[Bug 447533] Review Request: minirpc - an RPC library for stream oriented transports

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: minirpc - an RPC library for stream oriented transports


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447533





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2008-05-21 03:41 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)

> I could do this, but it doesn't seem to matter with multilib. Plus, one of the
> headers is a generated file anyway, so the timestamps don't mean much. Is
there
> a reason for doing this?

For the file which is not generated the timestamp is an interesting 
information in any case.

For the generated file, it does matter if you install both arch and 
do a rpm -V.

there is also some simple related hints on 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MultilibTricks

But since the doxygen files are generated too, I won't make it a
blocker.

The timestamps could be kept with (untested):

touch -c -r minirpc/minirpc.h.in minirpc/minirpc.h
touch -r CHANGES doc/html/*

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.