[Bug 433488] Review Request: dayplanner - An easy and clean Day Planner
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Mar 4 11:42:58 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dayplanner - An easy and clean Day Planner
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433488
mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #296522|0 |1
is obsolete| |
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-03-04 06:42 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=296726)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=296726&action=view)
holiday_japan again.
> : Last modified: May 3, 2008
> : by Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
> Is date correct?
Of course not correct...
Well,
* Replace /usr with %{_prefix} (prefix=/usr)
* For perl modules dependency, don't write rpm names directly
but write the module names the rpms provide, such as
"BuildRequires: perl(Locale::gettext)"
! By the way, devel-tools/GenDesktop needs perl(Locale:gettext),
but this script doesn't seem to be called and actually
your srpm builds without BuildRequires: perl-gettext:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=490198
Other things are okay.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This package (dayplanner) is APPROVED by me
----------------------------------------------------------------
P.S.
> P.S If you have time could you also review this:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434614? Thanks in advance!
Well, for the last few days I was checking review requests to which
I had not replied for a few days and actually it seems I have commented
on about 20 review requests within these 5 days...
So if you want me to review the above, would you wait a bit, please?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list