[Bug 438262] Review Request: beecrypt - An open source cryptography library

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: beecrypt - An open source cryptography library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438262





------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl  2008-05-19 00:44 EST -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > * Drop the java_arches %define and %ifarch's, gcj is available on all Fedora
> >   supported platforms now a days
> 
> Looks like the java package doesn't make sense at all when seeing bug #151294,
> I would disable the package for the next rebuild again until situation changes. 
> Would this be suitable for you as well?
> 

Given the new info disabling / removing the java sub-package is fine with me.

> > * Re-enable c++ bindings, the reason to disable them (not make rpm depend upon
> >   libstdc++) is no longer valid, and I think that for other beecrypt users 
> >   beecrypt requering libstdc++ is nothing but a small nuisance.
> 
> I still would like to keep the c++ bindings disabled - even if only rpm was the
> reason to do that.
>

Well, its normal for Fedora packages to enable as much features / bindings as
possible. But its not mandatory, so although I would prefer c++ support being
enabled (*), I'll also approve the package with it disabled. Note that Debian
does have c++ support enabled be default.

* unless there are good reasons not too, and requiring libstdc++ is not a good
reason IMHO


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.