[Bug 429882] Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Mar 27 10:00:46 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429882





------- Additional Comments From dwayne at translate.org.za  2008-03-27 06:00 EST -------
Thanks David,

(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)

>  [!] Rpmlint output:
> source RPM: python-Levenshtein.src:26: E: use-of-RPM_SOURCE_DIR
> binary RPM: empty
> 
> You should rather use %SOURCE1 to refer to the location of the source file.
> Also, this source file should be pointed to a URL from whence it can be
> downloaded. It may be good to make a package for genextdoc, and then you can
> just say BuildRequires and run it normally

Fixed - not worth packaging genextdoc separately.

>  [?] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
> in the spec URL.
> This is hard to check because the original website has disappeared, and the spec
> URL provided points to the translate package download copy. Either taking over
> maintenance of the project, or getting the author to resurrect it would solve
this.
> I did check against versions from the web archive successfully:
>      SHA1SUM of tar.bz2:d630141e003f47a43e0f8eacdcbf593bf9d15ed6
>
http://web.archive.org/web/20070305015113/trific.ath.cx/Ftp/python/levenshtein/python-Levenshtein-0.10.1.tar.bz2

Have left/tried to leave comment on the new blog.

> Also as noted above, genextdoc.py should be placed on a public URL

Not that critical I think.  Its as valuable as a patch

> Also, it would be good to use %{version} for the version in the source URL

Fixed.
 
>  [?] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
>      Tested on: devel/x86_64
>  [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
> architectures.
>      Tested on: i386

Not sure myself how to do a mock build

Will upload new SRPM and SPEC


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list