[Bug 437626] Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Mar 15 12:16:13 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437626


stjepan.gros at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sgros at zemris.fer.hr
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |177841




------- Additional Comments From stjepan.gros at gmail.com  2008-03-15 08:16 EST -------
rpmlint gives the following messages for the base package:

miredo.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libteredo.so
miredo.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libtun6.so
miredo.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /etc/miredo/miredo.conf 0644

But, as I understand it, dynamic libraries do not belong to development
packages? Also, why is miredo.conf treated as a script when in the spec file
it's explicitly marked as config?

What is missing is init.d script (are there any templates?

Also, there is possibility for this packate to be split into client and server
packages? Should I do it?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list