[Bug 451643] Review Request: libmusicbrainz3 - Library for accessing MusicBrainz servers
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jun 17 00:34:43 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libmusicbrainz3 - Library for accessing MusicBrainz servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451643
bdpepple at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2008-06-16 20:34 EST -------
MD5Sum:
d42110ae548dae1eea73e83b03a1a936 libmusicbrainz-3.0.1.tar.gz
Good:
* Source URL is canonical
* Upstream source tarball verified
* Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines
* Group Tag is from the official list
* Valid license tag
* Buildroot has all required elements
* All paths begin with macros
* Make succeeds even when %{_smp_mflags} is defined
* Files have appropriate permissions and owners
* Rpmlint produces only the following warning, which can be safely ignored:
libmusicbrainz3-devel.i386: W: no-documentation
* Package installs and uninstalls cleanly
Bad:
* Missing BR on libdiscid-devel.
* It looks like your missing a requires on neon-devel & libdiscid-devel for the
devel subpackage. Please verify if this is correct before importing into cvs.
Minor (Non-blocker):
* I noticed there are some tests in the tarball, which might be worthwhile to
run in the building process w/make check.
+1 APPROVED, once bad items are looked at.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list