[Bug 438105] Review Request: libconcord - Library to talk to Logitech® Harmony® universal remote controls

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libconcord - Library to talk to Logitech® Harmony® universal remote controls


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438105


s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org  2008-05-03 19:37 EST -------
Package Review
==============

Key:
 - = N/A
 x = Check
 ! = Problem
 ? = Not evaluated

=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
 [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
 [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec.
 [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
     Tested on: i386 (F8 system, F8 mock, devel mock)
 [x] Rpmlint output:
     Minor warnings:
     libconcord-perl.i386: W: no-documentation
     libconcord-python.i386: W: no-documentation
 [x] Package is not relocatable.
 [x] Buildroot is correct
     %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)
 [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     License type: GPLv3+
 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
 [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
 [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
     MD5SUM this package    : c2487e851864f38c4da4fe02093652a5
     MD5SUM upstream package: c2487e851864f38c4da4fe02093652a5
 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
 [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are
listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [-] The spec file handles locales properly.
 [x] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
 [x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
 [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 [!] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
     TODO is packaged in both libconcord and libconcord-devel.
     I would suggest simply removing it from libconcord-devel, judging by other
packages.
 [x] Permissions on files are set properly.
 [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
 [x] Package consistently uses macros.
 [x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
 [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
 [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
 [x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
 [x] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
 [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
 [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
 [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.

=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
 [x] Latest version is packaged.
 [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
 [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
 [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
     Tested on: i386 (F8 and devel)
 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
     Tested all arches via koji scratch build for F8.
 [x] Package functions as described.
 [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
 [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
 [x] File based requires are sane.

=== SUMMARY ===

APPROVED.

Before actually building/pushing this, you should resolve the duplicate TODO file.

Minor notes: There is a README for the Perl bindings in the source package. You
might want to package that with libconcord-perl. Latest CVS has a similar README
for the Python bindings. If you feel really energetic, you could add that file
as an extra source, and package that in libconcord-python.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.