[Bug 252110] Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Mar 1 18:57:14 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252110


j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl




------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl  2008-03-01 13:57 EST -------
Hmm,

When I suggested in Bug 227121 to mark it as a duplicate of this and to reopen
this, and that I then would review this, I was kind of hoping that I would only
be reviewing it, as I'm not mighty familiar with java. The only reason I'm
interested in wstx, is because it beats the stax implementation shipped by
default with icedtea by a factor of 10 when it comes to speed, making the
loading of freecol (a game written in java I maintain) about 10 times faster.

So perhaps a co-maintainership is the best solution, I can take either role
(submitter or reviewer) now, and then later we maintain this together?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list