[Bug 438195] Review Request: wgrib2 - Wgrib for GRIB-2
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon May 19 21:51:46 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: wgrib2 - Wgrib for GRIB-2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438195
pertusus at free.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-05-19 17:51 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > I did a package too, very similar with yours (strange isn't it ;-)
>
> I guess we both work in the earth sciences area?
As strange as it may be, I am not in earth sciences (though I
was trained as a biologist), I am an economist, but an economist
working a lot with climate scientists (mainly on climate change
consequences)...
> g2clib-devel requires libpng-devel.
Ok.
I have 2 remarks
- I think it is better to avoid naming files with fedora, to
play nicer with downstream for spec files, be it only EPEL.
- the -r of rm is useless
These are not blockers, so:
* follow packaging guidelines
* match upstream
8929dd70291298b2638a6740011d82be wgrib2.tgz.v1.7.2b
* free software, license included
* %files section right
APPROVED
I'd appreciate to be in initialCC and watchcommit.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list