[Bug 431098] Review Request: gambas2 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gambas2 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431098





------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com  2008-03-15 16:22 EST -------
OK, so here is -4:

New SRPM:
http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/gambas2-2.2.1-4.fc9.src.rpm
New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/gambas2.spec

With -4, here is the explanation for the remaining rpmlint errors:

W: no-documentation
E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib

The gambas2 subpackages don't have any documentation, and due to the nature of
gambas2, has "non-binaries" in /usr/lib. Some of the subpackages actually have
.so files here, so they don't trigger the second error.

gambas2-ide.x86_64: E: world-writable
/usr/share/gambas2/examples/Drawing/Sensor/.lang 0777
gambas2-ide.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm
/usr/share/gambas2/examples/Drawing/Sensor/.lang 0777
gambas2-ide.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/share/gambas2/examples/Drawing/Sensor/.lang

Inside the gambas2-ide subpackage are all of the "example" programs. The gambas2
IDE interface actually displays these examples, and offers to load them into the
IDE. In order for them to actually work, several directories need to be world
writable (0777). Also, several important files (important to gambas2, not to me)
are named with a . at the beginning, so they trigger the "hidden" warning.

All of these are reasonably safe to ignore, I've minimized the directories and
files that are 777, none of the example code is set 777.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.