[Bug 433199] Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Mar 27 18:10:37 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433199
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-03-27 14:10 EST -------
For 2.2.4-5:
* License
-----------------------------------------------------------
-License: GPLv2+
+Release: 5%{?dist}
+# The Scintilla editor plugin is under MIT.
+License: GPLv2+ and MIT
-----------------------------------------------------------
- Well, libanjuta-scintilla.la is only used by
libanjuta-editor.so, which is polluted by GPLv2+ from
libanjuta.so so the license tag should still be
GPLv2+ only (there is no libanjuta-scintilla.so in rpm).
* PKGCONFIG
-----------------------------------------------------------
+export PKG_CONFIG_PATH="./PKGCONFIG"
%configure --disable-static --enable-gtk-doc --enable-devhelp \
--enable-plugin-glade --enable-graphviz --enable-plugin-sourceview \
--disable-plugin-valgrind --enable-plugin-subversion \
- --with-svn-lib=%{_libdir}
+ --with-svn-lib=%{_libdir} PKG_CONFIG_PATH=./PKGCONFIG
------------------------------------------------------------
- Perhaps the last "PKG_CONFIG_PATH=./PKGCONFIG" (as configure
option) is not needed.
(In reply to comment #24)
> > * rpath issue
> You seem to have left out /lib. I added it but that leads to the following
> rpmlint error:
> anjuta.src:103: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib
>
> Can't we use /%{lib} or %{_libdir} instead of hardcoding the paths?
- This is very intentional and here we must ignore this rpmlint
error.
Other things are okay.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This package (anjuta) is APPROVED by me (again)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ref:
I once reviewed anjuta however at that time I didn't care about
rpath issue or license issue or so :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210464
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list