[Bug 428368] Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite
Alias: fedora-ds

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428368





------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com  2008-03-27 19:01 EST -------
comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > Well, under the current setup, you would get both, with the x86_64 binaries
> > taking precedence.  Looks like current plan is to fix yum so that you would only
> > get the preferred architecture.
> 
> Ok.  I guess at that point I can then make fedora-ds noarch?

You could make it noarch now.

> > Why is fedora-ds-base multilib at the moment anyway?  Is there any reason why
> > you would want to run the 32-bit version on x86_64?
> 
> Is it multilib?  What makes it multilib?  I don't think there is any reason to
> run the 32-bit version on x86_64.

fedora-ds-base is multilib because it has a -devel sub-package.  I believe you
can black list it by sending a request to rel-eng at fedoraproject.org.(In reply to 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.