[Bug 436831] Review Request: gbrainy - Gbrainy is a brain teaser game and trainer to keep your brain trained

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Mar 29 15:40:36 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gbrainy - Gbrainy is a brain teaser game and trainer to keep your brain trained


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436831


fedora at famillecollet.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |fedora at famillecollet.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com  2008-03-29 11:40 EST -------
REVIEW :

- rpmlint output 2 errors. Seems ok for mono.
gbrainy.x86_64: E: no-binary
gbrainy.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
- The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
- The spec file name match the base package 
- The package meet the  Packaging Guidelines
- The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license 
- The License field in the package spec file match the actual license (GPLv2)
- the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
- The spec file for the package is be legible. 
- The sources used to build the package match the upstream source
9e85c503475f04955e48e1b2728700f4  gbrainy-0.61.tar.gz
- successfully compile and build into binary rpms (F8 i386 + x86_64)
- ExcludeArch : ppc64
- BuildRequires ok
- locales ok
- no shared libs
- no duplicate files in the %files
- Permissions on files are set properly
- %clean section
- consistently use macros
- contain code
- no Large documentation
- %doc  don't affect the runtime of the application
- no header / library
- include a %{name}.desktop
- don't own files or directories already owned by other packages
- %install, start with rm -rf %{buildroot}
- filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.
- works fine (except i never find the answer, must be a bug)
- build in mock (F8, i386)

APPROVED



Remember to file a bug against Bug #238953 (ExcludeArch Tracker for ppc64)


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list