[Bug 433225] Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Mar 3 16:39:24 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433225


pertusus at free.fr changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |NEEDINFO
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(jnovy at redhat.com)




------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2008-03-03 11:39 EST -------
2 issues remaining:

The 
%{_texmf_main}/fonts/cmap/EUC-UCS2
%{_texmf_main}/fonts/cmap/UniKSCms-UCS2-H
%{_texmf_main}/fonts/cmap/UniKSCms-UCS2-V
files ownership. Jindriiiiiich?

The release is 0.20.... while dvipdfmx coming from current texlive
is 19. It is bad. I suggest using directly 20, even if it is against
the guideline, and use something like
20.1.20071115cvs
to avoid going higher than 20, since dvipdfmx in texlive is already 
wrong. Another possibility would be to use epochs, but I think we should
avoid as much as possible.



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list