[Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511





------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org  2008-03-01 03:44 EST -------
The current status of stuff (or what I would say is most important) is that a 
large portion of the BRs don't exist yet in Fedora (due to the nascent Java 
packaging guidelines) or are hugely outdated. So I predict this package won't 
get in for quite a while because of this.

But here's the shopping list:

* asm 3.0 (we currently have asm2, which is 2.1)
* emma (we don't have this at all yet)
* jarjar (we don't have this either)
* jline (we have 0.9.9, upstream is 0.9.94)
* jna (we don't have it at all)
* joda-time (we don't have it at all)
* joni (we don't have this, but I probably can/will package it)
* junit (we have this one! phew!)
* retroweaver (we don't have this at all either)

So a lot of this stuff needs to enter Fedora before jruby can. I hope that we 
can get this stuff in and then jruby by F10. Maybe that is a lofty goal :).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.