[Bug 439772] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Mar 31 13:27:05 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request:  x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439772





------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com  2008-03-31 09:27 EST -------
Manuel, Thank you for your comments.


 Major
=======

1) This shouldn't be an issue, but fixing.
2) Ooops :)
3) x11vnc itself (x11vnc/x11vnc.c) seems to be under GPLv2
libvncserver looks to be GPLv2+ and GPLv2. I consider "see GPL (latest version)"
to the latest version in time of writing the document.
However, I'm gonna use libvncserver from Fedora (--with-system-libvncserver) and
not from the tarball.
4) Hm, I don't think so. The idea of using this minilzo code is to not include
the whole big lzo package. If libvncserver project ships minilzo code inside, I
suppose they take responsibility of maintaining it inside their code.
5) You're right, this is ugly. I'm excluding those classes from the packages.
End-users can download those classes from upstream website (or use their java
programs) with -httpdir switch. So it does not disable the ability of using
x11vnc with a webserver.


 Minor
=======

1) Fixed
2) Removed


Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/x11vnc/x11vnc.spec
SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/x11vnc/x11vnc-0.9.3-2.fc8.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list