[Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Jun 29 01:31:43 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466
tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu
Flag| |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-28 21:31 EST -------
Yes, I think this package is fine. I don't really see anything worth commenting on.
* source files match upstream:
c00cc9e1387b26c1a1d3f0a82dd39bbd05c2598a645124bc2efb006d8d21e61d
clive-0.4.16.tar.bz2
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
clive = 0.4.16-3.fc10
=
/usr/bin/env
newt-python
python(abi) = 2.5
python-feedparser
python-urlgrabber
xclip
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list