[Bug 442507] Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jun 6 04:38:10 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507





------- Additional Comments From asayama at sm.sony.co.jp  2008-06-06 00:38 EST -------
(In reply to comment #23)
> As long there is the understanding that only one elfspe binary, either 32bit or
> 64bit, can be installed, I don't think there is a real issue.

It looks like the same situation as other executable packages, such as bash,
coreutils, ppc64-utils, etc. The ppc64 repository (development/ppc64/,
releases/9/Everything/ppc64/, etc) have only ppc64 packages, so I thought that
the ppc64 package should be built for ppc64 targets. Is it unnecessary to care
about this case?

> My understanding is, that the ADA compiler can produce either 32bit or 64bit
> binaries depending on how the ADA compiler itself was built.
> From that perspective, choosing the 64bit seems the better choice. But I don't
> have neither a strong opinion nor a strong background in this area.

Hmm, the Fedora's ppc repository provides only 32bit version of libgnat, and the
ppc64 repository provides no libgnat, though the gnat compiler seems to be able
to generate both of 32bit and 64bit object files...


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list