[Bug 235672] Review Request: zope3 - Zope 3 web application server framework

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: zope3 - Zope 3 web application server framework


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235672


bugzilla at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|devel                       |rawhide

timothy.selivanow at virtualxistenz.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |timothy.selivanow at virtualxis
                   |                            |tenz.com




------- Additional Comments From timothy.selivanow at virtualxistenz.com  2008-03-18 18:58 EST -------
Minor rpmlint complaints:

./zope3.spec:13: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{zope_pkgname}
Change to /usr/%{_lib}/%{zope_pkgname}

./zope3.spec:101: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build rm -rf %{buildroot}
I see this was taken from the original zope 2.10.x spec, this should be removed.

./zope3.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 24)
Simple to change.  Make sure that you are using one method throughout the spec.


Also, version 3.4.0c1 is newest upstream
(http://www.zope.org/Products/Zope3/3.4.0c1/Zope-3.4.0c1.tgz), and curious on
how this package and python-zope-interface might/could interact.

I'm not happy (rpmbuild fails with lib change) with the directory structure that
it creates under /usr/${_lib} either (e.g.
/usr/lib64/zope3/lib64/python/BTrees/_OOBTree.so, would be nice to integrate
more with %{python_sitearch} if possible), I imagine something like (for my
given example) /usr/lib64/python2.5/zope/BTrees/_OOBTree.so would be more
appropriate.


It's been a while since anyone has commented on this, does this have any
backing?  I'm slightly interested as I've wanted to work with Zope and I
re-build the f6 packages for use on CentOS.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.