[Bug 446814] Review Request: emacs-lookup - Emacsen interface to look up dictionaries

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jun 25 04:26:25 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: emacs-lookup - Emacsen interface to look up dictionaries


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446814





------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2008-06-25 00:26 EST -------
I had intended to get back to this with some more review commentary so we didn't
have to go back and forth, but I ran out of time, sorry.

I notice that the lookup-guide.info file isn't in UTF8, and isn't in any
encoding I recognize, so it doesn't render at all for me.  (rpmlint complains
it, of course.)  Do you know what the encoding is?  Is it possible to convert to
UTF8 so that everyone can at least look at the file without having to set some
specific encoding?

I get a "406 Not Acceptable" error when visiting the URL given in the spec.  I
expect that the server is trying to present a page based on my language
settings, but none exists.  Perhaps it would be better to simply refer directly
to the Japanese page at http://openlab.jp/edict/lookup/index.html.ja. 
Unfortunately my Japanese is only good enough to read a few words (and most of
the gairaigo) on that page, but it's obviously a reasonable page to use as the
URL for this package.
 
Unfortunately this package fails to conform to many of the Emacs packaging
guidelines given in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Emacs.  The
versioned dependencies are missing, the build dependencies are not correct
(although the package still builds for me), there are no separate -el packages,
etc.  There are some pretty complete templates on the guideline page which you
can copy.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list