[Bug 389471] Review Request: afflib - Library to support the Advanced Forensic Format

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: afflib - Library to support the Advanced Forensic Format


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389471


grenier at cgsecurity.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |grenier at cgsecurity.org
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|                            |fedora-review-




------- Additional Comments From grenier at cgsecurity.org  2008-03-19 16:48 EST -------
- rpmlint aff*3.1.3-2.fc9.i386.rpm
afftools.i386: W: no-documentation
rpmlint aff*3.1.3-2.fc9.x86_64.rpm
afftools.x86_64: W: no-documentation
=> Note: no documentation is present in the upstream package
- Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for
directory ownership and usability): Missing

The remaining tests are ok
- Package Name: Ok
- Spec file name: Ok
- License: BSD with advertising
- License field in the package spec: Ok
- License is present in afflib-3.1.3-2.fc9.i386.rpm
- Spec is in English: Ok
- Spec is readable: Ok
- md5sum matches: Ok
afflib-3.1.3.tar.gz 1286187 1205123793 606a80d5b4d9d052c2f34b9947677634 0100664
mockbuild mockbuild 0 0 0 X
wget http://www.afflib.org/afflib.tar.gz; md5sum afflib.tar.gz
606a80d5b4d9d052c2f34b9947677634  afflib.tar.gz
- Build succesfully: Yes
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=522092
- BuildRequires: Ok
- %post -p /sbin/ldconfig: Ok
%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig: Ok
- "%defattr(-,root,root,-)" is used for each package
- %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT: Ok
- Header files must be in a -devel package: Ok
- Static libraries must be in a -static package: no static libraries => Ok
- If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then
  library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package: Ok
- %package        devel
Requires:       %{name} = %{version}-%{release}: Ok
- Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives: Ok
- %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT: Ok
- filenames: Ok
- License is included in upstream package: Ok
- Mock build: Ok
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=522092
- afflib.pc is in afflib-devel

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.