess showing the status > to terminal is preferred, I modified your script a bit. Alright great! I have incorporated your changes. Note : I build the SRPM on my box by commenting BuildRequires : ibmtts-devel I am not sure how to obtain the RPM for this. (Although there is some mention of an RPM for this here : http://ibmtts-sdk.sourceforge.net/howto-make-gnome-speech-ibmtts-rpm.html) I hope this does not have an undesirable effect? (In reply to comment #44) Yes, I am aware. I wrote two pre-reviews (#448458, #448292) and I will write more detailed reviews now that I guess the speech-dispatcher package is in shape. Furthermore, I have also created an FAS account "hemantg"and have requested membership for cvsextras group. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 09:59:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 05:59:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806200959.m5K9xo79006755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-20 05:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Is this being worked on by anyone? Otherwise I can take it and proceed in spec > file creation. Currently this bug is not reviewed by anyone. If you want, you can assign this bug to yourself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 10:02:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 06:02:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452211] spu-binutils: Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201002.m5KA2GLC024891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: spu-binutils: Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-06-20 06:02 EST ------- I regret having to say so, but this submission will need a lot of improvements, before it can make it into Fedora. Please make yourself familiar with the Fedora packaging guidelines and with cross-building binutils. Did you compare your spec against those of the avr-binutils? Just 3 points for you to investigate: * Don't replace packages from other packages (e.g. bfd) * Don't use %makeinstall * Check how to install infos and check if your binutils's info install at all (Hint: For cross-binutils built from FSF sources, you need to --disable-infos, because they clash with those of a native binutils). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 10:15:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 06:15:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201015.m5KAFKAf027015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 mnowak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mnowak at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 12:07:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 08:07:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169754] Review Request: tclxml - XML parsing package for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201207.m5KC7LTG030404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclxml - XML parsing package for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=169754 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2008-06-20 08:07 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: tclxml New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 12:09:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 08:09:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174278] Review Request: tcldom - XML DOM bindings for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201209.m5KC9s92015153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcldom - XML DOM bindings for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=174278 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2008-06-20 08:09 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: tcldom New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 12:15:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 08:15:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217262] Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201215.m5KCFNg3032076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217262 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2008-06-20 08:15 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: tdom New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 12:22:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 08:22:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445224] Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201222.m5KCM3oO000895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445224 ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at gmail.com 2008-06-20 08:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > > Needs fixing: > > > > package meets naming and versioning guidelines. > > package builds in mock: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=664952&name=build.log > > package installs properly. (couldn't check) > > debuginfo package looks complete. (couldn't check) > > final provides and requires are sane (couldn't check) > > if shared libraries are present, make sure ldconfig is run > > So, the only issue under the "Needs fixing" category is the build error you got > in mock. I'll look into that one. That, and the naming. See below. > Also, did you have any response to my questions (in previous comment) about how > I should be referencing the source: tarball vs. CVS If you are still working on the feature upstream and it's not released as of yet, I would recommend a CVS snapshot and a pre-release package, yes. Once the utility is included in a real upstream tarball, you can fixup the RPM specfile to use that. While it's a bit more work upfront for the packager, it more accurately reflects the state of the package upstream and gives you a bit more flexibility if you want to respin the snapshot to bring in more fixes, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 12:42:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 08:42:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201242.m5KCgAwb021194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 dtimms at iinet.net.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtimms at iinet.net.au ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2008-06-20 08:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > > python-urwid.src: W: summary-not-capitalized console user interface for python > > python-urwid.src: W: invalid-license LGPL > > Fixed. Niall: Did you get a chance to update your spec with the review points already mentioned ? If so, please provide the location of your .spec and .src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 14:11:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:11:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444760] Review Request: obm - Open Business Management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201411.m5KEBVqT006510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obm - Open Business Management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444760 ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2008-06-20 10:11 EST ------- So it looks like rpmlint output isn't that clean. Most of these would be pretty simple to fix. A few of the warnings seem odd to me. Once these items get cleaned up a little, I can dig into the RPM, install it and offer some more feedback. The package looks close. rpmlint obm-2.1.9-2.fc9.src.rpm obm.src:27: W: unversioned-explicit-provides obm-core obm.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 12) obm.src: W: strange-permission obm-config.sh 0755 rpmlint obm* obm.noarch: E: non-standard-uid /var/lib/obm apache obm.noarch: E: non-standard-gid /var/lib/obm apache obm.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/obm-2.1.9/README.fedora obm.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/obm-2.1.9/database/support_incident/structure_tables.sql obm.noarch: E: zero-length /etc/obm/obm-rpm.conf obm-config.noarch: W: no-documentation obm-config.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/obm-config obm-MySQL.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/obm-MySQL-2.1.9/mysql.sql obm-Satellite.noarch: W: no-documentation obm-services.noarch: W: no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 14:20:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:20:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201420.m5KEKR9q008070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|spu-binutils: Binutils for |Review Request: spu-binutils |the SPU on IBM Cell |- Binutils for the SPU on |processors |IBM Cell processors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 14:25:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:25:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230316] Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201425.m5KEPS0I009080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230316 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2008-06-20 10:25 EST ------- URL for .spec file is still the same http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jbrout.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 14:23:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:23:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230316] Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201423.m5KENHHk008544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230316 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2008-06-20 10:23 EST ------- OK, there is new snapshot upstream, so I have created new .src.rpm (http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jbrout-0.2.201-1.fc9.src.rpm), which builds in koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=672885 I still don't know how to fix the problem with many .mo files, but otherwise this package should be all right (rpmlint is otherwise silent on both src.rpm and noarch.rpm). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 14:27:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:27:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201427.m5KERpaR023858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide mpg at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mpg at redhat.com 2008-06-20 10:27 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: hulahop New Branches: OLPC-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 15:07:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:07:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448808] Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201507.m5KF7PjY031828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448808 ------- Additional Comments From musuruan at gmail.com 2008-06-20 11:07 EST ------- Are you sure FreeSCI can be included in Fedora? Is there any free data for it? If the answer is no, it cannot be included. If the answer is yes, it can be included but a package for at least a free game must be submitted too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 15:09:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:09:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436677] Review Request: xxdiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201509.m5KF9kgL032029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xxdiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436677 cattelan at xfs.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cattelan at xfs.org 2008-06-20 11:09 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xxdiff Short Description: Graphical file/directory viewer Owners: cattelan Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 15:12:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452251] New: Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452251 Summary: Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: omajid at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://omajid.fedorapeople.org/libmatthew-java.spec SRPM URL: http://omajid.fedorapeople.org/libmatthew-java-0.7.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A colleciton of Java libraries - Unix Sockets Library This is a collection of classes and native code to allow you to read and write Unix sockets in Java. - Debug Library This is a comprehensive logging and debugging solution. - CGI Library This is a collection of classes and native code to allow you to write CGI applications in Java. - I/O Library This provides a few much needed extensions to the Java I/O subsystem. - Hexdump This class formats byte-arrays in hex and ascii for display. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 15:15:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:15:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452251] Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201515.m5KFFrl1000942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452251 omajid at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | Summary|Review Request: libmatthew- |Review Request: libmatthew- |java - collection of java |java - collection of java |libraries |libraries ------- Additional Comments From omajid at redhat.com 2008-06-20 11:15 EST ------- Sorry, but I forgot to mention that this is my first package and I am looking for a sponsor. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 15:21:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:21:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217262] Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201521.m5KFLA6K019736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217262 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-20 11:21 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 15:23:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:23:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201523.m5KFNLpY002251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-20 11:23 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 15:26:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:26:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436677] Review Request: xxdiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201526.m5KFQZeE020892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xxdiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436677 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-20 11:26 EST ------- cvs done. I assume the legal blocker is solved with those removals... Spot: Can you confirm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 15:28:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:28:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452150] Review Request: swarp - Tool that resamples and co-adds together FITS images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201528.m5KFSPFl021077@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swarp - Tool that resamples and co-adds together FITS images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452150 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-20 11:28 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 15:28:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:28:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449135] Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201528.m5KFSRvk021102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449135 ------- Additional Comments From musuruan at gmail.com 2008-06-20 11:28 EST ------- The spec file doesn't seem to follow many Fedora packaging guidelines. Please read them again at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines BTW the latest stable GForge version is 4.5.19 released on 10/11/2007. You should definitely package this version. You should also split it in different sub-packages, like Debian and Mandriva do. You may also want to check other distribution's packages for patches and ideas. Debian: http://packages.debian.org/etch/gforge Mandriva: http://svn.mandriva.com/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/packages/cooker/gforge/current/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 15:31:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:31:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448808] Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201531.m5KFVYiC003909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448808 ------- Additional Comments From cheekyboinc at foresightlinux.org 2008-06-20 11:31 EST ------- I didnt know that... There are demos and shareware versions but, no the games are not free (i dont think there is any free Sierra game). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 15:39:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:39:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436677] Review Request: xxdiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201539.m5KFdKgc004956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xxdiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436677 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-06-20 11:39 EST ------- Yes, he took out the screenshots directory and is using a clean tarball. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 15:41:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:41:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448808] Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201541.m5KFfwcW023481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448808 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-20 11:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Is there any free data for it? If the answer is no, it cannot be included. Why? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 15:46:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:46:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448808] Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201546.m5KFkoWH024520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448808 ------- Additional Comments From musuruan at gmail.com 2008-06-20 11:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Why? Because this is the rule Games SIG has. Interpreters and games that don't follow this rule have been retired and often moved to other repositories. If you think this is not correct you are welcome to post a message in the Games SIG mailing list. More info on this SIG here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 15:51:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:51:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201551.m5KFp9HE007240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-20 11:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #45) For -12: > > - Also, change the permissions of the file in srpm (i.e. %SOURCEx) > > to 0644. > > I have changed the permissions of the following files to 0644: > 4] speech-dispatcherd (with execute capability however) Please also change this (speech-dispatcherd) to 0644 permission. You can safely do this because anyway you set the permission to 0755 on installation: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- install -p -m 0755 %SOURCE1 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir}/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- (please fix this when you import this package to Fedora CVS) > Yes, I am aware. I wrote two pre-reviews (#448458, #448292) Well actually I reviewed bug 448292 (fbpanel) and your comment 1 was very proper, however I didn't notice that _you_ wrote the comment :) Okay. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (speech-dispatcher) is APPROVED by me ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 16:02:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:02:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201602.m5KG2TBC027670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 ------- Additional Comments From amdunn at gmail.com 2008-06-20 12:02 EST ------- One can do slightly better on ppc64 - the bytecode version compiles, but it seems as though any compile fails for ppc64 on f10, I think some change was recently made that breaks compiles there - everything works fine on f9, and a build with a spec file that incorporates the modification to use bytecode on ppc64 is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=671994 In any case, I believe all of the relevant issues people have raised have been addressed and that this package is ready for review for inclusion into the repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 16:14:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:14:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226302] Merge Review: pm-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201614.m5KGE3BE011426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pm-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226302 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-20 12:14 EST ------- Sorry for the long delay here. ;( rpmlint now says: pm-utils.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 39, tab: line 72) Fix if you like.. not a big deal. pm-utils.src: W: strange-permission pm-utils-99hd-apm-restore 0755 pm-utils.src: W: strange-permission pm-utils-bugreport-info.sh 0755 ignore. pm-utils.x86_64: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/pm-hibernate /usr/lib64/pm-utils/bin/pm-action pm-utils.x86_64: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/pm-suspend-hybrid /usr/lib64/pm-utils/bin/pm-action pm-utils.x86_64: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/pm-suspend /usr/lib64/pm-utils/bin/pm-action Any luck fixing those? pm-utils.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/pm-suspend.log Shouldn't you add a Requires: logrotate and add a logrotate file for this? pm-utils.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%pre mv pm-utils.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post mv Not sure how to get around those, unless you don't need the mv commands anymore. pm-utils-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation ignore. On the requires, seems like kbd might need to be required for chvt? pciutils was added for a pci.h header, but I don't think it's needed anymore. see bug: 182566 So, I would leave kbd, but remove pciutils... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 17:16:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:16:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445977] Review Request: ikiwiki - A wiki compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201716.m5KHGFVd008718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ikiwiki - A wiki compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445977 ------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny at gmx.de 2008-06-20 13:16 EST ------- perl-XML-RPC is reviewed in bug 435835, btw. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 17:21:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:21:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227128] Review Request: xstream-1.1.3-1jpp - XML serialization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201721.m5KHLKtb009752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xstream-1.1.3-1jpp - XML serialization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227128 thomas.moschny at gmx.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomas.moschny at gmx.de ------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny at gmx.de 2008-06-20 13:21 EST ------- Note that the latest version of XStream is 1.3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 17:31:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:31:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201731.m5KHVprX011577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 ------- Additional Comments From victor.lazzarini at nuim.ie 2008-06-20 13:31 EST ------- I finally was able to come back to it. Two horrid weeks of admin work at my Uni. Anyway, all seemed to have gone well: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=53372 One question: At work, I am behind a firewall and the only way to get out is through the proxy. I use a socks proxy with cvs and curl, but I could not figure out how to make koji connect (I tried tsocks which is what I use with cvs, to no avail). Do you have any suggestions? As it is I am building from home, which is not ideal. Should I close this ticket? Thanks for all your help, it really made a difference. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 17:41:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:41:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448808] Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201741.m5KHf3J7027385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448808 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-20 13:41 EST ------- If there's as much as a demo or some non-use-restricted content which can be downloaded from the 'net, then the package is fine. Witness xu4. For the counterpoint, see Exult, which itself is free but for which no free content. (I personally disagree with the exclusion of Exult, but that's neither here nor there.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 17:45:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:45:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448808] Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201745.m5KHjnZA013877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448808 ------- Additional Comments From musuruan at gmail.com 2008-06-20 13:45 EST ------- Please read this thread about FreeSCI: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-games-list/2007-April/msg00008.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 17:53:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448808] Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201753.m5KHrjXi029454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448808 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-20 13:53 EST ------- Yes, that thread is a reasonable reference, and doesn't contradict my comments above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 17:54:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:54:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238816] Review Request: gtk-qtcurve-engine - The Gtk2 side of QtCurve In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201754.m5KHsLKj029539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-qtcurve-engine - The Gtk2 side of QtCurve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238816 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-06-20 13:54 EST ------- ping, Kelly, I'd be willing to review your qtcurve stack here, if you're still interested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 17:54:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:54:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452150] Review Request: swarp - Tool that resamples and co-adds together FITS images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201754.m5KHs7LB029510@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swarp - Tool that resamples and co-adds together FITS images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452150 sergio.pasra at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From sergio.pasra at gmail.com 2008-06-20 13:54 EST ------- Built in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 17:55:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:55:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201755.m5KHteBh015703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 victor.lazzarini at nuim.ie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 17:55:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:55:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201755.m5KHtDMT030061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 ------- Additional Comments From victor.lazzarini at nuim.ie 2008-06-20 13:55 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: olpcsound New Branches: olpc-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 17:56:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:56:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201756.m5KHusQw016077@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-20 13:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #45) By the way: > Note : I build the SRPM on my box by commenting BuildRequires : ibmtts-devel > I am not sure how to obtain the RPM for this. (Although there is some mention of > an RPM for this here : > http://ibmtts-sdk.sourceforge.net/howto-make-gnome-speech-ibmtts-rpm.html) > I hope this does not have an undesirable effect? Well, perhaps I don't correctly understand what you mean by "this does not have an undesirable effect?"... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 18:05:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:05:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452282] New: Review Request: mfiler3 - Two pane file manager under UNIX console Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452282 Summary: Review Request: mfiler3 - Two pane file manager under UNIX console Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/mfiler3/mfiler3.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/mfiler3/mfiler3-1.0.0-1.fc9p.src.rpm Description: Minnu's Filer3 is a two pane file manager under UNIX console. koji scratch build for dist-f10 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=673171 for dist-f9-updates-candidate http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=673235 rpmlint: mfiler3.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/mfiler3-1.0.0/doc/BUG mfiler3.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir /etc/mfiler3/.mfiler3 For first rpmlint: I added the whole directory doc/ as %doc, so while it is easy to remove this rpmlint I want to leave this for now. For second rpmlint: we can safely ignore this rpmlint. Note: mfiler3 makefile does not support "make install DESTDIR=foo" format. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 18:11:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:11:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201811.m5KIBEbe018809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-20 14:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #41) > One question: At work, I am behind a firewall and the only way > to get out is through the proxy. I use a socks proxy with > cvs and curl, but I could not figure out how to make koji connect > (I tried tsocks which is what I use with cvs, to no avail). Do > you have any suggestions? As it is I am building from home, which > is not ideal. Well, I am not a expert of koji and currently I cannot tell you how to deal with that soon. Maybe it is better that you ask on fedora-devel-list. > Should I close this ticket? Yes, now I am closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 18:16:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:16:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452282] Review Request: mfiler3 - Two pane file manager under UNIX console In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201816.m5KIGHDI001370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mfiler3 - Two pane file manager under UNIX console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452282 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 18:29:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:29:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449928] Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201829.m5KITwB0021564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library Alias: libwfut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449928 atorkhov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |libwfut Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 18:54:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:54:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448808] Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201854.m5KIskcJ025562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448808 ------- Additional Comments From cheekyboinc at foresightlinux.org 2008-06-20 14:54 EST ------- Unfortunately this site is down: http://scicommunity.com/ I have found many game demos on this site: http://agisci.classicgaming.gamespy.com/sierradm.shtml ...but this site needs a fileplanet account. I have not found any other sources. That wont be sufficient, or? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 19:07:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:07:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451408] Review Request: python-wsgiproxy - HTTP proxying tools for WSGI apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201907.m5KJ7ilL010973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-wsgiproxy - HTTP proxying tools for WSGI apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451408 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-20 15:07 EST ------- python-wsgiproxy-0.1-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 19:07:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:07:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449962] Review Request: tex-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201907.m5KJ7vF7011038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449962 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-20 15:07 EST ------- tex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 19:06:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:06:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201906.m5KJ61nv010569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-20 15:06 EST ------- lazarus-0.9.24-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 19:09:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:09:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451681] Review Request: sk2py - Migrates Cadence Skill based PCells to Python PyCells In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201909.m5KJ9AZ9011395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sk2py - Migrates Cadence Skill based PCells to Python PyCells https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451681 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 19:06:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:06:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201906.m5KJ63tj010619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.9.24-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 19:11:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:11:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225671] Merge Review: curl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201911.m5KJBI8Q030775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: curl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225671 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-20 15:11 EST ------- curl-7.18.2-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 19:09:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:09:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451681] Review Request: sk2py - Migrates Cadence Skill based PCells to Python PyCells In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201909.m5KJ98Cu029895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sk2py - Migrates Cadence Skill based PCells to Python PyCells https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451681 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-20 15:09 EST ------- sk2py-0.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 19:07:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:07:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443467] Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201907.m5KJ7pcr029530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443467 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-20 15:07 EST ------- ale-0.9.0.1-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 19:12:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:12:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201912.m5KJC2PA012850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-20 15:12 EST ------- fbpanel-4.12-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 19:14:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:14:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201914.m5KJE8ob013421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-20 15:14 EST ------- fbpanel-4.12-5.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 19:13:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:13:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443468] Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201913.m5KJDO0w013239@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443468 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-20 15:13 EST ------- hdrprep-0.1.2-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 19:12:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:12:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225671] Merge Review: curl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201912.m5KJCXhj013010@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: curl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225671 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-20 15:12 EST ------- curl-7.18.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 19:12:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:12:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201912.m5KJC4Qx012893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |4.12-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 19:14:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:14:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451408] Review Request: python-wsgiproxy - HTTP proxying tools for WSGI apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201914.m5KJEWgI013485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-wsgiproxy - HTTP proxying tools for WSGI apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451408 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 19:13:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:13:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443468] Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201913.m5KJDBGH031790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443468 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-20 15:13 EST ------- hdrprep-0.1.2-4.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 19:13:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:13:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451406] Review Request: python-tempita - A very small text templating language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201913.m5KJDvxs032024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tempita - A very small text templating language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451406 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-20 15:13 EST ------- python-tempita-0.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 19:14:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:14:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451408] Review Request: python-wsgiproxy - HTTP proxying tools for WSGI apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201914.m5KJEU7X032223@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-wsgiproxy - HTTP proxying tools for WSGI apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451408 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-20 15:14 EST ------- python-wsgiproxy-0.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 19:15:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:15:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201915.m5KJF1Vs032438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-20 15:15 EST ------- xmms-pulse-0.9.4-5.fc9.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 19:14:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:14:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443467] Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201914.m5KJEsa4032278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443467 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-20 15:14 EST ------- ale-0.9.0.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 19:13:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:13:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451406] Review Request: python-tempita - A very small text templating language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201913.m5KJDxSU032075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tempita - A very small text templating language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451406 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.2-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 19:14:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:14:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443467] Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201914.m5KJEueI032312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443467 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.9.0.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 19:13:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:13:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443468] Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201913.m5KJDDTs031829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443468 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.1.2-4.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 19:15:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:15:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451406] Review Request: python-tempita - A very small text templating language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201915.m5KJFFUX014438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tempita - A very small text templating language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451406 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-20 15:15 EST ------- python-tempita-0.2-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 19:15:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:15:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201915.m5KJF4hx014249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.9.4-5.fc9.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 19:16:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:16:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201916.m5KJGeYn014635@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 ------- Additional Comments From dwheeler at dwheeler.com 2008-06-20 15:16 EST ------- Hi - congrats to Alan Dunn, I think this looks like a good package! Just a note - my comment 20 described how to wrap up coqtop using rlwrap when you invoke coqtop interactively. Unfortunately, Alan Dunn found that doing that has some problems. For example, pasting sometimes doesn't work as expected. So he's convinced me that this automatic wrapping should NOT be done, and that his packaging as it stands is the better approach. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 19:23:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:23:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452282] Review Request: mfiler3 - Two pane file manager under UNIX console In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201923.m5KJNC22002125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mfiler3 - Two pane file manager under UNIX console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452282 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-20 15:23 EST ------- Re: the rpmlint warnings, I also get mfiler3-mdnd.x86_64: W: no-documentation which isn't a problem. I would probably delete the zero-length BUG file in %prep to avoid complicating the %files list, but I don't see it as a particularly significant problem. My Japanese is just good enough to puzzle out most of the homepage, and most of it is gairaigo anyway. One thing I couldn't quite get is the "bug" section mentioning, I think, excessive memory consumption. Maybe that's what should be in the BUG file. I think I'll have to take your word on the license; I don't see any mention of the GPL version anywhere, but there are some non-ASCII comments in the source which don't render in UTF8 for me. I guess it's conceivable that there's something in there, though I don't think it likely. * source files match upstream: 6d22b511a3279764c357b4355ac1c9b21354338b52e8d7eb0c47f5c50783db06 mfiler3-1.0.0.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: mfiler3-1.0.0-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm config(mfiler3) = 1.0.0-1.fc10 mfiler3 = 1.0.0-1.fc10 = /bin/bash config(mfiler3) = 1.0.0-1.fc10 libgc.so.1()(64bit) libmigemo.so.1()(64bit) libncurses.so.5()(64bit) libonig.so.2()(64bit) libtinfo.so.5()(64bit) mfiler3-mdnd-1.0.0-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm mfiler3-mdnd = 1.0.0-1.fc10 = /usr/bin/env mfiler3 = 1.0.0-1.fc10 ruby(gtk2) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. It seems to run fine although I didn't try to do much with it. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 19:45:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:45:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226046] Merge Review: libsoup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806201945.m5KJjBLw019682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libsoup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226046 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-06-20 15:45 EST ------- The BuildRequires: pkgconfig is not needed because the other -devel BuildRequires pull in pkgconfig anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 20:01:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 16:01:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452306] New: Review Request: tcl-pgtcl - Tcl client library for PostgreSQL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452306 Summary: Review Request: tcl-pgtcl - Tcl client library for PostgreSQL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tgl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tgl.fedorapeople.org/tcl-pgtcl.spec SRPM URL: http://tgl.fedorapeople.org/tcl-pgtcl-1.6.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The tcl-pgtcl package contains Pgtcl, a Tcl client library for connecting to a PostgreSQL server. This is actually not a new package: we have been shipping it for a long time as part of the postgresql SRPM. However, the upstream project was split off from core postgresql quite some time ago, and now has its own tarball name and version numbering. To track this properly we need to split out pgtcl as a separate SRPM. I've also taken the opportunity to try to make the packaging conform to current guidelines for Tcl extensions, which the present postgresql-tcl package is rather far away from. Once this package is accepted I will remove pgtcl from the postgresql SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 20:48:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 16:48:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444760] Review Request: obm - Open Business Management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806202048.m5KKmMAX017081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obm - Open Business Management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444760 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-20 16:48 EST ------- Michael asked me to take a look. I find it useful to comment on the found rpmlint complaints as many of them are bogus, but that's not always easy since rpmlint doesn't really give any indication of how much import you should give to its spew. Here's my take: obm.src:27: W: unversioned-explicit-provides obm-core This is bad since you currently provide every possible version of obm-core, which makes it impossible for anything to depend on a specific obm-core version. You must provide a version. obm.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 12) I simply ignore these annoying warnings. I mean, it's nice if they're cleaned up, but come on. obm.src: W: strange-permission obm-config.sh 0755 rpmlint complains about any executable in the src.rpm; I've never seen this as being problematic but I'm not sure you can count on files in src.rpm having any specific permissions. Note also that a more recent rpmlint gives: obm.src:304: E: files-attr-not-set The %files list for the -services subpackage is missing the %defattr line. The non-stanrard-uid complaints are OK. The README.fedora file really shouldn't be executable. structure_tables.sql should be passed through iconv; there's an extended ASCII character in the first line and the file doesn't containing any specific information about how it should be displayed. What is the point of the obm-rpm.conf file? If it needs to be there but shouldn't initially hold anything, can we at least put a comment in there? What is obm-config? I'm guessing it's not a pkgconfig file, and if so then the rpmlint complaint is bogus. The mysql.sql file should not be executable. The no-documentation warnings are OK as long as there isn't some bit of relevant documentation that's been missed. I personally would use "obm-satellite" and "obm-mysql" as I dislike mixed-case package names; qt3-MySQL is the only non-Perl/Python module that uses that case, for example, while 59 packages downcase it including the mysql package itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 21:19:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:19:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446993] Review Request: liblicense - License for storing and retrieving license information in media files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806202119.m5KLJTY3003586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblicense - License for storing and retrieving license information in media files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446993 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 21:18:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:18:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446993] Review Request: liblicense - License for storing and retrieving license information in media files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806202118.m5KLIwFq022155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblicense - License for storing and retrieving license information in media files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446993 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 21:28:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:28:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452317] New: Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 Summary: Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/heuristica-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/heuristica-fonts-20080619-1.fc10.nim.src.rpm Description: Heuristica is a serif latin & cyrillic font, derived from the "Adobe Utopia?" font that was released to the TeX Users Group under a liberal license. See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Heuristica_font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 21:41:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:41:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447751] Review Request: diary - A application to allow you to keep a diary of your life In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806202141.m5KLfFt6007343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diary - A application to allow you to keep a diary of your life https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447751 ------- Additional Comments From lokthare at gmail.com 2008-06-20 17:41 EST ------- Spec URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/diary.spec SRPM URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/diary-0.3-1.fc9.src.rpm - Update to the new release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 21:40:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:40:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446993] Review Request: liblicense - License for storing and retrieving license information in media files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806202140.m5KLeJxC007266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblicense - License for storing and retrieving license information in media files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446993 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-20 17:40 EST ------- I'm pretty sure dennis intended to set fedora-review to '+'. "dgilmore" is not a valid FAS account; using "ausil". CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 21:48:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:48:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452321] New: Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 Summary: Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tgl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tgl.fedorapeople.org/PyGreSQL.spec SRPM URL: http://tgl.fedorapeople.org/PyGreSQL-3.8.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The PyGreSQL package provides a module for developers to use when writing Python code for accessing a PostgreSQL database. This is actually not a new package: we have been shipping it for a long time as part of the postgresql SRPM. However, the upstream project was split off from core postgresql quite some time ago, and now has its own tarball name and version numbering. To track this properly we need to split out PyGreSQL as a separate SRPM. I've also taken the opportunity to try to make the packaging conform to current guidelines for python modules, which the present postgresql-python package is rather far away from. Once this package is accepted I will remove PyGreSQL from the postgresql SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 22:08:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:08:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445028] Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806202208.m5KM8OmP011803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445028 rickyz at cmu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 22:08:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:08:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445028] Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806202208.m5KM83oe030226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445028 rickyz at cmu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rickyz at cmu.edu ------- Additional Comments From rickyz at cmu.edu 2008-06-20 18:08 EST ------- Looks like all of the deps are in Fedora now, so I'd love to try and review this. By the way, it looks like 0.9.6.2 is out now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 22:27:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:27:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445028] Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806202227.m5KMRSm1014766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445028 ------- Additional Comments From kylev at kylev.com 2008-06-20 18:27 EST ------- 0.9.6.2 has a problem, I think. The tarball is out of whack, and nobody has (yet) responded to my posting here: http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-devel/browse_thread/thread/815a9f9c53215345 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 23:08:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 19:08:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452324] New: Review Request: lxterminal - Desktop-independent VTE-based terminal emulator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452324 Summary: Review Request: lxterminal - Desktop-independent VTE- based terminal emulator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxterminal-0.1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxterminal.spec Description: LXterminal is a VTE-based terminal emulator with support for multiple tabs. It is completely desktop-independent and does not have any unnecessary dependencies. In order to reduce memory usage and increase the performance all instances of the terminal are sharing a single process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 23:36:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 19:36:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806202336.m5KNaTtB025526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-06-20 19:36 EST ------- Uploading new specfile for version 0.4.16. Tested: * build of noarch & src package * rpmlint * basic functionality, RSS, scan, newt-based 'client' on F9 and rawhide * http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/clive/clive-0.4.16-1.fc9.noarch.rpm * http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/clive/clive-0.4.16-1.fc9.src.rpm * specfile in attachment or here: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/clive/clive.spec Please, review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 20 23:43:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 19:43:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806202343.m5KNhtD3011958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 ------- Additional Comments From nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com 2008-06-20 19:43 EST ------- > Is this being worked on by anyone? Otherwise I can take it and proceed in spec > file creation. I don't understand. If I opend this review, it was because I was working on the spec file. > Please, review. It seems you are the reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 00:21:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 20:21:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452282] Review Request: mfiler3 - Two pane file manager under UNIX console In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806210021.m5L0LqxQ018020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mfiler3 - Two pane file manager under UNIX console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452282 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-20 20:21 EST ------- Thank you for your quick review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mfiler3 Short Description: Two pane file manager under UNIX console Owners: mtasaka Branches: F-9 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 01:40:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:40:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446976] Review Request: tkabber - Tkabber is a Free and Open Source client for the Jabber instant messaging system. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806210140.m5L1elrS012510@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tkabber - Tkabber is a Free and Open Source client for the Jabber instant messaging system. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446976 ------- Additional Comments From avl at l14.ru 2008-06-20 21:40 EST ------- new version tkabber - 0.11.0 ftp://ftp.l14.ru/pub/repo/FC/9/SPECS/tkabber.spec ftp://ftp.l14.ru/pub/repo/FC/9/SRPMS/tkabber-0.11.0-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 03:04:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 23:04:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452195] Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806210304.m5L34paQ011892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452195 ------- Additional Comments From supersonicandtails at gmail.com 2008-06-20 23:04 EST ------- I've fixed the errors you pointed out, Ignacio, as well as a few other things. Most notably, Presto no longer links with Allegro during build. This is because Allegro contains some non-PIC assembly code that rpmlint doesn't want to allow. rpmlint now complains about undefined references to Allegro functions due to not linking, but the end user can link with Allegro when using Presto. The only other solution to this would be to either remove or change the assembly code in Allegro, neither of which I want to do. Here are the updated SRPM and spec links. I've built the SRPM using mock with no errors, and gotten rid of all the rpmlint errors. http://www.hypersonicsoft.org/projects/downloads/Presto/misc/presto-0.1.1-6.fc9.src.rpm http://www.hypersonicsoft.org/projects/downloads/Presto/misc/presto.spec Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 03:19:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 23:19:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452195] Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806210319.m5L3JaYI013922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452195 ------- Additional Comments From supersonicandtails at gmail.com 2008-06-20 23:19 EST ------- Links changed: http://www.hypersonicsoft.org/projects/downloads/Presto/release/presto.spec http://www.hypersonicsoft.org/projects/downloads/Presto/release/presto-0.1.1-6.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 03:53:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 23:53:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447607] Review Request: abgraph - ABGraph is a simple tool to benchmark webservers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806210353.m5L3rawb001277@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abgraph - ABGraph is a simple tool to benchmark webservers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447607 ------- Additional Comments From supersonicandtails at gmail.com 2008-06-20 23:53 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=309963) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309963&action=view) mock build log The build log from building abgraph with mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 03:54:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 23:54:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447607] Review Request: abgraph - ABGraph is a simple tool to benchmark webservers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806210354.m5L3spqJ001377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abgraph - ABGraph is a simple tool to benchmark webservers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447607 supersonicandtails at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #309963|mock build log |build log from mock description| | ------- Additional Comments From supersonicandtails at gmail.com 2008-06-20 23:54 EST ------- (From update of attachment 309963) No errors building abgraph with mock: mock -r fedora-8-i386 rebuild abgraph-1.0-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 04:20:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 00:20:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447599] Review Request: immix - image mixer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806210420.m5L4Ka6l023006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: immix - image mixer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447599 ------- Additional Comments From supersonicandtails at gmail.com 2008-06-21 00:20 EST ------- Builds with no errors from mock fedora-9-i386, and no output from rpmlint on the installed package. The specfile looks good to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 06:01:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 02:01:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806210601.m5L61nTG005457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-06-21 02:01 EST ------- The Bash trick should really be unnecessary: your package is noarch, so even on 64-bit systems the files will be in /usr/lib/pythonX.Y/... , never /usr/lib64/pythonX.Y/... . The invocation you're using actually returns /usr/lib64 on 64-bit systems, which is not where your files end up installed. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python: It might be a good idea to generate the wrapper script during the packaging process, though: Put this at the top of the specfile: %{!?python_sitelib: %define python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()")} (note: not get_python_lib(1) which gives you the arch-specific directory) %install ... cat > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/vnc2swf-edit << EOF exec python %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/edit.py "$@" EOF But do you really need to do this? edit.py works just fine if you symlink it. Likewise with vnc2swf itself. I'd suggest just symlinking them all to /usr/bin. Could not reproduce the ImportError you're getting -- movie comes from pyvnc2swf so I'm not sure why you're getting that. Is that from *after* you install the RPM or before? Note that the recordwin script has, hardbaked into it, x11vnc and xwininfo. x11vnc is part of libvncserver, but apparently it's not shipped in the Fedora package at all. You might want to file a bug asking for it to be included, and meanwhile, %exclude %{_bindir}/recordwin.sh from the %files section? edit.py throws some exceptions if called without the right arguments; you might want to fix the code path so that if any argument is missing, it exits after displaying the error messages rather than attempting (futilely) to continue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 07:16:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 03:16:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452172] Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806210716.m5L7GT3B016103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452172 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-06-21 03:16 EST ------- Thanks! I intend to maintain this for F-9+ and EL-5+; co-maintainers and maintainers for earlier branches are of course welcome. @tibbs: good catch wrt --skipversion, I'll adjust the patch before the first build. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mysqltuner Short Description: MySQL high performance tuning script Owners: scop Branches: F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 07:22:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 03:22:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452195] Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806210722.m5L7M7te016908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452195 ------- Additional Comments From supersonicandtails at gmail.com 2008-06-21 03:22 EST ------- I have more changes than I thought to make to the package. I'll update the links once again tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 09:31:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 05:31:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452354] New: Review Request: entertrack - Web-based artifact tracking/management system written in PHP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452354 Summary: Review Request: entertrack - Web-based artifact tracking/management system written in PHP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/et/entertrack.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/et/entertrack-1.2.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: EnterTrack is an open source web-based artifact tracking/management system written in PHP. EnterTrack is derived from Issue-Tracker v4.0.1 (www.issue-tracker.com) and adds a number of features particularly useful to larger groups. EnterTrack provides large organizations with start-to-finish tracking of artifacts (artifacts can be problems, bugs, requests, projects, etc.), group collaboration for artifact management, and status reports for high-level performance metrics. Rpmlint warns about non-standard uid/gid for files and directories that needs to be writable by apache and errors at zero-length index.html whose purpose is to block access to the dir (some content is added in the current upstream code). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 09:52:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 05:52:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806210952.m5L9qFpT009474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 mnowak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mnowak at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-06-21 05:52 EST ------- Sorry. Did not get the process of creating spec/package (reporter) and reviewing (assigner). Feel free to reuse the spec file. Re-assigning back to nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 10:44:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 06:44:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806211044.m5LAikkD032332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 ------- Additional Comments From nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com 2008-06-21 06:44 EST ------- > Sorry. Did not get the process of creating spec/package (reporter) and reviewing > (assigner). Feel free to reuse the spec file. Perhaps we could co-maintain the specifile ? btw, update for 0.4.16 : Spec URL : http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/clive.spec SRPM URL : http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/clive-0.4.16-1.fc9.src.rpm rpmlint output : [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint -i clive-0.4.16-1.fc9.noarch.rpm [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint -i clive-0.4.16-1.fc9.src.rpm [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ Rebuild under mock is OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 12:14:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 08:14:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806211214.m5LCEv0w014846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-06-21 08:14 EST ------- Thanks for offer. I bet there's not much work here in this package. I'd better find something else to work on. gl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 12:40:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 08:40:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806211240.m5LCe4Wi019086@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2008-06-21 08:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > The Bash trick should really be unnecessary: your package is noarch, so even on > 64-bit systems the files will be in /usr/lib/pythonX.Y/... , never > /usr/lib64/pythonX.Y/... . The invocation you're using actually returns OK, I reread the Packaging/Python info, and see where it's coming from: I thought that %sitelib would be /usr/lib64 on x86_64, but as you mention this is noarch. > Put this at the top of the specfile: > > %{!?python_sitelib: %define python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from > distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()")} Updated the sitelib assignment. > But do you really need to do this? edit.py works just fine if you symlink it. > Likewise with vnc2swf itself. I'd suggest just symlinking them all to /usr/bin. OK. Without the need to determine the final arch specific location of the *.py, yes, I can simply use a symlink, done for the 3x command line tools. > Could not reproduce the ImportError you're getting -- movie comes from pyvnc2swf > so I'm not sure why you're getting that. Is that from *after* you install the > RPM or before? Here is a test case: 1. vncserver :1 2. vnc2swf 3. options|server|localhost:1 4. start 5. stop 6. save as test.swf 7. exit 8. vnc2swf-play test.swf result: vnc2swf-play ~/dev/pytest.swf Using pygame 1.7.1release Input movie: version=5, size=1024x768, framerate=12fps, frames=187, duration=15.6s. Output movie size: 1024x768 Scanning source swf file: /home/davidt/dev/pytest.swf... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/vnc2swf-play", line 267, in play(args, info, debug=debug) File "/usr/bin/vnc2swf-play", line 234, in play PygameMoviePlayer(movie, debug=debug).play() File "/usr/bin/vnc2swf-play", line 165, in play self.builder.start() File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyvnc2swf/output.py", line 942, in start self.stream.open() File "/usr/bin/vnc2swf-play", line 79, in open import pymedia ImportError: No module named pymedia === Since fedora now has a flash player, I removed the play.py script and symlink. > Note that the recordwin script has, hardbaked into it, x11vnc and xwininfo. > x11vnc is part of libvncserver, but apparently it's not shipped in the Fedora > package at all. You might want to file a bug asking for it to be included, and > meanwhile, %exclude %{_bindir}/recordwin.sh from the %files section? Yes, disabled recordwin for now. It looks to me like x11vnc is a separate part of the libvncserver project: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=32584 > edit.py throws some exceptions if called without the right arguments; you might > want to fix the code path so that if any argument is missing, it exits after > displaying the error messages rather than attempting (futilely) to continue. Created a patch that changes the return into a sys.exit. This seems to work well to show the usage and exit at that point. updated spec: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/pyvnc2swf/pyvnc2swf.spec src.rpm: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/pyvnc2swf/pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 13:50:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 09:50:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806211350.m5LDoErY014737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 ------- Additional Comments From nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com 2008-06-21 09:50 EST ------- So is it possible to put status back to "NEW" ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 14:01:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:01:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449135] Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806211401.m5LE1083016643@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449135 ------- Additional Comments From javiplx at gmail.com 2008-06-21 10:00 EST ------- Event after rereading the packaging guidelines, I don't see the spec missing many of them, but maybe only some. Could you be more specific? Packaging old version is somewhat intentional, partly because that is the version I initially packaged at work, and partly to be able to test a proper package upgrade. About subpackages, I'm not sure about which ones might be useful, and I don't see the package mature enough for them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 14:15:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:15:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449135] Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806211415.m5LEFoSt018952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449135 ------- Additional Comments From musuruan at gmail.com 2008-06-21 10:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Event after rereading the packaging guidelines, I don't see the spec missing > many of them, but maybe only some. Could you be more specific? If you don't follow each guideline your package cannot be approved. Therefore start correcting the one you noticed. Then run rpmlint and correct the errors you'll get. After that scrap all the ugly non-fedora bits like: [ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT I suggest you to read other spec files that are in Fedora to improve your knowledge. > Packaging old version is somewhat intentional, partly because that is the > version I initially packaged at work, and partly to be able to test a proper > package upgrade. It is not a good choice to present a package review for an outdated version. Just think about the security problem version 4.5 probably had and that have been corrected in 4.5.19. > About subpackages, I'm not sure about which ones might be useful, and I don't > see the package mature enough for them. You really should do subpackages. Thus the user can choose to install only the subpackages he needs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 14:35:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:35:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447639] Review Request: typespeed - Test your typing speed and get your fingers' CPS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806211435.m5LEZwJA021940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: typespeed - Test your typing speed and get your fingers' CPS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447639 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-06-21 10:35 EST ------- Since Hans' Reviews are all done I'm going to review this one. Stay tuned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 14:36:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:36:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447639] Review Request: typespeed - Test your typing speed and get your fingers' CPS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806211436.m5LEa7dj004577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: typespeed - Test your typing speed and get your fingers' CPS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447639 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 14:54:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:54:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448204] Review Request: php-pear-Net-DNS - Resolver library used to communicate with a DNS server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806211454.m5LEsPdd006975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-DNS - Resolver library used to communicate with a DNS server Alias: pear-Net-DNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448204 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |pear-Net-DNS AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 14:55:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448205] Review Request: php-pear-Net-IPv4 - IPv4 network calculations and validation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806211455.m5LEtFGH024835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-IPv4 - IPv4 network calculations and validation Alias: pear-Net-IPv4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448205 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |pear-Net-IPv4 AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 15:27:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 11:27:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806211527.m5LFRmdH012446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-21 11:27 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 15:29:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 11:29:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452172] Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806211529.m5LFToR7029911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452172 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-21 11:29 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 15:32:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 11:32:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452282] Review Request: mfiler3 - Two pane file manager under UNIX console In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806211532.m5LFWRK6030590@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mfiler3 - Two pane file manager under UNIX console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452282 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-21 11:32 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 15:38:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 11:38:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447607] Review Request: abgraph - ABGraph is a simple tool to benchmark webservers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806211538.m5LFceYr031475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abgraph - ABGraph is a simple tool to benchmark webservers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447607 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-06-21 11:38 EST ------- Lubomir, yes, upstream promised to release it this weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 15:42:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 11:42:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452172] Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806211542.m5LFgxPB032187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452172 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-06-21 11:42 EST ------- I volunteer to maintain this for EL-4. Creating CVS request per Ville's approval in comment #3: Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: mysqltuner New Branches: EL-4 Updated Fedora CC: wolfy Updated EPEL Owners: wolfy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 16:03:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 12:03:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447639] Review Request: typespeed - Test your typing speed and get your fingers' CPS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806211603.m5LG3Mim017978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: typespeed - Test your typing speed and get your fingers' CPS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447639 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-06-21 12:03 EST ------- Fix - MUST: rpmlint: rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/typespeed-* typespeed.i386: E: zero-length /var/games/typespeed.score typespeed.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/typespeed-0.6.4/ChangeLog typespeed.i386: E: setgid-binary /usr/bin/typespeed games 02755 typespeed.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/typespeed 02755 The errors are due to the games group ownership and are therefor save to ignore but please convert the ChangeLog to UTF-8 with iconv. This should be done together with the sed command in %prep and not during %install OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} OK - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license (GPLv2+) OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. OK - MUST: The source package includes the text of the license and it is correctly included in %doc OK - MUST: The spec file is written in American English OK - MUST: The spec file is legible OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package match the upstream source by md5 fb55b92ad7e29a1a6a7a3e1ca383d5e2 OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i386 OK - MUST: No known ExcludeArch OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires OK - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro OK - MUST: The package is not designed to be relocatable OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing FIX - MUST: Although permissions on files are set properly, the %defattr is wrong. Should be "%defattr(-,root,root,-)" for _all_ files, different permissions should be set with %attr, for example %attr(2755,root,games) %{_bindir}/%{name} %attr(664,root,games) %{_localstatedir}/games/%{name}.score OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: The package contains code, no content OK - MUST: No large documentation files for a separate %{name}-doc package OK - MUST: The files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application Fix - MUST: The package includes a %{name}.desktop file (although it it no GUI application) which is correctly installed with desktop-file-install. But the Category "Application" is obsolete and should be removed. I also suggest to include typespeed.desktop as a separate file and not to create it in the spec. OK - MUST: The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install the package runs 'rm -rf %{buildroot}' OK - MUST: All filenames in the package are valid UTF-8 OK - SHOULD: The package builds in mock OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described, but I noticed a small bug: The German words file contains some English words, for example "Equipment". FIX - Minor: %description should be reworked a little: DOS is an abbreviation and should therefor be written in capital letters. The third sentence needs an article at the beginning, "The Idea" instead of "Idea". I suggest you simply use the description from the 'About' paragraph of the homepage: "Typespeed's idea is ripped from ztspeed (a DOS game made by Zorlim). The Idea behind the game is rather easy: type words that are flying by from left to right as fast as you can. If you miss 10 or more words, game is over. You can play typespeed for your own or with a friend using TCP/IPv4." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 16:57:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 12:57:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246348] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806211657.m5LGvX8V010928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246348 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2008-06-21 12:57 EST ------- It didn't happen before YAPC, unfortunately, but here's an update to 0.6.3: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/parrot/parrot.spec http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/parrot-0.6.3-1.src.rpm Trying to install the parrot-lua package gives this error: error: Failed dependencies: perl(Parrot::Test) is needed by parrot-lua-0.6.3-1.fc9.x86_64 Parrot::Test is included with parrot, but doesn't seem to get install with any of the sub-packages, so I need to check on that. The good news is that we now have a working "perl6" in the rakudo package: $ perl6 -v This is Rakudo Perl 6, revision 0 built on parrot 0.6.3 for x86_64-linux-thread-multi. Copyright 2006-2008, The Perl Foundation. $ perl6 -e 'say "Hello"' Hello $ perl6 -e '"Hello".say' Segmentation fault <- needs a bug report filed :-) $ perl6 -e '"Hello".say;' Hello I'm a little torn on what version numbers to use for the various sub-packages. A lot of the languages have a 0.1.0 version number on them somewhere, but that doesn't seem to change often (if at all), which would make versioning for upgrades awkward. If the situation ever changes, I guess we can always add an Epoch to those packages. So I have *not* tried to build this in mock, and I know rpmlint complains about a lot of things. Reporting failures isn't helpful (yet), but patches are. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 17:32:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:32:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452282] Review Request: mfiler3 - Two pane file manager under UNIX console In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806211732.m5LHWpix031938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mfiler3 - Two pane file manager under UNIX console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452282 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-21 13:32 EST ------- Rebuilt successfully on devel F-9/8, requested for F-9/8 on bodhi, closing. Thank you for the review and CVS procedure (closed within one day !) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 18:12:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:12:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806211812.m5LICeLI006353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-06-21 14:12 EST ------- I guess this is RH bugzilla limitation, never found out how to move it to NEW from another state. Filled bug 452383, you are in Cc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 18:18:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:18:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448435] Review Request: PythonCard - PythonCard GUI construction toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806211818.m5LII3u6024264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PythonCard - PythonCard GUI construction toolkit Alias: PythonCard-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448435 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-06-21 14:18 EST ------- * Good catch on samples, I've moved it with tools (these are examples) to docdir. * python-PythonCard just does not sound nice :) I think everybody will find that PythonCard are written in python :) thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 18:36:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:36:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452172] Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806211836.m5LIaHT4027545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452172 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-21 14:36 EST ------- mysqltuner-0.9.1-4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 18:39:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:39:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452172] Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806211839.m5LIdKsa010792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452172 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-06-21 14:39 EST ------- EL-5 and F-9+ builds succeeded, tweaking fedora-cvs flag so that admins notice comment 5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 18:51:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:51:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250804] Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806211851.m5LIppjt012913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data Alias: perl-Encode-Detect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250804 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-06-21 14:51 EST ------- James, ping again: do you intend to build this for the other branches you requested in comment 16? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 19:02:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 15:02:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448205] Review Request: php-pear-Net-IPv4 - IPv4 network calculations and validation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806211902.m5LJ2AGl014922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-IPv4 - IPv4 network calculations and validation Alias: pear-Net-IPv4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448205 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 19:02:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 15:02:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448204] Review Request: php-pear-Net-DNS - Resolver library used to communicate with a DNS server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806211902.m5LJ24eq014874@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-DNS - Resolver library used to communicate with a DNS server Alias: pear-Net-DNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448204 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 19:25:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 15:25:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445010] Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806211925.m5LJPq4h002971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445010 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 19:45:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 15:45:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806211945.m5LJjIr3006432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 ------- Additional Comments From hedayat at grad.com 2008-06-21 15:45 EST ------- The correct SRPM: http://www.assembla.com/spaces/hedayat/documents/dOrnuopLqr3BySab7jnrAJ/download/rcssserver3d-0.6-0.1.20080620cvs.fc9.src.rpm (OR: http://assembla.com/file/hedayat/2_rcssserver3d-0.6-0.1.20080620cvs.fc9.src.rpm) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 19:46:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 15:46:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452387] New: Review Request: netris - A console-based, networked clone of Tetris Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452387 Summary: Review Request: netris - A console-based, networked clone of Tetris Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chax at i-rpg.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rydzyk.net/fedora/netris.spec SRPM URL: http://rydzyk.net/fedora/netris-0.52-3.fc9.src.rpm Description: Netris is a curses-based Tetris clone. It has single player and internet game (2 player) modes. You can also play against a bot. I need a sponsor, because it is my first package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 19:57:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 15:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445010] Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806211957.m5LJvKe4024162@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445010 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-06-21 15:57 EST ------- Unfortunately, I can't be a sponsor for you :( This package looks fine to me, but: * name your patch %{name}-%{version}-%{descrptions}.patch if possible * delete Encoding from .desktop file, it has been deprecated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 20:05:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 16:05:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451405] Review Request: python-weberror - Web Error handling and exception catching middleware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806212005.m5LK5Wia009944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-weberror - Web Error handling and exception catching middleware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451405 Bug 451405 depends on bug 451406, which changed state. Bug 451406 Summary: Review Request: python-tempita - A very small text templating language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451406 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-21 16:05 EST ------- Currently this builds but doesn't install due to the missing WebOb dependency. Did you intend to submit that or was someone else going to do so? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 20:11:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 16:11:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451405] Review Request: python-weberror - Web Error handling and exception catching middleware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806212011.m5LKB7Tk010871@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-weberror - Web Error handling and exception catching middleware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451405 ------- Additional Comments From rickyz at cmu.edu 2008-06-21 16:11 EST ------- Yup, this was intentional (as part of an effort to get everything packaged to be ready to support turbogears2). I spoke to spot, who had already packaged, but not submitted a WebOb package, and I'll be submitting that package myself shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 20:16:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 16:16:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225855] Merge Review: gphoto2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806212016.m5LKGuEQ011834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gphoto2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225855 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-06-21 16:16 EST ------- MUST Items: OK - rpmlint is clean OK - follows Naming Guidelines OK - spec file is named as %{name}.spec xx - package does not meet Packaging Guidelines + Is it necessary to define multilib_arches? + Since the package no longer carries the library, it should not be mentioned in the description. + Source0 does not conform to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL packaging/rpm/package.spec.in and packaging/rpm/gphoto2.spec seem to have a non-functional URL. Upstream should be informed about it. + The --enable-docs and --enable-lockdev options could not be found in configure and configure.ac and look like remnants from libgphoto2. + Is --with-doc-dir really needed? Shouldn't it by %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} instead of %{_docdir}/%{name}? + To preserve timestamps you could consider using: make install INSTALL="%{__install} -p" DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Why not include ChangeLog and TODO in %doc? + Why not include contrib/simple-mtpupload in %doc? OK - license meets Licensing Guidelines xx - License field meets actual license + Should be GPLv2+ instead of GPLv2. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#SoftwareLicenses packaging/rpm/package.spec.in and packaging/rpm/gphoto2.spec wrongly mention LGPL. Upstream should be informed about it. OK - upstream license file included in %doc OK - spec file uses American English OK - spec file is legible OK - sources match upstream sources OK - package builds successfully OK - ExcludeArch for s390 and s390x + s390 and s390x are not Fedora supported architectures, yet. Out of curiosity, what is the reason for this? xx - redundant and extra build dependencies listed + libusb-devel and libexif-devel are brought in by libgphoto2-devel, lockdev-devel looks like an old requirement from libgphoto2, while pkgconfig is brought in by all the -devel packages providing *.pc files. xx - locales not handled properly + BuildRequires: gettext should be added. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files OK - no shared libraries OK - package is not relocatable OK - file and directory ownership OK - no duplicates in %file OK - file permissions set properly + The preferred attribute definition is: %defattr(-,root,root,-) OK - %clean present xx - macros not used consistently + Both %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT notations used. + No need to enclose them within double quotes. According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Macros only one style should be used. OK - contains code and permissable content OK - -doc is not needed OK - contents of %doc does not affect the runtime OK - no header files OK - no static libraries OK - no pkgconfig files OK - no library files OK - -devel is not needed OK - no libtool archives OK - %{name}.desktop file not needed OK - does not own files or directories owned by other packages OK - buildroot correctly prepped OK - all file names valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - upstream provides license text xx - no translations for description and summary OK - package builds in mock successfully OK - package builds on all supported architectures + s390 and s390x are excluded, which are not Fedora architectures. OK - package functions as expected OK - scriptlets are sane OK - subpackages are not needed OK - no pkgconfig files OK - no file dependencies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 20:24:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 16:24:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452388] New: Review Request: python-migrate - Schema migration tools for SQLAlchemy Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452388 Summary: Review Request: python-migrate - Schema migration tools for SQLAlchemy Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: a.badger at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-migrate.spec SRPM URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-migrate-0.4.4-1.src.rpm Description: Schema migration tools for SQLAlchemy designed to support an agile approach to database design and make it easier to keep development and production databases in sync as schema changes are required. It allows you to manage. database change sets and database repository versioning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 20:26:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 16:26:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452388] Review Request: python-migrate - Schema migration tools for SQLAlchemy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806212026.m5LKQ2QX029413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-migrate - Schema migration tools for SQLAlchemy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452388 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rickyz at cmu.edu ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2008-06-21 16:26 EST ------- Ricky and I are working on this together. Reviewers, it's fine with me if he works on modifying the package to finish the review as I'm going on vacation for a bit more than a week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 20:33:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 16:33:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452387] Review Request: netris - A console-based, networked clone of Tetris In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806212033.m5LKXB41030510@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netris - A console-based, networked clone of Tetris https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452387 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-21 16:33 EST ------- My understanding is that we can't package Teris clones, especially if we actually go so far as to call them "Tetris clones". Asking the legal folks for advice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 20:48:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 16:48:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806212048.m5LKmdIi000304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trash - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 ------- Additional Comments From lokthare at gmail.com 2008-06-21 16:48 EST ------- I have receive an email of the author suggesting to use trash-cli for the name. Does it seem ok? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 20:48:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 16:48:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433926] Review Request: freehoo - Freehoo is a free console based messenger for Yahoo IM Service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806212048.m5LKmH3C032742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freehoo - Freehoo is a free console based messenger for Yahoo IM Service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433926 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 20:45:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 16:45:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433926] Review Request: freehoo - Freehoo is a free console based messenger for Yahoo IM Service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806212045.m5LKjmI7032552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freehoo - Freehoo is a free console based messenger for Yahoo IM Service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433926 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |debarshi.ray at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 20:46:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 16:46:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452387] Review Request: netris - A console-based, networked clone of Tetris In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806212046.m5LKk9YS032606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netris - A console-based, networked clone of Tetris https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452387 ------- Additional Comments From chax at i-rpg.net 2008-06-21 16:46 EST ------- As far as I know, there is a company, which holds "Tetris" trademark, but they do not own anything else (like patents, look and feel...). Because of that, upstream describes this game "version of T*tris", anyway, this is only description, so I thought it wouldn't make any problems. Also, there are some clones already packaged, like ksirtet from kdegames3. Anyway, thank you for help. I know there are some rules here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 21:21:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:21:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806212121.m5LLLVN8022039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trash - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-21 17:21 EST ------- Looks good to me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 21:21:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:21:39 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_450527=5D_Review_Request=3A_libkni_-_C++_l?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ibrary_f=C3=BCr_the_Katana_robot_arm?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806212121.m5LLLdAC022083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libkni - C++ library f?r the Katana robot arm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-21 17:21 EST ------- You can only get undefined-non-weak-symbol complaints by installing the package and then running "rpmlint libkni". My build script installs the built package into the mock chroot in order to do this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 21:31:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:31:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806212131.m5LLVYwT023589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-21 17:31 EST ------- I don't see anything matching your name, so I'm going to make the assumption that you need a sponsor and set things appropriately. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join has more info. If I'm incorrect, please excuse me and remove the blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 21:37:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:37:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452388] Review Request: python-migrate - Schema migration tools for SQLAlchemy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806212137.m5LLbiYl024433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-migrate - Schema migration tools for SQLAlchemy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452388 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-21 17:37 EST ------- Hmm, 404 on that URL. I used http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-migrate-0.4.4-1.fc9.src.rpm instead. Unfortunately it doesn't build in mock on rawhide: + /usr/bin/python setup.py build Traceback (most recent call last): File "setup.py", line 2, in from setuptools import setup,find_packages ImportError: No module named setuptools I added a python-setuptools dependency and it builds OK. With that added it builds OK. Full review forthcoming.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 22:27:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 18:27:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452388] Review Request: python-migrate - Schema migration tools for SQLAlchemy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806212227.m5LMRsoi015315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-migrate - Schema migration tools for SQLAlchemy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452388 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-21 18:27 EST ------- Aside from the build error, which I'll just assume is fixed in order to progress with this review, I note that /usr/bin/migrate is just begging for conflicts. While no package in Fedora provides it, a quick search shows that it's used in at least one clustering environment, an HSM system, something Zope related, and some user migration tools. Is there any other reasonable choice of name that could be used? I note that there's a test suite in the tarball; it looks like it should be possible to run this with sqlite, but I have no idea how or if it's at all possible to do that at runtime. A minor nit, I guess, but you might as well remove the unneeded comments left over from the specfile template. * source files match upstream: 2877b1b95c0e34aabc61c81636a136bc2af900703aa580bc4321bab65f48411a sqlalchemy-migrate-0.4.4.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires missing python-setuptools (at least in rawhide) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (after adding python-setuptools dependency). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: python-migrate = 0.4.4-1.fc10 = /usr/bin/python python(abi) = 2.5 ? %check is not present, but there's a test suite, * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 22:35:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 18:35:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452105] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-RADIUS - Wrapper Classes for the RADIUS PECL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806212235.m5LMZwJT016764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-RADIUS - Wrapper Classes for the RADIUS PECL Alias: pear-Auth-RADIUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452105 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-21 18:35 EST ------- Another trivial review; builds fine, rpmlint is silent and everything looks good to me. I assume you know that Requires(hint): is the same as Requires:, so this package ends up depending on mcrypt, mhash, and Crypt-CHAP. They're tiny, so I don't see this as a problem, but I don't really see the point in just not using regular dependencies. * source files match upstream: fc993398a48e00eea572ac74157d02d53ead4fb60471e1ebb8861c4ae133b90e Auth_RADIUS-1.0.6.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included (separately) upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(Auth_RADIUS) = 1.0.6 php-pear-Auth-RADIUS = 1.0.6-1.fc10 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear php-mcrypt php-mhash php-pear(Crypt_CHAP) php-pear(PEAR) php-pecl(radius) >= 1.2.5 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 22:42:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 18:42:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452105] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-RADIUS - Wrapper Classes for the RADIUS PECL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806212242.m5LMgIti001370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-RADIUS - Wrapper Classes for the RADIUS PECL Alias: pear-Auth-RADIUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452105 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2008-06-21 18:42 EST ------- I use requires(hint) as a note to myself (or someone looking at the spec) that the package is optional. Kind of like a comment. Thanks for the review. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 22:45:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 18:45:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452105] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-RADIUS - Wrapper Classes for the RADIUS PECL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806212245.m5LMj6Fo017986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-RADIUS - Wrapper Classes for the RADIUS PECL Alias: pear-Auth-RADIUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452105 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2008-06-21 18:45 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-Auth-RADIUS Short Description: Wrapper Classes for the RADIUS PECL Owners: xulchris Branches: EL-5 F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 22:53:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 18:53:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445797] Review Request: erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806212253.m5LMrxO2003000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445797 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(lemenkov at gmail.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-21 18:53 EST ------- So should I assume that you won't rename this package or provide some evidence that the existing guidelines shouldn't apply? If not, I suppose this ticket cannot progress and should be closed. I don't recall seeing any discussions on fedora-devel, and no proposals for changing the guidelines have come before the packaging committee. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 22:56:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 18:56:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452105] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-RADIUS - Wrapper Classes for the RADIUS PECL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806212256.m5LMu5o1019618@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-RADIUS - Wrapper Classes for the RADIUS PECL Alias: pear-Auth-RADIUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452105 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-21 18:56 EST ------- I would suggest that if you wish to include a comment in the spec, you simply use a regular comment instead of using syntax which simply isn't defined in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 23:21:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:21:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446814] Review Request: emacs-lookup - Emacsen interface to look up dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806212321.m5LNLNeY007529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-lookup - Emacsen interface to look up dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446814 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-21 19:21 EST ------- This fails to build in mock for me; the build completes, but the final assembly process fails with: error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/info/dir It's recommended that you rm -f this; whether it is generated or not depends on several things, but it should never be included in the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 23:33:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:33:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227128] Review Request: xstream-1.1.3-1jpp - XML serialization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806212333.m5LNX8sE025385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xstream-1.1.3-1jpp - XML serialization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227128 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-21 19:33 EST ------- This package could also use some work to meet the current Java packaging guidelines. Is there still any interest in getting this into Fedora, along with all of the other Java packages that were submitted before the guidelines were complete? If there's no interest right now, I can go ahead and mark them as not being ready for review and when that work is done they can go back into the review queue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 23:40:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:40:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431249] Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806212340.m5LNeJAh010282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431249 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 23:40:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:40:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431251] Review Request: rep-gtk - GTK+ binding for librep Lisp environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806212340.m5LNeZRG026622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rep-gtk - GTK+ binding for librep Lisp environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431251 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 23:43:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:43:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434861] Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806212343.m5LNhDeX026793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434861 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-21 19:43 EST ------- I don't see you in the account system at all; is this your first package for Fedora? I'm assuming that it is; setting things appropriately. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join for more information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 23:50:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:50:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450223] Review Request: mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki - An extension to provide an interwiki management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806212350.m5LNoist011679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki - An extension to provide an interwiki management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450223 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-21 19:50 EST ------- mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki-0-0.3.20080606svn.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 23:50:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:50:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450223] Review Request: mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki - An extension to provide an interwiki management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806212350.m5LNoQHY028003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki - An extension to provide an interwiki management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450223 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-21 19:50 EST ------- mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki-0-0.3.20080606svn.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 21 23:53:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434698] Review Request: md5deep - A set of cross-platform tools to compute hashes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806212353.m5LNrOh4028226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: md5deep - A set of cross-platform tools to compute hashes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434698 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-21 19:53 EST ------- I didn't notice the above comment and so this seems to have fallen through the tracks, sorry. Paul, would you still like a review of this? Would you consider updating the package to version 3.0? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 00:24:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 20:24:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450685] Review Request: R-DBI - Database Interface for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806220024.m5M0OSlI000349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-DBI - Database Interface for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450685 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-06-21 20:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Builds fine; rpmlint has the expected R complaints plus this: > E: zero-length /usr/share/R/library/DBI/doc/DBI.R > Honestly I'm not sure what this is for or even where it comes from. Perhaps an > R expert can tell us what's up, but I don't think this is a significant issue. Safe to ignore I think. > I would recommend using http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/DBI/index.html > for the upstream URL; it's a bit better than an index page full of unrelated > directories and tarballs. Yeah, I followed the example from the wiki, I've changed this though. > The description could use a little attention. I'd recommend stealing something > like the following from upstream: > A database interface (DBI) definition for communication between R and > relational database management systems. Done SRPM: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/R-DBI-0.2-2.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/R-DBI.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 01:12:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 21:12:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806220112.m5M1Ca3H007775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP Alias: php-pear-Auth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2008-06-21 21:12 EST ------- Okay more fixes needed: 1. The sub-packages must require their parent package, like so: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} 2. Please remove all tabs from the spec file 3. Please do what I mentioned in comment #20 (we need to discuss virtual provides for pear subpackages) 4. Please update the %files section like so: %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc %{pear_name}-%{version}/docdir/%{pear_name}/* %{pear_xmldir}/%{pear_name}.xml %{pear_phpdir}/%{pear_name}* %{pear_testdir}/%{pear_name} %exclude %{pear_phpdir}/%{pear_name}/Container/SMBPasswd.php %exclude %{pear_phpdir}/%{pear_name}/Container/RADIUS.php %files samba %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{pear_phpdir}/%{pear_name}/Container/SMBPasswd.php %files radius %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{pear_phpdir}/%{pear_name}/Container/RADIUS.php -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 01:34:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 21:34:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450685] Review Request: R-DBI - Database Interface for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806220134.m5M1YCHa010691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-DBI - Database Interface for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450685 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-21 21:34 EST ------- OK, everything looks good to me. Unfortunately R upstreams aren't quite as organized as, say, Perl's CPAN so sometimes the URL in the example spec on the wiki gets you somewhere and sometimes it doesn't. Anyway, APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 02:17:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 22:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452395] New: Review Request: lxlauncher - Open source replacement for Asus Launcher of the EeePC Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452395 Summary: Review Request: lxlauncher - Open source replacement for Asus Launcher of the EeePC Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxlauncher.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxlauncher-0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: LXLauncher is designed as an open source replacement for the Asus Launcher included in their EeePC. It is desktop-independent and follows freedesktop.org specs, so newly added applications will automatically show up in the launcher, and vice versa for the removed ones. LXLauncher is part of LXDE, the Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 02:24:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 22:24:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451153] Review Request: mapbender - Geospatial portal for OGC OWS architectures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806220224.m5M2OG3f001905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapbender - Geospatial portal for OGC OWS architectures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451153 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-21 22:24 EST ------- I'm not sure what the point of the %post scriptlet is. That output doesn't go anywhere; I'm not even sure yum displays things like that, and it certainly won't be seen for things like kickstart installs. It's best to put that information into a README.Fedora file and install it as %doc. Is there anything which restricts access to localhost by default? The conf just sets up the alias but I don't see any access restrictions. Since this program comes up with a default password (according to the information in the %post scriptlet, at least), it would be very bad for it to allow access from the network by default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 02:37:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 22:37:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443675] Review Request: sip-redirect - Tiny IPv4 and IPv6 SIP redirect server written in Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806220237.m5M2buCe004141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sip-redirect - Tiny IPv4 and IPv6 SIP redirect server written in Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443675 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-21 22:37 EST ------- I agree that the source should if at all possible be obtainable without registration of any kind. I can't really fathom why you would want to restrict downloads like that. Get a fedorahosted or use your fedorapeople space if you're really concerned that too many people might download your software. The %pre scriptlet is missing the final "exit 0" line. I don't understand why you would need to touch and chown the log directory in %post. Why not just put it in the %files list normally? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 03:49:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 23:49:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450685] Review Request: R-DBI - Database Interface for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806220349.m5M3nCko014544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-DBI - Database Interface for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450685 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-06-21 23:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > OK, everything looks good to me. Unfortunately R upstreams aren't quite as > organized as, say, Perl's CPAN so sometimes the URL in the example spec on the > wiki gets you somewhere and sometimes it doesn't. > > Anyway, APPROVED Thank you! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-DBI Short Description: Database Interface for R Owners: nigelj Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-8 F-9 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 04:00:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 00:00:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452195] Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806220400.m5M40fuH016578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452195 ------- Additional Comments From supersonicandtails at gmail.com 2008-06-22 00:00 EST ------- Here's the update: http://www.hypersonicsoft.org/projects/downloads/Presto/release/presto-0.1.3-1.fc9.src.rpm http://www.hypersonicsoft.org/projects/downloads/Presto/release/presto.spec The package builds cleanly on at least Fedora i386 and x86_64 systems. rpmlint gives no errors (but still the tolerable warnings that I mentioned above). Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 04:23:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 00:23:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452195] Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806220423.m5M4NhoW019911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452195 ------- Additional Comments From supersonicandtails at gmail.com 2008-06-22 00:23 EST ------- - -devel is missing a Requires of allegro-devel, and should have no BuildRequires >> The -devel package depends on the main package, which depends on allegro-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 04:27:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 00:27:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445797] Review Request: erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806220427.m5M4RdB9020622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445797 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(lemenkov at gmail.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-06-22 00:27 EST ------- OK, closing this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 04:32:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 00:32:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235731] Review Request: openbsd-malloc - Alternative malloc() implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806220432.m5M4WoBF004875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openbsd-malloc - Alternative malloc() implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235731 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-06-22 00:32 EST ------- I'm no longer interested in packaging this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 04:56:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 00:56:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806220456.m5M4uSgH008187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-22 00:56 EST ------- Doesn't build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=674696 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 11:49:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 07:49:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806221149.m5MBnm7L020679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 claudio at claudiotomasoni.it changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(claudio at claudiotom| |asoni.it) | ------- Additional Comments From claudio at claudiotomasoni.it 2008-06-22 07:49 EST ------- Sorry, solved problems with ADSL provider. I'm working on this right now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 12:03:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 08:03:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225855] Merge Review: gphoto2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806221203.m5MC3UQi023519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gphoto2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225855 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-06-22 08:03 EST ------- If the package is creating the %{buildroot}%{_docdir}/%{name} directory, it should either be removed or owned by the package because a package must own all directories that it creates. And I am only curious to know why this fails to build on s390 and s390x, and not why they are not Fedora-supported architectures. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 12:46:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 08:46:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433926] Review Request: freehoo - Freehoo is a free console based messenger for Yahoo IM Service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806221246.m5MCkfpE014227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freehoo - Freehoo is a free console based messenger for Yahoo IM Service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433926 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-06-22 08:46 EST ------- MUST Items: OK - rpmlint is clean OK - follows Naming Guidelines OK - spec file is named as %{name}.spec xx - package does not meet Packaging Guidelines + According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Requires there is no need to mention Requires: guile readline glib2. RPM automagically picks them up: [rishi at ginger x86_64]$ rpm --requires -qp freehoo-3.5.2-1.fc8.x86_64.rpm [...] libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libguile.so.17()(64bit) [...] libreadline.so.5()(64bit) + Requires: words is needed because freehoo uses /usr/share/dict/words. + freehoo.1 is now UTF-8 and conversion is not needed anymore. + Why is C_INCLUDE_PATH needed? It looks like the configure takes care of it: AC_SUBST(YAHOO2_CFLAGS) AC_SUBST(YAHOO2_LIBS) + Does 'make test' really work? I am getting: [rishi at ginger src]$ make test make: *** No rule to make target `test'. Stop. [rishi at ginger src]$ + Is '%{__rm} -rf %{buildroot}/examples' really needed? Looks like %{buildroot}/examples is not created. + The following two lines are not needed: %{__rm} -f %{buildroot}/usr/doc/%{name}/autogen.sh %{__cp} -av %{buildroot}/usr/doc/%{name}/* %{buildroot}/%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ Just remove %{buildroot}/usr/doc because %doc copies the files anyway. + According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Documentation the INSTALL file should not be carried. OK - license meets Licensing Guidelines xx - License field meets actual license + Should be GPLv2+ instead of GPLv2. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#SoftwareLicenses OK - upstream license file included in %doc OK - spec file uses American English OK - spec file is legible OK - sources match upstream sources OK - package builds successfully OK - ExcludeArch not needed OK - build dependencies correctly listed + You could consider listing each dependency on a separate line. OK - no locales OK - no shared libraries OK - package is not relocatable OK - file and directory ownership OK - no duplicates in %file OK - file permissions set properly + The preferred attribute definition is: %defattr(-,root,root,-) OK - %clean present xx - macros not used consistently + Use %{_infodir} instead of %{_datadir}/info. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros + Try not to mix freehoo and %{name} in the Spec. eg., %files. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Macros OK - contains code and permissable content OK - -doc is not needed OK - contents of %doc does not affect the runtime OK - no header files OK - no static libraries OK - no pkgconfig files OK - no library files OK - -devel is not needed OK - no libtool archives OK - %{name}.desktop file not needed OK - does not own files or directories owned by other packages OK - buildroot correctly prepped OK - all file names valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - upstream provides license text xx - no translations for description and summary OK - package builds in mock successfully OK - package builds on all supported architectures OK - package functions as expected OK - scriptlets are sane OK - subpackages are not needed OK - no pkgconfig files OK - no file dependencies outside /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 12:47:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 08:47:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226115] Merge Review: m4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806221247.m5MCloKq030804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: m4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226115 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mitr at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-06-22 08:47 EST ------- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 12:55:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 08:55:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434861] Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806221255.m5MCt6HD015717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434861 ------- Additional Comments From ivaxer at gmail.com 2008-06-22 08:55 EST ------- Yes, this is my first package in Fedora. I have registered the Fedora account(name: ivaxer), I hope that nothing is missed. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 12:57:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 08:57:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445224] Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806221257.m5MCv7lQ015973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445224 ------- Additional Comments From dcnltc at us.ibm.com 2008-06-22 08:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > > So, the only issue under the "Needs fixing" category is the build error you got > > in mock. I'll look into that one. > > That, and the naming. See below. I didn't see anything below about the naming issue. What is the naming problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 13:15:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 09:15:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452413] New: Review Request: BkChem - my 1st package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 Summary: Review Request: BkChem - my 1st package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: henriquecsj at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/bkchem.spec SRPM URL: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/bkchem-0.12.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: BkChem is a chemical drawing tool that can be a good alternative to XDrawChem (abandoned since 2005 by the developers). The alternative Pacage needs some changes to work, like the creation of a .desktop file. This is my first package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 13:18:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 09:18:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - my 1st package - FE-NEEDSPONSOR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806221318.m5MDITGe019551@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: BkChem - my 1st package - FE-NEEDSPONSOR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 henriquecsj at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: BkChem - my |Review Request: BkChem - my |1st package |1st package - FE- | |NEEDSPONSOR -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 13:17:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 09:17:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452395] Review Request: lxlauncher - Open source replacement for Asus Launcher of the EeePC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806221317.m5MDHsGm003391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxlauncher - Open source replacement for Asus Launcher of the EeePC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452395 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-06-22 09:17 EST ------- Robert, I'm CC'ing you beause I know you have an EeePC, so maybe you can help me with this review... ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 13:43:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 09:43:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449504] Review Request: ranpwd - A program to generate random passwords In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806221343.m5MDhbQw007143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ranpwd - A program to generate random passwords https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449504 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: ranpwd - A |Review Request: ranpwd - A |program to generate random |program to generate random |passwords |passwords Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-06-22 09:43 EST ------- Why are using closing #436930, are you sure Krzysztof Kurzawski don't want to maintain the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 13:44:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 09:44:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449504] Review Request: ranpwd - A program to generate random passwords In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806221344.m5MDieM9023440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ranpwd - A program to generate random passwords https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449504 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 13:57:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 09:57:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433444] php update create a dependancie issue with raydium & maniadrive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806221357.m5MDv0Ae025533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: php update create a dependancie issue with raydium & maniadrive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433444 ------- Additional Comments From kdekorte at gmail.com 2008-06-22 09:56 EST ------- happens on 32bit as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 15:35:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 11:35:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445010] Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806221535.m5MFZVEI024131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445010 ------- Additional Comments From telimektar at esraonline.com 2008-06-22 11:35 EST ------- Hi the package and spec have been modified with your suggestions. * The patch has been renamed %{name}-%{version}-makefile.patch for the %{description} may be a little too long for a file name. * Also The .desktop is modified. You can find here the modified SRPM and SPEC : SPEC URL : http://www.telimektar.com/rpm/xvarstar/xvarstar-0.9-1.fc9.src.rpm SRPM URL : http://www.telimektar.com/rpm/xvarstar/xvarstar.spec It isn't that bad if you can't be a sponsor for me, i'll try to find another one. Can you commit this package and mark me as co-maintaner ? PS : I have beginning packaging PyCards wich is needed for skylive.it ;) in order to have more package to show to my potential sponsors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 15:54:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 11:54:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450685] Review Request: R-DBI - Database Interface for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806221554.m5MFsME1010419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-DBI - Database Interface for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450685 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-22 11:54 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 15:56:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 11:56:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452105] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-RADIUS - Wrapper Classes for the RADIUS PECL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806221556.m5MFu6W0027080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-RADIUS - Wrapper Classes for the RADIUS PECL Alias: pear-Auth-RADIUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452105 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-22 11:56 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 15:58:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 11:58:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452172] Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806221558.m5MFw1rs011056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452172 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-22 11:58 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 16:14:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 12:14:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443675] Review Request: sip-redirect - Tiny IPv4 and IPv6 SIP redirect server written in Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806221614.m5MGEfTA029870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sip-redirect - Tiny IPv4 and IPv6 SIP redirect server written in Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443675 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2008-06-22 12:14 EST ------- My package does not fit 2nd must of https://fedorahosted.org/web/en/terms and never will do so. It's not a log directory, it's a log file. How else to get a empty log file, which fits "rpm -V" etc.? %ghost doesn't create files, just keeps attributes. %config isn't IMHO an option for a log file. MySQL afaik does handing of the log file the same way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 17:15:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 13:15:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433444] php update create a dependancie issue with raydium & maniadrive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806221715.m5MHFPYl007028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: php update create a dependancie issue with raydium & maniadrive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433444 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 17:14:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 13:14:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235731] Review Request: openbsd-malloc - Alternative malloc() implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806221714.m5MHEcl8006598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openbsd-malloc - Alternative malloc() implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235731 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 17:13:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 13:13:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806221713.m5MHDxAA006550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | Summary|Review Request: BkChem - my |Review Request: BkChem - |1st package - FE- |Chemical drawing program |NEEDSPONSOR | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 17:50:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 13:50:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445010] Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806221750.m5MHo4Wg012118@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445010 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-06-22 13:50 EST ------- Sure, I'll do that. the PythonCard review is going on in Bug 448435 (sorry for not mailing it our to the list), you can start working on the skylive.it if you have time :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 17:54:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 13:54:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445010] Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806221754.m5MHsgnm028719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445010 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-06-22 13:54 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xvarstar Short Description: an astronomical program used for searching GCVS Owners: mmahut Branches: F-8, F-9, EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 18:08:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:08:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806221808.m5MI8acI031205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 ------- Additional Comments From henriquecsj at gmail.com 2008-06-22 14:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > Spec URL: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/bkchem.spec > SRPM URL: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/bkchem-0.12.2-1.fc9.src.rpm > Description: BkChem is a chemical drawing tool that can be a good alternative to XDrawChem (abandoned since 2005 by the developers). > The alternative Pacage needs some changes to work, like the creation of a .desktop file. > This is my first package The package seems to be working very well and the changes I made will be oticed to the developer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 18:31:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:31:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444264] Review Request: usb_modeswitch - brings umts / 4g cards into operational mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806221831.m5MIVHAT002331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: usb_modeswitch - brings umts / 4g cards into operational mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444264 ------- Additional Comments From romal at gmx.de 2008-06-22 14:31 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.romal.de/files/usb_modeswitch.spec SRPM URL: http://www.romal.de/files/usb_modeswitch-0.9.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Done. I fixed the spec-file and synced the new upstream release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 18:38:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:38:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447948] Review Request: R-lmtest - Testing Linear Regression Models for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806221838.m5MIcPKj019581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-lmtest - Testing Linear Regression Models for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447948 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-22 14:38 EST ------- Orion, ping? The fixes needed are pretty trivial. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 19:38:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 15:38:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449504] Review Request: ranpwd - A program to generate random passwords In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806221938.m5MJcB66012778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ranpwd - A program to generate random passwords https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449504 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-06-22 15:38 EST ------- [ x=ok -=dont't apply !=please fix ?=may fix ] MUST [x] rpmlint must be run clean on every package [x] package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [x] spec file name must match the base package %{name} [-] package must meet the Packaging Guidelines [x] [GPLv2+] package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license [x] license field in the package spec file must match the actual license [-] includes the text of the license(s) in its own file: include in %doc [x] be written in American English [x] spec file for the package be legible [!] sources used to build the package must match the upstream source md5sum: ce5bb201130aad92f0f9a90fc8be624f: ok however fix date by using e.g. wget -N [x] compile and build into binary rpms on at least one architecture http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=675038 [-] not successfully compil an architecture: use ExcludeArch [x] all build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [x] spec file MUST handle locales properly [-] shared library files not in any default linker paths: ldconfig [-] relocatable package: the packager must state this fact [-] package must own all directories that it creates [x] not any duplicate files in the %files listing [x] permissions on files must be set properly [x] package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} [x] consistently use macros [x] must contain code, or permissable content [-] large docs should go in a -doc subpackage [-] %doc must not affect the runtime of the application [-] header files must be in a -devel package [-] static libraries must be in a -static package [-] containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' [-] library files that end in .so: go in a -devel package [-] devel pkg: require base package using a fully versioned dependency [-] no .la libtool archives [-] gui app include a %{name}.desktop file [+] must not own files or directories already owned by other packages [+] %install includes rm -rf %{buildroot} [+] filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 SHOULD [?] nice you if ping upstream about missing license text [+] translations if description and summary sections [+] test that the package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=675038 [+] compile and build into binary rpms on all archs http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=675038 [+] package functions as described [-] those scriptlets are sane [-] subpackages require the base packag fully versioned dep [-] pkgconfig(.pc) in devel [-] no explicit file dep outside /etc, /bin/, /sbin, /usr/{sbin,bin} PEDANTIC [?] change INSTALL="install -p" to INSTALL="%{__install} -p" [?] change %{_mandir}/man1/* to %{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 19:46:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 15:46:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806221946.m5MJkYw2030597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 ------- Additional Comments From hedayat at grad.com 2008-06-22 15:46 EST ------- :( Sorry about it. The new SRPM should be OK: http://www.assembla.com/spaces/hedayat/documents/dOrnuopLqr3BySab7jnrAJ/download/rcssserver3d-0.6-0.1.20080620cvs.fc9.src.rpm (OR: http://assembla.com/file/hedayat/3_rcssserver3d-0.6-0.1.20080620cvs.fc9.src.rpm) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 19:50:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 15:50:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445279] Review Request: brettfont-fonts - A handwriting font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806221950.m5MJoxxk014960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brettfont-fonts - A handwriting font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445279 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 20:01:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:01:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806222001.m5MK1GQf016602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-06-22 16:01 EST ------- If you please can fix the static libs issue (ping upstream about the problem?), I would do a proper review of this package (and rest of the zypper stack (which seems in pretty good shape by the first brief look)). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 20:17:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:17:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444264] Review Request: usb_modeswitch - brings umts / 4g cards into operational mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806222017.m5MKHxsU002944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: usb_modeswitch - brings umts / 4g cards into operational mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444264 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-06-22 16:17 EST ------- Review for 847c6b0838ceda2c3c794748bd15446e usb_modeswitch-0.9.4-1.fc9.src.rpm FIX - MUST: rpmlint: rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/usb_modeswitch-* usb_modeswitch.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/usb_modeswitch.conf The file needs to be marked as config file: %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/usb_modeswitch.conf see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Configuration_files usb_modeswitch.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.9.4 0.9.4-1.fc10 The version needs to be specified in the format %{version}-%{release} without disttag. This is important because changelog gets parsed automatically. And _please_ preserve the whole changelog and make an entry for every package release, even during review so we can track the changes. A correct changelog would look like this: %changelog * Sat Jun 22 2008 Robert M. Albrecht 0.9.4-1 - Update to 0.9.4 - Honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS * Sat May 26 2008 Robert M. Albrecht 0.9.4-0.1.beta2 - First package Release usb_modeswitch.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 1) I know that this is pedantic, but so is rpmlint. Ether use one, tabs OR spaces. I wouldn't call this a blocker because as the specfile is legible, so fix this if you like. I recommend to only use spaces for formatting because tabs are IMO harder to read in cvs diffs. OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} OK - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license (GPLv2+) OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license OK - MUST: The source package includes the text of the license and it is correctly included in %doc OK - MUST: The spec file is written in American English OK - MUST: The spec file is legible OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package match the upstream source by md5 3c03c3ae51a10d599c33c119693186c9 OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i386 OK - MUST: No known ExcludeArch OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires OK - MUST: The package is not designed to be relocatable OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates (it creates none) OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: The package contains code, no content OK - MUST: No large documentation files for a separate %{name}-doc package OK - MUST: The files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application OK - MUST: The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install the package runs 'rm -rf %{buildroot}' OK - MUST: All filenames in the package are valid UTF-8 OK - SHOULD: The package builds in mock FIX - SHOULD: The description in the package spec file contains German translations. Please also add a German Summary then: Summary(de): USB Modeswitch aktiviert UMTS-Karten And please use Umlauts. OK - SHOULD: The package seems to function as described (cannot really test in absence of an 4G Card) OK - SHOULD: The package is the latest version Please fix all issues I marked and then I will approve this package. NEEDSWORK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 20:20:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:20:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452105] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-RADIUS - Wrapper Classes for the RADIUS PECL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806222020.m5MKK5Kn019692@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-RADIUS - Wrapper Classes for the RADIUS PECL Alias: pear-Auth-RADIUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452105 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-22 16:20 EST ------- php-pear-Auth-RADIUS-1.0.6-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 20:44:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:44:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450223] Review Request: mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki - An extension to provide an interwiki management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806222044.m5MKi7iD023051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki - An extension to provide an interwiki management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450223 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-22 16:44 EST ------- mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki-0-0.3.20080606svn.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 20:41:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:41:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] New: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mnowak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome.spec SRPM URL: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-2.3.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Windows can be managed in several layouts: tiled, maximized, dwindle, spiral, floating. Each layout can be applied on-the-fly, optimizing the environment for the application in use and the task performed. Managing windows in tiled mode assures that no space will be wasted on the screen. No gaps, no overlap. Other layouts can be used for different purpose. Floating layout which will let organize windows like any other window manager is present. This is my first package and I need sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 20:45:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:45:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452172] Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806222045.m5MKjbIK007566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452172 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-22 16:45 EST ------- mysqltuner-0.9.1-4 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 20:42:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:42:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806222042.m5MKghhG006729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 mnowak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 20:42:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:42:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450223] Review Request: mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki - An extension to provide an interwiki management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806222042.m5MKgwhe006824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki - An extension to provide an interwiki management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450223 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-22 16:42 EST ------- mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki-0-0.3.20080606svn.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 20:56:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:56:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444264] Review Request: usb_modeswitch - brings umts / 4g cards into operational mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806222056.m5MKuxqf025595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: usb_modeswitch - brings umts / 4g cards into operational mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444264 ------- Additional Comments From romal at gmx.de 2008-06-22 16:56 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.romal.de/files/usb_modeswitch.spec SRPM URL: http://www.romal.de/files/usb_modeswitch-0.9.4-2.fc9.src.rpm Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 21:15:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:15:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806222115.m5MLFYB0012380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-06-22 17:15 EST ------- * rpmlint: clean [root at dhcp-lab-192 SPECS]# rpmlint ../SRPMS/awesome-2.3.1-1.fc9.src.rpm awesome.spec 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. * tested i386 build * mock succeeded [root at dhcp-lab-192 SPECS]# mock rebuild -r fedora-9-i386 ../SRPMS/awesome-2.3.1-1.fc9.src.rpm [root at dhcp-lab-192 SPECS]# mock rebuild -r fedora-9-i386 ../SRPMS/awesome-2.3.1-1.fc9.src.rpm INFO: Start(../SRPMS/awesome-2.3.1-1.fc9.src.rpm) Config(fedora-9-i386) ... State Changed: build INFO: Done(../SRPMS/awesome-2.3.1-1.fc9.src.rpm) Config(fedora-9-i386) 9 minutes 12 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock//fedora-9-i386/result -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 21:29:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:29:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806222129.m5MLT1Co030594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-22 17:29 EST ------- Actually rpmlint isn't clean: awesome.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libX11 awesome.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXext awesome.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXinerama awesome.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXrandr Why do you need explicit dependencies on those? rpm already finds dependencies on: libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXext.so.6()(64bit) libXinerama.so.1()(64bit) libXrandr.so.2()(64bit) and several others which you did not include explicitly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 21:37:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:37:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434698] Review Request: md5deep - A set of cross-platform tools to compute hashes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806222137.m5MLbKLV015533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: md5deep - A set of cross-platform tools to compute hashes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434698 ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2008-06-22 17:37 EST ------- Yes I will update the package, however I don't think that review basis will change considerably. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 21:50:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:50:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444264] Review Request: usb_modeswitch - brings umts / 4g cards into operational mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806222150.m5MLo6VN001469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: usb_modeswitch - brings umts / 4g cards into operational mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444264 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-06-22 17:50 EST ------- rpmlint is happy and so am I. This package is APPROVED. 1. Please follow the instructions in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure 2. You need to get a Fedora Account http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account I guess you already have one so you only need to apply for the "cvsextras" group. 3. You might also want to read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored (Don't worry, I will sponsor you) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 21:52:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:52:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806222152.m5MLqdo1017708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-06-22 17:52 EST ------- Yup, true. Removed the autodetected deps. Only libconfuse >= 2.6 is left. [root at dhcp-lab-192 SPECS]# rpmlint ../SRPMS/awesome-2.3.1-1.fc9.src.rpm awesome.spec ../RPMS/i386/awesome-2.3.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm ../RPMS/i386/awesome-debuginfo-2.3.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 22:11:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450371] Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806222211.m5MMBOwr005790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 ------- Additional Comments From supersonicandtails at gmail.com 2008-06-22 18:11 EST ------- Working links: http://www.hypersonicsoft.org/projects/downloads/Pok%C3%A9gen/nightly/pokegen.spec http://www.hypersonicsoft.org/projects/downloads/Pok%C3%A9gen/nightly/pokegen-0.0.2-0.3.fc9.20080617svn210.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 22:15:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:15:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438609] Review Request: elisa-plugins-bad - Bad Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806222215.m5MMFLRq021962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa-plugins-bad - Bad Plugins for the Elisa Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438609 mnowak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mnowak at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-06-22 18:15 EST ------- Please explain in what way they are "bad". Is it the same way 'gstreamer-plugins-bad' is? There are any legal issues? (Did short skim thru the package and found no problem on first sight.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 22:22:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:22:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452195] Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806222222.m5MMMbQd022977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452195 supersonicandtails at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://www.hypersonicsoft.or | |g/projects/showproject.php?i | |d=29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 22:55:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:55:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452172] Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806222255.m5MMtPN7012122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452172 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-06-22 18:55 EST ------- built in all branches. closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 22:55:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:55:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452107] Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806222255.m5MMtAtV011978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-22 18:55 EST ------- I note the proper compiler flags aren't used; most things seem to be compiled with -Isrc-common -Isrc-unix -Iobjs -Isrc-agg/include -Isrc-common/agg-extras -O3 -c There seems to be the occasional cc call, probably from yacc, that includes the regular optflags plus all of the above. That's probably why the debuginfo package includes only the yacc-generated bits. There are also several patches included; it would be good to get comments including at least their upstream status. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 23:00:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 19:00:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450371] Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806222300.m5MN09S2028364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 ------- Additional Comments From supersonicandtails at gmail.com 2008-06-22 19:00 EST ------- __Review__ Here's the output from rpmlint: [root at peter redhat]# rpmlint pokegen pokegen.i386: W: no-documentation pokegen.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.0.2-0.3 0.0.2-0.3.fc9.20080617svn210 pokegen.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libpokebattle.so.0.0.2 _ZN10Pokebattle5Arena16remakeCollectionEv pokegen.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libpokebattle.so.0.0.2 _ZN10Pokebattle5Arena7cleanUpEv pokegen.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libpokebattle.so.0.0.2 _ZNK10Pokebattle4Team7pokemodEv pokegen.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libpokebattle.so.0.0.2 /usr/lib/libQtXml.so.4 pokegen.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libpokebattle.so.0.0.2 /lib/libpthread.so.0 pokegen.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libpokebattle.so.0.0.2 /lib/libm.so.6 pokegen.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libpokemod.so.0.0.2 /lib/libpthread.so.0 pokegen.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libpokemod.so.0.0.2 /lib/libm.so.6 There was no output from "rpmlint pokegen-devel". There are no doc files in the non-devel package, and there's an odd version jump in the changelog that doesn't make sense to anyone reading: * Sun Jun 17 2008 Ben Boeckel 0.0.2-0.3 - New SVN revision - Fixes for release versioning - clean section fixed * Sun Jun 08 2008 Ben Boeckel 0.0.2-2 - New SVN revision - Fixes for name change There's also some unused libraries such as libpthread that I suppose are being dragged in my qmake-qt4. You can fix this by modifying the CONFIG variable in your .pro file. eg. CONFIG -= qt \ thread \ X11 \ gui \ core The SRPM fails to build in mock: ERROR: No Spec file found in srpm: pokegen-0.0.2-0.3.fc9.20080617svn210.src.rpm That's it. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 23:06:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 19:06:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452078] Review Request: node - Simple node front end, modelled after the node shells of TheNet and G8BPQ nodes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806222306.m5MN6vxP014020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: node - Simple node front end, modelled after the node shells of TheNet and G8BPQ nodes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452078 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-22 19:06 EST ------- I have essentially no idea what this package does, but I went ahead and built it out of curiosity. I must say that given the description above, especially the "certainly not ready" part, I'd be uncomfortable about installing this even if a FAQ told me to. Could that bit perhaps be removed? Maybe take the "I think it's already somewhat usable" bit out as well, since "yum info" probably doesn't think anything about the packages usability. I don't see anything else in the distro that uses /var/ax25. Where is this standard for ax25 applications? Does this standard somehow trump the FHS? Seems to me that /var/lib/ax25 is more appropriate. I wouldn't worry about working around obviously bogus rpmlint complaints. rpmlint isn't necessarily the authority which must be quieted, and in the case of your configure script it should just be ignored (although what you've done works too). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 22 23:30:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 19:30:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226046] Merge Review: libsoup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806222330.m5MNUVX9000660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libsoup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226046 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From mbarnes at redhat.com 2008-06-22 19:30 EST ------- Fixed in libsoup-2.23.1-4.fc10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 01:55:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 21:55:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452449] New: Review Request: perl-Set-Crontab Expand crontab(5)-style integer lists Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452449 Summary: Review Request: perl-Set-Crontab Expand crontab(5)- style integer lists Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mastahnke at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/perl-Set-Crontab.spec SRPM URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/perl-Set-Crontab-1.00-13.fc9.noarch.rpm Description: Set::Crontab parses crontab-style lists of integers and defines some utility functions to make it easier to deal with them. Note: This is the first of a series of packages that we trying to get into Fedora for the ultimate goal of getting Spacewalk into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 02:08:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:08:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452449] Review Request: perl-Set-Crontab Expand crontab(5)-style integer lists In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230208.m5N28dX0024938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Set-Crontab Expand crontab(5)-style integer lists https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452449 mastahnke at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |452450 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 02:32:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:32:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449393] Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230232.m5N2W4q3028473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449393 ------- Additional Comments From chris at tylers.info 2008-06-22 22:32 EST ------- Hi Peter -- sorry for the delay with this, I'm on the road back from FUDCon and will continue the review when I get back to decent connectivity on Tuesday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 02:48:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:48:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230248.m5N2mVvB014890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rhbugs at n-dimensional.de ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-22 22:48 EST ------- *** Bug 427530 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 02:48:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:48:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 427530] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome tiling window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230248.m5N2mVQv014866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome tiling window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427530 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-22 22:48 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 452427 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 02:51:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:51:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452453] Review Request: perl-Crypt-RIPEMD160 - Perl extension for the RIPEMD-160 Hash function In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230251.m5N2pDuI031418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-RIPEMD160 - Perl extension for the RIPEMD-160 Hash function https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452453 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |452450 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 02:50:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:50:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452453] New: Review Request: perl-Crypt-RIPEMD160 - Perl extension for the RIPEMD-160 Hash function Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452453 Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-RIPEMD160 - Perl extension for the RIPEMD-160 Hash function Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dev at nigelj.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/perl-Crypt-RIPEMD160.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/perl-Crypt-RIPEMD160-0.04-14.fc9.src.rpm Description: The Crypt::RIPEMD160 module allows you to use the RIPEMD160 Message Digest algorithm from within Perl programs. Note the bump to -14, it's just so it's > than the version in the Spacewalk repo (I know it's not SOP). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 03:05:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:05:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452454] New: Review Request: perl-Crypt-Rijndael - Crypt::CBC compliant Rijndael encryption module Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452454 Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-Rijndael - Crypt::CBC compliant Rijndael encryption module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dev at nigelj.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/perl-Crypt-Rijndael.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/perl-Crypt-Rijndael-1.06-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This module implements the Rijndael cipher, which has just been selected as the Advanced Encryption Standard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 03:05:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:05:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452454] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Rijndael - Crypt::CBC compliant Rijndael encryption module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230305.m5N35iZL001297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-Rijndael - Crypt::CBC compliant Rijndael encryption module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452454 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |452450 nThis| | Summary|Review Request: perl-Crypt- |Review Request: perl-Crypt- |Rijndael - Crypt::CBC |Rijndael - Crypt::CBC |compliant Rijndael |compliant Rijndael |encryption module |encryption module -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 03:26:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:26:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452455] New: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Locale - Localization support for DateTime.pm Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452455 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Locale - Localization support for DateTime.pm Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dev at nigelj.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/perl-DateTime-Locale.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/perl-DateTime-Locale-0.4001-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: DateTime::Locale is primarily a factory for the various locale subclasses. It also provides some functions for getting information on all the available locales. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 03:28:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:28:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446814] Review Request: emacs-lookup - Emacsen interface to look up dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230328.m5N3SJCL020970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-lookup - Emacsen interface to look up dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446814 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2008-06-22 23:28 EST ------- Thank you for catching this up. wasn't aware of that so that I didn't see that error here. anyway fixed in: Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/emacs-lookup/emacs-lookup.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/emacs-lookup/emacs-lookup-1.4.1-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 03:29:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452456] New: Review Request: perl-DateTime-TimeZone - Time zone object base class and factory Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452456 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-TimeZone - Time zone object base class and factory Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dev at nigelj.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/perl-DateTime-TimeZone.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/perl-DateTime-TimeZone-0.7701-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This class is the base class for all time zone objects. A time zone is represented internally as a set of observances, each of which describes the offset from GMT for a given time period. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 03:27:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:27:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452455] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Locale - Localization support for DateTime.pm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230327.m5N3RldU004402@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Locale - Localization support for DateTime.pm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452455 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |452450 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 03:29:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:29:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452456] Review Request: perl-DateTime-TimeZone - Time zone object base class and factory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230329.m5N3Tt0n021117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-TimeZone - Time zone object base class and factory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452456 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |452450 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 03:52:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452449] Review Request: perl-Set-Crontab Expand crontab(5)-style integer lists In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230352.m5N3qL4p024713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Set-Crontab Expand crontab(5)-style integer lists https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452449 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-22 23:52 EST ------- I really hate to say this, but this software is licensed under the Artistic license _only_ (not the usual "Same as Perl"). Software which is only available under the Artistic license is not permissible in Fedora according to the lawyers. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 04:02:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:02:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452457] Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230402.m5N42mbu009852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452457 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |452450 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 04:02:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:02:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452457] New: Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452457 Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dev at nigelj.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP-1.04-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This module provides a pure Perl implementation of the CAST5 block cipher. CAST5 is also known as CAST-128. It is a product of the CAST design procedure developed by C. Adams and S. Tavares. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 04:05:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:05:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452458] Review Request: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230405.m5N45w78027058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452458 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |452450 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 04:05:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:05:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452458] New: Review Request: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452458 Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dev at nigelj.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword-0.03-12.fc9.src.rpm Description: Crypt::GeneratePassword generates random passwords that are (more or less) pronounceable. Unlike Crypt::RandPasswd, it doesn't use the FIPS-181 NIST standard, which is proven to be insecure. It does use a similar interface, so it should be a drop-in replacement in most cases. NOTE: This was bumped to -12 in order to be > -11 in the Spacewalk repos -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 04:08:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:08:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452453] Review Request: perl-Crypt-RIPEMD160 - Perl extension for the RIPEMD-160 Hash function In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230408.m5N489UK010608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-RIPEMD160 - Perl extension for the RIPEMD-160 Hash function https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452453 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 04:13:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:13:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447751] Review Request: diary - A application to allow you to keep a diary of your life In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230413.m5N4DiIJ028022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diary - A application to allow you to keep a diary of your life https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447751 ------- Additional Comments From lokthare at gmail.com 2008-06-23 00:13 EST ------- Spec URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/diary.spec SRPM URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/diary-0.3.1-1.fc9.src.rpm - Update to the new release - Drop the patch (fixed upstream) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 04:15:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:15:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230415.m5N4FCr0011773@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trash - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 ------- Additional Comments From lokthare at gmail.com 2008-06-23 00:15 EST ------- Spec URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/trash-cli.spec SRPM URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/trash-cli-0.1.10.28-1.fc9.src.rpm - Update to the new release - Change to the new name -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 04:28:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:28:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452457] Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230428.m5N4SDKn013607@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452457 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-23 00:28 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=675953 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 563d7ecad9193fe442cf1fe0b1da1a97 Crypt-CAST5_PP-1.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful, 2 tests skipped. Files=3, Tests=8, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.08 cusr + 0.00 csys = 0.08 CPU) + Package perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP-1.04-1.fc10 => Provides: perl(Crypt::CAST5_PP) = 1.04 Requires: perl >= 0:5.004 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(AutoLoader) perl(Carp) perl(Test::More) >= 0.47 perl(integer) perl(strict) perl(vars) SHOULD: All tests should be successful. Check build.log from koji build and you will see t/2cbc...... skipped all skipped: Crypt::CBC required for this test t/3taint.... skipped all skipped: Test::Taint required for this test -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 04:39:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:39:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452458] Review Request: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230439.m5N4dVmN031646@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452458 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-23 00:39 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=675955 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM But NOT for RPM. perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword-0.03/README The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). ==> You can use iconv to fix this. + source files match upstream url 65a9e924ba7496ebd13b70d863d8ae1b Crypt-GeneratePassword-0.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test is ok. + Package perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword-0.03-12.fc10 => Provides: perl(Crypt::GeneratePassword) = 0.03 Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) SHOULD: * Use iconv to fix rpmlint warning before importing this package to CVS. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 04:42:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:42:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452457] Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230442.m5N4gAIT032310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452457 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-06-23 00:42 EST ------- Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP-1.04-2.fc9.src.rpm Fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 04:39:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:39:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452457] Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230439.m5N4dfqn031693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452457 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 04:47:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:47:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452455] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Locale - Localization support for DateTime.pm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230447.m5N4lpxW016394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Locale - Localization support for DateTime.pm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452455 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 04:53:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:53:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452455] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Locale - Localization support for DateTime.pm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230453.m5N4rH42001442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Locale - Localization support for DateTime.pm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452455 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-23 00:53 EST ------- remove BR: perl from SPEC Is cldr license approved license? I don't see its mentioned on Licensing page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 04:55:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:55:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452455] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Locale - Localization support for DateTime.pm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230455.m5N4tpEQ017670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Locale - Localization support for DateTime.pm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452455 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-23 00:55 EST ------- Also, build failed as missing BR:perl(Test::More) see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=675973 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 05:13:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452456] Review Request: perl-DateTime-TimeZone - Time zone object base class and factory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230513.m5N5DrY5004697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-TimeZone - Time zone object base class and factory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452456 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-23 01:13 EST ------- rpmlint gave perl-DateTime-TimeZone.noarch: E: useless-explicit-provides perl(DateTime::TimeZone) This package provides 2 times the same capacity. It should only provide it once. ==> look https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Filtering_Requires:_and_Provides -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 05:13:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:13:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452455] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Locale - Localization support for DateTime.pm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230513.m5N5DoVJ004667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Locale - Localization support for DateTime.pm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452455 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(dev at nigelj.com) ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-06-23 01:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > remove BR: perl from SPEC Done > Is cldr license approved license? I don't see its mentioned on Licensing page. I suspect this is out of date, I'll have a look around and see. (In reply to comment #2) > Also, build failed as missing BR:perl(Test::More) > see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=675973 Fixed Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/perl-DateTime-Locale.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/perl-DateTime-Locale-0.4001-2.fc9.src.rpm Lets see about the licensing situation though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 05:15:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:15:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452454] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Rijndael - Crypt::CBC compliant Rijndael encryption module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230515.m5N5FD1K005194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-Rijndael - Crypt::CBC compliant Rijndael encryption module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452454 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-06-23 01:15 EST ------- Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/perl-Crypt-Rijndael.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/perl-Crypt-Rijndael-1.06-2.fc9.src.rpm Forgot a Build Req -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 05:18:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:18:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452458] Review Request: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230518.m5N5IFOx005558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452458 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-06-23 01:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > + rpmlint is silent for SRPM But NOT for RPM. > perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 > /usr/share/doc/perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword-0.03/README > The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it > in the specfile for example using iconv(1). > ==> You can use iconv to fix this. Will do. > APPROVED. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword Short Description: Generate secure random pronounceable passwords Owners: nigelj Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 05:36:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:36:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452455] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Locale - Localization support for DateTime.pm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230536.m5N5aCsY008394@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Locale - Localization support for DateTime.pm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452455 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(dev at nigelj.com) | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-23 01:36 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=675976 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 04cd7e65e4c773dfce972699aafc1f64 DateTime-Locale-0.4001.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test is ok. All tests successful, 2 tests and 1 subtest skipped. Files=10, Tests=9379, 4 wallclock secs ( 3.87 cusr + 0.13 csys = 4.00 CPU) Except license everything else look ok to me. my question is can we see if CLDR license can be approved license and can we specify it in License tag also? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 05:38:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:38:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452455] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Locale - Localization support for DateTime.pm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230538.m5N5c9kb024143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Locale - Localization support for DateTime.pm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452455 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-23 01:38 EST ------- I missed rpmlint output in above review. you need to work on following warning perl-DateTime-Locale.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/perl-DateTime-Locale-0.4001/Changes The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). ==> use iconv to fix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 05:41:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:41:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452456] Review Request: perl-DateTime-TimeZone - Time zone object base class and factory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230541.m5N5f2Ne009144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-TimeZone - Time zone object base class and factory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452456 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-06-23 01:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > rpmlint gave > perl-DateTime-TimeZone.noarch: E: useless-explicit-provides perl(DateTime::TimeZone) > This package provides 2 times the same capacity. It should only provide it > once. > ==> look > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Filtering_Requires:_and_Provides Yeah, for public record... I'm a dummy... Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/perl-DateTime-TimeZone.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/perl-DateTime-TimeZone-0.7701-2.fc9.src.rpm Just the provides script fix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 05:59:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:59:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452457] Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230559.m5N5xKal027340@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452457 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-23 01:59 EST ------- koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=675990 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 05:58:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:58:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452456] Review Request: perl-DateTime-TimeZone - Time zone object base class and factory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230558.m5N5weS3027298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-TimeZone - Time zone object base class and factory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452456 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-23 01:58 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=675992 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url cf56d3770231d59853f4edcd6b56cc45 DateTime-TimeZone-0.7701.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test is ok. All tests successful, 1 test and 26 subtests skipped. Files=18, Tests=2812, 7 wallclock secs ( 6.91 cusr + 0.19 csys = 7.10 CPU) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 07:20:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 03:20:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447751] Review Request: diary - A application to allow you to keep a diary of your life In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230720.m5N7KglF024876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diary - A application to allow you to keep a diary of your life https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447751 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-23 03:20 EST ------- The name of this package seems also too generic to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 07:33:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 03:33:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452456] Review Request: perl-DateTime-TimeZone - Time zone object base class and factory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230733.m5N7Xaq8026939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-TimeZone - Time zone object base class and factory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452456 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-06-23 03:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > APPROVED. Thanks New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-DateTime-TimeZone Short Description: Time zone object base class and factory Owners: nigelj Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 07:32:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 03:32:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452457] Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230732.m5N7WnnB009907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452457 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-06-23 03:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=675990 > > APPROVED. Thanks New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP Short Description: CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl Owners: nigelj Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 07:45:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 03:45:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452087] Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230745.m5N7jF0K029264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452087 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-06-23 03:45 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: collectl New Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 07:57:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 03:57:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452471] New: Review-Request: perl-Test-Mock-LWP - Easy mocking of LWP packages Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452471 Summary: Review-Request: perl-Test-Mock-LWP - Easy mocking of LWP packages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-Test-Mock-LWP.spec OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-Test-Mock-LWP.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/mock-results/perl-Test-Mock-LWP-0.05-1.el5.noarch/perl-Test-Mock-LWP-0.05-1.el5.src.rpm mock: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/mock-results/perl-Test-Mock-LWP-0.05-1.el5.noarch/ Description: This package arises from duplicating the same code to mock LWP et al in several different modules I've written. This version is very minimalist, but works for my needs so far. I'm very open to new suggestions and improvements. (TODO: Now I see this description sucks. I'll replace it when updating the package.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 07:57:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 03:57:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452470] New: Review-Request: perl-Test-WWW-Selenium - Perl Client for the Selenium Remote Control test tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452470 Summary: Review-Request: perl-Test-WWW-Selenium - Perl Client for the Selenium Remote Control test tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-Test-WWW- Selenium.spec OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-Test-WWW-Selenium.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/mock-results/perl-Test-WWW-Selenium-1.15-1.el5.noarch/perl-Test-WWW-Selenium-1.15-1.el5.src.rpm mock: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/mock-results/perl-Test-WWW-Selenium-1.15-1.el5.noarch/ Description: Selenium Remote Control (SRC) is a test tool that allows you to write automated web application UI tests in any programming language against any HTTP website using any mainstream JavaScript-enabled browser. SRC provides a Selenium Server, which can automatically start/stop/control any supported browser. It works by using Selenium Core, a pure-HTML+JS library that performs automated tasks in JavaScript; the Selenium Server communicates directly with the browser using AJAX (XmlHttpRequest). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 08:00:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:00:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451542] Review-Request: perl-Algorithm-Permute - Handy and fast permutation with object oriented interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230800.m5N80YGE014954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-Algorithm-Permute - Handy and fast permutation with object oriented interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451542 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-23 04:00 EST ------- Thanks for the review Parag! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Algorithm-Permute Short Description: Handy and fast permutation with object oriented interface Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 07:58:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 03:58:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452472] New: Review-Request: perl-TAP-Harness-Archive - Create an archive of TAP test results Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452472 Summary: Review-Request: perl-TAP-Harness-Archive - Create an archive of TAP test results Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-TAP-Harness- Archive.spec OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-TAP-Harness-Archive.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/mock-results/perl-TAP-Harness-Archive-0.03-1.el5.noarch/perl-TAP-Harness-Archive-0.03-1.el5.src.rpm mock: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/mock-results/perl-TAP-Harness-Archive-0.03-1.el5.noarch/ Description: This module is a direct subclass of TAP::Harness and behaves in exactly the same way except for one detail. In addition to outputting a running progress of the tests and an ending summary it can also capture all of the raw TAP from the individual test files or streams into an archive file (.tar or .tar.gz). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 08:07:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:07:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451540] Review-Request: perl-String-Random - Perl module to generate random strings based on a pattern In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230807.m5N87uiZ001584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-String-Random - Perl module to generate random strings based on a pattern https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451540 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-23 04:07 EST ------- Hm, on my el5 perl(Test::More) is provided by core perl package. Thsi is most likely used only for testing, so I'll just disable the tests for newer Fedoras, I'll just have to find out which ones. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 08:06:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:06:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451541] Review-Request: perl-Authen-Captcha - Perl extension for creating captcha's to verify the human element in transactions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230806.m5N86fk3001437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-Authen-Captcha - Perl extension for creating captcha's to verify the human element in transactions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451541 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-23 04:06 EST ------- Parag: Thanks for the review. I updated the packages and rpmlint seems to be quiet now. SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-Authen-Captcha.spec SRPM:http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/perl-Authen-Captcha-1.023-2.el5.src.rpm (Sorry that I use the same filenames, but it is due to the fact that the former one had incorrect revision number, as you found out.) [lkundrak at trurl SPECS]$ rpmlint -i /home/lkundrak/rpmbuild/SRPMS/perl-Authen-Captcha-1.023-2.el5.src.rpm /home/lkundrak/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/perl-Authen-Captcha-1.023-2.el5.noarch.rpm [lkundrak at trurl SPECS]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 08:10:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:10:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451541] Review-Request: perl-Authen-Captcha - Perl extension for creating captcha's to verify the human element in transactions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230810.m5N8ALoN017547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-Authen-Captcha - Perl extension for creating captcha's to verify the human element in transactions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451541 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-23 04:10 EST ------- SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-Authen-Captcha.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/perl-Authen-Captcha-1.023-2.el5.src.rpm For that seems that mod_rewrites don't work as they used to :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 08:14:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:14:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451540] Review-Request: perl-String-Random - Perl module to generate random strings based on a pattern In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230814.m5N8ESLj002702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-String-Random - Perl module to generate random strings based on a pattern https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451540 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-23 04:14 EST ------- Oh -- now I get it, while looking at build logs. It is indeed that Test::More used to be provided by core perl package, but no longer is. Fixed package: SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-String-Random.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/perl-String-Random-0.22-2.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 08:14:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:14:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452455] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Locale - Localization support for DateTime.pm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230814.m5N8EGb0018094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Locale - Localization support for DateTime.pm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452455 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2008-06-23 04:14 EST ------- The DateTime::Locale (and DateTime::TimeZone) modules are packaged bundled with DateTime in Fedora already. See Bug #167376. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 08:12:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:12:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452078] Review Request: node - Simple node front end, modelled after the node shells of TheNet and G8BPQ nodes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230812.m5N8C5QG017861@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: node - Simple node front end, modelled after the node shells of TheNet and G8BPQ nodes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452078 ------- Additional Comments From cooly at gnome.eu.org 2008-06-23 04:12 EST ------- > Could that bit perhaps be removed? Maybe take the "I think > it's already somewhat usable" bit out as well, since "yum info" probably doesn't > think anything about the packages usability. Corrected description. > I don't see anything else in the distro that uses /var/ax25. Where is this > standard for ax25 applications? Does this standard somehow trump the FHS? > Seems to me that /var/lib/ax25 is more appropriate. I've changed to localstate dir to /var/lib/ax25. New versions: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/node.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/node-0.3.2-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 08:17:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:17:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452456] Review Request: perl-DateTime-TimeZone - Time zone object base class and factory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230817.m5N8Hrlh003620@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-TimeZone - Time zone object base class and factory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452456 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2008-06-23 04:17 EST ------- This package will almost certainly conflict with the perl-DateTime package that it is enhancing, since the perl-DateTime package includes the DateTime::TimeZone and DateTime::Locale modules too; see Bug #167376. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 08:17:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:17:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452471] Review-Request: perl-Test-Mock-LWP - Easy mocking of LWP packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230817.m5N8HWsO018914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-Test-Mock-LWP - Easy mocking of LWP packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452471 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review-Request: perl-Test- |Review-Request: perl-Test- |Mock-LWP - Easy mocking of |Mock-LWP - Easy mocking of |LWP packages |LWP packages Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-23 04:17 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=676059 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 2496324cd4474966269847836770b7a0 Test-Mock-LWP-0.05.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test is ok. All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=11, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.07 cusr + 0.01 csys = 0.08 CPU) + Package perl-Test-Mock-LWP-0.05-1.fc10 => Provides: perl(HTTP::Request) perl(HTTP::Response) perl(LWP::UserAgent) perl(Test::Mock::HTTP::Request) = 0.01 perl(Test::Mock::HTTP::Response) = 0.01 perl(Test::Mock::LWP) = 0.05 perl(Test::Mock::LWP::UserAgent) = 0.01 Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Test::Mock::HTTP::Request) perl(Test::Mock::HTTP::Response) perl(Test::MockObject) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 08:23:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:23:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452471] Review-Request: perl-Test-Mock-LWP - Easy mocking of LWP packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230823.m5N8NP5n019966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-Test-Mock-LWP - Easy mocking of LWP packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452471 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |452470 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 08:23:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:23:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452470] Review-Request: perl-Test-WWW-Selenium - Perl Client for the Selenium Remote Control test tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230823.m5N8NOEv019940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-Test-WWW-Selenium - Perl Client for the Selenium Remote Control test tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452470 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |452471 AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review-Request: perl-Test- |Review-Request: perl-Test- |WWW-Selenium - Perl Client |WWW-Selenium - Perl Client |for the Selenium Remote |for the Selenium Remote |Control test tool |Control test tool Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-23 04:23 EST ------- Add Apache to License tag also. Build failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=676057 Found missing perl(Test::Mock::LWP) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 08:25:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:25:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452471] Review-Request: perl-Test-Mock-LWP - Easy mocking of LWP packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230825.m5N8PwFD020613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-Test-Mock-LWP - Easy mocking of LWP packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452471 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-23 04:25 EST ------- Thanks Parag! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-Mock-LWP Short Description: Easy mocking of LWP packages Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 08:28:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:28:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452472] Review-Request: perl-TAP-Harness-Archive - Create an archive of TAP test results In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230828.m5N8Sc4p005458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-TAP-Harness-Archive - Create an archive of TAP test results https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452472 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review-Request: perl-TAP- |Review-Request: perl-TAP- |Harness-Archive - Create an |Harness-Archive - Create an |archive of TAP test results |archive of TAP test results Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-23 04:28 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=676055 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 5a92a2ae5b434692295555a68146703d TAP-Harness-Archive-0.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test is ok. All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=26, 1 wallclock secs ( 1.03 cusr + 0.09 csys = 1.12 CPU) + Package perl-TAP-Harness-Archive-0.03-1.fc10 => Provides: perl(TAP::Harness::Archive) = 0.03 Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Archive::Tar) perl(Cwd) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Find) perl(File::Path) perl(File::Spec) perl(File::Temp) perl(TAP::Harness) >= 3.05 perl(TAP::Parser) perl(YAML::Tiny) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 08:33:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:33:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452455] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Locale - Localization support for DateTime.pm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230833.m5N8XeX8006258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Locale - Localization support for DateTime.pm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452455 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-23 04:33 EST ------- oops my bad. I just checked this package exists in fedora using yum search DateTime I should have checked its contents first before doing review of this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 08:32:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:32:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452456] Review Request: perl-DateTime-TimeZone - Time zone object base class and factory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230832.m5N8WCun021806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-TimeZone - Time zone object base class and factory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452456 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-23 04:32 EST ------- oops my bad. I just checked this package exists in fedora using yum search DateTime -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 08:35:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:35:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452472] Review-Request: perl-TAP-Harness-Archive - Create an archive of TAP test results In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230835.m5N8Z1gA021998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-TAP-Harness-Archive - Create an archive of TAP test results https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452472 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-23 04:35 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-TAP-Harness-Archive Short Description: Create an archive of TAP test results Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-9 F-8 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 08:38:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:38:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451542] Review-Request: perl-Algorithm-Permute - Handy and fast permutation with object oriented interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230838.m5N8cQBp007103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-Algorithm-Permute - Handy and fast permutation with object oriented interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451542 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 08:36:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:36:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452470] Review-Request: perl-Test-WWW-Selenium - Perl Client for the Selenium Remote Control test tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230836.m5N8arM7022629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-Test-WWW-Selenium - Perl Client for the Selenium Remote Control test tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452470 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-23 04:36 EST ------- Apache License Added. As you correctly found out Tess::Mock::LWP is pending adding to Fedora. Thanks for adding the dependency! SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-Test-WWW-Selenium.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/mock-results/perl-Test-WWW-Selenium-1.15-1.el5.noarch/perl-Test-WWW-Selenium-1.15-2.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 08:41:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:41:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452455] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Locale - Localization support for DateTime.pm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230841.m5N8f99G023407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Locale - Localization support for DateTime.pm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452455 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-23 04:41 EST ------- Just looked into perl-DateTime.spec and found that this package is part of existing perl-DateTime package in fedora. In this case I am going to CLOSE this review as NOTABUG. Sorry Nigel for taking your time to update initial submitted package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 08:43:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:43:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452456] Review Request: perl-DateTime-TimeZone - Time zone object base class and factory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230843.m5N8hbWg007994@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-TimeZone - Time zone object base class and factory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452456 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-23 04:43 EST ------- Just looked into perl-DateTime.spec and found that this package is part of existing perl-DateTime package in fedora. In this case I am going to CLOSE this review as NOTABUG. Sorry Nigel for taking your time to update initial submitted package. Request you to submit a bug to update perl-DateTime-TimeZone in perl-DateTime package to 0.7701 version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 08:52:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:52:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438609] Review Request: elisa-plugins-bad - Bad Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230852.m5N8q1cf009793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa-plugins-bad - Bad Plugins for the Elisa Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438609 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2008-06-23 04:52 EST ------- Easy to explain, two things : 1) "bad" are the plugins which are to be improved, and "ugly" are the ones with legal concerns. 2) the current version of Elisa requires the "bad" set of plugins to actually work (kind of silly if you ask me, but that's the way it is). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 08:54:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:54:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451541] Review-Request: perl-Authen-Captcha - Perl extension for creating captcha's to verify the human element in transactions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230854.m5N8sbC8025643@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-Authen-Captcha - Perl extension for creating captcha's to verify the human element in transactions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451541 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-23 04:54 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=676063 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 7c20090844dd2406e4ef6a894c66348b Authen-Captcha-1.023.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=32, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.13 cusr + 0.01 csys = 0.14 CPU) +Package perl-Authen-Captcha-1.023-2.fc10 => Provides: perl(Authen::Captcha) = 1.23 Requires: perl >= 0:5.00503 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(Digest::MD5) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Spec) perl(GD) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 08:57:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:57:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449393] Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230857.m5N8vJWS026481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449393 ------- Additional Comments From pbrobinson at gmail.com 2008-06-23 04:57 EST ------- No problems. Also I've seen a similar cpio md5 mismatch to the one below. I'm not sure if its just my laptop or something else. http://blogs.linux.ie/caolan/2005/02/23/cpio-md5-sum-mismatch/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 09:01:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 05:01:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452456] Review Request: perl-DateTime-TimeZone - Time zone object base class and factory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230901.m5N91057011760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-TimeZone - Time zone object base class and factory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452456 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2008-06-23 05:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Request you to submit a bug to update perl-DateTime-TimeZone in perl-DateTime > package to 0.7701 version. I'd also request that perl-DateTime had "provides" for perl-DateTime-TimeZone and perl-DateTime-Locale too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 09:00:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 05:00:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451540] Review-Request: perl-String-Random - Perl module to generate random strings based on a pattern In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230900.m5N90jcx011662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-String-Random - Perl module to generate random strings based on a pattern https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451540 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-23 05:00 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=676061 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match with different upstream url c0319f95c56450624cc646f7425e327e String-Random-0.22.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test All tests successful. Files=6, Tests=158, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.18 cusr + 0.03 csys = 0.21 CPU) + Package perl-String-Random-0.22-2.fc10 => Provides: perl(String::Random) = 0.22 Requires: perl >= 0:5.006_001 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(warnings) SHOULD=> Change Source URL to http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/S/ST/STEVE/String-Random-0.22.tar.gz APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 09:49:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 05:49:45 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_450527=5D_Review_Request=3A_libkni_-_C++_l?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ibrary_f=C3=BCr_the_Katana_robot_arm?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230949.m5N9njs4002776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libkni - C++ library f?r the Katana robot arm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-06-23 05:49 EST ------- Ok, now that I could reproduce it (thanks for this info!) I could confirm that it is in fact a problem because the LM and InvKin libs were not linked against the Base lib. I fixed this. New SRPM is at http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/robotics/libkni-3.9.2-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 09:47:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 05:47:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448808] Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806230947.m5N9lCkT002556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448808 cheekyboinc at foresightlinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From cheekyboinc at foresightlinux.org 2008-06-23 05:47 EST ------- I close this review until we find a "free game" (downloadable!) for it... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 10:05:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 06:05:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452172] Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231005.m5NA534p022920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452172 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2008-06-23 06:05 EST ------- Can I ask a build for F-8 too? I want use it on F-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 10:22:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 06:22:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451540] Review-Request: perl-String-Random - Perl module to generate random strings based on a pattern In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231022.m5NAMlV2025654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-String-Random - Perl module to generate random strings based on a pattern https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451540 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 10:21:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 06:21:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451541] Review-Request: perl-Authen-Captcha - Perl extension for creating captcha's to verify the human element in transactions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231021.m5NALxRu025560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-Authen-Captcha - Perl extension for creating captcha's to verify the human element in transactions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451541 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-23 06:21 EST ------- Danke schon, Parag. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Authen-Captcha Short Description: Perl extension for creating captcha's to verify the human element in transactions Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 10:22:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 06:22:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451541] Review-Request: perl-Authen-Captcha - Perl extension for creating captcha's to verify the human element in transactions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231022.m5NAMeK3008582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-Authen-Captcha - Perl extension for creating captcha's to verify the human element in transactions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451541 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 10:22:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 06:22:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451540] Review-Request: perl-String-Random - Perl module to generate random strings based on a pattern In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231022.m5NAMWQ4008539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-String-Random - Perl module to generate random strings based on a pattern https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451540 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-23 06:22 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-String-Random Short Description: Perl module to generate random strings based on a pattern Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 11:48:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 07:48:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452486] New: Review Request: stage - 2D multiple-robot simulator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452486 Summary: Review Request: stage - 2D multiple-robot simulator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: makghosh at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~makghosh/SPECS/stage.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~makghosh/SRPMS/stage-2.1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Stage simulates a population of mobile robots, sensors and objects in a two-dimensional bitmapped environment. Stage is designed to support research into multi-agent autonomous systems, so it provides fairly simple, computationally cheap models of lots of devices rather than attempting to emulate any device with great fidelity. Koji scratch build: waiting for player[https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025] which is a dependency to get into the fedora repository. Rpmlint: shows no errors in my i386 system build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 11:50:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 07:50:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452486] Review Request: stage - 2D multiple-robot simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231150.m5NBoVj4007692@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stage - 2D multiple-robot simulator Alias: stage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452486 makghosh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |stage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 11:49:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 07:49:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452486] Review Request: stage - 2D multiple-robot simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231149.m5NBnjma007141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stage - 2D multiple-robot simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452486 makghosh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |448025 Summary|Review Request: stage - 2D |Review Request: stage - 2D |multiple-robot simulator |multiple-robot simulator -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 11:49:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 07:49:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231149.m5NBnkjm007170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 makghosh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |452486 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 11:58:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 07:58:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231158.m5NBwcRB024252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server Alias: player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 tim at niemueller.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |player -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 13:55:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:55:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444760] Review Request: obm - Open Business Management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231355.m5NDt0gU013745@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obm - Open Business Management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444760 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2008-06-23 09:54 EST ------- ho craps, how i could let pass these bogus (shame on me!) Anyways, > What is the point of the obm-rpm.conf file? If it needs to be there but > shouldn't initially hold anything, can we at least put a comment in there? Right, it's just a config cache file which's use by upstream for the configuration. > What is obm-config? I'm guessing it's not a pkgconfig file, and if so then the > rpmlint complaint is bogus. definitively not. It's a shell script that help you configure all the stuff easier. Maybe an "obm-setup" could be better ? > I personally would use "obm-satellite" and "obm-mysql" as I dislike mixed-case > package names; qt3-MySQL is the only non-Perl/Python module that uses that case, > for example, while 59 packages downcase it including the mysql package itself. I'm ok with that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 14:18:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:18:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231418.m5NEIpb4003333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 goyal.hemant at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 14:17:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:17:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231417.m5NEHkRg018612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 goyal.hemant at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 14:23:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:23:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231423.m5NENJ8p004258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-06-23 10:23 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: speech-dispatcher Short Description: Common interface to different TTS engines Owners: hemantg Branches: OLPC-2 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 14:22:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:22:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452516] New: Review Request: perl-AnyEvent - Framework for multiple event loops Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452516 Summary: Review Request: perl-AnyEvent - Framework for multiple event loops Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/perl-AnyEvent.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/perl-AnyEvent-4.152-1.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm Description: Framework for multiple event loops http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=676522 This package filter the perl-Qt event module as it will need some special care, but is unmaintained until now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 14:30:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:30:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452516] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent - Framework for multiple event loops In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231430.m5NEUPj6021259@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-AnyEvent - Framework for multiple event loops https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452516 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |448613 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 14:30:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:30:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448613] Review Request: perl-EV - Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231430.m5NEUPTE021238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-EV - Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448613 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |452516 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-06-23 10:30 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/perl-EV.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/perl-EV-3.42-2.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm Description: Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library This package seems to requires AnyEvent at buildtime (according to Makefile.PL) but will be required by AnyEvent at runtime. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 14:34:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:34:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231434.m5NEYLUo021813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-06-23 10:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #47) > > Note : I build the SRPM on my box by commenting BuildRequires : ibmtts-devel > > I am not sure how to obtain the RPM for this. (Although there is some mention of > > an RPM for this here : > > http://ibmtts-sdk.sourceforge.net/howto-make-gnome-speech-ibmtts-rpm.html) > > I hope this does not have an undesirable effect? > > Well, perhaps I don't correctly understand what you mean by "this > does not have an undesirable effect?"... ibmtts is not freely available. Hence I need to comment out BuildRequires:ibm_tts when I build the package. Otherwise I get the following error: ===================================================================== error: Failed build dependencies: ibmtts-devel is needed by speech-dispatcher-0.6.6-13.fc7.i386 ===================================================================== So I was wondering if this could be a problem when I build in koji. And thank you for sponsoring me :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 14:46:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:46:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231446.m5NEkPD1008582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-23 10:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #49) > (In reply to comment #47) > > Well, perhaps I don't correctly understand what you mean by "this > > does not have an undesirable effect?"... > > ibmtts is not freely available. Hence I need to comment out > BuildRequires:ibm_tts when I build the package. Otherwise I get the following > error: > > ===================================================================== > error: Failed build dependencies: > ibmtts-devel is needed by speech-dispatcher-0.6.6-13.fc7.i386 > ===================================================================== > > So I was wondering if this could be a problem when I build in koji. Actually I was building this on koji when reviewing :) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=672900 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 14:55:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:55:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448613] Review Request: perl-EV - Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231455.m5NEtxqb026016@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-EV - Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448613 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|452516 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 14:54:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:54:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226115] Merge Review: m4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231454.m5NEsl2f025544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: m4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226115 mitr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|mitr at redhat.com |vcrhonek at redhat.com Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mitr at redhat.com) | ------- Additional Comments From mitr at redhat.com 2008-06-23 10:54 EST ------- m4 is now owned by Vitezslav, sorry for not noticing this earlier. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 14:55:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:55:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452516] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent - Framework for multiple event loops In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231455.m5NEtwMV025989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-AnyEvent - Framework for multiple event loops https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452516 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|448613 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-06-23 10:55 EST ------- I forgot to say that perl-EV needs to be filtered until it is built: So here is the scratch build according to the above spec file: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=676543 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 14:58:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:58:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452521] Review Request: perl-Coro - Coroutine process abstraction In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231458.m5NEweEM010654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Coro - Coroutine process abstraction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452521 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |448613, 452516 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 14:58:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:58:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452516] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent - Framework for multiple event loops In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231458.m5NEwfZL010698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-AnyEvent - Framework for multiple event loops https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452516 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |452521 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 14:58:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:58:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448613] Review Request: perl-EV - Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231458.m5NEwfSW010678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-EV - Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448613 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |452521 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 14:57:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:57:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452521] New: Review Request: perl-Coro - Coroutine process abstraction Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452521 Summary: Review Request: perl-Coro - Coroutine process abstraction Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/perl-Coro.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/perl-Coro-4.743-1.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm Description: Coroutine process abstraction -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 15:00:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:00:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452523] Review Request: perl-Event-ExecFlow - High level API for event-based execution flow control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231500.m5NF0Tgg026965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Event-ExecFlow - High level API for event-based execution flow control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452523 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |452516 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 15:00:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:00:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452516] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent - Framework for multiple event loops In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231500.m5NF0Tkk026986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-AnyEvent - Framework for multiple event loops https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452516 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |452523 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 14:59:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:59:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447159] Review Request: ocsinventory - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231459.m5NExXnd026474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447159 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-06-23 10:59 EST ------- All items fixed, looks good, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 15:00:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:00:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452523] New: Review Request: perl-Event-ExecFlow - High level API for event-based execution flow control Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452523 Summary: Review Request: perl-Event-ExecFlow - High level API for event-based execution flow control Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/perl-Event-ExecFlow.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/perl-Event-ExecFlow-0.63-1.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm Description: High level API for event-based execution flow control -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 15:11:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:11:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231511.m5NFBKOp029218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-23 11:11 EST ------- Okay, license issue is now resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 15:26:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:26:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231526.m5NFQS7A016648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-23 11:26 EST ------- cvs done. Did you also want a OLPC-3 branch? Feel free to add a new request and set fedora-cvs to ? when you do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 15:29:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:29:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451540] Review-Request: perl-String-Random - Perl module to generate random strings based on a pattern In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231529.m5NFTqkS032662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-String-Random - Perl module to generate random strings based on a pattern https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451540 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-23 11:29 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 15:28:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:28:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445010] Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231528.m5NFS3JU032553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445010 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-23 11:28 EST ------- Marek: You can't both review a package and maintain it... Can you get someone else to review? or sponsor Michael? Michael: I might be able to sponsor you, can you provide pointers to any pre-reviews you have done, and/or other packages you have submitted? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 15:33:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:33:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451542] Review-Request: perl-Algorithm-Permute - Handy and fast permutation with object oriented interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231533.m5NFXKxQ001021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-Algorithm-Permute - Handy and fast permutation with object oriented interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451542 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-23 11:33 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 15:31:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:31:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451541] Review-Request: perl-Authen-Captcha - Perl extension for creating captcha's to verify the human element in transactions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231531.m5NFVRDf000866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-Authen-Captcha - Perl extension for creating captcha's to verify the human element in transactions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451541 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-23 11:31 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 15:34:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:34:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231534.m5NFYGHV001122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(geoff at programmer- | |monk.net) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-23 11:34 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 15:35:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:35:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434614] Review Request: cdcat - Hyper's CdCatalog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231535.m5NFZwTH001623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdcat - Hyper's CdCatalog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434614 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(kurzawax at gmail.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-23 11:35 EST ------- Closing. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please file a new review request and mark this bug as a duplicate of the new one. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 15:37:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:37:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444134] Review Request: spe - Python IDE editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231537.m5NFbdjS018598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spe - Python IDE editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444134 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-23 11:37 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 15:38:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:38:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444760] Review Request: obm - Open Business Management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231538.m5NFcokL018719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obm - Open Business Management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444760 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-23 11:38 EST ------- I wouldn't bother with renaming obm-config just to quiet rpmlint; the complaint is obviously bugus and should just be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 15:34:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:34:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231534.m5NFYpt4017803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(ismael at olea.org) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-23 11:34 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 15:38:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:38:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445105] Review Request: milkytracker - SDL clone of the Fasttracker II module tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231538.m5NFcU9f018679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: milkytracker - SDL clone of the Fasttracker II module tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445105 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(muepsj at gmail.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-23 11:38 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 15:36:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:36:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434906] Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231536.m5NFaVl7001873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434906 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-23 11:36 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 15:41:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:41:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452457] Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231541.m5NFf9fu002895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452457 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-23 11:41 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 15:38:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:38:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444952] Review Request: tlock - terminal lock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231538.m5NFc6UD002102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tlock - terminal lock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444952 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(pj.pandit at yahoo.co | |.in) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-23 11:38 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 15:44:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:44:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452471] Review-Request: perl-Test-Mock-LWP - Easy mocking of LWP packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231544.m5NFiFCQ019848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-Test-Mock-LWP - Easy mocking of LWP packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452471 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-23 11:44 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 15:42:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:42:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452458] Review Request: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231542.m5NFgh6L019588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452458 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-23 11:42 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 15:47:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:47:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231547.m5NFlVqw020744@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server Alias: player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2008-06-23 11:47 EST ------- I'm working on the review today. Sorry for the delay. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 15:47:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:47:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452472] Review-Request: perl-TAP-Harness-Archive - Create an archive of TAP test results In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231547.m5NFlGwb020700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-TAP-Harness-Archive - Create an archive of TAP test results https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452472 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-23 11:47 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 15:45:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:45:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445010] Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231545.m5NFjnIW020505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445010 ------- Additional Comments From telimektar at esraonline.com 2008-06-23 11:45 EST ------- I've only made this package for the moment. I've begun to work on skylive few days ago. For the maintaining of the package I think a little mail on the astronomy-list may help to find another reviewer. My sponsoring can await other packages, thanks of your proposition Kevin ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 15:48:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441830] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231548.m5NFmZWw004253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI Alias: perl-DBD-ODBC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441830 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-06-23 11:48 EST ------- yup, I'm sorry about my unresponsiveness, but I was not prepared for this amount of work and got dragged into other things anyway. I've not lost interest in this package and will get back to it as time permit. I've just noticed there is a 1.16 version out, I'll give it a try. Again, sorry for the delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 15:54:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:54:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434614] Review Request: cdcat - Hyper's CdCatalog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231554.m5NFsJXL021967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdcat - Hyper's CdCatalog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434614 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 15:50:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:50:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448808] Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231550.m5NFodp3021518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448808 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 15:52:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:52:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452172] Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231552.m5NFqm6P005275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452172 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-06-23 11:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Can I ask a build for F-8 too? I want use it on F-8. See comment 3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 16:08:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:08:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225752] Merge Review: filesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231608.m5NG87NN024963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225752 ------- Additional Comments From pknirsch at redhat.com 2008-06-23 12:08 EST ------- Git repo working now, added filesystem.spec and lang-exceptions files to it and changed the Sourc1 URL to https://fedorahosted.org/filesystem/browser/lang-exceptions Build for filesystem-2.4.17-1.fc10 is running as i type this. Thanks, Read ya, Phil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 16:25:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:25:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447159] Review Request: ocsinventory - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231625.m5NGPOi9011596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447159 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |xavier at bachelot.org Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-06-23 12:25 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocsinventory Short Description: Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation Owners: remi Branches: devel, F-9, F-8, EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 16:39:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:39:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 401101] Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231639.m5NGdQpO030173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=401101 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-06-23 12:39 EST ------- The problem leave within afflib and I'm waiting for the next afflib release to have it fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 16:38:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:38:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225752] Merge Review: filesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231638.m5NGcVE4030107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225752 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-06-23 12:38 EST ------- lang-exceptions in cvs/devel != https://fedorahosted.org/filesystem/browser/lang-exceptions The latter contains HTML tags. Is there a URL that will retrieve it in plain text? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 17:24:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:24:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231724.m5NHOlsj005910@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server Alias: player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2008-06-23 13:24 EST ------- Okay first comments. Builds against f9 and devel in mock. Doesn't build against F8 in mock .. this isn't a blocker. But you should be aware of this in case you want to open an F8 branch. If you are planning on opening an F8 branch we can look at this more closely after the review is done. I think you should move the example code into an examples directory under /usr/share/ instead of leaving them under /usr/lib/. Either /usr/share/doc/player-examples by treating them as docs or under or /usr/share/player/ by treating them as normal file payloads. There are existing examples of both types of behavior for examples subpackages. I've run rpmlint against the f9 builds.. and for the most part no serious problems. But... the debuginfo package is throwing a lot of warnings and errors from rpmlint concerning files in /usr/src/* due to the fact that they are set as executable in the orginal source tarball. I don't think its a serious issue, but it might be easily fixable in the spec with a recursive chmod call to strip the executable bits in the source subdirectories tree before the build. I'll probably patch that into the spec file. Working through the formal review now. I'll post a patched spec file as part of the formal review. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 17:30:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:30:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445010] Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231730.m5NHUHcx022473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445010 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-06-23 13:30 EST ------- Kevin, you're right... it would be really nice if you can review Michael's work and sponsor him (I'm not a sponsor). Thanks Kevin :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 17:39:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:39:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231739.m5NHdNOK008403@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server Alias: player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-23 13:39 EST ------- I was going to comment that /usr/bin/player is a terribly generic name which would conflict with a few things which aren't in our distro (the last.fm player and mplayer are two examples which other distros install as /usr/bin/player). However, when building this to see what binaries it actually installed, the build failed: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../.. -I../../../libplayercore -I../../../client_libs/libplayerc++ -I../../../client_libs/libplayerc -Wall -I../../.. -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -MT dbconn.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/dbconn.Tpo -c dbconn.cc -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/dbconn.o dbconn.cc: In member function 'BoundingBox PostgresConn::BinaryToBBox(const uint8_t*, uint32_t)': dbconn.cc:317: error: invalid conversion from 'const GEOSGeometry*' to 'GEOSGeometry*' dbconn.cc:323: error: invalid conversion from 'const GEOSCoordSequence*' to 'GEOSCoordSequence*' make[4]: *** [dbconn.lo] Error 1 Jef, did your successful builds happen on a 64-bit machine? I'm building in mock on x86_64 rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 18:06:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:06:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442329] Review Request: gnome-lirc-properties - Infrared Remote Controls setup tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231806.m5NI6j7w029517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-lirc-properties - Infrared Remote Controls setup tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442329 Bug 442329 depends on bug 442341, which changed state. Bug 442341 Summary: Support Debian-style configuration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442341 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 18:13:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:13:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452087] Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231813.m5NID32Y030648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452087 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-23 14:13 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 18:17:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:17:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] New: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 Summary: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dwheeler at dwheeler.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.dwheeler.com/zfuzz.spec SRPM URL: http://www.dwheeler.com/zfuzz-20070911-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The zfuzz (Z fuzz, previously "fuzz") package is a collection of tools that help you to (1) format and print good-looking specifications in the Z ("zed") formal specification language using LaTeX, and (2) check them for compliance with the Z scope and type rules. The package defines a LaTeX style with extra LaTeX commands for laying out Z specifications, and includes font definitions for Z?s special symbols. The type-checker includes a new "use before definition" (-d) option; with this enabled, you can put the paragraphs of a specification in whatever order best suits your exposition (instead of having to present material in a stricter definition-before-use order). It also includes a "Lisp-style echoing" option, which echos input in a Lisp-like format for further analysis. This package is useful if you want to create formal specifications using the Z specification language. The Z language accepted is that of the Z Reference Manual, second edition, which is not exactly the same as the Z ISO standard (see http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/hise/cadiz/standard.html for the differences). Historically, this package was called "fuzz", but there is another program ALSO called fuzz that users might simultaneously install. So the name of this package and command-line type-checker has been changed to "zfuzz". The LaTeX style itself continues to be named "fuzz" so LaTeX documents will continue to work. Much of the documentation refers to this package by the name "fuzz". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 18:19:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:19:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231819.m5NIJQBR015899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From dwheeler at dwheeler.com 2008-06-23 14:19 EST ------- NOTE: This is my first Fedora package, and I am seeking a sponsor! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 18:20:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:20:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231820.m5NIKiLG032195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 dwheeler at dwheeler.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 18:23:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:23:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231823.m5NINsg8016862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From dwheeler at dwheeler.com 2008-06-23 14:23 EST ------- Note: rpmlint gives no errors, and mock works. I've walked through the Packaging Guidelines, Package Naming Guidelines, and Reviewer Guidelines, and I _believe_ I've complied with them. The spec file includes comments that justifies some of the decisions I made while packaging this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 18:24:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:24:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451693] Review Request: garmin-sync - Utility for syncing data from Garmin Edge/Forerunner devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231824.m5NIO9uB016913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: garmin-sync - Utility for syncing data from Garmin Edge/Forerunner devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451693 katzj at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2008-06-23 14:24 EST ------- Build underway -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 18:23:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:23:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451692] Review Request: pyusb - python bindings for libusb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231823.m5NINxep032721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyusb - python bindings for libusb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451692 katzj at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2008-06-23 14:23 EST ------- Committed and building -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 18:24:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:24:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451693] Review Request: garmin-sync - Utility for syncing data from Garmin Edge/Forerunner devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231824.m5NIO0Ze032754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: garmin-sync - Utility for syncing data from Garmin Edge/Forerunner devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451693 Bug 451693 depends on bug 451692, which changed state. Bug 451692 Summary: Review Request: pyusb - python bindings for libusb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451692 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 18:27:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:27:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445105] Review Request: milkytracker - SDL clone of the Fasttracker II module tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231827.m5NIRHo8017895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: milkytracker - SDL clone of the Fasttracker II module tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445105 muepsj at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(muepsj at gmail.com) | ------- Additional Comments From muepsj at gmail.com 2008-06-23 14:27 EST ------- Added an informal review here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452486 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 18:24:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:24:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452486] Review Request: stage - 2D multiple-robot simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231824.m5NIOi2e017095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stage - 2D multiple-robot simulator Alias: stage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452486 ------- Additional Comments From muepsj at gmail.com 2008-06-23 14:24 EST ------- This is just an informal review. MUST items: - Rpmlint output clean on the spec file and the source rpm file: ok - Package name: ok - Spec file name: ok - Package license: ok - Actual license: ok - License file included: ok - Spec file legible and in American English: ok - Included source file matches upstream source: ok - BuildRequires seem ok. - No need to use %find_lang. ok - /sbin/ldconfig called in %post and %postun: ok - Package not relocatable: ok - Owns its directories and files: ok - No duplicate files in %files: ok - Permissions set correctly with %defattr: ok - rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %clean: ok - Consistent macro use with $RPM_BUILD_ROOT: ok - Package contains code: ok - No large documentation: ok - Headers in -devel package: ok - Static libraries in -static package: ok - Includes .pc files for pkgconfig, depends on pkgconfig: ok - %{_libdir}/*.so goes in -devel package, %{_libdir}/*.so.* go in the main package: ok - Fully versioned dependency for the -devel subpackage: ok - No .la files: ok - rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT at the beginning of %install: ok - Filenames are valid UTF-8: ok - Builds ok; can't test since the dependencies aren't yet in Fedora 9. Building a modified package without the player-devel dependency works fine. May need a fix: - Doesn't contain a .desktop file and doesn't tell why there is no need for one, even though is a GUI application (uses Gtk). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 18:29:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:29:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447948] Review Request: R-lmtest - Testing Linear Regression Models for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231829.m5NITcGb001426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-lmtest - Testing Linear Regression Models for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447948 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-06-23 14:29 EST ------- Sorry, was on vacation for a while, then busy :-). Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/R-lmtest.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/R-lmtest-0.9-2.fc8.src.rpm * Mon Jun 23 2008 Orion Poplawski 0.9-2 - Fix License, add README and COPYRIGHTS to doc - Fixup non utf8 files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 18:49:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:49:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231849.m5NInY2h022094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 19:04:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:04:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451542] Review-Request: perl-Algorithm-Permute - Handy and fast permutation with object oriented interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231904.m5NJ471F025311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-Algorithm-Permute - Handy and fast permutation with object oriented interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451542 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-23 15:04 EST ------- Thanks Parag, thanks Kevin. Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 19:04:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:04:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451541] Review-Request: perl-Authen-Captcha - Perl extension for creating captcha's to verify the human element in transactions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231904.m5NJ4ADj025345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-Authen-Captcha - Perl extension for creating captcha's to verify the human element in transactions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451541 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-23 15:04 EST ------- Thanks Parag, thanks Kevin. Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 18:59:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:59:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231859.m5NIxisv024039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-23 14:59 EST ------- Please change the release number every time you modify your spec file. For 0.6-0.1: * Source files - %SOURCE0 included in your srpm differs from what I can download from the URL as written - Please write the full URL of (or how you received) %SOURCE1 * BuildRequires - Some BuildRequires are redundant https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 - Also you are writing mesa-libGL-devel twice. BTW please use 'libGL-devel' instead of mesa-libGL-devel. * Requires - When adding Ruby to Requires, also ruby(abi) Requires must be added: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby * Requires for -devel subpackage - Please investigate and add proper Requires for -devel subpackage. For example, rcssserver3d/zeitgeist/parameterlist.h contains: --------------------------------------------------------------- 24 25 #include 26 #include --------------------------------------------------------------- This means that rcsssserver3d-devel should have "Requires: boost-devel" * Redundant description - Please remove all SUSE related description. This just makes your spec file complicated unneededly. * %vendor macro --------------------------------------------------------------- %define vendor fedora --------------------------------------------------------------- - You must not define %vendor macro. This macro overrides "Vendor:" value on "rpm -qi", where Fedora uses "Fedora Project" by default. * Subpackages having different version from main package ---------------------------------------------------------------- Version: 1.1 ---------------------------------------------------------------- - We don't allow that subpackages has different version from main package but for some exception (like perl, texlive). * %prep vs %build ---------------------------------------------------------------- autoreconf --install chmod a-x app/simspark/rsg/agent/nao/* find -name "*.cpp" -exec chmod a-x {} \; find -name "*.h" -exec chmod a-x {} \; ---------------------------------------------------------------- - Please move all to %prep. * Timestamps - As this package installs many files which are not modified during build, please use ---------------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" CPPROG="cp -p" ---------------------------------------------------------------- to keep timestamps on installed files. The method 'INSTALL="install -p"' usually works for recent autotool-based Makefiles. And sometimes 'CPPROG="cp -p"' is needed for some old packages using install-sh for installing files - Also, when using "install" or "cp" commands, add "-p" option. * Desktop file Category - "X-Red-Hat-Base" is deprecated and should not be added any longer. * ld.so.conf.d ---------------------------------------------------------------- %{_sysconfdir}/ld.so.conf.d/%{name}.conf ---------------------------------------------------------------- ! Please don't add this. All files under %{_libdir}/%{name} are used only for this package and making those libraries system wide is undesirable unless it is actually intended. And this actually causes problem as - Fedora ships tinyxml, which provides libtinyxml.so.0 (and installs this library under %{_libdir}), and some rpms require this library. - However when this ld.so.conf file is added, all binaries requiring libtinyxml.so.0 finds the libraries under %{_libdir}/%{name}/ first and tries to use it, not %{_libdir}/libtinyxml.so For example, when you install rcssserver3d and cegui, The following happen: ---------------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ ldd -r /usr/lib/libCEGUITinyXMLParser-0.6.0.so linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00110000) libCEGUIBase-0.6.0.so => /usr/lib/libCEGUIBase-0.6.0.so (0x00117000) libtinyxml.so.0 => /usr/lib/rcssserver3d/libtinyxml.so.0 (0x00377000) <====== libxerces-c.so.28 => /usr/lib/libxerces-c.so.28 (0x0038a000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x00763000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x0077d000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00782000) libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x00874000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x0089d000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00a3d000) libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (0x00a4b000) libpcre.so.0 => /lib/libpcre.so.0 (0x00ade000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00a1b000) undefined symbol: _ZNK13TiXmlDocument6AcceptEP12TiXmlVisitor (/usr/lib/libCEGUITinyXMLParser-0.6.0.so) undefined symbol: _ZN13TiXmlDocument8StreamInEPSiPSs (/usr/lib/libCEGUITinyXMLParser-0.6.0.so) ---------------------------------------------------------------- The expected result is: ---------------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ ldd -r /usr/lib/libCEGUITinyXMLParser-0.6.0.so linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00110000) libCEGUIBase-0.6.0.so => /usr/lib/libCEGUIBase-0.6.0.so (0x00117000) libtinyxml.so.0 => /usr/lib/libtinyxml.so.0 (0x00377000) libxerces-c.so.28 => /usr/lib/libxerces-c.so.28 (0x0038e000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x00767000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00781000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00786000) libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x00878000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x008a1000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00a3d000) libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (0xb7fd1000) libpcre.so.0 => /lib/libpcre.so.0 (0xb7fa6000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00a1b000) --------------------------------------------------------------- Also, shipping libtinyxml.so.0 in the current way is causing a problem on rpm system anyway because on rpm rcssserver3d package also "Provides" libtinyxml.so.0. This means that (for example) cegui can be installed without tinyxml package if rcssserver3d is installed, while tinyxml package is actually needed for cegui, which of course cause a problem (you can try this). So you must follow below: - Please remove %{name}.conf file under %_sysconfdir/ld.so.conf.d - Check if system wide libtinyxml.so provided by tinyxml package can substitute for %{_libdir}/%{name}/libtinyxml.so.0 (by adding patches) - If it seems difficult, filter out libtinyxml.so.0 from Requires/ Provides following http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/FilteringAutomaticDependencies (some explanation are written on http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-June/msg00690.html ) - Remove "--disable-rpath" from %configure option. Well, actually the reason you had to add ld.so.conf.d file was because you removed the *needed rpath* %{_libdir}/%{name}. - Then calling /sbin/ldconfig on scriptles should be no longer needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 19:04:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:04:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452471] Review-Request: perl-Test-Mock-LWP - Easy mocking of LWP packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231904.m5NJ44iv008597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-Test-Mock-LWP - Easy mocking of LWP packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452471 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-23 15:04 EST ------- Thanks Parag, thanks Kevin. Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 19:04:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:04:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452472] Review-Request: perl-TAP-Harness-Archive - Create an archive of TAP test results In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231904.m5NJ433T008564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-TAP-Harness-Archive - Create an archive of TAP test results https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452472 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-23 15:04 EST ------- Thanks Parag, thanks Kevin. Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 19:04:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:04:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452470] Review-Request: perl-Test-WWW-Selenium - Perl Client for the Selenium Remote Control test tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231904.m5NJ45cK008625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-Test-WWW-Selenium - Perl Client for the Selenium Remote Control test tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452470 Bug 452470 depends on bug 452471, which changed state. Bug 452471 Summary: Review-Request: perl-Test-Mock-LWP - Easy mocking of LWP packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452471 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 19:04:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:04:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451540] Review-Request: perl-String-Random - Perl module to generate random strings based on a pattern In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231904.m5NJ4CWK008671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-String-Random - Perl module to generate random strings based on a pattern https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451540 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-23 15:04 EST ------- Thanks Parag, thanks Kevin. Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 19:14:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:14:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447159] Review Request: ocsinventory - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231914.m5NJEnUA010701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447159 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-23 15:14 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 19:17:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:17:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449135] Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231917.m5NJHHRB028472@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449135 ------- Additional Comments From javiplx at gmail.com 2008-06-23 15:17 EST ------- Actually I didn't see any missing guideline. Just say 'some' as a midpoint from none to many. Whichever blocking guideline you see that I didn't follow, please tell me, and I'll fix. rpmlint only gives a warning about indentation mixing of tabs and spaces, but that's actually a rpmlint problem parsing a HERE document. And regarding the non-fedora bits, I might remove the check for build root not being root directory, but the cleaning of buildroot _is_ a fedora bit. Regarding the version, I have upgraded (and uploaded) the package to the latest stable version (4.5.19) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 19:26:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:26:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451582] Review Request: kvirc - themeable qt based irc client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231926.m5NJQs6j013492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kvirc - themeable qt based irc client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451582 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-06-23 15:26 EST ------- neat, consider doing http://quassel-irc.org/ ? or know of any plans for kvirc porting to qt4? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 19:38:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:38:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452449] Review Request: perl-Set-Crontab Expand crontab(5)-style integer lists In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231938.m5NJc7UW015834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Set-Crontab Expand crontab(5)-style integer lists https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452449 ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2008-06-23 15:38 EST ------- I thought that I remembered that also, but when I looked at the wiki page last night (the same one you refer to) I didn't see Artistic as bad. Now when I look again, I am just wrong. Apparently Artistic != Artistic 2.0 it's ok. Withdrawn review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 19:42:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:42:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452449] Review Request: perl-Set-Crontab Expand crontab(5)-style integer lists In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231942.m5NJgAM4000824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Set-Crontab Expand crontab(5)-style integer lists https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452449 mastahnke at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 19:42:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:42:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231942.m5NJg4sA000788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-23 15:42 EST ------- Unfortunately this failed to build for me in mock on x86_64, rawhide: In file included from :758: /usr/include/unistd.h:327: error: conflicting types for 'read' zscan.l:38: error: previous declaration of 'read' was here In file included from /usr/include/unistd.h:1100, from :758: /usr/include/bits/unistd.h:35: error: conflicting types for 'read' zscan.l:38: error: previous declaration of 'read' was here make[1]: *** [zscan.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... rm zscan.c make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/fuzz-2007-09-11/src' make: *** [src] Error 2 What release did you build against? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 19:46:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:46:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231946.m5NJk83n017418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-06-23 15:46 EST ------- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 19:49:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:49:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246524] Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231949.m5NJnVN3017790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library Alias: libquikgrid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246524 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-06-23 15:49 EST ------- ping ? (this is also true for libMini) Can you cc'd me when you will ask the mains developpers of the related packages ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 19:51:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:51:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452449] Review Request: perl-Set-Crontab Expand crontab(5)-style integer lists In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806231951.m5NJp5fG018399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Set-Crontab Expand crontab(5)-style integer lists https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452449 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-23 15:51 EST ------- If you really need this package, you could contact the author and see about relicensing the code. Or perhaps just get him to clarify whether he's using the original artistic license or one of the acceptable versions. Unfortunately the link in the license text in the documentation doesn't actually go to any license text. On IRC last night, though, I recall someone indicating that this module isn't actually used by spacewalk. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 20:00:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:00:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451582] Review Request: kvirc - themeable qt based irc client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806232000.m5NK0Nrm004820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kvirc - themeable qt based irc client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451582 ------- Additional Comments From smparrish at shallowcreek.net 2008-06-23 16:00 EST ------- Yes they are working on a QT4 port atm. Also will look at quassel-irc and work up a package for that one as well. -) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 20:08:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:08:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451903] Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806232008.m5NK8dJt021651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451903 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-23 16:08 EST ------- perl-Mail-DKIM-0.32-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 20:08:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:08:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451903] Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806232008.m5NK8cCV021618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451903 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-23 16:08 EST ------- perl-Mail-DKIM-0.32-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 20:11:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:11:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183374] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Random In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806232011.m5NKB8T4022383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-Random https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=183374 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2008-06-23 16:11 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Crypt-Random New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 20:06:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:06:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179444] Review Request: perl-Class-Loader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806232006.m5NK6qJ8021455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Loader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=179444 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2008-06-23 16:06 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Class-Loader New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 20:12:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:12:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183889] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Primes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806232012.m5NKCQB5022696@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-Primes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=183889 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2008-06-23 16:12 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Crypt-Primes New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 20:32:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:32:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806232032.m5NKWc3d010846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server Alias: player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2008-06-23 16:32 EST ------- no 64 build here. I have it building under f9 32bit. The project itself is actually named player so then binaries of the form /usr/bin/player* aren't in shorthand. Is it appropriate to rename binaries when the actual project name is too generic? And what exactly do you do to make them less generic? its one thing to make a binary be more specific to match the project name.. requiring mplayer's binary to say mplayer instead of player. But when the project name is too generic what exactly do you do? Do you append player- to all the binaries so we have executables like player-player and player-playernav ? -jef -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 21:10:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:10:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452251] Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806232110.m5NLA7nk001813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452251 ------- Additional Comments From omajid at redhat.com 2008-06-23 17:10 EST ------- After talking to Thomas Fitzsimmons, modified spec file (and added a patch to srpm) to build and run using openjdk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 21:26:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:26:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452584] New: Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 Summary: Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/mldonkey.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/mldonkey-2.9.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: MLDonkey is a door to the 'donkey' network, a decentralized network used to exchange big files on the Internet. It is written in a wonderful language, called Objective-Caml, and present most features of the basic Windows donkey client, plus some more: - It should work on most UNIX-compatible platforms. - You can remotely command your client, either by telnet (port 4000), by a WEB browser (http://localhost:4080), or with a classical client interface (see http://www.nongnu.org/mldonkey) - You can connect to several servers, and each search will query all the connected servers. - You can select mp3s by bitrates in queries (useful ?). - You can select the name of a downloaded file before moving it to your incoming directory. - You can have several queries in the graphical user interface at the same time. - You can remember your old queries results in the command-line interface. - You can search in the history of all files you have seen on the network. It can also access other peer-to-peer networks: - BitTorrent - Fasttrack - FileTP (wget-clone) - DC++ ======================================= Another one attempt to package this app. Previous ones: http://bugzilla.livna.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1487 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433143 Although this package has quite long history of suggestions and fixed issues there are many things to do left. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 21:42:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:42:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806232142.m5NLgnU4007372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 ------- Additional Comments From hedayat at grad.com 2008-06-23 17:42 EST ------- OK, I thought that I should increase the release number after the approval of the first rpm. * Source files: - Yes, the package was a CVS version of the server. 0.6 has released yesterday and I'll upload a new package using the released version. I don't know what URL should I use for CVS versions of the package since there is no released tar.gz for such versions. - I've created %SOURCE1 using the pictures which can be found in the user-manual.pdf. Should I specify this in the spec file? Where and how? * BuildRequires: No, I've written mesa-libGL-devel and mesa-libGLU-devel. OK, I'll use libGL-devel and libGLU-devel. * Requires: * Requires for -devel subpackage: OK * Redundant description: OK, I'll separate my Fedora spec file from the (to-become) generic spec file * %vendor macro: OK, the macro will be useless in the Fedora-only spec file anyway. * Subpackages having different version from main package: I've used a separate version since the -doc subpackage doesn't change that often. BTW, I'll remove the version as desired. * %prep vs %build: * Timestamps * Desktop file Category OK * ld.so.conf.d: OK! The --disable-rpath option was added just because of Fedora!! Since the guidelines say the rpath is prohibited I've added this option. It seems that using rpath is allowed in this case, so I'll use it. The ld.so.conf file was added for the same reason. I'll remove it too. I'll remove tinyxml files from the package. I'll upload a new spec/srpm based on your comments. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 21:51:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:51:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806232151.m5NLpVQb009126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 ------- Additional Comments From hedayat at grad.com 2008-06-23 17:51 EST ------- The only redundant build requirement seems to be gcc-c++. I'll remove it but it doesn't seems to be a requirement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 22:08:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:08:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806232208.m5NM8P5Z029625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rpm at greysector.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2008-06-23 18:08 EST ------- I guess I'll continue my review from before then. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 22:52:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:52:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806232252.m5NMqRaD004852@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server Alias: player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2008-06-23 18:52 EST ------- Okay you'll need to include .desktop files for each of the gui applications or drop a comment indicating why the guis do not need to be in the menus. You would need individual .desktop files for these three commands: playerv playernav playercam This is a blocker. Also seriously consider renaming player executable to player_server or equivalent. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 22:54:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:54:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447948] Review Request: R-lmtest - Testing Linear Regression Models for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806232254.m5NMsbZG005018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-lmtest - Testing Linear Regression Models for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447948 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-23 18:54 EST ------- Thanks; looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 22:57:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806232257.m5NMvKUE005708@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2008-06-23 18:57 EST ------- Partial review: http://bugzilla.livna.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1487#c43 is still not addressed fully: Since it doesn't run as root, it's better to move the log to /var/log/mldonkey/mldonkey.log and set ownership of that directory accordingly. --- http://bugzilla.livna.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1487#c39 is still not addressed fully: mldonkey_df_monitor.sh: email=`grep "^ mail =" /var/lib/mldonkey/downloads.ini | sed 's/ mail = //g'` This is far from foolproof. It'll fail there are whitespace changes in that line. --- I see that the install section has improved a bit (uses make install now), but it's still far from ideal. Though I guess there's nothing wrong with it packaging-wise. BuildRequires: dos2unix Redundant BR, trivial to avoid using perl or tr. Not a blocker though. It doesn't build on F-8, though: error: Failed build dependencies: ocaml-lablgtk-devel >= 2.10.0 is needed by mldonkey-2.9.5-1.fc8 If I relax that BR to >= 2.6.0, it fails at compilation: ocamlopt.opt -inline 10 -I src/utils/cdk -I src/utils/lib -I src/utils/ocamlrss -I src/utils/xml-light -I src/utils/net -I tools -I src/daemon/common -I src/daemon/driver -I src/utils/mp3tagui -I src/config/unix -I src/gtk2/gui -I src/gtk2/gui/x11 -I src/gtk2/gui/win32 -I icons/rsvg -I +lablgtk2 -I src/networks/direct_connect -I src/networks/fasttrack -I src/networks/fileTP -I src/networks/bittorrent -I src/networks/donkey -c src/utils/net/ip_set.ml /usr/bin/ocamlc.opt -I src/utils/cdk -I src/utils/lib -I src/utils/ocamlrss -I src/utils/xml-light -I src/utils/net -I tools -I src/daemon/common -I src/daemon/driver -I src/utils/mp3tagui -I src/config/unix -I src/gtk2/gui -I src/gtk2/gui/x11 -I src/gtk2/gui/win32 -I icons/rsvg -I +lablgtk2 -I src/networks/direct_connect -I src/networks/fasttrack -I src/networks/fileTP -I src/networks/bittorrent -I src/networks/donkey -c src/utils/net/ip_set.ml /usr/bin/ocamlc.opt -I src/utils/cdk -I src/utils/lib -I src/utils/ocamlrss -I src/utils/xml-light -I src/utils/net -I tools -I src/daemon/common -I src/daemon/driver -I src/utils/mp3tagui -I src/config/unix -I src/gtk2/gui -I src/gtk2/gui/x11 -I src/gtk2/gui/win32 -I icons/rsvg -I +lablgtk2 -I src/networks/direct_connect -I src/networks/fasttrack -I src/networks/fileTP -I src/networks/bittorrent -I src/networks/donkey -c src/utils/net/http_server.mli ocamlopt.opt -inline 10 -I src/utils/cdk -I src/utils/lib -I src/utils/ocamlrss -I src/utils/xml-light -I src/utils/net -I tools -I src/daemon/common -I src/daemon/driver -I src/utils/mp3tagui -I src/config/unix -I src/gtk2/gui -I src/gtk2/gui/x11 -I src/gtk2/gui/win32 -I icons/rsvg -I +lablgtk2 -I src/networks/direct_connect -I src/networks/fasttrack -I src/networks/fileTP -I src/networks/bittorrent -I src/networks/donkey -c src/utils/net/http_server.ml ocamlopt.opt -inline 10 -I src/utils/cdk -I src/utils/lib -I src/utils/ocamlrss -I src/utils/xml-light -I src/utils/net -I tools -I src/daemon/common -I src/daemon/driver -I src/utils/mp3tagui -I src/config/unix -I src/gtk2/gui -I src/gtk2/gui/x11 -I src/gtk2/gui/win32 -I icons/rsvg -I +lablgtk2 -I src/networks/direct_connect -I src/networks/fasttrack -I src/networks/fileTP -I src/networks/bittorrent -I src/networks/donkey -c src/daemon/common/commonOptions.ml Fatal error: out of memory. make: *** [src/daemon/common/commonOptions.cmx] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /home/rathann/build/tmp/rpm-tmp.20151 (%build) Note that I have 2GB RAM, which I think should be enough. Or is that a problem with lablgtk? Builds fine in mock/devel/i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 23:06:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:06:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447948] Review Request: R-lmtest - Testing Linear Regression Models for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806232306.m5NN6HbP022345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-lmtest - Testing Linear Regression Models for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447948 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-06-23 19:06 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-lmtest Short Description: Testing Linear Regression Models for R Owners: orion Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 23 23:48:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:48:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445224] Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806232348.m5NNmYhO028535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445224 ------- Additional Comments From dcnltc at us.ibm.com 2008-06-23 19:48 EST ------- > > > package meets naming and versioning guidelines. > > > package builds in mock: > > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=664952&name=build.log I think the problem in the build was because configure didn't really work. What kind OS was on your test machine? I think the crux of the problem is in the output from configure: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU = powerpc64, OS = linux-gnu, Vendor = redhat, HostType = powerpc64 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ERROR: Platform powerpc64 not yet supported On the fedora9 ppc machine I tried I got: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU = powerpc64, OS = linux-gnu, Vendor = redhat, HostType = powerpc -------------------------------------------------------------------------- So, it is HostType=powerpc vs HostType=powerpc64. On my machine I don't get this configuration error. What does config.guess return on your machine? On my Fedora9 ppc machine I get: powerpc64-redhat-linux-gnu which is the same thing I see in a RHEL5.2 ppc machine. If you think that the configure script should be able to handle the HostType=powerpc64, I can go ahead and patch the configure.in. > > > package installs properly. (couldn't check) > > > debuginfo package looks complete. (couldn't check) > > > final provides and requires are sane (couldn't check) > > > if shared libraries are present, make sure ldconfig is run What does this mean by "couldn't check"? I was unable to do hardly any testing on the fedora9 machine because I couldn't find compatible pieces like binutils-devel since my machine is in ABAT. I spent about a week some time ago trying to get Fedora9-alpha installed from CDs on a ppc machine but never could get it to work. > > That, and the naming. See below. > What is the naming issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 00:21:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:21:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452601] Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806240021.m5O0LONs019270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452601 mastahnke at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |452450 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 00:20:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:20:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452601] New: Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452601 Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mastahnke at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/perl-Business-CreditCard.spec SRPM URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/perl-Business-CreditCard-0.30-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: These subroutines tell you whether a credit card number is self-consistent -- whether the last digit of the number is a valid checksum for the preceding digits. Note: To find license, I had to look in the actual Perl pm file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 00:33:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:33:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806240033.m5O0XAaJ021002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server Alias: player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2008-06-23 20:33 EST ------- rpmlint output with specfile modified to silence the debuginfo rpmlint warnings. See attached attachment for updated specfile. I'm not sure what to do about the examples subpackage. It contains source code, libraries and executables..all of which is put under _libdir/player/examples/ I'm not sure that is appropriate. It feels a little wonky to do it that way. If the point of the examples are coding examples for review...I would almost prefer that the examples were not compiled and that the examples subpackage only included the source material and instructions on how to compile the examples on a client system as needed. Anyways here's the rpmlint output. I'm fine with everything except the examples warnings and docs subpackage errors. I'll need to look at the docs errors a bit more. Do those mentioned zero-length map files need to be included at all? player-devel.i386: W: no-documentation player-doc.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/player-doc-2.1.0/player-docs/classClaser__coll__graph.map player-doc.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/player-doc-2.1.0/player-docs/classMessageReplaceRule__coll__graph.map player-doc.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/player-doc-2.1.0/player-docs/classConfigFile__coll__graph.map player-examples.i386: W: no-documentation player-examples.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/player/examples/libplayerc++/args.h player-examples.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/player/examples/plugins/exampleinterface/example_xdr.h player-examples.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/player/examples/plugins/exampledriver/libexampledriver.a player-examples.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/player/examples/plugins/multidriver/libmultidriver.a player-examples.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/player/examples/plugins/opaquedriver/libopaquedriver.a player-examples.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/player/examples/plugins/exampleinterface/example_functiontable.c player-examples.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/player/examples/plugins/exampleinterface/libeginterf.a player-examples.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/player/examples/plugins/exampleinterface/eginterf_client.c player-examples.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/player/examples/plugins/logplugin/liblogplugin.a player-examples.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/player/examples/plugins/exampleinterface/libeginterfdriver.a player-examples.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/player/examples/plugins/exampleinterface/example_interface.h player-examples.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/player/examples/libplayerc/speech_c_client.c player-examples.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/player/examples/libplayerc/simple.c player-examples.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/player/examples/libplayerc/service_discovery.c player-examples.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/player/examples/libplayerc/vmap.c player-python.i386: W: no-documentation player-python.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/_playerc.so 0775 player-static.i386: W: no-documentation 8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 19 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 00:39:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:39:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806240039.m5O0d3mr021755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server Alias: player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2008-06-23 20:39 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=310088) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=310088&action=view) modified spec file to fix review issues spec file to fix review related issues. Please see full srpm at http://jspaleta.fedorapeople.org/reviews/player/player-2.1.0-0.3.rc2.fc8.src.rpm for specfile and .desktop sources The .desktop files were added for each of the gui applications. The Category setting may need to be adjusted. They currently configured to have menu entries show up under Education. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 00:45:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:45:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452601] Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806240045.m5O0jnZp005283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452601 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david at fetter.org ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-23 20:45 EST ------- *** Bug 244947 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 00:45:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:45:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244947] Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806240045.m5O0jnFr005238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244947 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|201449 | nThis| | Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-23 20:45 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 452601 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 00:44:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:44:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806240044.m5O0iMBf004787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server Alias: player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-23 20:44 EST ------- FYI, here's a failing scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=677252 We don't have any hard rules about renaming binaries; packages in the distro should not conflict with each other if at all possible (and should always do so explicitly) but nothing provides /usr/bin/player so there won't be any conflicts. It does, however, pay to be wary of things that might potentially conflict, and I don't think anyone would disagree that /usr/bin/player is a terribly generic name. So it's really up to the maintainer in this case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 01:31:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:31:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435470] Review Request: zenoss - The Open Source Network Management System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806240131.m5O1V7Hs013933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zenoss - The Open Source Network Management System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435470 shawn.starr at rogers.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shawn.starr at rogers.com ------- Additional Comments From shawn.starr at rogers.com 2008-06-23 21:31 EST ------- This looks interesting. If you need help reviewing I can help you out. Yeah we need to use FHS paths in Fedora/RHEL/EPEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 02:31:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 22:31:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445224] Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806240231.m5O2VB5K024672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445224 ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at gmail.com 2008-06-23 22:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > > > > package meets naming and versioning guidelines. > > > > package builds in mock: > > > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=664952&name=build.log > I think the problem in the build was because configure didn't really work. > What kind OS was on your test machine? This was an official Fedora rawhide builder. > I think the crux of the problem is in > the output from configure: > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CPU = powerpc64, OS = linux-gnu, Vendor = redhat, HostType = powerpc64 > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ERROR: Platform powerpc64 not yet supported > > On the fedora9 ppc machine I tried I got: > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CPU = powerpc64, OS = linux-gnu, Vendor = redhat, HostType = powerpc > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > So, it is HostType=powerpc vs HostType=powerpc64. On my machine I don't get > this configuration error. > > What does config.guess return on your machine? There were some changes in rawhide recently on this. I'll see if I can dig up the email thread. > On my Fedora9 ppc machine I get: > powerpc64-redhat-linux-gnu > > which is the same thing I see in a RHEL5.2 ppc machine. RHEL 5.x has no bearing here. It's quite old compared to Fedora. > If you think that the configure script should be able to handle the > HostType=powerpc64, I can go ahead and patch the configure.in. That might have been the solution, but I'll check. > > > > package installs properly. (couldn't check) > > > > debuginfo package looks complete. (couldn't check) > > > > final provides and requires are sane (couldn't check) > > > > if shared libraries are present, make sure ldconfig is run > What does this mean by "couldn't check"? The package didn't build, so I couldn't check those items. Looking at the spec file, I don't expect any issues. > I was unable to do hardly any testing > on the fedora9 machine because I couldn't find compatible pieces like > binutils-devel since my machine is in ABAT. I spent about a week some time ago > trying to get Fedora9-alpha installed from CDs on a ppc machine but never could > get it to work. Fedora 9 has been released for a month now. Try using the Gold release, as Alpha is very old and is known to have bugs. > > That, and the naming. See below. > > > What is the naming issue? Sorry, I should have been more clear. I included the Release and Version fields here. If you do a CVS snapshot package, you'll need to fixup the Release and Version fields appropriately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 02:34:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 22:34:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806240234.m5O2Y9QA009225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From dwheeler at dwheeler.com 2008-06-23 22:34 EST ------- I built against 32-bit x86 on Fedora 9; it worked there. If necessary, I could exclude the 64-bit architecture and require running the 32-bit version on x86. Unfortunately, the comments in the source package make me suspect that this has not been tested on a 64-bit architecture. If porting to 64-bit is non-trivial, I plan to limit the architectures to start with, and then expand over time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 03:26:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:26:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452601] Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806240326.m5O3QOhA002359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452601 ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2008-06-23 23:26 EST ------- Tibbs, since the other bug was closed without ever CVS branching, will this one be reviewed or could we just branch the other one? I can maintain either way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 03:37:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:37:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452616] Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806240337.m5O3bgnK020686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452616 mastahnke at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |452450 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 03:37:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:37:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452616] New: Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452616 Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mastahnke at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP.spec SRPM URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP-1.04-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This module provides a pure Perl implementation of the CAST5 block cipher. CAST5 is also known as CAST-128. It is a product of the CAST design procedure developed by C. Adams and S. Tavares. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 03:57:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:57:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452457] Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806240357.m5O3vomL023843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452457 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mastahnke at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-23 23:57 EST ------- *** Bug 452616 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 03:57:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:57:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452616] Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806240357.m5O3vnOO023819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452616 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-23 23:57 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 452457 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 04:44:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:44:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806240444.m5O4i7XX031024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From dwheeler at dwheeler.com 2008-06-24 00:44 EST ------- I patched the one line noted as a problem on x86_64. Available as: http://www.dwheeler.com/zfuzz.spec http://www.dwheeler.com/zfuzz-20070911-2.fc9.src.rpm http://www.dwheeler.com/zfuzz-20070911-2.fc9.i386.rpm Unfortunately, I don't have an x86_64 machine with F9+ that I can use as a test, so I don't know if that fixes the problem. Let me know if it does; otherwise, I'll exclude the architecture, and later once I get Koji access I can fix it for other archs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 05:16:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 01:16:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806240516.m5O5GGnY019724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 goyal.hemant at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-06-24 01:16 EST ------- Thanks Kevin. Yes I need an OLPC-3 branch as well :) It was not mentioned in the CVSAdminProcedures page hence I refrained from asking. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: speech-dispatcher [New Branches: ] OLPC-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 05:25:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 01:25:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806240525.m5O5Pk5v005761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-06-24 01:25 EST ------- Kevin I am sorry for the confusion. Kindly disregard the last change request. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: speech-dispatcher [New Branches: ] OLPC-3 F-7 F-8 (ie in addition to OLPC-2) (In reply to comment #52) > Thanks Kevin. > > Yes I need an OLPC-3 branch as well :) It was not mentioned in the > CVSAdminProcedures page hence I refrained from asking. > > Package Change Request > ====================== > Package Name: speech-dispatcher > [New Branches: ] OLPC-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 05:46:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 01:46:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444952] Review Request: tlock - terminal lock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806240546.m5O5k8fh008727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tlock - terminal lock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444952 pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(pj.pandit at yahoo.co| |.in) | ------- Additional Comments From pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in 2008-06-24 01:46 EST ------- Hey Mamoru, how are you? I did package tlock for devel(F-10), F-8, F-9, EL-4 and EL-5 successfully. :) Now will it be included in the next Fedora/EL release automatically, or do I still need to do something? I'm again working on move now, converting it to `ptrash'. Hey, I'm really thankful to you for all the support you gave me. Thank you! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 06:36:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 02:36:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452087] Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806240636.m5O6aIXd016589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452087 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-06-24 02:36 EST ------- Kevin, it looks to me that you missed the F-8 and F-9 branches in the previous request Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: collectl New Branches: F-8 F-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 06:59:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 02:59:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806240659.m5O6xb9l020037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server Alias: player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-24 02:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > no 64 build here. I have it building under f9 32bit. > > The project itself is actually named player so then binaries of the form > /usr/bin/player* aren't in shorthand. Is it appropriate to rename binaries > when the actual project name is too generic? It is, but it is also possible to convince upstream in some cases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 07:27:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 03:27:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806240727.m5O7Rn7m008737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server Alias: player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2008-06-24 03:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > FYI, here's a failing scratch build: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=677252 There seems to have been a significant change in the geos package between fedora 9 and development that has changed the api. The player code will need to be patched to support the newer geos currently available in the development tree. This might take a little bit of investigation to fix... or it might be a quickie. I'll need to rebuild the geos in development onto my f9 box to do some testing. It appears that geos was never built in the f8 or in the f9 timeframe, and both trees are still using the same geos version built against f7. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 07:41:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 03:41:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452636] New: Review Request:http-mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 Summary: Review Request:http-mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: philipp at redfish-solutions.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.djhsolutions.com/pprindeville/httpd-mod_proxy_html.spec SRPM URL: http://www.djhsolutions.com/pprindeville/httpd-mod_proxy_html-3.0.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Not sure if this is my first official request and I need a sponsor or not... I've submitted things via surrogates before. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 07:42:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 03:42:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request:http-mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806240742.m5O7gAcJ011233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:http-mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 philipp at redfish-solutions.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | Summary|Review Request:http- |Review Request:http- |mod_proxy_html - Module to |mod_proxy_html - Module to |rewrite content as it passes|rewrite content as it passes |through an apache proxy. |through an apache proxy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 07:50:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 03:50:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444952] Review Request: tlock - terminal lock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806240750.m5O7oaRW029186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tlock - terminal lock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444952 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-24 03:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #36) For EPEL - Actually I don't know. Currently I don't maintain any packages on EPEL. However according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#Package_maintenance_and_update_policy it seems that packages are added automatically after one month of testing period? For F-9/8 It is *not* pushed automatically. You have to visit https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ and request to push your packages into repositories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 09:19:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 05:19:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444760] Review Request: obm - Open Business Management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806240919.m5O9Jjwf014310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obm - Open Business Management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444760 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2008-06-24 05:19 EST ------- fine, available bogus should now be ignored. http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/obm/obm.spec http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/obm/obm-2.1.9-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 10:33:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 06:33:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241033.m5OAXtnj028054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 ------- Additional Comments From lvillani at binaryhelix.net 2008-06-24 06:33 EST ------- I sent an email to upstream' development mailing list but I didn't get any answer. What are we going to do if they don't respond? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 10:35:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 06:35:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444952] Review Request: tlock - terminal lock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241035.m5OAZeJn028710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tlock - terminal lock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444952 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-24 06:35 EST ------- tlock-1.3-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 10:37:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 06:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444952] Review Request: tlock - terminal lock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241037.m5OAb7nZ012097@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tlock - terminal lock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444952 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-24 06:37 EST ------- tlock-1.3-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 10:53:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 06:53:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225752] Merge Review: filesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241053.m5OArnDZ014617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225752 ------- Additional Comments From pknirsch at redhat.com 2008-06-24 06:53 EST ------- Well, yes, but it looks like this: https://fedorahosted.org/filesystem/browser/lang-exceptions?format=raw which is bad for putting in Source tags as i'd then get a local file called "lang-exceptions?format=raw" when i wget it which then would be packaged liked that into the srpm. :/ Welcome to the wonderful web interface of GIT. :/ Read ya, Phil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 12:32:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 08:32:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452663] New: Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452663 Summary: Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/andika-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/andika-fonts-1.0-1.fc10.nim.src.rpm Description: Andika is a sans serif, Unicode-compliant font designed especially for literacy use, taking into account the needs of beginning readers. The focus is on clear, easy-to-perceive letterforms that will not be readily confused with one another. A sans serif font is preferred by some literacy personnel for teaching people to read. Its forms are simpler and less cluttered than those of most serif fonts. For years, literacy workers have had to make do with fonts that were not really suitable for beginning readers and writers. In some cases, literacy specialists have had to tediously assemble letters from a variety of fonts in order to get all of the characters they need for their particular language project, resulting in confusing and unattractive publications. Andika addresses those issues. See also http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIL_Andika_fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 12:48:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 08:48:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225752] Merge Review: filesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241248.m5OCmKVM003778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225752 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-06-24 08:48 EST ------- Can you include that URL in a comment, so when they run the BADSOURCE/BADURL script, there's documentation for an exception to be added to the whitelist? The "lang-exceptions?format=raw" md5sums to the same as lang-exceptions, so that'd be perfect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 13:24:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:24:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225752] Merge Review: filesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241324.m5ODOU2E011024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225752 ------- Additional Comments From pknirsch at redhat.com 2008-06-24 09:24 EST ------- OK, building a new package now with the following comment above the Sourc1 tag: # Raw source1 URL: https://fedorahosted.org/filesystem/browser/lang-exceptions?format=raw -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 14:15:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:15:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241415.m5OEFjBH005054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 mepal at mepal.cn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mepal at mepal.cn ------- Additional Comments From mepal at mepal.cn 2008-06-24 10:15 EST ------- I'm still seeing maildrop lacks of courier-authlib support - seems you didn't have courier-authlib-devel installed while building maildrop, as mentioned in Comment #27. And maildrop built here is using different versioning compare with what Courier recommended, I have to bump up version by changing spec file in bz2 download from courier to make sure it won't be "upgraded" by yum. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 14:24:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:24:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452688] Review Request: dbus-java - Java implementation of the DBus protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241424.m5OEOxmF023169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-java - Java implementation of the DBus protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452688 omajid at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |452251 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 14:25:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:25:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452251] Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241425.m5OEP0sp023198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452251 omajid at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |452688 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 14:24:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:24:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241424.m5OEODxv023111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 ------- Additional Comments From lvillani at binaryhelix.net 2008-06-24 10:24 EST ------- Upstream says that they're doing such way because of the still unstable API. Since they're stabilising the API they say that they will be providing shared libraries in the near future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 14:23:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:23:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452688] New: Review Request: dbus-java - Java implementation of the DBus protocol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452688 Summary: Review Request: dbus-java - Java implementation of the DBus protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: omajid at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://omajid.fedorapeople.org/dbus-java.spec SRPM URL: http://omajid.fedorapeople.org/dbus-java-2.5-0.1.20080624.fc9.src.rpm Description: D-Bus is a message bus system, a simple way for applications to talk to one another. In addition to interprocess communication, D-Bus helps coordinate process lifecycle; it makes it simple and reliable to code a "single instance" application or daemon, and to launch applications and daemons on demand when their services are needed. This is a complete independent implementation of the D-Bus protocol in Java. It comprises a library to write programs in Java which access D-Bus, a tool for generating stubs from D-Bus introspection data and a simple daemon. Being written in Java it works on both Windows and Linux (and other Unix-like systems). When using a TCP transport it is entirely Java-based; when using Unix-sockets it requires a small JNI library to use Unix-Sockets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 14:29:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:29:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225752] Merge Review: filesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241429.m5OETiQG024146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225752 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-06-24 10:29 EST ------- Brilliant. APPROVED. Thanks, sorry for the hoops. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 14:28:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452691] New: Review Request: btrfs-progs - supporting programs for btrfs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452691 Summary: Review Request: btrfs-progs - supporting programs for btrfs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: josef at toxicpanda.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jwhiter/btrfs-progs.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jwhiter/btrfs-progs-0.15-3.fc8.src.rpm Description: The btrfs-progs package provides all the userpsace programs needed to create, check, modify and correct any inconsistencies in the btrfs filesystem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 14:29:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:29:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241429.m5OETjNX024179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge reviews to be completed for F9 Alias: F9MergeReviewTarget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 225752, which changed state. Bug 225752 Summary: Merge Review: filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225752 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 14:34:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:34:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225752] Merge Review: filesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241434.m5OEY8af008413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225752 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 14:46:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:46:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452691] Review Request: btrfs-progs - supporting programs for btrfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241446.m5OEk5B4027609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: btrfs-progs - supporting programs for btrfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452691 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-06-24 10:46 EST ------- This seems somewhat early, considering there's no kernel support (and the on-disk format isn't even stabilized yet....) How does having this in now help? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 14:49:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:49:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452691] Review Request: btrfs-progs - supporting programs for btrfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241449.m5OEnRbS011131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: btrfs-progs - supporting programs for btrfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452691 ------- Additional Comments From jbacik at redhat.com 2008-06-24 10:49 EST ------- Just helps me stay ahead of the game, when it does hit mainline I'm going to have a bunch of other crap to do, so I'd like to go ahead and get this into fedora now to cut down on the amount of work I have to do later on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 15:17:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 11:17:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452702] New: No sound on Acer Travelmate 250 running Fresh Install of Fedora 9. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452702 Summary: No sound on Acer Travelmate 250 running Fresh Install of Fedora 9. Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: i686 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kmahadeo at broward.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 9 How reproducible: Fresh Install on Acer Travelmate 250 Steps to Reproduce: Fresh Install on Acer Travelmate 250 1. 2. 3. Actual results: No Sound. Expected results: Sound. Additional info: Tried many ideas found on web. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 15:32:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 11:32:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452702] No sound on Acer Travelmate 250 running Fresh Install of Fedora 9. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241532.m5OFWi2T019999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No sound on Acer Travelmate 250 running Fresh Install of Fedora 9. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452702 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-package- |lkundrak at v3.sk, drzeus- |review at redhat.com |bugzilla at drzeus.cx AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lpoetter at redhat.com Component|Package Review |pulseaudio ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2008-06-24 11:32 EST ------- Changing component to pulseaudio at that will be nearer to being the right component... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 15:38:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 11:38:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452714] New: Review Request: Quassel - Distributed IRC Client and Core application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452714 Summary: Review Request: Quassel - Distributed IRC Client and Core application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: smparrish at shallowcreek.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SPEC & SRPM file is here: http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/quassel/ Description: Quassel IRC is a modern, cross-platform, distributed IRC client, meaning that one (or multiple) client(s) can attach to and detach from a central core -- much like the popular combination of screen and a text-based IRC client such as WeeChat, but graphical. Build logs are here: F9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=678455 Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=678468 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 15:43:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 11:43:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452251] Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241543.m5OFhVSh022179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452251 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2008-06-24 11:43 EST ------- Clipping error on rpmlint output: $ rpmlint RPMS/i386/libmatthew-java-0.7.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm libmatthew-java.i386: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libcgi-java.so libmatthew-java.i386: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libunix-java.so This warning must be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 15:42:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 11:42:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452087] Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241542.m5OFgqRR022096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452087 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-24 11:42 EST ------- Sorry about that. I was having issues with the pkgdb and only did a subset for debugging. Should be done now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 15:41:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 11:41:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452251] Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241541.m5OFfYYZ021949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452251 fitzsim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fitzsim at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2008-06-24 11:41 EST ------- - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted... $ rpmlint SRPMS/libmatthew-java-0.7.1-1.fc9.src.rpm $ rpmlint RPMS/i386/libmatthew-java-0.7.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm -soname /usr/lib/libcgi-java.so -soname /usr/lib/libunix-java.so $ rpmlint RPMS/i386/libmatthew-java-javadoc-0.7.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm $ rpmlint RPMS/i386/libmatthew-java-debuginfo-0.7.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guideli... OK - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the fo... OK - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and m... OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual ... OK - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the lice... OK - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is... OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream sou... I'm not sure what this comment means: # debian version is newer than upstream Source must come from the actual upstream, not from another distribution. If Debian's version is better than upstream then add another patch with those changes. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms ... OK - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an... OK - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except fo... OK - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using... OK - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not j... The JNI objects should go in %{_libdir}/%{name}, not %{_libdir}. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#Packaging_JAR_files_that_use_JNI - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must s... OK - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does no... OK - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files list... OK - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be ... OK - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{... OK - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the [w... OK - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is de... OK - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The de... OK - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the r... OK - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfi... OK - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so... See JNI comment above. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the ba... OK - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should ... OK - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.deskt... OK - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other... OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buil... OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a sep... OK - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file s... s/java/Java/ in the summary tag. Usually description is in paragraph form, not bullet points. I'll leave this up to you though. - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See [... A Rawhide i386 mock build fails: + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-build-id /builddir/build/BUILD/libmatthew-java-0.7.1 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/libmatthew-java-0.7.1-1.fc10-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/libcgi-java.so *** ERROR: No build ID note found in /var/tmp/libmatthew-java-0.7.1-1.fc10-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/libcgi-java.so RPM build errors: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.14107 (%install) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.14107 (%install) Child returncode was: 1 - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all su... rpmbuild works on i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as describe... No demos to try. - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is ... The if ... fi formatting is a little strange, but OK. - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base p... Does the javadoc subpackage actually need the base package to be installed? Usually javadoc subpackages are an exception to this guideline. - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase,... OK - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sb... OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 16:59:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:59:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452601] Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241659.m5OGx30f005143@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452601 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-24 12:59 EST ------- FYI, it's just SOP to close old dead reviews as duplicates of new ones. If I can get a few minutes I'll go ahead and review this package; it should be trivial. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 17:00:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:00:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241700.m5OH0HVd020834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-24 13:00 EST ------- If you have a Fedora account, you already have koji access. Just download your cert and run fedora-packager-setup. I did build the updated package on my x86_64 rawhide box and it worked fine, though, so this package should be ready for review. I can't promise I'll be able to do that any time soon, though, so anyone else is welcome to review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 17:15:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:15:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452691] Review Request: btrfs-progs - supporting programs for btrfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241715.m5OHFGFj009379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: btrfs-progs - supporting programs for btrfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452691 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-24 13:15 EST ------- I'll go ahead and review this, but I can't test it at all so I'm asking some of the kernel folks if they'll sign off on it. Full review forthcoming.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 17:31:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:31:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451903] Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241731.m5OHVPOu013284@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451903 kylev at kylev.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 17:33:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:33:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241733.m5OHX7Zt027676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-24 13:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #44) > I'm still seeing maildrop lacks of courier-authlib support - > ........ (all snip) Please file a RFE against maildrop and don't use this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 17:39:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:39:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452601] Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241739.m5OHd8GC029561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452601 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 17:36:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:36:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452691] Review Request: btrfs-progs - supporting programs for btrfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241736.m5OHasXl029154@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: btrfs-progs - supporting programs for btrfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452691 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-24 13:36 EST ------- The only question I have involves the compiler flags; assuming x86_64, this package uses: -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -Werror -Os whereas the defaults are -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic I've no particular issues with -Os versus -O2, but my understanding is that -fstack-protector is of some importance, at least. Any reason not to use our default compiler flags, perhaps with s/-O2/-Os/? * source files match upstream: ca261e50a5a66f7169b60d7bb5b9835e6284f4fa81d58e17d942fd3b4934618a btrfs-progs-0.15.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. ? Not sure about compiler flags: -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -Werror -Os * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: btrfs-progs = 0.15-3.fc10 = libuuid.so.1()(64bit) * %check is present; no test suite upstream. I cannot test this package. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 18:46:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:46:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452601] Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241846.m5OIkRpA010142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452601 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-24 14:46 EST ------- The copyright in the .pm file says the usual "Same as Perl", so the License: tag should be "GPL+ or Artistic" as indicated in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing. Yes, even though Artistic alone is not acceptable for Fedora, people who get the software from us are still welcome to use the software under those terms Honestly, that's the only issue; you can just fix it when you check in. * source files match upstream: 1a052afd178419057dff025b8ea3ad003ab110bce270359d3af70ad18664e055 Business-CreditCard-0.30.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Business::CreditCard) = 0.30 perl-Business-CreditCard = 0.30-1.fc10 = perl >= 1:5 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Exporter) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED; just fix up the License: tag when you check in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 19:00:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:00:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452251] Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241900.m5OJ0EAW012676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452251 ------- Additional Comments From omajid at redhat.com 2008-06-24 15:00 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://omajid.fedorapeople.org/libmatthew-java/libmatthew-java.spec SRPM URL: http://omajid.fedorapeople.org/libmatthew-java/libmatthew-java-0.7.1-1.fc9.src.rpm fixed soname warning, jni object locations, added --build-id flag to build on rawhide and removed explicit dependency of javadoc on base package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 19:08:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:08:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241908.m5OJ8r4k031883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server Alias: player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2008-06-24 15:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > FYI, here's a failing scratch build: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=677252 I understand the failure against development. Did you also have a failing building on 64bit against f9? -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 19:09:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:09:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450476] InfiniBand Connection Management library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241909.m5OJ9ZVS031995@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: InfiniBand Connection Management library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450476 dledford at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2008-06-24 15:09 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libibcm Short Description: InfiniBand Connection Management library Owners: dledford Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 19:13:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:13:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452601] Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241913.m5OJDaSH000493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452601 mastahnke at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 19:13:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:13:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452601] Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241913.m5OJDQ5s000436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452601 ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2008-06-24 15:13 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Business-CreditCard Short Description: Validate/generate credit card checksums/names Owners: stahnma Branches:F8, F9, EL4, EL5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 19:20:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:20:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241920.m5OJKh62002252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-06-24 15:20 EST ------- I'll do informal package review for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 19:43:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:43:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452749] Review Request: ocp - Open Cubic Player for MOD/S3M/XM/IT/SID/MIDI music files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241943.m5OJhLcB020874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocp - Open Cubic Player for MOD/S3M/XM/IT/SID/MIDI music files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452749 cra at wpi.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 19:42:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:42:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452749] New: Review Request: ocp - Open Cubic Player for MOD/S3M/XM/IT/SID/MIDI music files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452749 Summary: Review Request: ocp - Open Cubic Player for MOD/S3M/XM/IT/SID/MIDI music files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cra at wpi.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://cra.fedorapeople.org/ocp/ocp.spec SRPM URL: http://cra.fedorapeople.org/ocp/ocp-0.1.15-1.2.fc9.src.rpm Description: Open Cubic Player is a music file player ported from DOS that supports Amiga MOD module formats and many variants, such as MTM, STM, 669, S3M, XM, and IT. It is also able to render MIDI files using sound patches and play SID, OGG Vorbis, and WAV files. OCP provides a nice text-based interface with several text-based and graphical visualizations. Koji scratch builds: f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=678736 f9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=678694 This is my first package submission, so I need a sponsor. Thanks!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 19:49:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:49:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241949.m5OJnX1g006816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trash - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-24 15:49 EST ------- It seems to me that the url is URL: http://www.andreafrancia.it/trash/ and that the source is Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/bluetrash/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz The timestamp of the source archive is not kept: 14458 jun 23 06:05 ../SOURCES/trash-cli-0.1.10.28.tar.gz 14458 jun 21 13:48 trash-cli-0.1.10.28.tar.gz You can use spectool -g or wget -N. The name of the command should also be trash-cli. The common namespace extends to the commands in %{_bindir}. rpmlint says: trash-cli.noarch: W: no-documentation I propose: %doc COPYING README You could use the page at http://www.andreafrancia.it/trash/ as documentation. The license is GPL+ since there is nothing specified in the source files. As a side note, it is better to have the GPL headers in source files, authors may not be able to hold in court otherwise. I tried to run the file ./test.py in-source, but it failed. Is it normal? In the test.bash file there is a security issue, files with reproducible names are created in /tmp, they should instead be cerated in the current directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 19:49:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:49:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241949.m5OJnq9b022049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: trash - |Review Request: trash-cli - |Command line trashcan |Command line trashcan |(recycle bin) interface |(recycle bin) interface -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 19:50:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:50:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241950.m5OJoN6o007381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-24 15:50 EST ------- Also a dot is missing at the end of the %description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 19:52:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:52:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806241952.m5OJqRGU022854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-24 15:52 EST ------- And it is a noarch package so the CFLAGS= is unneeded... as said in the comment ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 20:11:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:11:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452691] Review Request: btrfs-progs - supporting programs for btrfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806242011.m5OKBYYY026743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: btrfs-progs - supporting programs for btrfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452691 ------- Additional Comments From jbacik at redhat.com 2008-06-24 16:11 EST ------- i can change the cflags in the spec file for now if you like, the flags that are used are just what chris happened to pick when he wrote the makefile :). I'll probably send something up to add -fstack-protector and -fexceptions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 20:21:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452691] Review Request: btrfs-progs - supporting programs for btrfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806242021.m5OKLvTC013445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: btrfs-progs - supporting programs for btrfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452691 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-24 16:21 EST ------- It would probably be best to pass CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" into the makefile, or to tweak that for -Os if you prefer. That way if we need to mess with the flags for whatever reason the package just needs a rebuild. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 20:20:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:20:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452749] Review Request: ocp - Open Cubic Player for MOD/S3M/XM/IT/SID/MIDI music files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806242020.m5OKKjUC013341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocp - Open Cubic Player for MOD/S3M/XM/IT/SID/MIDI music files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452749 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rpm at greysector.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2008-06-24 16:20 EST ------- This is fantastic. Cubic Player brings a lot of memories. ;) I'll review this and sponsor you, but in the meantime, please do a couple of reviews to show your understanding of the packaging guidelines. I may even have one of my own packages to throw at you. What is your FAS user name? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 20:28:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:28:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452486] Review Request: stage - 2D multiple-robot simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806242028.m5OKSRic014417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stage - 2D multiple-robot simulator Alias: stage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452486 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2008-06-24 16:28 EST ------- Thanks for the quick review. Though this is a gtk application, everything in the PSG (Player/Stage/Gazebo) framework more or less works from CLI. For, normally stage or rather the libstageplugin is actually invoked by player by loading a cfg file/simulation environment. And then stage starts off. Interaction occurs through a client interface. So as obvious, cfg files etc can vary at each run of player/stage which are required to be provided as options to the binaries. The binaries provided solely by stage package also have similar application and depends on .world files as options. The gui is not yet got to the level of taking care of all this, so practically there seems no feasible use of .desktop file for stage. But if at all required something can be done with the example .cfg files that comes with stage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 20:42:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:42:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806242042.m5OKgi6M031667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-06-24 16:42 EST ------- > %define major_version 0.4 > %define minor_version 16 > Version: %{major_version}.%{minor_version} I don't think it's necessary to have it because of one edit less in Source0 line. But never mind. Looking at random py src file, the license is actually GNU GPLv2+, please, fix the License line in spec. Looking at the Requires line from rpmbuild Requires: /usr/bin/env newt-python python >= 2.4 python(abi) = 2.5 python-feedparser python-urlgrabber xclip I see that you don't need 'python >= 2.4' because RPM-dep-solver said 'python(abi) = 2.5', feel free to omit it. > make %{?_smp_mflags} Useless in Python code. Feel free to echo the variable. It contains just '-j2' or similar. Useful only while compiling C(++) code. Once you are using '%{__sed}' and then 'rm -rf ...' -- be consistent. > %{__sed} -i -e s@"\${exec_prefix}/lib/python2.5/site-packages"@$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{python_sitelib}@ Makefile > %{__sed} -i -e s@"\${prefix}/lib/python2.5/site-packages"@$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{python_sitelib}@ Makefile Is it really necessary in newer clive version? What happen if the 2 lines are missing? %{_mandir}/man?/%{name}* is more general when it comes to change of the X in clive.X.man file. -- Hope to help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 20:52:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:52:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452749] Review Request: ocp - Open Cubic Player for MOD/S3M/XM/IT/SID/MIDI music files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806242052.m5OKqkr6001006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocp - Open Cubic Player for MOD/S3M/XM/IT/SID/MIDI music files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452749 ------- Additional Comments From cra at wpi.edu 2008-06-24 16:52 EST ------- My FAS user name is cra. I'd be glad to look at some of your packages. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 20:54:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:54:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448215] Review Request: mozvoikko - Finnish Voikko spell-checker extension for Mozilla programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806242054.m5OKsaGA018664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mozvoikko - Finnish Voikko spell-checker extension for Mozilla programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448215 ------- Additional Comments From vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi 2008-06-24 16:54 EST ------- Upstream released a new version, this is the first "official" release via Sourceforge. There were only a couple of small changes, here's the updated package. Updated SPEC: http://vpv.fedorapeople.org/packages/mozvoikko/mozvoikko.spec New SRPM: http://vpv.fedorapeople.org/packages/mozvoikko/mozvoikko-0.9.5-0.1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 21:30:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:30:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452251] Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806242130.m5OLULJv008097@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452251 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2008-06-24 17:30 EST ------- $ rpmlint RPMS/i386/libmatthew-java-0.7.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm mock build succeeds on fedora-rawhide-i386. The upstream project shouldn't be using ld directly to link the JNI libraries. Can you patch it to use gcc instead? This may allow you to not specify --build-id. Also, the contents of RPM_OPT_FLAGS (see rpm --eval %{optflags}) are not being passed to cpp, cc and ld. They need to be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 21:36:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:36:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449504] Review Request: ranpwd - A program to generate random passwords In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806242136.m5OLa20K009009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ranpwd - A program to generate random passwords https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449504 ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2008-06-24 17:36 EST ------- Yes, I'm sure he don't want to maintain this package. Fixed version: Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/ranpwd/ranpwd.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/ranpwd/ranpwd-1.2-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 22:16:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:16:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452749] Review Request: ocp - Open Cubic Player for MOD/S3M/XM/IT/SID/MIDI music files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806242216.m5OMGdxi000736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocp - Open Cubic Player for MOD/S3M/XM/IT/SID/MIDI music files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452749 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2008-06-24 18:16 EST ------- Partial review:: ocp-0.1.15-alsa.patch: - if ((err=snd_pcm_hw_params_any(alsa_pcm, hwparams))) + err=snd_pcm_hw_params_any(alsa_pcm, hwparams); + if (err < 0) This can be done in one line: + if ((err=snd_pcm_hw_params_any(alsa_pcm, hwparams)) < 0) Have the patches been sent upstream? ocp.spec: Release: 1.2%{dist} Please make it just 1%{dist}. We'll start the review at release 1 and increase that number with each revision until the package is approved. BuildRequires: libogg-devel Redundant, required by libvorbis-devel # ocp contains non-64-bit clean i386 assembly ExclusiveArch: i386 Not necessary. It builds and works (mostly) on x86_64 (tested!). I've talked to one of the developers and he said he's working on fixing it on ppc. He also said it works on sparc. Also, please put all BuildRequires in separate lines and sort them alphabetically. It makes them easier to manage and makes cvs diffs smaller and more readable. There's no need to disable libid3tag support, it is present in Fedora (needs BR: libid3tag-devel). There's no reason to disable OSS support, either (no additional BRs or Requires:) /etc/X11/wmconfig/opencubicplayer What's that doing here? I thought these were long obsolete. Additionally, no package owns /etc/X11/wmconfig anymore, so you'll leave unowned /etc/X11/wmconfig directory after ocp is uninstalled. # mv docs to docdir mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} mv %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/{AUTHORS,BUGS,COPYING,CREDITS,KEYBOARD_REMAPS,SUID,TODO} \ %{buildroot}%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} That's not how it's done. Just put those files in %doc. mv %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/opencubicplayer.desktop \ %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/fedora-ocp.desktop Not necessary. Just use --delete-original in desktop-file-install call. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 22:43:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:43:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452714] Review Request: Quassel - Distributed IRC Client and Core application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806242243.m5OMhIG9004737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Quassel - Distributed IRC Client and Core application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452714 cra at wpi.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cra at wpi.edu ------- Additional Comments From cra at wpi.edu 2008-06-24 18:43 EST ------- Partial review: rpmlint output: >rpmlint quassel-0.2.0-1.fc9.src.rpm quassel.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 7) [This is fine] quassel.src: E: description-line-too-long Quassel IRC is a modern, distributed IRC client, meaning that one (or multiple) client(s) can attach to and detach from a central core -- quassel.src: E: description-line-too-long much like the popular combination of screen and a text-based IRC client such as WeeChat, but graphical [Please wrap the text into a paragraph of no more than 80-characters per line] quassel.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog [Please include version after each changelog header line like this: * Sat Jun 23 2008 Steven Parrish 0.2.0-0.1.beta1 ] quassel.src: W: invalid-license GPLv2 GPLv3 [correct syntax is "or" between each license: License: GPLv2 or GPLv3 ] quassel.src: W: strange-permission quasselclient.desktop 0777 quassel.src: W: strange-permission quasselcore.desktop 0777 quassel.src: W: strange-permission quassel.desktop 0777 quassel.src: W: strange-permission quassel.spec 0777 [Since these desktop files originated as included Source: the easiest way to fix these is to chmod 644 *.desktop before you build] Packaging Review MUST Items: + for items that pass review - for required changes ? for suggestions or needs investigation + package name matches upstream - version/release doesn't follow guidelines for beta/pre-release versions: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages I suggest using: Version: 0.2.0 Release: 0.1.beta1%{?dist} + spec file name matches package name - License is good: dual GPLv2 / GPLv3, but as stated above, License tag needs to use correct syntax for dual-license scenario: License: GPLv2 or GPLv3 - Need to include gpl-v2.txt, gpl-v3.txt, and COPYING in the package as %doc + spec is in American English ? suggest blank line before %clean and between other sections for readability + Source0: URL download sha1sum matches src in package: 36fe1f1352f79f77d824d076add4e9e24c49ba75 quassel-0.2.0-beta1.tar.bz2 + Package built successfully in koji, BuildRequires apparently fine ? Why are you manually installing only a few files rather than using "make install"? + owns all directories it creates + no duplicate %files + permissions look good on installed files + has a proper %clean section - please use %{_datadir} macro in place of /usr/share + package contains code suitable for Fedora packaging - no documentation - consider including README and any other documentation (not INSTALL build instructions though) ? For your core and client subpackages: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} + Desktop files are present and installed with desktop-file-install + no shared directory ownerships + rm -rf %{buildroot} at beginning of %install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 23:27:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:27:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806242327.m5ONRbjK027234@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 ------- Additional Comments From andrea.francia at gmx.it 2008-06-24 19:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > The license is GPL+ since there is nothing specified in the source files. > As a side note, it is better to have the GPL headers in source files, > authors may not be able to hold in court otherwise. I'm working on it. > I tried to run the file ./test.py in-source, but it failed. Is it normal? It's not normal. Could you provide the error message? > In the test.bash file there is a security issue, files with reproducible > names are created in /tmp, they should instead be cerated in the current > directory. I'm working on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 23:41:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:41:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806242341.m5ONfM6V029284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 ------- Additional Comments From andrea.francia at gmx.it 2008-06-24 19:41 EST ------- > The name of the command should also be trash-cli. The name of the package is trash-cli which means "Interacting with the Freedesktop trashcan trough the Command Line Interface" The name of the main command is 'trash' without "-cli". The command is used is this way: $ trash this-file That means: "trash this-file in the trashcan", there is no reason to append the "-cli" suffix to the main command. You are already using the Command Line Interface. For example the commands to remove, move, copy, or touch files are: "rm", "mv", "cp" and "touch". There is not an "rm-cli" nor a "cp-cli". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 24 23:44:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:44:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452714] Review Request: Quassel - Distributed IRC Client and Core application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806242344.m5ONio7e029655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Quassel - Distributed IRC Client and Core application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452714 ------- Additional Comments From smparrish at shallowcreek.net 2008-06-24 19:44 EST ------- Thanks for the comments. Uploaded revised SPEC and SRPMS files to http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/quassel/ You asked why I was manually installing the files instead of using make install. Here is the quote from the developers.... "make install will probably do something, but it has never been tried and may destroy your system or kill a kitten. It's not necessary anyway, since there are no installable files other than the binaries. Though this might change in later releases." Also the way the packages are broken up as follows. The base package contains a monolithic build of the client and server. You would use this when client and server would reside on the same machine, otherwise the client and server packages can be installed on different machines so do not depend on each other. Again thanks for the comments. Anything else just ask. Build logs: F9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=678971 Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=678976 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 00:08:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:08:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183374] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Random In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250008.m5P08j8r001256@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-Random https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=183374 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-24 20:08 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 00:10:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:10:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183889] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Primes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250010.m5P0A85x018567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-Primes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=183889 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-24 20:10 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 00:13:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:13:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445010] Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250013.m5P0DWtE019002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445010 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-24 20:13 EST ------- ok, let me know when you have a skylive package available for review? If you get a chance to do some pre-reviews of other pending packages please let me know... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 00:12:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:12:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250012.m5P0CcS3018884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-24 20:12 EST ------- We no longer do F-7 branches. ;( Also, if you are doing F-8, you should really also do F-9 so there is a good upgrade path. Shall I make OLPC-3 F-8 F-9 for you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 00:14:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:14:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447948] Review Request: R-lmtest - Testing Linear Regression Models for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250014.m5P0EkTT019151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-lmtest - Testing Linear Regression Models for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447948 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-24 20:14 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 00:16:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:16:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450476] InfiniBand Connection Management library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250016.m5P0Gfig002677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: InfiniBand Connection Management library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450476 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-24 20:16 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 00:18:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:18:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452601] Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250018.m5P0I1MW002906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452601 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-24 20:18 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 00:26:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:26:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452454] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Rijndael - Crypt::CBC compliant Rijndael encryption module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250026.m5P0Q6oY004408@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-Rijndael - Crypt::CBC compliant Rijndael encryption module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452454 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-24 20:26 EST ------- Wow, I could swear that I typed in a bunch of information but somehow it was lost. Crap. Let me see if I can remember what I wrote. This package seems quite confused about its license. Makefile.PL says "gpl". META.yml says "gpl". COPYING includes a copy of the LGPL (v2). README says "GNU Public License". Note that there's no such thing. Rijndael.pm also says "GNU Public License", but then refers to the COPYING file. _rijndael.c says LGPLv2+. rijndael.h also says LGPLv2+. And the spec has LGPLv2 only. I'm pretty sure that things are really LGPLv2+ and the authors are just a bit confused about what to call it, but it would be a good idea to check with them and perhaps get them to clarify. Anyway, that's the only issue I see here. I'll go ahead and approve this with the license tag changed to LGPLv2+ and in the unlikely event that's not what the authors intended you can fix it up at that time. * source files match upstream: f319f8ba16884759e8d2353d7dfcd8cabcc2a0bd39a8f4613b8fe43beef1623f Crypt-Rijndael-1.06.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field doesn't seem to match the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: Rijndael.so()(64bit) perl(Crypt::Rijndael) = 1.06 perl-Crypt-Rijndael = 1.06-2.fc10 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Test::Manifest) >= 1.14 perl(Test::More) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=11, Tests=121, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.34 cusr + 0.06 csys = 0.40 CPU) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 01:13:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:13:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452749] Review Request: ocp - Open Cubic Player for MOD/S3M/XM/IT/SID/MIDI music files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250113.m5P1DjwL028311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocp - Open Cubic Player for MOD/S3M/XM/IT/SID/MIDI music files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452749 ------- Additional Comments From cra at wpi.edu 2008-06-24 21:13 EST ------- Thanks. I've applied most of your suggested changes. New packages here: Spec URL: http://cra.fedorapeople.org/ocp/ocp.spec SRPM URL: http://cra.fedorapeople.org/ocp/ocp-0.1.15-2.fc9.src.rpm Koji scratch builds: f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=679020 f9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=679039 I've sent all patches upstream already. I'll let upstream decide how to best apply them and then I'll remove them from the package. I'm told that the libid3tag requirement is going away upstream, but I reenabled it anyway. Not sure it gets used without libmad being built... Bumped release to 2 and will use only integers from now on. I did try building x86_64 locally, and while it builds, there are issues with popping/clipping and incorrect playback. I've reenabled all archs for now and will work with upstream as issues arise. Regarding desktop-file-install, I'm renaming the file to meet the letter of this guideline: MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the [wiki:Self:Packaging/Guidelines#desktop desktop files section of Packaging Guidelines] . If you feel that using opencubicplayer.desktop rather than changing it to be ocp.desktop is acceptable, I'll take out the rename. It doesn't matter to me either way... Thanks again for taking a look at this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 01:17:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:17:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452195] Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250117.m5P1HRlg012091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452195 ------- Additional Comments From ivazqueznet at gmail.com 2008-06-24 21:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > - -devel is missing a Requires of allegro-devel, and should have no BuildRequires > >> The -devel package depends on the main package, which depends on allegro-devel. No, the main package has allegro-devel as a BuildRequires. Software built using presto-devel will fail due to the fact that presto.h (in presto-devel) requires allegro.h (in allegro-devel), but presto-devel does not require allegro-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 02:15:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:15:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226046] Merge Review: libsoup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250215.m5P2Fhw6021348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libsoup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226046 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-06-24 22:15 EST ------- Running rpmlint on the installed package in F-8 throws these: libsoup.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libsoup-2.2.so.8.5.0 /lib64/libgthread-2.0.so.0 The binary contains unused direct shared library dependencies. This may indicate gratuitously bloated linkage; check that the binary has been linked with the intended shared libraries only. libsoup.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libsoup-2.2.so.8.5.0 /lib64/librt.so.1 The binary contains unused direct shared library dependencies. This may indicate gratuitously bloated linkage; check that the binary has been linked with the intended shared libraries only. libsoup.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libsoup-2.2.so.8.5.0 /lib64/libgpg-error.so.0 The binary contains unused direct shared library dependencies. This may indicate gratuitously bloated linkage; check that the binary has been linked with the intended shared libraries only. I don't have a Rawhide system at hand, so not sure whether these are present there too. These can be removed by putting the following before invoking make (see anjuta and glade3): sed --in-place --expression 's! -shared ! -Wl,--as-needed\0!g' libtool Everything else looks fine to me. +---------------------------------+ | This package is APPROVED by me. | +---------------------------------+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 02:19:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:19:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208675] Review Request: miau - Full-featured IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250219.m5P2Ju4S006534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: miau - Full-featured IRC bouncer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208675 jima at beer.tclug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2008-06-24 22:19 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: miau New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 02:38:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:38:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452454] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Rijndael - Crypt::CBC compliant Rijndael encryption module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250238.m5P2cU9A010692@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-Rijndael - Crypt::CBC compliant Rijndael encryption module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452454 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-06-24 22:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Wow, I could swear that I typed in a bunch of information but somehow it was > lost. Crap. Let me see if I can remember what I wrote. > > This package seems quite confused about its license. > > Makefile.PL says "gpl". > META.yml says "gpl". > COPYING includes a copy of the LGPL (v2). > README says "GNU Public License". Note that there's no such thing. > Rijndael.pm also says "GNU Public License", but then refers to the COPYING file. > _rijndael.c says LGPLv2+. > rijndael.h also says LGPLv2+. > > And the spec has LGPLv2 only. > > I'm pretty sure that things are really LGPLv2+ and the authors are just a bit > confused about what to call it, but it would be a good idea to check with them > and perhaps get them to clarify. Nice spotting, I'll fix this now. > APPROVED Thank you New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Crypt-Rijndael Short Description: Crypt::CBC compliant Rijndael encryption module Owners: nigelj Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 02:41:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:41:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452454] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Rijndael - Crypt::CBC compliant Rijndael encryption module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250241.m5P2fDGI011381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-Rijndael - Crypt::CBC compliant Rijndael encryption module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452454 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 02:43:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:43:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208675] Review Request: miau - Full-featured IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250243.m5P2hp6H026934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: miau - Full-featured IRC bouncer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208675 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-24 22:43 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 02:49:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:49:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452454] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Rijndael - Crypt::CBC compliant Rijndael encryption module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250249.m5P2nHig012631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-Rijndael - Crypt::CBC compliant Rijndael encryption module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452454 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-24 22:49 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 02:50:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:50:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444952] Review Request: tlock - terminal lock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250250.m5P2oUt6028682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tlock - terminal lock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444952 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-24 22:50 EST ------- tlock-1.3-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 02:51:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:51:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444952] Review Request: tlock - terminal lock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250251.m5P2phID013878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tlock - terminal lock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444952 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-24 22:51 EST ------- tlock-1.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 02:50:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:50:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444952] Review Request: tlock - terminal lock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250250.m5P2oWmk013566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tlock - terminal lock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444952 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |1.3-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 02:52:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:52:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452105] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-RADIUS - Wrapper Classes for the RADIUS PECL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250252.m5P2qUuH029716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-RADIUS - Wrapper Classes for the RADIUS PECL Alias: pear-Auth-RADIUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452105 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-24 22:52 EST ------- php-pear-Auth-RADIUS-1.0.6-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 02:52:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:52:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452105] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-RADIUS - Wrapper Classes for the RADIUS PECL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250252.m5P2qW2g029757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-RADIUS - Wrapper Classes for the RADIUS PECL Alias: pear-Auth-RADIUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452105 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |1.0.6-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 04:01:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:01:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250401.m5P41k92010706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 ------- Additional Comments From panov at canopus.iacp.dvo.ru 2008-06-25 00:01 EST ------- Nicolas, As far as I know Fedora bewares of patents. The Utopia font was patented: http://www.google.com/patents?id=MNkpAAAAEBAJ http://www.freepatentsonline.com/D317323.html . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 04:26:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:26:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446814] Review Request: emacs-lookup - Emacsen interface to look up dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250426.m5P4QPHN030624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-lookup - Emacsen interface to look up dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446814 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 00:26 EST ------- I had intended to get back to this with some more review commentary so we didn't have to go back and forth, but I ran out of time, sorry. I notice that the lookup-guide.info file isn't in UTF8, and isn't in any encoding I recognize, so it doesn't render at all for me. (rpmlint complains it, of course.) Do you know what the encoding is? Is it possible to convert to UTF8 so that everyone can at least look at the file without having to set some specific encoding? I get a "406 Not Acceptable" error when visiting the URL given in the spec. I expect that the server is trying to present a page based on my language settings, but none exists. Perhaps it would be better to simply refer directly to the Japanese page at http://openlab.jp/edict/lookup/index.html.ja. Unfortunately my Japanese is only good enough to read a few words (and most of the gairaigo) on that page, but it's obviously a reasonable page to use as the URL for this package. Unfortunately this package fails to conform to many of the Emacs packaging guidelines given in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Emacs. The versioned dependencies are missing, the build dependencies are not correct (although the package still builds for me), there are no separate -el packages, etc. There are some pretty complete templates on the guideline page which you can copy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 05:01:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 01:01:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250501.m5P51kXe003801@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-06-25 01:01 EST ------- Hi Kevin, (In reply to comment #54) > We no longer do F-7 branches. ;( Oh okay. > Shall I make OLPC-3 F-8 F-9 for you? Yeah that will be fine :-). Best to make this package available to as many users as possible :). Thanks for the suggestion! Best, Hemant -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 05:16:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 01:16:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428925] Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250516.m5P5Gauq006118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428925 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |debarshi.ray at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-06-25 01:16 EST ------- I am interested in reviving this. I will look into the work done till now and submit the Spec/SRPM pair once I am done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 05:30:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 01:30:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250530.m5P5UFcO008403@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-06-25 01:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > For example the commands to remove, move, copy, or touch files are: "rm", "mv", > "cp" and "touch". There is not an "rm-cli" nor a "cp-cli". Unlike your "trash" application, these applications are ISO/IEEE/POSIX standardized, widely used and have a long (25+ years) history. That said, I agree with comment #1, upstream should consider to rename their "trash" application into something less generic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 05:53:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 01:53:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250553.m5P5rfFl028482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-06-25 01:53 EST ------- Fun. What I don't understand then is how Adobe (which is a serious firm, with real lawyers) could give the font to the TEX user group with a license that allowed OFL-ing. Would you have the name of the Adobe contact per chance? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 06:46:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 02:46:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250646.m5P6k1N8020955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 ------- Additional Comments From andrea.francia at gmx.it 2008-06-25 02:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Unlike your "trash" application, these applications are ISO/IEEE/POSIX > standardized, widely used and have a long (25+ years) history. "lsmod" is not so old and is not called lsmod-cli, its name reflet what it does (list the modules). Is "lsmod" ISO, IEEE or POSIX standardized? The "rename" command present in the Fedora is called "rename", not "yet-another-renamer", the rename command is not so old nor standardized. In fact the "rename" found in other distribution is from a different package with another interface. Instead the trash-cli package will be present soon in at least two distribution (Fedora and Ubuntu) with the same command names. Another not so old example are "lspci" that list the PCI devices. In my opinion each command name should reflect what the command does. > That said, I agree with comment #1, upstream should consider to rename their > "trash" application into something less generic. There is not a "trash" *application* there is a package named "trash-cli" that provides four commands (implemented as executables): - trash (that trashes files) - list-trash (that list the trashed files) - empty-trash (that empty the trashcan(s)) - restore-trash (that restore a trashed file) You think that I should rename all adding -cli? The Freedesktop Trash Specification are followed by KDE, soon by GNOME, and by other Desktop Enviroment. I think is enough a standard that name the command line interface commands to interact with it without adding some strange suffix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 06:55:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 02:55:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445105] Review Request: milkytracker - SDL clone of the Fasttracker II module tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250655.m5P6tnkp006018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: milkytracker - SDL clone of the Fasttracker II module tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445105 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-25 02:55 EST ------- Well, would you do a pre-review for packages which all BuildRequires are already available on Fedora? The review request you commented depends on another package which does not build on rawhide for now so I cannot check if your pre-review is proper. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 07:24:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 03:24:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250724.m5P7OKqb010892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-25 03:24 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=310234) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=310234&action=view) error from ./trash.py -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 07:41:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 03:41:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250741.m5P7fuKK030455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-25 03:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > Unlike your "trash" application, these applications are ISO/IEEE/POSIX > > standardized, widely used and have a long (25+ years) history. > "lsmod" is not so old and is not called lsmod-cli, its name reflet what it does > (list the modules). Is "lsmod" ISO, IEEE or POSIX standardized? lsmod is specific enough. > The "rename" command present in the Fedora is called "rename", not > "yet-another-renamer", the rename command is not so old nor standardized. In It is in util-linux-ng, so this is not something very problematic, it is going to be a defacto standard. > fact the "rename" found in other distribution is from a different package with > another interface. That's an issue, but I'd say that in that case the rename from util-linux-ng should be considerd as the reference. I may be wrong, I don't know this very well. There are other better example, however, ren is such an example, and it is my bad since I reviewed and accepted it, certainly before Ralf made me aware of the naming issues. Another example is GMT, but in that case I think that it has enough precedence since this application is very old. > Instead the trash-cli package will be present soon in at least two distribution > (Fedora and Ubuntu) with the same command names. That's not a good reason. > Another not so old example are "lspci" that list the PCI devices. But this is not a non-specific name. > In my opinion each command name should reflect what the command does. As far as possible. > > That said, I agree with comment #1, upstream should consider to rename their > > "trash" application into something less generic. > There is not a "trash" *application* there is a package named "trash-cli" that > provides four commands (implemented as executables): > - trash (that trashes files) > - list-trash (that list the trashed files) > - empty-trash (that empty the trashcan(s)) > - restore-trash (that restore a trashed file) > > You think that I should rename all adding -cli? No, only trash in my opinion. The others are specific enough. They could be even more specific, but at the expense of usability. The right level of non-genericity is something subjective, my feeling is that trash is not right since it may clash easily with an application doing something very different, and be used in a standard in the future, be is a defacto standard like what is in some basic package like util-linux, coreutils, bash buil-in and a few others or a real standard. > The Freedesktop Trash Specification are followed by KDE, soon by GNOME, and by > other Desktop Enviroment. > I think is enough a standard that name the command line interface commands to > interact with it without adding some strange suffix. The command name is not standardised, isn't it? Not the command line interface? If it is so, then the alternative system should be used, but I don't think this is the case here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 08:02:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 04:02:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452806] New: Review Request: ember-media - media files for the ember Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452806 Summary: Review Request: ember-media - media files for the ember Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: atorkhov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://purple.worldforge.org/~alex/fedora/ember-media.spec SRPM URL: http://purple.worldforge.org/~alex/fedora/ember-media-0.5.2-1.src.rpm (big package, 115M) Description: Media files for the ember WorldForge client. Non-free pack in tarball is reported upstream and would be fixed in next version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 08:01:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 04:01:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452805] New: Review Request: ember - WorldForge client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452805 Summary: Review Request: ember - WorldForge client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: atorkhov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://purple.worldforge.org/~alex/fedora/ember.spec SRPM URL: http://purple.worldforge.org/~alex/fedora/ember-0.5.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Ember is a client for MMORPGs using the Worldforge system. It uses the Ogre 3D engine with CEGUI. This package builds only under rawhide (in mock) because it requires cegui-0.6.0 and libwfut. All patches (including changed tarball because of non-free pack) are reported upstream and would be fixed in next version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 08:07:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 04:07:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250807.m5P876uo020224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 ------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny at gmx.de 2008-06-25 04:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Need to have (STK) packaged also. Started, but not finished yet. > So, few others notes. > * Qt i18n > configure:21663: checking Qt translations > configure:21679: WARNING: *** not found! You may want to install a Qt i18n package Fixed, and will be fixed in 0.3.3. > * Source0 > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/lmms/lmms-%{version}.tar.bz2 > instead of > http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/lmms/lmms-0.3.2.tar.bz2 Fixed. > * You can use: > %configure --disable-static \ > %ifnarch i386 > --without-vst \ > %endif > Done. > * You need to use make %{?_smp_mflags} (unless it fails and you need to drop a > comment if it does. Parallel building indeed fails for 0.3.2, but upstream told me it works for their current trunk. We'll see. Disabled for now. > * Prevent timestramps changes at install : > make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install INSTALL="install -p" Pretty uncommon and not covered by the package guidelines. > * CFLAGS : -ftree-vectorize -ftree-loop-linear are used and may override some of > our CFLAGS (or not - anyway we may need to see if this is really needed). -ftree-vectorize Perform loop vectorization on trees. This flag is enabled by default at `-O3'. -ftree-loop-linear Perform linear loop transformations on tree. This flag can improve cache performance and allow further loop optimizations to take place. Don't see a reason to not enable this. > * post/postun > update-mime-database %{_datadir}/mime &> /dev/null || : > update-desktop-database &> /dev/null || : > You need to add full path for them like /usr/bin/update-desktop-database > and remove the &> /dev/null (as if it fails, we will not know) > only the last || : would be needed Copied that from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database. > * desktop file > - Usually GNOME HIG compliance requires to use verbs in Comments Will ask upstream to fix that. > - Icon and Exec should mention the path (and .png) Can you explain what you mean? > It would be fine to drop a symlink into /usr/share/pixmaps Done. > - X-Desktop-File-Install-Version=0.3 is written before desktop-file-install is used. > - Categories / "MimeType" is a list and does not have a semicolon as trailing > character, fixing - this could be fixed at source also. Again, will ask upstream to fix that. Meanwhile, not a real problem, because that's fixed by desktop-file-install. > - License is GPLv2+ - OK Found one file (drumsynth) that has a MIT license in it. Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/lmms.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/lmms-0.3.2-2.fc9.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Jun 25 2008 Thomas Moschny <...> - 0.3.2-2 - Update license tag. - Add patch to fix plugin dir on 64bit archs. - Add ladspa-caps-plugins dependency. - Suggestions from the review: * Simplify configure step. * Fix sf.net download link. * Add patch to let configure find the qt translations. * Link icon to _datadir/pixmaps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 08:30:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 04:30:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250830.m5P8Urn8024680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-06-25 04:30 EST ------- Actually, googling the it a bit it seems: 1. last time this went to court the patent angle was rejected and the copyright angle upholded 2. the entity that sued and was the patent holder was Adobe 3. the authorization Adobe gave to the TEX user group explicitely covers copyright and talks about font modifications So I don't really see Adobe suing for patents when they gave the green light to modifications and redistribution themselves, and courts refused the patent argument before. But IANAL, so this is for fedora-legal to decide. And if the text of the current TEX User Group grant is not good enough, presumably a better one can be negociated with Adobe since the release of Utopia comes from them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 09:30:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 05:30:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449135] Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806250930.m5P9U0ai019611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449135 ------- Additional Comments From musuruan at gmail.com 2008-06-25 05:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > And regarding the non-fedora bits, I might remove the check for build root not > being root directory, but the cleaning of buildroot _is_ a fedora bit. Cleaning the buildroot this way: [ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT is not a Fedora bit. Since you should NEVER build an RPM as root, it MUST be done this way: rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > Regarding the version, I have upgraded (and uploaded) the package to the latest > stable version (4.5.19) At each update, you must provide a link to the updated spec file and a link to the new source RPM file and a changelog. This is a Fedora Packaging guideline. Moreover, you aren't versioning the spec file in the changelog (something rpmlint complains about) and you didn't update the changelog. The licence tag in not correct. GPL is not an acceptable license (but, for example, GPLv2 is). This is also something rpmlint complains about. Since you are looking for a sponsor, I suggest you to read this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 12:05:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:05:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452450] RFE: Include Spacewalk (and dependencies) in Fedora In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251205.m5PC5f61016884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RFE: Include Spacewalk (and dependencies) in Fedora Alias: F-Spacewalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452450 msuchy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |452832 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 12:05:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:05:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452832] New: Review Request: perl-Math-FFT - Perl extension for Fast Fourier Transforms Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452832 Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-FFT - Perl extension for Fast Fourier Transforms Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: msuchy at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-Math-FFT/perl-Math-FFT.spec SRPM URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-Math-FFT/perl-Math-FFT-1.28-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This module implements some algorithms for calculating Fast Fourier Transforms for one-dimensional data sets of size 2^n. This is my first package, and I'm seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 12:10:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:10:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452832] Review Request: perl-Math-FFT - Perl extension for Fast Fourier Transforms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251210.m5PCA9Gj018055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-FFT - Perl extension for Fast Fourier Transforms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452832 msuchy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: perl-Math- |Review Request: perl-Math- |FFT - Perl extension for |FFT - Perl extension for |Fast Fourier Transforms |Fast Fourier Transforms Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 12:16:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:16:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445028] Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251216.m5PCG6FU002172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445028 ------- Additional Comments From rickyz at cmu.edu 2008-06-25 08:16 EST ------- The source URL (http://pylonshq.com/download/Pylons-0.9.6.1.tar.gz) currently gives a 404. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 12:28:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:28:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452832] Review Request: perl-Math-FFT - Perl extension for Fast Fourier Transforms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251228.m5PCSsw1022028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-FFT - Perl extension for Fast Fourier Transforms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452832 dhorak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From dhorak at redhat.com 2008-06-25 08:28 EST ------- Please, no generated specs by cpan2rpm. When you need a spec generator, then you can use rpmdev-newspec from rpmdevtools package. It has a special mode for Perl packages and works very well. See the following links: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers#Get_Involved http://spot.fedorapeople.org/Summit2008/GoodRPMPackages-TomCallaway-2008.pdf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 12:43:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:43:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452842] New: Review Request: monotorrent - a bit torrent client for mono Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452842 Summary: Review Request: monotorrent - a bit torrent client for mono Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/monotorrent.spec SRPM URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/monotorrent-0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: monotorrent is a bittorrent client for mono. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 12:53:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:53:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452832] Review Request: perl-Math-FFT - Perl extension for Fast Fourier Transforms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251253.m5PCrhcf027166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-FFT - Perl extension for Fast Fourier Transforms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452832 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-25 08:53 EST ------- Miroslav: You may prefer using cpanspec; the generated SPEC files mostly comply with the Fedora guidelines, you'll probably have to do just minor adjustments such as verifying a License, and possibly adding missing dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 14:33:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:33:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452251] Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251433.m5PEXNFQ030386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452251 ------- Additional Comments From omajid at redhat.com 2008-06-25 10:33 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://omajid.fedorapeople.org/libmatthew-java/libmatthew-java.spec SRPM URL: http://omajid.fedorapeople.org/libmatthew-java/libmatthew-java-0.7.1-1.fc9.src.rpm replaced ld with gcc; passed %{optflags} to cflags, ppflags, ldflags and gcjflags -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 14:37:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:37:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452691] Review Request: btrfs-progs - supporting programs for btrfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251437.m5PEb6ht031223@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: btrfs-progs - supporting programs for btrfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452691 ------- Additional Comments From jbacik at redhat.com 2008-06-25 10:37 EST ------- K updated the package http://people.redhat.com/jwhiter/btrfs-progs.spec http://people.redhat.com/jwhiter/btrfs-progs-0.15-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 14:50:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:50:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452871] New: Provide sysprof for Fedora9+ Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452871 Summary: Provide sysprof for Fedora9+ Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: linuxhippy at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Description of problem: Sysprof is a really useful tool for developers tuning software helps in understanding whats going on on the system as a whole. Fedora8 contained sysprof-1.0.9, however it seems its not supported with more recent kernels (I had to install 2.6.24). Fedora9 does not seem to offer a sysprof package at all, it would be great if it could be re-introduced again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 15:04:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:04:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452871] Provide sysprof for Fedora9+ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251504.m5PF4ON1021007@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Provide sysprof for Fedora9+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452871 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | Status|NEW |CLOSED Component|Package Review |sysprof Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2008-06-25 11:04 EST ------- sysprof requires a kernel module, and out-of-tree kernel modules are barred by Fedora policy. The plan was to move it to livna/rpmfusion but that doesn't seem to have happened yet. http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/sysprof/F-9/dead.package?view=markup See also this thread: http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2007-December/msg01668.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 15:02:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:02:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452107] Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251502.m5PF2pkg003931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-06-25 11:02 EST ------- Patches sent upstream (for gcc43 compat), except for the nostrip patch. Can you suggest a way to enforce the proper compiler flags? I've played around with setting CFLAGS and CPPFLAGS and not having much success. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 15:03:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:03:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452872] New: Review Request: bmake - The NetBSD make(1) tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452872 Summary: Review Request: bmake - The NetBSD make(1) tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jmmv at netbsd.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://portal.pc.ac.upc.edu/pub/fedora/bmake.spec SRPM URL: ftp://portal.pc.ac.upc.edu/pub/fedora/bmake-0.20080515-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: bmake, the NetBSD make(1) tool, is a program designed to simplify the maintenance of other programs. The input of bmake is a list of specifications indicating the files upon which the targets (programs and other files) depend. bmake then detects which targets are out of date based on their dependencies and triggers the necessary commands to bring them up to date when that happens. bmake is similar to GNU make, even though the syntax for the advanced features supported in Makefiles is very different. ---- This is my first Fedora RPM and I do not currently have a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 15:06:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:06:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452251] Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251506.m5PF6pD4021839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452251 fitzsim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2008-06-25 11:06 EST ------- Just one more change request. It may produce the same result, but the more conventional way to link a shared object is to pass -shared to gcc. So I'd recommend replacing: -Wl,-soname=$@ in soname.patch with -shared You should work with upstream to clean up these build scripts. Most importantly they should not be invoking the linker directly, but there's also the make variables: specifying CFLAGS on the make line should add to, not override, the tools options. So if upstream is fixed you should only need: make %{?_smp_mflags} \ CFLAGS='%{optflags}'\ GCJFLAGS='%{optflags}' \ LDFLAGS='%{optflags}' \ PPFLAGS='%{optflags}' Please make the -shared change when you commit the package. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 16:31:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:31:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447948] Review Request: R-lmtest - Testing Linear Regression Models for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251631.m5PGVOJi020194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-lmtest - Testing Linear Regression Models for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447948 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-06-25 12:31 EST ------- Checked in and built. Thanks all! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 16:37:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:37:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452195] Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251637.m5PGbIjg006353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452195 ------- Additional Comments From supersonicandtails at gmail.com 2008-06-25 12:37 EST ------- Touch?. ;) http://www.hypersonicsoft.org/projects/downloads/Presto/release/presto-0.1.3-2.fc9.src.rpm http://www.hypersonicsoft.org/projects/downloads/Presto/release/presto.spec Requires added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 17:21:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:21:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452107] Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251721.m5PHLpDg014263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 13:21 EST ------- > Patches sent upstream (for gcc43 compat), except for the nostrip patch. Please document that in the spec. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PatchUpstreamStatus > Can you suggest a way to enforce the proper compiler flags? Patch the CPPFLAGS define in the Makefile, perhaps? Also, does this package include its own version of agg? I think agg is already in the distro. If that's the case, this package should use the system version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 17:28:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:28:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251728.m5PHSqM6030951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-06-25 13:28 EST ------- Any progress here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 17:27:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:27:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446102] Review Request: xdialog - X11 drop in replacement for cdialog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251727.m5PHRmRh030873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdialog - X11 drop in replacement for cdialog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446102 mnowak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mnowak at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-06-25 13:27 EST ------- Informal package review: ======================== -Release: 1%{dist} -License: GPL+ +Release: 1%{?dist} +License: GPLv2 * The preferred dist tag is now ?dist. * License should be as concrete as possible, in source archive is GPLv2 -URL: http://xdialog.dyns.net/ +URL: http://xdialog.free.fr * This is the server, where sources are located. -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root +BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) * Tip: this is #1 in "BuildRoot tag" section of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines BuildRequires: gtk+-devel >= 1.2.0 * Isn't it possible to completely get rid of GTK+v1? It's ugly, not widely supported these days and adds build dependency. -%{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} +rm -rf %{buildroot} * Be consistent, use command style OR macro style. -%{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} +rm -rf %{buildroot} * Same ^ here. -%defattr(-, root, root, 0755) -%doc AUTHORS BUGS ChangeLog COPYING NEWS README +%defattr(-, root, root, -) +%doc AUTHORS BUGS ChangeLog COPYING * IMO, useless for docs. * README is not maintained for years (just read it) and NEWS is symlink to ChangeLog. -%{_mandir}/man1/Xdialog.1* +%{_mandir}/man?/%{real_name}* * This is more general way how to play with man pages, don't have to care of every one page and of the section. -* Sat Apr 5 2008 Patrice Dumas 2.3.1-1 -- submit to fedora. +* Sat Apr 5 2008 Patrice Dumas - 2.3.1-1 +- Submit to Fedora. * Just some more consistency issues. -- Please see the output of rpmlint on arch dependent package (e.g. i386) you'll see lot of warning about +x on doc files: xdialog.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/xdialog-2.3.1/samples/timebox * Change it to 0644 or erase them. -- Hope it's useful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 17:47:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:47:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251747.m5PHl38q018933@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 ------- Additional Comments From smilner at redhat.com 2008-06-25 13:47 EST ------- Sorry, no I have not made any progress on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 17:49:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:49:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450686] Review Request: R-RSQLite - SQLite Interface for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251749.m5PHnWcD002363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-RSQLite - SQLite Interface for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450686 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 13:49 EST ------- Shouldn't this have a build dependency on R-DBI? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 17:50:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:50:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452872] Review Request: bmake - The NetBSD make(1) tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251750.m5PHoua9019626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bmake - The NetBSD make(1) tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452872 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 17:53:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:53:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447368] Review Request: schroot - Execute commands in a chroot environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251753.m5PHr6FN003177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schroot - Execute commands in a chroot environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447368 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 18:10:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:10:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251810.m5PIAqw3023367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-25 14:10 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 18:17:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:17:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450013] Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251817.m5PIHUkX024513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 ------- Additional Comments From dmalcolm at redhat.com 2008-06-25 14:17 EST ------- I've reworked things to try to make this parallel-installable with bugzilla, and use /testopia on the server Updated specfile at same location: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/testopia.spec and SRPM at: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/testopia-3.0.4-1_4.tr2.0_RC1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 18:19:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:19:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452663] Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251819.m5PIJjTY024748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452663 ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-06-25 14:19 EST ------- Informal package review: ======================== -Summary: Andika SIL fonts +Summary: Andika is a sans serif font designed for literacy use and for beginning readers * No need to be so brief, ~80 chars are usually ok for rpmlint. -* Tue Jun 24 2008 -- 1.0-1 -? Initial packaging +* Tue Jun 24 2008 - 1.0-1 +- Initial packaging + * Just indenting and ascii-sation. -- Seems good to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 18:26:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:26:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251826.m5PIQiob026368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 mnowak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mnowak at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-06-25 14:26 EST ------- Does anyone mailed our legal, yet? Can I do so? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 18:29:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:29:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214751] Review Request: xview - XView widget libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251829.m5PIT6LB009660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xview - XView widget libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214751 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 18:30:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:30:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232465] Review Request: lv2core - An Audio Plugin Standard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251830.m5PIUnRH010139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lv2core - An Audio Plugin Standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232465 ------- Additional Comments From pjones at redhat.com 2008-06-25 14:30 EST ------- Why does this need a .pc file at all? Everything that it'll display is (and has always been) the compiler default. If you remove it, building against the header will work just as well, but there'll be no need for it to be arch-specific. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 18:32:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:32:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452901] New: Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452901 Summary: Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pm at datasphere.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/ocspd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/ocspd-1.5.1-rc1.2.fc8.src.rpm Description: The ocspd is an RFC2560 compliant OCSPD responder. It can be used to verify the status of a certificate using OCSP clients (such as Mozilla/Firefox/Thunderbird/Apache). It is CRL-based, and is able to fetch CRLs from files, LDAP or HTTP. This product is under the OpenCA license, which is Apache-like: should be Fedora-compatible. OpenCA releases an RPM (openca-ocspd) used as starting point for the current one. The license paragraph has not been changed, resulting in an rpmlint error. Needs also a system-user named "ocspd" for the daemon. This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 18:36:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:36:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251836.m5PIaInN011372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 ------- Additional Comments From andrea.francia at gmx.it 2008-06-25 14:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > The right level > of non-genericity is something subjective, my feeling is that > trash is not right since it may clash easily with an application doing something > very different, and be used in a standard in the future, be > is a defacto standard like what is in some basic package like util-linux, > coreutils, bash buil-in and a few others or a real standard. When a such standard will be created I can accommodate the trash-cli command names to do not conflict with the standard. The util-linux is standard only on Linux based distribution. Debian which is not Linux specific doesn't have the util-linux 'rename' which is a command with a interface so poorly designed that doesn't allows to grows (for example you cannot add any switches to rename synopsys without broking the existing interface). At the present 'trash' is the best (in terms of usability) name I've found for the command that trashes files. It's important for me provide a usable interface to facilities of trash-cli package. If someone could suggest me a name that is good in terms of usability and is not so generic please tell me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 18:36:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:36:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452901] Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251836.m5PIaUp4028252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452901 pm at datasphere.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 18:41:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:41:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251841.m5PIf1qi012289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-06-25 14:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Does anyone mailed our legal, yet? Can I do so? You can but blocking on FE-Legal is supposed to be sufficient -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 18:42:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:42:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446102] Review Request: xdialog - X11 drop in replacement for cdialog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251842.m5PIgvJY029373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdialog - X11 drop in replacement for cdialog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446102 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-25 14:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > -Release: 1%{dist} > +Release: 1%{?dist} > * The preferred dist tag is now ?dist. Thanks. Not only is it preferred, but it is bad to have %{dist} since it may not be defined. > -License: GPL+ > +License: GPLv2 > * License should be as concrete as possible, in source archive is GPLv2 I don't understand. All the files in src seems not to have any license header, which means GPL+. Am I missing something? > -URL: http://xdialog.dyns.net/ > +URL: http://xdialog.free.fr Indeed, looks like it is better to use xdialog.free.fr. > -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root > +BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) > > * Tip: this is #1 in "BuildRoot tag" section of > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines I prefer a reproducible buildroot. I changed it to the 2nd BuildRoot tag, though. > BuildRequires: gtk+-devel >= 1.2.0 > > * Isn't it possible to completely get rid of GTK+v1? It's ugly, not widely > supported these days and adds build dependency. For this package it could have been the converse. As said above in Comment #1 the author prefers the gtk1 version. Besides build dependencies are not an issue. It is true that gtk1 is lacking some features, prominently utf8, still it is not a reason to leave it apart when upstream advertises to use it. > -%{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} > +rm -rf %{buildroot} > > * Be consistent, use command style OR macro style. > > -%defattr(-, root, root, 0755) > +%defattr(-, root, root, -) Both issues are not a big deal in my opinion, but changed anyway. > -%doc AUTHORS BUGS ChangeLog COPYING NEWS README > +%doc AUTHORS BUGS ChangeLog COPYING > > * IMO, useless for docs. > * README is not maintained for years (just read it) and NEWS is symlink to > ChangeLog. I'll leave the README, it has meaningful informations in it and the fact that it is no more maintained is plainly documented. > -%{_mandir}/man1/Xdialog.1* > +%{_mandir}/man?/%{real_name}* > > * This is more general way how to play with man pages, don't have to care of > every one page and of the section. I prefer listing files more precisely such that build fails if file name changes or new file appear. > -* Sat Apr 5 2008 Patrice Dumas 2.3.1-1 > -- submit to fedora. > +* Sat Apr 5 2008 Patrice Dumas - 2.3.1-1 > +- Submit to Fedora. > > * Just some more consistency issues. I prefer keeping the changelog of Dag/Dries like they want it to be formatted, but switch to my preferred format in fedora, so I'll leave it as is. > Please see the output of rpmlint on arch dependent package (e.g. i386) you'll > see lot of warning about +x on doc files: > > xdialog.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/xdialog-2.3.1/samples/timebox > > * Change it to 0644 or erase them. Nope, they are sample that can be run as is and are right to be there and executable, rpmlint cannot always be right. Thanks for the review. Are you waiting to be sponsored? Updated package: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/xdialog-2.3.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 18:54:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:54:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251854.m5PIsbrO031407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 ------- Additional Comments From andrea.francia at gmx.it 2008-06-25 14:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Created an attachment (id=310234) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=310234&action=view) [edit] > error from ./trash.py > Many thanks for reporting the errors, they will be very useful to me. Could I ask to provide me only another information? I need the output of "df" on the machine where the test 'testListVolumes' fails. Or at least I need to know that machine the output of the commands invocation df and df -P differs. If this is the case I will know that the problem is already solved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 19:00:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:00:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251900.m5PJ08pC015928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-25 15:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > The right level > > of non-genericity is something subjective, my feeling is that > > trash is not right since it may clash easily with an application doing something > > very different, and be used in a standard in the future, be > > is a defacto standard like what is in some basic package like util-linux, > > coreutils, bash buil-in and a few others or a real standard. > > When a such standard will be created I can accommodate the trash-cli command > names to do not conflict with the standard. Anticipating by not using generic names will help not forcing users to redo all their scripts. > The util-linux is standard only on Linux based distribution. Debian which is not > Linux specific doesn't have the util-linux 'rename' which is a command with a > interface so poorly designed that doesn't allows to grows (for example you > cannot add any switches to rename synopsys without broking the existing interface). I don't want to argue about that example, it may very well be that using rename from util-linux-ng is a bad choice and that it should be discussed with upstream and in the mean time renamed. If you fill a bug against util-linux-ng I'd like to be in CC to see what the maintainer says and be able to argue on that case. As I said above there is 'ren' in fedora which is a bad idea already, but it is not a reason to let other generic names enter the distro. > At the present 'trash' is the best (in terms of usability) name I've found for > the command that trashes files. It's important for me provide a usable interface > to facilities of trash-cli package. If someone could suggest me a name that is > good in terms of usability and is not so generic please tell me. I can propose to-trash in-trash trash-dump trash-put I can try other names if none fits (but I am not very good at that be it only because I am not a native english speaker). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 19:03:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:03:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251903.m5PJ3YNr000926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-06-25 15:03 EST ------- Review is coming up shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 19:02:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:02:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449504] Review Request: ranpwd - A program to generate random passwords In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251902.m5PJ2SdP016601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ranpwd - A program to generate random passwords https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449504 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-06-25 15:02 EST ------- Thanks Rafalm, all issues are fixed, this package - ranpwd - is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 19:01:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:01:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251901.m5PJ1a5d016440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-25 15:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #13) > > Created an attachment (id=310234) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=310234&action=view) [edit] [edit] > > error from ./trash.py > > > Many thanks for reporting the errors, they will be very useful to me. > > Could I ask to provide me only another information? I need the output of "df" on > the machine where the test 'testListVolumes' fails. Or at least I need to know > that machine the output of the commands invocation df and df -P differs. > If this is the case I will know that the problem is already solved. Here are the df and df -P outputs: [dumas at localhost ~]$ df Sys. de fich. 1K-blocs Occup? Disponible Capacit? Mont? sur /dev/sda2 9469180 8845188 135216 99% / tmpfs 251616 0 251616 0% /dev/shm /dev/sda6 37418568 30076264 5410892 85% /home [dumas at localhost ~]$ df -P Sys. de fich. 1024-blocs Capacit? Disponible Occup?e Mont? sur /dev/sda2 9469180 8845188 135216 99% / tmpfs 251616 0 251616 0% /dev/shm /dev/sda6 37418568 30076264 5410892 85% /home -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 19:30:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:30:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251930.m5PJUcMc021920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From dwheeler at dwheeler.com 2008-06-25 15:30 EST ------- I used koji; the current package builds on ALL supported platforms for Fedora 9 (dist-f9). Thus... This package is ready for review! Do I have any reviewers? Note: I fixed the Wiki page PackageMaintainers/Join so that it clearly shows that you CAN use Koji before being sponsored, and the basics of how to use it. The page was very misleading originally; it seemed to say that you had to have a sponsor and CVS access before you could use Koji. Obviously that's not true! It also didn't show how to use Koji for simple scratch builds, and that was sad. Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 19:37:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:37:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450816] Review Request: alevt - Teletext decoder/browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251937.m5PJbIQi007352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alevt - Teletext decoder/browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450816 mnowak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mnowak at redhat.com Summary|Review Request: alevt - |Review Request: alevt - |Teletext decoder/browser |Teletext decoder/browser ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-06-25 15:37 EST ------- Informal package review: ======================== -Summary: Teletext decoder/browser Name: alevt Version: 1.6.2 Release: 1%{?dist} -License: GPLv2 +Summary: Teletext decoder/Browser Group: Applications/Multimedia +License: GPLv2 +URL: http://goron.de/~froese Source: http://goron.de/~froese/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Source1: alevt.desktop Patch0: alevt-1.6.2-pixmap.patch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -URL: http://goron.de/~froese * Please, keep the usual order of fields. * e.g. Name: Version: Release: Summary: Group: License: URL: Source0: BuildRoot: BuildRequires: Requires: %build -#overwrite $OPT to produce debuginfo -make %{?_smp_mflags} -e OPT="-O2 -w" +#overwrite $OPT to produce standard Fedora build with propper FLAGS + +# alevt does not have standard build system, so we call configure +# to populate CFLAGS, then we move them to another var which persists +# and we *unset CFLAGS* and have alevt build system to populate it +%configure || true +FLAGS=${CFLAGS} +unset CFLAGS +# will produce lot of garbage on output +make %{?_smp_mflags} -e OPT="${FLAGS}" * Hope it's selfdescriptive. * The debuginfos were somewhat useless without the "-g" option. Now it uses Fedora's own CFLAGS automatically. %install rm -rf %{buildroot} -mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir} -mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_mandir}/man1 +mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_bindir} +mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1 make USR_X11R6=/usr MAN=share/man rpm-install desktop-file-install --vendor="fedora" \ - --dir=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications %{SOURCE1} + --dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications %{SOURCE1} * Be consistent in using macro style v. variable style %clean @@ -42,9 +50,7 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} %{_bindir}/alevt-date %{_bindir}/alevt-cap %{_datadir}/applications/*%{name}.desktop -%doc %{_mandir}/man1/alevt.1x.gz -%doc %{_mandir}/man1/alevt-date.1.gz -%doc %{_mandir}/man1/alevt-cap.1.gz +%{_mandir}/man?/%{name}* %{_datadir}/pixmaps/mini-alevt.xpm %doc README CHANGELOG COPYRIGHT * The one line will rule them all :) @@ -62,6 +68,7 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} * Sun May 23 1999 Karsten Hopp - several minor patches of Marios spec-file: - german descriptions - buildroot (patched Makefile) - some changed install-paths +- german descriptions +- buildroot (patched Makefile) +- some changed install-paths + * Just typo-enhancements -- Incorporate the changes, please, so the package is closer to formal review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 19:40:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:40:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230316] Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251940.m5PJeNNY023844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230316 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 15:40 EST ------- Seems there's no longer any reason for the svn checkout instructions since you can directly fetch a tarball. There's no real point in mentioning the License in the Summary:, is there? Or what language the package is written in? These things really don't matter to someone who is interested in what the package does. Similarly for the %description; does any Fedora user particularly care whether the software works on Windows 2000? And who is "me" in the description? Yum or some package manager will display this to most users, and surely yum isn't going to be conversing about itself. rpmlint does indeed complain about the .mo files not being mentioned in %lang. You could list each of them separately in the %files list with %lang(foo) but at most that would allow someone to save a little space by excluding some specific lang files. Nice to have, but not absolutely necessary in my opinion, although it shouldn't be too terribly difficult if you wanted to do that. You should probably report this issue with the desktop file upstream: key "Categories" is a list and does not have a semicolon as trailing character, fixing Also, there's no need to use "--vendor=fedora" when installing your desktop file. Not sure if you noticed it, but there's no point to the %find_lang call, since this package insatlls nothing into /usr/share/locale. The %{name}.lang file is empty. You might as well just remove the %find_lang call and the -f bit from %files. * source files match upstream: b62b1bbd72400fd352deb8523a61e2b2da4f81c47f2118dd51488bee626fe77c jbrout-0.2.201.sources.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. X summary could use some work. X description could use some work. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: jbrout = 0.2.201-1.fc10 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/env fbida jhead pygtk2 >= 2.6 python >= 2.4 python-imaging python-lxml * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I installed and ran this package; it seems to work OK. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. X desktop installed with --vendor=fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 19:44:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:44:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450816] Review Request: alevt - Teletext decoder/browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251944.m5PJimjZ024446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alevt - Teletext decoder/browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450816 ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-06-25 15:44 EST ------- Debuginfos: =========== * See the differences in sizes (first column in Bytes), the more is "better" :). Your old OPT="...": ------------------- 8348 /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/alevt-cap.debug 6352 /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/alevt-date.debug 12780 /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/alevt.debug With "... -g": ---------- 71760 /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/alevt-cap.debug 37412 /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/alevt-date.debug 149152 /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/alevt.debug Fedora CFLAGS: -------------- 75376 /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/alevt-cap.debug 39556 /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/alevt-date.debug 156104 /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/alevt.debug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 19:48:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:48:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452663] Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251948.m5PJmxKr025286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452663 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-06-25 15:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Informal package review: > ======================== > -Summary: Andika SIL fonts > +Summary: Andika is a sans serif font designed for literacy use and for > beginning readers > > * No need to be so brief, ~80 chars are usually ok for rpmlint. Actually rpmlint has a 79 column limit and your proposal is 80 Though I suppose ?A SIL sans serif font designed for literacy use and for beginning readers? would be fine > -* Tue Jun 24 2008 > -- 1.0-1 > -? Initial packaging > +* Tue Jun 24 2008 - 1.0-1 the rpm maintainers will tell you anything after the mail is garbage (but it's a common mistake, even if the guidelines authorize both) > +- Initial packaging You'll take unicode out of my dead hands :) changelog is and always been UTF-8 > Seems good to me. Thanks for the review, care to do an official one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 19:56:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:56:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806251956.m5PJuvPs027087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-06-25 15:56 EST ------- [ x=ok -=dont't apply !=please fix ?=may fix ] MUST [!] rpmlint must be run on every package a) bkchem.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 10) remove tab in the Group: line b) bkchem.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bkchem/oasa/setup.py 0644 Is this need at all? Remove in %install [x] package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [x] spec file name must match the base package %{name} [x] package must meet the Packaging Guidelines [!] [GPLv2] package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license The bkchem/plugins/piddle directory seems to have files with a mix of copyrights, can you check with upstream regarding license of these files? [!] license field in the package spec file must match the actual license See over [x] includes the text of the license(s) in its own file: include in %doc [x] be written in American English [x] spec file for the package be legible [!] sources used to build the package must match the upstream source da8bceec65cf4e054a19c510633b61f4 bkchem-0.12.2.tar.gz fa3fc119f06ad0204c5c046b768cabd9 bkchem-0.12.2.tar.gz.rpm Remove bkchem.desktop and bkchem.png from tarball, you have to use pristine sources. They are added by source1 and source2, rpmbuild will take care of that. Ask if trouble. Source2 bkchem.png is already in the tarball as images/bkchem.png? [x] compile and build into binary rpms on at least one architecture http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=680857 [-] not successfully compile an architecture: use ExcludeArch [x] all build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [x] spec file MUST handle locales properly [-] shared library files not in any default linker paths: ldconfig [-] relocatable package: the packager must state this fact [x] package must own all directories that it creates [x] not any duplicate files in the %files listing [x] permissions on files must be set properly [x] package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} [!] consistently use macros spec in url is fixed, however not the spec in the src.rpm Bump release when doing updates 13, 19 and 22 has the same release, should be on release 3 now. [x] must contain code, or permissable content [?] large docs should go in a -doc subpackage Maybe split off the doc/ dir in a separate bkchem-doc package? [x] %doc must not affect the runtime of the application [-] header files must be in a -devel package [-] static libraries must be in a -static package [-] containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' [-] library files that end in .so: go in a -devel package [-] devel pkg: require base package using a fully versioned dependency [-] no .la libtool archives [!] gui app include a %{name}.desktop file Set vendor to nothing: --vendor="" [x] must not own files or directories already owned by other packages [x] %install includes rm -rf %{buildroot} [x] filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 SHOULD [!] ping upstream about missing license text see above, the piddle subdir. [?] translations if description and summary sections [x] test that the package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=680857 [x] compile and build into binary rpms on all archs http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=680857 [x] package functions as described [!] those scriptlets are sane Just remove the %post/%postun scripts (sorry). [-] subpackages require the base package fully versioned dep [-] pkgconfig(.pc) in devel [-] no explicit file dep outside /etc, /bin/, /sbin, /usr/{sbin,bin} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 20:03:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:03:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452832] Review Request: perl-Math-FFT - Perl extension for Fast Fourier Transforms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806252003.m5PK314Q012638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-FFT - Perl extension for Fast Fourier Transforms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452832 ------- Additional Comments From msuchy at redhat.com 2008-06-25 16:03 EST ------- OK. I used cpanspec and it indeed produce much better spec (although not relocatable). URL are the same: Spec URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-Math-FFT/perl-Math-FFT.spec SRPM URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-Math-FFT/perl-Math-FFT-1.28-1.fc9.src.rpm Can you try it now, please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 20:10:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:10:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806252010.m5PKAD7X014251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-25 16:10 EST ------- Some remarks on the spec file: * I think it is better to use sed instead of perl for one-liners * gcc is not needed in BuildRequires (see the exceptions in guidelines) * use the virtual provides like tex(tex) and tex(latex) instead of explicitely depending on texlive * coments are good, but some of your comments are, in my opinion, (much) too long. For example the one about not splitting the package could be # the package contains few glyphs, but separating a font subpackages would # seemed unnecessary and confusing since it should be the only package using # the fonts * also some comments are redundant. For example you comment twice that mf and pk files are installed such that they don't have to be recreated. * paraphrasing the whole INSTALL file is not useful either. * you could split out the latex part, in tex-zfuzz. * the %description is much too long. * regarding the .pdf it is better to have the source and be able to rebuild from source in fedora. But even if it cannot be regenerated it is better to package it. There is no license issue because it is BSD, and it can be allowed in fedora because it is content. * The %build section has too much comments. Most of your code is self-documented * I think that a patch for adding the DESTDIR would be better than the substitution and I hope that upstream would accept it. * I don't think that CFLAGS can be defined when make is launched. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 20:19:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452911] New: Review Request: trustyrc - Fully modular IRC robot Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452911 Summary: Review Request: trustyrc - Fully modular IRC robot Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/trustyrc.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/trustyrc-0.1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: trustyRC is an IRC robot fully modular that brings all common bots features (channel moderation, administration, accounts system, quotes ...), and much more... In fact, trustyRC is a kernel that load features such as log system, configuration parser, networking, etc, and ... a plugin (un)loader. All plugins can communicate with other ones and this system provides high flexible maintenance. A plugin can be loaded/unloaded while the bot is running. So if a plusgin needs to be updated, it can be unloaded, rebuilded, and reloaded. During this steps, the bot will never stop. Plugins are stored in shared librairies witch contains new features. When the .so file is loaded, features are added to the bot, and when the plugin is unloaded, features are no more usable. rpmlint output : [eponyme at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint trustyrc-0.1.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm [eponyme at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint trustyrc-plugins-0.1.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm trustyrc-plugins.i386: W: no-documentation [eponyme at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint trustyrc-plugins-extras-0.1.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm trustyrc-plugins-extras.i386: W: no-documentation [eponyme at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint trustyrc-debuginfo-0.1.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm [eponyme at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint trustyrc-0.1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm [eponyme at FEDOBOX tmp]$ Rebuild under mock is OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 20:20:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:20:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452842] Review Request: monotorrent - a bit torrent client for mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806252020.m5PKKBiW015911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotorrent - a bit torrent client for mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452842 mnowak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mnowak at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-06-25 16:20 EST ------- Informal package review: ======================== -Group: Development/Languages -License: X11/MIT +Group: Applications/Internet +License: MIT * Found group which fits better. * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing claims X11 to be MIT * NOTE: In sources is MIT but in COPYRIGHT file is GNU GPLv2. From my POV: It'd be good to contact author and ask him to be clear on this. # Bug 241850 - no Mono on pp64 -ExclusiveArch: %ix86 x86_64 ppc ia64 armv4l sparc alpha +ExcludeArch: ppc64 * I guess this is saner. %description -Monotorrent is a bittorrent for mono +Monotorrent is an open source bittorrent library. The main aim of this +library is to provide a rich API for developers to connect to so they +can harness BitTorrent for all downloading needs. * Some more descriptions. %package devel -Summary: .pc file for monotorrent +Summary: Development files for for monotorrent Group: Documentation Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} pkgconfig %description devel -Package config file for monotorrent +Development files for for monotorrent * Just a strings. %prep %setup -q @@ -47,6 +49,7 @@ make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install %{_libdir}/monotorrent/* %files devel +%defattr(-,root,root,-) %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/monotorrent.pc * This is necessary to have rpmlint silent. -- [root at dhcp-lab-192 SPECS]# rpmlint monotorrent.spec /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/monotorrent-0.4-1.fc9.src.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/monotorrent-0.4-1.fc9.i386.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/monotorrent-devel-0.4-1.fc9.i386.rpm monotorrent.i386: E: no-binary monotorrent.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib monotorrent-devel.i386: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. * Take a look at this. Complaint of the /usr/bin/... stuff not to be binaries (they are shell scripts). * Dunno about the /usr/lib/ stuff. Hope someone experienced will see this BZ. -- Please incorporate changes. Feel free to ask. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 20:22:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:22:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806252022.m5PKMhW4032052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 ------- Additional Comments From nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com 2008-06-25 16:22 EST ------- Update : Spec URL : http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/clive.spec SRPM URL : http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/clive-0.4.16-2.fc9.src.rpm - Licence updated - smp_mflags removed >> %{__sed} -i -e s@"\${exec_prefix}/lib/python2.5/site-packages"@$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{python_sitelib}@ Makefile >> %{__sed} -i -e s@"\${prefix}/lib/python2.5/site-packages"@$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{python_sitelib}@ Makefile I think I must keep this lines because of "hardcoded" /lib/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 20:35:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452251] Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806252035.m5PKZMnu002158@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452251 ------- Additional Comments From omajid at redhat.com 2008-06-25 16:35 EST ------- Updated Spec URL: http://omajid.fedorapeople.org/libmatthew-java/libmatthew-java.spec SRPM URL: http://omajid.fedorapeople.org/libmatthew-java/libmatthew-java-0.7.1-1.fc9.src.rpm also includes a patch (sent it upstream too) to match make %{?_smp_mflags} \ CFLAGS='%{optflags}'\ GCJFLAGS='%{optflags}' \ LDFLAGS='%{optflags}' \ PPFLAGS='%{optflags}' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 20:35:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:35:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446158] Review Request: xesam-glib - A GObject library for dealing with Xesam services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806252035.m5PKZqF9002236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xesam-glib - A GObject library for dealing with Xesam services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446158 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: xesam-glib -|Review Request: xesam-glib - |A GObject library for |A GObject library for |dealing with Xesam services |dealing with Xesam services Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 16:35 EST ------- I have absolutely no idea what Xesam is; could you at least define it in your %description? I would suggest using http://xesam.org/people/kamstrup/xesam-glib/ as your URL: tag; this at least has some information on the package. rpmlint is quiet except for the following: xesam-glib.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libxesam-glib.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libdbus-1.so.3 This means that the libxesam-glib links against libdbus-1 but doesn't actually call any functions from it. There's a quick libtool tweak that should fix this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CommonRpmlintIssues#unused-direct-shlib-dependency I note that 0.3 is out now; I don't see anything that would change this review. I also noticed that there's a test suite in the source. A naive "make check" didn't work for me, though. Have you looked into whether or not it's runnable? * source files match upstream: 8fde51fd248f9215d78c366d5827e39826b2c09007398a05962f4d1d7ab32efd xesam-glib-0.2.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. X description could use a definition of Xesam. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint has an issue that should be looked into. * final provides and requires are sane: xesam-glib-0.2.1-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm libxesam-glib.so.0()(64bit) xesam-glib = 0.2.1-1.fc10 = /sbin/ldconfig libdbus-1.so.3()(64bit) libdbus-glib-1.so.2()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libxesam-glib.so.0()(64bit) xesam-glib-devel-0.2.1-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm xesam-glib-devel = 0.2.1-1.fc10 = dbus-glib-devel libxesam-glib.so.0()(64bit) pkgconfig xesam-glib = 0.2.1-1.fc10 X %check is not present, but some sort of test suite is in the tarball. * shared libraries installed: ldconfig called properly. unversioned .so files are in the -devel package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets OK (ldconfig). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * pkgconfig file in the -devel package; pkgconfig dependency is present. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 20:41:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:41:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449135] Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806252041.m5PKf1Vw003149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449135 ------- Additional Comments From javiplx at gmail.com 2008-06-25 16:41 EST ------- The location for the new spec/srpm are Spec URL: http://www.freewebs.com/javiplx/Fedora/gforge.spec SRPM URL: http://www.freewebs.com/javiplx/Fedora/gforge-4.5.19-1.fc9.src.rpm The check for buildroot value has been removed both within %install and %clean sections. Which rpmlint version are you using ? The one I use from rpmlint-0.82-3.fc9.noarch does not complain about the changelog or license, but only about the tab-spaces mentioned before. In any case, I've also changed both items. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 20:54:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:54:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447607] Review Request: abgraph - ABGraph is a simple tool to benchmark webservers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806252054.m5PKsq1l005332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abgraph - ABGraph is a simple tool to benchmark webservers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447607 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-06-25 16:54 EST ------- Lubomir, see new SRPM: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/abgraph/abgraph-1.1-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 21:10:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:10:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445151] Review Request: merkaartor - openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806252110.m5PLA7Ep025626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: merkaartor - openstreetmap editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445151 ------- Additional Comments From sven at lank.es 2008-06-25 17:10 EST ------- > qt4 is a Requires, not a BuildRequires. And the requires isn't even needed. Removed > Mock build perfectly without "BuildRequires: xorg-x11-proto-devel > xorg-x11-xtrans-devel", are they usefull ? No - I don't remember where I got those from - works fine without as far as I can see. > The software doesn't use make install, so you can remove > this line : "make INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install". Right - this will probably change with the - soon to be released (TM) version 0.11. I have removed the line. Thanks for your comments - updated files: Spec URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SPECS/merkaartor.spec SRPM URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SRPM/merkaartor-0.0.10-6.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 21:15:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:15:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442233] Review Request: oprofileui - user interface for analysing oprofile data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806252115.m5PLFTmp026606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oprofileui - user interface for analysing oprofile data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442233 mnowak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mnowak at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-06-25 17:15 EST ------- > oprofileui.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libglade2 > oprofileui.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxml * No. Can't be. This means that you can omit it from spec file ('Requires:') because RPMbuild found them while creating package and thus added it to the RPM automatically. - [OK] License Field in spec - [-] License text in %doc Ok, however not correct version. * Add it as SourceX and copy-in in installation process. Would be nice if original reporter could fix the issues, they are all EasyFix... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 21:18:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:18:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448435] Review Request: PythonCard - PythonCard GUI construction toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806252118.m5PLIsMk010062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PythonCard - PythonCard GUI construction toolkit Alias: PythonCard-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448435 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-25 17:18 EST ------- Thanks for the fixes marek, I'm fine with the package now, I and I guess the guidelines are too. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 21:20:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195836] Review Request: php-pecl-apc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806252120.m5PLK0q0010146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-apc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195836 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide rpm at timj.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at timj.co.uk Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2008-06-25 17:19 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pecl-apc New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Updated Fedora CC: timj Updated EPEL Owners: timj Updated EPEL CC: chabotc This has been agreed by the Fedora package owner chabotc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 21:18:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:18:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452921] New: Review Request: libzrtpcpp - ZRTP support library for the GNU ccRTP stack Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452921 Summary: Review Request: libzrtpcpp - ZRTP support library for the GNU ccRTP stack Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin at tummy.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/libzrtpcpp/libzrtpcpp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/libzrtpcpp/libzrtpcpp-1.3.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This package provides a library that adds ZRTP support to the GNU ccRTP stack. Phil Zimmermann developed ZRTP to allow ad-hoc, easy to use key negotiation to setup Secure RTP (SRTP) sessions. GNU ZRTP together with GNU ccRTP (1.5.0 or later) provides a ZRTP implementation that can be directly embedded into client and server applications. There are some minor rpmlint warnings, which I don't think are worth fixing, but I suppose I will at reviewer request. Otherwise builds fine for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 21:20:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452921] Review Request: libzrtpcpp - ZRTP support library for the GNU ccRTP stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806252120.m5PLKcGS027560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzrtpcpp - ZRTP support library for the GNU ccRTP stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452921 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |433265 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 21:23:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:23:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448435] Review Request: PythonCard - PythonCard GUI construction toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806252123.m5PLNqvx011491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PythonCard - PythonCard GUI construction toolkit Alias: PythonCard-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448435 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-06-25 17:23 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: PythonCard Short Description: GUI construction toolkit Owners: mmahut Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 21:37:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:37:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449504] Review Request: ranpwd - A program to generate random passwords In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806252137.m5PLbfPb014010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ranpwd - A program to generate random passwords https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449504 rafalzaq at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2008-06-25 17:37 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ranpwd Short Description: A program to generate random passwords Owners: rafalzaq Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 21:55:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:55:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446158] Review Request: xesam-glib - A GObject library for dealing with Xesam services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806252155.m5PLt7TR016816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xesam-glib - A GObject library for dealing with Xesam services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446158 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2008-06-25 17:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I have absolutely no idea what Xesam is; could you at least define it in your > %description? > > I would suggest using http://xesam.org/people/kamstrup/xesam-glib/ as your URL: > tag; this at least has some information on the package. > > rpmlint is quiet except for the following: > xesam-glib.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency > /usr/lib64/libxesam-glib.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libdbus-1.so.3 > This means that the libxesam-glib links against libdbus-1 but doesn't actually > call any functions from it. There's a quick libtool tweak that should fix this: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CommonRpmlintIssues#unused-direct-shlib-dependency > > I note that 0.3 is out now; I don't see anything that would change this review. > I've addressed all the issues you pointed out above. > I also noticed that there's a test suite in the source. A naive "make check" > didn't work for me, though. Have you looked into whether or not it's runnable? > One would need a desktop search service that support xesam specifications for 'make check' to work. Only the current versions of strigi and beagle have such support (to my knowledge); tracker support is coming along. Thanks for the review. Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/xesam/xesam-glib.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/xesam/xesam-glib-0.3.0-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 22:00:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:00:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449135] Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806252200.m5PM04QF001959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449135 ------- Additional Comments From musuruan at gmail.com 2008-06-25 18:00 EST ------- Some other notes. * Buildroot is not correct: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag * Changelog format is not correct: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs * License tag is still not correct: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines I just read the license in a couple of files and they are GPLv2+. You should read the license statements in *all* the files. I know it's a PITA but it is for a good purpose. * Docs should not include INSTALL instructions. * I had a quick look at the mandriva RPM. It seems you miss some Requires. For example, why mailman is not required? And cvs? Or subversion? Again this should be done using subpackages thus the user can only install what it needs. * You also seem not to install a lot from the source package. When making a package you should provide the most out of the upstream package, not the minimum. * RPM macros are not always used: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros For example, you should not use /etc but %{_sysconfdir} instead. * Source URL is not downloadable: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 22:14:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250469] Review Request: olpc-security - A metapackage for the OLPC security platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806252214.m5PMEKv5004384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpc-security - A metapackage for the OLPC security platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250469 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 18:14 EST ------- I was informed that this old ticket is no longer relevant; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 22:13:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:13:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246349] Review Request: perl-Perl6-Pugs - Perl 6 Implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806252213.m5PMDBr0020088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl6-Pugs - Perl 6 Implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246349 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 18:13 EST ------- I'm going to go ahead and mark this as not ready; if you'd like a review, just clear the whiteboard. If not, I guess you can close this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 22:14:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:14:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806252214.m5PMEUg5020154@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From dwheeler at dwheeler.com 2008-06-25 18:14 EST ------- I've responded to comment 8 - the new release (number 3) is at: http://www.dwheeler.com/zfuzz-20070911-3.fc9.src.rpm http://www.dwheeler.com/zfuzz-20070911-3.fc9.i386.rpm http://www.dwheeler.com/zfuzz.spec This new zfuzz.spec file is rpmlint-clean, just like the previous ones were. I also did: koji build --scratch dist-f9 zfuzz-20070911-3.fc9.src.rpm and all architectures successfully completed (5 done, 0 failed) with this release (3) on Fedora 9. Here's how I handled each comment in comment 8: >* I think it is better to use sed instead of perl for one-liners Ok, done (with sed -i). BuildRequires: perl removed, because of this. >* gcc is not needed in BuildRequires (see the exceptions in guidelines) It's not NEEDED, but it is PERMITTED, so I thought it'd be better to be explicit. But I don't really care, so I've removed it. >* use the virtual provides like tex(tex) and tex(latex) instead of > explicitely depending on texlive Ah! Good point! Done. >* coments are good, but some of your comments are, in my opinion, (much) > too long. For example the one about not splitting the package could be ># the package contains few glyphs, but separating a font subpackages would ># seemed unnecessary and confusing since it should be the only package using ># the fonts > >* also some comments are redundant. For example you comment twice that > mf and pk files are installed such that they don't have to be recreated. > >* paraphrasing the whole INSTALL file is not useful either. Okay, shortened comments significantly. >* you could split out the latex part, in tex-zfuzz. True, but as I commented, I saw little point in doing so. The type-checker and latex style are meant to be used together, and are combined in upstream anyway. If that's wrong, they could be split later, but I doubt anyone will want it that way. >* the %description is much too long. Ok, shortened. >* regarding the .pdf it is better to have the source and be able to > rebuild from source in fedora. But even if it cannot be regenerated > it is better to package it. > There is no license issue because it is BSD, and it can be allowed in > fedora because it is content. Good! That was my exactly my thinking as well, which is why I packaged it this way. >* The %build section has too much comments. Most of your code is > self-documented Ok, comments removed/shortened. >* I think that a patch for adding the DESTDIR would be better than the > substitution and I hope that upstream would accept it. Done. I would hope that too, but I don't control upstream :-). I _will_ send the patches (and the spec file) to upstream once it's passed review. >* I don't think that CFLAGS can be defined when make is launched. Sure it can, it works just fine. CFLAGS is just yet another make variable. Easy test: if you remove the CFLAGS text in this .spec file, the options passed to gcc change radically. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 22:22:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:22:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429809] Review Request: mumble - low-latency, high quality voice chat software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806252222.m5PMMQou005831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mumble - low-latency, high quality voice chat software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429809 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 18:22 EST ------- Anything happening with this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 22:20:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:20:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428686] Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806252220.m5PMKYXd005635@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428686 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(jamatos at fc.up.pt) | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 18:20 EST ------- No response; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 22:33:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:33:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806252233.m5PMXTMk023095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From dwheeler at dwheeler.com 2008-06-25 18:33 EST ------- I've fiddled with the spec file comments further, including removing 2 now-spurious ones. New SRPM and spec file (release 4) here: http://www.dwheeler.com/zfuzz-20070911-4.fc9.src.rpm http://www.dwheeler.com/zfuzz.spec Okay, hopefully that's the "last one" :-). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 22:44:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:44:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806252244.m5PMi4ru024893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-25 18:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > It's not NEEDED, but it is PERMITTED, so I thought it'd be better to be > explicit. But I don't really care, so I've removed it. It is permitted, but for gcc it is discouraged. > True, but as I commented, I saw little point in doing so. The type-checker and > latex style are meant to be used together, and are combined in upstream anyway. > If that's wrong, they could be split later, but I doubt anyone will want it that > way. Now that I have read the fuzz manual I understand that I was wrong, the fuzz checker needs the latex part. In fact this is a latex package with a syntax checker. It seems to me that it should better be called tex-zfuzz and there is no reason to split it. > >* I think that a patch for adding the DESTDIR would be better than the > > substitution and I hope that upstream would accept it. > > Done. I would hope that too, but I don't control upstream :-). > I _will_ send the patches (and the spec file) to upstream once it's > passed review. Right. > >* I don't think that CFLAGS can be defined when make is launched. > > Sure it can, it works just fine. CFLAGS is just yet another make variable. > Easy test: if you remove the CFLAGS text in this .spec file, the options passed > to gcc change radically. Sure, I was referring to "${CFLAGS:-%optflags}", here $CFLAGS cannot be defined and if they were they should be overwritten anyway. There are still some comments that can be shortened a lot. For example, for the INSTALL file, suffice to say that the license is in the INSTALL file, everybody will understand why it has to be shipped. The BuildConflict is not right. You should arrange for things to build right with or without zfuzz installed. The comment about running mktexlsr is not useful, nor the one describing the manuals. It is in INSTALL which can be read by the user. Regarding the version, I am not sure that using the date is wise. Indeed if the versioning scheme changes, the new version may become newer. I think that using 0 as version and putting the date in the release is better, like Version: 0 Release: 0.X.20070911 This has a disadvantage, namely when release changes, the version doesn't change (similar with development snapshots). (In reply to comment #10) > Okay, hopefully that's the "last one" :-). Not this one... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 23:08:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:08:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195836] Review Request: php-pecl-apc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806252308.m5PN8OI5013053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-apc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195836 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-25 19:08 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 23:10:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:10:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448435] Review Request: PythonCard - PythonCard GUI construction toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806252310.m5PNATtP029668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PythonCard - PythonCard GUI construction toolkit Alias: PythonCard-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448435 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-25 19:10 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 25 23:13:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:13:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449504] Review Request: ranpwd - A program to generate random passwords In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806252313.m5PNDUoc013927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ranpwd - A program to generate random passwords https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449504 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-25 19:13 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 00:04:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:04:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260004.m5Q04iKQ021592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From dwheeler at dwheeler.com 2008-06-25 20:04 EST ------- In reply to comment #11) >Now that I have read the fuzz manual I understand that I was wrong, the >fuzz checker needs the latex part. In fact this is a latex package with >a syntax checker. It seems to me that it should better be called >tex-zfuzz >and there is no reason to split it. I'm don't think that's a good idea. It's not part of any typical TeX distribution, and the upstream name is "fuzz" not "tex-zfuzz". Besides, when I contacted upstream, he recommended "zfuzz". I'd prefer to keep its name as "zfuzz", to make it more likely that people who know what it is will find it, and to honor upstream request. >Sure, I was referring to "${CFLAGS:-%optflags}", here $CFLAGS cannot be >defined and if they were they should be overwritten anyway. Oh, _that's_ what you meant! You mean use: make CFLAGS="%{optflags}" Okay, I'll do that. >There are still some comments that can be shortened a lot. For example, >for the INSTALL file, suffice to say that the license is in the INSTALL >file, everybody will understand why it has to be shipped. Ok, shortened. >The BuildConflict is not right. You should arrange for things to >build right with or without zfuzz installed. Ok, done. > The comment about running mktexlsr is not useful, nor the one describing > the manuals. It is in INSTALL which can be read by the user. The point was to justify some decisions for people reading the .spec file, not for end-users. I rewrote/shortened the text to (hopefully) make that clearer. > Regarding the version, I am not sure that using the date is wise. Indeed > if the versioning scheme changes, the new version may become newer. I > think that using 0 as version and putting the date in the release is > better, like > Version: 0 > Release: 0.X.20070911 > This has a disadvantage, namely when release changes, the version doesn't > change (similar with development snapshots). I agree with the problems of using the date. But as you noted, putting it in the release has its own problems. Upstream uses a date as the version number and is unlikely to change, so it seemed reasonable to be consistent with upstream. Is this critically important? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 00:13:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:13:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260013.m5Q0D3Hh023102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From dwheeler at dwheeler.com 2008-06-25 20:13 EST ------- Okay, new version. I haven't changed the package name (per my comments above), but I did change other things (as noted above). New SRPM and spec file (release 5) here: http://www.dwheeler.com/zfuzz-20070911-5.fc9.src.rpm http://www.dwheeler.com/zfuzz.spec rpmlint clean. koji clean for all f9 architectures. Comments? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 00:31:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:31:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260031.m5Q0VNIm009433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 20:31 EST ------- So did anything ever happen here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 00:54:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:54:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252049] Review Request: asm2 - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260054.m5Q0sYRm012767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asm2 - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252049 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Status Whiteboard| |NotReady Flag|needinfo?(viveklak at gmail.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 20:54 EST ------- Well, no response in over six months, and no response to additional prompting and needinfo. I've no choice but to close the Java package reviews that Vivek has opened. If someone feels the urge to flame me, please instead expend the effort updating these packages to current guidelines and reopening the tickets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 00:58:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:58:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252062] Review Request: ehcache - Easy Hibernate Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260058.m5Q0wr16029667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ehcache - Easy Hibernate Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252062 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 20:58 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 00:58:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:58:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252059] Review Request: derby - Derby DB (ex Cloudscape) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260058.m5Q0wbOt029621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: derby - Derby DB (ex Cloudscape) Alias: derby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252059 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 20:58 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 00:57:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:57:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252051] Review Request: avalon-excalibur - Java development components In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260057.m5Q0vr2m029533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avalon-excalibur - Java development components https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252051 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 20:57 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 00:59:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:59:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252080] Review Request: jakarta-poi - Java API To Access Microsoft Format Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260059.m5Q0xKwA029722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jakarta-poi - Java API To Access Microsoft Format Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252080 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 20:59 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 00:59:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:59:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252077] Review Request: ivy - Dependency manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260059.m5Q0x5oE013614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivy - Dependency manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252077 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 20:59 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 00:57:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:57:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252050] Review Request: aspectwerkz - AOP for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260057.m5Q0ve5A013442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspectwerkz - AOP for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252050 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 20:57 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 00:58:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:58:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252052] Review Request: bsh2 - Lightweight Scripting for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260058.m5Q0w8FT013508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsh2 - Lightweight Scripting for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252052 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 20:58 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 00:58:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:58:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252054] Review Request: c3p0 - JDBC DataSources/Resource Pools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260058.m5Q0wKb3013563@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: c3p0 - JDBC DataSources/Resource Pools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252054 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 20:58 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 01:03:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:03:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251428] Review Request: aopalliance - Java/J2EE AOP standards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260103.m5Q13PAH031030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aopalliance - Java/J2EE AOP standards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251428 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 21:03 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 01:04:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:04:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252115] Review Request: jfreechart - Charts Generation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260104.m5Q14oqA015051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfreechart - Charts Generation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252115 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 21:04 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 01:05:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:05:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252111] Review Request: xml-commons-resolver12 - Resolver subproject of xml-commons In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260105.m5Q155Vu015458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xml-commons-resolver12 - Resolver subproject of xml-commons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252111 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 21:05 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 01:08:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:08:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252090] Review Request: proxool - Proxool Java connection pool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260108.m5Q18x3X032300@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: proxool - Proxool Java connection pool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252090 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 21:08 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 01:07:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:07:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252105] Review Request: quartz - Quartz Enterprise Job Scheduler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260107.m5Q1773V031986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quartz - Quartz Enterprise Job Scheduler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252105 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 21:07 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 01:08:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:08:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252098] Review Request: jacorb - Free Java implementation of OMG's CORBA standard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260108.m5Q181xD032146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jacorb - Free Java implementation of OMG's CORBA standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252098 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 21:08 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 01:08:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252097] Review Request: gnu-trove - High performance collections for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260108.m5Q18MNJ032212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-trove - High performance collections for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252097 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 21:08 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 01:07:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:07:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252100] Review Request: jakarta-slide-webdavclient - Slide WebDAV client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260107.m5Q17osg032090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jakarta-slide-webdavclient - Slide WebDAV client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252100 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 21:07 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 01:06:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:06:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252110] Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260106.m5Q16JaG031876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252110 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 21:06 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. Hans, given that Vivek hasn't responded at all to any of the reviews he opened, might I suggest you consider just submitting this yourself? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 01:07:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:07:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252101] Review Request: joesnmp - Java SNMP class library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260107.m5Q17euh016172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joesnmp - Java SNMP class library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252101 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 21:07 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 01:09:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:09:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252084] Review Request: jgraph - JGraph Diagram Component In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260109.m5Q19sn6016698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jgraph - JGraph Diagram Component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252084 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 21:09 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 01:10:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:10:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252048] Review Request: xml-im-exporter - XML Im-/Exporter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260110.m5Q1AEOY017158@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xml-im-exporter - XML Im-/Exporter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252048 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 21:10 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 01:07:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:07:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252103] Review Request: odmg - ODMG 3.0 Java Binding In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260107.m5Q17L2q016101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: odmg - ODMG 3.0 Java Binding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252103 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 21:07 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 01:08:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:08:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252093] Review Request: xercesjarv - JARV driver for Xerces-2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260108.m5Q18fHx016393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xercesjarv - JARV driver for Xerces-2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252093 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 21:08 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 01:08:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:08:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252092] Review Request: swarmcache - Cluster-aware Caching for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260108.m5Q18oNO016442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swarmcache - Cluster-aware Caching for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252092 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 21:08 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 01:10:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:10:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252083] Review Request: jdbm - JDBM transactional persistence engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260110.m5Q1A4Jx017096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jdbm - JDBM transactional persistence engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252083 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 21:10 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 01:08:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:08:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252095] Review Request: hessian - Hessian binary web service protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260108.m5Q18Vn9016339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hessian - Hessian binary web service protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252095 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 21:08 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 01:06:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:06:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252107] Review Request: snmptrapappender - SNMP Trap Appender extension for log4j In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260106.m5Q16fG2015903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: snmptrapappender - SNMP Trap Appender extension for log4j https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252107 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 21:06 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 01:06:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:06:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252106] Review Request: servletapi6 - Java servlet and JSP implementation classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260106.m5Q16uK9016024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: servletapi6 - Java servlet and JSP implementation classes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252106 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 21:06 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 01:09:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:09:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252089] Review Request: oscache - High performance J2EE caching solution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260109.m5Q19FPa016562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oscache - High performance J2EE caching solution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252089 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 21:09 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 01:10:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:10:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252047] Review Request: jakarta-commons-transaction - Commons Transaction In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260110.m5Q1AOa7017210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jakarta-commons-transaction - Commons Transaction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252047 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 21:10 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 01:06:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:06:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252109] Review Request: wsdl4j16 - Web Services Description Language Toolkit for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260106.m5Q16Uvw015848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wsdl4j16 - Web Services Description Language Toolkit for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252109 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 21:06 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 01:13:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:13:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252116] Review Request: berkeleydb - Berkeley DB Java Edition In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260113.m5Q1DjRB001031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: berkeleydb - Berkeley DB Java Edition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252116 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 21:13 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 01:13:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:13:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252119] Review Request: picocontainer - Dependency-injection container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260113.m5Q1DZCq000977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: picocontainer - Dependency-injection container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252119 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 21:13 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 252049 after a complete lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 01:11:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446102] Review Request: xdialog - X11 drop in replacement for cdialog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260111.m5Q1BOoE017451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdialog - X11 drop in replacement for cdialog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446102 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-06-25 21:11 EST ------- I have tried a mock build and it gives the following error: Making all in po make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/Xdialog-2.3.1/po' test -z "fr.gmo de.gmo ru.gmo es.gmo hu.gmo pt_BR.gmo no_NO.gmo id.gmo nl.gmo it.gmo pl.gmo ca.gmo sv_SE.gmo" || make fr.gmo de.gmo ru.gmo es.gmo hu.gmo pt_BR.gmo no_NO.gmo id.gmo nl.gmo it.gmo pl.gmo ca.gmo sv_SE.gmo make[3]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/Xdialog-2.3.1/po' rm -f fr.gmo && : -c --statistics -o fr.gmo fr.po rm -f de.gmo && : -c --statistics -o de.gmo de.po mv: cannot stat `t-de.gmo': No such file or directory rm -f ru.gmo && : -c --statistics -o ru.gmo ru.po mv: cannot stat `t-fr.gmo': No such file or directory make[3]: *** [de.gmo] Error 1 make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make[3]: *** [fr.gmo] Error 1 mv: cannot stat `t-ru.gmo': No such file or directory make[3]: *** [ru.gmo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/Xdialog-2.3.1/po' make[2]: *** [stamp-po] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/Xdialog-2.3.1/po' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/Xdialog-2.3.1' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.71846 (%build) Adding gettext-devel as BR solves that. Once adding that I see no real blockers except for one small problem. On one hand, the guidelines require the presence of a desktop file. On the other hand this application (which works OK in Fedora 7, BTW) needs arguments to be provided to it, so a mere desktop file will be useless. Maybe we could add a comment to the spec specifying why no desktop file is included ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 01:38:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:38:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285801] Review Request: simias - Collection-Oriented Data Storage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260138.m5Q1cUDv005013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: simias - Collection-Oriented Data Storage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285801 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 21:38 EST ------- This is terribly old; it landed right in the middle of one of the java carpet bombs and I always skipped over it when looking for tickets to review. Are you still interested in having this reviewed? Do you have an updated package incorporating those patches? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 02:13:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:13:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260213.m5Q2DOYI010884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From dwheeler at dwheeler.com 2008-06-25 22:13 EST ------- Sigh, release 5 had a bug; if zfuzz was already installed, it wouldn't always rebuild. Irrelevant in a mock build, but now it should work all the time. Since I had to fix it, I also added a patch that eliminated a compiler warning. New release 6 available here: http://www.dwheeler.com/zfuzz-20070911-6.fc9.src.rpm http://www.dwheeler.com/zfuzz.spec rpmlint, koji build clean on all architectures. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 02:22:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:22:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441141] Review Request: antlr3 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260222.m5Q2MqKA029608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: antlr3 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441141 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 22:22 EST ------- This failed to build due to a missing dependency on python; I added it and then it failed to build in ant: + ant Buildfile: build.xml generator-prepare: [mkdir] Created dir: /builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-3.0.1/codegen [copy] Copying 6 files to /builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-3.0.1/codegen generator: BUILD FAILED /builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-3.0.1/build.xml:102: The following error occurred while executing this line: /builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-3.0.1/build.xml:55: Problem: failed to create task or type antlr Cause: the class org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.ANTLR was not found. This looks like one of Ant's optional components. Action: Check that the appropriate optional JAR exists in -/usr/share/ant/lib -/builddir/.ant/lib -a directory added on the command line with the -lib argument Do not panic, this is a common problem. The commonest cause is a missing JAR. This is not a bug; it is a configuration problem Total time: 0 seconds Unfortunately that's totally bewildering to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 02:26:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:26:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449393] Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260226.m5Q2QwX9013436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449393 ------- Additional Comments From chris at tylers.info 2008-06-25 22:26 EST ------- The package builds cleanly under mock and installs OK, but it doesn't seem to *do* anything, whether invoked with a "-webapp ..." argument or without. I've tested it on two x86_64 systems, each running F9 in a fairly clean configuration, and get the same result on both: no UI appears, and no error messages appear. mfinkle suggested running "xulrunner /usr/lib64/prism-0.9/application.ini", but that produces the same effect. The binary download from http://people.mozilla.org/~mfinkle/prism/prism-0.9.en-US.linux-i686.tar.bz2 does present a UI in a window. Also, I am getting SELinux alerts when run in enforcing mode due to /tmp access. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 02:48:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:48:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446102] Review Request: xdialog - X11 drop in replacement for cdialog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260248.m5Q2mL2u001747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdialog - X11 drop in replacement for cdialog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446102 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-06-25 22:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Adding gettext-devel as BR solves that. gettext is enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 03:12:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:12:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436147] Review Request: mairix - A program for indexing and searching email messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260312.m5Q3CEAG006450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mairix - A program for indexing and searching email messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436147 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-25 23:12 EST ------- I'm not really sure why this has been sitting around for so long; it's a small package, it builds fine and rpmlint finds nothing to complain about. I can't really test it because all of my mail is locked away in a cyrus server, but I can review the packaging. Everything looks fine to me. * source files match upstream: e1d28459531ce30ce8dd41215cb0e6351ea81767cf4bbf1e8dbd22618f4de1d7 mairix-0.21.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: mairix = 0.21-1.fc10 = libbz2.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I do not have the means to test this package. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 03:23:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:23:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449393] Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260323.m5Q3NOvo023377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449393 ------- Additional Comments From chris at tylers.info 2008-06-25 23:23 EST ------- Additional info: [B] is the binary download from pmo/~mfinkle (32 bit) [F] is the fedora package (64 bit) xulrunner[B]+application.ini[F] does not work xulrunner[F]+application.ini[B] does work xulrunner[F]+application.ini[F] does not work xulrunner[B]+application.ini[B] does work -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 04:36:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:36:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260436.m5Q4aTJS019935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(axel.thimm at atrpms. | |net) ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2008-06-26 00:36 EST ------- Oh, crap. Seems I've completely dropped the ball on this one. The firmware is in, but I think the last time I looked at this, I was halfway waiting on a reply to comment #31 (and by extension, #22), and then forgot about it. My sincere apologies. I see there's a relatively new ivtv 1.2.0 out now, which ATrpms packaged up a few days ago. Axel, where should I pick up the review at? (i.e., with what spec?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 04:50:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:50:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450054] Review Request: liblinebreak - A Unicode line-breaking library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260450.m5Q4ohKK004974@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblinebreak - A Unicode line-breaking library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450054 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-26 00:50 EST ------- One thing to note is that you should include info about checking out the actual version that you're packaging. Since upstream doesn't even bother to tag anything, you should probably use -D and pass the checkout date. You might as well remove the commented-out bits of the spec like the empty BuildRequires: and Requires: and the scriptlets. These are minor, though. * source files match upstream (verified by manual comparison). * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper (none). * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: liblinebreak-static = 0.9.6-2.fc10 liblinebreak-devel = 0.9.6-2.fc10 = (no non-glibc dependencies) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. Can't test this without building something which uses it. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers OK in -devel package. * no pkgconfig files. * static libraries present: no dynamic libs present, so OK in the -devel package. -static provide is present. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 04:51:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:51:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260451.m5Q4pvU3022436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 axel.thimm at atrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |MODIFIED Priority|medium |high Flag|needinfo?(axel.thimm at atrpms.| |net) | ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2008-06-26 00:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #33) > I see there's a relatively new ivtv 1.2.0 out now, which ATrpms packaged up a > few days ago. Axel, where should I pick up the review at? (i.e., with what spec?) I'll package up a separate one for Fedora inclusion, as 1.2.x still has kos inside. On a different note: Conexant has been granting permissions on using the firmware at the kernel source level (and other firmwares as well), so probably some future kernel will need to Obsolete ivtv-firmware. But let's get there first. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 06:51:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 02:51:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252110] Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260651.m5Q6pYU4008817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252110 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-06-26 02:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Hans, given that Vivek hasn't responded at all to any of the reviews he opened, > might I suggest you consider just submitting this yourself? I would love to but currently I'm investing all my time into: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/BetterWebcamSupport So maybe sometime in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 07:13:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 03:13:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260713.m5Q7DnVY012714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager Alias: awesome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 mnowak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |awesome -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 08:30:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 04:30:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451903] Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260830.m5Q8U7Nq026872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451903 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-26 04:30 EST ------- perl-Mail-DKIM-0.32-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 08:32:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 04:32:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444817] Review Request: Spicebird - Collaboration Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260832.m5Q8WGeg010756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Spicebird - Collaboration Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444817 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-26 04:32 EST ------- spicebird-0.4-5.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 08:32:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 04:32:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451903] Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260832.m5Q8WV4m010872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Sign and verify Internet mail with DKIM/DomainKey signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451903 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-26 04:32 EST ------- perl-Mail-DKIM-0.32-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 08:32:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 04:32:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444817] Review Request: Spicebird - Collaboration Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806260832.m5Q8WIni010796@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Spicebird - Collaboration Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444817 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.4-5.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 10:36:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 06:36:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429809] Review Request: mumble - low-latency, high quality voice chat software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261036.m5QAa62i002266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mumble - low-latency, high quality voice chat software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429809 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-06-26 06:36 EST ------- Probably not Jason I'm to busy with work. I'll probably have to withdraw myself from this review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 10:50:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 06:50:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429809] Review Request: mumble - low-latency, high quality voice chat software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261050.m5QAoXaJ004829@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mumble - low-latency, high quality voice chat software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429809 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-06-26 06:50 EST ------- I would say that using a private copy of speex is definitely a no go for fedora. If a newer version is needed, please ask it's maintainer to upgrade it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 11:14:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 07:14:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436147] Review Request: mairix - A program for indexing and searching email messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261114.m5QBElOQ008889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mairix - A program for indexing and searching email messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436147 ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2008-06-26 07:14 EST ------- Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 11:16:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 07:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436147] Review Request: mairix - A program for indexing and searching email messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261116.m5QBGbut009504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mairix - A program for indexing and searching email messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436147 mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2008-06-26 07:16 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mairix Short Description: A program for indexing and searching email messages Owners: mlichvar Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 11:52:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 07:52:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450686] Review Request: R-RSQLite - SQLite Interface for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261152.m5QBqY59031933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-RSQLite - SQLite Interface for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450686 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-06-26 07:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Shouldn't this have a build dependency on R-DBI? And you'd be right, DOH! Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/R-RSQLite.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/R-RSQLite-0.6-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 11:57:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 07:57:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450685] Review Request: R-DBI - Database Interface for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261157.m5QBvxHN016795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-DBI - Database Interface for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450685 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-26 07:57 EST ------- R-DBI-0.2-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 11:57:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 07:57:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450685] Review Request: R-DBI - Database Interface for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261157.m5QBvpbo016741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-DBI - Database Interface for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450685 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-26 07:57 EST ------- R-DBI-0.2-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 12:00:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:00:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452457] Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261200.m5QC0ZLh001454@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452457 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-26 08:00 EST ------- perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP-1.04-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 12:00:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:00:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452457] Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261200.m5QC0ZsS017795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452457 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-26 08:00 EST ------- perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP-1.04-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-26 08:00 EST ------- perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP-1.04-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 12:05:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:05:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450223] Review Request: mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki - An extension to provide an interwiki management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261205.m5QC5Hnm002855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki - An extension to provide an interwiki management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450223 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |mediawiki-SpecialInterwiki- | |0-0.3.20080606svn.fc9 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 12:08:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:08:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452458] Review Request: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261208.m5QC8Kiq003476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452458 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-26 08:08 EST ------- perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword-0.03-12.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 12:21:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:21:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447757] Review Request: mediawiki-ParserFunctions - Enhances the Mediawiki parser with logical functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261221.m5QCL1Mf006155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-ParserFunctions - Enhances the Mediawiki parser with logical functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447757 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-06-26 08:21 EST ------- MUST: Y: rpmlint on each package Y: Meeting Package Naming Guidelines Y: Spec file name matches base package name Y: License field is valid Y: Meets Packaging Guidelines Y: License included in package (if included in source) Y: Spec file written in en_US Y: Spec file is legible Y: Sources match upstream source Y: Source URL 'sane' Y: Compiles successfully - [noarch] -: ExcludeArch required? Y: All Build Dependencies Listed -: Handles locales sanely -: Library packages run ldconfig Y: Package is not relocatable Y: Package owns all directories created Y: No duplicate file listings Y: defattr set correctly Y: %clean is used Y: Macro use conisistant Y: Contains Code/Content that is allowed -: Large Documentation in -doc subpackage Y: %doc must not affect package runtime -: Header files in -devel -: Static libraries in -static -: pkgconfig files require pkgconfig -: Library files are located in correct package -: -devel requires base package w/ fully versioned dependency Y: Packages do not contact .la (libtool) archives -: GUI Apps have .desktop files Y: No duplicate directory ownerships Y: %install cleans buildroot Y: Filenames are valid UTF-8 SHOULD: -: Description/Summary sections contain translations -: Builds in mock/koji Y: Builds on all architectures Y: Program works upon testing -: Scriptlets are sane -: Subpackages require base package -: pkgconfig.pc files in -devel -: File dependencies should only be in /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin APPROVED Sorry it took so long, it kind of hit the back burner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 12:22:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:22:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452458] Review Request: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261222.m5QCMxWc022641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452458 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-26 08:22 EST ------- perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword-0.03-12.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 12:21:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:21:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447757] Review Request: mediawiki-ParserFunctions - Enhances the Mediawiki parser with logical functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261221.m5QCLNSV022425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-ParserFunctions - Enhances the Mediawiki parser with logical functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447757 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 14:06:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:06:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445151] Review Request: merkaartor - openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261406.m5QE60Go027359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: merkaartor - openstreetmap editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445151 ------- Additional Comments From pablo.martin-gomez at laposte.net 2008-06-26 10:06 EST ------- Ok, for me, the package and the spec are good. You just need to wait for a sponsor to come. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 14:28:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:28:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428686] Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261428.m5QESkUJ014228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428686 jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2008-06-26 10:28 EST ------- The changes are trivial and in this case the use of the bugzilla interface becomes cumbersome. :-( On the other hand it is the end of the second semester here and so life has been really busy here. :-( I would like to reopen this report for several reasons, first because it is need in lyx and second because this should allow us to gather enough experience and insight as to draft package guidelines for tex packages and to ease the review of future packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 14:41:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:41:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428686] Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261441.m5QEfsSE001708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428686 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|201449 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 15:09:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:09:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 401101] Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261509.m5QF9Y5t006935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=401101 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-06-26 11:09 EST ------- The Problem has been fixed in devel, and going thought the updates process in F-8 and F-9... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 15:27:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:27:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 401101] Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261527.m5QFRElX010640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=401101 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-06-26 11:27 EST ------- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=682158 This task is for F-10 I will fix the #12 with the description seen here: http://www.sleuthkit.org/sleuthkit/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 15:37:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:37:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439263] Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261537.m5QFbXWX027350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439263 fitzsim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2008-06-26 11:37 EST ------- I built this into Rawhide. Let's target Fedora 10 for NetBeans. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 15:37:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:37:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439265] Review Request: libnb-platform7 - NetBeans Platform 6.0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261537.m5QFbY7h027387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnb-platform7 - NetBeans Platform 6.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439265 Bug 439265 depends on bug 439263, which changed state. Bug 439263 Summary: Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439263 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 15:54:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:54:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428686] Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261554.m5QFsKX4030522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428686 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2008-06-26 11:54 EST ------- * Thu Jun 26 2008 Jos? Matos - 1.6-5 - doc subpackage requires tetex-doc and no longer requires the main package. See the package and the spec file in: http://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 15:56:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:56:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444817] Review Request: Spicebird - Collaboration Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261556.m5QFuCH2016137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Spicebird - Collaboration Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444817 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-26 11:56 EST ------- Do you plan to build for f9/devel? Typically you should build and test in devel, then when stable push those out for f9/f8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 15:58:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:58:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452251] Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261558.m5QFwxka016539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452251 ------- Additional Comments From omajid at redhat.com 2008-06-26 11:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libmatthew-java Short Description: collection of java libraries Owners: omajid Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 16:02:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:02:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428686] Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261602.m5QG2SnN017626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428686 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 16:16:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444817] Review Request: Spicebird - Collaboration Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261616.m5QGGvMA020195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Spicebird - Collaboration Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444817 ------- Additional Comments From smparrish at shallowcreek.net 2008-06-26 12:16 EST ------- The current version .4 is not compatible with gcc4.3, version .7 due out this month will be. Once it is release will have F9/Devel versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 16:27:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:27:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230316] Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261627.m5QGREU9004513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230316 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2008-06-26 12:27 EST ------- Updated package is available at http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jbrout-0.2.201-2.fc9.src.rpm and SPEC file is still at http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jbrout.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 17:50:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:50:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261750.m5QHoma8002117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 smallvil at get9.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: un-fonts- |Review Request: un-fonts- |core - Korean TrueType fonts|core - Korean TrueType fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 17:49:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:49:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] New: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: smallvil at get9.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://get9.net/rpm/un-fonts-core.spec SRPM URL: http://get9.net/rpm/un-fonts-core-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: This package provides more improved free Korean Truetype fonts. Dennis Jang -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 17:50:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:50:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] New: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: smallvil at get9.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://get9.net/rpm/un-fonts-extra.spec SRPM URL: http://get9.net/rpm/un-fonts-extra-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: This package provides more improved free Korean Truetype fonts. Dennis Jang -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 17:57:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:57:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447757] Review Request: mediawiki-ParserFunctions - Enhances the Mediawiki parser with logical functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261757.m5QHv7hG018216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-ParserFunctions - Enhances the Mediawiki parser with logical functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447757 ianweller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-06-26 13:57 EST ------- thanks. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mediawiki-ParserFunctions Short Description: Enhances the MediaWiki parser with logical functions Owners: ianweller Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 18:11:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:11:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188445] Review Request: bootconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261811.m5QIB5Bf006053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188445 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-06-26 14:11 EST ------- Ping, Sam. Please raise fedora?cvs flag (see below) to "?" when you will be ready. Everybody waiting for you :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 18:14:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:14:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191492] Review Request: unuran - Universal Non-Uniform Random number generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261814.m5QIEjqJ021758@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unuran - Universal Non-Uniform Random number generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191492 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-06-26 14:14 EST ------- Me also confused. Ping, Neal! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 18:49:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452688] Review Request: dbus-java - Java implementation of the DBus protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261849.m5QIn6Pb012887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-java - Java implementation of the DBus protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452688 ------- Additional Comments From omajid at redhat.com 2008-06-26 14:49 EST ------- Upstream released a new version. No code changes. Updated spec file and srpm: Spec URL: http://omajid.fedorapeople.org/dbus-java/dbus-java.spec SRPM URL: http://omajid.fedorapeople.org/dbus-java/dbus-java-2.5-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 18:57:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:57:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452251] Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261857.m5QIvSBU014559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452251 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 19:06:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:06:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453026] New: Review Request: xmp - A multi-format module player Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453026 Summary: Review Request: xmp - A multi-format module player Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/xmp.spec SRPM URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/xmp-2.5.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: The Extended Module Player is a modplayer for Unix-like systems that plays over 80 mainstream and obscure module formats from Amiga, Atari, Acorn, Apple IIgs and PC, including Protracker (MOD), Scream Tracker 3 (S3M), Fast Tracker II (XM) and Impulse Tracker (IT) files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 19:07:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:07:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449135] Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261907.m5QJ7Qtr016934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449135 ------- Additional Comments From javiplx at gmail.com 2008-06-26 15:07 EST ------- First of all, I've discovered the rpmlint discrepancies. I was running that on the specfile itself, but not on the packages. It looks like rpmlint reads the RPM headers, so I didn't discovered many things (as far as I know, the non-standard-uid for apache are not important, are they?) The new versions are on Spec URL: http://www.freewebs.com/javiplx/Fedora/gforge.spec SRPM URL: http://www.freewebs.com/javiplx/Fedora/gforge-4.5.19-2.fc9.src.rpm Buildroot, %_sysconfigdir, and %docs fixed. For Changelod I preferred the third available option, as I tend to copy the modifier line and change only the date. I've changed also the license, but I have a doubt about it. The upstream site (fixed now on URL) simply states 'GPL'. Shouldn't this be honoured ? Regarding the Source with full url, the download url (http://gforge.org/frs/download.php/245/gforge-4.5.19.tar.bz2) includes a internal release number 245 that changes from one version to another on unrelated manner (for 4.4 is 102). Is it OK to use this unpredictable value ? mailman requirement is also fixed. It was actually a mistake. Regarding subpackages (specifically svn/cvs) I'm still believe the package is not mature enough. The packaged local.inc fixes sys_use_scm=false, so none of them are currently a requirement. I obviously plan to make them available, but I need more work to make that smoothly. Currently I use gforge at workplace, but without many features (not only SCM but also mailmain) and it's perfectly functional, even whithout the many subdirs I opted not to copy to buildroot. My plans, in parallel with made the package compliant with guidelines, is to enable all this stuff one by one with proper although basic testing, to ensure that the final package is at least only partly broken. As example, adding the plugins directory adds some Perl requirements on a full PHP package that I think must be tracked. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 19:31:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:31:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261931.m5QJViQI004578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From dwheeler at dwheeler.com 2008-06-26 15:31 EST ------- Any more reviewer comments? I've addressed every one posted above. The only ones I haven't done at all are using a different name and a different version numbering scheme, for reasons noted above. I'd like to think this is ready to go... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 19:30:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:30:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453026] Review Request: xmp - A multi-format module player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261930.m5QJUD94004310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmp - A multi-format module player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453026 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |453035 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2008-06-26 15:30 EST ------- # work around missing BRs in audacious-devel in rawhide BuildRequires: dbus-glib-devel Filed bug 453035. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 19:35:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:35:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443469] Review Request: pytrainer - A tool to log all your sport excursions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261935.m5QJZFuk005325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pytrainer - A tool to log all your sport excursions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443469 katzj at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|katzj at redhat.com |silfreed at silfreed.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2008-06-26 15:35 EST ------- Okay, more comprehensive review: * Needs to own %{_datadir}/pytrainer directory rather than just the contents of the directory * I thought we had removed the need for --vendor from the desktop-file-install, but guidelines still include it so I may be mistaken Otherwise, looks good. Fix up the first one before importing it and then once you get the license clarification, include that as well as having the license file as %doc. But APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 19:46:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:46:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261946.m5QJkHGW024396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 ------- Additional Comments From hedayat at grad.com 2008-06-26 15:46 EST ------- New package: SRPM: http://www.assembla.com/spaces/hedayat/documents/cu2tpoq0ar3Amzab7jnrAJ/download/rcssserver3d-0.6-2.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.assembla.com/spaces/hedayat/documents/dC7Shyoh0r3z6aab7jnrAJ/download/rcssserver3d.spec (Alternative links: SRPM:http://assembla.com/file/hedayat/1_rcssserver3d-0.6-2.fc9.src.rpm SPEC:http://assembla.com/file/hedayat/3_rcssserver3d.spec ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 19:56:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:56:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806261956.m5QJuorS009382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-06-26 15:56 EST ------- I still guess it's good idea to be consistent in using macro- v. variable- style rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT but %{__sed} """ You should pick a style and use it consistently throughout your packaging. Mixing the two styles, while valid, is bad from a QA and usability point of view, and should not be done in Fedora packages. """ see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 20:03:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:03:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450470] RDMA kernel stack initializing package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806262003.m5QK3Hkd027769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RDMA kernel stack initializing package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450470 pablo.martin-gomez at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pablo.martin- | |gomez at laposte.net ------- Additional Comments From pablo.martin-gomez at laposte.net 2008-06-26 16:03 EST ------- The package and the spec files seem good to me. Just the name rdma should be replace by the macro %{name}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 20:03:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:03:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439265] Review Request: libnb-platform7 - NetBeans Platform 6.0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806262003.m5QK3J7T027809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnb-platform7 - NetBeans Platform 6.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439265 fitzsim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(jtulach at netbeans.o | |rg) ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2008-06-26 16:03 EST ------- Jaroslav, please remove the java-rpmbuild build requirement (or propose java-rpmbuild for inclusion in Fedora, if appropriate) so that this review can proceed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 20:29:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:29:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450470] RDMA kernel stack initializing package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806262029.m5QKTEPJ015440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RDMA kernel stack initializing package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450470 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2008-06-26 16:29 EST ------- I don't see any blockers here so its APPROVED. And sorry for the delay responding! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 20:36:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:36:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452901] Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806262036.m5QKaWYg003327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452901 ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-06-26 16:36 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=310379) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=310379&action=view) OpenCA license derived from source package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 20:39:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:39:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452901] Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806262039.m5QKdV2L003545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452901 mnowak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 20:48:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:48:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452901] Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806262048.m5QKmwra018771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452901 mnowak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #310379|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 20:52:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:52:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453026] Review Request: xmp - A multi-format module player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806262052.m5QKqBvx019443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmp - A multi-format module player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453026 cra at wpi.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cra at wpi.edu ------- Additional Comments From cra at wpi.edu 2008-06-26 16:52 EST ------- On naming, it looks like most audacious plugin packages are named audacious-plugins-*. The only exception is audacious-plugin-fc. The "plugins" packages appear to be all built from a single audacious-plugins src.rpm, so it makes sense to use "plugins" for that. The fc plugin is a single plugin built from its own audacious-plugin-fc.src.rpm package. audacious.i386 1.4.6-1.fc9 installed audacious-libs.i386 1.4.6-1.fc9 installed audacious-plugin-fc.i386 0.2-6 installed audacious-plugins.i386 1.4.5-1.fc9 installed audacious-plugins-amidi.i386 1.4.5-1.fc9 installed audacious-plugins-vortex.i386 1.4.5-1.fc9 installed audacious-plugins-wavpack.i386 1.4.5-1.fc9 installed Available Packages audacious-devel.i386 1.4.6-1.fc9 fedora audacious-plugins-arts.i386 1.4.5-1.fc9 fedora audacious-plugins-esd.i386 1.4.5-1.fc9 fedora audacious-plugins-jack.i386 1.4.5-1.fc9 fedora audacious-plugins-metronome.i386 1.4.5-1.fc9 fedora Thoughts? "audacious-plugin-xmp" is consistent with the fc plugin, so I'm okay with that naming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 20:52:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:52:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450470] RDMA kernel stack initializing package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806262052.m5QKqrdR005883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RDMA kernel stack initializing package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450470 dledford at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2008-06-26 16:52 EST ------- Awesome. I've updated the spec file to use the %{name} macro more, but since this is a case where the package itself is the upstream source, no one should be changing the name on us ;-) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rdma Short Description: Infiniband/iWARP Kernel Module Initializer Owners: dledford Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 21:04:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445010] Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806262104.m5QL48Ah021563@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445010 ------- Additional Comments From telimektar at esraonline.com 2008-06-26 17:04 EST ------- Ok I'll do so I'm actually contacting skylive devs for their install scripts are quit strange, but this is an other story ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 21:16:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:16:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446102] Review Request: xdialog - X11 drop in replacement for cdialog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806262116.m5QLGafG023987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdialog - X11 drop in replacement for cdialog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446102 ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-06-26 17:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I don't understand. All the files in src seems not to have any license > header, which means GPL+. Am I missing something? No, you are completely right. > Thanks for the review. Are you waiting to be sponsored? Yes, I am and I'd appreciate sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 21:26:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:26:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444817] Review Request: Spicebird - Collaboration Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806262126.m5QLQ4p8025748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Spicebird - Collaboration Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444817 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-26 17:26 EST ------- Just wanted to make sure devel and 9 were not missed. ;) Thanks for the clarification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 22:31:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:31:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449504] Review Request: ranpwd - A program to generate random passwords In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806262231.m5QMVLJm023650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ranpwd - A program to generate random passwords https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449504 rafalzaq at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2008-06-26 18:31 EST ------- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 22:53:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:53:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452691] Review Request: btrfs-progs - supporting programs for btrfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806262253.m5QMrt2E007735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: btrfs-progs - supporting programs for btrfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452691 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-26 18:53 EST ------- This looks fine to me. I guess there's little hope of getting any of the kernel folks to chime in here, and I can't really see any reason to hold this up because I can at least run the tools, I just can't mount any filesystems. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 23:16:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:16:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446158] Review Request: xesam-glib - A GObject library for dealing with Xesam services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806262316.m5QNGOTr031213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xesam-glib - A GObject library for dealing with Xesam services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446158 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-26 19:16 EST ------- I guess we'll skip the test suite, then, although it would to get a comment about it in the spec. rpmlint is quiet now and the %description looks good. The only other nit I can find to pick is that the %description for the -devel package could use a period at the end. That's really minor, though. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 26 23:25:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:25:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230316] Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806262325.m5QNP1w2032379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230316 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-26 19:25 EST ------- Summary and description look good; desktop file installed correctly. Looks fine to me. APPROVED Only took 16 months! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 00:03:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:03:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450417] Review Request: gambit-termite - Gambit-C Scheme programming system, with Termite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806270003.m5R03tUv019455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gambit-termite - Gambit-C Scheme programming system, with Termite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450417 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-26 20:03 EST ------- Did you make any decision about whether you were going to try to build gambit-termite out of gambit-c? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 00:00:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:00:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428686] Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806270000.m5R00AVf018730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428686 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-26 20:00 EST ------- Sorry for closing, but sometimes when there's no response to pings and NEEDINFO, closing the ticket does the trick. I note you're not using the dist tag; you package enough things in Fedora that I assume you can deal with the issues, but lately even experienced packagers have run into issues caused by not using the dist tag so I would still recommend it. But in the end it's your choice. * source files match upstream: a011ab46e968e4dfabfa8b56a892b0ae05aaeb481c8c8d21dc0d82e2c213bacb simplecv.zip * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: tex-simplecv-1.6-5.noarch.rpm tex-simplecv = 1.6-5 = /usr/bin/texhash tetex-latex tex-simplecv-doc-1.6-5.noarch.rpm tex-simplecv-doc = 1.6-5 = /usr/bin/texhash tetex-doc * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets OK (texhash). * code, not content. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 01:12:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:12:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806270112.m5R1CoeU031325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 01:12:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:12:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806270112.m5R1CJCW017679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 01:25:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:25:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448874] Review Request: pyroom - PyRoom is a full screen text editor and a clone of Writeroom In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806270125.m5R1PweV001519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyroom - PyRoom is a full screen text editor and a clone of Writeroom https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448874 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-26 21:25 EST ------- So did anyone decide to pick this package up? All that's left from rpmlint is: pyroom.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/pyroom/pyroom_error.py pyroom.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/pyroom/autosave.py pyroom.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/pyroom/gui.py pyroom.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/pyroom/preferences.py pyroom.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/pyroom/basic_edit.py I don't see why these are executable; a quick chmod should fix them. I think something's wrong with the Source0: URL; spectool gets a 404 trying to download it. I agree that a .desktop file is needed. Otherwise I think this looks good, and if nobody else wants to review it I'll be happy to take a look at an updated package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 04:14:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:14:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452921] Review Request: libzrtpcpp - ZRTP support library for the GNU ccRTP stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806270414.m5R4EcnX031757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzrtpcpp - ZRTP support library for the GNU ccRTP stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452921 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-27 00:14 EST ------- I guess those rpmlint complaints boil down to; No docs for the -devel package. NEWS is executable. A couple of source files are executable, which makes rpmlint complain about the debuginfo package. These: libzrtpcpp.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libzrtpcpp-1.3.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libdl.so.2 libzrtpcpp.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libzrtpcpp-1.3.so.0.0.0 /lib64/librt.so.1 libzrtpcpp.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libzrtpcpp-1.3.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libgpg-error.so.0 libzrtpcpp.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libzrtpcpp-1.3.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 aren't a serious issue but again it's a one line sed call to tweak libtool to make them go away. These are really trivial fixes and the unused-direct-shlib-dependency isn't really a blocker, so I'll trust you to do what's best when you check in. * source files match upstream: 5b4e5a439543541a041f68f30c203180198e3ced2d6df488ab1390be6d383cfc libzrtpcpp-1.3.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. The source files have a number of licenses (GPLv3+, GPLv2+ and what looks like an MIT variant) but the final product seems to be GPLv3+. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint has a few valid complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: libzrtpcpp-1.3.0-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm libzrtpcpp-1.3.so.0()(64bit) libzrtpcpp = 1.3.0-1.fc10 = /sbin/ldconfig libccgnu2-1.6.so.0()(64bit) libccrtp1-1.6.so.0()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcrypt.so.11()(64bit) libgcrypt.so.11(GCRYPT_1.2)(64bit) libgpg-error.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.9)(64bit) libzrtpcpp-1.3.so.0()(64bit) libzrtpcpp-devel-1.3.0-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm libzrtpcpp-devel = 1.3.0-1.fc10 = libzrtpcpp = 1.3.0-1.fc10 libzrtpcpp-1.3.so.0()(64bit) pkgconfig * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I've no idea how to test this. * shared libraries installed: unversioned .so links are in the -devel package. ldconfig is called properly. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets OK (pkgconfig). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * pkgconfig files in the -devel package. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 05:10:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:10:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452911] Review Request: trustyrc - Fully modular IRC robot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806270510.m5R5AqAQ009223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trustyrc - Fully modular IRC robot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452911 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-27 01:10 EST ------- I just took a quick look. Here are a few comments: The compiler is not called with the proper flags (%{optflags} or $RPM_OPT_FLAGS depending on your preference). This misses all of the default Fedora security options and results in the debuginfo package missing all of the source code. I'd say the security options are especially important for something that's going to be subjected to constant untrusted network input such as an IRC bot. If you're going to use "%{__sed}" instead of "sed", you need to use "${__rm}" instead of "rm". I personally prefer the non-macro versions, but it's up to you; just be consistent. The license seems to me to be GPLv2+; where do you see it restricted to v2 only? The source files include the "any later version" language. A couple of English notes: "IRC robot fully modular" sounds better as the summary of this ticket: "Fully modular IRC robot". "Extras plugins" should be "Extra plugins". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 05:32:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:32:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445028] Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806270532.m5R5W00K012773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445028 ------- Additional Comments From rickyz at cmu.edu 2008-06-27 01:31 EST ------- sources match upstream URL: needs to be pointed to pypi, as mentioned above rpmlint clean: check (there are some errors/warnings in the noarch RPM, but they are caused by stub files for creating a project): python-pylons.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pylons/templates/default_project/+package+/lib/__init__.py_tmpl python-pylons.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pylons/templates/default_project/+package+/tests/functional/__init__.py_tmpl python-pylons.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pylons/templates/minimal_project/+package+/templates/.distutils_placeholder python-pylons.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pylons/templates/minimal_project/+package+/templates/.distutils_placeholder python-pylons.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pylons/templates/default_project/+package+/model/__init__.py_tmpl python-pylons.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pylons/templates/default_project/+package+/__init__.py_tmpl python-pylons.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pylons/templates/default_project/+package+/templates/.distutils_placeholder python-pylons.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pylons/templates/default_project/+package+/templates/.distutils_placeholder python-pylons.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pylons/templates/minimal_project/+package+/__init__.py_tmpl python-pylons.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pylons/templates/default_project/+package+/controllers/__init__.py_tmpl python-pylons.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pylons/templates/default_project/+package+/config/__init__.py_tmpl python-pylons.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pylons/templates/default_project/+package+/tests/test_models.py_tmpl 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 10 errors, 2 warnings. conforms to Package Naming Guidelines: check conforms to Packaging Guidelines: check approved/correct license: check license included in %doc: check build in mock: check correct BuildRequires: check owns all directories that it creates: check no duplicate files in %files: check correct permissions: check correct %clean section: check consistent use of macros: check rm -rf %{buildroot}: check UTF-8 filenames: check I'm pretty much ready to approve this once the Source0 is changed to http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/P/Pylons/Pylons-0.9.6.1.tar.gz. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 05:53:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:53:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806270553.m5R5rS2s016246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: redhat-lsb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 hliu at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hliu at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From hliu at redhat.com 2008-06-27 01:53 EST ------- This is a pre-review for convincing one of the sponsors of approving my application: I ran rpmlint against SRPM of the latest redhat-lsb, and I got following errors and warnings: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/lsb/install_initd A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/lsb/remove_initd A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. E: hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/lsb A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. E: hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/lsb/install_initd A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. E: hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/lsb/remove_initd A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/lsb A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/lsb A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. W: macro-in-%changelog endif Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. W: invalid-license GPL The value of the License tag was not recognized. Known values are: "AFL", "Affero GPL", "ASL 1.0", "ASL 1.0+", "ASL 1.1", "ASL 1.1+", "ASL 2.0", "ASL 2.0+", "APSL 2.0", "APSL 2.0+", "Artistic clarified", "Boost", "BSD with advertising", "BSD", "CeCILL", "CDDL", "CPL", "Condor", "Cryptix", "EPL", "eCos", "EFL 2.0", "EFL 2.0+", "EU Datagrid", "GPL+", "GPLv2", "GPLv2+", "GPLv3", "GPLv3+", "IBM", "iMatix", "Intel ACPI", "Interbase", "Jabber", "LaTeX", "LGPL+", "LGPLv2", "LGPLv2 with exceptions", "LGPLv2+", "LGPLv3", "LGPLv3+", "LPL", "mecab-ipadic", "MIT", "MPLv1.0", "MPLv1.0+", "MPLv1.1", "MPLv1.1+", "NCSA", "NGPL", "NOSL", "Netscape", "Nokia", "OpenLDAP", "OSL 1.0", "OSL 1.0+", "OpenSSL", "Phorum", "PHP", "Public Domain", "Python", "QPL", "RPSL", "Ruby", "Sleepycat", "SMLNJL", "SISSL", "SPL", "Vim", "VNLSL", "VSL", "W3C", "WTFPL", "wxWindows", "xinetd", "Zend", "ZPLv1.0", "ZPLv1.0+", "ZPLv2.0", "ZPLv2.0+", "zlib", "CDL", "FBSDDL", "GFDL", "Open Publication", "CC-BY", "CC-BY-SA", "DSL", "Free Art", "Arphic", "SIL Open Font", "Redistributable, no modification permitted", "Freely redistributable without restriction". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 06:22:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 02:22:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445028] Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806270622.m5R6MF3Q007497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445028 rickyz at cmu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 06:41:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 02:41:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453082] New: Review Request: python-dtopt - Add options to doctest examples while they are running Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453082 Summary: Review Request: python-dtopt - Add options to doctest examples while they are running Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rickyz at cmu.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/python-dtopt/python-dtopt.spec SRPM URL: http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/python-dtopt/python-dtopt-0.1-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: dtopts adds options to doctest examples while they are running. When using the doctest module it is often convenient to use the ELLIPSIS option, which allows you to use ... as a wildcard. But you either have to setup the test runner to use this option, or you must put #doctest: +ELLIPSIS on every example that uses this feature. dtopt lets you enable this option globally from within a doctest, by doing: >>> from dtopt import ELLIPSIS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 06:57:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 02:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806270657.m5R6v67V013671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |453016 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 06:57:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 02:57:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806270657.m5R6v775013700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |453017 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 07:09:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 03:09:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453083] New: Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 Summary: Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: abartlet at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://abartlet.net/samba4-rpm/samba4.spec SRPM URL: http://abartlet.net/samba4-rpm/samba4-4.0.0-0.alpha4.1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Samba 4 is the ambitious next version of the Samba suite that is being developed in parallel to the stable 3.0 series. The main emphasis in this branch is support for the Active Directory logon protocols used by Windows 2000 and above, and to provide client libraries for these protocols. This package has been specifically designed not to conflict with Samba3, and to provide the libraries and tools required to build OpenChange. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 07:46:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 03:46:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806270746.m5R7kbgc004184@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-06-27 03:46 EST ------- rpmlint says: un-fonts-core.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.2-080608-1 1.0-1.fc9 How about using the latest released 1.0.2-080608 tarball? (Also since you note it in the changelog.:) I think the version can be just 1.0.2 and then the datestamp can go into the release field following http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines. Probably %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{name} %define archivename un-fonts Name: un-fonts-core would be ok for this package. un-fonts-core.src: W: invalid-license GPL v2 The license url http://korea.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.ko.html embedded in the ttf fonts is broken. Could you please contact upstream to clarify their intention on the GPL version. It would be better if the fonts files just stated the GPL version (eg "version 2 or later") than referring to a url which might change or disappear. Anyway currently the License tag should be GPLv2+ or maybe GPLv2. (There seems to be a translation at http://korea.gnu.org/documents/copyleft/gpl.ko.html but again Fedora, like the FSF, would not recognise the unofficial translation. So it does not really help.) You don't use xorg-x11-font-utils or ttmkfdir so those buildrequires can be dropped. It would be good to have a bit more information in the description. There can also be summary and description in Korean added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 07:55:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 03:55:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806270755.m5R7tt4d024628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-06-27 03:55 EST ------- Hi Mamoru, I was building for F-8 on Koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=682970, and the build does not seem to execute. There is no information in build.log which can help me figure out what could be wrong.. It just shows this : ============================================================================== ENTER do(['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bs --target i386 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/speech-dispatcher.spec'], False, '/var/lib/mock/dist-f8-build-211694-37279/root/', None, 0, True, 0, 101, 102, None, logger=) Executing command: ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bs --target i386 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/speech-dispatcher.spec'] sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory warning: Could not canonicalize hostname: x86-3 Building target platforms: i386 Building for target i386 Wrote: /builddir/build/SRPMS/speech-dispatcher-0.6.6-13.fc8.src.rpm LEAVE do --> ============================================================================= I expect it to proceed forward from LEAVE do --> but it just fails? Any hints? Thanks, Hemant -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 08:03:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 04:03:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806270803.m5R83PT6008251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-27 04:03 EST ------- Please check root.log when you see "mock exited with status 10" or "status 30". ---------------------------------------------------------------- DEBUG util.py:250: No Package Found for dotconf-devel ---------------------------------------------------------------- It seems that dotconf is available only on F-9+ and OLPC2+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 09:03:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 05:03:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806270903.m5R93EtD008079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: redhat-lsb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 ------- Additional Comments From hliu at redhat.com 2008-06-27 05:03 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=310415) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=310415&action=view) Patch to purge all the errors and warnings given by rpmlint This's the patch used to purge all the errors and warnings given by rpmlint: Errors: hardcoded lib path Warnings: 1. macro-in-%changelog endif 2. invalid-license GPL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 09:11:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 05:11:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449135] Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806270911.m5R9BWNI024226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449135 ------- Additional Comments From musuruan at gmail.com 2008-06-27 05:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > I've changed also the license, but I have a doubt about it. The upstream site > (fixed now on URL) simply states 'GPL'. Shouldn't this be honoured ? No, you should follow what is written here ("Q: How do I figure out what version of the GPL/LGPL my package is under?"): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ > Regarding the Source with full url, the download url > (http://gforge.org/frs/download.php/245/gforge-4.5.19.tar.bz2) includes a > internal release number 245 that changes from one version to another on > unrelated manner (for 4.4 is 102). Is it OK to use this unpredictable value ? It's OK. It is more important to check that the version you supply matches the upstream one. You only need to remember to update it at every new release. > Regarding subpackages (specifically svn/cvs) I'm still believe the package is > not mature enough. The packaged local.inc fixes sys_use_scm=false, so none of > them are currently a requirement. I obviously plan to make them available, but I > need more work to make that smoothly. Currently I use gforge at workplace, but > without many features (not only SCM but also mailmain) and it's perfectly > functional, even whithout the many subdirs I opted not to copy to buildroot. When you request a review is because you think your package is mature enough. I suggest you to work on adding subpackages and posting an update. Moreover, gforge is not really useful without an SCM tool. Meanwhile, since you need to be sponsored, I suggest you to follow what is described in the HowToGetSponsored wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored And in particular that "The best ways for you to illustrate your understanding of the packaging guidelines are to submit quality packages and to assist with package reviews." Since GForge is a request on the WishList (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList), I written a note that there is this review request. This should give you more visibility. I'll be on holidays really soon, so I hope someone else can step in and help you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 09:38:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 05:38:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444264] Review Request: usb_modeswitch - brings umts / 4g cards into operational mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806270938.m5R9c6LN030262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: usb_modeswitch - brings umts / 4g cards into operational mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444264 romal at gmx.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From romal at gmx.de 2008-06-27 05:38 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: usb_modeswitch Short Description: Gets 4G cards in operational mode Owners: romal Branches: F-9 InitialCC: romal Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 10:57:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 06:57:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188445] Review Request: bootconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271057.m5RAvAPM015895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188445 mrsam at courier-mta.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mrsam at courier-mta.com 2008-06-27 06:57 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bootconf Short Description: GRUB configuration utility Owners: mrsam Branches: F-9 InitialCC: mrsam Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 11:06:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 07:06:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452450] RFE: Include Spacewalk (and dependencies) in Fedora In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271106.m5RB61S9004681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RFE: Include Spacewalk (and dependencies) in Fedora Alias: F-Spacewalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452450 msuchy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |453109 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 11:06:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 07:06:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453109] New: Review Request: NPusers - Adds NOCpulse production users Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 Summary: Review Request: NPusers - Adds NOCpulse production users Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: msuchy at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/NPusers/NPusers.spec URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/NPusers/NPusers-1.17.11-6.fc9.src.rpm Description: Installs NOCpulse users Note: I still do not have sponsor although I requested it in BZ 452832. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 11:09:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 07:09:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191492] Review Request: unuran - Universal Non-Uniform Random number generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271109.m5RB9wd0019597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unuran - Universal Non-Uniform Random number generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191492 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-27 07:09 EST ------- unuran-1.2.4p1-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 11:16:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 07:16:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452450] RFE: Include Spacewalk (and dependencies) in Fedora In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271116.m5RBGcWX007988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RFE: Include Spacewalk (and dependencies) in Fedora Alias: F-Spacewalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452450 msuchy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |453111 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 11:16:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 07:16:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453109] Review Request: NPusers - Adds NOCpulse production users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271116.m5RBGaso007926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NPusers - Adds NOCpulse production users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 msuchy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |453111 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 11:16:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 07:16:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453111] New: Review Request: np-config - NOCpulse global configuration file Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453111 Summary: Review Request: np-config - NOCpulse global configuration file Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: msuchy at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SPEC URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/np-config/np-config.spec URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/np-config/np-config-2.110.3-7.fc9.src.rpm Description: np-config contains the nocpulse configuration file and access libraries for it in perl and python Note: this package require BZ 453109, which are not reviewed yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 12:00:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:00:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230316] Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271200.m5RC0cEN021013@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230316 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2008-06-27 08:00 EST ------- GREAT!!! And thanks a lot for resolving for me the problem with %lang files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 12:37:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:37:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453119] New: Review Request: Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453119 Summary: Review Request: Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: veillard at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 12:54:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:54:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453119] Review Request: Java bindings for the libvirt library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271254.m5RCsTGr016845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Java bindings for the libvirt library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453119 veillard at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: Java | |bindings for the libvirt | |library Flag| |fedora-review?, fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From veillard at redhat.com 2008-06-27 08:54 EST ------- Oops apparenty I pressed enter before finishing to complete the bug ... SRPMS: ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/java/libvirt-java-0.1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm spec: ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/java/libvirt-java.spec result of rpmlint: wei:~ -> rpmlint rpms/SRPMS/libvirt-java-0.1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm libvirt-java.src:88: E: files-attr-not-set libvirt-java.src: W: invalid-license LGPL libvirt-java.src: E: unknown-key GPG#de95bc1f libvirt-java.src: W: strange-permission libvirt-java.spec 0600 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings. wei:~ -> the strange thing is that if I check the spec file I don't get the same ... wei:~/libvirt-java -> rpmlint libvirt-java.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. wei:~/libvirt-java -> I think I found the error on line 88, %files javadoc %defattr(-,root,root) <- that was missing For the invalid licence I'm a bit puzzled... We include a LGPL 2.1 COPYING.LIB and reference it in the source code. I guess then it should be labelled LGPLv2 instead of LGPL as the spec file now says. I have tried to adhere to the jpackage-utils-policy text and follow some of the few examples of existing java bindings using JNI around libraries, but there isn't that much in Fedora (the Java gnome bindings are a bit complex to follow directly), so I had to make a few guesses when generating the spec file. I hope it's okay ... Daniel Daniel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 13:46:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:46:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452832] Review Request: perl-Math-FFT - Perl extension for Fast Fourier Transforms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271346.m5RDktLk019427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-FFT - Perl extension for Fast Fourier Transforms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452832 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-27 09:46 EST ------- Miroslav: Thanks for the updated package. Please note that relocatable packages are deprecated for Fedora [1], so not being relocatable is not an issue at all. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Relocatable_packages RPMLint is quiet. Spec file is clean legible. 1.) Licensing Seems like the copyright status of several pieces of code is not known. As per module's documentation [2], fft4g.c is not necessarily covered by this module's license. According to original author's [3] website, the file is public domain. Please do the following: * Add " and Public Domain" to the License: tag, and accompany it with a comment about which parts of the code are covered by which license. * Encourage the upstream author to include verbatim copy of the copyright disclaimer (as in [3]) in this package's documentation. [2] http://search.cpan.org/dist/Math-FFT/FFT.pm#COPYRIGHT [3] http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~ooura/fft.html arrays.c file that comes from PGPLOT package is covered by the very same license as this module's code [4]. You are encouraged to ask this package's upstream to reflect this fact in their documentation, and please add appropriate comment to the License: tag in your spec file as well. [4] http://search.cpan.org/src/KGB/PGPLOT-2.20/LICENSE 2.) Package does not build due to lacking dependencies Addding BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker.pm) might be enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 13:51:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:51:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453111] Review Request: np-config - NOCpulse global configuration file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271351.m5RDpWg4001333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: np-config - NOCpulse global configuration file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453111 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 14:28:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:28:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453133] New: Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453133 Summary: Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ansilva at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.the-silvas.com-a.googlepages.com/nethogs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.the-silvas.com-a.googlepages.com/nethogs-0.7-1.20080627cvs.fc8.src.rpm Description: NetHogs is a small "net top" tool. Instead of breaking the traffic down per protocol or per subnet, like most such tools do, it groups bandwidth by process and does not rely on a special kernel module to be loaded. So if there's suddenly a lot of network traffic, you can fire up NetHogs and immediately see which PID is causing this, and if it's some kind of spinning process, kill it. NOTE 1 - This tool is under the Fedora Packages WishList. NOTE 2 - I currently maintain the rpmrebuild packages as well, therefore this is *NOT* my first package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 14:32:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:32:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453133] Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271432.m5REWCEQ031585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453133 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 14:38:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:38:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453133] Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271438.m5REcrPi001680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453133 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-06-27 10:38 EST ------- Hey Anderson, This package does not build under gcc 4.3 (>Fedora 9), patching is needed. g++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables decpcap_test.cpp decpcap.o -o decpcap_test -lpcap -lm conninode.cpp: In function 'void addtoconninode(char*)': conninode.cpp:48: error: 'exit' was not declared in this scope conninode.cpp: In function 'void refreshconninode()': conninode.cpp:162: error: 'exit' was not declared in this scope make: *** [conninode.o] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 14:50:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:50:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453133] Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271450.m5REo6Qh005338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453133 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-06-27 10:50 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=310442) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=310442&action=view) Proposed patch In gcc 4.3, the headers been cleaned up to compile and run faster, but now you have to be sure that you #include everything you really use in the application itself... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 14:51:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:51:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446158] Review Request: xesam-glib - A GObject library for dealing with Xesam services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271451.m5REp3NM005584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xesam-glib - A GObject library for dealing with Xesam services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446158 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2008-06-27 10:51 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xesam-glib Short Description: A GObject library for dealing with Xesam services Owners: deji Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 14:55:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:55:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453133] Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271455.m5REtU4v006908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453133 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-06-27 10:55 EST ------- Please submit a new patched package that will build under gcc 4.3 and also rpmlint is not happy about lib dependencies. nethogs.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency libcap nethogs.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency libstdc++ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 14:58:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:58:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453133] Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271458.m5REwceq021844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453133 ------- Additional Comments From ansilva at redhat.com 2008-06-27 10:58 EST ------- Marke, the rpmlint issue has been fixed... you were too quick for me :-) I've contacted upstream about the issue with the compilation, I will try to fix it, and submit them a patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 15:05:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:05:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226547] Merge Review: x86info In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271505.m5RF522g024144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: x86info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226547 davej at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 15:11:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:11:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453119] Review Request: libvirt-java: Java bindings for the libvirt library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271511.m5RFBmLP026240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvirt-java: Java bindings for the libvirt library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453119 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Java |Review Request: libvirt- |bindings for the libvirt |java: Java bindings for the |library |libvirt library Flag|fedora-review?, fedora-cvs? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 15:15:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:15:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453133] Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271515.m5RFFnnc013133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453133 ------- Additional Comments From ansilva at redhat.com 2008-06-27 11:15 EST ------- Ok... net spec updloaded, and new src rpm that compiles under Fedora Spec URL: http://www.the-silvas.com-a.googlepages.com/nethogs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.the-silvas.com-a.googlepages.com/ nethogs-0.7-2.20080627cvs.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 15:16:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:16:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453133] Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271516.m5RFGnd6027618@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453133 ------- Additional Comments From ansilva at redhat.com 2008-06-27 11:16 EST ------- Fixing URL: SRPM URL: http://www.the-silvas.com-a.googlepages.com/ nethogs-0.7-2.20080627cvs.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 15:18:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:18:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453133] Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271518.m5RFISYR013819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453133 ------- Additional Comments From ansilva at redhat.com 2008-06-27 11:18 EST ------- Last try, my browser is being stupid: Spec URL: http://www.the-silvas.com-a.googlepages.com/nethogs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.the-silvas.com-a.googlepages.com/nethogs-0.7-2.20080627cvs.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 15:48:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:48:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 401101] Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271548.m5RFmBHR023270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=401101 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 15:47:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:47:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 401101] Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271547.m5RFlO4U023022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=401101 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-06-27 11:47 EST ------- Everything seems fine now, I'll come back with a full review in a while, I want to also test it first. The only thing that I am not fond of is the fact that all header files in -devel have the date of the build. I would have thought that the original date should have been preserved given the usage of INSTALL="install -p" in %install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 15:47:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:47:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 401101] Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271547.m5RFlp7C023179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=401101 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 16:17:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:17:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230316] Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271617.m5RGH4PS013920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230316 mcepl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2008-06-27 12:17 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jbrout Short Description: Photo manager, written in pyGTK Owners:mcepl Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits:yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 16:22:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:22:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446159] Review Request: xesam-tools - A toolkit for Xesam compliant services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271622.m5RGMpg0015518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xesam-tools - A toolkit for Xesam compliant services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446159 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-27 12:22 EST ------- I'm going to assume that the tests here are similarly not runnable. I couldn't get them to run, at least. The upstream web site seems to be down now, but I think a more specific URL would be good if possible. The only thing I'm not sure about is the license. The code doesn't have the expected license blocks, but PKG-INFO and setup.py both say "GNU LGPL 2.1" so I would have to assume LGPLv2 and not LGPLv2+ as you have. This should definitely be clarified with upstream, and "License: LGPLv2" used in the interim. Honestly that's the only thing I see that requires fixing, so you can just change it when you check in. * source files match upstream: fcaea2c7dc21ede48feed9d743560e97db4c9fceb534a808a618b3f1791a5e93 xesam-tools-0.6.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. ? license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. license text not included upstream. license text included in package. latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: xesam-tools = 0.6.1-1.fc10 = /usr/bin/python python(abi) = 2.5 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED, just fix up the License. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 16:37:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:37:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271637.m5RGb9GO019651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 ------- Additional Comments From nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com 2008-06-27 12:37 EST ------- updated to use "sed" : Spec URL : http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/clive.spec SRPM URL : http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/clive-0.4.16-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 16:40:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:40:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271640.m5RGefAi020812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 ------- Additional Comments From nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com 2008-06-27 12:40 EST ------- forget rpmlint output : [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint clive-0.4.16-3.fc9.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint clive-0.4.16-3.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rebuild under mock is still ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 16:47:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:47:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453133] Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271647.m5RGlNXg022688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453133 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-06-27 12:47 EST ------- Package looks sane, all works. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 16:49:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:49:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230316] Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271649.m5RGnnSU009003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230316 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-27 12:49 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 16:51:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:51:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436147] Review Request: mairix - A program for indexing and searching email messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271651.m5RGp4lc009717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mairix - A program for indexing and searching email messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436147 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-27 12:51 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 16:54:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446158] Review Request: xesam-glib - A GObject library for dealing with Xesam services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271654.m5RGs0EO010328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xesam-glib - A GObject library for dealing with Xesam services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446158 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-27 12:53 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 16:58:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:58:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450470] RDMA kernel stack initializing package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271658.m5RGw7Ud025387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RDMA kernel stack initializing package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450470 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-27 12:58 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 16:56:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:56:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447757] Review Request: mediawiki-ParserFunctions - Enhances the Mediawiki parser with logical functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271656.m5RGuWhj025177@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-ParserFunctions - Enhances the Mediawiki parser with logical functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447757 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-27 12:56 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 17:00:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:00:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452251] Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271700.m5RH0Hcb012091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452251 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-27 13:00 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 16:58:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:58:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453133] Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271658.m5RGw9Vl011298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453133 ansilva at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ansilva at redhat.com 2008-06-27 12:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nethogs Short Description: top-like tool for network bandwidth Owners: afsilva Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 17:00:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:00:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271700.m5RH0dsJ026437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-27 13:00 EST ------- Shouldn't this depend on the recently submitted heimdal package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 16:59:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:59:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453082] Review Request: python-dtopt - Add options to doctest examples while they are running In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271659.m5RGxlWP025806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-dtopt - Add options to doctest examples while they are running https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453082 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-27 12:59 EST ------- Builds fine, rpmlint is silent. I admit to not being able to understand anything at all about the summary or even the description, I can't even understand enough of them to suggest improvements. I suppose someone who knows something of the subject matter would understand them, but I would suggest trying to make it a little more readable if you can. I guess my issue is that %description seems more like the documentation for the package instead of a short overview of what it does. Still, perhaps I'm just daft, and the packaging itself looks fine. * source files match upstream: 06ae07a12294a7ba708abaa63f838017d1a2faf6147a1e7a14ca4fa28f86da7f dtopt-0.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: python-dtopt = 0.1-2.fc10 = python(abi) = 2.5 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I've no idea how to test this. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 17:03:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:03:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453133] Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271703.m5RH3hdd012918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453133 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-27 13:03 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 17:03:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:03:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453109] Review Request: NPusers - Adds NOCpulse production users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271703.m5RH3OEn012829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NPusers - Adds NOCpulse production users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | Summary|Review Request: NPusers - |Review Request: NPusers - |Adds NOCpulse production |Adds NOCpulse production |users |users -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 17:06:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:06:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445028] Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271706.m5RH6XjF028139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445028 ------- Additional Comments From kylev at kylev.com 2008-06-27 13:06 EST ------- I'd like to run with this, but I can't quite justify it. I don't feel comfortable putting out 0.9.6.1 since 0.9.6.2 is a security fix (not nice to allow people to install a known bad release). And I can roll 0.9.6.2 since the tarball is so badly broken (well, I *could*, but it'd be lacking docs, LICENSE, and include a number of gross .spec hacks to un-do their mess). I'm hoping for a new tarball from Pylons people, and will continue to put pressure on them for a few more days. Let me know if you disagree with this plan. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 17:14:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:14:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271714.m5RHEDCE030098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-27 13:14 EST ------- * it is not needed to put the name in the summary, I mean you can remove 'Z fuzz -' from the Summary. * Regarding the patch file names, I have a recommendation you can ignore, I use name like zfuzz-20070911-read-decl.patch to know in which version the patch was added. * regarding the version, if the versioning scheme was changed and the version became less recent that the latest date (the ordering is the ascii ordering), then you'll have to use an epoch. Not the end of the world but prone to easy errors when forgetting to specify the epoch in a version-release string. * regarding the name, having tex-zfuzz as a name really means that the name of the upstream software is zfuzz, but that it is a tex package. The fact that it is a tex package does not means that it is in a tex distribution (besides, I am quite sure that it could easily be incorporated in tex distributions). Users who knows that teh zfuzz package name is zfuzz and that it is a tex package should in fact expect that it is called tex-zfuzz. So naming it tex-zfuzz doesn't means that upstream choice is not honoured, but that honouring upstream choice in the fedora context means adding tex- in front. That being said, adding tex- in front of tex packages was agreed by the packaging commitee, it is in the guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingNamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28TeX.29 but it was also said that not having tex- was not a big deal so I would not considering it as a blocker, but I think that you should really take into account consistency with the remaining of the distribution and user expectations. For the sponsoring, could you please point me to other works you've done in fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 17:14:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:14:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271714.m5RHEcC1016084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server Alias: player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2008-06-27 13:14 EST ------- Just FYI, I'm looking into the development build failure. I'm pretty sure I can patch a fix that works with geos 3 as seen in the current development tree. This is a blocker issue. This needs to build against development as part of the review. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 17:15:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:15:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271715.m5RHFc8W016601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-27 13:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Any more reviewer comments? I've addressed every one posted above. The only > ones I haven't done at all are using a different name and a different version > numbering scheme, for reasons noted above. > > I'd like to think this is ready to go... Never forget that fedora is volunteer based, so being patient is often necessary... But this also means that othere should be patient with you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 17:58:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:58:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226115] Merge Review: m4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271758.m5RHwL9D029853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: m4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226115 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(vcrhonek at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-06-27 13:58 EST ------- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 18:27:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:27:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446159] Review Request: xesam-tools - A toolkit for Xesam compliant services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271827.m5RIRiYC019663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xesam-tools - A toolkit for Xesam compliant services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446159 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2008-06-27 14:27 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xesam-tools Short Description: A toolkit for Xesam compliant services Owners: deji Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 18:28:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:28:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445028] Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271828.m5RISRhV006253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445028 kylev at kylev.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|http://www.kylev.com/pylons-|http://kylev.fedorapeople.or |rpm/python-pylons-0.9.6.1- |g/RPM/python-pylons-0.9.6.2- |2.fc8.src.rpm |1.fc8.src.rpm ------- Additional Comments From kylev at kylev.com 2008-06-27 14:28 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.kylev.com/pylons-rpm/python-pylons.spec SRPM URL: http://kylev.fedorapeople.org/RPM/python-pylons-0.9.6.2-1.fc8.src.rpm rpmlint still whines about a few empty/hidden files, but those are from the distro itself. I also had to add a find -delete to get rid of the ._ files which started being installed into site-packages (grr!). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 18:35:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:35:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445028] Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271835.m5RIZa5w022047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445028 ------- Additional Comments From kylev at kylev.com 2008-06-27 14:35 EST ------- Damnit... fedorapeople move FAIL Spec URL: http://kylev.fedorapeople.org/RPM/python-pylons.spec SRPM URL: http://kylev.fedorapeople.org/RPM/python-pylons-0.9.6.2-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 18:37:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:37:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438806] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Header - OO interface to modify and handle HTTP headers and status codes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271837.m5RIbtGH008946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Header - OO interface to modify and handle HTTP headers and status codes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438806 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-27 14:37 EST ------- Actually, Remi is a sponsor now although I really thought someone else was going to sponsor David. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 18:43:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:43:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445028] Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271843.m5RIhscA023816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445028 ------- Additional Comments From rickyz at cmu.edu 2008-06-27 14:43 EST ------- sources match upstream URL: check 01d0e1ca95cfbfa1f73b8b5ae9a5f0a5 Pylons-0.9.6.2.tar.gz still builds/installs cleanly: check APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 18:44:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:44:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445028] Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271844.m5RIi31c023880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445028 rickyz at cmu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 18:48:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:48:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445977] Review Request: ikiwiki - A wiki compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271848.m5RImksi011573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ikiwiki - A wiki compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445977 ------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny at gmx.de 2008-06-27 14:48 EST ------- Is there something blocking the review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 18:48:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:48:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230316] Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271848.m5RImSew011513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230316 mcepl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2008-06-27 14:48 EST ------- F-8 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=54032 F-9 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=54031 Rawhide http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=54030 Wov! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 18:51:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:51:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445028] Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271851.m5RIp5YP026113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445028 kylev at kylev.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kylev at kylev.com 2008-06-27 14:51 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-pylons Short Description: A python web application toolkit Owners: kylev Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 18:54:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:54:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438897] Review Request: framewave - Image and signal processing routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271854.m5RIsVka013315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: framewave - Image and signal processing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438897 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-27 14:54 EST ------- This one failed to build because the test suite needs csh. (?!) I added that, and things then fail later: make TMPDIR=/builddir/build/BUILD/FRAMEWAVE_1.1_SRC_05MAY08_BETA/UnitTest/tmp/release_64//ThresholdAndCompare OUTDIR=/builddir/build/BUILD/FRAMEWAVE_1.1_SRC_05MAY08_BETA/UnitTest/bin/release_64/ BITNESS=64 CONFIG_TYPE=release FW_INC_PATH=/builddir/build/BUILD/FRAMEWAVE_1.1_SRC_05MAY08_BETA/UnitTest/FWBuildBits FW_BIN_PATH=/builddir/build/BUILD/FRAMEWAVE_1.1_SRC_05MAY08_BETA/Framewave/build/bin//release_shared_64 UNIT_TEST_FRAMEWORK_LIB_PATH=/builddir/build/BUILD/FRAMEWAVE_1.1_SRC_05MAY08_BETA/UnitTest/bin/release_64/ SRC_DIR=/builddir/build/BUILD/FRAMEWAVE_1.1_SRC_05MAY08_BETA/UnitTest/UnitTestCollection/ThresholdAndCompare ls: cannot access /builddir/build/BUILD/FRAMEWAVE_1.1_SRC_05MAY08_BETA/UnitTest/FWBuildBits/*.h: No such file or directory g++ -m64 -g -DLIN -DLIN64 -fPIC -c -o /builddir/build/BUILD/FRAMEWAVE_1.1_SRC_05MAY08_BETA/UnitTest/tmp/release_64//ThresholdAndCompare/ut_iCompare.o -I../../UnitTestFramework/UnitTestFramework/ -I../BaseObjects/ -I/builddir/build/BUILD/FRAMEWAVE_1.1_SRC_05MAY08_BETA/UnitTest/FWBuildBits ut_iCompare.cpp In file included from ../BaseObjects/Object.h:11, from ThresholdAndCompareObjects.h:10, from ut_iCompare.cpp:10: ../BaseObjects/UnitTest.h:84:20: error: fwBase.h: No such file or directory ut_iCompare.cpp:11:21: error: fwImage.h: No such file or directory and the failures seem to cascade from there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 18:58:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:58:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445068] Review Request: ocaml-bin-prot - Read and write OCaml values in a type-safe binary protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271858.m5RIwq3o028201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-bin-prot - Read and write OCaml values in a type-safe binary protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445068 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-27 14:58 EST ------- Any progress here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 19:03:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:03:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453133] Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271903.m5RJ3BSb016465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453133 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-27 15:03 EST ------- nethogs-0.7-2.20080627cvs.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 19:04:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:04:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453133] Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271904.m5RJ4kRE016711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453133 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-27 15:04 EST ------- nethogs-0.7-2.20080627cvs.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 19:10:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:10:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453194] New: Review Request: vagalume - A Last.fm client for Gnome and Maemo Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453194 Summary: Review Request: vagalume - A Last.fm client for Gnome and Maemo Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: debarshi.ray at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/vagalume.spec SRPM URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/vagalume-0.6-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Vagalume is a Last.fm client based on Gnome, and specially designed to work in the Maemo platform. It is known to work in Nokia devices with the following operating systems: * Internet Tablet OS 2006 (Nokia 770) * Internet Tablet OS 2007 (Nokia N800 and 770 using Hacker Edition) * Internet Tablet OS 2008 (Nokia N810 and updated N800) Besides that, it also works in standard PCs. Vagalume has been tested and developed in a desktop PC running GNU/Linux, and it should work in other Unix-like systems too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 19:11:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:11:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453194] Review Request: vagalume - A Last.fm client for Gnome and Maemo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271911.m5RJBiYL032628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vagalume - A Last.fm client for Gnome and Maemo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453194 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-06-27 15:11 EST ------- Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=683953 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 19:13:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271913.m5RJDrAh000632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From dwheeler at dwheeler.com 2008-06-27 15:13 EST ------- Here's a new version of the package, which I believe resolves all issues raised above: http://www.dwheeler.com/tex-zfuzz-7.09-7.fc9.src.rpm http://www.dwheeler.com/tex-zfuzz.spec rpmlint is clean on specs, SRPMs, and binary RPMs. koji builds on all dist-f9 architectures without error. Here are my responses to comment 16: >* it is not needed to put the name in the summary, I mean you can remove > 'Z fuzz -' from the Summary. Ok, done. >* Regarding the patch file names, I have a recommendation you can ignore, > I use name like zfuzz-20070911-read-decl.patch > to know in which version the patch was added. Sounds reasonable! Done. I know you said I could ignore it, but I did it anyway :-). >* regarding the version, if the versioning scheme was changed and the > version became less recent that the latest date (the ordering is the > ascii ordering), then you'll have to use an epoch. Not the end of the > world but prone to easy errors when forgetting to specify the epoch > in a version-release string. Yes, I know about epoch and its problems. But I don't like the idea of creating an arbitrary "1.0"; it doesn't convey any information, and if it were completely arbitrary and disconnected from upstream, other distributions might use a different version numbering system... leading to confusion. So here's my proposal: version numbering is of the form "(yyyy-2000).mm[dd]". Since this was released on 2007-09-11, this is version "7.09". Thus we have a normal-looking version number, yet one that easily syncs with upstream. Ubuntu uses this format, so it's not unknown in the world. >* regarding the name, having tex-zfuzz as a name really means that the > name of the upstream software is zfuzz, but that it is a tex package. > The fact that it is a tex package does not means that it is in a tex > distribution... Ah, okay. Package renamed to "tex-zfuzz". > For the sponsoring, could you please point me to other works you've > done in fedora? * I created and wrote the majority of the content of: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo * I'm the upstream developer for two Fedora packages, sloccount and flawfinder I've done a lot of stuff related to Free-Libre / open source software that isn't Fedora-specific: * http://www.dwheeler.com/oss_fs_why.html "Why OSS/FS? Look at the Numbers!" had a major impact years ago. This was the first paper to show, through _quantitative_ studies, that FLOSS was worth considering. Basically, it's a survey of many different quantitative studies, and when it came out there was nothing like it. * http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/high-assurance-floss.html is a survey of FLOSS tools that can help high assurance * http://www.dwheeler.com/ has lots more. * I'm well-known in OSS circles; you can see some of my presentations (http://www.dwheeler.com/presentations.html). * Worse comes to worse, ask Bruce Perens, Eric Raymond, or Michael Tiemann; they can vouch for me. Does that help? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 19:24:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:24:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453119] Review Request: libvirt-java: Java bindings for the libvirt library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271924.m5RJOLvU003843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvirt-java: Java bindings for the libvirt library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453119 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-27 15:24 EST ------- Unfortunately it looks like libvirt has broken dependencies in rawhide: Error: Missing Dependency: libgnutls.so.13()(64bit) is needed by package libvirt so this doesn't build at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 19:35:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:35:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452457] Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271935.m5RJZQsF026534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452457 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-27 15:35 EST ------- perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP-1.04-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 19:34:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:34:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452458] Review Request: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271934.m5RJYjoN025982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452458 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-27 15:34 EST ------- perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword-0.03-12.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 19:35:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:35:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452457] Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271935.m5RJZTev026580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452457 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |1.04-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 19:36:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:36:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450685] Review Request: R-DBI - Database Interface for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271936.m5RJa7Vm007825@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-DBI - Database Interface for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450685 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-27 15:36 EST ------- R-DBI-0.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 19:35:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:35:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450685] Review Request: R-DBI - Database Interface for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271935.m5RJZYe7007587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-DBI - Database Interface for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450685 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-27 15:35 EST ------- R-DBI-0.2-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 19:38:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:38:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452458] Review Request: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271938.m5RJc2fb008405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452458 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-27 15:38 EST ------- perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword-0.03-12.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 19:35:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:35:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450685] Review Request: R-DBI - Database Interface for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271935.m5RJZalY007628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-DBI - Database Interface for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450685 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.2-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 19:34:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:34:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452458] Review Request: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271934.m5RJYmVa006938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452458 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.03-12.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 19:37:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:37:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452457] Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271937.m5RJbgLW027336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP - CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452457 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-27 15:37 EST ------- perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP-1.04-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 19:55:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:55:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447757] Review Request: mediawiki-ParserFunctions - Enhances the Mediawiki parser with logical functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271955.m5RJtDbf032740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-ParserFunctions - Enhances the Mediawiki parser with logical functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447757 ianweller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 19:53:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:53:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447757] Review Request: mediawiki-ParserFunctions - Enhances the Mediawiki parser with logical functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806271953.m5RJrTWm032056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-ParserFunctions - Enhances the Mediawiki parser with logical functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447757 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-27 15:53 EST ------- mediawiki-ParserFunctions-1.1.1-1.20080520svn35130.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 20:00:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453194] Review Request: vagalume - A Last.fm client for Gnome and Maemo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806272000.m5RK0Ogw015342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vagalume - A Last.fm client for Gnome and Maemo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453194 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-27 16:00 EST ------- This was already submitted and then rejected for Fedora; the review was moved to Livna. Have circumstances changed such that this should go into Fedora? See bug 445036. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 20:25:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:25:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452251] Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806272025.m5RKPhnA008707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452251 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-27 16:25 EST ------- libmatthew-java-0.7.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 20:34:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:34:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453119] Review Request: libvirt-java: Java bindings for the libvirt library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806272034.m5RKYZIU010829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvirt-java: Java bindings for the libvirt library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453119 ------- Additional Comments From veillard at redhat.com 2008-06-27 16:34 EST ------- I built libvirt-0.4.4 when I released it in CVS on Wednesday, it first broke because qemu broke, but I have rebuilt it as libvirt-0.4.4-1.fc10 'libvirt-0.4.4-1.fc10 Tag: dist-f10 Status: complete Built' usually this mean the build suceeded, and unless rawhide didn't picked it up that build from 2 days ago , or libgnutls released again an incompatible version, you should not see the dependancy problem, really ... I woudl have looked at the build in bodhi but ssl errors prevents me from loggin in ... Daniel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 20:39:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:39:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453119] Review Request: libvirt-java: Java bindings for the libvirt library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806272039.m5RKdMXW025427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvirt-java: Java bindings for the libvirt library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453119 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-27 16:39 EST ------- It's quite possible that my mirror hasn't caught up yet; I'll keep trying. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 20:37:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:37:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445652] Review Request: libloader - Java Resource Loading Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806272037.m5RKbhZI011853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libloader - Java Resource Loading Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445652 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-27 16:37 EST ------- Builds fine; rpmlint just says: libloader-javadoc.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation which isn't a problem since we don't care about Group: anyway. I can't seem to find anything related to this package at the upstream URL given. Am I missing something? I'm no java expert so I'm just relying on the guidelines; they indicate that you should be able to call ant with just "ant" instead of "ant compile javadoc" and indeed the packages seem to come out the same. I don't think this is remotely significant, though. I don't see anything which would prevent this package from being approved, though. * source files match upstream: 2ba6b426309d150e897731942aadf464f91adc3617a36744bce7a5bbeb62de9f libloader-0.3.7.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: libloader-0.3.7-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm libloader.jar.so()(64bit) libloader = 0.3.7-1.fc10 = /bin/sh java java-gcj-compat >= 1.0.31 jcommon jpackage-utils libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) libloader-javadoc-0.3.7-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm libloader-javadoc = 0.3.7-1.fc10 = jpackage-utils libloader = 0.3.7-1.fc10 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * code, not content. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. Java-specific bits: * no pre-built jars * single jar, named after the package * jarfiles are under _javadir. * javadocs are under _javadocdir. * ant called properly. * no wrapper script necessary. * gcj called properly. * gcj scriptlets present and OK. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 20:53:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:53:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445653] Review Request: libformula - Java Formula Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806272053.m5RKrSJr016087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libformula - Java Formula Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445653 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-27 16:53 EST ------- rpmlint again says: libformula-javadoc.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation which isn't an issue. * source files match upstream: d369b01bad65469a4fc2b31141ae696b43e164842634b48266ce55088ee0efc2 libformula-0.1.18.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: libformula-0.1.18-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm libformula.jar.so()(64bit) libformula = 0.1.18-1.fc10 = /bin/sh java java-gcj-compat >= 1.0.31 jcommon jpackage-utils libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) libformula-javadoc-0.1.18-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm libformula-javadoc = 0.1.18-1.fc10 = jpackage-utils libformula = 0.1.18-1.fc10 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * code, not content. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no pre-built jars * single jar, named after the package * jarfiles are under _javadir. * javadocs are under _javadocdir. * ant called properly. * no wrapper script necessary. * gcj called properly. * gcj scriptlets present and OK. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 20:58:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:58:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445655] Review Request: librepository - Java Hierarchical repository abstraction layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806272058.m5RKwjed030399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librepository - Java Hierarchical repository abstraction layer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445655 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-27 16:58 EST ------- Again the bogus rpmlint complaint: librepository-javadoc.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation Not an issue. * source files match upstream: 6af6974e4d5ebd9c7c4eed03f140ee4d5db340550c48b794e5419bb6b4aec362 librepository-0.1.6.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: librepository-0.1.6-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm librepository.jar.so()(64bit) librepository = 0.1.6-1.fc10 = /bin/sh java java-gcj-compat >= 1.0.31 jcommon jpackage-utils libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) librepository-javadoc-0.1.6-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm librepository-javadoc = 0.1.6-1.fc10 = jpackage-utils librepository = 0.1.6-1.fc10 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * code, not content. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no pre-built jars * single jar, named after the package * jarfiles are under _javadir. * javadocs are under _javadocdir. * ant called properly. * no wrapper script necessary. * gcj called properly. * gcj scriptlets are present and OK. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 21:00:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:00:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445915] Review Request: flute - Java CSS parser using SAC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806272100.m5RL0Dr1018060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flute - Java CSS parser using SAC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445915 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 21:26:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:26:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445915] Review Request: flute - Java CSS parser using SAC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806272126.m5RLQ5S3006071@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flute - Java CSS parser using SAC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445915 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|tibbs at math.uh.edu |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-27 17:26 EST ------- Crap, I happened to not notice the jpp thing in the release before I took this package, and I was trying to avoid reviewing any packages that used it. So I'll return this to the queue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 21:24:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:24:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453224] New: Review Request: prelude-correlator - Correlates IDMEF events for prelude-manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453224 Summary: Review Request: prelude-correlator - Correlates IDMEF events for prelude-manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sgrubb at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/files/prelude-correlator.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/files/prelude-correlator-0.9.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Prelude-Correlator serves to correlate, in real time, the multiple events received by Prelude Manager. Several isolated alerts, generated from different probes, can thus trigger a single correlation alert should the events be related. This correlation alert then appears within the Prewikka interface and indicates the potential target information via the set of correlation rules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 21:26:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:26:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453224] Review Request: prelude-correlator - Correlates IDMEF events for prelude-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806272126.m5RLQQxI025422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-correlator - Correlates IDMEF events for prelude-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453224 ------- Additional Comments From sgrubb at redhat.com 2008-06-27 17:26 EST ------- Instructions for registering prelude-correlator have been added to the prelude HOWTO at http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/audit/prelude.txt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 21:31:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:31:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452911] Review Request: trustyrc - IRC robot fully modular In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806272131.m5RLV4Dv007346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trustyrc - IRC robot fully modular https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452911 nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: trustyrc - |Review Request: trustyrc - |Fully modular IRC robot |IRC robot fully modular ------- Additional Comments From nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com 2008-06-27 17:31 EST ------- updated : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/trustyrc.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/trustyrc-0.1.1-2.fc9.src.rpm rpmplint output : [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint trustyrc-0.1.1-2.fc9.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint trustyrc-0.1.1-2.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint trustyrc-debuginfo-0.1.1-2.fc9.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint trustyrc-plugins-0.1.1-2.fc9.i386.rpm trustyrc-plugins.i386: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint trustyrc-plugins-extras-0.1.1-2.fc9.i386.rpm trustyrc-plugins-extras.i386: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rebuild under mock is OK changelog : - Change buildrequires for curl (only on plugins-extras) - Licence update - non-macro usage for sed - english corrections - compiler flags set -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 21:35:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:35:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442249] Review Request: uniXM - standalong qt player for XMradio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806272135.m5RLZvpe027643@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uniXM - standalong qt player for XMradio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442249 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-27 17:35 EST ------- Is this remotely useful with the free codecs we can ship in Fedora? My understanding is that it requires either mplayer or vlc, neither of which are in Fedora, and even then they require a windows codec to be present. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 22:27:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:27:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438806] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Header - OO interface to modify and handle HTTP headers and status codes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806272227.m5RMRAGL022297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Header - OO interface to modify and handle HTTP headers and status codes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438806 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2008-06-27 18:27 EST ------- I am in the process of sponsoring David with bug #438804 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 22:26:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:26:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806272226.m5RMQgie022197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-27 18:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > >* regarding the version, if the versioning scheme was changed and the > > version became less recent that the latest date (the ordering is the > > ascii ordering), then you'll have to use an epoch. Not the end of the > > world but prone to easy errors when forgetting to specify the epoch > > in a version-release string. > > Yes, I know about epoch and its problems. But > I don't like the idea of creating an arbitrary "1.0"; it doesn't convey > any information, and if it were completely arbitrary and > disconnected from upstream, other distributions might use a different > version numbering system... leading to confusion. I don't propose 1.0 as version number, but a plain 0. That way any versioning scheme chosen later will be newer. It is still possible to switch to another scheme, for example to be consistent with what other distros do if 0 is chosen for now. The informative part would be in the release tag. > So here's my proposal: version numbering is of the form "(yyyy-2000).mm[dd]". > Since this was released on 2007-09-11, this is version "7.09". Thus we have > a normal-looking version number, yet one that easily syncs with upstream. > Ubuntu uses this format, so it's not unknown in the world. I don't really object to that, but I think that using a plain 0 and having the date in the release tag leaves more room for flexibility and allow any change. If you really don't like that 0, I won't make it blocking, however. I think I will submit this issue on the packaging list, it is not the first time something like that happens, and though I don't think it should be a guideline, some recommendations may be interesting. > > For the sponsoring, could you please point me to other works you've > > done in fedora? > > * I created and wrote the majority of the content of: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo Ok, I'll sponsor you, that's an interesting initiative. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 22:36:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:36:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445687] Review Request: portreserve - TCP port reservation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806272236.m5RMa3b0010756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: portreserve - TCP port reservation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445687 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-27 18:36 EST ------- Yes, it builds fine for me on rawhide. I see the above three rpmlint complaints and don't think they're significant. Everything looks good to me. * source files match upstream: 16ca78b8aadb34d42a14fd2d6614e75cc7c130b81a4abfba08afd81a36913804 portreserve-0.0.1.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none). * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: portreserve = 0.0.1-2.fc10 = /bin/sh * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets OK (service setup). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 22:53:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:53:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251805] Review Request: postgresql-orafce - Implementation of some Oracle functions into PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806272253.m5RMroHQ014748@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-orafce - Implementation of some Oracle functions into PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-27 18:53 EST ------- I'm not sure what happened here; looks like Ruben missed the vact that you updated the package. This did not build for me in mock: bison -y -d -p orafce_sql_yy sqlparse.y make: execvp: bison: Permission denied which is a bit weird, but bison is indeed not installed. I added a build dependency and things fail due to flex not being installed. So I added that and things still fail: error: openssl/ssl.h: No such file or directory error: openssl/err.h: No such file or directory error: gssapi/gssapi.h: No such file or directory I added a build dependency on openssl-devel and things finally build, although I'm a bit confused because it doesn't supply a gssapi.h Can you try doing a mock or koji build and ensure that there's nothing else that needs to be added to get this to build properly? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 22:57:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:57:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441141] Review Request: antlr3 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806272257.m5RMvdZo029577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: antlr3 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441141 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-06-27 18:57 EST ------- Thanks for the look; the problem was that we were missing a few build deps, in particular the previous version of antlr. http://cdn.verbum.org/antlr3.spec http://cdn.verbum.org/antlr3-3.0.1-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 22:55:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:55:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238815] Review Request: kde-style-qtcurve - The KDE side of QtCurve In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806272255.m5RMthwH029213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-style-qtcurve - The KDE side of QtCurve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238815 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(lightsolphoenix at gm | |ail.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 22:56:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:56:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238817] Review Request: qtcurve - Metapackage to install both sides of QtCurve In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806272256.m5RMu8Xm029308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtcurve - Metapackage to install both sides of QtCurve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238817 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(lightsolphoenix at gm | |ail.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 22:55:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:55:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238816] Review Request: gtk-qtcurve-engine - The Gtk2 side of QtCurve In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806272255.m5RMtR85029141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-qtcurve-engine - The Gtk2 side of QtCurve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238816 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(lightsolphoenix at gm | |ail.com) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-27 18:55 EST ------- I know this is an ancient ticket, but there have been a couple of interested comments with no response. I'll set all of these needinfo and will close them soon if there's no response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 23:00:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 19:00:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806272300.m5RN0q0N016822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 ------- Additional Comments From abartlet at redhat.com 2008-06-27 19:00 EST ------- It should, but at the moment we have not finished the extraction of Samba-specific hacks from the internal copy of Heimdal (and the incorporation of build system magic to detect an appropriate system Heimdal etc). We are very close, but not quite there yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 22:59:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:59:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453231] New: Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Output filter to rewrite HTML links in a proxy situation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453231 Summary: Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Output filter to rewrite HTML links in a proxy situation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rayvd at bludgeon.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/mod_proxy_html/mod_proxy_html.spec SRPM URL: http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/mod_proxy_html/mod_proxy_html-3.0.1-4.src.rpm Description: mod_proxy_html is an output filter to rewrite HTML links in a proxy situation, to ensure that links work for users outside the proxy. It serves the same purpose as Apache's ProxyPassReverse directive does for HTTP headers, and is an essential component of a reverse proxy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 23:22:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 19:22:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188445] Review Request: bootconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806272322.m5RNMg1q022404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188445 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-27 19:22 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 23:24:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 19:24:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445028] Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806272324.m5RNOB9L022642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445028 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-27 19:24 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 23:25:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 19:25:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446159] Review Request: xesam-tools - A toolkit for Xesam compliant services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806272325.m5RNPd4W004507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xesam-tools - A toolkit for Xesam compliant services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446159 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-27 19:25 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 27 23:38:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 19:38:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441141] Review Request: antlr3 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806272338.m5RNcOi3007569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: antlr3 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441141 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-27 19:38 EST ------- Yes, that one builds. It's a bit odd for >800 source files to turn into one jar and two bits of documentation, but as I have no idea at all how to test this, I'll take your word that everything that needs to be in there is in there. No AOT compilation is done, which is OK since it's only a SHOULD in the guidelines. Everything looks good to me. * source files match upstream: 99fe1b65071e91e5ac378cd7338742f1269a069147525639c654236d60c8fd77 antlr-3.0.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: antlr3 = 3.0.1-2.fc10 = jpackage-utils * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no pre-built jars * single jar, named after the package * jarfiles are under _javadir. * ant called properly. * gcj not called. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 00:55:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:55:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238816] Review Request: gtk-qtcurve-engine - The Gtk2 side of QtCurve In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806280055.m5S0tiRa026961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-qtcurve-engine - The Gtk2 side of QtCurve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238816 lightsolphoenix at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(lightsolphoenix at gm| |ail.com) | ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2008-06-27 20:55 EST ------- Sorry, I've been thinking about whether I want to try keeping up with the packaging again; I had a bit of trouble with it before. I want to resubmit these packages, but I think it would be better to close up the current reviews and create new ones, because the stack has changed a bit since I submitted these; instead of kde-style-qtcurve, there's a kde4-style-qtcurve and a kde3-style-qtcurve. I have the packages for all of them, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 04:33:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 00:33:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445028] Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806280433.m5S4XvDp009888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445028 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-28 00:33 EST ------- python-pylons-0.9.6.2-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 04:33:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 00:33:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445028] Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806280433.m5S4XOwN028882@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445028 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-28 00:33 EST ------- python-pylons-0.9.6.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 06:12:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 02:12:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452354] Review Request: entertrack - Web-based artifact tracking/management system written in PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806280612.m5S6C44V001777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: entertrack - Web-based artifact tracking/management system written in PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452354 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-06-28 02:12 EST ------- Update spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/et/entertrack.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/et/entertrack-1.2.3-1.fc10.src.rpm ChangeLog: - update to new upstream version 1.2.3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 07:50:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 03:50:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191492] Review Request: unuran - Universal Non-Uniform Random number generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806280750.m5S7oCQY011944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unuran - Universal Non-Uniform Random number generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191492 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-06-28 03:50 EST ------- Ok, thanks. Seems that we can close this Review Request now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 07:51:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 03:51:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191492] Review Request: unuran - Universal Non-Uniform Random number generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806280751.m5S7pJck025626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unuran - Universal Non-Uniform Random number generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191492 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 09:34:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 05:34:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806280934.m5S9Yu5k019543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 assim.deodia at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From assim.deodia at gmail.com 2008-06-28 05:34 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: dotconf New Branches: OLPC-3 F-8 F-9 This package is required by speech-dispatcher (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259) OLPC-3 F-8 and F-9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 11:19:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 07:19:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281119.m5SBJnKD013198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 ------- Additional Comments From smallvil at get9.net 2008-06-28 07:19 EST ------- Summary: Un series Korean TrueType fonts Spec URL: http://get9.net/rpm/un-fonts-core.spec SRPM URL: http://get9.net/rpm/un-fonts-core-1.0.2.080608-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is a set of Korean TrueType fonts. Un-fonts is comes from the HLaTeX as type1 fonts in 1998 by Koaunghi Un It converted to TrueType with the FontForge(PfaEdit) by Won-kyu Park in 2003. This package has only the most common font families. Install un-fonts-extra for additional fonts. #1 Rebuild and repackaging for rpmlint #2 Changed package name to Un series Korean TrueType fonts #3 Summary and description of the changes, added to Korean #4 Added %define archiveversion 080608, because 080608 is snapshot version #5 I have a problem in korean spacing words for rpmlint. I don't fix it #6 fixed License: GPLv2+ -- Problem #5 # rpmlint -i un-fonts-core.spec un-fonts-core.spec:25: W: non-break-space line 25 The spec file contains a non-break space, which looks like a regular space in some editors but can lead to obscure errors. It should be replaced by a regular space. un-fonts-core.spec:27: W: non-break-space line 27 The spec file contains a non-break space, which looks like a regular space in some editors but can lead to obscure errors. It should be replaced by a regular space. un-fonts-core.spec:28: W: non-break-space line 28 The spec file contains a non-break space, which looks like a regular space in some editors but can lead to obscure errors. It should be replaced by a regular space. 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 11:23:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 07:23:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281123.m5SBNGBx014255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 ------- Additional Comments From smallvil at get9.net 2008-06-28 07:23 EST ------- Summary: Un series Korean TrueType fonts Spec URL: http://get9.net/rpm/un-fonts-extra.spec SRPM URL: http://get9.net/rpm/un-fonts-extra-1.0.2.080608-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is a set of Korean TrueType fonts. Un-fonts is comes from the HLaTeX as type1 fonts in 1998 by Koaunghi Un It converted to TrueType with the FontForge(PfaEdit) by Won-kyu Park in 2003. This package has only the most common font families. Install un-fonts-core for additional fonts. #1 Rebuild and repackaging for rpmlint #2 Changed package name to Un series Korean TrueType fonts #3 Summary and description of the changes, added to Korean #4 Added %define archiveversion 080608, because 080608 is snapshot version #5 I have a problem in korean spacing words for rpmlint. I don't fix it #6 fixed License: GPLv2+ -- Problem #5 # rpmlint -i un-fonts-extra.spec un-fonts-extra.spec:25: W: non-break-space line 25 The spec file contains a non-break space, which looks like a regular space in some editors but can lead to obscure errors. It should be replaced by a regular space. un-fonts-extra.spec:27: W: non-break-space line 27 The spec file contains a non-break space, which looks like a regular space in some editors but can lead to obscure errors. It should be replaced by a regular space. un-fonts-extra.spec:28: W: non-break-space line 28 The spec file contains a non-break space, which looks like a regular space in some editors but can lead to obscure errors. It should be replaced by a regular space. 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 12:11:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 08:11:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452842] Review Request: monotorrent - a bit torrent client for mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281211.m5SCBfLd027084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotorrent - a bit torrent client for mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452842 gnomeuser at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From gnomeuser at gmail.com 2008-06-28 08:11 EST ------- I'm back from vacation in Brazil now, so I will take this one. Review coming shortly, I promise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 12:19:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 08:19:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281219.m5SCJSWA015522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP Alias: php-pear-Auth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 Bug 438804 depends on bug 452105, which changed state. Bug 452105 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-RADIUS - Wrapper Classes for the RADIUS PECL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452105 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dhollis at davehollis.com 2008-06-28 08:19 EST ------- Updated with suggestions from #25: http://web.davehollis.com:81/packages/php-pear-Auth.spec http://web.davehollis.com:81/packages/php-pear-Auth-1.6.1-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 12:28:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 08:28:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281228.m5SCSWQx017926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP Alias: php-pear-Auth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 ------- Additional Comments From dhollis at davehollis.com 2008-06-28 08:28 EST ------- Shoot, just noticed that the requires for the subpackages was incorrect (php-pear(Auth_Radius) not php-pear(Auth_RADIUS)). Here's a corrected round: http://web.davehollis.com:81/packages/php-pear-Auth.spec http://web.davehollis.com:81/packages/php-pear-Auth-1.6.1-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 12:41:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 08:41:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452842] Review Request: monotorrent - a bit torrent client for mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281241.m5SCfJ4G002347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotorrent - a bit torrent client for mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452842 gnomeuser at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From gnomeuser at gmail.com 2008-06-28 08:41 EST ------- Thank you Paul for packaging up this, any hope for Monsoon in Fedora? Since Michal already did fine work: %defattr(-,root,root,-) needed for the devel package and the descriptions and summaries need to be expanded a bit for clarity aside that this builds in mock (rawhide-x86_64) and otherwise stands up to the requirements. Clear up the license conflict as pointed out by Mr. Nowak. Michal: The exclusive line is a standard mono thing, we only have mono on certain platforms and currently ppc64 is unsupported so we note it by removing it from that exclusivearch line. It's not the clearest solution we know but it's intended this way. The rpmlint stuff is standard, rpmlint doesn't know all it needs to do to ignore this warning for mono packages - we tend to just ignore it rantings. I'll approve this, pending the license being worked out, Fedora makes no guanteees as to the license tag so we can ship with mistakes and the rest of the problems can be fixed up at import time. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 14:55:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 10:55:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445068] Review Request: ocaml-bin-prot - Read and write OCaml values in a type-safe binary protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281455.m5SEtosC003331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-bin-prot - Read and write OCaml values in a type-safe binary protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445068 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com)| ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-06-28 10:55 EST ------- I'm very busy at the moment because my house is having some serious building work done. It'll be a few weeks before I get back on top of this and other reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 15:01:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:01:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450483] libibmad package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281501.m5SF1Cvo005003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libibmad package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450483 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ed at eh3.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2008-06-28 11:01 EST ------- Hi Doug, here's a quick review: GOOD: + source matches upstream SHA1SUM: 1a2b36d0f309690ad660c9c1ff177f76c2484104 libibcommon-1.1.0.tar.gz 1a2b36d0f309690ad660c9c1ff177f76c2484104 libibcommon-1.1.0.tar.gz.UP + license is correct and correctly included in the main package + specfile looks clean and macros sane + proper use of ldconfig + *.la files are removed + proper use of -devel and -static + has %clean + builds in mock F8 x86_64 + rpmlint reports just two ignore-able warnings: libibcommon-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation libibcommon-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation + dir ownership looks good + permissions look good NEEDSWORK: - according to the review guidelines, the spec must have: rm -rf %{buildroot} or the equivalent at the start of %install section. - Is the ExclusiveArch really necessary? Could it just be deleted? I'm only asking because the review guidelines now include specific rules concerning ExcludeArch and, if the ExclusiveArch is removed, then I think the package will be fine wrt those guidelines. Maybe a comment such as "is known to work on arches ... but has not been tested on ..." would be enough? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 15:21:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:21:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453264] Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281521.m5SFL3EX028334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453264 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2008-06-28 11:21 EST ------- Ack, just realized that the files in this conflict with the 'js' package. Need to investigate this more, because it seems jscoverage includes it's own version of js. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 15:19:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:19:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453264] New: Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453264 Summary: Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jkeating at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/review/jscoverage.spec SRPM URL: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/review/jscoverage-0.3.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: JSCoverage is a tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs. Code coverage statistics show which lines of a program have been executed (and which have been missed). This information is useful for constructing comprehensive test suites (for which it is often called test coverage). JSCoverage works by instrumenting the JavaScript code used in web pages. Code coverage statistics are collected while the instrumented JavaScript code is executed in a web browser. JSCoverage works with any modern standards-compliant web browser - including Internet Explorer (IE 6 and IE 7), Firefox (FF 2 and FF 3), Opera, and Safari - on Windows and Linux. Package scratch builds fine across the arches. rpmlint is silent. I had to fix rpaths by seding the libtool in the js/ directory as configure wouldn't take the --disable-rpath option. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 15:53:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:53:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451095] libcxgb3 hardware driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281553.m5SFrIQ7003618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libcxgb3 hardware driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451095 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ed at eh3.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2008-06-28 11:53 EST ------- Here's a quick review: GOOD: + source matches upstream SHA1SUM: 4aa38c77c42ebbd07d724f2df6cf2e108af03c8d libcxgb3-1.2.1.tar.gz 4aa38c77c42ebbd07d724f2df6cf2e108af03c8d libcxgb3-1.2.1.tar.gz.UP + license is correct and correctly included in the main package + specfile looks clean and macros sane + *.la files are removed + builds in mock F8 x86_64 + rpmlint reports: libcxgb3.src:12: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes %{name}-devel libcxgb3.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/modprobe.d/libcxgb3.conf libcxgb3.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/libibverbs.d/cxgb3.driver libcxgb3.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided libcxgb3-devel libcxgb3-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation + dir ownership looks good + permissions look good I think the "Obsoletes: %{name}-devel" is harmless. If, as Doug points out, it helps users upgrade from upstream/3rd-party RPMs then I'd like to allow it. I don't see any blockers here so its APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 16:01:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:01:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450481] libibcommon package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281601.m5SG1wR8020023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libibcommon package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450481 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ed at eh3.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2008-06-28 12:01 EST ------- Here's a review (this time pasted into the correct bz entry!): GOOD: + source matches upstream SHA1SUM: 1a2b36d0f309690ad660c9c1ff177f76c2484104 libibcommon-1.1.0.tar.gz 1a2b36d0f309690ad660c9c1ff177f76c2484104 libibcommon-1.1.0.tar.gz.UP + license is correct and correctly included in the main package + specfile looks clean and macros sane + proper use of ldconfig + *.la files are removed + proper use of -devel and -static + has %clean + builds in mock F8 x86_64 + rpmlint reports just two ignore-able warnings: libibcommon-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation libibcommon-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation + dir ownership looks good + permissions look good NEEDSWORK: - according to the review guidelines, the spec must have: rm -rf %{buildroot} or the equivalent at the start of %install section. - Is the ExclusiveArch really necessary? Could it just be deleted? I'm only asking because the review guidelines now include specific rules concerning ExcludeArch and, if the ExclusiveArch is removed, then I think the package will be fine wrt those guidelines. Maybe a comment such as "is known to work on arches ... but has not been tested on ..." would be enough? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 16:02:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:02:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450483] libibmad package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281602.m5SG2JhT006010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libibmad package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450483 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2008-06-28 12:02 EST ------- Please ignore comment #1 above. I'm trying to review the IB-related packages and I accidentally pasted the above comment into this bz entry. My apologies! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 16:20:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:20:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450410] Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281620.m5SGK3i9010296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450410 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(guido.ledermann at go | |oglemail.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-28 12:20 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 16:26:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:26:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453231] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Output filter to rewrite HTML links in a proxy situation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281626.m5SGQt4L012036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Output filter to rewrite HTML links in a proxy situation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453231 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 12:26 EST ------- Is this the same as the http-mod_proxy_html package that was just submitted for review a couple of days ago? See bug 452636. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 16:37:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:37:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453231] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Output filter to rewrite HTML links in a proxy situation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281637.m5SGb39J014582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Output filter to rewrite HTML links in a proxy situation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453231 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2008-06-28 12:37 EST ------- Hmm, it does appear to be so, though that is for a slightly older version. Shucks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 16:49:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:49:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request:http-mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281649.m5SGnAH0017426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:http-mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 rayvd at bludgeon.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rayvd at bludgeon.org ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2008-06-28 12:49 EST ------- Looks like I missed this and submitted one of my own a few days after you: Bug #453231 Yours was first so I am happy to defer, but take a glance at mine and let me know what you want to do. If you want, you can even use my spec and RPM as I think it's a little closer to being "Fedora'ized" than yours is. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 16:53:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:53:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452842] Review Request: monotorrent - a bit torrent client for mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281653.m5SGrM29018637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotorrent - a bit torrent client for mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452842 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 17:14:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:14:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453119] Review Request: libvirt-java: Java bindings for the libvirt library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281714.m5SHE3fS005289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvirt-java: Java bindings for the libvirt library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453119 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 13:14 EST ------- OK, it looks like my mirror has updated and the dependencies install correctly, but the package doesn't build: In file included from org_libvirt_VirNetwork.c:1: org_libvirt_VirNetwork.h:2:17: error: jni.h: No such file or directory In file included from org_libvirt_VirNetwork.c:1: org_libvirt_VirNetwork.h:15: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'jstring' and a bunch of similar errors follow. Many packages seem to provide a jni.h so I'm not really sure what's missing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 17:26:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:26:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448717] Review Request: gnome-rdp - rdesktop front end In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281726.m5SHQJlT026943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-rdp - rdesktop front end https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448717 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 13:26 EST ------- I don't see that the user janderson has been sponsored; setting NEEDSPONSOR. If that's not you, my apologies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 17:23:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:23:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448702] Review Request: SndObj - The Sound Object Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281723.m5SHNjV3026122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SndObj - The Sound Object Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448702 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(victor.lazzarini at n | |uim.ie) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 13:23 EST ------- Any response, Victor? It's been a month since your last comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 17:41:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:41:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227128] Review Request: xstream-1.1.3-1jpp - XML serialization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281741.m5SHfMnl029917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xstream-1.1.3-1jpp - XML serialization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227128 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 13:40 EST ------- No response. I had chatted with someone from the Red Hat Java team who indicated that these should probably all be closed anyway, but unfortunately I can't find it in my logs right now. So I'll close all of these; if that's in error, please reopen them but please also update the packages to correspond with the Java packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 17:43:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:43:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281743.m5SHhOm2011628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-28 13:43 EST ------- For 0.6-2 * SourceURL - %SOURCE0 tarball could not be found from the URL written as %SOURCE0. Maybe: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sserver/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz ? * Source1 - Please specify the URL of (or how you received) %SOURCE1 * Macros - Please use macros properly. /usr/bin should be %{_bindir}. * libtinyxml.so linkage -------------------------------------------------------------------- 2382 g++ -shared -nostdlib /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.3.1/../../../crti.o /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.3.1/crtbeginS.o .libs/export.o .libs/roselements.o .libs/rosimporter.o .libs/rosimporter_c.o -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/builddir/build/BUILD/rcssserver3d-0.6/utility/tinyxml/.libs -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/lib/rcssserver3d /builddir/build/BUILD/rcssserver3d-0.6/utility/tinyxml/.libs/libtinyxml.so -L/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.3.1 -L/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.3.1/../../.. -lstdc++ -lm -lc -lgcc_s /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.3.1/crtendS.o /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.3.1/../../../crtn.o -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -Wl,-soname -Wl,rosimporter.so -o .libs/rosimporter.so 3902 + rm -rf /var/tmp/rcssserver3d-0.6-2.fc10-root-mockbuild//usr/lib/rcssserver3d/libtinyxml.so /var/tmp/rcssserver3d-0.6-2.fc10-root- mockbuild//usr/lib/rcssserver3d/libtinyxml.so.0 /var/tmp/rcssserver3d-0.6-2.fc10-root-mockbuild//usr/lib/rcssserver3d/libtinyxml.so.0.0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------- - When building rosimporter.so, the internal libtinyxml.so is used, however when installing rosimporter.so, the internal libtinyxml.so is removed. This is dangerous because system-wide libtinyxml.so may change sover or may have different ABI than the internal libtinyxml.so. You should create a patch which makes it sure that rosimporter.so is actually linked against system wide libtinyxml.so. * Timestamps - To keep timestamps on more files to be installed, please apply the following: -------------------------------------------------------------------- sed -i.stamp -e 's|cp -r|cp -pr|' app/simspark/Makefile.{am,in} -------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 17:45:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:45:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227051] Review Request: easymock-1.2-1jpp - Easy mock objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281745.m5SHjO7I030971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: easymock-1.2-1jpp - Easy mock objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227051 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 13:45 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 227128. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 17:45:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:45:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227053] Review Request: excalibur-avalon-framework-4.3-6jpp - Avalon Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281745.m5SHjYTJ031034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: excalibur-avalon-framework-4.3-6jpp - Avalon Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227053 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 13:45 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 227128. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 17:45:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:45:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227056] Review Request: geronimo-specs-1.1-1jpp - Geronimo J2EE server J2EE specifications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281745.m5SHjjTl031104@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geronimo-specs-1.1-1jpp - Geronimo J2EE server J2EE specifications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227056 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 13:45 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 227128. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 17:46:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:46:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227076] Review Request: juddi-0.9-0.rc4.2jpp - Open source Java implementation UDDI specification. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281746.m5SHkB52031326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: juddi-0.9-0.rc4.2jpp - Open source Java implementation UDDI specification. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227076 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 13:46 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 227128. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 17:44:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:44:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227043] Review Request: cglib-2.1.3-2jpp - Code Generation Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281744.m5SHivr4012002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cglib-2.1.3-2jpp - Code Generation Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227043 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 13:44 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 227128. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 17:46:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:46:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227116] Review Request: servletapi4-4.0.4-4jpp - Java servlet and JSP implementation classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281746.m5SHkpDP012944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: servletapi4-4.0.4-4jpp - Java servlet and JSP implementation classes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227116 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 13:46 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 227128. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 17:46:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:46:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227110] Review Request: proxytoys-0.2.1-1jpp - ProxyToys In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281746.m5SHkcJX012870@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: proxytoys-0.2.1-1jpp - ProxyToys https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227110 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 13:46 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 227128. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 17:45:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:45:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227072] Review Request: jmock-1.0.1-3jpp - Test Java code using mock objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281745.m5SHjsFm012679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jmock-1.0.1-3jpp - Test Java code using mock objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227072 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 13:45 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 227128. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 17:44:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:44:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227039] Review Request: backport-util-concurrent-2.1-1jpp - Backport of java.util.concurrent API, introduced in Java 5.0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281744.m5SHiic6011940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: backport-util-concurrent-2.1-1jpp - Backport of java.util.concurrent API, introduced in Java 5.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227039 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 13:44 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 227128. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 17:47:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:47:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227120] Review Request: ws-scout-1.0-4jpp - Apache Scout Implementation of JSR 93 (JAXR) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281747.m5SHl0Bw031609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ws-scout-1.0-4jpp - Apache Scout Implementation of JSR 93 (JAXR) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227120 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 13:46 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 227128. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 17:50:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:50:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227124] Review Request: xmlrpc-2.0.1-3jpp - Java XML-RPC implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281750.m5SHo73Y032405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-2.0.1-3jpp - Java XML-RPC implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227124 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 13:50 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 227128. This is the only ticket that has had any kind of an update, but the links in comment #1 are invalid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 17:46:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:46:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227088] Review Request: mojo-maven2-plugins-1.0-2jpp - Maven2 plugin set from mojo.codehaus.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281746.m5SHkUlf031474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mojo-maven2-plugins-1.0-2jpp - Maven2 plugin set from mojo.codehaus.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227088 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 13:46 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 227128. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 17:54:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:54:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request:http-mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281754.m5SHs6cf000808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:http-mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 13:54 EST ------- If you folks want to work together to produce a package for review, that's great and I'll try to help. But I agree that Philip's spec needs more work than Ray's. Things like Fedora not using Vendor or Packager, the package name not matching what's used in Fedora (try "yum list mod_\*") and, honestly, "Excludeos: windows"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 17:51:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:51:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450482] libibumad package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281751.m5SHpRWx000357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libibumad package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450482 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ed at eh3.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2008-06-28 13:51 EST ------- Here's a review: GOOD: + source matches upstream SHA1SUM: f50dcb3f1bc789dd2b951aae176b58774c6aeb44 libibumad-1.2.0.tar.gz f50dcb3f1bc789dd2b951aae176b58774c6aeb44 libibumad-1.2.0.tar.gz.UP + license ("GPLv2 or BSD") is correct and correctly included + proper use of ldconfig + *.la is correctly removed + builds locally (F8 x86_64) w/ the libibcommon-devel installed + rpmlint reports two ignore-able warnings: libibumad-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation libibumad-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation + dir ownership looks good + permissions look good NEEDSWORK: - The %install sections is missing a: rm -rf %{buildroot} at the beginning - Please remove the ExclusiveArch: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 18:04:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:04:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448702] Review Request: SndObj - The Sound Object Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281804.m5SI4n6o003705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SndObj - The Sound Object Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448702 ------- Additional Comments From victor.lazzarini at nuim.ie 2008-06-28 14:04 EST ------- Sorry, but I have not had time to work on this. I have fixes for everything and now I can test it on Koji. But it will be mid-July before I can get around to doing it. I am taking this off the urgent priority. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 18:05:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:05:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431320] Review Request: pam_usb - Hardware authentication using ordinary USB Flash Drives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281805.m5SI5ZxH004213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_usb - Hardware authentication using ordinary USB Flash Drives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431320 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(lkundrak at v3.sk) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 18:04:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:04:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281804.m5SI4Wok003604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(michel.sylvan at gmai | |l.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-28 14:04 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 18:04:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:04:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448702] Review Request: SndObj - The Sound Object Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281804.m5SI4e0v003652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SndObj - The Sound Object Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448702 victor.lazzarini at nuim.ie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|urgent |low Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(victor.lazzarini at n| |uim.ie) | ------- Additional Comments From victor.lazzarini at nuim.ie 2008-06-28 14:04 EST ------- Sorry, but I have not had time to work on this. I have fixes for everything and now I can test it on Koji. But it will be mid-July before I can get around to doing it. I am taking this off the urgent priority. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 18:08:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:08:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238379] Package review: emesene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281808.m5SI89tr018273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: emesene Alias: emesene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(louizatakk at gmail.c| |om) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 18:04:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:04:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442249] Review Request: uniXM - standalong qt player for XMradio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281804.m5SI4ro0017213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uniXM - standalong qt player for XMradio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442249 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 14:04 EST ------- Actually after looking at the source more closely, I'm just going to go ahead and close this because I can't see a way that it's acceptable for Fedora. If you disagree, feel free to reopen and then block FE-Legal so that the lawyers can take a look. I just can't imagine that they'd say anything different, however. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 18:06:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:06:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450483] libibmad package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281806.m5SI6gGB017995@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libibmad package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450483 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2008-06-28 14:06 EST ------- Perhaps I can paste the correct review notes into the little Firefox text box this time. Let's watch and see how it goes... GOOD: + source matched upstream SHA1SUM: 743b35ca9257cf8f5f3d022df6161acc31301994 libibmad-1.2.0.tar.gz 743b35ca9257cf8f5f3d022df6161acc31301994 libibmad-1.2.0.tar.gz.UP + license is correct and correctly included + builds locally on F8 x86_64 w/ libibumad-devel installed + proper use of ldconfig + the *.la are deleted + permissions and dir ownership look good + rpmlint reports these two ignore-able warnings: libibmad-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation libibmad-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation NEEDSWORK: - please remove the ExclusiveArch: - please add "rm -rf %{buildroot}" or equivalent to the beginning of %install Yup, I think that was the one. [*shakes head slowly and walks away*] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 18:12:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:12:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447599] Review Request: immix - image mixer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281812.m5SICEMD019518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: immix - image mixer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447599 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(lxtnow at gmail.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 18:11:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:11:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442244] Review Request: fotox - Program for improving image files made with a digital camera In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281811.m5SIBKV8019311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fotox - Program for improving image files made with a digital camera https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442244 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(adel.gadllah at gmail | |.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-28 14:11 EST ------- Any updates here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 18:10:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:10:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235672] Review Request: zope3 - Zope 3 web application server framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281810.m5SIAmQN019174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zope3 - Zope 3 web application server framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235672 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 14:10 EST ------- So is anything happening with this ticket? Honestly since Eugene has indicated that he doesn't want to be involved, and as far as I know, zope can't actually work in any supported release of Fedora because they all have python 2.5, I'm just going to close this. Timothy, if you do still want to pursue this, please open your own review ticket with fresh packages. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 18:13:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:13:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request:http-mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281813.m5SIDYYZ006128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:http-mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 ------- Additional Comments From philipp at redfish-solutions.com 2008-06-28 14:13 EST ------- I have no problem merging them. That's fine. Some observations: * we don't need -Wl,"-lxml2" in the invocation of apxs. We can just use -lxml2 directly; * similarly, it would be preferable to install via "apxs -i -S LIBEXECDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{modulesdir} -n %{modname} %{modname}.la" as I've done; the .libs directory is an implementation detail of apxs using libtool that we shouldn't rely on; Do we really need to supply the path to apxs? It should be in the default search path. If it's not, it might be because someone wants to try out a new version of it (in which case we should use that anyway). Other than that, I'm fine with the rest of the changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 18:16:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:16:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236856] Review Request: brlcad - An extensive Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG) modeling system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281816.m5SIGwv9020785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brlcad - An extensive Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG) modeling system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236856 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 14:16 EST ------- FYI, this didn't build for me. Looks like something has changed in Fedora's TCL. checking whether to build Tcl...no checking for Tcl configuration... configure: error: /usr/lib64 directory doesn't contain tclConfig.sh error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.78800 (%build) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.78800 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 18:19:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:19:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436330] Review Request: libtrash - Libraries to move files to a trash-folder on delete In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281819.m5SIJWkO021144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtrash - Libraries to move files to a trash-folder on delete https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436330 ianweller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ianweller at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-06-28 14:19 EST ------- I'll review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 18:19:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:19:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238817] Review Request: qtcurve - Metapackage to install both sides of QtCurve In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281819.m5SIJPO8021099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtcurve - Metapackage to install both sides of QtCurve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238817 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(lightsolphoenix at gm| |ail.com) | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 14:19 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 238816. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 18:18:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:18:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450189] Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281818.m5SIIc5r007420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450189 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-28 14:18 EST ------- By the way your srpm does not build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=685293 At least Gconf is missing from BuildRequires. Note: as you are already sponsored, you can check if your srpm actually builds on koji beforehand by: $ koji build --scratch where can be either dist-f10, dist-f9-updates-candidate or dist-f8-updates-candidate. When the build is successful, the rebuilt binary rpms and some logs are put under http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch//task_/ . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 18:19:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:19:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238815] Review Request: kde-style-qtcurve - The KDE side of QtCurve In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281819.m5SIJ0x2007486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-style-qtcurve - The KDE side of QtCurve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238815 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(lightsolphoenix at gm| |ail.com) | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 14:18 EST ------- Closing as detailed in bug 238816. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 18:18:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:18:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238816] Review Request: gtk-qtcurve-engine - The Gtk2 side of QtCurve In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281818.m5SII7Bx007333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-qtcurve-engine - The Gtk2 side of QtCurve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238816 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 14:18 EST ------- OK, I'll close these out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 18:25:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:25:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445261] Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281825.m5SIPuIK022762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445261 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 14:25 EST ------- Any progress here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 18:47:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:47:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445028] Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281847.m5SIlCZH027970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445028 kylev at kylev.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 18:53:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:53:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431320] Review Request: pam_usb - Hardware authentication using ordinary USB Flash Drives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281853.m5SIrIfl029523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_usb - Hardware authentication using ordinary USB Flash Drives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431320 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(lkundrak at v3.sk) | ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-28 14:53 EST ------- The spec file is very nicely written and legible. Builds in mock (tried in el5), uses compiler flags correctly. Just a few things, probably only 1.) being a blocker, consider the other ones just advices: 1.) RPMlint. Please correct these: pam_usb.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/pam_usb-0.4.2/pam.d-examples 0644 A standard directory should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have wrong directory permissions in some dirs included in your package. pam_usb.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/pam_usb-0.4.2 0644 A standard directory should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have wrong directory permissions in some dirs included in your package. pam_usb.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/pamusb-conf 0754 A standard executable should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have a wrong executable permissions in some files included in your package. 2.) Use of pmount The tool uses non-standard mechanism to escalate privileges. If the dependence of it can not be dropped, please document the fact that this package depends on it in %description. 3.) sed -i -e 's|/lib/security|/%{_lib}/security|' Makefile You already patch Makefile. I suggest you move this to the patch. Additionally, please consider renaming the patch to --.patch 4.) %description is too long and contains non-portable formatting Please take into consideration, how would the description look in a gui tool, such as pup or packagekit gui. I suggest you leave only the first paragraph sans the last sentence of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 18:55:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:55:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450410] Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281855.m5SItCiY030216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450410 guido.ledermann at googlemail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(guido.ledermann at go| |oglemail.com) | ------- Additional Comments From guido.ledermann at googlemail.com 2008-06-28 14:55 EST ------- Sorry for the delay. My review will be posted during the next week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 19:42:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:42:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448702] Review Request: SndObj - The Sound Object Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281942.m5SJgAWO010368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SndObj - The Sound Object Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448702 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 15:42 EST ------- OK, just clear the status whiteboard when you're ready and this will reappear in the review queue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 19:40:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:40:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806281940.m5SJegmY010037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 ------- Additional Comments From hedayat at grad.com 2008-06-28 15:40 EST ------- * SourceURL Yes, you're right. * Source1 OK, I added a comment in the spec file about it * Macros Fixed! * libtinyxml.so linkage Yes you're right. It was a temporary solution since rosimporter is currently unused! But I found that the tinyxml library in the package has some additional functionality, so I'll filter or rename the library. * Timestamps Done I'll create a (hopefully!) better SRPM soon. Thanks a lot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 20:46:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 16:46:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436330] Review Request: libtrash - Libraries to move files to a trash-folder on delete In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806282046.m5SKkmxe026649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtrash - Libraries to move files to a trash-folder on delete https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436330 ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-06-28 16:46 EST ------- - The spec you mentioned from the URL does not match the spec in the SPRM - Make sure that the /sbin/ldconfig lines are as follows: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig - Don't use %{name}-latest in the URL, use %{name}-%{version}. Yes, the URL is still valid. - libtrash.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libtrash.so - move %{_libdir}/libtrash.so to a -devel package - Other rpmlint errors: - libtrash.i386: E: no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib/libtrash.so.3.2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 21:14:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:14:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452832] Review Request: perl-Math-FFT - Perl extension for Fast Fourier Transforms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806282114.m5SLEIt6019251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-FFT - Perl extension for Fast Fourier Transforms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452832 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-28 17:14 EST ------- To be a bit more clear; only the license tag with the comment and the missing dependecy are considered blockers with respect to guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 21:17:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:17:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453109] Review Request: NPusers - Adds NOCpulse production users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806282117.m5SLHcuK020214@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NPusers - Adds NOCpulse production users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 21:34:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:34:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453109] Review Request: NPusers - Adds NOCpulse production users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806282134.m5SLYKTh023998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NPusers - Adds NOCpulse production users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-28 17:34 EST ------- Do not consider it an offense, but this is very poorly pacakged, with minimal effort spent to comply with Fedora quality requirements. A couple of examples: 1.) This is completely pointless, please do not do it Source9999: version Version: %(echo `awk '{ print $1 }' %{SOURCE9999}`) Release: %(echo `awk '{ print $2 }' %{SOURCE9999}`)%{?dist} 2.) Do not use file dependencies, as they are slow, unless you have to. This is not the case here, all these are in well-known packages. Requires: /usr/sbin/useradd /bin/chmod /bin/false /usr/bin/passwd /bin/chown /bin/awk Also, for ones you use it in install-time scriptlets use Requires(pre): and Requires(post): respectively. You also use a couple of more utilities, such as ssh-keygen, which you completely miss a require for. 3.) You do not define %main_source anyhere. FWIW, these lines are completely useless %define build_sub_dir %(echo %{main_source} | sed 's/\.tar\.gz$//') %setup -n %build_sub_dir 4.) Replace absolute paths with macros, such as %{_sysconfdir} and %{_localstatedir}. See rpm --showrc for more. # Install the user creation script install -m 755 -d %buildroot/etc/nocpulse install -m 755 -d %buildroot/var/log/nocpulse ... 5.) Completely incorrect %files list %pre ... # Setting up nocpulse homedir and ssh key pair for dir in /etc/nocpulse /var/lib/nocpulse/{,.ssh,var{,/archives}} do if [ ! -d $dir ] then mkdir -p $dir fi done /usr/bin/ssh-keygen -q -t dsa -N '' -f /var/lib/nocpulse/.ssh/nocpulse-identity chown -R nocpulse.nocpulse /var/lib/nocpulse %files %defattr(-,nocpulse,nocpulse) %dir /etc/nocpulse %dir /var/log/nocpulse Files list refers to the state of the tree at package build time. Files that are created at install- or run-time should use %ghost. 6.) You are obviously not on Solaris in Fedora; do you really need to keep Solaris stuff here? Also this seems to deal with user and group management, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Users_and_Groups if [ $OSTYPE = solaris ] ; then SOLARIS=true sysacct= wheel_group=apache oracle_group=dba tcsh=/usr/local/bin/tcsh orac else SOLARIS= sysacct=-r wheel_group="-G apache" oracle_group=oinstall tcsh=/bin/tcsh fi I could proceed on an on; (%build section missing, etc., etc.) but the package is really not ready for any qa, running rpmlint would be a nonsense at this point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 21:44:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:44:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453109] Review Request: NPusers - Adds NOCpulse production users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806282144.m5SLiRR1008760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NPusers - Adds NOCpulse production users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 21:44:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:44:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453111] Review Request: np-config - NOCpulse global configuration file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806282144.m5SLiI3s008708@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: np-config - NOCpulse global configuration file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453111 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-28 17:44 EST ------- This needs to be fundamentally reworked; see bug #453109 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 21:40:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:40:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453109] Review Request: NPusers - Adds NOCpulse production users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806282140.m5SLeds7008088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NPusers - Adds NOCpulse production users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-28 17:40 EST ------- Sorry for not being more constructive, but the package needs to be completely reworked to be acceptable for Fedora, and in its current state can not serve as a basis for any constructive criticism. I recommend you to spend some time getting comfortable with the packaging guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines Also, reading existing Fedora SPEC files may help a lot: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms When it comes to tooling, you'll definitely appreciate rpmlint and rpmdev-tools. rpmdev-newspec may give you a good starting point for a reworked package. Also, I'll gladly help to resolve problems that may arise during your packaging attempts. NB: This package and bug #453111 should probably be integrated into a single package with nocpulse, unless there are really good reasons against it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 21:45:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:45:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806282145.m5SLj3g0009262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From dwheeler at dwheeler.com 2008-06-28 17:45 EST ------- >> here's my proposal: version numbering is of the form "(yyyy-2000).mm[dd]". >> Since this was released on 2007-09-11, this is version "7.09". Thus we have >> a normal-looking version number, yet one that easily syncs with upstream. >> Ubuntu uses this format, so it's not unknown in the world. >I don't really object to that, but I think that using a plain 0 >and having the date in the release tag leaves more room >for flexibility and allow any change. For the _first_ version number, "0" is doable, and it will allow us to wait a little while in case there's another/better approach that comes to light. So I'll update this package to use version "0" as its initial release. But version "0" is really just a useful delaying tactic. For the _next_ version it won't be obvious what the new value should be (other than "greater than 0"). Having it continuously "0" _works_, but it seems awkward for the long term. Sooner or later a "real" solution needs to be determined, one that "obviously works" across distributions. Otherwise, no one will be able to tell if (for example) the Debian and Fedora versions are the same, or they'll be hideously ugly. Some way of synchronizing version numbers seems like a good idea. >I think I will submit this issue on the packaging list, it is not the >first time something like that happens, and though I don't think it should >be a guideline, some recommendations may be interesting. I agree. I'm currently packaging minisat2, and it has the same problem - its "version number" is the release date. If you don't get a chance to post this version-date topic to the list within a day or so, I plan to post it. I'd definitely like to hear others' views about this, and maybe even get a rough consensus. Let me know if there's some reason I shouldn't do so. >Ok, I'll sponsor you, that's an interesting initiative. Excellent! Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 21:59:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:59:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806282159.m5SLxl0V012668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-28 17:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > For the _first_ version number, "0" is doable, and it will allow us to > wait a little while in case there's another/better approach that comes to > light. So I'll update this package to use version "0" as its initial release. > > But version "0" is really just a useful delaying tactic. > For the _next_ version it won't be obvious what the > new value should be (other than "greater than 0"). Having it > continuously "0" _works_, but it seems awkward for the long term. > Sooner or later a "real" solution needs to be determined, > one that "obviously works" across distributions. > Otherwise, no one will be able to tell if (for example) the > Debian and Fedora versions are the same, or they'll be hideously ugly. > Some way of synchronizing version numbers seems like a good idea. Indeed, but point is that it is upstream who should be taken the lead here. It is just a workaround that leave us flexibility. Dates are, in my opinion, just as meaningless as 0 in any case. > I agree. I'm currently packaging minisat2, and it has the same problem - > its "version number" is the release date. > > If you don't get a chance to post this version-date topic > to the list within a day or so, I plan to post it. I'd definitely like to > hear others' views about this, and maybe even get a rough consensus. > Let me know if there's some reason I shouldn't do so. Go ahead. I think that the right list is the packaging list and not the devel list, for such issues the signal over noise is much better. If nobody cares, then the devel list could be used then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 22:16:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:16:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452251] Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806282216.m5SMG8G2002662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452251 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.7.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 22:16:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:16:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452251] Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806282216.m5SMG6hC017411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452251 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-28 18:16 EST ------- libmatthew-java-0.7.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 22:15:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:15:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447757] Review Request: mediawiki-ParserFunctions - Enhances the Mediawiki parser with logical functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806282215.m5SMFRsh017112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-ParserFunctions - Enhances the Mediawiki parser with logical functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447757 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-28 18:15 EST ------- mediawiki-ParserFunctions-1.1.1-1.20080520svn35130.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 22:17:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447757] Review Request: mediawiki-ParserFunctions - Enhances the Mediawiki parser with logical functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806282217.m5SMHLJR017977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-ParserFunctions - Enhances the Mediawiki parser with logical functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447757 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |1.1.1-1.20080520svn35130.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 22:15:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:15:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453133] Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806282215.m5SMFpuX017327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453133 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-28 18:15 EST ------- nethogs-0.7-2.20080627cvs.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update nethogs'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-5810 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 22:17:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:17:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447757] Review Request: mediawiki-ParserFunctions - Enhances the Mediawiki parser with logical functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806282217.m5SMHJmf003204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-ParserFunctions - Enhances the Mediawiki parser with logical functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447757 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-28 18:17 EST ------- mediawiki-ParserFunctions-1.1.1-1.20080520svn35130.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 22:26:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:26:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452470] Review-Request: perl-Test-WWW-Selenium - Perl Client for the Selenium Remote Control test tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806282226.m5SMQZuC020779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-Test-WWW-Selenium - Perl Client for the Selenium Remote Control test tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452470 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(panemade at gmail.com | |) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 22:25:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:25:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453287] New: Review Request: perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu - Perl extension for the GNU Readline/History Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453287 Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu - Perl extension for the GNU Readline/History Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-Term-ReadLine- Gnu.spec OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu-1.17a-2.el5.src.rpm Description: An implementation of Term::ReadLine using the GNU Readline/History Library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 22:33:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:33:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453287] Review Request: perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu - Perl extension for the GNU Readline/History Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806282233.m5SMX4Cx022261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu - Perl extension for the GNU Readline/History Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453287 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-28 18:33 EST ------- Note that this currently won't build on rawhide (and probably also Fedora 9), unless you comment out the tests. Actually, the test themselves run fine, but cause the interpreter to crash when it terminates. This is not particularly limiting, but an annoyance and has an implication of changing the return value of perl to indeicate failure (which causes the test suite to fail). I'd appreciate if anyone helped me to debug the problem, since Perl internals are not anything I would be especially familiar with. I've been given an advice of recompiling perl with -DDEBUGGING flag, but given my limited computing powers this is not going to happen soon. I have at least reported the issue upstream: #37194: Term::ReadLine::Gnu causes panic during global destruction on perl 5.10 http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=37194 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 22:37:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:37:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446134] Review Request: jsr-305 - reference implementation of JSR-305 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806282237.m5SMbAJR023342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jsr-305 - reference implementation of JSR-305 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446134 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 18:37 EST ------- I have essentially no idea what this package is for, and very little knowledge of Java, but it's been in the queue for six weeks and I can read the packaging guidelines as well as anyone else so I'll see what I can do. This builds fine for me; rpmlint says: jsr-305.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/jsr-305 Unfortunate; these should be under /usr/share but that's what our maven package does so you have no choice. jsr-305.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java jsr-305-javadoc.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation These don't matter; we don't care what goes in Group:. The URL in the spec (and the comment before the License: tag, and what's in Source1) are 404 for me. It works if you remove the "index.html" bit. I don't think it's necessary to include a copy of the upstream web page to prove the license, although if you have a copy of the email sent in response to your query, perhaps you might want to include that. If you do want to include a copy, though, please do use a functioning URL. You will need to include instructions for actually obtaining the subversion snapshot that you include in the package. And it would be a good idea to version the tarball as well. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL Looking at the debug package, it seems that a bunch of the source is missing. I do not know enough about java to tell if something's gone wrong here or if the source files just aren't supposed to be there for whatever reason. Can you have a look? I thought the Java folks had decided that they didn't want to make unversioned symlinks for javadocs. I don't, however, see it in any of the guidelines, neither encouraged nor discouraged. This package should not own /etc/maven/fragments. The same goes for /usr/share/maven2/poms. Unfortunately this is actually specified by the guidelines, so I'm working to try and get the guidelines fixed, because this is simply broken. The guidelines indicate that all of the aot compilation bits should be conditionalized. X can't compare source files with upstream; no instructions for making the svn checkout and Source1: URL does not exist. * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. ? debuginfo package looks a bit too empty. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: jsr-305-0-0.1.20080527svn.fc10.x86_64.rpm jsr-305-0.jar.so()(64bit) jsr-305 = 0-0.1.20080527svn.fc10 = /bin/sh java >= 1.5 java-gcj-compat >= 1.0.31 jpackage-utils libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) jsr-305-javadoc-0-0.1.20080527svn.fc10.x86_64.rpm jsr-305-javadoc = 0-0.1.20080527svn.fc10 = jpackage-utils jsr-305 = 0-0.1.20080527svn.fc10 * %check is not present; no test suite usptream. (Although there's a couple of test directories in the tarball, they're empty.) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. X shouldn't own /etc/maven/fragments or /usr/share/maven2/poms * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. X scriptlets shoudl consitionalize the aot bits. * code, not content. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no pre-built jars * single jar, named after the package * jarfiles are under _javadir. * javadocs are under _javadocdir. * maven called properly. * no wrapper script necessary. X gcj should be called conditionally. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 23:09:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 19:09:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request:http-mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806282309.m5SN9vWv015846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:http-mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2008-06-28 19:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I have no problem merging them. That's fine. > > Some observations: > > * we don't need -Wl,"-lxml2" in the invocation of apxs. We can just use -lxml2 > directly; I'm definitely not an expert on apxs, does -lxml2 get added automatically somewhere later in the process? I originally did not use it and resulted in a .so that wasn't linked against libxml2.so. Had to use LoadFile in Apache to get things working. > * similarly, it would be preferable to install via "apxs -i -S > LIBEXECDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{modulesdir} -n %{modname} %{modname}.la" as I've > done; the .libs directory is an implementation detail of apxs using libtool > that we shouldn't rely on; That makes sense to me! > Do we really need to supply the path to apxs? It should be in the default > search path. If it's not, it might be because someone wants to try out a new > version of it (in which case we should use that anyway). I don't think we do, I just typically prefer to be more specific than less. > Other than that, I'm fine with the rest of the changes. > I'll merge in your suggestions to my spec file. I don't have a burden to be the maintainer particularly if you are interested, just let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 23:11:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 19:11:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451095] libcxgb3 hardware driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806282311.m5SNBWuv031702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libcxgb3 hardware driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451095 dledford at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2008-06-28 19:11 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libcxgb3 Short Description: Userspace driver for Chelsio iWARP hardware Owners: dledford Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 23:41:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 19:41:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453231] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Output filter to rewrite HTML links in a proxy situation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806282341.m5SNfG6I023689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Output filter to rewrite HTML links in a proxy situation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453231 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2008-06-28 19:41 EST ------- Updated spec and SRPM with suggestions from Philip: Spec: http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/mod_proxy_html/mod_proxy_html.spec SRPM: http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/mod_proxy_html/mod_proxy_html-3.0.1-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 28 23:43:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 19:43:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request:http-mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806282343.m5SNh9aS024043@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:http-mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2008-06-28 19:43 EST ------- Alright, I see what you mean about passing -lxml2 directly. A much more obvious solution. :-) See my bug (#453231) for the latest spec and srpm. Do you want to close this one out as a duplicate of mine or vice versa (the request would need to be renamed to conform with other Fedora Apache modules)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 00:18:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 20:18:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433926] Review Request: freehoo - Freehoo is a free console based messenger for Yahoo IM Service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290018.m5T0Iceh015272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freehoo - Freehoo is a free console based messenger for Yahoo IM Service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433926 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2008-06-28 20:18 EST ------- Alright, I *think* I got everything you mentioned. I went ahead and just removed the %check section completely as well. Spec: http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/freehoo/freehoo.spec SRPM: http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/freehoo/freehoo-3.5.2-2.src.rpm Thanks for your efforts on this! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 01:31:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 21:31:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290131.m5T1Vhtc031853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 21:31 EST ------- Yes, I think this package is fine. I don't really see anything worth commenting on. * source files match upstream: c00cc9e1387b26c1a1d3f0a82dd39bbd05c2598a645124bc2efb006d8d21e61d clive-0.4.16.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: clive = 0.4.16-3.fc10 = /usr/bin/env newt-python python(abi) = 2.5 python-feedparser python-urlgrabber xclip * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 02:08:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 22:08:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452470] Review-Request: perl-Test-WWW-Selenium - Perl Client for the Selenium Remote Control test tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290208.m5T28S22007195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-Test-WWW-Selenium - Perl Client for the Selenium Remote Control test tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452470 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(panemade at gmail.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-28 22:08 EST ------- The reason I have not done review of this is that I am repeatedly getting 404 error for SRPM download still. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 02:07:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 22:07:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453287] Review Request: perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu - Perl extension for the GNU Readline/History Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290207.m5T279He024254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu - Perl extension for the GNU Readline/History Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453287 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 22:07 EST ------- This is a tough one. Until the bug is fixed, I don't know if we want to have this package in the distro because it may just cause bug reports for any software which might use it. Below I'll just ignore the test suite, and I wouldn't have any problems with approving it instantly were the test suite to start working, but in the current state I just don't know what to do. Perhaps talk to the fedora-perl-devel list and see if anyone there has an opinion. * source files match upstream: 41206971d87c63cecb6c5892d9cd4c96b53aacd31279db7bf5571662352f9bac Term-ReadLine-Gnu-1.17a.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: Gnu.so()(64bit) perl(Term::ReadLine::Gnu) = 1.17 perl(Term::ReadLine::Gnu::AU) perl(Term::ReadLine::Gnu::Var) perl(Term::ReadLine::Gnu::XS) perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu = 1.17a-2.fc10 = libreadline.so.5()(64bit) libtinfo.so.5()(64bit) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(AutoLoader) perl(Carp) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(Term::ReadLine::Gnu::XS) perl(strict) perl(vars) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 02:15:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 22:15:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450482] libibumad package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290215.m5T2FcQB026109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libibumad package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450482 ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2008-06-28 22:15 EST ------- %install fixed and exclusivearch removed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 02:15:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 22:15:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450481] libibcommon package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290215.m5T2FQfc026058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libibcommon package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450481 ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2008-06-28 22:15 EST ------- Fixed the %install section Removed the ExclusiveArch. The software can be built anywhere, but obviously without a hardware driver, it's useless. The ExclusiveArch just mimicked what I knew to be working architectures as far as the kernel and the driver situation is concerned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 02:15:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 22:15:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450483] libibmad package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290215.m5T2FkK6008921@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libibmad package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450483 ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2008-06-28 22:15 EST ------- Hehehe...%install fixed and exclusivearch removed ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 02:53:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 22:53:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290253.m5T2reiF016162@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From dwheeler at dwheeler.com 2008-06-28 22:53 EST ------- Ah, a thought. If we're to have: > Version: 0 then instead of: > Release: 0.X.20070911 I suggest: > Release: 20070911.X%{?dist} (where "X" is the traditional release number.) That way, it sorts correctly; a 2008-based release will always be later than 2007. Sound reasonable? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 03:06:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 23:06:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290306.m5T36NMY003922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From dwheeler at dwheeler.com 2008-06-28 23:06 EST ------- BTW, I'm aware that https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines has the "0.X.20070911" for 'pre-release' packages, but this isn't pre-release (or a snapshot, or post-release). The guidelines presume that everyone does "1.0" version formats. Anyway, let me know which you'd prefer: 1. 0.X.20070911 because it matches the pre-release format, or 2. 20070911.X%{?dist} because it sorts well, or 3. 0.20070911.X%{?dist} as a third alternative. And I'll put it that way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 03:15:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 23:15:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446159] Review Request: xesam-tools - A toolkit for Xesam compliant services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290315.m5T3FRYq020838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xesam-tools - A toolkit for Xesam compliant services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446159 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2008-06-28 23:15 EST ------- I did fix up the License, and it's now built for rawhide and F-9. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 03:18:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 23:18:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446158] Review Request: xesam-glib - A GObject library for dealing with Xesam services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290318.m5T3I1rl005974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xesam-glib - A GObject library for dealing with Xesam services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446158 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2008-06-28 23:18 EST ------- I put a comment about skipping 'make check' in the spec. Package now built for both rawhide and F-9. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 04:19:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 00:19:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290419.m5T4JBH3002116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-29 00:19 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 04:20:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 00:20:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444264] Review Request: usb_modeswitch - brings umts / 4g cards into operational mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290420.m5T4KRQF019778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: usb_modeswitch - brings umts / 4g cards into operational mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444264 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-29 00:20 EST ------- I don't see 'romal' in the cvsextras group. Christoph: Did you sponsor him? Is the account name correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 04:21:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 00:21:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451095] libcxgb3 hardware driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290421.m5T4LS95003025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libcxgb3 hardware driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451095 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-29 00:21 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 04:25:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 00:25:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452842] Review Request: monotorrent - a bit torrent client for mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290425.m5T4PA50020985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotorrent - a bit torrent client for mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452842 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |gnomeuser at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-29 00:25 EST ------- Paul: Can you add a cvs template here with what you want in your cvs request? See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 07:29:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 03:29:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request:http-mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290729.m5T7TeuG032619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:http-mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 ------- Additional Comments From philipp at redfish-solutions.com 2008-06-29 03:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > I have no problem merging them. That's fine. > > > > Some observations: > > > > * we don't need -Wl,"-lxml2" in the invocation of apxs. We can just use - lxml2 > > directly; > I'm definitely not an expert on apxs, does -lxml2 get added automatically > somewhere later in the process? I originally did not use it and resulted in a > .so that wasn't linked against libxml2.so. Had to use LoadFile in Apache to get > things working. I was just going by the example config file, which says that you need the LoadFile anyway... So the fact that the module wasn't linked (statically) against libxml2.a was a good thing. Plus it means that you can update versions of libxml2.so independently, which you lose if the module links statically against libxml2.a instead. > > * similarly, it would be preferable to install via "apxs -i -S > > LIBEXECDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{modulesdir} -n %{modname} %{modname}.la" as I've > > done; the .libs directory is an implementation detail of apxs using libtool > > that we shouldn't rely on; > That makes sense to me! > > Do we really need to supply the path to apxs? It should be in the default > > search path. If it's not, it might be because someone wants to try out a new > > version of it (in which case we should use that anyway). > I don't think we do, I just typically prefer to be more specific than less. Well, for the person developing a new version of apxs, they might appreciate being able to test their changes against all the Apache modules without having to modify each and every one of the .spec files to do so. > > Other than that, I'm fine with the rest of the changes. > > > I'll merge in your suggestions to my spec file. I don't have a burden to be the > maintainer particularly if you are interested, just let me know. Either way is fine with me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 07:51:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 03:51:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448717] Review Request: gnome-rdp - rdesktop front end In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290751.m5T7phbc006258@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-rdp - rdesktop front end https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448717 guido.ledermann at googlemail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |guido.ledermann at googlemail.c | |om ------- Additional Comments From guido.ledermann at googlemail.com 2008-06-29 03:51 EST ------- I'm doing a pre-review to become sponsored and these are my comments on your package. * rpmlint gives errors and warnings. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Use_rpmlint * %defattr is placed a bit too late, should be before %files * your program uses localized files. You must not use %{_datadir}/locale/ to place them sonewhere. You should use findlang. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files * BuildRequires: are you sure there are no redundant requirements? (glib2-devel gtk2-devel gtk-sharp2-devel gnome-sharp-devel) * if your package contains a GUI application, please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files * Group: I'd use Application/Internet rater than Applications/System. All vnc/rdesktop/tsclient applications are there. * Patch0: why do you call it gnome-rdp-fedora.patch? It is not fedora specific, so you should call it different (distribution neutral). * License: please include the license file as documentation. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text That's all for now. Again: this is just my pre-review, not an official review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 07:58:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 03:58:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450410] Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290758.m5T7wNaf023354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450410 ------- Additional Comments From guido.ledermann at googlemail.com 2008-06-29 03:58 EST ------- Here is my pre-review of a package. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448717 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 07:57:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 03:57:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448717] Review Request: gnome-rdp - rdesktop front end In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290757.m5T7vXa8007810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-rdp - rdesktop front end https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448717 ------- Additional Comments From guido.ledermann at googlemail.com 2008-06-29 03:57 EST ------- One really small last thing: don't add empty lines after the %description, and please add a dot at the end of sentences. No dots after summary, but after description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 08:04:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 04:04:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453287] Review Request: perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu - Perl extension for the GNU Readline/History Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290804.m5T8472i025462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu - Perl extension for the GNU Readline/History Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453287 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-29 04:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > This is a tough one. Until the bug is fixed, I don't know if we want to have > this package in the distro because it may just cause bug reports for any > software which might use it. Fair enough; Thanks for the review. Since I mostly care about having this in EPEL (where the bug either doesn't exist, or is mitigated somehow), I'm wondering if I'll get an approval if I promised not to build this in Fedora branches until this gets fixed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 08:01:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 04:01:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request:http-mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290801.m5T81pHO024533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:http-mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 ------- Additional Comments From philipp at redfish-solutions.com 2008-06-29 04:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) > > I'm definitely not an expert on apxs, does -lxml2 get added automatically > > somewhere later in the process? I originally did not use it and resulted in a > > .so that wasn't linked against libxml2.so. Had to use LoadFile in Apache to > get > > things working. > I was just going by the example config file, which says that you need the > LoadFile anyway... So the fact that the module wasn't linked (statically) > against libxml2.a was a good thing. Plus it means that you can update versions > of libxml2.so independently, which you lose if the module links statically > against libxml2.a instead. Actually, scratch that. I just did a quick test of with and without -lxml2 in the initial compile of apxs. In either case, libxml2.a is not statically linked. The only difference seems to be that if you specify -lxml2, then that library is added to the dynamic load list for the shared object... and if you don't, then it must be explicitly loaded with the LoadFile called out in the config file. Since the config file calls it out explicitly, and since it's normally loaded up manually anyway on other platforms, I'm inclined to stick with the slightly more complicated way of loading libxml2.so up explictly... just to be compatible with other distros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 08:05:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 04:05:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452470] Review-Request: perl-Test-WWW-Selenium - Perl Client for the Selenium Remote Control test tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290805.m5T856Dn026002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-Test-WWW-Selenium - Perl Client for the Selenium Remote Control test tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452470 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-29 04:05 EST ------- Parag: I'm sorry for that. The correct URL is: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/mock-results/perl-Test-WWW-Selenium-1.15-2.el5.noarch/perl-Test-WWW-Selenium-1.15-2.el5.src.rpm Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 08:10:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 04:10:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444760] Review Request: obm - Open Business Management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290810.m5T8An0E027557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obm - Open Business Management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444760 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-06-29 04:10 EST ------- Grrr, see #447921 You should also note than version 2.1.10 is out... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 08:11:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 04:11:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290811.m5T8Ba0O027747@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-29 04:11 EST ------- 2. tight you to a in-release scheme, 1. is the most flexible, but 3. is also possible, indeed, if the scheme changes, one can afterward use 1.7.09.X So I'd prefer 1. or 3., as you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 08:14:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 04:14:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444760] Review Request: obm - Open Business Management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290814.m5T8EJtx028252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obm - Open Business Management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444760 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-06-29 04:14 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=310528) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=310528&action=view) init script for satellite Init script fixed to : - use localized message - user daemon command to display success/failure status - user killproc command to display success/failure status - change restart option to really restart the daemon - add reload option -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 08:17:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 04:17:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444760] Review Request: obm - Open Business Management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290817.m5T8HjRV029384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obm - Open Business Management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444760 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-06-29 04:17 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=310529) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=310529&action=view) Apache conf file Apache configuration file fixed to - change Directory to "/usr/share/obm" (upper) - move php-value/php-flag in directory - comment log (should only be uncomment with virtual host) - add php_flag display_errors Off (obm produce a lot of "notice") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 08:20:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 04:20:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444760] Review Request: obm - Open Business Management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290820.m5T8KEmK030223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obm - Open Business Management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444760 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |447921 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 08:34:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 04:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444760] Review Request: obm - Open Business Management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290834.m5T8Y4lx030497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obm - Open Business Management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444760 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #310528|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-06-29 04:34 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=310530) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=310530&action=view) init script for satellite -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 08:39:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 04:39:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444760] Review Request: obm - Open Business Management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290839.m5T8dwqT031923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obm - Open Business Management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444760 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-06-29 04:39 EST ------- Missing /var/log/obm used by satellite. Cycle in link to satellite conf file. You must change from pushd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/%{name}-satellite/ ln -s ./%{name}Satellite.cf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/obm-satellite/%{name}Satellite.cf To ln -s ../../..%{_sysconfdir}/%{name}-satellite/%{name}Satellite.cf \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/obm-satellite/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 08:52:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 04:52:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450410] Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290852.m5T8qfnH003016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450410 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-29 04:52 EST ------- Okay, your pre-review seems good to some extent for initial comments. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This package (multiget) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor. At the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 09:32:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 05:32:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433926] Review Request: freehoo - Freehoo is a free console based messenger for Yahoo IM Service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290932.m5T9Wi74030360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freehoo - Freehoo is a free console based messenger for Yahoo IM Service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433926 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-06-29 05:32 EST ------- +---------------------------------+ | This package is APPROVED by me. | +---------------------------------+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 09:36:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 05:36:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806290936.m5T9aMMY014865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-29 05:36 EST ------- Missing buildRequires, at least: libGL-devel libGLU-devel postgresql-devel mysql-devel krb5-devel fftw-devel python-devel qt4-devel ftgl-devel gcc-gfortran python-devel Some may not really needed because they are in turn dependencies of other BuildRequires. The internal libAfterImage is used, there is this: WARNING: System libAfterImage is too new, using built-in this should be fixed. A libafterimage library is shipped which is clearly wrong. Also there is a minicern library, instead the system cern library, in cernlib-utils should be used. Then the 2 apps depending on the cernlib could be in a separate package. It would be nice if you could remove the in-source 3rd party library directories before doing the build, to be sure that they are not used. There are 2 files installed not packaged: /usr/bin/g2root /usr/bin/h2root The libraries should have a soname, you should add --enable-soversion Currently the programs don't start because the shared libraries are not found by the dynamic loader. To correct that you should add a file in /etc/ld.so.conf.d The fedora build flags are not used. Some binary names are too generic in my opinion, namely: root, roots, genmap, xrd How is the python ROOT module used? Shouldn't it be in the python directories? And similar with genreflex. And there is also a /usr/lib/root/writer.py which looks dubious. How is it used? In any case it should certainly be below %_datadir (or in the python dirs). A separate package should be done for the (x)emacs stuff, there are guidelines for that. Many files and directories that are in %_sysconfdir doesn't look like configuration, like /etc/root/html/ /etc/root/RadioNuclides.txt /etc/root/gdb-backtrace.sh /etc/root/valgrind-root.supp /etc/root/root.mimes /etc/root/proof/ Most should certainly be in %_datadir Is /etc/root/vmc/ really needed? If needed it certainly should be in %_datadir and in -devel. Are the files in /usr/share/root/plugins/ used at runtime? (they are in root-devel) According to the doc, it seems that the files in /etc/profile.d are not needed. root-config may also be useful at runtime to have programs find the paths/arch, at least it is used in root.sh (though it is not useful for linux). I am not sure that the root icons should be in /usr/share/icons/ this directory is for icon themes conforming with freedesktop. It should certainly better be in /usr/share/root/icons At least a .desktop file is missing for root, and maybe more. What is the difference between root and root.exe? in the root.mime file, external applications should use xdg-open. Because of the loader issue above I cannot test, but I'd like to have an example showing when the cint header files are needed. In the init.d files, you should remove references to environment variables. in the xrootd there is a @libdir@, but in fact all that relates to LD_LIBRARY_PATH should be removed. Also there should be example /etc/sysconfig/*d to show even in a very sketchy way what can go in these files. It even seems to me than some variales should be mandatorily set in these sysconfig files, like XRDUSER. Corresponding users should be created, there is a related guideline for user and group creation. Looks like there are many things done in /tmp, it would be nice to be sure that what is done here is always done with unpredictable names, to avoid the race in tmp security issue. There are many dependencies that are not in fedora (like pythia, castor, globus...) some of which may be free software other aren't. In general I insist on having all the free software dependencies in fedora, but in that case this means really too much. There is one dep already in fedora, unuran, you could try to use it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 10:08:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 06:08:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446102] Review Request: xdialog - X11 drop in replacement for cdialog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291008.m5TA8tN2006980@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdialog - X11 drop in replacement for cdialog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446102 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-29 06:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > > Thanks for the review. Are you waiting to be sponsored? > > Yes, I am and I'd appreciate sponsorship. Could you please point me to other work you have done in fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 10:10:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 06:10:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444264] Review Request: usb_modeswitch - brings umts / 4g cards into operational mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291010.m5TAAwVi007659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: usb_modeswitch - brings umts / 4g cards into operational mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444264 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-06-29 06:10 EST ------- romal is correct and he now is sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 10:23:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 06:23:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446102] Review Request: xdialog - X11 drop in replacement for cdialog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291023.m5TAN2iX010746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdialog - X11 drop in replacement for cdialog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446102 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-29 06:23 EST ------- Added the getext BR and the comment: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/xdialog-2.3.1-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 10:32:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 06:32:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428686] Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291032.m5TAWrgb013190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428686 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-29 06:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > I note you're not using the dist tag; you package enough things in Fedora that I > assume you can deal with the issues, but lately even experienced packagers have > run into issues caused by not using the dist tag so I would still recommend it. What kind of issue? It seems to me that for noarch packages like this one no %dist is better. There is an issue of directory dependency for the -doc subpackage. First it seems that the location should be %{_texmf}/doc/latex/%{real_name} Then for directory owning it should depend on texlive-texmf or on texlive-texmf-doc. I don't think the tetex-doc dependency is strictly needed, however, contrary to what I imply with Comment #13. Last think is that maybe you could use tex(latex) instead of tetex-latex if don't target F-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 10:55:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 06:55:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445036] Review Request: vagalume - Last.fm client for GNOME and Maemo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291055.m5TAt0GY018191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vagalume - Last.fm client for GNOME and Maemo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445036 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |debarshi.ray at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-06-29 06:54 EST ------- *** Bug 453194 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 10:54:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 06:54:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453194] Review Request: vagalume - A Last.fm client for Gnome and Maemo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291054.m5TAsxE5018162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vagalume - A Last.fm client for Gnome and Maemo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453194 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-06-29 06:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > This was already submitted and then rejected for Fedora; the review was moved to > Livna. Have circumstances changed such that this should go into Fedora? > > See bug 445036. The situation is still the same. Closing as a duplicate of bug 445036 and adding it to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList#General_Fedora_Packages_WishList *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 445036 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 11:59:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 07:59:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291159.m5TBxkOa002016@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 ------- Additional Comments From assim.deodia at gmail.com 2008-06-29 07:59 EST ------- I am getting this error while performing import of dotconf repository [Assim at localhost rpmbuild]$ ssh-add --help Enter passphrase for /home/Assim/.ssh/id_rsa: Identity added: /home/Assim/.ssh/id_rsa (/home/Assim/.ssh/id_rsa) Identity added: /home/Assim/.ssh/id_dsa (/home/Assim/.ssh/id_dsa) [Assim at localhost rpmbuild]$ fedora-cvs dotconf Checking out dotconf from fedora cvs: Error: Permission denied (publickey,keyboard-interactive). cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any) i have used same keys before also and it has worked. I later found that in FAS account i have uploaded id-dsa key instead of id-rsa. I have replaced it still i am getting same error. have i missed something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 11:56:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 07:56:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291156.m5TBupXm001341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 ------- Additional Comments From nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com 2008-06-29 07:56 EST ------- Thank you tibbs. Do you want to be in initialCC for cvs request ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 12:04:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 08:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447159] Review Request: ocsinventory - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291204.m5TC4IJN019046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447159 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 12:13:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 08:13:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291213.m5TCDXUX021846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-29 08:13 EST ------- Well, first would you try to re-download fedora-upload-ca.cert available from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Install_the_Client_Tools_.28Koji.29 and re-run fedora-packager-setup ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 12:47:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 08:47:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442244] Review Request: fotox - Program for improving image files made with a digital camera In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291247.m5TClY5F014740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fotox - Program for improving image files made with a digital camera https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442244 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(adel.gadllah at gmail| |.com) | ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2008-06-29 08:47 EST ------- Well I sent a patch to upstream to add an autotools based buildsys because upstream was saying it was "too complicated". Upstream has yet to release a version with this patch. Will ping him next week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 13:31:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 09:31:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450482] libibumad package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291331.m5TDVJN9025696@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libibumad package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450482 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2008-06-29 09:31 EST ------- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 13:30:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 09:30:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450481] libibcommon package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291330.m5TDU13K025169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libibcommon package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450481 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2008-06-29 09:30 EST ------- OK, its APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 13:33:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 09:33:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450483] libibmad package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291333.m5TDXI5s009233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libibmad package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450483 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2008-06-29 09:33 EST ------- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 13:39:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 09:39:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450410] Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291339.m5TDd6Dg027509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450410 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-06-29 09:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Then I will sponsor you. As written in comment #2 I am willing to sponsor Guido, in fact I already did, so I'm removing FE-NEEDSPINSOR blocker now. Guido and me know each other from real life and we are both German, which simplifies communication a lot. Nevertheless thanks a lot for offering sponsorship to Guido and for helping out with this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 13:57:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 09:57:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450410] Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291357.m5TDvrsg032425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450410 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-29 09:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > As written in comment #2 I am willing to sponsor Guido, in fact I already did, > so I'm removing FE-NEEDSPINSOR blocker now. Guido and me know each other from > real life and we are both German, which simplifies communication a lot. Ah, that is much better! Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 15:07:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 11:07:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450539] Review Request: service-discovery-applet - Service discovery applet based on Avahi for the Gnome panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291507.m5TF7RXG032534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: service-discovery-applet - Service discovery applet based on Avahi for the Gnome panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450539 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-06-29 11:07 EST ------- Not an official review, just a few thoughts: I suggest to name this package gnome-applet-service-discovery, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28General.29 Better name a svn snapshot after the revision and not the date, because then the reviewer can simply check out the correrct version with svn co -rXXXXX svn://svn.0pointer.de/service-discovery-applet/trunk service-discovery-applet I see you define both python_sitelib and python_sitearch. Please remove the unneeded definition. You are missing a requirement: $ service-discovery-applet Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/service-discovery-applet", line 51, in error_msg(_("A required python module is missing!\n%s") % (e)) File "/usr/bin/service-discovery-applet", line 29, in error_msg d = gtk.MessageDialog(parent=None, flags=gtk.DIALOG_MODAL, NameError: global name 'gtk' is not defined running service-discovery-config gives a messagebox saying: "Ein ben?tigtes Python Modul fehlt! No module named avahi" Not sure if we have a python-avahi package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 15:26:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 11:26:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291526.m5TFQbda021748@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-06-29 11:26 EST ------- the error message indicates ssh auth failure. make sure the key you are using is the same as the key you have uploaded to FAS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 15:42:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 11:42:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291542.m5TFgZmM025719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-29 11:42 EST ------- I do not; thanks. I do far too many reviews to be CC'd on all of them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 15:50:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 11:50:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453264] Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291550.m5TFoxK0027620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453264 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2008-06-29 11:50 EST ------- Grr. Well, Spec URL: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/review/jscoverage.spec SRPM URL: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/review/jscoverage-0.3.2-0.1.rc1.fc9.src.rpm have been updated after talking some with upstream. They don't install the js stuff anymore, but it was noticed that jscoverage statically links against the js that's built during the build process. I've asked upstream to help me work up a configure option that has it dynamically link against the system js, we'll see where that goes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 15:58:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 11:58:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291558.m5TFwtvi012164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com 2008-06-29 11:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: clive Short Description: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts Owners: eponyme Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 16:16:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 12:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428686] Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291616.m5TGGb9A016973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428686 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-29 12:16 EST ------- You still have to keep the release tag different between branches; without dist you just have to do it manually, and even experienced packagers have issues. Especially since you generally import into devel first, but its release has to be higher than the others. You are absolutely correct about the doc directory; _texmf/doc/tex doesn't actually seem to exist in the distro. I know I checked it, but I was trusting you on the tetex-doc dependency; I honestly don't understand why it would be necessary, but I'm not TeX expert and I figured it wouldn't really hurt anything. I'm curious as to why you said it was necessary, though. Also, since you seem to know more about TeX than I, are the texhash scriptlets really necessary for the -doc package? Did the F8 tex packages grow the tex(latex) provides? It doesn't look like it from here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 16:27:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 12:27:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291627.m5TGR3Gx019592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Alias: ntop_package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 ------- Additional Comments From rakesh.pandit at gmail.com 2008-06-29 12:27 EST ------- > E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/sbin/ntop ['/usr/lib64'] > E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libntopreport-3.3.so ['/usr/lib64'] >These need to be fixed. The information at I was not able to reproduce on my m/c. Will try to check on 64 bit m/c > W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libntop-3.3.so /lib64/ libcrypt.so.1 > W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libntop-3.3.so /lib64/ libnsl.so.1 > W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libntop-3.3.so /lib64/ libssl.so.7 > W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libntop-3.3.so /usr/lib64/ libsensors.so.4 >These indicate that the ntop libs are linked against various other libraries Fixed. >You can drop the %if 0%{?fedora} >= 7 conditional stuff Fixed. Spec URL: http://rakesh.gnulinuxcentar.org/ntop.spec SRPM URL: http://rakesh.gnulinuxcentar.org/ntop-3.3-3.fc8.src.rpm Will update soon on rpath. -- Rakesh Pandit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 16:40:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 12:40:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291640.m5TGeWps023055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-29 12:40 EST ------- *** Bug 428410 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 16:40:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 12:40:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428410] Review Request: LADR - Library for Automated Deduction Research In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291640.m5TGeVCN023026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LADR - Library for Automated Deduction Research https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428410 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-29 12:40 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 451996 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 17:08:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 13:08:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450616] opensm package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291708.m5TH8gN6013843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: opensm package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450616 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ed at eh3.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2008-06-29 13:08 EST ------- Hi Doug, thank you for submitting an opensm package for Fedora. Here is a quick review: GOOD: + source matches upstream: f2f47a9bad4ba3ed1c48361dfc8f21826882b7cb opensm-3.2.1.tar.gz f2f47a9bad4ba3ed1c48361dfc8f21826882b7cb opensm-3.2.1.tar.gz.UP + license is correct and correctly included + permissions look good + dir ownership looks good + with dependencies installed, local builds on F8 x86_64 succeed + rpmlint reports: opensm.src: W: strange-permission opensm.initd 0775 opensm.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/logrotate.d/opensm opensm.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/sbin/osmtest ['/usr/lib64', '/u/u0/ehill/rpmbuild/BUILD/opensm-3.2.1/osmtest/../../libibumad/.libs', '/u/u0/ehill/rpmbuild/BUILD/opensm-3.2.1/osmtest/../../libibcommon/.libs'] opensm.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/sbin/opensm ['/usr/lib64', '/u/u0/ehill/rpmbuild/BUILD/opensm-3.2.1/opensm/../../libibumad/.libs', '/u/u0/ehill/rpmbuild/BUILD/opensm-3.2.1/opensm/../../libibcommon/.libs'] opensm.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm opensm.x86_64: E: malformed-line-in-lsb-comment-block # opensm-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation opensm-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation opensm-libs.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libosmvendor.so.2.0.0 ['/usr/lib64'] opensm-libs.x86_64: W: one-line-command-in-%post /sbin/ldconfig opensm-libs.x86_64: W: one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig opensm-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation NEEDSWORK: + First, the rpath issues. I've tried to put together a patch that removes the rpaths from the configure script and some of the Makefile.in-s but so far I've failed to remove all of them. And, removing some of the rpaths breaks the install since certain *.la{i,} files won't get generated. Perhaps someone with stronger hack-fu can (please?) take a look at it? Or, perhaps we can just ignore these rather-annoying rpath warnings since it is something specific to just these two opensm executables (and cannot cause any std-path problems for other packages since they are not shared libs). + Please delete the blank line in the LSB comment block. + Please use '%post libs -p /sbin/ldconfig' and '%postun libs -p /sbin/ldconfig' I haven't (yet) had the time to install and run it on a machine with IB hardware -- will try that next. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 17:14:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 13:14:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450686] Review Request: R-RSQLite - SQLite Interface for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291714.m5THE1N0030883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-RSQLite - SQLite Interface for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450686 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ Bug 450686 depends on bug 450685, which changed state. Bug 450685 Summary: Review Request: R-DBI - Database Interface for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450685 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-29 13:14 EST ------- I'd suggest using http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/RSQLite/index.html for the URL, as it actually has some information about the package. * source files match upstream: 8eb6faf25b494db17c74e0a83099839796539ae059cc8fd58fbac13aac2c63d8 RSQLite_0.6-9.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: RSQLite.so()(64bit) R-RSQLite = 0.6-3.fc10 = /bin/bash /bin/sh R R-DBI libR.so()(64bit) * %check is present and all tests pass. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets OK (R package registration) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 17:19:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 13:19:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453224] Review Request: prelude-correlator - Correlates IDMEF events for prelude-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291719.m5THJRTs016415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-correlator - Correlates IDMEF events for prelude-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453224 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-29 13:19 EST ------- This fails to build for me: + install -m 755 /builddir/build/SOURCES/prelude-correlator.init /var/tmp/prelude-correlator-0.9.0-1.fc10-root-mockbuild/etc/rc.d/init.d/prelude-correlator install: cannot stat `/builddir/build/SOURCES/prelude-correlator.init': No such file or directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 17:21:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 13:21:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445010] Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291721.m5THLeok000530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445010 ------- Additional Comments From telimektar at esraonline.com 2008-06-29 13:21 EST ------- Pablo Martin Gomez has suggested me two minor things for the packages. Fistr, I didn't update %release after Marek suggestions, and the ':' wasn't well-placed into %description. Here are updated spec and srpm : http://www.telimektar.com/rpm/xvarstar/release-2/xvarstar.spec http://www.telimektar.com/rpm/xvarstar/release-2/xvarstar-0.9-2.fc9.src.rpm Also, Marek, Pablo seems to be ok for reviewing me, are you still ok for maintaining xvarstar, and mark me as co-mainainer ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 17:31:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 13:31:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450816] Review Request: alevt - Teletext decoder/browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291731.m5THVW4L019613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alevt - Teletext decoder/browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450816 ------- Additional Comments From cooly at gnome.eu.org 2008-06-29 13:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > * The debuginfos were somewhat useless without the "-g" option. Now it uses > Fedora's own CFLAGS automatically. My intention was to use -g from the beginning -w was there by mistake. Anyway the best aproach is fedora's own CFLAGS. I've modified the file and bump release: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/alevt.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/alevt-1.6.2-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 17:49:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 13:49:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449151] Review Request: pyodbc - Python DB API 2.0 Module for ODBC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291749.m5THnaYQ007182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyodbc - Python DB API 2.0 Module for ODBC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449151 rayvd at bludgeon.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 17:52:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 13:52:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453224] Review Request: prelude-correlator - Correlates IDMEF events for prelude-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291752.m5THqnM0024836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-correlator - Correlates IDMEF events for prelude-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453224 ------- Additional Comments From sgrubb at redhat.com 2008-06-29 13:52 EST ------- Doh! Added Source1 which holds the init script. New srpm and spec file uploaded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 17:57:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 13:57:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433926] Review Request: freehoo - Freehoo is a free console based messenger for Yahoo IM Service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291757.m5THvpNa026065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freehoo - Freehoo is a free console based messenger for Yahoo IM Service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433926 rayvd at bludgeon.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2008-06-29 13:57 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: freehoo Short Description: Console based Yahoo Client Owners: rayvd Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 17:57:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 13:57:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291757.m5THvxjL026112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-29 13:57 EST ------- Then I guess the next question is whether you would like a review of this now or whether you've opened this to track the development effort. Not that I can promise to do a review myself, of course; this is a big package and several people will probably needed share the review work. Some initial comments from a quick look at the spec; I did not build the package: Please use the proper versioning scheme for prerelease packages: Release: 0.1.alpha%{alpha_version}%{?dist} ^ and increment the '1' with each new release until 4.0.0 is actually released, at which point you can just go to "Release: 1%{?dist}". See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages Please use the correct License: tag; comma-separation is ambiguous and not valid. I'm not sure if the code is triple-licensed or if different pieces of the built package have different licenses, but both situations are covered in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines. Any possibility of parallel make? The ldconfig call in %install is confusing to me. What's it for? Please use the proper scriptlets for user/group creation; http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups Shouldn't the condrestart go in %postun, not %post? You need the proper dependencies for the scriptlets. Requires(post): /sbin/chkconfig, /sbin/service and so on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 18:01:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:01:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291801.m5TI1j48027117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-29 14:01 EST ------- Some random comments on 200805a-1: * About prover9-libtoolise.patch - This patch seems to be for providing shared library named libladr.so.4. However if the original tarball does not provide any shared library by default, this way is dangerous because we cannot guess with what soversion the upstream developer comes to provide shared library in the future. At this stage the number "4:0:0" can be chosen arbitrarily without any ground. See also the explanation by Patrice Dumas: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PatriceDumas So if this package only provides static archives by default, please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries of "static libraries only". * Compilation flags - This package completely ignores Fedora specific compilation flags: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags You can check what flags must be passed by $ rpm --eval %optflags This also reads to creating non-useful debuginfo rpm. * Timestamps - When using %__install or %__cp commands, add "-p" option to keep timestamps on installed files. * Unneeded ldconfig call - This -devel package does not need to call /sbin/ldconfig on scriptlets. * Too generic names - Again filenames like "attack" or "renamer", "rewriter", etc... are too generic for files to be installed under %_bindir. Also it may be that the names "isofilter?" are also dangerous, as my system already has "iso-info" or "isoinfo" (!!!!) or "isosize" or so. Would you rename these binaries to "prover9-???" or move these under %_libdir/%name , for example? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 18:24:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:24:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428686] Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291824.m5TIOP8j032603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428686 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-29 14:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > You still have to keep the release tag different between branches; without dist > you just have to do it manually, and even experienced packagers have issues. > Especially since you generally import into devel first, but its release has to > be higher than the others. Higher or equal. But indeed, it is less easy to bump in previous release without becoming greater than devel. However the dist really doesn't makes sense here. > You are absolutely correct about the doc directory; _texmf/doc/tex doesn't > actually seem to exist in the distro. I know I checked it, but > I was trusting you on the tetex-doc dependency; I honestly don't understand why > it would be necessary, but I'm not TeX expert and I figured it wouldn't really > hurt anything. (tetex/texlive)-doc holds the texdoc utility which can be used to view docs in the texmf tree. texlive-texmf-doc holds most of the documentation, and the _texmf/doc/latex is owned by texlive-texmf and texlive-texmf-doc. So the texlive-texmf or texlive-texmf-doc is in my opinion needed for directory owning. But (tetex/texlive)-doc is less needed, in my opinion, the doc can be viewed without texdoc. > Also, > since you seem to know more about TeX than I, are the texhash scriptlets really > necessary for the -doc package? Yes, they are if in the texmf tree, since then they can be accessed by texdoc which uses kpathsea to locate them. > Did the F8 tex packages grow the tex(latex) provides? It doesn't look like it > from here. No it doesn't, but I said in Comment #20 not to do it is F-8 is targeted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 18:26:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:26:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291826.m5TIQw7P001085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-29 14:26 EST ------- Some ramdom comments: * Licensing - Well, the license of LICENSE.txt as shown on the URL is actually NON-FREE, so the license cannot be accepted on Fedora. However as far as I checked the source tarball, this software is licensed under "BSD with advertising". Note that anyway we don't allow the license tag such as "Freely redistributable without restriction". * Versioning - This package seems to be a pre-version for 2.3.2. In such case the current versioning is wrong. Please refer to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages * builds - Your package does not build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=685315 build.log says that at least "ping" binary (in iputils) is missing from BuildRequires. * perl module dependency - When adding perl module dependency as (Build)Requires, please don't write the rpm names directly but write what modules the rpms provide: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides * Macros - Use macros correctly. For example, /etc must be %{_sysconfdir}. - Also, using the directory %{_prefix}/local is not allowed on Fedora. * Inproper scriptlets - You must call "mkdir" "chown" "ln" "chmod" commands on scriptlets except for very special cases. As same as other packages, for this package you must create the needed directories by the time %install ends, and must add those directories to %files entry and set attribute correctly by using %attr. * Directory ownership issue - Please make it sure that all directories which are created by installing this packages are correctly owned by this package. Currently %{_sysconfdir}/rancid/, %{_datadir}/rancid/ are not owned by any packages. * %changelog version - The EVR (Epoch:Version:Release) number of this package does not coincide with the last entry on %changelog. Please make it sure that when you modify your spec file, you also change the release number of the spec file to avoid confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 18:28:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:28:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291828.m5TIS3Ys001289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From dwheeler at dwheeler.com 2008-06-29 14:28 EST ------- Okay. Between 1 and 3 I'd prefer 3, because if the scheme NEVER changes, it will sort correctly into the indefinite future. So: 0.20070911.X%{?dist} it is. I'll add a comment line explaining it. I don't know of any other issues with the package, let me know if there are any. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 18:35:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:35:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291835.m5TIZxAE018907@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: zfuzz - Z |Review Request: tex-zfuzz - |fuzz - Type-checker and |Type-checker and LaTeX style |LaTeX style for Z spec |for Z spec language |language | Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-29 14:35 EST ------- * rpmlint is silent * follow guidelines * free software, license included. * match upstream 4e4d00d8571b14919f95f041a927f71b fuzzman-2up.pdf e3eb1467804bf4bf5b8dcf8eed773c69 fuzzman.pdf c3145cea9c6f16fb02e068fd1ea669a9 refcard-2up.pdf 082297daa993c97d8e35fb75f8bb2810 refcard-3up.pdf be69ba14a3b997bcde65828a34909e67 refcard.pdf 9f021c0e68f8f4616095f57ff2192c6f fuzz-2007-09-11.tar.gz * %files section right APPROVED Did you apply to sponsorship? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 18:42:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:42:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235672] Review Request: zope3 - Zope 3 web application server framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291842.m5TIgv9h020451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zope3 - Zope 3 web application server framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235672 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2008-06-29 14:42 EST ------- Suggestion, if you need Python 2.4 you should open a review in rhe rpmfussion project, because they have a compat-python-2.4 package which you ma need for zope. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 18:50:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:50:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452688] Review Request: dbus-java - Java implementation of the DBus protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291850.m5TIoXX9006996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-java - Java implementation of the DBus protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452688 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? Bug 452688 depends on bug 452251, which changed state. Bug 452251 Summary: Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452251 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-29 14:50 EST ------- This builds fine. The only rpmlint complaint is: dbus-java.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.5-1.fc9 2.5-1.fc10 which happens because I'm building this on rawhide. Normally you just don't include the dist tag in your changelog versions. I'm a bit confused by the installed wrapper scripts; they all contain: JARPATH=/usr/local/share/java which doesn't seem correct. Installing and running ListDBus gives me: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/freedesktop/dbus/bin/ListDBus Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.freedesktop.dbus.bin.ListDBus at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:217) [...] The guidelines are unfortunately silent on the subject of symlinking the jar files, but this seems to be common enough. * source files match upstream: 2b2001aa2fccc6cc3eedfeb35d2c7b13e52811c27820f27f0f6ce0e8f547ad65 dbus-java-2.5.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint has one minor complaint which is easy to fix. * final provides and requires are sane: dbus-java-2.5-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm dbus-2.5.jar.so()(64bit) dbus-bin-2.5.jar.so()(64bit) dbus-viewer-2.5.jar.so()(64bit) dbus-java = 2.5-1.fc10 = /bin/sh java-1.6.0-openjdk java-gcj-compat >= 1.0.31 jpackage-utils libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) dbus-java-javadoc-2.5-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm dbus-java-javadoc = 2.5-1.fc10 = jpackage-utils X %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I'm not sure how to test this, honestly, since I don't know much about dbus, but just running ListDBus seems to fail badly. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK; gcj-rebuild-db stuff. * code, not content. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no pre-built jars * single jar, named after the package * jarfiles are under _javadir. * javadocs are under _javadocdir. X wrapper scripts provided, but not working properly. * gcj called properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 18:51:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:51:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453264] Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291851.m5TIpOL5022633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453264 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2008-06-29 14:51 EST ------- message from upstream (that I will later put in the spec file itself): From: Ed To: Jesse Keating Subject: Re: Packaging jscoverage for Fedora Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 12:01:38 -0500 (13:01 EDT) Jesse Keating wrote: > Hrm, that exposes a different problem. Fedora has a pretty strict > policy with regard to statically compiled software, in that you have to > have a really really good reason to bring it in and have the exception > on file. Are there any ways to compile jscoverage against the shared js > library? > The Mozilla SpiderMonkey js library is intended to be used as a JavaScript interpreter, but JSCoverage uses it for parsing, rather than interpreting, JavaScript. Unfortunately the parsing functions are not "public" and could possibly change any time the library is upgraded. I think the above qualifies as a good reason to allow static linking. I'm ready to have this package reviewed. The only current rpmlint output is a number of .css files in the examples have dos line endings, which doesn't effect their use. If not necessary I'd rather not munge those files during package build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 19:02:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:02:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227116] Review Request: servletapi4-4.0.4-4jpp - Java servlet and JSP implementation classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291902.m5TJ2aYA009944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: servletapi4-4.0.4-4jpp - Java servlet and JSP implementation classes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227116 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2008-06-29 15:02 EST ------- Good: + Local build works fine. + Mock build works fine. Bad: - Rpmlint complaints source rpm: $ rpmlint servletapi4-4.0.4-4jpp.src.rpm servletapi4.src:50: W: unversioned-explicit-provides servlet servletapi4.src:57: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes servlet4 servletapi4.src:58: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes servlet23 servletapi4.src:59: W: unversioned-explicit-provides servlet4 servletapi4.src:60: W: unversioned-explicit-provides servlet23 servletapi4.src:74: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT servletapi4.src:75: W: setup-not-quiet servletapi4.src:173: W: macro-in-%changelog name servletapi4.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install servletapi4.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 9, tab: line 31) servletapi4.src: W: non-standard-group Internet/WWW/Dynamic Content servletapi4.src: W: invalid-license Apache License servletapi4.src: E: unknown-key GPG#c431416d 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 11 warnings. - Package contains wrong Group tag - Package should not contains Vendor tag - Package should not contains Distribution tag. - Source tag contains not a full quallified URI - Package doesn't contains buildRequires and Requires to java - Rpmlint conplaints binary package: $ rpmlint servletapi4-4.0.4-4jpp.noarch.rpm servletapi4.noarch: W: non-standard-group Internet/WWW/Dynamic Content servletapi4.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 4.0.4-4jpp 0:4.0.4-4jpp servletapi4.noarch: W: invalid-license Apache License 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. - Rpmlint complaints javadoc rpm: $ rpmlint servletapi4-javadoc-4.0.4-4jpp.noarch.rpm servletapi4-javadoc.noarch: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation servletapi4-javadoc.noarch: W: invalid-license Apache License 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 19:32:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:32:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446102] Review Request: xdialog - X11 drop in replacement for cdialog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291932.m5TJWPiq000330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdialog - X11 drop in replacement for cdialog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446102 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-06-29 15:32 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM: 31 warnings triggered by the fact that all example files are marked executable; quite ugly at the first sight but since no additional dependency is pulled in + it is intentional to have the examples runable by default (as opposed to using "sh " ), I will not object [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 292c552506633c54a28d51aa290277b7b5c0c708 Xdialog-2.3.1.tar.bz2 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. It is a GUI, but requires a mandatory argument when run, so a desktop file to launch it would be useless. A comment specofying this aspect is included in the spec [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on:devel/x86_64, F7/x86_64 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 19:36:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:36:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446102] Review Request: xdialog - X11 drop in replacement for cdialog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291936.m5TJaEDl001512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdialog - X11 drop in replacement for cdialog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446102 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-06-29 15:36 EST ------- Since the original sources do not really have a license specified (but only include the standard COPYING file), I suggest to act according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ ("Now, keep in mind that most upstreams are probably leaving the versioning out by accident. If you get to case 4, you definitely want to let upstream know that you are unable to determine the applicable version(s) of the license from the source and documentation. They'll almost certainly let you know what their intended license version is, and (hopefully) correct it in the upstream source. "). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 19:37:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:37:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446841] Review Request: sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806291937.m5TJbvxj001868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446841 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-29 15:37 EST ------- This did not build for me: Processing files: sippy-0-1.20080515cvs.fc10 Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.38465 error: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/sippy-0-1.20080515cvs.fc10-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/* and later: Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/sippy-0-1.20080515cvs.fc10-root-mockbuild error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sippy-0.0-py2.5.egg-info /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sippy/CCEvents.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sippy/CCEvents.pyc and so on, for every installed file. Looks like you're using sitearch when you should be using sitelib, since this is a noarch package. I can't imagine that this package could ever actually build, but somehow you got rpmlint output. As you currently have things, this is just a python module and should be called python-sippy. Even if it has some scripts but is still mainly used as a module, I'd name it as a module. But if it's an application that happens to bundle modules for its own use, then name it after the application. If you expect that the examples will actually need to be called by people during regular use then they should be in _bindir. Otherwise they should be packaged as documentation, and generally not be made executable. Although it's not really a problem (i.e. a review blocker) for them to be executable as long as they don't pull in dependencies that the package wouldn't have were they not executable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 20:08:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 16:08:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 394871] Review Request: automaton - a Java finite state automata/regular expression library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806292008.m5TK8DtK026489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: automaton - a Java finite state automata/regular expression library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394871 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-29 16:08 EST ------- Looks like mona also went with the X.YrZ version format as well, which is fine with me. rpmlint complains only about the Group: tags, which seems to be normal for java packages and which we don't care about anyway. I'm pretty sure the jars are rebuilt, but the upstream source includes a prebuilt one, so it would be best to simply delete it in %prep. The gcj bits should all be conditionalized. * source files match upstream: 2af431a4c9beee99d9739d1284efa99a4b21c6bfd27059f430de6ef4574cdb56 automaton-1.10-4.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: automaton-1.10r4-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm automaton-1.10r4.jar.so()(64bit) automaton = 1.10r4-1.fc10 = /bin/sh java java-gcj-compat >= 1.0.31 jpackage-utils libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) automaton-javadoc-1.10r4-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm automaton-javadoc = 1.10r4-1.fc10 = automaton = 1.10r4-1.fc10 jpackage-utils * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I to not know how to test this package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. X scriptlets should consitionalize the gcj bits. * code, not content. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. ? no pre-built jars * single jar, named after the package * jarfiles are under _javadir. * javadocs are under _javadocdir. * ant called properly. * no wrapper script necessary. X gcj not called properly; should be conditionalized. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 20:17:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 16:17:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445068] Review Request: ocaml-bin-prot - Read and write OCaml values in a type-safe binary protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806292017.m5TKHpve012117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-bin-prot - Read and write OCaml values in a type-safe binary protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445068 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-29 16:17 EST ------- No problem; just clear the whiteboard when you're ready for a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 20:32:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 16:32:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806292032.m5TKWphd015878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-29 16:32 EST ------- Some random comments on 0.1.5-1: * Version - Current newest tarball seems 0.1.6. * tarball - As the upstream ships bzip2 compressed tarball, please use it. * BuildRequires: - Currently mono-core is not available on ppc64. So this package needs 'ExcludeArch: ppc64'. * Timestamps - To keep timestamps on installed files, please consider to use: ------------------------------------------------------------------ make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" ------------------------------------------------------------------ This method usually works for recent autotool based Makefiles. * Installed directory - Currently this package installs somefiles under %{_prefix}/lib/%{name}, which is wrong for 64 bits machine (x86_64, where %{_prefix}/lib is /usr/lib while %{_libdir} is /usr/lib64). Please apply a patch so that this package use %{_libdir}/%{name} * Directory ownership issue - Please make it sure that all directories created when installing this package are owned correctly by this package. Currently %{_libdir}/%{name}, %{_datadir}/%{name} are not owned by any packages. * GTK icon cache update - As this package installs icons under %_datadir/icons/hicolor, please follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GTK.2B_icon_cache * defattr - Please unify defattr usage to %defattr(-,root,root,-) * Requires - It seems that this package needs some Requires: On my system: --------------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ tasque ** (Tasque.exe:5510): WARNING **: The following assembly referenced from /usr/lib/tasque/Tasque.exe could not be loaded: Assembly: gnome-sharp (assemblyref_index=2) Version: 2.16.0.0 Public Key: 35e10195dab3c99f The assembly was not found in the Global Assembly Cache, a path listed in the MONO_PATH environment variable, or in the location of the executing assembly (/usr/lib/tasque/). ** (Tasque.exe:5510): WARNING **: Could not load file or assembly 'gnome-sharp, Version=2.16.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=35e10195dab3c99f' or one of its dependencies. Unhandled Exception: System.TypeLoadException: Could not load type 'Tasque.Application' from assembly 'Tasque, Version=0.0.0.0, Culture=neutral'. --------------------------------------------------------------- Please make it sure that you change the release number of the spec file every time you modify your spec file when version number does not change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 20:53:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 16:53:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453335] New: Review Request: systemc - Design and verification language for Hardware Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453335 Summary: Review Request: systemc - Design and verification language for Hardware Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/systemC/systemc.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/systemC/systemc-2.2.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: SystemC? is a language built in standard C++ by extending the language with the use of class libraries. SystemC addresses the need for a system design and verification language that spans hardware and software. SystemC is listed among Fedora Electronic Lab (FEL) packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 21:05:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:05:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428686] Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806292105.m5TL55dI023990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428686 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-29 17:05 EST ------- Honestly, I really meant different releases. A package this small is not going to get the manual copy and inheritance behavior, you cannot tag the exact same EVR into two different branches, and if you could tag them you wouldn't be able to build them, and if you could build them bodhi wouldn't let you issue updates for them. So I'm really not kidding, the releases will need to be different. So that's why I just recommend using the dist tag and saving the trouble of keeping the releases straight manually. But it's up to the maintainer, of course. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 21:14:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:14:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450410] Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806292114.m5TLEOgf025956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450410 guido.ledermann at googlemail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From guido.ledermann at googlemail.com 2008-06-29 17:14 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: multiget Updated Fedora Owners: guidoledermann -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 21:23:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:23:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453264] Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806292123.m5TLNsmo027585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453264 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-29 17:23 EST ------- There's more than just css files in doc; I don't know why license files are buried down in there, but who knows. Anyway, one line fixes everything up: find doc -type f -exec sed -i 's/\r//' {} \; There's a test suite in the tarball; it runs fine with: %check cd tests make check The documentation is a bit over half the package. The whole thing is only a bit over a megabyte so I wouldn't really worry about it, though if this becomes a dependency of many other packages I'd consider splitting it to a subpackage. I need to run now, but that really looks to be about all there is to say. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 21:29:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:29:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231786] Review Request: multiget - easy-to-use GUI file downloader for Windows/Linux/BSDs/MacOs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806292129.m5TLTHxT012716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multiget - easy-to-use GUI file downloader for Windows/Linux/BSDs/MacOs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231786 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From guido.ledermann at googlemail.com 2008-06-29 17:29 EST ------- New review can be found here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450410 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 21:41:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:41:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428686] Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806292141.m5TLfIis031422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428686 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-29 17:41 EST ------- I see. Shouldn't this be considered as a bug in our infrastructure? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 21:50:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:50:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806292150.m5TLofRY017021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From dwheeler at dwheeler.com 2008-06-29 17:50 EST ------- > Did you apply to sponsorship? Not sure what you mean. I used the FE-NEEDSPONSOR bug in bugzilla, and "applied" to the cvsextras group on the Fedora accounts system (which seems to know I don't have a sponsor). Do I need to do something else? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 22:00:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:00:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453133] Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806292200.m5TM0kJO019050@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453133 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.7-2.20080627cvs.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 22:01:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:01:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453133] Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806292201.m5TM12H1019117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453133 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-29 18:01 EST ------- nethogs-0.7-2.20080627cvs.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 22:00:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:00:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453133] Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806292200.m5TM0iOO019013@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nethogs - top-like tool for network bandwidth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453133 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-29 18:00 EST ------- nethogs-0.7-2.20080627cvs.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 22:25:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:25:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806292225.m5TMPW5i007546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-29 18:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #27) > and "applied" to the cvsextras group on the Fedora accounts system > (which seems to know I don't have a sponsor). That's what I meant. What is your account name? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 22:28:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:28:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806292228.m5TMSIcw024163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 ------- Additional Comments From abartlet at redhat.com 2008-06-29 18:28 EST ------- This package is submitted for immediate review. I hope to see it included in Fedora well before the final release of Samba 4.0.0. Parallel make is specifically excluded in the samba4 build process. The ldconfig call in %install is to create the macros that a post-install ldconfig would provide, as required by rpmlint. The group add and other scriptlets are copied from the Samba 3.2 package. Please also file a bug there. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 22:33:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:33:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806292233.m5TMX1rr008461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server Alias: player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-06-29 18:33 EST ------- Thanks for all the comments. I'm going to reply as soon as possible but we are currently preparing hard for RoboCup in China (in two weeks) which limits time I can put into this. I hope to get some time during the evenings next week, otherwise after China. I'm on it, but slowed down. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 29 22:43:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:43:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450539] Review Request: service-discovery-applet - Service discovery applet based on Avahi for the Gnome panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806292243.m5TMh2h7026240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: service-discovery-applet - Service discovery applet based on Avahi for the Gnome panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450539 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-06-29 18:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Not an official review, just a few thoughts: > > I suggest to name this package gnome-applet-service-discovery, see > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28General.29 Hmm, this is different from upstream. My first search was for service-discovery-applet so I wouldn't have found it with that name. Would yum search provides lines to remedy this problem? > Better name a svn snapshot after the revision and not the date, because then the > reviewer can simply check out the correrct version with > svn co -rXXXXX svn://svn.0pointer.de/service-discovery-applet/trunk > service-discovery-applet So you can with the date, just use svn co -r{DATE}... Having a date usually makes it easier to get a feeling how up2date the package really is. I've used this for other packages already. Just assume someone tried to do this on git or cvs stuff... > I see you define both python_sitelib and python_sitearch. Please remove the > unneeded definition. I usually keep it for easy spawning new packages by copying. I can't see in the guidelines that I shouldn't. > You are missing a requirement: > $ service-discovery-applet > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/service-discovery-applet", line 51, in > error_msg(_("A required python module is missing!\n%s") % (e)) > File "/usr/bin/service-discovery-applet", line 29, in error_msg > d = gtk.MessageDialog(parent=None, flags=gtk.DIALOG_MODAL, > NameError: global name 'gtk' is not defined > > running service-discovery-config gives a messagebox saying: > "Ein ben?tigtes Python Modul fehlt! > No module named avahi" > > Not sure if we have a python-avahi package Ah, needs to require avahi-tools, which contains the Python bindings for some reason... Thanks for pointing this out! I've uploaded a new SPEC (same URL as above) and new SRPM (at http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/misc/service-discovery-applet-0.4.5-0.3.svn20080609.fc9.src.rpm). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 00:16:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:16:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445010] Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806300016.m5U0Gf9B023829@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445010 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-06-29 20:16 EST ------- I would like to be a co-maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 03:51:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 23:51:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806300351.m5U3p6jm007891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From dwheeler at dwheeler.com 2008-06-29 23:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) My account name is "dwheeler". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 04:23:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:23:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806300423.m5U4NNC6029464@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From dwheeler at dwheeler.com 2008-06-30 00:23 EST ------- Here's the package, same as the old one except that I redid the version/release numbering as noted above. Also, I shortened the "ChangeLog" considerably; I doubt anyone wants great detail about what happened before it entered the repository. I reset the release number to 1; this release number format is completely different (and incompatible) from the previous ones anyway, so we may as well start fresh at 1. SRPM and .spec file at: http://www.dwheeler.com/tex-zfuzz-0-0.20070911.1.fc9.src.rpm http://www.dwheeler.com/tex-zfuzz.spec rpmlint is clean on .spec, binary i386 RPM, _and_ SRPM. "koji build --scratch dist-f9" is clean on all 5 architectures. Did I misunderstand anything? Or see anything else that needs doing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 04:43:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:43:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450148] Review Request: jedit - short java editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806300443.m5U4hBkY032402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jedit - short java editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450148 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(luca at foppiano.org) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-30 00:43 EST ------- Would you update your srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 04:42:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:42:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452470] Review-Request: perl-Test-WWW-Selenium - Perl Client for the Selenium Remote Control test tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806300442.m5U4gHbc015570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-Test-WWW-Selenium - Perl Client for the Selenium Remote Control test tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452470 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-06-30 00:42 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock. koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=686732 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 932a71581ebfaad8bc544aa1eae39c5e Test-WWW-Selenium-0.15.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test All tests successful, 1 test skipped. Files=8, Tests=239, 1 wallclock secs ( 1.14 cusr + 0.04 csys = 1.18 CPU) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 05:06:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 01:06:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806300506.m5U56PIp003913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 ------- Additional Comments From assim.deodia at gmail.com 2008-06-30 01:06 EST ------- I downloaded fedora-upload-ca.cert and ran fedora-package-setup. Still I am getting same error. i recently changed the uploaded key. Does system take some time to get it updated? I am using the same id_rsa.pub key which i have uploaded in FAS. I am able to use koji and have build all the packages on it successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 06:34:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 02:34:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225816] Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils (stalled) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806300634.m5U6YDAe000406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils (stalled) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225816 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mbarnes at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Priority|high |medium ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-06-30 02:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Is this review still "(stalled)" ? Yes - feel free to continue it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 06:45:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 02:45:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225816] Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806300645.m5U6jP0K002215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225816 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: gnome-doc- |Merge Review: gnome-doc- |utils (stalled) |utils -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 06:45:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 02:45:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225816] Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils (stalled) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806300645.m5U6j6e2002174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils (stalled) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225816 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |F9 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-06-30 02:45 EST ------- Thanks for the update in comment 10. Based on this I think the package is ok now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 07:28:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:28:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452470] Review-Request: perl-Test-WWW-Selenium - Perl Client for the Selenium Remote Control test tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806300728.m5U7S3B9025364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-Test-WWW-Selenium - Perl Client for the Selenium Remote Control test tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452470 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-30 03:28 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-WWW-Selenium Short Description: Perl Client for the Selenium Remote Control test tool Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 07:28:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:28:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452470] Review-Request: perl-Test-WWW-Selenium - Perl Client for the Selenium Remote Control test tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806300728.m5U7SPF2008839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-Test-WWW-Selenium - Perl Client for the Selenium Remote Control test tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452470 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 08:12:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:12:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446841] Review Request: sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806300812.m5U8Ce3n000864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446841 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-06-30 04:12 EST ------- > I can't imagine that this package could ever actually build ...but it does :) Thanks for hint with sitelib - I'll apply this and other suggestions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 08:41:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:41:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450816] Review Request: alevt - Teletext decoder/browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806300841.m5U8fEZo021475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alevt - Teletext decoder/browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450816 ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-06-30 04:41 EST ------- Proposing this patch, which is more fedora best practices aware: * still populates the OPT variable but without invoking %configure (which fails right after) * less variable playing/messing * updated comment --- alevt.spec 2008-06-29 19:26:04.000000000 +0200 +++ alevt.spec_new 2008-06-30 10:36:39.000000000 +0200 @@ -23,14 +23,11 @@ This program decodes and displays Videot %build #overwrite $OPT to produce standard Fedora build with propper FLAGS -# alevt does not have standard build system, so we call configure -# to populate CFLAGS, then we move them to another var which persists -# and we *unset CFLAGS* and have alevt build system to populate it -%configure || true -FLAGS=${CFLAGS} -unset CFLAGS +# alevt does not have standard build system, so we populate OPT, +# which is internal build variable to accomodate Fedora opt flags + # will produce lot of garbage on output -make %{?_smp_mflags} -e OPT="${FLAGS}" +make %{?_smp_mflags} -e OPT="%{optflags}" %install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 08:48:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:48:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452663] Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806300848.m5U8mdIP006327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452663 ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-06-30 04:48 EST ------- I do. (But now focusing on being sponsored and having awesome package into the distribution.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 09:06:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 05:06:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445652] Review Request: libloader - Java Resource Loading Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806300906.m5U96026025650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libloader - Java Resource Loading Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445652 caolanm at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From caolanm at redhat.com 2008-06-30 05:05 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libloader Short Description: A Java Resource Loading Framework Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 09:09:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 05:09:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445655] Review Request: librepository - Java Hierarchical repository abstraction layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806300909.m5U998rq010101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librepository - Java Hierarchical repository abstraction layer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445655 caolanm at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From caolanm at redhat.com 2008-06-30 05:09 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: librepository Short Description: A Java Hierarchical repository abstraction layer Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 09:08:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 05:08:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445653] Review Request: libformula - Java Formula Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806300908.m5U98N7K026017@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libformula - Java Formula Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445653 caolanm at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From caolanm at redhat.com 2008-06-30 05:08 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libformula Short Description: A Java Formula Parser Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 09:25:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 05:25:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450816] Review Request: alevt - Teletext decoder/browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806300925.m5U9PMLD028837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alevt - Teletext decoder/browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450816 ------- Additional Comments From cooly at gnome.eu.org 2008-06-30 05:25 EST ------- Updated spec file and bump release: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/alevt.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/alevt-1.6.2-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 09:23:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 05:23:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446841] Review Request: python-sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806300923.m5U9NxNQ028428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446841 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: sippy - |Review Request: python-sippy |B2BUA SIP call controlling |- B2BUA SIP call controlling |component |component ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-06-30 05:23 EST ------- > Looks like you're using sitearch when you should be using sitelib, Fixed. > As you currently have things, this is just a python module and should be called python-sippy. Renamed. > If you expect that the examples will actually need to be called by people during regular use then they should be in _bindir. Otherwise they should be packaged as documentation, and generally not be made executable. Moved to %_bindir New version: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-sippy.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-sippy-0-2.20080627cvs.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 09:48:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 05:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436147] Review Request: mairix - A program for indexing and searching email messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806300948.m5U9mZsr032537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mairix - A program for indexing and searching email messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436147 mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 10:31:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 06:31:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442329] Review Request: gnome-lirc-properties - Infrared Remote Controls setup tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301031.m5UAVIEY007020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-lirc-properties - Infrared Remote Controls setup tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442329 Bug 442329 depends on bug 442328, which changed state. Bug 442328 Summary: Remote database should be more easily findable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442328 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 11:33:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 07:33:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452832] Review Request: perl-Math-FFT - Perl extension for Fast Fourier Transforms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301133.m5UBXUBp001167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-FFT - Perl extension for Fast Fourier Transforms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452832 ------- Additional Comments From msuchy at redhat.com 2008-06-30 07:33 EST ------- Spec and srpm updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 11:35:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 07:35:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453224] Review Request: prelude-correlator - Correlates IDMEF events for prelude-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301135.m5UBZJos017621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-correlator - Correlates IDMEF events for prelude-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453224 tmraz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tmraz at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 11:45:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 07:45:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452470] Review-Request: perl-Test-WWW-Selenium - Perl Client for the Selenium Remote Control test tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301145.m5UBjsGj019432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-Test-WWW-Selenium - Perl Client for the Selenium Remote Control test tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452470 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 11:44:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 07:44:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452832] Review Request: perl-Math-FFT - Perl extension for Fast Fourier Transforms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301144.m5UBiaAk018939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-FFT - Perl extension for Fast Fourier Transforms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452832 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-06-30 07:44 EST ------- License: (GPL+ or Artistic) and Aritistic and Public Domain This is still incorrect. There are no bits that are covered just by Artistic license (that would not be permissible for Fedora anyway). I think this should say "(GPL+ or Artistic) and Public Domain". Given it's trivial to fix, this won't warrant a blocker. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 11:50:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 07:50:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453395] New: Review Request: libmapi - OpenChange: Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 Summary: Review Request: libmapi - OpenChange: Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: abartlet at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://abartlet.net/openchange-rpm/libmapi.spec SRPM URL: http://abartlet.net/openchange-rpm/libmapi-0.7-0.1.svnr627.fc9.src.rpm Description: OpenChange provides libraries to access Microsoft Exchange servers using native protocols. This package is built so tools like kdepim can be built with native access to Exchange. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 11:54:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 07:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453224] Review Request: prelude-correlator - Correlates IDMEF events for prelude-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301154.m5UBsWaM020716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-correlator - Correlates IDMEF events for prelude-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453224 ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2008-06-30 07:54 EST ------- First comments: Please add some meaningful text to the Summary of the main package. Something like "Real time correlator of events received by Prelude Manager" The version/release must match the upstream and comply with the Fedora NamingGuidelines (the beta1b should be added to the release). version should be: 0.9.0 and release: 0.1.beta1b (0.2.beta1b, ....) rpmlint -v prelude-correlator-0.9.0-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm prelude-correlator.x86_64: I: checking prelude-correlator.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/prelude-correlator/lua-rules 0700 prelude-correlator.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/prelude-correlator 0700 Do these directories have to be unreadable to group/other? prelude-correlator.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/prelude-correlator-0.9.0/AUTHORS Please drop AUTHORS from docs if it is empty. prelude-correlator.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.9.0.beta1b 0.9.0-1.fc9 See above. prelude-correlator.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/prelude-correlator $prog This is OK. rpmlint -v prelude-correlator-devel-0.9.0-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm prelude-correlator-devel.x86_64: I: checking prelude-correlator-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation rpmlint -v prelude-correlator-debuginfo-0.9.0-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm prelude-correlator-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking rpmlint -v prelude-correlator-0.9.0-1.fc9.src.rpm prelude-correlator.src: I: checking prelude-correlator.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 20, tab: line 74) I think this is purely cosmetic and OK. prelude-correlator.src: W: strange-permission prelude-correlator.init 0755 This is OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 12:06:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:06:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453395] Review Request: libmapi - OpenChange: Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301206.m5UC6mgi023515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmapi - OpenChange: Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-06-30 08:06 EST ------- First suggestion, drop the Epoch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 12:28:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:28:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453109] Review Request: NPusers - Adds NOCpulse production users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301228.m5UCSPmY027824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NPusers - Adds NOCpulse production users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 ------- Additional Comments From msuchy at redhat.com 2008-06-30 08:28 EST ------- Lubo, I appreciate you comments, just to put you in context. NOCpulse is very old code and I already do a lot of cleaning of it (but I know it is not excuse for not clean it further). And although I'm going in incorporate some of your comment I have to disagree on and explain this points: 1) This is not completely pointless. We (RHN Satellite team) put version to separate file (for every package) so we can easily bump up it using our own build scripts. This way we can avoid of situation when somebody forget it to bump up and we end up with two package with same NEVR but different content. If you are aware of better handling of this I'd thankfully if you share this with me. 3) Ops, correct. I forgot to put this lines to spec: Source2: sources %define main_source %(awk '{ print $2 ; exit}' %{SOURCE2}) Source0: %{main_source} Which again seems pointless. But it is not. We often build development versions of rpm (because we are upstream) and the .tar.gz is named as %(name)-.tar.gz and only release packages have name %(name)-%(version)-tar.gz I'm unwilling to change it because of [1]. 6) nocpulse runs on various arch, so I either keep it there or make spec for each arch. I'm unwilling to change it because of [1]. [1] Making changes to code (or anything in tar.gz) is easily done using patches, src.rpm, rpm and fedora do not have tools how to track changes to spec file. And because we are upstream we either change this spec and then we have to change our team processes or we leave it in spec file. And about comment #2, NB: This package originaly hold more then what is currently inside and in future can containt more or less. Yes, it is possible to intergrated it itno single packages, but a) historicaly it was separate packages, so it probably should stay separate b) some packages may need only users, but not config files, so it should stay separate. c) fact, that both packages are small is no reason for integration. IMO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 12:32:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:32:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450686] Review Request: R-RSQLite - SQLite Interface for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301232.m5UCWvQN012534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-RSQLite - SQLite Interface for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450686 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-06-30 08:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I'd suggest using http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/RSQLite/index.html for > the URL, as it actually has some information about the package. > Your right, I thought I changed that one... > APPROVED Thanks, New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-RSQLite Short Description: SQLite database interface for R Owners: nigelj Branches: F-8 F-9 Cvsextras Commits: yes Note there will most likely be a EL-4/5 request in the future but I haven't had a chance to even check if the version of SQLite is new enough for this package yet. (I know it prevents a few of my other packages entering EL-* though) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 12:40:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:40:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453224] Review Request: prelude-correlator - Correlates IDMEF events for prelude-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301240.m5UCeAFi013851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-correlator - Correlates IDMEF events for prelude-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453224 ------- Additional Comments From sgrubb at redhat.com 2008-06-30 08:40 EST ------- New package is at: http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/files/prelude-correlator-0.9.0-0.1.beta1b.fc9.src.rpm This addresses items 1, 2, & 5 above. Item 3, I would expect that the perms be 0700 for the correlator directory. I don't think you want users able to see example what the admin is watching for. I could open it to group root without any concern, but then again it doesn't really buy anything. Item 4, I expect the AUTHORS file to contain something before the beta phase ends. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 12:45:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:45:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452832] Review Request: perl-Math-FFT - Perl extension for Fast Fourier Transforms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301245.m5UCjjVk030776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-FFT - Perl extension for Fast Fourier Transforms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452832 ------- Additional Comments From msuchy at redhat.com 2008-06-30 08:45 EST ------- Oh, I misinterpreted the arrays.c. Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 13:09:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:09:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452107] Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301309.m5UD9rnO002447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-06-30 09:09 EST ------- Still playing with the compiler flags. Just got confirmation from upstream that cfdg needs the bundled agg to run, as upstream agg has thusfar been unresponsive to their patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 13:07:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:07:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452832] Review Request: perl-Math-FFT - Perl extension for Fast Fourier Transforms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301307.m5UD7bB6002269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-FFT - Perl extension for Fast Fourier Transforms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452832 msuchy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From msuchy at redhat.com 2008-06-30 09:07 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Math-FFT Short Description: Perl extension for Fast Fourier Transforms Owners: msuchy Branches: devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 13:19:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:19:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450481] libibcommon package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301319.m5UDJQC9020424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libibcommon package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450481 dledford at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2008-06-30 09:19 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libibcommon Short Description: OpenFabrics Alliance InfiniBand management common library Owners: dledford Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 13:21:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:21:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450483] libibmad package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301321.m5UDLDQv021162@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libibmad package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450483 dledford at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2008-06-30 09:21 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libibmad Short Description: OpenFabrics Alliance InfiniBand MAD library Owners: dledford Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 13:20:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:20:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450482] libibumad package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301320.m5UDKiMV021088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libibumad package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450482 dledford at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2008-06-30 09:20 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libibumad Short Description: OpenFabrics Alliance InfiniBand umad (user MAD) library Owners: dledford Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 13:53:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:53:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453412] New: Review Request: gtk-aurora-engine - Aurora theme engine for gtk2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453412 Summary: Review Request: gtk-aurora-engine - Aurora theme engine for gtk2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tuomas.mursu at kapsi.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://koti.kapsi.fi/~darkon/rpm/rev/gtk-aurora-engine/0/gtk-aurora-engine.spec SRPM URL: http://koti.kapsi.fi/~darkon/rpm/rev/gtk-aurora-engine/0/gtk-aurora-engine-1.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Aurora theme engine for gtk2 This is my first package submission for Fedora, and so I'm seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 13:55:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:55:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453412] Review Request: gtk-aurora-engine - Aurora theme engine for gtk2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301355.m5UDt50f010656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-aurora-engine - Aurora theme engine for gtk2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453412 tuomas.mursu at kapsi.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 14:11:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:11:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445687] Review Request: portreserve - TCP port reservation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301411.m5UEB3h7013697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: portreserve - TCP port reservation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445687 twaugh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From twaugh at redhat.com 2008-06-30 10:11 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: portreserve Short Description: TCP port reservation utility Owners: twaugh Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 14:11:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:11:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450616] opensm package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301411.m5UEBlAD013982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: opensm package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450616 ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2008-06-30 10:11 EST ------- I fixed the two easy items. The rpath item is going to need to be run through upstream. Whenever you have a package with a bunch of junk like this in Makefile.in's and the configure script, the correct way to *attempt* to fix it is to modify the Makefile.am's and configure.in and then run autoreconf (which will also rerun automake). However, once I did that, it became clear that there is some incompatibility or some switch I'm missing in my setup that the maintainer uses to run automake on these sources because my devel environment throws loads of errors over the contents of the Makefile.am files. So, I'll go talk to the upstream maintainer and see about both A) what's going on with automake and B) getting the changes in upstream directly so I don't have to carry a patch forever. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 14:32:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:32:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453395] Review Request: libmapi - OpenChange: Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301432.m5UEWcQQ017689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmapi - OpenChange: Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |453083 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 14:32:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:32:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301432.m5UEWdgI017718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |453395 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 14:41:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450616] opensm package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301441.m5UEf0VI003775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: opensm package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450616 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2008-06-30 10:40 EST ------- Do you think it would make sense to use the "last resort" option described in the Guidelines: chrpath --delete $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/* as a temporary measure (assuming it works)? That would remove the rpath blocker and allow me to approve the package. Then (or perhaps simultaneously?) the work you describe could be done to improve the upstream build setup? Its just a suggestion... :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 14:41:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:41:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429809] Review Request: mumble - low-latency, high quality voice chat software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301441.m5UEfwqc019600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mumble - low-latency, high quality voice chat software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429809 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-30 10:41 EST ------- I guess I'll go ahead and close this; feel free to reopen it if you have more time and wish to continue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 14:59:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:59:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453224] Review Request: prelude-correlator - Correlates IDMEF events for prelude-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301459.m5UExuIm022707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-correlator - Correlates IDMEF events for prelude-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453224 ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2008-06-30 10:59 EST ------- You use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %clean and %{buildroot} in %install. It should be unified. I think there is a missing Requires: libprelude-devel in the devel subpackage. The include file there includes libprelude include file. Perhaps there should be some kind of README.Fedora which would describe just in few words the steps which are necessary to get the correlator running - such as the registration to the prelude manager. Should the prelude-manager be required for the correlator package? But as I understand it could be theoretically running on another machine so perhaps not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 15:08:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:08:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450616] opensm package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301508.m5UF8E6D024361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: opensm package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450616 ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2008-06-30 11:08 EST ------- Actually, I'm close to having a fixed version already. The upstream maintainer has already replied and I figured out what I was doing wrong in trying to run autoreconf (automake needs the --foreign flag to work with these Makefile.am files). I should have something soon that meets all the criteria I think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 15:10:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:10:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] New: Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 Summary: Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: auralvance at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.rutgers.edu/fedora/songbird.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.rutgers.edu/fedora/songbird-0.6.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Songbird provides a public playground for Web media mash-ups by providing developers with both desktop and Web APIs, developer resources and fostering Open Web media standards. Songbird is listed on the Package Maintainers wish list. It has come a long way since early development, does not require mp3 support, and any browser plugins are optional to the user. Note: This is my first package submission and I am seeking a sponsor. I am aware of a couple .spec/build issues, but I thought it best to begin the review process now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 15:12:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:12:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301512.m5UFC0EX025163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 auralvance at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 15:20:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:20:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450616] opensm package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301520.m5UFK6Rn026736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: opensm package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450616 ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2008-06-30 11:20 EST ------- OK, new versions of the files uploaded that solve the rpath problem properly. I'll also send the patch upstream, although I don't know if they'll take it just because they might want to keep things the way they are for devel purposes. As before, files have the same name and have been copied over the old files, so you might have to force a refresh if there is a web cache between you and people.redhat.com. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 15:30:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:30:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453109] Review Request: NPusers - Adds NOCpulse production users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301530.m5UFU51p029012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NPusers - Adds NOCpulse production users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 msuchy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(lkundrak at v3.sk) ------- Additional Comments From msuchy at redhat.com 2008-06-30 11:30 EST ------- Ok, I discussed with team the version file and we can put it directly into spec. But the sources file, which define name of tar.gz file will be litlle bit pain for us to put into spec. But it is doable. So I have question: Can be name of tar.gz defined in file "sources" and read by spec file using: Source2: sources %define main_source %(awk '{ print $2 ; exit}' %{SOURCE2}) Source0: %{main_source} Or this is blocker and I should definitely remove it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 15:29:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:29:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452691] Review Request: btrfs-progs - supporting programs for btrfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301529.m5UFTuXR012591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: btrfs-progs - supporting programs for btrfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452691 jbacik at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jbacik at redhat.com 2008-06-30 11:29 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: btrfs-progs Short Description: Userspace programs for btrfs Owners: josef Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 15:55:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:55:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433926] Review Request: freehoo - Freehoo is a free console based messenger for Yahoo IM Service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301555.m5UFtqOT000726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freehoo - Freehoo is a free console based messenger for Yahoo IM Service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433926 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-30 11:55 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 15:58:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:58:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444264] Review Request: usb_modeswitch - brings umts / 4g cards into operational mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301558.m5UFwCmK017402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: usb_modeswitch - brings umts / 4g cards into operational mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444264 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-30 11:58 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 15:59:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:59:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452688] Review Request: dbus-java - Java implementation of the DBus protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301559.m5UFx1hX001083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-java - Java implementation of the DBus protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452688 ------- Additional Comments From omajid at redhat.com 2008-06-30 11:59 EST ------- Updated packages: Spec URL: http://omajid.fedorapeople.org/dbus-java/dbus-java.spec SRPM URL: http://omajid.fedorapeople.org/dbus-java/dbus-java-2.5-1.fc9.src.rpm fixed incoherent name warning, fixed wrapper scripts and added %check (upstream had one but i hadnt come across %check while reading up on packaging). rpmlint reports a warning dbus-java.src:149: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} which i am ignoring because when the package is built as noarch, this conditional line is not executed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 16:00:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:00:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445652] Review Request: libloader - Java Resource Loading Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301600.m5UG0oA2018188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libloader - Java Resource Loading Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445652 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-30 12:00 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 16:04:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:04:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452688] Review Request: dbus-java - Java implementation of the DBus protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301604.m5UG4cCr002118@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-java - Java implementation of the DBus protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452688 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-30 12:04 EST ------- This package doesn't seem to be any different than the package in comment 1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 16:02:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:02:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445653] Review Request: libformula - Java Formula Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301602.m5UG2kfq002008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libformula - Java Formula Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445653 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-30 12:02 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 16:05:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:05:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445655] Review Request: librepository - Java Hierarchical repository abstraction layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301605.m5UG5xYr002597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librepository - Java Hierarchical repository abstraction layer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445655 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-30 12:05 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 16:08:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:08:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445687] Review Request: portreserve - TCP port reservation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301608.m5UG8ENp019132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: portreserve - TCP port reservation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445687 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-30 12:08 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 16:11:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:11:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453224] Review Request: prelude-correlator - Correlates IDMEF events for prelude-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301611.m5UGB3qX019807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-correlator - Correlates IDMEF events for prelude-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453224 ------- Additional Comments From sgrubb at redhat.com 2008-06-30 12:11 EST ------- And yes in large deployments, it would be a dedicated machine hence the separation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 16:09:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:09:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453224] Review Request: prelude-correlator - Correlates IDMEF events for prelude-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301609.m5UG9vhJ019276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-correlator - Correlates IDMEF events for prelude-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453224 ------- Additional Comments From sgrubb at redhat.com 2008-06-30 12:09 EST ------- New files were uploaded to address items 1 & 2 from comment#6. As for item 3, I expect a man page to be added by upstream during the beta process that explains this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 16:11:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:11:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450410] Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301611.m5UGBJSl019924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450410 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-30 12:11 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 16:14:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:14:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301614.m5UGEFH2020152@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-30 12:14 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 16:16:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:16:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450481] libibcommon package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301616.m5UGGDo1020825@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libibcommon package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450481 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-30 12:16 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 16:17:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:17:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450482] libibumad package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301617.m5UGHciL004578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libibumad package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450482 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-30 12:17 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 16:19:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:19:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450483] libibmad package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301619.m5UGJPI6004685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libibmad package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450483 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-30 12:19 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 16:21:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:21:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450686] Review Request: R-RSQLite - SQLite Interface for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301621.m5UGL437005238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-RSQLite - SQLite Interface for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450686 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-30 12:21 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 16:22:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:22:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452470] Review-Request: perl-Test-WWW-Selenium - Perl Client for the Selenium Remote Control test tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301622.m5UGMbLr021820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: perl-Test-WWW-Selenium - Perl Client for the Selenium Remote Control test tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452470 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-30 12:22 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 16:20:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:20:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285801] Review Request: simias - Collection-Oriented Data Storage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301620.m5UGKuTf021661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: simias - Collection-Oriented Data Storage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285801 snecklifter at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2008-06-30 12:20 EST ------- Hi Jason, (In reply to comment #15) > This is terribly old; it landed right in the middle of one of the java carpet > bombs and I always skipped over it when looking for tickets to review. > > Are you still interested in having this reviewed? Do you have an updated > package incorporating those patches? This is a dependency for iFolder which I was hoping to get packaged for Fedora. However upstream (Novell) are acting wierd, incrementing versions without releasing code and there doesn't seem to be much of a need for it as evidenced by the lack of comment in the iFolder mailing lists. The patches are still being ignored so I'm closing this one for now. Thank you for the prod and previous attention. Regards Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 16:24:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:24:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452691] Review Request: btrfs-progs - supporting programs for btrfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301624.m5UGO1nV005655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: btrfs-progs - supporting programs for btrfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452691 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-30 12:24 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 16:27:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:27:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452832] Review Request: perl-Math-FFT - Perl extension for Fast Fourier Transforms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301627.m5UGRV4i006491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-FFT - Perl extension for Fast Fourier Transforms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452832 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-30 12:27 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 16:32:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:32:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285801] Review Request: simias - Collection-Oriented Data Storage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301632.m5UGW8Tf023482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: simias - Collection-Oriented Data Storage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285801 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 16:34:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:34:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301634.m5UGYxni007698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-30 12:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #40) > I am able to use koji and have build all the packages on it successfully. Well, does it mean that you can rebuild dotconf now? (Would you try F-8 branch?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 16:42:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:42:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434906] Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301642.m5UGgWoq025636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434906 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-30 12:42 EST ------- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 16:44:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:44:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301644.m5UGiEM3025776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(claudio at claudiotom | |asoni.it) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-30 12:44 EST ------- Any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 16:44:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:44:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444134] Review Request: spe - Python IDE editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301644.m5UGirFS009863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spe - Python IDE editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444134 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-30 12:44 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 17:22:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:22:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453224] Review Request: prelude-correlator - Correlates IDMEF events for prelude-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301722.m5UHMXQn017003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-correlator - Correlates IDMEF events for prelude-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453224 tmraz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2008-06-30 13:22 EST ------- rpmlint -v prelude-correlator-0.9.0-0.1.beta1b.fc9.src.rpm prelude-correlator.src: I: checking prelude-correlator.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 21, tab: line 76) prelude-correlator.src: W: strange-permission prelude-correlator.init 0755 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. OK rpmlint -v prelude-correlator-0.9.0-0.1.beta1b.fc9.x86_64.rpm prelude-correlator.x86_64: I: checking prelude-correlator.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/prelude-correlator/lua-rules 0700 prelude-correlator.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/prelude-correlator 0700 prelude-correlator.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/prelude-correlator-0.9.0/AUTHORS prelude-correlator.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/prelude-correlator $prog prelude-correlator.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/prelude-correlator $prog 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 2 warnings. OK (with comments above) rpmlint -v prelude-correlator-devel-0.9.0-0.1.beta1b.fc9.x86_64.rpm prelude-correlator-devel.x86_64: I: checking prelude-correlator-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. OK rpmlint -v prelude-correlator-debuginfo-0.9.0-0.1.beta1b.fc9.x86_64.rpm prelude-correlator-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK I've noticed one more thing - please remove the calls to /sbin/ldconfig from %post and %postun, the package doesn't contain any libraries (the lua.so bindings are not a regular library and are placed correctly in a subdirectory). So given you fix the above APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 17:26:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:26:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445652] Review Request: libloader - Java Resource Loading Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301726.m5UHQSgP017849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libloader - Java Resource Loading Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445652 caolanm at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 17:30:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:30:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445653] Review Request: libformula - Java Formula Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301730.m5UHUBka018595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libformula - Java Formula Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445653 caolanm at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 17:36:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:36:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453224] Review Request: prelude-correlator - Correlates IDMEF events for prelude-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301736.m5UHa9aO003049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-correlator - Correlates IDMEF events for prelude-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453224 ------- Additional Comments From sgrubb at redhat.com 2008-06-30 13:36 EST ------- Fixed ldconfig in spec file. New files uploaded if you wanted to check. Thanks for looking over the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 17:40:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:40:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445655] Review Request: librepository - Java Hierarchical repository abstraction layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301740.m5UHeHkI020423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librepository - Java Hierarchical repository abstraction layer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445655 caolanm at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 17:53:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:53:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450621] Review Request: itaka - On-demand screen capture server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301753.m5UHrNXX022681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: itaka - On-demand screen capture server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450621 ------- Additional Comments From nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com 2008-06-30 13:53 EST ------- update for 0.2.1 version : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/itaka.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/itaka-0.2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm rpmlint output : [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint itaka-0.2.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint itaka-0.2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rebuild under mock is OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 17:56:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:56:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450616] opensm package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301756.m5UHulIf006590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: opensm package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450616 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2008-06-30 13:56 EST ------- Cool, that was quick! :-) I just downloaded and built the new version and the rpath problem is gone. I don't see any blockers so its APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 17:54:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:54:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453335] Review Request: systemc - Design and verification language for Hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301754.m5UHsxsA005973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: systemc - Design and verification language for Hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453335 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-30 13:54 EST ------- I noted that you posted to fedora-devel-list regarding the questionable license. I'm not quite sure why this was submitted for review when the license was known to be problematic, but I'll have this ticket block FE-Legal now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 18:12:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:12:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301812.m5UIC20D009365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 ------- Additional Comments From auralvance at gmail.com 2008-06-30 14:12 EST ------- To clarify on the x86_64 debug comment in the spec file: /usr/lib/rpm/debugedit is called during the debug creation process and it fails to read the x86_64 binaries. extracting debug info from /var/tmp/songbird-0.6.1-1-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/songbird-0.6.1/xulrunner/xulrunner-bin Failed to write file: invalid section entry size This is not an issue in i386. I verified that the packages still work as intended, but the debug info is somehow maligned. This issue is definitely upstream, so I will be posting a bug when I have one. For more info I found the same issue in bug 187243 As for rpmlint, there are some issues, but all are upstream: $ rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/songbird-0.6.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm songbird.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/songbird-0.6.1/xulrunner/README.txt songbird.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/songbird-0.6.1/xulrunner/icons/mozicon16.xpm songbird.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/songbird-0.6.1/searchplugins/google-lyrics.xml songbird.i386: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/songbird-0.6.1/README.txt songbird.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/songbird-0.6.1/xulrunner/icons/mozicon50.xpm songbird.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/songbird-0.6.1/.autoreg songbird.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/songbird-0.6.1/.autoreg songbird.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/songbird-0.6.1/xulrunner/components/nsContentPrefService.js songbird.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/songbird-0.6.1/TRADEMARK.txt songbird.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/songbird-0.6.1/components/sbAddonMetadata.js songbird.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/songbird-0.6.1/xulrunner/components/nsHandlerService.js songbird.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/songbird-0.6.1/xulrunner/LICENSE songbird.i386: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/songbird-0.6.1/components/sbMetadataHandlerTaglib.so ['$ORIGIN/../xulrunner'] songbird.i386: W: no-soname /usr/lib/songbird-0.6.1/lib/sbGStreamer.so songbird.i386: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/songbird-0.6.1/xulrunner/mangle ['$ORIGIN/../lib'] songbird.i386: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/songbird-0.6.1/xulrunner/shlibsign ['$ORIGIN/../lib'] 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 12 errors, 4 warnings. The only one I was really concerned with is the RPATH error, but this seems to be completely internal in order to direct songbird to its own xulrunner libs. If it were to ask LD for information I'm guessing songbird would receive local xulrunner libs which are not patched by upstream. Feedback is appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 18:14:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:14:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450616] opensm package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301814.m5UIEfD6009596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: opensm package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450616 dledford at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2008-06-30 14:14 EST ------- Awesome, thanks ;-) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: opensm Short Description: OpenIB InfiniBand Subnet Manager and management utilities Owners: dledford Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 18:22:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:22:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301822.m5UIMfhQ011266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 rayvd at bludgeon.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:http- |Review Request: |mod_proxy_html - Module to |mod_proxy_html - Module to |rewrite content as it passes|rewrite content as it passes |through an apache proxy. |through an apache proxy. ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2008-06-30 14:22 EST ------- I'd like to get the opinion of the reviewer on that. My feeling is that linking libxml2.so against the module itself might be more Fedora-ish than using LoadFile. And as this RPM is for Fedora specifically.... Are you set up with a FAS account and all that good stuff? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 18:23:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:23:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301823.m5UINdMc027924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2008-06-30 14:23 EST ------- *** Bug 453231 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 18:23:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:23:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453231] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Output filter to rewrite HTML links in a proxy situation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301823.m5UINcIU027900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Output filter to rewrite HTML links in a proxy situation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453231 rayvd at bludgeon.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2008-06-30 14:23 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 452636 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 18:25:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:25:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301825.m5UIPFVn012022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2008-06-30 14:25 EST ------- I have closed my bug as a duplicate of this one. Spec: http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/mod_proxy_html/mod_proxy_html.spec SRPM: http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/mod_proxy_html/mod_proxy_html-3.0.1-5.src.rpm Phil, feel free to use my spec and SRPM there. Would you be willing to add me as a co-maintainer on this once it is approved? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 18:32:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:32:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442329] Review Request: gnome-lirc-properties - Infrared Remote Controls setup tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301832.m5UIW7m4014953@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-lirc-properties - Infrared Remote Controls setup tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442329 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2008-06-30 14:32 EST ------- I'm currently working my way through fixing upstream problems in gnome-lirc-properties. See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=530359 for details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 18:32:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:32:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301832.m5UIWYMo015029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 ------- Additional Comments From philipp at redfish-solutions.com 2008-06-30 14:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > I'd like to get the opinion of the reviewer on that. My feeling is that linking > libxml2.so against the module itself might be more Fedora-ish than using > LoadFile. And as this RPM is for Fedora specifically.... > Are you set up with a FAS account and all that good stuff? No, no account yet. I'll wait for an opinion of a reviewer. Yeah, loading it might be more Fedoraish, but that's not necessarily a good thing. Sometimes just having configs that move easily from one platform to another without changes is a bigger win. (In reply to comment #10) > Phil, feel free to use my spec and SRPM there. Would you be willing to add me > as a co-maintainer on this once it is approved? Sure, that would be fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 18:32:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:32:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452901] Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301832.m5UIWHM2029693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452901 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-30 14:32 EST ------- Build seems to be failing at the very early stage: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=687769 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 18:39:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:39:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301839.m5UId9ex030795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 ------- Additional Comments From assim.deodia at gmail.com 2008-06-30 14:39 EST ------- > Well, does it mean that you can rebuild dotconf now? (Would you try F-8 branch?) Yes I just now tried [Assim at localhost rpmbuild]$ koji build --scratch dist-f8 ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc7.src.rpm Uploading srpm: /home/Assim/rpmbuild/SRPMS/dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc7.src.rpm [====================================] 100% 00:03:53 199.38 Kb 873.48 B/sec Created task: 687799 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=687799 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 687799 build (dist-f8, dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc7.src.rpm): open (x86-2.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 687802 buildArch (dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc7.src.rpm, i386): open (x86-4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 687800 buildArch (dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc7.src.rpm, ppc): open (ppc4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 687803 buildArch (dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc7.src.rpm, ppc64): open (ppc1.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 687801 buildArch (dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc7.src.rpm, x86_64): open (xenbuilder4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 687801 buildArch (dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc7.src.rpm, x86_64): open (xenbuilder4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 4 open 1 done 0 failed 687802 buildArch (dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc7.src.rpm, i386): open (x86-4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 3 open 2 done 0 failed 687803 buildArch (dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc7.src.rpm, ppc64): open (ppc1.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 2 open 3 done 0 failed 687799 build (dist-f8, dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc7.src.rpm): open (x86-2.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 1 open 4 done 0 failed 687800 buildArch (dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc7.src.rpm, ppc): open (ppc4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 0 open 5 done 0 failed 687799 build (dist-f8, dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc7.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 18:49:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:49:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452688] Review Request: dbus-java - Java implementation of the DBus protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301849.m5UInQeE019019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-java - Java implementation of the DBus protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452688 ------- Additional Comments From omajid at redhat.com 2008-06-30 14:49 EST ------- Bumped up the release number Spec URL: http://omajid.fedorapeople.org/dbus-java/dbus-java.spec SRPM URL: http://omajid.fedorapeople.org/dbus-java/dbus-java-2.5-2.fc9.src.rpm copying changes from comment 3: fixed incoherent name warning, fixed wrapper scripts and added %check (upstream had one but i hadnt come across %check while reading up on packaging). rpmlint reports a warning dbus-java.src:149: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} which i am ignoring because when the package is built as noarch, this conditional line is not executed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 19:03:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:03:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442233] Review Request: oprofileui - user interface for analysing oprofile data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301903.m5UJ324v022476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oprofileui - user interface for analysing oprofile data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442233 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-06-30 15:03 EST ------- > - [OK] License Field in spec > - [-] License text in %doc > Ok, however not correct version. > > * Add it as SourceX and copy-in in installation process. This is in fact ok already, my bad, sorry. > > Would be nice if original reporter could fix the issues, they are all EasyFix... To help the reporter I have created a updated package: - add desktop-file-utils - remove vendor in desktop-file-install - remove libglade2 and libxml from reqs (picked up by rpm) - fix macro usage - fix timestamp on sources and installed files - fix docs - add %%post/%%postun scripts - license is GPLv2 spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/oprofileui/oprofileui.spec srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/oprofileui/oprofileui-0.2.0-2.fc9.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=687854 Could you please have a look Dave? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 19:23:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:23:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301923.m5UJNqIV026790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-30 15:23 EST ------- clive-0.4.16-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 19:21:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:21:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301921.m5UJLbb9026548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-30 15:21 EST ------- clive-0.4.16-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 19:28:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:28:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351531] Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301928.m5UJSRZW027824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351531 ------- Additional Comments From stephan at xfce.org 2008-06-30 15:28 EST ------- The problem is found, and solved in svn. It is caused by a wrong marshaller. You can fix it by cherry-picking the changes of revision 5016 of upstream svn. (http://svn.xfce.org/svn/goodies/ristretto/trunk) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 19:31:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:31:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453465] Review Request: transbot - An irc bot designed to translate between languages on separate channels In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301931.m5UJV0nm009275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: transbot - An irc bot designed to translate between languages on separate channels https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453465 jesusfreak91 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 19:30:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:30:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453465] New: Review Request: transbot - An irc bot designed to translate between languages on separate channels Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453465 Summary: Review Request: transbot - An irc bot designed to translate between languages on separate channels Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jesusfreak91 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: https://fedorahosted.org/lingobot/browser/transbot.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorahosted.org/lingobot/browser/transbot-0.1-1.src.rpm Description: transbot is an irc bot that translates between languages on separate irc channels (connecting at the moment to irc.freenode.net). Users must specify the language each channel is running. It takes input from one channel, translates it, and outputs the translated text into other channels in that channel's specified language. Handles public messages, topic changes, mode changes, join/leave events, and auto-joins to invited channels. This is my first package, and I'll need a sponsor for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 19:55:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:55:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452921] Review Request: libzrtpcpp - ZRTP support library for the GNU ccRTP stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806301955.m5UJtaXB014574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzrtpcpp - ZRTP support library for the GNU ccRTP stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452921 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-30 15:55 EST ------- Thanks for the quick review. I will clean up those unused-direct-shlib-dependency errors before checking in. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libzrtpcpp Short Description: ZRTP support library for the GNU ccRTP stack Owners: kevin Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 20:04:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447457] Review Request: gupnp-av - UPnP-AV is a collection of helpers for building AV upnp apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806302004.m5UK4I8B002618@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gupnp-av - UPnP-AV is a collection of helpers for building AV upnp apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447457 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |446639 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 20:04:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446639] Review Request: gupnp - GUPnP is an framework for creating UPnP devices & control points In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806302004.m5UK4I0n002644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gupnp - GUPnP is an framework for creating UPnP devices & control points https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446639 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |447457 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 20:03:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:03:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450616] opensm package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806302003.m5UK3Nur002551@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: opensm package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450616 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-30 16:03 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 20:03:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:03:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447456] Review Request: gupnp-tools: a collection of dev tools utilising GUPnP and GTK+ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806302003.m5UK3x2U016270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gupnp-tools: a collection of dev tools utilising GUPnP and GTK+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447456 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |446639 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 20:04:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:04:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446639] Review Request: gupnp - GUPnP is an framework for creating UPnP devices & control points In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806302004.m5UK41ro016294@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gupnp - GUPnP is an framework for creating UPnP devices & control points https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446639 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |447456 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 20:05:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:05:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452921] Review Request: libzrtpcpp - ZRTP support library for the GNU ccRTP stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806302005.m5UK5v25003609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzrtpcpp - ZRTP support library for the GNU ccRTP stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452921 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-06-30 16:05 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 20:10:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:10:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 394871] Review Request: automaton - a Java finite state automata/regular expression library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806302010.m5UKAMd5004491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: automaton - a Java finite state automata/regular expression library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394871 ------- Additional Comments From loganjerry at gmail.com 2008-06-30 16:10 EST ------- Thanks for the review, Jason. I now remove the prebuilt jar in the %prep section and have conditionalized all the gcj stuff. New versions are here: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/automaton/automaton.spec http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/automaton/automaton-1.10r4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 20:30:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:30:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452901] Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806302030.m5UKU6BZ008577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452901 ------- Additional Comments From pm at datasphere.ch 2008-06-30 16:30 EST ------- Oups! Mocked successfully with fedora-8-i386, but: AC_SUBST( PACKAGE_MINOR ) --> configure.in:14: error: AC_SUBST: `PACKAGE_MAJOR ' is not a valid shell variable name ...seems autoconf 2.62 does not like extraneous spaces around variable names... At the same URL as above, you can find a new version patching the configure.in file accordingly. Has passed mock -r fedora-devel-i386. Thanks for trying and reporting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 20:58:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:58:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806302058.m5UKw0Tm026601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-30 16:57 EST ------- clive-0.4.17-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 21:01:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:01:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446639] Review Request: gupnp - GUPnP is an framework for creating UPnP devices & control points In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806302101.m5UL12Cu014212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gupnp - GUPnP is an framework for creating UPnP devices & control points https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446639 pbrobinson at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |446637 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 21:01:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:01:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446637] Review Request: gssdp - GSSDP implements resource discovery and announcement over SSDP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806302101.m5UL15eH014236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gssdp - GSSDP implements resource discovery and announcement over SSDP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446637 pbrobinson at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |446639 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 21:06:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:06:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446134] Review Request: jsr-305 - reference implementation of JSR-305 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806302106.m5UL6DoV028299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jsr-305 - reference implementation of JSR-305 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446134 ------- Additional Comments From loganjerry at gmail.com 2008-06-30 17:06 EST ------- Thanks once again for doing a review for me, Jason. This package defines some annotations that Java programmers use to declare various properties of their code. Those annotations are consumed by the findbugs tool, which I will be submitting to Fedora Real Soon Now. I fixed the broken URLs and dropped the index.html file. Incidentally, upstream has promised to include a LICENSE file at some point; see http://groups.google.com/group/jsr-305/msg/e6d62dc6cd7fe361. This is noted in the spec file. I have included subversion checkout instructions, and have versioned the tarball. I have made the package own what it puts into /etc/maven/fragments and /usr/share/maven2/poms instead of owning the directories. As far as I know, the question about versioned symlinks for javadocs is still unresolved, so I left that bit alone. I have conditionalized the GCJ bits. Some source files do not appear in the debuginfo package because they contain no code. Those files contain only annotation definitions. This is why I dropped the GCJ bits from the jcip-annotations package altogether, because GCJ produces nothing useful from annotation definition only files. There are some files with code in this package, though, so I left the GCJ bits in; those files show up in the debuginfo package. New versions of the spec file and SRPM are here: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jsr-305/jsr-305.spec http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jsr-305/jsr-305-0-0.1.20080613svn.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 21:07:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:07:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447456] Review Request: gupnp-tools: a collection of dev tools utilising GUPnP and GTK+ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806302107.m5UL7kic015360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gupnp-tools: a collection of dev tools utilising GUPnP and GTK+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447456 pbrobinson at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |447457 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 21:07:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:07:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447457] Review Request: gupnp-av - UPnP-AV is a collection of helpers for building AV upnp apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806302107.m5UL7mlf015381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gupnp-av - UPnP-AV is a collection of helpers for building AV upnp apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447457 pbrobinson at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |447456 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 21:08:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:08:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806302108.m5UL8O84028560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-30 17:08 EST ------- clive-0.4.17-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 21:08:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441141] Review Request: antlr3 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806302108.m5UL8MiT028527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: antlr3 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441141 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-06-30 17:08 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: antlr3 Short Description: ANother Tool for Language Recognition Owners: walters at redhat.com Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 21:08:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:08:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441141] Review Request: antlr3 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806302108.m5UL8feG028604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: antlr3 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441141 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-06-30 17:08 EST ------- Thank you for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 21:09:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:09:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452559] Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806302109.m5UL9aCM028679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-06-30 17:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > Here's the package, same as the old one except that I redid the > version/release numbering as noted above. Also, I shortened the > "ChangeLog" considerably; I doubt anyone wants great detail about what > happened before it entered the repository. I prefer to have the full changelog, it also documents what was taken care of during the review. I won't make it a blocker, though. > I reset the release number to 1; > this release number format is completely different (and incompatible) > from the previous ones anyway, so we may as well start fresh at 1. Agreed. > SRPM and .spec file at: > http://www.dwheeler.com/tex-zfuzz-0-0.20070911.1.fc9.src.rpm > http://www.dwheeler.com/tex-zfuzz.spec > > rpmlint is clean on .spec, binary i386 RPM, _and_ SRPM. > "koji build --scratch dist-f9" is clean on all 5 architectures. > > Did I misunderstand anything? Or see anything else that needs doing? I have sponsored you. Just proceed with the cvs request. I already have approved the package by setting fedora-review to +. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 22:27:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:27:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435543] Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806302227.m5UMRQ6d008829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435543 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(bob at fedoraunity.or | |g) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-30 18:27 EST ------- OK, so this has been dumped back in the queue. I don't know why Parag didn't just set NEEDINFO and then close it after a fashion; it seems he'd rather force someone else to have to do that. So I guess it falls to me. It has been 3.5 months since the last comment from the submitter. Setting NEEDINFO; I will close this ticket soon if there is no further response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 22:33:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:33:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446134] Review Request: jsr-305 - reference implementation of JSR-305 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806302233.m5UMXsVK009724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jsr-305 - reference implementation of JSR-305 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446134 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-30 18:33 EST ------- Thanks for the info, and the description of the debuginfo package. The ownership (and perhaps location) of the maven directories is under discussion currently and its possible that ownership of those directories will move into jpackage-utils by the end of the week. I'm going to go ahead and take this for review, but I'm going to wait until that situation becomes clear before I approve anything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 22:59:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:59:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446639] Review Request: gupnp - GUPnP is an framework for creating UPnP devices & control points In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806302259.m5UMxUNe032359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gupnp - GUPnP is an framework for creating UPnP devices & control points https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446639 ------- Additional Comments From pbrobinson at gmail.com 2008-06-30 18:59 EST ------- Updated to the latest release. Spec URL: http://fedora.roving-it.com/rawhide/gupnp.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.roving-it.com/rawhide/gupnp-0.12.1-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 23:42:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:42:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450371] Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806302342.m5UNg2Pu006732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 ------- Additional Comments From mathstuf at gmail.com 2008-06-30 19:42 EST ------- I forgot to mention that I am upstream. I've taken care of rpmlint warnings (except for -devel not having documentation) that I found. The versions have been fixed (looking at the SVN history) to be accurate. I've moved to cmake, so the extraneous libraries are no longer a problem. Here are the new spec and SRPM files: http://www.hypersonicsoft.org/projects/downloads/Pok?gen/nightly/pokegen-0.0.2-0.7.20080630svn221.fc9.src.rpm http://www.hypersonicsoft.org/projects/downloads/Pok?gen/nightly/pokegen.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 23:51:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:51:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450539] Review Request: service-discovery-applet - Service discovery applet based on Avahi for the Gnome panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806302351.m5UNpNnv021585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: service-discovery-applet - Service discovery applet based on Avahi for the Gnome panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450539 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-06-30 19:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > My first search was for > service-discovery-applet so I wouldn't have found it with that name. Would yum > search provides lines to remedy this problem? No, unfortunately not. 'yum install service-discovery-applet' would work but not 'yum search'. IMO this is something that should be fixed in yum. Nevertheless we should stick to the naming guidelines I think. > So you can with the date, just use svn co -r{DATE}... Having a date usually > makes it easier to get a feeling how up2date the package really is. Ok, agreed as it's in line with the naming guidelines. > I usually keep it for easy spawning new packages by copying. I can't see in the > guidelines that I shouldn't. It's written in the python spec template from rpmdev-newrpmspec, but in the end it's your decision. > Ah, needs to require avahi-tools, which contains the Python bindings for some > reason... Thanks for pointing this out! But I still don't see a Requires: on avahi-tools, only the BuildRequires that has been there before. :( > I've uploaded a new SPEC (same URL as above) and new SRPM (at > http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/misc/service-discovery-applet-0.4.5-0.3.svn20080609.fc9.src.rpm). Ok, a few more comments on that one: Why not change # cd service-discovery-applet # svn export service-discovery-applet service-discovery-applet-0.4.5.svn`date +%Y%m%d` # cd .. to # svn export . ../service-discovery-applet-0.4.5.svn`date +%Y%m%d` tar cvfz ... needs to be tar -cvfz ... BuildRoot tag is wrong, according to the guidelines it should be "%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)" BuildRequires "perl-XML-Parser" should be "perl(XML::Parser)" instead Are you sure you need gettext-devel and not only gettext? You have a lot of redundant build requirements that don't need to be specified explicitly: - libtool requires autoconf and automake, automake requires autoconf and perl - GConf2-devel requires automake and glib2-devel - intltool already requires gettext and perl(XML::Parser) - perl(XML::Parser) of course requires perl As long as you don't specify a version it is not necessary to list all these BRs. Use "export GCONF_DISABLE_MAKEFILE_SCHEMA_INSTALL=1" to avoid error messages due to missing permissions during %install. You are also missing the necessary scriptlets to (un)install the gconf schemas, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GConf Use "make %{?_smp_mflags}", although it won't make much difference. Please fix %defattr to (-,root,root-). Only cosmetics, I know. ;) %{_libdir}/bonobo/servers/GNOME_ServiceDiscoveryApplet.server %{_libdir} will become /usr/lib64 on x86_64, so this package cannot be noarch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 30 23:55:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:55:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351531] Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200806302355.m5UNtTac022216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351531 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-06-30 19:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #49) > So can anybody test this on i386 rawhide? Of course I meant x86_64 ;) (In reply to comment #50) > The problem is found, and solved in svn. Ok, here is a new package: SRPM: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/ristretto-0.0.21-0.1.20080630svn.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/ristretto.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.