[Bug 452688] Review Request: dbus-java - Java implementation of the DBus protocol
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Jun 29 18:50:33 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dbus-java - Java implementation of the DBus protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452688
tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flag| |fedora-review?
Bug 452688 depends on bug 452251, which changed state.
Bug 452251 Summary: Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452251
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-06-29 14:50 EST -------
This builds fine. The only rpmlint complaint is:
dbus-java.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.5-1.fc9 2.5-1.fc10
which happens because I'm building this on rawhide. Normally you just don't
include the dist tag in your changelog versions.
I'm a bit confused by the installed wrapper scripts; they all contain:
JARPATH=/usr/local/share/java
which doesn't seem correct. Installing and running ListDBus gives me:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/freedesktop/dbus/bin/ListDBus
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.freedesktop.dbus.bin.ListDBus
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:217)
[...]
The guidelines are unfortunately silent on the subject of symlinking the jar
files, but this seems to be common enough.
* source files match upstream:
2b2001aa2fccc6cc3eedfeb35d2c7b13e52811c27820f27f0f6ce0e8f547ad65
dbus-java-2.5.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
X rpmlint has one minor complaint which is easy to fix.
* final provides and requires are sane:
dbus-java-2.5-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
dbus-2.5.jar.so()(64bit)
dbus-bin-2.5.jar.so()(64bit)
dbus-viewer-2.5.jar.so()(64bit)
dbus-java = 2.5-1.fc10
=
/bin/sh
java-1.6.0-openjdk
java-gcj-compat >= 1.0.31
jpackage-utils
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit)
libz.so.1()(64bit)
dbus-java-javadoc-2.5-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
dbus-java-javadoc = 2.5-1.fc10
=
jpackage-utils
X %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I'm not sure how to test this,
honestly, since I don't know much about dbus, but just running ListDBus seems
to fail badly.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* scriptlets are OK; gcj-rebuild-db stuff.
* code, not content.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no pre-built jars
* single jar, named after the package
* jarfiles are under _javadir.
* javadocs are under _javadocdir.
X wrapper scripts provided, but not working properly.
* gcj called properly.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list