[Bug 436036] Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Mar 11 20:59:49 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436036





------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org  2008-03-11 16:59 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Well, I am not familiar with java, so I must ask you
> some question.
> 
> * ExcludeArch
>   - Now "java-devel > 1.6" is provided by java-1.7.0-icedtea
>     for all archs and this should build on all archs.

The ExcludeArch is there from when I was trying to build in koji as dist-f8 and 
didn't want to hit PPC build hosts. It is a mistake I will remedy.

>   - By the way now Fedora ships "java-1.6.0-openjdk" and
>     I am not sure which mock tries to use by "BuildRequires:
>     java-devel >= 1.6".

Shouldn't matter I don't think.

> * libffi
>   - From build.log jna uses internall libffi, however now
>     (at least on rawhide) libffi is system-widely provided.
>     Would you patch against jna to use system wide libffi?

Yes.

> * Fedora specific compilation flags
>   - From build.log, Fedora specific compilation flags are
>     not honored.

Will fix.

> * debuginfo? strip binaries?
> ...
>      When Fedora compilation flags are correctly honored,
>      libtestlib.so is created with debug flag "-g", and this will not be
>      stripped as this library is packaged as jar style.
>      - Are there any means to create "debuginfo" rpm for this library?
>      - If not, should this library be stripped or not?

I don't know how this should be handled. I will fix the other problems and then 
ask the java devel list about this sort of thing.

Thank you for the very thorough feedback!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list