[Bug 433199] Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433199





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2008-05-25 16:13 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=306628)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=306628&action=view)
rpmlint of 2.4.1-1.fc10 I see

rpmlint log of 2.4.1-1.fc10 anjuta binary rpms on i386 I see
is attached. Does this log coincide with what you see?

Then:
A.
anjuta-devel.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib/anjuta/libfile-manager.so libfile-manager.so.0.0.0
anjuta-devel.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib/anjuta/liblanguage-manager.so liblanguage-manager.so.0.0.0
  - These are symlinks to plugin modules, not system-wide libraries
    and should be main anjuta package, not in -devel package.

B.
anjuta.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/share/anjuta/project/anjuta-plugin/src/plugin.c

and etc
  - I saw these rpmlint also in 2.2.3 era and I guess these  files
    must be main package (per your comment 2)

C.
anjuta.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/gconf/schemas/anjuta-build-basic-autotools-plugin.schemas

 and etc
  - You can just ignore all. Actually gconf schemas files are not config
    file, however perhaps for historical reason they are put under
    /etc.

D.
anjuta-devel.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
 - Perhaps you can ignore this.

E.
anjuta.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/anjuta/project/mkfile/po/ChangeLog
  - Same as B.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.