[Bug 449842] Review Request: trac-xmlrpc-plugin - XML-RPC plugin for Trac

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: trac-xmlrpc-plugin - XML-RPC plugin for Trac


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449842





------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com  2008-06-03 18:23 EST -------
MUST:
Y: rpmlint on each package
trac-xmlrpc-plugin.noarch: W: no-documentation
Y: Meets Package Naming Guidelines
Y: Spec file name matches base package name
Y: License field is valid
Y: Meets Packaging Guidelines
 -: License included in package (if included in source)
 Y: Spec file written in en_US
 Y: Spec file is legible
 Y: Sources match upstream source
 Y: Source URL 'sane'
 Y: Compiles successfully - [F9 (noarch), Rawhide (noarch)]
 -: ExcludeArch required?
 Y: All Build Dependencies Listed
 -: Handles locales sanely
 -: Library packages run ldconfig
 Y: Package is not relocatable
 -: Package owns all directories created
 Y: No duplicate file listings
 Y: defattr set correctly
 Y: %clean is used
 Y: Macro use conisistant
 Y: Contains Code/Content that is allowed
 -: Large Documentation in -doc subpackage
 Y: %doc must not affect package runtime
 -: Header files in -devel
 -: Static libraries in -static
 -: pkgconfig files require pkgconfig
 -: Library files are located in correct package
 -: -devel requires base package w/ fully versioned dependency
 -: Packages do not contact .la (libtool) archives
 -: GUI Apps have .desktop files
 Y: No duplicate directory ownerships
 Y: %install cleans buildroot
 Y: Filenames are valid UTF-8

SHOULD:
-: Description/Summary sections contain translations
Y: Builds in mock/koji
Y: Builds on all architectures
-: Scriptlets are sane
-: Subpackages require base package
-: pkgconfig.pc files in -devel
-: File dependencies should only be in /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin

Same moans as with Bug #449840, lack of COPYING file but this time, no
documentation at all, non blocker though.

It'd be nice to see python-setuptools-devel pulled in by BR but as mentioned, it
doesn't block the build.

Here's your APPROVED ticket, please take it to the next counter (CVS).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.