[Bug 445655] Review Request: librepository - Java Hierarchical repository abstraction layer
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jun 27 20:58:45 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: librepository - Java Hierarchical repository abstraction layer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445655
tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flag| |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-27 16:58 EST -------
Again the bogus rpmlint complaint:
librepository-javadoc.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation
Not an issue.
* source files match upstream:
6af6974e4d5ebd9c7c4eed03f140ee4d5db340550c48b794e5419bb6b4aec362
librepository-0.1.6.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint has acceptable complaints.
* final provides and requires are sane:
librepository-0.1.6-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
librepository.jar.so()(64bit)
librepository = 0.1.6-1.fc10
=
/bin/sh
java
java-gcj-compat >= 1.0.31
jcommon
jpackage-utils
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit)
libz.so.1()(64bit)
librepository-javadoc-0.1.6-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
librepository-javadoc = 0.1.6-1.fc10
=
jpackage-utils
librepository = 0.1.6-1.fc10
* %check is not present; no test suite upstream.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* code, not content.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no pre-built jars
* single jar, named after the package
* jarfiles are under _javadir.
* javadocs are under _javadocdir.
* ant called properly.
* no wrapper script necessary.
* gcj called properly.
* gcj scriptlets are present and OK.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list