[Bug 434727] Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed May 28 15:43:08 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434727


tcallawa at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com  2008-05-28 11:43 EST -------
Good:

- rpmlint checks return:
libpst.src: W: strange-permission libpst.spec 0600
libpst.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.6.9 0.6.9-1.fc10

I'm ok with ignoring the permission on the spec file, but you should really fix
the changelog versioning. Just remember to put the version-release at the end
(right now, you're just putting version).

- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (GPLv2+) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream (6321e94601697a20b9850a3c4eec718b77869ec8)
- package compiles on devel (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file 

This is approved. Thanks for your patience! :)

You should be able to pick up the process around here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Watch_for_Feedback

I will sponsor you.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list