[Bug 446159] Review Request: xesam-tools - A toolkit for Xesam compliant services
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jun 27 16:22:51 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xesam-tools - A toolkit for Xesam compliant services
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446159
tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flag| |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-27 12:22 EST -------
I'm going to assume that the tests here are similarly not runnable. I couldn't
get them to run, at least.
The upstream web site seems to be down now, but I think a more specific URL
would be good if possible.
The only thing I'm not sure about is the license. The code doesn't have the
expected license blocks, but PKG-INFO and setup.py both say "GNU LGPL 2.1" so I
would have to assume LGPLv2 and not LGPLv2+ as you have. This should definitely
be clarified with upstream, and "License: LGPLv2" used in the interim.
Honestly that's the only thing I see that requires fixing, so you can just
change it when you check in.
* source files match upstream:
fcaea2c7dc21ede48feed9d743560e97db4c9fceb534a808a618b3f1791a5e93
xesam-tools-0.6.1.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
? license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
license text not included upstream.
license text included in package.
latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
xesam-tools = 0.6.1-1.fc10
=
/usr/bin/python
python(abi) = 2.5
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
APPROVED, just fix up the License.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list