[Bug 452559] Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2008-06-27 13:14 EST -------
* it is not needed to put the name in the summary, I mean you can remove
  'Z fuzz -' from the Summary.

* Regarding the patch file names, I have a recommendation you can ignore,
  I use name like
zfuzz-20070911-read-decl.patch
  to know in which version the patch was added.

* regarding the version, if the versioning scheme was changed and the 
  version became less recent that the latest date (the ordering is the 
  ascii ordering), then you'll have to use an epoch. Not the end of the
  world but prone to easy errors when forgetting to specify the epoch
  in a version-release string.

* regarding the name, having tex-zfuzz as a name really means that the 
  name of the upstream software is zfuzz, but that it is a tex package. 
  The fact that it is a tex package does not means that it is in a tex
  distribution (besides, I am quite sure that it could easily be incorporated
  in tex distributions). Users who knows that teh zfuzz package name
  is zfuzz and that it is a tex package should in fact expect that it is
  called tex-zfuzz. So naming it tex-zfuzz doesn't means that upstream 
  choice is not honoured, but that honouring upstream choice in the 
  fedora context means adding tex- in front.

  That being said, adding tex- in front of tex packages was agreed by the 
  packaging commitee, it is in the guidelines: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingNamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28TeX.29
  but it was also said that not having tex- was not a big deal so I would
  not considering it as a blocker, but I think that you should really
  take into account consistency with the remaining of the distribution
  and user expectations.


For the sponsoring, could you please point me to other works you've
done in fedora?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.