From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 02:06:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 22:06:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811010206.mA126mmn028827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #10 from Jameson 2008-10-31 22:06:47 EDT --- Update SPEC in the same location, and new SRPM: http://www.vtscrew.com/libprojectM-1.2.0-4.fc9.src.rpm I haven't got with upstream about that license issue, yet, but I will when I pass them my patch for the .pc file issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 04:51:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 00:51:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469470] New: Review Request: mz - A fast versatile packet generator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mz - A fast versatile packet generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 Summary: Review Request: mz - A fast versatile packet generator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: boni.vivek at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/spec/mz.spec SRPM URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/srpms/mz-0.34.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Mausezahn is a free fast traffic generator written in C which allows you to send nearly every possible and impossible packet. Mausezahn can also be used for example as didactical tool in network labs or for security audits including penetration and DoS testing. As traffic generator Mausezahn is for example used test IP multicast or VoIP networks. Speeds close to the Ethernet limit are reachable (depending on the HW platform). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 05:01:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 01:01:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811010501.mA151E05004777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |469471 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 05:01:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 01:01:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811010501.mA151C9d004704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |464781 Depends on| |461407 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 04:59:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 00:59:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469471] New: Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 Summary: Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mycae at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Package SkinLF, 6.7 Files: Spec URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/skinlf.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/skinlf-6.7-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Skin Look And Feel is able to read GTK (The Gimp ToolKit) and KDE (The K Desktop Environment) Skins to enhance your application GUI controls such as Buttons, Checks, Radios, Scrollbars, Progress Bar, Lists, Tables, Internal Frames, Colors, Background Textures, Regular Windows. This allows for the skinning of java applications to enhance their look and feel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 05:01:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 01:01:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811010501.mA151Dgw004729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |469471 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 05:10:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 01:10:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mz - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811010510.mA15Anru006096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #1 from vivek shah 2008-11-01 01:10:48 EDT --- I had a successful Koji scratch build. Here is the task ID http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=914103 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 05:14:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 01:14:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811010514.mA15EvSP022728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-01 01:14:56 EDT --- Currently this is marked as CLOSED WONTFIX by the submitter. mycae, would you want to take over this package? If so, would you modify the srpm by the original submitter (if you want) and upload the new srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 05:35:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 01:35:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811010535.mA15Zg17025862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 --- Comment #2 from D Haley 2008-11-01 01:35:41 EDT --- Do we need the javadoc? The package works fine as it is -- that's how I built skinlf. If anything needs to be done, I can give it a shot -- but I can't see any *major* issues with the package as it stands. There has just recently been a new version released though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 05:34:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 01:34:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467182] Review Request: hunspell-sc - Sardinian hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811010534.mA15YYoH009164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467182 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-01 01:34:33 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=914108 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 05284890c3445c5850a3c1410790a057 aspell5-sc-1.0.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 05:40:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 01:40:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469114] Review Request: hunspell-mn - Mongolian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811010540.mA15eH7d010129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469114 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-01 01:40:16 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=914110 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 2433e1a19c18351abdef3742a88d2097 dict-mn.oxt + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 06:07:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 02:07:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811010607.mA1678d2029814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #13 from D Haley 2008-11-01 02:07:07 EDT --- I have uploaded the new spec & src rpm. Now pending upon deps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 06:43:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 02:43:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469473] New: Review Request: axel - A lightweight download accelerator by using multiple connections Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: axel - A lightweight download accelerator by using multiple connections https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469473 Summary: Review Request: axel - A lightweight download accelerator by using multiple connections Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ph.linfan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://gcell.fedorapeople.org/axel.spec SRPM URL: http://gcell.fedorapeople.org/axel-2.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Axel tries to accelerate HTTP/FTP downloading process by using multiple connections for one file. It can use multiple mirrors for a download. Axel has no dependencies and is lightweight, so it might be useful as a wget clone on byte-critical systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 06:46:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 02:46:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811010646.mA16krhr018652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-01 02:46:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Do we need the javadoc? Not necessary (if you think so) > There has just recently been a new version released though. Okay, then please upgrade. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 06:51:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 02:51:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811010651.mA16pTZq003046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ph.linfan at gmail.com --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-01 02:51:28 EDT --- *** Bug 469473 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 06:51:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 02:51:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469473] Review Request: axel - A lightweight download accelerator by using multiple connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811010651.mA16pSTU003009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469473 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-01 02:51:27 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 454980 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 07:13:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 03:13:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458359] Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811010713.mA17DuYl021888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458359 --- Comment #7 from Till Maas 2008-11-01 03:13:55 EDT --- The patches were accepted by upstream and here is my request for a logo from the Fedora Artwork team: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/DesignService#GPScorrelate_application Not using %{name} in Source0 is kind of intentional, because I do not see any added value to use it and afaik it is not required by the source URL guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 07:32:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 03:32:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469474] New: Review Request: sovix - A website revision system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sovix - A website revision system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469474 Summary: Review Request: sovix - A website revision system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: boni.vivek at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/spec/sovix.spec SRPM URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/srpms/sovix-0.0.1.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: GNU Sovix is the PHP-based, extensible, customizable, semantic website revision system.If this seems to be a bit of a mouthful, an easier explanation is Sovix is a free Emacs-like WRS, the text editor Sovix was developed in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 07:49:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 03:49:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811010749.mA17nImO026457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 --- Comment #4 from D Haley 2008-11-01 03:49:17 EDT --- OK looked at the project a bit more -- couldn't see any real changes, other than datestamps on their build. Anyway, the re-built srpm & spec file are available. Simon Wesp: I hope you don't mind me hosting your work -- let me know if you are going to maintain -- I am assuming not due to "wontfix" tag. Spec URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/laf-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/laf-plugin-1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 08:52:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 04:52:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mz - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811010852.mA18qKSN004806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-01 04:52:19 EDT --- I am quite sure that trying to install the binary under the name "mz" will meet reluctance. How about renaming it to mausezahn ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 09:55:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 05:55:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467001] Review Request: litmus - WebDAV Test Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811010955.mA19tung031781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467001 --- Comment #6 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-11-01 05:55:55 EDT --- Hi, your comments in changelog for versions 0.12-1 and 1.12-2 are the same. Also, I think that BuildRequires: autoconf automake is not necessary. Authough there is an autogen.sh in the source, it is not used. I tried building litmus with these options %configure --with-ssl \ --with-expat \ --with-included-neon \ --enable-threadsafe-ssl=posix and BuildRequires: expat-devel BuildRequires: neon-devel BuildRequires: openssl-devel and got Install prefix: /usr Compiler: gcc neon library: included libneon (0.28.3) XML parser: expat SSL library: SSL support enabled, using OpenSSL (0.9.7 or later) Therefore, the bundled neon version is 0.28.3 (the same of F9), but higher than F8 (0.27.2). It also uses the external expat in this case. As a consequence, building for F8 is better this way, if you intend to do that. But this is just a suggestion, because using the bundled neon, seems also to force the use of the external expat and openssl. Otherwise, it uses whatever neon uses. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 11:36:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 07:36:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mz - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011136.mA1BaiuA015368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #3 from vivek shah 2008-11-01 07:36:43 EDT --- As far as Package Naming guidelines are concerned the package name must match the upstream tarball and be consistent with the name in case it is packaged under different distros in case another package with the same name does not(which does not exist as of now even in the Review queues). This software exists in Debian under the name 'mz' so I feel it is reasonable to continue with the package name 'mz'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 11:59:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 07:59:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469114] Review Request: hunspell-mn - Mongolian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011159.mA1BxS8g019473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469114 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-11-01 07:59:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-mn Short Description: Mongolian hunspell dictionary Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 11:59:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 07:59:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467182] Review Request: hunspell-sc - Sardinian hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011159.mA1Bx05M003538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467182 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Caolan McNamara 2008-11-01 07:58:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-sc Short Description: Sardinian hunspell dictionary Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 12:15:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 08:15:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011215.mA1CFcYw007006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 --- Comment #12 from Levente Farkas 2008-11-01 08:15:37 EDT --- Richard are you one the mailing list too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 12:22:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 08:22:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011222.mA1CMHlq024546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 --- Comment #13 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-11-01 08:22:16 EDT --- The mailing list has 7 subscribers at the moment (including me). Not bad for an ML which has only been open for 5 days :-) I see that you are subscribed, so you should be able to post. If you have any problems let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 12:25:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 08:25:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456892] Review Request: aget - multi-threaded download accelerator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011225.mA1CPoZ2009162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456892 --- Comment #12 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-11-01 08:25:49 EDT --- aget is orphaned , also aget is a dead project, there are no one working in it(no developers) I don't have tried axel, but seems to do the same thing. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 I don't know if is a good idea to include aget again in fedora. but if you want to do this go ahead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 12:33:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 08:33:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011233.mA1CXmKH010416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-01 08:33:47 EDT --- First of all: (In reply to comment #16) > SRPM URL: > http://www.torsten.rausche.net/fedora/review/nxtvepg/nxtvepg-2.8.1-1.fc9.src.rpm - I must say this srpm (tarball in this srpm) is problematic. Almost all codes in 2.8.1 tarball are still under GPLv2 (strict), however newly added tv_grab_ttx.pl is under GPLv3+, which are, unfortunately, incompatible: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#GPL_Compatibility_Matrix You need to fix license issue first. (In reply to comment #16) > How much time will it cost then to do > the same with a foreign package? I guess you will take much less time than the package you develop by yourself and release by yourself. > Do I > have to check every single point in that pre-reviews to get them honored? I don't know what you mean by "single point", however please check at least what is written on "ReviewGuidelines" and "Guidelines" wiki > How > many pre-reviews will I have to do? At least one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 12:40:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 08:40:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011240.mA1Cep7U027938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-01 08:40:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Update SPEC in the same location, and new SRPM: > http://www.vtscrew.com/libprojectM-1.2.0-4.fc9.src.rpm Seems 404... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 12:43:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 08:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011243.mA1ChEBY028275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 12:43:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 08:43:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011243.mA1Ch546018788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 Bug 469471 depends on bug 461407, which changed state. Bug 461407 Summary: Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 12:43:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 08:43:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011243.mA1Ch4Vj018725@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-01 08:43:03 EDT --- (Reopening) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 13:09:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 09:09:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467409] Review Request: mingw32-atk - MinGW Windows Atk library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011309.mA1D9HlO000417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467409 Levente Farkas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lfarkas at lfarkas.org --- Comment #1 from Levente Farkas 2008-11-01 09:09:16 EDT --- please apply this patch for require versioned native packages: --- ./mingw32-atk.spec.lfarkas 2008-11-01 13:50:38.000000000 +0100 +++ ./mingw32-atk.spec 2008-11-01 14:08:33.000000000 +0100 @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ %define __find_requires %{_mingw32_findrequires} %define __find_provides %{_mingw32_findprovides} +%define glib2_version 2.6.0 + Name: mingw32-atk Version: 1.24.0 Release: 2%{?dist} @@ -27,7 +29,7 @@ BuildRequires: pkgconfig # Need native one too for msgfmt BuildRequires: gettext # Need native one too for glib-genmarshal -BuildRequires: glib2-devel +BuildRequires: glib2-devel >= %{glib2_version} %description -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 13:13:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 09:13:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011313.mA1DD9G0001201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 Levente Farkas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lfarkas at lfarkas.org --- Comment #1 from Levente Farkas 2008-11-01 09:13:08 EDT --- please apply this patch diff -up ./mingw32-glib2.spec.lfarkas ./mingw32-glib2.spec --- ./mingw32-glib2.spec.lfarkas 2008-11-01 14:10:12.000000000 +0100 +++ ./mingw32-glib2.spec 2008-11-01 14:12:21.000000000 +0100 @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ BuildRequires: pkgconfig # Native version required for msgfmt use in build BuildRequires: gettext # Native version required for glib-genmarshal -BuildRequires: glib2-devel +BuildRequires: glib2-devel >= %{version} %description MinGW Windows Glib2 library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 13:14:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 09:14:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467420] Review Request: mingw32-gtk2 - MinGW Windows Gtk2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011314.mA1DEqtF024133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467420 Levente Farkas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lfarkas at lfarkas.org --- Comment #2 from Levente Farkas 2008-11-01 09:14:50 EDT --- please apply: diff -up ./mingw32-gtk2.spec.lfarkas ./mingw32-gtk2.spec --- ./mingw32-gtk2.spec.lfarkas 2008-11-01 14:13:22.000000000 +0100 +++ ./mingw32-gtk2.spec 2008-11-01 14:14:14.000000000 +0100 @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ %define __find_requires %{_mingw32_findrequires} %define __find_provides %{_mingw32_findprovides} +%define glib2_version 2.6.0 + Name: mingw32-gtk2 Version: 2.14.4 Release: 3%{?dist} @@ -38,11 +40,11 @@ BuildRequires: pkgconfig # Native one for msgfmt BuildRequires: gettext # Native one for glib-genmarsjal -BuildRequires: glib2-devel +BuildRequires: glib2-devel >= %{glib2_version} # Native one for gtk-update-icon-cache -BuildRequires: gtk2 +BuildRequires: gtk2 >= %{version} # Native one for gdk-pixbuf-csource -BuildRequires: gtk2-devel +BuildRequires: gtk2-devel >= %{version} %description -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 13:18:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 09:18:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469485] New: Review Request: fakeap - Fake Access Points generator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fakeap - Fake Access Points generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469485 Summary: Review Request: fakeap - Fake Access Points generator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/fakeap.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/fakeap-0.3.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.blackalchemy.to/project/fakeap/ Description: FakeAP generates thousands of counterfeit 802.11b access points. Hide in plain sight amongst Fake AP's cacophony of beacon frames. As part of a honeypot or as an instrument of your site security plan, Fake AP confuses Wardrivers, NetStumblers, Script Kiddies, and other undesirables. Koji scratch build: F9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=914135 F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=914133 RPM rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 noarch]$ rpmlint -i fake* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. SRPM rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i fakeap* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 13:22:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 09:22:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011322.mA1DMbGI002926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-01 09:22:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > (In reply to comment #21) > > * Shipping -static subpackage > > - Please explain why this package is needed where -devel > > subpackage is provided which includes .so symlink libraries. > > Usually static archives must be removed unless > > the package does not provide shared libraries. > > There are > some cases when you need static libraries, Unless you provide the concrete case for this package I strongly disagree (packaging guidelines say that the "compelling reason" must be provided) (If you still want I probably have to ask for FESCo: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Staticly_Linking_Executables ) > and for these cases having > static libraries packaged saves you from rebuilding the required > libraries yourself. This is exactly why we think we must _not_ provide static archives unless avoided. Using static archives will cause problem when some security issues or so are found in protobuf and people forget that they are using old static protobuf archive, for example. > > !!For -vim subpackage > > ! Neither of %_datadir/vim/vimfiles/{ftdetect,syntax} are owned > > by any packages, however I will ask vim maintainer about this. > > > > Any news on this item? Oops, completely forgotton, I will surely ask later... > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Additional remark about python subpackage: > > The -python subpackage should not depend on the base package or any other > > packages because it is a pure python implementation. > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > - Well, for technical discussion, does this mean that there will > > be no problem even if the installed version of protobuf and > > protobuf-python differ? (if you don't write Requires this > > can happen). > > This discussion can be applied for -java subpackage. > > From my point of view, the only possible problem is that someone can > finish using newer protobuf-compiler with older python/java > bindings. Both java and python implementations are usable as a runtime > without any C++ code, you only need corresponding version of > protobuf-compiler for development. Then you should ensure that the trouble you mentioned here won't happen. * One method is to make -compiler subpackage have: ----------------------------------------------------- Conflicts: %{name}-java < %{version} Conflicts: %{name}-java > %{version} ----------------------------------------------------- or so. > > * For -java subpackage > > - About "BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1.6.0" > > -- If this means that Java binding needs OpenJDK to > > build, then this line must be > > -------------------------------------------------------- > > BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1:1.6.0 > > -------------------------------------------------------- > > java-devel vitrual Provides by java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel > > has Epoch 1 for historical reason (see: > > I can successfully build the package with > java-1.6.0-sun-devel-1.6.0.3-1jpp without mock on my system, and > BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1.6 brings > java-1.7.0-icedtea-devel-1.7.0.0-0.19.b21.snapshot.fc8.i586 which > builds the package succesfully. Well, actually I don't care about RHEL4, however for this case I can allow "java-devel > 1.6". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 13:39:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 09:39:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011339.mA1DdF6H005321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 --- Comment #1 from Simon Wesp 2008-11-01 09:39:14 EDT --- Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/sbackup-0.10.5/sbackup.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/sbackup-0.10.5/sbackup-0.10.5-2.fc10.src.rpm I think this would be a good package for EPEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 13:43:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 09:43:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457109] Review-Request: perl-TAP-Harness-JUnit - Generate JUnit compatible output from TAP results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011343.mA1Dh3DK028614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457109 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Marek Mahut 2008-11-01 09:43:02 EDT --- Package looks sane. + source files match upstream: bdf902ea7a92272def706871a6c1bd5e TAP-Harness-JUnit-0.01.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + dist tag is present + build root is correct + license is ok + latest version is being packaged + package builds in mock (f8, devel) + rpmlint is silent APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 14:15:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 10:15:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468517] Review Request: saoimage - Utility for displaying astronomical images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011415.mA1EFb0O001223@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468517 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Marek Mahut 2008-11-01 10:15:36 EDT --- Thank you for the package. The package looks sane, please take into consideration Mamoru's comment and fix small cosmetic issue around desktop file and this package is APPROVED. ./saoimage.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 14:16:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 10:16:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011416.mA1EG76W011371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |469491 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 14:23:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 10:23:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462181] Review Request: teeworlds - Online multi-player platform 2D shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011423.mA1ENKYc012236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462181 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |469492 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 14:23:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 10:23:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469492] Review Request: bam - A fast and flexible build system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011423.mA1ENJJA012208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469492 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462181 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 14:22:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 10:22:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469492] New: Review Request: bam - A fast and flexible build system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bam - A fast and flexible build system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469492 Summary: Review Request: bam - A fast and flexible build system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/bam-0.0.0.for.teeworlds.0.4.3/bam.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/bam-0.0.0.for.teeworlds.0.4.3/bam-0.0.0.for.teeworlds.0.4.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: the bam build system for teeworlds -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 14:36:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 10:36:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: QuickFIX - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011436.mA1EaiIa004136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Depends on| |182235 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 14:37:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 10:37:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: QuickFIX - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011437.mA1EbKhv014194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 --- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-11-01 10:37:19 EDT --- the first thing to be checked before continue. is the license compatible with fedora ? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 14:49:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 10:49:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011449.mA1EnKLT005579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #29 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-11-01 10:49:19 EDT --- I'll leave this as-it-is then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 14:53:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 10:53:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469494] New: Review Request: xlcrack - Recover lost and forgotten passwords from XLS files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xlcrack - Recover lost and forgotten passwords from XLS files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469494 Summary: Review Request: xlcrack - Recover lost and forgotten passwords from XLS files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/xlcrack.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/xlcrack-1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://devel.tlrmx.org/misc/ Description: xlcrack recovers lost passwords for XLS files, such as those saved by Excel 95. In order to do this it implements a simple XOR encryption algorithm common to several Microsoft Office applications. Koji scratch builds: F9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=914172 F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=914177 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint -i xl* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i xl* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 15:10:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 11:10:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011510.mA1FATrp018701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-11-01 11:10:28 EDT --- - Source: - Please use 'Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz' instead of a link to a mirror https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 15:18:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 11:18:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469474] Review Request: sovix - A website revision system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011518.mA1FIr64019578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469474 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-01 11:18:52 EDT --- Just some small comments on your spec file - URL: http://gnu.org/software/%{name} - This is not wrong, just not so handy -> copy-&-paste is not possible - $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} - This is only cosmetically. It will look nicer if you are using just one style of those macros. - %define _enable_debug_package 0 - There is no need for this because the package is 'noarch' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 15:18:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 11:18:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011518.mA1FI5Wa009470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 --- Comment #2 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-11-01 11:18:04 EDT --- what`s the lasted version ? http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/uml_utilities_20070815.tar.bz2 http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 15:34:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 11:34:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: QuickFIX - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011534.mA1FYMJr011623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 --- Comment #2 from Hayden James 2008-11-01 11:34:21 EDT --- Here's the licensing information: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/license.html I'll post to fedora-legal-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 15:38:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 11:38:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: QuickFIX - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011538.mA1FcJRm012225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 --- Comment #3 from Hayden James 2008-11-01 11:38:19 EDT --- Actually, looks like you beat me to the punch. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 15:44:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 11:44:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011544.mA1FiAt1022886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-01 11:44:08 EDT --- Well, for -2: * License - Well protobuf.pc.in is still under ASL 2.0 You should ask the author to change the license of this file (well, actually I have no idea why this pkgconfig file has license term, first of all...) Fortunately currently the author is in CC list of this bug. Rick, would you agree to change .pc.in file you wrote to be under BSD or to remove license term completely? * BuildRequires - This package won't build without "BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel" (note: here I don't say about Requires). * Requires - "Requires: %{name}-java-%{version}-%{release}" should be "Requires: %{name}-java = %{version}-%{release}" * rpmlint issue ** non-standard-group - Group "Development/Documentation" should simply be "Documentation". ** non-executable-script ------------------------------------------------------------ E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/google/protobuf/descriptor_pb2.py 0644 ------------------------------------------------------------ - If this script are not meant to be executed by user directly, then this script must not have shebang (anyway the shebang #!/usr/bin/python2.4 is wrong because we use python 2.5) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 16:01:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 12:01:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011601.mA1G15AJ025513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 --- Comment #9 from Soumya Kanti Chakraborty 2008-11-01 12:01:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Okay, thank you for reply. I already have applied for the Fedora Packager CVS Commit Group. I have requested for the Sponsorship and my FAS name is soumya. Mamoru tell me if you need something more to be done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 16:06:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 12:06:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011606.mA1G6UHX016101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-01 12:06:29 EDT --- Okay, now I am sponsoring you. Please follow Join wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 16:07:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 12:07:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011607.mA1G7HcM026235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-01 12:07:16 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 16:22:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 12:22:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011622.mA1GMrSn028443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 --- Comment #3 from Paul Wouters 2008-11-01 12:22:52 EDT --- Thanks for the pointers. The download sites are a complete mess. I hadn't even noticed there was a newer version until you pointed it out. It is only directly linked and not accessable via the sf.net downloads pages. Spec URL: ftp://ftp.openswan.org/uml_utilities/uml_utilities.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.openswan.org/uml_utilities/uml_utilities-20070815-1.fc9.src.rpm * Sat Nov 1 2008 Paul Wouters - 20070815-1 - Was pointed to newer version of source at obscured location - Hack out hardcoded stripping of binaries - -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 no longer needed rpmlint output: uml_utilities.src:19: W: setup-not-quiet uml_utilities.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/uml_net root 04755 uml_utilities.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/uml_net 04755 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. I am not sure why setup is not quiet, since all it contains is: %setup -n tools-%{ver} which only untars the source without an error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 16:37:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 12:37:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011637.mA1GbQ2a020442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #14 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-11-01 12:37:25 EDT --- You are supposed to increase the revision of the rpm (and document any changes in the %changelog section) and post the complete urls for spec and srpm in the bugzilla comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 16:56:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 12:56:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467798] Review Request: dnsperf - Benchmarking authorative and recursing DNS servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011656.mA1GuB3p023099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467798 --- Comment #10 from Paul Wouters 2008-11-01 12:56:10 EDT --- Oh, I had done that because you had said "licence should be MIT. Otherwise no problems." and I had made that change. sorry.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 16:56:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 12:56:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467798] Review Request: dnsperf - Benchmarking authorative and recursing DNS servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011656.mA1GunYA023182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467798 Paul Wouters changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 16:57:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 12:57:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011657.mA1GvsxL023293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 Soumya Kanti Chakraborty changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 --- Comment #18 from Soumya Kanti Chakraborty 2008-11-01 12:57:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Okay, thank you for reply. The New SRPM and SPEC file :- Spec URL: http://soumya.fedorapeople.org/python-wikimarkup.spec SRPM URL: http://soumya.fedorapeople.org/python-wikimarkup-1.01-3.005svn.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 17:09:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 13:09:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469474] Review Request: sovix - A website revision system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011709.mA1H9OlN001914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469474 --- Comment #2 from vivek shah 2008-11-01 13:09:23 EDT --- Thanks for the comments, as far as I see these are not blockers as far as the Package review guidelines are concerned. Will you be assigning the review of this package to yourself and do a complete review (if it is not already done) because then I can fix all the suggestions that you mentioned in the spec file in one go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 17:11:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 13:11:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447847] Review Request: unbound - Validating, recursive, and caching DNS(SEC) resolver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011711.mA1HBHPa025231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447847 Paul Wouters changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 17:20:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 13:20:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469474] Review Request: sovix - A website revision system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011720.mA1HKupn003838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469474 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-01 13:20:55 EDT --- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS kind of makes clear that using %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 17:18:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 13:18:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mz - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011718.mA1HImoj026048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-01 13:18:47 EDT --- I was speaking about the binary application's name (i.e. /bin/mz <--> /bin/mausezahn), not the package name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 17:20:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 13:20:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011720.mA1HKuI2026530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 Soumya Kanti Chakraborty changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 17:24:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 13:24:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011724.mA1HOHjo004057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 --- Comment #11 from Soumya Kanti Chakraborty 2008-11-01 13:24:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Okay, now I am sponsoring you. Please follow Join wiki again. Thanks Mamoru for sponsoring me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 17:34:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 13:34:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011734.mA1HY2JN005386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-01 13:34:01 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 17:34:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 13:34:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467182] Review Request: hunspell-sc - Sardinian hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011734.mA1HYncJ005439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467182 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-01 13:34:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 17:35:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 13:35:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469114] Review Request: hunspell-mn - Mongolian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011735.mA1HZQN5028527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469114 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-01 13:35:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 17:36:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 13:36:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445970] Review Request: g2ipmsg - IP Messenger for GNOME 2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011736.mA1HadBR006013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445970 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-01 13:36:38 EDT --- Thanks for fixing that. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 17:38:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 13:38:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452108] Review Request: cfdg-fe - A frontend for cfdg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011738.mA1Hc3ZH028824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452108 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-01 13:38:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 18:15:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 14:15:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011815.mA1IFkHr001843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-01 14:15:45 EDT --- --------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (python-wikimarkup) is APPROVED by mtasaka --------------------------------------------------------------------- As I wrote in bug 459010, please follow "Join" wiki. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 18:34:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 14:34:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011834.mA1IY8QX013992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 --- Comment #4 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-11-01 14:34:07 EDT --- try %setup -q -n tools-%{ver} the Source0 is very strange, looks like jdike and blaisorblade is not using sourceforge to host files, the best options is ask where are located the lasted version and what's the right address for downloading it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 18:41:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 14:41:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443675] Review Request: sip-redirect - Tiny IPv4 and IPv6 SIP redirect server written in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011841.mA1IfHaL005461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443675 --- Comment #9 from Robert Scheck 2008-11-01 14:41:16 EDT --- Ping? What are we currently lacking? The first two points from comment #6 are just a minor change, the third one I would like to avoid for the given reason. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 18:50:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 14:50:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011850.mA1IosPC006906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 --- Comment #5 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-11-01 14:50:53 EDT --- what's the difference between this: mylib=`echo %{_libdir} | sed "s/\/usr//"` ln -s ..$mylib/uml/port-helper $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/port-helper and this : ln -s %{_libdir}/uml/port-helper $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/port-helper ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 19:31:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 15:31:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request:
- In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011931.mA1JVhcR013011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 Javier Palacios changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 19:29:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 15:29:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: javiplx at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.freewebs.com/javiplx/Fedora/debmirror/debmirror.spec SRPM URL: http://www.freewebs.com/javiplx/Fedora/debmirror/debmirror-20070123-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This program downloads and maintains a partial local Debian mirror. It can mirror any combination of architectures, distributions and sections. Files are transferred by ftp, http, hftp or rsync, and package pools are fully supported. It also does locking and updates trace files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 19:32:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 15:32:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011932.mA1JWiKg023180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 Javier Palacios changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |script -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 19:41:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 15:41:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011941.mA1JfRI6014369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-11-01 15:41:26 EDT --- I belive you need use some macros, something like this -> /usr/bin/debmirror -> %{_bindir}/debmirror cp debmirror $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/bin -> cp -p debmirror $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir} -p = preserve timestamp for more info about macros. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#Macros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 19:56:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 15:56:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011956.mA1JuRdG016523@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #2 from Javier Palacios 2008-11-01 15:56:26 EDT --- I'll delay the upload of the new version a couple of days to wait for more comments, but both changes are applied. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 20:18:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 16:18:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811012018.mA1KIt4C019634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #3 from Terje R??sten 2008-11-01 16:18:55 EDT --- Yes, this is simple package which could be even simpler: rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/bin cp debmirror $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/bin -> %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} %{__install} -pD -m 0755 %{name} %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/%{name} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -> %clean %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc debmirror.conf /usr/bin/debmirror -> %files %defattr(-, root ,root, -) %doc %{name}.conf %{_bindir}/%{name} BTW: why is the explicit req: Requires: perl-LockFile-Simple needed? rpmbuild don't find this req. by itself? GPL as license is not correct, is it GPLv2, GPLv2+, GPLv3 or GPLv3+ ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 20:23:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 16:23:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457109] Review-Request: perl-TAP-Harness-JUnit - Generate JUnit compatible output from TAP results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811012023.mA1KNX5c030455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457109 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-11-01 16:23:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-TAP-Harness-JUnit Short Description: Generate JUnit compatible output from TAP results Owners: lkundrak Branches: EL-5 F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 20:22:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 16:22:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468517] Review Request: saoimage - Utility for displaying astronomical images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811012022.mA1KM4Sh030336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468517 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-11-01 16:22:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Thank you for the package. > > The package looks sane, please take into consideration Mamoru's comment and fix > small cosmetic issue around desktop file and this package is APPROVED. Will do. Thanks. > ./saoimage.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is > deprecated Encoding used to be mandatory, and including it is not an error yet. Will exclude it from recent Fedora branches and devel. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: saoimage Short Description: Utility for displaying astronomical images Owners: lkundrak Branches: EL-5 F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 20:25:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 16:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811012025.mA1KPr7Q020906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #4 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-11-01 16:25:52 EDT --- I belive the correct license tag should be GPLv2, also take a look on rpmlint message about Misc group. rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/noarch/debmirror-20070123-1.fc9.noarch.rpm debmirror.noarch: W: non-standard-group Misc debmirror.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. I belive all files in debian dir should be installed as %doc, including doc/design.txt look https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Configuration_files and Why you don`t install debmirror.conf in %{_sysconfdir} using %config(noreplace) ? also why you have included a patch moving this file to $HOME ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 20:49:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 16:49:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811012049.mA1KnZ4D001334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #5 from Javier Palacios 2008-11-01 16:49:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > -> > %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} For so simple commands I personally prefer to use them instead of the macros > BTW: why is the explicit req: > > Requires: perl-LockFile-Simple > > needed? Probably rpmbuild finds that, that is an explicit requirement of the software, and it does not hurt > GPL as license is not correct, is it GPLv2, GPLv2+, GPLv3 or GPLv3+ ? I really don't know which version. It's probably whichever version is standard for debian. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 20:56:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 16:56:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811012056.mA1KuSNn025184@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #28 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2008-11-01 16:56:26 EDT --- Jason, is there any more information you need from us before you can proceed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 21:05:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 17:05:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811012105.mA1L5u0u026434@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #6 from Javier Palacios 2008-11-01 17:05:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/noarch/debmirror-20070123-1.fc9.noarch.rpm > debmirror.noarch: W: non-standard-group Misc > debmirror.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL I saw that, but I can made no guess about GPL version. Regarding the group, where is the list of standard groups? > I belive all files in debian dir should be installed as %doc, including > doc/design.txt I've added changelog, debian.NEWS and design. The remaining files on debian directory are only used to construct debian packages > > look > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Configuration_files > and Why you don`t install debmirror.conf in %{_sysconfdir} using > %config(noreplace) ? also why you have included a patch moving this file to > $HOME ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 21:16:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 17:16:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811012116.mA1LGZuT028130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #7 from Javier Palacios 2008-11-01 17:16:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > and Why you don`t install debmirror.conf in %{_sysconfdir} using > %config(noreplace) ? also why you have included a patch moving this file to > $HOME ? The patch is to avoid the /etc/debmirror.conf gets a requirement. The sample configuration file is not included because I build this package to use with cobbler, and I see easier to clear the configuration file, as most options must be rewritten to sync different repositories -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 22:11:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 18:11:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469527] New: Review Request: tcping - Check of TCP connection to a given IP/Port Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tcping - Check of TCP connection to a given IP/Port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469527 Summary: Review Request: tcping - Check of TCP connection to a given IP/Port Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/tcping.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/tcping-1.3.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.linuxco.de/tcping/tcping.html Description: tcping does a TCP connect to the given ip/port combination. The user can specify a timeout in seconds. This is useful in shell scripts running in firewalled environments. Often SYNs are just being dropped by firewalls, thus connection establishment will be retried several times (for minutes) until a TCP timeout is reached. With tcping it is possible to check first if the desired port is reachable and then start connection establishment. Koji scratch builds: F9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=914530 F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=914535 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint -i tc* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i tc* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 22:40:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 18:40:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811012240.mA1Me5Pm007631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 --- Comment #23 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-11-01 18:40:03 EDT --- Hi, I built the package and used bodhi for moving it to testing: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?packageOrder=-blocked&userID=866&buildOrder=-completion_time&buildStart=0#packagelist However, I did understand why there is only one tag "dist f-8". What does this mean? My previous CVS Request did not include the devel (F10) branch. Although I could build parprouted for F10, I could not send it for testing. Should I do another CVS Request for F10? Use make tag? Finally, what is the rule for moving a package from testing to stable? Could it have gone to stable directly? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 23:19:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 19:19:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811012319.mA1NJj22012708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #8 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-11-01 19:19:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > Requires: perl-LockFile-Simple > > > > needed? > > Probably rpmbuild finds that, that is an explicit requirement of the software, > and it does not hurt It is both superfluous and wrong (correct would be Requires: perl(LockFile::Simple)). (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #4) > > and Why you don`t install debmirror.conf in %{_sysconfdir} using > > %config(noreplace) ? also why you have included a patch moving this file to > > $HOME ? > > The patch is to avoid the /etc/debmirror.conf gets a requirement. > The sample configuration file is not included because I build this package to > use with cobbler, and I see easier to clear the configuration file, as most > options must be rewritten to sync different repositories That's not how packages are supposed to work in fedora. IMO, this package should not be accepted with this patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 23:45:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 19:45:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226526] Merge Review: vim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811012345.mA1NjHet016296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226526 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 23:51:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 19:51:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469114] Review Request: hunspell-mn - Mongolian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811012351.mA1NpjaN017218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469114 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 23:48:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 19:48:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454408] Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811012348.mA1NmMdt016628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #14 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-11-01 19:48:21 EDT --- I would recommend to add --disable-infos to %configure to avoid wasting time on building the infos. Finally, I would have approved this package, if it wasn't providing this: mingw32-binutils(x86-64) = 2.18.50_20080109_2-8.fc10 What is this meant to mean? IMO, it's meaningless. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 23:51:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 19:51:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467182] Review Request: hunspell-sc - Sardinian hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811012351.mA1NpYa3026650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467182 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 00:25:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 20:25:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462535] Review Request: python-foolscap - Next-generation RPC protocol, intended to replace Perspective Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811020025.mA20P9aN021783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462535 --- Comment #4 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-11-01 20:25:08 EDT --- Thanks Jon, New version here: Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/python-foolscap.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/python-foolscap-0.3.1-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 01:43:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 21:43:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468643] Review Request: perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction - Expose PL_dirty In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811020143.mA21hsLp008894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468643 --- Comment #9 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-01 21:43:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction Short Description: Expose PL_dirty Owners: cweyl Branches: F-8 F-9 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 01:43:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 21:43:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468643] Review Request: perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction - Expose PL_dirty In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811020143.mA21huH8032068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468643 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 01:43:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 21:43:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468643] Review Request: perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction - Expose PL_dirty In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811020143.mA21h6rX031994@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468643 --- Comment #8 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-01 21:43:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction Short Description: Expose PL_dirty Owners: cweyl Branches: F-8 F-9 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 01:59:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 21:59:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811020159.mA21xMjx001867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Subhodip Biswas <440volt.tux at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(440volt.tux at gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #24 from Subhodip Biswas <440volt.tux at gmail.com> 2008-11-01 21:59:20 EDT --- i have mailed upstream since i am not a direct contributer to olpc . Anyways I am still waiting for a reply -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 03:21:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 23:21:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mz - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811020321.mA23LAc4022332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #5 from vivek shah 2008-11-01 23:21:10 EDT --- But why would I want to split the binary name from mz to mausezahn when it is not causing any conflict with biaries of any other package and not keep the binary name consistent with the package name and the manual page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 03:33:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 23:33:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mz - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811020333.mA23XQr9014051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-01 23:33:25 EDT --- Because a) two letter commands are a scarce resource b) http://www.google.ro/search?q=mz returns nothing useful on the first page while http://www.google.ro/search?q=mausezahn contains only useful stuff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 06:56:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 01:56:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811020656.mA26usqP018591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #30 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-02 01:56:54 EDT --- Okay, then now I leave the final judgement for this review request to the current assignee. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 07:08:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 02:08:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811020708.mA2785Xg019947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-02 02:08:04 EDT --- Well, would you check if all files under %geminstdir are really needed at any time for this package? IMO the files under %geminstdir/examples, %geminstdir/tests/ (and also these directories themselves) can be marked as %doc. Also %geminstdir/[A-Z]* should be marked as %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 08:43:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 03:43:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811020843.mA28hWr6022597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #9 from Terje R??sten 2008-11-02 03:43:31 EDT --- > IMO, this package should not be accepted with this patch. I agree with Ralf here, I suppose the the idea behind a distro is to have packages to work out of box, that is value of the distro. In this case this means a working config file with a file system intrastructure ready to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 10:05:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 05:05:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454408] Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021005.mA2A5siB004856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 --- Comment #15 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-11-02 05:05:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Finally, I would have approved this package, if it wasn't providing this: > mingw32-binutils(x86-64) = 2.18.50_20080109_2-8.fc10 > > What is this meant to mean? IMO, it's meaningless. It's added automatically as far as I'm aware. In this package we don't override RPM's normal dependency generation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 10:09:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 05:09:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446563] Review Request: rubygem-rspec - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021009.mA2A98KV015526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446563 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org Flag| |needinfo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 10:14:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 05:14:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021014.mA2AEcr5016398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #31 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-11-02 05:14:37 EDT --- Thanks a lot, both the assignee and I have learned something ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 10:11:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 05:11:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021011.mA2ABx9o005926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org --- Comment #6 from David Woodhouse 2008-11-02 05:11:57 EDT --- I thought that it was considered good practice to bump the release for changes made during review, so unless you submit a perfect package in the first place it was quite _common_ for the first package to have a release other than -1? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 10:22:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 05:22:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468554] Review Request: barrage - Kill and destroy as many targets as possible within 3 minutes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021022.mA2AMiBh018105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468554 Stefan Posdzich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Stefan Posdzich 2008-11-02 05:22:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: barrage Short Description: kill and destroy as many targets as possible Owners: cheekyboinc Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 10:26:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 05:26:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467154] Review Request: libvirt-qpid - An interface with libvirt using QMF (qpid modeling framework) which utilizes the Advanced Message Queuing protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021026.mA2AQmQV019102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467154 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(imain at redhat.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 10:26:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 05:26:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467154] Review Request: libvirt-qpid - An interface with libvirt using QMF (qpid modeling framework) which utilizes the Advanced Message Queuing protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021026.mA2AQGuS019002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467154 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org --- Comment #4 from David Woodhouse 2008-11-02 05:26:15 EDT --- Fails to build on all architectures. If there's a good reason why not, you'll need to file an appropriate bug and make sure it's on the FE-ExcludeArch-$ARCH tracker for each architecture on which you don't build it -- and then you can use ExcludeArch. And if there isn't a good reason, you know what to do :) It seems to require qpidc which doesn't exist on all architectures -- and which seems to be breaking the rules by not having an appropriate bug filed on the ExcludeArch trackers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 10:39:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 05:39:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 232790] Review Request: ming - SWF output library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021039.mA2AdmOZ010723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232790 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #20 from David Woodhouse 2008-11-02 05:39:45 EDT --- Perhaps we should ship it without the perl bindings to start with, and add them only when they start working? If we're sure the bug is only in the bindings and not elsewhere, that is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 10:24:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 05:24:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463217] Review Request: gnuplot-py - Python interface to Gnuplot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021024.mA2AOnp1018377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463217 --- Comment #10 from Sergio Pascual 2008-11-02 05:24:47 EDT --- I have put mode.py and test.py in docs. Source0 contains a full url now Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/gnuplot-py.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/gnuplot-py-1.8-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 10:50:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 05:50:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 233946] Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021050.mA2Ao5oD023392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233946 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org Flag| |needinfo?(seg at haxxed.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 10:58:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 05:58:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 251805] Review Request: postgresql-orafce - Implementation of some Oracle functions into PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021058.mA2AwBOU024825@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org Flag| |needinfo?(devrim at commandpro | |mpt.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 11:05:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 06:05:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467329] Review Request: mingw32-termcap - MinGW terminal feature database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021105.mA2B5dhd026485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467329 Bruno Haible changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bruno at clisp.org --- Comment #3 from Bruno Haible 2008-11-02 06:05:38 EDT --- All free Unices abandoned termcap in favour of ncurses between 1992 and 1995. Reason: tgetent() is inherently unsafe to use, it is designed to produce buffer overflows, because the caller of this function and the implementation of this function simply don't communicate about the size of the buffer. It'd best to ditch this package, and use ncurses instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 11:03:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 06:03:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431026] Review Request: gtvg - A simple TV program schedule viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021103.mA2B3mbJ015159@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431026 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org Flag| |needinfo?(ivazqueznet at gmail | |.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 11:06:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 06:06:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469548] New: Review Request: ap-utils - Configure and monitor Wireless Access Points Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ap-utils - Configure and monitor Wireless Access Points https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469548 Summary: Review Request: ap-utils - Configure and monitor Wireless Access Points Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/ap-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/ap-utils-1.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://ap-utils.polesye.net/ Description: Wireless Access Point Utilities for Unix - it's a set of utilities to configure and monitor Wireless Access Points under Unix using SNMP and tftp protocol. * ap-config - to config and get stats from Atmel-MIB based APs and devices that support IEEE 802.11 MIB and NWN DOT11EXT MIB * ap-gl - to config and get stats from Atmel-MIB based APs with 1.4k.2 firmware * ap-tftp - command line utility to upgrade AP firmare over tftp * ap-auth - command line utility to work with mac auth * ap-mrtg - to get stat from AP and return it in MRTG parsable format * ap-rrd - to get stat from AP and save it into RRD database * ap-trapd - to receive, parse, and log trap messages from AP Koji scratch builds: F9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=914639 F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=914644 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint ap-* ap-utils.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/ap-config 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. There is nothing for a devel package. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint ap-* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 11:14:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 06:14:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431249] Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021114.mA2BEcI7017087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431249 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org Flag| |needinfo?(rkhadgar at redhat.c | |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 11:12:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 06:12:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461794] Review Request:0xFFFF - The Open Free Fiasco Firmware Flasher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021112.mA2BCE4k016806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461794 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from David Woodhouse 2008-11-02 06:12:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: 0xFFFF Short Description: The Open Free Fiasco Firmware Flasher Owners: dwmw2 Branches: F-9 devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 11:25:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 06:25:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 232790] Review Request: ming - SWF output library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021125.mA2BPES6029938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232790 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #21 from Patrice Dumas 2008-11-02 06:25:13 EDT --- I think that we should ship the broken perl bindings if we ship something. Maybe we should not need to wait for this issue to be solved, since it has been so long. Cristian, if you want to be the maintainer, please submit something, I can do the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 11:27:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 06:27:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mz - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021127.mA2BRhU8030208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr --- Comment #7 from Patrice Dumas 2008-11-02 06:27:42 EDT --- Also see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Use_of_common_namespace -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 11:46:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 06:46:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 437785] Review Request: php-ZendFramework-api-doc - Zend Framework API documentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021146.mA2BkX9Y022343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437785 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dwmw2 at infradead.org Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from David Woodhouse 2008-11-02 06:46:32 EDT --- Would be good to include a licence file, but not mandatory. Everything else looks good. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 11:54:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 06:54:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467329] Review Request: mingw32-termcap - MinGW terminal feature database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021154.mA2BsGJa001932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467329 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-11-02 06:54:15 EDT --- Ncurses doesn't compile on Windows, although if you do manage to patch it and get a working ncurses, please post it because that would be a very important advance for us. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 11:53:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 06:53:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 437801] Review Request: php-ZendFramework-manual-en - Documentation for the Zend Framework in English In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021153.mA2BrJ5D001819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437801 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dwmw2 at infradead.org Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from David Woodhouse 2008-11-02 06:53:18 EDT --- Again, a licence file would be good -- but not mandatory. Would be good to tidy up the whitespace in the specfile a little too -- the Name: and URL: fields are more indented than the others. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 12:05:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 07:05:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438587] Review Request: libsqlite3x - C++ Wrapper for the SQLite3 database engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021205.mA2C5Ctw025421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438587 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dwmw2 at infradead.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 12:04:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 07:04:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438587] Review Request: libsqlite3x - C++ Wrapper for the SQLite3 database engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021204.mA2C4kDH025059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438587 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from David Woodhouse 2008-11-02 07:04:44 EDT --- "Here you can find "sqlite3x" and "sq3", two different C++ wrapper APIs for working with sqlite3 databases. These two independent APIs are different in nature but are distributed together because they are maintained together." We should probably put them into separate binary subpackages. I agree with ditching pointless stupid build systems when they're too complex to get them to work. But normally I use that as a reason for ditching autocrap and just writing proper Makefiles. I would advocate that in this case, rather than replacing one crap overengineered build system with another. But not a review blocker. Would be good to have a licence file, but not mandatory since upstream doesn't have it. Approved -- but please consider splitting into separate packages for sqlite3x vs. sq3 before doing the first build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 12:06:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 07:06:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469553] New: Review Request: asleap - Recovering tool for weak LEAP and PPTP passwords Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: asleap - Recovering tool for weak LEAP and PPTP passwords https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469553 Summary: Review Request: asleap - Recovering tool for weak LEAP and PPTP passwords Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/asleap.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/asleap-2.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.willhackforsushi.com/Asleap.html Description: asleap is a tool to recover weak LEAP and PPTP passwords. asleap is the product of the research of weaknesses in Cisco's proprietary LEAP protocol. asleap can work directly from any wireless interface in RFMON mode and can perform channel hopping. Koji scratch builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=914677 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint -i asl* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint asl* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 12:06:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 07:06:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438601] Review Request: libcommon - LibCommon is a reusable library written in C# In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021206.mA2C6tn4004198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438601 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from David Woodhouse 2008-11-02 07:06:54 EDT --- --2008-11-02 12:06:27-- http://sereinity.free.fr/fedora/libcommon-0.2.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Resolving sereinity.free.fr... 212.27.63.124 Connecting to sereinity.free.fr|212.27.63.124|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 403 Forbidden -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 12:15:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 07:15:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438897] Review Request: framewave - Image and signal processing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021215.mA2CFxNO027132@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438897 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org Flag| |needinfo?(orion at cora.nwra.c | |om) --- Comment #8 from David Woodhouse 2008-11-02 07:15:56 EDT --- I take it we're not approving the package until either the unit tests pass, or we have a convincing explanation of why it's OK for them to be failing. Marking as NEEDINFO until such fix (or explanation) is forthcoming... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 12:29:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 07:29:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021229.mA2CT9ac029132@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #10 from Javier Palacios 2008-11-02 07:29:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > I agree with Ralf here, I suppose the the idea behind a distro is to have > packages > to work out of box, that is value of the distro. > In this case this means a working config file with a file system intrastructure > ready to go. The package works out of the box. The config file is not a requirement, but just a way to override hardcoded defaults. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 12:43:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 07:43:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438587] Review Request: libsqlite3x - C++ Wrapper for the SQLite3 database engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021243.mA2ChihL031383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438587 --- Comment #7 from David Woodhouse 2008-11-02 07:43:43 EDT --- Oops, missed a requirement -- you must add Requires: pkgconfig in the -devel subpackage(s) because they provide .pc files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 12:46:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 07:46:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 442875] Review Request: virt-ctrl - Graphical management app for virtual machines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021246.mA2CkMCM032044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442875 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dwmw2 at infradead.org Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from David Woodhouse 2008-11-02 07:46:20 EDT --- Package looks sane, meets review requirements. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 12:58:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 07:58:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021258.mA2Cwbcx012518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 --- Comment #24 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-11-02 07:58:36 EDT --- when you run fedora-cvs parprouted the directory F-10 is created ? if yes, then I belive you will able to push updates in bodhi after F10 released. someone will notify when bodhi start accepting updates for F10 if not, then you need to ask cvs for F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 13:38:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 08:38:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021338.mA2DcKqJ020097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-02 08:38:19 EDT --- mycae, if you modified your spec/srpm, would you change the release number and post the URLs of your new spec/srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 13:38:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 08:38:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mz - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021338.mA2Dc7mE020033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #8 from vivek shah 2008-11-02 08:38:07 EDT --- So in this case although there are no such pertinent conflicts but one might arise in the future, the only solution that crops up is to work with upstream rather than patching up Makefile/renaming binaries as this might cause distro specific inconsistencies. I will mail upstream right away and see if the binaries and manuals can be renamed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 13:36:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 08:36:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021336.mA2Da8SJ019901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rpm at greysector.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-02 08:36:07 EDT --- For -1: * License - As some files in the source zip are under zlib, the license tag must be "BSD and zlib" * Remove redundant %doc * Release - I guess it is preferable that you bump the release number to 2 and add some comments in %changelog (because of maintainer change) * Versioning, source zip - The source zip in the srpm differs from what I could download from the URL written as %SOURCE0: ------------------------------------------------- 90874 2008-09-06 05:41 laf-plugin-1.0-1.fc9.src/laf-plugin-all.zip 54511 2008-09-15 09:01 laf-plugin-all.zip ------------------------------------------------- Would you check this? ! Note Please change the release number every time you modify your spec file/srpm to avoid confusion. CC-ing to Dominik, who may be the potentional sponsor of you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 13:47:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 08:47:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021347.mA2DlKEj010733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 Sergey Svishchev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |svs at ropnet.ru Flag| |needinfo?(dwmw2 at infradead.o | |rg) --- Comment #16 from Sergey Svishchev 2008-11-02 08:47:19 EDT --- The SRPM is not fetchable at the moment (openconnect-f9: Failed to change directory). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 13:57:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 08:57:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469560] New: Review Request: pympdtouchgui - mpd client designed for touchscreens Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pympdtouchgui - mpd client designed for touchscreens https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469560 Summary: Review Request: pympdtouchgui - mpd client designed for touchscreens Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sven at lank.es QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SPECS/pympdtouchgui.spec SRPM URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SRPM/pympdtouchgui-0.302-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: pympdtouchgui is a client for MPD (Music Player Daemon) that is usable via touchscreen and will run on embedded-systems without X (but works with X and a mouse, too). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 14:22:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 09:22:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021422.mA2EMBYf027581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-02 09:22:08 EDT --- For -3: * For BuildRequires - libXft-devel is required by pango-devel and pango-devel is required by gtk2-devel - gtk2-devel is required by vte-devel so these are redundant. Note: (In reply to comment #1) > The compilation requires libXft-devel, libXrender-devel, fontconfig-devel and > freetype-devel. but it seems that those dependences should have been stated in > the vte-devel package, - vte-devel requires gtk2-devel and gtk2-devel requires pango-devel and pango-devel requires libXft-devel libXrender-devel fontconfig-devel freetype-devel * Files under xpm/ -------------------------------------------------------------- %{__cp} -av xpm/ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name} -------------------------------------------------------------- - I don't think xpm/Makefile{,am,in} are needed. * Desktop file vendor suffix - Packaging guidelines changed and for new packages --vendor=fedora must not be used anymore: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/DesktopFileVendor ! If you want to maintain this package also on EPEL??, --vendor="" is needed (because EPEL uses old desktop-file-utils which won't accept desktop-file-install command without specifying vendor) ! %changelog - I recommend to put one line between each %changelog entry like: --------------------------------------------------------------- * Thu Oct 30 2008 Vivek Shah 1.2.0-3 - Fixed BuildRequires to remove unrequired dependencies - Added missing unowned directories - Added directive to use Fedora CFLAGS while building * Mon Oct 14 2008 Vivek Shah 1.2.0-2 - Added desktop file, fixed new build requires * Wed Aug 20 2008 Vivek Shah 1.2.0-1 - Fixed permissions of files under scheme/ to 644 --------------------------------------------------------------- This is useful when you use "make clog" on Fedora CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 14:23:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 09:23:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469560] Review Request: pympdtouchgui - mpd client designed for touchscreens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021423.mA2ENkYw016781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469560 --- Comment #1 from Sven Lankes 2008-11-02 09:23:45 EDT --- Minor update - use docfiles from tarball instead of those installed by setup.py Spec URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SPECS/pympdtouchgui.spec SRPM URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SRPM/pympdtouchgui-0.302-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 14:26:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 09:26:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460727] Review Request: gnujump - A jumping game which is a clone of xjump In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021426.mA2EQMJk028319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460727 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-02 09:26:21 EDT --- Newest seems 1.0.6. vivek, would you try it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 14:40:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 09:40:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469560] Review Request: pympdtouchgui - mpd client designed for touchscreens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021440.mA2EeEQA019289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469560 --- Comment #2 from Sven Lankes 2008-11-02 09:40:14 EDT --- Another minor update - this time the installed rpm actually works (default theme was installed to the wrong directory) Spec URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SPECS/pympdtouchgui.spec SRPM URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SRPM/pympdtouchgui-0.302-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 15:56:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 10:56:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469563] New: Review Request: hunspell-sw - Swahili hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-sw - Swahili hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469563 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-sw - Swahili hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-sw.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-sw-0.20050819-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Swahili hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 15:57:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 10:57:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469564] New: Review Request:hunspell-fj - Fijian hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:hunspell-fj - Fijian hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469564 Summary: Review Request:hunspell-fj - Fijian hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-fj.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-fj-0.20050811-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Fijian hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 15:58:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 10:58:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469565] New: Review Request: hunspell-la - Latin hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-la - Latin hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469565 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-la - Latin hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-la.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-la-0.20080903-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Latin hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 16:11:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 11:11:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452749] Review Request: ocp - Open Cubic Player for MOD/S3M/XM/IT/SID/MIDI music files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021611.mA2GBD6A010480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452749 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(cra at wpi.edu) --- Comment #10 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-11-02 11:11:11 EDT --- ping? I will sponsor you after this package passes review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 16:42:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 11:42:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467051] Review Request: arp-scan - scan network using ARP protocol. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021642.mA2GgdSg014417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467051 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 16:50:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 11:50:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468797] Review Request: jrosetta - JRosetta provides a common base for graphical component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021650.mA2Go6GG015650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468797 --- Comment #1 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-11-02 11:50:05 EDT --- Full review, relevant items only. MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock//fedora-rawhide-i386/result 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . Summary: JRosetta provides a common base for graphical component No need to repeat package name in Summary. Suggestion: Summary: A common base for graphical user interface components ln -fs ${j}-%{version}.jar $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir}/${j}.jar Why does it need the symlinks? All patches should have an upstream bug link or comment, so please add a comment before Patch0: jrosetta-1.0.1-rm_classpath.patch - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Licence is GPLv2 only, not v2+. Please correct. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Source matches upstream: 0f42365004065d01923bd55ca458fb47 jrosetta-1.0.1-GPL.zip Please add a comment in the specfile with either the URL of the download page or the full URL of the zip archive, i.e.: # http://dev.artenum.com/projects/JRosetta/download/JRosetta-1-0-1/data/src-gpl?action=download&nodecorator - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Builds fine in mock for rawhide(F-10)/i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 17:18:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 12:18:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438601] Review Request: libcommon - LibCommon is a reusable library written in C# In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021718.mA2HIwUi008659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438601 Beno?t Marcelin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #2 from Beno?t Marcelin 2008-11-02 12:18:57 EDT --- Sorry, but I lost any interest to package/maintain libcommon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 17:26:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 12:26:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469492] Review Request: bam - A fast and flexible build system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021726.mA2HQhBq020955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469492 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 17:46:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 12:46:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438601] Review Request: libcommon - LibCommon is a reusable library written in C# In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021746.mA2HkP0N023358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438601 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from David Woodhouse 2008-11-02 12:46:24 EDT --- OK, let's close the bug then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 17:55:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 12:55:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 382371] Review Request: gnome-do - quick object search and interaction In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021755.mA2HtJll024732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=382371 Mario Chacon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |the.masch at gmail.com --- Comment #10 from Mario Chacon 2008-11-02 12:55:16 EDT --- Hello, I when I try to enable Files and Folders plugin I got this error and I cannot enable it: Installing "Do.File,1.4" addin... The following add-ins will be installed: - Files and Folders v1.4 Installing Files and Folders v1.4 ERROR: /home/masch/.local/share/gnome-do/plugins-0.6.0/addins/Do.File.1.4/File.addin.xml already exists -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 17:52:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 12:52:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021752.mA2Hqdna024118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-02 12:52:38 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: F9/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i python-suds* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPMs: [fab at laptop024 noarch]$ rpmlint -i python-suds* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-buildroot [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: LGPLv3+ [!] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [1] [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM upstream: a51aa09cd6507d40a6a7862fc02ef90b9c5ce9930a9b0860532d348e5e6f67f5 SHA1SUM of package: a51aa09cd6507d40a6a7862fc02ef90b9c5ce9930a9b0860532d348e5e6f67f5 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F9/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. Tested F9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=914769 [-] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [1] LICENSE is missing in %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 17:54:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 12:54:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469492] Review Request: bam - A fast and flexible build system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021754.mA2Hs3Ql013105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469492 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-11-02 12:54:02 EDT --- The package seems pretty clean and well done -- thanks! However, there are some (mostly cosmetic) issues: 1.) Fix the version number Version: 0.0.0.for.teeworlds.0.4.3 # bam is not versioned Please don't make up version numbers like this. Using "0.4.3" as a version number would perfectly do. 2.) Use the original source code from upstream. Source0: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/%{name}-%{version}/SOURCES/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 If you extracted this from a tarball with a public URL, use that one. If you checked it from a SCM, add a comment (and adjust the Release tag to the date you checked it out). 3.) Please improve Summary and description a bit: Summary: A fast and flexible build system Package Guidelines read: "Please put personal preferences aside..." while "fast and flexible" seem much like a personal preference. %description the bam build system for teeworlds Please use capitalization and punctuation correctly. Please consider enhancing the description a bit, so even a non-tech user understand what does the package do (and that he doesn't want to install it :). "A tool that controls process of producing executables of software from its source code. Used to build Teeworlds game." or something similar might be appropriate. 4.) Don't install bam into sbin install -D -m 0755 src/%{name} \ %{buildroot}%{_sbindir}/%{name} According to FHS sbin is intended for system administration tools, mainly used by root user. BAM is not used for administration and definitely shouldn't be run by root. 5.) Possibly do not include TODO sh todo.sh > TODO The produced file doesn't really make sense to anyone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 18:04:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 13:04:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469569] New: Review Request: latex2rtf - LaTeX to RTF converter that handles equations, figures, and cross-references Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: latex2rtf - LaTeX to RTF converter that handles equations, figures, and cross-references https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469569 Summary: Review Request: latex2rtf - LaTeX to RTF converter that handles equations, figures, and cross-references Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/latex2rtf.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/latex2rtf-1.9.19-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: LaTeX2rtf is a translator program which is intended to translate a LaTeX document (precisely: the text and a limited subset of LaTeX tags) into the RTF format which can be imported by several textprocessors (including Microsoft Word for Windows and Word for Macintosh). rpmlint output: SPECS/latex2rtf.spec:31: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build sed 's#@OPTFLAGS@#%{optflags}#g;s#@PREFIX@#%{buildroot}#g;s#@BINDIR@#%{_bindir}#g;s#@MANDIR@#%{_mandir}#g;s#@INFODIR@#%{_infodir}#g;s#@DATADIR@#%{_datadir}#g' < Makefile.orig > Makefile latex2rtf.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/latex2rtf/cfg/russian.cfg 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 18:20:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 13:20:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469492] Review Request: bam - A fast and flexible build system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021820.mA2IKYP4016814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469492 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-11-02 13:20:33 EDT --- Builds fine in mock (tried in el5). RPMlint is silent and happy. And there's one more issue: 6.) Please honour optflags sh make_unix.sh This should better be replaced with sh -x make_unix.sh %{optflags} (The -x is there so that the log from build output is more legible) Note that the optflags aren't used also when you build "txt2c". Since it is not installed, but used only during the build process, I don't believe it's an issue. If you want to build it with optflags, add "$@" to the corresponding line of make_unix.sh. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 18:49:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 13:49:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431249] Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021849.mA2InGLv031862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431249 Michal Jaegermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #320229|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #12 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-11-02 13:49:13 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=322231) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=322231) spec used to compile sawfish-1.3.4 I run into a situation where a compilation of sawfish runs into troubles in a linking phase with complaints about multiply defined functions. The trouble is really caused by glib2 and how it does inlining. A file /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gutils.h is included in multiple source files and you will get the following expansion in all these places: extern gint g_bit_nth_lsf (gulong mask, gint nth_bit) { do { nth_bit++; if (mask & (1UL << nth_bit)) return nth_bit; } while (nth_bit < ((4 * 8) - 1)); return -1; } and other similar. That does not work too well. It is possible to work around glib2 troubles by defining __STRICT_ANSI__ which indeed inlines glib2 definitions. Attached is a spec file I used for a compilation and two patches which are referenced there. Additional themes were copied from old Red Hat sawfish sources. They do not have be included although it is nice if they are available. Two patches referenced in this spec are attached too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 18:51:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 13:51:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431249] Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021851.mA2IpBee021345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431249 --- Comment #13 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-11-02 13:51:09 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=322232) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=322232) sawfish-1.3.4 patch for Makedefs.in to avoid problems with inlines of glib2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 18:52:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 13:52:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431249] Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021852.mA2Iqc31021551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431249 --- Comment #14 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-11-02 13:52:37 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=322233) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=322233) sawfish-1.3.4-imlib.patch - to allow compilations using imlib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 19:15:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 14:15:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811021915.mA2JF1jb024752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 --- Comment #27 from Rick L Vinyard Jr 2008-11-02 14:14:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > Well, for -2: > > * License > - Well protobuf.pc.in is still under ASL 2.0 > You should ask the author to change the license > of this file > (well, actually I have no idea why this pkgconfig > file has license term, first of all...) > Fortunately currently the author is in CC list > of this bug. Rick, would you agree to change .pc.in > file you wrote to be under BSD or to remove license > term completely? I didn't realize I had left the license in the header... was just copying and pasting. The license should be removed completely... there's nothing there to license... it's just a pkgconfig file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 20:13:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 15:13:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452749] Review Request: ocp - Open Cubic Player for MOD/S3M/XM/IT/SID/MIDI music files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811022013.mA2KDQL7011686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452749 Charles R. Anderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(cra at wpi.edu) | --- Comment #11 from Charles R. Anderson 2008-11-02 15:13:25 EDT --- Ok, icon file change made. Spec URL: http://cra.fedorapeople.org/ocp/ocp.spec SRPM URL: http://cra.fedorapeople.org/ocp/ocp-0.1.15-3.fc10.src.rpm Koji scratch build: f9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=915017 Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 20:13:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 15:13:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462446] Review Request: ttf2pt1 - TrueType to Adobe Type 1 font converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811022013.mA2KDGTa000676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-02 15:13:14 EDT --- ttf2pt1-3.4.4-7.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ttf2pt1-3.4.4-7.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 20:24:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 15:24:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468765] Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811022024.mA2KOMKo013239@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468765 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-02 15:24:22 EDT --- Thank you spot for taking care of the license issue. I updated the files: SPEC: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/hydrogen-drumkits.spec SRPM: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/hydrogen-drumkits-0-0.20080907.2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 20:50:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 15:50:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469579] New: Review Request: skychart - Planetarium software for the advanced amateur astronomer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: skychart - Planetarium software for the advanced amateur astronomer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469579 Summary: Review Request: skychart - Planetarium software for the advanced amateur astronomer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/skychart.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/skychart-3.0.1.5-1.20081026svn.el5.src.rpm Description: This program enables you to draw sky charts, making use of the data in 16 catalogs of stars and nebulae. In addition the position of planets, asteroids and comets are shown. The purpose of this program is to prepare different sky maps for a particular observation. A large number of parameters help you to choose specifically or automatically which catalogs to use, the colour and the dimension of stars and nebulae, the representation of planets, the display of labels and coordinate grids, the superposition of pictures, the condition of visibility and more. All these features make this celestial atlas more complete than a conventional planetarium. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 20:59:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 15:59:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469579] Review Request: skychart - Planetarium software for the advanced amateur astronomer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811022059.mA2KxT48018134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469579 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmahut at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Marek Mahut 2008-11-02 15:59:28 EDT --- Taking for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 21:20:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 16:20:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469579] Review Request: skychart - Planetarium software for the advanced amateur astronomer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811022120.mA2LK7lQ021364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469579 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mmahut at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-11-02 16:20:06 EDT --- FYI: This needs fpc 2.2.2 and lazarus 0.9.26 which are in F-10 and not in other branches (yet). Builds in fedora-devel-i386 mock, RPMlint silent: $ cd /var/lib/mock//fedora-development-i386/result $ rpmlint -i *.rpm $ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 21:35:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 16:35:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469052] Review Request: ris-linux - RIS for Linux - Boot winpe from the net / Ris Windows Installation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811022135.mA2LZqSN023474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469052 --- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-11-02 16:35:51 EDT --- 1 - please fix macros. replace %{_sysconfdir}/init.d/ with %{_initrddir} more info here. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#Macros 2 - improve scriptlets https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Running_scriptlets_only_in_certain_situations http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets also when a more experienced user look your spec, he will ask to use install -p to preserve timestamps :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 21:42:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 16:42:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469583] New: Review Request: me-tv - Digital television viewer for GNOME Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: me-tv - Digital television viewer for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469583 Summary: Review Request: me-tv - Digital television viewer for GNOME Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/me-tv.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/me-tv-0.7.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Me TV is a GNOME desktop application for watching digital television services that use the DVB standard. Me TV works with DVB-T and DVB-C cards that have kernel driver support. Me TV uses the xine video player to render its output onto its video window. Me TV reads the Electronic Program Guide (EPG) data that is transmitted over the air to populate a built-in program guide which can be used for scheduling recordings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 21:49:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 16:49:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811022149.mA2LnG2k013838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 --- Comment #6 from Paul Wouters 2008-11-02 16:49:15 EDT --- Re: #4: I'm now using the link that's most prominently linked as the "download it here" link. I also added -q, which indeed resolved the warning. Re: #5: The difference is that I'm making a relative softlink, instead of an absolute one. eg a link to ../lib instead of /usr/lib Spec URL: ftp://ftp.openswan.org/uml_utilities/uml_utilities.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.openswan.org/uml_utilities/uml_utilities-20070815-2.fc9.src.rpm * Sun Nov 2 2008 Paul Wouters - 20070815-2 - Added -q to setup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 21:54:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 16:54:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468453] Review Request: shed - simple ncurses based hex editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811022154.mA2LsodG025772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468453 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-02 16:54:49 EDT --- shed-1.13-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/shed-1.13-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 21:51:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 16:51:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mz - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811022151.mA2LpeEx025558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #9 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-02 16:51:39 EDT --- Or simply use make install INSTALL="%{__install} -p" DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sbindir}/%{name} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sbindir}/mausezahn mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1/%{name} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1/mausezahn %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{_sbindir}/mausezahn %{_mandir}/man1/mausezahn* and be done with it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 21:52:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 16:52:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468453] Review Request: shed - simple ncurses based hex editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811022152.mA2Lq1bW025604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468453 Adam Miller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(maxamillion at gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #11 from Adam Miller 2008-11-02 16:52:00 EDT --- Very sorry for the oversight, the fix has been made. I deleted my update request in Bodhi for the package. I uploaded to new SRPM and new spec to: Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/shed.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/shed-1.13-3.src.rpm I have also committed my change to fedora cvs, tagged the new version for each branch and sent each one to koji (and plague for the EL branches) to be rebuilt to the new version of the spec file. Once that has completed I will resubmit the update request to bodhi. Once again, I do apologize for the oversight and I will do my best to make sure I don't let one of my mistakes make it into cvs, the build sys, and updates again. Build reports for the new version: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68315 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68314 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68313 http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=637 http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=638 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 22:04:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 17:04:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] New: Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some car accros the moon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some car accros the moon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 Summary: Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some car accros the moon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: phil at linuxeinsteiger.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: www.Thinkcoding.org/Fedora/moon-buggy.spec SRPM URL: www.Thinkcoding.org/Fedora/moon-buggy-1.0.51-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Moon-buggy is a simple character graphics game where you drive some kind of car across the moon's surface. Unfortunately there are dangerous craters there. Fortunately your car can jump over them! The game has some resemblance of the classic arcade game moon-patrol which was released in 1982. A clone of this game was relased for the Commodore C64 in 1983. The present, ASCII art version of moon-buggy was written many years later by Jochen Voss. Its my first Fedora Package, i would be pleased for Sponsoring. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 22:15:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 17:15:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some car accros the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811022215.mA2MFPOV029277@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 Christopher Stone changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chris.stone at gmail.com Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 22:38:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 17:38:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469588] New: Review Request: corrida - Application for archivation of meteor observations Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: corrida - Application for archivation of meteor observations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469588 Summary: Review Request: corrida - Application for archivation of meteor observations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/corrida.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/corrida-0.96.11-1.el5.src.rpm Description: Application was designed by Polish Fireball Center cooperators to ease archivation of meteor observations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 22:55:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 17:55:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469588] Review Request: corrida - Application for archivation of meteor observations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811022255.mA2MtKFw023707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469588 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mmahut at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Marek Mahut 2008-11-02 17:55:19 EDT --- Amazing! Perfect and clean package, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 23:15:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 18:15:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469590] Review Request: cpuid - Dumps information about the CPU(s) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811022315.mA2NFMJY005689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469590 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |179260 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 23:14:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 18:14:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469590] Review Request: cpuid - Dumps information about the CPU(s) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811022314.mA2NETHx026439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469590 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |238953 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 23:12:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 18:12:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469590] New: Review Request: cpuid - Dumps information about the CPU(s) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cpuid - Dumps information about the CPU(s) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469590 Summary: Review Request: cpuid - Dumps information about the CPU(s) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/cpuid.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/cpuid-20060917-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.etallen.com/cpuid.html Description: cpuid dumps detailed information about the CPU(s) gathered from the CPUID instruction, and also determines the exact model of CPU(s). It supports Intel, AMD, and VIA CPUs, as well as older Transmeta, Cyrix, UMC, NexGen, and Rise CPUs. Koji scratch builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=915108 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint -i cpuid* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i cpuid* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. 'ExcludeArch: ppc ppc64' because cpuid is not able to detect those CPUs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 00:00:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 19:00:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431249] Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030000.mA300dmH001353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431249 --- Comment #15 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-11-02 19:00:37 EDT --- In spec files like in comment #9 there is make host_type=%{_target_platform} Unfortunately this may result in DOC file placed in /usr/libexec/sawfish/1.3.3/i686-redhat-linux-gnu/DOC while sawfish-ui looks for in /usr/libexec/sawfish/1.3.3/i386-redhat-linux if %{_target_platform} evaluates to "i386-redhat-linux". As a result sawfish-ui refuses to run. One way to prevent that is to do 'make host_type=%{_host_cpu}-redhat-linux-gnu'. My old versions of specs had also this: ## hackaround for # checking build system type... %define _host %{_target_platform} %define _build %{_target_platform} and that needs to be consistently used especially when %{_host_cpu} differs from %{_arch}. A requirement is that all of this agrees with librep and rep-gtk. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 00:27:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 19:27:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469052] Review Request: ris-linux - RIS for Linux - Boot winpe from the net / Ris Windows Installation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030027.mA30RdbL004979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469052 --- Comment #2 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-11-02 19:27:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > 1 - please fix macros. > > replace > %{_sysconfdir}/init.d/ > with > %{_initrddir} > Fixed. > 2 - improve scriptlets > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Running_scriptlets_only_in_certain_situations > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets > Fixed. > also when a more experienced user look your spec, he will ask to use install -p > to preserve timestamps :-) Fixed. New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/ris-linux.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/ris-linux-0.4-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 03:10:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 22:10:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459855] Review Request: ncid - Caller ID distributed over a network to a variety of devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030310.mA33AWRg006794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459855 Eric Sandeen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(esandeen at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #4 from Eric Sandeen 2008-11-02 22:10:31 EDT --- Finally trying to take some time to finish this up. One question: > NOK: owns the directories it creates. > /etc/ncid > /usr/share/ncid > are shared by the packages but no package owns these directories. If both ncidd and ncid-client put files here, but neither one requires the other, can they both "own" these directories? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 03:16:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 22:16:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030316.mA33Gk0G007647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #29 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-02 22:16:43 EDT --- An updated package would be good I guess... :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 03:21:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 22:21:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459855] Review Request: ncid - Caller ID distributed over a network to a variety of devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030321.mA33L4pY029677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459855 --- Comment #5 from Eric Sandeen 2008-11-02 22:21:03 EDT --- Oh, also: > Another observation: > Why did you remove the shebang line from the ncidrotate-script? If it's > supposed to be executable, drop it in /usr/libexec/%{name}/. It really isn't executable, it's just sourced by... er... another script which isn't packaged or installed. Grr. I should just install ncidd.logrotate and remove the other one. Regarding initscripts, I have a least one other package w/ initscripts, I'll probably convert all to upstart when appropriate and when I have some time. I'll have to check on the cidcall.log issue; ISTR that the daemon didn't properly create it if it didn't already exist (maybe even failed to start), and make install touches it: install-log: touch $(CALLLOG) so... *shrug* I could echo something into it to shut up rpmlint ;) I have to say that the package itself isn't particularly tidy... I may consider trying to get some of these fixes upstream before I decide that I really want to maintain this in fedora ... I've been using it at home though, and it does seem reasonably functional & useful, at least :) Thanks, -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 03:22:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 22:22:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030322.mA33ML2a029904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 Bug 454022 depends on bug 454019, which changed state. Bug 454019 Summary: Review Request: tcl-tktreectrl - Multi-column hierarchical listbox widget for Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454019 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #3 from jebba 2008-11-02 22:22:20 EDT --- I built this and the various packages missing from fedora on a fedora 9ish system. Running coccinella I'm getting this: thirsty:~$ DISPLAY=:0.0 coccinella Error in startup script: version conflict for package "xml": have 3.1, need 99.0 while executing "package require xml 99.0" (file "/usr/share/coccinella/jabberlib/wrapper.tcl" line 74) invoked from within "source /usr/share/coccinella/jabberlib/wrapper.tcl" ("package ifneeded wrapper 1.2" script) invoked from within "package require wrapper" (file "/usr/share/coccinella/jabberlib/jabberlib.tcl" line 147) invoked from within "source /usr/share/coccinella/jabberlib/jabberlib.tcl" ("package ifneeded jlib 2.0" script) invoked from within "package require jlib" (file "/usr/share/coccinella/jabber/Jabber.tcl" line 31) invoked from within "source /usr/share/coccinella/jabber/Jabber.tcl" ("package ifneeded Jabber 1.0" script) invoked from within "package require Jabber" (file "/usr/bin/coccinella" line 260) My builds are here: http://freeeee.org/source/ http://freeeee.org/i386/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 05:33:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 00:33:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469588] Review Request: corrida - Application for archivation of meteor observations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030533.mA35XZfl026957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469588 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-11-03 00:33:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: corrida Short Description: Application for archivation of meteor observations Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 05:37:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 00:37:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469588] Review Request: corrida - Application for archivation of meteor observations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030537.mA35begB016576@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469588 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 06:24:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 01:24:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469613] New: Review Request: gnue-appserver - GNU Enterprise Application Server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnue-appserver - GNU Enterprise Application Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469613 Summary: Review Request: gnue-appserver - GNU Enterprise Application Server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: aaronh at garden.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://agave.garden.org/~aaronh/rpm/gnue-appserver.spec SRPM URL: http://agave.garden.org/~aaronh/rpm/gnue-appserver-0.5.2-1.src.rpm Description: This is a the follow-up to the gnue-commons Review Request. Bug #439310 The GNU Enterprise Application Server is the core of the n-tier variant of the GNU Enterprise system. To the front end (be it GNUe Forms, GNUe Reports or any other tool), it provides user-definable business objects with arbitrary fields and methods. While transforming access to those fields and methods into database communication and calling of scripts, it cares about stability, security, speed, and consistency. A good test of the package is to make sure the application service starts. Further testing requires a package to connect to the application server as a data source. Here are simple instructions for setting up the application server. They require the gnue-forms package that is not in Fedora (yet!). http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Getting_started_with_GNUe_Appserver sha1sums: 8f653a0f2f4c0cc84664faec91f5a352aa840361 gnue-appserver-0.5.2.tar.gz e2c38663789762910269388510956d7bd1df3c66 gnue-appserver-0.5.2-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 07:55:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 02:55:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469627] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class - A Path::Class type library for Moose Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class - A Path::Class type library for Moose https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469627 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class - A Path::Class type library for Moose Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-Types-Path-Class OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class-0.05-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: MooseX::Types::Path::Class creates common Moose types, coercions and option specifications useful for dealing with Path::Class objects as Moose attributes. Coercions (see Moose::Util::TypeConstraints) are made from both 'Str' and 'ArrayRef' to both Path::Class::Dir and Path::Class::File objects. If you have MooseX::Getopt installed, the Getopt option type ("=s") will be added for both Path::Class::Dir and Path::Class::File. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=915265 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 08:50:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 03:50:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454408] Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030850.mA38omep013281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-11-03 03:50:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > > Finally, I would have approved this package, if it wasn't providing this: > > mingw32-binutils(x86-64) = 2.18.50_20080109_2-8.fc10 > > > > What is this meant to mean? IMO, it's meaningless. > > It's added automatically as far as I'm aware. In this package > we don't override RPM's normal dependency generation. Yes, I meanwhile also noticed. It's FC10's rpm adding more rpm-database bloat and redundancy. IMO, the rpm devs are outsmarting itselves. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 08:47:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 03:47:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030847.mA38lECt012632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #84 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-03 03:47:03 EDT --- It isn't assigned to anyone, so I'm clearing the flag to NEW. On another note, the spec should be modified to use mpi-selector in RHEL and environment-modules in Fedora so that users can easily select which environment to use. Alternatives is system-wide, and should not be used. Deji, are you still interested on working on the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 09:09:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 04:09:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030909.mA399Tlq028531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 --- Comment #85 from Deji Akingunola 2008-11-03 04:09:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #84) > It isn't assigned to anyone, so I'm clearing the flag to NEW. > > On another note, the spec should be modified to use mpi-selector in RHEL and > environment-modules in Fedora so that users can easily select which environment > to use. Alternatives is system-wide, and should not be used. > For one, mpi-selector in not in Fedora. And I've included support for using environment-modules in the package since a long time ago. I prefer using alternatives on my workstation, so I don't think support for that should be removed. > Deji, are you still interested on working on the package? srpm and rpm spec files for the latest release are available below; ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2-1.0.8-1.fc10.src.rpm ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 09:14:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 04:14:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454408] Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030914.mA39ETSx018526@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-11-03 04:14:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-binutils Short Description: MinGW Windows binutils Owners: rjones berrange Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: rjones berrange -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 09:18:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 04:18:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 442875] Review Request: virt-ctrl - Graphical management app for virtual machines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030918.mA39I6qe030335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442875 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-11-03 04:18:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: virt-ctrl Short Description: Graphical management app for virtual machines Owners: rjones Branches: F-10 InitialCC: rjones -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 09:42:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 04:42:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469590] Review Request: cpuid - Dumps information about the CPU(s) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030942.mA39gwZV003036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469590 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan at danny.cz --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2008-11-03 04:42:57 EDT --- few notes: - better will be to use "ExclusiveArch i386 x86_64" instead of ExcludeArch, because it will not work on Sparc/S390/ARM/... - the summary should reflect that it is useful only in x86 CPUs - I see that last release was in 2006, how it works with recent CPUs? - we already have x86info - no need to mark the man page as %doc, it is done automagically (http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm-snapshot/s1-rpm-inside-files-list-directives.html) - install the non-gzipped man page (as cpuid.1), it is compressed automagically during rpm build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 10:23:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 05:23:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467325] Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for character set conversion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031023.mA3ANWIp010061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467325 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |mingw32-iconv - GNU |mingw32-iconv - GNU |libraries and utilities for |libraries and utilities for |producing multi-lingual |character set conversion |messages | --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-11-03 05:23:32 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw32-iconv.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw32-iconv-1.12-5.fc10.src.rpm * Mon Nov 3 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.17-5 - Changed the summary (Bruno Haible). - Note about mingw32-gettext / Remove *.mo files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 10:43:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 05:43:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467409] Review Request: mingw32-atk - MinGW Windows Atk library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031043.mA3AhZAu013767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467409 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-11-03 05:43:34 EDT --- I don't understand what the purpose of this patch is. The version of glib2 in RHEL-5 currently is 2.12.3, and the version in Fedora is 2.18.2, so why the constraint on this really ancient version (2.6.0)? Did you mean that the glib2-devel version must be the same as the mingw32-glib2 version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 10:47:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 05:47:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467420] Review Request: mingw32-gtk2 - MinGW Windows Gtk2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031047.mA3Alm4v014785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467420 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-11-03 05:47:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) Please see my comments: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467409#c2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402#c2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 10:46:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 05:46:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031046.mA3AkgJF014628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-11-03 05:46:41 EDT --- I'm not sure about this patch - it will break building glib2 on EPEL, since RHEL-5 has some older version of glib2 (2.12.x). I can understand that it might be necessary to ensure that the version of glib-genmarshall (from native) is similar, but is it actually necessary on EPEL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 10:56:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 05:56:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031056.mA3AuYUY005372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Berrange 2008-11-03 05:56:33 EDT --- Furthermore, can we please *not* litter the Fedora review tickets with EPEL related stuff. The spec files / SRPMS submitted for review are intended to work against Fedora rawhide, and should be reviewed in that context. We make no claims as to their suitability for EPEL, and it is irrelevant for the purposes of these reviews since we are only targetting Fedora 9/10/rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 11:02:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 06:02:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467409] Review Request: mingw32-atk - MinGW Windows Atk library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031102.mA3B2DQu006491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467409 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Berrange 2008-11-03 06:02:12 EDT --- I don't see that this is needed for Fedora. The SPEC file is intended for use in Fedora 9/10/rawhide, and the build requires are sufficient to ensure correct building in all those versions. This package is not being targetted for EPEL, and in any case the change is also not required for successfully building in EPEL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 11:03:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 06:03:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031103.mA3B3otY006658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 --- Comment #86 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-03 06:03:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #85) > (In reply to comment #84) > > On another note, the spec should be modified to use mpi-selector in RHEL and > > environment-modules in Fedora so that users can easily select which environment > > to use. Alternatives is system-wide, and should not be used. > > > For one, mpi-selector in not in Fedora. And I've included support for using > environment-modules in the package since a long time ago. I prefer using > alternatives on my workstation, so I don't think support for that should be > removed. Well, I was referring to mpi-selector in EPEL. You're not interested in EPEL? Also, you're not requiring the environment-modules package in Fedora. > > Deji, are you still interested on working on the package? > srpm and rpm spec files for the latest release are available below; > ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2-1.0.8-1.fc10.src.rpm > ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2.spec OK. Could you add some comments on the BRs? To me BR emacs-common and gdb are a bit odd.. According to GCC man page, -fPIC only makes a difference on the m68k, PowerPC and SPARC (compared to -fpic?). Thus, should you have -fPIC also on ppc architectures? Why don't you have --enable-f77 in the configure phase? Since the package has Java functionality, you must follow the Java Packaging guidelines: MUST have: BuildRequires: java-devel [>= specific_version] BuildRequires: jpackage-utils Requires: java >= specific_version Requires: jpackage-utils Also, in the setup phase, clean out old .jar files: find -name '*.jar' -o -name '*.class' -exec rm -f '{}' \; Otherwise the spec file seems quite clean to me. This is really an embarrassment, having had the package on review for 3 years. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 11:07:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 06:07:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467943] Review Request: solar-kde-theme - Solar KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031107.mA3B7O6r018472@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467943 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #23 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-11-03 06:07:22 EDT --- Package is in f10-final, not intended for f9, closing. Thanks for help! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 11:26:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 06:26:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467180] Review Request: pngnq - tool for quantizing PNG images in RGBA format Version In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031126.mA3BQ6nt010836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467180 --- Comment #8 from Gerd Hoffmann 2008-11-03 06:26:05 EDT --- Revision #5 uploaded: http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/osm/pngnq/pngnq.spec http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/osm/pngnq/pngnq-0.5-5.fc10.src.rpm Added patch comments, fixed up macro usage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 11:23:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 06:23:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467179] Review Request: pngcrush - Optimizer for PNG (Portable Network Graphics) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031123.mA3BNnXo010142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467179 --- Comment #7 from Gerd Hoffmann 2008-11-03 06:23:48 EDT --- Revision #3 uploaded http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/osm/pngcrush/pngcrush.spec http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/osm/pngcrush/pngcrush-1.6.10-3.fc10.src.rpm Headers are removed completely now. The patch holds the build fix for "?chunk_name? undeclared" now, thus it isn't obsolete. I'm using pkg-config now for cflags & ldlibs. Source0 URL has been fixed. ChangeLog.txt is now %doc. Being picky on the license is perfectly fine, better safe than sorry ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 11:29:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 06:29:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469080] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - plugin for Pidgin which displays the music track currently playing in the status message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031129.mA3BTqB8022347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469080 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-03 06:29:51 EDT --- Just some small comments on your spec file The current version is 0.4.11, perhaps you should update your spec file to reflect the latest upstream version. - Your Source0 is not working...it should be something like http://%{name}.googlecode.com/files/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 - In your %prep section: %setup -q is enough, because the upstream name is now pidgin-musictracker and no longer musictracker like in the version you packed. - You can use " find %{buildroot} -name '*.la' -exec rm -f {} ';' " in the %install section to remove the *.la. This way to don't need to exclude those files in the %files section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 11:26:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 06:26:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031126.mA3BQYP8021983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 --- Comment #4 from Levente Farkas 2008-11-03 06:26:32 EDT --- for #2 epel build already break:-( for #3 i assume all fedora packages should have to follow the guidelines eg: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag the purpose of such guidelines that the same spec file should have to be build on _both_ fedora X and epel (or at least try to keep fedora and epel spec file as close to each other as possible). my goal was to create such packages which is working on both fedora X and epel. most production software are build on rhel/centos and if it's build for that the the windows binary of the same source would be useful to build on the same host with the same gtk, glib, gcc etc. i know the main purpose of these packages to build virt-manager and friends on fedora and windows and that the current rhel/centos is almost unusable with the shipped virt-manager, kvm etc. (that's the point i rebuild many of them on epel from fedora), but the goal should have to be that this packages when stabilized be included in rhel too. still most of the people wouldn't like to use fedora as their server, but may be rhel-5.x eg: 5.4 can contain a newer virt-manager and kvm (although it require newer kernel module too). and yes i know you make no claims to be able to use these packages on epel, but wouldn't be nice? as it's require only a little effort... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 11:33:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 06:33:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461400] Review Request: cherokee - Flexible and Fast Webserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031133.mA3BXf1b012010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461400 --- Comment #18 from Pavel Lis? 2008-11-03 06:33:40 EDT --- I've added package to F-9 testing (by Bodhi) and to EPEL4/5 by CVS make and I've edited comps by CVS. What I have to do next? Or is it done already? How can I push them to stable? Is it my job or this process is independent on me? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 11:43:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 06:43:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031143.mA3BhsRg013778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-11-03 06:43:53 EDT --- I'm requesting new packages be added to the EL-5 (EPEL) branch so it is useful to know about bugs that affect these packages in EPEL. May be better to open separate BZs about those however. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 12:02:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 07:02:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469023] Review Request: perl-Class-Adapter - Perl implementation of the "Adapter" Design Pattern In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031202.mA3C2j14017248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469023 --- Comment #3 from Matej Cepl 2008-11-03 07:02:44 EDT --- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 12:02:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 07:02:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469023] Review Request: perl-Class-Adapter - Perl implementation of the "Adapter" Design Pattern In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031202.mA3C25TB017178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469023 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|skasal at redhat.com |mcepl at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Matej Cepl 2008-11-03 07:02:04 EDT --- + GOOD: rpmlint is silent on both source and binary package. + GOOD: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + GOOD: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + GOOD: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . + GOOD: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . + GOOD: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + GOOD: LICENSE file is in %doc. + GOOD: The spec file is written in American English. + GOOD: The spec file for the package is legible. + GOOD: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. 39b4b06a30b770ae5a7ee42dccdf143e Class-Adapter-1.05.tar.gz + GOOD: The package successfully compiles and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=915478 + GOOD: noarch, so it compiles everywhere. + GOOD: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + GOOD: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. No locale support. + GOOD: no libraries + GOOD: not relocatable + GOOD: A package owns all directories that it creates. Follows perl guidelines. + GOOD: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + GOOD: Permissions on files must be set properly. + GOOD: Each package have a %clean section. + GOOD: Each package consistently use macros. + GOOD: The package contains code, or permissable content. + GOOD: No large documentation files, so no a -doc subpackage. + GOOD: Files registered in %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. + GOOD: No header files. + GOOD: No static libraries. + GOOD: No pkgconfig(.pc) files. + GOOD: The package does not contain library files with a suffix. + GOOD: No devel packages. + GOOD: No .la libtool archives. + GOOD: Packages does not contain GUI applications. + GOOD: Packages does not own files or directories owned by other packages. + GOOD: Runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %install + GOOD: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. + SHOULD: Includes license text. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 12:19:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 07:19:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469023] Review Request: perl-Class-Adapter - Perl implementation of the "Adapter" Design Pattern In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031219.mA3CJPF5031241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469023 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-11-03 07:19:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Class-Adapter Short Description: base for creating class follows the Adapter pattern Owners: mmaslano Branches: devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 12:22:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 07:22:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458440] Review Request: bluemindo - Simple audio player in python/GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031222.mA3CMEq6031956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458440 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-03 07:22:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > %build section > - What is %{nil}? Is there a problem with the debuginfo package? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Debuginfo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 12:30:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 07:30:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031230.mA3CUwbG001098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 Bug 459088 depends on bug 469491, which changed state. Bug 469491 Summary: Directory ownership issue under /usr/share/vim/vimfiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469491 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 13:10:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 08:10:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469673] New: Package review: File::ShareDir::PAR - same functionality as File::ShareDir with PAR support Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package review: File::ShareDir::PAR - same functionality as File::ShareDir with PAR support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469673 Summary: Package review: File::ShareDir::PAR - same functionality as File::ShareDir with PAR support Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora DESCRIPTION: File::ShareDir::PAR provides the same functionality as File::ShareDir but tries hard to be compatible with PAR packaged applications. The problem is, that the concept of having a distribution or module specific share directory becomes a little hazy when you're loading everything from a single file. PAR uses an @INC hook to intercept any attempt to load a module. File::ShareDir uses the directory structure that is typically found in the directories that are listed in @INC for storing the shared data. In a PAR enviroment, this is not necessarily possible. http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-File-ShareDir-PAR/perl-File-ShareDir-PAR-0.02-1.fc10.src.rpm http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-File-ShareDir-PAR/perl-File-ShareDir-PAR.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 14:13:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:13:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454018] Review Request: tcl-tkpng - Tcl/Tk support for PNG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031413.mA3EDWWo021660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454018 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |454022 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 14:13:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:13:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031413.mA3EDVm3021635@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |454018 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 14:21:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:21:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467718] Review Request: rubygem-gruff - Beautiful graphs for one or multiple datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031421.mA3ELmIr023604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467718 --- Comment #2 from Darryl L. Pierce 2008-11-03 09:21:47 EDT --- Anybody interested in reviewing this ruby gem? Should be a simple review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 14:35:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:35:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452108] Review Request: cfdg-fe - A frontend for cfdg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031435.mA3EZYV3026235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452108 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-03 09:35:33 EDT --- cfdg-fe-0.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cfdg-fe-0.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 14:36:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:36:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466906] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-SetID - Provides api for correctly changing user identity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031436.mA3EalU7015660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466906 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dennis at ausil.us Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-03 09:36:46 EDT --- builds fine in mock, there is some issues though: There is no way to verify the license. The URL points at the generic spacewalk page and i could not find a page that talked about this package. at the least there should be a page for the tarball that has some contact info, a description and links to release tarballs. There really should be a LICENSE file in the tarball and a header on the souce .pm file and the test .pl file that state what the license is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 14:38:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:38:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031438.mA3EcZh6026543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-11-03 09:38:34 EDT --- Yep, I missed something. Fixed in -2: New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/coccinella/coccinella-0.96.10-2.fc10.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/coccinella/coccinella.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 14:39:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:39:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454010] Review Request: iaxclient - Library for creating telephony solutions that interoperate with Asterisk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031439.mA3EdpbX026668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454010 --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-11-03 09:39:50 EDT --- New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/coccinella/iaxclient-2.1-0.2.beta3.fc10.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/coccinella/iaxclient.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 14:47:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:47:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443675] Review Request: sip-redirect - Tiny IPv4 and IPv6 SIP redirect server written in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031447.mA3ElSje028372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443675 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-11-03 09:47:26 EDT --- Thanks for woke me up, Robert :) Let's summarize things * issue with registration may be ignored (however I still think that all sources, listed in Fedora's spec-files should be accessible w/o restrictions of any kind) * my first two remarks are cosmetic and you promised to change your spec acordingly * I age with you about %{_initrdir} issue - my last remark must be ignored About touch and chmod for log files - I don't think that there are considerably more effective techniques to create zero-length log-file if it does not exists than your approach (and MySQL maintainer's one, respectively). OK, assuming that you fix spec-file according to all suggestions, here is my REVIEW: - rpmlint is not silent: [petro at Sulaco noarch]$ rpmlint sip-redirect-0.1.2-1.noarch.rpm sip-redirect.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/sip-redirect sip sip-redirect.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/sip-redirect sip sip-redirect.noarch: E: non-root-user-log-file /var/log/sip-redirect sip sip-redirect.noarch: E: non-root-group-log-file /var/log/sip-redirect sip sip-redirect.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%post chown sip-redirect.noarch: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/sip-redirect sip-redirect} 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 3 warnings. [petro at Sulaco noarch]$ + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. - The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. I cannot verify it since I cannot dl files w/o registration. + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture (ppc). + No extra build dependencies + The package doesn't create additional directories. + The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). + The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . + The package contains code, or permissable content. + No large documentation files + Every file, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). + All filenames in the packages are valid UTF-8. Warnings and errors from rpmlint may be ignored in this case, so the package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 14:57:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:57:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: QuickFIX - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031457.mA3EvKqa030133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 --- Comment #4 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-11-03 09:57:19 EDT --- don't worry, I will keep my fingers away from your eyes the quickfix people answered my email, about license. http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=20081103071943.996574bdd30485e55131bd2b2a76da64.bb74004a9c.wbe%40email.secureserver.net&forum_name=quickfix-users " It is released with a Apache/BSD style license, it is an OSI approved license. --oren " now, the license is no more a problem, I belive you can put License: BSD in your spec file. I don`t know if will be easy to package this, because quickfix seems to be a library, not a program. libquickfix-C++ libquickfix-Java libquickfix-NET libquickfix-Python libquickfix-Ruby the best to to is to wait a more experienced developer l@@k your spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 14:58:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:58:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031458.mA3Ew5xa019824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 Joost van der Sluis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #56 from Joost van der Sluis 2008-11-03 09:57:59 EDT --- ackage Change Request ====================== Package Name: lazarus New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: joost -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 15:01:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 10:01:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443675] Review Request: sip-redirect - Tiny IPv4 and IPv6 SIP redirect server written in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031501.mA3F1V9K020650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443675 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Robert Scheck 2008-11-03 10:01:29 EDT --- Peter, thanks for doing the review. I'll of course do the changes from previous comments as I already said before importing into CVS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sip-redirect Short Description: Tiny IPv4 and IPv6 SIP redirect server written in Perl Owners: robert Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 14:59:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:59:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469686] New: Review Request: ogre-meshmagick - Command line manipulation tool for Ogre meshes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ogre-meshmagick - Command line manipulation tool for Ogre meshes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469686 Summary: Review Request: ogre-meshmagick - Command line manipulation tool for Ogre meshes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: atorkhov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://atorkhov.fedorapeople.org/ogre-meshmagick.spec SRPM URL: http://atorkhov.fedorapeople.org/ogre-meshmagick-0.4.0-0.1.20080731svn2488.fc10.src.rpm Description: MeshMagick is a manipulation tool for Ogre meshes (and skeletons). It allows the user to query interesting information and to transform binary meshes (and skeletons) in many ways. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 15:03:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 10:03:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031503.mA3F3WjP031242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 --- Comment #25 from Jon Ciesla 2008-11-03 10:03:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > when you run fedora-cvs parprouted the directory F-10 is created ? > > if yes, then I belive you will able to push updates in bodhi after F10 > released. > > someone will notify when bodhi start accepting updates for F10 Should be right around F-10 GA. > if not, then you need to ask cvs for F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 15:25:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 10:25:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: QuickFIX - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031525.mA3FPptw003247@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-03 10:25:50 EDT --- I guess this is ASL 1.1. http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-1.1 Perhaps spot will answer this in fedora-legal-list, however I guess spot will also say so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 15:36:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 10:36:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460887] Review Request: libpcapnav - a libpcap trace file navigation library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031536.mA3FaQpG005246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460887 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-03 10:36:25 EDT --- What is the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 15:45:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 10:45:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031545.mA3FjL8Q029648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 --- Comment #12 from vivek shah 2008-11-03 10:45:18 EDT --- Thanks for the notes, I created a package keeping in mind all the above notes but it encounters a problem when I added the sed script modification as you suggested in order to pass the CFLAGS. The binary which is installed from the package built with Fedora CFLAGS does not load the guile interactive mode while it does without it. I will be investigating the issue to see what is causing the problem but would like your take on the matter as well. You can see the issue for yourself by installing from release 3 (which uses the CFLAGS) while release 2 (does not) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 15:50:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 10:50:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460727] Review Request: gnujump - A jumping game which is a clone of xjump In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031550.mA3Fonxu008057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460727 --- Comment #4 from vivek shah 2008-11-03 10:50:48 EDT --- Yes I have looked into it and will give it a try and see if the bug exists and if it does will patch it up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 15:51:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 10:51:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453109] Review Request: nocpulse-common - Add NOCpulse users and includes common files for NOCpulse. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031551.mA3FpKjm008242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 --- Comment #18 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-03 10:51:18 EDT --- ping, no cvs admin request yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 15:58:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 10:58:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031558.mA3FwbSA032522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-03 10:58:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Thanks for the notes, > I created a package keeping in mind all the above notes but it encounters a > problem when I added the sed script modification as you suggested in order to > pass the CFLAGS. Would you write a procedure to reproduce the problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 16:09:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 11:09:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457916] Review Request: lmbench - lmbench benchmark tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031609.mA3G901G012085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457916 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kevinverma at fedora | |project.org) --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-03 11:08:58 EDT --- What is the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 16:11:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 11:11:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453109] Review Request: nocpulse-common - Add NOCpulse users and includes common files for NOCpulse. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031611.mA3GBN22003263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Miroslav Suchy 2008-11-03 11:11:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nocpulse-common Short Description: NOCpulse common Owners: msuchy Branches: devel F-9 F-10 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 16:08:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 11:08:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031608.mA3G8Agk002465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 --- Comment #14 from vivek shah 2008-11-03 11:08:09 EDT --- >From gnurobots.spec remove the following line from %prep sed -i.optflags -e '/^CFLAGS=/d' configure Build the package and run the binary You can see the interactive mode being launched with guile prompt and this is how the binary SHOULD behave In gnurobots.spec keep the above line in %prep Build the package and run the binary You can see the interactive mode not being launched which is how the binary should not behave. I hope this is what you wanted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 16:19:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 11:19:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031619.mA3GJUOm014440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #30 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-03 11:19:28 EDT --- Yes, I need an updated package to review. I have been away for a few days but I don't think I missed any notice of one being made available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 16:18:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 11:18:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469673] Review request: perl-File-ShareDir-PAR - same functionality as File::ShareDir with PAR support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031618.mA3GIUm6004573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469673 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Package review: |Review request: |File::ShareDir::PAR - same |perl-File-ShareDir-PAR - |functionality as |same functionality as |File::ShareDir with PAR |File::ShareDir with PAR |support |support --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-03 11:18:29 EDT --- We have scripts that parse these review requests. I ask again: please use the template or at least use the same format as other review tickets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 16:24:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 11:24:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467154] Review Request: libvirt-qpid - An interface with libvirt using QMF (qpid modeling framework) which utilizes the Advanced Message Queuing protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031624.mA3GOHlu005588@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467154 Ian Main changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(imain at redhat.com) | --- Comment #5 from Ian Main 2008-11-03 11:24:16 EDT --- Yes that is the reason why it's not all architectures (qpidc not supporting all archs). I guess the right thing to do would be to file a bug against qpidc and then I could do the same for libvirt-qpid. Can I file that bug or do I talk to the owners of the package? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 16:28:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 11:28:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466906] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-SetID - Provides api for correctly changing user identity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031628.mA3GSr5W016632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466906 --- Comment #3 from Miroslav Suchy 2008-11-03 11:28:52 EDT --- Dennis com'on you are part of team which say under which license it is released. But OK: Updated SPEC http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-SetID/perl-NOCpulse-SetID.spec Updated SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-SetID/perl-NOCpulse-SetID-1.6.8-1.f10.src.rpm There will be no page with description and links to released tarballs unless you will make it :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 16:28:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 11:28:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226240] Merge Review: perl-Archive-Zip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031628.mA3GSUxN016589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226240 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |skasal at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Stepan Kasal 2008-11-03 11:28:28 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Archive-Zip New Branch: EL-5 Owner: skasal at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 16:26:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 11:26:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469189] Review Request: system-autodeath - Automatically disable system default route on a specific date. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031626.mA3GQcv3016399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469189 Matthew Miller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mattdm at mattdm.org --- Comment #5 from Matthew Miller 2008-11-03 11:26:37 EDT --- Tim's package review comments look correct to me. I have a few concerns which basically amount to documentation and features. Documentation: The descriptive paragraph duplicated in the spec file, README, and man page has a typo: "notifying that the system with autodie on a specific date" should be "will autodie". (Although I'd actually like to see the word "autodie" replaced with "remove itself from the network" -- no need to go out of our way to scare people.) Also, "everyday" should be "every day". There should also be a descriptive comment (maybe the same paragraph yet again?) in system-autodeath.conf explaining what's okay there. And, it'd be nice if there were some off values like "disabled" that could be used. I'm also a little concerned about the default date 2009-12-01 in the current config file. I think it should either be more conservative by default or based on the Fedora release the package is built for. At the current rate, Fedora 10 is likely to be maintained for a month or two beyond Dec 2009. So, something like: Fedora 8: 2009-02-25; Fedora 9: 2009-08-25; Fedora 10: 2010-02-25; etc. This would require a little vigilance from the package maintainer as schedules change, but would make the package useful out of the box. Alternately, one crazy idea would be to make the default be based on the file date of /etc/fedora-release (at package build time) + 18 months. I know you'll hate that but throwing it out there. :) Failing that, the default should be something like "package build time + 4 years". The last thing we want is this thing going off by accident on a supported system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 16:41:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 11:41:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031641.mA3GfSj0009014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #11 from Jeff Ortel 2008-11-03 11:41:27 EDT --- I added LICENSE to %doc. SRPM URL: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/s/u/suds/python-suds-0.3.1-5.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 16:44:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 11:44:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467154] Review Request: libvirt-qpid - An interface with libvirt using QMF (qpid modeling framework) which utilizes the Advanced Message Queuing protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031644.mA3Gihfx019644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467154 --- Comment #7 from David Woodhouse 2008-11-03 11:44:42 EDT --- dammit. bug 468244. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 16:43:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 11:43:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467154] Review Request: libvirt-qpid - An interface with libvirt using QMF (qpid modeling framework) which utilizes the Advanced Message Queuing protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031643.mA3GhsbX019558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467154 --- Comment #6 from David Woodhouse 2008-11-03 11:43:53 EDT --- Bug 268244 -- it did already exist, but it wasn't correctly marked as blocking the FE-ExcludeArch-$ARCH trackers for the excluded architectures. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 16:46:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 11:46:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031646.mA3GkwTx009936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 --- Comment #5 from jebba 2008-11-03 11:46:57 EDT --- It's segfaulting on me. Right after "Set and read preferences" in the splash screen. Here's the end of the strace, if that helps at all: 5141 lstat64("/usr", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0 5141 lstat64("/usr/share", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0 5141 lstat64("/usr/share/coccinella", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0 5141 lstat64("/usr/share/coccinella/iconsets", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0 5141 lstat64("/usr/share/coccinella/iconsets/emoticons", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0 5141 lstat64("/usr/share/coccinella/iconsets/emoticons/default", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0 5141 open("/usr/share/coccinella/iconsets/emoticons/default/face-smile.png", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 4 5141 fcntl64(4, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0 5141 ioctl(4, SNDCTL_TMR_TIMEBASE or TCGETS, 0xbfe77d68) = -1 ENOTTY (Inappropriate ioctl for device) 5141 _llseek(4, 0, [0], SEEK_SET) = 0 5141 read(4, "\211PNG\r\n\32\n\0\0\0\rIHDR\0\0\0\26\0\0\0\26\20\6\0\0\0\224$\260"..., 4096) = 2609 5141 _llseek(4, 0, [0], SEEK_SET) = 0 5141 --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) --- 5141 +++ killed by SIGSEGV +++ ---> ioctl(4, SNDCTL_TMR_TIMEBASE or TCGETS, 0xbfe77d68) = -1 ENOTTY (Inappropriate ioctl for device) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 16:57:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 11:57:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469189] Review Request: system-autodeath - Automatically disable system default route on a specific date. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031657.mA3GvTxT022415@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469189 --- Comment #6 from seth vidal 2008-11-03 11:57:28 EDT --- Fixed the typos and changed 'autodie' phrase. New description is: system-autodeath is a cron job that runs daily, checking the current time versus a configured death date for the machine. Within one week of this date the system will emit log notices to syslog.alert notifying that the system will remove its default network route on a specific date. On the date the system will have its default route deleted. It will continue to do this every day until someone does something about it. With regard to the timing: 1. I'll make it a separate source in the config so it is easy to change 2. this pkg will not be installed by default so it's not a risk to anyone 3. basing the date on other values is a bad plan - since we've had to replace fedora-release in the last 2 releases (f8 and f9) and we're not changing the EOL for them b/c of the fedora-release rebuild. 4. I'll bump it to 2010-01-15. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 17:01:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:01:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031701.mA3H1d5b012936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #47 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-11-03 12:01:35 EDT --- Re comment #6 about building a "noarch subpackages". A changelog for rpm-4.6.0-0.rc1.7 in the current rawhide includes the following comment: * Sat Oct 25 2008 Panu Matilainen - Make noarch sub-packages actually work I guess that this leaves you in a cold with earlier rpm versions. Maybe Panu would have some additional comments; in particular about mechanics of this option. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 17:05:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:05:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031705.mA3H5wW6024285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-03 12:05:57 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=322343) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=322343) Trial patch Ah, actually now I understood. Will the patch attached fix the problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 17:14:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:14:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244389] Review Request: sugar-datastore - Sugar Datastore In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031714.mA3HEku9025306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244389 Marco Pesenti Gritti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Marco Pesenti Gritti 2008-11-03 12:14:43 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sugar-datastore New Branches: F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 17:12:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:12:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244377] Review Request: sugar-artwork - Artwork for Sugar look-and-feel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031712.mA3HCRv4025210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244377 Marco Pesenti Gritti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Marco Pesenti Gritti 2008-11-03 12:12:25 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sugar-artwork New Branches: F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 17:15:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:15:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431707] Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031715.mA3HFx3G015441@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431707 Marco Pesenti Gritti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Marco Pesenti Gritti 2008-11-03 12:15:58 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sugar-toolkit New Branches: F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 17:15:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:15:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 343741] Review Request: sugar-base - Base Sugar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031715.mA3HFNPl015347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343741 Marco Pesenti Gritti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Marco Pesenti Gritti 2008-11-03 12:15:22 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sugar-base New Branches: F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 17:13:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:13:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244373] Review Request: sugar-presence-service - Sugar presence service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031713.mA3HDvFf014986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244373 Marco Pesenti Gritti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Marco Pesenti Gritti 2008-11-03 12:13:56 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sugar-presence-service New Branches: F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 17:19:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:19:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031719.mA3HJQum026084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 Marco Pesenti Gritti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Marco Pesenti Gritti 2008-11-03 12:19:23 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: hulahop New Branches: F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 17:17:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:17:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466033] sugar-browse -- Browse activity for sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031717.mA3HHUnT015850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466033 Marco Pesenti Gritti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Marco Pesenti Gritti 2008-11-03 12:17:29 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sugar-browse New Branches: F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 17:30:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:30:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226240] Merge Review: perl-Archive-Zip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031730.mA3HUdkc028249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226240 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #9 from Stepan Kasal 2008-11-03 12:30:38 EDT --- oops, I withdraw the request from comment #8, the package is going to appear in RHEL-5. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 17:40:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:40:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031740.mA3HenHM029924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |promac at gmail.com --- Comment #25 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-11-03 12:40:48 EDT --- I removed the symbolic links and added the search path in the scripts. It is working fine this way. Same URLS as before. Any comments? Is this acceptable? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 17:42:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:42:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031742.mA3HgDgf030073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-11-03 12:42:12 EDT --- I fixed a bug in tkimg recently that was causing behavior like this, but I think I only did it for rawhide. Can you try updating to: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=66555 If that resolves it, I'll do proper F-8/F-9 builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 17:56:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:56:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468285] Review Request: gobject-introspection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031756.mA3HuL8U022687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468285 --- Comment #5 from Colin Walters 2008-11-03 12:56:20 EDT --- License is resolved upstream: http://svn.gnome.org/svn/gobject-introspection/trunk/COPYING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 17:59:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:59:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466033] sugar-browse -- Browse activity for sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031759.mA3HxbIF000570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466033 --- Comment #7 from Marco Pesenti Gritti 2008-11-03 12:59:36 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sugar-browse New Branches: F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 18:00:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:00:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244373] Review Request: sugar-presence-service - Sugar presence service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031800.mA3I0Mmm001100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244373 --- Comment #12 from Marco Pesenti Gritti 2008-11-03 13:00:21 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sugar-presence-service New Branches: F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 18:00:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:00:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031800.mA3I0gY4001130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 --- Comment #19 from Marco Pesenti Gritti 2008-11-03 13:00:42 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: hulahop New Branches: F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 18:00:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:00:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244377] Review Request: sugar-artwork - Artwork for Sugar look-and-feel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031800.mA3I01Ps000662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244377 --- Comment #12 from Marco Pesenti Gritti 2008-11-03 13:00:00 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sugar-artwork New Branches: F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 17:58:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:58:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431707] Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031758.mA3Hwmi1022975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431707 --- Comment #11 from Marco Pesenti Gritti 2008-11-03 12:58:47 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sugar-toolkit New Branches: F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 17:59:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:59:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244389] Review Request: sugar-datastore - Sugar Datastore In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031759.mA3HxF6V023037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244389 --- Comment #7 from Marco Pesenti Gritti 2008-11-03 12:59:14 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sugar-datastore New Branches: F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 18:02:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:02:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468285] Review Request: gobject-introspection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031802.mA3I2ufl001355@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468285 Owen Taylor changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Owen Taylor 2008-11-03 13:02:55 EDT --- Looks good. Make sure to fix the License tag to reflect the dual licensing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 18:25:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:25:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031825.mA3IP5ub005047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 --- Comment #7 from jebba 2008-11-03 13:25:04 EDT --- It at least launches ok now. I haven't tested further, but will try sometime this week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 18:40:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:40:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468554] Review Request: barrage - Kill and destroy as many targets as possible within 3 minutes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031840.mA3Ie9kT007762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468554 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-03 13:40:08 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 18:38:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:38:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453109] Review Request: nocpulse-common - Add NOCpulse users and includes common files for NOCpulse. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031838.mA3Icjl1007330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-03 13:38:44 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 18:44:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:44:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468517] Review Request: saoimage - Utility for displaying astronomical images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031844.mA3IiQt5030635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468517 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-03 13:44:25 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 18:48:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:48:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031848.mA3Imptv009205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #12 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-03 13:48:51 EDT --- I see no further blocker, package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 18:49:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:49:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443675] Review Request: sip-redirect - Tiny IPv4 and IPv6 SIP redirect server written in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031849.mA3In5fs009245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443675 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-03 13:49:04 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 18:51:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:51:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031851.mA3Ipcjo032037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 18:50:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:50:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457109] Review-Request: perl-TAP-Harness-JUnit - Generate JUnit compatible output from TAP results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031850.mA3IoGjH031799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457109 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-03 13:50:15 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 18:47:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:47:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454408] Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031847.mA3Il9uB031293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-03 13:47:06 EDT --- no need to add owners, co-maintainers to intialCC list they are automatically there by ownership, it is useful to add you manager if he/she wants to see bugs as they come in. CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 18:51:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:51:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031851.mA3IpNVh009881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #13 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-03 13:51:22 EDT --- If you have found a sponsor you can go on with the CVS admin procedure. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 18:55:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:55:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468643] Review Request: perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction - Expose PL_dirty In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031855.mA3ItqdZ010816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468643 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-03 13:55:51 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 18:55:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:55:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469588] Review Request: corrida - Application for archivation of meteor observations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031855.mA3It4tG010578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469588 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-03 13:55:03 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 18:54:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:54:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469023] Review Request: perl-Class-Adapter - Perl implementation of the "Adapter" Design Pattern In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031854.mA3Is32g010185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469023 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-03 13:54:02 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 18:51:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:51:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 442875] Review Request: virt-ctrl - Graphical management app for virtual machines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031851.mA3IpP8x009915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442875 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-03 13:51:24 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 18:56:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:56:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461794] Review Request:0xFFFF - The Open Free Fiasco Firmware Flasher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031856.mA3IuhG7000487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461794 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-03 13:56:42 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 18:59:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:59:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244377] Review Request: sugar-artwork - Artwork for Sugar look-and-feel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031859.mA3Ixxwc011469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244377 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-03 13:59:58 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 18:58:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:58:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 343741] Review Request: sugar-base - Base Sugar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031858.mA3Iw9jI011209@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343741 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-03 13:58:08 EDT --- im assuming you mean F-10 CVS done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 18:59:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:59:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244373] Review Request: sugar-presence-service - Sugar presence service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031859.mA3Ix6Vv000747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244373 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-03 13:59:05 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 19:01:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 14:01:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244389] Review Request: sugar-datastore - Sugar Datastore In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031901.mA3J1edk012103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244389 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-03 14:01:39 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 19:03:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 14:03:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031903.mA3J3UGT012290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-03 14:03:29 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 19:02:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 14:02:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466033] sugar-browse -- Browse activity for sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031902.mA3J2Xvc001622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466033 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-03 14:02:32 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 19:08:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 14:08:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431707] Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031908.mA3J8VVA013720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431707 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-03 14:08:30 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 19:07:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 14:07:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031907.mA3J7pwP013636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #57 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-03 14:07:50 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 19:11:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 14:11:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468285] Review Request: gobject-introspection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031911.mA3JBKr9004065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468285 Colin Walters changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 19:13:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 14:13:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468285] Review Request: gobject-introspection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031913.mA3JDmCT014855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468285 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #7 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-03 14:13:46 EDT --- unsetting cvs admin request since there is no cvs admin request here -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 19:26:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 14:26:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468285] Review Request: gobject-introspection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031926.mA3JQ6PK017384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468285 Colin Walters changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Colin Walters 2008-11-03 14:26:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gobject-introspection Short Description: Metadata reflection system for GObject-based libraries Owners: walters otaylor Branches: F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 19:29:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 14:29:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031929.mA3JTYJc017668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Flag| |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? --- Comment #38 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-11-03 14:29:31 EDT --- Package Change Request ======================= Package Name: ktechlab Short Description: Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits Owners: chitlesh Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 19:52:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 14:52:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469560] Review Request: pympdtouchgui - mpd client designed for touchscreens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031952.mA3Jq2SP013114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469560 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |limb at jcomserv.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2008-11-03 14:52:01 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Clean. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK. - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 OK. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig NA. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. NA. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) OK. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. NA. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. Would this not benefit from a .desktop file, if only to allow people to demo the program easily? - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. Summary: .desktop question. Also, rename setuppy-patch to pympdtouchgui-setuppy.patch to avoid SRPM clobber. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 20:16:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 15:16:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468643] Review Request: perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction - Expose PL_dirty In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811032016.mA3KGOWl027271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468643 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 20:26:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 15:26:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469743] New: Review Request: perl-IO-TieCombine - Produce tied (and other) separate but combined variables Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-TieCombine - Produce tied (and other) separate but combined variables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469743 Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-TieCombine - Produce tied (and other) separate but combined variables Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/IO-TieCombine OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-IO-TieCombine.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-IO-TieCombine-1.000-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This package allows you to tie separate variables into a combined whole, using ties and other magic. This can be very useful when, say, you want a unified output from various different things that return data in different ways (STDIN/ERR, scalars, handles, etc). Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=916535 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 20:34:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 15:34:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469560] Review Request: pympdtouchgui - mpd client designed for touchscreens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811032034.mA3KYoKA030156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469560 --- Comment #4 from Sven Lankes 2008-11-03 15:34:49 EDT --- > Would this not benefit from a .desktop file, if only to allow > people to demo the program easily? You're probably right. I have now included one. Also the patch is renamed. Spec URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SPECS/pympdtouchgui.spec SRPM URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SRPM/pympdtouchgui-0.302-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 20:36:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 15:36:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469560] Review Request: pympdtouchgui - mpd client designed for touchscreens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811032036.mA3KafLK030778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469560 --- Comment #5 from Sven Lankes 2008-11-03 15:36:40 EDT --- Note: pympdtouchgui doesn't currently have an icon - this will be fixed in a future release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 20:49:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 15:49:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469748] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Log-Log4perl - A Logging Role for Moose based on Log::Log4perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Log-Log4perl - A Logging Role for Moose based on Log::Log4perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469748 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Log-Log4perl - A Logging Role for Moose based on Log::Log4perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-Log-Log4perl OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-Log-Log4perl.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-Log-Log4perl-0.31-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A logging role building a very lightweight wrapper to Log::Log4perl for use with your the Moose classes. The initialization of the Log4perl instance must be performed prior to logging the first log message. Otherwise the default initialization will happen, probably not doing the things you expect. For compatibility the 'logger' attribute can be accessed to use a common interface for application logging. For simple logging needs use MooseX::Log::Log4perl::Easy to directly add log_ methods to your class instance. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=916576 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 21:00:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 16:00:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469750] New: Review Request: perl-Term-Size - Simple way to get terminal size Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-Size - Simple way to get terminal size https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469750 Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-Size - Simple way to get terminal size Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Term-Size OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Term-Size.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Term-Size-0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: *Term::Size* is a Perl module which provides a straightforward way to retrieve the terminal size. Both functions take an optional filehandle argument, which defaults to '*STDIN{IO}'. They both return a list of two values, which are the current width and height, respectively, of the terminal associated with the specified filehandle. 'Term::Size::chars' returns the size in units of characters, whereas 'Term::Size::pixels' uses units of pixels. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=916588 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 21:08:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 16:08:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467179] Review Request: pngcrush - Optimizer for PNG (Portable Network Graphics) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811032108.mA3L8GF1026365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467179 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jerry James 2008-11-03 16:08:15 EDT --- Looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 21:21:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 16:21:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446563] Review Request: rubygem-rspec - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811032121.mA3LLS3S028672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446563 Michael Stahnke changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #3 from Michael Stahnke 2008-11-03 16:21:26 EDT --- Doesn't requiring rubygems imply that it requires ruby? It would seem that requiring another package that requires these things should be ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 21:23:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 16:23:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469560] Review Request: pympdtouchgui - mpd client designed for touchscreens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811032123.mA3LNJan028820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469560 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2008-11-03 16:23:18 EDT --- Not in the guidelines yet, but it's approved: >--vendor=fedora should not be used for new packages, use --vendor="" instead to >get desktop-file-install to install the .desktop file without prepending a >vendor prefix. > > Kevin Kofler You could make an icon. What I've done many times is take a screenshot of the app, choose something representative, and crop it down to the desired size, and save as a .png. I used the airplane from apricots, and a cluster of particles from xgrav. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 21:29:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 16:29:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446563] Review Request: rubygem-rspec - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811032129.mA3LTIPe029747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446563 --- Comment #4 from Michael Stahnke 2008-11-03 16:29:16 EDT --- I updated the srpm either way; it's not a difficult update. It doesn't make a ton of sense to me, but the packaging guidelines appear to concur with you. http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-rspec.spec http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-rspec-1.1.8-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 21:35:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 16:35:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446563] Review Request: rubygem-rspec - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811032135.mA3LZfE2008733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446563 --- Comment #5 from Casey Dahlin 2008-11-03 16:35:40 EDT --- The buildrequires doesn't need to be ruby(abi), just ruby. For the requires, you have to specify the abi version. ruby(abi) = 1.8 I assume -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 21:49:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 16:49:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469756] New: Review Request: perl-Sort-Naturally - Sort lexically, but sort numeral parts numerically Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sort-Naturally - Sort lexically, but sort numeral parts numerically https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469756 Summary: Review Request: perl-Sort-Naturally - Sort lexically, but sort numeral parts numerically Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Sort-Naturally OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Sort-Naturally.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Sort-Naturally-1.02-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This module exports two functions, 'nsort' and 'ncmp'; they are used in implementing my idea of a "natural sorting" algorithm. Under natural sorting, numeric substrings are compared numerically, and other word-characters are compared lexically. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=916619 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 22:12:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 17:12:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469560] Review Request: pympdtouchgui - mpd client designed for touchscreens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811032212.mA3MCpXL015092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469560 --- Comment #7 from Sven Lankes 2008-11-03 17:12:50 EDT --- .desktop-file ist fixed. I have also added an icon made from the "play"-button of pympdtouchgui. This is the best I can come up with and it doesn't look too ugly in the menu ... Spec URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SPECS/pympdtouchgui.spec SRPM URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SRPM/pympdtouchgui-0.302-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 23:02:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 18:02:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811032302.mA3N2iUk022647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #12 from Jameson 2008-11-03 18:02:43 EDT --- Sorry about that... I must've been on the wrong machine when I tried to copy it, or something. It's there now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 23:13:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 18:13:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468517] Review Request: saoimage - Utility for displaying astronomical images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811032313.mA3NDWnw024132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468517 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-11-03 18:13:31 EDT --- Thanks a lot Ma{moru,rek}, Dennis. Imported and build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 23:14:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 18:14:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469588] Review Request: corrida - Application for archivation of meteor observations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811032314.mA3NEX7Y014216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469588 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-11-03 18:14:32 EDT --- Thanks for the review Marek. Thanks for CVS Dennis. Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 23:14:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 18:14:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457109] Review-Request: perl-TAP-Harness-JUnit - Generate JUnit compatible output from TAP results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811032314.mA3NEuhl014263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457109 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-11-03 18:14:55 EDT --- Thanks Marek. Thanks Dennis. Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 23:23:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 18:23:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811032323.mA3NNTS9025860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 --- Comment #80 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-03 18:23:25 EDT --- scala-2.7.2-0.3.RC6.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/scala-2.7.2-0.3.RC6.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 23:42:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 18:42:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438897] Review Request: framewave - Image and signal processing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811032342.mA3NgYCx028763@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438897 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(orion at cora.nwra.c | |om) | --- Comment #9 from Orion Poplawski 2008-11-03 18:42:31 EDT --- Here's the latest build. There are still a handful of unit test failures, though not as many as before I believe. I'm not sure this is enough to block a review though, I don't think so. I'll let the hypothetical possible future reviewer decide. * Mon Nov 3 2008 Orion Poplawski - 1.3-0.20081029.1 - 1.3 29OCT08 devbuild - Build FwHeaderConvert_lin from source - Use "thread=systemboost" build option to use system boost library http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/framewave.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/framewave-1.3-0.20081029.1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 00:06:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 19:06:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469460] review request: gir-repository - GObject Introspection Repository In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811040006.mA406bIZ032343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469460 --- Comment #1 from Owen Taylor 2008-11-03 19:06:36 EDT --- Looks very good in general. Couple of small problem. X - COPYING file upstream needs fixing X - Missing requiements on gobject-introspection[-devel] for directories X - Shouldn't own %{_datadir}/gir Details below. Also, I really don't like "metadata" at all for this as I said in the gobject-intropsection API review. We don't need to overload that term more. Can you change the summary/descriptions to say "introspection data"? [*] OK or not applicable [X] Problem [-] Not checked Musts ====== [*] rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. gir-repository.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 6) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 [*] The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . [*] The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . [*] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . [*] The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [X] The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. COPYING in the distro is GPLv2+, no other indication of license. [*] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [*] The spec file must be written in American English. [*] The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). [-] The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SVN snapshot [*] The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [*] If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [*] All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [*] The spec file MUST handle locales properly. [*] Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [*] If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [X] A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. main package require gobject-introspection for %{libdir}/girepository. Devel should require gobject-introspection-devel and have %{_datadir}/gir/* in the file list since the directory is coming from gobject-introspection-devel. [*] A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [*] Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [*] Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). [*] Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . [*] The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . [*] Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) [*] If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [*] Header files must be in a -devel package. [*] Static libraries must be in a -static package. [*] Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [*] If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. OK exception IMO. (I think the the .so files at least need the API version in them .. /usr/lib/libgirepo-Clutter-custom.so should have 0.8 in the name somewhere. But that's an upstream issue.) [*] In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [*] Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [*] Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [X] Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. See above. [*] At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. See above [*] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Should ====== [*] If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [*] The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [-] The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. Hard to do since gobject-introspection isn't yet in rawhide. [-] The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-] The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [*] If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [*] Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [*] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [*] If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Please see File Dependencies in the Guidelines for further information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 00:31:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 19:31:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811040031.mA40VQnW025905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bdpepple at gmail.com --- Comment #14 from Brian Pepple 2008-11-03 19:31:25 EDT --- Jeff, you don't need a sponsor anymore do you? It looks like Thomas Fitzsimmons beat me to the punch. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 00:44:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 19:44:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438897] Review Request: framewave - Image and signal processing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811040044.mA40is7U004776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438897 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-03 19:44:53 EDT --- Generally I would leave it up to the maintainer. After all, you have to deal with bugs reported against your package if those test failures actually cause problems in use by end-users. It would certainly be good to document the failures in the spec somehow, either by listing them out or perhaps by filing a ticket here (once the package is imported, of course) or with upstream and adding a reference to it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 02:42:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 21:42:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: QuickFIX - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811040242.mA42gH71023387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 --- Comment #6 from Hayden James 2008-11-03 21:42:17 EDT --- I made the license change to BSD. I can make the change in the future to create packages for other languages, however the current package builds a C++ based shared library and a devel package containing header files for development. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 03:33:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 22:33:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: QuickFIX - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811040333.mA43Xtcv021308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|182235 | --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-03 22:33:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > I made the license change to BSD. >From spot's reply: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-November/msg00011.html Please use ASL 1.1. (Removing FE-Legal) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 04:09:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 23:09:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446563] Review Request: rubygem-rspec - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811040409.mA449w8a026713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446563 --- Comment #6 from Michael Stahnke 2008-11-03 23:09:57 EDT --- http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-rspec.spec http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-rspec-1.1.8-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 05:53:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 00:53:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811040553.mA45reRO021717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |pstream-devel - POSIX |pstreams-devel - POSIX |Process Control in C++ |Process Control in C++ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 05:53:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 00:53:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469808] New: Review Request: pstream-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pstream-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 Summary: Review Request: pstream-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: PStreams class is like a C++ wrapper for the POSIX.2 functions popen(3) and pclose(3), using C++ iostreams instead of C's stdio library. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/pstreams-devel.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/pstreams-devel-0.6.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Needed for pdf2djvu package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 06:35:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 01:35:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811040635.mA46Z0wX027458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #18 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-11-04 01:34:59 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 06:43:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 01:43:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469811] Review Request: pdf2djvu - PDF to DjVu converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811040643.mA46hD2N017756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469811 --- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-11-04 01:43:12 EDT --- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 <--- depends on pstreams-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 06:42:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 01:42:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469811] Review Request: pdf2djvu - PDF to DjVu converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811040642.mA46gVXf017679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469811 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |469808 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 06:42:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 01:42:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811040642.mA46gW6C017706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |469811 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 06:42:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 01:42:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469811] New: Review Request: pdf2djvu - PDF to DjVu converter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pdf2djvu - PDF to DjVu converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469811 Summary: Review Request: pdf2djvu - PDF to DjVu converter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: pdf2djvu creates DjVu files from PDF files. It's able to extract: graphics, text layer, hyperlinks, document outline (bookmarks) and metadata. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/pdf2djvu.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/pdf2djvu-0.4.13-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 07:23:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 02:23:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469023] Review Request: perl-Class-Adapter - Perl implementation of the "Adapter" Design Pattern In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811040723.mA47N8X5023336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469023 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 07:50:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 02:50:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811040750.mA47o0YV005201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #13 from David Carter 2008-11-04 02:49:58 EDT --- Updated versions: Spec URL: http://arm4.org/Downloads/0.8-0.5/arm4.spec SRPM URL: http://arm4.org/Downloads/0.8-0.5/arm4-0.8-0.5.fc9.src.rpm I must say though, it's kind of annoying to hit an rpmlint update in the few short hour between submission and review :) Some comments on these reported errors though. First of all, despite the assertion of rpmlint, there are many cases where this is a valid design choice, such as when a common error handler is put in a library. In this case, it was used in panic conditions only, and I still think that's valid. At this point, the fix is largely cosmetic, although I will address this more completely for a future release. Which brings me to the larger issue. Fixing this will always require an architectural rethink. At the very least, it will require a change to the library version number, potentially putting it out of sync with the upstream version. Ultimately this isn't the responsibility of the packager, but of the original developer, and as pointed out already the developer may just say deal with it. Honestly, if I weren't also the upstream developer, I wouldn't have changed anything. As it is, I'm fixing internal libraries that provide no public API for problems that I don't think exist. I guess my point is that this warning should largely be ignored during reviews. The dangers of not doing so are too great. OK, rant done, the new code removes these warnings. With regard to your comments on the practice review, I did use the checklist at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines. I'll do a better job of noting the pass/fail states next time. I'll do a couple of additional reviews later this week when I get some of my work out of the way. Thanks! Dave -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 07:56:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 02:56:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467179] Review Request: pngcrush - Optimizer for PNG (Portable Network Graphics) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811040756.mA47u2ll006491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467179 Gerd Hoffmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Gerd Hoffmann 2008-11-04 02:56:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pngcrush Short Description: Optimizer for PNG files Owners: kraxel Branches: F-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 08:13:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 03:13:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811040813.mA48DkIb030604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(440volt.tux at gmail | |.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 08:32:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 03:32:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469814] New: Review Request: fuse-zip - Fuse-zip is a fs to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fuse-zip - Fuse-zip is a fs to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469814 Summary: Review Request: fuse-zip - Fuse-zip is a fs to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/fuse-zip.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/fuse-zip-0.2.6-1.fc10.src.rpm fuse-zip is a FUSE file system to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives based in libzip implemented in C++. With fuse-zip you really can work with ZIP archives as real directories. Unlike KIO or Gnome VFS, it can be used in any application without modifications. Unlike other FUSE filesystems, only fuse-zip provides write support to ZIP archives. Also, fuse-zip is faster that all known implementations on large archives with many files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 08:37:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 03:37:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469743] Review Request: perl-IO-TieCombine - Produce tied (and other) separate but combined variables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811040837.mA48b5Ga012634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469743 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-IO-TieCombine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 08:41:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 03:41:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469816] New: Review Request: perl-App-Cmd - Write command line apps with less suffering Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-App-Cmd - Write command line apps with less suffering Alias: perl-App-Cmd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469816 Summary: Review Request: perl-App-Cmd - Write command line apps with less suffering Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/App-Cmd OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-App-Cmd.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-App-Cmd-0.202-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: App::Cmd is intended to make it easy to write complex command-line applications without having to think about most of the annoying things usually involved. For information on how to start using App::Cmd, see App::Cmd::Tutorial. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 08:41:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 03:41:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469816] Review Request: perl-App-Cmd - Write command line apps with less suffering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811040841.mA48ftLK002892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469816 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |469743 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 08:43:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 03:43:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469750] Review Request: perl-Term-Size - Simple way to get terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811040843.mA48hKRw003175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469750 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Term-Size -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 08:41:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 03:41:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469743] Review Request: perl-IO-TieCombine - Produce tied (and other) separate but combined variables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811040841.mA48fuOR002940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469743 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |469816 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 08:43:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 03:43:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469756] Review Request: perl-Sort-Naturally - Sort lexically, but sort numeral parts numerically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811040843.mA48hxYW003226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469756 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Sort-Naturally -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 08:42:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 03:42:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467180] Review Request: pngnq - tool for quantizing PNG images in RGBA format Version In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811040842.mA48g4MS003075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467180 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-04 03:42:02 EDT --- Thank you. ---------------------------------------- This package (pngnq) is approved by oget ---------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 09:43:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 04:43:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438587] Review Request: libsqlite3x - C++ Wrapper for the SQLite3 database engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811040943.mA49hVAw025575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438587 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Sailer 2008-11-04 04:43:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libsqlite3x Short Description: C++ Wrapper for the SQLite3 database engine Owners: sailer Branches: F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 09:48:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 04:48:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438587] Review Request: libsqlite3x - C++ Wrapper for the SQLite3 database engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811040948.mA49mNr1026729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438587 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 10:01:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 05:01:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469814] Review Request: fuse-zip - Fuse-zip is a fs to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041001.mA4A18P7018099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469814 --- Comment #1 from Debarshi Ray 2008-11-04 05:01:07 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=322403) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=322403) Fix creation of empty debuginfo package. The Makefile uses 'install -s' which strips the debug symbols from the binaries causing an empty debuginfo package to be created. The attached patch addresses this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 10:14:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 05:14:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469563] Review Request: hunspell-sw - Swahili hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041014.mA4AEn67031461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469563 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-04 05:14:47 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=916853 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 1ce4e40feaf5e890db87daeeb793222d dictionary_myspell_sw_TZ_1.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 10:15:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 05:15:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469565] Review Request: hunspell-la - Latin hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041015.mA4AF4H5031800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469565 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-04 05:15:02 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=916849 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. da7e61b1048f263df28d641f0e33b0b6 dict-la_2008-09-03.oxt + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 10:14:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 05:14:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469564] Review Request:hunspell-fj - Fijian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041014.mA4AEVkh031409@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469564 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-04 05:14:29 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=916851 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 94e3d80fa9bd547c3fc418f483ef547a fj_FJ.aff 721cb9e8531c70960a9d9c1d45ab5065 fj_FJ.dic 215aeedf57e3c88fe7be97b48bad51ca README_fj_FJ.txt + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 09:55:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 04:55:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244371] Review Request: sugar - OLPC desktop environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811040955.mA49tL8R028191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244371 Marco Pesenti Gritti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Marco Pesenti Gritti 2008-11-04 04:55:19 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sugar New Branches: F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 10:18:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 05:18:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041018.mA4AIshG032415@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(t.sailer at alumni.e | |thz.ch) | --- Comment #7 from Thomas Sailer 2008-11-04 05:18:53 EDT --- http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/zfstream.spec http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/zfstream-20041202-2.fc10.src.rpm New %description: zfstream is a small C++ library which provides an abstraction API for reading and writing compressed and non-compressed files using the same API. It supports libz and libbz2 compression schemes. The library is trivial to use and provides client applications with a unified interface for reading and writing files without having to know whether they are compressed or not. On my current x86_64 rawhide system: rpmlint zfstream-20041202-2.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. pmlint zfstream.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint zfstream-20041202-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm. zfstream-devel-20041202-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm zfstream-debuginfo-20041202-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm zfstream.x86_64: W: no-documentation zfstream-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation zfstream-debuginfo.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/lib/debug 0775 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. rpmlint zfstream zfstream.x86_64: W: no-documentation I don't know what to do about the debuginfo error, as the debuginfo package is generated automatically and I don't do anything evil in the spec file, afaik. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 10:21:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 05:21:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469750] Review Request: perl-Term-Size - Simple way to get terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041021.mA4ALiNc000837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469750 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-04 05:21:43 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=916867 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 982b5df8351e7654a42b7bffc0bf1d57 Term-Size-0.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave None as they are not used. + Package perl-Term-Size-0.2-1.fc10 => Provides: Size.so perl(Term::Size) = 0.2 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) perl(AutoLoader) perl(Carp) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 10:38:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 05:38:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469748] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Log-Log4perl - A Logging Role for Moose based on Log::Log4perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041038.mA4Ac0LN004675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469748 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-04 05:37:59 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=916902 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 302a2413b6faeff398cdb0a9f267e8d6 MooseX-Log-Log4perl-0.31.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=22, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.01 sys + 0.98 cusr 0.06 csys = 1.06 CPU) + Package perl-MooseX-Log-Log4perl-0.31-1.fc10 => Provides: perl(MooseX::Log::Log4perl) = 0.31 perl(MooseX::Log::Log4perl::Easy) = 0.31 Requires: perl(Log::Log4perl) perl(Moose::Role) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 10:39:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 05:39:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469743] Review Request: perl-IO-TieCombine - Produce tied (and other) separate but combined variables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041039.mA4AdTDK004793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469743 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-04 05:39:28 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=916894 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url a2e0d8019cf8ca3ea33d970d93f9853e IO-TieCombine-1.000.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=5, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.04 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.07 CPU) + Package perl-IO-TieCombine-1.000-1.fc10 => Provides: perl(IO::TieCombine) = 1.000 perl(IO::TieCombine::Handle) = 1.000 perl(IO::TieCombine::Scalar) = 1.000 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(IO::TieCombine::Handle) perl(IO::TieCombine::Scalar) perl(Symbol) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 10:40:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 05:40:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469756] Review Request: perl-Sort-Naturally - Sort lexically, but sort numeral parts numerically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041040.mA4AecbE025821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469756 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-04 05:40:37 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=916895 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url a173f3f8f519ebae6e5e578e843f6e1c Sort-Naturally-1.02.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=23, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.00 sys + 0.04 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.07 CPU) + Package perl-Sort-Naturally-1.02-1.fc10 => Provides: perl(Sort::Naturally) = 1.02 Requires: perl >= 1:5 perl(Config) perl(Exporter) perl(integer) perl(locale) perl(strict) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 10:45:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 05:45:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469833] New: Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Use the GMP library for Math::BigInt routines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Use the GMP library for Math::BigInt routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469833 Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Use the GMP library for Math::BigInt routines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at city-fan.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Math-BigInt-GMP/perl-Math-BigInt-GMP.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Math-BigInt-GMP/perl-Math-BigInt-GMP-1.24-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Provides support for big integer calculations via means of the GMP C-library. Math::BigInt::GMP provides its own XS layer to access the GMP C-library rather than using Math::GMP as an intermediate layer, an approach that reduces the memory footprint compared with the old approach used in earlier versions of Math::BigInt. This package is needed to provide GMP support for Math::BigInt-using packages (such as perl-Crypt-DSA and perl-Crypt-DH) in Fedora 9 onwards, where the Math::BigInt implementation has changed and no longer uses the existing Math::GMP module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 10:52:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 05:52:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469814] Review Request: fuse-zip - Fuse-zip is a fs to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041052.mA4AqJRr027934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469814 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-11-04 05:52:18 EDT --- Thanks for patch. Applied. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/fuse-zip.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/fuse-zip-0.2.6-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 12:08:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 07:08:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: QuickFIX - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041208.mA4C8Can021430@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 --- Comment #8 from Hayden James 2008-11-04 07:08:11 EDT --- Ok, I've instead changed it to ASL 1.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 12:07:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 07:07:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469843] New: Review Request: unhide - Tool to find hidden processes and TCP/UDP ports from rootkits Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: unhide - Tool to find hidden processes and TCP/UDP ports from rootkits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469843 Summary: Review Request: unhide - Tool to find hidden processes and TCP/UDP ports from rootkits Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/unhide.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/unhide-20080519-1.fc10.src.rpm Unhide is a forensic tool to find processes and TCP/UDP ports hidden by rootkits, Linux kernel modules or by other techniques. It includes two utilities: unhide and unhide-tcp. Unhide detects hidden processes using three techniques: - comparing the output of /proc and /bin/ps - comparing the information gathered from /bin/ps with the one gathered from system calls (syscall scanning) - full scan of the process ID space (PIDs bruteforcing) unhide-tcp identifies TCP/UDP ports that are listening but are not listed in /bin/netstat through brute forcing of all TCP/UDP ports available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 12:48:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 07:48:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467180] Review Request: pngnq - tool for quantizing PNG images in RGBA format Version In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041248.mA4CmDYj028912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467180 Gerd Hoffmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Gerd Hoffmann 2008-11-04 07:48:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pngnq Short Description: tool for quantizing PNG images in RGBA format Owners: kraxel Branches: F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 13:52:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 08:52:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041352.mA4DqMUL030550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 --- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede 2008-11-04 08:52:21 EDT --- Here is an initial lists with comments and things to fix, note that I've not done a full review yet as I cannot build barry due to the missing .desktop file, see the MUST FIX list. MUST FIX -------- * The tarbal in the SRPM differs from the one provided by upstream (but contents are identical). Did you make any changes to rights or something like that? Please do not do that, please redownload upstream's tarbal and use that as is. * barry.desktop is not included in the srpm, this is because you do not have a Source# line for it, add the following below the Source0 line : Source1: barry.desktop * when you install the .desktop file you refer to it by a path which depends on the build environment, this will for example not work on the buildsys. Always refer to source files using %{SOURCE#}, so instead of: desktop-file-install --vendor="" --dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/ ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/%{name}.desktop write: desktop-file-install --vendor="" --dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/ ${SOURCE1} * Please remove the following commented lines, they add no information, as the same is already written above them: #%if "(0%{?fc9} || 0%{?fc10})" # $define with_opensync 0 #%else # $define with_opensync 1 #%endif * Drop the (tm) and the "(BlackBerry is a registered trademark of Research in Motion Limited.)) Everywhere, I've consulted out licensing expert on that and that is not necessary (and so ugly) * We don't do soname as packagename in Fedora so please rename the libbarry0 subpackage to barry-libs, so replace: %package -n libbarry0 With: %package libs And do to the same for "%description -n libbarry0" * The Group for the -libs package should be "System Environment/Libraries" * Drop the "Requires: boost", rpm will pick this up automatically" * Rename libbarry-devel to barry-devel, iow replace "%package -n libbarry-devel" with "%package devel" * "Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}" should be "Requires: %{name}-libs = %{version}-%{release}" * Drop the "Conflicts: barry-bcharge", we've never shipped that and using Conflicts is BAD * Drop the "Requires: gtkmm24", rpm will pick this up automatically * Drop the "Requires: libbarry0, libopensync >= 0.22", rpm will pick this up automatically * Drop all the "%attr(0755,root,root)" and the "%attr(0644,root,root)" those should not be necessary * Only include the COPYING file as %doc for the -libs package, the rest will require that so it will always be installed * "[ "%{buildroot}" != "/" ] && %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot}" is deprecated instead just write: "%{__rm} -rf %{buildroot}" * "-p /sbin/ldconfig" must be on the same line as %post[un] so for example: "%post libs -p /sbin/ldconfig" Should fix ---------- * Fix the indentation of the BuildRequires: line (add one space) * Currently your main package is empty. I believe that most users will want the gui tools, so I would like to suggest dropping the gui sub package and put the files currently there in the main package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 13:57:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 08:57:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438587] Review Request: libsqlite3x - C++ Wrapper for the SQLite3 database engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041357.mA4Dvvha011027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438587 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Sailer 2008-11-04 08:57:56 EDT --- I thought about splitting up sqlite3x and sq3 into different packages, but then decided it's not worth it because both libraries are very small. But if you think differently, fine with me, here is the split version: Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/libsqlite3x.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/libsqlite3x-20071018-4.fc10.src.rpm Also fixed the pkgconfig dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 14:09:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 09:09:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041409.mA4E9LQ3002070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 14:44:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 09:44:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041444.mA4EicYU021153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 Jeff Ortel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Jeff Ortel 2008-11-04 09:44:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-suds Short Description: A lightweight python soap web services client. Owners: jortel Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: jortel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 14:45:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 09:45:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359941] Review Request: drupal-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041445.mA4EjaPh021628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359941 Bug 359941 depends on bug 359931, which changed state. Bug 359931 Summary: Review Request: drupal-date - This package contains both the Date module and a Date API module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359931 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 359941 depends on bug 359911, which changed state. Bug 359911 Summary: Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359911 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2008-11-04 09:45:35 EDT --- Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-calendar/drupal-calendar.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-calendar/drupal-calendar-6.x.2.0-2.rc4.fc9.src.rpm New version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 16:14:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:14:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041614.mA4GEIon028279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-04 11:14:17 EDT --- For -4: * About Patch1 (libprojectM-pc-libsuffix.patch) - Well, with this patch LIB_INSTALL_DIR itself is expanded as /usr/lib{,64}, so the created libprojectM.pc contains ------------------------------------------------- 3 libdir=/usr//usr/lib ------------------------------------------------- (on i386). The correct line is "libdir=/usr/lib" (on i386). * About removing CRLF line ------------------------------------------------- sed -i 's/\r//' ChangeLog ------------------------------------------------- - Please move this line to %prep (for --short-circuit issue) Other things seem okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 16:20:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:20:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469560] Review Request: pympdtouchgui - mpd client designed for touchscreens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041620.mA4GKX8T029948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469560 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2008-11-04 11:20:32 EDT --- Looks great. I like the icon. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 16:29:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:29:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469743] Review Request: perl-IO-TieCombine - Produce tied (and other) separate but combined variables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041629.mA4GTEK3010429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469743 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-04 11:29:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-IO-TieCombine Short Description: produce tied (and other) separate but combined variables Owners: cweyl Branches: F-8 F-9 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 16:31:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:31:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469748] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Log-Log4perl - A Logging Role for Moose based on Log::Log4perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041631.mA4GVjTE032073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469748 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 16:29:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:29:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469743] Review Request: perl-IO-TieCombine - Produce tied (and other) separate but combined variables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041629.mA4GTGbT031364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469743 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 16:31:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:31:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469748] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Log-Log4perl - A Logging Role for Moose based on Log::Log4perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041631.mA4GVh6J032052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469748 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-04 11:31:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-Log-Log4perl Short Description: A Logging Role for Moose based on Log::Log4perl Owners: cweyl Branches: F-8 F-9 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 16:31:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:31:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469750] Review Request: perl-Term-Size - Simple way to get terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041631.mA4GVQIf011074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469750 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 16:31:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:31:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469750] Review Request: perl-Term-Size - Simple way to get terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041631.mA4GVORu011053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469750 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-04 11:31:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Term-Size Short Description: Simple way to get terminal size Owners: cweyl Branches: F-8 F-9 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 16:32:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:32:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469756] Review Request: perl-Sort-Naturally - Sort lexically, but sort numeral parts numerically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041632.mA4GWWkd011401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469756 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-04 11:32:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Sort-Naturally Short Description: package perl-Sort-Naturally is not installed Owners: cweyl Branches: F-8 F-9 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 16:32:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:32:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469756] Review Request: perl-Sort-Naturally - Sort lexically, but sort numeral parts numerically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041632.mA4GWYWx032540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469756 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 16:34:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:34:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469756] Review Request: perl-Sort-Naturally - Sort lexically, but sort numeral parts numerically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041634.mA4GY6HS032621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469756 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-04 11:34:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Sort-Naturally Short Description: Sort lexically, but sort numeral parts numerically Owners: cweyl Branches: F-8 F-9 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 16:34:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:34:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469892] New: Review Request: examiner - Utility to disassemble and comment foreign executable binaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: examiner - Utility to disassemble and comment foreign executable binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469892 Summary: Review Request: examiner - Utility to disassemble and comment foreign executable binaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: The Examiner is an application that utilizes the objdump command to disassemble and comment foreign executable binaries. This app was designed to analyse static compiled binaries but works ok with others. The intention is for forensic research but could also be used in general reverse engineering. This program can only handle basic disassembly. If the binary has been modified to resist debugging then the Examiner probably will not be able to analyse the code. Also the Examiner will not analyse live running code. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/examiner.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/examiner-0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 16:39:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:39:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469560] Review Request: pympdtouchgui - mpd client designed for touchscreens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041639.mA4GdFE4012681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469560 --- Comment #9 from Sven Lankes 2008-11-04 11:39:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pympdtouchgui Short Description: mpd client designed for touchscreens Owners: slankes Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 16:39:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:39:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469560] Review Request: pympdtouchgui - mpd client designed for touchscreens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041639.mA4GdR42001182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469560 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 16:40:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:40:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469894] New: Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469894 Summary: Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/cglib.spec SRPM URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/cglib-2.2-1.src.rpm Description: cglib is a powerful, high performance and quality code generation library for Java. It is used to extend Java classes and implements interfaces at runtime. Note: This package is loosely based on an existing JPackage package by Ralf Apel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 16:44:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:44:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469896] New: Review Request: nachocalendar - A flexible Calendar component for the Java platform Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nachocalendar - A flexible Calendar component for the Java platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469896 Summary: Review Request: nachocalendar - A flexible Calendar component for the Java platform Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/nachocalendar.spec SRPM URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/nachocalendar-0.23-1.src.rpm Description: nachocalendar is a flexible Java calendar component. The project seems to be mostly dead, but it's an indirect dependency of JabRef (my ultimate goal) so I'm proposing it for inclusion anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 16:42:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:42:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469895] New: Review Request: ktable - Custom SWT Table Widget for Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ktable - Custom SWT Table Widget for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469895 Summary: Review Request: ktable - Custom SWT Table Widget for Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/ktable.spec SRPM URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/ktable-2.1.3-1.20081104cvs.src.rpm Description: KTable is a custom SWT table widget that provides a flexible grid of cells to display data. Since it is custom-drawn, it does not have the restrictions of the native SWT Table control. The ktable website only provides compiled tarballs for download, so this is based on a CVS snapshot. The project seems to be mostly dead, but it's an indirect dependency of JabRef (my ultimate goal) so I'm proposing it for inclusion anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 16:52:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:52:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469563] Review Request: hunspell-sw - Swahili hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041652.mA4GqBAS016496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469563 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-11-04 11:52:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-sw Short Description: Swahili hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 16:52:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:52:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469565] Review Request: hunspell-la - Latin hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041652.mA4GqqNh016588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469565 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-11-04 11:52:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-la Short Description: Latin hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 17:02:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 12:02:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041702.mA4H2c6N018803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla 2008-11-04 12:02:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Updated versions: > > Spec URL: http://arm4.org/Downloads/0.8-0.5/arm4.spec > SRPM URL: http://arm4.org/Downloads/0.8-0.5/arm4-0.8-0.5.fc9.src.rpm > > I must say though, it's kind of annoying to hit an rpmlint update in the few > short hour between submission and review :) Fortunately that isn't THAT common. :) > Some comments on these reported errors though. First of all, despite the > assertion of rpmlint, there are many cases where this is a valid design choice, > such as when a common error handler is put in a library. In this case, it was > used in panic conditions only, and I still think that's valid. At this point, > the fix is largely cosmetic, although I will address this more completely for a > future release. > > Which brings me to the larger issue. Fixing this will always require an > architectural rethink. At the very least, it will require a change to the > library version number, potentially putting it out of sync with the upstream > version. Ultimately this isn't the responsibility of the packager, but of the > original developer, and as pointed out already the developer may just say deal > with it. Honestly, if I weren't also the upstream developer, I wouldn't have > changed anything. As it is, I'm fixing internal libraries that provide no > public API for problems that I don't think exist. > > I guess my point is that this warning should largely be ignored during reviews. > The dangers of not doing so are too great. > > OK, rant done, the new code removes these warnings. If you really feel that strongly about it, why not make that case in a bug against rpmlint? It's always being changed to adapt to different use cases. And remember, rpmlint silence is not a prerequisite for approval, especially where warnings are concerned, it's more there to encourage discussion, documentation, and to make sure that both packager and reviewer have a better idea what's really going on. > With regard to your comments on the practice review, I did use the checklist at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines. I'll do a better job > of noting the pass/fail states next time. I'll do a couple of additional > reviews later this week when I get some of my work out of the way. Sounds good. One or two more, plus this package's approval, and we're in business. I'll post a formal review of this package soon. > Thanks! > Dave -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 16:51:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:51:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469564] Review Request:hunspell-fj - Fijian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041651.mA4GpKjc004244@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469564 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-11-04 11:51:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-fj Short Description: Fijian hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 16:46:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:46:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469897] New: Review Request: swingx - A collection of powerful, useful, and just plain fun Swing components Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: swingx - A collection of powerful, useful, and just plain fun Swing components https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469897 Summary: Review Request: swingx - A collection of powerful, useful, and just plain fun Swing components Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/swingx.spec SRPM URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/swingx-0.9.4-1.src.rpm Description: SwingX contains a collection of powerful, useful, and just plain fun Swing components. Each of the Swing components have been extended, providing data-aware functionality out of the box. New useful components have been created like the JXDatePicker, JXTaskPane, and JXImagePanel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 17:32:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 12:32:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466974] Review Request: vdr-remote - Extended remote control plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041732.mA4HWnsI013222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466974 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-04 12:32:47 EDT --- vdr-remote-0.4.0-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vdr-remote-0.4.0-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 17:56:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 12:56:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468554] Review Request: barrage - Kill and destroy as many targets as possible within 3 minutes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041756.mA4HuT6G030008@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468554 Stefan Posdzich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 18:05:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 13:05:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466147] Review Request:fedora-ksplice - Script Collection for Using KSplice on Fedora Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041805.mA4I5PwK019848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466147 --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-11-04 13:05:24 EDT --- New upstream release: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/fedora-ksplice/fedora-ksplice.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/fedora-ksplice/fedora-ksplice-0.3-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 19:23:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 14:23:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466033] Review Request: sugar-browse - Browse activity for sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041923.mA4JNf5v002721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466033 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|sugar-browse -- Browse |Review Request: |activity for sugar |sugar-browse - Browse | |activity for sugar -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 19:28:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 14:28:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468453] Review Request: shed - simple ncurses based hex editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041928.mA4JSJFX014773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468453 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-04 14:28:18 EDT --- shed-1.13-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/shed-1.13-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 19:28:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 14:28:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041928.mA4JS4mV014730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #48 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-04 14:28:00 EDT --- rpm may now support noarch subpackages, but the buildsys doesn't. Honestly there are some interesting issues that crop up, such as which of the noarch packages gets used? The one from the i386 build, the x86_64 build, one of the PPC builds, or something else? There's no guarantee that they're the same; unless significant care is taken they will almost always differ in the timestamps of the included files and may differ in more significant ways. Bottom line: noarch subpackages do not work and aren't going to work even in F10, regardless of what support has been checked into rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 19:43:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 14:43:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469579] Review Request: skychart - Planetarium software for the advanced amateur astronomer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041943.mA4JhJfE017544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469579 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Marek Mahut 2008-11-04 14:43:17 EDT --- Package reviewed and looks correct. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 19:46:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 14:46:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469931] New: Review Request: ipmiutil - IPMI Management Utilities Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ipmiutil - IPMI Management Utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469931 Summary: Review Request: ipmiutil - IPMI Management Utilities Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: arcress at users.sourceforge.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ipmiutil.sourceforge.net/docs/ipmiutil.spec SRPM URL: http://ipmiutil.sourceforge.net/FILES/ipmiutil-2.2.4-1.src.rpm Description: ipmiutil provides various utilities to manage an IPMI system, such as view the IPMI firmware log, perform an IPMI reset, configure the IPMI LAN interface, get and set sensor thresholds, etc. It supports various drivers or a driverless mode, useful for bootables. Ipmiutil was formerly known as 'panicsel'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 19:49:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 14:49:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469931] Review Request: ipmiutil - IPMI Management Utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041949.mA4Jn37N007088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469931 Andy Cress changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://ipmiutil.sourceforge | |.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 19:56:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 14:56:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469931] Review Request: ipmiutil - IPMI Management Utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811041956.mA4JuUjq008511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469931 --- Comment #1 from Bill Nottingham 2008-11-04 14:56:30 EDT --- How does this differ in general from ipmitool? There seems to be quite a bit of overlap here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 20:13:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 15:13:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466237] Review Request: perl-File-Comments - Recognizes file formats and extracts format-specific comments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811042013.mA4KDjOk023276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466237 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-04 15:13:43 EDT --- I took this and then promptly went out of town. Sorry about that; I thought I would have time to finish it up before I left. rpmlint does complain about all of the executable documentation. The scripts do generate an additional dependency on perl(Getopt::Std) which would not be there if the documentation wasn't executable. Since this happens to be provided by the base Perl package currently I guess it isn't really problematic. * source files match upstream: 770bf884c44b3346f7240d173235e27e5022d0277346845eda4187f858ea5fed File-Comments-0.07.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. O rpmlint has complaints about executable documentation. O final provides and requires (extra Getopt::Std dependency): perl(File::Comments) = 0.07 perl(File::Comments::Plugin) perl(File::Comments::Plugin::C) = 0.01 perl(File::Comments::Plugin::HTML) = 0.01 perl(File::Comments::Plugin::Java) = 0.01 perl(File::Comments::Plugin::JavaScript) perl(File::Comments::Plugin::Makefile) = 0.01 perl(File::Comments::Plugin::PHP) = 0.01 perl(File::Comments::Plugin::Perl) = 0.01 perl(File::Comments::Plugin::Python) = 0.01 perl(File::Comments::Plugin::Shell) = 0.01 perl(File::Comments::Target) perl-File-Comments = 0.07-1.fc10 = /usr/bin/perl perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Comments) perl(File::Comments::Plugin) perl(File::Comments::Plugin::C) perl(File::Comments::Plugin::Makefile) O perl(Getopt::Std) perl(HTML::TokeParser) perl(Log::Log4perl) perl(Sysadm::Install) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=9, Tests=75, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.02 sys + 1.05 cusr 0.12 csys = 1.23 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. O file permissions are acceptable (documentation is executable, not causing extra packages to be pulled in) * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 20:16:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 15:16:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466777] Review Request: perl-Satcon - Framework for configuration files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811042016.mA4KGZbL024231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466777 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-04 15:16:34 EDT --- Sorry for the slow response; I've been away for a few days. Yes, this looks fine. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 20:35:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 15:35:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469579] Review Request: skychart - Planetarium software for the advanced amateur astronomer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811042035.mA4KZVXY016460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469579 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-11-04 15:35:30 EDT --- Wow, that easy. I'll inform you once things go wrong with the package once I import it! :) I heard it doesn't build on ppc64! :) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: skychart Short Description: Planetarium software for the advanced amateur astronomer Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 20:43:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 15:43:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469492] Review Request: bam - A fast and flexible build system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811042043.mA4KhgH9017805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469492 --- Comment #3 from Simon Wesp 2008-11-04 15:43:41 EDT --- SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/bam-0.0.0.4.3/bam.spec SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/bam-0.0.0.4.3/bam-0.0.0.4.3-1.fc10.src.rpm --------- rpmlint /var/lib/mock//epel-5-i386/result/bam-* bam.src: W: uncompressed-zip /bam.zip 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. --------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 20:49:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 15:49:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466237] Review Request: perl-File-Comments - Recognizes file formats and extracts format-specific comments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811042049.mA4Kn9TK018586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466237 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth 2008-11-04 15:49:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-File-Comments Short Description: Recognizes file formats and extracts format-specific comments Owners: pghmcfc Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 20:54:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 15:54:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811042054.mA4KsDm7019559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla 2008-11-04 15:54:12 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Clean now. :) - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Says EPL, which is ok, but what's in COPYING? - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK on i386 F-9. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 NA. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig OK. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) OK. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. Do the static and shared libs need to be together for some reason, or could they be separated into -devel and -static? - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). OK. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. OK. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK. - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. Summary: licensing and static libs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 21:13:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 16:13:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469952] New: Review Request: dopewars - a drug dealing game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dopewars - a drug dealing game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469952 Summary: Review Request: dopewars - a drug dealing game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/dopewars.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/dopewars-1.5.12-1.src.rpm Description: Based on John E. Dell's old Drug Wars game, dopewars is a simulation of an imaginary drug market. dopewars is an All-American game which features buying, selling, and trying to get past the cops! The first thing you need to do is pay off your debt to the Loan Shark. After that, your goal is to make as much money as possible (and stay alive)! You have one month of game time to make your fortune. dopewars supports multiple players via. TCP/IP. Chatting to and fighting with other players (computer or human) is supported; check the command line switches (via dopewars -h) for further information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 21:20:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 16:20:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469492] Review Request: bam - A fast and flexible build system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811042120.mA4LKmcn003494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469492 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-11-04 16:20:47 EDT --- Looks fine this time. Thanks! APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 21:21:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 16:21:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469460] review request: gir-repository - GObject Introspection Repository In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811042121.mA4LLo9X023903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469460 --- Comment #2 from Colin Walters 2008-11-04 16:21:49 EDT --- Thanks for the review. I've fixed these two problems locally. Also changed the summary. http://cdn.verbum.org/gir-repository.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 21:27:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 16:27:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469952] Review Request: dopewars - a drug dealing game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811042127.mA4LR6ln004720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469952 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-04 16:27:05 EDT --- New release fixes build in mock: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/dopewars.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/dopewars-1.5.12-2.src.rpm rpmlint output: dopewars.x86_64: E: zero-length /var/lib/games/dopewars.sco dopewars.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/dopewars 02755 dopewars-sdl.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 21:27:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 16:27:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469955] New: Review Request: fprintd - D-Bus service for Fingerprint reader access Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fprintd - D-Bus service for Fingerprint reader access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469955 Summary: Review Request: fprintd - D-Bus service for Fingerprint reader access Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bnocera at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Not that this requires libfprint >= 0.1, builds available at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=917627 Spec URL: http://hadess.fedorapeople.org/fprintd/fprintd.spec SRPM URL: http://hadess.fedorapeople.org/fprintd/fprintd-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: D-Bus service to access fingerprint readers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 21:34:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 16:34:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452108] Review Request: cfdg-fe - A frontend for cfdg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811042134.mA4LYEEM005902@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452108 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-04 16:34:13 EDT --- cfdg-fe-0.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cfdg-fe-0.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 21:40:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 16:40:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469492] Review Request: bam - A fast and flexible build system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811042140.mA4Le5JV007177@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469492 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Simon Wesp 2008-11-04 16:40:04 EDT --- thank you very much! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bam Short Description: A build system Owners: cassmodiah lkundrak Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 21:37:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 16:37:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462446] Review Request: ttf2pt1 - TrueType to Adobe Type 1 font converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811042137.mA4LbM3h026592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-04 16:37:20 EDT --- ttf2pt1-3.4.4-7.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ttf2pt1-3.4.4-7.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 22:03:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 17:03:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469743] Review Request: perl-IO-TieCombine - Produce tied (and other) separate but combined variables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811042203.mA4M3xnc011500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469743 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-04 17:03:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-IO-TieCombine Short Description: produce tied (and other) separate but combined variables Owners: cweyl Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 22:03:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 17:03:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469756] Review Request: perl-Sort-Naturally - Sort lexically, but sort numeral parts numerically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811042203.mA4M37aW011453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469756 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-04 17:03:06 EDT --- Let's try this again, but with F-10. Heh. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Sort-Naturally Short Description: Sort lexically, but sort numeral parts numerically Owners: cweyl Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 22:05:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 17:05:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811042205.mA4M5FCf011989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 --- Comment #4 from Christopher D. Stover 2008-11-04 17:05:14 EDT --- Thanks for your thorough initial review Hans! I feel bad you found so much wrong the first time around, but I've made the fixes. Here's the new output from rpmlint: [Chris at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint barry.spec barry.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 10, tab: line 4) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [Chris at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/barry-0.14-1.fc10.src.rpm barry.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 10, tab: line 4) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [Chris at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/barry-* barry.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libbarry.so barry-devel.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/barry-devel-0.14/www/static.sh barry-devel.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/barry-devel-0.14/www/clean.sh barry-devel.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/barry-devel-0.14/www/clean.sh R barry-devel.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/barry-devel-0.14/www/static.sh R 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. I'm ignoring the library warning because it's not a devel file, it's required for the utilities to work. I'm also ignoring the doc file warnings because the shell scripts do need to be executable, and they generate/remove html devel documentation if the user runs them. In regards to your comments: * I'm not sure what happened with my source tarball. I redownloaded it so please let me know if it still appears to be different this time. * The .desktop file is in the SRPM this time. * I got rid of the libs and util package and consolidated them into the main package. Since the libraries are built from source and the libs package was required to do anything useful, I figured it made sense. Let me know if there's a problem with this. Also, I chose to consolidate the util package instead of gui because I see the util as more basic things to make the Blackberry work with Linux. Thanks again for your input and let me know what you think this time around. SPEC URL: http://8uxodw.bay.livefilestore.com/y1pX2QxGel80n1v0PasG0m-xSKp6YpCGEeOWnmN8rtAMELCATbd7GLcbMgylxarFMM3hKLHXhHWlPpXmnFciqdCDQ/barry.spec?download SRPM URL: http://8uxodw.bay.livefilestore.com/y1pX2QxGel80n1RK93qW0QkHr7q7HjnLMWS-65DxnUq66tI0412d2ruZCsj0cJJdqE0A-qGmzzCnw9Hmp1MYT-5tA/barry-0.14-1.fc10.src.rpm?download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 22:03:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 17:03:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469750] Review Request: perl-Term-Size - Simple way to get terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811042203.mA4M3IJE031662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469750 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-04 17:03:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Term-Size Short Description: Simple way to get terminal size Owners: cweyl Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 22:03:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 17:03:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469748] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Log-Log4perl - A Logging Role for Moose based on Log::Log4perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811042203.mA4M3XQO031700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469748 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-04 17:03:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-Log-Log4perl Short Description: A Logging Role for Moose based on Log::Log4perl Owners: cweyl Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 22:31:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 17:31:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469968] New: Review Request: Vala - a programming language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Vala - a programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469968 Summary: Review Request: Vala - a programming language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/vala.spec SRPM URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/vala-0.5.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Vala is a new programming language that aims to bring modern programming language features to GNOME developers without imposing any additional runtime requirements and without using a different ABI compared to applications and libraries written in C. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 22:28:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 17:28:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811042228.mA4MSKPO003211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 --- Comment #21 from Michael Stahnke 2008-11-04 17:28:18 EDT --- When providing new rpms, please provide SOURCE rpms and not i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 22:37:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 17:37:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469969] New: Review Request: Tao Framework - C# bindings for many different libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Tao Framework - C# bindings for many different libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469969 Summary: Review Request: Tao Framework - C# bindings for many different libraries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/tao.spec SRPM URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/taoframework-2.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Tao Framework for .NET is a collection of bindings to facilitate cross-platform media application development utilizing the .NET and Mono platforms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 22:42:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 17:42:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469972] Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811042242.mA4Mg7Ax017599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 Paul F. Johnson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |469969 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 22:42:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 17:42:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469969] Review Request: Tao Framework - C# bindings for many different libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811042242.mA4Mg7om017577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469969 Paul F. Johnson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |469972 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 22:41:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 17:41:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469972] New: Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 Summary: Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/glfw.spec SRPM URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/glfw-2.6-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: GLFW is a free, Open Source, portable framework for OpenGL application development. In short, it is a single library providing a powerful, portable API for otherwise operating system specific tasks such as opening an OpenGL window, and reading keyboard, time, mouse and joystick input. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 23:25:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 18:25:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469590] Review Request: cpuid - Dumps information about the CPU(s) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811042325.mA4NP046024353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469590 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-04 18:25:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > few notes: > - better will be to use "ExclusiveArch i386 x86_64" instead of ExcludeArch, > because it will not work on Sparc/S390/ARM/... fixed > - the summary should reflect that it is useful only in x86 CPUs fixed > - I see that last release was in 2006, how it works with recent CPUs? I can't test the tool with recent CPUs because I only own older hardware. > - we already have x86info and 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' > - no need to mark the man page as %doc, it is done automagically > (http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm-snapshot/s1-rpm-inside-files-list-directives.html) fixed > - install the non-gzipped man page (as cpuid.1), it is compressed automagically during rpm build fixed New Spec: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/cpuid.spec New SRPM: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/cpuid-20060917-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 00:52:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 19:52:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811050052.mA50qlW9005438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #14 from Jameson 2008-11-04 19:52:46 EDT --- Yeah, I upset myself with that libprojectM.pc issue because I originally planed on adding @LIBSUFFIX@ to that line, but I only defined the patch in the SPEC and never executed it. I didn't know why it didn't work, so I switched it to @LIB_INSTALL_DIR@, and was in disbelief that it still wasn't working until I noticed the patch command was missing. That's why it wound up the way it did. Anyway, all is well now. The SPEC is in the usual location, and the SRPM is here: http://www.vtscrew.com/libprojectM-1.2.0-5.fc9.src.rpm Thanks for all the help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 04:28:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 23:28:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469993] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-URI - URI related types and coercions for Moose Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-URI - URI related types and coercions for Moose https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469993 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-URI - URI related types and coercions for Moose Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-Types-URI OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-Types-URI.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-Types-URI-0.01-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This package provides Moose types for fun (and profit) with the URI classes. It has slightly DWIMier types than the the URI classes have due to implementation details, so the types should be more forgiving when ducktyping will work anyway (e.g. URI::WithBase does not inherit URI). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 05:53:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 00:53:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811050553.mA55rfJp018184@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 --- Comment #81 from Harshad RJ 2008-11-05 00:53:36 EDT --- One small complaint about the 2.7.2-0.2.RC1 package: The jline package isn't added to the classpath defacto. But when I download and install scala distribution from scala-lang.org, jline is bundled alongwith it, and is available in the class path. If this has been fixed in the RC6 package, please ignore this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 06:26:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 01:26:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811050626.mA56QIiq023061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-05 01:26:17 EDT --- Tested this the other day: rpmlint is clean, but I can't get the font to render default for ja on the desktop when I remove other Japanese fonts. (Tagoh mentioned some update to the font .conf file is needed.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 06:36:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 01:36:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469997] New: Review Request: ratproxy - A passive web application security assessment tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ratproxy - A passive web application security assessment tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469997 Summary: Review Request: ratproxy - A passive web application security assessment tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/ratproxy.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/ratproxy-1.51-1.fc10.src.rpm A semi-automated, largely passive web application security audit tool, optimized for an accurate and sensitive detection, and automatic annotation, of potential problems and security-relevant design patterns based on the observation of existing, user-initiated traffic in complex web 2.0 environments. Detects and prioritizes broad classes of security problems, such as dynamic cross-site trust model considerations, script inclusion issues, content serving problems, insufficient XSRF and XSS defenses, and much more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 06:45:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 01:45:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469998] New: Review Request: nightview - A general astronomical software package to control of a CCD camera Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nightview - A general astronomical software package to control of a CCD camera https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469998 Summary: Review Request: nightview - A general astronomical software package to control of a CCD camera Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/nightview.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/nightview-0.3.1-1.el5.src.rpm Description: Nightview is a general astronomical software package to control of a CCD camera together with a telescope. It provides an intuitive graphical interface for getting of individual exposures and a telescope possitioning. An advanced command line interface is also offered to support of a scripting and a long time serie imaging. Nightview is designed as a fully network transparent providing maximum flexibility of its usage. Moreover, all components are prepared with possibility to be simply superseded by an user's equivalent for support of individual improvements and possible requested extendings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 06:49:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 01:49:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469998] Review Request: nightview - A general astronomical software package to control of a CCD camera In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811050649.mA56nELW015508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469998 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-11-05 01:49:13 EDT --- nightview.i386: E: no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. This is a convenience meta-package that drags in the whole suite when installed. It, obviously, can't be nade noarch separately. That might not be true for RPM 4.6, which makes it possible for subpackages to be noarch, but since it also introduces architecture-specific dependencies, it might make more sense to leave it as it is, architecture specific, and let it depend on packages of specific architectures. Builds fine in fedora-5-i386-epel mock, the above is the only RPMLint warning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 07:16:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 02:16:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811050716.mA57G8Cs019804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH 2008-11-05 02:16:07 EDT --- I don't know how you tested it though, this is a Mincho typeface, which is similar to serif. so usually you don't see that on the desktop by default so that most applications defaults sans-serif or monospace. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 07:49:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 02:49:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467154] Review Request: libvirt-qpid - An interface with libvirt using QMF (qpid modeling framework) which utilizes the Advanced Message Queuing protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811050749.mA57nQfY024144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467154 --- Comment #8 from Ian Main 2008-11-05 02:49:25 EDT --- So where are we at with this then? It sounds like the next qpid release will fix the architecture issue. I'm inclined to just wait till then and remove it here. Do I still need to file a bug against libvirt-qpid? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 08:02:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 03:02:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467154] Review Request: libvirt-qpid - An interface with libvirt using QMF (qpid modeling framework) which utilizes the Advanced Message Queuing protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811050802.mA582ZMS004231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467154 --- Comment #9 from David Woodhouse 2008-11-05 03:02:34 EDT --- Is libvirt-qpid also missing on some architectures? If so, it should have an ExcludeArch bug of its own, blocking the FE-ExcludeArch-$ARCH trackers for the affected architectures. And that bug should by blocked by the qpid bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 09:33:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 04:33:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469998] Review Request: nightview - A general astronomical software package to control of a CCD camera In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811050933.mA59XhKN009100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469998 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mmahut at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Marek Mahut 2008-11-05 04:33:42 EDT --- 1) you're missing desktop-file-utils in BuildRequires 2) gcc 4.3 problem: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=918010&name=build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 10:20:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 05:20:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468116] Review Request: sugar-analyze - Analysing tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051020.mA5AKC6O017737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468116 --- Comment #4 from Marco Pesenti Gritti 2008-11-05 05:20:11 EDT --- We have a release with the fix: http://dev.laptop.org/pub/sugar/sources/Analyze/Analyze-8.tar.bz2 Can you please update the spec/package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 10:23:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 05:23:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051023.mA5ANUm1029181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 --- Comment #5 from Hans de Goede 2008-11-05 05:23:29 EDT --- Ok, it builds this time, so full review this time: MUST FIX -------- * Do not uses tabs, only use spaces, rpmlint has a good reason to complain, here is how the specfile looks in my editor (with standard 8 space tabs): Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar Source1: %{name}.desktop BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * Put either the utils or the libs in a separate sub-package, with multilib (64 bit systems with 32 bit compatibility) both a 32 bit and a 64 bit version of the sub-package containing the libs will get added to the repository, we don't want to have both 32 and 64 bit utils in the 64 bit repository * The license tag should be GPLv2+ not GPLv2, I so no license headers without the "or any later version" language * "barry.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libbarry.so", that file should really go the the -devel package, and no the utils don't need it, the trick is to put the libbarry.so.* files in the libs package and libbarry.so in the devel package * Only documentation, not doc build scripts should be shipped as %doc: barry-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/barry-devel-0.14/www/static.sh barry-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/barry-devel-0.14/www/clean.sh barry-devel.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/barry-devel-0.14/www/clean.sh R barry-devel.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/barry-devel-0.14/www/static.sh R So you must not include static.sh and clean.sh here, there are 2 ways todo this: 1) rm the scripts in %setup 2) make a copy of the www dir in %build and remove the files from the copy (use this when the scripts are needed during build / make intall) and then use the copy in %doc * barry seems to out rpaths in its binaries when build on x86_64: barry.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/bidentify ['/usr/lib64'] Put the following 3 lines between each %{configure} and %{__make} (so put them in 3 times): # Disable rpath sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' libtool sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool * barry.spec has various directory ownership issues, all non standard dirs must be owned either by barry itself, or by a package required by barry: %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/udev/rules.d/* You should add a "Requires: udev" as that ownes the %{_sysconfdir}/udev/rules.d dir %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/security/console.perms.d/* Add a "Requires: pam" %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/modprobe.d/blacklist-berry_charge Add a "Requires: module-init-tools" %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/ppp/peers/barry-rogers Add a "Requires initscripts" %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/chatscripts/barry-rogers.chat Hmm, no such directory exists on my system, better own it in the package, add a: %dir %{_sysconfdir}/chatscripts To the %files list %{_includedir}/barry/* barry-devel should own %{_includedir}/barry, so instead write: %{_includedir}/barry/ That will get you to own the dir and gets you all the files below it %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/*.pc Add a "Requires: pkgconfig" to the devel package %{_datadir}/barry/glade/*.glade barry should own %{_datadir}/barry and everything below it, so write: %{_datadir}/barry/ %{_libdir}/opensync You should add a Requires: for what ever package owns %{_libdir}/opensync * Do not package .la files, instead remove them from the buildroot in %install after the make install Thats it, with the next iteration please increase Release one and add a changelog entry what you changed, we always track changes even during review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 10:59:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 05:59:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051059.mA5AxKpc025011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-05 05:59:18 EDT --- Okay. + This package itself is now okay + As written on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored new packagers to be sponsored are required to either - submit another review request - or do a pre-review of other person's review request You have already other review requests. While there may be some issues to fix, they seems good to some extent. --------------------------------------------------------------- This package (libprojectM) is APPROVED by mtasaka --------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Orcan, thanks you for pre-review. If you want to review other libprojectM related packages, it is okay now and I would appreciate it. Also thanks to Jason for pre-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 11:43:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 06:43:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468453] Review Request: shed - simple ncurses based hex editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051143.mA5BhhIv011505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468453 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 11:43:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 06:43:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051143.mA5BhI6R001148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #16 from Jameson 2008-11-05 06:43:17 EDT --- I have applied for sponsorship. My Fedora account is ImNtReal. I verified with upstream that this entire package should be LGPL, so that must have been a typo in Parser.cpp. Patching the license in the source seems like it would be inappropriate for us, so unless you have any other advice about that, I'll leave it to be fixed upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 12:03:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 07:03:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051203.mA5C3aOP015754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-05 07:03:35 EDT --- Okay. Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. (In reply to comment #16) > Patching the license in the source seems like it would be > inappropriate for us, so unless you have any other advice about that, I'll > leave it to be fixed upstream. Yes, patching against license text is inappropriate. While I think I can ignore this for now, please ask the upstream to fix typo in the next version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 12:45:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 07:45:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469894] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051245.mA5CjXe4024094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469894 --- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-11-05 07:45:32 EDT --- Updated spec, now builds properly in mock and is rpmlint clean. http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/cglib.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/cglib-2.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 12:48:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 07:48:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469895] Review Request: ktable - Custom SWT Table Widget for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051248.mA5CmAVh014500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469895 --- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-11-05 07:48:09 EDT --- Updated spec, now builds properly in mock and is rpmlint clean. http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/ktable.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/ktable-2.1.3-2.20081104cvs.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 12:47:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 07:47:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469896] Review Request: nachocalendar - A flexible Calendar component for the Java platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051247.mA5Cl14l014332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469896 --- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-11-05 07:47:00 EDT --- Updated spec, now builds properly in mock and is rpmlint clean. http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/nachocalendar.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/nachocalendar-0.23-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 12:48:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 07:48:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469897] Review Request: swingx - A collection of powerful, useful, and just plain fun Swing components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051248.mA5CmqnX014569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469897 --- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-11-05 07:48:51 EDT --- Updated spec, now builds properly in mock and is rpmlint clean. http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/swingx.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/swingx-0.9.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 13:55:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 08:55:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 442914] Review Request: eg - Git for mere mortals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051355.mA5Dtdp9029146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442914 --- Comment #10 from James Bowes 2008-11-05 08:55:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > James, what's up here? > > I can't find this package in any repo, could you please have a look? > > BTW: upstream version is 0.93. Ha, guess i forgot to submit it to bodhi. Anyways, it's there now. I'll update to a newer version shortly. Thanks Terje! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 13:54:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 08:54:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429882] Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051354.mA5DsEGB028656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429882 Dwayne Bailey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #23 from Dwayne Bailey 2008-11-05 08:54:11 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-Levenshtein New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 OLPC-2 OLPC-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 14:46:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 09:46:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051446.mA5EkMrv017403@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #18 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-05 09:46:21 EDT --- Thank you Mamoru, I will start reviewing the other projectM packages sometime this week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 14:58:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 09:58:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454867] Review Request: kcirbshooter - A small puzzle game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051458.mA5EwrhC010109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454867 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Nils Philippsen 2008-11-05 09:58:51 EDT --- Good: - Re-added information about the copyright terms and holder to the source file. - No compiled executable found in the source tarball. - Uses $RPM_BUILD_ROOT consistently. - Uses RPM optimization flags - Corrected grammar of description. APPROVED. Go ahead and request CVS to be set up now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 15:19:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 10:19:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462296] Review Request: testgen4web-runner - Perl module to replay files recorded with TestGen4Web In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051519.mA5FJFGr024275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462296 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-11-05 10:19:14 EDT --- OK source files match upstream: OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field (same as Perl) matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package isn't need. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 15:26:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 10:26:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469993] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-URI - URI related types and coercions for Moose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051526.mA5FQ8pQ025847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469993 --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-11-05 10:26:07 EDT --- There are needed requirements: perl(MooseX::Types::Path::Class), perl(URI::FromHash). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 15:35:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 10:35:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462253] Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051535.mA5FZbES027985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462253 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-05 10:35:36 EDT --- Looks like this got dropped somehow. I am still seeing a test skipped due to missing Compress::Zlib. I read comment #2 to say that you were going to include it, but I don't see it there and I can verify that it is not pulled into the build environment by any other package. I'm also getting an rpmlint complaint: perl-Cache-FastMmap.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.28-1 ['1.28-2.fc10', '1.28-2'] and indeed the spec in the src.rpm linked above has a changelog entry with version "2.28-1" instead of "1.28-2". But the spec file linked above does not seem to have the above issues, so I'm a bit confused. Did you build the src.rpm and then modify the spec further? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 15:39:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 10:39:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 251805] Review Request: postgresql-orafce - Implementation of some Oracle functions into PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051539.mA5FdBXE028665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-05 10:39:08 EDT --- It's been quite some time since there was any movement here. This ticket will be closed soon if there is no response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 15:43:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 10:43:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 394941] Review Request: tpm-tools - TPM management utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051543.mA5FhU36019680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394941 Bug 394941 depends on bug 426152, which changed state. Bug 426152 Summary: Review Request: openCryptoki - An open-source PKCS#11 implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426152 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 15:43:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 10:43:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426152] Review Request: openCryptoki - An open-source PKCS#11 implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051543.mA5FhTma019644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426152 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-05 10:43:27 EDT --- Well, its been another four months and nobody has stepped up to clear up the confusion. I'm just going to close this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 15:51:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 10:51:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051551.mA5Fp1ow032028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #27 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-05 10:50:59 EDT --- Once closing.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 15:49:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 10:49:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051549.mA5FnGCW031408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #39 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-05 10:49:12 EDT --- (Closing as the last message is only new branch request. cvs flags can set set as ? even if the bug is left closed) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 15:50:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 10:50:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470066] New: Review Request: R-qtl - Quantitative trait loci (qtl) functionality for R Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: R-qtl - Quantitative trait loci (qtl) functionality for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470066 Summary: Review Request: R-qtl - Quantitative trait loci (qtl) functionality for R Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www3.tsl.uu.se/~ellert/R-qtl/R-qtl.spec SRPM URL: http://www3.tsl.uu.se/~ellert/R-qtl/R-qtl-1.09-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Analysis of experimental crosses to identify genes (called quantitative trait loci, QTLs) contributing to variation in quantitative traits. Specfile based on template in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/R -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 15:52:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 10:52:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469931] Review Request: ipmiutil - IPMI Management Utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051552.mA5FqpS2032433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469931 --- Comment #2 from Andy Cress 2008-11-05 10:52:50 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=322599) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=322599) A comparison of common IPMI open source packages A good question that I have been asked before. There is significant overlap between the two, with the key difference being the architectural approach: ipmiutil is more top-down with the focus being to optimize common management tasks, while ipmitool is more bottom-up with the focus being to expose granular IPMI features. ipmiutil was started in 2001, while ipmitool was started in 2003. Attached is my assessment of a feature comparison, including the relative advantages of each. There are precedents for making more than one choice available in the same space, and given that ipmiutil currently has a significant installed base, it makes sense to include it in Fedora, since SLES, MontaVista, and RedFlag have also included it. ipmiutil project stats, avg over last 60 days: (as of 11/04/08) 325 Hits/day 134 Pages/day 28.3 MB/day 9.4 Downloads/day -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 15:52:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 10:52:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051552.mA5Fqr0M022198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(andy at gohanman.com | |) --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-05 10:52:51 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 15:56:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 10:56:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470066] Review Request: R-qtl - Quantitative trait loci (qtl) functionality for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051556.mA5FulCI023017@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470066 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-05 10:56:46 EDT --- Do you already have a sponsor? I see that you've applied for membership in the packager group but it hasn't been approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 16:06:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 11:06:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051606.mA5G69uW003118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-05 11:06:07 EDT --- I wouldn't worry about the non-standard-dir-perm thing; I believe it simply has to do with your umask. I don't see it here. I have to ask, though, where does zfstream-autotools.tar.gz come from? It seems to contain several additional source files and such. What is the upstream status of all that code? We strongly discourage significantly forking upstream source within a package; if you want to fork, do it properly and set up some kind of project hosting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 16:07:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 11:07:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435276] Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051607.mA5G7XU4025597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435276 --- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-05 11:07:32 EDT --- Any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 16:10:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 11:10:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431026] Review Request: gtvg - A simple TV program schedule viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051610.mA5GAbek026174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431026 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-05 11:10:36 EDT --- Any update? It's been... a really long time. I guess I'll close this soon if there's no further response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 16:03:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 11:03:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051603.mA5G3xY9024592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 Andy Theuninck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(andy at gohanman.com | |) | --- Comment #20 from Andy Theuninck 2008-11-05 11:03:58 EDT --- Sorry for the lapses; I really do intend to finish packaging this. I've got koji installed but I haven't had time to do anything else with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 16:11:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 11:11:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435724] Review Request: fedora-ds-graph - an rrdtool-based graphing utility for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051611.mA5GBrDs004115@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435724 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(stpierre at nebrwesl | |eyan.edu) --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-05 11:11:52 EDT --- Chris, do you still wish to submit this package. Can you respond to some of the commentary here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 16:15:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 11:15:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470070] New: Review Request: perl-URI-FromHash - Build a URI from a set of named parameters Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-URI-FromHash - Build a URI from a set of named parameters Alias: perl-URI-FromHash https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470070 Summary: Review Request: perl-URI-FromHash - Build a URI from a set of named parameters Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/URI-FromHash OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 1 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-URI-FromHash.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-URI-FromHash-0.03-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: This module provides a simple one-subroutine "named parameters" style interface for creating URIs. Underneath the hood it uses 'URI.pm', though because of the simplified interface it may not support all possible options for all types of URIs. It was created for the common case where you simply want to have a simple interface for creating syntactically correct URIs from known components (like a path and query string). Doing this using the native 'URI.pm' interface is rather tedious, requiring a number of method calls, which is particularly ugly when done inside a templating system such as Mason or TT2. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=918240 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 16:13:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 11:13:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 436612] Review Request: avfs - A Virtual File System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051613.mA5GDjuW026887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436612 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-05 11:13:43 EDT --- It's been quite some time without response to commentary and this has been set NEEDINFO for a couple of weeks now; I'm going to close this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 16:17:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 11:17:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438808] Review Request: php-pear-DB-ldap - A DB compliant interface to LDAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051617.mA5GHR6L005797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438808 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-05 11:17:25 EDT --- Is anything happening with these tickets? I recall that someone was supposed to be sponsoring David, but I still see nothing in the account system. David, are you still interested in submitting these packages? Do you need someone else to sponsor you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 16:19:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 11:19:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470070] Review Request: perl-URI-FromHash - Build a URI from a set of named parameters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051619.mA5GJ061028046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470070 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |469993 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 16:19:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 11:19:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469627] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class - A Path::Class type library for Moose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051619.mA5GJ0Sl028030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469627 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |469993 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 16:18:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 11:18:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469993] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-URI - URI related types and coercions for Moose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051618.mA5GIxDV028009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469993 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |470070, 469627 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-05 11:18:58 EDT --- Hmm, I don't seem to be setting dependson/blocked right via xmlrpc since 3.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 16:21:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 11:21:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443238] Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051621.mA5GLNaO028692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443238 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(bogado at bogado.net | |) --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-05 11:21:22 EDT --- Setting NEEDINFO; I will close this soon if there is no further response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 16:19:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 11:19:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 439627] Review Request: gluegen - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051619.mA5GJbUM028121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(walters at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-05 11:19:35 EDT --- Any updates here? Things seem to have been waiting on a response from Colin for a few months now. Setting needinfo; I guess I'll close this if there's no response soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 16:23:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 11:23:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444760] Review Request: obm - Open Business Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051623.mA5GNOZs029017@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444760 --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-05 11:23:22 EDT --- Anything happening here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 16:24:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 11:24:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435724] Review Request: fedora-ds-graph - an rrdtool-based graphing utility for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051624.mA5GOr9X029134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435724 Chris St. Pierre changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(stpierre at nebrwesl | |eyan.edu) | --- Comment #4 from Chris St. Pierre 2008-11-05 11:24:52 EDT --- Yes, I intend to fix all of these issues in the next version of Fedora DS Graph, but release of that has been held up by some unrelated issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 16:27:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 11:27:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051627.mA5GRFpT029750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Sailer 2008-11-05 11:27:14 EDT --- zfstream-autotools.tar.gz has been written by me. Yes, it has been sent upstream, but the author won't take it, as he is also the author of toc, the original build system. I tried half a day to get toc working, without success. Even if I got it to work, it would unlikely have worked and picked the correct compiler flags etc. for any architecture I don't own (i.e. everything but x86). So it seemed far less work to just drop in autotools scripts. And autotool is working and maintained for pretty much all architectures fedora supports, so it seems to me that with autotools build scripts, I will have a better chance of getting the packages to compile and run on other architectures as well. See the similar discussion on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438587 BTW: I do not intend to actually fork the project source code, just replace the build system, as it proved unworkable for me. I will send source code changes upstream, and the author will apply them. He's just not keen on replacing the build system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 16:46:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 11:46:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051646.mA5GkJC0000473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-05 11:46:18 EDT --- gstreamer-java-0.9-0.3.20081023hg.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gstreamer-java-0.9-0.3.20081023hg.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 16:53:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 11:53:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051653.mA5Gr9v9011530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-05 11:53:08 EDT --- So you're saying that all of the .c, .cpp and .h files in zfstream-autotools.tar.gz are part of the build system? That seems difficult to believe. Obviously if toc doesn't work we have to do something. I'm surprised that someone thinks autotools is an improvement over anything, but so be it. Still, adding new source goes beyond a simple buildsystem change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 16:51:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 11:51:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469998] Review Request: nightview - A general astronomical software package to control of a CCD camera In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051651.mA5Gpu3M001421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469998 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-11-05 11:51:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > 1) you're missing desktop-file-utils in BuildRequires Right, fixed. > 2) gcc 4.3 problem: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=918010&name=build.log Also fixed. Thanks for the suggestions! New package: SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/nightview.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/nightview-0.3.1-2.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 16:59:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 11:59:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462253] Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051659.mA5Gx8Sp012504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462253 --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2008-11-05 11:59:07 EDT --- I'm confused too - I certainly never modify spec files without automatically rebuilding and testing corresponding rpms. I can't rule out copying the wrong src.rpm to the server though - I've replaced it with a fresh rebuild (and redownloaded and rechecked that I've really uploaded the correct thing this time). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 17:14:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 12:14:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051714.mA5HEiko015222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 --- Comment #11 from Thomas Sailer 2008-11-05 12:14:44 EDT --- autotools may be crap, but at least it's known crap 8-) If you have an example of a Makefile, that builds a shared library and works on all supported/soon to be supported architectures (including mingw), then I'd be interested! The archive also contains the source code for supporting zip files (in addition to gz and bz2). This code has been sent upstream, and the author agreed (on Jan 2008) to include it, but apparently hasn't gotten around it. I will ping again... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 17:37:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 12:37:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454867] Review Request: kcirbshooter - A small puzzle game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051737.mA5HbNZv018775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454867 Stefan Posdzich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Stefan Posdzich 2008-11-05 12:37:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kcirbshooter Short Description: A small puzzle game Owners: cheekyboinc Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 17:54:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 12:54:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051754.mA5Hs8g3011310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #19 from Ulrich Drepper 2008-11-05 12:54:07 EDT --- [I'm traveling again...] (In reply to comment #17) > *now=>not, updated=>update, funde=>files > *tpyo erorr, I am durnck ;-) Not a good to refer to kajo data, it gets removed at ta short while. I didn't see it. Re the documentation: I added some more files but they really are not necessary. As I said before, it's stupid on rpmlint's part to insist on doc files for all these packages. The -libs subpackage still doesn't have any but this is just fine. There is nothing to say. Anybody who needs to know more will find the main package, pfstools, and read the docs there. Find the latest srpm and spec file here: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfstools-1.6.5-4.fc9.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfstools.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 18:17:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 13:17:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447368] Review Request: schroot - Execute commands in a chroot environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051817.mA5IHf0p025461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447368 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-05 13:17:40 EDT --- I don't feel competent to fully review this package but I can make a few comments: You shouldn't duplicate all of those %doc files between the various subpackages. I'm curious as to which guideline you believe mandates that you split off the libsbuild package. Generally library splits are only required to prevent multilib conflicts, but I don't believe this is a multilib package. (For one thing, it has no -devel subpackage.) There are a few rpmlint complaints: dchroot.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/dchroot root 04755 dchroot.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/dchroot 04755 schroot.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/schroot root 04755 schroot.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/schroot 04755 Obviously these are intended. dchroot.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/dchroot ['/usr/lib64'] schroot.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/libexec/schroot/schroot-releaselock ['/usr/lib64'] schroot.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/libexec/schroot/schroot-mount ['/usr/lib64'] schroot.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/libexec/schroot/schroot-listmounts ['/usr/lib64'] schroot.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/schroot ['/usr/lib64'] These are problematic. The tarball seems to include a large amount of doxygen-generated documentation. Is that of any use to end-users? If so it should probably be packaged, although a subpackage might be useful. I agree that a security review would be useful, but I'm certainly not the one to do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 19:56:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 14:56:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051956.mA5JuRl9005198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #19 from Jameson 2008-11-05 14:56:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libprojectM Short Description: music visualization library Owners: imntreal Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: imntreal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 19:57:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 14:57:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051957.mA5Jv4BV010843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 Jameson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 19:59:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 14:59:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446563] Review Request: rubygem-rspec - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051959.mA5JxOEq005500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446563 --- Comment #7 from Casey Dahlin 2008-11-05 14:59:23 EDT --- Looks all right to me. Do you need sponsorship? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 20:23:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 15:23:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429882] Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052023.mA5KNIXZ015381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429882 Dwayne Bailey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 21:12:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 16:12:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052112.mA5LC5fu024765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #28 from Christoph Wickert 2008-11-05 16:12:00 EDT --- Robert and I agreed to switch primary ownership. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: beldi Owners: cwickert, robert -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 21:11:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 16:11:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470066] Review Request: R-qtl - Quantitative trait loci (qtl) functionality for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052111.mA5LBm1Z024718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470066 --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2008-11-05 16:11:48 EDT --- I have a few other packages that I have submitted that are actively being reviewed, but not any approved package yet. I did add the NEED SPONSOR tag to the first package I submitted. As far as I have understood I can not become a member of the packager group until my first package is approved. It might well be that this package will be the one approved first, since it is less complicated than the others, has no patches applied, and very closely follows the template in the guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 21:19:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 16:19:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469833] Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Use the GMP library for Math::BigInt routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052119.mA5LJwn8025685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469833 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-Math-BigInt-GMP -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 21:46:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 16:46:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052146.mA5LkGRg031756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 --- Comment #29 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-05 16:46:16 EDT --- Is there some reason you can't make this change in the packagedb yourselves? There's no CVS admin action involved here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 21:54:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 16:54:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470140] New: Review Request: nettee - Network "tee" program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nettee - Network "tee" program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470140 Summary: Review Request: nettee - Network "tee" program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/nettee.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/nettee-0.1.9-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://saf.bio.caltech.edu/nettee.html Description: nettee is a network "tee" program. It can typically transfer data between N nodes at (nearly) the full bandwidth provided by the switch which connects them. It is handy for cloning nodes or moving large database files Koji scratch builds: F9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=918707 F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=918700 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint -i nett* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i nettee* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 22:06:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:06:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458994] Review Request: liveusb-creator - A liveusb creator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052206.mA5M6goA003132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458994 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert 2008-11-05 17:06:40 EDT --- The %files section of this package is broken: %{_datadir}/* does not work, because now liveusb-creator also owns %{_datadir}/applications and %{_datadir}/pixmaps Kushal, please use something like %{_bindir}/* %{_sbindir}/* %{_datadir}/pixmaps/*.png %{_datadir}/applications/*.desktop or even better: %{_bindir}/%{name} %{_sbindir}/%{name} %{_datadir}/pixmaps/fedorausb.png %{_datadir}/applications/fedora-%{name}.desktop This way you make sure you don't accidentally package unwanted files. Nigel, please review more carefully next time, "No duplicate directory ownerships" should really mean "No duplicate directory ownerships". ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 22:28:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:28:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052228.mA5MSCoJ001780@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 --- Comment #30 from Christoph Wickert 2008-11-05 17:28:11 EDT --- How can I do this in packagedb? I have been an owner right from the beginning and have all privileges, still packagedb lists Robert as owner, see https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/beldi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 22:27:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:27:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438587] Review Request: libsqlite3x - C++ Wrapper for the SQLite3 database engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052227.mA5MRdQM001737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438587 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-05 17:27:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 22:28:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:28:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467179] Review Request: pngcrush - Optimizer for PNG (Portable Network Graphics) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052228.mA5MSeiF001847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467179 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-05 17:28:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 22:30:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:30:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469579] Review Request: skychart - Planetarium software for the advanced amateur astronomer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052230.mA5MUXcu002315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469579 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-05 17:30:32 EDT --- Note that if it fails to build on ppc64, you MUST file a bug against the ppc64 blocker. ;) cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 22:31:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:31:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468285] Review Request: gobject-introspection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052231.mA5MVggX007135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468285 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 22:35:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:35:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469560] Review Request: pympdtouchgui - mpd client designed for touchscreens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052235.mA5MZjlP007759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469560 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-05 17:35:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 22:34:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:34:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052234.mA5MYhfe002801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-05 17:34:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 22:39:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:39:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052239.mA5Mdhac008082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-05 17:39:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 22:38:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:38:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469492] Review Request: bam - A fast and flexible build system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052238.mA5Mc1pY007961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469492 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-05 17:38:00 EDT --- The description seems very generic here. Let me know in a new request if you would like to update it to something more descriptive. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 22:41:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:41:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454867] Review Request: kcirbshooter - A small puzzle game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052241.mA5Mf6xH003998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454867 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-05 17:41:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 22:45:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:45:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469565] Review Request: hunspell-la - Latin hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052245.mA5Mj5Fx009317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469565 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-05 17:45:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 22:44:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:44:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469564] Review Request:hunspell-fj - Fijian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052244.mA5MiRjE008946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469564 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-05 17:44:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 22:43:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:43:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467180] Review Request: pngnq - tool for quantizing PNG images in RGBA format Version In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052243.mA5Mh7F1008797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467180 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-05 17:43:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 22:43:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:43:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469563] Review Request: hunspell-sw - Swahili hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052243.mA5MhsED004273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469563 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-05 17:43:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 22:46:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:46:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469743] Review Request: perl-IO-TieCombine - Produce tied (and other) separate but combined variables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052246.mA5MkBGw004826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469743 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-05 17:46:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 22:48:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:48:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469750] Review Request: perl-Term-Size - Simple way to get terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052248.mA5Mmvmr009809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469750 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-05 17:48:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 22:47:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:47:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469748] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Log-Log4perl - A Logging Role for Moose based on Log::Log4perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052247.mA5MlNce009701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469748 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-05 17:47:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 22:50:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:50:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469756] Review Request: perl-Sort-Naturally - Sort lexically, but sort numeral parts numerically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052250.mA5Mo4YR005464@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469756 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-05 17:50:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 22:51:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:51:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466237] Review Request: perl-File-Comments - Recognizes file formats and extracts format-specific comments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052251.mA5Mpwvu010423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466237 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-05 17:51:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 22:57:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:57:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244371] Review Request: sugar - OLPC desktop environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052257.mA5MvY2K011314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244371 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-05 17:57:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 23:00:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 18:00:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052300.mA5N0jt1007273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 --- Comment #31 from Robert Scheck 2008-11-05 18:00:44 EDT --- Theoretically packagedb works, in fact when I'm using it, only the flavor broken is available. Anyway solved with help of abadger1999 on #fedora-admin: [23:35:05] < rsc> who broke packagedb? [23:35:11] < abadger1999> rsc: I did. [23:35:12] < rsc> I'm not able to release an ownership. [23:35:23] < abadger1999> rsc: Which page? [23:35:26] < rsc> abadger1999: I knew that ;) [23:35:31] < abadger1999> heh [23:35:32] < rsc> abadger1999: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/beldi [23:35:47] < rsc> cwickert shall get owner and I as co-maintainer (so just vice versa change) [23:36:35] < abadger1999> rsc: Do you get an error message? [23:36:59] < rsc> abadger1999: that would made me lucky. Just nothing happens. Even no ajax animation. [23:38:24] < abadger1999> rsc: can you try refreshing the page for me and hitting it again. [23:38:31] < rsc> of course. Hang on. [23:38:44] < rsc> Refreshed, will click now. [23:38:57] < abadger1999> If I'm lucky, you hit the page while I was restarting the servers and they lost the session information. [23:39:00] < rsc> Clicked to all three butons. [23:39:09] < rsc> *buttons [23:40:22] < rsc> abadger1999: anything nice found? [23:41:20] < abadger1999> rsc: Nope. I see the request that you put in before but not the one you're putting in now. [23:41:45] < abadger1999> Ah hah [23:41:46] < rsc> maybe the buttons itself are broken? [23:41:47] < abadger1999> There it is [23:42:13] < abadger1999> Oh wait... That's the login URL [23:42:24] < abadger1999> 1 minute ago [23:42:43] < rsc> hmpf. [23:42:57] < rsc> re-login now. [23:43:13] < rsc> clicked "released ownership" again, nothing happend [23:43:53] < abadger1999> Let me try... I'm in cvsadmin which sometimes means I can't reproduce the error but worth a shot. [23:44:47] < abadger1999> Yeah. Something's broken. [23:45:09] < abadger1999> Ah... I updated some of the javascript... since that's static it gets cached. [23:45:17] < abadger1999> Let me clear mod_cache on the proxies [23:50:34] < abadger1999> rsc: Okay, try again [23:51:26] < rsc> abadger1999: works. [23:51:28] < rsc> cwickert: take it. [23:51:39] < cwickert> rsc: mom... [23:51:41] < rsc> abadger1999: thank you. So you really broke it? ;) [23:52:36] < cwickert> abadger1999: I can't take the package from rsc, the button does nothing for me ether [23:52:52] < abadger1999> rsc: heh :-) Somewhat [23:52:52] < rsc> cwickert: haha! [23:53:13] < rsc> abadger1999: okay, now you've to switch back, that he can take it. Looks like this is maybe the old JavaScript? ;) [23:53:19] < abadger1999> cwickert: Refresh the page and try again. I needed to flush the cache on the web servers when I upgraded. [23:54:02] < abadger1999> rsc: yeah. The old javascript was in the cache. But it referenced things that are no longer in the new server. So things broke. [23:54:12] < cwickert> abadger1999: I did reload the page... [23:54:12] < abadger1999> after flushing the cache, the new javascript should be being saved. [23:54:23] < cwickert> let me restart my browser [23:54:53] < abadger1999> Hmmm... yeah if it's still broken after that, there's something fishy going on... it's being cached somewhere. [23:55:41] < cwickert> abadger1999: works now [23:55:54] < cwickert> rsc: ok, now re-add the permissions you need [23:56:05] < abadger1999> cwickert: Cool. [23:56:36] < abadger1999> rsc, cwickert: Thanks for letting me know about that. I need to add flush the cache to the TurboGears SOP. [23:57:03] < rsc> cwickert: done, you've to approve the spam flooding now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 23:04:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 18:04:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469564] Review Request: hunspell-fj - Fijian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052304.mA5N41uT007689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469564 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:hunspell-fj |Review Request: hunspell-fj |- Fijian hunspell |- Fijian hunspell |dictionaries |dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 23:49:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 18:49:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052349.mA5Nnlex014552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #40 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2008-11-05 18:49:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 23:51:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 18:51:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052351.mA5Nplo9019789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 23:54:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 18:54:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429882] Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811052354.mA5NsAkM015379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429882 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #24 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2008-11-05 18:54:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 00:00:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 19:00:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469560] Review Request: pympdtouchgui - mpd client designed for touchscreens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060000.mA600xh0016559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469560 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-05 19:00:58 EDT --- pympdtouchgui-0.302-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pympdtouchgui-0.302-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 00:08:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 19:08:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466237] Review Request: perl-File-Comments - Recognizes file formats and extracts format-specific comments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060008.mA608vU5017454@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466237 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-05 19:08:57 EDT --- perl-File-Comments-0.07-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-File-Comments-0.07-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 00:10:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 19:10:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466237] Review Request: perl-File-Comments - Recognizes file formats and extracts format-specific comments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060010.mA60AtPO017884@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466237 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-05 19:10:54 EDT --- perl-File-Comments-0.07-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-File-Comments-0.07-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 00:11:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 19:11:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466237] Review Request: perl-File-Comments - Recognizes file formats and extracts format-specific comments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060011.mA60BtNU022531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466237 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-05 19:11:54 EDT --- perl-File-Comments-0.07-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-File-Comments-0.07-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 00:33:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 19:33:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431026] Review Request: gtvg - A simple TV program schedule viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060033.mA60X180021583@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431026 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED Flag|needinfo?(ivazqueznet at gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #3 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams 2008-11-05 19:33:00 EDT --- Sorry, I've been a bit busy as of late. I'll put this on hold for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 01:04:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 20:04:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470155] New: Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 Summary: Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alexeskin at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: www.math.uchicago.edu/~eskin/xword/xword.spec SRPM URL: www.math.uchicago.edu/~eskin/xword/xword-1.0-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: Xword is a GTK program that works well for doing crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format used by The New York Times and others. As well as a clock, it supports printing. It also auto-saves puzzles as you solve them so that you can return to partially completed puzzles. This package is based on the debian/ubuntu package. This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 01:25:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 20:25:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470070] Review Request: perl-URI-FromHash - Build a URI from a set of named parameters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060125.mA61P7p1001048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470070 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|1 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 01:35:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 20:35:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060135.mA61ZdjL002857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #29 from Conrad Meyer 2008-11-05 20:35:38 EDT --- Any new comments? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 01:36:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 20:36:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060136.mA61aIks002955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 01:44:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 20:44:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469579] Review Request: skychart - Planetarium software for the advanced amateur astronomer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060144.mA61ijbt031960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469579 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-11-05 20:44:44 EDT --- Imported and built. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 01:53:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 20:53:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060153.mA61rtCx001043@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #20 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-11-05 20:53:54 EDT --- I never did a complete review. It failed at that time, to build. Reason: + /bin/cat /builddir/build/SOURCES/pfstools-mDATA.patch + /usr/bin/patch -s -p1 -b --suffix .mDATA --fuzz=0 + aclocal /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.DDk9s1: line 41: aclocal: command not found error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.DDk9s1 (%prep) RPM build errors: Misses buildrequire automake. I will do a complete review shortly. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 01:59:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 20:59:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462253] Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060159.mA61xWV5006326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462253 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 01:56:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 20:56:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462253] Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060156.mA61uein006056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462253 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-05 20:56:38 EDT --- Yes, that's better, thanks. This package looks fine. Please go ahead and get your account set up, accept the CLA and apply for membership in the packager group. I will sponsor you. * source files match upstream: aa819d16345b537a88b539f5afe9a90b3ddf208a21ea5f89f0bc0850fe0a05d5 Cache-FastMmap-1.28.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: CImpl.so()(64bit) perl(Cache::FastMmap) = 1.28 perl(Cache::FastMmap::CImpl) = 1.28 perl-Cache-FastMmap = 1.28-2.fc10 perl-Cache-FastMmap(x86-64) = 1.28-2.fc10 = perl >= 0:5.006 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Cache::FastMmap::CImpl) perl(XSLoader) perl(bytes) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=14, Tests=315, 23 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.02 sys + 4.30 cusr 0.67 csys = 5.05 CPU) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 02:25:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 21:25:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445208] Review Request: rubygem-rapt - Rails Plugin Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060225.mA62PMxV006459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445208 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-05 21:25:21 EDT --- I've no idea why nobody has commented on this yet, but I went to take a look and found the above links invalid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 02:29:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 21:29:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446563] Review Request: rubygem-rspec - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060229.mA62T90n011186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446563 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-05 21:29:07 EDT --- Nope, he's already in the packager group. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 02:59:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 21:59:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446563] Review Request: rubygem-rspec - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060259.mA62x9JG011545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446563 Casey Dahlin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cdahlin at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Casey Dahlin 2008-11-05 21:59:07 EDT --- Looks good to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 03:06:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 22:06:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446989] Review Request: python-epsilon - A small utility package that depends on tools too recent for Twisted In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060306.mA636060012886@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446989 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-05 22:05:59 EDT --- I'm sorry that you have not received a response to your submission. If you are still interested in submitting this package, here are a few comments: Is there any arch-specific code in this package? I don't see anything compiled, and there are no binaries included in the final rpm. Are you sure it shouldn't be noarch? No version of Fedora less than F8 is supported, so you should simply remove the conditionals that refer to such old versions (especially the FC3 one; that's long dead). If you intend to build for EPEL then you may need some conditionals for that, but they should be indicated as being for EPEL. Also, please note that the package doesn't actually work on those old releases; it doesn't even build on F8 because your files list explicitly specifies the egg.info file, when F8 and older don't generate one. Your files list can be as simple as a single line: %{python_sitelib}/* Is there any particular reason for the complex file list you have now? As a bonus, that would actually let you build on F8 without conditionalizing. NAME.txt has DOS line endings and should be converted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 03:11:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 22:11:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446989] Review Request: python-epsilon - A small utility package that depends on tools too recent for Twisted In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060311.mA63BJAn018377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446989 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-05 22:11:18 EDT --- Also, the License: tag is not correct. The LICENSE file contains exact what is termed the "Modern Style with Sublicense" on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT, implying that "License: MIT" is correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 03:23:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 22:23:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454441] Review Request: R-bigmemory - Manage massive matrices in R using C++, with support for shared memory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060323.mA63NrKi020574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454441 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-05 22:23:52 EDT --- It's been a while since this was submitted although the last blocker was only recently closed. Unfortunately I think upstream has moved on a bit as I can no longer fetch the upstream source. Did you want to update the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 04:01:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 23:01:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469756] Review Request: perl-Sort-Naturally - Sort lexically, but sort numeral parts numerically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060401.mA641WIT023098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469756 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 04:04:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 23:04:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452108] Review Request: cfdg-fe - A frontend for cfdg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060404.mA644fq6027891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452108 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-05 23:04:39 EDT --- cfdg-fe-0.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 04:03:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 23:03:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455396] Review Request: TrustedQSL - TrustedQSL ham-radio applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060403.mA643cR9027712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455396 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-05 23:03:37 EDT --- trustedqsl-1.11-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 04:04:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 23:04:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452108] Review Request: cfdg-fe - A frontend for cfdg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060404.mA644iTj027926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452108 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 04:05:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 23:05:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469280] Review Request: fedora-business-cards - A tool for rendering Fedora contributor business cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060405.mA645YjN028581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469280 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|ERRATA |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 04:05:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 23:05:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469280] Review Request: fedora-business-cards - A tool for rendering Fedora contributor business cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060405.mA645VEt028551@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469280 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-05 23:05:30 EDT --- fedora-business-cards-0.2.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 04:03:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 23:03:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462446] Review Request: ttf2pt1 - TrueType to Adobe Type 1 font converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060403.mA643tsK023433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-05 23:03:54 EDT --- ttf2pt1-3.4.4-7.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 04:03:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 23:03:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445126] Review Request: mirrormanager - Fedora MirrorManager server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060403.mA643Rwd023319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445126 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-05 23:03:26 EDT --- mirrormanager-1.2.6-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 04:03:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 23:03:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462446] Review Request: ttf2pt1 - TrueType to Adobe Type 1 font converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060403.mA643w6c023485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 04:03:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 23:03:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445126] Review Request: mirrormanager - Fedora MirrorManager server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060403.mA643V7P023357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445126 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 04:09:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 23:09:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455396] Review Request: TrustedQSL - TrustedQSL ham-radio applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060409.mA6495hR029785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455396 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-05 23:09:04 EDT --- trustedqsl-1.11-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 04:08:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 23:08:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468453] Review Request: shed - simple ncurses based hex editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060408.mA648UWR025411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468453 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-05 23:08:29 EDT --- shed-1.13-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 04:23:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 23:23:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469743] Review Request: perl-IO-TieCombine - Produce tied (and other) separate but combined variables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060423.mA64Nvdd000468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469743 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 04:25:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 23:25:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469750] Review Request: perl-Term-Size - Simple way to get terminal size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060425.mA64PJrD001082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469750 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 04:27:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 23:27:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469748] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Log-Log4perl - A Logging Role for Moose based on Log::Log4perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060427.mA64R09D001414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469748 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 04:42:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 23:42:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464049] Package Review Request for libprojectM-qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060442.mA64gs4W003898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464049 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-05 23:42:53 EDT --- Ok, this package is next. Here are my notes: * rpmlint on the SRPMS or SPEC gives: libprojectM-qt.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 10) which can be fixed easily. * There is no file containing the license text. Please inform the upstream. The license as of it is should be GPLv2+, which is correct. * Source0 must be corrected * The package does not (directly or indirectly) depend on another package that owns on /usr/share/pixmaps (please verify this). Thus it must own /usr/share/pixmaps * The empty doc line %doc can be taken off, if there's no reply to the license query from upstream. * I find the description (*) for the devel package insufficient. What it says is true for any devel packages. I would copy the contents of the description from the main package and paste it to the beginning of the devel's description, and after that add the (*) to the end. * You must BR: cmake I recommend you using "mock" to figure out BR's. * No headers in devel? (just checking) * The pc file needs patched as you did for the libprojectM package (to fix the /usr/lib(64) issue) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 04:57:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 23:57:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462253] Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060457.mA64vaNX001811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462253 --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2008-11-05 23:57:34 EDT --- Thanks Jason. Account is already set up (iarnell) and CLA accepted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 05:11:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 00:11:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470173] New: Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 Summary: Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/m4ri.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/m4ri-20081028-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: M4RI is a library for fast arithmetic with dense matrices over F_2. The name M4RI comes from the first implemented algorithm: The "Method of the Four Russians" inversion algorithm published by Gregory Bard. M4RI is used by the Sage mathematics software and the PolyBoRi library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 06:13:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 01:13:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470177] New: Review Request: perl-Module-Util - Module name tools and transformations Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Util - Module name tools and transformations Alias: perl-Module-Util https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470177 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Util - Module name tools and transformations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-Util OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Module-Util.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Module-Util-1.04-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This module provides a few useful functions for manipulating module names. Its main aim is to centralise some of the functions commonly used by modules that manipulate other modules in some way, like converting module names to relative paths. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=919203 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 06:20:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 01:20:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470178] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-ConfigFromFile - An abstract Moose role for setting attributes from a configfile Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-ConfigFromFile - An abstract Moose role for setting attributes from a configfile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470178 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-ConfigFromFile - An abstract Moose role for setting attributes from a configfile Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-ConfigFromFile OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-ConfigFromFile.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-ConfigFromFile-0.02-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is an abstract role which provides an alternate constructor for creating objects using parameters passed in from a configuration file. The actual implementation of reading the configuration file is left to concrete subroles. It declares an attribute 'configfile' and a class method 'new_with_config', and requires that concrete roles derived from it implement the class method 'get_config_from_file'. Attributes specified directly as arguments to 'new_with_config' supercede those in the configfile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 06:21:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 01:21:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469627] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class - A Path::Class type library for Moose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060621.mA66LSdC015147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469627 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |470178 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 06:21:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 01:21:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470178] Review Request: perl-MooseX-ConfigFromFile - An abstract Moose role for setting attributes from a configfile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060621.mA66LR3D015127@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470178 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |469627 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 06:42:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 01:42:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464049] Package Review Request for libprojectM-qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060642.mA66gqjx022235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464049 --- Comment #2 from Jameson 2008-11-06 01:42:51 EDT --- I actually already built it with mock. The reason I left out cmake was because I had put it as a requirement for libprojectM-devel. I now understand that it was the wrong way to go about it, but I believe all of the above is corrected. New SPEC in same location. New SRPM: http://www.vtscrew.com/libprojectM-qt-1.2.0-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 06:48:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 01:48:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464050] Package Review Request for projectM-libvisual In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060648.mA66mN7P023072@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464050 Jameson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jameson 2008-11-06 01:48:22 EDT --- I have a new SPEC in original location, and a new SRPM: http://www.vtscrew.com/projectM-libvisual-1.2.0-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 06:49:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 01:49:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464051] Package Review Request for projectM-jack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060649.mA66n2OI023123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464051 Jameson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jameson 2008-11-06 01:49:02 EDT --- I have a new SPEC in original location, and a new SRPM: http://www.vtscrew.com/projectM-jack-1.2.0-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 06:49:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 01:49:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464054] Package Review Request for projectM-pulseaudio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060649.mA66ncBl019661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464054 Jameson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jameson 2008-11-06 01:49:37 EDT --- I have a new SPEC in original location, and a new SRPM: http://www.vtscrew.com/projectM-pulseaudio-1.2.0-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 07:10:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 02:10:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470179] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-App-Cmd - Mashes up MooseX::Getopt and App::Cmd Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-App-Cmd - Mashes up MooseX::Getopt and App::Cmd Alias: perl-MooseX-App-Cmd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470179 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-App-Cmd - Mashes up MooseX::Getopt and App::Cmd Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-App-Cmd OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-App-Cmd.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-App-Cmd-0.04-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This module marries the App::Cmd manpage with the MooseX::Getopt manpage. Use it like the App::Cmd manpage advises (especially see the App::Cmd::Tutorial manpage), swapping the App::Cmd::Command manpage for the MooseX::App::Cmd::Command manpage. Then you can write your moose commands as moose classes, with the MooseX::Getopt manpage defining the options for you instead of 'opt_spec' returning a the Getopt::Long::Descriptive manpage spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 07:12:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 02:12:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470179] Review Request: perl-MooseX-App-Cmd - Mashes up MooseX::Getopt and App::Cmd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060712.mA67C4P2023140@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470179 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |470178, 469627, 469816 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 07:12:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 02:12:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469627] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class - A Path::Class type library for Moose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060712.mA67C5vh023163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469627 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |470179 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 07:12:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 02:12:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470178] Review Request: perl-MooseX-ConfigFromFile - An abstract Moose role for setting attributes from a configfile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060712.mA67C7wr023198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470178 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |470179 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 07:16:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 02:16:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470179] Review Request: perl-MooseX-App-Cmd - Mashes up MooseX::Getopt and App::Cmd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060716.mA67GSWs023831@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470179 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-06 02:16:27 EDT --- I swear I fixed those "manpage" references in the %description. Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-App-Cmd.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-App-Cmd-0.04-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 07:12:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 02:12:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469816] Review Request: perl-App-Cmd - Write command line apps with less suffering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060712.mA67C6EN023181@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469816 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |470179 Bug 469816 depends on bug 469743, which changed state. Bug 469743 Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-TieCombine - Produce tied (and other) separate but combined variables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469743 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 07:18:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 02:18:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464050] Package Review Request for projectM-libvisual In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060718.mA67I9Pk024011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464050 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-06 02:18:08 EDT --- (fedora-review flags must be set by a reviewer, please revert) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 07:27:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 02:27:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060727.mA67Rvhd029357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 Aaron S. Hawley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aaronh at garden.org --- Comment #1 from Aaron S. Hawley 2008-11-06 02:27:56 EDT --- What's the significance of doxygen as a build requirement? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 08:08:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 03:08:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469894] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060808.mA688qtH002741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469894 Aaron S. Hawley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aaronh at garden.org --- Comment #2 from Aaron S. Hawley 2008-11-06 03:08:51 EDT --- I haven't done Java packages, but you should probably make /etc/maven/fragments/cglib a %conf. rpmlint warns: cglib.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/cglib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 08:25:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 03:25:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060825.mA68PhO3005761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-11-06 03:25:42 EDT --- - removed, mistakenly wrote it. - Thanks. Updated: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/pstreams-devel.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/pstreams-devel-0.6.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 08:33:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 03:33:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469811] Review Request: pdf2djvu - PDF to DjVu converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060833.mA68X7Pe006740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469811 Aaron S. Hawley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aaronh at garden.org --- Comment #2 from Aaron S. Hawley 2008-11-06 03:33:06 EDT --- For whatever reason, it compiles on Fedora 9 i386, but complains when linking with jpeg. [...] g++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -pthread -I/usr/include/poppler -DPOPPLER_VERSION=807 -DDJVULIBRE_BIN_PATH="\"/usr/bin\"" pdf2djvu.o compoppler.o debug.o config.o system.o sexpr.o quantizer.o -lpoppler -ldjvulibre -ljpeg -lpthread -lm -o pdf2djvu /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ljpeg collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [pdf2djvu] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.61865 (%build) Running `pkg-config --libs ddjvuapi' gives "-ldjvulibre -ljpeg -lpthread -lm". I have libjpeg-6b-41.fc9.i386 installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 08:39:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 03:39:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464054] Package Review Request for projectM-pulseaudio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060839.mA68dlRt007799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464054 Jameson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 08:39:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 03:39:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464050] Package Review Request for projectM-libvisual In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060839.mA68dIW8007738@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464050 Jameson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #3 from Jameson 2008-11-06 03:39:17 EDT --- Sorry about that. I thought it was like the CVS flag, where you would mark the ? when it needed review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 08:40:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 03:40:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464051] Package Review Request for projectM-jack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060840.mA68eANd003524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464051 Jameson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 08:44:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 03:44:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469563] Review Request: hunspell-sw - Swahili hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060844.mA68iTPv008701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469563 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 08:42:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 03:42:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469811] Review Request: pdf2djvu - PDF to DjVu converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060842.mA68g3ZR008443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469811 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan at danny.cz --- Comment #3 from Dan Hor?k 2008-11-06 03:42:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > For whatever reason, it compiles on Fedora 9 i386, but complains when linking > with jpeg. > > [...] > g++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector > --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic > -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -pthread -I/usr/include/poppler > -DPOPPLER_VERSION=807 -DDJVULIBRE_BIN_PATH="\"/usr/bin\"" pdf2djvu.o > compoppler.o debug.o config.o system.o sexpr.o quantizer.o -lpoppler > -ldjvulibre -ljpeg -lpthread -lm -o pdf2djvu > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ljpeg > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > make: *** [pdf2djvu] Error 1 > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.61865 (%build) > > Running `pkg-config --libs ddjvuapi' gives "-ldjvulibre -ljpeg -lpthread -lm". > > I have libjpeg-6b-41.fc9.i386 installed. You need libjpeg-devel installed to be able to link with libjpeg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 08:43:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 03:43:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469564] Review Request: hunspell-fj - Fijian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060843.mA68ht6M003943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469564 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 08:44:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 03:44:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469565] Review Request: hunspell-la - Latin hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060844.mA68i9bT003985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469565 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 09:01:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 04:01:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466777] Review Request: perl-Satcon - Framework for configuration files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060901.mA691wGI012373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466777 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Miroslav Suchy 2008-11-06 04:01:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Satcon Short Description: Framework for configuration files Owners: msuchy Branches: devel F-9 F-10 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 09:52:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 04:52:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060952.mA69qB5c017557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #11 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-11-06 04:52:10 EDT --- The config file is the official way to adapt it to a particular platform. Unless you manage to make this patch adopted by upstream, you can consider this package and your request for sponsorship on hold. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 10:24:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 05:24:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456353] Review Request: libffado - Free firewire audio driver library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061024.mA6AOPXa028803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456353 Alex Kanavin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ak at sensi.org --- Comment #3 from Alex Kanavin 2008-11-06 05:24:23 EDT --- There is a new upstream release (beta7) available. Also, it seems to require a newer version of jack than what's available in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 11:36:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 06:36:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468116] Review Request: sugar-analyze - Analysing tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061136.mA6BaDmb004789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468116 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-06 06:36:12 EDT --- Sure, I will make an update over the weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 11:34:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 06:34:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467180] Review Request: pngnq - tool for quantizing PNG images in RGBA format Version In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061134.mA6BYPVo004227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467180 Gerd Hoffmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Gerd Hoffmann 2008-11-06 06:34:24 EDT --- committed & built now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 11:34:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 06:34:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467179] Review Request: pngcrush - Optimizer for PNG (Portable Network Graphics) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061134.mA6BYUGd004263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467179 Gerd Hoffmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Gerd Hoffmann 2008-11-06 06:34:29 EDT --- committed & built now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 11:42:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 06:42:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some car accros the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061142.mA6BgDW5010673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 --- Comment #1 from Simon Wesp 2008-11-06 06:42:12 EDT --- mh, Source0 causes me some bit of discomfort Perhaps you should use the 2 original sources of upstream and pack the translations from the debian-project as third source.. I?m not sure that you should handle it in this way you created Source0 with original upstream version of moonbuggy and moonbuggysound and the translations from the debian-project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 11:46:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 06:46:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466660] Review Request: sympy - A Python library for symbolic mathematics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061146.mA6Bk5aL006540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466660 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-06 06:46:04 EDT --- Please add also branch for EPEL (at least 5), and build documentation into a -doc package. HTML documentation builds fine, LaTeX doesn't seem to work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 13:11:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 08:11:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438587] Review Request: libsqlite3x - C++ Wrapper for the SQLite3 database engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061311.mA6DBFP0027694@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438587 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-06 08:11:14 EDT --- libsqlite3x-20071018-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libsqlite3x-20071018-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 13:13:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 08:13:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438587] Review Request: libsqlite3x - C++ Wrapper for the SQLite3 database engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061313.mA6DDSdV023353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438587 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-06 08:13:28 EDT --- libsqlite3x-20071018-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libsqlite3x-20071018-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 13:38:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 08:38:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469673] Review request: perl-File-ShareDir-PAR - same functionality as File::ShareDir with PAR support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061338.mA6Dc1bd027683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469673 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |skasal at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |skasal at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 13:38:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 08:38:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469955] Review Request: fprintd - D-Bus service for Fingerprint reader access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061338.mA6Dc3pU027709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469955 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #1 from Till Maas 2008-11-06 08:38:02 EDT --- Some issues I noticed at my first check: - Why do you need a Conflict with pam_fprint, are Obsolutes/Provides not better fitted here? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Conflicts - Source0 is not a URL and it is not explained how to create the source https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL - Is it intentional that the config files in /etc are not marked as %config? Btw. the release string of the linked libfprint seems to be wrong, it should be 0.1.pre.fc10 instead of 1.pre.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 13:50:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 08:50:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462253] Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061350.mA6DooFl001726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462253 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-06 08:50:49 EDT --- Oh, you attempted to join some time ago. That shouldn't be done until you actually have a sponsor. In any case, its set up now; you should be able to make your CVS request. Also, you seem to have left your real name out of your account information, which is why I didn't find you in the database. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 13:50:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 08:50:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061350.mA6Do8HW001503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #30 from Jon Ciesla 2008-11-06 08:50:06 EDT --- Paulo, were you doing to take this one and to the formal review now that you're sponsored, or shall I? Conrad, if he doesn't want to or can't soon, I'll do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 13:48:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 08:48:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470250] New: (docbook5-style-xsl) Review Request: docbook5-style-xsl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: (docbook5-style-xsl) Review Request: docbook5-style-xsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470250 Summary: (docbook5-style-xsl) Review Request: docbook5-style-xsl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ovasik at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Ondrej Vasik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review?, fedora-cvs? Created an attachment (id=322712) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=322712) spec file for docbook5-style-xsl package. Description of problem: Need review of docbook5-style-xsl package for Fedora. It is based on docbook-style-xsl spec file structure, but it is for namespace aware Docbook 5 only. Tarball could be downloaded from the address http://downloads.sourceforge.net/docbook/docbook-xsl-ns-1.74.0.tar.bz2 (specified in spec file as well). Additional info: Basic rpmlint checks done, Docbook 5 package is not yet in Fedora, I do plan to do the spec file and submit for review soon as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 14:13:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 09:13:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454408] Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061413.mA6EDDmx006797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 --- Comment #20 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-11-06 09:13:11 EDT --- Done in EL-5: $ plague-client list uid 684 684: mingw32-binutils (mingw32-binutils-2_18_50_20080109_2-8_el5) rjones at redhat.com needsign/success xenbuilder2.fedora.redhat.com(i386): 426a863c17dbbe874cce7898ca0ac08cd5d01beb done/done xenbuilder2.fedora.redhat.com(x86_64): 46947021c47a18e0393002bd9748f4d71c175b63 done/done ppc2.fedora.redhat.com(ppc): d56a79cb0d74d102989a5fad3803b8f918f17db0 done/done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 14:12:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 09:12:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454408] Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061412.mA6EC8js001966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 --- Comment #19 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-11-06 09:12:07 EDT --- Build done for F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=919444 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 14:14:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 09:14:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454408] Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061414.mA6EE7Mv002277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #21 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-11-06 09:14:06 EDT --- Fails in F-10 at the moment because of the freeze, so I'll leave this bug open for the time being. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 14:17:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 09:17:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061417.mA6EHron003343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 --- Comment #19 from Thomas Moschny 2008-11-06 09:17:50 EDT --- Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/lmms.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/lmms-0.4.0-1.fc10.src.rpm %changelog * Sun Nov 2 2008 Thomas Moschny <..> - 0.4.0-1 - Updated to 0.4.0 final. - Removed patches already applied upstream, adjusted the remaining. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 14:22:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 09:22:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469673] Review request: perl-File-ShareDir-PAR - same functionality as File::ShareDir with PAR support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061422.mA6EM9qm008932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469673 --- Comment #2 from Stepan Kasal 2008-11-06 09:22:08 EDT --- Jason, I suppose you mean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&format=extras-review right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 14:33:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 09:33:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438406] Review Request: ufiformat - Disk formatting utility for USB floppy devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061433.mA6EXOK2011457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438406 --- Comment #9 from Chris Adams 2008-11-06 09:33:23 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.cmadams.net/fedora/ufiformat/ufiformat.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cmadams.net/fedora/ufiformat/ufiformat-0.9.4-3.fc8.src.rpm I would still like to see this in Fedora. The biggest impediment is probably more in that I haven't done anything further to get myself sponsored. I will try to get a few more of the packages I have built locally together for review, but that will probably take a few weeks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 14:37:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 09:37:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465382] Review Request: bouncycastle-mail - SMIME/CMS packages for Bouncy Castle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061437.mA6Eb7PI012336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465382 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mefoster at gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-11-06 09:37:06 EDT --- Any chance of this making it into Fedora 9 as well? It's a dependency of something I want to package ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 14:40:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 09:40:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061440.mA6EekZH013170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |promac at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |promac at gmail.com --- Comment #31 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-11-06 09:40:44 EDT --- Hi, Jon I can finish the review. In fact, the only problem was the legal issued you raised and Spot clarified for us. I'll finish the review tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 14:37:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 09:37:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469673] Review request: perl-File-ShareDir-PAR - same functionality as File::ShareDir with PAR support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061437.mA6EbF7Q008074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469673 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-06 09:37:14 EDT --- Yes, or simply use the same format. Isn't the goal to have the packages reviewed quickly? I can't imagine why someone would want to differ needlessly, since it only complicates things for any automated processes we might have and thus slows things down. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 14:47:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 09:47:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446563] Review Request: rubygem-rspec - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061447.mA6ElFwG014516@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446563 Michael Stahnke changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 14:47:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 09:47:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446563] Review Request: rubygem-rspec - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061447.mA6El2iq010475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446563 Michael Stahnke changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Michael Stahnke 2008-11-06 09:47:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-rspec Short Description: Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby Owners: stahnma Branches: F-8, F-9, F-10, EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 15:11:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 10:11:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438406] Review Request: ufiformat - Disk formatting utility for USB floppy devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061511.mA6FBjts015794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438406 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-06 10:11:44 EDT --- Honestly, anyone who waits around for eight months and still wants to contribute deserves sponsorship in my book. Especially now that it doesn't automatically grant access to the entire distro. This package is simple, builds fine in rawhide, and elicits no complaints from rpmlint. I can't really do any testing as I don't have the necessary equipment, though. All I can do is verify that the binary runs, which it does. I will sponsor you. It seems you've already applied for access, so I'll click the button and you can make your CVS request after everything syncs. * source files match upstream: da72377b4e5c1672457aca7a117427cb91bbf4be3035d00bb9ae34c376849bbe ufiformat-0.9.4.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: ufiformat = 0.9.4-3.fc10 ufiformat(x86-64) = 0.9.4-3.fc10 = libext2fs.so.2()(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. The binary runs, but that's all I'm able to test. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 15:11:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 10:11:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438406] Review Request: ufiformat - Disk formatting utility for USB floppy devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061511.mA6FBvHp015911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438406 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 15:13:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 10:13:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 442875] Review Request: virt-ctrl - Graphical management app for virtual machines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061513.mA6FDtfN016312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442875 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-11-06 10:13:53 EDT --- Built for F-10 here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=919484 Built for F-11 here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=919483 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 15:26:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 10:26:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447365] Review Request: llgal - generates static web-pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061526.mA6FQqZl023343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447365 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: llgal - |llgal-0.13.15 - llgal |generates static web-pages |generates static web-pages | --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-06 10:26:51 EDT --- I'm not sure comment #7 was followed. Please do not define %release at all. Also, what's the point of appending ".noarch" to Release:? ".noarch.i386.rpm" is... not a good idea. If you want to build a noarch package, add "BuildArch: noarch". Please don't start the Summary: with the name of the package. llgal - llgal generates whatever is rather redundant. You need to submit a src.rpm, not a built binary package. We need to be able to build the package you submit for ourselves. A package cannot put things in /usr/local under any circumstances. (Well, your personal packages can do so; that's your business. But no packages in the distro can do so.) If the upstream insists on that, it will need to be fixed or patched. Don't put eval in your files list. Just use the standard defines for Perl modules. Use macros in your files list; instead of hardcoding /usr/bin, use %{_bindir}. This package fails to own /usr/share/llgal. Your files list can be much simpler in any case: %files %{_bindir}/llgal %{_datadir}/llgal/ %{perl_vendorlib}/* Or at least I think that would do it; I don't have the sources to build from in order to test. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 15:35:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 10:35:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454959] Review Request: eclipse-cusp - Eclipse Common Lisp Development Tools (Cusp) plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061535.mA6FZIUk025250@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454959 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(green at redhat.com) --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-06 10:35:16 EDT --- Any updates here? It's been several months now. Also, the guidelines for eclipse plugins have been updated; I do not know if that has any bearing on this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 15:41:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 10:41:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470293] New: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vcrhonek at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-network/sblim-cmpi-network.spec SRPM URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-network/sblim-cmpi-network-1.3.8-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Standards Based Linux Instrumentation Network Providers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 15:43:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 10:43:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465382] Review Request: bouncycastle-mail - SMIME/CMS packages for Bouncy Castle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061543.mA6FhN8f023092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465382 --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-06 10:43:22 EDT --- Yes that is something I want to do as well. Bouncycastle (bcprov) of F-9 is an old version. That needs to be updated if we want to push bcmail into F-9. I have been trying to reach the F-9 maintainer (fitzsim) of bcprov for a while. He didn't reply to my emails and my pkgdb requests. You might, as well, want to try your chances with him. I'd be happy to make bcmail into F-9 if he allows me to co-maintain bcprov, or updates it himself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 15:52:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 10:52:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465382] Review Request: bouncycastle-mail - SMIME/CMS packages for Bouncy Castle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061552.mA6FqLTb024937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465382 --- Comment #9 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-11-06 10:52:20 EDT --- For what it's worth, I just tried rebuilding the bouncycastle-mail SRPM on Fedora 9. All I had to do was change 1.41 to 1.38 (the current F9 version) in a couple of places and it seemed to work fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 15:57:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 10:57:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438897] Review Request: framewave - Image and signal processing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061557.mA6FvEpi029351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438897 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-06 10:57:11 EDT --- I did look at the failing tests. Most (12 of 17) seem to be FP overflow issues: Buffer mismatch at index: 0 Actual: {inf,-inf} Expected: {6.80565e+37,-1.36113e+38} One is confusing to me: Buffer mismatch at index: 0 Actual: 2.82843 Expected: 2.82843 I don't see what's differing there. Three do not provide any failure messages. The remaining one: Catalog: RotateCenterTestCatalog Function: fwiRotateCenter_8u_C1R Buffer mismatch at index: 0 Actual: 3 Expected: 4 TestCase 1 (Test 1) failed! doesn't mean anything to me. Do these match the failures you're seeing? Does upstream have any comment on them? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 16:12:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 11:12:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469590] Review Request: cpuid - Dumps information about the CPU(s) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061612.mA6GC26c032241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469590 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|dan at danny.cz | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Dan Hor?k 2008-11-06 11:12:01 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: OK source files match upstream: 0aac0d5104e45421ce3c48f0fe2d924d0d13caf1 cpuid-20060917.src.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. BAD license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. BAD compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. BAD rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - license should be MIT instead of BSD (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT) - $RPM_OPT_FLAGS are not used to compile, could be solved with make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DVERSION=$(VERSION)" - rpmlint complains cpuid.src:48: W: macro-in-%changelog doc => make it "... %%doc ..." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 16:30:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 11:30:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465382] Review Request: bouncycastle-mail - SMIME/CMS packages for Bouncy Castle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061630.mA6GU0gq002809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465382 --- Comment #10 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-06 11:29:59 EDT --- Well, I thought about packaging bcmail-1.38 for F-9. The source is available. But this violates the "Latest version must be packaged" guideline. There's not much I can do for F-9 since my hands are tied. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 16:30:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 11:30:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061630.mA6GU7IA003144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #32 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-11-06 11:30:06 EDT --- Lifting FE-Legal, as this is now okay with the stripped tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 16:22:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 11:22:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460352] Review Request: xwota - Who's On the Air Database interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061622.mA6GMl7w001448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460352 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-06 11:22:46 EDT --- I'm confused about the licensing situation: The COPYING file contains GPLv2. README says: Xwota is free and it is published under the GNU GPL Licence. The source files (that aren't autogenerated by glade) say: * Copyright Emanuele Madeo IZ0ETE * Email I would guess that the result is GPLv2+, but the fact that the source files are merely copyrighted with no rights given and do not refer to the GPL at all may override the other statements. I guess I'll block FE-Legal; maybe this could get into the FAQ. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 16:27:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 11:27:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460352] Review Request: xwota - Who's On the Air Database interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061627.mA6GRU3k031900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460352 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-11-06 11:27:29 EDT --- So, this should be: License: GPL+ We know that Emanuele Madeo is the author and copyright holder, and README is his statement of licensing intent. However, we have no clear versioning intent (remember, COPYING doesn't reflect versioning intent for GPL), thus GPL+. We should also strongly recommend that upstream include proper source file license attribution, with versioning intent, on all source files. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 16:35:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 11:35:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061635.mA6GZ0gI003880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 --- Comment #13 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-11-06 11:34:59 EDT --- Try: jl at yorel.be -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 16:57:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 11:57:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466660] Review Request: sympy - A Python library for symbolic mathematics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061657.mA6GvEeO005075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466660 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Conrad Meyer 2008-11-06 11:57:13 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sympy New Branches: EL-5 Owners: konradm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 17:39:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 12:39:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460352] Review Request: xwota - Who's On the Air Database interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061739.mA6HdjoO015764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460352 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-06 12:39:43 EDT --- Thanks, spot. So, this package is simple and looks pretty good except for the license tag. Is there any point to mentioning what operating systems the program works on? Does that even matter for a Fedora package? I note the following complaint from desktop-file-install: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/xwota-0.4-4.fc10.x86_64/usr/share/applications/xwota.desktop: warning: value "xwota.png" for key "Icon" in group "Desktop Entry" is an icon name with an extension, but there should be no extension as described in the Icon Theme Specification if the value is not an absolute path So just fix that and the license tag and the desktop file up and this should be ready to go. Finally, I note that you have submitted 24 packages for review, while you've only reviewed three packages. I will periodically revisit your packages as I work through the queue and I suppose eventually all of them will be reviewed but the reviewers are much more likely to review your packages if you do some more reviews yourself. * source files match upstream: 8c8f996270e4e93769ba0604c94bfaf5f8226b43eccb0b39c4938e4b5a7eec3c xwota-0.4.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field needs a fix. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: xwota = 0.4-4.fc10 xwota(x86-64) = 0.4-4.fc10 = libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit) libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangoft2-1.0.so.0()(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I don't really know how to use the program, but I installed it and it seemed to work. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. X desktop file elicits a complaint from desktop-file-install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 17:54:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 12:54:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464049] Package Review Request for libprojectM-qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061754.mA6HsDcV018416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464049 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-06 12:54:12 EDT --- Everything seems fine, except: * I don't think we need Requires: libprojectM = %{version}, qt for the main package, since these will be picked up by rpmbuild. You can check what the rpmbuild picked up as "requires" after you build the package by issuing: rpm -qpv --requires --.rpm I have one last question: This is a frontend for libprojectM. But I can't find a binary to start the frontend. How does it start? Is it called from the binaries of pulseaudio and alsa packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 17:57:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 12:57:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438897] Review Request: framewave - Image and signal processing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061757.mA6HvBgJ015408@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438897 --- Comment #12 from Orion Poplawski 2008-11-06 12:57:09 EDT --- Matches what I'm seeing. Errors have been reported (see comment #7), but no response yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 18:19:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 13:19:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061819.mA6IJIhU023423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-06 13:19:17 EDT --- The header files seem to be in the main package. Is this intentional? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 18:16:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 13:16:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470325] New: Review Request: qd - Double-Double and Quad-Double Arithmetic Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qd - Double-Double and Quad-Double Arithmetic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470325 Summary: Review Request: qd - Double-Double and Quad-Double Arithmetic Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/qd.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/qd-2.3.7-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This package provides numeric types of twice the precision of IEEE double (106 mantissa bits, or approximately 32 decimal digits) and four times the precision of IEEE double (212 mantissa bits, or approximately 64 decimal digits). Due to features such as operator and function overloading, these facilities can be utilized with only minor modifications to conventional C++ and Fortran-90 programs. In addition to the basic arithmetic operations (add, subtract, multiply, divide, square root), common transcendental functions such as the exponential, logarithm, trigonometric and hyperbolic functions are also included. A detailed description of the algorithms used is available in the docs subdirectory (see docs/qd.ps). rpmlint output: qd.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/qd/inline.h qd.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/qd/qd_config.h qd.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/qd/qd_real.h qd.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/qd/fpu.h qd.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/qd/c_dd.h qd.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/qd-config qd.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libqd_f_main.a qd.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/qd/c_qd.h qd.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/qd/dd_inline.h qd.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libqd.a qd.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/qd/dd_real.h qd.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/qd/qd_inline.h qd.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libqdmod.a qd.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/qd/bits.h qd-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 14 warnings. I can't seem to be able to disable static library builds and enable the shared library build, even though this is supposedly supported by the package... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 18:28:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 13:28:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468765] Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061828.mA6ISB11021385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468765 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-06 13:28:10 EDT --- I realized that the some sources I used fail to match the upstream sha1sums. I thought maybe the upstream updated their files but their page still shows the old timestamps?? Anyways, I created a new SRPM that has the correct sha1sums. SPEC: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/hydrogen-drumkits.spec SRPM: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/hydrogen-drumkits-0-0.20080907.3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 18:50:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 13:50:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061850.mA6IoNbS026060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2008-11-06 13:50:23 EDT --- Er, nope. Fixing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 18:47:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 13:47:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447368] Review Request: schroot - Execute commands in a chroot environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061847.mA6IlqFJ025575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447368 --- Comment #6 from Zach Carter 2008-11-06 13:47:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I don't feel competent to fully review this package but I can make a few > comments: thanks :) > You shouldn't duplicate all of those %doc files between the various > subpackages. will fix. > > I'm curious as to which guideline you believe mandates that you split off the > libsbuild package. Generally library splits are only required to prevent > multilib conflicts, but I don't believe this is a multilib package. (For one > thing, it has no -devel subpackage.) I can't find it anymore, but I was pretty sure it existed. I'll change it back. > schroot.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/schroot > ['/usr/lib64'] > These are problematic. I'll fix these. > The tarball seems to include a large amount of doxygen-generated documentation. > Is that of any use to end-users? If so it should probably be packaged, > although a subpackage might be useful. It looks mostly like developer docs, indexed source code, etc. I would think developers would probably have downloaded the source code anyway, so I'm not sure how useful it would be to individual users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 18:57:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 13:57:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061857.mA6IvHxf031584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer 2008-11-06 13:57:16 EDT --- Fixed in: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/m4ri.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/m4ri-20081028-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 19:05:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:05:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466147] Review Request:fedora-ksplice - Script Collection for Using KSplice on Fedora Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061905.mA6J5O2u029180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466147 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-06 14:05:23 EDT --- The two included scripts, which seem to be the meat of the package, are clearly under GPLv2, yet COPYING is GPLv3. This seems a bit confused. Legally we're supposed to take the versioning from the licenses on the actual code, so GPLv2 is correct here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 19:08:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:08:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464049] Package Review Request for libprojectM-qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061908.mA6J8fDH029729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464049 --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-06 14:08:39 EDT --- Hey Jameson, I asked fellow packagers about the /usr/share/pixmaps issue. The correct solution is to require the package "filesystem" which owns /usr/share/pixmaps . But I'm not sure if this will be done by the dependency chain, or if we should explicitly require "filesystem" in libprojectM-qt . Let me investigate this further. Sorry for the confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 19:07:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:07:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447368] Review Request: schroot - Execute commands in a chroot environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061907.mA6J7tPZ029628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447368 --- Comment #7 from Zach Carter 2008-11-06 14:07:53 EDT --- Updated spec and SRPM: http://www.zachcarter.com/rpms/schroot.spec http://www.zachcarter.com/rpms/schroot-1.2.1-2.fc10.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Nov 5 2008 Zach Carter - 1.2.1-2 - move libsbuild subpackage into main package - remove duplicate doc entries - disable rpath - defattr for dchroot files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 19:21:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:21:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464049] Package Review Request for libprojectM-qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061921.mA6JLlNQ004439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464049 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-06 14:21:46 EDT --- OK, this is the chain: - libprojectM-qt requires qt (rpmbuild will pick this up) - qt requires glibc - glibc requires basesystem - basesystem requires filesystem Therefore, what you did initially was correct as far as the /usr/share/pixmaps is concerned. Sorry again for the confusion I created. libprojectM-qt shouldn't own /usr/share/pixmaps. But you should still remove the explicit Requires: libprojectM = %{version}, qt That statement of mine is still valid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 19:32:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:32:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456353] Review Request: libffado - Free firewire audio driver library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061932.mA6JW6I7006512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456353 --- Comment #4 from Jarod Wilson 2008-11-06 14:32:05 EDT --- Gah. I completely forgot all about this... New build tossed together. Spec URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/libffado/libffado.spec SRPM URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/libffado/libffado-2.0-0.3.beta7.fc10.src.rpm I didn't see any reference to a newer version of jack being required though, and it built just fine on a rawhide x86_64 system... Ah. Then again, I'm running a local build of jack that is probably sufficiently new... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 19:43:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:43:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456353] Review Request: libffado - Free firewire audio driver library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061943.mA6JhIWo004245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456353 --- Comment #5 from Alex Kanavin 2008-11-06 14:43:17 EDT --- Er, it's straight in the README: jackd (>= 0.109.12), http://jackaudio.org [NOTE: at the time of writing, this is the development (SVN) version.] http://subversion.ffado.org/ffado/tags/2.0-beta7/README Rawhide seems to have 0.109.2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 19:44:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:44:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466147] Review Request:fedora-ksplice - Script Collection for Using KSplice on Fedora Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061944.mA6JiDZC004336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466147 --- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-11-06 14:44:12 EDT --- Thank you for you comment. The COPYING file was created by the autotools, but I have noew corrected it on svn://fedorahosted.org/fedora-ksplice/trunk Because I have create some new enhancement/bugfixes, I will create a new release next week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 19:50:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:50:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469952] Review Request: dopewars - a drug dealing game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061950.mA6JoL9Z005641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469952 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |limb at jcomserv.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla 2008-11-06 14:50:20 EDT --- rpmlint: dopewars.i386: E: zero-length /var/lib/games/dopewars.sco Expected. dopewars.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/dopewars 02755 A standard executable should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have a wrong executable permissions in some files included in your package. Acceptable. dopewars-sdl.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. Probably fine. Other issues on full review: Source0: must include url: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL Otherwise ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 20:10:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 15:10:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462446] Review Request: ttf2pt1 - TrueType to Adobe Type 1 font converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811062010.mA6KAxbl009403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446 --- Comment #24 from G?ran Uddeborg 2008-11-06 15:10:57 EDT --- So now it's available. Thanks a lot Patrice and Kevin for your help! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 20:17:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 15:17:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456353] Review Request: libffado - Free firewire audio driver library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811062017.mA6KHwRS014856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456353 --- Comment #6 from Jarod Wilson 2008-11-06 15:17:57 EDT --- Ah, I was looking at the beta6 to beta7 changelog. So that was already a requirement for beta6 too, I believe. I've got a 0.112.x svn snap I'm running here, completely forgot about that. This should probably target F11 rawhide, once its open, and hopefully, jack will get the necessary update to go with it... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 20:25:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 15:25:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 314161] Review Request: noip - Dynamic DNS client for no-ip.com In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811062025.mA6KPu07016424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=314161 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-06 15:25:54 EDT --- New package review request at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470354 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 20:24:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 15:24:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470354] New: Review Request: noip - A dynamic DNS update client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: noip - A dynamic DNS update client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470354 Summary: Review Request: noip - A dynamic DNS update client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/noip.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/noip-2.1.7-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Keep your current IP address in sync with your No-IP host or domain with this Dynamic Update Client (DUC). The client continually checks for IP address changes in the background and automatically updates the DNS at No-IP whenever it changes. rpmlint output: noip.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/noip noip noip.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/run/noip noip noip.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/run/noip 0700 noip.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /etc/no-ip2.conf noip noip.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/no-ip2.conf noip noip.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/no-ip2.conf 0600 noip.x86_64: E: zero-length /etc/no-ip2.conf noip.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/noip $prog ../../SPECS/noip.spec:33: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep sed -i 's|@OPTFLAGS@|%{optflags}|g;s|@SBINDIR@|%{buildroot}%{_sbindir}|g' Makefile 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 20:27:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 15:27:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811062027.mA6KR9Sp012600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 Dario Landazuri changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dario at landazuri.net --- Comment #87 from Dario Landazuri 2008-11-06 15:26:59 EDT --- Deji, > For one, mpi-selector in not in Fedora. And I've included support for using > environment-modules in the package since a long time ago. I prefer using > alternatives on my workstation, so I don't think support for that should be > removed. > > > Deji, are you still interested on working on the package? > srpm and rpm spec files for the latest release are available below; > ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2-1.0.8-1.fc10.src.rpm > ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2.spec I'm curious if there is any plan to include mpi-selector support at all. I'm recompiling your rpms on a few RHEL5 boxes. Up until recently, it was the only mpi compiler on them, but I just got a request to install openmpi alongside it. I'd like to use RH's openmpi rpms and have them coexist correctly next to your mpich2 rpms. I"m trying to use Doug Ledford's openmpi spec file to hack in mpi-selector support, but I wanted to check if you'd planned on putting any work in on this. TIA. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 20:51:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 15:51:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some car accros the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811062051.mA6Kpkcr016840@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 --- Comment #2 from Philipp Baum 2008-11-06 15:51:45 EDT --- New: http://www.Thinkcoding.org/Fedora/moon-buggy.spec http://www.Thinkcoding.org/Fedora/moon-buggy-1.0.51-2.fc10.src.rpm Koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=920044 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 20:48:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 15:48:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811062048.mA6Km3OA016177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-06 15:48:02 EDT --- Just built this again. rpmlint says: zeromq.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 1) Not a big deal; fix it if you like. zeromq-c.x86_64: W: no-documentation zeromq-c-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation Not a problem. zeromq.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libzmq.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 zeromq-c.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libczmq.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libpthread.so.0 zeromq-c.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libczmq.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 These are linked against libm and libpthread without actually calling any functions in those libraries. I don't think this is a problem as it doesn't cause any additional dependencies, although it should go away if you can get -Wl,as-needed passed to the compiler during the link stage. Since this package uses libtool, the trick at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Common_Rpmlint_Issues#unused-direct-shlib-dependency may be useful. I'll take a better look when I get home. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 20:56:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 15:56:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443675] Review Request: sip-redirect - Tiny IPv4 and IPv6 SIP redirect server written in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811062056.mA6KuidW017811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443675 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-06 15:56:43 EDT --- sip-redirect-0.1.2-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sip-redirect-0.1.2-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 20:55:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 15:55:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443675] Review Request: sip-redirect - Tiny IPv4 and IPv6 SIP redirect server written in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811062055.mA6Ktv5g017578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443675 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1.2-2 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Robert Scheck 2008-11-06 15:55:55 EDT --- Package: sip-redirect-0.1.2-2.fc10 Tag: dist-f10-updates-candidate Status: complete Built by: robert Package: sip-redirect-0.1.2-2.fc8 Tag: dist-f8-updates-candidate Status: complete Built by: robert Package: sip-redirect-0.1.2-2.fc9 Tag: dist-f9-updates-candidate Status: complete Built by: robert 686 (sip-redirect): Build on target fedora-5-epel succeeded. 687 (sip-redirect): Build on target fedora-4-epel succeeded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 21:01:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 16:01:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462253] Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811062101.mA6L1RNU018872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462253 --- Comment #8 from Iain Arnell 2008-11-06 16:01:26 EDT --- I was just following the instructions on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join - maybe section 1.1.9.4 should be moved to section 1.1.11? 1.1.7 Create Your Review Request 1.1.8 Watch for Feedback 1.1.9 Get a Fedora Account ... 1.1.9.4.1 In the table, look for the packager group, and click Apply under Status. 1.1.10 Install the Client Tools (Koji) 1.1.11 Get Sponsored As for real name, it's definitely there in the account details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 21:06:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 16:06:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462253] Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811062106.mA6L6itj019919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462253 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Iain Arnell 2008-11-06 16:06:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Cache-FastMmap Short Description: Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 21:04:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 16:04:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245561] Review Request: ht - File editor/viewer/analyzer for executables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811062104.mA6L4BE8019260@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245561 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #13 from Till Maas 2008-11-06 16:04:07 EDT --- Sorry for the delay. The %optflags are still not OK: NOT OK: There is still fomit-frame-pointer and -O3 in the compiler flags, e.g.: if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I./analyser -I./asm -I./info -I./io/posix -I./io -I./output -I./eval -I. -DNOMACROS -pipe -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -fsigned-char -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Woverloaded-virtual -Wnon-virtual-dtor -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -MT htcfg.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/htcfg.Tpo" -c -o ht [NEEDS WORK] rpmlint output: ht.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/ht-2.0.14/TODO The file should be converted to UTF, e.g. with BR: recode and this in %prep: recode latin1..utf8 TODO Or some iconv/touch lines. ht-debuginfo.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/ht-2.0.14/endianess.cc 0775 ht-debuginfo.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/ht-2.0.14/endianess.cc endianess.cc is executable in the tarball, the group writable comes from my setup. Imho should rpmbuild create sane permissions for debuginfo contents. But you could also ask upstream to remove the executable bit from the source file. [OK] Spec in %{name}.spec format [OK] license allowed: GPLv2 [OK] license matches shortname in License [OK] license in tarball and included in %doc: COPYING [OK] package is code or permissive content {OK} patches sent to upstream and commented [OK] Source0 is a working URL {OK} Sourceforge URL is Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz [OK] Source0 matches Upstream: b3721a82532ba24bbfbc7f812b218217 ht-2.0.14.tar.bz2 [OK] Package builds on all platforms: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=920089 [OK] BuildRequires are complete (mock builds) (OK) No file dependencies outside of /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin [OK] %find_lang used for locales [N/A] Every (sub)package containing libraries runs ldconfig %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig [N/A] .h (header) files are in -devel subpackage [N/A] .a (static libraries) are in -static subpackage [N/A] contains .pc (pkgconfig) files and has Requires: pkgconfig (N/A) .pc files are in -devel subpackage [N/A] contains .so.X(.Y) files and .so is in -devel [N/A] -devel subpackage has Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [N/A] .la files (libtool) are not included [N/A] Has GUI and includes %{name}.desktop [N/A] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install [OK] Prefix: /usr not used (not relocatable) [OK] Owns all created directories [OK] no duplicates in %files [OK] %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [OK] Does not own files or dirs from other packages [OK] included filenames are in UTF-8 [OK] %clean is rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] Consistent macro usage [OK] large documentation is -doc subpackage [OK] %doc does not affect runtime {OK} no pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) {OK} well known BuildRoot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) {OK} PreReq not used {OK} no duplication of system libraries {OK} no rpath {OK} Timestamps preserved with cp and install {OK} Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) {OK} Requires(pre,post) style notation not used {OK} only writes to tmp /var/tmp $TMPDIR %{_tmppath} %{_builddir} (and %{buildroot} on %install and %clean) {OK} no Conflicts {OK} nothing installed in /srv {OK} Changelog in allowed format {OK} does not use Scriptlets Sane Provides: and Requires: {OK} Follows Naming Guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 21:33:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 16:33:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466777] Review Request: perl-Satcon - Framework for configuration files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811062133.mA6LXqYR025009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466777 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2008-11-06 16:33:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 21:36:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 16:36:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245561] Review Request: ht - File editor/viewer/analyzer for executables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811062136.mA6LaRbA025662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245561 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Till Maas 2008-11-06 16:36:25 EDT --- I studied the package a little and found this out: Use this to disable the -O3 and -fomit-frame-pointer: %configure --enable-maintainermode make %{?_smp_mflags} Beware, the --enable-maintainermode is chosen by upstream and not the well known --enable-maintainer-mode option that autotools provide, which is described here: http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/maintainer_002dmode.html Maybe you can get upstream to choose a better name for this option. :-) Given that the remaining change is very simple, I APPROVE this package, but please update the spec/srpm before import to make it build with the right compiler flags. Thank you very much for packaging this. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 21:41:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 16:41:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458379] Review Request: wondershaper - Simple network shaper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811062141.mA6LfRDl026452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458379 --- Comment #5 from Till Maas 2008-11-06 16:41:26 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 21:53:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 16:53:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811062153.mA6LrelF028093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 --- Comment #88 from Deji Akingunola 2008-11-06 16:53:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #87) > Deji, > > > I'm curious if there is any plan to include mpi-selector support at all. I'm > recompiling your rpms on a few RHEL5 boxes. Up until recently, it was the only > mpi compiler on them, but I just got a request to install openmpi alongside it. > I'd like to use RH's openmpi rpms and have them coexist correctly next to your > mpich2 rpms. > > I"m trying to use Doug Ledford's openmpi spec file to hack in mpi-selector > support, but I wanted to check if you'd planned on putting any work in on this. > I have no immediate plans on adapting the mpich2 spec to mpi-selector. I'll likely work on supporting it once it is included Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 21:57:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 16:57:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447104] Review Request: qdevelop - development environment for QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811062157.mA6Lv0CV032009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447104 --- Comment #8 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-11-06 16:56:59 EDT --- Update for 0.26.1 : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/qdevelop.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/qdevelop-0.26.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Changelog : - Rebuild for 0.26.1 - Add commands for icons menu updating - Remove patch (no more usefull) rpmlint output : [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint qdevelop-0.26.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm qdevelop-0.26.1-1.fc9.src.rpm qdevelop-debuginfo-0.26.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm qdevelop.i386: E: devel-dependency qt-devel 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ Rebuild under mock is OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 22:04:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 17:04:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464054] Package Review Request for projectM-pulseaudio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811062204.mA6M4w4n000655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464054 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-06 17:04:57 EDT --- * This package has licensing issues. The COPYING file is GPLv2+. Also the following files claim GPLv2+: depcomp missing QPulseAudioDeviceModel.hpp The file ConfigFile.h has a copy of MIT license, Modern Style with sublicense: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT#Modern_Style_with_sublicense The file qprojectM-pulseaudio.cpp claims LGPLv2+ which causes the problem. This file links to libprojectM-qt, which is licensed as GPLv2+. But according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#GPLCompatibilityMatrix (the bottom matrix) you can't release a project under LGPLv2+ if you link to a library that is licensed under GPLv2+. This project has to be converted to GPLv2+. According to the footnote 7 under the matrix, you are allowed to do that. Then the License tag in the SPEC should be License: GPLv2+ and MIT But please confirm this with the upstream. * According to the recent changes in the guidelines, for the new packages, you shouldn't have the --vendor tag in the desktop-file-install. * Why do you have two .desktop files? They look pretty much the same to me. One should be removed. * I'm not sure if you need Requires: libprojectM = %{version}, pulseaudio I will check this (you should check this too). Also I will finish the review sometime tonight or tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 22:20:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 17:20:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245561] Review Request: ht - File editor/viewer/analyzer for executables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811062220.mA6MKeAa032691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245561 Andreas Bierfert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Andreas Bierfert 2008-11-06 17:20:39 EDT --- Thanks for the review. I will adjust the package accordingly before the import. Since there will be branching also already with F-10 branch. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ht Short Description: File editor/viewer/analyzer for executables Owners: awjb Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 22:39:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 17:39:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469590] Review Request: cpuid - Dumps information about the CPU(s) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811062239.mA6MdpdT003937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469590 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |FutureFeature -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 22:42:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 17:42:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468116] Review Request: sugar-analyze - Analysing tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811062242.mA6MgWMa007046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468116 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-06 17:42:31 EDT --- Updated Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-analyze.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-analyze-8-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 22:42:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 17:42:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222960] Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811062242.mA6Mgqjn004834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222960 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(lxtnow at gmail.com) --- Comment #24 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-06 17:42:49 EDT --- Hmm, no response to Mamoru's question in seven months. I don't even know if there's any point to this package in the new KVM and libvirt world, but if there's no response soon then I guess I'll just close this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 23:09:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 18:09:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811062309.mA6N9hrg009642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #33 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-11-06 18:09:42 EDT --- I extracted the files from the .src.rpm: rpm2cpio ../cddlib-094f-6.fc9.src.rpm | cpio -ivmud cddlib-094f-free.tar.gz cddlib.spec 2328 blocks [cascavel:~/temp/temp] tar -ztvf cddlib-094f-free.tar.gz gzip: stdin: not in gzip format tar: Child returned status 1 tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors Although the file has an extension .tar.gz it seems to be just an uncompressed tar archive (.tar). Anyway, the file with the license issue has been removed. [cascavel:~/temp/temp] tar -tvf cddlib-094f-free.tar.gz | grep Combinatorica5.m [cascavel:~/temp/temp] and the debug package generation has been disabled. Please, just check the .tar.gz file creation and the package will be ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 23:29:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 18:29:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811062329.mA6NTcS2015050@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #34 from Conrad Meyer 2008-11-06 18:29:37 EDT --- It's actually a .tar.bz2. I've renamed the SOURCE file and await your approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 23:36:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 18:36:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811062336.mA6Na6Q7014439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #35 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-11-06 18:36:05 EDT --- Oh, I see. That is right, it is a tar.bz2 Did you update the links? Also, the spec file should change Source0: %{name}-094f-free.tar.gz for Source0: %{name}-094f-free.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 00:00:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 19:00:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070000.mA700xP6017914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #36 from Conrad Meyer 2008-11-06 19:00:58 EDT --- Yes, I fixed the spec file. No, I didn't bother uploading the changes to the same place because it is trivial. When you set "fedora-review" to "+" I can start getting it imported into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 00:05:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 19:05:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070005.mA705XKH018668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #37 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-11-06 19:05:32 EDT --- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 00:18:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 19:18:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466660] Review Request: sympy - A Python library for symbolic mathematics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070018.mA70Iaih023199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466660 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #11 from Conrad Meyer 2008-11-06 19:18:35 EDT --- Wait, no, I don't want to maintain this for EPEL. You can take it if you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 00:17:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 19:17:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070017.mA70HE0N023024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #38 from Conrad Meyer 2008-11-06 19:17:13 EDT --- Thanks. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cddlib Short Description: A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons Owners: konradm Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 00:43:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 19:43:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438406] Review Request: ufiformat - Disk formatting utility for USB floppy devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070043.mA70hnup026834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438406 Chris Adams changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 00:43:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 19:43:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438406] Review Request: ufiformat - Disk formatting utility for USB floppy devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070043.mA70hWJF026790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438406 --- Comment #11 from Chris Adams 2008-11-06 19:43:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ufiformat Short Description: Disk formatting utility for USB floppy devices Owners: cmadams Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 01:24:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 20:24:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464054] Package Review Request for projectM-pulseaudio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070124.mA71OF3F032733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464054 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-06 20:24:14 EDT --- OK, here's the rest of the review: * The files AUTHORS and NEWS are empty and useless. It's ok to not package them. But keep an eye on them whenever there is an update by upstream. * Requires: libprojectM = %{version} is definitely not needed. I'm not very sure about the Requires: pulseaudio rpmbuild picks up pulseaudio-libs as a dependency. This is probably enough. Is there a particular reason why you required pulseaudio? * The line find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.la' -exec rm -f {} ';' doesn't seem necessary since no .la files are built. Is this also true for libprojectM-qt? Can you check? * Please make use of the %{name} macro whenever possible, e.g. in the %install and %files sections. * It would be nice if you add a Generic Name to the .desktop file. Also "Application" is forbidden in the category field. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 01:26:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 20:26:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464049] Package Review Request for libprojectM-qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070126.mA71Qmi6000797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464049 --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-06 20:26:48 EDT --- * While I was trying to build projectM-pulseaudio, I found out that these two must be explicitly required in the libprojectM-qt-devel package: qt-devel, libprojectM-devel Because they are not picked up by rpmbuild but they are called from the /usr/include/libprojectM-qt/qprojectm_mainwindow.hpp file. * Also, as I noted in the other package's ticket please check that if the line find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.la' -exec rm -f {} ';' is really necessary in the SPEC file . I don't see any .la files built with libprojectM-qt . Sorry for the long TO-DO list. We need to have everything according to the book. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:09:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:09:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464049] Package Review Request for libprojectM-qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070209.mA729xL6004589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464049 --- Comment #8 from Jameson 2008-11-06 21:09:58 EDT --- Oh, and, yes, the front end is called from the pulseaudio and jack packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:09:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:09:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464049] Package Review Request for libprojectM-qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070209.mA729GSH004532@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464049 --- Comment #7 from Jameson 2008-11-06 21:09:15 EDT --- No problem. I understand the need to get all of this right. It's what separates the official Fedora repos from the third party ones that create all the dependency issues. It looks like you were correct about the .la files. I had just been copying my old SPECs to start a new one, so sometimes I'll have extra stuff like that left over. Here's an update: http://www.vtscrew.com/libprojectM-qt-1.2.0-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:24:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:24:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245561] Review Request: ht - File editor/viewer/analyzer for executables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070224.mA72OW9m009475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245561 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-06 21:24:31 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:25:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:25:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070225.mA72PTAU009985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #39 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-06 21:25:28 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:23:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:23:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470250] (docbook5-style-xsl) Review Request: docbook5-style-xsl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070223.mA72NMpn009362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470250 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #1 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-06 21:23:21 EDT --- unsetting cvs flag. you only need to set it to ? when this package is approved and there is action needed by a cvs admin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:21:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:21:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446563] Review Request: rubygem-rspec - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070221.mA72LuqC006908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446563 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-06 21:21:55 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:28:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:28:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438406] Review Request: ufiformat - Disk formatting utility for USB floppy devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070228.mA72SIkL010293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438406 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-06 21:28:17 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:27:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:27:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462253] Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070227.mA72Ramp007871@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462253 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-06 21:27:35 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:35:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:35:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464054] Package Review Request for projectM-pulseaudio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070235.mA72ZOr9009149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464054 --- Comment #4 from Jameson 2008-11-06 21:35:23 EDT --- Do I need both the fedora-projectM-pulseaudio.desktop and projectM-pulseaudio.desktop, or should I delete the latter? Also, what kind of generic name should I use? Something like Pulseaudio Music Visualization? I'll talk to upstream about switching the LGPL'd file to GPL. I think what happened was that they originally had everything licensed under the GPL, and changed the core package to license it to a commercial game developer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:50:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:50:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465758] Review Request: perl-Net-Daemon - Perl extension for portable daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070250.mA72oUpZ013870@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465758 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:50:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:50:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465758] Review Request: perl-Net-Daemon - Perl extension for portable daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070250.mA72oQaw011651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465758 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-06 21:50:25 EDT --- perl-Net-Daemon-0.44-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:51:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:51:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466237] Review Request: perl-File-Comments - Recognizes file formats and extracts format-specific comments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070251.mA72pRQ1011915@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466237 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-06 21:51:26 EDT --- perl-File-Comments-0.07-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:51:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:51:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458826] Review Request: s390utils - Linux/390 specific utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070251.mA72paIC014235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458826 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nobody at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-06 21:51:34 EDT --- *** Bug 226385 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:51:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:51:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226385] Merge Review: s390utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070251.mA72pZQR014210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226385 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-06 21:51:34 EDT --- This isn't actually in CVS; it was not imported during the merge. Closing this as a dup of the later package review ticket. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 458826 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:53:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:53:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438587] Review Request: libsqlite3x - C++ Wrapper for the SQLite3 database engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070253.mA72rlXe014676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438587 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-06 21:53:46 EDT --- libsqlite3x-20071018-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libsqlite3x'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9435 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:53:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:53:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070253.mA72re7k012422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 --- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-06 21:53:39 EDT --- un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.7.080608.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:54:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:54:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070254.mA72s32I012510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-06 21:54:01 EDT --- un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:52:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:52:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462818] Review Request: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL - SSL support for Net::SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070252.mA72qOvx012117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462818 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-06 21:52:23 EDT --- perl-Net-SMTP-SSL-1.01-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:52:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:52:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466237] Review Request: perl-File-Comments - Recognizes file formats and extracts format-specific comments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070252.mA72qVZ6012180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466237 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-06 21:52:31 EDT --- perl-File-Comments-0.07-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:52:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:52:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462818] Review Request: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL - SSL support for Net::SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070252.mA72qRkk012150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462818 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:56:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:56:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470250] Review Request: docbook5-style-xsl - Norman Walsh's XSL stylesheets for DocBook 5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070256.mA72u6hU013278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470250 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|(docbook5-style-xsl) Review |Review Request: |Request: docbook5-style-xsl |docbook5-style-xsl - Norman | |Walsh's XSL stylesheets for | |DocBook 5 Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-06 21:56:05 EDT --- I'm not sure why the fedora-review flag is set, either. Nobody will ever see this package to review it if the flag is set. Can this actually be reviewed without the docbook 5 package you mention? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 03:00:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 22:00:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464054] Package Review Request for projectM-pulseaudio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070300.mA730mxR014929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464054 --- Comment #5 from Jameson 2008-11-06 22:00:47 EDT --- Getting rid of the vendor tag gets rid of the extra desktop file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:57:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:57:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070257.mA72vP7I014070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 --- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-06 21:57:24 EDT --- un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.7.080608.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:58:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:58:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070258.mA72wYiE014320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-06 21:58:33 EDT --- un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 03:08:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 22:08:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070308.mA738ShM016434@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-06 22:08:27 EDT --- I note that 0.3.2 isn't announced upstream, just 0.3.1. 0.3.3 seems to be tagged as well but I didn't see a tarball. The descriptions really need some elaboration. "Development files for C", for example, is almost completely nondescriptive, and "Fast messaging system", while fine for a summary, really needs elaboration because it could refer just as well to mutt or an IRC client. Unfortunately the upstream web site is completely useless as a source of descriptive text. Maybe: ZeroMQ (0MQ) is an implementation of the Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP) written in C++, calling itself "the fastest messaging system ever?. And then something like: ZeroMQ C interface libaries. or something for the C subpackage and Development files for the ZeroMQ C interface libraries. Is there any reason the python and java interfaces aren't built? And if the python interface isn't being built, why is there a build dependency on python-devel? Maybe I'm missing something, but zeromq-c-devel doesn't seem to have any dependency on zeromq-devel, which leaves /usr/include/zmq unowned if zeromq-c-devel only is installed. Do you know if the tests under the perf directory are runnable at build time? It seems like there are some local tests, but I have no idea how to run them. * source files match upstream: d11291730967f91762bfdbf7352871ba20fddffe8eead1a66e96cd1053f47eab zmq-0.3.2.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. X summaries could use some work. X descriptions could use some work. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. ? not sure about BuildRequires: python-devel. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint has some easily fixed complaints. X final provides and requires: zeromq-0.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm libzmq.so.0()(64bit) zeromq = 0.3.2-1.fc10 zeromq(x86-64) = 0.3.2-1.fc10 = /sbin/ldconfig libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libzmq.so.0()(64bit) zeromq-c-0.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm libczmq.so.0()(64bit) zeromq-c = 0.3.2-1.fc10 zeromq-c(x86-64) = 0.3.2-1.fc10 = /sbin/ldconfig libczmq.so.0()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libzmq.so.0()(64bit) zeromq = 0.3.2-1.fc10 X no dependency on zeromq-devel zeromq-c-devel-0.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm zeromq-c-devel = 0.3.2-1.fc10 zeromq-c-devel(x86-64) = 0.3.2-1.fc10 = libczmq.so.0()(64bit) zeromq-c = 0.3.2-1.fc10 zeromq-devel-0.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm zeromq-devel = 0.3.2-1.fc10 zeromq-devel(x86-64) = 0.3.2-1.fc10 = libzmq.so.0()(64bit) zeromq = 0.3.2-1.fc10 ? not sure if there's a test suite there or not. * shared libraries installed: ldconfig is called where necessary unversioned .so files are present in the respective -devel packages. X /usr/include/zmq ownership issues in zeromq-c-devel. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel packages. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 03:18:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 22:18:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464049] Package Review Request for libprojectM-qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070318.mA73IFY7018241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464049 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-06 22:18:14 EDT --- Oh, I should've been more clear. When I said "copy the description from the main package" I meant to copy it from the libprojectM-qt package. So the description for the libprojectM-qt-devel should be: ----- projectM-qt is a GUI designed to enhance the projectM user and preset writer experience. It provides a way to browse, search, rate presets and setup preset playlists for projectM-jack and projectM-pulseaudio. The %{name}-devel package contains libraries and header files for developing applications that use %{name}. ----- This is all for for this package. Make sure you correct the description before you commit. ------------------------------------------------- This package (libprojectM-qt) is approved by oget ------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 03:35:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 22:35:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464049] Package Review Request for libprojectM-qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070335.mA73Z7fP023734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464049 Jameson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Jameson 2008-11-06 22:35:06 EDT --- Taken care of. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 03:34:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 22:34:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464054] Package Review Request for projectM-pulseaudio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070334.mA73YGnP023322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464054 --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-06 22:34:15 EDT --- "Pulseaudio Music Visualization" is not bad. Something like just "Pulseaudio Visualization" may work too. There is no strict rule for this. Some people just copy the contents of Name into Generic Name, but I don't like it that way. It's really up to you. So that's what the vendor tag does. I'm learning this with you :) Removal of the vendor tag was decided in the mailing list a while ago, just when I started packaging stuff. I see that it didn't make its way to the Guidelines yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 04:14:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 23:14:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464054] Package Review Request for projectM-pulseaudio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070414.mA74ECMu029951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464054 --- Comment #7 from Jameson 2008-11-06 23:14:11 EDT --- This should take care of all of the above. I e-mailed upstream about the license. The new SRPM is located: http://www.vtscrew.com/projectM-pulseaudio-1.2.0-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 04:33:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 23:33:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470424] New: Review Request: libtopology - Libtopology is a library for discovering the hardware topology on Linux systems Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libtopology - Libtopology is a library for discovering the hardware topology on Linux systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470424 Summary: Review Request: libtopology - Libtopology is a library for discovering the hardware topology on Linux systems Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tony at bakeyournoodle.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bakeyournoodle.com/~tony/fedora/libtopology/libtopology.spec SRPM URL: http://bakeyournoodle.com/~tony/fedora/libtopology/libtopology-0.3-0.1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Libtopology is a library for discovering the hardware topology on Linux systems This is my first packages and I seek sponsorship. I have tested this .src.rpm with koji I expect you can see the build results at: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=920506 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 04:36:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 23:36:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470424] Review Request: libtopology - Libtopology is a library for discovering the hardware topology on Linux systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070436.mA74atgP031280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470424 Tony Breeds changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 04:49:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 23:49:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464050] Package Review Request for projectM-libvisual In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070449.mA74nI21002680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464050 --- Comment #4 from Jameson 2008-11-06 23:49:18 EDT --- I have a new SPEC in original location, and a new SRPM: http://www.vtscrew.com/projectM-libvisual-1.2.0-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 04:48:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 23:48:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464051] Package Review Request for projectM-jack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070448.mA74mq5X000557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464051 --- Comment #2 from Jameson 2008-11-06 23:48:51 EDT --- I have a new SPEC in original location, and a new SRPM: http://www.vtscrew.com/projectM-jack-1.2.0-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 05:17:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 00:17:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070517.mA75H2Iq005131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(dennis at ausil.us) --- Comment #40 from Conrad Meyer 2008-11-07 00:17:01 EDT --- **** Access denied: konradm is not in ACL for rpms/cddlib/devel cvs commit: Pre-commit check failed Hm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 05:21:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 00:21:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464049] Package Review Request for libprojectM-qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070521.mA75L5IM007860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464049 Jameson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 05:56:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 00:56:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070556.mA75uTG1010740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 Jameson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Jameson 2008-11-07 00:56:28 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libprojectM New Branches: F-10 Owners: imntreal I need the new branch. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 05:57:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 00:57:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464049] Package Review Request for libprojectM-qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070557.mA75vrD8012839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464049 Jameson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Jameson 2008-11-07 00:57:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libprojectM-qt Short Description: frontend for libprojectM Owners: imntreal Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: imntreal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 06:15:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 01:15:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070615.mA76F9u6015541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-07 01:15:08 EDT --- Currently mass branching is proceeding and the request for F-10 branch is not needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 06:29:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 01:29:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469317] Review request: lynis - Security and system auditing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070629.mA76TI2d017659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469317 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |cooly at gnome.eu.org --- Comment #1 from Lucian Langa 2008-11-07 01:29:17 EDT --- Please fix this using macros instead of hard coded path. mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/lynis # profile install -m 644 -p default.prf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/lynis -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 06:33:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 01:33:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469317] Review request: lynis - Security and system auditing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070633.mA76XQXV018301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469317 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cooly at gnome.eu.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 06:36:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 01:36:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460352] Review Request: xwota - Who's On the Air Database interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070636.mA76aFrf018917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460352 --- Comment #5 from Lucian Langa 2008-11-07 01:36:14 EDT --- > Is there any point to mentioning what operating systems the program works on? > Does that even matter for a Fedora package? dropped the part. > I note the following complaint from desktop-file-install: > /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/xwota-0.4-4.fc10.x86_64/usr/share/applications/xwota.desktop: > warning: value "xwota.png" for key "Icon" in group "Desktop Entry" is an icon > name with an extension, but there should be no extension as described in the > Icon Theme Specification if the value is not an absolute path fixed > So just fix that and the license tag and the desktop file up and this should be > ready to go. fixed > Finally, I note that you have submitted 24 packages for review, while you've > only reviewed three packages. I will periodically revisit your packages as I > work through the queue and I suppose eventually all of them will be reviewed > but the reviewers are much more likely to review your packages if you do some > more reviews yourself. fixing... new version: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/xwota.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/xwota-0.4-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 06:45:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 01:45:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466660] Review Request: sympy - A Python library for symbolic mathematics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070645.mA76jskH018027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466660 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-07 01:45:53 EDT --- Fine. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sympy New Branches: EL-5 Owners: jussilehtola -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 06:49:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 01:49:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469952] Review Request: dopewars - a drug dealing game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070649.mA76nDYu020485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469952 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-07 01:49:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Source0: must include url: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL > > Otherwise ok. Good catch. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/dopewars.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/dopewars-1.5.12-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 06:56:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 01:56:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469317] Review request: lynis - Security and system auditing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070656.mA76uEnp021784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469317 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-11-07 01:56:13 EDT --- Thanks, Updated: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/lynis.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/lynis-1.2.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 07:06:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 02:06:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070706.mA7760Fb020961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-07 02:05:59 EDT --- CVS outrage is over and F-10 branch is created for libprojectM. So now you can rebuild libprojectM for also F-11/10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 07:06:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 02:06:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429882] Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070706.mA776FZQ023270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429882 Dwayne Bailey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #25 from Dwayne Bailey 2008-11-07 02:06:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > Package Change Request > ====================== > Package Name: python-Levenshtein > New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 OLPC-2 OLPC-3 (In reply to comment #24) > cvs done. The branches have appeared correctly on the pkgdb: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/python-Levenshtein But branches aren't present in CVS: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/python-Levenshtein/ I believe there was a CVS outage which might relate to the problem. Thus re-requesting the branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 07:25:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 02:25:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435015] Review Request: gpp4 - LGPL CCP4 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070725.mA77P3Yd023653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-07 02:25:01 EDT --- Would you rebuild gpp4 and mmdb also for F-11 branch? Also, please submit requests to push F-9/10 gpp4/mmdb packages into repositories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 07:29:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 02:29:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070729.mA77TMRV023990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #24 from Jameson 2008-11-07 02:29:21 EDT --- I just did a cvs update, but I still don't seem to have a F-10 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 07:35:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 02:35:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070735.mA77ZMwD025039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #25 from Jameson 2008-11-07 02:35:21 EDT --- Nevermind, I re-ran the fedora-cvs script, and it found it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 07:59:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 02:59:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070759.mA77xYdV030665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-07 02:59:33 EDT --- libprojectM-1.2.0-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libprojectM-1.2.0-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 07:58:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 02:58:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070758.mA77wGPv028202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-07 02:58:15 EDT --- libprojectM-1.2.0-5.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libprojectM-1.2.0-5.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 08:00:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 03:00:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070800.mA780Wjb028913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-07 03:00:31 EDT --- libprojectM-1.2.0-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libprojectM-1.2.0-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 08:20:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 03:20:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469317] Review request: lynis - Security and system auditing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070820.mA78KXxg002319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469317 --- Comment #3 from Lucian Langa 2008-11-07 03:20:32 EDT --- There are a few issues: %{_datadir}/%{name}/include/* %{_datadir}/%{name}/plugins/* %{_datadir}/%{name}/db/* will result in unowned directories. Suggestion: simply drop those and modify: %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} -> %{_datadir}/%{name} lynis.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/lynis/default.prf Also you have to decide if you should mark this file noreplace. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Configuration_files .. if so, header needs to be adapted. Note: Not seeing any differences in previous release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 08:16:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 03:16:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070816.mA78GNNL001635@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 Denis Leroy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- --- Comment #21 from Denis Leroy 2008-11-07 03:16:22 EDT --- MUST item: - rpmlint output OK (init incoherent-subsys warning is a false positive) - name is according to guidelines - spec file name is ok - package meets packaging guidelines - license is CDDL - spec file is legible - source URL following svn snapshot guidelines - compile and builds - builds in mock - ldconfig called property - owns all directories - no duplicates - file props ok - clean section cleans buildroot - no libraries, header fiels or GUI apps - no ownership conflicts - filenames are UTF-8 - ppc Archexclude ok, not supported by upstream Package is APPROVED. (please remove contrib directory as mentioned in comment #17). Uwe, you should now go into https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ and create yourself an account. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 08:24:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 03:24:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070824.mA78ONQP002669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 Denis Leroy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review+ --- Comment #22 from Denis Leroy 2008-11-07 03:24:22 EDT --- Oops sorry, incorrectly set the flag, not sure how that happened... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 08:45:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 03:45:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222960] Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070845.mA78jYWp006667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222960 Xavier Lamien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(lxtnow at gmail.com) | --- Comment #25 from Xavier Lamien 2008-11-07 03:45:31 EDT --- thanks for the heads up Jason. No mail report received from previous update of this bug. Well, upstream has moved its software to Convirt (with KVM and libvirt support) since few months already. I'll just make it available in a new Review request. So I think this bug can be easily close. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 08:58:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 03:58:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469317] Review request: lynis - Security and system auditing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070858.mA78wIuW008693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469317 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-11-07 03:58:17 EDT --- Thanks - Done http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/lynis.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/lynis-1.2.1-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 08:59:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 03:59:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222960] Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070859.mA78xWtr008861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222960 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-07 03:59:30 EDT --- Okay, thank you for update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 08:59:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 03:59:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469317] Review request: lynis - Security and system auditing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070859.mA78xwGJ006709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469317 --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-11-07 03:59:58 EDT --- lynis.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/lynis/default.prf I will keep default.prf in /etc, as it a conf file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 08:58:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 03:58:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464049] Package Review Request for libprojectM-qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070858.mA78wOvJ006456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464049 Bug 464049 depends on bug 464047, which changed state. Bug 464047 Summary: Review Request for libprojectM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 08:58:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 03:58:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464050] Package Review Request for projectM-libvisual In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070858.mA78wP2R006476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464050 Bug 464050 depends on bug 464047, which changed state. Bug 464047 Summary: Review Request for libprojectM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 08:58:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 03:58:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070858.mA78wN0E006428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-07 03:58:22 EDT --- Okay, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 08:58:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 03:58:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470250] Review Request: docbook5-style-xsl - Norman Walsh's XSL stylesheets for DocBook 5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070858.mA78w91J006380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470250 --- Comment #3 from Ondrej Vasik 2008-11-07 03:58:08 EDT --- Sorry for flags, I thought it is necessary to set them to ? for review and that they will be changed to + after review. Actually spec file and installation could be reviewed for sanity independently, although you may not be able to check functionality of those XSL stylesheets without Docbook5 DTD's (but I guess I will have docbook5-dtds spec for review soon - hopefully today or next week) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 08:57:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 03:57:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462181] Review Request: teeworlds - Online multi-player platform 2D shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070857.mA78vjDa006320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462181 --- Comment #10 from Simon Wesp 2008-11-07 03:57:44 EDT --- okay, we finished bam, but it is not builded yet. i will build it today or tomorrow. would you patch out the internal libs/applications/dependencies? i can?t do that, because 1.) i can?t patch them out or/and 2.) i patch it out and the build or the application run failed, because the internals are modified or not compatible to the fedora supplied. perhaps you can fix it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 09:47:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 04:47:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070947.mA79lYpv016111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 --- Comment #14 from Gerd Hoffmann 2008-11-07 04:47:33 EDT --- Mail sent, lets see ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 09:57:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 04:57:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some car accros the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070957.mA79vO1Q020267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 --- Comment #3 from Simon Wesp 2008-11-07 04:57:23 EDT --- okay, you created a desktop-file with an install and on your personal wikipage (http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Phill) you declared, that you want to review moon-buggy for the actual EL and Fedora branches. For EL4 & EL5 you need a vendor. you can handle it in this way: desktop-file-install %{SOURCE1} \ %if 0%{?rhel} --vendor="" \ %endif --dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications I used this for my package(s), but i don?t know, if this an official way to handle it. Perhaps we should ask in -packaging or -devel or -epel list(s) first?! I didn?t found a hint on this lists in the archives. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 10:11:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 05:11:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469317] Review request: lynis - Security and system auditing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071011.mA7ABDY8020547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469317 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Lucian Langa 2008-11-07 05:11:12 EDT --- Thank you. Review: OK source files match upstream : 4f8db3c524c1014db5842ca2dbd575aa lynis-1.2.1.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK summary is OK. OK description is OK. OK dist tag is present. OK build root OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. OK license text included in package. N/A BuildRequires are proper. N/A compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). OK package installs properly. N/A debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires are sane: config(lynis) = 1.2.1-2.fc10 lynis = 1.2.1-2.fc10 = /bin/sh config(lynis) = 1.2.1-2.fc10 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 N/A no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no static libraries. OK no libtool .la files. N/A not GUI application. Suggestion: Please consider doing something about header of /etc/lynis/default.prf as it might seem confusing # # Do NOT change this file, as it will be overwritten while upgrading. Instead # make a copy of this file and adjust it. # I think is should be changed upstream. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 10:32:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 05:32:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071032.mA7AWGPB027467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #18 from Lucian Langa 2008-11-07 05:32:14 EDT --- If the submitter is more interested in upstream development, I can take over the package submission/maintainer-ship, or simply become co-maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 10:33:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 05:33:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460959] Review Request: libkml - A KML library written in C++ with bindings to other languagues In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071033.mA7AX0wU027536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460959 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #12 from Till Maas 2008-11-07 05:32:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > I'm sorry, Rakesh, but I can't go further (at least until I'll find a box with > F-10 installed). I'm releasing my fedora-review flags. If nobody will review > this package, I'll restart the review process, but only after I'll update my > working machine to F-10. You can use "koji build --scratch dist-f10 libkml-0.4.0-2.fc10.src.rpm" to make koji build the srpm for you for all primary archs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 10:39:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 05:39:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200245] Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071039.mA7Adsdj028803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200245 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Pravin Satpute 2008-11-07 05:39:51 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name:scim-sayura New Branches: F-9 Owners: pravins -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 10:40:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 05:40:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468765] Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071040.mA7AeUHH025992@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468765 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #4 from Till Maas 2008-11-07 05:40:29 EDT --- THis probably creates a empty README.ColomboAcousticDrumkit file: iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf8 README.ColomboAcousticDrumkit \ -o README.ColomboAcousticDrumkit If you want to use iconv, afaik you have to output it to a temporary file, use touch to restore the timestamp of the temporary file and then rename it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 10:53:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 05:53:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469329] Review Request: nebula - An intrusion signature generator (Security tool) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071053.mA7Ar7O9031374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469329 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #3 from Till Maas 2008-11-07 05:53:06 EDT --- You can use this to avoud the -Werror. The default Fedora optflags contains some security enhancements (e.g. -fstack-protector), that should not be removed except if it is not possible to use them. The usage of -Werror is not such a case imho. %configure make %{?_smp_mflags} AM_CFLAGS=-D_GNU_SOURCE The AM_CFLAGS contain the Werror and are defined in the Makefile.am files. A glance over the Makefile showed, that they can be easily overwritten. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 11:26:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 06:26:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some car accros the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071126.mA7BQq4d002186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 --- Comment #4 from Philipp Baum 2008-11-07 06:26:51 EDT --- No, its only wrong at my wikipage.. ill fix it, thx. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 11:22:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 06:22:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071122.mA7BM7ah001373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 --- Comment #89 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-11-07 06:22:06 EDT --- mpi-selector looks like a quick hack added into RHEL instead of environment-modules, hence it'll probably never make it into Fedora, as environment-modules already surpasses it in terms of functionality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 11:45:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 06:45:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444165] Review Request: mkrdns - automatic reverse DNS zone generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071145.mA7Bjk3H008525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444165 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(jonathansteffan at g | |mail.com) --- Comment #7 from Till Maas 2008-11-07 06:45:44 EDT --- Is there some estimate when this review can be finished? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 11:44:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 06:44:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 243501] Review Request: qtiplot-doc - Documentation of qtiplot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071144.mA7Bi2uB005305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243501 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |opensource at till.name Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG AssignedTo|opensource at till.name |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(frank-buettner at gm | |x.net) | --- Comment #7 from Till Maas 2008-11-07 06:44:00 EDT --- There was no response for a while and iirc I read somewhere that the submitter is currently very busy. Therefore I close this for now, feel free to reopen this once you want to finish it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 12:03:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 07:03:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469814] Review Request: fuse-zip - Fuse-zip is a fs to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071203.mA7C3TFs009001@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469814 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #3 from Till Maas 2008-11-07 07:03:28 EDT --- In %build I would also add LDFLAGS, because otherwise g++ is once called without these flags (g++ fuse-zip.o fileNode.o bigBuffer.o fuseZipData.o libZipWrapper.o -pthread -L/lib -lfuse -lrt -ldl -lzip -lz -o fuse-zip): make %{?_smp_mflags} CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" LDFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" Instead of the sed and the DESTDIR you can better use this here in %install: make install INSTALLPREFIX="$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_prefix}" DESTDIR is not used in the makefile, so you do not need to use it for make install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 12:08:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 07:08:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469892] Review Request: examiner - Utility to disassemble and comment foreign executable binaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071208.mA7C8tm2010197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469892 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #1 from Till Maas 2008-11-07 07:08:55 EDT --- Instead of the huge sed script you should better define the variables at the make commandline, e.g. make install BIN="${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/%{_bindir}" for each of the variable substitions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 12:11:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 07:11:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071211.mA7CBhfg013560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #3 from Till Maas 2008-11-07 07:11:42 EDT --- You should use either %{buildroot} or RPM_BUILD_ROOT, but not both in the same spec file. The install is missing a "-p" to preserve the timestamps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 12:18:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 07:18:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469843] Review Request: unhide - Tool to find hidden processes and TCP/UDP ports from rootkits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071218.mA7CIIuS014772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469843 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #1 from Till Maas 2008-11-07 07:18:17 EDT --- You probably only need on of these two lines, because the second one will overwrite the output of the first one: %{__cc} %{optflags} unhide.c -o unhide %{__cc} %{optflags} unhide-linux26.c -o unhide Also you do not follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#macros Use either $RPM_OPT_FLAGS and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %optflags and %buildroot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 12:22:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 07:22:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469317] Review request: lynis - Security and system auditing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071222.mA7CM83i012890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469317 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-11-07 07:22:07 EDT --- Thanks - I will check with upstream also. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lynis Short Description: Security and system auditing tool Owners: rakesh Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 12:33:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 07:33:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469997] Review Request: ratproxy - A passive web application security assessment tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071233.mA7CX6sX017544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469997 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #1 from Till Maas 2008-11-07 07:33:05 EDT --- Instead of the sed command, you better run make CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -D_GNU_SOURCE" You can add -Wno-pointer-sign like upstream does if you do not want to see tons of pointer signedness warnings, but it would probably better to fix this in the code. :-) Something not so nice is, that the tarball contains a non free precompiled binary in flare-dist/flare, i.e. add a rm -rf flare-dist/ flare in %prep. In the future there may be checks may prevent the rpm from beeing built if there are precompiled binaries present. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 12:36:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 07:36:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071236.mA7CaMmu015240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-11-07 07:36:21 EDT --- Updated - Thanks http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/pstreams-devel.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/pstreams-devel-0.6.0-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 12:48:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 07:48:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071248.mA7CmUXc017147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 13:09:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 08:09:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071309.mA7D9fpQ021542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 --- Comment #90 from Doug Ledford 2008-11-07 08:09:39 EDT --- Correct. I have every intention of sticking with environment-modules for Fedora and never bringing in mpi-selector. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 13:13:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 08:13:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470502] New: Review Request: kde-plasma-runcommand - Simple plasmoid to run commands without using terminal or KRunner Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kde-plasma-runcommand - Simple plasmoid to run commands without using terminal or KRunner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470502 Summary: Review Request: kde-plasma-runcommand - Simple plasmoid to run commands without using terminal or KRunner Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jreznik at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/kde-plasma-runcommand/kde-plasma-runcommand.spec SRPM URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/kde-plasma-runcommand/kde-plasma-runcommand-0.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Simple plasmoid to run commands without using terminal or KRunner. Inspired by KRunner runners, plasma-runner and KDE3 equivalent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 13:24:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 08:24:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071324.mA7DOJpd028027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 --- Comment #5 from Till Maas 2008-11-07 08:24:18 EDT --- There are some issues left: - license is not included in %doc: COPYING.LIB You should also include in %doc: AUTHORS ChangeLog You need the BR doxygen, because you can create additional documentation with "make docs", this is also missing in the rpm. I would at least include the html documentation in %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 13:34:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 08:34:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071334.mA7DYHBs027092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 --- Comment #6 from Till Maas 2008-11-07 08:34:16 EDT --- [OK] rpmlint output: silent [OK] Spec in %{name}.spec format [OK] license allowed:LGPLv3 [OK] license matches shortname in License: tag [NOT OK] license in tarball and included in %doc: COPYING.LIB [OK] package is code or permissive content: {N/A} patches sent to upstream and commented [OK] Source0 is a working URL {OK} Sourceforge URL is Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name} [OK] Source0 matches Upstream: a12c2793937c2ea1bee04827d7b2ca63 pstreams-0.6.0.tar.gz [OK] Package builds on all platforms: [N/A] ExcludeArch bugs are filed and commented: [TODO] BuildRequires are complete (mock builds) (OK) No file dependencies outside of /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin [N/A] %find_lang used for locales [N/A] Every (sub)package containing libraries runs ldconfig %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig [OK] .h (header) files are in -devel subpackage [N/A] .a (static libraries) are in -static subpackage [N/A] contains .pc (pkgconfig) files and has Requires: pkgconfig (N/A) .pc files are in -devel subpackage [N/A] contains .so.X(.Y) files and .so is in -devel [N/A] -devel subpackage has Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} The -devel package is the main apge here. [N/A] .la files (libtool) are not included [N/A] Has GUI and includes %{name}.desktop [N/A] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install [OK] Prefix: /usr not used (not relocatable) [OK] Owns all created directories [OK] no duplicates in %files [OK] %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [OK] Does not own files or dirs from other packages [OK] included filenames are in UTF-8 [OK] %clean is rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] Consistent macro usage [OK] large documentation is -doc subpackage [OK] %doc does not affect runtime {OK} no pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) {OK} well known BuildRoot It's kind of this one: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) {OK} PreReq not used {N/A} RPM_OPT_FLAGS honoured {N/A} Useful debuginfo generated {OK} no duplication of system libraries {N/A} no rpath {OK} Timestamps preserved with cp and install {N/A} Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) {OK} Requires(pre,post) style notation not used {OK} only writes to tmp /var/tmp $TMPDIR %{_tmppath} %{_builddir} (and %{buildroot} on %install and %clean) {OK} no Conflicts {OK} nothing installed in /srv {OK} Changelog in allowed format {OK} does not use Scriptlets Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch Sane Provides: and Requires: {OK} Follows Naming Guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 13:39:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 08:39:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443238] Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071339.mA7Dd4uf030898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443238 Victor Bogado changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(bogado at bogado.net | |) | --- Comment #13 from Victor Bogado 2008-11-07 08:39:03 EDT --- Sorry for the delay, I didn't have noticed your comments until that last one. :-P I made all the changes you have stated. For the "font" I don't know how I would do it, the website of the font author is a flash-only-mess, I really hate those sites, and don't have a download link for the font it self. But even if there were, the font was altered by the author of the game to include numbers. So as far as I know there is no upstream release of this font. But I do understand the need for a separated package, so I will email the author that knows the designer that made the font so we can figure something out. I would suggest to bundle at first with the font, and later when we complete the font package change this one to use the former. the new packages are at the same place as usual : http://bogado.net/rpm/cave9.spec http://bogado.net/rpm/cave9-0.3-2.bog9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 13:47:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 08:47:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470508] New: Review Request: Ajaxterm - A web-based terminal Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Ajaxterm - A web-based terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470508 Summary: Review Request: Ajaxterm - A web-based terminal Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/Ajaxterm.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/Ajaxterm-0.10-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Ajaxterm is a web based terminal. It was totally inspired and works almost exactly like http://anyterm.org/ except it's much easier to install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 13:49:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 08:49:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443238] Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071349.mA7DnGNC030036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443238 --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-07 08:49:15 EDT --- Mamoru, did you want to take this one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 14:09:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 09:09:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443238] Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071409.mA7E9cmf004935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443238 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-07 09:09:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Mamoru, did you want to take this one? If you want to review this, I would appreciate it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 14:07:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 09:07:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071407.mA7E7WwP004681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 --- Comment #7 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-11-07 09:07:31 EDT --- Updated - Thanks http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/pstreams-devel.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/pstreams-devel-0.6.0-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 14:07:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 09:07:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071407.mA7E7i2S004731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 14:10:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 09:10:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469627] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class - A Path::Class type library for Moose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071410.mA7EAc0P002714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469627 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-07 09:10:37 EDT --- Including the tests as documentation causes an additional dependency on perl(Test::More). You'll either need to filter this or not include the tests as documentation. This package also provides: perl(Bar) perl(Foo) which seems a bit odd. These seem to come from the tests as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 14:15:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 09:15:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469329] Review Request: nebula - An intrusion signature generator (Security tool) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071415.mA7EFJGk006550@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469329 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-11-07 09:15:18 EDT --- Thanks - Updated http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/nebula.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/nebula-0.2.2-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 14:30:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 09:30:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469329] Review Request: nebula - An intrusion signature generator (Security tool) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071430.mA7EUvLk006717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469329 --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-11-07 09:30:56 EDT --- http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/nebula.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/nebula-0.2.2-4.fc10.src.rpm Updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 14:27:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 09:27:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071427.mA7ERnmX006134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 --- Comment #8 from Till Maas 2008-11-07 09:27:48 EDT --- [OK] license in tarball and included in %doc: COPYING.LIB [OK] BuildRequires are complete (mock builds) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=920922 {NOT OK} Timestamps preserved with cp and install If you use make install here, then the timestamp is not preserved. You can use this patch to preserve it: https://sourceforge.net/tracker2/download.php?group_id=48695&atid=453894&file_id=300540&aid=2234202 If you add the patch, please mention in a comment in the spec file, that it is already submitted upstream and point to this location (the tracker for this patch): https://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?func=detail&atid=453894&aid=2234202&group_id=48695 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 14:30:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 09:30:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469833] Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Use the GMP library for Math::BigInt routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071430.mA7EUZND006654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469833 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-07 09:30:33 EDT --- I followed the URL as usual when doing reviews and failed to notice that I had ended up at the Math-GMP page, which confused the hell out of me. I think you want URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Math-BigInt-GMP/ instead. That's really the only thing I see wrong with this package; I'll approve it and you can fix up the URL when you check in. * source files match upstream: 3f00fb0191b4343745b99f104a50f50a49fa7424fe70cc002f000465161a8eb4 Math-BigInt-GMP-1.24.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: GMP.so()(64bit) perl(Math::BigInt::GMP) = 1.24 perl-Math-BigInt-GMP = 1.24-1.fc10 perl-Math-BigInt-GMP(x86-64) = 1.24-1.fc10 = libgmp.so.3()(64bit) perl >= 0:5.006002 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(XSLoader) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=5530, 3 wallclock secs ( 0.51 usr 0.03 sys + 2.50 cusr 0.07 csys = 3.11 CPU) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED, just fix up the URL. The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 14:40:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 09:40:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071440.mA7EeXdt011669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 --- Comment #10 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-11-07 09:40:32 EDT --- I clashed with your updated. Wait I will updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 14:38:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 09:38:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071438.mA7Ec5t5008173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 --- Comment #9 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-11-07 09:38:03 EDT --- http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/pstreams-devel.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/pstreams-devel-0.6.0-5.fc10.src.rpm Updated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 14:45:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 09:45:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469833] Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Use the GMP library for Math::BigInt routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071445.mA7EjPtg012581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469833 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth 2008-11-07 09:45:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP Short Description: Use the GMP library for Math::BigInt routines Owners: pghmcfc Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 14:47:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 09:47:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071447.mA7El3Ew012892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 --- Comment #11 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-11-07 09:47:02 EDT --- http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/pstreams-devel.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/pstreams-devel-0.6.0-6.fc10.src.rpm Updated - Thanks for patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 14:46:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 09:46:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469833] Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Use the GMP library for Math::BigInt routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071446.mA7EkcL5012822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469833 --- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth 2008-11-07 09:46:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I followed the URL as usual when doing reviews and failed to notice that I had > ended up at the Math-GMP page, which confused the hell out of me. I think you > want > URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Math-BigInt-GMP/ > instead. > > That's really the only thing I see wrong with this package; I'll approve it and > you can fix up the URL when you check in. Good spot; guess which package spec I used as a template for this one... Thanks for the review (again). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 14:57:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 09:57:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429882] Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071457.mA7EvUpx015017@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429882 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #26 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2008-11-07 09:57:29 EDT --- My bad. cvs really done this time :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 15:00:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 10:00:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071500.mA7F0DCY015730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Till Maas 2008-11-07 10:00:11 EDT --- {OK} Timestamps preserved with cp and install Thank you for your fast responses, now everything is good, this package is now APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 15:05:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 10:05:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071505.mA7F5Iju013989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-11-07 10:05:17 EDT --- Thanks New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pstreams-devel Short Description: POSIX Process Control in C++ Owners: rakesh Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 15:07:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 10:07:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469329] Review Request: nebula - An intrusion signature generator (Security tool) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071507.mA7F76Tl014437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469329 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 15:21:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 10:21:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469329] Review Request: nebula - An intrusion signature generator (Security tool) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071521.mA7FLdlx020582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469329 --- Comment #6 from Till Maas 2008-11-07 10:21:38 EDT --- BR: are not complete: checking for zlib.h... no configure: error: zlib headers not found. You probably need at least zlib-devel. You can test with "koji build --scratch dist-f10 nebula-0.2.2-4.fc10.src.rpm" whether your BRs are complete or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 15:36:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 10:36:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469673] Review request: perl-File-ShareDir-PAR - same functionality as File::ShareDir with PAR support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071536.mA7FaTPq020453@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469673 --- Comment #4 from Stepan Kasal 2008-11-07 10:36:28 EDT --- OK source files match upstream: sha256sum: 1f528cd3fe2086b14f2992c4525a5cd697fb53c7cc8505bf5adeb78793e40b18 OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. OK license text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock. OK package installs properly. OK no debuginfo package OK rpmlint is silent. BAD final provides and requires are sane -- see below OK %check is present and all tests pass: t/01_compile........ok t/02_without_par....ok t/03_with_par.......ok All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=60, 2 wallclock secs Result: PASS OK no shared libraries OK owns the directories it creates. BAD owns directories created by perl-File-ShareDir; please replace %{perl_vendorlib}/* with %{perl_vendorlib}/File/ShareDir %{perl_vendorlib}/auto/share/*/File-ShareDir-PAR OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. no pkgconfig files. no libtool .la droppings. OK no desktop files There are three redundant manual requires: Requires: perl(Class::Inspector) >= 1.12 Requires: perl(File::ShareDir) Requires: perl(Params::Util) >= 0.07 But all there requires are also detected automatically. To add the version requirements, I suggest to patch PAR.rpm this way: sed -i " s/^use Params::Util *'/use Params::Util 0.07 '/ s/^use Class::Inspector *()/use Class::Inspector 1.12 ()/ " lib/File/ShareDir/PAR.pm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 15:38:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 10:38:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470531] New: Review Request: hunspell-cop - Coptic hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-cop - Coptic hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470531 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-cop - Coptic hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-cop.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-cop-0.2.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Coptic hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 15:39:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 10:39:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470533] New: Review Request: hunspell-tet - Tetum hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-tet - Tetum hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470533 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-tet - Tetum hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-tet.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-tet-0.20050108-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 15:39:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 10:39:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470532] New: Review Request: hunspell-eo - Esperanto hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-eo - Esperanto hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470532 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-eo - Esperanto hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-eo.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-eo-0.20041129-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Esperanto hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 15:42:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 10:42:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469329] Review Request: nebula - An intrusion signature generator (Security tool) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071542.mA7FgVw8021593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469329 --- Comment #7 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-11-07 10:42:29 EDT --- http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/nebula.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/nebula-0.2.2-5.fc10.src.rpm Thanks Koji Build - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=921010 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 15:58:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 10:58:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469673] Review request: perl-File-ShareDir-PAR - same functionality as File::ShareDir with PAR support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071558.mA7FwBKE024486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469673 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-07 10:58:10 EDT --- Please remember to set the fedora-review flag when you're reviewing a package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 16:01:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 11:01:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mz - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071601.mA7G1tE8029440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #10 from vivek shah 2008-11-07 11:01:54 EDT --- I have talked with upstream and am going to add the reply from the mz maintainer -------------- Reply of Mausezahn maintainer (Herbert Haas) ------------------- I decided to stick on "mz" because not only other distros have already included it that way, many users got already used to that abbreviation, and finally "mz" gives the idea of a quick (small, fast, efficient) tool. I don't expect any collisions with other tools that name. There are 676 possibilities of 2-letter names and most people tend to use longer names for marketing purposes. Also nobody searches for "mz" in Google, I think, rather one would look for "Mausezahn"... I asked Debian Maintainers for their opinion and they also had no problem with "mz". Thus, in order not to confuse the already established audience I think it is better to stick on "mz". Hope you can deal with that ;-) ---------------------------- End of reply ------------------------------------- I am not completely sure about renaming the binary and the manpage because: He claims it goes as mz in a lot of distros and the binary goes into /usr/sbin/ and I would not want to cause distro confusion for a common software. Please suggest before I upload an updated SRPM and SPEC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 16:02:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 11:02:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452749] Review Request: ocp - Open Cubic Player for MOD/S3M/XM/IT/SID/MIDI music files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071602.mA7G22GB025437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452749 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-11-07 11:01:59 EDT --- missing Requires: hicolor-icon-theme (for the hicolor icon dirs) ... # remove wmconfig stuff rm -rf %{buildroot}/etc/X11/wmconfig/ rmdir %{buildroot}/etc/X11 These two could be shortened to: rm -rf %{buildroot}/etc/X11 ... %{_bindir}/ultrafix.sh This could be renamed to ocp-ultrafix.sh. You can fix these issues after importing the package. Package APPROVED and you are now sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 16:03:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 11:03:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469329] Review Request: nebula - An intrusion signature generator (Security tool) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071603.mA7G3rsR025622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469329 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Till Maas 2008-11-07 11:03:51 EDT --- [OK] rpmlint output: silent [OK] Spec in %{name}.spec format [OK] license allowed: [GPLv2] license matches shortname in License: tag [OK] license in tarball and included in %doc: COPYING [OK] package is code or permissive content: {N/A} patches sent to upstream and commented [OK] Source0 is a working URL {OK} Sourceforge URL is Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name} [OK] Source0 matches Upstream: 9d388753e6bf14c9811a92a586ce8cfa nebula-0.2.2.tar.gz [OK] Package builds on all platforms: [N/A] ExcludeArch bugs are filed and commented: [OK] BuildRequires are complete (mock builds) zlib-devel is missing (OK) No file dependencies outside of /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin [N/A] %find_lang used for locales [N/A] Every (sub)package containing libraries runs ldconfig %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig [N/A] .h (header) files are in -devel subpackage [N/A] .a (static libraries) are in -static subpackage [N/A] contains .pc (pkgconfig) files and has Requires: pkgconfig (N/A) .pc files are in -devel subpackage [N/A] contains .so.X(.Y) files and .so is in -devel [N/A] -devel subpackage has Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [N/A] .la files (libtool) are not included [N/A] Has GUI and includes %{name}.desktop [N/A] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install [OK] Prefix: /usr not used (not relocatable) [OK] Owns all created directories [OK] no duplicates in %files [OK] %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [OK] Does not own files or dirs from other packages [OK] included filenames are in UTF-8 [OK] %clean is rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] Consistent macro usage [OK] large documentation is -doc subpackage [OK] %doc does not affect runtime {OK} no pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) {OK} well known BuildRoot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) {OK} PreReq not used {OK} RPM_OPT_FLAGS honoured {OK} Useful debuginfo generated {OK} no duplication of system libraries {OK} no rpath {OK} Timestamps preserved with cp and install {OK} Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) {OK} Requires(pre,post) style notation not used {OK} only writes to tmp /var/tmp $TMPDIR %{_tmppath} %{_builddir} (and %{buildroot} on %install and %clean) {OK} no Conflicts {OK} nothing installed in /srv {OK} Changelog in allowed format {OK} does not use Scriptlets Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch Sane Provides: and Requires: {OK} Follows Naming Guidelines This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 16:13:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 11:13:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469329] Review Request: nebula - An intrusion signature generator (Security tool) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071613.mA7GDlm1031881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469329 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-11-07 11:13:46 EDT --- Thanks New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nebula Short Description: An intrusion signature generator (Security tool) Owners: rakesh Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 16:13:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 11:13:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463808] Review Request: robotfindskitten - A game/zen simulation. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071613.mA7GDRuW031837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463808 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #1 from Till Maas 2008-11-07 11:13:26 EDT --- - You do not use a URL in Source0[0], probably this can be used: http://robotfindskitten.org/download/POSIX/robotfindskitten-1.7320508.406.tar.gz - There is no upstream patch status[1] mentioned in the spec file. [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PatchUpstreamStatus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 16:22:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 11:22:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469814] Review Request: fuse-zip - Fuse-zip is a fs to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071622.mA7GMZqf029684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469814 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-11-07 11:22:34 EDT --- http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/fuse-zip.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/fuse-zip-0.2.6-3.fc10.src.rpm Updated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 16:29:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 11:29:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469814] Review Request: fuse-zip - Fuse-zip is a fs to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071629.mA7GTYag004736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469814 --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-11-07 11:29:33 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=921071 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 16:35:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 11:35:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470140] Review Request: nettee - Network "tee" program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071635.mA7GZF4S005986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470140 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #1 from Till Maas 2008-11-07 11:35:14 EDT --- - These two lines can probably be removed from %build #acc. README.txt #gcc -Wall -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -o nettee nettee.c - The find commandline looks too complex to me, "chmod 644 *.sh" does afaics the same job - The spec is not honouring the %optflags[0], e.g. use this in %build: %{__cc} %{optflags} -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -o nettee nettee.c - With the %opflags set, it does not compile: In line 868 open is used with O_CREAT, but without default permissions of the file to be created. I will attach a patch that will fix this. If you add the patch to the package, please mention that this is already fixed in the development version (0.2.0 beta)[1] [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PatchUpstreamStatus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 16:40:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 11:40:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470547] New: Review Request: SEMI - MIME rendering library for Emacs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: SEMI - MIME rendering library for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470547 Summary: Review Request: SEMI - MIME rendering library for Emacs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vmayatsk at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/vmayatsk/wl/semi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/vmayatsk/wl/semi-1.14.6-1.fc10.src.rpm RPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/vmayatsk/wl/semi-1.14.6-1.fc10.noarch.rpm Description: SEMI is a library to provide MIME feature for GNU Emacs. MIME is a proposed internet standard for including content and headers other than (ASCII) plain text in messages. Wanderlust mail client requires this library to render messages. SEMI + Wanderlust are my first packages for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 16:38:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 11:38:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470140] Review Request: nettee - Network "tee" program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071638.mA7GcqtR032578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470140 --- Comment #2 from Till Maas 2008-11-07 11:38:51 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=322863) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=322863) open with O_CREAT needs a mode -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 16:32:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 11:32:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470545] New: Review Request: Wanderlust - an advanced mail client for Emacs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Wanderlust - an advanced mail client for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470545 Summary: Review Request: Wanderlust - an advanced mail client for Emacs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vmayatsk at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/vmayatsk/wl/wl.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/vmayatsk/wl/wl-2.15.6-1.fc10.src.rpm RPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/vmayatsk/wl/wl-2.15.6-1.fc10.noarch.rpm Description: Wanderlust is advanced mail client for Emacs. It supports IMAP4rev1, NNTP, POP(POP3[3]/APOP), MH and Maildir protocols. Package contains latest cvs snapshot and a bunch of patches from http://repo.or.cz/w/more-wl.git This is my first package for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 16:45:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 11:45:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469814] Review Request: fuse-zip - Fuse-zip is a fs to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071645.mA7GjHJ1008157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469814 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 16:48:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 11:48:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454441] Review Request: R-bigmemory - Manage massive matrices in R using C++, with support for shared memory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071648.mA7Gmdgb002004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454441 --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-11-07 11:48:38 EDT --- New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/R-bigmemory-2.3-1.fc10.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/R-bigmemory.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 17:03:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 12:03:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469814] Review Request: fuse-zip - Fuse-zip is a fs to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071703.mA7H3ZLw011931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469814 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Till Maas 2008-11-07 12:03:34 EDT --- [OK] rpmlint output: silent [OK] Spec in %{name}.spec format [OK] license allowed: GPLv3+ [OK] license matches shortname in License: tag [OK] license in tarball and included in %doc: LICENSE [OK] package is code or permissive content: {OK} patches sent to upstream and commented [OK] Source0 is a working URL {N/A} Sourceforge URL is Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name} [OK] Source0 matches Upstream: 4b3c564d12226588c1564faa789b3608 fuse-zip-0.2.6.tar.gz [OK] Package builds on all platforms: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=921071 [N/A] ExcludeArch bugs are filed and commented: [OK] BuildRequires are complete (mock builds) (OK) No file dependencies outside of /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin [N/A] %find_lang used for locales [N/A] Every (sub)package containing libraries runs ldconfig %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig [N/A] .h (header) files are in -devel subpackage [N/A] .a (static libraries) are in -static subpackage [N/A] contains .pc (pkgconfig) files and has Requires: pkgconfig (N/A) .pc files are in -devel subpackage [N/A] contains .so.X(.Y) files and .so is in -devel [N/A] -devel subpackage has Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [N/A] .la files (libtool) are not included [N/A] Has GUI and includes %{name}.desktop [N/A] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install [N/A] Prefix: /usr not used (not relocatable) [OK] Owns all created directories [OK] no duplicates in %files [OK] %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [OK] Does not own files or dirs from other packages [OK] included filenames are in UTF-8 [OK] %clean is rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] Consistent macro usage [OK] large documentation is -doc subpackage [OK] %doc does not affect runtime {OK} no pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) {OK} well known BuildRoot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) {OK} PreReq not used {OK} RPM_OPT_FLAGS honoured {OK} Useful debuginfo generated {OK} no duplication of system libraries {OK} no rpath {OK} Timestamps preserved with cp and install {OK} Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) {OK} Requires(pre,post) style notation not used {OK} only writes to tmp /var/tmp $TMPDIR %{_tmppath} %{_builddir} (and %{buildroot} on %install and %clean) {OK} no Conflicts {OK} nothing installed in /srv {OK} Changelog in allowed format {OK} does not use Scriptlets Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch Sane Provides: and Requires: {OK} Follows Naming Guidelines Please remove the INSTALL from %doc before importing this package into Fedora's CVS, because this file is not useful for users of Fedora. Everything else looks good, therefore this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 17:12:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 12:12:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469627] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class - A Path::Class type library for Moose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071712.mA7HCvew006359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469627 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-07 12:12:56 EDT --- Hmm, interesting. These weren't included as auto dep/provs on either of my F-9 or F-8 systems (or dist-f9 under koji), but with a scratch build under dist-f10/dist-f11 they do. no unwanted prov/req: dist-f9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=921115&name=build.log picks up prov/req: dist-f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=921117&name=build.log dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=921119&name=build.log Updated to filter bits from %_docdir: Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class-0.05-2.fc9.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=921120 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 16:25:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 11:25:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452749] Review Request: ocp - Open Cubic Player for MOD/S3M/XM/IT/SID/MIDI music files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071625.mA7GPNxW030338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452749 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #13 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-11-07 11:25:22 EDT --- Ah, I forgot: per current guidelines, you need to mention the status of the patches you apply in your package. AFAIK you said you'd sent them upstream, so please just add a comment above the PatchN: lines in the spec file to indicate that. Also, I'm removing the FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 17:18:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 12:18:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469814] Review Request: fuse-zip - Fuse-zip is a fs to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071718.mA7HIFUW007317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469814 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-11-07 12:18:14 EDT --- Thanks - Yes I will remove that file. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fuse-zip Short Description: Fuse-zip is a fs to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives Owners: rakesh Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 17:29:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 12:29:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443238] Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071729.mA7HThZ8016522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443238 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-07 12:29:41 EDT --- Unfortunately I have no way to test this; it doesn't over a remote X connection. I got someone on IRC to test it and it works fine. I get the following from rpmlint: cave9.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/cave9 0775 This doesn't happen in the buildsys so it must be some weirdness with my local setup, but you really should force the permissions just in case, either by using install -p -m 755 or by running chmod manually. You need to document which parts of the package are under which licenses. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios for some suggestions on how to go about doing this. It should be sufficient to indicate that the code is GPLv3+ and the licenses for the data are indicated in data_README.txt. Also, you are missing an "and Public Domain" for the NASA-produced sounds. %description is a complete sentence and should end with a period. * source files match upstream: 89a1ef99f2399bf7638b25ce4b51c5c088e01c29bc407eab689ccbb39c5b8d39 cave9_data-4.tgz 569d311b4f02d3b25ed98051b752bb3606fc243f0f1a7a0c8901c4569eceb11f cave9_src-0.3.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. X description needs a trailing period. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field missing "and Public Domain". * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint has a valid complaint. * final provides and requires are sane: cave9 = 0.3-2.fc10 cave9(x86-64) = 0.3-2.fc10 = dejavu-fonts libGL.so.1()(64bit) libGLU.so.1()(64bit) libSDL-1.2.so.0()(64bit) libSDL_image-1.2.so.0()(64bit) libSDL_ttf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) * %check is not present; no way to test this automatically. Testing indicates that it works fine. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. X error in file permissions. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. * desktop files valid and installed properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 17:37:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 12:37:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469843] Review Request: unhide - Tool to find hidden processes and TCP/UDP ports from rootkits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071737.mA7HbkwI010268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469843 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-11-07 12:37:45 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=921140 http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/unhide-20080519-2.fc10.src.rpm http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/unhide.spec Updated - Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 17:51:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 12:51:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468570] Review Request: webmin - new package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071751.mA7HpHjn012836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468570 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-07 12:51:16 EDT --- * Some general issues on your scriptlets: - First of all, generally rpm * should not treat any files/directories which are not listed in any rpms. * if rpm creates some files when the rpm is to be installed, all files must be listed in the rpm itself So: ------------------------------------------------- %pre tempdir=%{_datadir}/%{name}/installation-log mkdir -p $tempdir ------------------------------------------------- - If this directory is needed, then this directory _must_ be listed in %files list ------------------------------------------------- cp -r --remove-destination %{_sysconfdir}/{%name} %{_datadir}/%{name}/webmin-etc-conf-backup ------------------------------------------------- - (well first of all {%name} is wrong) - Treating %_sysconfdir/%name is wrong because this is not listed in any rpms. rpm should handle files only listed in some rpms. If if this webmin fails if some files exist under %_sysconfdir/%name, then %pre script should simply "exit with 1" and do backup of files under %_sysconfdir/%name must be done directly by sysadmin. ------------------------------------------------- %post ./setup.sh >$tempdir/webmin-setup.out 2>&1 chmod 600 $tempdir/webmin-setup.out ------------------------------------------------- - First of all, in this case $tempdir/webmin-setup.out (and the directory $tempdir itself) must be in %files list - And %attr must be used for this file - And please explain what ./setup.sh does (especially explain what files this setup.sh creates/modifies). Those files must all be listed in %files, too - Also "rpm -V webmin" must not fail with this (i.e. rpm stores the information of the size and md5sum values of the installed files. If this script modifies files listed in %files, then %verify(not size md5 mtime) should be used, for example) ------------------------------------------------- cat >%{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/uninstall.sh < References: Message-ID: <200811071801.mA7I1Tns022214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-07 13:01:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Ok, I've instead changed it to ASL 1.1. Then would you post the new URLs of your spec/srpm? Note that every time you change your spec/srpm, please also change the release number of your spec file to avoid confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 18:17:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 13:17:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071817.mA7IH3kM025072@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 Uwe Kubosch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #23 from Uwe Kubosch 2008-11-07 13:17:02 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: zfs-fuse Short Description: ZFS is an advanced modern general-purpose filesystem from Sun Microsystems, originally designed for Solaris/OpenSolaris. Owners: donv Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 18:25:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 13:25:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454441] Review Request: R-bigmemory - Manage massive matrices in R using C++, with support for shared memory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071825.mA7IPOqP026905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454441 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-07 13:25:23 EDT --- I'm a little surprised to see %{__rm} in one of your specs; I don't recall that you used those in the past. If you do intend them, you probably want %{__mkdir_p} and %{__cp} as well. Or is there some specific reason that %{__rm} is being used? * source files match upstream: c3ae302a5dc3806f49d59da0ef528e2ea9ead43367a02efd5f39de202709c262 bigmemory_2.3.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. X specfile does not use macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has only the expected R complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: bigmemory.so()(64bit) R-bigmemory = 2.3-1.fc10 R-bigmemory(x86-64) = 2.3-1.fc10 = /bin/sh R libR.so()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.9)(64bit) texlive-latex * %check is present and all tests pass. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * scriptlets are OK (R package registration). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 18:22:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 13:22:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469952] Review Request: dopewars - a drug dealing game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071822.mA7IMNXo018478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469952 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2008-11-07 13:22:22 EDT --- Looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 18:48:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 13:48:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454441] Review Request: R-bigmemory - Manage massive matrices in R using C++, with support for shared memory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071848.mA7Imv4W031554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454441 --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-11-07 13:48:56 EDT --- Honestly, I don't know how those got in there. Probably grabbed an old autogenerated R addon spec as a base when I was making the package the first time around. New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/R-bigmemory-2.3-2.fc10.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/R-bigmemory.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 18:48:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 13:48:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465897] Review Request: Judy - General purpose dynamic array library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071848.mA7Imt3Y023808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-07 13:48:54 EDT --- Well, * License - README says LGPLv2, however all codes are under LGPLv2+. Would you ask the upstream about this? Currently to honor README file, the license tag must be "LGPLv2". * test program - As the tarball contains test/ subdirectory, please execute some test program at %check. You may have to set LD_FLAGS or LD_LIBRARY_PATH or so, or to modify test/Checkit to create test program correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 19:02:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 14:02:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435015] Review Request: gpp4 - LGPL CCP4 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071902.mA7J2aWD002373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-07 14:02:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > Would you rebuild gpp4 and mmdb also for F-11 branch? > > Also, please submit requests to push F-9/10 gpp4/mmdb packages into > repositories. Ah, I found F-11 gpp4/mmdb. So please submit requests to push F-9/10 gpp4/mmdb into repositories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 19:13:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 14:13:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454441] Review Request: R-bigmemory - Manage massive matrices in R using C++, with support for shared memory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071913.mA7JDN6O004419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454441 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-07 14:13:22 EDT --- Looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 19:14:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 14:14:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458402] Review Request: griffith - Media collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071914.mA7JEBmJ028758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458402 --- Comment #5 from Debarshi Ray 2008-11-07 14:14:09 EDT --- Ping. Rahul can you please use http://www.griffith.cc/ as the value of the URL tag and uncomment the dependency on python-chardet since it has already been built? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 19:24:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 14:24:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470547] Review Request: SEMI - MIME rendering library for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071924.mA7JOdRu030859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470547 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-07 14:24:38 EDT --- Is there a dependency between this and Wanderlust? If so, one of these tickets should block the other. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 19:26:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 14:26:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470545] Review Request: Wanderlust - an advanced mail client for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071926.mA7JQCTL006920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470545 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 19:38:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 14:38:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470547] Review Request: SEMI - MIME rendering library for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071938.mA7JcUVG001134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470547 --- Comment #2 from Vitaly Mayatskikh 2008-11-07 14:38:29 EDT --- Yes, Wanderlust requires SEMI. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 19:53:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 14:53:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470547] Review Request: SEMI - MIME rendering library for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071953.mA7JrpWv004058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470547 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |470545 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 19:53:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 14:53:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470545] Review Request: Wanderlust - an advanced mail client for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071953.mA7JroLp004034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470545 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |470547 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 19:53:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 14:53:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470155] Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071953.mA7JrELY003977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 20:33:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 15:33:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni - C++ library for the Katana robot arm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072033.mA7KXdoT019077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-07 15:33:37 EDT --- I'm sorry I haven't been able to get back to this, but I have some time now. Too bad the so-called "review-o-matic" can't actually interpret that rpmlint output. The no-documentation complaints are OK, the zero-length files in the -docs package are all due to the usual suck that comes with doxygen. The upstream URL doesn't seem to take me to anywhere useful. The page isn't exactly blank, but it doesn't seem to actually refer to the software. I went to the download page and there seems to be a 4.0.0 version out there; I'll look at it if you would like to do an update. The source files indicate GPLv2+ (they have the "any later version" clause), so the license tag seems off. There's some mixed macro use in the spec; if you're not going to use %{__mkdir_p} and %{__rm}, then don't use %{__install} either. I can't tell if all of the source gets into the debuginfo package. Its compiled, but I guess its possible that some of it may only go into the static libraries from which debuginfo can't be generated. Certainly some of the source is in there. * source files match upstream: 85b28a100feb0dd77a94e4d77922fa7849078eef3438d969c0c01cfb6a01d296 KNI_3.9.2.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. X specfile does not use macros consistently * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate (as far as I can tell; build output is hidden). * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. ? debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: libkni-3.9.2-4.fc10.x86_64.rpm config(libkni) = 3.9.2-4.fc10 libKNIBase.so.3.9()(64bit) libkni = 3.9.2-4.fc10 libkni(x86-64) = 3.9.2-4.fc10 = /sbin/ldconfig config(libkni) = 3.9.2-4.fc10 libKNIBase.so.3.9()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.9)(64bit) libkni-devel-3.9.2-4.fc10.x86_64.rpm pkgconfig(libkni) = 3.9.2 libkni-devel = 3.9.2-4.fc10 libkni-devel(x86-64) = 3.9.2-4.fc10 = libKNIBase.so.3.9()(64bit) libkni = 3.9.2-4.fc10 pkgconfig libkni-doc-3.9.2-4.fc10.x86_64.rpm libkni-doc = 3.9.2-4.fc10 libkni-doc(x86-64) = 3.9.2-4.fc10 = libkni-examples-3.9.2-4.fc10.x86_64.rpm libkni-examples = 3.9.2-4.fc10 libkni-examples(x86-64) = 3.9.2-4.fc10 = libKNIBase.so.3.9()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libkni = 3.9.2-4.fc10 libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.1)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.9)(64bit) libkni-static-3.9.2-4.fc10.x86_64.rpm libkni-static = 3.9.2-4.fc10 libkni-static(x86-64) = 3.9.2-4.fc10 = libkni-devel = 3.9.2-4.fc10 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I've no idea how to test this, since I have no robotic arms handy. * shared libraries present: unversioned .so files are in the -devel package. ldconfig called properly. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files. * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig). * code, not content. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * pkgconfig file is in the -devel package, with proper dependency. * static libraries are in a separate -static package. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 20:48:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 15:48:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246527] Review Request: vtp - VTP (Virtual Terrain Project) libraries and applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072048.mA7KmtMG021836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246527 --- Comment #3 from Rick L Vinyard Jr 2008-11-07 15:48:54 EDT --- Here's an update: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/vtp-080910-0.1.7038svn.fc9.src.rpm http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/vtp.spec Here's the download utilities in script form: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/vtp-make-data-tarball http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/vtp-make-enviro-tarball http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/vtp-make-tarball Just an FYI... depending on my schedule I may not be around much for the next two months. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 21:00:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 16:00:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246524] Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072100.mA7L0Rdx024196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246524 --- Comment #20 from Rick L Vinyard Jr 2008-11-07 16:00:25 EDT --- No word yet. I'm hoping to hear something soon since it would simplify some of the VTP patches as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 20:59:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 15:59:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246525] Review Request: libMini - A high-performance terrain rendering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072059.mA7Kxrwj023690@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 --- Comment #25 from Rick L Vinyard Jr 2008-11-07 15:59:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > 1* Fix License to LGPLv2+ > I don't think there is a LGPLv2 short name as every files under 2.1 should be > redistributable under 3 with the LGPL case (in the contrary of the GPL). There is an LGPLv2 short name: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing I think this one falls under the LGPLv2 only since the accompanying documentation includes this line in README.html: Terms of Usage The terrain renderer is licensed under the terms of the LGPL 2.1. No warranty WHATSOEVER is expressed; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE! If it had the phrase "under the terms of the LGPL 2.1 or any later version" then it would be LGPLv2+, but I think the docs keep it at LGPLv2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 21:01:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 16:01:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072101.mA7L1DIY024537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 Bug 463767 depends on bug 463742, which changed state. Bug 463742 Summary: Update version of ppl to 0.10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463742 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 21:05:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 16:05:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469952] Review Request: dopewars - a drug dealing game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072105.mA7L59MS025219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469952 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-07 16:05:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dopewars Short Description: A drug dealing game Owners: jussilehtola Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 21:13:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 16:13:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435015] Review Request: gpp4 - LGPL CCP4 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072113.mA7LDWqI026483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 --- Comment #27 from Tim Fenn 2008-11-07 16:13:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > (In reply to comment #25) > > Would you rebuild gpp4 and mmdb also for F-11 branch? > > > > Also, please submit requests to push F-9/10 gpp4/mmdb packages into > > repositories. > > Ah, I found F-11 gpp4/mmdb. So please submit requests to push F-9/10 gpp4/mmdb > into repositories. Done! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 21:26:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 16:26:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072126.mA7LQ9VQ021382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #24 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-07 16:26:08 EDT --- I don't see donv in the packager group. Denis: Do you intend to sponsor them? Please reset the cvs flag once they are sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 21:29:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 16:29:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469329] Review Request: nebula - An intrusion signature generator (Security tool) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072129.mA7LTmvN028981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469329 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-07 16:29:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 21:28:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 16:28:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469952] Review Request: dopewars - a drug dealing game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072128.mA7LSeqP021624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469952 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-07 16:28:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 21:27:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 16:27:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469317] Review request: lynis - Security and system auditing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072127.mA7LRDrc021540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469317 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-07 16:27:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 21:31:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 16:31:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072131.mA7LVFdE022248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-07 16:31:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 21:35:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 16:35:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464049] Package Review Request for libprojectM-qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072135.mA7LZ0fQ029843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464049 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-07 16:34:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 21:33:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 16:33:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469814] Review Request: fuse-zip - Fuse-zip is a fs to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072133.mA7LXexP029729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469814 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-07 16:33:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 21:36:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 16:36:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469833] Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Use the GMP library for Math::BigInt routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072136.mA7LaU6S030512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469833 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-07 16:36:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 21:38:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 16:38:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466660] Review Request: sympy - A Python library for symbolic mathematics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072138.mA7Lcl4a030734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466660 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-07 16:38:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 21:37:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 16:37:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200245] Review Request: scim-sinhala - SCIM IME for Sri Lanka In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072137.mA7Lbdxo023502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200245 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-07 16:37:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 21:43:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 16:43:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469494] Review Request: xlcrack - Recover lost and forgotten passwords from XLS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072143.mA7Lh5xq031630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469494 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-07 16:43:03 EDT --- It doesn't get much simpler than this package. Unfortunately, there's one issue: the package doesn't compile with the proper set of compiler flags. Adding sed -i -e 's/-g -Wall/%{optflags}/' Makefile after the %setup call gets things building properly, but without a test document I can't verify that it doesn't break anything. (I guess * source files match upstream: ad01be3262726d94774f519ffb920a925abe95c483d05105b596c372cc13dcf5 xlcrack-1.2.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. X compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: xlcrack = 1.2-1.fc10 xlcrack(x86-64) = 1.2-1.fc10 = libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgsf-1.so.114()(64bit) libxml2.so.2()(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I don't have an old excel around to create a document I could use to test this. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 21:46:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 16:46:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468299] Review Request: jabberpy - Python xmlstream and jabber IM protocol libs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072146.mA7LkQM6025027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468299 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-07 16:46:26 EDT --- jabberpy-0.5-0.17.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jabberpy-0.5-0.17.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 21:45:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 16:45:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468299] Review Request: jabberpy - Python xmlstream and jabber IM protocol libs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072145.mA7LjdxR024865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468299 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-07 16:45:38 EDT --- jabberpy-0.5-0.17.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jabberpy-0.5-0.17.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 21:47:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 16:47:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468299] Review Request: jabberpy - Python xmlstream and jabber IM protocol libs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072147.mA7Ll9Gi032411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468299 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-07 16:47:08 EDT --- jabberpy-0.5-0.17.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jabberpy-0.5-0.17.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 22:08:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 17:08:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469969] Review Request: Tao Framework - C# bindings for many different libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072208.mA7M8EjB003915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469969 David Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gnomeuser at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from David Nielsen 2008-11-07 17:08:13 EDT --- I'll take this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 22:08:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 17:08:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469972] Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072208.mA7M8A0j028909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 David Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gnomeuser at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from David Nielsen 2008-11-07 17:08:09 EDT --- I'll take this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 22:11:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 17:11:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 448717] Review Request: gnome-rdp - rdesktop front end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072211.mA7MBDZH004652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448717 John Anderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 22:16:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 17:16:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453412] Review Request: gtk-aurora-engine - Aurora theme engine for gtk2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072216.mA7MGirP030338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453412 John Anderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |john.e.anderson at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 22:12:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 17:12:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469833] Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Use the GMP library for Math::BigInt routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072212.mA7MCPR2029631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469833 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve at silug.org --- Comment #5 from Paul Howarth 2008-11-07 17:12:24 EDT --- OK so I came to check out perl-Math-BigInt-GMP from CVS and found that it was already there. Steven Pritchard is the owner of the package and it was reviewed in Bug #447191. I missed it because I checked for its existence using "yum install 'perl(Math::BigInt::GMP)'" on my Fedora 9 box and there were no matching packages. Steven has built it for Fedora 10/devel (at the time) but not F-9, and there's no point building it for anything older, though there are branches for F-8, EL-4, and EL-5. It would appear that my new package request has made me the owner of the devel, F-10, and F-9 branches. What to do about this? Steven, shall we co-maintain this? There may also be an issue to consider in the package database in that I was able to "take over" this package by accident, which probably should have been blocked. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 22:16:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 17:16:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469474] Review Request: sovix - A website revision system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072216.mA7MGWIn005636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469474 Mohak Vyas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mohakvyas at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Mohak Vyas 2008-11-07 17:16:31 EDT --- The md5sum I had from the original tarball and from your .src.rpm does not match. Even the two tarballs are different sizes. You should take a look in that. 406043 2008-10-23 sovix-0.0.1.6.tar.gz -- Original tarball 407110 2008-11-07 sovix-0.0.1.6.tar.gz -- The one from your .src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 22:34:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 17:34:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453412] Review Request: gtk-aurora-engine - Aurora theme engine for gtk2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072234.mA7MYeJk008234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453412 John Anderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 22:33:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 17:33:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 235694] Review Request: s3270 - Scripted 3270 Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072233.mA7MXJm4008143@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235694 Jarod Wilson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |INSUFFICIENT_DATA Flag|needinfo?(bpeck at redhat.com) | --- Comment #4 from Jarod Wilson 2008-11-07 17:33:17 EDT --- Just gonna kill this off for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 22:43:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 17:43:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 235694] Review Request: s3270 - Scripted 3270 Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072243.mA7Mhdic009737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235694 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 22:59:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 17:59:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469833] Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Use the GMP library for Math::BigInt routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072259.mA7Mxrhq012892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469833 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-07 17:59:51 EDT --- I have set it back to owned by steve until you guys can sort it out. I usually catch things like this, but it's hard to note as the current tools just change things, they don't warn that the package already exists. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 23:04:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 18:04:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469833] Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Use the GMP library for Math::BigInt routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072304.mA7N4dhX013889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469833 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-07 18:04:38 EDT --- I did submit a patch to pkgdb-client to optionally work in an add-only mode; I don't know what became of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 23:16:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 18:16:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468765] Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072316.mA7NGSqD016251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468765 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-07 18:16:27 EDT --- Thanks for the reminder. I forgot to do that. The way I did it does not produce an empty file, but it doesn't preserve the time stamp either. Now it is fixed. The new files are: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/hydrogen-drumkits.spec http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/hydrogen-drumkits-0-0.20080907.4.fc9.src.rpm Do you think I should change the (E)VR to Version: 20080907 (or 2008.09.07) Release: 4 since this is a package made for Fedora specifically? I don't think the upstream will ever produce such a compilation package of drumkits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 23:21:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 18:21:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469527] Review Request: tcping - Check of TCP connection to a given IP/Port In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811072321.mA7NLGQ6008969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469527 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-07 18:21:15 EDT --- This code seems to be confused about how it is licensed. Note that the LICENSE file contains the LGPL (v2) but the code itself says: * This code may be freely redistributed under the terms of the * GNU General Public License. and this agrees with the README: This software may be freely distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL). No version is specified anywhere, so GPL+ would seem to apply. Can you clarify with upstream? I'm inclined to say it's best to simply pretend that LICENSE file is not there at all. The guidelines say that the text of the license(s) must be included if its there at all, but this isn't the text of the code's license, it's some other license. This also suffers from the compiler flags problem; easily fixed by changing the make line to: make CCFLAGS="%{optflags}" %{?_smp_mflags} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 00:11:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 19:11:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432239] Review Request: electronics-menu - Electronics Menu for the Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080011.mA80B1OL016496@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432239 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-11-07 19:11:00 EDT --- Package Change Request ======================= Package Name: electronics-menu Short Description: Electronics Menu for the Desktop Owners: chitlesh Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 00:14:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 19:14:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080014.mA80Ek9p024505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks| |182235 AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-07 19:14:44 EDT --- I'm seeing several issues with this package. The COPYING file contains v2 of the GPL, but the code itself does not specify a version. Their web site indicates GPLv2+, but I do not know if the web site is a sufficient statement of intent. According to the licensing FAQ, the web site isn't consulted about this. Blocking FE-Legal for a ruling. The "testsuite" directory would seem to include a test suite. Is it possible to run it at build time? If so, it needs to be run unless there's a compelling reason not to do so. A shared library is installed but ldconfig is not called. In addition, this package seems to have a rather odd library versioning convention. The usual method is to have the library version after the ".so" but this package has it before. I'm afraid I don't understand why it would be doing this differently than almost all other libraries. The static library is not permitted in the -devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries This is the "static libraries and shared libraries" case. rpmlint says only: m4ri-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation which is fine. * source files match upstream: 6e30b50b74c72ceca431461d471e38f682d7a6ad1c2d07db28806fff1d3e30e8 m4ri-20081028.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. ? license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none). * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: m4ri-20081028-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm libm4ri-0.0.20081029.so()(64bit) m4ri = 20081028-2.fc10 m4ri(x86-64) = 20081028-2.fc10 = m4ri-devel-20081028-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm m4ri-static = 20081028-2.fc10 m4ri-devel = 20081028-2.fc10 m4ri-devel(x86-64) = 20081028-2.fc10 = libm4ri-0.0.20081029.so()(64bit) m4ri = 20081028-2.fc10 X %check is not present but a test suite seems to exist. X shared libraries are installed but ldconfig is not called. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * no pkgconfig files. X static libraries are in the -devel package. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 00:17:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 19:17:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080017.mA80H0aG017513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #33 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-11-07 19:16:58 EDT --- Package Change Request ======================= Package Name: xcircuit Short Description: Electronic circuit schematic drawing program Owners: chitlesh Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 00:34:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 19:34:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457160] Review Request: Zorba - General purpose XQuery processor implemented in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080034.mA80YtDC027476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457160 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(paulfkunz at gmail.c | |om) --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-07 19:34:52 EDT --- It's been two months since David's comment with no response; I will close this ticket soon if there is no further activity. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 00:38:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 19:38:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446814] Review Request: emacs-lookup - Emacsen interface to look up dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080038.mA80cIbS020300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446814 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-07 19:38:16 EDT --- So its been over four months since I made my comments with no response. I will close this ticket soon if there is no further progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 00:56:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 19:56:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080056.mA80ulgH030710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer 2008-11-07 19:56:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > I'm seeing several issues with this package. > > The COPYING file contains v2 of the GPL, but the code itself does not specify a > version. Their web site indicates GPLv2+, but I do not know if the web site is > a sufficient statement of intent. According to the licensing FAQ, the web site > isn't consulted about this. Blocking FE-Legal for a ruling. Right, I believed I marked the package GPLv2+ accordingly, but it'd be good to hear from Legal. > The "testsuite" directory would seem to include a test suite. Is it possible > to run it at build time? If so, it needs to be run unless there's a compelling > reason not to do so. No. Or at least when I tried running them, it didn't work. (It tries to build the tests using system libraries, without those in the buildroot. Is there any easy fix for that?) > A shared library is installed but ldconfig is not called. In addition, this > package seems to have a rather odd library versioning convention. The usual > method is to have the library version after the ".so" but this package has it > before. I'm afraid I don't understand why it would be doing this differently > than almost all other libraries. Beats me. > The static library is not permitted in the -devel package. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries > This is the "static libraries and shared libraries" case. Alright. > ? license field matches the actual license. > X %check is not present but a test suite seems to exist. > X shared libraries are installed but ldconfig is not called. > X static libraries are in the -devel package. Added ldconfig, moved static libraries to -static subpackage. New spec/srpm: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/m4ri.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/m4ri-20081028-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 01:18:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 20:18:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464054] Package Review Request for projectM-pulseaudio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080118.mA81Ia9g001468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464054 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-07 20:18:35 EDT --- Great, one more done. ------------------------------------------------------ This package (projectM-pulseaudio) is approved by oget ------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 01:30:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 20:30:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462253] Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080130.mA81UK61003159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462253 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-07 20:30:19 EDT --- perl-Cache-FastMmap-1.28-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Cache-FastMmap-1.28-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 01:30:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 20:30:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462253] Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080130.mA81UNUX003212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462253 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-07 20:30:22 EDT --- perl-Cache-FastMmap-1.28-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Cache-FastMmap-1.28-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 01:59:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 20:59:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470626] New: Review Request: balance - TCP load-balancing proxy server with round robin and failover mechanisms Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: balance - TCP load-balancing proxy server with round robin and failover mechanisms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470626 Summary: Review Request: balance - TCP load-balancing proxy server with round robin and failover mechanisms Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/balance/balance.spec SRPM URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/balance/balance-3.42-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: Balance is a simple but powerful generic tcp proxy with round robin load balancing and failover mechanisms. The program behaviour can be controlled at runtime using a simple command line syntax. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 02:11:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 21:11:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080211.mA82BTvL000750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-07 21:11:28 EDT --- libprojectM-1.2.0-5.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 02:10:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 21:10:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443675] Review Request: sip-redirect - Tiny IPv4 and IPv6 SIP redirect server written in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080210.mA82AcVx000449@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443675 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-07 21:10:37 EDT --- sip-redirect-0.1.2-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 02:11:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 21:11:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080211.mA82Bsap009265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-07 21:11:53 EDT --- libprojectM-1.2.0-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 02:11:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 21:11:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443675] Review Request: sip-redirect - Tiny IPv4 and IPv6 SIP redirect server written in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080211.mA82BbpD009157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443675 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-07 21:11:36 EDT --- sip-redirect-0.1.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 02:17:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 21:17:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: QuickFIX - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080217.mA82HrBL001738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 --- Comment #10 from Hayden James 2008-11-07 21:17:52 EDT --- Here's the updated files: http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/quickfix-1.12.4-3.fc9.src.rpm http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/quickfix.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 02:58:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 21:58:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457160] Review Request: Zorba - General purpose XQuery processor implemented in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080258.mA82wR87007461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457160 David Timms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul_kunz at slac.stanford.edu --- Comment #7 from David Timms 2008-11-07 21:58:26 EDT --- Jason, I checked the original .spec URL and there has not been changes to it. However, the project seems active and is now at zorba-0.9.4.tar.gz. Paul has also built packages for 0.9.4 {f8,f9} on the ftp site. Trying his old email just in case, {Paul feel free to remove}... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 03:14:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 22:14:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226240] Merge Review: perl-Archive-Zip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080314.mA83EQbx009978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226240 --- Comment #10 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-07 22:14:24 EDT --- If/when it will appear in RHEL-5 (that is at least 3 months from now) it should have a newer e-v-r than what EPEL provides and everybody will be happy. Meanwhile we have a bunch of packages in EPEL-5 which cannot be installed due to this package not being available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 04:20:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 23:20:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464051] Package Review Request for projectM-jack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080420.mA84KjG5028346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464051 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-07 23:20:44 EDT --- This one is almost perfect. There are few little things to go through. * URL has a typo * Same subtleties apply for the license of this package as for the projectM-pulseaudio. "GPLv2+ and MIT" is fine but it would be good if we get a confirmation from upstream. * I don't see any .la files built. You should remove that line. * For the desktop file, please add Encoding=UTF-8 Terminal=false You use the same icon in the desktop file that you use for projectM-pulseaudio. You can require projectM-pulseaudio on this package, but that's not a nice solution. I think the best solution is renaming the icon file for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 05:00:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 00:00:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469317] Review request: lynis - Security and system auditing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080500.mA850pin001737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469317 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-08 00:00:51 EDT --- lynis-1.2.1-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lynis-1.2.1-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 04:59:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 23:59:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469317] Review request: lynis - Security and system auditing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080459.mA84xbjF025701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469317 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-07 23:59:36 EDT --- lynis-1.2.1-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lynis-1.2.1-3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 05:01:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 00:01:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469317] Review request: lynis - Security and system auditing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080501.mA851ITi001846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469317 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-08 00:01:17 EDT --- lynis-1.2.1-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lynis-1.2.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 05:02:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 00:02:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469329] Review Request: nebula - An intrusion signature generator (Security tool) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080502.mA852ljW001984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469329 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-08 00:02:46 EDT --- nebula-0.2.2-5.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nebula-0.2.2-5.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 05:03:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 00:03:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469329] Review Request: nebula - An intrusion signature generator (Security tool) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080503.mA853URC026530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469329 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-08 00:03:30 EDT --- nebula-0.2.2-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nebula-0.2.2-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 05:04:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 00:04:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469329] Review Request: nebula - An intrusion signature generator (Security tool) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080504.mA854Hxx026613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469329 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-08 00:04:17 EDT --- nebula-0.2.2-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nebula-0.2.2-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 05:05:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 00:05:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080505.mA855jKa027056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-08 00:05:44 EDT --- pstreams-devel-0.6.0-6.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pstreams-devel-0.6.0-6.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 05:06:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 00:06:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080506.mA856rfu002771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-08 00:06:52 EDT --- pstreams-devel-0.6.0-6.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pstreams-devel-0.6.0-6.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 05:07:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 00:07:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080507.mA857HmP002842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-08 00:07:16 EDT --- pstreams-devel-0.6.0-6.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pstreams-devel-0.6.0-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 05:10:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 00:10:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469814] Review Request: fuse-zip - Fuse-zip is a fs to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080510.mA85Ap1M003510@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469814 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-08 00:10:51 EDT --- fuse-zip-0.2.6-4.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fuse-zip-0.2.6-4.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 05:11:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 00:11:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469814] Review Request: fuse-zip - Fuse-zip is a fs to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080511.mA85BfQb003641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469814 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-08 00:11:41 EDT --- fuse-zip-0.2.6-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fuse-zip-0.2.6-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 05:12:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 00:12:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469814] Review Request: fuse-zip - Fuse-zip is a fs to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080512.mA85CLGq028121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469814 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-08 00:12:20 EDT --- fuse-zip-0.2.6-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fuse-zip-0.2.6-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 05:18:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 00:18:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469329] Review Request: nebula - An intrusion signature generator (Security tool) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080518.mA85IZLF004613@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469329 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 05:18:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 00:18:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469317] Review request: lynis - Security and system auditing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080518.mA85IPSH028994@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469317 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 05:18:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 00:18:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080518.mA85Ih8j029047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 05:18:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 00:18:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469814] Review Request: fuse-zip - Fuse-zip is a fs to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080518.mA85Io6E029105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469814 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 05:18:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 00:18:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469811] Review Request: pdf2djvu - PDF to DjVu converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080518.mA85IiZB029076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469811 Bug 469811 depends on bug 469808, which changed state. Bug 469808 Summary: Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 05:46:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 00:46:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452749] Review Request: ocp - Open Cubic Player for MOD/S3M/XM/IT/SID/MIDI music files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080546.mA85kBf4008497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452749 Charles R. Anderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Charles R. Anderson 2008-11-08 00:46:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocp Short Description: Open Cubic Player for MOD/S3M/XM/IT/SID/MIDI music files Owners: cra Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 06:12:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 01:12:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470639] New: Review Request: dpatch - Debian patch utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dpatch - Debian patch utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470639 Summary: Review Request: dpatch - Debian patch utility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/dpatch/dpatch.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/dpatch/dpatch-2.0.30-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: dpatch is the tool used by debian for applying patches to their packages. It is useful to have in fedora for applying and converting their patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 07:16:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 02:16:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435016] Review Request: mmdb - MMDB coordinate library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080716.mA87GNTG012201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435016 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-08 02:16:20 EDT --- For now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 07:16:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 02:16:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435018] Review Request: clipper - crystallographic object oriented library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080716.mA87GP65012250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435018 Bug 435018 depends on bug 435016, which changed state. Bug 435016 Summary: Review Request: mmdb - MMDB coordinate library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435016 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 07:16:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 02:16:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435017] Review Request: SSM - coordinate superposition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080716.mA87GO1e012226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435017 Bug 435017 depends on bug 435016, which changed state. Bug 435016 Summary: Review Request: mmdb - MMDB coordinate library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435016 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 07:35:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 02:35:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435017] Review Request: SSM - coordinate superposition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080735.mA87ZON8022663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435017 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-08 02:35:23 EDT --- For -8: * License - The license tag should be LGPLv2+. * BuildRequires - This package won't build without "BuildRequires: mmdb-devel". * configure option ------------------------------------------------------------ 55 ++ pkg-config --variable=prefix mmdb 56 + ./configure --build=i386-redhat-linux-gnu --host=i386-redhat-linux-gnu --target=i386-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix= --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/usr/com --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --with-mmdb=/usr --disable-static 57 configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-mmdb ------------------------------------------------------------ - Is the option "--with-mmdb=foo" useful? * Timestamps ------------------------------------------------------------ make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install='install -p' ------------------------------------------------------------ - The last argument should be "INSTALL='install -p'". * Document - There is no need that -devel subpackage should own the same document files in main package. * rpmlint ** undefined-non-weak-symbol - "$ rpmlint ssm" (please try rpmlint for 'installed' ssm) shows that libssm.so.0 contains many undefined non-weak symbols. ! You can check this also by $ ldd -r %_libdir/libssm.so.0 For packages providing -devel subpackage this cannot be allowed because this causes linkage error. I guess making libssm.so linked against libmmdb.so will fix this issue (because LD_PRELOAD=%_libdir/libmmdb.so.0.0.0 ldd -r %_libdir/libssm.so.0.0.0 shows no undefined non-weak symbols) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 08:15:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 03:15:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080815.mA88FktO019903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-08 03:15:44 EDT --- Some notes for 0.15-0.1: * SourceURL - When the source is created from git repository, please write in the spec file as comments how you created the source tarball: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control * BuildRequires - As ppl-devel 0.10 is available on dist-f11, please modify BuildRequires. * Requires - Please check if all required packages are to be correctly installed for -devel subpackage. ! For example, %_includedir/%name/ppl_backend.h contains: -------------------------------------------------------------- 33 34 #include 35 #include 36 #include 37 #include -------------------------------------------------------------- This means that -devel subpackage must have "Requires: ppl-devel gmp-devel" (here I am not saying about BuildRequires) * Group - Usually the main packge has "Group: System Environment/Libraries" and -devel subpackage has "Group: Development/Libraries". ! You can make your spec file based on the skeleton spec file created by $ rpmdev-newspec -t lib cloog * Dependency between main/subpackages - Usually the dependency between main package and subpackages must be EVR (Epoch:Version:Release) specific (i.e. -devel subpackage must have "Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}) * Shipping static archives - Please explain why you want to ship static archives even if shared library is available. This must be avoided unless there is some specific reason. c.f. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exclusion_of_Static_Libraries * cflags - When compiling this software the option "-fomit-frame-pointer" is used. This option makes debugging very difficult, so this option must be removed. * Timestamps - Please consider to use -------------------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" -------------------------------------------------------------------- to keep timestamps on installed files as much as possible. This method usually works for Makefiles generated by recent autotools. * %_infodir/dir file - Rebuild fails without -------------------------------------------------------------------- rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_infodir}/dir -------------------------------------------------------------------- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=921939 * Info files - Files under %_infodir are automatically regarded as %doc. - Please follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Texinfo * %changelog format - For how to write %changelog, please follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs * Documents - Please add the files below to %doc of main package. -------------------------------------------------------------------- README -------------------------------------------------------------------- ! Note Please change the release number every time you modify your spec/srpm to avoid confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 08:52:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 03:52:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080852.mA88q386032556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |470639 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 08:52:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 03:52:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470639] Review Request: dpatch - Debian patch utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080852.mA88q1du032518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470639 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |457210 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-08 03:52:00 EDT --- Updated to require dpkg: Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/dpatch/dpatch.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/dpatch/dpatch-2.0.30-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 09:04:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 04:04:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469833] Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Use the GMP library for Math::BigInt routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811080904.mA894erP002260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469833 --- Comment #8 from Paul Howarth 2008-11-08 04:04:39 EDT --- Steve, can you do a build of perl-Math-BigInt-GMP for F-9 as I need it for perl-Crypt-DSA perl-Crypt-DH? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 12:59:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 07:59:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469952] Review Request: dopewars - a drug dealing game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811081259.mA8Cx1l6007741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469952 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-08 07:59:00 EDT --- dopewars-1.5.12-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dopewars-1.5.12-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 12:58:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 07:58:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469952] Review Request: dopewars - a drug dealing game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811081258.mA8Cw7qw032118@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469952 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-08 07:58:06 EDT --- dopewars-1.5.12-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dopewars-1.5.12-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 13:23:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 08:23:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811081323.mA8DNdUm012918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #18 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-08 08:23:38 EDT --- According to the Package Naming Conventions, shouldn't this package be named pstreams instead of pstreams-devel? The dash is a separator which shouldn't be used in the base name of the package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#General_Naming Of course, pstreams should then provide pstreams-devel = %{version}-%{release} . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 13:30:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 08:30:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469811] Review Request: pdf2djvu - PDF to DjVu converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811081330.mA8DUJ5b006136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469811 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-08 08:30:18 EDT --- MUST: Change patch1 to patch0. MUST: License is GPLv2+, not GPLv2. SHOULD: Please break BuildRequires one per line in alphabetized order. MUST: Add libjpeg-devel to BR. MUST: Modify install bit to install -p -m 644 -D {doc,%{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1}/pdf2djvu.1 install -p -m 755 -D {,%{buildroot}%{_bindir}/}pdf2djvu to preserve time stamps. SHOULD: Capitalize first letters of sentence in %changelog. After you've corrected these I'll approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 13:36:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 08:36:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470508] Review Request: Ajaxterm - A web-based terminal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811081336.mA8DaCR1007128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470508 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-08 08:36:10 EDT --- Read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups and make necessary corrections to spec file (Requires and adding users). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 13:47:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 08:47:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811081347.mA8Dl1gW008861@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 --- Comment #19 from Till Maas 2008-11-08 08:47:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > According to the Package Naming Conventions, shouldn't this package be named > pstreams instead of pstreams-devel? The dash is a separator which shouldn't be > used in the base name of the package. The naming guidelines demand that the dash[1] is used as a separator in the base name of packages and there are only some exceptions that allow to use the underscore instead. Also the review guidelines contain a MUST item that demands header files being in a -devel package: - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. Btw. debian also uses their devel naming scheme for pstreams: http://packages.debian.org/sid/libpstreams-dev > Of course, pstreams should then provide pstreams-devel = %{version}-%{release} What is the technical advantage of this? I would expect header files to be in a -devel package. [1] some examples: bitmap-fonts bodhi-client bridge-utils -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 14:03:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 09:03:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469811] Review Request: pdf2djvu - PDF to DjVu converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811081403.mA8E3G4E011592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469811 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 14:05:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 09:05:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469972] Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811081405.mA8E5BrZ012053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 --- Comment #2 from David Nielsen 2008-11-08 09:05:10 EDT --- bad rpmlint output: glfw.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/glfw-2.6/glfwug.tex glfw.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/glfw-2.6/glfwrm.tex glfw.x86_64: E: no-binary (if it has no binary wouldn't libglfw be a better name - also documentation goes in the documentation package) glfw-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package (see below) glfw-devel.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libglfw.so glfw-devel.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libglfw.so glfw.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 9) according to http://glfw.sourceforge.net/license.html license is zlib/libpng not bsd and as usual a few comments on your voodoo is nice for those who maintain your packages while you are unable. You should split out all the documentation into a subpackage or at the very least put it in the -devel package (though there seems to be a lot of it, a doc package would be preferable) Good news though, it builds in mock (x86_64 f10) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 14:14:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 09:14:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811081414.mA8EEdjn021675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 --- Comment #20 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-08 09:14:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > (In reply to comment #18) > > According to the Package Naming Conventions, shouldn't this package be named > > pstreams instead of pstreams-devel? The dash is a separator which shouldn't be > > used in the base name of the package. > > The naming guidelines demand that the dash[1] is used as a separator in the > base name of packages and there are only some exceptions that allow to use the > underscore instead. Also the review guidelines contain a MUST item that demands > header files being in a -devel package: Right. > > Of course, pstreams should then provide pstreams-devel = %{version}-%{release} > > What is the technical advantage of this? I would expect header files to be in a > -devel package. Well, the name confuses me a bit since I'd expect there to be a package named pstreams. Of course, one can add Provides: pstreams to pstreams-devel as well. > [1] some examples: > bitmap-fonts > bodhi-client > bridge-utils OK. Well, maybe it isn't as bad as I first thought: I find the following packages in F9 Everything SRPMS with names containing -devel: gnome-devel-docs sblim-cmpi-devel xorg-x11-proto-devel xorg-x11-xtrans-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 14:30:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 09:30:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469492] Review Request: bam - A fast and flexible build system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811081430.mA8EU7YH024201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469492 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-08 09:30:07 EDT --- bam-0.0.0.4.3-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bam-0.0.0.4.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 14:35:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 09:35:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469972] Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811081435.mA8EZdkT025169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 --- Comment #3 from Paul F. Johnson 2008-11-08 09:35:39 EDT --- Spec URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/glfw.spec SRPM URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/libglfw-2.6-2.fc10.src.rpm Okay, sorted most of the problems except for the spec file - I can do that on the next run (somewhat rushed today!!!!) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 14:46:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 09:46:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469811] Review Request: pdf2djvu - PDF to DjVu converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811081446.mA8Ekb1Q026891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469811 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-11-08 09:46:36 EDT --- http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/pdf2djvu.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/pdf2djvu-0.4.13-2.fc9.src.rpm Updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 14:55:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 09:55:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469811] Review Request: pdf2djvu - PDF to DjVu converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811081455.mA8Ethkp028283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469811 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 15:13:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 10:13:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469892] Review Request: examiner - Utility to disassemble and comment foreign executable binaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811081513.mA8FDlT0022432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469892 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-11-08 10:13:46 EDT --- http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/examiner-0.5-2.fc9.src.rpm http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/examiner.spec Updated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 15:25:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 10:25:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469811] Review Request: pdf2djvu - PDF to DjVu converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811081525.mA8FPk6Y000446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469811 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-08 10:25:44 EDT --- Looks good, although you don't need %defattr(644,root,root,755) since the permissions are now set by install. Just use %defattr(-,root,root,-) You can do this upon import to CVS. ----------------------------------- rpmlint output is clean. Packaged according to Review Guidelines. The package is APPROVED. ----------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 15:45:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 10:45:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469811] Review Request: pdf2djvu - PDF to DjVu converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811081545.mA8FjC0H026862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469811 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-08 10:45:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Looks good, although you don't need > > %defattr(644,root,root,755) > > since the permissions are now set by install. Just use > > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > > You can do this upon import to CVS. And you can also remove %attr(755,root,root) from bindir/* in the files section. Thus, the new %files section should be %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{_bindir}/%{name} %{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 15:51:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 10:51:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469997] Review Request: ratproxy - A passive web application security assessment tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811081551.mA8FpTbb003795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469997 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-11-08 10:51:28 EDT --- I have reported about all these issues upstream. Number of lines required for fixing warnings are enormous. Warnings are around 1000+ lines. So, I am using flag to suppress these warnings. Regarding some fwrite warnings (not handling return values) I have also reported them. I think these are not blockers. Thanks - Updated http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/ratproxy.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/ratproxy-1.51-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 15:54:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 10:54:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469811] Review Request: pdf2djvu - PDF to DjVu converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811081554.mA8FsRWH027758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469811 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-11-08 10:54:26 EDT --- Thanks - Will fix while importing. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pdf2djvu Short Description: PDF to DjVu converter Owners: rakesh Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 16:02:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 11:02:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470626] Review Request: balance - TCP load-balancing proxy server with round robin and failover mechanisms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811081602.mA8G2h5o005248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470626 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |balance -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 16:04:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 11:04:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225796] Merge Review: giflib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811081604.mA8G4YjV029230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225796 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |447832 AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nmurray at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 17:39:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 12:39:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467791] Review Request: vtun - Virtual tunnel over TCP/IP networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811081739.mA8HdEqL018294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467791 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cooly at gnome.eu.org --- Comment #1 from Lucian Langa 2008-11-08 12:39:13 EDT --- rpmlint: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/vtund please consider adding logrotate script. In the %files section, we prefer to use %defattr(-, root, root, -) please also consider preserving timestamps of installed files: -p flag for install command and INSTALL="install -p" parameter for makeinstall target. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 17:41:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 12:41:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466301] Review Request: ario - Music Player Daemon Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811081741.mA8Hfgs9018879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466301 --- Comment #6 from John F 2008-11-08 12:41:40 EDT --- Hi Mamoru, I have fixed these issues. Sorry it took a while, I have been super busy. Specfile: http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~jhford/fedora/ario.spec SRPM: http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~jhford/fedora/ario-1.1-4.fc10.src.rpm Thanks for your time and input, I really appreciate it! John -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 18:22:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 13:22:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811081822.mA8IMnCd024286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Summary|Review Request: QuickFIX - |Review Request: quickfix - |development library for FIX |development library for FIX |based applications |based applications --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-08 13:22:48 EDT --- For 1.12.4-3: ! You can make your spec file based on the skeleton spec file created by $ rpmdev-newspec -t lib quickfix * Group - Usually main package of this type has "Group: System Environment/Libraries" * License --------------------------------------------- src/C++/FlexLexer.h BSD with advertising src/C++/strptime.c BSD with advertising src/getopt.c BSD with advertising --------------------------------------------- - The license tag must be "ASL 1.1 and BSD with advertising" * SourceURL - For sourceforge hosted source tarball, please refer to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net * BuildRequires - Remove all redundant (unneeded) BuildRequires. ! "libtool,autoconf,automake" are not needed because no autotools are called ! "zlib libxml2" are not needed because the corresponsing -devel packages are in BuildRequires * Dependency for -devel subpackage - -devel subpackage must have "Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}" (see: "MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel ... of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines ) * Parallel make https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make - Support parallel make if possible. If this package does not support parallel make write in the spec file as comments that this package does not support it. * Compiler flags ---------------------------------------------- 410 + make 411 make all-recursive 412 make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/quickfix' 413 Making all in src 414 make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/quickfix/src' 415 Making all in C++ 416 make[3]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/quickfix/src/C++' 417 Making all in test 418 make[4]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/quickfix/src/C++/test' 419 if /bin/sh ../../../libtool --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../.. -I.. -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wall -ansi -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -I/usr/include/libxml2 -O0 -g -MT FieldBaseTestCase.lo -MD -MP -MF ".deps/FieldBaseTestCase.Tpo" \ 420 -c -o FieldBaseTestCase.lo `test -f 'FieldBaseTestCase.cpp' || echo './'`FieldBaseTestCase.cpp; \ 421 then mv ".deps/FieldBaseTestCase.Tpo" ".deps/FieldBaseTestCase.Plo"; \ 422 else rm -f ".deps/FieldBaseTestCase.Tpo"; exit 1; \ 423 fi ---------------------------------------------- - Fedora uses "-O2" compiler flags (, which can be checked by $ rpm --eval %optflags ), which is replaced by the latter "-O0", which needs fixing. * %files entry - There are some packaging issues about %files entry * %_libdir/libquickfix.so.10 must included in main package * %_libdir/libquickfix.so must be in -devel package * %_libdir/*.a _must_ not be packaged: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exclusion_of_Static_Libraries ! Usually with Makefiles generated by recent autotools files can be correctly installed with ------------------------------------------------------- make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install ------------------------------------------------------- However this package does not support DESTDIR=..., so using %makeinstall is preferable (although this must usually be avoided as written on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used ) than installing files manually by "cp -a" as you are doing now (the latter method may cause make mistakes much more than using %makeinstall) When using %makeinstall, please also note in the spec file that this package does not DESTDIR. * Duplicate files - Many files are listed twice: ------------------------------------------------------- 1173 Processing files: quickfix-debuginfo-1.12.4-3.fc10 1174 Processing files: quickfix-devel-1.12.4-3.fc10 1175 warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/quickfix/Acceptor.h 1176 warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/quickfix/Application.h 1177 warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/quickfix/CallStack.h 1178 warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/quickfix/ConfigLexer.h ................. ------------------------------------------------------- Note that the %files entry ------------------------------------------------------- %files %{_includedir}/quickfix ------------------------------------------------------- contains the directory %_includedir/quickfix itself _and_ all files/directories/etc under %_includedir/quickfix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 18:33:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 13:33:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464050] Package Review Request for projectM-libvisual In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811081833.mA8IXmoP016789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464050 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-08 13:33:47 EDT --- * URL needs corrected Thanks for updating the SPEC, addressing common issues with other packages. Here are my notes for this one: * Again, the licensing of this one is a disaster. Any replies from upstream yet? ConfigFile.h is MIT COPYING is GPLv2+ lvtoprojectM.h LGPLv2+ The source file actor_projectM.cpp does not have any license indicated, hence we should assume that one is what the COPYING file says. Then the final license should be (until there is a clarification by upstream) License: LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+ and MIT What do you think? * %{_libdir}/libvisual-0.4/actor/ is owned by libvisual-plugins. Rpmbuild does not pick up this dependency. Please check whether projectM-libvisual depends on libvisual-plugins. If yes, explicitly require libvisual-plugins. If no, own the directory %{_libdir}/libvisual-0.4/actor/ . * You should get rid of the commented out lines unless there's a reason (e.g. if it is an explanation for a command, patch etc.) # Just a general reminder. When you put a (build-)dependency like BR: libprojectM-devel = %{version} ? this package will not build if there is an upstream update to libprojectM-devel but no update is made to this one. Then you will need to come back to this package and update the BR. It is fine to do so, but keep in mind that you can also use ">=" instead of "=", to save some work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 19:16:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 14:16:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: ltsp-server-livesetupdocs - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811081916.mA8JGiDR023915@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #12 from Peter Scheie 2008-11-08 14:16:43 EDT --- Calling xdg-open to display the file does not work. It may have to do with the user ID in live image being generated on the fly (?). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 19:31:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 14:31:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454867] Review Request: kcirbshooter - A small puzzle game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811081931.mA8JVrcQ026152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454867 Stefan Posdzich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 20:02:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 15:02:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438406] Review Request: ufiformat - Disk formatting utility for USB floppy devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811082002.mA8K2BUB007415@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438406 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-08 15:02:10 EDT --- ufiformat-0.9.4-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ufiformat-0.9.4-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 20:02:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 15:02:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438406] Review Request: ufiformat - Disk formatting utility for USB floppy devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811082002.mA8K2I8d030952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438406 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-08 15:02:17 EDT --- ufiformat-0.9.4-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ufiformat-0.9.4-3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 20:02:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 15:02:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438406] Review Request: ufiformat - Disk formatting utility for USB floppy devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811082002.mA8K2Eke030912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438406 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-08 15:02:13 EDT --- ufiformat-0.9.4-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ufiformat-0.9.4-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 20:12:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 15:12:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470140] Review Request: nettee - Network "tee" program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811082012.mA8KC3Nd032623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470140 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-08 15:12:03 EDT --- Thanks Till for your help with this package. Updated: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/nettee.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/nettee-0.1.9-2.fc9.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=922713 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 20:18:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 15:18:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226557] Merge Review: xfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811082018.mA8KI14g001043@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226557 --- Comment #7 from Hans de Goede 2008-11-08 15:18:00 EDT --- A new fixed version (as discussed in comment #4), is in devel / F11 now, the build of it is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=922755 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 20:31:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 15:31:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: ltsp-server-livesetupdocs - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811082031.mA8KVcI1011723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #13 from Warren Togami 2008-11-08 15:31:37 EDT --- > It may have to do with the user ID in live image being generated on the fly (?). Huh? No. xdg-open just was not designed with this in mind, to open local URL's without a protocol. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 21:09:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 16:09:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469590] Review Request: cpuid - Dumps information about the CPU(s) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811082109.mA8L9NV1016848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469590 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-08 16:09:22 EDT --- Thanks Dan for helping me to bring this package into Fedora. (In reply to comment #3) > - license should be MIT instead of BSD > (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT) fixed > - $RPM_OPT_FLAGS are not used to compile, could be solved with > make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 > -DVERSION=$(VERSION)" fixed > - rpmlint complains > cpuid.src:48: W: macro-in-%changelog doc => make it "... %%doc ..." fixed Update: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/cpuid.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/cpuid-20060917-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 22:02:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 17:02:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470140] Review Request: nettee - Network "tee" program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811082202.mA8M2U10024784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470140 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 22:29:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 17:29:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470140] Review Request: nettee - Network "tee" program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811082229.mA8MTXB8018836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470140 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Till Maas 2008-11-08 17:29:32 EDT --- [OK] rpmlint output: silent [OK] Spec in %{name}.spec format [OK] license allowed: GPLv2 [OK] license matches shortname in License: tag [OK] license in tarball and included in %doc: LICENSE [OK] package is code or permissive content: {OK} patches sent to upstream and commented [OK] Source0 is a working URL {N/A} Sourceforge URL is Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name} [OK] Source0 matches Upstream: 35546f5f651a607365f94e115eb2ecd8 nettee-0.1.9.tar.gz [OK] Package builds on all platforms: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=922713 [N/A] ExcludeArch bugs are filed and commented: [OK] BuildRequires are complete (mock builds) (OK) No file dependencies outside of /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin [N/A] %find_lang used for locales [N/A] Every (sub)package containing libraries runs ldconfig %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig [N/A] .h (header) files are in -devel subpackage [N/A] .a (static libraries) are in -static subpackage [N/A] contains .pc (pkgconfig) files and has Requires: pkgconfig (N/A) .pc files are in -devel subpackage [N/A] contains .so.X(.Y) files and .so is in -devel [N/A] -devel subpackage has Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [N/A] .la files (libtool) are not included [N/A] Has GUI and includes %{name}.desktop [N/A] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install [OK] Prefix: /usr not used (not relocatable) [OK] Owns all created directories [OK] no duplicates in %files [OK] %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [OK] Does not own files or dirs from other packages [OK] included filenames are in UTF-8 [OK] %clean is rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] Consistent macro usage [N/A] large documentation is -doc subpackage [OK] %doc does not affect runtime {OK} no pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) {OK} well known BuildRoot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) {OK} PreReq not used {OK} RPM_OPT_FLAGS honoured {OK} Useful debuginfo generated {OK} no duplication of system libraries {OK} no rpath {OK} Timestamps preserved with cp and install {N/A} Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) {OK} Requires(pre,post) style notation not used {OK} only writes to tmp /var/tmp $TMPDIR %{_tmppath} %{_builddir} (and %{buildroot} on %install and %clean) {OK} no Conflicts {OK} nothing installed in /srv {OK} Changelog in allowed format {OK} does not use Scriptlets Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch Sane Provides: and Requires: {OK} Follows Naming Guidelines The package is APPROVED. Nevertheless I would think about using "chmod 644 *.sh" instead of "find *.sh -type f -name \* -exec chmod 644 {} \;", to make the spec easier to read. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 22:37:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 17:37:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470140] Review Request: nettee - Network "tee" program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811082237.mA8MbBS6020081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470140 --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-08 17:37:10 EDT --- theoretically speaking, there is a slight difference between the two commands. find does the change recursively, unlike the direct chmod which only affects the top level folder -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 22:51:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 17:51:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470140] Review Request: nettee - Network "tee" program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811082251.mA8MpFe1031138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470140 --- Comment #6 from Till Maas 2008-11-08 17:51:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > theoretically speaking, there is a slight difference between the two commands. > find does the change recursively, unlike the direct chmod which only affects > the top level folder I know, also chmod would also remove the executable flag of directories, but in this case there are no such directories, so for this package/spec a plain chmod would do exactly the same and be easier to read. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 23:44:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 18:44:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470694] New: Review Request: rubygem-rack - Common API for connecting web frameworks, web servers and layers of software Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rack - Common API for connecting web frameworks, web servers and layers of software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470694 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rack - Common API for connecting web frameworks, web servers and layers of software Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-rack.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-rack-0.4.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Rack provides a common API for connecting web frameworks, web servers and layers of software in between rpmlint: silent koji scratch builds: - dist-f8-updates-candidate: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=922924 - dist-f9-updates-candidate: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=922926 - dist-f10-updates-candidate: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=922928 - dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=922930 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 23:45:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 18:45:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470695] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811082345.mA8NjaAd029922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470695 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |rubygem-passenger - | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 23:44:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 18:44:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470695] New: Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-passenger - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470695 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: rpmlint output: rubygem-passenger.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/passenger-config ^ I'm not sure why this is being recognized as a -devel file... it's just a script. rubygem-passenger-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation rubygem-passenger-doc.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. koji scratch builds fail because of the rubygem-rake build requirement (See #470694) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 23:49:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 18:49:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811082349.mA8Nn9Wb006753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |470694 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 23:49:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 18:49:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470694] Review Request: rubygem-rack - Common API for connecting web frameworks, web servers and layers of software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811082349.mA8NnAtK006778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470694 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |470696 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 8 23:48:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 18:48:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470696] New: Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-passenger.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-passenger-2.0.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Phusion Passenger is a deployment system for Ruby on Rails applications on Apache, i.e. a 'mod_rails'. Rails deployment becomes an "upload & done" process. rpmlint output: [jmeeuwen at ghandalf packages]$ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/rubygem-passenger-* ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/mod_passenger-2.0.3-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm rubygem-passenger.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/passenger-config rubygem-passenger-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation rubygem-passenger-doc.x86_64: W: no-documentation mod_passenger.x86_64: W: no-documentation koji scratch builds fail atm. because of a required rubygem-fastthread update/upgrade (built and pushed already) and a missing required package rubygem-rack (See #470694) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 01:23:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 20:23:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811090123.mA91NVl6010850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Comment #43 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-11-08 20:23:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #40) > Created an attachment (id=320806) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320806) [details] > more cleanups this patch makes non sense, why don't change only NAME=slony1 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 01:30:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 20:30:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811090130.mA91UWAv011826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 --- Comment #12 from Hayden James 2008-11-08 20:30:31 EDT --- Ok I believed I fixed most of the above. Here's the updated files: http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/quickfix.spec http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/quickfix-1.12.4-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 01:33:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 20:33:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811090133.mA91XZ3n012115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 --- Comment #13 from Hayden James 2008-11-08 20:33:34 EDT --- The only issue I have is whether or not "Group: System Environment/Libraries" is more correct than "Development/Libraries". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 01:49:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 20:49:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470702] New: Review Request: L-function - L-function calculator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: L-function - L-function calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470702 Summary: Review Request: L-function - L-function calculator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/L-function.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/L-function-1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A library and a command-line executable that do computations on a class of special functions called L-functions. Among others, this class includes the Riemann zeta function and the Ramanujan tau function. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 02:28:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 21:28:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811090228.mA92SboE027713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #1 from John F 2008-11-08 21:28:36 EDT --- Depending on ario is because I am waiting to be sponsored through ario. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 02:28:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 21:28:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811090228.mA92S2E6027643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 John F changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |466301 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 02:28:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 21:28:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466301] Review Request: ario - Music Player Daemon Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811090228.mA92S3Tn027675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466301 John F changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |470703 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 02:26:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 21:26:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470703] New: Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 Summary: Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: johnhford at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~jhford/fedora/links.spec SRPM URL: http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~jhford/fedora/links-2.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is a new version of the Links graphical browser. It is distinct from the elinks browser which is currently included because it offers an X11 or Linux framebuffer graphical mode. There only issue is that the elinks package is using /usr/bin/links even though it isn't actually called links. I would be willing to do the modifications to elinks depending on what the outcome is -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 04:05:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 23:05:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811090405.mA945Weg032106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Comment #44 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-11-08 23:05:31 EDT --- Ruben. Can you help me to discover why man7 is not installing correct ? http://ispbrasil.com.br/slony1/slony1.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/slony1/slony1-1.2.15-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 04:15:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 23:15:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811090415.mA94FNNh001087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 04:15:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 23:15:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470694] Review Request: rubygem-rack - Common API for connecting web frameworks, web servers and layers of software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811090415.mA94F1KC000741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470694 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 06:10:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 01:10:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189197] Review Request: gtk2hs - Haskell gtk2 binding (renamed to ghc-gtk2hs) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811090610.mA96At1q025579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189197 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: gtk2hs |Review Request: gtk2hs - | |Haskell gtk2 binding | |(renamed to ghc-gtk2hs) --- Comment #15 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-09 01:10:52 EDT --- The package has been renamed to ghc-gtk2hs for F11 in line with the new Haskell Packaging Guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 06:28:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 01:28:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464049] Package Review Request for libprojectM-qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811090628.mA96SdFI027622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464049 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-09 01:28:39 EDT --- libprojectM-qt-1.2.0-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libprojectM-qt-1.2.0-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 09:24:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 04:24:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461678] Review Request: purple-microblog - Libpurple plug-in supporting microblog services like Twitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811090924.mA99OuLA020428@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461678 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-09 04:24:55 EDT --- purple-microblog-0.2.0-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/purple-microblog-0.2.0-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 09:36:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 04:36:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470066] Review Request: R-qtl - Quantitative trait loci (qtl) functionality for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811090936.mA99aBXN022533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470066 --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert 2008-11-09 04:36:10 EDT --- The sysadmins have closed the www3.tsl.uu.se server and moved all pages to the www5.tsl.uu.se server, without putting an alias in DNS. I am arguing with them to put an alias in, but I don't know if I will succeed. So (at least for now) use these URLs instead of the once above: Spec URL: http://www5.tsl.uu.se/~ellert/R-qtl/R-qtl.spec SRPM URL: http://www5.tsl.uu.se/~ellert/R-qtl/R-qtl-1.09-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 10:03:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 05:03:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469590] Review Request: cpuid - Dumps information about the CPU(s) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091003.mA9A3XDv018302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469590 --- Comment #5 from Dan Hor?k 2008-11-09 05:03:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > > > - $RPM_OPT_FLAGS are not used to compile, could be solved with > > make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 > > -DVERSION=$(VERSION)" > Hm, the VERSION is now undefined during the compile. But after reading the Makefile, the proper solution would be to use "-DVERSION=%{version}" in the CFLAGS. So, please, one more iteration is required, all other issues have already been resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 10:09:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 05:09:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470140] Review Request: nettee - Network "tee" program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091009.mA9A9wGA019363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470140 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-09 05:09:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nettee Short Description: Network "tee" program Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 10:09:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 05:09:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470140] Review Request: nettee - Network "tee" program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091009.mA9A9498019270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470140 --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-09 05:09:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > theoretically speaking, there is a slight difference between the two commands. > > find does the change recursively, unlike the direct chmod which only affects > > the top level folder > > I know, also chmod would also remove the executable flag of directories, but in > this case there are no such directories, so for this package/spec a plain chmod > would do exactly the same and be easier to read. I agree with Till that the spec file should be as easy to read as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 10:19:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 05:19:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some car accros the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091019.mA9AJ128020960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 --- Comment #5 from Simon Wesp 2008-11-09 05:19:00 EDT --- mh, the translations are broken. perhaps you should drop this part.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 10:21:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 05:21:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461400] Review Request: cherokee - Flexible and Fast Webserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091021.mA9ALjCI021696@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461400 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #19 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-11-09 05:21:43 EDT --- This package has been pushed to updates, closing bug. Pavel, if you push a package to updates, and include the bug number, bodhi can automagically close the bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 10:31:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 05:31:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some car accros the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091031.mA9AV4Rg023144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 --- Comment #6 from Simon Wesp 2008-11-09 05:31:03 EDT --- and the game has no pause function. perhaps you can use the debian-pause patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 10:56:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 05:56:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443238] Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091056.mA9AuvoN003179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443238 --- Comment #17 from Victor Bogado 2008-11-09 05:56:55 EDT --- I made the required changes, I wasn't experiencing the mode problem for here my binaries were correctly setted to 755, but as you said, better safe then sorry. :-) specs and source rpm at the same bat-place : http://bogado.net/rpm/cave9-0.3-3.bog9.src.rpm http://bogado.net/rpm/cave9.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 11:28:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 06:28:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469590] Review Request: cpuid - Dumps information about the CPU(s) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091128.mA9BSWct032487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469590 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-09 06:28:31 EDT --- Thanks again (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > > > > - $RPM_OPT_FLAGS are not used to compile, could be solved with > > > make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 > > > -DVERSION=$(VERSION)" > > > > Hm, the VERSION is now undefined during the compile. But after reading the > Makefile, the proper solution would be to use "-DVERSION=%{version}" in the > CFLAGS. So, please, one more iteration is required, all other issues have > already been resolved. New make: make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="%{optflags} -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DVERSION=%{version}" Update: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/cpuid.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/cpuid-20060917-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 11:32:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 06:32:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091132.mA9BWHEs008864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 --- Comment #12 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-11-09 06:32:16 EDT --- Why don't you ask for CVS work and import and build. This one blocks ldtp package also? Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 12:21:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 07:21:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091221.mA9CL9oW008793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-09 07:21:08 EDT --- unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 12:20:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 07:20:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091220.mA9CKLLg008621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-09 07:20:20 EDT --- unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 12:22:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 07:22:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091222.mA9CMBUx009044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-09 07:22:10 EDT --- unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 13:11:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 08:11:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni - C++ library for the Katana robot arm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091311.mA9DBD0A017736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 --- Comment #11 from Tim Niemueller 2008-11-09 08:11:12 EDT --- I have fixed the license tag and converted to consistent (non-)macro usage. The URL used to contain more info, seems they changed it. I now added a link to http://www.neuronics.ch/cms_de/web/index.php?id=386 which describes the overall architecture and the place of the KNI in this. Additionally I added a patch that is necessary for usage with usb2ser adapter. Patch went to Neuronics as well. I want to stay with version 3.9.2 for now. I will have to do some tests with the new version on the robot with the arm, as it is a major release and they changed some core components. I'll push an update later if it works just fine. I also have to check if it can be a drop-in replacement or if the API has changed. The new SRPM is at http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/robotics/libkni-3.9.2-6.fc9.src.rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 13:10:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 08:10:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470720] New: Review Request: gdnet - Demonstration tool for the libdnet interface Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gdnet - Demonstration tool for the libdnet interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470720 Summary: Review Request: gdnet - Demonstration tool for the libdnet interface Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/gdnet.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/gdnet-0.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://jon.oberheide.org/projects/gdnet/ Description: gdnet is a graphical tool demonstrating the power and simplicity of the libdnet interface. Using the GTK+ toolkit, it provides a variety of networking features in a simple, easy-to-use interface. Koji scratch builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=923189 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint -i gdn* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i gdn* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 13:15:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 08:15:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470720] Review Request: gdnet - Demonstration tool for the libdnet interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091315.mA9DFP5m018627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470720 --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-09 08:15:24 EDT --- Hmmm, there is a problem after the installation of this package. [fab at laptop024 ~]$ gdnet ** (gdnet:18125): WARNING **: fw_open(): could not get fw handle Segmentation fault -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 13:25:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 08:25:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091325.mA9DPD9x020639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #1 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-11-09 08:25:12 EDT --- Updated the SPEC and SRPM for better placement of the mod_passenger.so file (in %{_libdir}/httpd/modules instead of %{ruby_sitearch}/apache2/mod_passenger.so) so that the configuration file %{_sysconfdir}/httpd/conf.d/mod_passenger.so can actually load it independent of the architecture. New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-passenger.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-passenger-2.0.3-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 13:34:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 08:34:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091334.mA9DY9G3021971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-09 08:34:09 EDT --- libev-3.48-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libev-3.48-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 13:33:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 08:33:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091333.mA9DXA9I021858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-09 08:33:09 EDT --- libev-3.48-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libev-3.48-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 13:32:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 08:32:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091332.mA9DW3ci021764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-09 08:32:02 EDT --- libev-3.48-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libev-3.48-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 13:40:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 08:40:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091340.mA9Dedlo031246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Comment #45 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-11-09 08:40:38 EDT --- Not sure what you mean, I prefer to review Devrim's package and wait for him to clean up his spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 13:49:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 08:49:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470508] Review Request: Ajaxterm - A web-based terminal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091349.mA9DnwxR032538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470508 --- Comment #2 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-11-09 08:49:57 EDT --- Thanks, corrected. New version here: Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/Ajaxterm.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/Ajaxterm-0.10-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 14:10:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 09:10:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470694] Review Request: rubygem-rack - Common API for connecting web frameworks, web servers and layers of software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091410.mA9EAZ7Q028723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470694 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-09 09:10:34 EDT --- For 0.4.0-1 * ruby(abi) dependency - Please check https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Packaging_Guidelines * Unused macro - %ruby_sitelib does not to be used anywhere. * Dependency - Please check if all needed Requires are added properly. ! For example, lib/rack/handler/mongrel.rb contains ---------------------------------------------------------- 1 require 'mongrel' 2 require 'stringio' ---------------------------------------------------------- So this file has "Requires: rubygem(mongrel)". However I don't know if this file itself is just optional or not. Anyway please check if all dependencies are correctly added. * %gemdir/bin - I guess files under %gemdir/bin must be moved into %_bindir (ref: rubygem-mongrel.spec) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 14:28:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 09:28:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470694] Review Request: rubygem-rack - Common API for connecting web frameworks, web servers and layers of software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091428.mA9ESefe006762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470694 --- Comment #2 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-11-09 09:28:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > For 0.4.0-1 > > * ruby(abi) dependency > - Please check > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Packaging_Guidelines > Stupid /me, I always somehow forget this one. Fixed. > * Unused macro > - %ruby_sitelib does not to be used anywhere. > Fixed. > * Dependency > - Please check if all needed Requires are added properly. > ! For example, lib/rack/handler/mongrel.rb contains > ---------------------------------------------------------- > 1 require 'mongrel' > 2 require 'stringio' > ---------------------------------------------------------- > So this file has "Requires: rubygem(mongrel)". > However I don't know if this file itself is just optional > or not. > Anyway please check if all dependencies are correctly added. > This is entirely optional, it is one of the handlers -rack can cope with (amongst others; fastcgi and webrick) > * %gemdir/bin > - I guess files under %gemdir/bin must be moved into > %_bindir (ref: rubygem-mongrel.spec) Fixed. New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-rack.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-rack-0.4.0-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 15:07:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 10:07:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470508] Review Request: Ajaxterm - A web-based terminal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091507.mA9F7jth012919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470508 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-09 10:07:44 EDT --- And still, require the packages chkconfig and initscripts instead of /sbin/chkconfig and /sbin/service. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 15:24:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 10:24:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091524.mA9FOUZx007376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #25 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-09 10:24:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > i have mailed upstream since i am not a direct contributer to olpc . Anyways I > am still waiting for a reply Please do not wait for OLPC to respond. Our packaging standards are higher than theirs, any any font package that passed Fedora review will just the OLPC package next time they rebase on a new Fedora version. Just do the requested fixes, so we can have a clean Fedora package OLPC can be referred to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 15:40:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 10:40:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091540.mA9FeFha009755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-09 10:40:14 EDT --- Umm... spot, would you answer my question below? ! First of all please unpack passenger-2.0.3.gem in the srpm by below: $ mkdir TMP ; cd TMP $ tar xf ../*gem (gem can be unpacked by tar) $ mkdir TMP ; cd TMP $ tar xzf ../data.tar.gz Then: First of all, the overall license this package is GPLv2 (not GPLv2+) Then ext/apache2/LICENSE-CNRI.TXT says: ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// A few functions in ext/apache2/Hooks.cpp are based on the source code of mod_scgi version 1.9. Its license is included in this file. Please note that these licensing terms *only* encompass those few functions, and not Passenger as a whole. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CNRI OPEN SOURCE LICENSE AGREEMENT (CNRI = Python 1.6 i.e. GPL incompatible license follows) ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// What I am in trouble is that - What functions in ext/apache2/Hooks.cpp are actually based on mod_scgi codes - And I don't know for now how these functions are used in the other parts of passenger source codes - So I am not sure if the code in Hooks.cpp under CNRI license won't conflict with GPL. spot, how do you think about this. For me the current status seems very obscure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 15:55:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 10:55:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469590] Review Request: cpuid - Dumps information about the CPU(s) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091555.mA9FtG6u019754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469590 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Dan Hor?k 2008-11-09 10:55:15 EDT --- All issues are fixed, so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 16:05:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:05:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091605.mA9G5f2K021457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #28 from Muayyad Alsadi 2008-11-09 11:05:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=323015) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323015) font config configuration -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 16:05:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:05:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091605.mA9G56u0021249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #27 from Muayyad Alsadi 2008-11-09 11:05:05 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=323014) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323014) spec file for arabeyes-fonts superpackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 16:05:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:05:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469590] Review Request: cpuid - Dumps information about the CPU(s) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091605.mA9G5O8D021392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469590 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 16:03:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:03:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091603.mA9G3vmZ020829@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Muayyad Alsadi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alsadi at ojuba.org --- Comment #26 from Muayyad Alsadi 2008-11-09 11:03:56 EDT --- Hi, I have FAS account and I would love to co-maintain this package for fedora as my first fedora package we need 3 font packages 1. KACST 2. core 3. decorative http://www.arabeyes.org/project.php?proj=Khotot as you case see they are already split by upstream http://cvs.arabeyes.org/viewcvs/art/khotot/ KACST is not developed by Arabeyes thus they need its own super package while core and decorative should be two subpackages of the same package the core fonts are missing the best font which is simplified naskhi, which can be downloaded from Araveyes fonts team leader and the designer of the fonts http://www.khaledhosny.org/filebrowser KACST's fonts are released under GPLv1 the decorative fonts are GPLv2 and the core fonts are OFL licensed I'll attach my .spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 16:04:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:04:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469590] Review Request: cpuid - Dumps information about the CPU(s) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091604.mA9G4Nbe012904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469590 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-09 11:04:22 EDT --- Thank you for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 16:05:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:05:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469590] Review Request: cpuid - Dumps information about the CPU(s) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091605.mA9G539j013266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469590 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-09 11:05:02 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cpuid Short Description: Dumps information about the CPU(s) Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 16:08:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:08:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470727] New: Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 Summary: Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matt at truch.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://matt.truch.net/fedora/slimdata.spec SRPM URL: http://matt.truch.net/fedora/slimdata-2.6.1a-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Slim is a data compression system for scientific data sets, both a binary and a library with C linkage. Slim works with integer data from one or more channels in a file, which it can compress more rapidly than general tools like gzip. Upstream: http://slimdata.sourceforge.net/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 16:17:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:17:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091617.mA9GHeUg023154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-09 11:17:39 EDT --- By the way some pre-remarks * BuildRequires - This package won't build without "BR: rubygem(fastthread)". - "BR: gcc-c++ findutils" are redundant. * Requires - Please check if all needed Requires are correctly added. It seems that at least "Requires: rubygem(rack) rubygem(fastthread)" are needed. * boost dependency - Well, when I try below to make build log more verbose (please consider this) ------------------------------------------------------- %prep %setup -q -c -T mkdir BINDIR cat > BINDIR/rake < References: Message-ID: <200811091622.mA9GMeQx023902@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-09 11:22:39 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=323017) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323017) mock build log for dist-f11 Forgot to attach mock build log... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 16:41:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:41:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195678] Review Request: redland-bindings - bindings for the redland RDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091641.mA9GfCqc018296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195678 Thomas Vander Stichele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #9 from Thomas Vander Stichele 2008-11-09 11:41:11 EDT --- So what should I do if I actually want to get this reviewed ? It seems it's just a structural problem of not being able to get reviewers for certain kinds of packages, which is a shame. I'll reopen jsut so it gets on someone's radar and someone can tell me what my options are if I want this reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 17:00:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 12:00:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466301] Review Request: ario - Music Player Daemon Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091700.mA9H0tiK029006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466301 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 17:49:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 12:49:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466301] Review Request: ario - Music Player Daemon Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091749.mA9Hnkrm027291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466301 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-09 12:49:45 EDT --- For -4: * More (Build)Requires fixes - "BuildRequires: gettext-devel" is excessive and "BuildRequires: gettext" is enough - "Requires: gettext" is not needed. * sed usage --------------------------------------------------------- sed s/ario.png/ario/ < %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/applications/ario.desktop \ > %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/applications/ario.desktop.new rm %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/applications/ario.desktop mv %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/applications/ario.desktop.new \ %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/applications/ario.desktop --------------------------------------------------------- - First of all fixing data/ario.desktop.in.in at %prep instead of fixing installed ario.desktop is preferred (for --short-circuit issue) - Then you can -i option of sed. --------------------------------------------------------- sed -i -e 's|ario\.png|ario|' data/ario.desktop.in.in --------------------------------------------------------- * libtool .la files - Usually installed libtool .la files _must_ be removed. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exclusion_of_Static_Libraries * %find_lang - The comment --------------------------------------------------------- # At some point it might be a good move to use %lang(xx) for the locales --------------------------------------------------------- is no longer needed because %find_lang actually does this (you can check the contents of Ario.lang) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 18:32:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 13:32:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091832.mA9IW4cV001204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Comment #46 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-11-09 13:32:02 EDT --- I agree, I am trying to speedup the process since Devrim is delaying too much to answer and this bug is here since 2006. I am also have found a bug in Makefile the man7 files was not installed because whitespaces in filenames -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 18:42:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 13:42:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091842.mA9Iga0O003021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Comment #47 from Devrim GUNDUZ 2008-11-09 13:42:35 EDT --- Actually Devrim is waiting for 2.0 release, which is in rc2 now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 18:51:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 13:51:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466301] Review Request: ario - Music Player Daemon Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091851.mA9Ipj5p004649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466301 --- Comment #8 from John F 2008-11-09 13:51:44 EDT --- Hi Mamoru, I have made the required changes: http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~jhford/fedora/ario.spec http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~jhford/fedora/ario-1.1-5.fc10.src.rpm Thanks again, it is really helpful! John -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 18:56:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 13:56:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091856.mA9IuKTN012777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-09 13:56:19 EDT --- For -4: * BuildRequires - build.log shows: ------------------------------------------------------ 348 checking for boost::pool_allocator... 349 no 350 checking for boost::fast_pool_allocator... 351 no ------------------------------------------------------ I guess "BuildRequires: boost-devel" must be added !!!! By the way, would you consider to build mysql/postgresql/python/ruby/java bindings? * Requires for -devel subpackage - A package which contains pkgconfig .pc file must have "Requires: pkgconfig": https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines - Also installed quickfix.pc contains: ------------------------------------------------------ Requires: libxml-2.0 ------------------------------------------------------ This means that -devel subpackage must have "Requires: libxml2-devel". * 64 bits architecture issue - quickfix.pc.in contains ------------------------------------------------------- 3 libdir=@prefix@/lib ------------------------------------------------------- @prefix@/lib is expanded as /usr/lib (on Fedora) even on 64 bits architecture, while on those machine this must be /usr/lib64. Usually replacing this with libdir=@libdir@ will fix this issue * Use of %makeinstall - Please write comments before calling %makeinstall that this tarball does not support "make install DESTDIR=foo". * Directory ownership issue - Currently the directory %_datadir/%name itself is not owned by any packages. Note that ------------------------------------------------------- %files %{_datadir}/%{name}/ ------------------------------------------------------- contains the directory %_datadir/%name itself and all files/directories/etc under %_datadir/%name. ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories#Wildcarding_Files_inside_a_Created_Directory * libtool .la files - Usually libtool .la files must be removed. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exclusion_of_Static_Libraries * %changelog format - For Fedora CVS usage I recomment to add one line between every %changelog entry like: -------------------------------------------------------- * Sat Nov 08 2008 Hayden James - 1.12.4-4 - Changed license to ASL 1.1 and BSD with advertising. Improved spec file to better conform * Sat Nov 07 2008 Hayden James - 1.12.4-3 - Changed license to ASL 1.1 * Sat Nov 03 2008 Hayden James - 1.12.4-2 - Changed license to BSD -------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 18:58:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 13:58:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091858.mA9IwYtK005614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #15 from Martin-Gomez Pablo 2008-11-09 13:58:33 EDT --- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 19:20:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 14:20:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470508] Review Request: Ajaxterm - A web-based terminal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091920.mA9JKmKo016785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470508 --- Comment #4 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-11-09 14:20:47 EDT --- Why, I don't remember reading that in the packaging guidelines? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 19:23:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 14:23:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091923.mA9JNZlr009577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) | --- Comment #16 from Ankur Sinha 2008-11-09 14:23:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > ping ? pong! hi.. have end semester exams so a little tied up.. will do it this week for sure.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 19:28:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 14:28:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091928.mA9JSdRq017589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Comment #48 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-11-09 14:28:38 EDT --- ok, but I'm still not agree with the name slony1-2.0.0-rc2.tar.bz2 for me slony-2.0.0-rc2.tar.bz2 will be better, only slony, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 19:27:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 14:27:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470508] Review Request: Ajaxterm - A web-based terminal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091927.mA9JRRGK010206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470508 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-09 14:27:27 EDT --- At least that's the way it's in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript Besides, requiring a package is AFAIK faster than going through the file lists, although the /sbin list is downloaded automatically anyways. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 19:36:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 14:36:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091936.mA9JaWHF011632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Comment #49 from Devrim GUNDUZ 2008-11-09 14:36:31 EDT --- Sorry, it won't happen. I am against the name change of the project. I don't know how much is it worth to remove 1 byte from the tarball name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 19:38:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 14:38:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091938.mA9JcgW9019134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 --- Comment #15 from Hayden James 2008-11-09 14:38:41 EDT --- Ok, I made all the changes suggested above. I think for a release in the future I'll build the bindings for other languages. But here's the updated files: http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/quickfix.spec http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/quickfix-1.12.4-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 19:46:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 14:46:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470508] Review Request: Ajaxterm - A web-based terminal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091946.mA9JkbWP020470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470508 --- Comment #6 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-11-09 14:46:37 EDT --- Ah, you're right. New version build: Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/Ajaxterm.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/Ajaxterm-0.10-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 20:06:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 15:06:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454220] Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092006.mA9K6WQj023517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454220 --- Comment #46 from Adam Huffman 2008-11-09 15:06:29 EDT --- Just as an update on this, the XML format has changed (in addition to losing the encryption), so I'm working on that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 20:08:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 15:08:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470508] Review Request: Ajaxterm - A web-based terminal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092008.mA9K80dE016264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470508 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 20:07:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 15:07:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470508] Review Request: Ajaxterm - A web-based terminal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092007.mA9K7kNv016226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470508 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-09 15:07:44 EDT --- Well, I might as well review the package. - MUST: The package must own all the directories it creates. %{_datadir}/ajaxterm/* should be %{_datadir}/ajaxterm - MUST: License is incorrect - sarissa* files are licensed under LGPLv2+ License: Public Domain and LGPLv2+ Other than that I cannot do now, since the AjaxTerm site is down and I cannot check the sources. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 20:31:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 15:31:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092031.mA9KV0l7019490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 --- Comment #6 from Christopher D. Stover 2008-11-09 15:30:59 EDT --- Hi Hans, thanks for the full review. I didn't realize those directory ownership issues were a problem before but I've read up on them and it makes sense now. Hopefully they should all be fixed now. Output from rpmlint: [Chris at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint barry.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [Chris at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/barry* 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I moved the libs out of the main package and back into their own package again. I also put *.so in the devel package. I added Requires: libopensync to the opensync package to make sure %{_libdir}/opensync exists. I cleaned up the doc directory -- removed *.sh and *.php which were used to create the *.html files. I added --disable-rpath to the %configure lines instead of the sed commands you pasted. I don't have a 64-bit machine to test on but can you let me know if this fixes the problem? If not, I'll have to use the sed commands. SPEC: http://8uxodw.bay.livefilestore.com/y1pzd9Tb3TfRlfB2LpwvfmZ4cu_zknwrn_D9-R9BaHNGIqgS355w_eUnWkcl8ZAFYbvTVArCdxuo4Q/barry.spec?download SRPM: http://8uxodw.bay.livefilestore.com/y1pzd9Tb3TfRlc7jRbx1-VYIoiOdC3wZL9botvMNwIskrSRYQmuAyM9wz5FosWRUw8TY1opI1uyiFk/barry-0.14-2.fc10.src.rpm?download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 20:29:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 15:29:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092029.mA9KTOJc019111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #5 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-11-09 15:29:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > First of all, the overall license this package is GPLv2 (not GPLv2+) The license tag actually says GPLv2, not GPLv2+ (In reply to comment #3) > By the way some pre-remarks > > * BuildRequires > - This package won't build without "BR: rubygem(fastthread)". Added BuildRequires: rubygem(fastthread) >= 1.0.1 > - "BR: gcc-c++ findutils" are redundant. > Removed these. > * Requires > - Please check if all needed Requires are correctly added. > It seems that at least "Requires: rubygem(rack) > rubygem(fastthread)" are needed. > Added these requires > * boost dependency > - Well, when I try below to make build log more verbose > (please consider this) (...snip...) > ------------------------------------------------------- > Here > - This package seem to be using internal libboost_thread library. > This should be changed so that mod_passenger.so uses external (system- > widely provided) libboost_thread-mt.so library > - Anyway Fedora specific compilation flags are not correctly honored. > I seem unable to do this. Logfile attached > * Redundant output > - I guess the "-v" option of "chmod -v 644 $script" is not needed... > (Actually you are not using -v option for chmod on the below lines) > - Also I guess rm -r"v"f is redundant... > It's redundant, but it shows which files are chmod'ed or rm'ed; since it's a find with a couple of parameters I'd like to be able to track down what happens. > * Document files > - You don't have to write %doc attribute for files under %_mandir > (as these are automatically regarded as %doc) > Fixed. > * Directory ownership issue > - Please own %{ruby_sitearch}/passenger/ > - Please also check the directory ownership issues between subpackages. > ! For example > - The directory %{geminstdir}/doc is owned by -doc subpackage > - -devel subpackage has %{geminstdir}/doc/definitions.h > - -devel subpackage does not have "Requires: -doc" > - So when -devel subpackage is installed with_out_ -doc subpackage > installed, %{geminstdir}/doc is not owned by any packages > Made %{geminstdir} shared between -devel and -doc package. > * %defattr > - is missing on mod_passenger subpackage. Fixed. New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-passenger.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-passenger-2.0.3-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 20:46:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 15:46:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470737] Review Request: pen - Load balancer for "simple" tcp based protocols such as http or smtp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092046.mA9Kkagi022027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470737 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |pen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 20:46:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 15:46:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470737] New: Review Request: pen - Load balancer for "simple" tcp based protocols such as http or smtp Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pen - Load balancer for "simple" tcp based protocols such as http or smtp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470737 Summary: Review Request: pen - Load balancer for "simple" tcp based protocols such as http or smtp Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/pen/pen.spec SRPM URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/pen/pen-0.18.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This is pen, a load balancer for "simple" tcp based protocols such as http or smtp. It allows several servers to appear as one to the outside and automatically detects servers that are down and distributes clients among the available servers. This gives high availability and scalable performance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 20:47:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 15:47:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466147] Review Request:fedora-ksplice - Script Collection for Using KSplice on Fedora Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092047.mA9KlY4D022134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466147 --- Comment #5 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-11-09 15:47:34 EDT --- New upstream release: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/fedora-ksplice/fedora-ksplice.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/fedora-ksplice/fedora-ksplice-0.4-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 21:13:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:13:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470737] Review Request: pen - Load balancer for "simple" tcp based protocols such as http or smtp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092113.mA9LDvrq000440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470737 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmahut at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 21:20:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:20:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470508] Review Request: Ajaxterm - A web-based terminal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092120.mA9LK7mS026838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470508 --- Comment #8 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-11-09 16:20:06 EDT --- Thanks, fixed both points. New version: Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/Ajaxterm.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/Ajaxterm-0.10-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 21:27:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:27:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092127.mA9LR2X6027806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 21:35:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:35:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092135.mA9LZri1029081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-09 16:35:51 EDT --- I'll go ahead and review this in the next few days sometime. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 21:44:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:44:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092144.mA9LiVGE030411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #12 from Javier Palacios 2008-11-09 16:44:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > The config file is the official way to adapt it to a particular platform. > > Unless you manage to make this patch adopted by upstream, you can consider this > package and your request for sponsorship on hold. I don't understand this well. First, the configuration file is not required, just optional. Second, the patch is there only to avoid that debmirror.conf goes listed as a requirement (if not packaged) Regarding upstream, I will try, but last version of this package is years ago. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 21:56:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:56:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092156.mA9LuejP007147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |besfahbo at redhat.com, | |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-09 16:56:39 EDT --- Since nobody bites, I'll take this. First review pass 1. you're packaging a font with a new license. While at first view it seems ok, you still need spot to approve it and put it on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal_considerations_for_fonts 2. please follow the font packaging process outlined on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle and in particular create a wiki page that describes your font and can be referenced in release notes (a wiki page template is available there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_description_template ) 3. your fontconfig priority (59) is a little low, our guidelines states CJK fonts should be in the 65-69 range http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Simple_priority_lists Of course Behdad has the last say on this, so if you convince him to ok it I'll let this pass. 4. your fontconfig rule is a bit more convoluted than what we usually do. It probably works but please get Behdad to review it (and ok it there). 5. please also alias the font the other way, so fontconfig knows it should use serif fonts to complete HanaMin http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Generic_names 6. please send your fontconfig file to hanazano upstream so it's included in their next release once you're happy with it 7. you can drop the -f argument to fc-cache for releases ? Fedora 9 8. please use the defattr suggested by guidelines %defattr(644,root,root,755) 9. it's a little easier to review a package when the fields are in the same order as in rpmdevtool's spectemplate-fonts.spec (cosmetic, you can ignore it, just take it into account for your next font package) All in all this was a pleasant spec file to review and I'll have no problem approving it once those little problems are taken care of ? NEEDINFO in the meanwhile -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 21:59:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:59:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092159.mA9Lxr5k032690@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #29 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-09 16:59:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > Created an attachment (id=323014) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323014) [details] > spec file for arabeyes-fonts superpackage Alsadi, as I stated on the list (and in this review) we do not do superpackages in Fedora, so if you want to propose spec files you need to propose one spec per font (ie 3 spec files), not a single spec that packages three different upstream archives in one go -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 22:10:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 17:10:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453839] Review Request: phatch - photo batch processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092210.mA9MAAr3002290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453839 --- Comment #7 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-11-09 17:10:09 EDT --- Update for 0.1.6 : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/phatch.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/phatch-0.1.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Its no more a noarch package, has %{_libdir} is used. No debuginfo generated. Package build on koji : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=923733 rpmlint output : [eponyme at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint phatch-0.1.6-1.fc9.i386.rpm phatch-0.1.6-1.fc9.src.rpm phatch.i386: E: no-binary phatch.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. [eponyme at FEDOBOX tmp]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 23:08:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 18:08:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468116] Review Request: sugar-analyze - Analysing tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092308.mA9N8NDA019438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468116 Marco Pesenti Gritti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Marco Pesenti Gritti 2008-11-09 18:08:23 EDT --- Can you please confirm if "mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{sugaractivitydir}" is actually necessary? I'd expect setup.py to take care of it. Anyway r+. Thanks! (you forgot to set fedora-review to ?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 23:21:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 18:21:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092321.mA9NLcjR014940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 Uwe Kubosch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 23:23:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 18:23:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092323.mA9NNgUI015269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 --- Comment #25 from Denis Leroy 2008-11-09 18:23:41 EDT --- Kevin, yes I sponsored him. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 00:30:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 19:30:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470424] Review Request: libtopology - Libtopology is a library for discovering the hardware topology on Linux systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100030.mAA0U0g2026052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470424 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt 2008-11-09 19:29:59 EDT --- $ rpmlint -i libtopology-0.3-0.1.fc9.src.rpm libtopology.src: E: description-line-too-long Libtopology is a library for discovering the hardware topology on Linux systems. Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines. * Licence is: LGPLv2 (not GPLv2) * Use %{_libdir} not %prefix/_lib as %_libdir is /usr/lib64 for 64-bit multi-arch platforms. * Prefer "cp -p" or "install -p" when installing files. * /usr/share/doc/libtopology-0.3/ is not included. (Hint: Run "rpm -qlvp" on the built packages and notice missing directory entries.) * Is it really desired to put the documentation into a separate package? The pkg is not even 100K in size. I would add the docs to the -devel pkg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 00:38:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 19:38:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100038.mAA0cLbl027609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt 2008-11-09 19:38:20 EDT --- > %files > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %doc AUTHORS COPYING INSTALL README TODO Absolutely no need to include the same %doc files also in the -devel pkg. > %{_bindir}/gar* > %{_datadir}/%{name}/garmintypes.txt Don't forget the corresponding directory entry! Add: %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} > %files devel > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %doc AUTHORS COPYING INSTALL README TODO > %{_datadir}/%{name}/doc/* Here either replace your line with %{_datadir}/%{name}/doc/ to add that directory and its contents recursively, or add: %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/doc to the -devel pkg files section. > %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/%{name}.pc You put a file in there, so "Requires: pkgconfig". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 00:50:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 19:50:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470754] Review Request: Pound - Pound is a reverse proxy, load balancer and HTTPS front-end for Web server(s) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100050.mAA0oJ2b005108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470754 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |Pound -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 00:49:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 19:49:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470754] New: Review Request: Pound - Pound is a reverse proxy, load balancer and HTTPS front-end for Web server(s) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Pound - Pound is a reverse proxy, load balancer and HTTPS front-end for Web server(s) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470754 Summary: Review Request: Pound - Pound is a reverse proxy, load balancer and HTTPS front-end for Web server(s) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/pound/Pound.spec SRPM URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/pound/Pound-2.4.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Pound is a reverse HTTP proxy, load balancer, and SSL wrapper. It proxies client HTTPS requests to HTTP backend servers, distributes the requests among several servers while keeping sessions, supports HTTP/1.1 requests even if the backend server(s) are HTTP/1.0, and sanitizes requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 01:09:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 20:09:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470424] Review Request: libtopology - Libtopology is a library for discovering the hardware topology on Linux systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100109.mAA19VPo000813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470424 --- Comment #2 from Tony Breeds 2008-11-09 20:09:30 EDT --- Firstly thank you for takign the time to review my package. (In reply to comment #1) > $ rpmlint -i libtopology-0.3-0.1.fc9.src.rpm > libtopology.src: E: description-line-too-long Libtopology is a library for > discovering the hardware topology on Linux systems. > Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding > this number, cut it to fit in two lines. Ah thanks. the rpmlint version in fc9 doesn't issue this warning. I've grabbed the version from rawhide. Fixed. --- rpmlint -i SRPMS/libtopology-0.3-0.2.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. --- > * Licence is: LGPLv2 (not GPLv2) So is is Fixed. > * Use %{_libdir} not %prefix/_lib as %_libdir is /usr/lib64 for > 64-bit multi-arch platforms. I swear I tried that and the .so files were landing in /usr/lib (on 64-bit). Fixed. > * Prefer "cp -p" or "install -p" when installing files. Fixed. .... Is that documented somewhere I missed? > * /usr/share/doc/libtopology-0.3/ is not included. > (Hint: Run "rpm -qlvp" on the built packages and notice missing > directory entries.) Ahh thank you for the hint! Fixed. > * Is it really desired to put the documentation into a separate package? > The pkg is not even 100K in size. I would add the docs to the -devel pkg. Fixed. Moved to the -devel package. New .specfile and .src.rpm at the same locations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 01:35:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 20:35:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100135.mAA1Z1d1012385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 01:34:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 20:34:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470756] New: Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 Summary: Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-HTTP/ghc-HTTP.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-HTTP/ghc-HTTP-3001.1.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A HTTP client library for Haskell http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/HTTP This package is needed to build cabal-install: the haskell package manager tool. (Please ignore the .fc9 tag and probably need to replace ghc_version with 6.8.3 for current rawhide (f10): ghc-6.10.1 is in koji but the version does not matter for this review: I will revert in the next update if necessary.:) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 01:56:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 20:56:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470754] Review Request: Pound - Pound is a reverse proxy, load balancer and HTTPS front-end for Web server(s) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100156.mAA1uQlR016522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470754 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-09 20:56:25 EDT --- closing this notabug. it already exists in Fedora https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/Pound yum install Pound will get it installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 02:30:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 21:30:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100230.mAA2UUxW015846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-09 21:30:29 EDT --- Here is on that actually builds in koji: had forgotten to specify ghc archs. Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-HTTP/ghc-HTTP.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-HTTP/ghc-HTTP-3001.1.4-2.fc9.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=923902 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 02:39:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 21:39:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100239.mAA2d6Yg024364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|tcallawa at redhat.com | --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-09 21:39:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Since nobody bites, I'll take this. First review pass > > 1. you're packaging a font with a new license. While at first view it seems ok, > you still need spot to approve it and put it on > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal_considerations_for_fonts See this https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-October/msg00022.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 03:33:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 22:33:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100333.mAA3X17x001825@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-09 22:33:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > * boost dependency > > - Well, when I try below to make build log more verbose > > (please consider this) > (...snip...) > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Here > > - This package seem to be using internal libboost_thread library. > > This should be changed so that mod_passenger.so uses external (system- > > widely provided) libboost_thread-mt.so library > > - Anyway Fedora specific compilation flags are not correctly honored. > > > > I seem unable to do this. Logfile attached Well, would you attach the log? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 04:21:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 23:21:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100421.mAA4LvoX003486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-09 23:21:56 EDT --- Note that if we only trust the code and docs in the tarball, the license is GPL+ as far as I can tell. If we additionally consult the web site, its GPLv2+. Unfortunately we have to be precise here. Ultimately, clarification from upstream is the best step. An email from them is sufficient; a fixed tarball is ideal but not necessary. Otherwise we'll wait to see what the legal folks have to say. The new package builds fine; rpmlint spews a no-documentation complaint about the -static package but that's nothing to worry about. About the library versioning thing, my concern is that something built against this package will end up needing -devel installed at runtime because the linker won't understand the different versioning convention and will end up with a dependency on libm4ri.so instead of libm4ri-0.0.20081029.so. This should be relatively easy to verify if you have some software which uses this library around to check. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 04:30:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 23:30:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100430.mAA4U0HW011805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 --- Comment #7 from Paul Wouters 2008-11-09 23:29:59 EDT --- Anyone wants to pick up the review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 05:03:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 00:03:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193271] Review Request: python-dns - DNS toolkit for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100503.mAA53wlg012919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193271 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey C. Ollie 2008-11-10 00:03:57 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-dns New Branches: EL-5 Owners: jcollie -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 05:12:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 00:12:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100512.mAA5C9nE021454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) | --- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH 2008-11-10 00:12:08 EDT --- Thank you for taking a review for this package. (In reply to comment #3) > 1. you're packaging a font with a new license. While at first view it seems ok, > you still need spot to approve it and put it on > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal_considerations_for_fonts I've already asked on fedora-legal-list, and just followed him to describe License tag - https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-October/msg00022.html > 2. please follow the font packaging process outlined on > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle > and in particular create a wiki page that describes your font and can be > referenced in release notes Just created: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Hanazono_font > 3. your fontconfig priority (59) is a little low, our guidelines states CJK > fonts should be in the 65-69 range > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Simple_priority_lists > > 4. your fontconfig rule is a bit more convoluted than what we usually do. It > probably works but please get Behdad to review it (and ok it there). I'd like to push this font prior to sazanami-mincho.ttf which we defaults for Serif for Japanese, because the quality is better than it. I'm not sure what's the right thing to do that for fontconfig config. that would be appreciated if someone could helps me. > 5. please also alias the font the other way, so fontconfig knows it should use > serif fonts to complete HanaMin > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Generic_names Fixed in the updated package. > 6. please send your fontconfig file to hanazano upstream so it's included in > their next release once you're happy with it Sure. > 7. you can drop the -f argument to fc-cache for releases ? Fedora 9 Can you update the template page as well to see what's the expected thing hereafter? > 8. please use the defattr suggested by guidelines %defattr(644,root,root,755) Sorry, missed one. fixed. > 9. it's a little easier to review a package when the fields are in the same > order as in rpmdevtool's spectemplate-fonts.spec (cosmetic, you can ignore it, > just take it into account for your next font package) Oh, wasn't aware of that. improved a bit in: Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 05:29:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 00:29:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469492] Review Request: bam - A fast and flexible build system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100529.mAA5TEhM024125@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469492 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 05:29:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 00:29:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462181] Review Request: teeworlds - Online multi-player platform 2D shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100529.mAA5TFYB024153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462181 Bug 462181 depends on bug 469492, which changed state. Bug 469492 Summary: Review Request: bam - A fast and flexible build system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469492 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 05:28:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 00:28:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100528.mAA5SGlk024050@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 Bernie Innocenti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bernie at codewiz.org --- Comment #4 from Bernie Innocenti 2008-11-10 00:28:14 EDT --- Current srpm builds on F9, but the init script searches for the server in the wrong location (/usr/libexec/mldonkey/mlnet instead of /usr/bin/mlnet). Apart from this small glitch, the server seems to work fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 06:13:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 01:13:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100613.mAA6Dnd7023965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 --- Comment #82 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-10 01:13:44 EDT --- scala-2.7.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/scala-2.7.2-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 06:57:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 01:57:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100657.mAA6vQVW008185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #13 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-11-10 01:57:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > The config file is the official way to adapt it to a particular platform. > > > > Unless you manage to make this patch adopted by upstream, you can consider this > > package and your request for sponsorship on hold. > > I don't understand this well. OK, more direct: 1. If you want to see this patch included into this package, ask the Debian upstream to include this patch into their sources and to change their package's behavior to rely on the implicit defaults. Right now, they are shipping this config file, they are relying upon, it's their package's documented behavor. > First, the configuration file is not required, just optional. Wrong, using this file is the official, nominal behavior. You are shipping a crippled and hacked package. 2. Your answers are demonstrating, that you might not be sufficiently skilled for contributing to Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 07:28:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 02:28:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470694] Review Request: rubygem-rack - Common API for connecting web frameworks, web servers and layers of software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100728.mAA7Slos003520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470694 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-10 02:28:46 EDT --- Well, * In comments and %changelog, please use %% instead of % so that macros won't be expanded. (Please fix this on Fedora CVS) Other things are okay. --------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-rack) is APPROVED by mtasaka --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 08:20:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 03:20:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100820.mAA8Kj5A012628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-10 03:20:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #3) > I've already asked on fedora-legal-list, and just followed him to describe > License tag - > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-October/msg00022.html If you could convince spot to publish this on his "licenses approved for fonts use" wiki page, that would make it easier for the next reviewers. Anyway > > 2. please follow the font packaging process outlined on > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle > > and in particular create a wiki page that describes your font and can be > > referenced in release notes > > Just created: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Hanazono_font Nice. You just need to remove the : before Category to activate them (fixed, I must rework the template help, everyone makes the same mistake) > > 3. your fontconfig priority (59) is a little low, our guidelines states CJK > > fonts should be in the 65-69 range > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Simple_priority_lists > > > > 4. your fontconfig rule is a bit more convoluted than what we usually do. It > > probably works but please get Behdad to review it (and ok it there). > > I'd like to push this font prior to sazanami-mincho.ttf which we defaults for > Serif for Japanese, because the quality is better than it. I'm not sure what's > the right thing to do that for fontconfig config. that would be appreciated if > someone could helps me. Ultimately, Behdad is the best judge of us all on fontconfig stuff. > > 5. please also alias the font the other way, so fontconfig knows it should use > > serif fonts to complete HanaMin > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Generic_names > > Fixed in the updated package. Nope, the rule I referenced would have been HanaMin serif The rule you added is equivalent to the one you already had, without the ja test. The fun thing is that your original rule needs to be placed after conf.d/65-nonlatin.conf to work, and your second rule needs to be placed before, so you can't use both in the same file :p Thus I'd advise to 1. keep your original rule 2. add the one I just wrote 3. use 66 as fontconfig prio 4. test test test > > 7. you can drop the -f argument to fc-cache for releases ? Fedora 9 > > Can you update the template page as well to see what's the expected thing > hereafter? It's documented in the comments nobody seems to read :) I'll drop it as soon as Fedora 8 in un-supported. > Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec > SRPM URL: > http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-2.fc9.src.rpm Appart from the fontconfig bit, you're almost there -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 08:39:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 03:39:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100839.mAA8d4B1024689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 --- Comment #7 from Conrad Meyer 2008-11-10 03:39:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Note that if we only trust the code and docs in the tarball, the license is > GPL+ as far as I can tell. If we additionally consult the web site, its > GPLv2+. Unfortunately we have to be precise here. Ultimately, clarification > from upstream is the best step. An email from them is sufficient; a fixed > tarball is ideal but not necessary. Otherwise we'll wait to see what the legal > folks have to say. Is an email from them much better than the front page of their website proclaiming GPLv2+? I've sent the maintainer an email about it anyways and await a reply. > The new package builds fine; rpmlint spews a no-documentation complaint about > the -static package but that's nothing to worry about. > > About the library versioning thing, my concern is that something built against > this package will end up needing -devel installed at runtime because the linker > won't understand the different versioning convention and will end up with a > dependency on libm4ri.so instead of libm4ri-0.0.20081029.so. This should be > relatively easy to verify if you have some software which uses this library > around to check. Sorry, I don't have any software around using this library. The goal is to eventually get Sage itself packaged properly, and this is one of the subprojects it encompasses. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 08:41:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 03:41:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100841.mAA8fd13025291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #14 from Javier Palacios 2008-11-10 03:41:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Wrong, using this file is the official, nominal behavior. You are shipping a > crippled and hacked package. > > 2. Your answers are demonstrating, that you might not be sufficiently skilled > for contributing to Fedora. OK. I understand this as a rejection. But could you kindly point me to the place where you learn that the config file is the "official" behaviour ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 08:51:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 03:51:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470533] Review Request: hunspell-tet - Tetum hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100851.mAA8pIpE017906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470533 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-10 03:51:16 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=924091 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. dd4d0b35446ea57435c06e2769083985 tet_ID.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 08:54:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 03:54:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470531] Review Request: hunspell-cop - Coptic hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100854.mAA8sYu6018336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470531 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-10 03:54:32 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=924087 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 030c28647ba1956b95e94cb1505bf4f5 dictionaries-cop.oxt + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. - license tag should be GPLv3 + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. Suggestions: From license-gpl.txt, license is GPLv3 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 08:59:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 03:59:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470532] Review Request: hunspell-eo - Esperanto hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100859.mAA8xA2F019266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470532 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-10 03:59:09 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=924089 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 518edcd9a9ecda594e519b2af1fd7e80 eo.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 09:30:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 04:30:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468466] Review Request: libgksu - Simple API for su and sudo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100930.mAA9UWrk002688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468466 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-10 04:30:31 EDT --- > iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 AUTHORS > AUTHORS.utf8; sed -i 's|\r$||g' AUTHORS.utf8; mv AUTHORS.utf8 AUTHORS Please kepp the timestamp of the files iconv --from=ISO-8859-1 --to=UTF-8 AUTHORS > AUTHORS.utf8 sed -i 's|\r$||g' AUTHORS.utf8 touch -c -r AUTHORS AUTHORS.utf8 mv AUTHORS.utf8 AUTHORS https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps > %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/%{name}2.pc Because of this, you need to put "Requires: pkgconfig" to the %package devel section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 09:29:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 04:29:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100929.mAA9Tx1Y025588@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #15 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-11-10 04:29:57 EDT --- in other words a mirror will wast 500 or more gigs of data, so there are no reason to store config file at $HOME, because the people will not create more than one mirror per machine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 09:32:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 04:32:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100932.mAA9WiA9002984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(boni.vivek at gmail. | |com) --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-10 04:32:40 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 09:51:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 04:51:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100951.mAA9pIMq029764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 --- Comment #8 from Conrad Meyer 2008-11-10 04:51:17 EDT --- Alright, I got a reply from the current maintainer. He has this to say: """ Hi, sorry for the mess. The software is definitely GPLv2+. The discrepancy in the source files is due to my inability to copy'n'paste the right legal blah. I can provide a new tarbar with updated legal stuff in the source files if needed. About: > In addition, this package seems to have a rather odd library versioning > convention. The usual method is to have the library version after > the ".so" but this package has it before. I'm afraid I don't understand why > it would be doing this differently than almost all other libraries. This difference is again not intentional. I though autotools would just do the right thing (tm) but somewhere on the line I seem to screw up setting that up. I will try to figure out where it went wrong and fix it somewhen in the near future. """ In other words, upstream is alive and well and is willing to work with us to get things done properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 09:57:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 04:57:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100957.mAA9vm5O007644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #16 from Javier Palacios 2008-11-10 04:57:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > in other words a mirror will wast 500 or more gigs of data, so there are no > reason to store config file at $HOME, because the people will not create more > than one mirror per machine. The only thing I can say to that is that I agree. You should ask the reason upwards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 10:25:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 05:25:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469811] Review Request: pdf2djvu - PDF to DjVu converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101025.mAAAPh8u013200@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469811 --- Comment #9 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-11-10 05:25:42 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 10:26:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 05:26:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469811] Review Request: pdf2djvu - PDF to DjVu converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101026.mAAAQ1u7004082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469811 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 10:32:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 05:32:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470792] New: Review Request: eclipse-shelled - Shell script editor plugin for Eclipse Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-shelled - Shell script editor plugin for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470792 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-shelled - Shell script editor plugin for Eclipse Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-shelled.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-shelled-1.0.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: ShellEd is a shell script editor for Eclipse. The great benefit of this plugin is the integration of man page information for content assist and text hover. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 11:05:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 06:05:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469527] Review Request: tcping - Check of TCP connection to a given IP/Port In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101105.mAAB5Dq2020091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469527 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-10 06:05:12 EDT --- 2008-11-10 Message sent to upstream about the licensing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 11:44:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 06:44:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468466] Review Request: libgksu - Simple API for su and sudo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101144.mAABiOMO017842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468466 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-10 06:44:23 EDT --- An appendix about the .desktop file. I was wrong...Upstream placed the file in this package, so it's ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 11:52:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 06:52:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101152.mAABqdts019568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) | --- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH 2008-11-10 06:52:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Nope, the rule I referenced would have been > > > HanaMin > > serif > > > > The rule you added is equivalent to the one you already had, without the ja > test. Doh, just referred the wrong thing.. :( > The fun thing is that your original rule needs to be placed after > conf.d/65-nonlatin.conf to work, and your second rule needs to be placed > before, so you can't use both in the same file :p Ah, ok. > Thus I'd advise to > 1. keep your original rule > 2. add the one I just wrote > 3. use 66 as fontconfig prio > 4. test test test Hmm, that seems not working. Sazanami Mincho is still used for Serif somehow. > > > > 7. you can drop the -f argument to fc-cache for releases ? Fedora 9 > > > > Can you update the template page as well to see what's the expected thing > > hereafter? > > It's documented in the comments nobody seems to read :) I'll drop it as soon as > Fedora 8 in un-supported. I meant in template file :) Though it may be not worth taking an effort for you because it's going to be EOL'd soon. BTW just noticed that I can't see any annotations on the template page. I had to do the view source to see. dunno if it's a problem on my browser, or mediawiki's bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 12:06:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 07:06:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468467] Review Request: gksu - Graphical frontend to su In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101206.mAAC6PAi022684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468467 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-10 07:06:24 EDT --- Some quick comments... - You added 'BuildRequires: gettext-devel' 'BuildRequires: gettext' is sufficient - I guess that all patches are coming from Debian. Am I right? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment - Is rpmlint not complaining about the NEWS file? - In this tarball is a .desktop file too. You should add it. libgksu: gksu-properties.desktop gksu: gksu.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 12:16:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 07:16:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101216.mAACGV4n001314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-10 07:16:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > > Thus I'd advise to > > 1. keep your original rule > > 2. add the one I just wrote > > 3. use 66 as fontconfig prio > > 4. test test test > > Hmm, that seems not working. Sazanami Mincho is still used for Serif somehow. Then does it work with 65? I thought I understood how fontconfig worked, but maybe I'm just another confused user > I meant in template file :) Though it may be not worth taking an effort for you > because it's going to be EOL'd soon. I'm rewriting all the templates anyway because of the number of multi-font packages we've had to process lately -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 12:42:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 07:42:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470531] Review Request: hunspell-cop - Coptic hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101242.mAACgFqR006113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470531 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-11-10 07:42:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-cop Short Description: Coptic hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 12:43:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 07:43:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470532] Review Request: hunspell-eo - Esperanto hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101243.mAACh5Ae006243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470532 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-11-10 07:43:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-eo Short Description: Esperanto hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 12:44:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 07:44:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470533] Review Request: hunspell-tet - Tetum hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101244.mAACiGBF030022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470533 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-11-10 07:44:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-tet Short Description: Tetum hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 14:04:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:04:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101404.mAAE4JID022957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-10 09:04:18 EDT --- My understa(In reply to comment #7) > Is an email from them much better than the front page of their website > proclaiming GPLv2+? Yes, unless you have some sort of copyright statement on the web site indicating that its authorship is the same as the software. I won't pretend to speak for the lawyers, but as I understand things the idea is to discern the intent of the copyright holders of the software. An email, while obviously not falsifiable by any stretch of the imagination, has been deemed sufficient for this purpose. Of course, that email must be included with the software as documentation. > Sorry, I don't have any software around using this library. Well, then your options are: * Find some way to test it by linking some code against it and seeing what happens. * Talk to someone who knows enough about the linker to answer the question. * Wait for upstream to change things. * Simply refuse to do one of the above and I'll return this ticket to the queue; perhaps someone will approve it over my objections. Let me know if this is what you prefer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 14:12:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:12:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467718] Review Request: rubygem-gruff - Beautiful graphs for one or multiple datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101412.mAAECSSp024709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467718 --- Comment #3 from Darryl L. Pierce 2008-11-10 09:12:27 EDT --- Three week followup: can somebody please review this package for me? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 14:21:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:21:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467718] Review Request: rubygem-gruff - Beautiful graphs for one or multiple datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101421.mAAELfrs017797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467718 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter 2008-11-10 09:21:40 EDT --- I'll take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 14:23:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:23:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101423.mAAENX7b026923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 --- Comment #7 from Hans de Goede 2008-11-10 09:23:32 EDT --- Getting there, getting there :) Must FIX: --------- * The Requires pkgconfig should be part of the -devel subpackage, not of the main package * Now that the libs are in barry-libs, barry-devel must require %{name}-libs = %{version}-%{release}, not just %{name} * Group for -libs should be: "Group: System Environment/Libraries" * The Summary for the gui subpackage is wrong: Summary: BlackBerry Desktop for Linux - bcharge, btool, breset and others But bcharge, btool and breset are in the main package. * These files and their matching Requires for dir ownership should be in the -libs packages, as users can also install just the gui tools + libs and then will still want to get these files: %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/udev/rules.d/* %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/security/console.perms.d/* %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/modprobe.d/blacklist-berry_charge * We do not ship static libraries, please remove this file after make install instead of shipping it: %{_libdir}/*.a (My fault I didn't catch this the first time) * I've tested it and using --disable-rpath does not work (it almost never does), so please use the provided sed commands instead Should FIX: ----------- * Please indent "udev .." to the same level as all the settings of all the other lines above this one: Requires: udev pam module-init-tools initscripts pkgconfig * As the -gui subpackage gets build unconditionally please move these BuildRequires up to the main BuildRequires portion and indent it as "udev ..": BuildRequires: gtkmm24-devel libglademm24-devel libglade2-devel libtar-devel desktop-file-utils Also note that you may use multiple BuildRequires lines below each other, please do so and make all these lines fit within 80 chars -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 14:23:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:23:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466764] Review Request: lensfun - A library to rectify the defects introduced by your photographic equipment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101423.mAAENNig018118@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466764 Darryl L. Pierce changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dpierce at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dpierce at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 14:28:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:28:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467718] Review Request: rubygem-gruff - Beautiful graphs for one or multiple datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101428.mAAES6BM019059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467718 --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter 2008-11-10 09:28:06 EDT --- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=924457 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 14:35:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:35:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205031] Review Request: python-telepathy - Python libraries for Telepathy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101435.mAAEZwMK029586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205031 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Brian Pepple 2008-11-10 09:35:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-telepathy Short Description: Python bindings for Telepathy Owners: morgan.collett at gmail.com, tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net Branches: OLPC-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 14:34:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:34:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 242790] Review Request: telepathy-glib - glib binding for the Telepathy D-Bus protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101434.mAAEYGN7028922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242790 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Brian Pepple 2008-11-10 09:34:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: telepathy-glib Short Description: GLib bindings for Telepathy Owners: morgan.collett at gmail.com, tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net Branches: OLPC-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 14:39:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:39:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 204417] Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101439.mAAEdW5i021205@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204417 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Brian Pepple 2008-11-10 09:39:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: telepathy-gabble Owners: morgan.collett at gmail.com, tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net Branches: OLPC-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 14:47:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:47:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466301] Review Request: ario - Music Player Daemon Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101447.mAAElQRK031575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466301 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-10 09:47:25 EDT --- Well, * In the comments or %changelog, please use %% instead of % to make it sure that macros won't be expanded in them (please fix it in Fedora CVS) Now + This package itself is now okay + As written on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored New Fedora packagers to be sponsored are requested to either - submit another review request with enough quality - do a "pre-review" of other person's review request You have another review request (bug 470703). While there is something which needs fixing, it seems good to some extent. ------------------------------------------------------------------ This package (ario) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------------ Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9/10, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 14:50:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:50:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466764] Review Request: lensfun - A library to rectify the defects introduced by your photographic equipment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101450.mAAEoBhk023283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466764 --- Comment #6 from Darryl L. Pierce 2008-11-10 09:50:09 EDT --- The RPM fails to build: RPM build errors: File not found: /home/mcpierce/Programming/rpms/tmp/lensfun-0.2.2b-2.fc9-root-mcpierce/usr/share/doc/lensfun-0.2.2b/manual Specfile contains: (mcpierce at mcpierce-laptop:lensfun)$ grep manual * lensfun.spec:make AUTODEP=0 %{?_smp_mflags} lensfun manual \ lensfun.spec:%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/manual/ but no such file or directory exists in the source tarball or build directory. MUST HAVES: [ ] rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [ ] The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . [ ] The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . [ ] The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . [X] The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [X] The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [X] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [X] The spec file must be written in American English. [ ] The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). [ ] The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. When I tried to retrieve the source tarball via wget: wget http://prdownload.berlios.de/lensfun/lensfun-0.2.2b.tar.bz2 it retrieved a webpage and not the sources. [ ] The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [ ] If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 [X] All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [ ] The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [ ] Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig [ ] If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [ ] A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. [X] A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [ ] Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [ ] Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). [ ] Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . [ ] The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . [ ] Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) [ ] If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [ ] Header files must be in a -devel package. [ ] Static libraries must be in a -static package. [ ] Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [ ] If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [X] In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [X] Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [ ] Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [ ] Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [X] At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. [ ] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD HAVES: [ ] If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [ ] The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [ ] The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. [ ] The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [ ] The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [ ] If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [ ] Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [ ] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [X] If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Please see File Dependencies in the Guidelines for further information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 14:55:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:55:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466764] Review Request: lensfun - A library to rectify the defects introduced by your photographic equipment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101455.mAAEtuJH024365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466764 --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter 2008-11-10 09:55:55 EDT --- built fine here? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=877655 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 15:11:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:11:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101511.mAAFBMlK027641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #30 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-11-10 10:11:15 EDT --- Package Change Request ======================= Package Name: alliance Short Description: Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem Owners: chitlesh Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 15:09:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:09:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470830] New: Review Request: open64 - The Open64 compiler suite (C, C++, Fortran) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: open64 - The Open64 compiler suite (C, C++, Fortran) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 Summary: Review Request: open64 - The Open64 compiler suite (C, C++, Fortran) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/open64.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/open64-4.2-1.el5.src.rpm Description: Open64 is a set of C, C++ and Fortran compilers. Open64 is the final result of research contributions from a number of compiler groups around the world. Formerly known as Pro64, Open64 was initially created by SGI and licensed under the GNU Public License (GPL). It was derived from SGI's MIPSPro compiler. Open64 also derives from work done by Intel Corp, in conjunction with the Chinese Academy of Sciences. They created the Open Research Compiler (ORC), a specially modified version of Open64 with custom modifications for researchers. These changes were later folded back into the main Open64 source tree in 2005. rpmlint output: open64.x86_64: W: no-documentation open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2/32/libstdc++.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2/libgcc.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2/libffio.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2/32/libmv.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2/32/libopenmp.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2/libmv.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2/32/libfortran.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2/libopenmp.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2/32/libgcc.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2/32/libinstr.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2/libstdc++.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2/libfortran.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2/32/libffio.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2/libinstr.a open64-debuginfo.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/open64-4.2-0/osprey/crayf90/sgi/cwh_types.i ../../SPECS/open64.spec:51: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build export TOOLROOT=%{buildroot}/usr ../../SPECS/open64.spec:73: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/gcc-lib/* 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 16 warnings. devel-file-in-non-devel-package warnings also come with gcc, so that shouldn't be a problem. script-without-shebang affects debuginfo package, no problem. rpm-buildroot-usage is not a problem. hardcoded-library-path warning is erroneous. Also gcc installs in /usr/lib/gcc-lib/ . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 15:17:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:17:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467718] Review Request: rubygem-gruff - Beautiful graphs for one or multiple datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101517.mAAFH07s005039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467718 --- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter 2008-11-10 10:16:59 EDT --- rpmlint clean. Following: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby Looks pretty good One comment: 1. License: GPLv2+ or Ruby where does this come from? In the archive, all I can find is MIT-LICENSE http://github.com/topfunky/gruff/tree/master/MIT-LICENSE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 15:18:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:18:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101518.mAAFIWdZ028963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Terje R??sten 2008-11-10 10:18:29 EDT --- Ok, everything is fine here now: APPROVED Now it blocks on FE-NEEDSPONSOR, I am not a sponsor and can't help you there. Anyway I would recommend that you do some reviews, more info here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 15:29:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:29:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466764] Review Request: lensfun - A library to rectify the defects introduced by your photographic equipment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101529.mAAFT5BV031042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466764 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 15:28:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:28:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466764] Review Request: lensfun - A library to rectify the defects introduced by your photographic equipment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101528.mAAFSEfI030865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466764 --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter 2008-11-10 10:28:13 EDT --- For the manual, that's supposed to get generated at buildtime via doxygen. Noticed a new upstream release while checking/fixing Source URL, I'll rev the pkg, and issue a new koji scratch build here in a jiffy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 15:40:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:40:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467718] Review Request: rubygem-gruff - Beautiful graphs for one or multiple datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101540.mAAFeUJ5010129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467718 --- Comment #7 from Darryl L. Pierce 2008-11-10 10:40:29 EDT --- Updated the license: SPEC: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-gruff.spec SRPM: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-gruff-0.3.4-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 15:37:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:37:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466764] Review Request: lensfun - A library to rectify the defects introduced by your photographic equipment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101537.mAAFbIPO009451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466764 --- Comment #9 from Rex Dieter 2008-11-10 10:37:17 EDT --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/lensfun/lensfun.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/lensfun/lensfun-0.2.3-1.src.rpm scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=924553 %changelog * Mon Nov 10 2008 Rex Dieter 0.2.3-1 - lensfun-0.2.3 - fix SOURCE Url - configure --target=..generic -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 15:47:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:47:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467718] Review Request: rubygem-gruff - Beautiful graphs for one or multiple datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101547.mAAFlX5S011439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467718 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter 2008-11-10 10:47:32 EDT --- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 15:59:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:59:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466764] Review Request: lensfun - A library to rectify the defects introduced by your photographic equipment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101559.mAAFxD8S013541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466764 --- Comment #10 from Darryl L. Pierce 2008-11-10 10:59:12 EDT --- Retested with the previous checklist. The following is the only area where the package slipped. [ ] Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). The spec file doesn't contain this Requires entry. Otherwise, things look good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 16:03:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:03:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466764] Review Request: lensfun - A library to rectify the defects introduced by your photographic equipment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101603.mAAG3AAk014665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466764 --- Comment #11 from Rex Dieter 2008-11-10 11:03:09 EDT --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/lensfun/lensfun.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/lensfun/lensfun-0.2.3-2.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Nov 10 2008 Rex Dieter 0.2.3-2 - -devel: Requires: pkgconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 16:08:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:08:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466764] Review Request: lensfun - A library to rectify the defects introduced by your photographic equipment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101608.mAAG8ROO015827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466764 --- Comment #12 from Darryl L. Pierce 2008-11-10 11:08:26 EDT --- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 16:08:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:08:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466764] Review Request: lensfun - A library to rectify the defects introduced by your photographic equipment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101608.mAAG8k5m015892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466764 Darryl L. Pierce changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 16:08:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:08:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469998] Review Request: nightview - A general astronomical software package to control of a CCD camera In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101608.mAAG8i3O015869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469998 --- Comment #4 from Marek Mahut 2008-11-10 11:08:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > 2) gcc 4.3 problem: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=918010&name=build.log > > Also fixed. Not really yet: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=924599&name=build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 16:10:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:10:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467718] Review Request: rubygem-gruff - Beautiful graphs for one or multiple datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101610.mAAGAQrL016439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467718 Darryl L. Pierce changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Darryl L. Pierce 2008-11-10 11:10:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-gruff Short Description: Beautiful graphs for one or multiple datasets Owners: mcpierce Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 16:15:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:15:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466764] Review Request: lensfun - A library to rectify the defects introduced by your photographic equipment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101615.mAAGFAdM008468@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466764 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Rex Dieter 2008-11-10 11:15:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lensfun Short Description: A library to rectify the defects introduced by your photographic equipment Owners: rdieter Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 16:16:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:16:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461678] Review Request: purple-microblog - Libpurple plug-in supporting microblog services like Twitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101616.mAAGGGIZ017542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461678 Stu Tomlinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ismael at olea.org --- Comment #14 from Stu Tomlinson 2008-11-10 11:16:13 EDT --- *** Bug 470836 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 16:29:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:29:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101629.mAAGT4NA020203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #20 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-11-10 11:29:01 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=924578 Package was also tested in F-8 x86_64 with rpmbuild (using a fresh libsamplerate 0.14) You could just enable shared build for libsamplerate since it was updated in july for rawhide and just today for F-8/F-9. Since ABI has been preserved I will try to push it... in F-8/F-9 The default directories are accurate even for lib64 systems. That was the remaining issue from my previous runtime test. --------------------- This package is APPROVED by me. --------------------- Please enable BR: libsamplerate >= 0.1.3 before import -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 16:28:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:28:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mz - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101628.mAAGSK1U011257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #11 from Patrice Dumas 2008-11-10 11:28:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > I don't expect any collisions with other tools that name. There are 676 > possibilities of 2-letter names This looks like a joke to me. 676 is so small compared with the number of free software packages and command-line applications. > I asked Debian Maintainers for their opinion and they also had no problem > with "mz". That's a bit strange, since in general debian maintainers tend to be aware of those issues. > Please suggest before I upload an updated SRPM and SPEC I don't have much to suggest. Tibbs is working on a guideline that should prevent such use of names, but there is no guarantee that it will be agreed by the FPC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 16:35:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:35:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mz - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101635.mAAGZFj4021778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #12 from Patrice Dumas 2008-11-10 11:35:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Please suggest before I upload an updated SRPM and SPEC Something I forgot to say is that currently using mz is not against the guidelines, so you could find a reviewer wanting to accept the package as-is. It won't be me, but there are plenty of fedora packagers and some don't care a bit about generic names. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 16:36:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:36:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195678] Review Request: redland-bindings - bindings for the redland RDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101636.mAAGaUZ8012790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195678 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu Blocks|201449 | --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-10 11:36:29 EDT --- I don't understand how you see this as a structural problem; I was here and willing to review this package, but you failed to respond. If you want a review now, a good place to start would be to make sure the package still builds and to release any updates that are necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 16:38:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:38:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101638.mAAGcn7W013051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #26 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-10 11:38:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 16:43:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:43:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469590] Review Request: cpuid - Dumps information about the CPU(s) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101643.mAAGhnah023344@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469590 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-10 11:43:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 16:43:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:43:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101643.mAAGhUG4023231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-11-10 11:43:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > What I am in trouble is that > - What functions in ext/apache2/Hooks.cpp are actually based on mod_scgi codes > - And I don't know for now how these functions are used in the other parts > of passenger source codes > - So I am not sure if the code in Hooks.cpp under CNRI license won't conflict > with GPL. > > spot, how do you think about this. For me the current status seems very > obscure. Problem 1: The functions which are copied are not marked, thus, the code is being reused without proper attribution. This means that the upstream for rubygem-passenger is in violation of the terms of the CNRI License: "3. In the event Licensee prepares a derivative work that is based on or incorporates scgi-1.9 or any part thereof, and wants to make the derivative work available to others as provided herein, then Licensee hereby agrees to include in any such work a brief summary of the changes made to scgi-1.9." No such summary exists. Problem 2: You cannot copy code which is under a GPLv2-incompatible license into a source file which is marked as GPLv2, then compile it into a larger GPLv2 program. So, even if we knew which functions were copied, it almost certainly wouldn't matter. This code is non-distributable. Unfortunately, there seems to be no easy way to fix Problem 2 (Problem 1 is easy enough to fix by the rubygem-passenger upstream). All releases of the mod_scgi code are under the CNRI license (although, changes made after 1.10 are under MIT). Some methods of fixing this issue would be: 1. Removing all of the copied code from mod_scgi 1.09, then replacing it either with clean-room written code (aka, code written by someone who has never looked at mod_scgi) or restructuring the rubygem-passenger code so that it is not necessary. 2. Getting permission from CNRI to use that code under different (GPLv2 compatible) terms. They seem to use MIT for changes to that codebase these days, perhaps they would give permission for the copied code to be used under those terms? However, until this issue is resolved, this one can't go any farther, sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 16:46:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:46:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470140] Review Request: nettee - Network "tee" program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101646.mAAGkjdk014803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470140 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-10 11:46:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 16:44:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:44:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466764] Review Request: lensfun - A library to rectify the defects introduced by your photographic equipment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101644.mAAGixMv014137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466764 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-10 11:44:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 16:46:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:46:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453412] Review Request: gtk-aurora-engine - Aurora theme engine for gtk2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101646.mAAGk9wb014724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453412 John Anderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tuomas.mursu at kaps | |i.fi) --- Comment #5 from John Anderson 2008-11-10 11:46:07 EDT --- Looking pretty good, a few things: 1) You can safely remove the "Requires: gtk2", gtk2-devel should take care of that 2) I looked at the names of other gtk engine packages, and they all followed the format gtk-engine-name I think gtk-engine-aurora would be a better fit 3) I see a minor ownership problem for %{_libdir}/gtk-2.0, see below 4) I would consider putting the themes in a subpackage Please remember to increment the version and update the changelog NEEDSWORK for now. MUST Items: OK - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. FIX - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines The rest of the gtk engines in Fedora follow the format gtk-engine-name, I would stick with that and change to gtk-engine-aurora OK - MUST: The spec file named in the format %{name}.spec OK - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Ok - MUST: License text included in doc OK - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. 95e8dab631202504d27eb9925f13317f OK - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK - MUST: Builds on all archs OK - MUST: All build dependencies listed OK - MUST: No locales OK - MUST: No ldconfig needed OK - MUST: Not relocated OK - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. OK - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK - MUST: No large docs OK - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK - MUST: No headers OK - MUST: No static libraries OK - MUST: No pkgconfig OK - MUST: No library files with a suffix OK - MUST: N/A no devel for devel name OK - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK - MUST: Not a GUI app, no .desktop needed FIX - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. package owns /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0 and /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines In files I'd make this change %{_libdir}/gtk-2.0/*/engines/* OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: OK - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. Theme works well -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 16:47:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:47:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457888] Review Request: fwknop - A Single Packet Authorization (SPA) implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101647.mAAGlaQa024270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457888 Miloslav Trmac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 16:49:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:49:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470533] Review Request: hunspell-tet - Tetum hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101649.mAAGniG9024570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470533 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-10 11:49:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 16:48:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:48:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470531] Review Request: hunspell-cop - Coptic hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101648.mAAGmGEG015183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470531 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-10 11:48:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 16:49:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:49:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470532] Review Request: hunspell-eo - Esperanto hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101649.mAAGn8fm015274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470532 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-10 11:49:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 16:51:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:51:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467718] Review Request: rubygem-gruff - Beautiful graphs for one or multiple datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101651.mAAGp5e6015828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467718 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-10 11:51:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 16:53:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:53:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452749] Review Request: ocp - Open Cubic Player for MOD/S3M/XM/IT/SID/MIDI music files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101653.mAAGrDo9025422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452749 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-10 11:53:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 16:56:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:56:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101656.mAAGuXr4017148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #31 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-10 11:56:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 16:57:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:57:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101657.mAAGv5wJ026473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #34 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-10 11:57:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 16:56:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:56:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426985] Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101656.mAAGuQaZ026400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426985 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #25 from Adam Tkac 2008-11-10 11:56:23 EDT --- Package were built, closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 17:01:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:01:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208200] Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101701.mAAH14Sv027455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208200 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? --- Comment #28 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-11-10 12:01:01 EDT --- Package Change Request ======================= Package Name: toped Short Description: IC Layout Editor Owners: chitlesh Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 16:58:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:58:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 204417] Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101658.mAAGwrpT017756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204417 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-10 11:58:52 EDT --- Please use FAS names for owners. ;) cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 17:02:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:02:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432239] Review Request: electronics-menu - Electronics Menu for the Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101702.mAAH2cVm027797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432239 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-10 12:02:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 17:02:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:02:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205031] Review Request: python-telepathy - Python libraries for Telepathy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101702.mAAH22nx027723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205031 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-10 12:02:01 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 17:03:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:03:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 242790] Review Request: telepathy-glib - glib binding for the Telepathy D-Bus protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101703.mAAH3WnR018943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242790 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-10 12:03:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 17:06:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:06:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208200] Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101706.mAAH6FJV028604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208200 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #29 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-10 12:06:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 17:14:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:14:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101714.mAAHEPng029880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 Levente Farkas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lfarkas at lfarkas.org --- Comment #1 from Levente Farkas 2008-11-10 12:14:24 EDT --- please apply this patch to be able to build on epel too: --- mingw32-libxml2.spec.lfarkas 2008-11-10 18:03:16.000000000 +0100 +++ mingw32-libxml2.spec 2008-11-10 18:06:52.000000000 +0100 @@ -40,6 +40,9 @@ %build +%if 0%{?fedora} < 9 +autoreconf +%endif LDFLAGS="-no-undefined" %{_mingw32_configure} --without-python --with-modules make -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 17:24:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:24:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101724.mAAHO3sP023212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 --- Comment #2 from Levente Farkas 2008-11-10 12:24:01 EDT --- at the same time in the files section this two lines: ------------------------------------------- %{_mingw32_libdir}/pkgconfig %{_mingw32_libdir}/pkgconfig/libxml-2.0.pc ------------------------------------------- should have to change to ------------------------------------------- %{_mingw32_libdir}/pkgconfig/ %{_mingw32_libdir}/pkgconfig/libxml-2.0.pc ------------------------------------------- or imho better to delete the second line: ------------------------------------------- %{_mingw32_libdir}/pkgconfig ------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 17:30:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:30:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101730.mAAHUDIk024748@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 Bug 455426 depends on bug 467029, which changed state. Bug 467029 Summary: please update the package version to 3.0.7 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467029 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 17:38:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:38:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101738.mAAHcYKd026376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 --- Comment #3 from Levente Farkas 2008-11-10 12:38:33 EDT --- and may be add an aclocal before the autoreconf would be useful to so the correct patch see bellow and the reason for rerun autoconf is that rhel/centos has older autoconf and automake and the auto generated file was generated by newer tools, but with this patch it can be compiled on rhel/centos without need for newer auto* packages. --- mingw32-libxml2.spec.lfarkas 2008-11-10 18:03:16.000000000 +0100 +++ mingw32-libxml2.spec 2008-11-10 18:35:10.000000000 +0100 @@ -40,6 +40,10 @@ %build +%if 0%{?fedora} < 9 +aclocal +autoreconf +%endif LDFLAGS="-no-undefined" %{_mingw32_configure} --without-python --with-modules make -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 17:44:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:44:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101744.mAAHiKRN027324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-11-10 12:44:19 EDT --- Levente, I'll bear these changes in mind when we actually add this package. It doesn't affect the Fedora review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 17:42:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:42:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 204417] Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101742.mAAHgaRr027156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204417 --- Comment #15 from Brian Pepple 2008-11-10 12:42:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Please use FAS names for owners. ;) Sorry, totally forgot. Tells you how long it's been since I've had to request a branch. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 17:48:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:48:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470830] Review Request: open64 - The Open64 compiler suite (C, C++, Fortran) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101748.mAAHmSF7028213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-10 12:48:27 EDT --- Unless I'm mistaken, gcc hasn't used /usr/lib/gcc-lib since 2.96. Unless you're going to have a dependency on compat-libgcc-296, this package will leave /usr/lib/gcc-lib unowned. Current gcc seems to use /usr/lib/gcc, even on x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 17:47:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:47:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101747.mAAHlZhw028056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #10 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-11-10 12:47:34 EDT --- When no other information is available, and we have a high degree of confidence that the website is maintained/created by the copyright holder of the licensed, we can use it as licensing intent (or versioning intent). It's always preferrable to get upstream to clarify this specifically, which you've done. Ideally, you'll want to get upstream to specifically note this in the source tarball, with proper code attribution (see: http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-howto.html , search for "copying permission statement"). Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 17:53:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:53:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466764] Review Request: lensfun - A library to rectify the defects introduced by your photographic equipment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101753.mAAHrx9u004724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466764 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-10 12:53:59 EDT --- lensfun-0.2.3-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lensfun-0.2.3-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 17:56:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:56:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466301] Review Request: ario - Music Player Daemon Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101756.mAAHuBha029775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466301 --- Comment #10 from John F 2008-11-10 12:56:10 EDT --- Hi Mamoru, I have applied to "Fedora Packager CVS Commit Group (packager)" in FAS. Thank you for all your help! John -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 17:53:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:53:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466764] Review Request: lensfun - A library to rectify the defects introduced by your photographic equipment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101753.mAAHrRja029170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466764 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-10 12:53:26 EDT --- lensfun-0.2.3-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lensfun-0.2.3-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 18:07:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:07:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470830] Review Request: open64 - The Open64 compiler suite (C, C++, Fortran) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101807.mAAI7KOb007563@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-10 13:07:19 EDT --- A koji build has failed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=924836 Looks like you're missing a build dependency on csh. Have you been able to build this package in mock or koji? Are you sure this works on PPC? I don't see any mention of PPC on the upstream web pages. I doubt it works on ARM, Sparc or Alpha, either. You will almost certainly need an ExcludeArch: or ExclusiveArch: statement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 18:07:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:07:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101807.mAAI7W0j007605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 --- Comment #8 from Christopher D. Stover 2008-11-10 13:07:31 EDT --- Yes! Getting closer. =) I'm sorry, I should have caught some of those fixes you put in the last comment so I hope you don't think I'm trying to torture you. I really do appreciate all your help! [Chris at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint barry.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [Chris at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/barry-* 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. %{_mandir}/man1/ and %{_datadir}/applications/ are owned by filesystem. Do I need to add a Requires for that or just leave it out since I would assume it's pretty standard to have in every system? I added the sed commands in there so hopefully the Rpath problem is resolved. I'm half tempted to merge the gui package and main package with command line utilities. Upstream has them separated but I see no reason to separate the single gui program from everything else. It just seems like extra work for the end user to install another package. What do you think? Any reason not to do this? SRPM: http://8uxodw.bay.livefilestore.com/y1pxYRuced4yd5SYGYEd0OdOc4HaHOKqTMeFGB1XvaCqgGoTv2lBmjZsvcY6wHZbTJcY5e4eSusYB_Pq0-Gxm333Q/barry-0.14-3.fc10.src.rpm?download SPEC: http://8uxodw.bay.livefilestore.com/y1pxYRuced4yd6JBXr2Z-CQqsy3UJmOHAdlbNgSGd2MssbkpTlCm5U7FowYLUs2X0X9W3WEBh8e-EQLyVrWKRQQtQ/barry.spec?download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 18:08:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:08:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101808.mAAI8NhO032209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|466301 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 18:08:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:08:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466301] Review Request: ario - Music Player Daemon Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101808.mAAI8LT5032170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466301 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841, 470703 | --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-10 13:08:20 EDT --- Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 18:13:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:13:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470626] Review Request: balance - TCP load-balancing proxy server with round robin and failover mechanisms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101813.mAAIDW3b000740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470626 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-10 13:13:31 EDT --- Some comments on your spec file: - 'Patch0: disable_IPV6_V6ONLY_check_for_now.patch' Where is patch coming from? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PatchUpstreamStatus - Where is balance.pdf (manual page) from the source going? I thinks that this pdf is not really necessary but what are the guidelines telling? - You can simplify your %build section if you like by summarize the commands mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_sbindir} install -m 755 balance %{buildroot}%{_sbindir}/%{name} -> install -Dp -m 0755 %{name} %{buildroot}%{_sbindir}/%{name} and mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1 install -m 644 balance.1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1 -> install -Dp -m 0644 %{name}.1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1 - %dir /var/run/balance should be -> %dir %{_localstatedir}/run/%{name} %{_localstatedir} is mandatory, using the %{name} macro optional Package consistently uses macros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 18:26:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:26:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435017] Review Request: SSM - coordinate superposition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101826.mAAIQkkQ003118@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435017 --- Comment #12 from Tim Fenn 2008-11-10 13:26:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > For -8: > > * License > - The license tag should be LGPLv2+. > Fixed. > * BuildRequires > - This package won't build without "BuildRequires: mmdb-devel". > Fixed. > * configure option > ------------------------------------------------------------ > 55 ++ pkg-config --variable=prefix mmdb > 56 + ./configure --build=i386-redhat-linux-gnu > --host=i386-redhat-linux-gnu --target=i386-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix= > --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin > --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include > --libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var > --sharedstatedir=/usr/com --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info > --with-mmdb=/usr --disable-static > 57 configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-mmdb > ------------------------------------------------------------ > - Is the option "--with-mmdb=foo" useful? > I forgot to include a patch to one of the makefiles to go along with the configure patch - fixed. > * Timestamps > ------------------------------------------------------------ > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install='install -p' > ------------------------------------------------------------ > - The last argument should be "INSTALL='install -p'". > Fixed. > * Document > - There is no need that -devel subpackage should own the same > document files in main package. > Removed. > * rpmlint > ** undefined-non-weak-symbol > - "$ rpmlint ssm" (please try rpmlint for 'installed' ssm) shows > that libssm.so.0 contains many undefined non-weak symbols. > ! You can check this also by $ ldd -r %_libdir/libssm.so.0 > For packages providing -devel subpackage this cannot be > allowed because this causes linkage error. > > I guess making libssm.so linked against libmmdb.so will fix this > issue > (because > LD_PRELOAD=%_libdir/libmmdb.so.0.0.0 ldd -r %_libdir/libssm.so.0.0.0 > shows no undefined non-weak symbols) Yeah, this all gets cleaned up with proper linking to libmmdb. new spec: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/ssm.spec new srpm: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/ssm-0.1-9.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 18:27:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:27:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101827.mAAIRGjO003255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #2 from John F 2008-11-10 13:27:15 EDT --- http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~jhford/fedora/links.spec http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~jhford/fedora/links-2.2-2.fc10.src.rpm Added a missing dependency. I have also modified %build to ensure that static libraries are built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 18:41:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:41:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101841.mAAIf384014913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-10 13:41:02 EDT --- Henrique, do you have another review request by you or have any pre-review for other person's review request? To follow Fedora policy written on HowToGetSponsored wiki, I request new packages to do either of the two I wrote above. If you choose to do a pre-review of other person's review request, - Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") - Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 18:36:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:36:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101836.mAAIaW0h013697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-10 13:36:30 EDT --- For -5: (In reply to comment #11) > For 1.12.4-3: > * Compiler flags > - Fedora uses "-O2" compiler flags (, which can be checked by > $ rpm --eval %optflags ), which is replaced by the latter "-O0", > which needs fixing. - This issue is not yet fixed. This can be fixed by ------------------------------------------------ %prep %setup -q -n quickfix %patch0 -p1 %patch1 -p1 sed -i.flags -e 's|-O0 -g||' src/C++/test/Makefile.in %build %configure --enable-shared ...... ------------------------------------------------ * Requires - Now "BuildRequires: boost-devel" is added, HAVE_BOOST_FAST_POOL_ALLOCATOR is defined on config.h and this affects installed config.h (however see below: usually config.h must not be installed) So now quickfix-devel should have "Requires: boost-devel", too * Excluding .la files - I prefer to use ------------------------------------------------ rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.la ------------------------------------------------ instead of using %exclude in this case. - Anyway if you use %exclude, please write this line after %defattr(-,root,root,-) line (otherwise rpmlint complains) * autotool generated header files inclusion - -devel subpackage installs autotool generated "config.h" as a header file. This must be avoid, because shipping "config.h" will easily cause namespace conflict when compiling codes with quickfix-devel: c.f. bug 208034 comment 43 A quick workaround can be: - rename installed "config.h" to "quickfix-config.h" - and the line #include "config.h" in installed Utility.h to "#include "quickfix-config.h"". Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 19:11:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:11:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101911.mAAJB7k4020759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-10 14:11:06 EDT --- Just some quick comments on your spec file: - iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/AUTHORS -o \ %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/AUTHORS You didn't preserve the time stamp https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps - desktop-file-install --vendor="fedora" Vendor tag 'fedora' is no longer used, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/DesktopFileVendor - gzip $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_mandir}/man1/links.1 This is not necessary, install only the non-gzipped man page (as links.1), it is compressed automatically during rpm build process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 19:18:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:18:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470140] Review Request: nettee - Network "tee" program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101918.mAAJIAAu022093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470140 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-10 14:18:09 EDT --- nettee-0.1.9-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nettee-0.1.9-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 19:19:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:19:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469590] Review Request: cpuid - Dumps information about the CPU(s) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101919.mAAJJcpF022296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469590 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-10 14:19:37 EDT --- cpuid-20060917-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cpuid-20060917-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 19:19:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:19:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469590] Review Request: cpuid - Dumps information about the CPU(s) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101919.mAAJJZr4022268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469590 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-10 14:19:34 EDT --- cpuid-20060917-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cpuid-20060917-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 19:18:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:18:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470140] Review Request: nettee - Network "tee" program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101918.mAAJID6w013822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470140 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-10 14:18:12 EDT --- nettee-0.1.9-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nettee-0.1.9-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 19:19:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:19:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101919.mAAJJbWn013945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 --- Comment #9 from Hans de Goede 2008-11-10 14:19:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > %{_mandir}/man1/ and %{_datadir}/applications/ are owned by filesystem. So are /usr/bin, /usr/lib, etc. filesystem is a pretty MUST have package, and about the first package to get installed, so ... > Do I > need to add a Requires for that or just leave it out since I would assume it's > pretty standard to have in every system? > You can leave it out :) > I added the sed commands in there so hopefully the Rpath problem is resolved. > Yip, those work (I already tested that before advising to use them) > I'm half tempted to merge the gui package and main package with command line > utilities. Upstream has them separated but I see no reason to separate the > single gui program from everything else. It just seems like extra work for the > end user to install another package. What do you think? I'm fine with merging those 2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 19:26:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:26:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461358] Review Request: weplab - Analyzing WEP encryption security on wireless networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101926.mAAJQP81015342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461358 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-10 14:26:24 EDT --- weplab-0.1.5-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/weplab-0.1.5-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 19:33:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:33:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101933.mAAJXEjZ016553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-10 14:33:13 EDT --- By the way - All codes are under GPLv2+ (or no license) and HTML files are under GFDL, so the license tag must be "GPLv2+ and GFDL". - This package uses some files from Python powerwidgets "Pmw", which is actually in Fedora as "python-pmw" (bug 462250: I reviewed...). Is it possible to make this package use system-wide python-pmw? (simply creating symlinks will be easier?) - I guess packaging oasa seperately will be better. http://bkchem.zirael.org/oasa_en.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 19:43:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:43:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443675] Review Request: sip-redirect - Tiny IPv4 and IPv6 SIP redirect server written in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101943.mAAJhmfk027157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443675 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-10 14:43:46 EDT --- sip-redirect-0.1.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sip-redirect-0.1.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 19:44:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:44:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469494] Review Request: xlcrack - Recover lost and forgotten passwords from XLS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101944.mAAJiaW9027241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469494 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-10 14:44:35 EDT --- Thanks Jason for your review and your tip about the solving of the compiler flags issue. With your compiler flags the tool works fine as far as I can evaluate this. [fab at laptop024 test_excel]$ xlcrack test_excel_95_01.xls test_excel_95_01.xls: uses strong cryptography This tool only works on XOR cryptography (e.g. Excel 95) [fab at laptop024 test_excel]$ xlcrack test_excel_95_02.xls test_excel_95_02.xls: is not encrypted [fab at laptop024 test_excel]$ xlcrack test_excel_95_03.xls test_excel_95_03.xls: has no password, see documentation Update: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/xlcrack.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/xlcrack-1.2-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 19:42:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:42:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101942.mAAJglMF018484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Berrange 2008-11-10 14:42:46 EDT --- The comments from #2/#3 don't make any sense. The RPM specfile for libxml isn't making any changes to any Makefile.am or configure.in files, so running autoreconf serves no purpose. It does not matter whether the version of autotools the configure script was generated with is newer than that on the host OS, because when compiling a package the generated 'configure' and "Makefile" scripts are purposely self-contained at runtime. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 19:52:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:52:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470830] Review Request: open64 - The Open64 compiler suite (C, C++, Fortran) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101952.mAAJqhsf029058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-10 14:52:43 EDT --- Thanks, noted and changed. Added reqs: gcc to fix problem with dir ownership. I was just going to fix the arch problem :) Now the package builds in mock, had to add a few BRs. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/open64.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/open64-4.2-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 19:53:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:53:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468562] Review Request: basket - Taking care of your ideas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101953.mAAJr7NW020465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468562 --- Comment #10 from Christopher D. Stover 2008-11-10 14:53:06 EDT --- [Chris at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint basket.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [Chris at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/basket-* basket.i386: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libbasketcommon.so libbasketcommon.so 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. Sorry for not responding to this sooner. I don't remember seeing an email about you making a comment. Anyway, I've fixed the problems from your last comment and created a bug upstream in regards to the so names. I also made a couple other changes: * added a Requires: hicolor-icon-theme * fixed some directory ownership issues in the main package -- I went back to what the previous maintainer was using in the old spec file * added %post and %postun in the kontact package SRPM: http://8uxodw.bay.livefilestore.com/y1pN1smuHPWD_G_o-6GvqfMrFFWKQ_QCWQvrjo2nLWZCgdW97SAKm-VMF5KDYPNnvYI2flfsP6jt1nxvVzO3DcpVQ/basket-1.0.3.1-2.fc10.src.rpm?download SPEC: http://8uxodw.bay.livefilestore.com/y1pN1smuHPWD_Gx1f3-jFUhPfCs53TbOfptJ9VJZ6DekO1Sh1cqKww2uVn2DJLc_4U6eZ1qKtNZ6ZknoH1Qu-6FZA/basket.spec?download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 20:06:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:06:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102006.mAAK6TMm022958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 --- Comment #10 from Christopher D. Stover 2008-11-10 15:06:28 EDT --- [Chris at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint barry.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [Chris at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/barry-0.14-4.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [Chris at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/barry-* 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I've merged the gui package and the main package. I think it may finally be ready to go unless there's anything else you can find. SPEC: http://8uxodw.bay.livefilestore.com/y1p-nds5yq83kTM-SF3rPmv6b6BvCgC_lXn-J2MWup6CFJl6HNRtPskw23UAA6sZuBZYFnfxUktnsx8KgQugZuKGA/barry.spec?download SRPM: http://8uxodw.bay.livefilestore.com/y1p-nds5yq83kS7s2V9BOZfRZYEg0FjGajXCaXYcXDvY3j5X0L8UmncQHNPtXnReEAlOOCRcbBN9eDlzOT8LN51uw/barry-0.14-4.fc10.src.rpm?download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 20:06:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:06:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102006.mAAK6TZu031975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-10 15:06:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > %files > > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > > %doc AUTHORS COPYING INSTALL README TODO > > Absolutely no need to include the same %doc files also in > the -devel pkg. fixed > > %{_bindir}/gar* > > %{_datadir}/%{name}/garmintypes.txt > > Don't forget the corresponding directory entry! > Add: %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} fixed > > %files devel > > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > > %doc AUTHORS COPYING INSTALL README TODO > > %{_datadir}/%{name}/doc/* > > Here either replace your line with > > %{_datadir}/%{name}/doc/ > > to add that directory and its contents recursively, or add: > > %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/doc > > to the -devel pkg files section. fixed > > %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/%{name}.pc > > You put a file in there, so "Requires: pkgconfig". fixed SPEC: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libgarmin.spec SRPM: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libgarmin-0-0.3.20081026svn.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 20:37:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:37:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470909] New: Review Request: wt - C++ library and application server for developing web applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: wt - C++ library and application server for developing web applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470909 Summary: Review Request: wt - C++ library and application server for developing web applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lvillani at binaryhelix.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=arbiter/public_git/rpm.git;a=blob_plain;f=libs/wt/wt.spec;hb=HEAD SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/srpm/wt-2.1.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Wt (pronounced 'witty') is a C++ library and application server for developing and deploying web applications. It is not a 'framework', which enforces a way of programming, but a library. The API is widget-centric, and inspired by existing C++ Graphical User Interface (GUI) APIs. To the developer, it offers complete abstraction of any web-specific implementation details, including event handling and graphics support. Page-based frameworks (such as based on PHP or JSP/JSF (+ servlets + struts)) for developing web application do not make abstraction of the peculiarities of the underlying technologies (HTML/XHTML, JavaScript, CSS, AJAX, Forms, DHTML, SVG/VML/Canvas). As a consequence, a developer must gain familiarity with all of these (evolving) technologies. Moreover, when choosing to use a technology (such the currently popular AJAX), the developer is responsible for graceful degradation when AJAX or JavaScript are not available or disabled. The structure of the application follows mostly the page-centric paradigm of early day HTML. This means that when using advanced AJAX techniques, as a developer you will need to design and maintain manually your client-server communication. Generating HTML code or filling HTML templates is prone to security problems such as XSS (Cross-Site-Scripting), by unwillingly allowing JavaScript to be inserted in the page. But this cannot be avoided by template frameworks, because as a developer you need to be able to insert self-written JavaScript to improve your web application. In contrast, a web application developed with Wt is written in only one compiled language (C++), from which the library generates the necessary HTML/XHTML, Javascript, CGI, SVG/VML/Canvas and AJAX code. The responsibility of writing secure and browser-portable web applications is handled by Wt. For example, if available, Wt will maximally use JavaScript and AJAX, but applications developed using Wt will also function correctly when AJAX is not available, or when JavaScript is disabled, reverting to a plain HTML/CGI mechanism for communication between browser and server. Self-review (*** MUST BE CONFIRMED BY ANOTHER REVIEWER ***) MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [lorenzo at normandy i386]$ rpmlint wt-2.1.5-1.fc10.i386.rpm wt.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/wt/wt_config.xml wt.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libwthttp.so.2.1.5 exit at GLIBC_2.0 [lorenzo at normandy i386]$ rpmlint wt-devel-2.1.5-1.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines (OK) - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . (OK) - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . (NEED CONFIRMATION BY REVIEWER) - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . (OK) - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. (OK) - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. (OK) - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). (OK -- Is readable, at least for me) - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. (OK) - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. (Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=925191) - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 (OK: Package builds on all supported architectures - see scratch build) - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. (OK: no locales for this package) - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig (OK) - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. (OK) - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. (OK) - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. (OK) - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. (OK) - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). (OK) - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . (OK) - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . (OK) - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) (OK) - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. (OK) - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. (OK) - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. (OK -- no static libraries present) - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). (OK) - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. (OK) - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} (OK) - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. (OK) - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. (OK) - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. (OK) - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. (OK) - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. (OK) SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. (OK) - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. (--) - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. (OK) - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. (OK) - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. (Tested locally, it works) - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. (OK) - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. (OK) - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. (OK) - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Please see File Dependencies in the Guidelines for further information. (OK) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 20:43:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:43:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470626] Review Request: balance - TCP load-balancing proxy server with round robin and failover mechanisms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102043.mAAKh3mh007337@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470626 --- Comment #2 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-11-10 15:43:02 EDT --- disable_IPV6_V6ONLY_check_for_now.patch, I am disabling ipv6 for now because the #if def code is not working , I will contact upstream about how to put balance to work with ipv6, about the file balance.pdf, it's have the same content as man1 (man balance), for me it doesn't need to be packaged. about the macros, fixed. http://ispbrasil.com.br/balance/balance.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/balance/balance-3.42-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 20:46:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:46:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470913] New: Review Request: lv2core - An Audio Plugin Standard Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lv2core - An Audio Plugin Standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470913 Summary: Review Request: lv2core - An Audio Plugin Standard Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: green at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/Fedora/lv2core.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/Fedora/lv2core-2.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: There are a large number of open source and free software synthesis packages in use or development at this time. This API ('LV2') attempts to give programmers the ability to write simple 'plugin' audio processors in C/C++ and link them dynamically ('plug') into a range of these packages ('hosts'). It should be possible for any host and any plugin to communicate completely through this interface. LV2 is a successor to LADSPA, created to address the limitations of LADSPA which many hosts have outgrown. Ardour and other Fedora apps will use this once it has been approved. This is the second time I've submitted it. I dropped the ball the first time around (several months ago). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 20:48:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:48:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470914] New: Review Request: slv2 - An LV2 host library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: slv2 - An LV2 host library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470914 Summary: Review Request: slv2 - An LV2 host library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: green at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/Fedora/slv2.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/Fedora/slv2-0.6.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: SLV2 is a library for LV2 hosts intended to make using LV2 Plugins as simple as possible (without sacrificing capabilities). Ardour and other Fedora packages will BuildRequire this once it has been approved. This is the second time I've submitted it. I dropped the ball the first time around. It depends on my recent lv2core submission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 20:51:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:51:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470909] Review Request: wt - C++ library and application server for developing web applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102051.mAAKpvn7031465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470909 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr --- Comment #1 from Patrice Dumas 2008-11-10 15:51:56 EDT --- The description is too long, in my opinion. Please have a look at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Use_of_common_namespace -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 21:00:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:00:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468562] Review Request: basket - Taking care of your ideas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102100.mAAL0T0L010807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468562 --- Comment #11 from Hans de Goede 2008-11-10 16:00:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > * added %post and %postun in the kontact package > Erm, that is not necessary, only packages which install files directly under %{_libdir} need to have ldconfig running post scripts, if they drop files in a subdir of %{_libdir}, those files are plugins, not libraries and there is no reason to run ldconfig, so please remove the %post[un] scripts from the kontakt sub-package other then that it looks ok. So once you are sponsored (see barry review), you can ask the current basket maintainer to give you the necessary rights to co-maintain and submit this new version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 20:58:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:58:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102058.mAAKwwGl010145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #19 from Torsten Rausche 2008-11-10 15:58:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > - I must say this srpm (tarball in this srpm) is problematic. > > Almost all codes in 2.8.1 tarball are still under GPLv2 (strict), however > newly added tv_grab_ttx.pl is under GPLv3+, which are, unfortunately, > incompatible: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#GPL_Compatibility_Matrix > You need to fix license issue first. Upstream doesn't want to change the licenses and suggests to split out the Perl script because it is not essential for the main application and can also be used stand-alone. Is it possible/allowed to move it into a subpackage with a different license tag? As the Perl script is still an experimental feature I could also exclude it for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 21:03:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:03:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102103.mAAL30h4011166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 --- Comment #11 from Hans de Goede 2008-11-10 16:02:59 EDT --- Looks al nice and shiny now :) I'm happy with the progress you've made with regards to understanding of packaging, so I'm ready to sponsor you now, create an Fedora account system account (if not done already) and apply for cvs-extras access. Once you've done that I'll sponsor you, and then you can do a CVS request here to create a barry module in CVS, for more on this see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 21:12:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:12:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 251282] Review Request: x3d-dtd-schema - X3D DTDs and schemata In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102112.mAALCRsa012934@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251282 Anthony Green changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(green at redhat.com) | --- Comment #10 from Anthony Green 2008-11-10 16:12:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Okay; at long last, an updated spec file and SRPM. > > This packages both the 3.0 and 3.1 specs and DTDs. > > spec: http://endoframe.com/x3d-dtd-schema.spec > SRPM: http://endoframe.com/x3d-dtd-schema-3.1-1.src.rpm > > Thanks Brandon. Sorry for the long silence. Which package should own /usr/share/xml/x3d? If not this package, then it should depend on one that does. Thanks, AG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 21:21:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:21:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461794] Review Request:0xFFFF - The Open Free Fiasco Firmware Flasher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102121.mAALLuJ0004956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461794 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-10 16:21:55 EDT --- David, I see you have build 0xFFFF for F10, but I don't see it in the repos. Have you made updates in the update system at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 21:19:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:19:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102119.mAALJB8X004226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #20 from Torsten Rausche 2008-11-10 16:19:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > If the submitter is more interested in upstream development, I can > take over the package submission/maintainer-ship, or simply become > co-maintainer. I don't develop upstream. I am just a daily user of it and track its development. Therefore I already package fresh releases for myself and thought other people would like this package too. I don't mind if another person would take over and maintain this package as long as this person steadily pushs new releases and is open for submissions from my side :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 21:22:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:22:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250943] Review Request: x3d-xsl - Web3D Consortium stylesheets for X3D In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102122.mAALM7O0014745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250943 Anthony Green changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(green at redhat.com) | --- Comment #11 from Anthony Green 2008-11-10 16:22:05 EDT --- I will review this this week. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 21:26:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:26:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 251282] Review Request: x3d-dtd-schema - X3D DTDs and schemata In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102126.mAALQgOE006145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251282 --- Comment #11 from Anthony Green 2008-11-10 16:26:41 EDT --- Some rpmlint output: x3d-dtd-schema.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 3.0-1 ['3.1-1', '3.1-1'] x3d-dtd-schema.noarch: W: invalid-license Distributable I think there's a real question about the license for these files. The closest thing I could find to a license is the Web3D IP policy: http://www.web3d.org/cgi-bin/fetch/fetch.cgi?ipr but I don't know if it really applies. Can you do better than "Distributable"? Thanks, AG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 21:27:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:27:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102127.mAALRuB0016135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #17 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-10 16:27:55 EDT --- Jeff, I see no builds for your package. Next step ;-) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Check_out_the_module -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 21:29:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:29:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 231305] Review Request: xml-security - Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102129.mAALTQ02006533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231305 --- Comment #11 from Anthony Green 2008-11-10 16:29:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > The import on sun.security is fixed in 1.4.1, however, some of the unit tests > fail. I dropped the ball here. Is there a newer package I can review? Thanks, AG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 21:30:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:30:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470830] Review Request: open64 - The Open64 compiler suite (C, C++, Fortran) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102130.mAALUbKw006900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-10 16:30:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Thanks, noted and changed. Added reqs: gcc to fix problem with dir ownership. > > I was just going to fix the arch problem :) > > Now the package builds in mock, had to add a few BRs. More patches to fix change of library locations. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/open64.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/open64-4.2-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 21:41:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:41:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102141.mAALf1rM008584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 21:39:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:39:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102139.mAALd6ke008160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-10 16:39:04 EDT --- I really think that the remove of the SuSE releated stuff from the spec file would make it more readable. - sorry, the right URL is Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz - Your Buildroot don't match the Guidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag - %defattr(-,root,root) is often %defattr(-,root,root,-) to leave the default directory permissions in place - Changelog: After every entry a blank line would be nice. It's definitely easier to read - License: Spec file: GPLv3+ rear GPLv2+ - Clean your Buildroot before you start doing stuff there rm -rf %{buildroot} or rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - cp -a usr etc $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/ Please preserve the timestamps https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps - Warning during rpm build process warning: File listed twice: /etc/rear/Debian/ia64.conf warning: File listed twice: /etc/rear/GNU/Linux.conf ... ... only add %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/rear/ (delete all other lines with %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/rear/*.*) to add that directory and its contents recursively (beware not tested and not sure about the permissions) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 21:38:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:38:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102138.mAALciUl008104@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bkearney at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bkearney at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Bryan Kearney 2008-11-10 16:38:43 EDT --- Couple of things: OK - Package name OK - License info is accurate OK - License tag is correct and licenses are approved OK - License files are installed as %doc OK - Specfile name OK - Specfile is legible OK - No prebuilt binaries included OK - BuildRoot value (one of the recommended values) OK - PreReq not used ?? - Source md5sum matches upstream - Any chance of working with upstream to get the tarball pushed to http://dev.laptop.org/pub/sugar/sources/. Barring that can you modify the checkout to use a snapshot (http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=activities/maze;a=snapshot;h=ffdbd8e3232ad67a6a99134f1252c76a81dbe000) OK - No hardcoded pathnames OK - Package owns all the files it installs OK - 'Requires' create needed unowned directories OK - BuildRequires sufficient OK - File permissions set properly OK - Macro usage is consistent ?? - rpmlint is silent - rpmlint on the srpm shows this (the last 3 are worriesome) sugar-maze.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities sugar-maze.src: W: strange-permission sugar-maze-checkout.sh 0755 sugar-maze.src: W: strange-permission Maze-6.tar.bz2 0755 sugar-maze.src: W: strange-permission sugar-maze.spec 0755 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 21:41:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:41:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102141.mAALfwV9018635@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 --- Comment #6 from Levente Farkas 2008-11-10 16:41:57 EDT --- for #2 the reason is this error message during rpmbuild: ----------------------------------------------- RPM build errors: File listed twice: /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/libxml-2.0.pc ----------------------------------------------- i hope this makes cleaner. for #3 without the autoreconf rpmbuild gives the error bellow. while with the above patch don't (anyway i'm not a gnu build system so if you know a better solution i welcome): ----------------------------------------------- Done configuring + make cd . && /bin/sh /home/lfarkas/rpm/BUILD/libxml2-2.7.2/missing --run aclocal-1.10 /home/lfarkas/rpm/BUILD/libxml2-2.7.2/missing: line 46: aclocal-1.10: command not found WARNING: `aclocal-1.10' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified `acinclude.m4' or `configure.in'. You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. cd . && /bin/sh /home/lfarkas/rpm/BUILD/libxml2-2.7.2/missing --run automake-1.10 --gnu /home/lfarkas/rpm/BUILD/libxml2-2.7.2/missing: line 46: automake-1.10: command not found WARNING: `automake-1.10' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified `Makefile.am', `acinclude.m4' or `configure.in'. You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. cd . && /bin/sh /home/lfarkas/rpm/BUILD/libxml2-2.7.2/missing --run autoconf aclocal.m4:20: warning: this file was generated for autoconf 2.61. You have another version of autoconf. It may work, but is not guaranteed to. If you have problems, you may need to regenerate the build system entirely. To do so, use the procedure documented by the package, typically `autoreconf'. configure.in:41: error: Autoconf version 2.60 or higher is required aclocal.m4:7055: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE is expanded from... configure.in:41: the top level autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 63 make: *** [configure] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.47244 (%build) ----------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 21:49:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:49:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470626] Review Request: balance - TCP load-balancing proxy server with round robin and failover mechanisms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102149.mAALnxDD019976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470626 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-10 16:49:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > disable_IPV6_V6ONLY_check_for_now.patch, I am disabling ipv6 for now because > the #if def code is not working , I will contact upstream about how to put > balance to work with ipv6, Don't explain me :-) Add this to the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 22:08:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:08:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470913] Review Request: lv2core - An Audio Plugin Standard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102208.mAAM8XPq014266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470913 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-10 17:08:31 EDT --- *** Bug 232465 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 22:08:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:08:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 232465] Review Request: lv2core - An Audio Plugin Standard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102208.mAAM8Wpk014241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232465 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|201449 | Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-10 17:08:31 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 470913 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 22:15:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:15:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470913] Review Request: lv2core - An Audio Plugin Standard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102215.mAAMF7N0025090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470913 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-10 17:15:06 EDT --- I note that this still includes a .pc file and is still arch-specific. I know the old ticket was closed but there are still open questions there and it would be really nice if you could address them. Comment #14 from Peter Jones, specifically. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 22:12:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:12:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444512] Review Request: eclipse-eclemma - EMMA plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102212.mAAMCkhd024506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444512 Anthony Green changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |green at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Anthony Green 2008-11-10 17:12:45 EDT --- I get the following when I try to build on F10... /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1r9udd: line 29: /usr/share/eclipse/buildscripts/pdebuild: No such file or directory AG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 22:19:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:19:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454959] Review Request: eclipse-cusp - Eclipse Common Lisp Development Tools (Cusp) plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102219.mAAMJ5He016088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454959 Anthony Green changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(green at redhat.com) | --- Comment #9 from Anthony Green 2008-11-10 17:19:03 EDT --- This package doesn't currently build with Eclipse 3.4 in F10. I'll try to fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 22:27:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:27:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470913] Review Request: lv2core - An Audio Plugin Standard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102227.mAAMRXLm017898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470913 --- Comment #3 from Anthony Green 2008-11-10 17:27:32 EDT --- We should include the .pc file because packages depending on this package, like slv2, expect to find one (to test the version, I think) and there's no need to deviate from upstream. I've added the %define debug_package %{nil} you suggested. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/Fedora/lv2core.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/Fedora/lv2core-2.0-2.fc10.src.rpm Thanks, AG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 22:43:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:43:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470155] Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102243.mAAMhRNa030705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 --- Comment #1 from Alex Eskin 2008-11-10 17:43:26 EDT --- Fixed a stupid packaging bug involving $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. New Spec URL: www.math.uchicago.edu/~eskin/xword/xword.spec New SRPM URL: www.math.uchicago.edu/~eskin/xword/xword-1.0-3.fc9.src.rpm rpmlint now reports no errors or warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 22:51:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:51:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470533] Review Request: hunspell-tet - Tetum hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102251.mAAMpaMC032049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470533 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 22:56:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:56:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470532] Review Request: hunspell-eo - Esperanto hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102256.mAAMuEwe000605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470532 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 23:18:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:18:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461794] Review Request:0xFFFF - The Open Free Fiasco Firmware Flasher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102318.mAANI2rJ004650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461794 --- Comment #10 from David Woodhouse 2008-11-10 18:18:00 EDT --- I have now. I was having fun watching all the bug reports for a package which hadn't even been _shipped_ yet... :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 23:41:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:41:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457160] Review Request: Zorba - General purpose XQuery processor implemented in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102341.mAANfRJQ008333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457160 Paul F. Kunz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(paulfkunz at gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #8 from Paul F. Kunz 2008-11-10 18:41:26 EDT --- I honestly thought that I had reponded to David's comment, but I don't see it. The Zorba project is indeed active, however the 0.9.4 release is not yet final, there're waiting for one small patch for the Windows build. On the ftp site, I have the latest release candidate. SRPM: ftp://zorba-xquery.com/zorba-0.9.4-2.fc8.src.rpm SPEC: ftp://zorba-xquery.com/zorba.spec I would appreciate a review of this, so I can quickly move when the final release is out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 23:49:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:49:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457160] Review Request: Zorba - General purpose XQuery processor implemented in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102349.mAANn5WL009295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457160 --- Comment #9 from Paul F. Kunz 2008-11-10 18:49:04 EDT --- Correction, the SRPM should be SRPM: ftp://zorba-xquery.com/zorba-0.9.4-2.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: ftp://zorba-xquery.com/zorba.spec that is, fc9 instead of fc8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 23:50:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:50:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102350.mAANoQub009812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #8 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-11-10 18:50:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (...snip...) > > Unfortunately, there seems to be no easy way to fix Problem 2 (Problem 1 is > easy enough to fix by the rubygem-passenger upstream). All releases of the > mod_scgi code are under the CNRI license (although, changes made after 1.10 are > under MIT). Some methods of fixing this issue would be: > > 1. Removing all of the copied code from mod_scgi 1.09, then replacing it either > with clean-room written code (aka, code written by someone who has never looked > at mod_scgi) or restructuring the rubygem-passenger code so that it is not > necessary. > > 2. Getting permission from CNRI to use that code under different (GPLv2 > compatible) terms. They seem to use MIT for changes to that codebase these > days, perhaps they would give permission for the copied code to be used under > those terms? > > However, until this issue is resolved, this one can't go any farther, sorry. Would another solution be to use mod_scgi >= 1.10? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 23:54:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:54:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102354.mAANsmV3010147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #26 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-11-10 18:54:47 EDT --- quick comments. I will have more time on wednesday... The snapshot is good, can be I've regenerated from today and the package built fine. What need to be improved. * The package release should notice it is a snapshot. So, either the version (0.1.0) is pre, or post. then the release will be <1 (aka: 0.1svn%{date}%{?dist} or >1 ( 1svn%{date}%{?dist}. * Package must use our $RPM_OPT_CFLAGS. For now it use -O3 -ffast-math, you will probably need another dynamic patch here as $RPM_OPT_CFLAGS depends on the cpu architecture. * rpmlint on installed packages (rpmlint yafaray yafaray-blender) aren't empty, specially there are a lot of undefined-non-weak-symbols. This is because of a missing library at linking time, This have to be repored upstream. /usr/lib64/_yafqt.so /usr/lib64/_yafrayinterface.so * I still cannot have yarafray blender plugin detected when blender-2.48a-4.fc8.x86_64 is used. I will ivestigate this, but maybe it would be easier to define a blender python plugins directory within the python libdir pathes. %{python_sitearch}/blender/ for architecture dependent plugin (like yafaray) %{python_sitelib}/blender for architecture independant plugin. Then every files from a given plugin will be shipped either in the architecture dependent python directory or the architecture independent one... I will give more testing on wednesday as i'm not sure for now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 23:55:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:55:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102355.mAANtLkb000680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #9 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-11-10 18:55:20 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=323134) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323134) output on a compile with attached diff (1) Attach output from a rake -v when compiling against the system-wide provided boost-static libraries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 23:57:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:57:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811102357.mAANvRGA000963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #10 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-11-10 18:57:27 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=323135) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323135) diff to Rakefile to compile against %{_libdir}/libboost_thread-mt.a Attach diff for Rakefile -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 00:20:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:20:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110020.mAB0KHdY004340@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org --- Comment #11 from Kevin Kofler 2008-11-10 19:20:16 EDT --- What will actually be required at runtime depends on what the DT_SONAME entry for the library is. If it includes the version, it's right, if it doesn't, it needs to be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 00:22:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:22:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110022.mAB0M6VC004652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Kofler 2008-11-10 19:22:05 EDT --- Oh, and to figure it out: readelf -d yourlibrary.so | grep SONAME or: eu-readelf -d yourlibrary.so | grep SONAME (readelf is part of binutils, eu-readelf of elfutils.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 00:27:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:27:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110027.mAB0RXS6015427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 --- Comment #13 from Kevin Kofler 2008-11-10 19:27:32 EDT --- As for some programs to test the library with, try running make in its testsuite folder. Then use readelf -d test_multiplication.c | grep NEEDED (or eu-readelf) to check what it's requiring. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 00:44:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:44:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110044.mAB0i8Tt017936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #14 from Conrad Meyer 2008-11-10 19:44:07 EDT --- For example: $ readelf -d test_multiplication | grep NEEDED 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libm4ri-0.0.20081029.so] $ readelf -d /usr/lib64/libm4ri-0.0.20081029.so |grep SONAME 0x000000000000000e (SONAME) Library soname: [libm4ri-0.0.20081029.so] On my x86_64 system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 00:49:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:49:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110049.mAB0necM018758@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #15 from Kevin Kofler 2008-11-10 19:49:39 EDT --- FE-Legal was already lifted by spot, why did you readd it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 00:50:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:50:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110050.mAB0ofVt008852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Kofler 2008-11-10 19:50:40 EDT --- The output from comment #14 looks OK to me, the versioning system is working properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 00:47:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:47:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110047.mAB0lvQs008412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |Thabit-fonts from |arabeyes-thabit-fonts |Arabeyes.org | --- Comment #30 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-10 19:47:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > Hi, I have FAS account and I would love to co-maintain this package for fedora > as my first fedora package Unfortunately you have to be a packager in order to comaintain a package. > we need 3 font packages > 1. KACST kacst-fonts is already in fedora for a long time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 00:52:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:52:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110052.mAB0qs7Z009279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 --- Comment #17 from Conrad Meyer 2008-11-10 19:52:53 EDT --- Did I re-add it? I didn't intend to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 01:26:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 20:26:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452749] Review Request: ocp - Open Cubic Player for MOD/S3M/XM/IT/SID/MIDI music files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110126.mAB1Q0K6014510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452749 Charles R. Anderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #16 from Charles R. Anderson 2008-11-10 20:25:59 EDT --- Imported, requested changes made, and built for devel, F-10, F-9. Closing bug. Thanks guys. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 01:34:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 20:34:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110134.mAB1YFwA026237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 Christopher D. Stover changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Christopher D. Stover 2008-11-10 20:34:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > I'm happy with the progress you've made with regards to understanding of > packaging, so I'm ready to sponsor you now Thanks Hans, I appreciate all your help! =) > create an Fedora account system account (if not done already) and apply for > cvs-extras access. Done. > you can do a CVS request here to create a barry module in CVS New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: barry Short Description: Barry is a desktop toolset for managing your BlackBerry device. Owners: quantumburnz Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: quantumburnz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 02:18:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:18:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470639] Review Request: dpatch - Debian patch utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110218.mAB2ISrk022262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470639 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-10 21:18:28 EDT --- Actually I realised that the patch I was looking at that lead to this submission was a darcs dpatch not a debian dpatch and as I recall debian dpatch's are just shell scripts to this package is probably pretty moot for fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 02:33:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:33:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193271] Review Request: python-dns - DNS toolkit for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110233.mAB2XlBc024205@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193271 Jeffrey C. Ollie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey C. Ollie 2008-11-10 21:33:45 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-dns New Branches: EL-5 Owners: jcollie,pwouters -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 04:34:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 23:34:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mz - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110434.mAB4YrK4013131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #13 from vivek shah 2008-11-10 23:34:52 EDT --- Well I too agree with the issues in the short name for mz and if something which must have been caught in Debian did not get caught there doesn't mean we will do the same as well. I will be uploading the updated SPEC and SRPM with the man page and binary renamed to mausezahn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 05:09:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:09:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110509.mAB59hM6028665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #4 from John F 2008-11-11 00:09:42 EDT --- Hi Fabian, Just a couple questions: 1. I notice that in a lot of documentation it states that timestamps should be preserved. Is this for auditing reasons mainly? 2. The documentation that I found for dealing with desktop files still says to use fedora as a vendor. Is it appropriate for me to update this page on the wiki? (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files) I have made the changes as you recomended and have uploaded a new specfile and srpm at: http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~jhford/fedora/links.spec http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~jhford/fedora/links-2.2-3.fc10.src.rpm Thank you very much for your time! John -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 05:16:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:16:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110516.mAB5GYNM019649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 --- Comment #14 from John F 2008-11-11 00:16:33 EDT --- sorry, i posted this to the wrong bug, ignore it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 05:16:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:16:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466301] Review Request: ario - Music Player Daemon Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110516.mAB5GmFL019690@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466301 John F changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from John F 2008-11-11 00:16:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ario Short Description: Ario Music Player Daemon Client Owners: john64 Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: john64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 05:16:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:16:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110516.mAB5G0rO019479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 John F changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |johnhford at gmail.com --- Comment #13 from John F 2008-11-11 00:15:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ario Short Description: Ario Music Player Daemon Client Owners: john64 Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: john64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 06:13:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 01:13:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464458] Review Request: greadelf - GUI frontend to elfinfo and eu-readelf In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110613.mAB6D7l1006081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464458 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pnemade at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Parag 2008-11-11 01:13:06 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: greadelf New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 06:14:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 01:14:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464457] Review Request: elfinfo - minimal elf file parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110614.mAB6EIop028272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464457 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pnemade at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Parag 2008-11-11 01:14:17 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: elfinfo New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 06:27:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 01:27:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245561] Review Request: ht - File editor/viewer/analyzer for executables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110627.mAB6Ro17031664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245561 Andreas Bierfert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #17 from Andreas Bierfert 2008-11-11 01:27:48 EDT --- Thanks for the review. Imported and build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 06:41:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 01:41:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464457] Review Request: elfinfo - minimal elf file parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110641.mAB6fbbr002004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464457 --- Comment #7 from Parag 2008-11-11 01:41:36 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: elfinfo New Branches: EL-5 Owners: ashokdas paragn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 06:41:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 01:41:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464458] Review Request: greadelf - GUI frontend to elfinfo and eu-readelf In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110641.mAB6fekA012048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464458 --- Comment #7 from Parag 2008-11-11 01:41:39 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: greadelf New Branches: EL-5 Owners: ashokdas paragn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 06:51:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 01:51:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110651.mAB6p3H1013989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 --- Comment #17 from Hayden James 2008-11-11 01:51:01 EDT --- Ok I have fixed the last of the bugs you've found. Here's the new package and spec file: http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/quickfix-1.12.4-6.fc9.src.rpm http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/quickfix.spec In terms of getting sponsored, I think I'm going to work on another C++ library I use a lot 'cryptopp.' Once I have that one complete, I will post another bug and link to it here. Thanks a lot for your time and help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 06:55:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 01:55:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435018] Review Request: clipper - crystallographic object oriented library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110655.mAB6tWRr004932@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435018 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-11 01:55:31 EDT --- Would you rewrite your spec/srpm? I guess you once want to clean up your spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 06:52:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 01:52:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435017] Review Request: ssm - coordinate superposition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110652.mAB6quVD004325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435017 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: SSM - |Review Request: ssm - |coordinate superposition |coordinate superposition |library |library Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-11 01:52:55 EDT --- Okay. --------------------------------------------------- This package (ssm) is APPROVED by mtasaka --------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 07:41:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 02:41:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464458] Review Request: greadelf - GUI frontend to elfinfo and eu-readelf In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110741.mAB7fkeB014362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464458 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-11 02:41:45 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 07:42:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 02:42:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464457] Review Request: elfinfo - minimal elf file parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110742.mAB7g5Y3014464@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464457 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-11 02:42:04 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 07:49:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 02:49:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470976] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-EndOfScope - Execute code after scope compilation finishes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110749.mAB7npM5015789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470976 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-11 02:49:50 EDT --- This package is a new dep of namespace::clean as of 0.09. Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=925898 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 07:47:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 02:47:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470976] New: Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-EndOfScope - Execute code after scope compilation finishes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-EndOfScope - Execute code after scope compilation finishes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470976 Summary: Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-EndOfScope - Execute code after scope compilation finishes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/B-Hooks-EndOfScope OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-B-Hooks-EndOfScope.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-B-Hooks-EndOfScope-0.04-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This module allows you to execute code when Perl has finished compiling the surrounding scope. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 07:53:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 02:53:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464457] Review Request: elfinfo - minimal elf file parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110753.mAB7rDDS025922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464457 --- Comment #9 from Parag 2008-11-11 02:53:12 EDT --- Thanks Jens for quick cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 07:53:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 02:53:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464458] Review Request: greadelf - GUI frontend to elfinfo and eu-readelf In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110753.mAB7rHkm025962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464458 --- Comment #9 from Parag 2008-11-11 02:53:16 EDT --- Thanks Jens for quick cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 08:25:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 03:25:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470424] Review Request: libtopology - Libtopology is a library for discovering the hardware topology on Linux systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110825.mAB8PNSg023838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470424 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bugs.michael at gmx.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt 2008-11-11 03:25:22 EDT --- > the rpmlint version in fc9 doesn't issue this warning Sure it does. > New .specfile and .src.rpm at the same locations. It's now missing "BuildRequires: doxygen", though. ;) Anyway: APPROVED If you like to continue with the Fedora Account setup, I can sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 08:30:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 03:30:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461976] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-ImageView - Perl bindings to the GtkImageView image viewer widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110830.mAB8UjhC025052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461976 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-Gtk2-ImageView -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 08:30:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 03:30:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110830.mAB8UKev024978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-11 03:30:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Created an attachment (id=323134) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323134) [details] > output on a compile with attached diff (1) > > Attach output from a rake -v when compiling against the system-wide provided > boost-static libraries You should link against libboost_thread-mt.so, not against static archive libboost_thread-mt.a. But anyway linkage fails by other reasons like ----------------------------------------------------------------- ApplicationPoolServerExecutable.cpp:86: undefined reference to `boost::this_thread::interruption_requested()' ----------------------------------------------------------------- (and many errors). It seems that this is because Fedora ships boot 1.34 while these symbols are introduced on 1.36+. So until Fedora upgrades boost we have to use internal boost. In this case Fedora compilation flags must be treated correctly. The following seems to fix this issue: ------------------------------------------------------------------ --- Rakefile.orig 2008-11-11 16:23:45.000000000 +0900 +++ Rakefile 2008-11-11 17:23:32.000000000 +0900 @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ subdir 'ext/boost/src' do file 'libboost_thread.a' => Dir['*.cpp'] + Dir['pthread/*.cpp'] do - flags = "#{OPTIMIZATION_FLAGS} -fPIC -I../.. #{THREADING_FLAGS} -DNDEBUG #{MULTI_ARCH_FLAGS}" + flags = "#{OPTIMIZATION_FLAGS} #{APACHE2::CXXFLAGS} -fPIC -I../.. #{THREADING_FLAGS} -DNDEBUG #{MULTI_ARCH_FLAGS}" compile_cxx "*.cpp", flags # NOTE: 'compile_cxx "pthread/*.cpp", flags' doesn't work on some systems, # so we do this instead. ------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 08:31:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 03:31:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110831.mAB8VC1R002280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #15 from Hans de Goede 2008-11-11 03:31:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > I'm happy with the progress you've made with regards to understanding of > > packaging, so I'm ready to sponsor you now > > Thanks Hans, I appreciate all your help! =) > > > create an Fedora account system account (if not done already) and apply for > > cvs-extras access. > > Done. > Erm, the cvs-extras group has been renamed to "packager" now (my bad), and I don't see a request from you to join that group, please apply for packager membership in the account system. I'm clearing the CVS request flag for now, as there is nothing the cvsadmins can do until your account is in order, please repeat the request and reset the flag when I've approved your packager membership. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 08:39:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 03:39:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470830] Review Request: open64 - The Open64 compiler suite (C, C++, Fortran) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110839.mAB8dQF1026463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-11 03:39:25 EDT --- Hmm, it seems that the compiled RPM doesn't really work on Fedora 9; in RHEL 5 it works fine. The binary RPM from open64.net works fine on Fedora 9... I did have to do quite a bit of patching to the header files to get open64 to build in Fedora 9, since g++ 4.3 is stricter than g++ 4.2 which is in RHEL 5. GCC 4.3 isn't listed as a supported compiler, 4.2 is. Too bad there's just 4.3 and 3.4 in Fedora - 4.3 is too new and 3.4 is too old, since one needs gfortran to compile the Fortran frontend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 08:39:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 03:39:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110839.mAB8d01Z026414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-11 03:38:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > > (...snip...) > > > > Unfortunately, there seems to be no easy way to fix Problem 2 (Problem 1 is > > easy enough to fix by the rubygem-passenger upstream). All releases of the > > mod_scgi code are under the CNRI license (although, changes made after 1.10 are > > under MIT). Some methods of fixing this issue would be: > > > > 1. Removing all of the copied code from mod_scgi 1.09, then replacing it either > > with clean-room written code (aka, code written by someone who has never looked > > at mod_scgi) or restructuring the rubygem-passenger code so that it is not > > necessary. > > > Would another solution be to use mod_scgi >= 1.10? Current mod_scgi seems 1.13. http://python.ca/scgi/releases/scgi-1.13.tar.gz However LICENSE.txt of mod_scgi 1.13 contains -------------------------------------------------------------------- This version of the SCGI package is derived from scgi 1.10, released by CNRI. See doc/LICENSE_110.txt for the licensing terms of that release. Changes made since that release are summarized in the CHANGES.txt file along with a list of authors. Those changes are made available under the following terms (commonly known as the MIT/X license). -------------------------------------------------------------------- This reads that the codes derived from scgi 1.10 codes are still under CNRI license, and only what is changed compared to 1.10 are under MIT. So I don't think using latest mod_scgi will solve this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 08:46:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 03:46:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110846.mAB8kXQC004990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-11 03:46:31 EDT --- I will recheck your latest srpm later, however: (In reply to comment #17) > In terms of getting sponsored, I think I'm going to work on another C++ library > I use a lot 'cryptopp.' Once I have that one complete, I will post another bug > and link to it here. Thanks a lot for your time and help. - cryptopp is already in Fedora https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/cryptopp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 08:54:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 03:54:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110854.mAB8sg3n006331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-11 03:54:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #12) > > (In reply to comment #11) > > > create an Fedora account system account (if not done already) and apply for > > > cvs-extras access. > > > > Done. > > > > Erm, the cvs-extras group has been renamed to "packager" now (my bad), and I > don't see a request from you to join that group, please apply for packager > membership in the account system. I can see the packager membership request from Christopher in the FAS name of "quantumburnz". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 09:00:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 04:00:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470830] Review Request: open64 - The Open64 compiler suite (C, C++, Fortran) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110900.mAB90oaB030806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-11 04:00:49 EDT --- Or, I could compile open64 with itself by including the binary release in the srpm which would then be used to compile the sources. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 09:03:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 04:03:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110903.mAB93AOt008483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Hans de Goede 2008-11-11 04:03:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: barry Short Description: Barry is a desktop toolset for managing your BlackBerry device. Owners: quantumburnz Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: quantumburnz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 09:05:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 04:05:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110905.mAB95Wjj032234@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-11 04:05:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > There only issue is that the elinks package is using /usr/bin/links even though > it isn't actually called links. I would be willing to do the modifications to > elinks depending on what the outcome is This is a bit tricky since a lot of people are used to using links in the console. I'd prefer this package and binary to be named links2, which also avoids the name clash with elinks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 09:02:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 04:02:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110902.mAB92RUk031364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 --- Comment #17 from Hans de Goede 2008-11-11 04:02:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > (In reply to comment #12) > > > (In reply to comment #11) > > > > create an Fedora account system account (if not done already) and apply for > > > > cvs-extras access. > > > > > > Done. > > > > > > > Erm, the cvs-extras group has been renamed to "packager" now (my bad), and I > > don't see a request from you to join that group, please apply for packager > > membership in the account system. > > I can see the packager membership request from Christopher in the FAS name > of "quantumburnz". You are right, my bad. I expected all sponsor needing people to be on the todo list of the initial login screen. What is the purpose of that todo list if it is incomplete? Anyways Christopher, you have been sponsored, I'll redo your CVS request now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 09:14:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 04:14:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110914.mAB9EMZk001581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-11 04:14:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > > I can see the packager membership request from Christopher in the FAS name > > of "quantumburnz". > > You are right, my bad. I expected all sponsor needing people to be on the todo > list of the initial login screen. What is the purpose of that todo list if it > is incomplete? For this issue, I have to agree with you because I don't know either what "Todo queue" is for... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 10:10:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:10:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111010.mABAAGeQ013776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 --- Comment #15 from Gerd Hoffmann 2008-11-11 05:10:15 EDT --- Got a reply, progress on the licensing front ;) Hello Gerd. I agree to relicense Set::Object under the same terms as (current) Perl itself - which is probably the choice between two licenses: Artistic 2.0 and GPL. Cordially, Jean-Louis -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 10:31:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:31:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111031.mABAVQQU018208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-11-11 05:31:24 EDT --- I have seen this sort of error before, but I'm not sure why it happens. I've just checked the libxml2-2.7.2.tar.gz tarball that we are using and the timestamps are correct - ie. aclocal.m4 is present with timestamp later than configure.in, so I see no reason why the build process should be trying to remake it. The timestamps on other files look fine too. Anyway, I still think we should leave this until we come to packaging for EPEL (as I said in comment 4 above). This is irrelevant to the Fedora review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 10:48:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:48:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111048.mABAm984021717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 --- Comment #16 from Gerd Hoffmann 2008-11-11 05:48:08 EDT --- new packages (updated license tag) uploaded: http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/osm/perl-Set-Object/perl-Set-Object.spec http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/osm/perl-Set-Object/perl-Set-Object-1.25-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 10:51:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:51:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471003] New: Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Summary: Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal-install/cabal-install.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal-install/cabal-install-0.6.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: cabal-install provides a user-based Haskell Hackage package manager which is essential for modern Haskell development. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 10:54:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:54:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111054.mABAsHoJ023059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |471003 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 10:54:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:54:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111054.mABAsIUF023080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |471003 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 10:54:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:54:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111054.mABAsFLV023010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com Blocks| |425882, 470756 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-11 05:54:14 EDT --- This requires ghc-zlib and ghc-HTTP which are currently under review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 12:53:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 07:53:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464471] Review Request: dvdrip - Graphical DVD ripping and encoding tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111253.mABCrp1E011272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464471 Martin J?rgens changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin at gamesplace.info --- Comment #3 from Martin J?rgens 2008-11-11 07:53:50 EDT --- dvdrip supports cluster mode whereas the master node does not need transcode or any other packages that are not in Fedora. The nodes that encode the video could be other computers having transcode installed from rpmfusion so having dvdrip in Fedora repos would make sense. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 13:06:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:06:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470626] Review Request: balance - TCP load-balancing proxy server with round robin and failover mechanisms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111306.mABD61hv014472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470626 --- Comment #4 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-11-11 08:06:00 EDT --- > Don't explain me :-) Add this to the spec file. I agree, fixed. http://ispbrasil.com.br/balance/balance.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/balance/balance-3.42-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 13:22:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:22:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471026] New: Review Request: chrony - An NTP client/server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: chrony - An NTP client/server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471026 Summary: Review Request: chrony - An NTP client/server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mlichvar at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~mlichvar/tmp/chrony.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~mlichvar/tmp/chrony-1.23-1.20081106gitbe42b4.fc10.src.rpm Description: A client/server for the Network Time Protocol, this program keeps your computer's clock accurate. It was specially designed to support systems with dial-up Internet connections, and also supports computers in permanently connected environments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 13:37:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:37:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464471] Review Request: dvdrip - Graphical DVD ripping and encoding tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111337.mABDbL6k021041@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464471 --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-11-11 08:37:20 EDT --- Yes, but don't you think thats not a very common usecase? I would argue that the average user who sees dvdrip in the Fedora repository is going to expect it to, well, rip encrypted video DVDs, and will be rather confused and unhappy when it doesn't. Whereas, if this lives entirely in rpmfusion, it will just work as expected out of the box and can have sane Requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 13:47:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:47:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111347.mABDlhOW000887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 --- Comment #17 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-11-11 08:47:42 EDT --- Please include a copy of your correspondence with the copyright holders on relicensing as a flat text file in this package (and put it in %doc), so that it is clear to others why we have it licensed like this when the source doesn't match. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 13:48:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:48:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111348.mABDmnNZ000985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #6 from John F 2008-11-11 08:48:48 EDT --- The issue is that this is the successor to the original links. Elinks is a fork where this is just version 2. In the elinks spec file the 'links' symlink is done by the package maintainer in the following code from %install: ln -s elinks $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/links ln -s elinks.1 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1/links.1 I also noticed that in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#General_Naming the package name should match upstream tarball where technically possible. Maybe this is a situation where alternatives should be used? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 13:52:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:52:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111352.mABDqDDG001866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-11 08:52:13 EDT --- I think the dependencies are backwards. Does this block ghc-zlib or is it the other way around? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 13:54:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:54:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111354.mABDsXvY002043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 --- Comment #28 from Lev Shamardin 2008-11-11 08:54:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > Unless you provide the concrete case for this package I strongly > disagree (packaging guidelines say that the "compelling reason" > must be provided) > (If you still want I probably have to ask for FESCo: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Staticly_Linking_Executables > ) The link above prohibits static linking of executables, and I completely agree with this policy. But I don't understand how does this prohibit providing -static library packages without any statically linked executables. > > and for these cases having > > static libraries packaged saves you from rebuilding the required > > libraries yourself. > > This is exactly why we think we must _not_ provide static archives unless > avoided. > Using static archives will cause problem when some security > issues or so are found in protobuf and people forget that they are > using old static protobuf archive, for example. Are we supposed to fix all potential security issues in the universe? Potential security issues in fedora packages are effectively handled in this case with the policy of prohibiting static linking of *executables*, because in this case the number of statically linked packages in fedora is minimal. But if the local administrator decides to build something locally against a -static library, he surely has a Reason to do this, and he has to perform some additional non-standard steps to do this (install -static subpackage), and of course he understands the drawbacks. If I want to make a statically linked executable for my local system not providing a -static subpackage just adds some additional inconvenience for me, but will never stop from static linkage, because I will simply build the static library myself. To summarize, there are no statically linked *executables* in protobuf-* packages, so I think that the policy is fulfilled. > > > > !!For -vim subpackage > > > ! Neither of %_datadir/vim/vimfiles/{ftdetect,syntax} are owned > > > by any packages, however I will ask vim maintainer about this. > > > > > > > Any news on this item? > Oops, completely forgotton, I will surely ask later... > > > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > > Additional remark about python subpackage: > > > The -python subpackage should not depend on the base package or any other > > > packages because it is a pure python implementation. > > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > > - Well, for technical discussion, does this mean that there will > > > be no problem even if the installed version of protobuf and > > > protobuf-python differ? (if you don't write Requires this > > > can happen). > > > This discussion can be applied for -java subpackage. > > > > From my point of view, the only possible problem is that someone can > > finish using newer protobuf-compiler with older python/java > > bindings. Both java and python implementations are usable as a runtime > > without any C++ code, you only need corresponding version of > > protobuf-compiler for development. > > Then you should ensure that the trouble you mentioned here won't happen. > * One method is to make -compiler subpackage have: > ----------------------------------------------------- > Conflicts: %{name}-java < %{version} > Conflicts: %{name}-java > %{version} > ----------------------------------------------------- > or so. I've added Conflicts: %{name}-compiler > %{version} Conflicts: %{name}-compiler < %{version} to -java and -python subpackages. (In reply to comment #26) > Well, for -2: > > * License > - Well protobuf.pc.in is still under ASL 2.0 > You should ask the author to change the license > of this file I removed the license header from the file, leaving only Copyright notice, as the author suggested. > * BuildRequires > - This package won't build without > "BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel" (note: here > I don't say about Requires). Fixed. However this is strange, since it did build successfully in mock on my Fedora 8 system. > > * Requires > - "Requires: %{name}-java-%{version}-%{release}" should be > "Requires: %{name}-java = %{version}-%{release}" Fixed. > > * rpmlint issue > ** non-standard-group > - Group "Development/Documentation" should simply be > "Documentation". Fixed. > > ** non-executable-script > ------------------------------------------------------------ > E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/google/protobuf/descriptor_pb2.py 0644 > ------------------------------------------------------------ > - If this script are not meant to be executed by user directly, > then this script must not have shebang (anyway the shebang > #!/usr/bin/python2.4 is wrong because we use python 2.5) This was in the protoc-generated code. It should be properly fixed in the upstream code, I've submitted a bug report: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=56 Meanwhile, I've modified the %build step to fix this. I've finally converted this package to use gtest library. Updated SPEC: http://shamardin.googlepages.com/protobuf.spec New SRPM: http://shamardin.googlepages.com/protobuf-2.0.2-3.fc8.src.rpm * Tue Nov 11 2008 Lev Shamardin - 2.0.2-3 - Added conflicts to java and python subpackages to prevent using with wrong compiler versions. - Fixed license. - Fixed BuildRequires for -python subpackage. - Fixed Requires and Group for -javadoc subpackage. - Fixed Requires for -devel subpackage. - Fixed issue with wrong shebang in descriptor_pb2.py. - Specify build options via --with/--without. - Use Fedora-packaged gtest library instead of a bundled one by default (optional). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 13:55:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:55:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464471] Review Request: dvdrip - Graphical DVD ripping and encoding tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111355.mABDtq1H024271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464471 --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-11 08:55:51 EDT --- +1 to comment #4. I would be very unhappy (translate: I would curse a day and half) if I would yum install dvdrip only to find out that... I cannot rip. To me this submission seems like a perfect candidate for our sister repo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 14:01:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:01:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111401.mABE11Hx003562@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-11 09:00:59 EDT --- To me alternatives looks like a nice answer. Did you try to talk with elinks's maintainer ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 13:57:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:57:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469494] Review Request: xlcrack - Recover lost and forgotten passwords from XLS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111357.mABDvKAU024632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469494 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-11 08:57:19 EDT --- It looks like a line was lost from my comment above, but unfortunately I can't remember what I might have written there. Oh, well. Anyway, this looks good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 14:06:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:06:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111406.mABE620s026417@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 --- Comment #19 from Hayden James 2008-11-11 09:06:01 EDT --- Great. The only package I use extensively for C++ development besides quickfix and cryptopp, that comes to mind, is ACE (http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE.html) but it appears someone has some working fedora packages, it just has not been included: http://dist.bonsai.com/ken/ace_tao_rpm/SRC/5.6.6-1/. Also, perhaps OTL, which would be extremely simple to package: http://otl.sourceforge.net/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 14:10:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:10:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464471] Review Request: dvdrip - Graphical DVD ripping and encoding tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111410.mABEAluq005291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464471 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-11-11 09:10:46 EDT --- I agree with what Martin said. (despite it will need to be properly tested to see which components will be disabled). I will just add that the dependencies are accurately sorted in the dvdrip program. So anyone can see what should be installed at runtime. But that will requires some more tweaking and rework the warning/error messages depending on what are the users needs. So, as martin said, we can already use dvdrip as a master node. I wonder what could be missing to submit tasks to this master node. (maybe xine for previews, but shouldn't be mandatory to submit blind tasks). For now, unless transcode is installed the program will block, but transcode shoudn't be mandatory to submit tasks nor to use it as a master node. Also; despite the name, dvdrip doesn't only take dvd as a primary source. It can also use files. In this case, there is no need to have mp2 support or else. About transcode. This program needs ffmpeg; but I think it should be possible to have a ffmpeg library patent free, which would lead to have a totally free built of transcode. Such task for ffmpeg wouldn't be maintainable or will create more conflicts with the plain ffmpeg library than it will solve IMO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 14:15:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:15:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111415.mABEFqQM028289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #8 from Patrice Dumas 2008-11-11 09:15:51 EDT --- alternative could be used if elinks and links command-line syntax are compatible. However the link for elinks to links should certaainly be undone when this package is put in fedora, such that elink is elinks and links is links. The elinks package is very broken when it comes to obsoletes and provides, however, and the elinks maintainer should contacted such that this is fixed. Unfortunately, the review request has been accepted without fixing those issues: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225725 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 14:18:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:18:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464471] Review Request: dvdrip - Graphical DVD ripping and encoding tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111418.mABEIveM006695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464471 --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-11-11 09:18:56 EDT --- This seems to be a significant amount of work, almost certainly which will not go upstream. I'm not sure how you'll be able to handle the missing dependencies in dvdrip, unless it is checking for its dependencies at runtime (and even then, if the user doesn't know about rpmfusion, this will likely serve to confuse them further when yum can't find these items). I'm not trying to be difficult for the sake of being difficult, but when an application's description is "Graphical DVD ripping and encoding tool" and it will be unable to do either of those tasks out of the box, I'm strongly inclined to let it live, fully enabled, in rpmfusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 14:17:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:17:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225725] Merge Review: elinks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111417.mABEHNcl006444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225725 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |pertusus at free.fr Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #4 from Patrice Dumas 2008-11-11 09:17:22 EDT --- As far as I can tell, the unversionned obsoletes and provides are still there. They are gonna cause much trouble to bug 470703. Please fix that, and fix it also in F8 and F9 and issue updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 14:24:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:24:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni - C++ library for the Katana robot arm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111424.mABEOunT008139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-11 09:24:54 EDT --- This fails to build for me; patch 3 fails to apply: Patch #3 (kni-3.9.2-ctor.patch): + /usr/bin/patch -s -p1 -b --suffix .ctor --fuzz=0 + /bin/cat /builddir/build/SOURCES/kni-3.9.2-ctor.patch 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/Base/cdlCOM.cpp.rej RPM build errors: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JKAEJ2 (%prep) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JKAEJ2 (%prep) Keep in mind that rawhide applies patches with --fuzz=0. It builds if you force --fuzz=2 but that shouldn't be needed for new packages. Also, while building the latest package (with fuzz set to 2) I noticed the following odd output: Building: ../../lib/linux/libKNI_InvKin.so.3.9.0 [failed] /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lKNIBase collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Building: ../../lib/linux/libKNI_LM.so.3.9.0 [failed] /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lKNIBase collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Building: keycontrol.demo [failed] /tmp/ccFUilYk.o: In function `main': /builddir/build/BUILD/KNI_3.9.2/demo/keycontrol/keycontrol.cpp:591: undefined reference to `CikBase::getCoordinates(double&, double&, double&, double&, double&, double&, bool)' /builddir/build/BUILD/KNI_3.9.2/demo/keycontrol/keycontrol.cpp:928: undefined reference to `CikBase::moveRobotTo(double, double, double, double, double, double, bool, int)' (and several more failures) Building: socketcontrol.demo [failed] /tmp/ccxSSsex.o: In function `main': /builddir/build/BUILD/KNI_3.9.2/demo/socketcontrol/socketcontrol.cpp:731: undefined reference to `CLMBase::moveRobotLinearTo(double, double, double, double, double, double, bool, int)' /builddir/build/BUILD/KNI_3.9.2/demo/socketcontrol/socketcontrol.cpp:596: undefined reference to `CikBase::getCoordinates(double&, double&, double&, double&, double&, double&, bool)' (and several more failures) And also the following additional rpmlint complaint: libkni.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libKNIBase.so.3.9.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 which is a bit odd. It's not a blocker, but I wonder why I'm only seeing it now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 14:23:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:23:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225725] Merge Review: elinks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111423.mABENNrW029846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225725 --- Comment #5 from Patrice Dumas 2008-11-11 09:23:21 EDT --- Another issue is that the symbolic link to links is dubious at best. It will also cause problem for bug 470703. What is your opinion on that? Why was it done in the first place? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 14:32:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:32:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470830] Review Request: open64 - The Open64 compiler suite (C, C++, Fortran) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111432.mABEWVSx009630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-11 09:32:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Hmm, it seems that the compiled RPM doesn't really work on Fedora 9; in RHEL 5 > it works fine. The binary RPM from open64.net works fine on Fedora 9... Also the RPM compiled in RHEL 5 works fine in Fedora 9, so the problem is indeed with gcc 4.3. I had a look at compiling open64 with the binary release of open64, but couldn't get it to work on Fedora 9. The package could be restrained to EPEL, since it doesn't work on Fedora 9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 14:34:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:34:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111434.mABEYsUD009873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #27 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-11-11 09:34:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > quick comments. I will have more time on wednesday... > > The snapshot is good, can be I've regenerated from today and the package built > fine. > > What need to be improved. > * The package release should notice it is a snapshot. So, either the version > (0.1.0) is pre, or post. then the release will be <1 (aka: > 0.1svn%{date}%{?dist} or >1 ( 1svn%{date}%{?dist}. Done. I used: 0.1.svn.%{date}%{?dist} > > * Package must use our $RPM_OPT_CFLAGS. > For now it use -O3 -ffast-math, you will probably need another dynamic patch > here as $RPM_OPT_CFLAGS depends on the cpu architecture. > > > * rpmlint on installed packages (rpmlint yafaray yafaray-blender) aren't empty, > specially there are a lot of undefined-non-weak-symbols. This is because of a > missing library at linking time, This have to be repored upstream. > /usr/lib64/_yafqt.so > /usr/lib64/_yafrayinterface.so This is what I get: [cascavel:~/SRPMS] rpmlint yafaray yafaray.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libyafaraycore.so yafaray.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libyafaraycore.so /usr/lib64/libIex.so.6 yafaray.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libyafaraycore.so /usr/lib64/libImath.so.6 yafaray.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libyafaraycore.so /lib64/libz.so.1 [cascavel:~/SRPMS] rpmlint yafaray-blender yafaray-blender.x86_64: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/blender/scripts/yafaray_ui.py "BPY" yafaray-blender.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/blender/scripts/yafaray_ui.py 0644 yafaray-blender.x86_64: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_export.py "BPY" yafaray-blender.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_export.py 0644 yafaray-blender.x86_64: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_light.py "BPY" yafaray-blender.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_light.py 0644 yafaray-blender.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libyafarayqt.so yafaray-blender.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libyafarayqt.so /lib64/libm.so.6 yafaray-blender.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libyafarayplugin.so yafaray-blender.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libyafarayplugin.so /lib64/libdl.so.2 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 4 warnings. > > * I still cannot have yarafray blender plugin detected when > blender-2.48a-4.fc8.x86_64 is used. I will ivestigate this, but maybe it would > be easier to define a blender python plugins directory within the python libdir > pathes. > > %{python_sitearch}/blender/ for architecture dependent plugin (like yafaray) > %{python_sitelib}/blender for architecture independant plugin. I put _yaf*.so in %{python_sitearch} and it also worked. Maybe this way you can get them detected. The scrpits (.py), I think they should go where the other blender scripts are: /usr/share/blender/scripts new URLs: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/specs/yafray.spec http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/yafaray-0.1.0-0.1.svn.20081031.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 14:36:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:36:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111436.mABEaLB9010588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #28 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-11-11 09:36:18 EDT --- Sorry. The correct spec is: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/specs/yafaray.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 14:44:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:44:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 204250] Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111444.mABEirfB000973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204250 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-11-11 09:44:51 EDT --- Package Change Request ======================= Package Name: Ngspice Short Description: A mixed level/signal circuit simulator Owners: chitlesh Branches: EL-5 - -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 14:58:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:58:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443238] Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111458.mABEwGxK014388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443238 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-11 09:58:14 EDT --- Yes, this one looks fine. I still haven't been able to determine why I and a few others see these issues in their personal mock builds but most people don't. Anyway, this looks fine now; the permissions are good and rpmlint is silent. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 14:59:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:59:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469494] Review Request: xlcrack - Recover lost and forgotten passwords from XLS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111459.mABExbMw004029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469494 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 15:22:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:22:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470830] Review Request: open64 - The Open64 compiler suite (C, C++, Fortran) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111522.mABFMDqW019419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-11 10:22:12 EDT --- This package has to make it into rawhide in any case, so it needs to work on Fedora. It is not unheard of for a package to include a binary copy once to do the initial bootstrapping; immediately after it is built, you remove the binary code and use the existing package to build the next one. Take a look at the specfile for the fpc package and the "useprebuiltcompiler" define. Still, it would perhaps be even better if the issues with gcc 4.3 were better understood before going that route. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 15:23:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:23:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471041] New: Review Request: diffpdf - PDF files comparator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: diffpdf - PDF files comparator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471041 Summary: Review Request: diffpdf - PDF files comparator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rafalzaq at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/diffpdf/diffpdf.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/diffpdf/diffpdf-0.3.8-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: DiffPDF is used to compare two PDF files. By default the comparison is of the text on each pair of pages, but comparing the appearance of pages is also supported (for example, if a diagram is changed or a paragraph reformatted). It is also possible to compare particular pages or page ranges. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 15:25:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:25:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111525.mABFPEMB009443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #31 from Muayyad Alsadi 2008-11-11 10:25:13 EDT --- > Unfortunately you have to be a packager in order to comaintain a package. till I get that, I'll be pleased to help at least by attaching .spec files in bugzilla >> we need 3 font packages >> 1. KACST > kacst-fonts is already in fedora for a long time. I meant to say we should have 3 separate packages because we have 3 upstream packages kacst: is from different author while arabeyes-core and arabeyes-decorative have different license (the first is GPLed and the second is OFL) Nicolas Mailhot proposed that each font should be split into a different package so at least we need 3 different source rpms because we have three upstreams they later can be split using some macro into final rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 15:28:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:28:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460352] Review Request: xwota - Who's On the Air Database interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111528.mABFSZdC020509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460352 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-11 10:28:33 EDT --- Looks good. desktop-file-install has been quieted and the license tag is correct now. APPROVED Thanks for doing more reviews; it really helps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 15:31:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:31:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111531.mABFVa1U010639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #9 from John F 2008-11-11 10:31:35 EDT --- I guess I should try to talk with the elinks maintainer, that makes a lot of sense! Should I contact them directly or use the fedora-devel list? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 15:31:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:31:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468128] Review Request: python-flickrapi - Python module for interfacing with the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111531.mABFV1xf010384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468128 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-11 10:31:00 EDT --- Ping? I'm thinking that test suite failure is simply due to not having supplied an appropriate jpeg file. If you could confirm a successful test suite run then I see no reason this couldn't be approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 15:38:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:38:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460352] Review Request: xwota - Who's On the Air Database interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111538.mABFcNsq023237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460352 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Lucian Langa 2008-11-11 10:38:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xwota Short Description: Who's On the Air Database interface Owners: lucilanga Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 15:44:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:44:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111544.mABFinfQ024735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #31 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2008-11-11 10:44:46 EDT --- OK, here are the links to the new packages: http://bos.fedorapeople.org/ghc-zlib-0.5.0.0-1.fc9.src.rpm http://bos.fedorapeople.org/ghc-zlib.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 16:23:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:23:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459387] Review Request: libtool2 - The GNU Portable Library Tool v2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111623.mABGNq17024330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459387 --- Comment #7 from Matthias Clasen 2008-11-11 11:23:50 EDT --- F11 is open for business. We should get moving on introducing libtool2 early in the cycle, parallel or not... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 16:36:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:36:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461929] Review Request: mnemosyne - Flash-card learning tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111636.mABGagkq027390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461929 --- Comment #6 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-11-11 11:36:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > I would like to, but I'm not sponsored yet :-( You are now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 16:58:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:58:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461929] Review Request: mnemosyne - Flash-card learning tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111658.mABGwV2E031274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461929 Charles R. Anderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cra at wpi.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Charles R. Anderson 2008-11-11 11:58:30 EDT --- Yes, thanks Dominik :-) You need to add Requires: hicolor-icon-theme for the /usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128/apps/ directory. Package ACCEPTED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 17:14:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:14:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470502] Review Request: kde-plasma-runcommand - Simple plasmoid to run commands without using terminal or KRunner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111714.mABHEdkU002274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470502 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2008-11-11 12:14:38 EDT --- I'll take a look. scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=926785 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 17:17:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:17:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470502] Review Request: kde-plasma-runcommand - Simple plasmoid to run commands without using terminal or KRunner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111717.mABHH22Q014021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470502 --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2008-11-11 12:17:01 EDT --- 1. I'd venture that only BR: kdebase-workspace is required here. 2. %post/%postun ldconfig scriptlets not needed otherwise, very simple here, pending scratch build and rpmlint tests, we're close. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 17:18:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:18:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111718.mABHIoVB014188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #15 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2008-11-11 12:18:49 EDT --- Hi, Mamoru, I will contact Beda Kosata to inquire about the possibility of creating links. Soon I'll post the answer here (In reply to comment #14) > By the way > > - All codes are under GPLv2+ (or no license) and HTML files > are under GFDL, so the license tag must be > "GPLv2+ and GFDL". > > - This package uses some files from Python powerwidgets > "Pmw", which is actually in Fedora as "python-pmw" > (bug 462250: I reviewed...). > Is it possible to make this package use system-wide > python-pmw? > (simply creating symlinks will be easier?) > > - I guess packaging oasa seperately will be better. > http://bkchem.zirael.org/oasa_en.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 17:25:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:25:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470502] Review Request: kde-plasma-runcommand - Simple plasmoid to run commands without using terminal or KRunner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111725.mABHPk7f005178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470502 --- Comment #3 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-11-11 12:25:45 EDT --- It's based on than's kde-plasma-lancelot SPEC file. So we should prepare template from latest "perfect" plasma SPEC file and then propagate changes to already reviewed ones. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 17:34:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:34:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470502] Review Request: kde-plasma-runcommand - Simple plasmoid to run commands without using terminal or KRunner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111734.mABHYjHY018220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470502 --- Comment #5 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-11-11 12:34:44 EDT --- Ok, thanks for quick review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 17:32:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:32:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470502] Review Request: kde-plasma-runcommand - Simple plasmoid to run commands without using terminal or KRunner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111732.mABHWPfb007215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470502 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter 2008-11-11 12:32:24 EDT --- rpmlint clean. confirmed functions as advertised. APPROVED (I'll leave you to address minor 1,2 issues before building) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 17:37:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:37:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470502] Review Request: kde-plasma-runcommand - Simple plasmoid to run commands without using terminal or KRunner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111737.mABHb6sq008341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470502 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-11-11 12:37:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kde-plasma-runcommand Short Description: Simple plasmoid to run commands without using terminal or KRunner Owners: jreznik Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 17:47:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:47:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111747.mABHluoU021374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #10 from Patrice Dumas 2008-11-11 12:47:55 EDT --- I think that you should try to contact the maintainer directly, and if things doesn't move, go to the mailing list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 17:52:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:52:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447738] Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111752.mABHqIxF011323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 --- Comment #13 from Debarshi Ray 2008-11-11 12:52:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > I'm pinging upstream to see if there are plans to port the ZYpp stack to rpm > 4.6. Any response? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 17:57:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:57:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447740] Review Request: zypper - easy to use command line package manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111757.mABHvXjf023352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447740 --- Comment #9 from Debarshi Ray 2008-11-11 12:57:32 EDT --- Waiting for progress in #447738 and #442714 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 18:15:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:15:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461929] Review Request: mnemosyne - Flash-card learning tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111815.mABIFCHW027682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461929 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-11-11 13:15:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mnemosyne Short Description: Flash-card learning tool Owners: rathann Branches: F-10 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 18:12:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:12:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461929] Review Request: mnemosyne - Flash-card learning tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111812.mABICnHA026983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461929 --- Comment #8 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-11-11 13:12:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > koji build: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=913629 > > You are building a noarch python package. > Using CFLAGS is irrelevant. (it is replaced as -O2 only as noarch package). > > In the install section, why do you need to install twice ? > %{__python} setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root %{buildroot} > should be enought. (at least there is the same set of files with this method). I just copied those two lines from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python Line removed. > Gnome HIG recommends to use verb(s) in comments for desktop files... > http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gup/hig/1.0/ Fixed. (In reply to comment #7) > You need to add Requires: hicolor-icon-theme for the > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128/apps/ directory. Fixed. Updated package: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/mnemosyne.spec http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/mnemosyne-1.1.1-3.r1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 18:17:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:17:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111817.mABIHCFs017644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 Thomas Moschny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Thomas Moschny 2008-11-11 13:17:10 EDT --- Thanks for this review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lmms Short Description: Linux MultiMedia Studio Owners: thm Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: none Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 18:25:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:25:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111825.mABIPVla019718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #18 from Jeff Ortel 2008-11-11 13:25:30 EDT --- Fabian, I've completed steps (1-12) in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess and all seems well. Now, getting ready to do steps 13 & 14 (make update) to push in to fedora updates for (F-8, F-9) and I have a question. Suds 0.3.2 is now GA. Should I (can I) follow the package update process now? Or, completely follow through with 0.3.1 and then update the package? Also, does it matter when I close this ticket with NEXT RELEASE? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 19:43:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:43:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447368] Review Request: schroot - Execute commands in a chroot environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111943.mABJh6lG016515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447368 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-11 14:43:04 EDT --- Note that I've asked on fedora-security-list for someone to have a look at this package. I've no idea of what response I might receive, but there's at least a chance that we can move forward. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 19:48:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:48:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465382] Review Request: bouncycastle-mail - SMIME/CMS packages for Bouncy Castle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111948.mABJm9lw017850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465382 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-11 14:48:08 EDT --- I finally got a hold of fitzsim. He released bouncycastle to me. I will update both bcprov and bcmail this week (for now for F-9 only. I'm not sure about F-8). Package Change Request ======================= Package Name: bouncycastle-mail New Branch: F-9 Owner: oget -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 20:23:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:23:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471108] New: Review Request: wholeslide - a library for decoding virtual slide files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: wholeslide - a library for decoding virtual slide files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471108 Summary: Review Request: wholeslide - a library for decoding virtual slide files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adam at spicenitz.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://wholeslide.cs.cmu.edu/download/wholeslide.spec SRPM URL: http://wholeslide.cs.cmu.edu/download/wholeslide-1.0.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Wholeslide library allows for vendor-independent decoding of virtual slide images. This package contains the C library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 20:32:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:32:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435017] Review Request: ssm - coordinate superposition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112032.mABKWKi2027258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435017 Tim Fenn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 20:32:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:32:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435017] Review Request: ssm - coordinate superposition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112032.mABKW1Zf027209@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435017 --- Comment #14 from Tim Fenn 2008-11-11 15:32:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ssm Short Description: coordinate superposition library Owners: timfenn Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: timfenn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 20:36:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:36:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468466] Review Request: libgksu - Simple API for su and sudo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112036.mABKacml028499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468466 --- Comment #6 from Simon Wesp 2008-11-11 15:36:37 EDT --- fixed SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/libgksu-2.0.7/libgksu.spec SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/libgksu-2.0.7/libgksu-2.0.7-3.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint-errors: libgksu.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gksu.schemas libgksu.i386: W: one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig i edited this %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig to this: .. Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig .. %postun /sbin/ldconfig i hope this won't be a problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 20:36:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:36:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468467] Review Request: gksu - Graphical frontend to su In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112036.mABKafL1028524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468467 --- Comment #2 from Simon Wesp 2008-11-11 15:36:40 EDT --- NEWS-file sorry, I have forget it to remove the NEWS-file, its an empty file gettext-devel. Strange, i made this error in every package, up to now, sorry! The Desktopfile It's a little tricky. The desktopfile tries to open a terminalemulator via gksu /usr/bin/x-terminal-emulator x-terminal-emulator is a setting in update-alternatives for debian and debian based distros. seems like fedora don't use this or a similar alternative to set a terminal. so this file will be needless, or? all patches are from the gksu-debianpackage upstream = debian package maintainer of gksu & libgksu fixed: news file and gettext and patchcomment, split the nautlis extension in an extra subpackage SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/gksu-2.0.0/gksu.spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/gksu-2.0.0/gksu-2.0.0-2.fc10.src.rpm Only rpmlint-error: gksu-nautilus-extension.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-2.0/libnautilus-gksu.a i think this won't be a problem, or? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 20:47:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:47:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471108] Review Request: wholeslide - a library for decoding virtual slide files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112047.mABKlvFD031023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471108 --- Comment #1 from Adam Goode 2008-11-11 15:47:56 EDT --- It's not with a stable API yet, but this Java code contains the main demo interface for the library: http://wholeslide.cs.cmu.edu/download/wholeslide-java-1.0.0.tar.gz The class is edu.cmu.cs.wholeslide.gui.Demo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 21:15:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:15:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435018] Review Request: clipper - crystallographic object oriented library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112115.mABLFFro025788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435018 --- Comment #12 from Tim Fenn 2008-11-11 16:15:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Would you rewrite your spec/srpm? I guess you once want > to clean up your spec file. Yes, now that all the deps are cleaned up, I did a bit of a cleaning/fixing: new spec: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/clipper.spec new srpm: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/clipper-2.0-16.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 22:06:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:06:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112206.mABM6VwX005168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #29 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-11-11 17:06:30 EDT --- I am also using: sed -i -e"s|REL_CCFLAGS = '-O3 -ffast-math'|REL_CCFLAGS = '-ffast-math %{optflags}'|g" config/linux2-config.py for the RPM_OPT_FLAGS. The compiler uses now: -ffast-math -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 22:13:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:13:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470424] Review Request: libtopology - Libtopology is a library for discovering the hardware topology on Linux systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112213.mABMDa33006679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470424 --- Comment #4 from Tony Breeds 2008-11-11 17:13:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Anyway: APPROVED > > If you like to continue with the Fedora Account setup, I can > sponsor you. Thank you I have created a FAS account completed the CLA and applied for membership to the packager group. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 22:22:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:22:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470424] Review Request: libtopology - Libtopology is a library for discovering the hardware topology on Linux systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112222.mABMMwue009479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470424 --- Comment #5 from Bill Nottingham 2008-11-11 17:22:57 EDT --- How does this compare to libbitmask and libcpuset from http://oss.sgi.com/projects/cpusets/? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 22:29:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:29:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469494] Review Request: xlcrack - Recover lost and forgotten passwords from XLS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112229.mABMTnem022672@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469494 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-11 17:29:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xlcrack Short Description: Recover lost and forgotten passwords from XLS files Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 22:41:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:41:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225725] Merge Review: elinks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112241.mABMfLGa025652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225725 --- Comment #6 from John F 2008-11-11 17:41:20 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=323269) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323269) Fixes to the elinks.spec file to have it work with the 'links' package Full spec file and srpm here: http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~jhford/fedora/elinks.spec http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~jhford/fedora/elinks-0.12-0.7.pre2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 22:43:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:43:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471041] Review Request: diffpdf - PDF files comparator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112243.mABMhVMd013755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471041 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-11 17:43:30 EDT --- I'm unable to download your spec file... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 23:19:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:19:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112319.mABNJLRL001196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |471003 Depends on|471003 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 23:19:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:19:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112319.mABNJMTu001217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |471003 Depends on|471003 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 23:19:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:19:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112319.mABNJJ0A001149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|425882, 470756 | Depends on| |425882, 470756 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-11 18:19:18 EDT --- Oops thanks - made this depend on ghc-zlib and ghc-HTTP reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 23:22:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:22:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112322.mABNMjOI023514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #32 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-11 18:22:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #31) > till I get that, I'll be pleased to help at least by attaching .spec files in bugzilla Thanks. > I meant to say we should have 3 separate packages > because we have 3 upstream packages Yep I think we all agree on this. :) > they later can be split using some macro into final rpm I think Nicolas was probably talking about subpackaging of upstream packages when they provide multiple fonts/faces, yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 23:29:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:29:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468128] Review Request: python-flickrapi - Python module for interfacing with the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112329.mABNTMBd024842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468128 --- Comment #4 from Ian Weller 2008-11-11 18:29:21 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=323272) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323272) Running of test suite with image I'm assuming you mean this test suite, and I'm assuming that if it doesn't return anything then it succeeded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 23:55:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:55:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470424] Review Request: libtopology - Libtopology is a library for discovering the hardware topology on Linux systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112355.mABNtZhg030551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470424 --- Comment #6 from Tony Breeds 2008-11-11 18:55:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > How does this compare to libbitmask and libcpuset from > http://oss.sgi.com/projects/cpusets/? I could be wrong but my reading of the code for libcpuset indicates it's primarily about creating (nestable) groups of CPUS for dealing with process affinity. It considers threads lightly, and mostly to work around a in kernel bug to do with set allocation. Libtopology's focus is discovery of CPU topology. It will export information about socket/package, core and thread configuration, along with (numa) memory placement. libtopology is "destined" to be used by tools such as taskset and numactl for "optimum" placement of CPU resources. for example "run 4 copies of $this on the "best" only on primary threads". To the best of my knowledge this isn't available in any other similar library. Certainly there is overlap with PLPA and cpuset but it is not complete and the libraries can be used to complement each other. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 00:01:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:01:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225725] Merge Review: elinks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120001.mAC01q2N031932@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225725 --- Comment #7 from Patrice Dumas 2008-11-11 19:01:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Created an attachment (id=323269) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323269) [details] > Fixes to the elinks.spec file to have it work with the 'links' package > > Full spec file and srpm here: > http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~jhford/fedora/elinks.spec > http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~jhford/fedora/elinks-0.12-0.7.pre2.fc10.src.rpm It would have been better to keep the obsoletes, but version them by using the links version number that was used when it was obsoleted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 00:06:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:06:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120006.mAC06O31011463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #32 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-11 19:06:23 EDT --- Thanks, Bryan. Perhaps the review should target f11 now since we have ghc-6.10.1 in dist-f11. But that is up to Jason really. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 00:07:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:07:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461011] Review Request: kde-plasma-lancelot - An alternative application launcher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120007.mAC07sqP011599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461011 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Kevin Kofler 2008-11-11 19:07:52 EDT --- That stuff has been built and pushed for a while. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 00:06:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:06:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471145] New: Review Request: procinfo-ng - System monitoring application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: procinfo-ng - System monitoring application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471145 Summary: Review Request: procinfo-ng - System monitoring application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/procinfo-ng.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/procinfo-ng-2.0.217-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/procinfo-ng/ Description: Procinfo-NG is a complete rewrite of the old system monitoring application procinfo. The goal is to make more readable (and reusable) code and to restore broken functionality. Koji scratch builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=927803 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint procinfo-ng* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint procinfo-ng* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I renamed the file 'procinfo' to 'procinfo-ng' in the %file section to avoid conflicts with the existing 'procinfo'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 00:08:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:08:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120008.mAC08txN000645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #33 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2008-11-11 19:08:53 EDT --- I'm easy. I'll be pushing a nearly-zero-day update of ghc 6.10.1 for f10 if I can. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 00:14:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:14:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470737] Review Request: pen - Load balancer for "simple" tcp based protocols such as http or smtp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120014.mAC0ENVf012758@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470737 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-11 19:14:22 EDT --- While fixing the encoding you don't preserve the timestamps. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 00:25:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:25:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120025.mAC0P8XY015010@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |OLPC 8960 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-11 19:25:07 EDT --- I've reported upstream about the tarball. I think that it will be really hard to get one because on most activities pages are no contact details about how to get in touch with the developer, no direct link to the bugtracking system, no proper entry (and some times no entry) in the bugtracking system, or no action from upstream in the past months. Let's give them some time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 00:25:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:25:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - Maze for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120025.mAC0Pl8u015195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: sugar-maze |Review Request: sugar-maze |- |- Maze for Sugar -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 01:09:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:09:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471145] Review Request: procinfo-ng - System monitoring application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120109.mAC19vq8023069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471145 --- Comment #1 from Bill Nottingham 2008-11-11 20:09:56 EDT --- Is it commandline-compatible, and somewhat-output-compatible, with original procinfo? If so, it may be worth talking to the procinfo maintainer about just obsoleting the old version.b -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 01:10:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:10:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464054] Package Review Request for projectM-pulseaudio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120110.mAC1AVxw012550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464054 Jameson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Jameson 2008-11-11 20:10:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: projectM-pulseaudio Short Description: projectM visualization through pulseaudio Owners: imntreal Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: imntreal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 01:29:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:29:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464051] Package Review Request for projectM-jack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120129.mAC1TPQT015608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464051 --- Comment #4 from Jameson 2008-11-11 20:29:24 EDT --- I have a new SPEC in original location, and a new SRPM: http://www.vtscrew.com/projectM-jack-1.2.0-4.fc9.src.rpm I double checked the URL, and it worked for me. Am I still missing something in it? I'm still waiting to hear from upstream about the license issues. I'm afraid I've scared them off with it, though. Sorry, I forgot that la files line. I thought I got rid of all of them. The desktop file is updated. I didn't think I would need to require the pulseaudio package since the icon is actually installed with libprojectM-qt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 01:39:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:39:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464051] Package Review Request for projectM-jack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120139.mAC1dmQJ017637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464051 --- Comment #5 from Jameson 2008-11-11 20:39:48 EDT --- Oh URL, not SOURCE. Gotcha -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 01:48:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:48:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464050] Package Review Request for projectM-libvisual In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120148.mAC1mMjS019509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464050 --- Comment #6 from Jameson 2008-11-11 20:48:21 EDT --- I'll have to wait until I get home to test the libvisual-plugins question, but I've got everything else worked out. As I said in the -jack bug, I haven't heard back from them about the license, and I'm concerned about how they are reacting to the license issues. It could just be they haven't gotten together about it, and back to me yet. At least this one doesn't link to any GPL libraries, so we should be okay if they want it to be LGPL. New source will come as soon as I can check out the libvisual-plugins issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:51:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:51:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469952] Review Request: dopewars - a drug dealing game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120251.mAC2ppK2010399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469952 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-11 21:51:50 EDT --- dopewars-1.5.12-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:55:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:55:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464049] Package Review Request for libprojectM-qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120255.mAC2teAK011693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464049 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-11 21:55:39 EDT --- libprojectM-qt-1.2.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:53:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:53:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120253.mAC2rfYq010818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 --- Comment #83 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-11 21:53:35 EDT --- scala-2.7.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:54:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:54:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460660] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120254.mAC2sJGs011036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460660 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:55:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:55:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464049] Package Review Request for libprojectM-qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120255.mAC2tgi7011726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464049 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:51:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:51:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469952] Review Request: dopewars - a drug dealing game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120251.mAC2pslT010431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469952 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:54:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:54:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462253] Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120254.mAC2s7Yi010969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462253 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:54:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:54:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120254.mAC2s1sJ010909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-11 21:54:00 EDT --- unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update unikurd-web-font'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-9546 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:55:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:55:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470140] Review Request: nettee - Network "tee" program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120255.mAC2tSum011647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470140 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-11 21:55:27 EDT --- nettee-0.1.9-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update nettee'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9559 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:52:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:52:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469590] Review Request: cpuid - Dumps information about the CPU(s) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120252.mAC2qobg010681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469590 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-11 21:52:49 EDT --- cpuid-20060917-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update cpuid'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9534 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:51:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:51:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468299] Review Request: jabberpy - Python xmlstream and jabber IM protocol libs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120251.mAC2pUoU010314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468299 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-11 21:51:29 EDT --- jabberpy-0.5-0.17.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update jabberpy'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9519 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:56:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:56:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459016] Review Request: bunny - Instrumented C code security fuzzer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120256.mAC2uuRm001995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459016 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-11 21:56:55 EDT --- bunny-0.93-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:53:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:53:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438406] Review Request: ufiformat - Disk formatting utility for USB floppy devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120253.mAC2rL2Q000526@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438406 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-11 21:53:19 EDT --- ufiformat-0.9.4-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:56:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:56:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438406] Review Request: ufiformat - Disk formatting utility for USB floppy devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120256.mAC2uoLb001966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438406 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-11 21:56:49 EDT --- ufiformat-0.9.4-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:56:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:56:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463123] Review Request: gnomint - Graphical x509 Certification Authority management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120256.mAC2uCA9001784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463123 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-11 21:56:10 EDT --- gnomint-0.5.4-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:54:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:54:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460660] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120254.mAC2sG1Q000832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460660 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-11 21:54:15 EDT --- php-pear-Auth-1.6.1-8.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:54:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:54:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462253] Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120254.mAC2s4UW000751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462253 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-11 21:54:03 EDT --- perl-Cache-FastMmap-1.28-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:53:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:53:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457160] Review Request: Zorba - General purpose XQuery processor implemented in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120253.mAC2rC4S000424@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457160 --- Comment #10 from Paul F. Kunz 2008-11-11 21:53:10 EDT --- upstream sources finalized their release, so I've updated the files and bumped the release number by 1... SRPM: ftp://zorba-xquery.com/zorba-0.9.4-3.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: ftp://zorba-xquery.com/zorba.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:53:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:53:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438406] Review Request: ufiformat - Disk formatting utility for USB floppy devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120253.mAC2rPQt000606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438406 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:53:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:53:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120253.mAC2rFXt000465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-11 21:53:13 EDT --- unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update unikurd-web-font'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9538 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:56:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:56:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120256.mAC2uKgv012234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 --- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-11 21:56:18 EDT --- tasque-0.1.7-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:58:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:58:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459016] Review Request: bunny - Instrumented C code security fuzzer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120258.mAC2w5fB012897@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459016 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-11 21:58:05 EDT --- bunny-0.93-5.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:57:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:57:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457108] Review Request: libss7 - SS7 protocol services to applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120257.mAC2vCVe012593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457108 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-11 21:57:11 EDT --- libss7-1.0.1-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:58:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:58:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466764] Review Request: lensfun - A library to rectify the defects introduced by your photographic equipment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120258.mAC2whLv013069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466764 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:59:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:59:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120259.mAC2x6Z2013223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-11 21:59:05 EDT --- libev-3.48-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libev'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9594 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:58:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:58:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466764] Review Request: lensfun - A library to rectify the defects introduced by your photographic equipment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120258.mAC2weP1003058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466764 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-11 21:58:40 EDT --- lensfun-0.2.3-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 03:01:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:01:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460660] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120301.mAC312OX004088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460660 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-11 22:01:01 EDT --- php-pear-Auth-1.6.1-8.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 03:00:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:00:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120300.mAC303lF003543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-11 22:00:02 EDT --- libev-3.48-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libev'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-9598 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 03:01:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:01:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468299] Review Request: jabberpy - Python xmlstream and jabber IM protocol libs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120301.mAC31YQT004338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468299 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-11 22:01:33 EDT --- jabberpy-0.5-0.17.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update jabberpy'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-9610 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 03:23:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:23:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464051] Package Review Request for projectM-jack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120323.mAC3N3A0019095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464051 Bug 464051 depends on bug 464049, which changed state. Bug 464049 Summary: Package Review Request for libprojectM-qt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464049 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-11 22:23:02 EDT --- My bad, I thought the icon belongs to projectM-pulseaudio. Then there is no problem with the icon. I will check this package probably tomorrow morning (EST). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 03:47:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:47:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120347.mAC3l5DZ024530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #9 from Akira TAGOH 2008-11-11 22:47:04 EDT --- Sorry, my bad. it works after changing: ja to: ja Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 04:23:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 23:23:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120423.mAC4NCYL030598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 vivek shah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(boni.vivek at gmail. | |com) | --- Comment #17 from vivek shah 2008-11-11 23:23:10 EDT --- I am currently in the process of shifting and will apply the patch and check it up in a couple of days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 05:35:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:35:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225725] Merge Review: elinks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120535.mAC5ZaSk011919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225725 John F changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |johnhford at gmail.com --- Comment #8 from John F 2008-11-12 00:35:35 EDT --- The last upstream update to the old version of links 1 was made in 2003 and I looked as far back as I could in Fedora and it is exclusively elinks since at least Fedora core 5. I could redo the patch with the versioned obsolete there, but I doubt that would have any real effect since as best as I can tell, there never has been an actual 'links' package in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 07:13:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 02:13:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120713.mAC7DKGO018452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-12 02:13:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Sorry, my bad. it works after changing: > > > ja > > > to: > > > ja > Oh, right. didn't catch it sorry. Are there so many japanese locales out there you can not use the full ja-FOO code? Because this test will trigger on any locale that contains ja (for example javanese, if fontconfig ever moves to iso639-2 or iso15924) (don't know if this is a big risk, I think this was a long-term fontconfig plan, Behdad would know) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 07:48:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 02:48:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120748.mAC7mdZH024331@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #34 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-12 02:48:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #33) > I'm easy. Basically the package looks pretty good to me now, my only comment is that we need requires for all the install scripts I guess. Because of not needing haddock09 those would also look easier with dist-f11 in koji # for ghc-pkg and haddock Requires(pre): ghc = %{ghc_version} Requires(preun): ghc = %{ghc_version} Requires(post): ghc = %{ghc_version} Requires(postun): ghc = %{ghc_version} (they need to be versioned for ghc-pkg) > I'll be pushing a nearly-zero-day update of ghc 6.10.1 for f10 if I can. (It might be better to wait a little longer I think for ghc-6.10.1 to stabilise and also after seeing how much work it was updating f9 to ghc-6.8.3, but let's see how we go.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 08:03:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 03:03:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120803.mAC83F18026651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #11 from Akira TAGOH 2008-11-12 03:03:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Are there so many japanese locales out there you can not use the full ja-FOO > code? Because this test will trigger on any locale that contains ja (for > example javanese, if fontconfig ever moves to iso639-2 or iso15924) No. maybe better testing "jp" or do you prefer ja-jp (or ja_jp? dunno) rather than that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 08:42:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 03:42:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120842.mAC8gHxR032489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #19 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-12 03:42:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > Now, getting ready to do steps 13 & 14 (make update) to push in to fedora > updates for (F-8, F-9) and I have a question. Suds 0.3.2 is now GA. Should I > (can I) follow the package update process now? Or, completely follow through > with 0.3.1 and then update the package? Sure you can follow the package update process with 0.3.2. Just update your spec file, change the version and reset your spec release number, and commit all changes to cvs. Then new build. All old builds are still available for direct downloading from koji if somebody is interested. > Also, does it matter when I close this ticket with NEXT RELEASE? You can let bodhi take care about this ticket, just add the bugzilla id in the 'New Update' form ( https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/ ). Or close the ticket now manually. At the just an appendix: Change your '- Add LICENSE to %doc.' to '- Add LICENSE to %%doc.' -> no rpmlint warning -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 08:47:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 03:47:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464050] Package Review Request for projectM-libvisual In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120847.mAC8lE5Y010418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464050 --- Comment #7 from Jameson 2008-11-12 03:47:13 EDT --- I have a new SPEC in original location, and a new SRPM: http://www.vtscrew.com/projectM-libvisual-1.2.0-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 08:47:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 03:47:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226317] Merge Review: procinfo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120847.mAC8l617010389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226317 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-12 03:47:05 EDT --- This is the review request for procinfo-info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471145 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 09:19:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:19:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120919.mAC9J2RU016371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-12 04:19:01 EDT --- If there is only one japanese locale by all means just test on "ja-jp" (without the contains bit). IIRC that was the locale format that worked for the Chinese people. However, as always with fontconfig, it's a good idea to test before pushing the rules on users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 11:00:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 06:00:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 343741] Review Request: sugar-base - Base Sugar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121100.mACB0q1O003309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343741 Tomeu Vizoso changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net --- Comment #11 from Tomeu Vizoso 2008-11-12 06:00:51 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sugar-base New Branches: OLPC-4 Owners: mpg erikos tomeu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 11:05:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 06:05:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244371] Review Request: sugar - OLPC desktop environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121105.mACB5wpR004237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244371 Tomeu Vizoso changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 11:05:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 06:05:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244371] Review Request: sugar - OLPC desktop environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121105.mACB5gSH004201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244371 Tomeu Vizoso changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net --- Comment #15 from Tomeu Vizoso 2008-11-12 06:05:39 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sugar New Branches: OLPC-4 Owners: mpg erikos tomeu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 11:04:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 06:04:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431707] Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121104.mACB4XKU025850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431707 --- Comment #13 from Tomeu Vizoso 2008-11-12 06:04:32 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sugar-toolkit New Branches: OLPC-4 Owners: mpg erikos tomeu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 11:02:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 06:02:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 343741] Review Request: sugar-base - Base Sugar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121102.mACB2QVD025652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343741 Tomeu Vizoso changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 11:04:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 06:04:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431707] Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121104.mACB4mHi025905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431707 Tomeu Vizoso changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 11:08:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 06:08:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244373] Review Request: sugar-presence-service - Sugar presence service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121108.mACB8WNZ004570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244373 Tomeu Vizoso changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 11:06:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 06:06:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244377] Review Request: sugar-artwork - Artwork for Sugar look-and-feel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121106.mACB6svH004406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244377 Tomeu Vizoso changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 11:06:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 06:06:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244377] Review Request: sugar-artwork - Artwork for Sugar look-and-feel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121106.mACB6dfc004333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244377 Tomeu Vizoso changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net --- Comment #14 from Tomeu Vizoso 2008-11-12 06:06:38 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sugar-artwork New Branches: OLPC-4 Owners: mpg erikos tomeu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 11:09:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 06:09:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244389] Review Request: sugar-datastore - Sugar Datastore In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121109.mACB9iE3026829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244389 Tomeu Vizoso changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 11:09:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 06:09:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244389] Review Request: sugar-datastore - Sugar Datastore In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121109.mACB9DOZ026774@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244389 Tomeu Vizoso changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net --- Comment #9 from Tomeu Vizoso 2008-11-12 06:09:12 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sugar-datastore New Branches: OLPC-4 Owners: mpg erikos tomeu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 11:08:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 06:08:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244373] Review Request: sugar-presence-service - Sugar presence service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121108.mACB83Sa026633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244373 Tomeu Vizoso changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net --- Comment #14 from Tomeu Vizoso 2008-11-12 06:08:02 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sugar-presence-service New Branches: OLPC-4 Owners: mpg erikos tomeu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 11:26:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 06:26:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121126.mACBQfEe030072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 Tomeu Vizoso changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 11:26:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 06:26:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121126.mACBQI71007930@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 Tomeu Vizoso changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net --- Comment #21 from Tomeu Vizoso 2008-11-12 06:26:17 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: hulahop New Branches: OLPC-4 Owners: mpg erikos tomeu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 11:28:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 06:28:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470737] Review Request: pen - Load balancer for "simple" tcp based protocols such as http or smtp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121128.mACBSHDX030245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470737 --- Comment #2 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-11-12 06:28:16 EDT --- I have found a example here. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Convert_encoding_to_UTF-8 fixed. http://ispbrasil.com.br/pen/pen.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/pen/pen-0.18.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 11:32:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 06:32:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 423631] Review Request: sugar-evince - evince package for OLPC, library for embedding In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121132.mACBWvuE008996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423631 Tomeu Vizoso changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net --- Comment #9 from Tomeu Vizoso 2008-11-12 06:32:55 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sugar-evince New Branches: OLPC-4 Owners: dsd mpg erikos tomeu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 11:33:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 06:33:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 423631] Review Request: sugar-evince - evince package for OLPC, library for embedding In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121133.mACBXOeX031179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423631 Tomeu Vizoso changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 12:46:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:46:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 231809] Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121246.mACCkU1s012186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231809 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hdegoede at redhat.com AssignedTo|hdegoede at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #22 from Hans de Goede 2008-11-12 07:46:26 EDT --- Re-assigning this to nobody, iow throwing it back into the review queue, I'm done with this ticket, its a real shame as it would be really nice to get the secondlife client into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 12:54:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:54:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469265] Review Request: pax-utils - PaX aware and related utilities for ELF binaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121254.mACCsVwI013564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469265 Rafa? Psota changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rafalzaq at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rafalzaq at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 13:30:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:30:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 423631] Review Request: sugar-evince - evince package for OLPC, library for embedding In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121330.mACDUMqX032685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423631 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Blocks| |462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 13:31:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:31:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244377] Review Request: sugar-artwork - Artwork for Sugar look-and-feel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121331.mACDVqi0022161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244377 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Blocks| |462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 13:31:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:31:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431707] Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121331.mACDVZdq000592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431707 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Blocks| |462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 13:33:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:33:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244371] Review Request: sugar - OLPC desktop environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121333.mACDXieS000955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244371 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Blocks| |462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 13:32:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:32:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244373] Review Request: sugar-presence-service - Sugar presence service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121332.mACDWuSp000813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244373 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Blocks| |462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 13:33:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:33:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244389] Review Request: sugar-datastore - Sugar Datastore In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121333.mACDX6v8022399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244389 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Blocks| |462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 13:48:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:48:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121348.mACDmZwh025447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 Josh Boyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jwboyer at gmail.com Blocks| |468400 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 14:00:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:00:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121400.mACE0REq007024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #16 from David Carter 2008-11-12 09:00:26 EDT --- I'm been looking into the two issues you mentioned. Static libraries will be a quick fix. The license stuff may take a bit more thought. I've been so involved in the project I forgot about the issue of the SDK code. It's certainly not a significant part of the project. My options are to rip out the offending code (used mostly in the tests), or to get it approved as is. It is potentially useful as part of the distributed package as well. I'll keep you posted. - Dave -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 14:01:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:01:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121401.mACE1TJB028545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-12 09:01:28 EDT --- python-suds-0.3.2-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-suds-0.3.2-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 14:01:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:01:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121401.mACE1Pq3007381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-12 09:01:25 EDT --- python-suds-0.3.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-suds-0.3.2-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 14:01:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:01:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121401.mACE1M4N007346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-12 09:01:21 EDT --- python-suds-0.3.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-suds-0.3.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 14:02:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:02:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444512] Review Request: eclipse-eclemma - EMMA plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121402.mACE2Tjp007529@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444512 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Andrew Overholt 2008-11-12 09:02:28 EDT --- Alex updated this for me and I apparently never uploaded it. Builds for me with 3.4 and matches new packaging guidelines for file locations: Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~overholt/eclipse-eclemma.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~overholt/eclipse-eclemma-1.3.2-1.fc9.src.rpm There are some rpmlint warnings but I believe they're all waivable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 14:05:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:05:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470531] Review Request: hunspell-cop - Coptic hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121405.mACE5GHx029430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470531 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 14:54:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:54:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470909] Review Request: wt - C++ library and application server for developing web applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121454.mACEsUR7017653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470909 --- Comment #2 from Lorenzo Villani 2008-11-12 09:54:29 EDT --- > The description is too long, in my opinion. Going to cut it ASAP > Please have a look at: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Use_of_common_namespace You mean that the package name is too much generic/short? (webtoolkit would be better?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 15:00:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:00:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454959] Review Request: eclipse-cusp - Eclipse Common Lisp Development Tools (Cusp) plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121500.mACF02nm008125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454959 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Overholt 2008-11-12 10:00:00 EDT --- I've put an updated specfile that builds for me here: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-cusp.spec There may be issues, but it's updated to put stuff in the right places :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 15:38:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:38:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471231] New: Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 Summary: Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pm at datasphere.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://monnerat.fedorapeople.org/WebCalendar.spec SRPM URL: http://monnerat.fedorapeople.org/WebCalendar-1.2.0-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: WebCalendar is a PHP-based calendar application that can be configured as a single-user calendar, a multi-user calendar for groups of users, or as an event calendar viewable by visitors. MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, DB2, Interbase, MS SQL Server, or ODBC is required. WebCalendar can be setup in a variety of ways, such as... * A schedule management system for a single person * A schedule management system for a group of people, allowing one or more assistants to manage the calendar of another user * An events schedule that anyone can view, allowing visitors to submit new events * A calendar server that can be viewed with iCal-compliant calendar applications like Mozilla Sunbird, Apple iCal or GNOME Evolution or RSS-enabled applications like Firefox, Thunderbird, RSSOwl, or FeedDemon, or BlogExpress. Scratch koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=928527 rpmlint: spec file: silent srpm: silent rpm: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/WebCalendar/includes/settings.php /etc/WebCalendar/settings.php W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/WebCalendar/includes/site_extras.php /etc/WebCalendar/site_extras.php ---> symlinks to configuration files. W: non-standard-gid /etc/WebCalendar/settings.php apache W: non-standard-gid /etc/WebCalendar apache E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/WebCalendar 0775 ---> Configuration directory/file is created and initialized when WebCalendar is invoked via a browser for the first time. These settings are needed for this purpose. E: non-readable /etc/WebCalendar/settings.php 0660 ---> configuration file that holds a password and therefore should not be publicly readable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 16:00:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:00:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121600.mACG0qkc031257@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-12 11:00:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > that comes to mind, is ACE > (http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE.html) but it appears someone has some > working fedora packages, it just has not been included: > http://dist.bonsai.com/ken/ace_tao_rpm/SRC/5.6.6-1/. - This is bug 450164, however currently this one is blocked by license issue (see the discussion from bug 450164 comment 18) > Also, perhaps OTL, which > would be extremely simple to package: http://otl.sourceforge.net/ - This one does not seems to be in Fedora currently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 16:16:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:16:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464051] Package Review Request for projectM-jack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121616.mACGGn1S023171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464051 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-12 11:16:48 EDT --- All good! ------------------------------------------------ This package (projectM-jack) is APPROVED by oget ------------------------------------------------ Jameson, if you have time, could you review my package (Bug# 468765)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 16:18:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:18:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471243] New: Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243 Summary: Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ovasik at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=323340) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323340) spec file for docbook5-schemas package Description of problem: Need review of docbook5-schemas package for Fedora. This package contains set of Norman Walsh's Docbook 5.X schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema). It is expected that the package will contain other Docbook 5.X schemas releases in future - so it uses for cycles even there is only one 5.0 Docbook 5 release at the moment. Zip-file of docbook 5.0 schemas could be downloaded from the address http://www.docbook.org/xml/5.0/docbook-5.0.zip Additional info: Basic rpmlint checks done, other docbook5 related review at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470250 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 16:21:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:21:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435018] Review Request: clipper - crystallographic object oriented library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121621.mACGLueh002717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435018 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-12 11:21:55 EDT --- Rebuild failed on dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=928611 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 16:22:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:22:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470250] Review Request: docbook5-style-xsl - Norman Walsh's XSL stylesheets for DocBook 5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121622.mACGMi0e024398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470250 --- Comment #4 from Ondrej Vasik 2008-11-12 11:22:42 EDT --- Just as a note, just added docbook5-schemas review request as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243 , so both basic docbook5 packages should be submitted for review at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 16:41:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:41:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121641.mACGfx7c007475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(aage at thaumaturge. | |org) --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-12 11:41:56 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 16:42:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:42:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121642.mACGggHh007574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(soumya at dgplug.org | |) --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-12 11:42:41 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 16:46:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:46:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121646.mACGk22h008370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(andy at gohanman.com | |) --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-12 11:46:01 EDT --- ping again? By the way at least you have to write CVS admin request on this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 16:43:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:43:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121643.mACGhx6H029770@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(soumya at dgplug.org | |) --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-12 11:43:58 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 16:51:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:51:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 423631] Review Request: sugar-evince - evince package for OLPC, library for embedding In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121651.mACGpDch031503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423631 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-12 11:51:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 16:47:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:47:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464050] Package Review Request for projectM-libvisual In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121647.mACGlIoK030742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464050 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-12 11:47:17 EDT --- Good to go. Just update the license information of the relevant packages, if there is need, whenever you get a reply from upstream. I guess we are done with projectM ( at least for now :) ) ----------------------------------------------------- This package (projectM-libvisual) is APPROVED by oget ----------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 16:54:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:54:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 343741] Review Request: sugar-base - Base Sugar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121654.mACGsJwI010026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343741 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-12 11:54:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 16:54:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:54:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244373] Review Request: sugar-presence-service - Sugar presence service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121654.mACGsoNM010118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244373 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-12 11:54:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 16:52:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:52:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121652.mACGqtco009755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-12 11:52:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 16:55:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:55:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244371] Review Request: sugar - OLPC desktop environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121655.mACGtkJe032739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244371 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-12 11:55:45 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 16:52:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:52:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431707] Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121652.mACGqG0r031771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431707 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-12 11:52:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 16:56:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:56:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244389] Review Request: sugar-datastore - Sugar Datastore In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121656.mACGuCsP000660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244389 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-12 11:56:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 16:55:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:55:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244377] Review Request: sugar-artwork - Artwork for Sugar look-and-feel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121655.mACGtJKN032554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244377 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-12 11:55:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 17:05:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:05:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121705.mACH58Mt013399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(cassmodiah at fedora | |project.org) --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-12 12:05:06 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 17:25:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:25:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121725.mACHPCiq017526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-12 12:25:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > (In reply to comment #17) > > - I must say this srpm (tarball in this srpm) is problematic. > > > > Almost all codes in 2.8.1 tarball are still under GPLv2 (strict), however > > newly added tv_grab_ttx.pl is under GPLv3+, which are, unfortunately, > > incompatible: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#GPL_Compatibility_Matrix > > You need to fix license issue first. > > Upstream doesn't want to change the licenses and suggests to split out the Perl > script because it is not essential for the main application and can also be > used stand-alone. Is it possible/allowed to move it into a subpackage with a > different license tag? > > As the Perl script is still an experimental feature I could also exclude it for > now. This depends on how this perl script is related to the rest part of nxtvepg. If this perl script "uses" (i.e. depends on) the rest part of nxtvepg, then the license conflict cannot be resolved only by moving it into a subpackage and this script must be removed completely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 17:15:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:15:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121715.mACHFwBE005739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(fkooman at tuxed.net | |) --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-12 12:15:56 EDT --- If it seems difficult to package GPshell, would you try to do a pre-review of other person's review request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 18:17:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:17:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461929] Review Request: mnemosyne - Flash-card learning tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121817.mACIHfv7017643@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461929 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-12 13:17:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 18:19:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:19:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121819.mACIJvqp017909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-12 13:19:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 18:25:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:25:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121825.mACIP77J019378@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-12 13:25:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 18:26:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:26:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466301] Review Request: ario - Music Player Daemon Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121826.mACIQlYt029501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466301 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-12 13:26:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 18:30:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:30:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464054] Package Review Request for projectM-pulseaudio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121830.mACIUVQH020353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464054 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ Bug 464054 depends on bug 464049, which changed state. Bug 464049 Summary: Package Review Request for libprojectM-qt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464049 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-12 13:30:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 18:45:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:45:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470502] Review Request: kde-plasma-runcommand - Simple plasmoid to run commands without using terminal or KRunner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121845.mACIjMEL023415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470502 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-12 13:45:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 18:49:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:49:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469494] Review Request: xlcrack - Recover lost and forgotten passwords from XLS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121849.mACInBt2001381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469494 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-12 13:49:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 18:47:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:47:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460352] Review Request: xwota - Who's On the Air Database interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121847.mACIllGa023860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460352 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-12 13:47:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 18:55:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:55:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435017] Review Request: ssm - coordinate superposition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121855.mACIt7IO002971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435017 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-12 13:55:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 18:59:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:59:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469972] Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121859.mACIxVaE003822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 --- Comment #4 from Paul F. Johnson 2008-11-12 13:59:29 EDT --- Ping!!!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 18:57:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:57:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465382] Review Request: bouncycastle-mail - SMIME/CMS packages for Bouncy Castle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121857.mACIvilw003475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465382 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-12 13:57:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 18:57:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:57:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 204250] Review Request: Ngspice - A mixed level/signal circuit simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121857.mACIv7XY003377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204250 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-12 13:57:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 19:01:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:01:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471041] Review Request: diffpdf - PDF files comparator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121901.mACJ1r0L004697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471041 --- Comment #2 from Rafa? Psota 2008-11-12 14:01:52 EDT --- nonlogic.org is down. New links: Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.fedorapeople.org/review/diffpdf/diffpdf.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.fedorapeople.org/review/diffpdf/diffpdf-0.3.8-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 19:07:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:07:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468539] Review Request: sugar-jukebox - Media player activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121907.mACJ7QvV006035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468539 --- Comment #2 from Simon Schampijer 2008-11-12 14:07:25 EDT --- new sources have been released http://kushaldas.in/tmp/Jukebox-4.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 19:15:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:15:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469972] Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121915.mACJFrSN029987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 --- Comment #5 from David Nielsen 2008-11-12 14:15:52 EDT --- oh when you said "the next run" I thought you meant another update was coming so I didn't look at it Generally I like this one, let's call it approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 19:40:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:40:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471275] New: Review Request: mod_scgi - Python implementation of the SCGI protocol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mod_scgi - Python implementation of the SCGI protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471275 Summary: Review Request: mod_scgi - Python implementation of the SCGI protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmahut at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/mod_scgi/mod_scgi.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/mod_scgi/mod_scgi.spec Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=929133 Description: The SCGI protocol is a replacement for the Common Gateway Interface (CGI) protocol. It is a standard for applications to interface with HTTP servers. It is similar to FastCGI but is designed to be easier to implement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 19:41:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:41:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471275] Review Request: mod_scgi - Python implementation of the SCGI protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121941.mACJfOrw013638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471275 --- Comment #1 from Marek Mahut 2008-11-12 14:41:23 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/mod_scgi/mod_scgi-1.13-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 19:48:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:48:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471275] Review Request: mod_scgi - Python implementation of the SCGI protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121948.mACJml7f003956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471275 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-11-12 14:48:46 EDT --- Thanks for the package. Taking this for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 21:10:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:10:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465382] Review Request: bouncycastle-mail - SMIME/CMS packages for Bouncy Castle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811122110.mACLAuDr020585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465382 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-12 16:10:55 EDT --- bouncycastle-mail-1.41-3.fc9,bouncycastle-1.41-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bouncycastle-mail-1.41-3.fc9,bouncycastle-1.41-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 21:28:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:28:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811122128.mACLSpp9001165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-12 16:28:51 EDT --- barry-0.14-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/barry-0.14-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 21:26:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:26:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435018] Review Request: clipper - crystallographic object oriented library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811122126.mACLQuRo001051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435018 --- Comment #14 from Tim Fenn 2008-11-12 16:26:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Rebuild failed on dist-f11: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=928611 Added a patch to fix the build problems, tested on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=929474 new spec: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/clipper.spec new srpm: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/clipper-2.0-17.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 21:28:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:28:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811122128.mACLShWL023528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-12 16:28:43 EDT --- barry-0.14-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/barry-0.14-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 21:28:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:28:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811122128.mACLSmcl023562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-12 16:28:47 EDT --- barry-0.14-4.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/barry-0.14-4.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 21:51:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:51:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469972] Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811122151.mACLpPCS028703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 --- Comment #7 from Paul F. Johnson 2008-11-12 16:51:25 EDT --- I'll rebuild for tao in the morning and update that :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 21:50:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:50:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469972] Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811122150.mACLoqqN028525@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 Paul F. Johnson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Paul F. Johnson 2008-11-12 16:50:51 EDT --- Thanks :-) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libglfw Short Description: A portable OpenGL framework Owners: pfj Branches: devel, f9 InitialCC: pfj -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 22:08:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:08:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468562] Review Request: basket - Taking care of your ideas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811122208.mACM8L6A008737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468562 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-12 17:08:20 EDT --- basket-1.0.3.1-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/basket-1.0.3.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 22:08:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:08:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468562] Review Request: basket - Taking care of your ideas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811122208.mACM8IT6031788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468562 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-12 17:08:17 EDT --- basket-1.0.3.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/basket-1.0.3.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 22:31:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:31:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463768] Package review: perl-PAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811122231.mACMVOfk012618@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463768 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-PAR -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 22:41:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:41:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471041] Review Request: diffpdf - PDF files comparator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811122241.mACMfYdB005222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471041 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-12 17:41:34 EDT --- After a fast look at the spec file, it looks good to me. If nobody is interested in doing the review, I will do it. You can convert two lines into one if you like... mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir} install -m 755 diffpdf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir} -> install -Dp -m 0755 %{name} %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/%{name} but don't mix %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=929672 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 23:21:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 18:21:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469494] Review Request: xlcrack - Recover lost and forgotten passwords from XLS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811122321.mACNLOVQ011763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469494 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-12 18:21:23 EDT --- xlcrack-1.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xlcrack-1.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 23:21:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 18:21:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469494] Review Request: xlcrack - Recover lost and forgotten passwords from XLS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811122321.mACNLREW020597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469494 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-12 18:21:26 EDT --- xlcrack-1.2-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xlcrack-1.2-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 23:50:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 18:50:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811122350.mACNooqn016598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 Chris Feist changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 00:15:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:15:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470424] Review Request: libtopology - Libtopology is a library for discovering the hardware topology on Linux systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130015.mAD0F7dj020127@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470424 Tony Breeds changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Tony Breeds 2008-11-12 19:15:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libtopology Short Description: CPU Topology library Owners: tbreeds Branches: F-9 F-10 EPEL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 00:25:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:25:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464051] Package Review Request for projectM-jack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130025.mAD0Pf5U021673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464051 Jameson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Jameson 2008-11-12 19:25:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: projectM-jack Short Description: projectM visualizations for JACK audio Owners: imntreal Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: imntreal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 00:27:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:27:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435017] Review Request: ssm - coordinate superposition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130027.mAD0RRRJ031032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435017 --- Comment #16 from Tim Fenn 2008-11-12 19:27:27 EDT --- cvs builds done, update request submitted to bodhi for F-9 and F-10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 00:26:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:26:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464051] Package Review Request for projectM-jack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130026.mAD0QHJV030946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464051 --- Comment #9 from Jameson 2008-11-12 19:26:16 EDT --- > Jameson, if you have time, could you review my package (Bug# 468765)? I'll start looking at it this week if no one else picks it up. That's actually one that I've been interested in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 00:30:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:30:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462254] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap - FastMmap session storage backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130030.mAD0UXbT031669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462254 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Flag| |fedora-review? Bug 462254 depends on bug 462253, which changed state. Bug 462253 Summary: Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462253 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-12 19:30:31 EDT --- Sorry for taking so long; I'd meant to pick up this review earlier but the Real Job has me busy lately :-) Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=929961 There are 2 missing BR's for tests, Test::Pod and Test::Pod::Coverage; both of these should be added as buildrequires. perl(Path::Class) appears twice in the requires, due to an explicit requires statement; this doesn't harm anything but I'd suggest dropping the explicit requires from the spec. The rpmlint warning you really can't do anything about :-) =====> perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap-0.05-1.fc9.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap.noarch: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap-0.05-1.fc9.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap-0.05-1.fc9.noarch.rpm perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Session::Store::FastMmap) = 0.05 perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap = 0.05-1.fc9 ====> requires for perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap-0.05-1.fc9.noarch.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Cache::FastMmap) >= 1.13 perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Session) >= 0.09 perl(Catalyst::Utils) perl(File::Spec) perl(NEXT) perl(Path::Class) perl(Path::Class) perl(base) perl(strict) Source matches upstream: a5c28758a3a212fcc0f374110bc7855c Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap-0.05.tar.gz a5c28758a3a212fcc0f374110bc7855c Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap-0.05.tar.gz.srpm License (perl) is correct. Make the requires/buildrequires changes at the top of this review, and I'll approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 00:27:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:27:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464050] Package Review Request for projectM-libvisual In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130027.mAD0R5sB021882@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464050 Jameson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Jameson 2008-11-12 19:27:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: projectM-libvisual Short Description: projectM visualizations through libvisual Owners: imntreal Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: imntreal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 00:45:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:45:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443238] Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130045.mAD0jvgn001492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443238 Victor Bogado changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Victor Bogado 2008-11-12 19:45:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: Cave9 Short Description: 3d game of cave exploration Owners: bogado Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 00:46:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:46:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464054] Package Review Request for projectM-pulseaudio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130046.mAD0kZNN024718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464054 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-12 19:46:34 EDT --- projectM-pulseaudio-1.2.0-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/projectM-pulseaudio-1.2.0-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 01:04:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:04:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471335] New: Review Request: libgdbus - Library for simple D-Bus integration with GLib Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libgdbus - Library for simple D-Bus integration with GLib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471335 Summary: Review Request: libgdbus - Library for simple D-Bus integration with GLib Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libgdbus.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libgdbus-0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: libgdbus is a helper library for D-Bus integration with GLib. Koji scratch builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=930029 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint libgdbus* libgdbus-devel.i386: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint libgdbus* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. This request based on the work which has be done in review marked as DEADREVIEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458698 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 01:08:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:08:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130108.mAD18XOV004823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #13 from Akira TAGOH 2008-11-12 20:08:32 EDT --- Sure. Updated. Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 02:06:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:06:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130206.mAD26iUb014116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #20 from Matthias Clasen 2008-11-12 21:06:41 EDT --- libsoup >= 2.25 adds a libproxy dependency too, so getting this reviewed sooner rather than later would be appreciated from the gnome side, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 02:23:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:23:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456955] Review-Request: libzdb - Zild Database Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130223.mAD2NBpV007155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456955 Bernard Johnson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |needinfo?(fedora at krishnan.c | |c) --- Comment #8 from Bernard Johnson 2008-11-12 21:23:10 EDT --- Rajesh, I wanted to bump up the version of dbmail, so I'm waiting on this package. Are you still working towards becoming a fedora contributor? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 02:53:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:53:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462254] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap - FastMmap session storage backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130253.mAD2rEYJ012174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462254 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2008-11-12 21:53:13 EDT --- Thanks, Chris. New spec and srpm to enable the pod tests and remove the duplicate requires. Spec URL: http://www.xs4all.nl/~iarnell/fedora/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap.spec SRPM URL: http://www.xs4all.nl/~iarnell/fedora/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap-0.05-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 03:35:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:35:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130335.mAD3ZFMZ028564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-12 22:35:14 EDT --- python-suds-0.3.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-suds'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9614 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 03:36:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:36:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130336.mAD3avcS029313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-12 22:36:57 EDT --- python-suds-0.3.2-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-suds'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-9630 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 03:38:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:38:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130338.mAD3cDRM029611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 --- Comment #21 from Hayden James 2008-11-12 22:38:12 EDT --- Well I just packaged OTL, wasn't really challenging, but here it is: http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/otl-4.0.176-1.fc9.src.rpm http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/otl.spec I probably won't even seek to get that included, but I thought of another lib I've used in the past that would be helpful which is snmp++: http://www.agentpp.com/index.html Btw, any chance to look at the latest quickfix spec file? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 05:13:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:13:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462254] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap - FastMmap session storage backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130513.mAD5Denj003614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462254 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-13 00:13:39 EDT --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 05:32:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:32:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462254] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap - FastMmap session storage backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130532.mAD5Wa59006598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462254 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2008-11-13 00:32:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap Short Description: FastMmap session storage backend Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 06:30:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:30:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460352] Review Request: xwota - Who's On the Air Database interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130630.mAD6UxOJ025076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460352 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-13 01:30:59 EDT --- xwota-0.4-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xwota-0.4-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 06:30:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:30:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460352] Review Request: xwota - Who's On the Air Database interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130630.mAD6U9xR024870@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460352 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-13 01:30:08 EDT --- xwota-0.4-5.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xwota-0.4-5.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 06:31:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:31:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460352] Review Request: xwota - Who's On the Air Database interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130631.mAD6VcdW016221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460352 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-13 01:31:37 EDT --- xwota-0.4-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xwota-0.4-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 06:34:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:34:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460352] Review Request: xwota - Who's On the Air Database interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130634.mAD6YraG025427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460352 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 06:56:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:56:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470830] Review Request: open64 - The Open64 compiler suite (C, C++, Fortran) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130656.mAD6uAaa028873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-13 01:56:08 EDT --- OK. Now I get it to build and work in mock for Fedora 9 x86_64 using open64 itself as compiler. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/open64.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/open64-4.2-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 07:02:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 02:02:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130702.mAD72MS8020995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-13 02:02:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > Well I just packaged OTL, wasn't really challenging, but here it is: > > http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/otl-4.0.176-1.fc9.src.rpm > http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/otl.spec - Please create another review request for this package. By the way Some other maintainer names srpm/binary rpms which contain only C++ templete as "foo-devel" from the beginning: Example: bug 469808 > I probably won't even seek to get that included, but I thought of another lib > I've used in the past that would be helpful which is snmp++: > http://www.agentpp.com/index.html - This one does not seem to be in Fedora currently. > Btw, any chance to look at the latest quickfix spec file? Thanks. - Will check later... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 08:15:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 03:15:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225725] Merge Review: elinks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130815.mAD8Fj9s009548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225725 Ondrej Vasik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ovasik at redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Ondrej Vasik 2008-11-13 03:15:43 EDT --- There was no links package in Fedora - last links package was 0.96 in RHEL2.1 and RHL7.3. Anyway, I'm not sure about dropping links symlinks as they are frequently used by elinks users for just running elinks. Versioned obsoletes are reasonable, I would suggest usage of different binary name in links package e.g. links2, links-g ... This is IMHO more safe solution... No patch for spec file is needed, we just have to discuss details what should be changed in elinks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 08:28:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 03:28:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225725] Merge Review: elinks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130828.mAD8SoJk011388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225725 --- Comment #10 from Ondrej Vasik 2008-11-13 03:28:49 EDT --- About the symlinks and their purpose at the beginning - I'm not sure, I guess it was because of keeping backward compatibility with some text-mode scripts as links package will probably bring requirements for X/framebuffer which could not be acceptable in some cases. Versioned obsoletes will be fixed without doubts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 08:35:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 03:35:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130835.mAD8ZLJQ003401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 Ondrej Vasik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ovasik at redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Ondrej Vasik 2008-11-13 03:35:20 EDT --- Just as a note - links2 is used as name of binary of original links on other Linux distros like Gentoo as well. So with versioned obsoletes in elinks everything would be fine and packages could live together without troubles. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 09:16:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 04:16:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130916.mAD9G44X021140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 --- Comment #8 from D Haley 2008-11-13 04:16:03 EDT --- I'm around, but I only have weekends to work on this -- and not all of those. Expect some updates this weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 09:20:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 04:20:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460306] Review Request: flickrfs - Virtual filesystem for flickr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130920.mAD9KicN022171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460306 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from Marek Mahut 2008-11-13 04:20:42 EDT --- This piece of software is very unstable and I'm not comfortable enough to be responsible having it in Fedora. Closing this review, if anyone wants to make another try please open a new review request and mark this bug as duplicate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 09:35:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 04:35:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435018] Review Request: clipper - crystallographic object oriented library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130935.mAD9Z8Tm015447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435018 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-13 04:35:06 EDT --- For -17: * License - Well, the description of the license in the source codes seems somewhat confusing, however the license tag can be safe with "LGPLv2+". * Source1 - Is this source created by yourself or can it be downloaded somewhere? (If some URL exists, write the URL like Source0) * Dependency for -devel subpackage - Installed clipper.pc contains: -------------------------------------------------------- 8 Requires: mmdb gpp4 10 Libs: -L/usr/lib -lclipper -lsrfftw -lsfftw -lm -------------------------------------------------------- This means that -devel subpackage must have "Requires: mmdb-devel gpp4-devel fftw2-devel", however - Would you check if "Requires: gpp4" and "Libs: -lstfftw -lsfftw" are really needed? Installed clipper-devel header files do not seem to depend on any header files in gpp4-devel or fftw2-devel", so I guess these Requires and Libs can be removed ! Note: "Requires: mmdb" is still needed (this means that clipper-devel must have "Requires: mmdb-devel") because clipper/mmdb/clipper_mmdb.h contains: -------------------------------------------------------- 50 51 #include 52 -------------------------------------------------------- * %setup - I guess %setup can be replaced by -------------------------------------------------------- %prep %setup -q -c -a 1 -------------------------------------------------------- ! Timestamps - Not a blocker, however for packages using "install-sh" to install files, -------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT CPPROG="cp -p" -------------------------------------------------------- to keep timestamps on installed files * %defattr - Now we recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) * Documents - The file "INSTALL" is usually for people who wants to compile/ install the package by himself and not needed for rpm users. * Directory ownership issue - %_includedir/clipper is not owned by any packages ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories#Wildcarding_Files_inside_a_Created_Directory * rpmlint -------------------------------------------------------- clipper.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/clipper-2.0/ChangeLog clipper-devel.i386: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/clipper-devel-2.0/dox/develop.dox clipper-devel.i386: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/clipper-devel-2.0/dox/coordtypes.dox clipper-devel.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/clipper-devel-2.0/dox/wheretolook.dox -------------------------------------------------------- - Including zero size "ChangeLog" seems meaningless - Please fix CRLF (Windows-like) end-of-line endcodings. - Usually files included as %doc must have 0644 permission -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 09:48:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 04:48:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469080] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - plugin for Pidgin which displays the music track currently playing in the status message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130948.mAD9mDDe017759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469080 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-13 04:48:12 EDT --- To find a sponsor it helps do do some informal reviews and submit some more packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 09:53:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 04:53:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470502] Review Request: kde-plasma-runcommand - Simple plasmoid to run commands without using terminal or KRunner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130953.mAD9rXHc028005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470502 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-13 04:53:32 EDT --- kde-plasma-runcommand-0.6-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kde-plasma-runcommand-0.6-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 10:37:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 05:37:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 235741] Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131037.mADAbEWw005520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235741 Tomeu Vizoso changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 10:40:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 05:40:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471373] New: Review Request: rmanage - Remotely monitoring machines on network Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rmanage - Remotely monitoring machines on network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471373 Summary: Review Request: rmanage - Remotely monitoring machines on network Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: panemade at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/rmanage/rmanage.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/rmanage/rmanage-0.1.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This tool is used for monitoring the LAN for connected machines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 10:36:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 05:36:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 235741] Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131036.mADAau2p005465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235741 Tomeu Vizoso changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net --- Comment #18 from Tomeu Vizoso 2008-11-13 05:36:53 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: hippo-canvas New Branches: OLPC-4 Owners: mpg erikos tomeu We need to fork this package because Sugar 0.83 (which should ship in the F10-based 9.1 OLPC release) depends on the three commits referenced below, which introduces API changes and thus cannot be applied in the F10 branch. http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/hippo-canvas?view=revision&revision=7297 http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/hippo-canvas?view=revision&revision=7296 http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/hippo-canvas?view=revision&revision=7295 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 12:08:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 07:08:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467644] Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131208.mADC84j9014222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467644 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-13 07:08:03 EDT --- One way would probably be to integrate sugar-memorize with no sound in Fedora for now. And fix this in the near future. There was a patch added to csound (named csound-5.03.0-add-oggplay.patch), maybe this solve the problem but I didn't investigate this further. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=205447 The current version of csound is 5.09. At the moment available for Fedora 5.07. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 13:10:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:10:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471373] Review Request: rmanage - Remotely monitoring machines on network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131310.mADDAcf7027305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471373 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-13 08:10:37 EDT --- Just some comment on your spec file... - 'desktop-file-install --vendor="fedora" \' is obsolete for new packages. Check https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/DesktopFileVendor - You are mixing $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} . That should not be done. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS - There is a po directory in the source. The tool provides translation. But BuildRequires: gettext, %find_lang %{name}, and %files -f %{name}.lang are missing. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 13:13:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:13:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468579] Review Request: PyQuante - Python Quantum Chemistry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131313.mADDDQvN005159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468579 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-13 08:13:25 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 13:12:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:12:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458440] Review Request: bluemindo - Simple audio player in python/GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131312.mADDCslY005075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458440 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-13 08:12:53 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 13:12:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:12:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131312.mADDC3BF004935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #35 from Jon Ciesla 2008-11-13 08:11:58 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: kicad New Branches: EL-5 Owners: limb chitlesh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 13:29:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:29:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131329.mADDTFnx008791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #12 from John F 2008-11-13 08:29:13 EDT --- I noticed that with Ubuntu and Debian, they do use links2 but that is because they also have links 1 which uses links. Their elinks package doesn't use the 'links' symlink. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 13:31:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:31:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471373] Review Request: rmanage - Remotely monitoring machines on network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131331.mADDVkUP032365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471373 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-13 08:31:45 EDT --- Thanks for looking into this package. I agree SPEC is not cleanly written and its submitted in a hurry. Here is updated SRPM. Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/rmanage/rmanage.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/rmanage/rmanage-0.1.5-2.fc9.src.rpm Note: As no translations are provided by this package I have not used guidelines for Handling locale files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 13:46:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:46:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468579] Review Request: PyQuante - Python Quantum Chemistry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131346.mADDkN80013340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468579 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-13 08:46:23 EDT --- Sorry, I'll get right on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 13:53:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:53:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131353.mADDrUo7014844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #13 from Ondrej Vasik 2008-11-13 08:53:29 EDT --- Yes, they have links v1.00 package, but links v1.00 package doesn't have graphic, so it could fully replace elinks - so I'll be completely ok to remove symlinks to links for hypothetical links v1.00 package if accepted on fedora-devel-list (although the output could differ a bit in some cases), but not for links v2.X package with graphics ... I really would prefer to use links2 binary name for links with graphic as it is used on other distros that way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 13:59:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:59:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470070] Review Request: perl-URI-FromHash - Build a URI from a set of named parameters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131359.mADDxOTw007074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470070 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-13 08:59:21 EDT --- ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: aae0fc31be1fbb997c39960096d2bc7500bad777 URI-FromHash-0.03.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if ava ilable. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: noarch, perl module [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. + additional bonus: "make test" passes ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 14:13:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:13:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468579] Review Request: PyQuante - Python Quantum Chemistry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131413.mADEDSB7010337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468579 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-13 09:13:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Only some quick comment about the rpmlint output and your spec file... > > Spec file: > > Detail about packaging python stuff: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python > > Name: PyQuante > - The name of your package should be lower case > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Case_Sensitivity The author refers to the software as PyQuante, also the python modules are called PyQuante. Refer to ORBit in Naming Guidelines. > BuildRequires > - 'BuildRequires: python' is missing It is already required by python-setuptools-devel (and numpy too?). > % files > - Please follow the guidelines > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#System_Architecture Hmm, I thought I already was following them. I can't find anything wrong with using %{python_sitearch} as defined in the Python guidelines. PyQuante contains compiled C code in the modules.. >> PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script >> /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/Minimizers.py 0644 > >You can add something like 'find *.py -type f | xargs chmod a+x' to fix this. If I do that then I get script-without-shebang errors. Besides, the files in site-packages don't need to be executable, since they just contain modules used by the frontend software. Check your python-sitelib directory, only a small minority of the .py files are executable. rpmlint shouldn't complain about this. > > PyQuante.x86_64: W: invalid-license Modified BSD > > PyQuante-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license Modified BSD > > For a valid license for Fedora, please take a look at > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing Yeah, but the license is not word-for-word BSD. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/PyQuante.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/PyQuante-1.6.1-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 14:17:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:17:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460306] Review Request: flickrfs - Virtual filesystem for flickr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131417.mADEH2Sh020963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460306 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449 Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 14:56:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:56:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245688] Review Request: python-pywbem - Python WBEM client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131456.mADEukEA029680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245688 --- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-13 09:56:41 EDT --- Any response? If you've fixed any of the above issues, please give a link to the updated package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 14:54:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:54:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468128] Review Request: python-flickrapi - Python module for interfacing with the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131454.mADEsi0c028903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468128 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-13 09:54:42 EDT --- Yes, I think that's what I'm looking for. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 15:42:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 10:42:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454441] Review Request: R-bigmemory - Manage massive matrices in R using C++, with support for shared memory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131542.mADFgBe3029759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454441 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-11-13 10:42:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-bigmemory Short Description: Manage massive matrices in R using C++, with support for shared memory Owners: spot Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 16:05:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:05:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470070] Review Request: perl-URI-FromHash - Build a URI from a set of named parameters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131605.mADG5xiH013442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470070 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 16:05:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:05:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470070] Review Request: perl-URI-FromHash - Build a URI from a set of named parameters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131605.mADG5vuK013423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470070 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-13 11:05:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-URI-FromHash Short Description: Build a URI from a set of named parameters Owners: cweyl Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 16:16:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:16:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131616.mADGGgwN016207@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(cassmodiah at fedora | |project.org) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 16:30:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:30:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131630.mADGUFWZ006902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 --- Comment #18 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-11-13 11:30:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > Please include a copy of your correspondence with the copyright holders on > relicensing as a flat text file in this package (and put it in %doc), so that > it is clear to others why we have it licensed like this when the source doesn't > match. Once you've done this and posted a new SRPM/SPEC, I should be able to lift FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 16:35:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:35:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131635.mADGZmj4007781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-13 11:35:46 EDT --- Okay, this package is now good with replacing /usr/include with %{_includedir}. Now I will wait for your another review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 17:18:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:18:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458024] Review Request: sblim-sfcc - Small Footprint CIM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131718.mADHIHb8027515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458024 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #15 from Matt Domsch 2008-11-13 12:18:15 EDT --- built on all branches. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 17:18:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:18:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458012] Review Request: openwsman - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131718.mADHIID2027545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458012 Bug 458012 depends on bug 458024, which changed state. Bug 458024 Summary: Review Request: sblim-sfcc - Small Footprint CIM Client Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458024 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 17:23:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:23:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458025] Review Request: wsmancli - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management - Command line Utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131723.mADHNKBs029258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458025 --- Comment #6 from Matt Domsch 2008-11-13 12:23:19 EDT --- srini - this needs to be rebuilt in the Fedora and EL branches now. Previous build requests failed as openwsman wasn't in the buildroots yet when you last tried to build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 17:33:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:33:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131733.mADHXBCo019304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 Soumya Kanti Chakraborty changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(soumya at dgplug.org |fedora-cvs? |) | --- Comment #14 from Soumya Kanti Chakraborty 2008-11-13 12:33:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pystatgrab Short Description: Python bindings for libstatgrab Owners: soumya Branches: F-9 InitialCC: soumya -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 17:36:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:36:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471429] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache - Catalyst Apache Engines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache - Catalyst Apache Engines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471429 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache - Catalyst Apache Engines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache-1.12-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: These classes provide mod_perl support for Catalyst. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 17:47:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:47:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131747.mADHllgd001585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-13 12:47:45 EDT --- Well, + As you seem to have reason I will admit -static subpackage for this package + This package itself is now in good shape. Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 17:38:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:38:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131738.mADHcdDa032314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 Soumya Kanti Chakraborty changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(soumya at dgplug.org |fedora-cvs? |) | --- Comment #21 from Soumya Kanti Chakraborty 2008-11-13 12:38:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-wikimarkup Short Description: It is a python module which formats text to Mediawiki Owners: soumya Branches: F-9 InitialCC: soumya -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 17:50:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:50:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131750.mADHotuk022782@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-13 12:50:54 EDT --- Please also request for F-10 branch (if you request for F-9 branch) because now F-10 branch is already frozen and devel branch points to F-11. Then please set fedora-cvs flag to ?. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 17:44:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:44:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471429] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache - Catalyst Apache Engines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131744.mADHi5Sx021457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471429 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-perl-devel-list at redh | |at.com --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell 2008-11-13 12:44:04 EDT --- Another one from the Task::Catalyst list. There should be nothing too surprising here. t/03podcoverage.t is skipped because the test fails; and the MP13 and MP19 modules are removed because we don't have the corresponding apache httpd versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 18:01:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:01:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438808] Review Request: php-pear-DB-ldap - A DB compliant interface to LDAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131801.mADI1xba004010@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438808 --- Comment #3 from David Hollis 2008-11-13 13:01:58 EDT --- I still haven't found a sponsor. I would still like to get these packages into Fedora, whether I'm the maintainer or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 18:26:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:26:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131826.mADIQPgL029387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 Soumya Kanti Chakraborty changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #16 from Soumya Kanti Chakraborty 2008-11-13 13:26:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pystatgrab Short Description: Python bindings for libstatgrab Owners: soumya Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: soumya -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 18:30:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:30:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454441] Review Request: R-bigmemory - Manage massive matrices in R using C++, with support for shared memory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131830.mADIUf6G009240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454441 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-13 13:30:41 EDT --- R-bigmemory-2.3-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-bigmemory-2.3-3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 18:31:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:31:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467644] Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131831.mADIVo9x030412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467644 --- Comment #3 from Simon Schampijer 2008-11-13 13:31:49 EDT --- Uploaded a new tarball - and fixed all the permission bits etc. so you can remove all of those :) http://dev.laptop.org/pub/sugar/sources/Memorize/Memorize-29.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 18:27:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:27:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131827.mADIRt3p029604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 Soumya Kanti Chakraborty changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 18:30:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:30:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454441] Review Request: R-bigmemory - Manage massive matrices in R using C++, with support for shared memory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131830.mADIUa5X030171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454441 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-13 13:30:35 EDT --- R-bigmemory-2.3-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-bigmemory-2.3-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 18:30:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:30:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454441] Review Request: R-bigmemory - Manage massive matrices in R using C++, with support for shared memory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131830.mADIUdJF030199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454441 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-13 13:30:38 EDT --- R-bigmemory-2.3-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-bigmemory-2.3-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 18:31:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:31:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131831.mADIVqqo009429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 --- Comment #22 from Soumya Kanti Chakraborty 2008-11-13 13:31:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-wikimarkup Short Description: It is a python module which formats text to Mediawiki Owners: soumya Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: soumya -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 18:44:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:44:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459161] Review Request: wraplinux - Utility to wrap a Linux kernel and initrd into an ELF or NBI file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131844.mADIi2M6011338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459161 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 18:48:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:48:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467644] Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131848.mADImvqW012268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467644 Simon Schampijer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Simon Schampijer 2008-11-13 13:48:56 EDT --- re: csound: I am ok with leaving the sound support out for now - but we should make sure we keep on working on that - would be nice to have - also we have to inspect sound support anyhow since we don't run pulseaudio on the XO. The patch you showed should work - i wrote that one - but it was added to the olpc-2 build only and we could make sure as well to update to the latest csound sources - as they contain the patch AFAIK. r+ anyway - when removing the hacks i fixed in the sources. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 19:06:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:06:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131906.mADJ65EG004951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243 --- Comment #1 from Ondrej Vasik 2008-11-13 14:06:04 EDT --- Other possibility would be to name the package itself just docbook5 and to have subpackages for schemas (docbook5-dtd , docbook5-rng , docbook5-sch and docbook5-xsd) ... I'm ok with it if the future reviewer will think that this name and package split would be more useful for users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 19:22:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:22:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131922.mADJME6O018859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #35 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-13 14:22:12 EDT --- One remaining question: if ghc library packages in the future do grow a runtime component, that will imply not only that this package grows a -devel subpackage but that anything which build against it has to change to having a build dependency on the -devel package. That could be avoided now in a couple of ways, but I don't know whether the possibility of ghc supporting shared libraries is sufficiently remote that its not worth it. The simplest way is for this package to provide ghc-zlib-devel and for other packages to BuildRequires: that. In any case, I'll leave that up to you folks. You will definitely need some extra dependencies for the scriptlets. I think there's one that's not listed above in comment 34; you'll need Rerquires(postun): haddock for the %ghc_reindex_haddock script. I'm not sure what is required for the register.sh and unregister.sh scripts although I suspect the above list should do it. We definitely need to get the full list of dependencies into the guidelines. Currently I think the haddock ones are missing. Or am I confused and is haddock somehow brought in by ghc? rpmlint output: ghc-zlib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.8.3/zlib-0.5.0.0/libHSzlib-0.5.0.0.a ghc-zlib.x86_64: E: devel-dependency zlib-devel ghc-zlib-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-zlib-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.8.3/zlib-0.5.0.0/libHSzlib-0.5.0.0_p.a I agree that the above are all acceptable and expected. * source files match upstream: 20e067cfbec87ec062ac144875a60e158ea6cf7836aac031ec367fcdd5446891 zlib-0.5.0.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. (library for ghc -> ghc- prefix) * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. X Scriptlet dependencies are mostly missing. final provides and requires: ghc-zlib-0.5.0.0-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm ghc-zlib = 0.5.0.0-1.fc10 ghc-zlib(x86-64) = 0.5.0.0-1.fc10 = /bin/sh ghc = 6.8.3 haddock09 zlib-devel ghc-zlib-prof-0.5.0.0-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm ghc-zlib-prof = 0.5.0.0-1.fc10 ghc-zlib-prof(x86-64) = 0.5.0.0-1.fc10 = ghc-zlib = 0.5.0.0 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 20:06:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:06:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221054] Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811132006.mADK6Kit016284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221054 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #22 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-11-13 15:06:17 EDT --- Package Change Request ======================= Package Name: gerbv Short Description: Gerber file viewer from the gEDA toolkit Owners: chitlesh Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 19:41:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:41:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471429] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache - Catalyst Apache Engines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131941.mADJfX05022819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471429 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-13 14:41:32 EDT --- Everything looks good. I note that the author has a rather decent test suite, but has not chosen to enable it, for whatever reason. (Makefile.PL explicitly specifies the tests as being only 't/0*.t'.) They all pass when I run them independently (with minor patches to change 01use.t to 02pod.t), but as upstream has them disabled, it's not a blocker. (I would suggest filing a bug upstream, asking if this is intentional, however.) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=931745 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (perl); make test passes cleanly. 00d89cac86ed977428468433389f4c6e Catalyst-Engine-Apache-1.12.tar.gz 00d89cac86ed977428468433389f4c6e Catalyst-Engine-Apache-1.12.tar.gz.srpm =====> perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache-1.12-2.fc9.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache-1.12-2.fc9.noarch.rpm perl(Catalyst::Engine::Apache) = 1.12 perl(Catalyst::Engine::Apache2) perl(Catalyst::Engine::Apache2::MP20) perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache = 1.12-2.fc9 ====> requires for perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache-1.12-2.fc9.noarch.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(APR::Table) perl(Apache2::Connection) perl(Apache2::Const) perl(Apache2::RequestIO) perl(Apache2::RequestRec) perl(Apache2::RequestUtil) perl(Apache2::Response) perl(Apache2::URI) perl(Catalyst::Runtime) perl(File::Spec) perl(URI) perl(URI::http) perl(URI::https) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 20:25:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:25:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470177] Review Request: perl-Module-Util - Module name tools and transformations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811132025.mADKPjGI019745@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470177 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 20:25:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:25:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469816] Review Request: perl-App-Cmd - Write command line apps with less suffering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811132025.mADKPJ0c019687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469816 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 20:24:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:24:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469627] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class - A Path::Class type library for Moose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811132024.mADKOuqn019346@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469627 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-13 15:24:55 EDT --- I see that you've been reviewing some packages lately, so I'll try to work through your recent submissions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 20:49:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:49:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435018] Review Request: clipper - crystallographic object oriented library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811132049.mADKnvnQ023939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435018 --- Comment #16 from Tim Fenn 2008-11-13 15:49:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > For -17: > > * License > - Well, the description of the license in the source codes seems > somewhat confusing, however the license tag can be safe > with "LGPLv2+". > OK. > * Source1 > - Is this source created by yourself or can it be downloaded > somewhere? (If some URL exists, write the URL like > Source0) > Created by me - I've submitted it upstream as well. > * Dependency for -devel subpackage > - Installed clipper.pc contains: > -------------------------------------------------------- > 8 Requires: mmdb gpp4 > 10 Libs: -L/usr/lib -lclipper -lsrfftw -lsfftw -lm > -------------------------------------------------------- > This means that -devel subpackage must have > "Requires: mmdb-devel gpp4-devel fftw2-devel", however > - Would you check if "Requires: gpp4" and > "Libs: -lstfftw -lsfftw" are really needed? > Installed clipper-devel header files do not seem to > depend on any header files in gpp4-devel or fftw2-devel", > so I guess these Requires and Libs can be removed > several of the functions under the ccp4/ folder are wrapped C++ calls to gpp4 functions, and functions in core/fftmap.h contain wrapped fftw calls. I've added the Requires to -devel. > > * %setup > - I guess %setup can be replaced by > -------------------------------------------------------- > %prep > %setup -q -c -a 1 > -------------------------------------------------------- > done. > ! Timestamps > - Not a blocker, however for packages using "install-sh" to > install files, > -------------------------------------------------------- > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT CPPROG="cp -p" > -------------------------------------------------------- > to keep timestamps on installed files > done. > * %defattr > - Now we recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) > oops, fixed. > * Documents > - The file "INSTALL" is usually for people who wants to compile/ > install the package by himself and not needed for rpm users. > removed. > * Directory ownership issue > - %_includedir/clipper is not owned by any packages > ref: > Ah, thanks! fixed. > > * rpmlint > -------------------------------------------------------- > clipper.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/clipper-2.0/ChangeLog > clipper-devel.i386: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/clipper-devel-2.0/dox/develop.dox > clipper-devel.i386: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/clipper-devel-2.0/dox/coordtypes.dox > clipper-devel.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/clipper-devel-2.0/dox/wheretolook.dox > -------------------------------------------------------- > - Including zero size "ChangeLog" seems meaningless > - Please fix CRLF (Windows-like) end-of-line endcodings. > - Usually files included as %doc must have 0644 permission removed the changelog file, fixed CRLF foo and file perms. new spec: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/clipper.spec new srpm: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/clipper-2.0-18.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 21:08:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:08:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463035] Review Request: pyroman - Very fast firewall configuration tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811132108.mADL8SQV027472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463035 --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-13 16:08:26 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 21:25:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:25:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470830] Review Request: open64 - The Open64 compiler suite (C, C++, Fortran) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811132125.mADLP8BN011109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-13 16:25:07 EDT --- And it builds fine in rawhide x86_64 now, it just doesn't build on EPEL or Fedora 8 since mock can't find the buildreq. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 21:24:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:24:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470830] Review Request: open64 - The Open64 compiler suite (C, C++, Fortran) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811132124.mADLORQ9010735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-13 16:24:26 EDT --- Oh, and the links http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/open64.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/open64-4.2-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 21:23:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:23:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470830] Review Request: open64 - The Open64 compiler suite (C, C++, Fortran) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811132123.mADLNoV0030175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-13 16:23:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > OK. Now I get it to build and work in mock for Fedora 9 x86_64 using open64 > itself as compiler. > > http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/open64.spec > http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/open64-4.2-4.fc9.src.rpm Switched to RPM versions of prebuilt compiler, since the i386 binaries aren't available as tar files for some reason and the build fails. Now the only problem is that mock refuses to build the srpm in 64-bit distros (except F9 works well!), due to ERROR: Bad build req: No Package Found for /lib/ld-linux.so.2. Exiting. However this file is required for the binary compilers (yes, the x86_64 binary is 32-bit also). If one leaves it out one gets sh: /builddir/build/BUILD/open64-4.2-0/opt/open64/bin/opencc: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory I'm not sure whether this is a bug in mock, I'm asking the fedora-packaging list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 21:36:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:36:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469969] Review Request: Tao Framework - C# bindings for many different libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811132136.mADLa0wu013159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469969 --- Comment #2 from Paul F. Johnson 2008-11-13 16:35:59 EDT --- Spec URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/tao.spec SRPM URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/taoframework-2.1.0-2.fc10.src.rpm Rebuild to use libglfw instead of glfw. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 21:37:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:37:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471480] New: Review Request: sfxr - Sound effect generator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sfxr - Sound effect generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471480 Summary: Review Request: sfxr - Sound effect generator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hdegoede at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/sfxr.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/sfxr-1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This little tool was made to provide a simple means of getting basic sound effects into a game. You just need to hit a few buttons in this application to get some largely randomized effects. All the parameters used to create each sound are manually tweakable to allow fine-tuning if you feel like getting your hands dirty. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 21:56:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:56:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470830] Review Request: open64 - The Open64 compiler suite (C, C++, Fortran) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811132156.mADLuNeM016628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-13 16:56:22 EDT --- Still, in koji it doesn't seem to have any problems to build for x86_64.. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=932345 Anyway, the compile seems to be working now on all distros and platforms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 22:01:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:01:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811132201.mADM1MvY004655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-13 17:01:21 EDT --- (22:32:08) nim-nim: tagoh3: your first fontconfig rule for hanazo is now fine (22:32:20) nim-nim: tagoh3: but the second one is still reversed (22:32:26) nim-nim: tagoh3: you need (22:32:32) nim-nim: (22:32:32) nim-nim: [fontname] (22:32:32) nim-nim: (22:32:32) nim-nim: [genericname] (22:32:32) nim-nim: (22:32:32) nim-nim: (22:32:59) nim-nim: with [fontname]=HanaMin (22:33:16) nim-nim: and [genericname]=serif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 22:15:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:15:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226166] Merge Review: mtx In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811132215.mADMFuPs020658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226166 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan at danny.cz --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-13 17:15:55 EDT --- Added Dan to CC since he made the last known update on the SPEC file. Sorry if this was not desired. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 22:13:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:13:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226166] Merge Review: mtx In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811132213.mADMDCN7007222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226166 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com, | |rbrich at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-13 17:13:11 EDT --- I made a full review on this package. Here are my notes: * rpmlint says: mtx.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/mtx-1.3.12/contrib/config_sgen_solaris.sh mtx.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/mtx-1.3.12/contrib/mtx-changer Please fix these. Actually, most of the contents of the contrib directory don't belong to %doc. Also this directory contains .tar.gz files. Those should be extracted and put in the appropriate places, and if necessary, be published as subpackages. * We prefer %defattr (-,root,root,-) * The default prefix is set as /usr/local in the configure script. And the default libdir is the hardcoded /usr/lib. I'm not sure if these have any effect during runtime. Please check and fix if necessary. * Most of the scripts in the contrib directory (even those in the tarballs) point to /usr/local, /usr/local/sbin too. Please fix those. * It would be more consistent with other macros you use if you prefer %{optflags} instead of $RPM_OPT_FLAGS * Parallel make must be supported whenever possible. If it is not supported, this should be noted in the SPEC file as a comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 22:31:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:31:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226314] Merge Review: prctl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811132231.mADMVplv023821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226314 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-13 17:31:50 EDT --- Why is there an explicit ExclusiveArch: ia64 ? I can't find any documentation that indicates this software is only for ia64. Also, do we have a branch for the ia64 architecture at Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 00:02:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:02:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471480] Review Request: sfxr - Sound effect generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140002.mAE02KkP006511@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471480 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-13 19:02:19 EDT --- Hans, the spec link is broken. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 00:07:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:07:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471480] Review Request: sfxr - Sound effect generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140007.mAE07Q0l007395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471480 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-13 19:07:25 EDT --- Would have been nice if the spec URL above would have been valid :) Anyway, here we go, using only the src.rpm : Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: MIT [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, c ontaining the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 9b511df1f39e99374063b89c78e7577d82c79ac2 sfxr-sdl.zip [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane: === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64, devel/i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [!] Package functions as described. Unable to test in this moment. The application does start and does not crash, but I have not been able to see any of the slides / buttons doing anything. Maybe because I am remote... [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [-] %check is present and the test passes. === Final Notes === 1. Please try to push usptream your relevant patches. At least one of them seems to deal with an unitialized field in SDL. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 00:15:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:15:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471480] Review Request: sfxr - Sound effect generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140015.mAE0FDlD008943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471480 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-13 19:15:12 EDT --- Sorry, I meant: [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [?] Package functions as described. Unable to test in this moment. The application does start and does not crash, but I have not been able to see any of the slides / buttons doing anything. Maybe because I am remote... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 00:50:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:50:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140050.mAE0oGTd014364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #36 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-13 19:50:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #35) > One remaining question: if ghc library packages in the future do grow a runtime > component, that will imply not only that this package grows a -devel subpackage > but that anything which build against it has to change to having a build > dependency on the -devel package. That could be avoided now in a couple of > ways, but I don't know whether the possibility of ghc supporting shared > libraries is sufficiently remote that its not worth it. The simplest way is > for this package to provide ghc-zlib-devel and for other packages to > BuildRequires: that. In any case, I'll leave that up to you folks. That is a very good suggestion and I think we should adopt that, since ghc is moving to support shared libraries. > We definitely need to get the full list of dependencies into the guidelines. > Currently I think the haddock ones are missing. Or am I confused and is > haddock somehow brought in by ghc? ghc-6.10.1 includes a version of haddock now, but ghc-6.8.3 does not. (Hence my suggestion to do the review against ghc-6.10.1, but it is not yet in rawhide, just dist-f11.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 02:01:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:01:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140201.mAE21KkB012372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #15 from Akira TAGOH 2008-11-13 21:01:19 EDT --- Doh! I should have a look carefully more.. Thanks for catching this up! Hopefully this would be a final review for hanazono-fonts. Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 02:12:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:12:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471509] New: Review Request: Ext JS - Ext JS is a cross-browser JavaScript library for building rich internet applications. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Ext JS - Ext JS is a cross-browser JavaScript library for building rich internet applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471509 Summary: Review Request: Ext JS - Ext JS is a cross-browser JavaScript library for building rich internet applications. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mohakvyas at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~mdvyas/ExtJS/extjs.spec SRPM URL: http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~mdvyas/ExtJS/extjs-2.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=927964 Description: Ext JS is a cross-browser JavaScript library for building rich internet applications. It includes: * High performance, customizable UI widgets. * Well designed and extensible Component model. * An intutive, easy to use API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 03:04:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:04:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446563] Review Request: rubygem-rspec - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140304.mAE34GSr003340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446563 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-13 22:04:15 EDT --- rubygem-rspec-1.1.11-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-rspec-1.1.11-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 03:02:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:02:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446563] Review Request: rubygem-rspec - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140302.mAE32awd003205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446563 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-13 22:02:35 EDT --- rubygem-rspec-1.1.11-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-rspec-1.1.11-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 03:03:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:03:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446563] Review Request: rubygem-rspec - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140303.mAE33iLI021931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446563 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-13 22:03:43 EDT --- rubygem-rspec-1.1.11-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-rspec-1.1.11-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 04:39:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:39:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471520] New: Review Request: rubygem-simple-rss - A simple, flexible, extensible, and liberal RSS and Atom reader for Ruby Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-simple-rss - A simple, flexible, extensible, and liberal RSS and Atom reader for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471520 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-simple-rss - A simple, flexible, extensible, and liberal RSS and Atom reader for Ruby Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mastahnke at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-simple-rss.spec SRPM URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-simple-rss-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A simple, flexible, extensible, and liberal RSS and Atom reader for Ruby -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 05:02:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:02:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471522] Review Request: OTL - OTL library for database connections and queries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140502.mAE52CCL024839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471522 Hayden James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 05:01:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:01:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471522] New: Review Request: OTL - OTL library for database connections and queries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: OTL - OTL library for database connections and queries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471522 Summary: Review Request: OTL - OTL library for database connections and queries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hayden.james at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/otl.spec SRPM URL: http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/otl-devel-4.0.176-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: OTL C++ database library/wrapper for Oracle/OCI, ODBC, and DB2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 05:03:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:03:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140503.mAE535Wd010477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 --- Comment #24 from Hayden James 2008-11-14 00:03:04 EDT --- I submitted another review request here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471522 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 05:16:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:16:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470424] Review Request: libtopology - Libtopology is a library for discovering the hardware topology on Linux systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140516.mAE5Gqiw013887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470424 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-14 00:16:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 05:30:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:30:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140530.mAE5U0DG029460@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-14 00:29:58 EDT --- A few quick questions: Upstream seems to have: http://ctdb.samba.org/packages/redhat/RHEL5/ctdb-1.0.65.tgz Any reason not to use that for Source url or to update to it? This doesn't seem to build on ppc/ppc64. See: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=933174 for the scratch build I did. Finally, you need a cvs template here. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 05:35:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:35:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462254] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap - FastMmap session storage backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140535.mAE5Zte2030669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462254 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-14 00:35:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 05:33:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:33:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469972] Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140533.mAE5X8OX016369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |kevin at tummy.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |gnomeuser at gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-14 00:33:07 EDT --- David: I know it's a formality, but could you set the fedora-review flag to + ? I know you approved in comment #5, but can you just confirm? Also, Paul: would it be possible to re-upload the spec so others could look? It's gone from the above links. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 05:39:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:39:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140539.mAE5dLsX030975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 --- Comment #25 from Hayden James 2008-11-14 00:39:19 EDT --- I also submitted a review request for SNMP++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 05:40:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:40:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140540.mAE5ewGI031507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-14 00:40:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 05:38:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:38:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140538.mAE5cViw030904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #23 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-14 00:38:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 05:38:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:38:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471527] Review Request: SNMP++ - SNMP C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140538.mAE5cqwF017121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 Hayden James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 05:38:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:38:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471527] New: Review Request: SNMP++ - SNMP C++ library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: SNMP++ - SNMP C++ library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 Summary: Review Request: SNMP++ - SNMP C++ library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hayden.james at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/snmp++.spec SRPM URL: http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/snmp++-3.2.23-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: SNMP++v3.x is based on SNMP++v2.8 from HP* and extends it by support for SNMPv3 and a couple of bug fixes. SNMP++v3.x is a C++ API which supports SNMP v1, v2c, and v3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 05:42:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:42:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464050] Package Review Request for projectM-libvisual In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140542.mAE5gaRR031651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464050 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-14 00:42:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 05:44:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:44:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464051] Package Review Request for projectM-jack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140544.mAE5i3Jk017940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464051 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-14 00:44:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 05:45:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:45:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470070] Review Request: perl-URI-FromHash - Build a URI from a set of named parameters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140545.mAE5jNL6018303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470070 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-14 00:45:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 05:50:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:50:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221054] Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140550.mAE5owhw000566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221054 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #23 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-14 00:50:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 05:48:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:48:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 235741] Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140548.mAE5mVMx032499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235741 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-14 00:48:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 05:47:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:47:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443238] Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140547.mAE5lIPZ032408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443238 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-14 00:47:16 EDT --- The package name is 'cave9' right, not 'Cave9' ? cvs done with that change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 05:49:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:49:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140549.mAE5ndB5018642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #36 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-14 00:49:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 08:31:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 03:31:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435018] Review Request: clipper - crystallographic object oriented library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140831.mAE8VbqI012338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435018 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-14 03:31:35 EDT --- For -18: (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > * Directory ownership issue > > - %_includedir/clipper is not owned by any packages > > ref: > > Ah, thanks! fixed. - This time build.log says: ------------------------------------------------------------ 2116 + exit 0 2117 warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/clipper/ccp4 2118 warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/clipper/ccp4/ccp4_map_io.h 2119 warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/clipper/ccp4/ccp4_mtz_io.h 2120 warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/clipper/ccp4/ccp4_mtz_types.h 2121 warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/clipper/ccp4/ccp4_utils.h 2122 warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/clipper/cif ------------------------------------------------------------ As written on the wiki I quoted on my comment 15, %files entry ------------------------------------------------------------ %files %{_includedir}/clipper ------------------------------------------------------------ contains the directory %_includedir/clipper _and_ all files/directories/etc under %_includedir/clipper. ? Static linkage - The following command ------------------------------------------------------------ $ rpm -ql clipper | grep /usr/bin | xargs ldd -r ------------------------------------------------------------ shows no binaries in clipper rpm under %_bindir do not depend on libclipper.so. This seems rather strange. For example, caniso binaries are created like: ------------------------------------------------------------ 1842 g++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-strict-aliasing -o caniso caniso.o ../clipper/mmdb/.libs/libclippermmdb.a ../clipper/cif/.libs/libclippercif.a ../clipper/cns/.libs/libclippercns.a ../clipper/minimol/.libs/libclipperminimol.a ../clipper/phs/.libs/libclipperphs.a ../clipper/ccp4/.libs/libclipperccp4.a -lgpp4 -lmmdb ../clipper/contrib/.libs/libclippercontrib.a ../clipper/core/.libs/libclippercore.a -lsrfftw -lsfftw -lm ------------------------------------------------------------ So these binaries use static libclipperXXXX.a. I guess these binaries should use system wide libclipper.so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 08:40:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 03:40:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469972] Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140840.mAE8eDG6026549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 David Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 08:39:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 03:39:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469972] Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140839.mAE8dhp7026185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 David Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from David Nielsen 2008-11-14 03:39:42 EDT --- dear Einstein I hate the new bugzilla, it's confusing layout keeps letting me forget these details. die die die.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 08:50:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 03:50:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471480] Review Request: sfxr - Sound effect generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140850.mAE8oj1h028412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471480 --- Comment #4 from Hans de Goede 2008-11-14 03:50:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Would have been nice if the spec URL above would have been valid :) Sorry. > Anyway, here we go, using only the src.rpm : Thanks! > === Final Notes === > 1. Please try to push usptream your relevant patches. At least one of them > seems to deal with an unitialized field in SDL. I've been discussing my improvements with upstream and as upstream only does windows, I've prepared a new release for upstream, note this currently is a proposed new release, but I expect upstream to pick it up: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/sfxr-sdl-1.1.tar.gz Quoting from the ChangeLog: sfxr-sdl-1.1 ------------ * Various small improvements and 1 bugfix by Hans de Goede : * Fix a small bug in the audio setup which could cause a quite noticable delay between pressing a button and hearing the sound * Add an icon and a .desktop file (applications menu entry) * Add a make install target, note: hardcoded to /usr but it does understand the DESTDIR make parameter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 08:52:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 03:52:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471480] Review Request: sfxr - Sound effect generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140852.mAE8qbCM028610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471480 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Hans de Goede 2008-11-14 03:52:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sfxr Short Description: Sound effect generator Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 09:24:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 04:24:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468539] Review Request: sugar-jukebox - Media player activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140924.mAE9Oftq002979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468539 --- Comment #3 from Kushal Das 2008-11-14 04:24:40 EDT --- Please use the latest source http://kushaldas.in/tmp/Jukebox-5.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 09:42:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 04:42:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140942.mAE9gEwK026590@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |tagoh at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-14 04:42:11 EDT --- This one looks good, thank you for your persistence. You can now continue the font package integration process, starting here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Please do not forget the comps and wiki parts. Reassigning the bug to you since my part is done. APPROVED PS Do not forget to subscribe to the low-traffic fedora-fonts-list, since Fedora 11 packaging changes are being discussed there right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 10:34:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 05:34:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141034.mAEAYZ6x017073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 --- Comment #21 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-11-14 05:34:34 EDT --- @Matthias. The package itself have been formally approved already. There is still few questions remaining that prevent to import. So for the gnome side, is there any plan to add libproxy support via Gconf-2 ? In which case I will import the last version in F-11. I think a NetworkManager advice would be needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 10:37:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 05:37:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141037.mAEAbRrb004662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Akira TAGOH 2008-11-14 05:37:26 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Nicolas. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hanazono-fonts Short Description: Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font Owners: tagoh Branches: devel F-10 F-9 F-8 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 10:42:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 05:42:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462835] Review Request: perl-Math-Calc-Units - Human-readable unit-aware calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141042.mAEAgM84005769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462835 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-14 05:42:21 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 10:57:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 05:57:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471522] Review Request: OTL - OTL library for database connections and queries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141057.mAEAvnMZ008495@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471522 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-11-14 05:57:48 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 11:11:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:11:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469583] Review Request: me-tv - Digital television viewer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141111.mAEBBmO5011543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469583 Miroslav Lichvar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mlichvar at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mlichvar at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 11:12:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:12:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471522] Review Request: OTL - OTL library for database connections and queries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141112.mAEBCI9o011713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471522 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-11-14 06:12:17 EDT --- Notes: * You forgot to add %prep section to your spec-file (where rpmbuild should unzip sources). Please add %prep %setup -q -c This means that rpmbuild will create default directory in BUILD (%{name}-%{version}), cd into it and will quietly unzip %{SOURCE0} * Add empty %build section (just to make rpmlint happy) * You should use mighty power of 'install' command instead of creating directory my hands :). E.g. instead of mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_includedir}/otl cp -a otlv4.h $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_includedir}/otl you may use install -D -p -m 644 otlv4.h $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_includedir}/%{name}/otlv4.h * Please split %description in shorter lines (to silent rpmlint): otl.src: E: description-line-too-long OTL 4.0 was designed as a combination of a C++ template framework and OTL-adapters. otl.src: E: description-line-too-long The framework is a generic implementation of the concept of OTL streams. The OTL-adapters otl.src: E: description-line-too-long are thin wrappers around the database APIs and are used as class type parameters Other things looks sane. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 11:17:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:17:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471026] Review Request: chrony - An NTP client/server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141117.mAEBHBqH025442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471026 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 11:21:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:21:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468579] Review Request: PyQuante - Python Quantum Chemistry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141121.mAEBL4hZ026204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468579 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-14 06:20:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Name: PyQuante > > - The name of your package should be lower case > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Case_Sensitivity > > The author refers to the software as PyQuante, also the python modules are > called PyQuante. Refer to ORBit in Naming Guidelines. OK > > BuildRequires > > - 'BuildRequires: python' is missing > > It is already required by python-setuptools-devel (and numpy too?). python is no longer in the default packageset. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#BuildRequires > > % files > > - Please follow the guidelines > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#System_Architecture > > Hmm, I thought I already was following them. I can't find anything wrong with > using %{python_sitearch} as defined in the Python guidelines. PyQuante contains > compiled C code in the modules.. I guess that I have had %{python_sitearch}/* in my mind. But I can remember if I thought about %{python_sitearch}/modulename/* > >> PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script > >> /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/Minimizers.py 0644 > > > >You can add something like 'find *.py -type f | xargs chmod a+x' to fix this. > > If I do that then I get script-without-shebang errors. > Besides, the files in site-packages don't need to be executable, since they > just contain modules used by the frontend software. > > Check your python-sitelib directory, only a small minority of the .py files are > executable. rpmlint shouldn't complain about this. I will take a look at it. > > > PyQuante.x86_64: W: invalid-license Modified BSD > > > PyQuante-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license Modified BSD > > > > For a valid license for Fedora, please take a look at > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing > > Yeah, but the license is not word-for-word BSD. The license looks like MIT 'Old Style with legal disclaimer 3' http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 11:17:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:17:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471026] Review Request: chrony - An NTP client/server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141117.mAEBHKaC012659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471026 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 11:35:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:35:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470626] Review Request: balance - TCP load-balancing proxy server with round robin and failover mechanisms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141135.mAEBZriJ016181@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470626 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 11:40:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:40:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470626] Review Request: balance - TCP load-balancing proxy server with round robin and failover mechanisms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141140.mAEBe18T016872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470626 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 11:45:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:45:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470626] Review Request: balance - TCP load-balancing proxy server with round robin and failover mechanisms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141145.mAEBj7LC030854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470626 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 12:15:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:15:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471575] New: Review Request: libnautilus-vcards - Nautilus vcard context menu extension Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libnautilus-vcards - Nautilus vcard context menu extension https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471575 Summary: Review Request: libnautilus-vcards - Nautilus vcard context menu extension Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: leamas.alec at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: ftp://mumin.dnsalias.net/pub/libnautilus-vcards.spec SRPM URL: ftp://mumin.dnsalias.net/pub//libnautilus-vcards-0.1-23:26M.x86_64.src.rpm Description: A Nautilus Vcard extension adding context menu items for sending email, call, send SMS or take a Tomboy note for users represented by a vcard. The different applications are command line apps configured through gconf. Some more info at http://sourceforge.net/projects/dt-contacts. This is one of two subprojects within this project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 12:35:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:35:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469583] Review Request: me-tv - Digital television viewer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141235.mAECZ6n6028616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469583 Miroslav Lichvar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|mlichvar at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #1 from Miroslav Lichvar 2008-11-14 07:35:05 EDT --- Looks like this package depends on xine which can't be packaged in Fedora due to patent issues, so I'm not sure adding me-tv to Fedora is a good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 12:44:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:44:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141244.mAECiVN7030395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-14 07:44:29 EDT --- qtoctave-0.8.1-0.20080823.svn165.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 12:46:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:46:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454441] Review Request: R-bigmemory - Manage massive matrices in R using C++, with support for shared memory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141246.mAECkw6u031552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454441 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-14 07:46:56 EDT --- R-bigmemory-2.3-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 12:46:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:46:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465382] Review Request: bouncycastle-mail - SMIME/CMS packages for Bouncy Castle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141246.mAECk7In031300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465382 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-14 07:46:06 EDT --- bouncycastle-mail-1.41-3.fc9, bouncycastle-1.41-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 12:47:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:47:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468562] Review Request: basket - Taking care of your ideas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141247.mAEClXTC011772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468562 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-14 07:47:31 EDT --- basket-1.0.3.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 12:46:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:46:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464054] Package Review Request for projectM-pulseaudio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141246.mAECkjj3011551@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464054 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-14 07:46:43 EDT --- projectM-pulseaudio-1.2.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 12:46:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:46:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445604] Review Request: tennix - A funny 2D tennis game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141246.mAECkWCk011501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445604 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-14 07:46:29 EDT --- tennix-0.6.1-4.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 12:47:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:47:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454441] Review Request: R-bigmemory - Manage massive matrices in R using C++, with support for shared memory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141247.mAEClwXC011908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454441 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-14 07:47:57 EDT --- R-bigmemory-2.3-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 12:46:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:46:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464054] Package Review Request for projectM-pulseaudio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141246.mAECkmKV011584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464054 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 12:47:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:47:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468562] Review Request: basket - Taking care of your ideas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141247.mAEClajq011818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468562 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 12:48:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:48:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141248.mAECmCv1011960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 12:47:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:47:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454441] Review Request: R-bigmemory - Manage massive matrices in R using C++, with support for shared memory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141247.mAECl08X011632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454441 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 12:51:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:51:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469583] Review Request: me-tv - Digital television viewer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141251.mAECpwWO000729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469583 --- Comment #2 from Dan Hor?k 2008-11-14 07:51:57 EDT --- There is dependency on xine-lib and this is part of Fedora for a long time, because it doesn't contain any problematic stuff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 12:48:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:48:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141248.mAECm7wN032103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-14 07:48:06 EDT --- barry-0.14-4.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 12:48:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:48:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141248.mAECmHkF032141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-14 07:48:16 EDT --- barry-0.14-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 12:52:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:52:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465750] Review Request: R-GeneR - R for genes and sequences analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141252.mAECquB0013679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465750 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 12:53:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:53:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469494] Review Request: xlcrack - Recover lost and forgotten passwords from XLS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141253.mAECrGk5013779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469494 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-14 07:53:15 EDT --- xlcrack-1.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xlcrack'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9673 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 12:53:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:53:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445604] Review Request: tennix - A funny 2D tennis game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141253.mAECr496001113@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445604 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-14 07:53:03 EDT --- tennix-0.6.1-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 12:52:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:52:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465750] Review Request: R-GeneR - R for genes and sequences analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141252.mAECqrHv001060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465750 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-14 07:52:52 EDT --- R-GeneR-2.11.1-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 12:53:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:53:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465750] Review Request: R-GeneR - R for genes and sequences analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141253.mAECro9q002035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465750 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-14 07:53:49 EDT --- R-GeneR-2.11.1-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 13:11:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:11:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469583] Review Request: me-tv - Digital television viewer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141311.mAEDBxUa016183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469583 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Dan Hor?k 2008-11-14 08:11:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > There is dependency on xine-lib and this is part of Fedora for a long time, > because it doesn't contain any problematic stuff. ignore this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 12:54:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:54:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470502] Review Request: kde-plasma-runcommand - Simple plasmoid to run commands without using terminal or KRunner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141254.mAECsSjq002733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470502 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-14 07:54:27 EDT --- kde-plasma-runcommand-0.6-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kde-plasma-runcommand'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9681 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 13:24:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:24:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471509] Review Request: extjs - Ext JS is a cross-browser JavaScript library for building rich internet applications. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141324.mAEDOgv5007548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471509 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 Summary|Review Request: Ext JS - |Review Request: extjs - Ext |Ext JS is a cross-browser |JS is a cross-browser |JavaScript library for |JavaScript library for |building rich internet |building rich internet |applications. |applications. --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-14 08:24:42 EDT --- I don't see any names matching yours in the account system; what's your FAS ID? Do you require a sponsor? I recall that extjs has some licensing issues; please see bug 455474. If you can, please indicate how things have changed since that ticket (if indeed they have). I'll go ahead and ask the legal folks to have a look. Please also note that a few folks are trying to develop packaging guidelines for javascript, but there are many issues. Please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/JavaScript and perhaps become involved in the process if you want to package javascript libraries. I don't think we'll be approving any javascript packages until the guidelines progress a bit further. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 13:28:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:28:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468539] Review Request: sugar-jukebox - Media player activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141328.mAEDStUj019069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468539 --- Comment #4 from Sebastian Dziallas 2008-11-14 08:28:54 EDT --- I updated the files for release 5... Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/sugar-jukebox.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/sugar-jukebox-5-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 13:41:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:41:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471026] Review Request: chrony - An NTP client/server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141341.mAEDfZCW021519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471026 --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2008-11-14 08:41:34 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: OK source files match upstream: f0c6b32099329f358dbdb4f62753d2c7cbc13c79 chrony-1.23.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (GPLv2). License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. ?? rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. ?? correct scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - rpmlint complains a bit chrony.src:52: W: configure-without-libdir-spec hand-crafted configure script, can be ignored chrony.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/chrony chrony chrony.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/chrony chrony chrony.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/chrony chrony chrony.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/chrony chrony chrony.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/chrony/rtc chrony chrony.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/chrony/rtc chrony chrony.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/chrony/drift chrony chrony.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/chrony/drift chrony OK chrony.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/chrony.keys 0600 OK chrony.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/chrony does chrony rotate the logs itself or ...? - the texinfo postun scriptlet is called at wrong occasion (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Texinfo) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 14:16:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:16:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141416.mAEEGmmE018500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 14:20:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:20:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469627] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class - A Path::Class type library for Moose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141420.mAEEK5ch025579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469627 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-14 09:20:04 EDT --- It's sad to add all of that cruft to the specfile just so you can include some test files which are simply not even remotely useful as documentation. Priorities, right? But, hey, it's your package. * source files match upstream: a80c5dc845a38867242edd2668db7ee8baa6126cd284b666ce2ed26fce30d5cd MooseX-Types-Path-Class-0.05.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(MooseX::Types::Path::Class) = 0.05 perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class = 0.05-2.fc10 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(MooseX::Types::Moose) perl(Path::Class) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=8, Tests=37, 3 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.02 sys + 1.03 cusr 0.11 csys = 1.18 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 14:21:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:21:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471026] Review Request: chrony - An NTP client/server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141421.mAEELVEA019959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471026 --- Comment #2 from Miroslav Lichvar 2008-11-14 09:21:30 EDT --- chrony doesn't rotate the logs, but there is a small problem that it keeps the files open. It needs to be told to release them by cyclelogs command which requires authorization which requires a valid commandkey in chrony.keys file. I'll try to fix both issues and post an update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 14:56:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:56:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225897] Merge Review: ImageMagick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141456.mAEEuvgP028527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225897 --- Comment #12 from Hans de Goede 2008-11-14 09:56:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I reviewed ImageMagick. It needs some work to yield the guidelines: > Thanks, Below is my response to items which I did not address the rest is fixed in the latest release which you can find here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=933562 > * Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed > in the spec. In my mock build the current ImageMagick rpm contains .la files in > /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.4.0/modules-Q16/coders/ > The .la files are still needed, see bug 185237, also as these are not in the standard library path, so they can do no harm. > Afaik, this one is not supported anymore, can be removed: > BuildRequires: libungif-devel > That is not true, libungif was a patent free *drop in* replacement for giflib, now that the patent is no longer valid we use giflib again, and giflib-devel provides libungif-devel, so this BR drags in giflib-devel, I've changed it to directly BR giflib-devel > * Is there a particular reason why you don't Require: > libpng-devel,libtiff-devel,libwmf-devel,libxml2-devel in the -devel package? > Because non of the ImageMagick headers use headers from these packages, it would be nice if you would check such things yourself before making comments like this in a review. Usually the reviewer does this the other way around he checks which headers from other packages the headers need, and if they are all Required by the -devel package. > * You might want to use the "--enable_static=no" flag for faster compilation. > This might also save some lines (from the SPEC) file dedicated to removing the > static libraries. I assume you mean --disable-static, done. > * Adding djvu and jbig supports will be nice (although not necessary). > jbig is patented and thus not included in Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 15:08:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 10:08:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: ltsp-server-livesetupdocs - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141508.mAEF8A4J031205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #14 from Peter Scheie 2008-11-14 10:08:08 EDT --- New version at http://petre.homedns.org/k12linux/ltsp-server-livesetupdocs-0.0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 16:13:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:13:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469816] Review Request: perl-App-Cmd - Write command line apps with less suffering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141613.mAEGDsXr018612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469816 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-14 11:13:53 EDT --- Gah, this still doesn't build on rawhide becaise IO::TieCombine isn't there. And it doesn't build on F9 either; the tests fail from lack of Test::More. I went ahead and added the Test::More build dep and built on F9. The inclusion of the test suite makes the doc directory larger than the rest of the package, but the package is small so I don't see that it makes much difference in the end. I'll go ahead and approve this but of course you'll need to fix the dependencies in order to build it. * source files match upstream: a3a240fb8e680417e9610790112ee80129cfec65a259f97cf77832009f3a06a4 App-Cmd-0.202.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are proper (needs Test::More) Note: added BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) to complete this review: * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (F9, x86_64) after adding build dep. * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(App::Cmd) = 0.202 perl(App::Cmd::ArgProcessor) = 0.202 perl(App::Cmd::Command) = 0.202 perl(App::Cmd::Command::commands) = 0.202 perl(App::Cmd::Command::help) = 0.202 perl(App::Cmd::Plugin) perl(App::Cmd::Setup) perl(App::Cmd::Simple) = 0.202 perl(App::Cmd::Subdispatch) = 0.202 perl(App::Cmd::Subdispatch::DashedStyle) = 0.202 perl(App::Cmd::Tester) perl(App::Cmd::Tester::Result) perl-App-Cmd = 0.202-1.fc9 = perl >= 0:5.006 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(App::Cmd) perl(App::Cmd::ArgProcessor) perl(App::Cmd::Command) perl(App::Cmd::Plugin) perl(App::Cmd::Subdispatch) perl(Carp) perl(Data::OptList) perl(File::Basename) perl(Module::Pluggable::Object) perl(Sub::Exporter) perl(Sub::Exporter::Util) perl(Sub::Install) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=6, Tests=42, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.34 cusr + 0.04 csys = 0.38 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is larger than the library, but still small so no subpackage is needed. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 16:50:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:50:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471527] Review Request: SNMP++ - SNMP C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141650.mAEGot72019930@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-14 11:50:54 EDT --- Well: * License - License is MIT. * %{version} tag in SourceURL - I recommend to use %{version} tag in SourceURL. With this you probably won't have to modify the SourceURL when version is upgraded. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_.25.7Bversion.7D * Requires - "Requires: openssl" is redundant. This type of library dependency related Requires are automatically detected by rpmbuild itself (but see below) * General rpmlint issue - Please check your srpm/binary rpms with rpmlint (in rpmlint rpm) to detect some general packaging issues. ---------------------------------------------- snmp++.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot .... snmp++.src: E: summary-too-long ... snmp++.src: E: description-line-too-long ... ---------------------------------------------- The meaning of the above errors/warnings can be shown by "$ rpmlint -I summary-ended-with-dot", for example. - Summary should not end with dot. - Summary must not exceed 79 characters - One line in %description must not exceed 79 characters * CFLAGS - Fedora specific compilation flags are not correctly honored. You can check what flags are used on Fedora by "$ rpm --eval %optflags". Passing 'USEROPTS="%{optflags}"' to "make" works for this package. * Macors - Use macros for standard directories. /usr should be %{_prefix}: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros * "shared library" with no soname - Well, the rebuilt "shared library" libsnmp++.so has no soname (-Wl,-soname is not used). In this case, ABI of this library may change in the future silently, and then all applications linking against this library silently. In such case I think we should not provide this "broken" "shared library" and only ship static archive. Would you follow this and the link below of "Static libraries only" case? - In this case the main package "snmp++" package becomes empty, so only -devel package must be created (and main "snmp++" package should not be created). -devel subpackage contains static archive, header files and some document files in this case. "Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}" should be removed and "Provides: %{name}-%{version}" should be added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 17:06:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:06:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141706.mAEH6qJ8023207@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |459945 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 17:06:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:06:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459945] Review Request: pfstmo - PFS tone mapping operators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141706.mAEH6phJ023178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459945 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cooly at gnome.eu.org Depends on| |459944 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 17:23:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:23:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462254] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap - FastMmap session storage backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141723.mAEHNdRZ025865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462254 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-14 12:23:38 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap-0.05-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap-0.05-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 17:23:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:23:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462254] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap - FastMmap session storage backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141723.mAEHNaGh032061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462254 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-14 12:23:35 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap-0.05-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap-0.05-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 17:34:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:34:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450050] Review Request: cgilib - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141734.mAEHYi03027586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450050 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cooly at gnome.eu.org --- Comment #3 from Lucian Langa 2008-11-14 12:34:43 EDT --- %files for the -devel package has no %defattr cgilib.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/cgilib-0.6/readme The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile's %prep section for example using iconv(1). please also consider preserve installed and/or modified files timestamps: - above iconv operation - make install target please explain why do you need to use autotools patch. You need to contact upstream for such modifications, anyway it should not be handled in the spec file. As I see it radically changes the source package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 18:09:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:09:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225897] Merge Review: ImageMagick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141809.mAEI9b8U008520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225897 --- Comment #13 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-14 13:09:35 EDT --- Thanks for the update! > > * Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed > > in the spec. In my mock build the current ImageMagick rpm contains .la files in > > /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.4.0/modules-Q16/coders/ > > > > > The .la files are still needed, see bug 185237, also as these are not in the > standard library path, so they can do no harm. > I realized that. I have got confused because when I built and installed ImageMagick without .la files, it worked. But I was sloppy enough to forget to remove the old .la files from a previous installation. So keeping them is *required*. > > * Is there a particular reason why you don't Require: > > libpng-devel,libtiff-devel,libwmf-devel,libxml2-devel in the -devel package? > > > > Because non of the ImageMagick headers use headers from these packages, it > would be nice if you would check such things yourself before making comments > like this in a review. Usually the reviewer does this the other way around he > checks which headers from other packages the headers need, and if they are all > Required by the -devel package. > I apologize. It was towards the end of a long review... I had to be careful and shouldn't make assumptions. > > * You might want to use the "--enable_static=no" flag for faster compilation. > > This might also save some lines (from the SPEC) file dedicated to removing the > > static libraries. > > I assume you mean --disable-static, done. > ./configure --help doesn't tell a --disable-static flag. If it works one way or the other, it's fine. > > * Adding djvu and jbig supports will be nice (although not necessary). > > > > jbig is patented and thus not included in Fedora Ok. What about djvu? All you need to do is add a BR: djvulibre-devel . It is enabled by the default ./configure Two more things: * There are two items (a directory and a file) that are in the source but do not end up in any of the packages: *** The files inside www/source/ are referenced in the docs. See, for example: file:///usr/share/doc/ImageMagick-6.4.5/www/magick-wand.html file:///usr/share/doc/ImageMagick-6.4.5/www/magick-core.html But the directory www/source isn't included in the -doc subpackage. I think it is a flaw of the Makefile script. Could you manually insert that directory into the -doc subpackage? *** Similarly, the file www/Magick++/COPYING doesn't end up in any subpackage. I think this file should go to the %doc of ImageMagick-c++ . * rpmlint says now: ImageMagick.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libMagickWand.so.1.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 This seems rather annoying. It is hard (or more appropriately, time-consuming) to check the entire code to see when these calls are made. Shall we ask the upstream if these calls would break anything or have you investigated the situation already? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 19:12:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:12:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470177] Review Request: perl-Module-Util - Module name tools and transformations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141912.mAEJCIJ3013598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470177 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-14 14:12:17 EDT --- I note that 1.05 came out the day after you submitted this package. It doesn't look like there's any significant differences between that and 1.04, so I'll go ahead and approve this package and if you like you can update when you check in. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: e3c556064dcf8fad412ddcf151bce5a23975f4e9ca966d02b55bd1bd1f1cbfc6 Module-Util-1.04.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Module::Util) = 1.04 perl-Module-Util = 1.04-1.fc10 = /usr/bin/perl perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Exporter) perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(File::Spec::Functions) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(List::Util) perl(Module::Util) perl(Pod::Usage) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: Files=2, Tests=45, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.01 sys + 0.05 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.08 CPU) Result: PASS * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 19:27:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:27:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435018] Review Request: clipper - crystallographic object oriented library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141927.mAEJRp0f016230@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435018 --- Comment #18 from Tim Fenn 2008-11-14 14:27:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > For -18: > > (In reply to comment #16) > > (In reply to comment #15) > > > > * Directory ownership issue > > > - %_includedir/clipper is not owned by any packages > > > ref: > > > > Ah, thanks! fixed. > > - This time build.log says: > ------------------------------------------------------------ > 2116 + exit 0 > 2117 warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/clipper/ccp4 > 2118 warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/clipper/ccp4/ccp4_map_io.h > 2119 warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/clipper/ccp4/ccp4_mtz_io.h > 2120 warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/clipper/ccp4/ccp4_mtz_types.h > 2121 warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/clipper/ccp4/ccp4_utils.h > 2122 warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/clipper/cif > ------------------------------------------------------------ > As written on the wiki I quoted on my comment 15, > %files entry > ------------------------------------------------------------ > %files > %{_includedir}/clipper > ------------------------------------------------------------ > contains the directory %_includedir/clipper _and_ all > files/directories/etc under %_includedir/clipper. > Sorry, I was rushing a bit - removed the extraneous entries. > ? Static linkage > - The following command > ------------------------------------------------------------ > $ rpm -ql clipper | grep /usr/bin | xargs ldd -r > ------------------------------------------------------------ > shows no binaries in clipper rpm under %_bindir do not depend > on libclipper.so. This seems rather strange. > fixed Makefile.am for the examples new spec: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/clipper.spec new srpm: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/clipper-2.0-19.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 19:27:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:27:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141927.mAEJRnk3025393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 --- Comment #22 from Matthias Clasen 2008-11-14 14:27:48 EDT --- GConf doesn't really enter the picture. NetworkManager should certainly play some role in dynamic network configuration (including proxies). But those things should certainly be developed upstream and do not have any direct bearing on the packaging of libproxy, afaics. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 20:18:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:18:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811142018.mAEKI6uh025878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #37 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-14 15:18:04 EDT --- That is a bit confusing; I didn't realize that haddock was moving into ghc, and unfortunately "rawhide" won't actually be rawhide for some time and while I can do build testing in koji its tough to do any actual install testing unless I work against static-repos. Unfortunately download speeds from there are so terribly slow that it takes me hours to init a buildroot. Let me see what I can come up with. So if I understand correctly, for ghc-6.10.1 the scriptlet dependencies should just be: Requires(pre): ghc = %{ghc_version} Requires(preun): ghc = %{ghc_version} Requires(post): ghc = %{ghc_version} Requires(postun): ghc = %{ghc_version} And the "Requires(post): haddock09" bit can go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 20:33:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:33:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470177] Review Request: perl-Module-Util - Module name tools and transformations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811142033.mAEKXRvL028522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470177 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 20:34:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:34:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469627] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class - A Path::Class type library for Moose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811142034.mAEKYEh8006071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469627 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 20:34:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:34:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469627] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class - A Path::Class type library for Moose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811142034.mAEKY9B6006050@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469627 --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-14 15:34:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class Short Description: A Path::Class type library for Moose Owners: cweyl Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 20:33:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:33:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470177] Review Request: perl-Module-Util - Module name tools and transformations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811142033.mAEKXPBd005987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470177 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-14 15:33:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Module-Util Short Description: Module name tools and transformations Owners: cweyl Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 20:33:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:33:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470070] Review Request: perl-URI-FromHash - Build a URI from a set of named parameters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811142033.mAEKX6VK005942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470070 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 20:37:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:37:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469816] Review Request: perl-App-Cmd - Write command line apps with less suffering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811142037.mAEKbxSo029336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469816 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 20:37:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:37:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469816] Review Request: perl-App-Cmd - Write command line apps with less suffering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811142037.mAEKbvwY006781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469816 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-14 15:37:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-App-Cmd Short Description: write command line apps with less suffering Owners: cweyl Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 20:37:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:37:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469627] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class - A Path::Class type library for Moose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811142037.mAEKbHnj006671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469627 --- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-14 15:37:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > It's sad to add all of that cruft to the specfile just so you can include some > test files which are simply not even remotely useful as documentation. > Priorities, right? But, hey, it's your package. Yeah, and consistency. I've been working on a feature proposal[1] to automagically package test suites, so I'm actually going to discontinue packaging them in %doc after these last few already-submitted package... [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FullyTestablePerl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 21:01:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:01:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467791] Review Request: vtun - Virtual tunnel over TCP/IP networks Message-ID: <200811142101.mAEL1KI6011496@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467791 --- Comment #2 from Gabriel Somlo 2008-11-14 16:01:20 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/vtun.spec SRPM URL: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/vtun-3.0.1-2.fc8.src.rpm Fixed %defattr Added -p flag to %{__install} and %{__make} install I did consider adding a logrotate script before I submitted the review request, but decided against it. vtund does not currently play nicely with having its per-connection traffic counter "log" files rotated (i.e., will not listen to a signal or otherwise detect that the files have been rotated, and will keep writing to the old files until completely restarted). Besides, the real vtund log entries go to syslog. I am considering submitting a feature request (or a patch) to upstream re. rotating connection stats files in /var/log/vtun, but a logrotate script won't help us at this time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 21:50:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:50:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471662] New: Review Request: qlandkartegt - GPS device mapping tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qlandkartegt - GPS device mapping tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471662 Summary: Review Request: qlandkartegt - GPS device mapping tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/qlandkartegt.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/qlandkartegt-0.8.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: QLandkarte GT is the ultimate outdoor aficionado's tool for GPS maps in GeoTiff format as well as Garmin's img vector map format. Additional it is the PC side frontend to QLandkarte M, a moving map application for mobile devices. And it fills the gap Garmin leaves in refusing to support Linux. QLandkarte GT is the proof that writing portable applications for Unix, Windows and OSX is feasible with a minimum of overhead. No excuses! QLandkarte GT does replace the original QLandkarte with a much more flexible architecture. It's not limited to a map format or device. Thus if you think your Magellan GPS or other should be supported, join the team. Additionally it is a front end to the GDAL tools, to make georeferencing scanned maps feasible for the normal user. Compared to similar tools like QGis, it's target users are more on the consumer side than on the scientific one. QLandkarte GT might not let you select every possible feature of the GDAL tools, but it will simplify their use to the demands of most users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 21:56:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:56:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471509] Review Request: extjs - Ext JS is a cross-browser JavaScript library for building rich internet applications. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811142156.mAELuoXC012223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471509 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-11-14 16:56:49 EDT --- Okay, so let me explain this. The latest version of ExtJS claims to be under GPLv3 with an exception, documented here: http://extjs.com/products/floss-exception.php RH Legal is firm that this exception clause isn't valid. One of the conditions for the exception is: the Derivative Work can reasonably be considered independent and separate work that is intended for use by end-users and not as a library for software development purposes. This doesn't make sense. "Independent and separate" from what? By definition the Derivative Work is formed by combining Ext with some FLOSS work, so it can't be "independent and separate" from those. Moreover, how do you determine whether a Derivative Work is "intended for use by end-users and not as a library for software development purposes"? Well, to some degree you might be able to, but it raises disturbing questions. This sounds very much like a field-of-use limitation. If any such work actually were declared to be "intended for use solely by end-users" surely that would make such a work non-free. (Non-open-source, even.) Does "not as a library for software development purposes" suggest that the Derivative Work must be under terms that prohibit modification? At best this is disturbingly unclear. There are a couple of other points one could make as well. The sum conclusion here is that Fedora and its users are not safe to use the exception clause in ExtJS. However, there is no barrier to using it under GPLv3. This means unfortunately that items like Testopia are right out, due to license incompatibility with GPLv3, but it doesn't prevent ExtJS from inclusion in Fedora on its own merit. BE SURE that anything you use with ExtJS is compatible with GPLv3! All of this text needs to go in a file in the package called "README-Fedora-Licensing", and the spec needs to reflect it like this: # The FLOSS Exception is NOT VALID for this package, see: # README-Fedora-Licensing License: GPLv3 ... Lifting FE-Legal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 22:33:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:33:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466953] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Utils - NOCpulse utility packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811142233.mAEMXRrH018316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466953 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-NOCpulse-Utils -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 22:32:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:32:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466953] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Utils - NOCpulse utility packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811142232.mAEMWr4d018267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466953 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-14 17:32:52 EDT --- Hmm, interesting. Since we (Fedora) appear to be upstream, why not include a Makefile.PL setup? This would allow this package to be consistent with the zillions of other Perl package out there, and make everyone's tasks way easier over the long run :-) (See, e.g., Module::Install for a quick, easy, modern way to setup the standard Perl module build/test/install framework.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 00:25:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 19:25:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455581] Review Request: php-pecl-ssh2 - php bindings to the functions of libssh2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811150025.mAF0PBVQ003360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455581 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 00:26:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 19:26:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455581] Review Request: php-pecl-ssh2 - php bindings to the functions of libssh2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811150026.mAF0Q3Tw013522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455581 --- Comment #5 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-11-14 19:26:02 EDT --- I am now sponsored, this package is now only waiting for a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 05:06:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 00:06:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468128] Review Request: python-flickrapi - Python module for interfacing with the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811150506.mAF56LQh022515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468128 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Ian Weller 2008-11-15 00:06:20 EDT --- CVS Admin: So this should be interesting, since Kushal has gotten this package approved and CVS branched but has effectively given up maintaining the package (see bug 457690). I'll consider it a change request. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-flickrapi Updated Description: Python module for interfacing with the Flickr API Owners: ianweller -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 07:00:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 02:00:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471522] Review Request: OTL - OTL library for database connections and queries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811150700.mAF70LXX005907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471522 --- Comment #3 from Hayden James 2008-11-15 02:00:20 EDT --- Ok, fixed above: http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/otl-devel.spec http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/otl-devel-4.0.176-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 07:23:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 02:23:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464050] Package Review Request for projectM-libvisual In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811150723.mAF7NsXW031421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464050 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-15 02:23:53 EDT --- projectM-libvisual-1.2.0-4.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/projectM-libvisual-1.2.0-4.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 08:46:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 03:46:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467791] Review Request: vtun - Virtual tunnel over TCP/IP networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811150846.mAF8kdJB019965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467791 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cooly at gnome.eu.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Lucian Langa 2008-11-15 03:46:38 EDT --- > Besides, the real vtund > log entries go to syslog. I am considering submitting a feature request (or a > patch) to upstream re. rotating connection stats files in /var/log/vtun, but a > logrotate script won't help us at this time. If so is it really necessary to install /var/log/vtund ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 09:36:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 04:36:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471429] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache - Catalyst Apache Engines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811150936.mAF9a3Fl018268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471429 --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2008-11-15 04:36:02 EDT --- That rather decent test suite is from Catalyst::Runtime. Proving t/live_*.t just tests Catalyst itself. The scripts in t/optional set things up to really test Engine::Apache, but anything that tests redirection is failing for me (looks like a problem with LWP - even though Catalyst::Test sets things up with LWP::UserAgent->new(max_redirect => 0), LWP still follows the first redirect automatically). Will go ahead with the package as is and enable additional tests later when I can get them to work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 09:39:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 04:39:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471429] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache - Catalyst Apache Engines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811150939.mAF9dGXV028720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471429 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2008-11-15 04:39:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache Short Description: Catalyst Apache Engines Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 10:10:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 05:10:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471522] Review Request: OTL - OTL library for database connections and queries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811151010.mAFAAGgl023900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471522 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-11-15 05:10:15 EDT --- Few additional remarks: * Add newline between %setup and %build (just cosmetic) * About renaming to otl-devel - although it's not a blocker I advise you to rename it back to otl. First, if some Fedora user will decide to play with otl, his first attempt will be "yum install otl". E.g. I strongly vote against naming of packages which differs from upstream ones w/o reasons. I can't find any reasons in your case. However some packages does prefer your current naming scheme. If you'll finally decide to stay with otl-devel, you should add "Provides: otl" to your spec-file. Please consider these two advices (of course, you may reject both - they're not a blocker issues) and I'll make a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 10:29:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 05:29:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 423821] Review Request: nagios-plugins-rsync - Nagios plugin to monitor remote rsync servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811151029.mAFATUEl004832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423821 --- Comment #16 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-11-15 05:29:28 EDT --- Ping again, Jima! We shouldn't wait so long until upstream will deside to add LICENSE. In any case - that's not a blocker :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 10:53:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 05:53:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470626] Review Request: balance - TCP load-balancing proxy server with round robin and failover mechanisms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811151053.mAFArIxQ030912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470626 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-15 05:53:17 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: F9/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint balance-3.42-4.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPMs: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint balance-3.42-4.fc9.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM upstream: 24bc4063e8af298471d7d0a2ac7462a6 SHA1SUM of package: 24bc4063e8af298471d7d0a2ac7462a6 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [-] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F9/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. Tested F9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=934305 Tested F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=934333 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. I see no further blocker, package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 13:26:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 08:26:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470626] Review Request: balance - TCP load-balancing proxy server with round robin and failover mechanisms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811151326.mAFDQ75l024907@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470626 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-11-15 08:26:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: balance Short Description: TCP load-balancing proxy server with round robin and failover mechanisms Owners: itamarjp Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 13:29:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 08:29:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226358] Merge Review: rdesktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811151329.mAFDT23J025260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226358 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-15 08:29:00 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=323691) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323691) Patch file for the rdesktop spec file This patch should fix the issues mentioned in Comment #1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 15:27:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 10:27:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471527] Review Request: SNMP++ - SNMP C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811151527.mAFFRn79023093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 --- Comment #2 from Hayden James 2008-11-15 10:27:48 EDT --- Ok I fixed all of the above: http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/snmp++.spec http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/snmp++-3.2.23-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 15:42:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 10:42:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435018] Review Request: clipper - crystallographic object oriented library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811151542.mAFFg1W6014740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435018 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-15 10:42:00 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=323692) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323692) Patch to compile -19 Rebuild failed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=934459 The attached patch will fix this issue: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=934517 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 15:43:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 10:43:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435018] Review Request: clipper - crystallographic object oriented library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811151543.mAFFhNQR025062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435018 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-15 10:43:22 EDT --- Other things are okay. ------------------------------------------------------ This package (clipper) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 15:48:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 10:48:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455581] Review Request: php-pecl-ssh2 - php bindings to the functions of libssh2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811151548.mAFFmnpj025791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455581 --- Comment #6 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-11-15 10:48:48 EDT --- Improved SRPM here, with license and a readme file included. http://ispbrasil.com.br/php-pecl-ssh2/php-pecl-ssh2.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/php-pecl-ssh2/php-pecl-ssh2-0.10-2.fc8.src.rpm rawhide build here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=934542 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 16:00:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 11:00:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225814] Merge Review: gnome-bluetooth In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811151600.mAFG0tqe027641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225814 Ondrej Vasik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ovasik at redhat.com Flag|needinfo?(ovasik at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #4 from Ondrej Vasik 2008-11-15 11:00:53 EDT --- Reassigned needinfo to new package maintainer... I guess you are right and the goal was to move all the functionality to bluez-gnome. If B.Nocera already did it, package could be probably removed from Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 16:01:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 11:01:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225814] Merge Review: gnome-bluetooth In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811151601.mAFG1Prd017520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225814 Ondrej Vasik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jmoskovc at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(jmoskovc at redhat.c | |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 16:07:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 11:07:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471522] Review Request: OTL - OTL library for database connections and queries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811151607.mAFG7wk6028478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471522 --- Comment #5 from Hayden James 2008-11-15 11:07:57 EDT --- Ok, I fixed these last two issues http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/otl-devel.spec http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/otl-devel-4.0.176-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 16:21:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 11:21:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811151621.mAFGLdjY030550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #38 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-15 11:21:36 EDT --- OK, I can verify that the package installs into a fresh dist-f11 buildroot with the dependencies as above and the package tweaked to build against ghc-6.10.1. So where are we? Basically, you tell me what you wnat to do. I guess at this point I'd say to just target ghc-6.10.1, drop "Requires(post): haddock09", add the -devel provide and we're good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 16:28:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 11:28:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471527] Review Request: SNMP++ - SNMP C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811151628.mAFGSiWY021111@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-15 11:28:43 EDT --- Well, * You set the soname of libsnmp++.so by yourself, however this may become confusing even the upstream begins to name the soname of this library differently in the future. For example the upstream may set soname as libsnmp++.so.0.0.0 at first. Also, there is no guarantee that the API of this library won't change when the major version of the tarball doesn't change. c.f. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PatriceDumas#On_not_shipping_shared_libraries_when_upstream_doesn.27t Usually I think when the upstream does not set the soname of the library properly, we should not ship the library. How do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 16:51:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 11:51:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471527] Review Request: SNMP++ - SNMP C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811151651.mAFGpRW0024533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 --- Comment #4 from Hayden James 2008-11-15 11:51:26 EDT --- I'll communicate with upstream about the soname change I made, but the package did provide a shared library, but the soname might just be an oversight so the above doesn't exactly apply, but I will let them know. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 17:02:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 12:02:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471522] Review Request: OTL - OTL library for database connections and queries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811151702.mAFH2H40026179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471522 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-11-15 12:02:16 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is (almost) silent: [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/otl-devel-4.0.176-4.fc9.noarch.rpm otl-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/otl-devel-4.0.176-4.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (BSD). + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ md5sum otlv4_h.zip* 16b07c774b737bd9fa0d8e0d3a569c67 otlv4_h.zip 16b07c774b737bd9fa0d8e0d3a569c67 otlv4_h.zip.from_srpm [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture (ppc). + No additional build dependencies + No need to handle locales + Does not contain shared library files + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT . + The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . + The package contains code, or permissable content. + Does not contain large documentation files + Does not contain %doc files + Header files are in a -devel package. + Does not contain static libraries + Does not contain pkgconfig(.pc) files + Does not contain library files with a suffix + Does not contain any .la libtool archives + No a GUI application + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. - At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 17:07:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 12:07:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811151707.mAFH7M7u004329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-15 12:07:20 EDT --- As this package itself is now okay (but please fix the issue on my comment 23 when importing to Fedora CVS) and as you are working on other packages, now I will approve this package. --------------------------------------------------------------- This package (quickfix) is APPROVED by mtasaka --------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 17:26:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 12:26:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811151726.mAFHQlJR007133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-11-15 12:26:45 EDT --- Update: * Ver. 2.9.6 (latest) * Some cleanups * Fixed issue with sending messages (since now user should change email in mldonkey_df_monitor from "root at localhost" to actual one) * Log-file moved to %{_localstatedir}/log/mldonkey/mldonkey.log http://peter.fedorapeople.org/mldonkey.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/mldonkey-2.9.6-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 17:29:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 12:29:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811151729.mAFHTSdj029744@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 --- Comment #27 from Hayden James 2008-11-15 12:29:26 EDT --- Ok, I signed up for an account and requested sponsorship, the account name is 'hjames'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 17:55:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 12:55:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471527] Review Request: SNMP++ - SNMP C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811151755.mAFHth89001247@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-15 12:55:43 EDT --- (removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 17:55:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 12:55:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471522] Review Request: OTL - OTL library for database connections and queries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811151755.mAFHtNP5001187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471522 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-15 12:55:23 EDT --- (removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 17:53:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 12:53:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811151753.mAFHrodi010665@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #28 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-15 12:53:49 EDT --- Okay, now I am sponsoring you. Please follow wiki again. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 18:06:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 13:06:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458030] Review Request: avogadro - Avogadro is an advanced Molecular editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811151806.mAFI6kmc012838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458030 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 18:20:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 13:20:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458643] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811151820.mAFIK3Ss014872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458643 Pavel Lis? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pavel.lisy at gmail.com --- Comment #10 from Pavel Lis? 2008-11-15 13:20:01 EDT --- What is actual state of packaging this? I really want it in F10 and I can help if it is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 18:53:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 13:53:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225897] Merge Review: ImageMagick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811151853.mAFIr7qF019728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225897 --- Comment #14 from Hans de Goede 2008-11-15 13:53:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Ok. What about djvu? All you need to do is add a BR: djvulibre-devel . It is > enabled by the default ./configure > I've done a new version: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=934612 with djvulibre support enabled, I've put the djvu libre plugin in a separate plugin package so as to not drag in djvulibre for everyone who wants ImageMagick, as it ways in at 2 MB's and we are already getting complaints about all the stuff ImageMagick drags in. > Two more things: > * There are two items (a directory and a file) that are in the source but do > not end up in any of the packages: > > *** The files inside www/source/ are referenced in the docs. See, for > example: > file:///usr/share/doc/ImageMagick-6.4.5/www/magick-wand.html > file:///usr/share/doc/ImageMagick-6.4.5/www/magick-core.html > But the directory www/source isn't included in the -doc subpackage. I > think it is a flaw of the Makefile script. Could you manually > insert that directory into the -doc subpackage? > Added. > *** Similarly, the file www/Magick++/COPYING doesn't end up in any > subpackage. I think this file should go to the %doc of > ImageMagick-c++ . > Added. > * rpmlint says now: > ImageMagick.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit > /usr/lib64/libMagickWand.so.1.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 > This seems rather annoying. It is hard (or more appropriately, time-consuming) > to check the entire code to see when these calls are made. Shall we ask the > upstream if these calls would break anything or have you investigated the > situation already? I cannot find the source for this I'll mail upstream about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 19:35:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:35:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471754] New: Review Request: virtaal - Localization and translation editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: virtaal - Localization and translation editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471754 Summary: Review Request: virtaal - Localization and translation editor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dwayne at translate.org.za QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dwayne.fedorapeople.org/virtaal-0.2-1.spec SRPM URL: http://dwayne.fedorapeople.org/virtaal-0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A program for Computer Aided Translation (CAT) built on the Translate Toolkit. Virtaal includes features that allow a localizer to work effectively including: syntax highlighting, autocomplete and autocorrect. Showing only the data that is needed through its simple and effective user interface it ensures that you can focus on the translation task straight away. By building on the Translate Toolkit, Virtaal is able to edit any of the following formats: XLIFF, Gettext PO and .mo, Qt .ts, .qph and .qm, Wordfast TM, TMX, TBX. By using the Translate Toolkit converters a translator can edit: OpenOffice.org SDF, Java (and Mozilla) .properties and Mozilla DTD. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 19:38:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:38:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471754] Review Request: virtaal - Localization and translation editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811151938.mAFJcerj016267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471754 Dwayne Bailey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |466608 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 19:56:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:56:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467791] Review Request: vtun - Virtual tunnel over TCP/IP networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811151956.mAFJu54R019013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467791 --- Comment #4 from Gabriel Somlo 2008-11-15 14:56:04 EDT --- > If so is it really necessary to install /var/log/vtund ? If the user enables connection stats logging in the config file (/etc/vtund.conf), the program does generate these files, and I think it might be nice to have the directory there even though rotating the files therein is not (yet) supported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 20:16:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 15:16:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225897] Merge Review: ImageMagick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811152016.mAFKGpHe032178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225897 --- Comment #15 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-15 15:16:50 EDT --- Thanks. There is one minor thing that I keep forgetting to say. There are two doc directories created, which is a consequence of the unusual version numbering of upstream: /usr/share/doc/ImageMagick-%{version} /usr/share/doc/ImageMagick-%{VER} I understand that the Makefile installs the document files in the latter one., but the %doc of the main package installs the files in the former one. It can be argued but I don't think we actually need two doc directories. This can be resolved by using the --docdir flag of configure or directly patching/sed'ding the configure file. I am leaving this up to you. You can fix this at a later release since it is a purely cosmetics issue. ---------------------------------------------- This package (ImageMagick) is APPROVED by oget ---------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 20:17:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 15:17:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225897] Merge Review: ImageMagick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811152017.mAFKH4TI022070@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225897 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 20:35:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 15:35:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464050] Package Review Request for projectM-libvisual In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811152035.mAFKZS8A002420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464050 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-15 15:35:27 EDT --- projectM-libvisual-1.2.0-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/projectM-libvisual-1.2.0-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 20:32:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 15:32:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811152032.mAFKWWHc001978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-15 15:32:30 EDT --- Sorry for the delay here... OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. See below - License (OFL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 7bce211edb964a2c3149e8ae6d46fc6a heuristica-src-20080825.tar.bz2 7bce211edb964a2c3149e8ae6d46fc6a heuristica-src-20080825.tar.bz2.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have dist tag See below - Should package latest version Issues: 1. There is a newer version upstream, might update to that before importing? 20081109 2. One more thing thats confusing me on the legal front that should be mentioned here: The fontforge script files that are used to produce the font are under the GPLv2+ license. Since they aren't shipped in the binary package or part of the font itself, I guess it's ok that the package license here is OFL, but I thought I would mention it here. I don't see any blockers here... so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 20:37:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 15:37:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464051] Package Review Request for projectM-jack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811152037.mAFKbbXo002680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464051 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-15 15:37:36 EDT --- projectM-jack-1.2.0-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/projectM-jack-1.2.0-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 21:40:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 16:40:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471527] Review Request: SNMP++ - SNMP C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811152140.mAFLeATA001317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 Hayden James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Hayden James 2008-11-15 16:40:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: snmp_pp Short Description: SNMP++ is a C++ development library for SNMP Owners: hjames Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 21:38:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 16:38:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471522] Review Request: OTL - OTL library for database connections and queries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811152138.mAFLcShr000957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471522 Hayden James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Hayden James 2008-11-15 16:38:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: otl Short Description: OTL is a C++ template library for Oracle/OCI, ODBC, and DB2/CLI connectivity Owners: hjames Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: mtasaka lemenkov -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 21:36:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 16:36:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811152136.mAFLaSbl000815@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 Hayden James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #29 from Hayden James 2008-11-15 16:36:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: quickfix Short Description: QuickFIX is a full-featured open source FIX engine Owners: hjames Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 21:43:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 16:43:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811152143.mAFLhZ9M011878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-15 16:43:33 EDT --- Thanks a lot for the review! Will of course import the lastest font version. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: apanov-heuristica-fonts Short Description: Heuristica serif font Owners: nim Branches: F10, devel InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 21:53:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 16:53:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471575] Review Request: libnautilus-vcards - Nautilus vcard context menu extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811152153.mAFLrUi8013321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471575 Alec Leamas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 --- Comment #1 from Alec Leamas 2008-11-15 16:53:29 EDT --- Updated spec file and rpm. New RPM url: ftp://mumin.dnsalias.net/pub//libnautilus-vcards-0.1-34.x86_64.src.rpm (spec file the same). Also, I really need a sponsor... This is, more or less, my first attempt to bring a package into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 23:42:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 18:42:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435018] Review Request: clipper - crystallographic object oriented library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811152342.mAFNgHS9019932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435018 --- Comment #21 from Tim Fenn 2008-11-15 18:42:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Created an attachment (id=323692) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323692) [details] > Patch to compile -19 > Thanks, applied! new spec: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/clipper.spec new srpm: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/clipper-2.0-20.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 23:43:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 18:43:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435018] Review Request: clipper - crystallographic object oriented library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811152343.mAFNhkYJ030298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435018 Tim Fenn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 23:43:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 18:43:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435018] Review Request: clipper - crystallographic object oriented library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811152343.mAFNhYkc030262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435018 --- Comment #22 from Tim Fenn 2008-11-15 18:43:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: clipper Short Description: crystallographic object oriented library Owners: timfenn Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: timfenn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 03:43:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 22:43:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811160343.mAG3hspu024648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 --- Comment #9 from D Haley 2008-11-15 22:43:53 EDT --- Made changes as Per M. Tasaksa's recommendations: * Sun Nov 16 2008 2.0-1 - Remove doc macro, fix licence to include zlib. - Bump up version, due to maintainer change. Spec URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/laf-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/laf-plugin-1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm I re-downloaded the source file from SOURCE0 when building, so should be OK now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 03:51:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 22:51:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811160351.mAG3pvv3026058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 --- Comment #10 from D Haley 2008-11-15 22:51:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Spec URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/laf-plugin.spec > SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/laf-plugin-1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Strike that, correct URL: Spec URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/laf-plugin-2.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/laf-plugin-1.0-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 07:35:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 02:35:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811160735.mAG7ZTjL025307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-16 02:35:27 EDT --- Well, - For license tag, as I said in my comment 6, it should be "BSD and zlib", not "BSD and ZLIB". ref: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing - Please fix changelog entry. Your last entry of %changelog says "2.0-1", which must be "1.0-2". Then: + This package itself is okay with the issues above fixed. + As written on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored New packages to be sponsored are requested to either - submit another review request with enough quality - or do a pre-review of other person's review request. For your case, you have other review requests, which seem good to some extent --------------------------------------------------------- This package (laf-plugin) is APPROVED by mtasaka --------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I guess Dominik will sponsor you (Dominik, is it okay?) If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9/10, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 08:00:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 03:00:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811160800.mAG80gkh006130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 --- Comment #12 from D Haley 2008-11-16 03:00:42 EDT --- I think I have resolved the package. In order to make sure all the package version numbers line up I have had to promot the package to version "4". Links: Spec URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/laf-plugin-4.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/laf-plugin-1.0-4.fc9.src.rpm I will attepmt to ensure that I have followed the prodcedures laid down in your comment above, and reply again. Thankyou for your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 08:15:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 03:15:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470547] Review Request: SEMI - MIME rendering library for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811160815.mAG8FptQ008223@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470547 Alec Leamas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |leamas.alec at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Alec Leamas 2008-11-16 03:15:50 EDT --- Hi! Unfortunately, I'm not a reviewer... But according to the instructions, I need to show some interest in reviewing other requests in order to get a sponsor. So I'll do that. Please feel free to do the same for me, my request is bug 471575 :-) For me, rpmlint gives the following semi.src: E: no-buildroot-tag semi.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 15, tab: line 2) semi.src: W: non-standard-group Unspecified semi.src: W: invalid-license GPL My mock build bails out, complaining about the missing Group: field. I think all of these issues should be closed. Copyright & license. Most (all?) files have a nice GPLv2 copyright notice. However, the I really miss the top-level file COPYING - the notices refer to this. I think it should be part of the package. See more below > #%define _default_patch_fuzz 2 > %define _semiver 1.14.6 > %define _flimver 1.14.8 > %define _emacsver 22.2 > > %define _lispdir %{_datadir}/emacs/site-lisp > > Summary: Library to provide MIME feature for GNU Emacs > Name: semi > Version: %{_semiver} > Release: 1%{?dist} > License: GPL > #Group: Applications/Internet As lint says, there need to be a valid group and license tag. As for license, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing - I think it boils down to GPLv2. For Group:, take a look at http://koti.welho.com/vskytta/packagers-handbook/packagers-handbook.html#guidelines-group-tag > URL: ftp://ftp.m17n.org/pub/mule/semi/semi-1.14-for-flim-1.14 > Source0: ftp://ftp.m17n.org/pub/mule/semi/semi-1.14-for-flim-1.14/semi-%{version}.tar.bz2 Unfortunately, these are password protected. > BuildRequires: emacs >= %{_emacsver}, flim >= %{_flimver} > BuildArch: noarch > Requires: emacs >= %{_emacsver}, flim >= %{_flimver} > > Patch1: semi-001-use-w3m-instead-of-w3.patch > > %description > SEMI is a library to provide MIME feature for GNU Emacs. MIME is a > proposed internet standard for including content and headers other than > (ASCII) plain text in messages [nit-picking] This was written some time ago... Isn't it fair these days to say that MIME is the way to handle content on Internet? > > %prep > > %setup -q -n semi-%{version} > %patch1 -p1 > > # necessary to generate the auto-autoloads.el file: > touch *.el > > %build > > %install > > rm -rf %buildroot > > %{__mkdir_p} %buildroot%{_lispdir}/semi > > cd $RPM_BUILD_DIR/semi-%{version} > > make LISPDIR=%buildroot%{_lispdir} > make LISPDIR=%buildroot%{_lispdir} install > > make clean Why make clean here? If all goes well, %clean will take care of it. If not, I think we want everything. Or am I missing something? > > %clean > rm -rf %buildroot > > %files > %defattr(-,root,root) > %doc NEWS README* ChangeLog SEMI* TODO VERSION > %{_lispdir}/semi > > %changelog > > * Fri Nov 7 2008 Vitaly Mayatskikh [1.14.6-1] > - first build > Cheers! --alec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 08:35:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 03:35:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470547] Review Request: SEMI - MIME rendering library for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811160835.mAG8Zwwl001055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470547 --- Comment #4 from Alec Leamas 2008-11-16 03:35:58 EDT --- Reading the Review Guidelines once more, I realize that my proposal just to add the COPYING file wasn't that good. What needs to be done is to try to get upstream to do this. But I don't know if it's feasible, and anyway I think you need advice by someone more experienced than me about this. I have already been wrong once :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 08:37:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 03:37:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811160837.mAG8bbhD011063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 --- Comment #13 from D Haley 2008-11-16 03:37:36 EDT --- I have applied for the packager group access, under the name "mycae". I have also succesfully built the package using koji. koji build --scratch dist-f9 laf-plugin-1.0-4.fc9.src.rpm Uploading srpm: laf-plugin-1.0-4.fc9.src.rpm [====================================] 100% 00:00:04 56.34 KiB 13.25 KiB/sec Created task: 934894 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=934894 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 934894 build (dist-f9, laf-plugin-1.0-4.fc9.src.rpm): free 934894 build (dist-f9, laf-plugin-1.0-4.fc9.src.rpm): free -> open (ppc7.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 934895 buildArch (laf-plugin-1.0-4.fc9.src.rpm, noarch): open (xenbuilder2.fedora.redhat.com) 934895 buildArch (laf-plugin-1.0-4.fc9.src.rpm, noarch): open (xenbuilder2.fedora.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 934894 build (dist-f9, laf-plugin-1.0-4.fc9.src.rpm): open (ppc7.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 09:14:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 04:14:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470155] Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811160914.mAG9EhM5007142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 Alec Leamas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |leamas.alec at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Alec Leamas 2008-11-16 04:14:42 EDT --- I need a sponsor, so I need to make some informal reviews. A short look at the spec file looks good, for what value that can be. But I get an "Access denied" for the srpm. No good, that is :-) --alec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 11:12:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 06:12:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471787] New: Review Request: taginfo - Printer of Tag Information from Media Files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: taginfo - Printer of Tag Information from Media Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471787 Summary: Review Request: taginfo - Printer of Tag Information from Media Files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/taginfo.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/taginfo-1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Taginfo is a quick implementation of the TagLib API for use in the music jukebox program Room Juice. It's meant to be fast, not featureful. Taginfo reads what tags TagLib can read, which as of this writing are ID3, ID3V2, Ogg, and FLAC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 12:21:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 07:21:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811161221.mAGCLBvk017292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 --- Comment #1 from D Haley 2008-11-16 07:21:10 EDT --- Files: Spec URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/skinlf-2.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/skinlf-6.7-2.fc9.src.rpm - Fix version numbering - Fix top level dir when building jar -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 12:21:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 07:21:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459211] Review Request: oolite - A space sim game, inspired by Elite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811161221.mAGCLtji017382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459211 S?bastien Scour changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |all_killem at yahoo.fr --- Comment #1 from S?bastien Scour 2008-11-16 07:21:54 EDT --- The link for the RPM is broken. :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 12:28:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 07:28:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811161228.mAGCS7Jf018428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #16 from D Haley 2008-11-16 07:28:05 EDT --- Spec URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/flexdock-4.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/flexdock-0.5.1-4.fc9.src.rpm - Update package revision number - Fix Top level dir -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 12:44:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 07:44:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811161244.mAGCinCd021139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 --- Comment #14 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-11-16 07:44:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > I have applied for the packager group access, under the name "mycae". Nice work. You are now sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 13:29:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 08:29:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811161329.mAGDTEo8030482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874 --- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-11-16 08:29:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > I note that 0.3.2 isn't announced upstream, just 0.3.1. 0.3.3 seems to be > tagged as well but I didn't see a tarball. Developers of ZeroMQ created version 0.3.3 specially for Fedora, to meet Fedora's policy regirding -rpath. It wasn't publically announced. > The descriptions really need some elaboration. "Development files for C", for > example, is almost completely nondescriptive, and "Fast messaging system", > while fine for a summary, really needs elaboration because it could refer just > as well to mutt or an IRC client. Unfortunately the upstream web site is > completely useless as a source of descriptive text. Maybe: > ZeroMQ (0MQ) is an implementation of the Advanced Message Queuing Protocol > (AMQP) written in C++, calling itself "the fastest messaging system ever?. > And then something like: > ZeroMQ C interface libaries. > or something for the C subpackage and > Development files for the ZeroMQ C interface libraries. Changed a little. > Is there any reason the python and java interfaces aren't built? And if the > python interface isn't being built, why is there a build dependency on > python-devel? Python installation was broken (patch submitted upstream where it was accepted). I fixed it and re-enabled. However I'm not sure about correct installation of java-interface, because I'm not keen in java stuff. > Maybe I'm missing something, but zeromq-c-devel doesn't seem to have any > dependency on zeromq-devel, which leaves /usr/include/zmq unowned if > zeromq-c-devel only is installed. Good catch - it was my fault. Fixed. > Do you know if the tests under the perf directory are runnable at build time? > It seems like there are some local tests, but I have no idea how to run them. I'll investigate it. > * source files match upstream: > d11291730967f91762bfdbf7352871ba20fddffe8eead1a66e96cd1053f47eab > zmq-0.3.2.tar.gz > * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. > * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. > X summaries could use some work. > X descriptions could use some work. Added more descriptive texts. > * dist tag is present. > * build root is OK. > * license field matches the actual license. > * license is open source-compatible. > * license text included in package. > * latest version is being packaged. > ? not sure about BuildRequires: python-devel. Re-enabled python-interface (requires autoreconf summoning). > * compiler flags are appropriate. > * %clean is present. > * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). > * package installs properly. > * debuginfo package looks complete. > X rpmlint has some easily fixed complaints. Cosmetic fixes made. However situation with unused dependencies on x86_64 will be investigated later (no access to x64 right now). > X final provides and requires: > zeromq-0.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm > libzmq.so.0()(64bit) > zeromq = 0.3.2-1.fc10 > zeromq(x86-64) = 0.3.2-1.fc10 > = > /sbin/ldconfig > libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) > libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) > libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) > libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) > libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) > libzmq.so.0()(64bit) > > zeromq-c-0.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm > libczmq.so.0()(64bit) > zeromq-c = 0.3.2-1.fc10 > zeromq-c(x86-64) = 0.3.2-1.fc10 > = > /sbin/ldconfig > libczmq.so.0()(64bit) > libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) > libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) > libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) > libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) > libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) > libzmq.so.0()(64bit) > zeromq = 0.3.2-1.fc10 > X no dependency on zeromq-devel Added. > zeromq-c-devel-0.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm > zeromq-c-devel = 0.3.2-1.fc10 > zeromq-c-devel(x86-64) = 0.3.2-1.fc10 > = > libczmq.so.0()(64bit) > zeromq-c = 0.3.2-1.fc10 > > zeromq-devel-0.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm > zeromq-devel = 0.3.2-1.fc10 > zeromq-devel(x86-64) = 0.3.2-1.fc10 > = > libzmq.so.0()(64bit) > zeromq = 0.3.2-1.fc10 > > ? not sure if there's a test suite there or not. AFAIK, nope. > * shared libraries installed: > ldconfig is called where necessary > unversioned .so files are present in the respective -devel packages. > X /usr/include/zmq ownership issues in zeromq-c-devel. Fixed. > * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. > * no duplicates in %files. > * file permissions are appropriate. > * no generically named files > * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig) > * code, not content. > * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. > * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. > * headers are in the -devel packages. > * no pkgconfig files. > * no static libraries. > * no libtool .la files. http://peter.fedorapeople.org/zeromq.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/zeromq-0.3.2-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 15:20:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 10:20:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435724] Review Request: fedora-ds-graph - an rrdtool-based graphing utility for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811161520.mAGFKgdl007588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435724 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-16 10:20:41 EDT --- Please clear the whiteboard when you are ready for a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 15:18:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 10:18:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 233946] Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811161518.mAGFIhom006992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233946 Bug 233946 depends on bug 231809, which changed state. Bug 231809 Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231809 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 15:18:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 10:18:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 231809] Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811161518.mAGFIfB1006910@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231809 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #23 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-16 10:18:38 EDT --- I don't understand why this is back in the queue instead of just being closed. Without a package to review and a submitter to make one, an open review ticket is completely pointless. Bryan, if you want to submit an xmlrpc-epi package, please do so in another ticket when you're ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 15:23:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 10:23:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811161523.mAGFN8AP008009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(dodji at redhat.com) --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-16 10:23:07 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 15:24:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 10:24:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435276] Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811161524.mAGFOMsH008134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435276 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #23 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-16 10:24:20 EDT --- Please clear the whiteboard when you are ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 15:21:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 10:21:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446814] Review Request: emacs-lookup - Emacsen interface to look up dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811161521.mAGFLpOQ007790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446814 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 15:22:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 10:22:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 251805] Review Request: postgresql-orafce - Implementation of some Oracle functions into PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811161522.mAGFMkcu007924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(devrim at commandpro | |mpt.com) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 15:50:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 10:50:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 251805] Review Request: postgresql-orafce - Implementation of some Oracle functions into PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811161550.mAGFoo0J012376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805 --- Comment #11 from Devrim GUNDUZ 2008-11-16 10:50:47 EDT --- Please hold this bug open a bit more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 15:51:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 10:51:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 251805] Review Request: postgresql-orafce - Implementation of some Oracle functions into PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811161551.mAGFp4CT012430@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805 Devrim GUNDUZ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 16:56:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 11:56:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471662] Review Request: qlandkartegt - GPS device mapping tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811161656.mAGGubQ6031723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471662 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 17:00:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:00:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811161700.mAGH0fqk032461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-16 12:00:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > I have applied for the packager group access, under the name "mycae". > > Nice work. You are now sponsored. Thanks. mycae, please follow "Join" wiki again. Next you have to write CVS request on this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 17:30:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:30:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471805] New: Review Request: aespipe - AES-based encryption tool for tar/cpio and loop-aes images Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: aespipe - AES-based encryption tool for tar/cpio and loop-aes images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471805 Summary: Review Request: aespipe - AES-based encryption tool for tar/cpio and loop-aes images Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: knolderpoor at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://users.skynet.be/fa990755/aespipe.spec SRPM URL: http://users.skynet.be/fa990755/aespipe-2.3e-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: aespipe is an encryption tool that reads from standard input and writes to standard output. It uses the AES (Rijndael) cipher. It can be used as an encryption filter, to create and restore encrypted tar/cpio backup archives and to read/write and convert loop-AES compatible encrypted images. aespipe can be used for non-destructive in-place encryption of existing disk partitions for use with the loop-AES encrypted loopback kernel module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 17:41:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:41:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471662] Review Request: qlandkartegt - GPS device mapping tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811161741.mAGHfeI9006499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471662 --- Comment #1 from Till Maas 2008-11-16 12:41:39 EDT --- [OK] rpmlint output: [OK] Spec in %{name}.spec format [OK] license allowed: GPLv2+ [OK] license matches shortname in License: tag [OK] license in tarball and included in %doc: copying [OK] package is code or permissive content: {N/A} patches sent to upstream and commented [OK] Source0 is a working URL {OK} Sourceforge URL is Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name} [OK] Source0 matches Upstream: 0cf413cc59e092ed2277578093d6c70d QLandkarteGT.0.8.1.tar.gz [NEEDSWORK] Package builds on all platforms: fails on ppc/ppc64: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=935213 [NEEDSWORK] ExcludeArch bugs are filed and commented: [OK] BuildRequires are complete (mock builds): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=935221 (OK) No file dependencies outside of /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin [N/A] %find_lang used for locales [N/A] Every (sub)package containing libraries runs ldconfig %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig [N/A] .h (header) files are in -devel subpackage [N/A] .a (static libraries) are in -static subpackage [N/A] contains .pc (pkgconfig) files and has Requires: pkgconfig (N/A) .pc files are in -devel subpackage [N/A] contains .so.X(.Y) files and .so is in -devel [N/A] -devel subpackage has Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [N/A] .la files (libtool) are not included [OK] Has GUI and includes %{name}.desktop [OK] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install [OK] Prefix: /usr not used (not relocatable) [OK] Owns all created directories [OK] no duplicates in %files [OK] %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [OK] Does not own files or dirs from other packages [OK] included filenames are in UTF-8 [OK] %clean is rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] Consistent macro usage [N/A] large documentation is -doc subpackage [OK] %doc does not affect runtime {OK} no pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) {OK} well known BuildRoot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) {OK} PreReq not used {OK} RPM_OPT_FLAGS honoured {OK} Useful debuginfo generated {OK} no duplication of system libraries {OK} no rpath {OK} Timestamps preserved with cp and install {OK} Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) {OK} Requires(pre,post) style notation not used {OK} only writes to tmp /var/tmp $TMPDIR %{_tmppath} %{_builddir} (and %{buildroot} on %install and %clean) {OK} no Conflicts {OK} nothing installed in /srv {OK} Changelog in allowed format {OK} does not use Scriptlets Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch Sane Provides: and Requires: {OK} Follows Naming Guidelines {N/A} shared libraries scriptlet Conclusion: The ppc(64) build failures need to be addressed, then I will approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 18:48:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 13:48:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471662] Review Request: qlandkartegt - GPS device mapping tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811161848.mAGImguT007627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471662 --- Comment #2 from Dan Hor?k 2008-11-16 13:48:41 EDT --- Updated Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/qlandkartegt.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/qlandkartegt-0.8.1-2.fc11.src.rpm ChangeLog: apply patch for bigendian arches, patch posted upstream koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=935266 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 19:22:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 14:22:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811161922.mAGJMk8R023022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 --- Comment #5 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-11-16 14:22:44 EDT --- Update to 0.9.6 : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/edb.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/edb-0.9.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Rebuild under mock is OK. Rebuild on koji is OK : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=935319 rpmlint output : [builder at FEDOBOX rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /home/builder/rpmbuild/SRPMS/edb-0.9.6-1.fc9.src.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/edb-0.9.6-1.fc9.i386.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/edb-plugins-0.9.6-1.fc9.i386.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/edb-debuginfo-0.9.6-1.fc9.i386.rpm 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [builder at FEDOBOX rpmbuild]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 19:41:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 14:41:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471809] New: Review Request: gnome-gmail-notifier - A simple application that monitors Gmail inboxes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnome-gmail-notifier - A simple application that monitors Gmail inboxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471809 Summary: Review Request: gnome-gmail-notifier - A simple application that monitors Gmail inboxes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ianweller at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/gnome-gmail-notifier/0.9.4-1/gnome-gmail-notifier.spec SRPM URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/gnome-gmail-notifier/0.9.4-1/gnome-gmail-notifier-0.9.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The GNOME Gmail Notifier is a project designed to provide a simple, easy- to-use application that monitors users' gmail inbox(es), and to deliver the appropriate notifications when new mail exists. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 20:04:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:04:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471429] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache - Catalyst Apache Engines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162004.mAGK47PA020343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471429 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-16 15:04:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 20:09:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:09:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471522] Review Request: otl - OTL library for database connections and queries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162009.mAGK94lU021214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471522 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: OTL - OTL |Review Request: otl - OTL |library for database |library for database |connections and queries |connections and queries --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-16 15:09:03 EDT --- What is the package name here? I see otl in the request, but the reviewed package was otl-devel? I don't see why it would be otl-devel if upstream is named otl... can you explain? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 20:08:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:08:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463035] Review Request: pyroman - Very fast firewall configuration tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162008.mAGK8nOj030629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463035 --- Comment #5 from Adam Huffman 2008-11-16 15:08:48 EDT --- Am working on another package which needs a partial rewrite - will get back to this one once that's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 20:13:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:13:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162013.mAGKDjV8022018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-16 15:13:44 EDT --- Clearing cvs flag for now. Reset it once everything is ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 20:16:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:16:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162016.mAGKG3R0022658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-16 15:16:01 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 20:14:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:14:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471527] Review Request: SNMP++ - SNMP C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162014.mAGKE9rM022071@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-16 15:14:08 EDT --- Sorry, this package will need to be approved before cvs can be processed. Ie, a reviewer must set the fedora-review flag to +. clearing the fedora-cvs flag for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 20:21:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:21:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162021.mAGKL2wm000412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-16 15:21:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 20:18:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:18:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470626] Review Request: balance - TCP load-balancing proxy server with round robin and failover mechanisms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162018.mAGKIFcP032246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470626 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-16 15:18:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 20:20:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:20:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469972] Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162020.mAGKK4K2032719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-16 15:20:03 EDT --- Paul: I assume you want a F10 branch as well? cvs done (with F-10 branch as well). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 20:25:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:25:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468128] Review Request: python-flickrapi - Python module for interfacing with the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162025.mAGKPUwQ001384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468128 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-16 15:25:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 20:23:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:23:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162023.mAGKNGDC000852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #30 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-16 15:23:15 EDT --- there is no F-11 branch, devel is the branch that will someday become F-11. ;) cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 20:28:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:28:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469816] Review Request: perl-App-Cmd - Write command line apps with less suffering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162028.mAGKSiWu025126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469816 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-16 15:28:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 20:27:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:27:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469627] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class - A Path::Class type library for Moose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162027.mAGKR9IG024952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469627 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-16 15:27:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 20:30:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:30:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471480] Review Request: sfxr - Sound effect generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162030.mAGKUg6j002373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471480 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-16 15:30:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 20:29:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:29:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470177] Review Request: perl-Module-Util - Module name tools and transformations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162029.mAGKTbZx001951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470177 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-16 15:29:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 20:32:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:32:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435018] Review Request: clipper - crystallographic object oriented library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162032.mAGKW6ud025833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435018 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #23 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-16 15:32:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 20:41:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:41:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471662] Review Request: qlandkartegt - GPS device mapping tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162041.mAGKfxAU004330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471662 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Till Maas 2008-11-16 15:41:58 EDT --- The package is now APPROVED. Btw. the Guidelines recommend that you add a comment nearby the patch saying that it was applied to upstream's SCM: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PatchUpstreamStatus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 21:17:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 16:17:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468128] Review Request: python-flickrapi - Python module for interfacing with the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162117.mAGLHPf8000857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468128 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-16 16:17:24 EDT --- python-flickrapi-1.1-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-flickrapi-1.1-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 21:17:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 16:17:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468128] Review Request: python-flickrapi - Python module for interfacing with the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162117.mAGLHMu9010562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468128 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-16 16:17:21 EDT --- python-flickrapi-1.1-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-flickrapi-1.1-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 21:26:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 16:26:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471817] New: Review Request: cmus - Ncurses-Based Music Player Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cmus - Ncurses-Based Music Player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471817 Summary: Review Request: cmus - Ncurses-Based Music Player Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/cmus.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/cmus-2.2.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: cmus is a small and fast text mode music player for Linux and many other UNIX-like operating systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 21:31:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 16:31:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162131.mAGLVq4r003670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #14 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-11-16 16:31:51 EDT --- Ping. Juha, you should move further (I mean, create cvs request, import into Fedora cvs, build, etc). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 21:34:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 16:34:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470626] Review Request: balance - TCP load-balancing proxy server with round robin and failover mechanisms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162134.mAGLY6PA013313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470626 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-16 16:34:06 EDT --- balance-3.42-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/balance-3.42-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 21:59:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 16:59:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162159.mAGLxORn017319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-16 16:59:22 EDT --- apanov-heuristica-fonts-20081109-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/apanov-heuristica-fonts-20081109-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 22:10:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:10:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462529] Review Request: python-feedcache - Wrapper for Mark Pilgrim's FeedParser module which caches feed content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162210.mAGMAJ4T019267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462529 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 22:19:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:19:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462529] Review Request: python-feedcache - Wrapper for Mark Pilgrim's FeedParser module which caches feed content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162219.mAGMJnLw020487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462529 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Brian Pepple 2008-11-16 17:19:48 EDT --- MD5Sum: 38a2d25a32409402995d624cbc7a5b39 feedcache-1.3.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Package builds in Mock. * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly Bad: * rpmlint produces the following errors which should be reviewed/corrected before importing into CVS: python-feedcache.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/feedcache/cachestoragelock.py 0644 python-feedcache.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/feedcache/__init__.py 0644 python-feedcache.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/feedcache/test_cachestoragelock.py 0644 python-feedcache.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/feedcache/test_cache.py 0644 python-feedcache.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/feedcache/cache.py 0644 python-feedcache.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/feedcache/test_server.py 0644 python-feedcache.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/feedcache/example.py 0644 python-feedcache.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/feedcache/example_threads.py 0644 python-feedcache.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/feedcache/test_shovefilesystem.py 0644 +1 APPROVED (once those rpmlint errors are looked at) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 22:23:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:23:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162223.mAGMNmdb011652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 22:27:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:27:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462621] Review Request: pycryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162227.mAGMRf8l021747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462621 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 22:43:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:43:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162243.mAGMhJ9t014263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 --- Comment #31 from Hayden James 2008-11-16 17:43:18 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: quickfix New Branches: F-9 Owners: hjames -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 22:45:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:45:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467764] Review Request: python-twitter - A python wrapper around the Twitter API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162245.mAGMjghQ014937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467764 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 22:43:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:43:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462621] Review Request: pycryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162243.mAGMhReB014288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462621 --- Comment #1 from Brian Pepple 2008-11-16 17:43:26 EDT --- MD5Sum: 94dce03471b0fbc0392cc76de207c234 pycryptopp-0.5.7.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Package builds in Mock. * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly Bad: * rpmlint produces the following errors: pycryptopp.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycryptopp/cipher/aesmodule.cpp pycryptopp.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycryptopp/hash/sha256module.cpp pycryptopp.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycryptopp/publickey/rsamodule.cpp pycryptopp.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycryptopp/hash/sha256.so 0775 pycryptopp.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycryptopp/test/test_sha256.py 0644 pycryptopp.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycryptopp/publickey/ecdsa.so 0775 pycryptopp.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycryptopp/publickey/rsa.so 0775 pycryptopp.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycryptopp/cipher/aes.so 0775 pycryptopp.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycryptopp/test/test_ecdsa.py 0644 pycryptopp.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycryptopp/test/test_rsa.py 0644 pycryptopp.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycryptopp/test/test_aes.py 0644 pycryptopp.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycryptopp/publickey/ecdsamodule.cpp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 22:49:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:49:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471522] Review Request: otl - OTL library for database connections and queries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162249.mAGMnDJt024600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471522 --- Comment #10 from Hayden James 2008-11-16 17:49:12 EDT --- This package is just for development of the OTL library. http://otl.sourceforge.net. It was suggested that since it was a header only project that it would be more appropriate to name the package otl-devel, however I don't have any strong feelings either way, what do you think is the correct way? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 22:51:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:51:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471527] Review Request: SNMP++ - SNMP C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162251.mAGMpvFb016068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 --- Comment #8 from Hayden James 2008-11-16 17:51:56 EDT --- Yes, my mistake. I'm in the middle of clearing up the last remaining issue with upstream. After that I will submit another request. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 22:56:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:56:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467764] Review Request: python-twitter - A python wrapper around the Twitter API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162256.mAGMujfP025933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467764 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Brian Pepple 2008-11-16 17:56:44 EDT --- MD5Sum: d4fe92ca630a7339a064cef8e91af2b9 python-twitter-0.5.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Valid license tag * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Package builds in Mock. * rpmlint produces no errors. * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly +1 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 22:56:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:56:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471527] Review Request: SNMP++ - SNMP C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162256.mAGMutoL016858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-16 17:56:55 EDT --- quickfix-1.12.4-6.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/quickfix-1.12.4-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 23:00:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:00:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468222] Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction management for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162300.mAGN08J4017448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468222 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 23:10:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:10:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468222] Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction management for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162310.mAGNAAsu018989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468222 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Brian Pepple 2008-11-16 18:10:09 EDT --- MD5Sum: 93b4f5d753b4ba99b201cce05c25e549 transaction-1.0a1.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Package builds in Mock. * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly Bad: * License tag should be 'ZPLv2.1', not 'ZPL'. * rpmlint produces the following errors: python-transaction.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0-0.1.a2 ['1.0-0.1.a1.fc9', '1.0-0.1.a1'] python-transaction.noarch: W: invalid-license ZPL You can fix the changelog & license tag when you import it into CVS. +1 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 23:13:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:13:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468223] Review Request: python-repoze-tm2 - Zope-like transaction manager via WSGI middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162313.mAGNDAxV019328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468223 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 23:21:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:21:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468223] Review Request: python-repoze-tm2 - Zope-like transaction manager via WSGI middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162321.mAGNLCbm029477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468223 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Brian Pepple 2008-11-16 18:21:11 EDT --- MD5Sum: 1354ffaa88ee82793342e7bf2cae6ea9 repoze.tm2-1.0a3.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Package builds in Mock. * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly Minor: * rpmlint produces the following: python-repoze-tm2.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0-0.1.a2 ['1.0-0.1.a3.fc9', '1.0-0.1.a3'] +1 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 23:25:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:25:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468224] Review Request: python-zope-sqlalchemy - Minimal Zope/SQLAlchemy transaction integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162325.mAGNP1mY021235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468224 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 23:28:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:28:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162328.mAGNSST0021897@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from D Haley 2008-11-16 18:28:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: laf-plugin Short Description: Native Look and Feel plugin for Java Owners: mycae Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 23:33:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:33:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468224] Review Request: python-zope-sqlalchemy - Minimal Zope/SQLAlchemy transaction integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162333.mAGNX1MJ031292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468224 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Brian Pepple 2008-11-16 18:33:00 EDT --- MD5Sum: 3edc2b0f02e778483de64b60ff214df9 zope.sqlalchemy-0.3.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Package builds in Mock. * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly Bad: * rpmlint produces the following, which based on the source files should be 'ZPLv2.1': python-zope-sqlalchemy.noarch: W: invalid-license ZPL the license tag can be fixed when you import it into CVS. +1 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 00:12:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:12:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468806] Review Request: python-dbsprockets - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database definitions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170012.mAH0CUTQ004866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468806 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 00:19:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:19:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453026] Review Request: xmp - A multi-format module player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170019.mAH0J4Xf029724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453026 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-16 19:19:04 EDT --- xmp-2.5.1-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xmp-2.5.1-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 00:18:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:18:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453026] Review Request: xmp - A multi-format module player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170018.mAH0IN02029648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453026 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-16 19:18:22 EDT --- xmp-2.5.1-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xmp-2.5.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 00:19:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:19:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453026] Review Request: xmp - A multi-format module player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170019.mAH0Jaht005839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453026 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-16 19:19:36 EDT --- xmp-2.5.1-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xmp-2.5.1-3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 00:29:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:29:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468806] Review Request: python-dbsprockets - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database definitions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170029.mAH0T1h0007336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468806 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Brian Pepple 2008-11-16 19:29:00 EDT --- MD5Sum: 95ec27cbce35e757430733ac8231e5a7 DBSprockets-0.5dev-r411.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * Package builds in Mock (after adding missing BR). * rpmlint produces the following errors which can be safely ignored since the tarball contains no documentation: python-dbsprockets.noarch: W: no-documentation * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly Bad: * Missing BR on python-setuptools-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 02:11:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 21:11:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471829] Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170211.mAH2BelT023997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 Hayden James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 02:11:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 21:11:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471829] New: Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 Summary: Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hayden.james at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/log4cxx.spec SRPM URL: http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/log4cxx-0.10.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Log4cxx is a popular logging package written in C++. One of its distinctive features is the notion of inheritance in loggers. Using a logger hierarchy it is possible to control which log statements are output at arbitrary granularity. This helps reduce the volume of logged output and minimize the cost of logging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 03:09:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 22:09:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: ltsp-server-livesetupdocs - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170309.mAH399mT000620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #15 from Peter Scheie 2008-11-16 22:09:08 EDT --- New version at http://petre.homedns.org/k12linux/k12linux-quick-start-guide-0.0.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Note name change to match new title for document. Covers configuring network for LTSP on LiveUSB & hard drive. Includes 'rpm -e' command to remove the package so it doesn't appear on user desktops if desired (and no longer suggests just removing the file from /etc/skel). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 03:21:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 22:21:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: QMTest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170321.mAH3LfQt028092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 Stefan Seefeld changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(seefeld at sympatico | |.ca) | --- Comment #6 from Stefan Seefeld 2008-11-16 22:21:39 EDT --- I have fixed the two issues you made me aware of, i.e. I have upgraded the ZOPE license to 2.1, and I have replaced the now obsolete URL to www.software-carpentry.com. I have uploaded a new source rpm and a new spec file: http://synopsis.fresco.org/download/srpm/qmtest-2.4-2.fc9.src.rpm http://synopsis.fresco.org/download/srpm/qmtest.spec If you confirm that this passes the Fedora acceptance test I'll spin a new minor QMTest release (2.4.1) and then submit qmtest-2.4.1-1 for inclusion into Fedora. Thanks, Stefan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 03:24:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 22:24:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470177] Review Request: perl-Module-Util - Module name tools and transformations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170324.mAH3OLMV003348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470177 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 03:36:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 22:36:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469627] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class - A Path::Class type library for Moose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170336.mAH3aFR3030499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469627 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 04:18:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 23:18:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170418.mAH4I6mU011843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #19 from Akira TAGOH 2008-11-16 23:18:05 EDT --- Thanks. built and updated comps and wiki as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 04:25:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 23:25:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170425.mAH4PMi2013022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #39 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-16 23:25:21 EDT --- Sounds good Jason: BTW I already added the -devel Provides to PackagingDrafts Haskell templates last week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 04:27:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 23:27:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170427.mAH4RYmp006119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #40 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-16 23:27:33 EDT --- I mean https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Haskell/LibraryOnlyTemplate -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 04:38:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 23:38:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471809] Review Request: gnome-gmail-notifier - A simple application that monitors Gmail inboxes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170438.mAH4cwmC014660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471809 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-16 23:38:57 EDT --- Need some work 1) remove vendor tag as per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/DesktopFileVendor I see some warnings also for desktop file but its ok. You can check those warnings in build log or output of desktop-file-validate 2) also you can remove original desktop file along with above fix as from rm %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop desktop-file-install --vendor="fedora" --dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications data/%{name}.desktop to desktop-file-install \ --delete-original \ --dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop 3) preserve timestamps by using make install as make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 04:46:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 23:46:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170446.mAH4ktmK008862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ianweller at gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Ian Weller 2008-11-16 23:46:54 EDT --- Ping? Just got a request with someone who's been speaking with upstream to get this in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 05:02:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:02:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170502.mAH52bAW011188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #17 from Ankur Sinha 2008-11-17 00:02:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > ping ? > > pong! > > hi.. have end semester exams so a little tied up.. will do it this week for > sure.. hi, sorry for the delay.. rebuilt with the changes advised by Pablo.. here are the new files.. http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec The doc on changelog doesnt tell me which ones dist and which ones version.. :( so i havent changed that in this one.. (pablo please help me with this) The warnings for the docs is still present.. How do i correct that? Also is there a better documentation for fontconfig rules somewhere? regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 05:06:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:06:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471809] Review Request: gnome-gmail-notifier - A simple application that monitors Gmail inboxes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170506.mAH56T3s018814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471809 --- Comment #2 from Ian Weller 2008-11-17 00:06:28 EDT --- * Sun Nov 16 2008 Ian Weller 0.9.4-2 - Patch desktop file to correctly define the application's icon - Fix desktop file installation - Keep timestamps on installed files - Change URL to actual URL instead of Google Code project page Spec: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/gnome-gmail-notifier/0.9.4-2/gnome-gmail-notifier.spec SRPM: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/gnome-gmail-notifier/0.9.4-2/gnome-gmail-notifier-0.9.4-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 05:09:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:09:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471787] Review Request: taginfo - Printer of Tag Information from Media Files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170509.mAH59gZh012118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471787 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-17 00:09:41 EDT --- Use CFLAGS in make command as make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="${optflags}" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 05:12:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:12:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471787] Review Request: taginfo - Printer of Tag Information from Media Files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170512.mAH5CFp2012750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471787 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-17 00:12:14 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=935739 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. b709dd6be61260c01d2bbdcb482cc1a6 taginfo-1.2.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. Suggestions 1) as per given in comment #1 use cflags before committing to cvs APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 05:17:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:17:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471787] Review Request: taginfo - Printer of Tag Information from Media Files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170517.mAH5HO1j013569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471787 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer 2008-11-17 00:17:23 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: taginfo Short Description: Printer of Tag Information from Media Files Owners: konradm Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 05:29:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:29:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471817] Review Request: cmus - Ncurses-Based Music Player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170529.mAH5TX2K015373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471817 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-11-17 00:29:32 EDT --- > BuildRequires: faad2-devel > BuildRequires: ffmpeg-devel > BuildRequires: libmad-devel It's in no way suitable for Fedora. Please, move to RPMFusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 05:33:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:33:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471817] Review Request: cmus - Ncurses-Based Music Player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170533.mAH5XmD9016060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471817 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2008-11-17 00:33:47 EDT --- Doh! I was wondering if those were Fedora or RPM Fusion. It can be built with those optional modules disabled, but I think a crippled media player is somewhat silly. Re-opening at RPM Fusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 05:37:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:37:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470547] Review Request: SEMI - MIME rendering library for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170537.mAH5bcuh016692@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470547 --- Comment #5 from Alec Leamas 2008-11-17 00:37:37 EDT --- #%define _default_patch_fuzz 2 > %define _semiver 1.14.6 > %define _flimver 1.14.8 > %define _emacsver 22.2 > > %define _lispdir %{_datadir}/emacs/site-lisp You should not use _* as a macro name - these are by convention reserved for "system" macros. Use semiver, flimver, emacsver and lispdir instead. Sorry I missed that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 06:24:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 01:24:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471809] Review Request: gnome-gmail-notifier - A simple application that monitors Gmail inboxes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170624.mAH6OveQ031017@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471809 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-17 01:24:56 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=935765 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 822426b19510036d14c00ed2ea24a899 gnome-gmail-notifier-0.9.4.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Desktop file installed correctly. + GUI app. Suggestions:- Build is successful if you remove BR:gettext As currently no translations ar e present you can avoid adding this BR:gettext see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=935770 without BR:gettext APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 06:39:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 01:39:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471809] Review Request: gnome-gmail-notifier - A simple application that monitors Gmail inboxes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170639.mAH6dRxu025631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471809 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Ian Weller 2008-11-17 01:39:26 EDT --- Thanks. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnome-gmail-notifier Short Description: A simple application that monitors Gmail inboxes Owners: ianweller Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 07:29:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 02:29:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: QMTest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170729.mAH7TVob032408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-17 02:29:29 EDT --- Now legal issue is resolved. Assigning to myself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 08:58:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 03:58:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471480] Review Request: sfxr - Sound effect generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170858.mAH8w0oA012563@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471480 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Hans de Goede 2008-11-17 03:57:58 EDT --- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 09:16:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:16:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471754] Review Request: virtaal - Localization and translation editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170916.mAH9GtiU024951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471754 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-17 04:16:53 EDT --- translate-toolkit-1.2.0-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/translate-toolkit-1.2.0-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 09:16:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:16:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471662] Review Request: qlandkartegt - GPS device mapping tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170916.mAH9GqUI024926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471662 --- Comment #4 from Dan Hor?k 2008-11-17 04:16:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Btw. the Guidelines recommend that you add a comment nearby the patch saying > that it was applied to upstream's SCM: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PatchUpstreamStatus I am aware of the guideline, I will put notice into the imported spec. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 09:18:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:18:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471662] Review Request: qlandkartegt - GPS device mapping tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170918.mAH9IcPG025205@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471662 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Dan Hor?k 2008-11-17 04:18:37 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qlandkartegt Short Description: GPS device mapping tool Owners: sharkcz silfreed Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 09:29:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:29:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170929.mAH9TpJi027035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173 --- Comment #9 from Chris Jones 2008-11-17 04:29:49 EDT --- Ian: I'm at least part of upstream and I've not had anyone mention RPM packaging to me for some time. Perhaps one of the ones in http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3?stat=3&search=terminator&srodzaj=3 would be helpful? If not, let me know if there is anything I can do to help whoever is packaging Terminator :) thanks folks :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 09:43:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:43:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170943.mAH9hjRi020667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #18 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-17 04:43:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > The warnings for the docs is still present.. How do i correct that? You have many examples of txt frobbing in the gfs font specs. Pablo can help you if needed. Also I'd have added http://www.thessalonica.org.ru/downloads/oldstand-manual.pdf in %doc > Also is there a better documentation for fontconfig rules somewhere? I'm not aware of better documentation than http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips or I wouldn't have bothered writing it in the first place Again do ask your reviewer (Pablo) or the list if you have problems understanding part of it. It's a wiki and it can be fixed. It's no use leaving obscure parts in it for other packagers to fail on. You have many font substitution examples in the dejavu font packages. Do not forget to declare your font is an acceptable substitute for all the different Old Standard variant out there (TTF, OTF, etc) Otherwise the fontconfig info in there http://nim.fedorapeople.org/rpm-fonts/rpm-fonts-1.8.tar.bz2 should apply as-is for Fedora versions < 11 (but not the rest) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 09:52:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:52:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170952.mAH9qxU3031111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #33 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-17 04:52:57 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 09:52:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:52:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170952.mAH9qvYK031063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-17 04:52:55 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 09:53:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:53:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466193] Review Request: alee-fonts - Korean TrueType Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170953.mAH9r2cN031187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466193 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-17 04:53:01 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 09:52:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:52:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457709] Review Request: perizia-fonts - English asymmetric font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170952.mAH9qt8j031029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457709 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-17 04:52:54 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 09:52:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:52:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170952.mAH9qs4f030995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-17 04:52:52 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 09:53:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:53:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170953.mAH9r1Gm031150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-17 04:53:00 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 09:53:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:53:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467507] Review Request: Rufscript-fonts - Rufscripts is a decorative handwriting based font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170953.mAH9r4RS031233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467507 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-17 04:53:03 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 10:22:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 05:22:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471863] New: Review Request: garmindev - Drivers for communication with Garmin GPS devices Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: garmindev - Drivers for communication with Garmin GPS devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471863 Summary: Review Request: garmindev - Drivers for communication with Garmin GPS devices Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/garmindev.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/garmindev-0-0.1.20081117svn928.fc11.src.rpm Description: Drivers for communication with Garmin GPS devices used by QLandkarteGT. koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=935969 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 10:37:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 05:37:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458598] Review Request: snowballz - a fun RTS game featuring snowball fights with penguins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811171037.mAHAbaPq030003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458598 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hdegoede at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Hans de Goede 2008-11-17 05:37:34 EDT --- Erm, I really so no reason for this to go to rpmfusion. Yes the current development version of snowballz requires pyglet, which can use avbin (not avlib but avbin!), it CAN use that, as it is python using ctypes, it will dynamically try to load it when needed. However pyglet will work fine without avbin, it just wont be able to play video and compressed audio files. Now the latter may be a problem as the hg versions of snowballz contains a few music files, some in .ogg other in .mp3 format. This is not an unrecoverable problem though, the mp3's can be converted to ogg before being put into Fedora, and either snowballz, or preferably pyglet can (and should) be patched to support ogg files without needing avbin. I'm use the pyglet developers when this is discussed with them will be very understanding about the need for free distro's like Fedora and Debian to be able to play back ogg files without requiring avbin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 12:30:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:30:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470508] Review Request: Ajaxterm - A web-based terminal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811171230.mAHCURkn026612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470508 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-17 07:30:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Thanks, fixed both points. > > New version: > Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/Ajaxterm.spec > SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/Ajaxterm-0.10-4.fc9.src.rpm Where do you set LANG=C (or unset LANG)? Ajaxterm only supports latin1. Spec cleanup: Change %dir %{_datadir}/ajaxterm %{_datadir}/ajaxterm/* to simply %{_datadir}/ajaxterm Source and license matches upstream. **************************** The package is APPROVED. **************************** Do the fixes mentioned above before importing to CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 13:32:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:32:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471754] Review Request: virtaal - Localization and translation editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811171332.mAHDWDGC030568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471754 --- Comment #2 from Dwayne Bailey 2008-11-17 08:32:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > translate-toolkit-1.2.0-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. > http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/translate-toolkit-1.2.0-3.fc9 Ignore this, I set the wrong bug number of a translate-toolkit update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 14:27:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:27:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460727] Review Request: gnujump - A jumping game which is a clone of xjump In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811171427.mAHERmwY019052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460727 --- Comment #5 from Debarshi Ray 2008-11-17 09:27:46 EDT --- Any progress? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 15:00:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 10:00:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459173] Review Request: python-peak-util-extremes - Production-quality 'Min' and 'Max' objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811171500.mAHF0kFa026733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459173 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Luke Macken 2008-11-17 10:00:44 EDT --- This package has been imported a built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 15:00:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 10:00:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459177] Review Request: python-peak-rules - Generic functions and business rules support systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811171500.mAHF0n3P026790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459177 Bug 459177 depends on bug 459173, which changed state. Bug 459173 Summary: Review Request: python-peak-util-extremes - Production-quality 'Min' and 'Max' objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459173 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 15:30:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 10:30:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458598] Review Request: snowballz - a fun RTS game featuring snowball fights with penguins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811171530.mAHFUjvX002319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458598 --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-17 10:30:44 EDT --- I'm not sure Hans. I talked to the main avbin developer, who is also the main pyglet developer. He doesn't want to work on such issues. But he says he would accept patches. You're free to try your chances with him :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 16:22:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:22:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470155] Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811171622.mAHGMwNi002952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 --- Comment #3 from Alex Eskin 2008-11-17 11:22:57 EDT --- Sorry about that. Try it now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 16:34:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:34:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471829] Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811171634.mAHGY6Mb005281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 Hayden James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 16:31:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:31:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811171631.mAHGVjBx005021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 Hayden James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 16:34:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:34:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471829] Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811171634.mAHGYL1g015865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 Hayden James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 17:08:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 12:08:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471915] New: Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 Summary: Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dwalluck at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: JBoss Web Server is an enterprise ready web server designed for medium and large applications, based on the Apache Tomcat. It is meant to be used as a replacement for the standard Web servers on all major platforms. JBoss Web Server provides organizations with a single deployment platform for Java Server Pages (JSP) and Java Servlet technologies, Microsoft .NET, PHP, and CGI. It uses a genuine high performance hybrid technology that incorporates the best of the most recent OS technologies for processing high volume data, while keeping all the reference Java specifications. It supports both in and out of the process execution of CGI and PHP scripts, as well as .NET applications. The hybrid technology model offers the best from threading and event processing models, and that makes the JBoss Web Server one of the fastest and most scalable web servers in the market. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 17:19:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 12:19:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811171719.mAHHJ89M025809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 John A. Khvatov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ivaxer at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #30 from John A. Khvatov 2008-11-17 12:19:05 EDT --- protobuf-2.0.2-3: Build filed on my Fedora 9, x86_64 such as: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=45. Source update needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 17:54:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 12:54:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471805] Review Request: aespipe - AES-based encryption tool for tar/cpio and loop-aes images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811171754.mAHHstkp001071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471805 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-17 12:54:54 EDT --- I don't see you in the account system; what's your ID there? Do you require sponsorship? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 17:52:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 12:52:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471429] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache - Catalyst Apache Engines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811171752.mAHHqdH0022120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471429 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-17 12:52:39 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache-1.12-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache-1.12-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 17:52:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 12:52:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471429] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache - Catalyst Apache Engines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811171752.mAHHqbim000624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471429 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-17 12:52:36 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache-1.12-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache-1.12-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 18:37:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:37:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471805] Review Request: aespipe - AES-based encryption tool for tar/cpio and loop-aes images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811171837.mAHIbhXb009388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471805 --- Comment #2 from Dean Mander 2008-11-17 13:37:42 EDT --- Hi Jason, don't know about ID but my account name is 'knol'. I'm already sponsored, thanks, but a review of this tiny little new package would be welcomed :-). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 18:54:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:54:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811171854.mAHIsYmh002411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nsheridan at gmail.c | |om) --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-17 13:54:31 EDT --- OK, it's been a month since I posted comment 14 and there's been no response. I will close this ticket soon if nothing further happens. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 18:55:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:55:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446989] Review Request: python-epsilon - A small utility package that depends on tools too recent for Twisted In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811171855.mAHItpgB013100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446989 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mteixeira at webset. | |net) --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-17 13:55:49 EDT --- Any response to the above commentary? Are you still interested in submitting this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 18:57:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:57:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449037] Review Request: afio - cpio compatible archiver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811171857.mAHIvAet003227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449037 --- Comment #15 from Bruno Cornec 2008-11-17 13:57:07 EDT --- Hello, I have had no feedback from a first mail sent to Mark the 30th of September. I've resent a mail today hoping for an answer this time. In the mean time, I have also got some feedback from lawyers that are the following: It appears that the relevant portion of the afio license is this: License notice 1, covering part of this software package. ... (1) It may not be sold at a profit. ... This software may be distributed with other software by a commercial vendor, provided that it is included at no additional charge. ... [Note: it is believed that condition 5 of the Perl "Artistic License" implies the intent of restriction (1) above.] For comparison, section 5 of Artistic License 1.0: 5. You may charge a reasonable copying fee for any distribution of this Package. You may charge any fee you choose for support of this Package. You may not charge a fee for this Package itself. However, you may distribute this Package in aggregate with other (possibly commercial) programs as part of a larger (possibly commercial) software distribution provided that you do not advertise this Package as a product of your own. You may embed this Package's interpreter within an executable of yours (by linking); this shall be construed as a mere form of aggregation, provided that the complete Standard Version of the interpreter is so embedded. There seems to be an obvious challenge: If distribution of code under the Artistic License 1.0 is OK, then what is the characteristic of the License for afio that takes it outside of Red Hat's policy ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 18:57:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:57:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462982] Review Request: buffer - General purpose buffer program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811171857.mAHIvwur013733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462982 --- Comment #13 from Bruno Cornec 2008-11-17 13:57:55 EDT --- Any feedback on my latest package version ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 19:18:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:18:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471805] Review Request: aespipe - AES-based encryption tool for tar/cpio and loop-aes images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811171918.mAHJI6AJ007564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471805 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-17 14:18:05 EDT --- I guess I don't know how anyone is supposed to be able to connect "Dean Mander" with "Rob Loos". Maybe something's screwy with the account system. The package fails to build for me in rawhide: Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.jcJ0ax + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd aespipe-v2.3e + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + aclocal /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.jcJ0ax: line 29: aclocal: command not found I'm not sure how this could build in mock or koji since you call autoconf and aclocal without having any dependency on them; do you have a link to a koji scratch build I could look at? Also, why do you even need to call aclocal and autoconf? Is there something wrong with the confugure script that's in the package? You're not patching anything as far as I can tell. The licensing of this code is confusing at best. You have License: GPL+, but: md5.c is GPLv2+ aes.c is, I think, "Copyright Only" aespipe.c is GPL+ rmd160.c is GPLv2+ sha512.c is GPL+ And then there are assembler files: aes-amd64.S is BSD aes-x86.S is BSD md5-amd64.S is GPL+ md5-x86.S is GPL+ And then there's aes-GPL.diff, which patches aes-amd64.S and aes-x86.S to allow GPL+ licenses, but I'm not really sure of either why this would be needed (3-clause BSD is already GPL compatible) or whether its reasonable to make licensing changes this way. My take is that the whole thing, once compiled, GPLv2+, but I think it would help if Legal verified that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 19:28:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:28:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449037] Review Request: afio - cpio compatible archiver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811171928.mAHJSWYQ019706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449037 --- Comment #16 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-11-17 14:28:31 EDT --- Artistic 1.0 is non-free and not permissable in Fedora. However, that's not really relevant. Keep in mind, the note is not part of the license, it is the uninformed guess of a later contributor. The original license says: (1) It may not be sold at a profit. The fact that there is the exception of "This software may be distributed with other software by a commercial vendor, provided that it is included at no additional charge.", and that Red Hat might meet that exception doesn't matter. It is still a use restriction, which would prevent a random individual (not a "commercial vendor") from burning Fedora DVDs and selling them on ebay Nothing else that comes later can affect that, except for the original copyright holder of code under that license (which is why we're trying to reach him). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 19:48:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:48:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467791] Review Request: vtun - Virtual tunnel over TCP/IP networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811171948.mAHJm4ZI013826@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467791 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Lucian Langa 2008-11-17 14:48:03 EDT --- Review: OK source files match upstream (using corrected URL): c342ffe77055d4248a38f0b380f28c1b vtun-3.0.1.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK summary is OK. OK description is OK. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is OK. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. OK license text included in package. OK BuildRequires are proper. N/A compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). OK package installs properly. OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. vtun.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/vtund.conf 0600 vtun.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/vtund vtun.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/vtund $prog First error and last warning can be ignored. While the second warning about logfile wont't work for this package. OK final provides and requires are sane: vtun = 3.0.1-2.fc10 vtun(x86-64) = 3.0.1-2.fc10 = /bin/sh /sbin/chkconfig /sbin/service config(vtun) = 3.0.1-2.fc10 libcrypto.so.7()(64bit) liblzo2.so.2()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) xinetd N/A no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK scriptlets present look OK OK initscript looks OK. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no static libraries. OK no libtool .la files. N/A not a gui app, no desktop file Suggestions: - Use "|| :" at the end of commands in scriptlets because RPM will abort scripts in the event of errors. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 20:10:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:10:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462529] Review Request: python-feedcache - Wrapper for Mark Pilgrim's FeedParser module which caches feed content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811172010.mAHKA3C9018976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462529 --- Comment #2 from Luke Macken 2008-11-17 15:10:01 EDT --- http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-feedcache-1.3-2.fc9.src.rpm http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-feedcache.spec * Mon Nov 17 2008 Luke Macken 1.3-2 - Remove script shebangs to make rpmlint happy [lmacken at x300 rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /home/lmacken/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/python-feedcache-1.3-2.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 20:11:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:11:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462529] Review Request: python-feedcache - Wrapper for Mark Pilgrim's FeedParser module which caches feed content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811172011.mAHKBbq7019379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462529 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Luke Macken 2008-11-17 15:11:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-feedcache Short Description: Wrapper for Mark Pilgrim's FeedParser module which caches feed content Owners: lmacken Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 20:41:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:41:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469816] Review Request: perl-App-Cmd - Write command line apps with less suffering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811172041.mAHKfLJT003555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469816 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 21:02:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:02:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462982] Review Request: buffer - General purpose buffer program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811172102.mAHL2v5w030405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462982 --- Comment #14 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-17 16:02:56 EDT --- Sorry for the delay, I was hoping to see some progress on the other packages you have submitted. Please let me know your FAS account and I will sponsor you. PS1: please ditch the ending ".fc9" from the version in changelog, otherwise building on other versions than F9 will lead to the following warning from rpmlint: buffer.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.19-3.fc9 ['1.19-3.fc10', '1.19-3'] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 21:22:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:22:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811172122.mAHLMG4R012497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173 Robert 'Bob' Jensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bob at fedoraunity.org --- Comment #10 from Robert 'Bob' Jensen 2008-11-17 16:22:15 EDT --- Chris, I was the one that spoke to Ian, I simply mentioned that "Upstream is looking for help getting terminator in to Fedora" this was based on a message I found on the project's website. Sorry for the confusion. Robert 'Bob' Jensen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 21:53:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:53:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471805] Review Request: aespipe - AES-based encryption tool for tar/cpio and loop-aes images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811172153.mAHLr74e018212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471805 --- Comment #4 from Dean Mander 2008-11-17 16:53:06 EDT --- from Comment #3: > Also, why do you even need to call aclocal and autoconf? Is there something > wrong with the confugure script that's in the package? You're not patching > anything as far as I can tell. Removed aclocal and autoconf, now it builds correctly in mock. > My take is that the whole thing, once compiled, GPLv2+, but I think it would > help if Legal verified that. I hadn't checked all files individually, thanks for notifying. The license FAQ covers a comparable case and claims GPLv2+, so you must be right on this. changelog: - remove of aclocal,autoconf - change license to GPLv2+ Spec URL: http://users.skynet.be/fa990755/aespipe.spec SRPM URL: http://users.skynet.be/fa990755/aespipe-2.3e-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 22:00:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:00:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470424] Review Request: libtopology - Libtopology is a library for discovering the hardware topology on Linux systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811172200.mAHM0rrZ009632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470424 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-17 17:00:53 EDT --- libtopology-0.3-0.3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libtopology-0.3-0.3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 22:05:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:05:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467791] Review Request: vtun - Virtual tunnel over TCP/IP networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811172205.mAHM5EqD023189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467791 Gabriel Somlo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Gabriel Somlo 2008-11-17 17:05:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vtun Short Description: Virtual tunnel over TCP/IP networks Owners: somlo Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 22:54:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:54:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470155] Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811172254.mAHMsJWP020639@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 --- Comment #4 from Alec Leamas 2008-11-17 17:54:18 EDT --- OK, now I can download. Rpmlint is dead quiet on package and spec file. The naming is OK, as is the base name of the spec file. Package builds cleanly in mock, on a Fedora 9/X86_64 configuration. After building and installing, the program starts just fine. Nothing strange at a first sight. The license: tag is valid, and the code has a proper license file and copyright notice in the source. The package meets to my understanding the Packaging Guidelines. The License file is not in %doc (there is no %doc at all). It should be. The upstream md5sum matches the srpm source (5e1963b488dfa0aca75be3bc3af04887) As a summary, I see no problems at all with this package besides the missing %doc LICENSE. And it looks fun. You know, it's harder if it's not your native language... I have actually walked down the complete review checklist, but it's really no point to describe all "complies" here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 02:19:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:19:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245688] Review Request: python-pywbem - Python WBEM client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811180219.mAI2J1am022310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245688 --- Comment #23 from Tim Potter 2008-11-17 21:18:57 EDT --- Hi Jason. I've made most of the fixes but haven't uploaded a new version just yet. I'm pretty busy for the rest of the week but will sort things out as soon as I can. (Also waiting for the official 0.7 release which hasn't happened yet). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 04:55:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:55:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455358] Review Request: xslthl - XSLT Syntax Highlighting for saxon and xalan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811180455.mAI4t7tN032108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455358 --- Comment #6 from Jeff Fearn 2008-11-17 23:55:06 EDT --- Sweet http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/files/xslthl.spec http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/files/xslthl-2.0.0-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 07:32:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 02:32:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466953] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Utils - NOCpulse utility packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811180732.mAI7W5Je028768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466953 --- Comment #2 from Miroslav Suchy 2008-11-18 02:32:04 EDT --- Patches are welcome. This is not my priority right now. But certainly on some TODO list, but not sure how deep :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 10:21:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 05:21:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458598] Review Request: snowballz - a fun RTS game featuring snowball fights with penguins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811181021.mAIALBNs003253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458598 --- Comment #7 from Hans de Goede 2008-11-18 05:21:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > I'm not sure Hans. I talked to the main avbin developer, who is also the main > pyglet developer. He doesn't want to work on such issues. But he says he would > accept patches. If he will accept patches (to pyglet) to support .ogg using other means then avbin, then clearly the right way to proceed with this is to do this in Fedora, and write a patch for pyglet to support ogg/vorbis audio playback. Similar work has been done for many other games in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 11:15:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 06:15:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472027] New: Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472027 Summary: Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/onboard.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/onboard-0.91.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: https://launchpad.net/onboard/ Description: An on-screen keyboard useful on tablet PCs or for mobility impaired users. Koji scratch builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=937698 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 noarch]$ rpmlint onb* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint onb* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. This package does not contain translation at the moment because I'm not able to integrate those. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 13:57:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:57:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467643] Review Request: sugar-speak - Speak for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811181357.mAIDvj6W014389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467643 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bkearney at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bkearney at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Bryan Kearney 2008-11-18 08:57:44 EDT --- See items below: OK - Package name XX - License info is accurate License is GPLv3 OK - License tag is correct and licenses are approved OK - License files are installed as %doc OK - Specfile name OK - Specfile is legible OK - No prebuilt binaries included OK - BuildRoot value (one of the recommended values) OK - PreReq not used ?? - Source md5sum matches upstream - Barring a "release" from upstream, can you export the source code usig the fixed snapshot url (http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=activities/speak;a=snapshot;h=f76cea50b0fdee97e92ce94ac379155d6f8d52ac) OK - No hardcoded pathnames OK - Package owns all the files it installs OK - 'Requires' create needed unowned directories OK - BuildRequires sufficient OK - File permissions set properly OK - Macro usage is consistent ?? - rpmlint is silent - rpmlint on the srpm shows this (the last 3 are worriesome) sugar-maze.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities sugar-maze.src: W: strange-permission sugar-maze-checkout.sh 0755 sugar-maze.src: W: strange-permission Maze-6.tar.bz2 0755 sugar-maze.src: W: strange-permission sugar-maze.spec 0755 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 14:25:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:25:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457517] Review Request: perl-Padre - Perl Application Development and Refactoring Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811181425.mAIEPMZ5022434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457517 Bug 457517 depends on bug 463768, which changed state. Bug 463768 Summary: Package review: perl-PAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463768 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 14:25:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:25:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463768] Package review: perl-PAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811181425.mAIEPL1A022407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463768 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-11-18 09:25:20 EDT --- Please add branch for F-9. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-PAR Short Description: Perl Archives - special zip files Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-9 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 15:08:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:08:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469673] Review request: perl-File-ShareDir-PAR - same functionality as File::ShareDir with PAR support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811181508.mAIF8gJZ002804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469673 --- Comment #6 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-11-18 10:08:41 EDT --- Please see new version http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-File-ShareDir-PAR/perl-File-ShareDir-PAR-0.02-2.fc10.src.rpm http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-File-ShareDir-PAR/perl-File-ShareDir-PAR.spec I apologize for wrong format. I was using what firefox offers in history :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 15:17:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:17:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469673] Review request: perl-File-ShareDir-PAR - same functionality as File::ShareDir with PAR support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811181517.mAIFHDAa004961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469673 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Stepan Kasal 2008-11-18 10:17:12 EDT --- The above changes has been incorporated, except the sed command patching File/ShareDir/PAR.pm, which really belongs upstream, not to the patch. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 15:27:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:27:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] New: Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 Summary: Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: john.e.anderson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/115301/mumbles.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/115301/mumbles-0.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Mumbles is a plugin driven, DBus based notification system written for the Gnome desktop. Similar to libnotify notifications and Growl for OSX, mumbles aims to provide a modern notification system for the GNU/Linux Desktop. I'd like to point out ahead of time there are two errors about scripts being non-executable in rpmlint. I believe those scripts have the shebang for unit test reasons and are not actually intended to be run, so I've left them as is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 16:02:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:02:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472066] New: Review Request: python-distutils-extra - Integrate more support into Python's distutils Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-distutils-extra - Integrate more support into Python's distutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472066 Summary: Review Request: python-distutils-extra - Integrate more support into Python's distutils Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-distutils-extra.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-distutils-extra-1.91.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: https://launchpad.net/python-distutils-extra Description: It allows you to easily integrate gettext, themed icons and GNOME documentation into your build and installation process. Koji scratch builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=938072 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 noarch]$ rpmlint python-* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint python-* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 16:28:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:28:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472071] Review Request: sugar-paint : Paint (Draw) Activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811181628.mAIGSMkc032683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472071 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 16:27:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:27:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472071] New: Review Request: sugar-paint : Paint (Draw) Activity for Sugar Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-paint : Paint (Draw) Activity for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472071 Summary: Review Request: sugar-paint : Paint (Draw) Activity for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bkearney at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/sugar-paint.spec SRPM URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/sugar-paint-23-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Draw activity for Sugar. This is the first package I have done compiling C Code. Please review the use of make. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 16:32:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:32:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472072] New: Review Request: perl-Sub-Override - Perl extension for easily overriding subroutines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Override - Perl extension for easily overriding subroutines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472072 Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Override - Perl extension for easily overriding subroutines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Sub-Override.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Sub-Override-0.08-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Perl extension for easily overriding subroutines. This is one of several requirements for perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 16:42:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:42:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472079] New: Review Request: perl-Regexp-Copy - Copy Regexp objects Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Regexp-Copy - Copy Regexp objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472079 Summary: Review Request: perl-Regexp-Copy - Copy Regexp objects Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Regexp-Copy.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Regexp-Copy-0.06-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Regexp::Copy allows you to copy the contents of one Regexp object to another. This is one of several requirements for perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 16:52:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:52:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472083] New: Review Request: perl-boolean - Boolean support for Perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-boolean - Boolean support for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472083 Summary: Review Request: perl-boolean - Boolean support for Perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-boolean.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-boolean-0.20-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Most programming languages have a native Boolean data type. Perl does not. This is one of several requirements for perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 16:54:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:54:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193271] Review Request: python-dns - DNS toolkit for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811181654.mAIGsIUs005578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193271 Jeffrey C. Ollie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 16:56:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:56:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455581] Review Request: php-pecl-ssh2 - php bindings to the functions of libssh2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811181656.mAIGu0oq006093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455581 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-18 11:55:58 EDT --- The code is explicitly licensed under 2.01 of the PHP License, which indicates that it can be used under the terms of that license or "any future version of this license." Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (PHP); make test passes cleanly. Package complies with PHP-specific guidelines. Koji scratch build looks good. Sources match upstream: 95bdbd6a9a0d14cb65c6d6bdc9ee1770 ssh2-0.10.tgz 95bdbd6a9a0d14cb65c6d6bdc9ee1770 ssh2-0.10.tgz.srpm Final provides/requires looks sane: ** php-pecl-ssh2-0.10-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint == provides config(php-pecl-ssh2) = 0.10-2.fc11 php-pecl(ssh2) = 0.10 ssh2.so()(64bit) php-pecl-ssh2 = 0.10-2.fc11 php-pecl-ssh2(x86-64) = 0.10-2.fc11 == requires /bin/sh /bin/sh /usr/bin/pecl /usr/bin/pecl config(php-pecl-ssh2) = 0.10-2.fc11 libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libssh2.so.1()(64bit) php(api) = 20041225 php(zend-abi) = 20060613 rtld(GNU_HASH) ** php-pecl-ssh2-debuginfo-0.10-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint == provides php-pecl-ssh2-debuginfo = 0.10-2.fc11 php-pecl-ssh2-debuginfo(x86-64) = 0.10-2.fc11 == requires APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 16:58:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:58:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472085] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-Tiny - Lightweight, dependency free HTML/XML generation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Tiny - Lightweight, dependency free HTML/XML generation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472085 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Tiny - Lightweight, dependency free HTML/XML generation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-HTML-Tiny.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-HTML-Tiny-1.03-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: HTML::Tiny is a simple, dependency free module for generating HTML (and XML). It concentrates on generating syntactically correct XHTML using a simple Perl notation. This is one of several requirements for perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 17:18:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:18:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472079] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Copy - Copy Regexp objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811181718.mAIHIHEC031776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472079 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 17:20:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:20:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472083] Review Request: perl-boolean - Boolean support for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811181720.mAIHKtJ0032480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472083 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 17:17:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:17:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472072] Review Request: perl-Sub-Override - Perl extension for easily overriding subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811181717.mAIHH2eZ031554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472072 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 17:20:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:20:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472083] Review Request: perl-boolean - Boolean support for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811181720.mAIHKvNq032508@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472083 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-boolean -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 17:17:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:17:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472072] Review Request: perl-Sub-Override - Perl extension for easily overriding subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811181717.mAIHH430031581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472072 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-Sub-Override -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 17:18:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:18:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472079] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Copy - Copy Regexp objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811181718.mAIHIJS7011016@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472079 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-Regexp-Copy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 17:18:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:18:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469969] Review Request: Tao Framework - C# bindings for many different libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811181718.mAIHIBkY010978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469969 --- Comment #3 from David Nielsen 2008-11-18 12:18:10 EDT --- as libglfw-devel is not available in F10 yet I can't complete the mock build required for the review just yet. I am also leaving for Brazil on the 22th of November and won't be home till the 18th of December so if you need this completed before then you will have to seek someone else to complete the review. I would suggest someone like spot who tends to be through in his reviews. Right now though, you can start by renaming the documentation package to doc to keep in line with the rest of Fedora. I also wonder if the examples wouldn't fit nicely in the doc package as well, I don't remember what the norm is here but I would think that example code would be a pristine form of documentation. You also alter the build system quite a bit, do you have a bug with upstream to track this, as well as the libdir stuff? It would be nice to not have to do that, admittedly cool looking, hackaround. rpmlint sayth: taoframework.src: E: invalid-spec-name taoframework.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 1) taoframework.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/taoframework-2.1.0/INSTALL taoframework.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/taoframework-2.1.0/COPYING taoframework-examples.x86_64: W: uncompressed-zip /usr/share/tao/examples/Data/PhysFsExamples.Simple.MyZip.zip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 18:14:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:14:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455581] Review Request: php-pecl-ssh2 - php bindings to the functions of libssh2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811181814.mAIIEBIO027548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455581 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 18:13:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:13:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455581] Review Request: php-pecl-ssh2 - php bindings to the functions of libssh2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811181813.mAIID8Dc026471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455581 --- Comment #8 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-11-18 13:13:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pecl-ssh2 Short Description: Bindings to the functions of libssh2 which implements the SSH2 protocol Owners: itamarjp Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 18:28:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:28:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472096] New: Review Request: perl-Regexp-Assemble - Assemble multiple Regular Expressions into a single RE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Regexp-Assemble - Assemble multiple Regular Expressions into a single RE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472096 Summary: Review Request: perl-Regexp-Assemble - Assemble multiple Regular Expressions into a single RE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Regexp-Assemble.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Regexp-Assemble-0.34-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Regexp::Assemble takes an arbitrary number of regular expressions and assembles them into a single regular expression (or RE) that matches all that the individual REs match. This is one of several requirements for perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu. Note: rpmlint gives two errors on the resulting RPM perl-Regexp-Assemble.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/perl-Regexp-Assemble-0.34/eg/hostmatch/error.canonical perl-Regexp-Assemble.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/perl-Regexp-Assemble-0.34/eg/file.3 Both are necessary as-is for t/05_hostmatch.t -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 18:34:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:34:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471863] Review Request: garmindev - Drivers for communication with Garmin GPS devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811181834.mAIIYWqY014355@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471863 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 18:45:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:45:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472098] New: Review Request: dekiwiki - a powerful opensource wiki which runs on Mono Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dekiwiki - a powerful opensource wiki which runs on Mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472098 Summary: Review Request: dekiwiki - a powerful opensource wiki which runs on Mono Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: services at mindtouch.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nightlybuild.mindtouch.com/Submitted_Packages/Fedora/src/dekiwiki.spec SRPM URL: http://nightlybuild.mindtouch.com/Submitted_Packages/Fedora/src/dekiwiki-8.08.11662-1.1.src.rpm Description: MindTouch Deki is a free open source wiki and application platform for communities and enterprises. Deki is an easy to use and sophisticated wiki for authoring, aggregating, organizing, and sharing content. Deki is also a platform for creating collaborative applications, or adding wiki capabilities to existing applications. Thanks for helping us with this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 19:00:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:00:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811181900.mAIJ0UW0020654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-18 14:00:28 EDT --- This fails to build; autoreconf is called without any build dependency on the autotools. Some people insist that autotools should never be called as part of a package build; I'm not one of them, but it seems a waste for that one line change. Do you know how much change there is in the resulting Makefile? Maybe you could just patch that instead. Or, I guess, fix the build dependency. The descriptive texts are better now; the only notes I'd make are s/standarts/standards/ in the main package %description and terminate %description lines with periods. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 18:59:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:59:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471863] Review Request: garmindev - Drivers for communication with Garmin GPS devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811181859.mAIIxx12020167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471863 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Brian Pepple 2008-11-18 13:59:58 EDT --- Good: * verified svn source tarball * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * License tag is valud * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All directories are owned by this or other packages * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * rpmlint produces no errors or warnings * Builds fine in mock. +1 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 19:03:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:03:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469955] Review Request: fprintd - D-Bus service for Fingerprint reader access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811181903.mAIJ3YPF007762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469955 --- Comment #2 from Bastien Nocera 2008-11-18 14:03:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Some issues I noticed at my first check: > > - Why do you need a Conflict with pam_fprint, are Obsolutes/Provides not better > fitted here? > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Conflicts It's not stable/tested enough to replace pam_fprint. So I'm currently only conflicting with it. > - Source0 is not a URL and it is not explained how to create the source > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL True, will fix. > - Is it intentional that the config files in /etc are not marked as %config? Yes and no. %{_sysconfdir}/fprintd.conf should be marked as %config, but it doesn't actually do anything useful yet, so it's better to just have it replaced for now. I should add a comment about it. > Btw. the release string of the linked libfprint seems to be wrong, it should be > 0.1.pre.fc10 instead of 1.pre.fc10 That should be fixed, I updated libfprint in F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=938201 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 19:35:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:35:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471863] Review Request: garmindev - Drivers for communication with Garmin GPS devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811181935.mAIJZqMF028560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471863 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Dan Hor?k 2008-11-18 14:35:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: garmindev Short Description: Drivers for communication with Garmin GPS devices Owners: sharkcz silfreed Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 19:45:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:45:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472098] Review Request: dekiwiki - a powerful opensource wiki which runs on Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811181945.mAIJjG2Q018436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472098 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david at gnsa.us Flag| |needinfo?(services at mindtouc | |h.com) --- Comment #1 from David Nalley 2008-11-18 14:45:14 EDT --- Hi Mathieu, I'll do a quick informal review as I can't sponsor you, but hopefully it will get you in better shape for reviews down the road. Using rpmlint: ./dekiwiki.spec:11: W: hardcoded-packager-tag services at mindtouch.com Fedora packages don't specify the packager for a number of different reasons - so a quick removal of that line will take care of at least one error. ./dekiwiki.spec:13: W: unversioned-explicit-provides mono(mindtouch.dream) There is no version number with mindtouch.dream and there should be so that version changes become more obvious. ./dekiwiki.spec:50: W: setup-not-quiet No one wants to see all of the output of installation when using an rpm. ./dekiwiki.spec: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install It actually looks like you are cleaning the buildroot. It may be looking for the line without the brackets. ./dekiwiki.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 2, tab: line 155) Obvious In addition I noticed in the installation instructions that you had: yum install wv links pdftohtml tidy You probably want to add those as requires in your spec file. Obviously princexml can't be included, but perhaps dompdf or a similar html2pdf app that's licensed as open source as be used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 21:29:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:29:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471575] Review Request: libnautilus-vcards - Nautilus vcard context menu extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811182129.mAILTslC009310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471575 --- Comment #2 from Alec Leamas 2008-11-18 16:29:53 EDT --- I'm trying to do my homework... Reviewed some other packages, read still more other reviews. Updated the package, including spec file. See the changelog for more info. New urls: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/dt-contacts/libnautilus-vcards-0.2-48.fc9.src.rpm and http://downloads.sourceforge.net/dt-contacts/libnautilus-vcards.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 21:37:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:37:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458288] Review Request: gitosis - git repository hosting application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811182137.mAILb79x023926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458288 --- Comment #15 from John A. Khvatov 2008-11-18 16:37:05 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gitosis New Branches: EL-5 Owners: ivaxer slankes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 21:40:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:40:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458288] Review Request: gitosis - git repository hosting application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811182140.mAILeJTO012224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458288 John A. Khvatov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #16 from John A. Khvatov 2008-11-18 16:40:17 EDT --- To Mamoru: I can't set fedora-cvs flag to "?" for new branch request. Why? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 21:45:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:45:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471373] Review Request: rmanage - Remotely monitoring machines on network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811182145.mAILj6nV013220@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471373 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-18 16:45:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Note: As no translations are provided by this package I have not used > guidelines for Handling locale files. That's ok I'm unable to rebuild your package. The issue is the name of the .desktop file. File not found: /home/fab/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/rmanage-0.1.5-2.fc9.i386/usr/share/applications/fedora-rmanage.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 21:52:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:52:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811182152.mAILqQ75026838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 Permaine Cheung changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pcheung at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pcheung at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Permaine Cheung 2008-11-18 16:52:25 EDT --- I'll take this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 22:02:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:02:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470508] Review Request: Ajaxterm - A web-based terminal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811182202.mAIM2bKV016848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470508 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-11-18 17:02:36 EDT --- Thanks, I'll fix the above mentioned points before importing. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: Ajaxterm Short Description: A web-based terminal Owners: ruben Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 22:18:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:18:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811182218.mAIMIjxP032182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 --- Comment #2 from Permaine Cheung 2008-11-18 17:18:44 EDT --- There are a few BuildRequires in this package that doesn't exist in Fedora, here's what I'm seeing in a mock build: No Package Found for javamail_1_3_1_api No Package Found for wsdl4j16 No Package Found for jbossas >= 0:4.2.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 22:35:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:35:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some car accros the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811182235.mAIMZ9Yw023039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 --- Comment #7 from Philipp Baum 2008-11-18 17:35:08 EDT --- Here is the New Version: http://www.Thinkcoding.org/Fedora/moon-buggy.spec http://www.Thinkcoding.org/Fedora/moon-buggy-1.0.51-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 23:15:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:15:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435018] Review Request: clipper - crystallographic object oriented library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811182315.mAINFBIj030786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435018 --- Comment #24 from Tim Fenn 2008-11-18 18:15:09 EDT --- cvs builds done, update request submitted to bodhi for F-9 and F-10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 23:20:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:20:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] New: Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 Summary: Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: red at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/tvbrowser.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/tvbrowser-2.7.1-0.3.fc10.i386.rpm Description: TV-Browser is a free electronic program guide (EPG). It offers more than 500 stations. This is my first package (with a little starting aid from che on #fedora-de) and I need a mentor. When I build the rpm, I seem to have some small problems that I've not been able to solve: - find: `debug': No such file or directory - some in-the-jars operation has a problem with a file within a jar that has spaces in its filename: + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-java-repack-jars cp: cannot stat `./bbc/rd/tvanytime/util/Copy': No such file or directory cp: cannot stat `of': No such file or directory cp: cannot stat `DVBLocatorToolbox': No such file or directory - javadoc compilation fails in this version of tvbrowser. I commmented those parts out for now and hope upstream will solve this. Nevertheless, I can install and run the application just fine. I was not sure, if it's ok to include out-of-the-box plugins/whatever in the base package or if I need to create additional packages for those. Comments and mentors welcome ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 23:31:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:31:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467645] Review Request: sugar-distance - Distance measurement for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811182331.mAINVCPL001233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467645 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |OLPC 8964 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 23:37:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:37:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467645] Review Request: sugar-distance - Distance measurement for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811182337.mAINbUZH014361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467645 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |OLPC 9009 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 23:39:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:39:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467645] Review Request: sugar-distance - Distance measurement for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811182339.mAINdO34002461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467645 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-18 18:39:23 EDT --- No action from upstream for a week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 00:05:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:05:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190005.mAJ05xek018826@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 Tim Fenn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |472149 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 00:05:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:05:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472149] Review Request: refmac-dictionary - chemical ligand dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190005.mAJ05wpL018802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472149 Tim Fenn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |472150 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 00:03:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:03:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468491] Review Request: sugar-connect - Connect for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190003.mAJ03rIZ006313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468491 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |OLPC 8966 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 00:05:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:05:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472150] New: Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 Summary: Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fenn at stanford.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/coot.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/coot-0.5-1.f8.src.rpm Description: Coot is a toolkit for Macromolecular Crystallography and model-building. Coot uses OpenGL, together with a new approach to map contouring and importing/creation and other modelling and building operations. It displays maps and models and allows model manipulations such as idealization, real space refinement, manual rotation/translation, rigid-body fitting, ligand search, solvation, mutations, rotamers, Ramachandran plots... Also see: http://www.ysbl.york.ac.uk/~emsley/coot/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 00:05:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:05:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472149] New: Review Request: refmac-dictionary - chemical ligand dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: refmac-dictionary - chemical ligand dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472149 Summary: Review Request: refmac-dictionary - chemical ligand dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fenn at stanford.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/refmac-dictionary.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/refmac-dictionary-5.02-1.f8.src.rpm Description: The refmac ligand dictionaries contain chemical information on a large number of molecules, including the chemical structure of the ligand, the tree-like structure, the links between ligands, and possible modifications to them. This information is stored in the mmCIF format, which is used by a number of molecular viewing, refinement and validation tools. Also see: http://www.ysbl.york.ac.uk/~garib/refmac/latest_refmac.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 00:12:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:12:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467644] Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190012.mAJ0C1Tf007705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467644 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-18 19:12:00 EDT --- Update Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-memorize.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-memorize-29-1.fc10.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=938635 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 00:21:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:21:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - Maze for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190021.mAJ0LrMN021270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-18 19:21:52 EDT --- No action from upstream for a week. To be honest, I see no benefit to work with the snapshot tarball. I would like to suggest that we work with the checkout from git till release tarballs are available. Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-maze.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-maze-6-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 00:30:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:30:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468120] Review Request: sugar-implode - Implode for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190030.mAJ0U76q010861@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468120 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |OLPC 8965 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 00:33:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:33:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467643] Review Request: sugar-speak - Speak for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190033.mAJ0X4Rw023101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467643 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |OLPC 8961 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-18 19:33:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > sugar-maze.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities Copy-and-paste error? ;-) Anyway, the permission of the file from comment #1 are fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 00:50:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:50:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467644] Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190050.mAJ0oGQc026246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467644 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-18 19:50:15 EDT --- Simon, did you do a full review? I'm just asking because the flag is set to '+' but the bug is not assigned to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 00:50:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:50:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468116] Review Request: sugar-analyze - Analysing tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190050.mAJ0oc2h026283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468116 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-18 19:50:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Can you please confirm if "mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{sugaractivitydir}" is > actually necessary? I'd expect setup.py to take care of it. You are right, 'mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{sugaractivitydir}' is not needed. > Anyway r+. Thanks! > > (you forgot to set fedora-review to ?) Did you do a full review? The flag is set to '+' but the bug is not assigned to you. Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-analyze.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-analyze-8-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 01:26:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:26:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435018] Review Request: clipper - crystallographic object oriented library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190126.mAJ1Qxo3000590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435018 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-18 20:26:58 EDT --- Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 01:40:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:40:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462529] Review Request: python-feedcache - Wrapper for Mark Pilgrim's FeedParser module which caches feed content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190140.mAJ1eKD2003132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462529 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-18 20:40:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 01:41:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:41:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471863] Review Request: garmindev - Drivers for communication with Garmin GPS devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190141.mAJ1fSPQ002799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471863 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-18 20:41:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 01:43:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:43:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467791] Review Request: vtun - Virtual tunnel over TCP/IP networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190143.mAJ1h3tM003489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467791 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-18 20:43:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 01:44:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:44:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463768] Package review: perl-PAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190144.mAJ1i2v8003277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463768 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-18 20:44:01 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 01:45:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:45:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470508] Review Request: Ajaxterm - A web-based terminal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190145.mAJ1jvDv003785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470508 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-18 20:45:56 EDT --- I assume you wanted a F-10 branch here as well? cvs done with F-10 added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 01:50:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:50:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190150.mAJ1ouL9005065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-18 20:50:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 01:49:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:49:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471522] Review Request: otl - OTL library for database connections and queries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190149.mAJ1nSo0004254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471522 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-18 20:49:26 EDT --- Well, the upstream project is "otl" so I would call it that here as well. Do other linux distros ship it as otl-devel? Is it better known by that name? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 01:53:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:53:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190153.mAJ1rEC6005347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #32 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-18 20:53:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 01:54:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:54:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471662] Review Request: qlandkartegt - GPS device mapping tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190154.mAJ1srnq005145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471662 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-18 20:54:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 01:58:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:58:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471373] Review Request: rmanage - Remotely monitoring machines on network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190158.mAJ1wME5006005@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471373 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-18 20:58:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Note: As no translations are provided by this package I have not used > > guidelines for Handling locale files. > > That's ok > > I'm unable to rebuild your package. The issue is the name of the .desktop file. > > File not found: > /home/fab/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/rmanage-0.1.5-2.fc9.i386/usr/share/applications/fedora-rmanage.desktop oops. Sorry I forgot to change %files section. here is updated links for package. Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/rmanage/rmanage.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/rmanage/rmanage-0.1.5-2.fc9.src.rpm Note:- I have kept same release number. If you want me to bump release please ask for that and will do that. koji scratch build:-http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=938763 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 02:43:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:43:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471527] Review Request: SNMP++ - SNMP C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190243.mAJ2hxIi014763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 --- Comment #10 from Hayden James 2008-11-18 21:43:58 EDT --- Ok, I spoke with upstream about the soname issue. They basically said that I should start the versioning at 0.0.0 and they will continue with 1.0.0 on the next release (3.2.24). I will make that change and upload new rpm and spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 02:59:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:59:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468116] Review Request: sugar-analyze - Analysing tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190259.mAJ2xNkb017478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468116 Marco Pesenti Gritti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mpg at redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Marco Pesenti Gritti 2008-11-18 21:59:21 EDT --- Yeah I did a full review. Reassigning to me now, I missed that part of the process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 03:25:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:25:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472083] Review Request: perl-boolean - Boolean support for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190325.mAJ3POwm023077@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472083 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-18 22:25:23 EDT --- Koji build fails due to missing br on perl(Test::More). https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=938137 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 03:24:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:24:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472072] Review Request: perl-Sub-Override - Perl extension for easily overriding subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190324.mAJ3O2N3022589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472072 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-18 22:24:01 EDT --- Test::Pod is missing from the BR (as well as Test::Pod::Coverage, but it's not a blocker). Please consider running a scratch build through koji; helps catch things like this :-) https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=938107 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (perl); make test passes cleanly. 8261e3d77145f0b154641597b7983bd6 Sub-Override-0.08.tar.gz 8261e3d77145f0b154641597b7983bd6 Sub-Override-0.08.tar.gz.srpm =====> perl-Sub-Override-0.08-1.fc9.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Sub-Override-0.08-1.fc9.noarch.rpm perl(Sub::Override) = 0.08 perl-Sub-Override = 0.08-1.fc9 ====> requires for perl-Sub-Override-0.08-1.fc9.noarch.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(strict) perl(warnings) Add the br on Test::Pod and I'll approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 03:26:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:26:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472079] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Copy - Copy Regexp objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190326.mAJ3QkTf023775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472079 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-18 22:26:45 EDT --- Koji build fails due to missing br on perl(Test::More). https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=938132 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 03:30:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:30:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190330.mAJ3U0Zq023915@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-18 22:29:58 EDT --- quickfix-1.12.4-6.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/quickfix-1.12.4-6.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 03:40:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:40:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458288] Review Request: gitosis - git repository hosting application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190340.mAJ3ekoI027517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458288 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review?, fedora-cvs+ |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-18 22:40:43 EDT --- For now I set fedora-cvs flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 03:50:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:50:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455581] Review Request: php-pecl-ssh2 - php bindings to the functions of libssh2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190350.mAJ3oK0g029866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455581 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-18 22:50:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 03:46:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:46:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471787] Review Request: taginfo - Printer of Tag Information from Media Files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190346.mAJ3kif6029026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471787 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-18 22:46:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 03:51:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:51:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193271] Review Request: python-dns - DNS toolkit for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190351.mAJ3pWph029123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193271 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-18 22:51:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 03:48:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:48:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471809] Review Request: gnome-gmail-notifier - A simple application that monitors Gmail inboxes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190348.mAJ3mrZI028405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471809 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-18 22:48:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 03:54:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:54:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458288] Review Request: gitosis - git repository hosting application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190354.mAJ3s0rx030381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458288 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-18 22:53:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 03:51:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:51:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471527] Review Request: SNMP++ - SNMP C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190351.mAJ3plPi030051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 --- Comment #11 from Hayden James 2008-11-18 22:51:46 EDT --- Ok here are the updated rpms: http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/snmp++.spec http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/snmp++-3.2.23-3.fc9.src.rpm I also created a package for log4cxx (sorry for cross listing, but didn't find anyone to review it yet) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 03:52:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:52:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190352.mAJ3qnxj030189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #34 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-18 22:52:48 EDT --- Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 04:00:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:00:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435017] Review Request: ssm - coordinate superposition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190400.mAJ40MBk032114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435017 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-18 23:00:21 EDT --- Closing, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 03:58:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:58:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471522] Review Request: otl - OTL library for database connections and queries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190358.mAJ3wQpu031474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471522 --- Comment #12 from Hayden James 2008-11-18 22:58:24 EDT --- I renamed the package to otl http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/otl-4.0.176-5.fc9.src.rpm http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/otl.spec There are no other changes. So I would like to go ahead with the cvs request: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: otl Short Description: OTL is a C++ template library for Oracle/OCI, ODBC, and DB2/CLI connectivity Owners: hjames Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: mtasaka lemenkov Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 04:01:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:01:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472085] Review Request: perl-HTML-Tiny - Lightweight, dependency free HTML/XML generation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190401.mAJ41K8O030949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472085 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-HTML-Tiny Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-18 23:01:19 EDT --- There is an examples/ directory; why not include it in %doc? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=939263 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (perl); make test passes cleanly. ce178f7dabb15930512fdbfe21d4edcb HTML-Tiny-1.03.tar.gz ce178f7dabb15930512fdbfe21d4edcb HTML-Tiny-1.03.tar.gz.srpm =====> perl-HTML-Tiny-1.03-1.fc9.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-HTML-Tiny-1.03-1.fc9.noarch.rpm perl(HTML::Tiny) = 1.03 perl-HTML-Tiny = 1.03-1.fc9 ====> requires for perl-HTML-Tiny-1.03-1.fc9.noarch.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 04:03:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:03:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471829] Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190403.mAJ43k1A032630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 Hayden James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 04:24:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:24:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472096] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Assemble - Assemble multiple Regular Expressions into a single RE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190424.mAJ4ORPo003797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472096 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-Regexp-Assemble Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-18 23:24:26 EDT --- The EOL encoding of file.3 is deliberate; as is the zero-length error. They're both under %doc, so no problem. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=939265 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (perl); make test passes cleanly. ddbf21d4d2e03798d351a34e79cafa30 Regexp-Assemble-0.34.tar.gz ddbf21d4d2e03798d351a34e79cafa30 Regexp-Assemble-0.34.tar.gz.srpm =====> perl-Regexp-Assemble-0.34-1.fc9.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint perl-Regexp-Assemble.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/perl-Regexp-Assemble-0.34/eg/hostmatch/error.canonical perl-Regexp-Assemble.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/perl-Regexp-Assemble-0.34/eg/file.3 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Regexp-Assemble-0.34-1.fc9.noarch.rpm perl(Regexp::Assemble) = 0.34 perl-Regexp-Assemble = 0.34-1.fc9 ====> requires for perl-Regexp-Assemble-0.34-1.fc9.noarch.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(constant) perl(overload) perl(re) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 04:39:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:39:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472027] Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190439.mAJ4dAjX006255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472027 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-18 23:39:09 EDT --- Just to note here that this package was previously submitted in bug447367 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 04:44:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:44:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190444.mAJ4igfB007228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #19 from Ankur Sinha 2008-11-18 23:44:40 EDT --- hi, updated the packages.. I did look at the pdf that youve mentioned.. I couldnt figure how to include it though, tried a few things but got stuck with errors.. here are the packages.. http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Can you tell me how to change the changelog please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 04:41:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:41:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190441.mAJ4fRs1006881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) | --- Comment #8 from Ankur Sinha 2008-11-18 23:41:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Ping? hi, upadated the package to remove the text errors.. I understand most of the spec file (manuals clarify everything that i do).. Im stuck on the fontconfig rules.. Thats why i asked for documentation.. I have no idea whats written in there and what ive added on given advice..(points 8 9 10) :( i havent much knowledge on Font families etc.. Any help with that? here are the updated packages.. http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts.spec and okay, Ill start using mock.. Ill update the wishlist.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 04:47:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:47:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472165] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Strict - Check syntax, presence of use strict/warnings, and test coverage Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Strict - Check syntax, presence of use strict/warnings, and test coverage Alias: perl-Test-Strict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472165 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Strict - Check syntax, presence of use strict/warnings, and test coverage Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Strict OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Test-Strict.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Test-Strict-0.09-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: "Test::Strict" lets you check the syntax, presence of "use strict;" and "use warnings;" in your perl code. It reports its results in standard "Test::Simple" fashion. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=939335 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 05:00:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:00:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472083] Review Request: perl-boolean - Boolean support for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190500.mAJ50H4Y008915@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472083 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2008-11-19 00:00:16 EDT --- Sorry - must remember to always build with mock first. New SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-boolean-0.20-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 05:01:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:01:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472072] Review Request: perl-Sub-Override - Perl extension for easily overriding subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190501.mAJ51QZS009162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472072 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2008-11-19 00:01:24 EDT --- New SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Sub-Override-0.08-2.fc9.src.rpm Test::Pod and Test::Pod::Coverage included now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 05:03:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:03:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472079] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Copy - Copy Regexp objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190503.mAJ53BX2010642@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472079 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2008-11-19 00:03:11 EDT --- new SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Regexp-Copy-0.06-2.fc9.src.rpm added the missing Test::More BR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 05:06:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:06:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472085] Review Request: perl-HTML-Tiny - Lightweight, dependency free HTML/XML generation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190506.mAJ56bUd010096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472085 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2008-11-19 00:06:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-HTML-Tiny Short Description: Lightweight, dependency free HTML/XML generation Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 05:08:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:08:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472096] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Assemble - Assemble multiple Regular Expressions into a single RE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190508.mAJ58Urx011683@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472096 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2008-11-19 00:08:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Regexp-Assemble Short Description: Assemble multiple Regular Expressions into a single RE Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 05:10:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:10:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472167] New: Review Request: perl-asa - Lets your class/object say it works like something else Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-asa - Lets your class/object say it works like something else Alias: perl-asa https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472167 Summary: Review Request: perl-asa - Lets your class/object say it works like something else Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/asa OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-asa.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-asa-0.02-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Perl 5 doesn't natively support Java-style interfaces, and it doesn't support Perl 6 style roles either. You can get both of these things in half a dozen different ways via various CPAN modules, but they usually require that you buy into "their way" of implementing your code. This package overrides the isa() method, allowing your class to claim it's a class it's not (that is, isn't in @ISA). Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=939375 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 05:08:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:08:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472165] Review Request: perl-Test-Strict - Check syntax, presence of use strict/warnings, and test coverage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190508.mAJ5869P010268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472165 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-19 00:08:05 EDT --- This package is a dep of App::Asciio. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 05:31:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:31:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472170] New: Review Request: perl-Check-ISA - DWIM, correct checking of an object's class Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Check-ISA - DWIM, correct checking of an object's class Alias: perl-Check-ISA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472170 Summary: Review Request: perl-Check-ISA - DWIM, correct checking of an object's class Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Check-ISA OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Check-ISA.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Check-ISA-0.04-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This module provides several functions to assist in testing whether a value is an object, and if so, ask about its class. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 05:33:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:33:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472170] Review Request: perl-Check-ISA - DWIM, correct checking of an object's class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190533.mAJ5X70r016200@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472170 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-19 00:33:06 EDT --- This package is a dependency of App::Asciio. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 05:32:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:32:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472170] Review Request: perl-Check-ISA - DWIM, correct checking of an object's class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190532.mAJ5WjWc014545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472170 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |472167 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 05:32:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:32:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472167] Review Request: perl-asa - Lets your class/object say it works like something else In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190532.mAJ5Wkin014573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472167 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |472170 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 05:36:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:36:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471809] Review Request: gnome-gmail-notifier - A simple application that monitors Gmail inboxes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190536.mAJ5ap4Y015327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471809 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-19 00:36:50 EDT --- gnome-gmail-notifier-0.9.4-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-gmail-notifier-0.9.4-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 05:36:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:36:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471809] Review Request: gnome-gmail-notifier - A simple application that monitors Gmail inboxes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190536.mAJ5arHZ015354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471809 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-19 00:36:53 EDT --- gnome-gmail-notifier-0.9.4-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-gmail-notifier-0.9.4-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 05:56:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:56:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458598] Review Request: snowballz - a fun RTS game featuring snowball fights with penguins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190556.mAJ5uWaT018248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458598 --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-19 00:56:31 EDT --- If you have the will and the energy, go for it. I don't want to dig into the pyglet code, but I can be the reviewer if someone does. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 06:05:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:05:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190605.mAJ65cdE021169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|197974 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 06:05:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:05:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190605.mAJ65dCa021193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|426751 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 06:24:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:24:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190624.mAJ6OktX023732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(loupgaroublond at gm | |ail.com) --- Comment #22 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-19 01:24:44 EDT --- Yaakov, when you think you will have time to continue this package review or would you like me to post an updated package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 06:26:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:26:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472027] Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190626.mAJ6QWHA024455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472027 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-19 01:26:31 EDT --- Suggestion:- 1) Good to modify onboard.desktop file line from Categories=GNOME;GTK;Accessibility;X-GNOME-PersonalSettings; to Categories=GNOME;GTK;Utility;Accessibility; This will make sure we have all onboard/onscreen virtual keyboards in same category 2) This package built successfully by removing BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel BuildRequires: gettext 3) I think you don't need Requires: gnome-python2 not sure about that though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 06:31:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:31:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190631.mAJ6VMqa025641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: QMTest - an |Review Request: qmtest - an |automated software test |automated software test |execution tool. |execution tool. --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-19 01:31:21 EDT --- For 2.4-2 * License ** There seems no files to specify GPL version ** Some codes/documents are under Open Publican - So the license tag should be "GPL+ and Open Publican" - Also some file contains the contents "(see the file LICENSE.OPL)", however I can find "LICENSE.OPL" file nowhere. Please add this. * ldconfig - Calling ldconfig on scriptlets is not needed for this package. * python module dependency - Please check if all python module dependency related rpms are correctly added to "Requires" * Documents - Please also install "ChangeLog" "NEWS" as documents -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 06:33:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:33:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190633.mAJ6X13g024117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 --- Comment #55 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-19 01:33:00 EDT --- Would you update this srpm again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 06:59:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:59:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472072] Review Request: perl-Sub-Override - Perl extension for easily overriding subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190659.mAJ6xaPC030627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472072 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-19 01:59:35 EDT --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 07:03:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 02:03:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472072] Review Request: perl-Sub-Override - Perl extension for easily overriding subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190703.mAJ73XvH031352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472072 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2008-11-19 02:03:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Sub-Override Short Description: Perl extension for easily overriding subroutines Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 07:04:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 02:04:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190704.mAJ74i0m029435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 --- Comment #9 from Stefan Seefeld 2008-11-19 02:04:43 EDT --- Here are updated package / spec file: http://synopsis.fresco.org/download/srpm/qmtest-2.4-3.fc9.src.rpm http://synopsis.fresco.org/download/srpm/qmtest.spec I added the missing files (LICENSE.OPL, ChangeLog, NEWS), removed the redundant ldconfig call, and adjusted the license tag to "GPLv2 and Open Publication" QMTest doesn't require any external Python modules, so there is nothing to add to "Requires". Thanks ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 07:51:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 02:51:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472179] Review Request: perl-Test-Block - Specify fine granularity test plans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190751.mAJ7ptKb006276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472179 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-19 02:51:54 EDT --- This package is a dependency of App::Asciio. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 07:53:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 02:53:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190753.mAJ7rvq4006517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 Thomas Moschny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomas.moschny at gmx.de --- Comment #1 from Thomas Moschny 2008-11-19 02:53:56 EDT --- - You need to provide a src rpm. - Please specify a download url for Source0. - Missing changelog. - Missing %doc files (at least add COPYRIGHT.txt). - Package should be noarch. rpmlint output: tvbrowser.i386: W: no-documentation tvbrowser.i386: W: summary-ended-with-dot Free EPG for over 500 stations. tvbrowser.i386: E: description-line-too-long TV-Browser is a free electronic program guide (EPG). It offers more than 500 stations. tvbrowser.i386: E: no-changelogname-tag tvbrowser.i386: E: no-binary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 07:51:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 02:51:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472179] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Block - Specify fine granularity test plans Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Block - Specify fine granularity test plans Alias: perl-Test-Block https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472179 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Block - Specify fine granularity test plans Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Block OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Test-Block.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Test-Block-0.11-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This module allows you to specify the number of expected tests at a finer level of granularity than an entire test script. It is built with Test::Builder and plays happily with Test::More and friends. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=939474 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 07:59:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 02:59:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463768] Package review: perl-PAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190759.mAJ7x892007300@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463768 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-11-19 02:59:07 EDT --- F-9 perl-PAR-0.983-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 07:59:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 02:59:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457517] Review Request: perl-Padre - Perl Application Development and Refactoring Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190759.mAJ7x95A007324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457517 Bug 457517 depends on bug 463768, which changed state. Bug 463768 Summary: Package review: perl-PAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463768 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 08:02:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:02:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471787] Review Request: taginfo - Printer of Tag Information from Media Files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190802.mAJ82wak008163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471787 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer 2008-11-19 03:02:57 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=939479 Build in rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 08:02:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:02:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469673] Review request: perl-File-ShareDir-PAR - same functionality as File::ShareDir with PAR support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190802.mAJ82eId008115@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469673 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-11-19 03:02:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-File-ShareDir-PAR Short Description: same functionality as File::ShareDir (compatible with PAR) Owners: mmaslano Branches: devel, F-10 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 08:10:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:10:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190810.mAJ8AlUp009581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-19 03:10:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > and adjusted the license tag to "GPLv2 and Open Publication" Well, would you tell me from what file you judged that this package is GPL version 2 specific, not GPL at any version (i.e. not GPL+ but GPLv2)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 08:20:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:20:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471863] Review Request: garmindev - Drivers for communication with Garmin GPS devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190820.mAJ8KcUl008565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471863 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 08:22:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:22:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190822.mAJ8MhGp011278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Moschny 2008-11-19 03:22:42 EDT --- Furthermore, you (accidentally) transferred classes from .jar files from the 'source' distribution into the final rpm, which is strictly not allowed. The reason is, that this command is wrong: find -name '*.jar' -o -name '*.class' -exec rm -f '{}' \; It needs to be changed to find \( -name '*.jar' -o -name '*.class' \) -exec rm -f '{}' \; in order to work as expected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 08:31:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:31:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471662] Review Request: qlandkartegt - GPS device mapping tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190831.mAJ8VVl5012682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471662 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 08:43:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:43:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468539] Review Request: sugar-jukebox - Media player activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190843.mAJ8hQbY014188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468539 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-19 03:43:25 EDT --- In another review request Marco suggested to check if 'mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{sugaractivitydir}' in the %build section is actually necessary because setup.py takes care of it. If you are using 'http://kushaldas.in/tmp/Jukebox-%{version}.tar.bz2' instead of 'http://kushaldas.in/tmp/Jukebox-5.tar.bz2' in Source0 you haven't to take care about this line in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 08:45:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:45:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467644] Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190845.mAJ8jNIj014699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467644 Simon Schampijer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |simon at schampijer.de --- Comment #7 from Simon Schampijer 2008-11-19 03:45:22 EDT --- Yup I did a full review. In the spec you posted above - the comment says that this is removed but it is still present :) {{{ #delete hidden files find %{buildroot} -name '.*' -exec rm -f {} ';' #wrong end-line-encoding #sed -i 's/\r//' %{buildroot}%{sugaractivitydir}Memorize.activity/images/stock-buddy.svg #fix rpmlint non-executable-script error #find %{buildroot}%{sugaractivitydir}Memorize.activity/*.py -type f | xargs chmod a+x #find %{buildroot}%{sugaractivitydir}Memorize.activity/csound/csoundserver.py -type f | xargs chmod a+x #remove exec bit #find %{buildroot}%{sugaractivitydir}Memorize.activity/images/*.svg -type f -name \* -exec chmod 644 {} \; }}} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 08:48:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:48:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472071] Review Request: sugar-paint : Paint (Draw) Activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190848.mAJ8msSI015068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472071 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net External Bug ID| |OLPC 9011 --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-19 03:48:54 EDT --- In another review request Marco suggested to check if 'mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{sugaractivitydir}' in the %build section is actually necessary because setup.py takes care of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 09:00:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:00:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468539] Review Request: sugar-jukebox - Media player activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190900.mAJ90uhl017624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468539 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |OLPC 9013 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 09:24:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:24:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472165] Review Request: perl-Test-Strict - Check syntax, presence of use strict/warnings, and test coverage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190924.mAJ9Oaau019354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472165 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-19 04:24:34 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=939617 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 34837b2bfabf73f7169bbfa4d00a403c Test-Strict-0.09.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=6, Tests=26, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.19 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.24 CPU) + Package perl-Test-Block-0.11-1.fc11 Provides: perl(Test::Block) = 0.11 perl(Test::Block::Plan) Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Test::Builder) perl(Tie::Scalar) perl(base) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 09:27:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:27:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468116] Review Request: sugar-analyze - Analysing tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190927.mAJ9RIYe020113@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468116 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-19 04:27:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sugar-analyze Short Description: Analysing tool for Sugar Owners: fab Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 09:28:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:28:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472165] Review Request: perl-Test-Strict - Check syntax, presence of use strict/warnings, and test coverage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190928.mAJ9SPl9020226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472165 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-19 04:28:24 EDT --- sorry I mixed other perl package review with this. Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=939617 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 34837b2bfabf73f7169bbfa4d00a403c Test-Strict-0.09.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=40, 7 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.00 sys + 7.09 cusr 0.36 csys = 7.48 CPU) + Package perl-Test-Strict-0.09-1.fc11 Provides: perl(Test::Strict) = 0.09 Requires: perl >= 0:5.004 perl(File::Find) perl(File::Spec) perl(FindBin) perl(Test::Builder) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 09:31:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:31:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472167] Review Request: perl-asa - Lets your class/object say it works like something else In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190931.mAJ9VYQs020986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472167 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-19 04:31:33 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=939617 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url b2b0358f0c8548dacdbdaeaa7c9fe5f7 asa-0.02.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=21, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.18 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.24 CPU) + Package perl-asa-0.02-1.fc11 Provides: perl(asa) = 0.02 Requires: perl >= 0:5.005 perl(Carp) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 09:28:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:28:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472179] Review Request: perl-Test-Block - Specify fine granularity test plans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190928.mAJ9Saq5020265@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472179 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-19 04:28:34 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=939616 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 386a722947f2c77f6157d1dea0338e35 Test-Block-0.11.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=6, Tests=26, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.19 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.24 CPU) + Package Package perl-Test-Block-0.11-1.fc11 Provides: perl(Test::Block) = 0.11 perl(Test::Block::Plan) Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Test::Builder) perl(Tie::Scalar) perl(base) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 09:47:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:47:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472149] Review Request: refmac-dictionary - chemical ligand dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190947.mAJ9l12g023825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472149 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-19 04:47:00 EDT --- suggestions 1) rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM and for RPM. refmac-dictionary.noarch: W: no-version-in-last-changelog refmac-dictionary.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog ==> missing version from changelog. Follow guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Changelogs 2) Don't mix macros follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Macros either use %{buildroot} OR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 10:49:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 05:49:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471575] Review Request: libnautilus-vcards - Nautilus vcard context menu extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191049.mAJAnJPh003205@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471575 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-19 05:49:18 EDT --- Just some quick comment on your spec file - remove the redundant stuff - %define version 0.2 -> Version: 0.2, later you can use %{version}. This is done automatically. - remove pkg (this is the macro %{name} ), url, and the dir stuff. The spec file will be much more readable. For almost all your entires exists a macro: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#Macros - Release: %{svnversion}%{?dist} . This means the release of the spec file not the version of the software. In your case this is '1' at the moment. More details about the naming https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Package_Release - URL should point to the project's website http://sourceforge.net/projects/dt-contacts/ - BuildRoot: Samples at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag - For translations is 'BR: gettext' sufficient. 'BuildRequires: gettext-devel' is not needed https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files - Replace '%defattr(-, root, root, 0755)' with '%defattr(-, root, root, -)' - add ABOUT-NLS to %doc - Is 'mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT' needed in the %install section? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 11:00:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:00:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471575] Review Request: libnautilus-vcards - Nautilus vcard context menu extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191100.mAJB0VPN009083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471575 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-19 06:00:30 EDT --- If you are still looking for doing some review, check out one of the following: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469080 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470737 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469485 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469548 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472066 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469553 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469080 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 11:01:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:01:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469080] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - plugin for Pidgin which displays the music track currently playing in the status message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191101.mAJB1j2l006162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469080 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-19 06:01:44 EDT --- If you are looking for doing a review, check out https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471575 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 11:24:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:24:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470066] Review Request: R-qtl - Quantitative trait loci (qtl) functionality for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191124.mAJBOsJf013649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470066 Alec Leamas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |leamas.alec at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Alec Leamas 2008-11-19 06:24:52 EDT --- (Hej!) I need a sponsor, so I need to make some informal reviews, see below, Please feel free to do the same for me, by request is bug 471575 (if it looks strange to you, it's nothing compared to what this stuff looks for me ;-) Summary: OK besides the license, which should be GPLv2 MUST stuff: rpmlint must be run on every package... - No errors or warnings on srpm or spec file. The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . - OK (see section on R-modules in the Naming Gauidelines). The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, - OK The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . - OK besides licensing, see below. (follows closely the specific R guidelines) The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license... - NOK, see below The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - The License tag is set to GPLv2+, but the actual source license is GPLv2. This is true both for the LICENSE file and at least some copyright notices. The text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc - OK The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - OK The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source - OK (b62289d268a09b72c5e804f35df53a67) The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms. - OK (Mock test, Fedora-9/X86_64) All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires - OK (since mock is OK) The spec file MUST handle locales properly. - NA Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files - NA If the package is designed to be relocatable... - NA A package must own all directories that it creates - OK A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - OK Permissions on files must be set properly - OK Each package must have a %clean section, rm -rf %{buildroot} - OK Each package must consistently use macros... - OK The package must contain code, or permissable content. - OK Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage - OK (According to the specific R Guidelines, otherwise a separate -doc subpackage would definitely be on the agenda) If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present - OK (Specific R Guidelines example). Header files must be in a -devel package. - NA Static libraries must be in a -static package. - NA Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must... - NA If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1 - NA If a package contains library files with a suffix - NA devel packages must require the base package using... - NA Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives - NA (no autoconf!) Packages containing GUI applications... - NA Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages - OK At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} - OK All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. - OK SHOULD - The upstream license file (GPLv2) is present. - Localized descriptions are not applicable. - Build OK in mock, se above. - Built also on my "normal" Fedora 9 x86_64 box. - Scriptlets are "sane" - There are no subpackages, pkgconfig .pc file or file deps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 11:26:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:26:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 448661] Review Request: u-boot-tools - contains mkimage a tool to create kernel bootable images for u-boot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191126.mAJBQmCB011296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448661 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-19 06:26:46 EDT --- Kumar, Josh approved your package. You need to find a sponsor before you can go on with the CVS admin procedure (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure). Please check https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 11:35:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:35:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471575] Review Request: libnautilus-vcards - Nautilus vcard context menu extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191135.mAJBZmOv016153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471575 --- Comment #5 from Alec Leamas 2008-11-19 06:35:47 EDT --- Oops, to late... I've done bug 470066 in a more formal manner, and put remarks on bug 470547 and bug 470155 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 12:05:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 07:05:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471575] Review Request: libnautilus-vcards - Nautilus vcard context menu extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191205.mAJC5WoU022147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471575 --- Comment #6 from Alec Leamas 2008-11-19 07:05:31 EDT --- (Scrolling up, finding your previous post...) Thanks for you remarks. Special thanks for the link on macros! Most of the remarks is just to fix. But: - In my case, the spec file is part of the source tree, living in the same svn repo as the source. I have actually thought about this... which doesn't mean I'm sure. But to me it seems reasonable to use the svn version in this case, since spec and source is always in sync. Or? - Auto(re)conf needs the gettext m4 macros in gettext-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 12:14:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 07:14:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191214.mAJCEiNi023990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-19 07:14:42 EDT --- Just some quick comments on your spec file. Some changes will make your life easier in the future because there will be less pain for maintaining ;-) - You can use 'Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}-1.tar.gz' instead of 'Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/mumbles/mumbles_0.4-1.tar.gz' - 'BuildRequires: python-devel' should be 'BuildRequires: python' https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#BuildRequires - 'BuildRequires: python-setuptools' should be 'BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel' https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs#Providing_Eggs_using_Setuptools - Replace '%setup -q -n mumbles-0.4' with '%setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}' - The vendor tag for .desktop file is no longer used for new packages. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/DesktopFileVendor Don't forget to change %{_datadir}/applications/fedora-%{name}.desktop - Add AUTHORS PKG-INFO README to %doc - Shouldn't '%{_datadir}/%{name}' be '%{_datadir}/%{name}/' and '%{python_sitelib}/mumbles' be '%{python_sitelib}/mumbles/'? There is a mixture of macros and the name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 12:23:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 07:23:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455581] Review Request: php-pecl-ssh2 - php bindings to the functions of libssh2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191223.mAJCNYcf025928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455581 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-19 07:23:33 EDT --- php-pecl-ssh2-0.10-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pecl-ssh2-0.10-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 13:16:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:16:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471575] Review Request: libnautilus-vcards - Nautilus vcard context menu extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191316.mAJDGd55005303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471575 --- Comment #7 from Alec Leamas 2008-11-19 08:16:38 EDT --- Made a new version. The issues you mentioned fixed, besides: - Trying to find a balance in when to define macros I have removed %pkg and %pkgdatadir, but kept %schemadir, %plugindir and %download_url. If you insist, I'll remove them. But I feel they make things a better e. g., by making the scriptlets a bit more more concise. And personally, I avoid source lines > 72 chars; hence %download_url - gettext-devel still there (see above). - And still svn-based revision. I'm not stubborn, but a little interested what the arguments are in a situation when the spec file release is the same as the source release... The reasons to stick to svn # are obvious, but I don't have to complete picture. New spec url: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/dt-contacts/libnautilus-vcards-48M.spec (The filename is bad, a cludge to handle sf limitations) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 13:20:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:20:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464141] Review Request: perl-Text-Trac - Perl extension for formatting text with Trac Wiki Style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191320.mAJDKK6p002547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464141 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-11-19 08:20:19 EDT --- OK source files match upstream OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field (same as Perl) matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package isn't need. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 13:21:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:21:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467643] Review Request: sugar-speak - Speak for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191321.mAJDLohB006462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467643 --- Comment #3 from Bryan Kearney 2008-11-19 08:21:49 EDT --- Can you re-post the spec file and srcrpm with the new licens info. If I can see those I can approve (Speak is GPLv3) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 13:28:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:28:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191328.mAJDSlMX004659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2008-11-19 08:28:46 EDT --- John, Fabian, as I'm sponsoring both of you I'd like to take this opportunity for a little lesson in packaging practice ;) (In reply to comment #1) > Just some quick comments on your spec file. Some changes will make your life > easier in the future because there will be less pain for maintaining ;-) > > - You can use 'Source0: > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}-1.tar.gz' instead > of 'Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/mumbles/mumbles_0.4-1.tar.gz' The packaging guidelines state that macros should be used "consistently", but not where ever possible. This means not to mix different macro styles (e.g. %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) but it does not mean that every appearance of foo needs to be replaced with %{name}. In this example the only macro that adds real value is %{version}, because you don't need to change the Source0 tag on updates. Using %{name} would only add value for a packager, who maintains _a_lot_ of packages from sf.net, so he can use the same Source0 tag for all his spec files. In fact I know many packagers, who try to avoid macros in the source url so it can be used by wget and friends more easily. Quote from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#macros "Having macros in a Source: or Patch: line is a matter of style" > - Replace '%setup -q -n mumbles-0.4' with '%setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}' see above: '%setup -q -n mumbles-%{version}' is sufficient > - Add AUTHORS PKG-INFO README to %doc Please don't add PKG-INFO, all it's info is in the spec file and thus in 'rpm -i mumbles' > - Shouldn't '%{_datadir}/%{name}' be '%{_datadir}/%{name}/' and > '%{python_sitelib}/mumbles' be '%{python_sitelib}/mumbles/'? > There is a mixture of macros and the name. Which is perfectly ok. "Use macros instead of hard-coded directory names" only applies to directories that are covered by one of the macros from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros I hope I have made some things more clearly for both of you. Nevertheless Fabian's comments are all helpful and show that he has read and understood the Guidelines well. @Fabian: If you continue working like this I will nominate you for becoming a sponsor in the near future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 13:33:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:33:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469993] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-URI - URI related types and coercions for Moose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191333.mAJDXhYE009111@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469993 Bug 469993 depends on bug 470070, which changed state. Bug 470070 Summary: Review Request: perl-URI-FromHash - Build a URI from a set of named parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470070 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 469993 depends on bug 469627, which changed state. Bug 469627 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class - A Path::Class type library for Moose https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469627 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-11-19 08:33:42 EDT --- Hm? I mean we don't have perl(MooseX::Types::Path::Class) and perl(URI::FromHash) packages into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 13:43:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:43:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - Maze for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191343.mAJDhLbI007735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 --- Comment #5 from Bryan Kearney 2008-11-19 08:43:20 EDT --- I tried installing the resulting RPM on my sugar VM.. and it failed do to not having a Requires: pygame. Please check the required imports and post an updated spec / src rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 13:54:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:54:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472071] Review Request: sugar-paint : Paint (Draw) Activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191354.mAJDs93n013980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472071 --- Comment #2 from Bryan Kearney 2008-11-19 08:54:08 EDT --- You are correct. New versions added: Spec URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/sugar-paint.spec SRPM URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/sugar-paint-23-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 13:52:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:52:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452306] Review Request: tcl-pgtcl - Tcl client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191352.mAJDqW3G013754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452306 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-11-19 08:52:30 EDT --- OK source files match upstream: OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package isn't need. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:12:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:12:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191412.mAJECJIK014666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 --- Comment #15 from Juha Tuomala 2008-11-19 09:12:16 EDT --- Pong. I'm active again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:14:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:14:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191414.mAJEEcTH014967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 Juha Tuomala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:24:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:24:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191424.mAJEO5Uj016864@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 --- Comment #16 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-11-19 09:24:04 EDT --- fedora-cvs ? flag is not enough, you should to follow PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:24:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:24:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468539] Review Request: sugar-jukebox - Media player activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191424.mAJEOLlW016927@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468539 --- Comment #6 from Sebastian Dziallas 2008-11-19 09:24:20 EDT --- Thanks for the comments! I uploaded a modified version: Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/sugar-jukebox.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/sugar-jukebox-5-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:30:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:30:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191430.mAJEU9pb022051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 --- Comment #17 from Juha Tuomala 2008-11-19 09:30:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dfu-util Short Description: USB Device Firmware Upgrade tool Owners: tuju jreznik Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: tuju -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:40:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:40:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191440.mAJEeJ5e024490@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #2 from Adam Huffman 2008-11-19 09:40:18 EDT --- gtkglext-devel, I should have said -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:38:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:38:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472229] New: Review Request: PyQwt - Python bindings for Qwt Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: PyQwt - Python bindings for Qwt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472229 Summary: Review Request: PyQwt - Python bindings for Qwt Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tadej.janez at tadej.hicsalta.si QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tadej.hicsalta.si/packages/PyQwt.spec SRPM URL: http://tadej.hicsalta.si/packages/PyQwt-5.1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: PyQwt is a set of Python bindings for the Qwt C++ class library which extends the Qt framework with widgets for scientific and engineering applications. It provides a widget to plot 2-dimensional data and various widgets to display and control bounded or unbounded floating point values. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:39:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:39:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191439.mAJEdfZP024027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #1 from Adam Huffman 2008-11-19 09:39:40 EDT --- Just tried building the coot SRPM after manually installing the dependencies, on an F9 system. Here's the output: rpmbuild --rebuild coot-0.5-1.f8.src.rpm Installing coot-0.5-1.f8.src.rpm Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.76679 + umask 022 + cd /home/adam/rpmbuild/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /home/adam/rpmbuild/BUILD + rm -rf coot-0.5 + /usr/bin/gzip -dc /home/adam/rpmbuild/SOURCES/coot-0.5.tar.gz + tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd coot-0.5 + /usr/bin/gzip -dc /home/adam/rpmbuild/SOURCES/coot-reference-structures.tar.gz + tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' ++ /usr/bin/id -u + '[' 500 = 0 ']' ++ /usr/bin/id -u + '[' 500 = 0 ']' + /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . + echo 'Patch #0 (configure.in.patch):' Patch #0 (configure.in.patch): + patch -p0 -s + cp /home/adam/rpmbuild/SOURCES/coot.in ./ + cp src/blank.cc src/coot_wrap_guile.cc + rm src/coot_wrap_python_pre.cc + iconv -f iso8859-1 -t utf-8 README + mv -f README.conv README + aclocal -I macros configure.in:101: warning: macro `AM_PATH_GTKGLEXT_1_0' not found in library + libtoolize --automake --copy + autoconf configure.in:101: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PATH_GTKGLEXT_1_0 If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. See the Autoconf documentation. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.76679 (%prep) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.76679 (%prep) so I think you need to add a BuildRequires for gtkglext. After installling that, here's what I see (which I think is expected until the mmdb situation is resolved): checking for GTK... yes checking for GNOME_CANVAS... yes checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config checking for GtkGLExt - version >= 1.0.0... yes (version 1.2.0) checking for GLUT... yes checking for MMDB... configure: error: Package requirements (mmdb >= 1.12) were not met: Requested 'mmdb >= 1.12' but version of mmdb is 1.09.1 Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively, you may set the environment variables MMDB_CFLAGS and MMDB_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.80390 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.80390 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:42:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:42:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191442.mAJEgqoE024856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2008-11-19 09:42:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > all it's info is in the spec file and thus in 'rpm -i mumbles' Of course I meant 'rpm -qi mumbles' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:42:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:42:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472229] Review Request: PyQwt - Python bindings for Qwt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191442.mAJEgtNJ020717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472229 Tadej Jane? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 --- Comment #1 from Tadej Jane? 2008-11-19 09:42:54 EDT --- I forgot to mention that this is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:51:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:51:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463922] Review Request: ifstat - Interface statistics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191451.mAJEp9qX027844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463922 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-19 09:51:08 EDT --- ifstat-1.1-8.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:48:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:48:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468128] Review Request: python-flickrapi - Python module for interfacing with the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191448.mAJEm1x7026579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468128 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-19 09:48:00 EDT --- python-flickrapi-1.1-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:49:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:49:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461678] Review Request: purple-microblog - Libpurple plug-in supporting microblog services like Twitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191449.mAJEngg4026992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461678 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-19 09:49:41 EDT --- purple-microblog-0.2.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:46:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:46:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191446.mAJEkbaY026056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-19 09:46:36 EDT --- wput-0.6.1-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:46:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:46:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470424] Review Request: libtopology - Libtopology is a library for discovering the hardware topology on Linux systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191446.mAJEkDUT025876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470424 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-19 09:46:12 EDT --- libtopology-0.3-0.3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:46:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:46:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191446.mAJEkeD8026091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:46:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:46:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470424] Review Request: libtopology - Libtopology is a library for discovering the hardware topology on Linux systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191446.mAJEkGRq025974@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470424 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:48:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:48:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462254] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap - FastMmap session storage backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191448.mAJEmVCH026673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462254 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-19 09:48:30 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap-0.05-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9711 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:51:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:51:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464050] Package Review Request for projectM-libvisual In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191451.mAJEpraK023439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464050 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-19 09:51:53 EDT --- projectM-libvisual-1.2.0-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:51:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:51:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464051] Package Review Request for projectM-jack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191451.mAJEpfRo023354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464051 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:48:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:48:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468128] Review Request: python-flickrapi - Python module for interfacing with the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191448.mAJEm3Xc022075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468128 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:50:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:50:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471575] Review Request: libnautilus-vcards - Nautilus vcard context menu extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191450.mAJEoelm022974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471575 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-19 09:50:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Oops, to late... I've done bug 470066 in a more formal manner, and put remarks > on bug 470547 and bug 470155 Just to be clear, I'm not a sponsor but I can help you with this package. It was just a suggestion about the reviews without any further investigation on your work. (In reply to comment #6) > - In my case, the spec file is part of the source tree, living in the same > svn repo as the source. I have actually thought about this... which > doesn't mean I'm sure. But to me it seems reasonable to use the svn > version in this case, since spec and source is always in sync. Or? More about the release tag, see below. > - Auto(re)conf needs the gettext m4 macros in gettext-devel I just quoted the guidelines. So, you are right. (In reply to comment #7) > - Trying to find a balance in when to define macros I have > removed %pkg and %pkgdatadir, but kept %schemadir, %plugindir and > %download_url. If you insist, I'll remove them. But I feel they make > things a better e. g., by making the scriptlets a bit more more concise. > And personally, I avoid source lines > 72 chars; hence %download_url I can live with that. Spec files are just easier to read for other packages when only 'standard' macros are used. > - And still svn-based revision. I'm not stubborn, but a little interested > what the arguments are in a situation when the spec file release is the > same as the source release... The reasons to stick to svn # are obvious, > but I don't have to complete picture. I think that your release is a post release. The naming guidelines have some examples. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Post-Release_packages "Release: The initial value of the release should normally be "1%{?dist}". Then, increment the number every time you release a new package for the same version of software. If a new version of the software being packaged is released, the version number should be changed to reflect the new software version, and the release number should be reset to 1." >From my point of view the release tag should look like this Release: 1.%{svnversion}svn%{?dist} > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/dt-contacts/libnautilus-vcards-48M.spec This way the name of the spec file didn't match the guidelines. I'm not an expert on exceptions. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Spec_file_name -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:53:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:53:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464050] Package Review Request for projectM-libvisual In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191453.mAJErQCf028965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464050 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-19 09:53:26 EDT --- projectM-libvisual-1.2.0-4.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:51:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:51:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464051] Package Review Request for projectM-jack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191451.mAJEpcxZ028525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464051 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-19 09:51:37 EDT --- projectM-jack-1.2.0-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:52:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:52:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468299] Review Request: jabberpy - Python xmlstream and jabber IM protocol libs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191452.mAJEq58I028663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468299 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-19 09:52:05 EDT --- jabberpy-0.5-0.17.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:52:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:52:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438587] Review Request: libsqlite3x - C++ Wrapper for the SQLite3 database engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191452.mAJEqtvb028856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438587 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-19 09:52:54 EDT --- libsqlite3x-20071018-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:54:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:54:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465758] Review Request: perl-Net-Daemon - Perl extension for portable daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191454.mAJEs7SS029084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465758 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-19 09:54:06 EDT --- perl-Net-Daemon-0.44-5.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:55:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:55:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462104] Review Request: cryptopp - Public domain C++ class library of cryptographic schemes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191455.mAJEtp0I030240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462104 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-19 09:55:50 EDT --- cryptopp-5.5.2-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:52:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:52:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438587] Review Request: libsqlite3x - C++ Wrapper for the SQLite3 database engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191452.mAJEqwc7028895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438587 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:52:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:52:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453026] Review Request: xmp - A multi-format module player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191452.mAJEq2Jk028629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453026 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-19 09:52:00 EDT --- xmp-2.5.1-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xmp'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9738 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:53:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:53:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468299] Review Request: jabberpy - Python xmlstream and jabber IM protocol libs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191453.mAJErIKA024274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468299 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-19 09:53:17 EDT --- jabberpy-0.5-0.17.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:56:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:56:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467293] Review Request: scummvm-tools - Tools for scummVM / S.C.U.M.M scripting language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191456.mAJEuvmX025751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467293 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-19 09:56:56 EDT --- scummvm-tools-0.12.0-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:52:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:52:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468299] Review Request: jabberpy - Python xmlstream and jabber IM protocol libs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191452.mAJEq8hS023680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468299 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:53:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:53:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464050] Package Review Request for projectM-libvisual In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191453.mAJErTFX024321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464050 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:56:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:56:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446563] Review Request: rubygem-rspec - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191456.mAJEul4t025683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446563 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-19 09:56:46 EDT --- rubygem-rspec-1.1.11-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-rspec'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9792 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:53:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:53:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471429] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache - Catalyst Apache Engines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191453.mAJEr8f6024213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471429 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-19 09:53:07 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache-1.12-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9755 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:52:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:52:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446563] Review Request: rubygem-rspec - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191452.mAJEqEV5023895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446563 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-19 09:52:12 EDT --- rubygem-rspec-1.1.11-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-rspec'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-9741 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:56:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:56:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453026] Review Request: xmp - A multi-format module player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191456.mAJEuXGA030815@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453026 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-19 09:56:31 EDT --- xmp-2.5.1-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xmp'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-9788 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 15:23:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:23:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466658] Review Request: VisualBoyAdvance - Nintendo Gameboy (,Advance,Color) Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191523.mAJFNF3n032047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466658 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #11 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-11-19 10:23:14 EDT --- Red Hat legal gave this a lot of thought, but in the end, they decided this one was too risky. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 15:40:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:40:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468806] Review Request: python-dbsprockets - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database definitions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191540.mAJFex4M008023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468806 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(bdpepple at gmail.co | |m) --- Comment #2 from Luke Macken 2008-11-19 10:40:57 EDT --- Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-dbsprockets.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-dbsprockets-0.5-0.2.dev.r411.fc9.src.rpm * Wed Nov 19 2008 Luke Macken - 0.5-0.2.dev.r411 - Add BR on python-setuptools-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 15:38:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:38:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468223] Review Request: python-repoze-tm2 - Zope-like transaction manager via WSGI middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191538.mAJFci31007410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468223 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Luke Macken 2008-11-19 10:38:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-repoze-tm2 Short Description: Zope-like transaction manager via WSGI middleware Owners: lmacken Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 15:37:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:37:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468222] Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction management for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191537.mAJFbgGn002925@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468222 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Luke Macken 2008-11-19 10:37:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-transaction Short Description: This package contains a generic transaction implementation for Python. Owners: lmacken Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 15:39:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:39:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468224] Review Request: python-zope-sqlalchemy - Minimal Zope/SQLAlchemy transaction integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191539.mAJFdGjX003098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468224 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Luke Macken 2008-11-19 10:39:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-zope-sqlalchemy Short Description: Minimal Zope/SQLAlchemy transaction integration Owners: lmacken Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 15:49:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:49:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454408] Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191549.mAJFnLb3005195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 --- Comment #22 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-11-19 10:49:19 EDT --- Checked this again, and it still fails in F-10. Guess we really do need to wait for the F-10 freeze to end. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 15:59:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:59:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191559.mAJFxBEW007263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874 --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-11-19 10:59:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > This fails to build; autoreconf is called without any build dependency on the > autotools. Some people insist that autotools should never be called as part of > a package build; I'm not one of them, but it seems a waste for that one line > change. Do you know how much change there is in the resulting Makefile? Maybe > you could just patch that instead. Or, I guess, fix the build dependency. Added autoconf as a BiuldRequires. I don't want to fix makefile instead of rebuilding it, because my patch already accepted upstream. Next release (0.4 - scheduled on next week) will include this fix. > The descriptive texts are better now; the only notes I'd make are > s/standarts/standards/ in the main package %description and terminate > %description lines with periods. Done. http://peter.fedorapeople.org/zeromq.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/zeromq-0.3.2-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 16:13:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:13:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471026] Review Request: chrony - An NTP client/server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191613.mAJGD9dl014132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471026 --- Comment #3 from Miroslav Lichvar 2008-11-19 11:13:04 EDT --- http://fedorapeople.org/~mlichvar/tmp/chrony-1.23-2.20081106gitbe42b4.fc10.src.rpm * Wed Nov 19 2008 Miroslav Lichvar 1.23-2.20081106gitbe42b4 - fix info uninstall - generate random command key in init script - support cyclelogs, online, offline commands in init script - add logrotate script -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 16:18:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:18:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466658] Review Request: VisualBoyAdvance - Nintendo Gameboy (,Advance,Color) Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191618.mAJGIa8P015208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466658 --- Comment #12 from Conrad Meyer 2008-11-19 11:18:35 EDT --- Thanks for considering it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 16:20:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:20:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458231] Review Request: aircrack-ptw - A tool for cracking WEP keys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191620.mAJGKv6s011807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458231 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu Flag| |needinfo?(adrian at linux.org. | |ar) --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter 2008-11-19 11:20:56 EDT --- Adrian, given Till's comment #3 , are you still interested in reviewing (and maintaining) this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 16:31:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:31:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472179] Review Request: perl-Test-Block - Specify fine granularity test plans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191631.mAJGV5wn017972@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472179 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 16:30:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:30:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472165] Review Request: perl-Test-Strict - Check syntax, presence of use strict/warnings, and test coverage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191630.mAJGU4v8017761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472165 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-19 11:30:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-Strict Short Description: no summary found Owners: cweyl Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 16:27:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:27:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469993] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-URI - URI related types and coercions for Moose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191627.mAJGRe6m017300@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469993 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-19 11:27:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Hm? I mean we don't have perl(MooseX::Types::Path::Class) and > perl(URI::FromHash) packages into Fedora. As of a couple days ago, we do -- note the two review bugs that were blocking this bug. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=940190 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 16:31:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:31:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472167] Review Request: perl-asa - Lets your class/object say it works like something else In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191631.mAJGVT6O014133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472167 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 16:31:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:31:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472179] Review Request: perl-Test-Block - Specify fine granularity test plans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191631.mAJGV3Hq013793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472179 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-19 11:31:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-Block Short Description: Specify fine granularity test plans Owners: cweyl Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 16:31:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:31:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472167] Review Request: perl-asa - Lets your class/object say it works like something else In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191631.mAJGVRYj014092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472167 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-19 11:31:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-asa Short Description: Lets your class/object say it works like something else Owners: cweyl Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 16:30:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:30:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472165] Review Request: perl-Test-Strict - Check syntax, presence of use strict/warnings, and test coverage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191630.mAJGU5jm013582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472165 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 16:45:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:45:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191645.mAJGjbXP017039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 --- Comment #4 from John Anderson 2008-11-19 11:45:36 EDT --- Thank you both for the comments. I have the updates here. http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/115301/mumbles.spec http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/115301/mumbles-0.4-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 16:46:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:46:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471575] Review Request: libnautilus-vcards - Nautilus vcard context menu extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191646.mAJGk7O2017203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471575 --- Comment #9 from Alec Leamas 2008-11-19 11:46:06 EDT --- The name of the spec file is still libnautilus-vcards.spec. I just had to rename it to handle some mysterious sf upload policies. It's just for the review. Your naming scheme looks great! It makes it possible to keep everybody happy. I'll go for that. Thanks! Many thanks for your help. I'll try to find some time for yet another review, this time one from your list... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 17:08:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:08:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191708.mAJH8pax024978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 --- Comment #3 from David Walluck 2008-11-19 12:08:50 EDT --- We really need to get the geronimo API's into Fedora. Alternatively, we could update existing Fedora packages with these provides. For now, I will simply change javamail_1_3_1_api to javamail. I will change wsdl4j16 to wsdl4j (1.5.2). Then, jbossweb just needs to be able to build against this version as we don't require wsdl4j at runtime. The jbossas dependency can be removed. The jboss logging sources are bundled along with jbossweb. There is a question as to whether these should be removed and we should be them as an external dependency first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 17:33:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:33:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471026] Review Request: chrony - An NTP client/server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191733.mAJHXFvA026250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471026 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Dan Hor?k 2008-11-19 12:33:14 EDT --- All issues are fixed, so this package is APPROVED. One final note - the Guidelines recommend that you add a comment nearby the patches that tracks their upstream status: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PatchUpstreamStatus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 17:45:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:45:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471575] Review Request: libnautilus-vcards - Nautilus vcard context menu extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191745.mAJHjeNC032565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471575 --- Comment #10 from Alec Leamas 2008-11-19 12:45:39 EDT --- When I looked at the generated RPM:s, with names like libnautilus-vcards-0.2-1.48Msvn.fc9.x86_64.rpm, I hesitated. It just doesn't look "right". These kind of names normally indicates some kind of snapshot or automatic, nightly builds. Read the release guidelines over again. And removed the 'svn' part i. e., 1.48svn -> 1.48. To me, it looks better, and seems to comply with the guidelines. Thus the release would be 0.2-1.54, 0.2-1.73, 0.3-1.85... Which leaves an open issue: under what circumstances should the 1. prefix change? My feeling is that will be left constantly as '1.'. Looking at the kernel (uname -r) , I suspect they have something like %version-%svnversion... Eventually, maybe some sponsor could have a final word on this? For the time being, I stick to %version-1.%&svnversion New URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/dt-contacts/libnautilus-vcards-53.spec (and, the "real" name still is libnautilus-vcards.spec, but sourceforge has their policies...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 17:42:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:42:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471026] Review Request: chrony - An NTP client/server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191742.mAJHgJih028033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471026 --- Comment #5 from Miroslav Lichvar 2008-11-19 12:42:18 EDT --- Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 17:44:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:44:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471026] Review Request: chrony - An NTP client/server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191744.mAJHinHv028213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471026 Miroslav Lichvar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Miroslav Lichvar 2008-11-19 12:44:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: chrony Short Description: An NTP client/server Owners: mlichvar Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 17:50:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:50:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471527] Review Request: SNMP++ - SNMP C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191750.mAJHoDL0000776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-19 12:50:12 EDT --- Rebuild failed. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=940272 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 17:53:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:53:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191753.mAJHrDgP001212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-19 12:53:11 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 18:38:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:38:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472269] New: Review Request: python-rope - Python Code Refactoring Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-rope - Python Code Refactoring Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472269 Summary: Review Request: python-rope - Python Code Refactoring Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: a.badger at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-rope.spec SRPM URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-rope-0.9.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A python refactoring library. It provides features like refactorings and coding assists. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 18:57:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:57:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472274] New: Review Request: atari++ - Unix based emulator of the Atari eight bit computers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: atari++ - Unix based emulator of the Atari eight bit computers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472274 Summary: Review Request: atari++ - Unix based emulator of the Atari eight bit computers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/atari++.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/atari++-1.55-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Atari++ Emulator is a Unix based emulator of the Atari eight bit computers, namely the Atari 400 and 800, the Atari 400XL, 800XL and 130XE, and the Atari 5200 game console. The emulator is auto-configurable and will compile on a variety of systems (Linux, Solaris, Irix). Atari++ 1.30 and up contain a built-in ROM emulation that tries to mimic the AtariXL operating system closely. koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=940319 Notes: - rpmlint is silent - the emulator contains own implementation of the OS stored usually in ROM, the source of this "ROM" is licensed under the same terms as the emulator itself - no ROM is required to run the emulator -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 19:04:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:04:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191904.mAJJ47x6010379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 --- Comment #7 from Matt Domsch 2008-11-19 14:04:05 EDT --- The DMTF Board passed a motion at the recent face to face meeting that removes part of the copyright statement going forward for all docs, including MOFs. The phrase "for uses consistent with this purpose" is to be removed from published CIM Schema stating with 2.21 and all specifications going forward. This policy is effective immediately. Tom, that should address this, yes? -Matt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 19:12:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:12:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472149] Review Request: refmac-dictionary - chemical ligand dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191912.mAJJCjun012186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472149 --- Comment #2 from Tim Fenn 2008-11-19 14:12:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > suggestions > 1) rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM and for RPM. > refmac-dictionary.noarch: W: no-version-in-last-changelog > refmac-dictionary.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog > ==> missing version from changelog. Follow guidelines > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Changelogs > Oops, fixed. > 2) Don't mix macros follow > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Macros > either use %{buildroot} OR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Fixed. Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/refmac-dictionary.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/refmac-dictionary-5.02-2.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 19:34:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:34:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472098] Review Request: dekiwiki - a powerful opensource wiki which runs on Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191934.mAJJY4Xw020879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472098 Mathieu OUDART changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(services at mindtouc | |h.com) | --- Comment #2 from Mathieu OUDART 2008-11-19 14:34:03 EDT --- Thanks a lot David for this review. I rebuilt the package and fixed the rpmlint messages you described. I didn't change the dependencies for now as these are optional and not really needed to run Deki. I would likely add them as "soft dependencies" or "recommended" but i couldn't find such tag in RPM specs. Here are the new links : Spec URL: http://nightlybuild.mindtouch.com/Submitted_Packages/Fedora/src/dekiwiki.spec SRPM URL: http://nightlybuild.mindtouch.com/Submitted_Packages/Fedora/src/dekiwiki-8.08.11680-1.1.src.rpm Cheers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 20:07:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:07:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811192007.mAJK7dIo022834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 --- Comment #14 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-11-19 15:07:37 EDT --- hmm, I don't get it. Why is matio.h shipped by -devel ? Please, give me a test case, A USER can write and read .mat files without matio.h in %name. I believe matio is an exception to the rule and matio.h should be shipped by %name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 20:16:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:16:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811192016.mAJKGBTp024630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 --- Comment #4 from David Walluck 2008-11-19 15:16:10 EDT --- Spec URL: SRPM URL: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 20:21:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:21:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811192021.mAJKLEjw025861@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 Dodji Seketeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(dodji at redhat.com) | --- Comment #7 from Dodji Seketeli 2008-11-19 15:21:13 EDT --- Pong, Thank you very much for the review. I am going to go through it and fix things as requested. Cheers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 20:43:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:43:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811192043.mAJKh3Id002092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 --- Comment #5 from Permaine Cheung 2008-11-19 15:43:03 EDT --- I still can't build with the new srpm in mock with rawhide, I'm getting: [javac] 182. ERROR in /builddir/build/BUILD/jbossweb2-2.1.1/java/org/apache/catalina/ant/jmx/JMXAccessorTask.java (at line 42) [javac] import javax.management.remote.JMXConnector; [javac] ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [javac] The import javax.management.remote cannot be resolved [javac] ---------- [javac] 183. ERROR in /builddir/build/BUILD/jbossweb2-2.1.1/java/org/apache/catalina/ant/jmx/JMXAccessorTask [javac] .java (at line 43) [javac] import javax.management.remote.JMXConnectorFactory; [javac] ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [javac] The import javax.management.remote cannot be resolved [javac] ---------- [javac] 184. ERROR in /builddir/build/BUILD/jbossweb2-2.1.1/java/org/apache/catalina/ant/jmx/JMXAccessorTask.java (at line 44) [javac] import javax.management.remote.JMXServiceURL; [javac] ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [javac] The import javax.management.remote cannot be resolved .... and a few others. Does it needs a BR on mx4j or some other package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 20:59:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:59:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811192059.mAJKxbKm005033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 --- Comment #15 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-11-19 15:59:35 EDT --- Can you update the spec please with respect to the above comments ? I support Jason Tibbitts's comments. Please do comment your spec properly and removed useless commented lines that confuse the reviewer. Also, in the description, change "libmatio" to "matio" (first word) For: >> # According to the README - zlib 1.2.2 is possible but require a patch >> BuildRequires: zlib-devel >= 1.2.3 Even F-7 has zlib-devel 1.2.3. Drop the version and the comment Is it useful to add doxygen commands in the spec file ? I understand the BuildRequires: doxygen. It is needed for the compilation, however extra doxygen commands in the spec file ? remove this %define _default_patch_fuzz 2, the package builds fine without it on F-8. Remember early next year, the F-8 will not be supported. Did you mock matio? sh: latex: command not found Problems running latex. Check your installation or look for typos in _formulas.tex and check _formulas.log! sh: dvips: command not found Problems running dvips. Check your installation! cd latex;.././format_api.sh;.././textopdf.sh .././textopdf.sh: line 3: pdflatex: command not found .././textopdf.sh: line 4: makeindex: command not found .././textopdf.sh: line 5: pdflatex: command not found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 21:16:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:16:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811192116.mAJLGWBR008712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 --- Comment #16 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-11-19 16:16:31 EDT --- Please use your real name in the changelog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 21:31:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:31:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467643] Review Request: sugar-speak - Speak for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811192131.mAJLVxbR011477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467643 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-19 16:31:58 EDT --- Sorry, I didn't upload a new version. After a new check of the license. The license is GPLv3+. COPYING says GPLv3, the file headers says "either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later version" Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-speak.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-speak-9-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 21:36:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:36:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811192136.mAJLaDtY006591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 --- Comment #8 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-11-19 16:36:12 EDT --- Where is this documented? Either we need a new tarball with the updated terms or some documentation to include in the package that reflects the new terms. Apart from that, it is acceptable as a content license. However, if we were to treat it as a code license, it lacks the permission to modify, thus is non-free. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 21:37:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:37:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471522] Review Request: otl - OTL library for database connections and queries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811192137.mAJLbaoH012401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471522 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-19 16:37:35 EDT --- cvs done with the exception that user lemenkov doesn't seem to exist. ;( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 21:52:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:52:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811192152.mAJLq33q009267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 --- Comment #6 from David Walluck 2008-11-19 16:52:02 EDT --- I built the RPM in rawhide x86_64. What JDK is being used? tomcat6 doesn't have a requirement on mx4j, so I suspect it might be a JDK5 vs. JDK6 issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 22:03:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:03:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811192203.mAJM3jkr011543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #7 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-11-19 17:03:44 EDT --- #001 You can replace %setup -q -n %{name}-%{version} by %setup -q #002 add %{?_smp_mflags} SYSTEMPERL=%{_datadir}/verilator/perl-systemc %{__make} %{?_smp_mflags} #003: use fedora optflags: add the following after configure %{__sed} -i "s|CPPFLAGSNOWALL +=|CPPFLAGSNOWALL +=%{optflags}|" \ {src,test_c,test_regress,test_sc,test_sp,test_verilated}/Makefile_obj #004: Are these useful ? /usr/share/verilator/bin /usr/share/verilator/bin/verilator_includer #005: move BUIDROOT/usr/share/verilator/examples to examples/ then %doc examples/ #006: Are these important: chitlesh(SPECS)[1]$rpm -ql verilator | grep -v examples | grep .cpp /usr/share/verilator/include/verilated.cpp /usr/share/verilator/perl-systemc/src/SpTraceVcdC.cpp #007 can you give me quick case study of how to use verilator ? It might be helpful for those who don't know, but want to do the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 22:25:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:25:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811192225.mAJMPs8u020671@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #20 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-19 17:25:53 EDT --- you have an example of separate pdf included as %doc in the yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts As for the changelog, I'm sure Pablo would be happy to help you, if you told us precisely what your changelog problem was. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 22:22:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:22:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811192222.mAJMMuNa014739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-19 17:22:55 EDT --- Ok, we're slowly getting there. Please remember to bump the release version each time you change you specfile. I see that your fontconfig understanding remains problematic. It's a bit difficult to help you if you do not ask specific questions, fontconfig is a complex software. I've really tried to make the fontconfig templates in http://nim.fedorapeople.org/rpm-fonts/rpm-fonts-1.8.tar.bz2 as simple as I could. What part of it do you not understand? If you want concrete examples (not abstract templates), just download the src.rpms of existing Fedora 9/10 font packages (the gfs fonts come to mind) and look at the fontconfig bits inside using file-roller. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 22:34:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:34:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811192234.mAJMY3TG021748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 --- Comment #7 from Permaine Cheung 2008-11-19 17:34:02 EDT --- I was trying to build it in rawhide i386. Looking at root.log, here are some of the packages installed: DEBUG util.py:250: java-1.5.0-gcj-devel i386 1.5.0.0-22.fc10 fedora 46 k DEBUG util.py:250: java-1.5.0-gcj i386 1.5.0.0-22.fc10 fedora 132 k DEBUG util.py:250: java-1.6.0-openjdk i386 1:1.6.0.0-2b12.fc10 fedora 29 M the java-devel is the 1.5.0 gcj one, so it's the JDK5 vs. JDK6 then? Was yours built with JDK 6? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 22:31:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:31:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472303] New: Review Request: python-ropevim - Python module to add rope refactoring to vim Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-ropevim - Python module to add rope refactoring to vim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472303 Summary: Review Request: python-ropevim - Python module to add rope refactoring to vim Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: a.badger at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-ropevim.spec SRPM URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-ropevim-0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Ropevim provides a python module to integrate the rope python refactoring library with vim. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 22:35:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:35:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811192235.mAJMZ4YN016818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 --- Comment #8 from Dodji Seketeli 2008-11-19 17:35:03 EDT --- So I have updated the spec file and srpm following your recommendations. The new spec file is at http://www.seketeli.org/dodji/rpms/cloog/cloog.spec-0.15-0.2.git The new srpm is at http://www.seketeli.org/dodji/rpms/cloog/cloog-0.15-0.2.git57a0bc.fc10.src.rpm. Thanks again for your review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 22:33:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:33:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811192233.mAJMXGo7016394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 --- Comment #9 from Matt Domsch 2008-11-19 17:33:15 EDT --- Documented: The DMTF Technical Committee chair sent an email to members of the TC stating the Board's decision, and asking them to make this change in all future published documentation and specifications. I would expect to see this change in a future posting of the CIM Schemas tarball. As for the MOFs (which implement a form of the specification) as code vs content, I have asked that the MOFs themselves be licensed under an explicit license such as the BSD 3-clause that permits modification. There is a "MOF Compiler". I am awaiting the answer to this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 22:37:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:37:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472269] Review Request: python-rope - Python Code Refactoring Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811192237.mAJMbIre017199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472269 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |472303 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 22:37:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:37:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472303] Review Request: python-ropevim - Python module to add rope refactoring to vim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811192237.mAJMbH8E017179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472303 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |472269 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 22:43:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:43:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811192243.mAJMhk8p018239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 --- Comment #10 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-11-19 17:43:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Documented: The DMTF Technical Committee chair sent an email to members of the > TC stating the Board's decision, and asking them to make this change in all > future published documentation and specifications. I would expect to see this > change in a future posting of the CIM Schemas tarball. A copy of that email would suffice for content (not code) distributed under that license. > As for the MOFs (which implement a form of the specification) as code vs > content, I have asked that the MOFs themselves be licensed under an explicit > license such as the BSD 3-clause that permits modification. There is a "MOF > Compiler". I am awaiting the answer to this. >From the context of this, I will assume the bits in the cim-schema packages are considered code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 22:58:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:58:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811192258.mAJMwPBf020625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #21 from Martin-Gomez Pablo 2008-11-19 17:58:24 EDT --- > The doc on changelog doesnt tell me which ones dist and which ones version.. :( > so i havent changed that in this one.. (pablo please help me with this) It's quite simple to understand, for exemple, your spec: Version: 1.1 Release: 1%{?dist} The number after "Version:" is the version one, it's given by upstream and you must not change it. So put "1.0" as it's the version of the font. The "Release:" number is a distro/package specific number, so each time you add an entry in the changelog, you increment by one this number. So currently, it should be "3%{?dist}". Also your changelog format is not correct, you have to add your email address as said in the guidelines (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs). > The warnings for the docs is still present.. How do i correct that? You should add the code proposed by Nicolas in the review request of the bonveno fonts in the %prep section . > You have many font substitution examples in the dejavu font packages. Do not > forget to declare your font is an acceptable substitute for all the different > Old Standard variant out there (TTF, OTF, etc) Ok, so you have to duplicate the XML code I gave you, and just change the first Old Standard to Old Standard TTF. For register this font as a serif one, add the following to the fontconfig file: serif Old Standard SFD -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 23:35:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:35:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469134] Review Request: deco-archive - Extraction scripts for various archive formats for use of deco In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811192335.mAJNZauW000475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469134 --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-19 18:35:35 EDT --- Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/deco-archive.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/deco-archive-1.2-2.fc9.src.rpm %changelog - Added conditionals to the trigger functions to suppress warnings on updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 23:36:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:36:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811192336.mAJNahRS027891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 --- Comment #21 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-19 18:36:42 EDT --- SPEC: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/deco.spec SRPM: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/deco-1.5.7-1.fc9.src.rpm %changelog - Version update -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 00:10:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:10:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447104] Review Request: qdevelop - development environment for QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811200010.mAK0AceQ000896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447104 Xavier Lamien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(lxtnow at gmail.com) | --- Comment #9 from Xavier Lamien 2008-11-19 19:10:37 EDT --- re: Sorry for the few-weeks-late on this bug review. All things match with the packaging Review guideline (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines) and qt specific requires and build. Rpmlint issue : That one can be ignored. Actually required to avoid 'segmentation fault' (from rawhide tries) ** APPROVED ** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 00:13:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:13:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449595] Review Request: gnome-applet-grandr - GNOME panel applet for XrandR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811200013.mAK0DI3R006493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449595 Xavier Lamien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(lxtnow at gmail.com) | --- Comment #5 from Xavier Lamien 2008-11-19 19:13:16 EDT --- i'm still around. Actually, you can go ahead and o a full review if you wanted to. I'll make sure to remove that before cvs import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 00:42:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:42:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449595] Review Request: gnome-applet-grandr - GNOME panel applet for XrandR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811200042.mAK0gWmC005885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449595 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dwmw2 at infradead.org Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from David Woodhouse 2008-11-19 19:42:31 EDT --- Aside from the zero-length file, please consider changing the description to reference Xorg instead of XFree86, although what it says at the moment _is_ technically correct. Please also consider fixing the email address in the specfile. Do you really think the spambots haven't learned to cope with [at] yet? You're only making hard for _real_ people, and not for the spammers. Other than that, it looks good. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 01:04:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:04:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471527] Review Request: SNMP++ - SNMP C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811200104.mAK14cum008948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 --- Comment #13 from Hayden James 2008-11-19 20:04:37 EDT --- Oops...brown paper bag moment, sorry about that. Here's the updated files: http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/snmp++.spec http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/snmp++-3.2.23-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 02:09:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:09:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459800] Review Request: python-py - Innovative python library containing py.test, greenlets and other niceties In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811200209.mAK2917m024890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459800 --- Comment #5 from Toshio Kuratomi 2008-11-19 21:09:00 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 02:11:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:11:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468806] Review Request: python-dbsprockets - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database definitions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811200211.mAK2Bol0020480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468806 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(bdpepple at gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #3 from Brian Pepple 2008-11-19 21:11:49 EDT --- Looks good. +1 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 04:10:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:10:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472083] Review Request: perl-boolean - Boolean support for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811200410.mAK4AiGv014796@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472083 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-19 23:10:43 EDT --- Looks good. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=940203 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (perl); make test passes cleanly. Source tarball matches upstream: a9dcfaa89e6b3ee52e0bb6e2d6b6c438 boolean-0.20.tar.gz a9dcfaa89e6b3ee52e0bb6e2d6b6c438 boolean-0.20.tar.gz.srpm =====> perl-boolean-0.20-2.fc9.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-boolean-0.20-2.fc9.noarch.rpm perl(boolean) = 0.20 perl-boolean = 0.20-2.fc9 ====> requires for perl-boolean-0.20-2.fc9.noarch.rpm perl >= 0:5.005003 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(base) perl(strict) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 04:24:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:24:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811200424.mAK4O1LY016718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #10 from Ankur Sinha 2008-11-19 23:24:00 EDT --- Hi, Im okay with the syntax.. Understood the xmllint too.. (The tar file says output will be .xml.. mines coming .conf..).How do i decide if a font goes Dejau or serif? Thats what i dont know how to decide.. Thanks both for your clarifications and patience.. Ill upload the new packages once ive checked them (will try using mock). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 04:28:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:28:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472079] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Copy - Copy Regexp objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811200428.mAK4Su86011392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472079 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-19 23:28:55 EDT --- Looks good. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=940198 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (perl); make test passes cleanly. Source tarball matches upstream: d0f3875e0655c0ac9eb37813ec82c137 Regexp-Copy-0.06.tar.gz d0f3875e0655c0ac9eb37813ec82c137 Regexp-Copy-0.06.tar.gz.srpm =====> perl-Regexp-Copy-0.06-2.fc9.x86_64.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Regexp-Copy-0.06-2.fc9.x86_64.rpm Copy.so()(64bit) perl(Regexp) perl(Regexp::Copy) = 0.06 perl(Regexp::Storable) = 0.06 perl-Regexp-Copy = 0.06-2.fc9 ====> requires for perl-Regexp-Copy-0.06-2.fc9.x86_64.rpm libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(AutoLoader) perl(Carp) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(Regexp::Storable) perl(strict) perl(vars) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 04:44:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:44:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471522] Review Request: otl - OTL library for database connections and queries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811200444.mAK4i6uF019791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471522 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-19 23:44:05 EDT --- otl-4.0.176-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/otl-4.0.176-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 04:44:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:44:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471522] Review Request: otl - OTL library for database connections and queries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811200444.mAK4idCR019869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471522 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-19 23:44:38 EDT --- otl-4.0.176-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/otl-4.0.176-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 04:55:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:55:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472079] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Copy - Copy Regexp objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811200455.mAK4t8jv021655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472079 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2008-11-19 23:55:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Regexp-Copy Short Description: Copy Regexp objects Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 04:55:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:55:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472083] Review Request: perl-boolean - Boolean support for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811200455.mAK4thIN015572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472083 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2008-11-19 23:55:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-boolean Short Description: Boolean support for Perl Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 05:01:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:01:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472335] New: Review Request: perl-rpm-build-perl - Perl compiler backend to extract Perl dependencies Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-rpm-build-perl - Perl compiler backend to extract Perl dependencies Alias: perl-rpm-build-perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472335 Summary: Review Request: perl-rpm-build-perl - Perl compiler backend to extract Perl dependencies Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/rpm-build-perl OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-rpm-build-perl.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-rpm-build-perl-0.6.8-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: B::PerlReq is a backend module for the Perl compiler that extracts dependencies from Perl source code, based on the internal compiled structure that Perl itself creates after parsing a program. The output of B::PerlReq is suitable for automatic dependency tracking (e.g. for RPM packaging). Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=940670 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 05:11:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:11:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472335] Review Request: perl-rpm-build-perl - Perl compiler backend to extract Perl dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811200511.mAK5BKjm024673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472335 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-20 00:11:19 EDT --- This package is a dep of Test::Dependencies, which in turn is a dep of App::Asciio. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 05:52:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:52:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472337] New: Review Request: fabric - A simple pythonic remote deployment tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fabric - A simple pythonic remote deployment tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472337 Summary: Review Request: fabric - A simple pythonic remote deployment tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: silas at sewell.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/rpm/fabric/fabric.spec SRPM URL: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/rpm/fabric/fabric-0.0.9-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Fabric is a simple pythonic remote deployment tool which is designed to upload files to, and run shell commands on, a number of servers in parallel or serially. This is my first package and as such I'll need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 05:55:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:55:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472337] Review Request: fabric - A simple pythonic remote deployment tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811200555.mAK5tk1G025095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472337 Silas Sewell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 06:50:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 01:50:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226235] Merge Review: pax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811200650.mAK6oWXw007047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226235 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-20 01:50:31 EDT --- I reviewed this package. Here is what needs to be done for compliance with the guidelines: * The doc files ABOUT-NLS, AUTHORS, ChangeLog, COPYING, NEWS, README, THANKS need to be packaged. * We prefer %defattr(-,root,root,-) * Buildroot must be one of these: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root * It would be nice if you explain in the SPEC file what the patches do. The project seems dead, I don't think there is any place to submit the patches to. * Parallel make should be supported whenever possible. If it is not supported, this should be noted in the SPEC file as a comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 08:30:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 03:30:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467644] Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811200830.mAK8UF3M016210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467644 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-20 03:30:13 EDT --- Like in the other review, I have to repost the spec file and the SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 08:27:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 03:27:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467643] Review Request: sugar-speak - Speak for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811200827.mAK8R5th015633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467643 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-20 03:27:04 EDT --- Bryan, don't go ahead with this review. For this package 'mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{sugaractivitydir}' is perhaps not necessary, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 09:16:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:16:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470155] Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811200916.mAK9G53C024422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 --- Comment #5 from Alex Eskin 2008-11-20 04:16:03 EDT --- Thanks a lot for for the review! I added the %doc LICENSE New Spec URL: http://www.math.uchicago.edu/~eskin/xword/xword.spec New SRPM URL: http://www.math.uchicago.edu/~eskin/xword/xword-1.0-4.fc9.src.rpm --Alex -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 11:00:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 06:00:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472348] Review Request: hunspell-no - Norwegian hunspell dictionaaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201100.mAKB0nUP012173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472348 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |472342 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 11:00:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 06:00:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472348] New: Review Request: hunspell-no - Norwegian hunspell dictionaaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-no - Norwegian hunspell dictionaaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472348 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-no - Norwegian hunspell dictionaaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-no.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-no-2.0.10-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Norwegian hunspell dictionaaries This combined Norwegian dictionary package is intended to replace the current out-of-date hunspell-nn and hunspell-nb packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 11:05:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 06:05:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201105.mAKB5wSm018398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #3 from Adam Huffman 2008-11-20 06:05:56 EDT --- Have just updated to new mmdb and latest version of refmac-dictionary. There's still a problem building coot: (cd .libs && rm -f libcoot-shelx.so.0 && ln -s libcoot-shelx.so.0.0.0 libcoot-shelx.so.0) (cd .libs && rm -f libcoot-shelx.so && ln -s libcoot-shelx.so.0.0.0 libcoot-shelx.so) creating libcoot-shelx.la (cd .libs && rm -f libcoot-shelx.la && ln -s ../libcoot-shelx.la libcoot-shelx.la) /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++ -DHAVE_GSL -DPKGDATADIR='"/usr/share/coot"' -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -fno-strict-aliasing -o testshelxreader test-shelx-reader.o ./libcoot-shelx.la ./libcoot-coord-utils.la ./libcoot-utils.la -lclipper -lsrfftw -lsfftw -lm -lmmdb -lgpp4 -lmmdb /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++ -DHAVE_GSL -DPKGDATADIR='"/usr/share/coot"' -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -fno-strict-aliasing -o testcootutils test-utils.o ./libcoot-shelx.la ./libcoot-coord-utils.la ./libcoot-utils.la -lclipper -lsrfftw -lsfftw -lm -lmmdb -lgpp4 -lmmdb g++ -DHAVE_GSL -DPKGDATADIR=\"/usr/share/coot\" -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -fno-strict-aliasing -o .libs/testshelxreader test-shelx-reader.o ./.libs/libcoot-shelx.so ./.libs/libcoot-coord-utils.so ./.libs/libcoot-utils.so -lclipper -lsrfftw -lsfftw -lm -lgpp4 -lmmdb g++ -DHAVE_GSL -DPKGDATADIR=\"/usr/share/coot\" -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -fno-strict-aliasing -o .libs/testcootutils test-utils.o ./.libs/libcoot-shelx.so ./.libs/libcoot-coord-utils.so ./.libs/libcoot-utils.so -lclipper -lsrfftw -lsfftw -lm -lgpp4 -lmmdb /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMDBFile::SetSpaceGroup(char*)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMDBFile::ReadCoorFile(char*, unsigned char)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMDBCoorManager::GetAtom(char*)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMCIFStruct::GetReal(double&, char*, unsigned char)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMCIFFile::ReadMMCIFFile(char*, unsigned char)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMDBCoorManager::GetModel(char*)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMDBFile::WriteMMDBF(char*, unsigned char)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMCIFLoop::GetReal(double&, char*, int, unsigned char)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMDBCoorManager::GetResidue(char*)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMCIFData::GetLoop(char*)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMCIFData::GetStructure(char*)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMDBCoorManager::GetChain(char*)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `FirstOccurence(char*, char)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMCIFLoop::GetInteger(int&, char*, int, unsigned char)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMCIFLoop::GetString(char*, int, int&)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMDBFile::WriteCIFASCII(char*, unsigned char)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMCIFStruct::GetString(char*, int&)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMDBFile::WritePDBASCII(char*, unsigned char)' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [testshelxreader] Error 1 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMDBFile::SetSpaceGroup(char*)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMDBFile::ReadCoorFile(char*, unsigned char)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMDBCoorManager::GetAtom(char*)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMCIFStruct::GetReal(double&, char*, unsigned char)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMCIFFile::ReadMMCIFFile(char*, unsigned char)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMDBCoorManager::GetModel(char*)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMDBFile::WriteMMDBF(char*, unsigned char)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMCIFLoop::GetReal(double&, char*, int, unsigned char)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMDBCoorManager::GetResidue(char*)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMCIFData::GetLoop(char*)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMCIFData::GetStructure(char*)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMDBCoorManager::GetChain(char*)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `FirstOccurence(char*, char)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMCIFLoop::GetInteger(int&, char*, int, unsigned char)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMCIFLoop::GetString(char*, int, int&)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMDBFile::WriteCIFASCII(char*, unsigned char)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMCIFStruct::GetString(char*, int&)' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/../../../../lib64/libclipper.so: undefined reference to `CMMDBFile::WritePDBASCII(char*, unsigned char)' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [testcootutils] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/adam/rpmbuild/BUILD/coot-0.5/coot-utils' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.53148 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.53148 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 12:00:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:00:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447104] Review Request: qdevelop - development environment for QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201200.mAKC0pJp028131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447104 Nicoleau Fabien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-11-20 07:00:49 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qdevelop Short Description: development environment for Qt4 Owners: eponyme Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 12:51:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:51:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201251.mAKCptmn005005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-20 07:51:54 EDT --- ... %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{__python} setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root %{buildroot} ... %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be mixed. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 13:10:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:10:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449037] Review Request: afio - cpio compatible archiver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201310.mAKDAI8s009167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449037 --- Comment #17 from Bruno Cornec 2008-11-20 08:10:13 EDT --- However, it seems Debian asked itself the same question and answered differently: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/1999/05/msg00162.html and http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/1999/05/msg00168.html And I have still no answer from Mark. Will try to see if I can contact him elsewhere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 13:22:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:22:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201322.mAKDM1Dl007024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 --- Comment #8 from Permaine Cheung 2008-11-20 08:22:00 EDT --- I tried a rawhide x86_64 build and it builds successfully, and from root.log, these packages installed: DEBUG util.py:250: java-1.5.0-gcj-devel x86_64 1.5.0.0-22.fc10 fedora 46 k DEBUG util.py:250: java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel i386 1:1.6.0.0-2b12.fc10 fedora 12 M DEBUG util.py:250: java-1.5.0-gcj x86_64 1.5.0.0-22.fc10 fedora 132 k DEBUG util.py:250: java-1.6.0-openjdk i386 1:1.6.0.0-2b12.fc10 fedora 29 M I wonder if openjdk-devel get installed on this buildroot randomly. I tried another i386 build, and it still fails as mentioned above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 13:43:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:43:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472337] Review Request: fabric - A simple pythonic remote deployment tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201343.mAKDhVMX011471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472337 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-20 08:43:30 EDT --- Just some quick comments on your spec file (without any deep investigation ;-) ): - 'License: GPLv2' The license should be GPLv2+. Take a look at the headers of the source: "or (at your option) any later version" - Replace 'BuildRequires: python-devel' with 'BuildRequires: python' https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#BuildRequires - Do you really need 'Requires: python-setuptools' ? - add TODO to %doc - 'Requires: python-paramiko < 2' is from my point of view not necessary because the current version of paramiko is 1.7.4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 13:48:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:48:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472337] Review Request: fabric - A simple pythonic remote deployment tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201348.mAKDmN6j012351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472337 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-20 08:48:22 EDT --- I can't sponsor you because I'm not a sponsor. I suggest that you follow this document to get sponsored. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 14:06:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:06:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472098] Review Request: dekiwiki - a powerful opensource wiki which runs on Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201406.mAKE6awx017179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472098 Andreas Thienemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |andreas at bawue.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |andreas at bawue.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 14:14:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:14:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467643] Review Request: sugar-speak - Speak for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201414.mAKEEC9k018929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467643 --- Comment #6 from Bryan Kearney 2008-11-20 09:14:11 EDT --- Looks like you need to add requires for the following pakcages: numpy espeak Add those, and I am fine. I honestly am fine with the extra mkdir. Post the new requires and I will approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 14:35:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:35:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472098] Review Request: dekiwiki - a powerful opensource wiki which runs on Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201435.mAKEZwxp027999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472098 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Thienemann 2008-11-20 09:35:56 EDT --- David mentioned you'll be needing someone sponsering you. I'll therefore continue with the review. About the dependencies: RPM as used by fedora currently does not offer soft dependencies. Either they are must be fulfilled or they are not needed. I'm usually leaning towards including them as hard dependencies for the users sake. Not everyone reads manuals. :) Some notes about the spec: Wrapping lines at 78chars makes it much more readable. For Requires or BuildRequires lines, the tag can be repeated several times. For the sake of readability: It might be worth considering different .spec files for fedora based and opensuse based distros, the %if/%endif conditionals make reading the spec a bit harder. If you want to keep the single .spec file, at least consider using only one %if %ifelse %endif block and execute all needed actions inside of it instead of repeating the %if %endif construct for a single command. The mkdir -p/cp combo used in the %install phase can be abbreviated as "install -D -m perms source dest". This way the directories leading up to it are created automatically and usually the install part can be written much more condensed. The bigger blocker is IMHO the %post script. Most of the commands it executes are unnecessary and can be implemented during the %install phase. e.g. mkdirs are better done during the %install phase and packaged in the %file section. That way these files are included in the rpmdb and are linked to a package. chmod commands are equally best done during the %install phase. %attr macros can be used in the %file part of the spec to assign special permissions to single files. Calling mozroots to change a local certificate store is a bad idea IMHO. This way possibly existing local policies are circumvented in a install script. Starting mysqld is a bad idea as well. It might be that the real mysqld is on a different machine and the local mysqld is therefore not needed. The dependency on it is acceptable IMHO, but starting it specifically is not. Furthermore, what if the mysqld init script is disabled? Just starting it once will not survice a reboot. Updating the database schema might be acceptable but the general suggestion is to not execute any SQL commands during a %post script but leave it to the system admin in question. They know their system much better then any packager can ever do. David's complaint about the %post script echoing messages is perfectly valid. RPM installations but especially upgrades might be performed at night and fully automated. Nobody is going to see these messages. The concept of rpm is unattended installation and this design principle should not be violated. Can the different %{webroot}/dekiwiki/bin %{webroot}/dekiwiki/editor etc. lines in the %file-section be condensed into one single %{webroot}/dekiwiki/ line? I'll go about building and installing the software later today for detailed review. So much for my first notes about the .spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 14:44:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:44:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201444.mAKEi8n4025190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 --- Comment #6 from John Anderson 2008-11-20 09:44:07 EDT --- Fixed buildroot http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/115301/mumbles-0.4-3.fc9.src.rpm http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/115301/mumbles.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 14:48:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:48:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201448.mAKEmgP6026446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-20 09:48:40 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 14:47:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:47:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470694] Review Request: rubygem-rack - Common API for connecting web frameworks, web servers and layers of software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201447.mAKElvgH026354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470694 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kanarip at kanarip.c | |om) --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-20 09:47:55 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 14:53:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:53:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465897] Review Request: Judy - General purpose dynamic array library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201453.mAKErYvb031434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(cra at wpi.edu) --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-20 09:53:32 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 15:27:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:27:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201527.mAKFRrOC002485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 --- Comment #9 from David Walluck 2008-11-20 10:27:51 EDT --- Why is it only pulled in on x86_64 when it should be the default on i386 also? Is there really something that requires that explicitly or does it have something to do with comps.xml (or who can we ask)? The larger problem is that we will have to force this so that other archs work as well. There's no consistency in the build roots, so we are always forced to change from JPackage to require JDK6. Since we don't have a better solution right now, I will make the JDK change and upload again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 15:32:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:32:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472337] Review Request: fabric - A simple pythonic remote deployment tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201532.mAKFWh4D003617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472337 --- Comment #3 from Silas Sewell 2008-11-20 10:32:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - 'License: GPLv2' The license should be GPLv2+. Take a look at the headers of > the source: "or (at your option) any later version" Fixed. > - Replace 'BuildRequires: python-devel' with 'BuildRequires: python' > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#BuildRequires Fixed. > - Do you really need 'Requires: python-setuptools' ? Yes, it is a requirement. > - add TODO to %doc Fixed. > - 'Requires: python-paramiko < 2' is from my point of view not necessary > because the current version of paramiko is 1.7.4 Fixed (the only reason I added this was because it was explicitly set in the egg). Thanks for your feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 16:08:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:08:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449037] Review Request: afio - cpio compatible archiver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201608.mAKG8srB010906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449037 --- Comment #18 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-11-20 11:08:53 EDT --- The irony there is that Debian is almost certainly not considered a "commercial vendor", thus, not subject to the exception clause. Red Hat Legal has advised (and I agree) that this licensing is non-free. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 16:43:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:43:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471527] Review Request: SNMP++ - SNMP C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201643.mAKGh32A021872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-20 11:43:02 EDT --- For -4: * Soname (In reply to comment #10) > Ok, I spoke with upstream about the soname issue. They basically said that I > should start the versioning at 0.0.0 and they will continue with 1.0.0 on the > next release (3.2.24). I will make that change and upload new rpm and spec > file. - In such case the SONAME of this library should be libsnmp++.so.0, not libsnmp++.so.0.0.0 (while the _name_ of this library can be libsnmp++.so.0.0.0) * undefined non-weak symbols - $ rpmlint snmp++ (you can try rpmlint on installed rpm) reports some undefined non-weak symbols on libsnmp++.so.0.0.0. (you can also check this by $ ldd -r %_libdir/libsnmp++.so.0.0.0 ) For packages providing -devel subpackages, leaving these symbols cannot be allowed because this causes linkage error. It seems that making libsnmp++.so.0.0.0 linked against libssl.so resolves this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 17:12:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:12:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472274] Review Request: atari++ - Unix based emulator of the Atari eight bit computers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201712.mAKHCxsu023545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472274 Miroslav Lichvar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mlichvar at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mlichvar at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Miroslav Lichvar 2008-11-20 12:12:58 EDT --- - rpmlint output: atari++.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/atari++-1.55/CREDITS atari++.x86_64: W: invalid-license TPL Not a blocker, but please convert also CREDITS in the spec. TPL is a valid license. - the package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines - the spec file name matches the base package %{name} - the package meets the Packaging Guidelines - the package is licensed with a Fedora approved license (TPL) - the License field in the package spec file matches the actual license - the file containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc - the spec file is written in American English - the spec file for the package is legible - the source matches the upstream source - all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires - the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing - permissions on files are set properly - the package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - the package consistently uses macros - the package contains code, or permissible content - files included as %doc don't affect the runtime of the application - the package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages - at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - all filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8 - the package builds in mock (at least on x86_64) - the package functions as described Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 17:23:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:23:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472274] Review Request: atari++ - Unix based emulator of the Atari eight bit computers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201723.mAKHNsMS030586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472274 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Dan Hor?k 2008-11-20 12:23:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: atari++ Short Description: Unix based emulator of the Atari eight bit computers Owners: sharkcz Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 17:55:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:55:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472418] New: Review Request: xmbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xmbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472418 Summary: Review Request: xmbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/xmbdfed.spec SRPM URL: http://auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/xmbdfed-4.7-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The XmBDFEditor lets you interactively create new bitmap font files or modify existing ones. It allows editing multiple fonts and multiple glyphs, it allows cut and paste operations between fonts and glyphs and editing font properties. The editor works natively with BDF fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 17:57:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:57:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455137] Review Request: soundmodem - Soundcard Packet Radio Modem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201757.mAKHvb1r031710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455137 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-20 12:57:36 EDT --- This failed to build for me on x86_64 with current rawhide: + ./configure --build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix= --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib64 --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/usr/com --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info checking build system type... Invalid configuration `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu': machine `x86_64-unknown' not recognized configure: error: /bin/sh ./config.sub x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu failed I do not know what that means. Maybe the configure script was simply generated by a really old autotools version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 18:32:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:32:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201832.mAKIW422011455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-20 13:32:03 EDT --- For -0.2 ! First of all, you can try to check your package by rpmlint (in rpmlint package). rpmlint detects some general packaging issues. Then: * Requires ----------------------------------------------------------- Requires: ppl-devel >= 0.10, gmp-devel >= 4.1.3 ----------------------------------------------------------- - This should be for cloog-devel package, not for cloog package * Group - Group for -devel subpackage should be "Development/Libraries", not "Development/Library" * %_infodir/dir - This file must not be installed. Overwriting this file by this rpm breaks system "info" information. * Please remove this file at %install (not %clean) and remove this file from %files * And restore the previous %clean * Shipping static archives - What I meant is that unless some specific reason static archive libfoo.a must be removed (as well as libtool .la file) * calling ldconfig on scriptlet - When using "%post -p /sbin/ldconfig" (i.e. using /sbin/ldconfig directly instead of calling bash and executing ldconfig in the shell script), no other additional scriptlets are allowed. i.e. if there is some other scriptlets than /sbin/ldconfig, you have to write like: ---------------------------------------------------------- %post /sbin/ldconfig /sbin/install-info %{_infodir}/%{name}.info %{_infodir}/dir || : ---------------------------------------------------------- * %changelog - git revision differs between %release and %change.log ? Some header files design flaw - Well, for example the head of %_includedir/cloog/cloog.h says: ---------------------------------------------------------- 40 #ifndef CLOOG_H 41 #define CLOOG_H 42 43 #ifdef CLOOG_PPL_BACKEND 44 # define GNUMP 45 # include 46 #else 47 # include 48 # include 49 #endif ---------------------------------------------------------- However, where can we tell if CLOOG_PPL_BACKEND is defined or not (when this package was built) (i.e whether this header file includes ppl_backend.h or polylib_backend.h)? build.log shows that when rebuilding this package -DCLOOG_PPL_BACKEND is used, however installed header files does not save such information.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 18:35:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:35:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201835.mAKIZ9jH006871@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(shamardin at gmail.c | |om) --- Comment #31 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-20 13:35:06 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 18:55:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:55:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201855.mAKItMoJ010915@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-20 13:55:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > (The tar file says > output will be .xml.. mines coming .conf..). Yes, that was a mistake in the documentation, now fixed, thanks for reporting >How do i decide if a font goes > Dejau or serif? Thats what i dont know how to decide.. DejaVu Sans is a font name, serif is a generic name. Is the tar documentation not clear enough on where you should use generics and where you should use font names? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 19:05:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:05:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467764] Review Request: python-twitter - A python wrapper around the Twitter API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201905.mAKJ5UA9012805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467764 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-11-20 14:05:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-twitter Short Description: A python wrapper around the Twitter API Owners: spot Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 EL-4 EL-5 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 19:14:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:14:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459637] Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201914.mAKJEpLn019361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-20 14:14:50 EDT --- This fails to build for me on x86_64 rawhide: --- Compiling SpanDtmfDecoder.cpp... /usr/include/spandsp/dtmf.h: In member function 'virtual bool SpanDtmfDecoder::initialize()': /usr/include/spandsp/dtmf.h:228: error: too few arguments to function 'void dtmf_rx_parms(dtmf_rx_state_t*, int, int, int, int)' SpanDtmfDecoder.cpp:169: error: at this point in file Also, the build system obscures the compiler calls, but I'm not sure I see any place that would incorporate the regular Fedora compiler flags. There's no mention of %{optflags} or $RPM_OPT_FLAGS in the spec and there's no configure script to call. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 19:26:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:26:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201926.mAKJQ7RZ021905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 --- Comment #10 from Permaine Cheung 2008-11-20 14:26:06 EDT --- I'm not sure it's only pulled in on x64_64 because of some explicit Requires: or it has to do with comps.xml. I'm not sure who we can ask either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 19:34:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:34:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467764] Review Request: python-twitter - A python wrapper around the Twitter API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201934.mAKJYlpm023512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467764 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-20 14:34:46 EDT --- python-twitter-0.5-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-twitter-0.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 19:34:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:34:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467764] Review Request: python-twitter - A python wrapper around the Twitter API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201934.mAKJYimN023482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467764 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-20 14:34:43 EDT --- python-twitter-0.5-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-twitter-0.5-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 19:34:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:34:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467764] Review Request: python-twitter - A python wrapper around the Twitter API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201934.mAKJYf9d023453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467764 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-20 14:34:40 EDT --- python-twitter-0.5-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-twitter-0.5-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 19:50:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:50:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460253] Review Request: qle - A QSO Logger and log Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201950.mAKJorPQ027293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460253 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-20 14:50:52 EDT --- This one builds, and is rather simple. I guess it might be nice to define QSO somewhere in your %description. I guess it makes sense to those who already know what it means, but it means nothing to me. This package should own /etc/qle * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 2e948b64233ded37b80a3e77009f1006bce40428f857a01792f3dd2385a7edb3 qle-0.0.10.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK (maybe define QSO) * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: config(qle) = 0.0.10-2.fc10 qle = 0.0.10-2.fc10 = /bin/bash /usr/bin/perl config(qle) = 0.0.10-2.fc10 cwdaemon hamlib-perl perl perl(Config::General) perl(DBD::SQLite) perl(DBI) perl(English) perl(File::Basename) perl(IO::Socket) perl(Tk) perl(Tk::After) perl(Tk::Bitmap) perl(Tk::ErrorDialog) perl(Tk::ItemStyle) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. It seems to work when I run it, although I've no idea how to do anything. X fails to own /erc/qle * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * desktop files valid and installed properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 19:52:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:52:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438897] Review Request: framewave - Image and signal processing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201952.mAKJqYNo027679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438897 --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-20 14:52:32 EDT --- It's still up to you. If you want to push this package with the test suite issues intact, I'm OK with that; just document the fact in the spec and include a link to the upstream ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 20:17:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:17:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461003] Review Request: ssbd - Voice keyer for use in hamradio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811202017.mAKKH3dI032655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461003 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-20 15:17:01 EDT --- I've no way to test this, but its been sitting for ten weeks and it builds OK so why not? Is it possible to clean up the grammar in the %description? The last sentence needs a period, I'm sure, but honestly I don't have enough context to be able to parse it and suggest improvements. I'm not sure how you arrive at "GPLv2" for the license tag; I can't find any statement of the GPL version in use, which would indicate "GPL+". Have I missed something? The package is missing the proper scriptlet dependencies for service and chkconfig: Requires(post): chkconfig Requires(preun): chkconfig, initscripts Requires(postun): initscripts * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 403fc4ce7da01c83bc2b5da8f8d11643c50dcd04e9f80a7a4f8f2deb041b22ce ssbd-0.10.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. X description could use some cleanup. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. ? license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. X final provides and requires missing chkconfig and service dependencies. config(ssbd) = 0.10-1.fc10 ssbd = 0.10-1.fc10 ssbd(x86-64) = 0.10-1.fc10 = /bin/bash /bin/sh config(ssbd) = 0.10-1.fc10 libglib-1.2.so.0()(64bit) libsndfile.so.1()(64bit) libsndfile.so.1(libsndfile.so.1.0)(64bit) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files X scriptlets OK (service management) but dependencies are missing. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 20:33:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:33:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460253] Review Request: qle - A QSO Logger and log Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811202033.mAKKX0sF004479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460253 --- Comment #3 from Lucian Langa 2008-11-20 15:32:59 EDT --- > I guess it might be nice to define QSO somewhere in your %description. I guess > it makes sense to those who already know what it means, but it means nothing to > me. > > This package should own /etc/qle Updated both: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/qle.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/qle-0.0.10-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 20:45:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:45:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 242228] Review Request: ps2eps - PS-to-EPS converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811202045.mAKKjBV4001844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242228 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #8 from Patrice Dumas 2008-11-20 15:45:10 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ps2eps New Branches: EL-5 Owners: pertusus Terje agreed by mail that I could maintain the EPEL branch. Terje, I think that you should confirm here. Also tell if you want to be comaintaner of EPEL branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 20:48:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:48:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811202048.mAKKmPUd007675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ville.skytta at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #22 from Ville Skytt? 2008-11-20 15:48:23 EDT --- License should be GPLv3 instead of GPL+. Having the scripts in /usr/share/deco and the trigger symlink logic in deco-archive will result in failures with read-only /usr/share (%{_netsharedpath}). The dir where deco looks for the scripts (ie. where they are symlinked in) would be better placed in /var/lib/deco. The "source" script dir is fine in /usr/share/deco. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 20:57:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:57:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463079] Review Request: ibp - A tool to show which IBP beacons are transmitting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811202057.mAKKvstr005011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463079 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-20 15:57:53 EDT --- Not much to say about this one. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: b3b118ca83619f0a5605652a0a8c385c77ada3a10321a771e2d19f9f59604abd ibp-0.21.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: ibp = 0.21-1.fc10 ibp(x86-64) = 0.21-1.fc10 = libX11.so.6()(64bit) libncurses.so.5()(64bit) libtinfo.so.5()(64bit) * %check is not present; seems to run OK although I've no idea how to interpret the output. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. * desktop files valid and installed properly. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 21:02:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:02:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460253] Review Request: qle - A QSO Logger and log Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811202102.mAKL2k2x006168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460253 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-20 16:02:45 EDT --- Looks good; thanks. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 21:17:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:17:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461899] Review Request: thebridge - ILink/EchoLink compatible conference bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811202117.mAKLHBj3009081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461899 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-20 16:17:10 EDT --- This package includes its own, old, copy of zlib, and it seems to build and link against it statically. It really needs to build against the system zlib instead. I'm not sure there's much point in stating that this softwarew runs inder QNX or OS X, as this package certainly won't. I note that 1.06 seems to be the current version. Any reason not to update to it? (I don't know if it has the zlib problem or not.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 21:20:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:20:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811202120.mAKLKUTC009807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 --- Comment #23 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-20 16:20:28 EDT --- Hi Ville, I wasn't very sure what to put for the license tag since no source file that contains code specifies a license in its header. There is only the LICENSE file that claims GPL3, even that file just mentions it in two lines and does not give the full text of GPL3. I have seen in some reviews that whenever the source code files do not specify a specific version of GPL, a generic version (like GPL+ ot GPLv2+) was picked. So do you think that whatever says in that LICENSE file, is enough to specify that the package is GPL3? I'm doing the other changes you asked and update the packages soon. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 21:24:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:24:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461050] Review Request: tucnak2 - VHF contest logging program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811202124.mAKLOh3C015177@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461050 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-20 16:24:41 EDT --- Unfortunately this failed to build for me on x86_64, rawhide: checking size of char... configure: error: cannot compute sizeof (char), 77 See `config.log' for more details. The end of config.log contains: configure:5922: checking size of char configure:6234: gcc -o conftest -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -pthread -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/SDL -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/include/libpng12 -z now conftest.c -lgpm -lm -lutil -lglib-2.0 -pthread -lgthread-2.0 -lrt -lglib-2.0 -lSDL -lpthread -lpng12 -lsndfile -lasound -lftdi -lusb >&5 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lusb collect2: ld returned 1 exit status configure:6237: $? = 1 configure: program exited with status 1 I have no idea why libusb is needed to compute sizeof(char), but there it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 21:33:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:33:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468604] Review Request: echolinux - Linux echolink client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811202133.mAKLX4JQ017066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468604 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-20 16:33:03 EDT --- This builds fine for me and rpmlint is silent. I cannot find any information about the GPL version in use; where did you see anything stating a GPL version? While verifiying the licensing issue, I found echolinux/gsm.h, which says: * Copyright 1992 by Jutta Degener and Carsten Bormann, Technische * Universitaet Berlin. See the accompanying file "COPYRIGHT" for * details. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY FOR THIS SOFTWARE. However, there is no accompanying COPYRIGHT file anywhere in the tarball. I think that without that, we have no rights to use or distribute this software. Also, do you know what libgsm.a is? It looks to me as if it is simply linked into the final application. The above copyright issue and the libgsm.a thing make me seriously doubt that this software is acceptable for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 21:36:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:36:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226356] Merge Review: rcs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811202136.mAKLapOg017886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226356 --- Comment #4 from Ville Skytt? 2008-11-20 16:36:50 EDT --- I'm not quite comfortable with approving this package without at least an explanation why the patch exists apart from that it makes the package compile; it looks and feels "wrong" to me. Please do look into it and report when you find the time and I'll have another look. No rush. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 21:42:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:42:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 242228] Review Request: ps2eps - PS-to-EPS converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811202142.mAKLgX2I018843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242228 --- Comment #9 from Terje R??sten 2008-11-20 16:42:32 EDT --- I can confirm that, thanks Pat! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 21:49:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:49:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467644] Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811202149.mAKLnK1x019891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467644 --- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-20 16:49:19 EDT --- again, Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-memorize.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-memorize-29-1.fc10.src.rpm Thanks for your patience -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 21:53:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:53:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467644] Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811202153.mAKLrsin020862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467644 --- Comment #10 from Simon Schampijer 2008-11-20 16:53:53 EDT --- You have uncommented the lines now - shouldn't we just remove them? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 22:03:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:03:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467644] Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811202203.mAKM3EI0022802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467644 --- Comment #11 from Simon Schampijer 2008-11-20 17:03:13 EDT --- Oh, maybe you wanted to keep it for the git checkout - i have fixed all the upstream sources - so we are save now. I guess it is time to request CVS branches now http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSAdminProcedure :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 22:25:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:25:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811202225.mAKMPuK3022210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 --- Comment #24 from Ville Skytt? 2008-11-20 17:25:54 EDT --- I'm confident that GPLv3 would be the correct choice for this package. GPL+ is correct when a package just includes the general GPL text (usually as COPYING) without being more specific anywhere else (because that's exactly what the GPL text says - any version of the GPL goes then). GPLv2+ on the other hand should be chosen only when something in the package actually explicitly says it is "v2 or later". The only mention of the license here is in the LICENSE file, and it is explicit about GPL v3. It would not hurt to ping upstream to include the whole GPL v3 text in the package and license notices in source files though, but that's not a requirement for the package to pass review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 22:33:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:33:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454667] Review Request: truecrypt - Free open-source disk encryption software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811202233.mAKMXsI2023359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454667 --- Comment #10 from Levente Farkas 2008-11-20 17:33:52 EDT --- since you communicating again it'd be useful if the new license also apply to the older version (like 4.3a too). some of us still believe it has some reason to package that version too. thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 22:40:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:40:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471373] Review Request: rmanage - Remotely monitoring machines on network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811202240.mAKMeSwS030073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471373 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-20 17:40:26 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: F9/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint rmanage-0.1.5-2.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPMs: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint rmanage* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM upstream: 4b28f94766e942662b9cccf936efd984 SHA1SUM of package: 4b28f94766e942662b9cccf936efd984 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F9/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. Tested F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=942180 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. If the license tag is fixed, I see no further blocker, package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 23:30:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:30:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467644] Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811202330.mAKNUD3f006788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467644 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-20 18:30:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sugar-memorize Short Description: Memorize for Sugar Owners: fab Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 23:29:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:29:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467644] Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811202329.mAKNT9Oi006358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467644 --- Comment #12 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-20 18:29:08 EDT --- Thanks Simon. I will remove the lines before cvs check-in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 00:29:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:29:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 233946] Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811210029.mAL0TsuP010156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233946 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #33 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-20 19:29:49 EDT --- Does this do anything at all without xmlrpc-epi? I'm going to assume not and mark it as not being ready; please clear the whiteboard if things progress to a point where it can be reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 00:52:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:52:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470325] Review Request: qd - Double-Double and Quad-Double Arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811210052.mAL0qtGD019340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470325 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-20 19:52:54 EDT --- I would posit that this shouldn't go in until we can either get a shared library out of this or at least get some kind of upstream confirmation that you really can't build it that way. You can ship the static librar(y|ies), if you like, in a separate -static package. And the headers should go in a -devel package, as rpmlint dutifully complains. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 00:53:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:53:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472337] Review Request: fabric - A simple pythonic remote deployment tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811210053.mAL0rw1P013616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472337 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-20 19:53:57 EDT --- Please bump the release of your spec file if you made any changes and add a changelog entry. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs At the moment your entry ends with '...ll.ch> - 0.0.9.-1' rpmlint complains about this: fabric.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.0.9.-1 ['0.0.9-1.fc10', '0.0.9-1'] There is another issue: fabric.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/fabric.py 0644 SRPM: [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint fab* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=942633 (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > - Do you really need 'Requires: python-setuptools' ? > > Yes, it is a requirement. I'm able to build this package without 'Requires: python-setuptools'. But I'm not very familiar with the *.egg stuff. I thought that 'BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel' is responsible for providing the egg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 01:05:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:05:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471527] Review Request: SNMP++ - SNMP C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811210105.mAL15DdT021361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 --- Comment #15 from Hayden James 2008-11-20 20:05:12 EDT --- Updated fixing the last two problems: http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/snmp++.spec http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/snmp++-3.2.23-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 01:08:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:08:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471527] Review Request: SNMP++ - SNMP C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811210108.mAL1871g016141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 --- Comment #16 from Hayden James 2008-11-20 20:08:07 EDT --- Also can you take a look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 I think this package is more important and should be ready to go (famous last words). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 01:25:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:25:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467791] Review Request: vtun - Virtual tunnel over TCP/IP networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811210125.mAL1PFjP024496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467791 Gabriel Somlo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 01:55:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:55:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472149] Review Request: refmac-dictionary - chemical ligand dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811210155.mAL1tDOd023853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472149 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-20 20:55:12 EDT --- Can you indicate where you see a statement that this package is under LGPLv3? All I see is the COPYING file, which has the usual language indicating that any LGPL version applies unless there is some indication of a specific choice of version. This would indicate LGPLv2+ (since there was no LGPLv1). In case you don't know and don't like typing, you can write BuildArchitectures: as just BuildArch:. Is there any reason to have the "data" directory, instead of just putting the monomers directly into %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}? It just seems a bit odd to have two successive directories with nothing in them except for another directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 02:45:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:45:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472337] Review Request: fabric - A simple pythonic remote deployment tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811210245.mAL2jig8004954@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472337 --- Comment #5 from Silas Sewell 2008-11-20 21:45:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Please bump the release of your spec file if you made any changes and add a > changelog entry. Fixed. > fabric.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/fabric.py 0644 fabric.py is never called directly (and would not do anything if it was) and site-packages modules generally don't have the executable permission. This issue was also raised in this request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351251 Example: [ssewell at gm ~]$ ll /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/*.py -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 14299 2008-04-03 10:14 /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/aotcompile.py -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 32345 2008-08-25 15:06 /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/audit.py -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10245 2008-07-03 05:36 /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/augeas.py -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7389 2006-08-22 08:18 /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/classfile.py -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 33 2008-08-05 00:05 /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/dbus_bindings.py ... > I'm able to build this package without 'Requires: python-setuptools'. But I'm > not very familiar with the *.egg stuff. I thought that 'BuildRequires: > python-setuptools-devel' is responsible for providing the egg. You are correct, but the requirement comes from the import of pkg_resources in the "fab" command. If python-setuptools is not installed on the local machine the "fab" command will not run. /usr/bin/fab: 5 from pkg_resources import load_entry_point 6 7 sys.exit( 8 load_entry_point('Fabric==0.0.9', 'console_scripts', 'fab')() 9 ) PkgResources: http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/PkgResources == Updated Media == Spec URL: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/rpm/fabric/fabric.spec SRPM URL: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/rpm/fabric/fabric-0.0.9-3.fc9.src.rpm Thanks again, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 03:25:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:25:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811210325.mAL3Pjen011546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 --- Comment #25 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-20 22:25:44 EDT --- Alright, files updated: SPEC: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/deco.spec SRPM: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/deco-1.5.7-2.fc9.src.rpm %changelog - License is GPLv3. - The extraction scripts will be inside %%{_var}/lib/%%{name}. note: I updated deco-archive too, accordingly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 03:27:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:27:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469134] Review Request: deco-archive - Extraction scripts for various archive formats for use of deco In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811210327.mAL3R0MA011753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469134 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-20 22:26:59 EDT --- Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/deco-archive.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/deco-archive-1.2-3.fc9.src.rpm %changelog - License is GPLv3. - Install the scripts in %%{_datadir}/%%{name} and the symlinks in %%{var}/lib/deco. Note that deco is updated accordingly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 03:26:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:26:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471373] Review Request: rmanage - Remotely monitoring machines on network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811210326.mAL3QTjj011679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471373 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-20 22:26:28 EDT --- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rmanage Short Description: Remotely monitoring machines on network Owners: paragn ashokdas Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 03:27:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:27:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471373] Review Request: rmanage - Remotely monitoring machines on network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811210327.mAL3R68G006364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471373 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 03:40:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:40:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459387] Review Request: libtool2 - The GNU Portable Library Tool v2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811210340.mAL3efkY014648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459387 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-20 22:40:39 EDT --- Is there any point to this ticket now that the base libtool package has simply been updated to version 2? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 03:54:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:54:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458866] Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811210354.mAL3sRP3011062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-20 22:54:25 EDT --- A couple of comments: If you're going to, for whatever reason, use macros like %__make and %{__mv}, you need to be consistent: either use the brackets or don't, and then you need to use %{__rm} instead of just "rm". Or just drop the macros entirely and save the typing. rpmlint complains about the .packlist file. Honestly I'm not sure why you would even need to package it, and if you check the perl package template you'll see that it deletes .packlist files and then goes through and deletes empty directory trees. In fact, perhaps you might want to take a look at the template; it might give you some hints for better ways to do some things. Install the rpmdevtools package and look at /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-perl.spec. In any case, it's always useful to run rpmlint on your packages (both the source RPM and the final built packages). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 05:27:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:27:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471373] Review Request: rmanage - Remotely monitoring machines on network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811210527.mAL5R427025527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471373 --- Comment #7 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-11-21 00:27:03 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 05:27:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:27:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471373] Review Request: rmanage - Remotely monitoring machines on network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811210527.mAL5RG1W025579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471373 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 05:47:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:47:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460253] Review Request: qle - A QSO Logger and log Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811210547.mAL5lAG8028809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460253 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Lucian Langa 2008-11-21 00:47:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qle Short Description: A QSO Logger and log Editor Owners: lucilanga Branches: F-8 F-9 devel EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 05:49:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:49:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463079] Review Request: ibp - A tool to show which IBP beacons are transmitting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811210549.mAL5n6WU028887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463079 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Lucian Langa 2008-11-21 00:49:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ibp Short Description: A tool to show which IBP beacons are transmitting Owners: lucilanga Branches: F-8 F-9 devel EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 06:11:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 01:11:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461003] Review Request: ssbd - Voice keyer for use in hamradio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811210611.mAL6B7kB032343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461003 --- Comment #2 from Lucian Langa 2008-11-21 01:11:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Is it possible to clean up the grammar in the %description? The last sentence > needs a period, I'm sure, but honestly I don't have enough context to be able > to parse it and suggest improvements. updated > I'm not sure how you arrive at "GPLv2" for the license tag; I can't find any > statement of the GPL version in use, which would indicate "GPL+". Have I > missed something? Package contains license text. See COPYING. > The package is missing the proper scriptlet dependencies for service and > chkconfig: > > Requires(post): chkconfig > Requires(preun): chkconfig, initscripts > Requires(postun): initscripts updated new version: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/ssbd.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/ssbd-0.10-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 06:44:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 01:44:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461050] Review Request: tucnak2 - VHF contest logging program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811210644.mAL6i5GV004569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461050 --- Comment #3 from Lucian Langa 2008-11-21 01:44:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > configure:6234: gcc -o conftest -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 > -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic > -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -pthread > -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/SDL > -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/include/libpng12 -z now conftest.c > -lgpm -lm -lutil -lglib-2.0 -pthread -lgthread-2.0 -lrt -lglib-2.0 -lSDL > -lpthread -lpng12 -lsndfile -lasound -lftdi -lusb >&5 > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lusb > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > configure:6237: $? = 1 > configure: program exited with status 1 > > I have no idea why libusb is needed to compute sizeof(char), but there it is. conftest is compiled against $LIBS which contains among other things -lusb. Anyway it should be harmless as tucnak2 requires libftdi which requires libusb. Updated BR... new version: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/tucnak2.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/tucnak2-2.14-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 08:20:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:20:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471373] Review Request: rmanage - Remotely monitoring machines on network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811210820.mAL8KgCR026275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471373 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-21 03:20:41 EDT --- rmanage-0.1.5-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rmanage-0.1.5-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 10:17:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:17:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469548] Review Request: ap-utils - Configure and monitor Wireless Access Points In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211017.mALAHU8L008305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469548 Alec Leamas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |leamas.alec at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Alec Leamas 2008-11-21 05:17:29 EDT --- Hi! I promised to make yet another review... Summary: OK besides some missing document files. A question mark on all the compiler warnigs when building, though. MUST stuff: rpmlint must be run on every package... - OK (No errors or warnings on srpm or spec file.) The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . - OK The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, - OK The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . - OK. The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license... - OK The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - OK (some files have GPLv+ notices, but GPLv2 is the common denominator). The text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc - OK The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - OK The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source - OK (ebdb2a03302648c939ac965617de2889) The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms. - OK, on my Fedora 9/X86_64 box. Lots of compiler warnings " warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness" while building." for constructs with a short and a literal #define int. Seems acceptable to me. (Upstream report?) All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires - OK (since mock is OK, see below) The spec file MUST handle locales properly. - OK Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files - NA If the package is designed to be relocatable... - NA A package must own all directories that it creates - NOK. The %doc section lists Documentation/*.html Documentation/FAQ but these are not present at all in the generated RPM. A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - OK Permissions on files must be set properly - OK Each package must have a %clean section, rm -rf %{buildroot} - OK Each package must consistently use macros... - OK The package must contain code, or permissable content. - OK Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage - TBD (Havn't seen those HTML files yet). If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present - OK Header files must be in a -devel package. - NA Static libraries must be in a -static package. - NA Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must... - NA If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1 - NA If a package contains library files with a suffix... - NA devel packages must require the base package using... - NA Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives - OK Packages containing GUI applications... - NA (ncurses apps are not considered being graphical) Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages - OK At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} - OK All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. - OK SHOULD - The upstream license file (GPLv2) is present. - Localized descriptions are not available what I can see. - Builds OK in mock, on a Fedora-9/x86_64 configuration - There are no scriptlets. - All apps works to the point of a help message or an initial ncurses screen. - There are no subpackages, pkgconfig .pc file or file deps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 10:55:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:55:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471522] Review Request: otl - OTL library for database connections and queries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211055.mALAtKsv014939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471522 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-21 05:55:19 EDT --- otl-4.0.176-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 10:56:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:56:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226663] Merge Review: ypbind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211056.mALAukFw015447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226663 --- Comment #9 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2008-11-21 05:56:39 EDT --- To make this complete: (In reply to comment #8) > Thanks for working on this. I checked out the current devel branch; it builds > fine; rpmlint says: > > ypbind.src: W: strange-permission ypbind.init 0755 > I don't understand why rpmlint is complaining here. This seems fine to me. Seems fine to me too. > > ypbind.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.20.4-9 > ['3:1.20.4-9.fc10', '3:1.20.4-9'] > Again, this seems quite OK. I'm guessing that it is complaining about not > seeing the epoch in the changelog version, but don't think we generally add it > there. I'll add epoch to changelog entries. I'm not sure if this must be, but it's missing only last few commits, so let rpmlint be happy:) > > So all of that looks bogus. I assume that the OTHER_YPBIND_OPTS thing is > something to be set in /etc/sysconfig/network instead of being edited into the > initscript. You're right, configuration should be done in /etc/sysconfig/network (and this file is then included in init script). > > The changes to the package look good; packaging-wise I have no complaints. > It's a bit odd seeing %{PACKAGE_VERSION} in the spec instead of %{version}; > I've never seen it before but it seems to work well enough. Interesting, I missed it... I'll change it to %{version}, I have no knowledge of %{PACKAGE_VERSION}. %{version} is common, let's use it. > > Any idea why autoreconf is run? There's been a bunch of discussion about > whether this should ever be run in a package, and while I don't fully > understand that discussion, I do think it would be good to ensure that the > autoreconf call is really needed and to add comments to the spec as > appropriate. I note that rpmdiff shows only timestamp differences between a > build that calls autoreconf and one that doesn't. autoreconf is used to generate new configure script and Makefile when configure.in/.ac, Makefile.in files are changed (patched). There's no patch changing it at the moment (one patch is changing variable in "po" directory, this is only one source of unsureness for me), so autoreconf call is IMHO not necessary. autoconf and automake in BuildRequires is then not necessary too. I'll discuss it rather yet, but it seems to be redundant. Fedora relate info is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/AutoConf > > As for the initscript patch in comment #7, it seems correct on its face but > it's a bit tough to read with only a non-context diff and I'm not really an > expert with the whole LSB init comment block thing anyway. Unfortunately I no > longer have any vestige of my NIS infrastructure around so I can't test this at > all. OK, there's open bugzilla on init script issue, so I think there's no need to resolve it here. > > So really the only open issue I see is the autoreconf thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 10:57:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:57:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467764] Review Request: python-twitter - A python wrapper around the Twitter API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211057.mALAvAan021621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467764 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-21 05:57:08 EDT --- python-twitter-0.5-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 10:57:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:57:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211057.mALAvRNY021727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-21 05:57:17 EDT --- quickfix-1.12.4-6.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 10:57:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:57:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471809] Review Request: gnome-gmail-notifier - A simple application that monitors Gmail inboxes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211057.mALAvtQ9021820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471809 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-21 05:57:54 EDT --- gnome-gmail-notifier-0.9.4-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 10:57:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:57:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467764] Review Request: python-twitter - A python wrapper around the Twitter API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211057.mALAvDrZ021675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467764 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 10:57:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:57:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471809] Review Request: gnome-gmail-notifier - A simple application that monitors Gmail inboxes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211057.mALAvvvE021852@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471809 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 11:02:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:02:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467764] Review Request: python-twitter - A python wrapper around the Twitter API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211102.mALB2jFc023453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467764 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-21 06:02:43 EDT --- python-twitter-0.5-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 11:04:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:04:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470502] Review Request: kde-plasma-runcommand - Simple plasmoid to run commands without using terminal or KRunner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211104.mALB4WeC023837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470502 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-21 06:04:31 EDT --- kde-plasma-runcommand-0.7-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 11:04:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:04:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470502] Review Request: kde-plasma-runcommand - Simple plasmoid to run commands without using terminal or KRunner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211104.mALB4Zit018341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470502 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 11:36:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:36:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459387] Review Request: libtool2 - The GNU Portable Library Tool v2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211136.mALBa07k029676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459387 Karsten Hopp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #9 from Karsten Hopp 2008-11-21 06:35:58 EDT --- no, I'll close it. The libtool-2 package in Rawhide uses the spec file from libtool-1.5 which already had a review AFAIK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 13:02:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:02:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459637] Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211302.mALD2stb008100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637 --- Comment #3 from Lucian Langa 2008-11-21 08:02:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > --- Compiling SpanDtmfDecoder.cpp... > /usr/include/spandsp/dtmf.h: In member function 'virtual bool > SpanDtmfDecoder::initialize()': > /usr/include/spandsp/dtmf.h:228: error: too few arguments to function 'void > dtmf_rx_parms(dtmf_rx_state_t*, int, int, int, int)' > SpanDtmfDecoder.cpp:169: error: at this point in file Patch2 was not applied. Fixed. > Also, the build system obscures the compiler calls, but I'm not sure I see any > place that would incorporate the regular Fedora compiler flags. There's no > mention of %{optflags} or $RPM_OPT_FLAGS in the spec and there's no configure > script to call. Fixed. A few notes: rpmlint libasync.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libasyncaudio-0.16.1.so exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 libasync.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libasynccpp-0.16.1.so exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 libasync-devel.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libasyncaudio-0.16.1.so exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 libasync-devel.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libasynccpp-0.16.1.so exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 Not entirely sure but I think it safe. >From what I could see there are 2 calls both internal error handling. I will address this upstream anyway. libasync.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency libasync-devel.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency I am unable to fix, package does not use libtool and passing -Wl,-as-needed won't work (fails with undefined reference) I think the above are harmless. new version: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/svxlink.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/svxlink-080730-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 13:25:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:25:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471829] Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211325.mALDPTZ0018210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 Hayden James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 13:31:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:31:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468539] Review Request: sugar-jukebox - Media player activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211331.mALDVnrH014567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468539 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bkearney at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bkearney at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Bryan Kearney 2008-11-21 08:31:47 EDT --- OK - Package name OK - License info is accurate OK - License tag is correct and licenses are approved OK - License files are installed as %doc OK - Specfile name OK - Specfile is legible OK - No prebuilt binaries included OK - BuildRoot value (one of the recommended values) OK - PreReq not used XX - Source md5sum matches upstream These do not match, and upstream is "hidden". Please change to a checkout from source repo. OK - No hardcoded pathnames OK - Package owns all the files it installs OK - 'Requires' create needed unowned directories OK - Package builds successfully on i386 and x86_64 (mock) OK - BuildRequires sufficient OK - File permissions set properly OK - Macro usage is consistent OK - rpmlint is silent Warnings are OK I have not installed it onto a blank sugar install yet, but have you verified all the imports are in the Requires? Please resolve the source code and I will re-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 13:42:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:42:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468604] Review Request: echolinux - Linux echolink client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211342.mALDg8WI021756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468604 --- Comment #2 from Lucian Langa 2008-11-21 08:42:07 EDT --- The name of the license is gpl.txt (included in the package). The rest of the files (not all of them) have the following header: /***************************** This is an alpha release of echlinux. Copyright 2002 Jeff Pierce wd4nmq. This software is covered by the included GNU Public License, GPL. $Log$ ****************************/ (In reply to comment #1) > However, there is no accompanying COPYRIGHT file anywhere in the tarball. I > think that without that, we have no rights to use or distribute this software. > > The above copyright issue and the libgsm.a thing make me seriously doubt that > this software is acceptable for Fedora. gsm.h comes from package gsm (hence the header). I could probably modify the include. > Also, do you know what libgsm.a is? It looks to me as if it is simply linked > into the final application. Some idiotic way of linking against a certain version of libgsm. See my Patch2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 13:44:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:44:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470547] Review Request: SEMI - MIME rendering library for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211344.mALDinpT016903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470547 --- Comment #6 from Vitaly Mayatskikh 2008-11-21 08:44:48 EDT --- Thanks for your comments, Alec! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 14:22:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:22:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455137] Review Request: soundmodem - Soundcard Packet Radio Modem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211422.mALEM9cl030746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455137 --- Comment #4 from Lucian Langa 2008-11-21 09:22:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > I do not know what that means. Maybe the configure script was simply generated > by a really old autotools version? I've used autotools to update. new ver: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/soundmodem.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/soundmodem-0.10-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 14:45:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:45:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468579] Review Request: PyQuante - Python Quantum Chemistry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211445.mALEjfVG029786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468579 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-21 09:45:39 EDT --- Fixed license tag to BSD (the license is almost the same as New BSD 3 clause license, only difference is BSD: THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS AS IS PyQuante: THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS AS IS I don't think there's anything wrong with the %files section, since the package doesn't end up owning any directories or files it shouldn't. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/PyQuante.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/PyQuante-1.6.1-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 15:04:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:04:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472525] New: Review Request: kio_sysinfo - KIO slave which shows basic system information Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kio_sysinfo - KIO slave which shows basic system information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472525 Summary: Review Request: kio_sysinfo - KIO slave which shows basic system information Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jreznik at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/kio_sysinfo/kio_sysinfo.spec SRPM URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/kio_sysinfo/kio_sysinfo-20081121-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is a sysinfo:/ KIO slave, which shows basic system information often requested by users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 15:05:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:05:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472525] Review Request: kio_sysinfo - KIO slave which shows basic system information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211505.mALF5Ep7001375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472525 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ltinkl at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 15:22:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:22:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468539] Review Request: sugar-jukebox - Media player activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211522.mALFM62v004700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468539 --- Comment #8 from Bryan Kearney 2008-11-21 10:22:05 EDT --- I was able to install it, and "run" it. But.. it did not do anything. Is there a way for me to verify it is working? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 16:13:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:13:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471829] Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211613.mALGDPMN018716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 16:29:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:29:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471527] Review Request: snmp++ - SNMP C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211629.mALGTnxZ021707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Summary|Review Request: SNMP++ - |Review Request: snmp++ - |SNMP C++ library |SNMP C++ library Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-21 11:29:48 EDT --- Okay. --------------------------------------------------------------- This package (snmp++) is APROVED by mtasaka --------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 16:27:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:27:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468414] Review Request: hamcrest - Hamcrest matcher object framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211627.mALGRP0Q016470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468414 David Walluck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 16:32:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:32:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211632.mALGWX9e022294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 --- Comment #11 from David Walluck 2008-11-21 11:32:32 EDT --- Spec URL: SRPM URL: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 16:53:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:53:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211653.mALGrBQX026187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-21 11:53:10 EDT --- Please submit push requests for F-10/9/8 on bodhi: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 16:54:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:54:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211654.mALGskx4026407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-21 11:54:45 EDT --- Please submit push requests for F-10/9/8 on bodhi: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 16:55:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:55:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211655.mALGtBnp021505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-21 11:55:10 EDT --- Sorry for duplicate comments... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 16:55:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:55:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211655.mALGtIUQ021543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-21 11:55:17 EDT --- Please submit push requests for F-10/9/8 on bodhi: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 16:53:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:53:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472542] New: Review Request: afuse - An automounter implemented with FUSE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: afuse - An automounter implemented with FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472542 Summary: Review Request: afuse - An automounter implemented with FUSE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/afuse.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/afuse-0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Afuse is an automounting file system implemented in user-space using FUSE. Afuse currently implements the most basic functionality that can be expected by an automounter; that is it manages a directory of virtual directories. If one of these virtual directories is accessed and is not already automounted, afuse will attempt to mount a filesystem onto that directory. If the mount succeeds the requested access proceeds as normal, otherwise it will fail with an error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 16:57:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:57:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211657.mALGvKp5021946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-21 11:57:19 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 16:59:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:59:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211659.mALGxDQF022122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(trausche at fedorapr | |oject.org) --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-21 11:59:10 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 17:02:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:02:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466301] Review Request: ario - Music Player Daemon Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211702.mALH2wZh023018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466301 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(johnhford at gmail.c | |om) --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-21 12:02:56 EDT --- Please rebuild this package on koji and for F-10/8/9 please submit push requests on bodhi: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 17:40:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:40:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461899] Review Request: thebridge - ILink/EchoLink compatible conference bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211740.mALHeCGf029087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461899 --- Comment #3 from Lucian Langa 2008-11-21 12:40:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > This package includes its own, old, copy of zlib, and it seems to build and > link against it statically. It really needs to build against the system zlib > instead. Fixed. > I'm not sure there's much point in stating that this softwarew runs inder QNX > or OS X, as this package certainly won't. Updated. > I note that 1.06 seems to be the current version. Any reason not to update to > it? (I don't know if it has the zlib problem or not.) Updated. (same zlib issue). new version: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/thebridge.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/thebridge-1.06-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 17:41:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:41:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461003] Review Request: ssbd - Voice keyer for use in hamradio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211741.mALHffl1001835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461003 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-21 12:41:39 EDT --- I know the package contains the license text. But did you actually read it? It contains version 2 of the GPL, and clause 9 says: " If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation. " http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing says: " A GPL or LGPL licensed package that lacks any statement of what version that it's licensed under in the source code/program output/accompanying docs is technically licensed under *any* version of the GPL or LGPL, not just the version in whatever COPYING file they include. " So, I ask again, where do you see that a version of the GPL is specified? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 17:56:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:56:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461003] Review Request: ssbd - Voice keyer for use in hamradio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211756.mALHuFeZ004146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461003 --- Comment #4 from Lucian Langa 2008-11-21 12:56:14 EDT --- updated: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/ssbd.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/ssbd-0.10-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 17:57:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:57:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469590] Review Request: cpuid - Dumps information about the CPU(s) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211757.mALHvWhn031719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469590 --- Comment #14 from Dan Hor?k 2008-11-21 12:57:31 EDT --- ping Didn't you forget to push the update to "stable"? New packages can go directly into stable and there is special type for such update (newpackage). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 18:05:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:05:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472542] Review Request: afuse - An automounter implemented with FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211805.mALI5rXp001015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472542 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-11-21 13:05:52 EDT --- Helpful companion to fuse. I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 18:08:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:08:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468604] Review Request: echolinux - Linux echolink client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211808.mALI89CF006241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468604 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-21 13:08:08 EDT --- I know that other files have that header, but the file in question does not. Without the accompanying COPYRIGHT file its not possible to determine what the license on that particular header is, and we have no redistribution rights at all. Now, given context we can tell that it comes from the gsm package, which is already in Fedora and carries an MIT license. However, I chatted with the legal expert and the bottom line is that unless we can go back in time and find something with that exact version of the header that has the COPYRIGHT file intact, we have no way to prove that the license didn't change at some point and hence the gsm.h and libgsm.a files need to be treated as prohibited source and actually removed from the tarball that gets packed into the srpm. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code for more details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 18:28:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:28:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468604] Review Request: echolinux - Linux echolink client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211828.mALISZoK005236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468604 --- Comment #4 from Lucian Langa 2008-11-21 13:28:34 EDT --- well, gsm.h from this package contains the RCS tag /*$Header: /home/kbs/jutta/src/gsm/gsm-1.0/inc/RCS/gsm.h,v 1.4 1993/01/29 20:07:38 jutta Exp $*/ here's a snippet from ChangeLog from that period: Tue Jan 25 22:53:40 1994 Jutta Degener (jutta at kugelbus) * Release 1.0 Patchlevel 3 changed rpe.c's STEP macro to work with 16-bit integers, thanks to Dr Alex Lee (alexlee at solomon.technet.sg); removed non-fatal bugs from add-test.dta, private.h and toast_audio.c, thanks to P. Emanuelsson. Fri Jan 29 19:02:12 1993 Jutta Degener (jutta at kraftbus) * Release 1.0 Patchlevel 2 fixed L_add(0,-1) in src/add.c and inc/private.h, thanks to Raphael Trommer at AT&T Bell Laboratories; various other ANSI C compatibility details Fri Oct 30 17:58:54 1992 Jutta Degener (jutta at kraftbus) * Release 1.0 Patchlevel 1 Switched uid/gid in toast's [f]chown calls. Wed Oct 28 14:12:35 1992 Carsten Bormann (cabo at kubus) * Release 1.0: released Copyright 1992 by Jutta Degener and Carsten Bormann, Technische Universitaet Berlin. See the accompanying file "COPYRIGHT" for details. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY FOR THIS SOFTWARE. Here's the content of COPYING: Copyright 1992, 1993, 1994 by Jutta Degener and Carsten Bormann, Technische Universitaet Berlin Any use of this software is permitted provided that this notice is not removed and that neither the authors nor the Technische Universitaet Berlin are deemed to have made any representations as to the suitability of this software for any purpose nor are held responsible for any defects of this software. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY FOR THIS SOFTWARE. As a matter of courtesy, the authors request to be informed about uses this software has found, about bugs in this software, and about any improvements that may be of general interest. Berlin, 28.11.1994 Jutta Degener Carsten Bormann -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 18:48:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:48:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446989] Review Request: python-epsilon - A small utility package that depends on tools too recent for Twisted In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211848.mALImVB0013479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446989 Mauricio Teixeira changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mteixeira at webset. | |net) | --- Comment #4 from Mauricio Teixeira 2008-11-21 13:48:29 EDT --- Jason, sorry for taking so long, but I was very busy. So, I have updated the package with your suggestions. Regarding the file lists, I just followed the packaging guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#Byte_Compiled_Files Would you please review it again? Spec URL: http://mteixeira.webset.net/mock/python-epsilon.spec SRPM URL: http://mteixeira.webset.net/mock/python-axiom-0.5.30-1.fc9.src.rpm Also, would you please review #446990 and #446991? They're all related. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 18:53:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:53:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459800] Review Request: python-py - Innovative python library containing py.test, greenlets and other niceties In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211853.mALIrb3H014458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459800 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Moschny 2008-11-21 13:53:36 EDT --- The py.magic.greenlet code does not work on ppc/ppc64, and the corresponding test segfaults. So far, upstream has not been able to reproduce that, and thus there's no fix yet, that's why we are currently stalled here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 19:06:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:06:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211906.mALJ6C7U012537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 --- Comment #12 from Permaine Cheung 2008-11-21 14:06:11 EDT --- Naming - OK Legal - OK Licensing - OK - LGPLv3 No inclusion of pre-built binaries or libraries - OK, removed in %prep verify any sources and patches : * Should the TOMCAT_CFG file be set to /etc/jbossweb/jbossweb2.conf instead of /etc/jbossweb/jbossweb.conf in jbossweb2-2.1-tool-wrapper.script? verify that the license stated in the spec file matches the actual license of the software - OK skim the summary and description for typos and oddities - OK make sure that the correct build root is used - OK ensure that macro usage is consistent - OK * rpmlint output: [pcheung at tonka result]$ rpmlint jbossweb2-2.1.1-4.2.fc10.src.rpm jbossweb2.src:86: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/lsb/init-functions jbossweb2.src:87: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/lsb/init-functions jbossweb2.src:145: W: unversioned-explicit-provides jsp21 jbossweb2.src:173: W: unversioned-explicit-provides servlet6 jbossweb2.src:174: W: unversioned-explicit-provides servlet25 jbossweb2.src: W: non-standard-group Networking/Daemons [pcheung at tonka result]$ rpmlint jbossweb2-2.1.1-4.2.fc10.noarch.rpm jbossweb2.noarch: E: non-standard-gid /var/cache/jbossweb2/temp jbossweb jbossweb2.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/cache/jbossweb2/temp 0775 jbossweb2.noarch: E: non-standard-gid /var/lib/jbossweb2/webapps jbossweb jbossweb2.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/jbossweb2/webapps 0775 jbossweb2.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/jbossweb2/webapps /var/lib/jbossweb2/webapps jbossweb2.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/jbossweb2/conf /etc/jbossweb2 jbossweb2.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/jbossweb2/lib /usr/share/java/jbossweb2 jbossweb2.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/jbossweb2/lib /usr/share/java/jbossweb2 jbossweb2.noarch: E: non-standard-gid /var/cache/jbossweb2/work jbossweb jbossweb2.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/cache/jbossweb2/work 0775 jbossweb2.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/jbossweb2/work /var/cache/jbossweb2/work jbossweb2.noarch: E: non-standard-gid /etc/jbossweb2/tomcat-users.xml jbossweb jbossweb2.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/jbossweb2/tomcat-users.xml 0660 jbossweb2.noarch: E: non-standard-gid /var/log/jbossweb2 jbossweb jbossweb2.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/jbossweb2 0775 jbossweb2.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/jbossweb2/temp /var/cache/jbossweb2/temp jbossweb2.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/jbossweb2/logs /var/log/jbossweb2 jbossweb2.noarch: E: non-standard-gid /etc/jbossweb2/Catalina/localhost jbossweb jbossweb2.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/jbossweb2/Catalina/localhost 0775 jbossweb2.noarch: W: non-standard-group Networking/Daemons jbossweb2.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm jbossweb2.noarch: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/init.d/jbossweb2 ${NAME} jbossweb2.noarch: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/init.d/jbossweb2 ${NAME} jbossweb2.noarch: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/init.d/jbossweb2 ${NAME} jbossweb2.noarch: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/init.d/jbossweb2 ${NAME} [pcheung at tonka result]$ rpmlint jbossweb2-admin-webapps-2.1.1-4.2.fc10.noarch.rpm jbossweb2-admin-webapps.noarch: W: no-documentation jbossweb2-admin-webapps.noarch: W: non-standard-group System Environment/Applications [pcheung at tonka result]$ rpmlint jbossweb2-docs-webapp-2.1.1-4.2.fc10.noarch.rpm jbossweb2-docs-webapp.noarch: W: no-documentation jbossweb2-docs-webapp.noarch: W: non-standard-group System Environment/Applications [pcheung at tonka result]$ rpmlint jbossweb2-javadoc-2.1.1-4.2.fc10.noarch.rpm [pcheung at tonka result]$ rpmlint jbossweb2-jsp-2.1-api-2.1.1-4.2.fc10.noarch.rpm jbossweb2-jsp-2.1-api.noarch: W: no-documentation jbossweb2-jsp-2.1-api.noarch: W: non-standard-group Internet/WWW/Dynamic Content [pcheung at tonka result]$ rpmlint jbossweb2-lib-2.1.1-4.2.fc10.noarch.rpm jbossweb2-lib.noarch: W: no-documentation jbossweb2-lib.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/java/jbossweb2/jbossweb2-servlet-2.5-api-2.1.1.jar ../jbossweb2-servlet-2.5-api-2.1.1.jar jbossweb2-lib.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/java/jbossweb2/jbossweb2-jsp-2.1-api-2.1.1.jar ../jbossweb2-jsp-2.1-api-2.1.1.jar jbossweb2-lib.noarch: W: non-standard-group Development/Compilers jbossweb2-lib.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm [pcheung at tonka result]$ rpmlint jbossweb2-servlet-2.5-api-2.1.1-4.2.fc10.noarch.rpm jbossweb2-servlet-2.5-api.noarch: W: no-documentation jbossweb2-servlet-2.5-api.noarch: W: non-standard-group Internet/WWW/Dynamic Content [pcheung at tonka result]$ rpmlint jbossweb2-webapps-2.1.1-4.2.fc10.noarch.rpm jbossweb2-webapps.noarch: W: no-documentation jbossweb2-webapps.noarch: W: non-standard-group System Environment/Applications Changelog - OK Tags - OK Requires - OK BuildRequires - OK Summary & description - OK Encoding - OK Documentation - OK Initscripts * Following https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript, this needs the following : # This is for /sbin/service Requires(preun): initscripts and also a # description line following right after chkconfig: line Why does the init script use the lsb/init-functions instead of the regular one? File and Directory ownership - OK Users and Groups: * Should the shell for jbossweb /sbin/nologin? Web Applications - OK * Should the default TOMCAT_USER be jbossweb2(instead of tomcat) in /etc/jbossweb/jbossweb2.2.1.init? No Files or Directories under /srv - OK All patches should have an upstream bug link or comment: * Please add comments for the patches The BuildRequires and Requires section in the Java packaging guidelines have the following: At a minimum, Java packages MUST: BuildRequires: java-devel [>= specific_version] BuildRequires: jpackage-utils Requires: java >= specific_version Requires: jpackage-utils For historical reasons, when specifying versions 1.6.0 or greater, an epoch of 1 must be included. Example: Requires: java >= 1:1.6.0 Please update the BR and R to the above format. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 19:33:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:33:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211933.mALJXnTo017294@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 --- Comment #13 from David Walluck 2008-11-21 14:33:48 EDT --- I fixed TOMCAT_CFG (which was wrong in both scripts) and TOMCAT_USER. The initscript is an LSB initscript (for cross-distro compatibility). I don't know that LSB is against Fedora policy in any way. LSB does not require chkconfig or service, but I added the description line just in case. I added comments to the Patch lines in the spec. There are no corresponding upstream bugs. I used java-1.6.0 and java-1.6.0-devel which has the same effect but avoids the epoch mess mentioned. The JDK is also set to /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0, but I wonder if this won't work if java-devel is not installed, and it's not required. Does setting it to /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.6.0 in /etc/sysconfig/jbossweb2 work as expected? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 19:47:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:47:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468604] Review Request: echolinux - Linux echolink client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211947.mALJlDLB020250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468604 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-21 14:47:12 EDT --- Blocking FE-Legal, then. Dropping the files was discussed as the best way to handle this, but if you really want to have it passed before the lawyers then I guess we can wait for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 20:00:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:00:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468806] Review Request: python-dbsprockets - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database definitions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811212000.mALK07Yv026388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468806 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Luke Macken 2008-11-21 15:00:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-dbsprockets Short Description: A package for creation of web widgets directly from database definitions Owners: lmacken Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 19:56:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:56:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469625] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class - A Path::Class type library for Moose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211956.mALJuRVu025523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469625 David Lawrence changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide CC| |dkl at redhat.com, | |fedora-package-review at redha | |t.com, notting at redhat.com Component|Test |Package Review QAContact| |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org Product|Bugzilla |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 20:15:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:15:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469625] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class - A Path::Class type library for Moose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811212015.mALKFEkV025413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469625 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 20:35:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:35:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811212035.mALKZ5m2000332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 --- Comment #14 from David Walluck 2008-11-21 15:35:04 EDT --- Spec URL: SRPM URL: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 21:13:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:13:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469590] Review Request: cpuid - Dumps information about the CPU(s) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811212113.mALLDrfU007454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469590 --- Comment #15 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-21 16:13:51 EDT --- Yes, I did. Thanks for the hint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 21:29:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:29:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811212129.mALLTfQC010060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 --- Comment #19 from Soumya Kanti Chakraborty 2008-11-21 16:29:40 EDT --- I don't have any branch as F-8 in cvs ? what do do ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 21:29:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:29:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811212129.mALLTY7d006460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 --- Comment #27 from Soumya Kanti Chakraborty 2008-11-21 16:29:33 EDT --- I don't have any branch as F-8 in cvs ? what do do ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 21:59:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:59:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811212159.mALLxVN2014937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 --- Comment #28 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-21 16:59:30 EDT --- You did not request an F-8 branch. Obviously if you don't want your package to go into F-8 then you should just push it to F-9 and F-10. If you do want an F-8 branch, make another CVS request and set the fedora-cvs flag back to '?'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 22:40:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:40:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468797] Review Request: jrosetta - JRosetta provides a common base for graphical component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811212240.mALMev4h021707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468797 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kwizart at gmail.com | |) --- Comment #2 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-11-21 17:40:55 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 22:50:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:50:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811212250.mALMoM89018903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Levente Farkas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Levente Farkas 2008-11-21 17:50:21 EDT --- with the attached patch the package is good. This package (mingw32-gcc) is APPROVED by lfarkas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 22:48:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:48:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811212248.mALMmiiU018473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Levente Farkas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lfarkas at lfarkas.org --- Comment #7 from Levente Farkas 2008-11-21 17:48:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=324355) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=324355) spec file patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 22:56:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:56:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454414] Review Request: mingw32-w32api - MinGW Windows cross-compiler Win32 header files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811212256.mALMumXh020066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454414 Levente Farkas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lfarkas at lfarkas.org --- Comment #2 from Levente Farkas 2008-11-21 17:56:46 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=324357) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=324357) spec file patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 22:52:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:52:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225897] Merge Review: ImageMagick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811212252.mALMqsTI019318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225897 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #16 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-21 17:52:51 EDT --- I guess (since you recently built another release in koji without addressing this issue) that you decided to leave the document directories the way they are. A reasoning would have been nice. Anyways, I'm closing the bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 22:53:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:53:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459800] Review Request: python-py - Innovative python library containing py.test, greenlets and other niceties In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811212253.mALMr8pI019351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459800 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Moschny 2008-11-21 17:53:07 EDT --- Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-py.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-py-0.9.2-4.fc9.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Nov 21 2008 Thomas Moschny <..> - 0.9.2-4 - Use dummy_greenlet on ppc and ppc64. * Tue Oct 7 2008 Thomas Moschny <..> - 0.9.2-3 - Replace compat modules by stubs using the system modules instead. - Add patch from trunk fixing a timing issue in the tests. * Tue Sep 30 2008 Thomas Moschny <..> - 0.9.2-2 - Update license information. - Fix the tests. Still four failing tests, though, see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=944709 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=944685 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 23:02:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:02:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 233946] Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811212302.mALN2hTG025829@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233946 Callum Lerwick changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(seg at haxxed.com) | --- Comment #34 from Callum Lerwick 2008-11-21 18:02:37 EDT --- Yes, xmlrpc-epi is required. I'm finally settled and getting back to hacking code so I may be reviving my Second Life efforts soon. I'm hacking on OpenJPEG at the moment... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 23:04:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:04:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454414] Review Request: mingw32-w32api - MinGW Windows cross-compiler Win32 header files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811212304.mALN4go6021181@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454414 Levente Farkas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Levente Farkas 2008-11-21 18:04:41 EDT --- with the attached patch the package is good. This package (mingw32-w32api) is APPROVED by lfarkas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 23:13:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:13:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454412] Review Request: mingw32-runtime - MinGW Windows cross-compiler runtime and root filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811212313.mALNDEGR027530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454412 Levente Farkas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Levente Farkas 2008-11-21 18:13:13 EDT --- with the attached patch the package is good. This package (mingw32-runtime) is APPROVED by lfarkas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 23:11:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:11:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454412] Review Request: mingw32-runtime - MinGW Windows cross-compiler runtime and root filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811212311.mALNBlB4027363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454412 Levente Farkas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lfarkas at lfarkas.org --- Comment #11 from Levente Farkas 2008-11-21 18:11:45 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=324358) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=324358) spec file patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 23:15:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:15:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472098] Review Request: dekiwiki - a powerful opensource wiki which runs on Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811212315.mALNFWMl023099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472098 --- Comment #4 from Mathieu OUDART 2008-11-21 18:15:31 EDT --- Thanks for the input Andreas. About the dependencies: i've had a quick test on fresh installs for Fedora9, CentOS5 and RHEL5 for the optional dependencies "wv xlhtml poppler-utils html2text" and unfortunately none of them resolves on all 3 systems :( That would really bother me if any Deki install failed because of these unresolved packages so I'd prefer to let them apart for now. about the spec: i applied your suggestions. I kept the %if conditions but tried to make it more readable. It's much more convenient to build from a single source on all platforms. wiki db update : I kept it for now considering that package updates can be done in the background/automatically. Upgrading the software files but not the db could result in a broken website until the sysadmin takes his actions. For the upgrade to be as safe and smooth as possible, I think it's better to update the wiki db schema at the same time we update the software files. about the %post : I let you have a look at it, I followed your recommendations. I now still have to figure out how to have users to complete the installation since I removed mozroots, mysqld start and all the output. Any best practices about that ? new links : Spec URL: http://nightlybuild.mindtouch.com/Submitted_Packages/Fedora/src/dekiwiki.spec SRPM URL: http://nightlybuild.mindtouch.com/Submitted_Packages/Fedora/src/dekiwiki-8.08.11722-1.1.src.rpm Cheers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 00:01:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:01:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811220001.mAM01LZU003301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 Mart??n Marqu?s changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin at marquesminen.com.ar --- Comment #6 from Mart??n Marqu?s 2008-11-21 19:01:18 EDT --- Shouldn't that be 2.9.6-2 to distinguish the changes from 2.6.9-1? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 00:05:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:05:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472149] Review Request: refmac-dictionary - chemical ligand dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811220005.mAM05gpi032082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472149 --- Comment #4 from Tim Fenn 2008-11-21 19:05:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Can you indicate where you see a statement that this package is under LGPLv3? > All I see is the COPYING file, which has the usual language indicating that any > LGPL version applies unless there is some indication of a specific choice of > version. This would indicate LGPLv2+ (since there was no LGPLv1). > Sorry, I assumed LGPLv3 since it says "version 3" at the top of the copying file, and appears to be an exact copy of: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl-3.0.txt > > Is there any reason to have the "data" directory, instead of just putting the > monomers directly into %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}? It just seems a bit odd > to have two successive directories with nothing in them except for another > directory. Right - the only reason for that is most programs that access the data assume the files are under datadir/data/monomers/ - I can simply make a symbolic link instead, though, if that would be more appropriate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 00:11:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:11:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469968] Review Request: Vala - a programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811220011.mAM0BjA9000512@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469968 G?rard Milmeister changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gemi at bluewin.ch --- Comment #1 from G?rard Milmeister 2008-11-21 19:11:44 EDT --- Is there a reason for the new submission? The package already exists: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/vala -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 00:31:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:31:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472149] Review Request: refmac-dictionary - chemical ligand dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811220031.mAM0V2O2008073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472149 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-21 19:31:01 EDT --- Sure, it says version 3, but it pays to actually read the license. See section 6: " If the Library as you received it does not specify a version number of the GNU Lesser General Public License, you may choose any version of the GNU Lesser General Public License ever published by the Free Software Foundation. " Our licensing page also covers this: " A GPL or LGPL licensed package that lacks any statement of what version that it's licensed under in the source code/program output/accompanying docs is technically licensed under *any* version of the GPL or LGPL, not just the version in whatever COPYING file they include. " http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing There's no need for a symlink; if other programs expect to see it there then there's no problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 00:56:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:56:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472149] Review Request: refmac-dictionary - chemical ligand dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811220056.mAM0ubTv011729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472149 --- Comment #6 from Tim Fenn 2008-11-21 19:56:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > Our licensing page also covers this: > > " > A GPL or LGPL licensed package that lacks any statement of what version that > it's licensed under in the source code/program output/accompanying docs is > technically licensed under *any* version of the GPL or LGPL, not just the > version in whatever COPYING file they include. > " > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing > Sorry, I didn't realize this. Changed to LGPLv2+ for now (and I'll talk with upstream about including a specific statement as to which version they intended). Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/refmac-dictionary.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/refmac-dictionary-5.02-3.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 00:58:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:58:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472269] Review Request: python-rope - Python Code Refactoring Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811220058.mAM0wIja007349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472269 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bdpepple at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 01:06:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:06:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811220106.mAM16mk8013179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #7 from Naveed Hasan 2008-11-21 20:06:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Shouldn't that be 2.9.6-2 to distinguish the changes from 2.6.9-1? http://mldonkey.sourceforge.net/News Release 2.9.5 had SRPM mldonkey-2.9.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Release 2.9.6 has SRPM mldonkey-2.9.6-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 01:08:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:08:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471527] Review Request: snmp++ - SNMP C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811220108.mAM186dr008729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 Hayden James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 01:08:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:08:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471527] Review Request: snmp++ - SNMP C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811220108.mAM18iJL008777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 --- Comment #18 from Hayden James 2008-11-21 20:08:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: snmp_pp Short Description: SNMP++ is a C++ development library for SNMP Owners: hjames Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 01:49:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:49:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472269] Review Request: python-rope - Python Code Refactoring Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811220149.mAM1n6iE014307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472269 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Brian Pepple 2008-11-21 20:49:05 EDT --- MD5Sum: 2b812782b43d365058fa1b2e64e36f7f rope-0.9.1.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Valid license tag * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Package builds in Mock. * rpmlint produces no errors. * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly. +1 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 04:22:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:22:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811220422.mAM4M8qH005476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #22 from D Haley 2008-11-21 23:22:06 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=324396) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=324396) Fix dirs for install target -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 04:23:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:23:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811220423.mAM4NKtx005580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #23 from D Haley 2008-11-21 23:23:19 EDT --- If I remove your patch0, then all is well with the build, however as you point out that is only because I have gluegen in my build dir. Could one possibly, as part of the gluegen package, simply install the glugegen source into /usr/share/gluegen/, and then with patch0, instead of commenting out the gluegen location, remap it to /usr/share/glugen? Also, as per the previous patch, some of the %install target locations were not quite right -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 04:26:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:26:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811220426.mAM4QlHa010530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #8 from Alexey Kuznetsov 2008-11-21 23:26:45 EDT --- 2(In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > Shouldn't that be 2.9.6-2 to distinguish the changes from 2.6.9-1? > > http://mldonkey.sourceforge.net/News > > Release 2.9.5 had SRPM mldonkey-2.9.5-1.fc9.src.rpm > Release 2.9.6 has SRPM mldonkey-2.9.6-1.fc9.src.rpm then why kernel do not clean suffix? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 05:51:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:51:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811220551.mAM5pEsc017640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #9 from Naveed Hasan 2008-11-22 00:51:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > then why kernel do not clean suffix? > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8 They do. Look on the second page of results and you'll see kernel-2.6.27-1.fc10, for example. The changes and builds for that package are much more frequent, sometimes multiple times a day. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 06:00:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 01:00:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811220600.mAM60jhr023550@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #10 from Alexey Kuznetsov 2008-11-22 01:00:43 EDT --- That is't true for kernel, i check about 5 pages and can't find any drops for suffix. As you can see before kernel-2.6.27-1.fc10 (-1) here (-0) suffix, look: kernel-2.6.27-0.408.rc9.git1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 06:14:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 01:14:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811220614.mAM6ESS3020544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #11 from Naveed Hasan 2008-11-22 01:14:26 EDT --- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines has all of the details for package naming, specifically http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Package_Release with respect to the release number. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 07:54:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 02:54:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811220754.mAM7s63c005819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 --- Comment #18 from D Haley 2008-11-22 02:54:05 EDT --- I appear to be having trouble with the make build targets for anything but the devel branch. F-8, F-9 and F-10 simply hang when executing make build. The devel branch works fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=944896&name=srpm.log Any advice would be appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 10:03:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:03:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221003.mAMA31he020853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 Lev Shamardin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(shamardin at gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #32 from Lev Shamardin 2008-11-22 05:02:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > protobuf-2.0.2-3: > Build filed on my Fedora 9, x86_64 such as: > http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=45. I have included the patch from svn to the package. Can you please check if it builds succesfully now? New SPEC: http://shamardin.googlepages.com/protobuf.spec New SRPM: http://shamardin.googlepages.com/protobuf-2.0.2-4.fc8.src.rpm Changelog: * Sat Nov 22 2008 Lev Shamardin - 2.0.2-4 - Added patch from subversion r70 to workaround gcc 4.3.0 bug (see http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=45 for more details). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 11:07:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:07:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221107.mAMB7ODP031928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 --- Comment #33 from John A. Khvatov 2008-11-22 06:07:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) > New SPEC: http://shamardin.googlepages.com/protobuf.spec > New SRPM: http://shamardin.googlepages.com/protobuf-2.0.2-4.fc8.src.rpm > > Changelog: > * Sat Nov 22 2008 Lev Shamardin - 2.0.2-4 > - Added patch from subversion r70 to workaround gcc 4.3.0 bug (see > http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=45 for more > details). It builds and works fine, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 11:18:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:18:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221118.mAMBIARE001272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |472639 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 11:18:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:18:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221118.mAMBIBdH001313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |472639 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 11:18:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:18:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468797] Review Request: jrosetta - JRosetta provides a common base for graphical component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221118.mAMBIC9g001347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468797 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |472639 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 11:18:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:18:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] New: Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 Summary: Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mycae at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 439630,464781,468797 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/scilab.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/scilab-5.0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Scilab is a scientific software package for numerical computations providing a powerful open computing environment for engineering and scientific applications. rpmlint -iv output is empty. Notes: *Requires Javahelp2, which is only available in F10 (I believe). I cheated and used an RPM available here: (http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/fedora/devel/i386/javahelp2-2.0.05-5.fc10.noarch.html). Package review is bug 439263. *In-program help has not been built, we probably want this. *The makefile that is included seems to call gcc & gfortran for the install target to perform some final linking operations -- this seems very very odd. What to do? Do I need to make gcc and gfortran "Requires:" of scilab? It also really slows down the %install target of rpmbuild. *I get a *lot* of "file listed twice" warnings from rpmbuild -- is * recursive in the %files section? Notes to other packagers/reviewers: *Scilab is fairly big. It takes a while to complete a build -- ~1hr on a 2.1 GHz machine. If you plan to rebuild more than once or twice, use ccache to speed it up a little (not all the time is spent on C/C++ compiling though). *I am having problems getting PVM to link correctly, as such I have disabled it -- if anyone wants to have a shot at patching this, please do. I have left the patches that fix a few problems with PVM in there for anyone looking at it. Probably just needs someone to correct the PVM_LIB value. *Need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to find JVM (libjava, libjvm, libhpi) before running scilab-bin. It can't find it for some reason *I have not tested parallel building to see if it works, how do we test this? Finally my upload bandwidth is not terrible, but it isn't massive, so patience when getting the SRPM :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 12:06:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:06:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461454] Review Request: lordsawar - Turn-based strategy game in a fantasy setting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221206.mAMC6rPs013764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461454 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bugs.michael at gmx.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 12:12:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:12:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460887] Review Request: libpcapnav - a libpcap trace file navigation library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221212.mAMCClcY014700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460887 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|bugs.michael at gmx.net |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt 2008-11-22 07:12:45 EDT --- No comment from the package submitter. I'm giving up for now. Also withdrawing the offer for sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 12:16:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:16:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438811] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-AJAX - PHP and JavaScript AJAX library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221216.mAMCG35q010729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438811 Lev Shamardin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shamardin at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Lev Shamardin 2008-11-22 07:16:01 EDT --- I'm not a sponsor, so this is not a formal review, but I hope this can speed things up a bit. - FAILED: rpmlint complaints: php-pear-HTML-AJAX.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 4, tab: line 50) You shoud use spaces for indentation. Just expand all tabs. php-pear-HTML-AJAX.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/php-pear-HTML-AJAX-0.5.2/examples/proxy_usage_server.php php-pear-HTML-AJAX.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/php-pear-HTML-AJAX-0.5.2/examples/support/test.class.php I see that you've tried to fix this issue in the %install script, but you are iconv'ing wrong files. You should iconv files in docdir/%{pear_name}/examples/ - PASSED: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - PASSED: Spec file name is ok. - FAILED: The package dos not meet the Packaging Guidelines for PHP. Please check with https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PHP A PEAR package MUST have: BuildRequires: php-pear(PEAR) Requires: php-pear(PEAR) Requires(post): %{__pear} Requires(postun): %{__pear} Provides: php-pear(foo) = %{version} post-scriptlets are fine. - PASSED: The license is fedora-compatible. - FAILED: The license specified on the project homepage is LGPL, the license specified in spec file is LGPLv3. - PASSED: The spec file is written in American English in legible. - PASSED: The sources match the upstream source (md5 verified). - PASSED: The package may be successfully built. - FAILED: Not all build build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. You should add at least dos2unix. - FAILED: The package does not build in mock due to missing BuildRequires. - PASSED: A package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - PASSED: Permissions are sane. - PASSED: %clean section is fine. - PASSED: macros usage is fine. - PASSED: The package must contains code. - PASSED: The package does not contain large documentation. - PASSED: %doc contents is fine. - FAILED: This package owns directory /usr/share/pear/HTML. It is already owned by php-pear-HTML-Common, so this package must Require it, and own only it's own subdirectory in /usr/share/pear/HTML. - PASSED: There is rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the beginning of %install. - PASSED: All filenames in rpm package are valid UTF-8. Some other general notes: You are packaging version 0.5.2 of the package which is a beta. There is a newer upstream beta available. Could you please justify why are you packaging an older release, or please upgrade to the newer upstream version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 12:33:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:33:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221233.mAMCXLxr013327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 --- Comment #34 from Lev Shamardin 2008-11-22 07:33:19 EDT --- I've made a pre-review here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438811 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 12:45:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:45:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470909] Review Request: wt - C++ library and application server for developing web applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221245.mAMCjc1Y015487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470909 --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt 2008-11-22 07:45:36 EDT --- > %files > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %doc LICENSE AUTHORS BUGS ReleaseNotes.html > %{_sysconfdir}/wt/wt_config.xml > %{_datadir}/Wt/resources/ The following directories are not included: %{_sysconfdir}/wt %{_datadir}/Wt Include the right directories recursively or use %dir attributes as appropriate. This is one of the MUST items you've quoted. > %files devel > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %doc LICENSE AUTHORS BUGS Even if harddisk space is cheap, why duplicate these files, which are already found in the main pkg? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 13:03:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:03:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457761] Review Request: dt - Generic data test program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221303.mAMD3D6F023144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457761 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net Resolution| |INSUFFICIENT_DATA Flag| |fedora-review- --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt 2008-11-22 08:03:12 EDT --- "404: Not Found." everywhere + no reply on Patrice' comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 13:18:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:18:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470508] Review Request: Ajaxterm - A web-based terminal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221318.mAMDIxxG026237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470508 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #12 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-11-22 08:18:58 EDT --- Thanks for the review Jussi. Package build and imported into rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 13:29:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:29:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456892] Review Request: aget - multi-threaded download accelerator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221329.mAMDTSER028329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456892 --- Comment #13 from Michael Schwendt 2008-11-22 08:29:26 EDT --- > these are not blocking issues These are format string buffer overflows and ought to get fixed. Run-time parameters (url, host, range) can cause a crash. Do a "grep GETREQ *" in the source tree and notice that during allocation of the buffer, the size is reduced by 2: Aget.c: fmt = (char *)calloc(GETREQSIZ - 2, sizeof(char)); The snprintf size, however, is not reduced by 2: Aget.c: snprintf(fmt, GETREQSIZ, GETREQ, req->url, req->host, PROGVERSION, soffset); Defs.h: GETREQSIZ = 256, Defs.h:#define GETREQ "GET %s HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: %s\r\nUser-Agent: %s\r\nRange: bytes=%ld-\r\nConnection: close\r\n\r\n" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 13:33:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:33:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471522] Review Request: otl - OTL library for database connections and queries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221333.mAMDXs5T029202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471522 Hayden James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 14:34:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:34:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221434.mAMEYBvS002544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 --- Comment #20 from Debarshi Ray 2008-11-22 09:34:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > I don't have any branch as F-8 in cvs ? what do do ? You don't have a branch for F-8 because you did not ask for it. Since Fedora 8 is nearing its EOL it is anyway good not to introduce new packages in it. So just ignore F-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 15:09:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:09:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221509.mAMF9rtT013237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #1 from Sylvestre Ledru 2008-11-22 10:09:52 EDT --- The parallel build of Scilab is working. I am using it nearly every day ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 15:14:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:14:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471527] Review Request: snmp++ - SNMP C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221514.mAMFEMQR014055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-22 10:14:21 EDT --- The package name of this should be "snmp++" , not "snmp_pp", I guess. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 15:23:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:23:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221523.mAMFNhql015678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-22 10:23:41 EDT --- It seems that you have not imported your srpm into F-10/9/8 branches yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 15:25:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:25:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471527] Review Request: snmp++ - SNMP C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221525.mAMFP0ff015767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 --- Comment #20 from Hayden James 2008-11-22 10:24:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: snmp++ Short Description: SNMP++ is a C++ development library for SNMP Owners: hjames Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 15:30:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:30:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221530.mAMFUbEG016941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-22 10:30:36 EDT --- Ah, sorry. You can ignore for F-8 branch. So please submit push requests for F-10/9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 15:29:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:29:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221529.mAMFTuYC011557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 --- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-22 10:29:55 EDT --- Ah, sorry. You can ignore for F-8 branch. So please submit push request for F-10/9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:25:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:25:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458866] Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221625.mAMGPsLm024476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866 --- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-11-22 11:25:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > A couple of comments: > > If you're going to, for whatever reason, use macros like %__make and %{__mv}, > you need to be consistent: either use the brackets or don't, and then you need > to use %{__rm} instead of just "rm". Or just drop the macros entirely and save > the typing. I do not see this so much sense to pay attention. But ok, I fix it. > rpmlint complains about the .packlist file. Honestly I'm not sure why you > would even need to package it, and if you check the perl package template > you'll see that it deletes .packlist files and then goes through and deletes > empty directory trees. In fact, perhaps you might want to take a look at the > template; it might give you some hints for better ways to do some things. > Install the rpmdevtools package and look at > /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-perl.spec. I have long thought about it file... Very thanks for this hints. I get few lines fronm this spec template (see spec changelog for more details). > In any case, it's always useful to run rpmlint on your packages (both the > source RPM and the final built packages). Off course! Now it is produce only 1 warning, but it is too erroneously: $ rpmlint -i xls2csv-1.06-1.fc9.src.rpm xls2csv.src:32: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS="vendor" PREFIX="%{buildroot}%{_prefix}" $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. so, it is wrong, because usage of %{buildroot} there is not touch this dir!!! This is needed only for configuration build. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/xls2csv/xls2csv-1.06-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:45:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:45:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454441] Review Request: R-bigmemory - Manage massive matrices in R using C++, with support for shared memory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221645.mAMGjkaa027228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454441 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:45:44 EDT --- R-bigmemory-2.3-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:43:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:43:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221643.mAMGhFWH021713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:43:13 EDT --- apanov-heuristica-fonts-20081109-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:46:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:46:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466764] Review Request: lensfun - A library to rectify the defects introduced by your photographic equipment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221646.mAMGkhq7022667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466764 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:46:40 EDT --- lensfun-0.2.3-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:47:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:47:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469590] Review Request: cpuid - Dumps information about the CPU(s) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221647.mAMGl1a0022758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469590 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:47:00 EDT --- cpuid-20060917-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update cpuid'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-9937 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:43:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:43:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221643.mAMGho9N021822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:43:49 EDT --- python-suds-0.3.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-suds'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-9877 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:50:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:50:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469492] Review Request: bam - A fast and flexible build system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221650.mAMGoXH2028404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469492 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:50:32 EDT --- bam-0.0.0.4.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:51:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:51:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470140] Review Request: nettee - Network "tee" program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221651.mAMGp6xY028507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470140 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:51:05 EDT --- nettee-0.1.9-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:49:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:49:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443675] Review Request: sip-redirect - Tiny IPv4 and IPv6 SIP redirect server written in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221649.mAMGnNKW027880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443675 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:49:21 EDT --- sip-redirect-0.1.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:51:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:51:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469560] Review Request: pympdtouchgui - mpd client designed for touchscreens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221651.mAMGp0sQ028474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469560 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:50:59 EDT --- pympdtouchgui-0.302-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pympdtouchgui'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-10000 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:49:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:49:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470626] Review Request: balance - TCP load-balancing proxy server with round robin and failover mechanisms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221649.mAMGnIo1027847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470626 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:49:17 EDT --- balance-3.42-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update balance'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-9975 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:47:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:47:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452108] Review Request: cfdg-fe - A frontend for cfdg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221647.mAMGlh63023149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452108 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:47:42 EDT --- cfdg-fe-0.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:49:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:49:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468453] Review Request: shed - simple ncurses based hex editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221649.mAMGncZm023449@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468453 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:49:37 EDT --- shed-1.13-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:51:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:51:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469590] Review Request: cpuid - Dumps information about the CPU(s) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221651.mAMGpjD1024348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469590 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:51:44 EDT --- cpuid-20060917-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:51:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:51:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467764] Review Request: python-twitter - A python wrapper around the Twitter API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221651.mAMGpZVG024288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467764 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:51:34 EDT --- python-twitter-0.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:49:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:49:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468128] Review Request: python-flickrapi - Python module for interfacing with the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221649.mAMGnUSg023418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468128 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:49:29 EDT --- python-flickrapi-1.1-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:48:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:48:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462253] Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221648.mAMGmMZp023251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462253 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:48:20 EDT --- perl-Cache-FastMmap-1.28-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:51:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:51:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470140] Review Request: nettee - Network "tee" program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221651.mAMGp9x3024093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470140 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:51:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:51:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469590] Review Request: cpuid - Dumps information about the CPU(s) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221651.mAMGpmoC024379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469590 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:48:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:48:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453026] Review Request: xmp - A multi-format module player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221648.mAMGme7Z023295@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453026 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:48:38 EDT --- xmp-2.5.1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xmp'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-9966 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:54:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:54:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221654.mAMGseZq029246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:54:38 EDT --- libprojectM-1.2.0-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:53:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:53:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466974] Review Request: vdr-remote - Extended remote control plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221653.mAMGrsmE029124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466974 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:53:52 EDT --- vdr-remote-0.4.0-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:53:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:53:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471809] Review Request: gnome-gmail-notifier - A simple application that monitors Gmail inboxes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221653.mAMGrKP5029031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471809 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:53:19 EDT --- gnome-gmail-notifier-0.9.4-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:52:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:52:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466237] Review Request: perl-File-Comments - Recognizes file formats and extracts format-specific comments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221652.mAMGqbpn028954@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466237 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:52:36 EDT --- perl-File-Comments-0.07-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:54:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:54:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221654.mAMGsPqC029193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:54:24 EDT --- libev-3.48-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libev'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-10000 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:54:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:54:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471373] Review Request: rmanage - Remotely monitoring machines on network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221654.mAMGssiU025282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471373 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:54:53 EDT --- rmanage-0.1.5-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:53:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:53:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438406] Review Request: ufiformat - Disk formatting utility for USB floppy devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221653.mAMGrTXE025068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438406 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:53:27 EDT --- ufiformat-0.9.4-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:52:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:52:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462446] Review Request: ttf2pt1 - TrueType to Adobe Type 1 font converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221652.mAMGqsIO024935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:52:52 EDT --- ttf2pt1-3.4.4-7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:54:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:54:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471373] Review Request: rmanage - Remotely monitoring machines on network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221654.mAMGsvqN025315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471373 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:56:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:56:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462254] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap - FastMmap session storage backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221656.mAMGuTal025980@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462254 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:56:28 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap-0.05-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-10000 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:57:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:57:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221657.mAMGvR2q030328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:57:25 EDT --- barry-0.14-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:59:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:59:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469494] Review Request: xlcrack - Recover lost and forgotten passwords from XLS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221659.mAMGxDs6030662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469494 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:59:11 EDT --- xlcrack-1.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:59:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:59:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469952] Review Request: dopewars - a drug dealing game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221659.mAMGxrFs030809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469952 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:59:52 EDT --- dopewars-1.5.12-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:59:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:59:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446563] Review Request: rubygem-rspec - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221659.mAMGx0UQ030573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446563 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:58:59 EDT --- rubygem-rspec-1.1.11-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-rspec'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-10000 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 17:00:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:00:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221700.mAMH005T030857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:59:59 EDT --- unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update unikurd-web-font'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-10000 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:59:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:59:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469494] Review Request: xlcrack - Recover lost and forgotten passwords from XLS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221659.mAMGx9th030625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469494 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:59:09 EDT --- xlcrack-1.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xlcrack'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-10000 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 17:00:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:00:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468562] Review Request: basket - Taking care of your ideas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221700.mAMH0MC6027351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468562 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 12:00:21 EDT --- basket-1.0.3.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:59:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:59:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469494] Review Request: xlcrack - Recover lost and forgotten passwords from XLS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221659.mAMGxGeX026785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469494 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:57:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:57:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471429] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache - Catalyst Apache Engines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221657.mAMGvan8026415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471429 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:57:35 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache-1.12-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-10000 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:59:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:59:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455581] Review Request: php-pecl-ssh2 - php bindings to the functions of libssh2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221659.mAMGxWQ6026890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455581 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:59:30 EDT --- php-pecl-ssh2-0.10-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pecl-ssh2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-10000 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 18:21:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:21:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221821.mAMILM9P006238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cooly at gnome.eu.org --- Comment #6 from Lucian Langa 2008-11-22 13:21:20 EDT --- - license of this package should pe GPLv2+ - this is a GUI application without .desktop file. - what's the purpose of edb-plugins ? As I can see edb main package cannot run without debugger core plugin. I you're going to provide a separate edb plugins package shouldn't that be optional ? I think you should separate in-core plugins from optional plugins (if it's even the case). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 18:37:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:37:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221837.mAMIbV4X008405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 13:37:30 EDT --- pystatgrab-0.5-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pystatgrab-0.5-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 18:38:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:38:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221838.mAMIcm0T008514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 13:38:48 EDT --- pystatgrab-0.5-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pystatgrab-0.5-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 18:40:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:40:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221840.mAMIeVjo008998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 13:40:31 EDT --- python-wikimarkup-1.01-3.005svn.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-wikimarkup-1.01-3.005svn.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 18:40:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:40:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221840.mAMIeS7s008961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 13:40:27 EDT --- python-wikimarkup-1.01-3.005svn.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-wikimarkup-1.01-3.005svn.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 19:18:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:18:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472303] Review Request: python-ropevim - Python module to add rope refactoring to vim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221918.mAMJIrtH018632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472303 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bdpepple at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 19:21:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:21:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465646] Review Request: hachoir-core - Hachoir core parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221921.mAMJLGPk015422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465646 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-22 14:21:15 EDT --- I reviewed this package. Here are my notes : * The package must obey python modules naming guidelines: Please see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29 And the spec file will need to be renamed accordingly. * Latest version is not packaged. Please update to the latest version. * You should probably make a %check section and run the tests given in the test_doc.py * There is a doc directory in the tarball. Should (at least, some of) the contents of that directory be packaged? * You must have BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel Please see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 19:27:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:27:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469997] Review Request: ratproxy - A passive web application security assessment tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221927.mAMJRSCI016291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469997 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cooly at gnome.eu.org --- Comment #3 from Lucian Langa 2008-11-22 14:27:27 EDT --- This is not a blocker but... as this is a network application (binds specific port, logs data to specific dir) will you consider providing sysvinit script, default logdir, logrotation, etc...? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 19:33:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:33:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472303] Review Request: python-ropevim - Python module to add rope refactoring to vim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221933.mAMJXfvl017097@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472303 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- --- Comment #1 from Brian Pepple 2008-11-22 14:33:40 EDT --- MD5Sum: 42390b31187a6ac5f06b5148af661f97 ropevim-0.2.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Valid license tag * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Package builds in Mock. * rpmlint produces no errors. * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly. Minor: * could look at making summary a bit less verbose. +1 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 20:01:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:01:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461454] Review Request: lordsawar - Turn-based strategy game in a fantasy setting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811222001.mAMK1Nex021440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461454 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Michael Schwendt 2008-11-22 15:01:21 EDT --- I'm inclined to say "let's make this a test update at least". It works better and doesn't crash as easily as before. Issues I've run into (and which may cause users to submit problem reports: * Music became loud noise after the first fight. Pulse Audio was still working fine (i.e. I could start a music player as a test), but in lordsawar it needed several attempts to make the music return. * At the end of a test game (the remaining two enemies surrendered), confirming "Quit" did not close the game window. I could choose and confirm Quit again and again, but that didn't help. Killing the process worked. The build log contains a few interesting warnings that are worth an investigation: gtksdl.c:218: warning: the address of 'SDL_windowhack' will always evaluate as ' true' playerlist.cpp:367: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char *' player.cpp:862: warning: suggest parentheses around && within || Packaging-wise it's fine. * A desktop menu icon could be added. * You could use --vendor="" instead of --vendor="fedora" when installing the .desktop file APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 23:27:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:27:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472303] Review Request: python-ropevim - Python module to add rope refactoring to vim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811222327.mAMNRRZv021722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472303 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 00:02:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:02:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461454] Review Request: lordsawar - Turn-based strategy game in a fantasy setting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230002.mAN02i2n026935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461454 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Ian Weller 2008-11-22 19:02:43 EDT --- oh ok! Thanks, Michael. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lordsawar Short Description: Turn-based strategy game in a fantasy setting Owners: ianweller Branches: F-10 InitialCC: (if you can do email addresses...) benasselstine at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 00:44:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:44:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230044.mAN0iMbZ032216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #4 from Tim Fenn 2008-11-22 19:44:21 EDT --- I'm updating clipper and ssm to fix the mmdb related build errors, they should be in soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 01:15:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 20:15:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472658] New: Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 Summary: Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: linux at cmadams.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cmadams.fedorapeople.org/shmpps/shmpps.spec SRPM URL: http://cmadams.fedorapeople.org/shmpps/shmpps-1.03-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: SHM driver to allow PPS time sources to work without a PPS kernel. The PPS pin must be connected to the declared signal pin on a serial or parallel port. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 01:38:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 20:38:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230138.mAN1cWHv003073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 --- Comment #7 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-11-22 20:38:31 EDT --- Thank you for your comment. Update : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/edb.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/edb-0.9.6-2.fc9.src.rpm Changelog : - Licence fix - Add desktop file - Removed separate plugin package I removed edb-plugins as there is no real interest. Rebuild under mock is OK. Build on koji ij OK : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=945577 Rpmlint output : [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint edb-0.9.6-2.fc9.i386.rpm edb-debuginfo-0.9.6-2.fc9.i386.rpm edb-0.9.6-2.fc9.src.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 02:34:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:34:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230234.mAN2Y38b014540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 21:34:02 EDT --- laf-plugin-1.0-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/laf-plugin-1.0-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 02:34:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:34:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230234.mAN2Y6AE010630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 21:34:05 EDT --- laf-plugin-1.0-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/laf-plugin-1.0-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 02:36:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:36:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230236.mAN2airS015150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 --- Comment #22 from D Haley 2008-11-22 21:36:44 EDT --- The build fails for F8. I cannot determine why from the build logs. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=945616 Something to do with being unable to set up the noarch build architecture. I think. Any advice? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 03:50:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 22:50:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472072] Review Request: perl-Sub-Override - Perl extension for easily overriding subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230350.mAN3oRma026189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472072 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-22 22:50:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 03:55:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 22:55:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468222] Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction management for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230355.mAN3tJto026957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468222 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-22 22:55:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 03:53:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 22:53:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468116] Review Request: sugar-analyze - Analysing tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230353.mAN3rpu7026483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468116 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-22 22:53:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 03:57:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 22:57:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468223] Review Request: python-repoze-tm2 - Zope-like transaction manager via WSGI middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230357.mAN3vh0h023090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468223 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-22 22:57:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 03:58:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 22:58:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468224] Review Request: python-zope-sqlalchemy - Minimal Zope/SQLAlchemy transaction integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230358.mAN3wcui023160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468224 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-22 22:58:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 03:59:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 22:59:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468806] Review Request: python-dbsprockets - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database definitions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230359.mAN3xde9023291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468806 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-22 22:59:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 04:01:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:01:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461454] Review Request: lordsawar - Turn-based strategy game in a fantasy setting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230401.mAN41T2s023872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461454 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-22 23:01:27 EDT --- sadly, no, we can't do arbitrary email addresses in InitialCC. ;( If they get a fas account we can easily add them however. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 04:03:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:03:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472079] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Copy - Copy Regexp objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230403.mAN43R1T024150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472079 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-22 23:03:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 04:05:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:05:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472083] Review Request: perl-boolean - Boolean support for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230405.mAN454h4024540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472083 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-22 23:05:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 04:08:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:08:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471026] Review Request: chrony - An NTP client/server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230408.mAN48jhf028728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471026 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-22 23:08:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 04:06:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:06:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472085] Review Request: perl-HTML-Tiny - Lightweight, dependency free HTML/XML generation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230406.mAN46HxC028584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472085 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-22 23:06:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 04:07:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:07:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472096] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Assemble - Assemble multiple Regular Expressions into a single RE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230407.mAN47POs024877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472096 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-22 23:07:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 04:20:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:20:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471527] Review Request: snmp++ - SNMP C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230420.mAN4KsU1030827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-22 23:20:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 04:16:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:16:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230416.mAN4GCrO030043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-22 23:16:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 04:18:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:18:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472274] Review Request: atari++ - Unix based emulator of the Atari eight bit computers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230418.mAN4IBVN030231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472274 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-22 23:18:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 04:22:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:22:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472165] Review Request: perl-Test-Strict - Check syntax, presence of use strict/warnings, and test coverage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230422.mAN4MRC7027063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472165 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-22 23:22:26 EDT --- "no summary found" ? The spec seems to have 'Check syntax, presence of use strict/warnings, and test coverage' is that not ok? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 04:23:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:23:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472167] Review Request: perl-asa - Lets your class/object say it works like something else In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230423.mAN4Ngiv027151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472167 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-22 23:23:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 04:26:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:26:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472179] Review Request: perl-Test-Block - Specify fine granularity test plans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230426.mAN4Qbjo027764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472179 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-22 23:26:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 04:28:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:28:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467644] Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230428.mAN4SrR5031809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467644 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-22 23:28:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 04:30:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:30:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469673] Review request: perl-File-ShareDir-PAR - same functionality as File::ShareDir with PAR support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230430.mAN4Uh7d032344@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469673 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-22 23:30:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 04:34:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:34:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447104] Review Request: qdevelop - development environment for QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230434.mAN4YpQY032650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447104 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-22 23:34:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 04:32:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:32:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460253] Review Request: qle - A QSO Logger and log Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230432.mAN4WQ1q032496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460253 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-22 23:32:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 04:33:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:33:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463079] Review Request: ibp - A tool to show which IBP beacons are transmitting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230433.mAN4XOjM028644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463079 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-22 23:33:23 EDT --- cvs done (also with F-10 branch). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 05:41:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 00:41:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471527] Review Request: snmp++ - SNMP C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230541.mAN5frxN009880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-23 00:41:53 EDT --- snmp++-3.2.23-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/snmp++-3.2.23-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 05:46:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 00:46:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471527] Review Request: snmp++ - SNMP C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230546.mAN5kKEj010556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-23 00:46:20 EDT --- snmp++-3.2.23-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/snmp++-3.2.23-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 06:54:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 01:54:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230654.mAN6sQAq015534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #2 from D Haley 2008-11-23 01:54:25 EDT --- Spec URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/scilab-2.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/scilab-5.0.1-2.fc9.src.rpm * Sat Nov 22 2008 5.0.1-2 - Fix files section - Remove pkg-config file. - remove windows_tools dir - Add parallel building for those with smp_mflags - Set make target to "all" rather than blank - Add doc files Two issues still remain. * Plotting causes a java exception saying that it cannot locate gluegen, even though I manually export the SCI variable (set to %{_buildroot}/usr/share/scilab/) before running & have simlarly set LD_LIBRARY_PATH. The result is a blank plotting window. * I still haven't worked on the documentation build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 06:54:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 01:54:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472662] New: Review Request: beanstalkd - fast, distributed, in-memory workqueue service Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: beanstalkd - fast, distributed, in-memory workqueue service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472662 Summary: Review Request: beanstalkd - fast, distributed, in-memory workqueue service Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jeremy at hinegardner.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jjh.fedorapeople.org/beanstalkd/beanstalkd.spec SRPM URL: http://jjh.fedorapeople.org/beanstalkd/beanstalkd-1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: beanstalkd is a fast, distributed, in-memory workqueue service. Its interface is generic, but was originally designed for reducing the latency of page views in high-volume web applications by running most time-consuming tasks asynchronously. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 07:15:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:15:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472072] Review Request: perl-Sub-Override - Perl extension for easily overriding subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230715.mAN7FEN5022682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472072 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-23 02:15:13 EDT --- perl-Sub-Override-0.08-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Sub-Override-0.08-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 07:15:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:15:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472072] Review Request: perl-Sub-Override - Perl extension for easily overriding subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230715.mAN7FHam018655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472072 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-23 02:15:17 EDT --- perl-Sub-Override-0.08-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Sub-Override-0.08-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 07:19:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:19:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472083] Review Request: perl-boolean - Boolean support for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230719.mAN7JMrH023057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472083 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-23 02:19:21 EDT --- perl-boolean-0.20-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-boolean-0.20-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 07:17:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:17:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472079] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Copy - Copy Regexp objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230717.mAN7HkXL022940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472079 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-23 02:17:45 EDT --- perl-Regexp-Copy-0.06-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Regexp-Copy-0.06-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 07:19:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:19:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472083] Review Request: perl-boolean - Boolean support for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230719.mAN7JPqY019091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472083 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-23 02:19:24 EDT --- perl-boolean-0.20-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-boolean-0.20-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 07:17:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:17:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472079] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Copy - Copy Regexp objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230717.mAN7Hmrn018974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472079 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-23 02:17:48 EDT --- perl-Regexp-Copy-0.06-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Regexp-Copy-0.06-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 07:42:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:42:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472085] Review Request: perl-HTML-Tiny - Lightweight, dependency free HTML/XML generation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230742.mAN7gY9a026283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472085 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-23 02:42:34 EDT --- perl-HTML-Tiny-1.03-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-Tiny-1.03-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 07:42:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:42:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472085] Review Request: perl-HTML-Tiny - Lightweight, dependency free HTML/XML generation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230742.mAN7gVLx022270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472085 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-23 02:42:31 EDT --- perl-HTML-Tiny-1.03-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-Tiny-1.03-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 07:54:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:54:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472096] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Assemble - Assemble multiple Regular Expressions into a single RE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230754.mAN7sq1u027784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472096 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-23 02:54:51 EDT --- perl-Regexp-Assemble-0.34-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Regexp-Assemble-0.34-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 07:55:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:55:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472167] Review Request: perl-asa - Lets your class/object say it works like something else In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230755.mAN7t9YR028110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472167 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 07:53:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:53:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472165] Review Request: perl-Test-Strict - Check syntax, presence of use strict/warnings, and test coverage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230753.mAN7rXBg027690@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472165 --- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-23 02:53:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > "no summary found" ? > > The spec seems to have 'Check syntax, presence of use strict/warnings, and test > coverage' is that not ok? That's a-ok, and what it should have been. "No summary" was apparently a bug in my script there... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 07:54:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:54:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472096] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Assemble - Assemble multiple Regular Expressions into a single RE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230754.mAN7ssmW023754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472096 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-23 02:54:54 EDT --- perl-Regexp-Assemble-0.34-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Regexp-Assemble-0.34-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 07:56:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:56:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472179] Review Request: perl-Test-Block - Specify fine granularity test plans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230756.mAN7utpq028376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472179 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 08:14:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:14:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438810] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Download - PHP Class for handling file downloads In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230814.mAN8Ebh4030616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438810 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 08:14:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:14:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438808] Review Request: php-pear-DB-ldap - A DB compliant interface to LDAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230814.mAN8EMjL030574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438808 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet 2008-11-23 03:14:20 EDT --- Please answer to all your pending reviews, there are work todo in comments on each of them I will be able to end the reviews and to sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 08:20:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:20:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438811] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-AJAX - PHP and JavaScript AJAX library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230820.mAN8Kxb3031819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438811 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet 2008-11-23 03:20:58 EDT --- I must disagree with Lev. As this package run without HTML_Common (check all the "require_once" in the scripts), you don't have to "Requires" it. So you must also own the /usr/share/pear/HTML directory. But %file must be cleared -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 08:17:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:17:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472664] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple - Easy to use HTML::TokeParser interface Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple - Easy to use HTML::TokeParser interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472664 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple - Easy to use HTML::TokeParser interface Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple-3.15-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: HTML::TokeParser is an excellent module that's often used for parsing HTML. However, the tokens returned are not exactly intuitive to parse. To simplify this, HTML::TokeParser::Simple allows the user ask more intuitive (read: more self-documenting) questions about the tokens returned. This is one of several requirements for perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 08:29:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:29:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472666] New: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural - Create machine readable date/time with natural parsing logic Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural - Create machine readable date/time with natural parsing logic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472666 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural - Create machine readable date/time with natural parsing logic Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-DateTime-Format-Natural.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-DateTime-Format-Natural-0.73-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: DateTime::Format::Natural takes a string with a human readable date/time and creates a machine readable one by applying natural parsing logic. This is one of several requirements for perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 08:34:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:34:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438811] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-AJAX - PHP and JavaScript AJAX library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230834.mAN8YeF7029229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438811 --- Comment #4 from Lev Shamardin 2008-11-23 03:34:39 EDT --- Agreed, I forgot to check the requires in the sorce code. BTW, may be this (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/DirectoryOwnershipImprovement) is already should be included into the guidelines? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 08:35:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:35:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230835.mAN8Z8aG029554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet 2008-11-23 03:35:07 EDT --- Small question : Do you think it is a good idea to import a very old package which doesn't seem maintained upstream for quite a long time (june 2006). Small notes : Version 0.9 is available, so you cannot use a pre-release version number (0.9-0.xxx) but a post release (Official 0.9 will have a 0.9-1 number schema) Please add in comment the "cvs export" command with the revision or date retrieved. Also indicate where the patch come from. If they are needed to build against latest php version, you should file a bug upstream with your patch attached (but I see in CSV php 5.3.0 compatibility have been fixed for a few months). + -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 08:38:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:38:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472668] New: Review Request: perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA - Perl implementation of the reCAPTCHA API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA - Perl implementation of the reCAPTCHA API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472668 Summary: Review Request: perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA - Perl implementation of the reCAPTCHA API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA-0.92-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: reCAPTCHA is a hybrid mechanical turk and captcha that allows visitors who complete the captcha to assist in the digitization of books. This is one of several requirements for perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 08:43:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:43:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230843.mAN8hJec002048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #3 from D Haley 2008-11-23 03:43:17 EDT --- Building the documentation will require some things we don't currently have in the repository. Most notably the JEuclid project. This particular project is quite large and has a very large number of dependencies, this will probably in turn require some packages we don't have as well. A quick internet search turns up no current RPMs for that project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 08:46:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:46:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230846.mAN8kZHk002632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet 2008-11-23 03:46:34 EDT --- Also read the PHP Guidelines (and/or read other pecl spec file) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PHP You must have the requires for ABI version .hu should be removed from release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 08:54:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:54:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438811] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-AJAX - PHP and JavaScript AJAX library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230854.mAN8sBcj003557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438811 --- Comment #5 from Remi Collet 2008-11-23 03:54:10 EDT --- See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwnership See 2 (Animal example). ++ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 10:07:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 05:07:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472666] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural - Create machine readable date/time with natural parsing logic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231007.mANA7Gva017095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472666 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-23 05:07:14 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). koji build=> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=946139 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url d5ca703d49ee23e85741d2da1dceeb31 DateTime-Format-Natural-0.73.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful. Files=9, Tests=248, 8 wallclock secs ( 0.07 usr 0.00 sys + 3.93 cusr 0.07 csys = 4.07 CPU) + Package perl-DateTime-Format-Natural-0.73-1.fc11 => Provides: perl(DateTime::Format::Natural) = 0.73 perl(DateTime::Format::Natural::Base) = 1.15 perl(DateTime::Format::Natural::Lang::Base) = 0.9 perl(DateTime::Format::Natural::Lang::EN) = 1.12 Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl(Carp) perl(Date::Calc) perl(DateTime) perl(DateTime::Format::Natural) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(List::MoreUtils) perl(Params::Validate) perl(Term::ReadLine) perl(base) perl(boolean) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 10:15:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 05:15:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472668] Review Request: perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA - Perl implementation of the reCAPTCHA API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231015.mANAF0wB018165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472668 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-23 05:14:59 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build=> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=946142 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 36b00fa37fd8a17367e1aa2f3b218f34 Captcha-reCAPTCHA-0.92.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful. Files=6, Tests=45, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 0.69 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.77 CPU) + Package perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA-0.92-1.fc11 => Provides: perl(Captcha::reCAPTCHA) = 0.92 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(HTML::Tiny) perl(LWP::UserAgent) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 10:24:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 05:24:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231024.mANAOJan020029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #4 from Sylvestre Ledru 2008-11-23 05:24:18 EDT --- gluegen is a native library provided by JOGL (libgluegen-rt.so) To help Scilab finding it, update etc/librarypath.xml and add the path inside. About jeuclid, the Debian packaging is available: http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/debian-science/packages/jeuclid/trunk/debian/ if it helps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 10:32:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 05:32:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472673] New: Review Request: pyglet - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pyglet - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472673 Summary: Review Request: pyglet - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orcanbahri at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/pyglet.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/pyglet-1.1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: pyglet provides an object-oriented programming interface for developing games and other visually-rich applications for Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. Some of the features of pyglet are: * No external dependencies or installation requirements. For most application and game requirements, pyglet needs nothing else besides Python, simplifying distribution and installation. * Take advantage of multiple windows and multi-monitor desktops. pyglet allows you to use as many windows as you need, and is fully aware of multi-monitor setups for use with fullscreen games. * Load images, sound, music and video in almost any format. pyglet can optionally use AVbin to play back audio formats such as MP3, OGG/Vorbis and WMA, and video formats such as DivX, MPEG-2, H.264, WMV and Xvid. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- The package have a few issues: * It depends softly on avbin. Softly means, it uses it if it is present, otherwise it won't produce errors. avbin is a wrapper around ffmpeg, so it can't be packaged for Fedora. I am packaging avbin for rpmfusion. pyglet can do many other things hence I thought I should package it for Fedora. The question is: Should I remove the last paragraph from the description? * The source tarball has an examples directory, with bunch of code examples. I am packaging all these examples in a -examples subpackage. Among them is a game called astraea. Astraea contains a ttf font file. The Readme file says it is a free font by I don't think we can include it in Fedora. It is actually this font: http://www.myfonts.com/fonts/larabie/saved-by-zero/ Right now, I picked a font that is available in Fedora and made the -examples subpackage require that font package. Is this a good solution? What is the best procedure in such cases? Please share your opinions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 10:50:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 05:50:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231050.mANAoUtQ024598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 --- Comment #5 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-11-23 05:50:28 EDT --- Firstly - thank you for comment. (In reply to comment #3) > Small question : > > Do you think it is a good idea to import a very old package which doesn't seem > maintained upstream for quite a long time (june 2006). This is work now and have not major bugs which must be fixed by upstream. Furthermore, I do not known any alternatives by functionality yet. So, answer is yes, I think is it is a very good idea to import this package. > Small notes : > > Version 0.9 is available, so you cannot use a pre-release version number > (0.9-0.xxx) but a post release (Official 0.9 will have a 0.9-1 number schema) Hm. It is build from CVS. How I should number its versions - 0.9-1.CVS20080512, 0.9-2.CVS20080512, 0.9-3.CVS20080512? Or 0.9-1.1.CVS20080512, 0.9-1-2.CVS20080512, 0.9-1-3.CVS20080512? > Please add in comment the "cvs export" command with the revision or date > retrieved. Excuse me, I do not understand. Date of CVS retrieving present in version and in defined macros %define CVS 20080512 in spec file. For what and where more I should comment it? > Also indicate where the patch come from. This is my patches. And it is reflected in spec changelog. > If they are needed to build against > latest php version, you should file a bug upstream with your patch attached > (but I see in CSV php 5.3.0 compatibility have been fixed for a few months). Patch not for PHP, patch for this extension to make it compatible with new PHP ABI. So, if we speak about file bug to upstream of this pecl extension - this have not sense, because you said before what it is old and unmaintained. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 10:57:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 05:57:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mz - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231057.mANAv97n021304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #14 from vivek shah 2008-11-23 05:57:08 EDT --- I have modified the package binary and manpage as per your suggestions. Please assign it to yourself and review it. Spec URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/spec/mz.spec SRPM URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/srpms/mz-0.34.5-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 11:04:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 06:04:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472676] New: Review Request: partimage Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: partimage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 Summary: Review Request: partimage Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://www.partimage.org/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: promac at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, jaredsmith at jaredsmith.net, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/specs/partimage.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/partimage-0.6.7-2.fc8.src.rpm Description of problem: Partimage is a Linux/UNIX partition imaging utility, which saves partitions, having a supported filesystem, to an image file. Partimage will only copy data from the used portions of the partition. The image file can be compressed with gzip or bzip2 to save space, and can be split into multiple files to be copied on CDs/DVDs. Partimage was compiled with login disabled, and supporting the following filesystems: ext2fs, ext3fs, fat, fat16, fat32, hfs, hpfs, jfs, ntfs, reiserfs, reiserfs-3.5, reiserfs-3.6, ufs, xfs. Additional Information: This request has been closed some time ago, and I would like to reopen it. I have been using partimage for years and have cloned dozens of computers with it. The spec I am submitting is based on Dag's, Ubuntu and Gentoo. I have tested all of its options and everything is working, except the pam usage via partimaged-passwd. Maybe someone can help me with this. Also, the buildarch is i386 and ppc, although I run it in x86_64 just fine. This is the original bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190000 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 11:02:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 06:02:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472664] Review Request: perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple - Easy to use HTML::TokeParser interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231102.mANB2qu2026917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472664 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-23 06:02:50 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build=> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=946153 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 2867824be9cbe3e86e94ca677d042ffe HTML-TokeParser-Simple-3.15.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=188, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 0.50 cusr 0.04 csys = 0.59 CPU) + Package perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple-3.15-1.fc11 => Provides: perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple) = 3.15 perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token) = 3.0 perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token::Comment) = 1.0 perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token::Declaration) = 1.0 perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token::ProcessInstruction) = 2.0 perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token::Tag) = 1.2 perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token::Tag::End) = 1.0 perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token::Tag::Start) = 1.0 perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token::Text) = 1.0 Requires: perl(HTML::Entities) perl(HTML::TokeParser) perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token) perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token::Comment) perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token::Declaration) perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token::ProcessInstruction) perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token::Tag) perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token::Tag::End) perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token::Tag::Start) perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token::Text) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 11:26:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 06:26:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231126.mANBQdtp030866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #5 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-11-23 06:26:37 EDT --- Kwizart also was working on a scilab rpm,. To my guess, he needed matio as well for scilab: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 The following is not a review blocker: ---------------------------------------- Is it possible for you to setup a wiki page and file a simple table describing what are the options/plugins that your package is supporting ? Perhaps on: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/SciTech/Scilab Since scilab can be used by anyone from any field of application, it will be helpful for other packagers/maintainers to know the actual situation. It is my case, I'll recommend scilab for electronics on FEL, and will try to make my best so that fedora has the maximum compatibility with Matlab environment. Thus your wiki page(which I will help you to) will enable me to find other packagers and packages missing for the best scilab experience targeting electronic design with FEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 11:32:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 06:32:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231132.mANBWbmk031875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #6 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-11-23 06:32:35 EDT --- This package requires a lot of work before approval. I'll rebuild and bring forward some review comments later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 12:14:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:14:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472683] New: Review Request: jpcap - Packet filtering library for Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jpcap - Packet filtering library for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 Summary: Review Request: jpcap - Packet filtering library for Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dignan.patrick at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://users.wpi.edu/~dignan/jpcap.spec SRPM URL: http://users.wpi.edu/~dignan/jpcap-0.7-3.fc10.src.rpm Description: Jpcap is a Java library for capturing and sending network packets from Java applications. This Jpcap package requires Java 1.6 or higher and libpcap 0.9 or higher. This is my first package, so I am looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 12:17:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:17:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet filtering library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231217.mANCHtHD006849@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 Patrick Dignan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 12:26:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:26:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231226.mANCQToI003853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |466737 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 12:24:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:24:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet filtering library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231224.mANCOpS1003252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 --- Comment #1 from Patrick Dignan 2008-11-23 07:24:50 EDT --- I'd like to note that this library was written by Keita Fujii (see the URL in the spec file), and I repackaged it to conform with Fedora's standards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 12:26:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:26:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231226.mANCQUT4003882@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |472639 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 12:23:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:23:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469897] Review Request: swingx - A collection of powerful, useful, and just plain fun Swing components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231223.mANCNIGB003117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469897 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |felix at fetzig.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |felix at fetzig.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Felix Kaechele 2008-11-23 07:23:17 EDT --- Looks good so far. Only thing I see is that you didn't comment on the patches within the SPEC file. Could you please add a comment wether you filed a bug with upstream already or if this patches are Fedora specific. Also see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment Also I'll be taking this bug for review now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 12:30:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:30:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231230.mANCUNET004610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au --- Comment #17 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-11-23 07:30:21 EDT --- # # Copyright (c) 2008 Daniel Haley # # This file and all modifications and additions to the pristine # package are under the same license as the package itself. # # please send bugfixes or comments to mycae at yahoo.com # Hmm isn't this a blocker for review ? There should be no other copyright/license on any fedora spec file except fedora's. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 12:34:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:34:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231234.mANCY0DP005023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #18 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-11-23 07:33:58 EDT --- #001: Missing BuildRequires: ant-commons-logging #002: Rpmlint issues; chitlesh(~)[0]$rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/flexdock-0.5.1-4.fc9.i386.rpm flexdock.i386: W: no-documentation flexdock.i386: W: non-standard-group Development/Java flexdock.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1-4 ['0.5.1-4.fc9', '0.5.1-4'] flexdock.i386: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libRubberBand.so flexdock.i386: E: shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libRubberBand.so 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. chitlesh(~)[0]$rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/flexdock-debuginfo-0.5.1-4.fc9.i386.rpm flexdock-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 12:38:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:38:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447104] Review Request: qdevelop - development environment for QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231238.mANCcoNn010232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447104 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-23 07:38:49 EDT --- qdevelop-0.26.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qdevelop-0.26.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 12:40:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:40:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472668] Review Request: perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA - Perl implementation of the reCAPTCHA API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231240.mANCe8ki010624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472668 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 12:37:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:37:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472664] Review Request: perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple - Easy to use HTML::TokeParser interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231237.mANCbTQR010115@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472664 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2008-11-23 07:37:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple Short Description: Easy to use HTML::TokeParser interface Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 12:42:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:42:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447104] Review Request: qdevelop - development environment for QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231242.mANCg19O006540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447104 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-23 07:42:00 EDT --- qdevelop-0.26.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qdevelop-0.26.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 12:39:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:39:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472668] Review Request: perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA - Perl implementation of the reCAPTCHA API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231239.mANCdrFG005942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472668 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2008-11-23 07:39:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA Short Description: Perl implementation of the reCAPTCHA API Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 12:38:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:38:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472666] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural - Create machine readable date/time with natural parsing logic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231238.mANCcrWm005860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472666 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2008-11-23 07:38:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural Short Description: Create machine readable date/time with natural parsing logic Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 12:40:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:40:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472684] New: Review Request: electric - Sophisticated Java based VLSI CAD System Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: electric - Sophisticated Java based VLSI CAD System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472684 Summary: Review Request: electric - Sophisticated Java based VLSI CAD System Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/electric/electric.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/electric/electric-8.07-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Electric is a sophisticated electrical CAD system that can handle many forms of circuit design, including custom IC layout (ASICs), schematic drawing, hardware description language specifications, and electro-mechanical hybrid layout. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 12:43:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:43:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447104] Review Request: qdevelop - development environment for QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231243.mANCh08s011038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447104 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-23 07:42:59 EDT --- qdevelop-0.26.1-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qdevelop-0.26.1-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 12:48:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:48:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231248.mANCm9aC007468@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au --- Comment #23 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-11-23 07:48:08 EDT --- As for the F8 failed built, the log says: DEBUG util.py:250: No Package Found for java-devel >= 1:1.6.0 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=945622&name=root.log In accordance to: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1165 F8 has java-devel-1.5.0 from java-1.5.0-gcj-1.5.0.0-17.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 12:54:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:54:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472685] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext - Return a new instance a component on each request Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext - Return a new instance a component on each request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472685 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext - Return a new instance a component on each request Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Return a new instance a component on each request. rpmlint shows two warnings, but there's not a lot I can do about long filenames. perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext.src: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-1.fc9.src.rpm perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext.noarch: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-1.fc9.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 13:00:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 08:00:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231300.mAND0BNw009921@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-11-23 08:00:09 EDT --- #001: remove the copyright paragraph, else I won't review this package #002: avoid renaming spec files : %{name}-X.spec. Always keep the spec filenme as %{name}.spec. I have seen you did the same for all your packages. #003: rpmlint issues chitlesh(~)[0]$rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/skinlf-6.7-2.fc9.i386.rpm skinlf.i386: W: no-documentation skinlf.i386: E: description-line-too-long Today many applications must be skinnable: your CD player, your emailnotifier, even your operating system! Now with Skin Look And Feel, your Java application is skinnable! Skin Look And Feel is able to read GTK (The Gimp ToolKit) and KDE (The K Desktop Environment) Skins to enhance your application GUI controls such as Buttons, Checks, Radios, Scrollbars, Progress Bar, Lists, Tables, Internal Frames, Colors, Background Textures, Regular Windows. skinlf.i386: W: non-standard-group skinlf skinlf.i386: W: invalid-license Apache skinlf.i386: E: no-binary Break the description paragraph into seperate lines. 004: Build errors, possible missing BuildRequires: [javac] ^ [javac] /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/BUILD/skinlf-6.7/build/src/com/l2fprod/tools/msstyles/MsStylesToSkinLF.java:78: warning: com.sun.org.apache.xpath.internal.XPathAPI is Sun proprietary API and may be removed in a future release [javac] (Element)XPathAPI. [javac] ^ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 13:04:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 08:04:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231304.mAND4SJ1010647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-23 08:04:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > (In reply to comment #22) > > The build fails for F8. I cannot determine why from the build logs. > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=945616 > > > > Something to do with being unable to set up the noarch build architecture. I > > think. > > > > Any advice? > > java >= 1:1.6 is not available on Fedora on Fedora 8, I mean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 13:02:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 08:02:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231302.mAND2DPv010354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-23 08:02:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > The build fails for F8. I cannot determine why from the build logs. > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=945616 > > Something to do with being unable to set up the noarch build architecture. I > think. > > Any advice? java >= 1:1.6 is not available on Fedora. Fedora 8 uses java icedtea, which has a virtual Provides "java = 1.7.0", which is lower than 1:1.6.0. On F-9+ Fedora uses java openjdk, which has a virtual Provides "java = 1:1.6.0". So if this package can build with java icedtea you can use "BR: java-devel >= 1.7" instead (note: 1.7 is lower than 1:1.6.0"), however another note that java icedtea (on Fedora 8) is not available on ppc64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 13:44:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 08:44:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mz - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231344.mANDie11018133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #15 from Patrice Dumas 2008-11-23 08:44:39 EDT --- I don't know if you are speaking about me, but to me the package name is still too short, si I wouldn't accept th epackage. Besides I have only jumped on the review because I try to avoid inflation of short and generic names in fedora, not because I am interested in doing the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 14:00:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:00:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231400.mANE0A6H025612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #7 from D Haley 2008-11-23 09:00:08 EDT --- >Is it possible for you to setup a wiki page and file a simple table describing >what are the options/plugins that your package is supporting ? > >Perhaps on: >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/SciTech/Scilab The wiki page has been created. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 14:12:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:12:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231412.mANECEHE027798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #8 from Sylvestre Ledru 2008-11-23 09:12:13 EDT --- Nice work. Just a short comment about this, jeuclid can be built with ant (get the build.xml from the Debian package). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 14:32:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:32:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469955] Review Request: fprintd - D-Bus service for Fingerprint reader access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231432.mANEWjVE026737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469955 --- Comment #3 from Bastien Nocera 2008-11-23 09:32:44 EDT --- All fixed. http://hadess.fedorapeople.org/fprintd/fprintd.spec http://hadess.fedorapeople.org/fprintd/fprintd-0.1-2.gitaf42ec70f3.fc10.src.rpm Koji scratch build worked: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=946393 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 14:48:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:48:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231448.mANEmuFI001016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 --- Comment #4 from D Haley 2008-11-23 09:48:55 EDT --- *sigh* One more time... URLS: Spec: http://www.dhd.selfip.com/427e/skinlf-3.spec SRPM: http://www.dhd.selfip.com/427e/skinlf-6.7-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 14:47:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:47:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231447.mANElNrT000908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 --- Comment #3 from D Haley 2008-11-23 09:47:22 EDT --- Spec URL: SRPM URL: > #001: remove the copyright paragraph, else I won't review this package Done. >#002: avoid renaming spec files : %{name}-X.spec. Always keep the spec filenme >as %{name}.spec. I have seen you did the same for all your packages. I'm going to do it again, just to be difficult -- my local copy is always blahblah.spec, only the bugzilla copies are blahblah-rev.spec. Sorry. How do I make sure other people on the 'net can see the changes in the spec files after I have made them? Is there a good way to do this? >#003: rpmlint issues >skinlf.i386: W: no-documentation Fixed. >skinlf.i386: E: description-line-too-long Fixed. >skinlf.i386: W: non-standard-group skinlf Fixed. >004: Build errors, possible missing BuildRequires: >... >warning: com.sun.org.apache.xpath.internal. >XPathAPI is Sun proprietary API and may be removed in a future release Not technically errors, these warnings arise due to my usage of the sun xpath api as a substitute for the org.apache.xpath api (patch #3), which was removed as of sun JRE1.5 [1]. I can look at this again to see if I can make it work without the patch, but that will have to wait. The package itself will still work with the sun API, it just means that I may have to revisit and update later. I'd rather continue with the current sun API if no-one knows how to solve this properly, and doesn't object to doing so. Just so we can lift the block on other bugs >skinlf.i386: W: invalid-license Apache Not fixed -- I am unsure how to proceed here. If you examine the LICENSE file in the source, it isn't Apache, contrary to what's on their website [2]. Its a redistributable with attribution licence, which doesn't appear up in the rpmlint -iv output. Which licence should I select?? Current RPMlint output: $ rpmlint -i skinlf-6.7-3.fc9.src.rpm skinlf.src: W: invalid-license Apache 2.0 Thanks for taking a look at the package! [1] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/xml/jaxp/JAXP-Compatibility_150.html#New [2] https://skinlf.dev.java.net/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 14:54:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:54:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231454.mANEs8aQ029968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 --- Comment #5 from D Haley 2008-11-23 09:54:08 EDT --- *sigh* again. There is no www prefix. URLS: Spec: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/skinlf-3.spec SRPM: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/skinlf-6.7-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 15:36:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:36:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231536.mANFaOLG004353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #12 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-11-23 10:36:22 EDT --- Please move your discussion of the Release tag to fedora-packaging mailing list. Peter's usage is correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 15:40:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:40:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231540.mANFeKZK009293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-11-23 10:40:19 EDT --- I've got a spec ready for 5.0.2 and was waiting for 5.0.3 to fix some problem I've reported upstream. For example, we shouldn't need to patch configure.ac for the jhall to javahelp2 jar detection (as the problem was reported upstream by me). I've also reported a problem with the default search path for the java machine using alternatives. I will upload a 5.0.3 spec/srpm once I'm back home. @D Haley About this: ----------- #Scilab installs lots of stuff to /usr/lib/debug and /usr/src/debug/ for some reason rm -rf /%{buildroot}/%{_libdir}/debug ----------- Those are debuginfo extracted by rpm. If you have a problem with them , then I would suggest that you review how your builsystem is done... thoses are expected to build fine and ends in %{name}-debuginfo rpm package. @Sylvestre According to our packaging standard. gluegen should be built separately from jogl, as we need jogl to be 'buildable' without using 'custom' Jar files at built time. (every jar file should be removed in prep). For some reason, separating the gluegen build from jogl isn't that trivial. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 15:45:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:45:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231545.mANFjTpZ010058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 Bug 469471 depends on bug 461407, which changed state. Bug 461407 Summary: Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 15:45:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:45:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231545.mANFjRZ6010028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-23 10:45:26 EDT --- By the way if you don't want you don't have to rebuild laf-plugin on F-8 as F-8 support is near end. Closing as NEXTRELEASE. When you think F-9/10 laf-plugin packages can be moved from testing to stable, please revisit bodhi and edit (modify) your push requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 15:50:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:50:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471527] Review Request: snmp++ - SNMP C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231550.mANFoCbN010627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-23 10:50:11 EDT --- Okay, now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 15:51:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:51:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231551.mANFpprM010892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #32 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-23 10:51:49 EDT --- Okay, now Closing as NEXTRELEASE. When you think F-9/10 packages can be moved from testing to stable, please revisit bodhi and edit (modify) your push requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 15:52:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:52:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462813] Review Request: ldtp - Desktop testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231552.mANFqe1h006502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462813 Bug 462813 depends on bug 459010, which changed state. Bug 459010 Summary: Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 15:52:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:52:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231552.mANFqder006473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-23 10:52:38 EDT --- Okay, now Closing as NEXTRELEASE. When you think F-9/10 packages can be moved from testing to stable, please revisit bodhi and edit (modify) your push requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 16:49:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 11:49:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438811] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-AJAX - PHP and JavaScript AJAX library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231649.mANGnB4B014501@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438811 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-23 11:49:10 EDT --- Then why does this package have to install files under %_datadir/pear/HTML ?? By the way currently on koji-11: # repoquery --repoid=koji-11 --whatprovides '/usr/share/pear/HTML/*' php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect-0:1.4.1-1.fc10.noarch php-pear-HTML-Common-0:1.2.4-2.fc10.noarch php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-0:3.2.10-1.fc9.noarch php-pear-HTML-Table-0:1.8.2-1.fc9.noarch php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-ElementGrid-0:0.1.1-2.fc10.noarch which all Requires php-pear-HTML-Common directly or indirectly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 17:02:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:02:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231702.mANH21Zm016814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #35 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-23 12:01:59 EDT --- Okay + Now this package itself is good + Your pre-review seems good for initial comments ------------------------------------------------------------- This package (protobuf) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 17:04:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:04:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438811] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-AJAX - PHP and JavaScript AJAX library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231704.mANH4Lca021406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438811 Christopher Stone changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chris.stone at gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Christopher Stone 2008-11-23 12:04:20 EDT --- I would recommend removing dos2unix entirely, and just sed which is part of the core build environment. Untested: find docdir -type f -exec sed -i 's/\r//' {} \; -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 17:09:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:09:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231709.mANH9T6p022256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 --- Comment #36 from Lev Shamardin 2008-11-23 12:09:26 EDT --- I have filed an application to the packagers group, my FAS login name is 'abbot'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 17:15:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:15:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438811] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-AJAX - PHP and JavaScript AJAX library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231715.mANHFF3f023476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438811 --- Comment #8 from Remi Collet 2008-11-23 12:15:14 EDT --- In PEAR extension, the tree is a thematic classification (not a dependency one) It's an upstream choice that packager cannot change. Requires must be taken from the PEAR documentation or (best) from the source In QuickForm.php => require_once 'HTML/Common.php'; So php-pear-HTML-QuickForm must requires php-pear-HTML-Common In Table.php => require_once 'HTML/Common.php'; So php-pear-HTML-Table must requires php-pear-HTML-Common In all the script from HTML_AJAX, there is no require/include outside of HTML/AJAX. So no need to require php-pear-HTML-Common ++ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 17:13:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:13:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231713.mANHDpRe018558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #37 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-23 12:13:47 EDT --- Confirmed. Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 17:51:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:51:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472696] New: Review Request: vcards-daemon - manage evolution contacts as vcards Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vcards-daemon - manage evolution contacts as vcards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472696 Summary: Review Request: vcards-daemon - manage evolution contacts as vcards Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: leamas.alec at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora A simple daemon which manages a directory of vcards reflecting the contents of a address book in evolution data server. On user level, it's related to bug 471575 - this part makes vcards available for the extension. However, there are no technical dependencies. Source RPM:http://downloads.sourceforge.net/dt-contacts/vcards-evo-daemon-0.2-1.61.src.rpm?use_mirror= Spec: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/dt-contacts/vcards-evo-daemon.spec?use_mirror= -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 17:51:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:51:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472696] Review Request: vcards-daemon - manage evolution contacts as vcards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231751.mANHpQYr024533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472696 Alec Leamas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 17:54:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:54:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472696] Review Request: vcards-daemon - manage evolution contacts as vcards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231754.mANHsbUO024842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472696 --- Comment #2 from Alec Leamas 2008-11-23 12:54:36 EDT --- This is my second submission for approval; I need s sponsor. My attempts to make what's required for being sponsored are documented in bug 471575 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 17:54:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:54:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472696] Review Request: vcards-daemon - manage evolution contacts as vcards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231754.mANHsFJh024796@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472696 --- Comment #1 from Alec Leamas 2008-11-23 12:54:14 EDT --- This is my second aubmission for approval; I need s sponsor. My attempts to make what's required for being sponsored are documented in bug 471575 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 18:40:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:40:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472673] Review Request: pyglet - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231840.mANIenHI005210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472673 --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-23 13:40:48 EDT --- I found out that the font (saved-by-zero) is not free, hence it cannot be packaged in Fedora: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/LarabieFontsLicense -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 19:21:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:21:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460253] Review Request: qle - A QSO Logger and log Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231921.mANJLBiZ012984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460253 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-23 14:21:09 EDT --- qle-0.0.10-5.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qle-0.0.10-5.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 19:16:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:16:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463079] Review Request: ibp - A tool to show which IBP beacons are transmitting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231916.mANJGjJx011915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463079 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-23 14:16:44 EDT --- ibp-0.21-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibp-0.21-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 19:18:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:18:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463079] Review Request: ibp - A tool to show which IBP beacons are transmitting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231918.mANJIHfl012120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463079 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-23 14:18:16 EDT --- ibp-0.21-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibp-0.21-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 19:19:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:19:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463079] Review Request: ibp - A tool to show which IBP beacons are transmitting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231919.mANJJ34I012217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463079 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 19:22:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:22:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460253] Review Request: qle - A QSO Logger and log Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231922.mANJM1mg008710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460253 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-23 14:22:00 EDT --- qle-0.0.10-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qle-0.0.10-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 19:17:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:17:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463079] Review Request: ibp - A tool to show which IBP beacons are transmitting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231917.mANJHW8J007706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463079 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-23 14:17:31 EDT --- ibp-0.21-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibp-0.21-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 19:23:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:23:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460253] Review Request: qle - A QSO Logger and log Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231923.mANJNB42013494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460253 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-23 14:23:11 EDT --- qle-0.0.10-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qle-0.0.10-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 19:23:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:23:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460253] Review Request: qle - A QSO Logger and log Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231923.mANJNqVH009121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460253 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 19:32:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:32:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231932.mANJWTgM015627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cooly at gnome.eu.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 20:38:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:38:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811232038.mANKcrvg027649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Lucian Langa 2008-11-23 15:38:52 EDT --- OK source files match upstream: bf13f4ec695dd37bd01c4eff2db63ef9 debugger-0.9.6.tgz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK summary is OK. OK description is OK. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is OK. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. OK license text included in package. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). OK package installs properly. OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires are sane: libAnalyzer.so()(64bit) libBinarySearcher.so()(64bit) libBookmarks.so()(64bit) libBreakpointManager.so()(64bit) libCheckVersion.so()(64bit) libDebuggerCore.so()(64bit) libDumpState.so()(64bit) libELFBinaryInfo.so()(64bit) libEnvironment.so()(64bit) libFunctionDB.so()(64bit) libFunctionFinder.so()(64bit) libHardwareBreakpoints.so()(64bit) libHeapAnalyzer.so()(64bit) libOpcodeSearcher.so()(64bit) libOpenFiles.so()(64bit) libReferences.so()(64bit) libStringSearcher.so()(64bit) libSymbolViewer.so()(64bit) edb = 0.9.6-2.fc10 edb(x86-64) = 0.9.6-2.fc10 = /bin/sh libQtCore.so.4()(64bit) libQtGui.so.4()(64bit) libQtNetwork.so.4()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) OK %check is not present. I was able to run application and debug a binary file N/A no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. N/A scriptlets present look OK N/A initscript looks OK. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no static libraries. OK no libtool .la files. OK this is a GUI application, desktop file OK Suggestion: please see if you can provide an icon file for this package. (try upstream, or try to find a default one) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 21:06:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:06:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472274] Review Request: atari++ - Unix based emulator of the Atari eight bit computers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811232106.mANL6fvA028260@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472274 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Dan Hor?k 2008-11-23 16:06:39 EDT --- Imported and built, thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 21:12:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:12:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811232112.mANLC6b8029199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 Nicoleau Fabien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-11-23 16:12:05 EDT --- Thank you for the review Lucian. I'll ask upstream for an icon file. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: edb Short Description: A debugger based on the ptrace API and Qt4 Owners: eponyme Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 00:27:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:27:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472713] New: Review Request: Smokeping - keeps track of your network latency Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Smokeping - keeps track of your network latency https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472713 Summary: Review Request: Smokeping - keeps track of your network latency Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: aage at thaumaturge.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://files.thaumaturge.org/users/dante/smokeping/smokeping.spec SRPM URL: http://files.thaumaturge.org/users/dante/smokeping/smokeping-2.4.2-0.1.src.rpm Description: SmokePing is a deluxe latency measurement tool. It can measure, store and display latency, latency distribution and packet loss. SmokePing uses RRDtool to maintain a longterm data-store and to draw pretty graphs, giving up to the minute information on the state of each network connection. This is my second package and I have no sponsor. I have based it on a old spec-file used "inhouse" at our company. But I still have some troubles with SELinux-enabled installations since the httpd needs to read and write outside its normal locations. Reference: My first package (Rancid): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 00:31:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:31:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240031.mAO0VYwc001453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 ?ge Olai Johnsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(aage at thaumaturge. | |org) | --- Comment #24 from ?ge Olai Johnsen 2008-11-23 19:31:30 EDT --- Sorry for the enormous delay! I've submited a second review request: Bug 472713 - Review Request: Smokeping - keeps track of your network latency https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472713 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 00:36:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:36:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472713] Review Request: Smokeping - keeps track of your network latency In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240036.mAO0aFxH002255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472713 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-11-23 19:36:14 EDT --- this package alrealy exists in fedora. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7035 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 01:20:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:20:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472673] Review Request: pyglet - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240120.mAO1K1cr004762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472673 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-23 20:20:00 EDT --- New files: Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/pyglet.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/pyglet-1.1.2-2.fc9.src.rpm %changelog - Removed the extra font dependency (reverting to the default system font). - Added Requires. I thought the dependency on a totally irrelevant fonts package is not that necessary, so I made the script fall back to the default system font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 01:47:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:47:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469843] Review Request: unhide - Tool to find hidden processes and TCP/UDP ports from rootkits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240147.mAO1l6ca016181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469843 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |unhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 01:51:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:51:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469527] Review Request: tcping - Check of TCP connection to a given IP/Port In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240151.mAO1pYNZ016983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469527 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |tcping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 02:13:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:13:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240213.mAO2DxRC021058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 Rudolf Kastl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |che666 at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Rudolf Kastl 2008-11-23 21:13:58 EDT --- build seems to error out aswell without laf-plugin installed so shouldnt that also have a BuildRequires on it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 04:40:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 23:40:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mz - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240440.mAO4e1CK010522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #16 from vivek shah 2008-11-23 23:40:00 EDT --- Now this becomes a bit misleading and confusing, if you see my comments above I had raised the same question about renaming the binaries and manpage without renaming the package name and was suggested to rename the binaries and manpage and get done with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 05:00:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:00:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472170] Review Request: perl-Check-ISA - DWIM, correct checking of an object's class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240500.mAO50Mtl018988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472170 Bug 472170 depends on bug 472167, which changed state. Bug 472167 Summary: Review Request: perl-asa - Lets your class/object say it works like something else https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472167 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-24 00:00:21 EDT --- Koji scratch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=947316 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 05:08:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:08:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469843] Review Request: unhide - Tool to find hidden processes and TCP/UDP ports from rootkits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240508.mAO58t7j020110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469843 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-24 00:08:54 EDT --- I've just taken a look at the project page and as far as I see, upstream is a bit inconsistent with the name of the source. First version was "unhide.tgz", followed by "unhide02112007.tgz" while the current version seems to be "unhide20080519.tgz" (note the change from day-month-year to year-month-date). I suggest to follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages in naming your package (i.e. change Version: 20080519 Release: 2%{?dist} to Version: 1.0 Release: 2%{?dist}.20080519 thus avoiding problems in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 05:14:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:14:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472348] Review Request: hunspell-no - Norwegian hunspell dictionaaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240514.mAO5EEb5020929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472348 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-24 00:14:13 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=947321 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. dab12f79c6ccc9b92b23733bb29fc234 no_NO-pack2-2.0.10.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 05:17:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:17:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472685] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext - Return a new instance a component on each request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240517.mAO5HexT021644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472685 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 05:16:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:16:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472170] Review Request: perl-Check-ISA - DWIM, correct checking of an object's class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240516.mAO5GHYS021530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472170 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-24 00:16:16 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=947323 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 7d118aadd4069b4287f309482776a2bd Check-ISA-0.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=83, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.31 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.36 CPU) + Package perl-Check-ISA-0.04-1.fc11 => Provides: perl(Check::ISA) = 0.04 Requires: perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Sub::Exporter) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) perl(warnings::register) APRPOVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 05:17:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:17:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472685] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext - Return a new instance a component on each request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240517.mAO5HfeZ017101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472685 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 05:25:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:25:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472685] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext - Return a new instance a component on each request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240525.mAO5PfAw018612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472685 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-24 00:25:39 EDT --- Everything looks good. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=947334 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (perl); make test passes cleanly. Source tarball matches upstream: dd3e9c804cb7f8d6755132d92b26a80a Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001.tar.gz dd3e9c804cb7f8d6755132d92b26a80a Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001.tar.gz.srpm Provides, requires and rpmlint looks sane: =====> perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-1.fc9.noarch.rpm ====> rpmlint perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext.noarch: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-1.fc9.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-1.fc9.noarch.rpm perl(Catalyst::Component::InstancePerContext) = 0.001001 perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext = 0.001001-1.fc9 ====> requires for perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-1.fc9.noarch.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Catalyst) perl(Moose) perl(Moose::Role) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 05:30:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:30:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472724] New: Review Request: xjparse - wrapper for the Xerces XML Schema validator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xjparse - wrapper for the Xerces XML Schema validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472724 Summary: Review Request: xjparse - wrapper for the Xerces XML Schema validator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bashton at brennanashton.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/xjparse.spec SRPM URL: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/xjparse-1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The xjparse tool is a simple command-line wrapper for the Xerces XML Schema validator. It accepts several options, notably one which specifies the set of schemas to be used during validation. I have scratch-built it for fedora 9 with koji on all arch http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=947352 This is my first package so I need a sponsorship. More packages are on the way once this happens. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 05:31:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:31:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472724] Review Request: xjparse - wrapper for the Xerces XML Schema validator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240531.mAO5VpKR019494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472724 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 05:48:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:48:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472335] Review Request: perl-rpm-build-perl - Perl compiler backend to extract Perl dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240548.mAO5mkw4026392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472335 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |472726 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 05:48:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:48:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472726] Review Request: perl-Test-Dependencies - Ensure that your Makefile.PL specifies all module dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240548.mAO5mjff026359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472726 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |472335 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 05:47:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:47:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472726] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Dependencies - Ensure that your Makefile.PL specifies all module dependencies Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Dependencies - Ensure that your Makefile.PL specifies all module dependencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472726 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Dependencies - Ensure that your Makefile.PL specifies all module dependencies Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Dependencies OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Test-Dependencies.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Test-Dependencies-0.11-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Makes sure that all of the modules that are 'use'd are listed in the Makefile.PL as dependencies. It has two styles: light, which is fast but confusable; and heavy, which takes more time but is more accurate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 06:17:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 01:17:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet capturing library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240617.mAO6HXCR026455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 Patrick Dignan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: jpcap - |Review Request: jpcap - |Packet filtering library |Packet capturing library |for Java |for Java -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 06:30:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 01:30:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472724] Review Request: xjparse - wrapper for the Xerces XML Schema validator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240630.mAO6U9B2028387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472724 --- Comment #1 from Brennan Ashton 2008-11-24 01:30:08 EDT --- I had forgotten to run rpmlint, it no longer has any warnings or errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 06:40:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 01:40:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461575] Review Request: openvas-libraries - Support libraries for Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240640.mAO6eFJC002131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461575 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(huzaifas at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #10 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-24 01:40:13 EDT --- Can you build this package for requested branches? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 06:47:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 01:47:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461575] Review Request: openvas-libraries - Support libraries for Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240647.mAO6l9lY003079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461575 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(huzaifas at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #11 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-11-24 01:47:08 EDT --- on it now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 06:47:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 01:47:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472685] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext - Return a new instance a component on each request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240647.mAO6lqSr030933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472685 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2008-11-24 01:47:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext Short Description: Return a new instance a component on each request Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 07:17:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 02:17:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471754] Review Request: virtaal - Localization and translation editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240717.mAO7HpJX007877@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471754 Bug 471754 depends on bug 466608, which changed state. Bug 466608 Summary: Update translate-toolkit to the latest release 1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466608 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|FAILS_QA |ON_QA Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 07:25:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 02:25:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429882] Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240725.mAO7PJFX004670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429882 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-24 02:25:15 EDT --- python-Levenshtein-0.10.1-6.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-Levenshtein-0.10.1-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 07:28:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 02:28:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240728.mAO7Sgqe009600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 --- Comment #25 from ?ge Olai Johnsen 2008-11-24 02:28:41 EDT --- And even more sorry that smokeping-package already was made... I cannot believe that i missed it when i was looking for it! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 08:08:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 03:08:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472170] Review Request: perl-Check-ISA - DWIM, correct checking of an object's class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240808.mAO88g07011403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472170 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-24 03:08:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Check-ISA Short Description: DWIM, correct checking of an object's class Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 08:08:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 03:08:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472170] Review Request: perl-Check-ISA - DWIM, correct checking of an object's class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240808.mAO88iDS011425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472170 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 08:14:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 03:14:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469673] Review request: perl-File-ShareDir-PAR - same functionality as File::ShareDir with PAR support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240814.mAO8ELFC012299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469673 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 09:00:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 04:00:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mz - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240900.mAO90GDq020834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #17 from Patrice Dumas 2008-11-24 04:00:15 EDT --- You cannot change the package name if upstream does not, so what you propose is the best you can do. I don't think that this package should enter fedora until the upstream maintainer changes the name, though. Especially with his reasoning showing that he cares only about 625 packages... Manuel made comments about the changes in the binary names, but it was not my comments... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 09:18:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 04:18:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472348] Review Request: hunspell-no - Norwegian hunspell dictionaaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240918.mAO9IEdI028798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472348 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-11-24 04:18:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-no Short Description: Norwegian hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 09:23:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 04:23:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240923.mAO9NaK8029958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |472736 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 09:49:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 04:49:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468539] Review Request: sugar-jukebox - Media player activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240949.mAO9niYt031115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468539 --- Comment #9 from Kushal Das 2008-11-24 04:49:41 EDT --- Download any song using browse and then play it from journal. Btw, I just found a bug which prevents it playing songs/videos with filename containing spaces or @ signs :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 10:04:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:04:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241004.mAOA421R001914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 --- Comment #38 from Lev Shamardin 2008-11-24 05:03:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: protobuf Short Description: Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format Owners: abbot Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: abbot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 10:12:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:12:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454412] Review Request: mingw32-runtime - MinGW Windows cross-compiler runtime and root filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241012.mAOACf9E007342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454412 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-11-24 05:12:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-runtime Short Description: MinGW Windows cross-compiler runtime Owners: rjones berrange Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 10:13:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:13:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454412] Review Request: mingw32-runtime - MinGW Windows cross-compiler runtime and root filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241013.mAOAD9Yd003859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454412 --- Comment #14 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-11-24 05:13:08 EDT --- (Note to self - change the summary before adding this package) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 10:12:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:12:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241012.mAOAChIO003790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-11-24 05:12:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-gcc Short Description: MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ Owners: rjones berrange Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 10:12:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:12:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454414] Review Request: mingw32-w32api - MinGW Windows cross-compiler Win32 header files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241012.mAOACboW003762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454414 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-11-24 05:12:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-w32api Short Description: MinGW Windows cross-compiler Win32 header files Owners: rjones berrange Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 10:38:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:38:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet capturing library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241038.mAOAclMH012346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 Patrick Dignan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |jpcap -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 11:04:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 06:04:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469897] Review Request: swingx - A collection of powerful, useful, and just plain fun Swing components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241104.mAOB4uuC017127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469897 --- Comment #3 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-11-24 06:04:54 EDT --- Okay, I've added comments to all of the patches (none of which look like they're going away soon) and also updated the summary based on the recent discussion on fedora-devel list. http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/swingx.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/swingx-0.9.4-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 11:15:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 06:15:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241115.mAOBFfda019654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 11:56:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 06:56:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471754] Review Request: virtaal - Localization and translation editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241156.mAOBuBpl023350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471754 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-24 06:56:10 EDT --- Just some quick comments on your spec file. - 'BuildRequires: python-devel' should be 'BuildRequires: python' https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#BuildRequires - %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be mixed. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS - '--vendor="fedora" \' is obsolete for new packages. see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/DesktopFileVendor - remove '.fc9' in your %changelog section https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 12:13:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 07:13:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241213.mAOCDgwm031208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 --- Comment #7 from D Haley 2008-11-24 07:13:41 EDT --- >build seems to error out aswell without laf-plugin installed so shouldnt that >also have a BuildRequires on it? Does Requires not imply BuildRequires? I was under the (maybe incorrect) assumption that buildrequires was just a weaker form of requires (ie Requires, but only at build time) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 12:51:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 07:51:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241251.mAOCp3mr006328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-24 07:51:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > >build seems to error out aswell without laf-plugin installed so shouldnt that > >also have a BuildRequires on it? > > Does Requires not imply BuildRequires? No. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 13:37:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:37:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471026] Review Request: chrony - An NTP client/server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241337.mAODbIxC011904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471026 Miroslav Lichvar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 14:06:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 09:06:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469895] Review Request: ktable - Custom SWT Table Widget for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241406.mAOE6K9v023290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469895 --- Comment #2 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-11-24 09:06:19 EDT --- Updated to flag maven depmap as "config" http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/ktable.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/ktable-2.1.3-3.20081104cvs.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 14:10:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 09:10:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241410.mAOEAg8J024328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net --- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla 2008-11-24 09:10:40 EDT --- Will it build on x86_64? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 14:08:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 09:08:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469894] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241408.mAOE8UQH023621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469894 --- Comment #3 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-11-24 09:08:29 EDT --- Updated to flag maven depmap as "config" and to explain the purpose of the patch http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/cglib.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/cglib-2.2-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 14:07:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 09:07:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469896] Review Request: nachocalendar - A flexible Calendar component for the Java platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241407.mAOE7hGV023492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469896 --- Comment #2 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-11-24 09:07:42 EDT --- Updated the description and summary, flagged the maven depmap as "config" http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/nachocalendar.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/nachocalendar-0.23-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 14:23:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 09:23:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469897] Review Request: swingx - A collection of powerful, useful, and just plain fun Swing components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241423.mAOENM28021702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469897 --- Comment #4 from Felix Kaechele 2008-11-24 09:23:20 EDT --- So here are my final findings after having a thorough look onto the package and the spec: [+] rpmlint output is OK swingx.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/swingx can be ignored because it actually is set as %config in the spec file [+] package is named correctly [+] matches upstream source md5 [-] meets the packaging guidelines: BuildRoot tag is not correct as it does not include %{release}: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag [+] License in SPEC matches actual license and is acceptable for Fedora [+] If license is included it should be in %doc [+] successfully compiles in mock [+] build dependencies are in BuildRequires [+] file permissions are correct [+] javadoc Subpackage exists One note on style: You switch between ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %install which is not considered to be good style I believe. But actually this is not an issue. After you fixed that tiny issues I'll most likely approve your package :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 14:27:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 09:27:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241427.mAOERaa0022719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #2 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-11-24 09:27:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Will it build on x86_64? Yes, it does. No problem. But according to upstream, the (listed) architectures are only i386+ and ppc. Last time I tried the x86_64 version, the server hanged, and I never tried it again. But maybe it worth a new testing ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 14:37:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 09:37:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241437.mAOEblJl030016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2008-11-24 09:37:46 EDT --- Definitely test and retry. No reason to only to 32-bit if it works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 14:37:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 09:37:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468539] Review Request: sugar-jukebox - Media player activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241437.mAOEbNjD024626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468539 --- Comment #10 from Bryan Kearney 2008-11-24 09:37:21 EDT --- Thanks.. seems to be ok. If the comment around the download is fixed I will approve. -- bk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 15:22:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:22:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241522.mAOFMCEV002114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 --- Comment #15 from David Walluck 2008-11-24 10:22:11 EDT --- Here are my justifications for rpmlint warnings. If it's the same warning/error I don't list it twice. [pcheung at tonka result]$ rpmlint jbossweb2-2.1.1-4.2.fc10.src.rpm jbossweb2.src:86: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/lsb/init-functions jbossweb2.src:87: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/lsb/init-functions This file is in /lib on both i386 and x86_64. jbossweb2.src:145: W: unversioned-explicit-provides jsp21 jbossweb2.src:173: W: unversioned-explicit-provides servlet6 jbossweb2.src:174: W: unversioned-explicit-provides servlet25 The versions are in the names. jbossweb2.src: W: non-standard-group Networking/Daemons Fedora allows any Group tag. [pcheung at tonka result]$ rpmlint jbossweb2-2.1.1-4.2.fc10.noarch.rpm jbossweb2.noarch: E: non-standard-gid /var/cache/jbossweb2/temp jbossweb jbossweb2.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/cache/jbossweb2/temp 0775 jbossweb2.noarch: E: non-standard-gid /var/lib/jbossweb2/webapps jbossweb jbossweb2.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/jbossweb2/webapps 0775 This is correct since it's a daemon, if we agree on the perms. jbossweb2.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/jbossweb2/webapps /var/lib/jbossweb2/webapps jbossweb2.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/jbossweb2/conf /etc/jbossweb2 jbossweb2.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/jbossweb2/lib /usr/share/java/jbossweb2 jbossweb2.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/jbossweb2/work /var/cache/jbossweb2/work jbossweb2.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/jbossweb2/temp /var/cache/jbossweb2/temp jbossweb2.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/jbossweb2/logs /var/log/jbossweb2 I am not sure how to fix these, or what the actual problem is. jbossweb2.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/jbossweb2/tomcat-users.xml 0660 This file contains passwords, so it should not be world readable. jbossweb2.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm # clean tempdir and workdir on removal or upgrade /bin/rm -rf /var/cache/jbossweb2/work/* /var/cache/jbossweb2/temp/* This allows the rpm to be removed cleanly, but it's not typical to do this. What do you think? jbossweb2.noarch: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/init.d/jbossweb2 ${NAME} jbossweb2.noarch: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/init.d/jbossweb2 ${NAME} jbossweb2.noarch: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/init.d/jbossweb2 ${NAME} jbossweb2.noarch: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/init.d/jbossweb2 ${NAME} This uses a variable in case the name of the script is changed, but since NAME is NAME="$(basename $0)", it is fine. [pcheung at tonka result]$ rpmlint jbossweb2-admin-webapps-2.1.1-4.2.fc10.noarch.rpm jbossweb2-admin-webapps.noarch: W: no-documentation Documentation is in the main package. [pcheung at tonka result]$ rpmlint jbossweb2-lib-2.1.1-4.2.fc10.noarch.rpm jbossweb2-lib.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/java/jbossweb2/jbossweb2-servlet-2.5-api-2.1.1.jar ../jbossweb2-servlet-2.5-api-2.1.1.jar jbossweb2-lib.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/java/jbossweb2/jbossweb2-jsp-2.1-api-2.1.1.jar ../jbossweb2-jsp-2.1-api-2.1.1.jar This is because the links are actually in another package, but jbossweb2-lib Requires that package, so it's fine. jbossweb2-lib.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then /bin/rm -f /usr/share/java/jbossweb2/\[commons-collections-tomcat5\].jar \ /usr/share/java/jbossweb2/\[commons-dbcp-tomcat5\].jar \ /usr/share/java/jbossweb2/\[commons-pool-tomcat5\].jar \ /usr/share/java/jbossweb2/\[ecj\].jar >/dev/null 2>&1 fi This is to clean dangling symlinks. Is it valid? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 15:45:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:45:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 242228] Review Request: ps2eps - PS-to-EPS converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241545.mAOFjZ3q011616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242228 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 15:52:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:52:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241552.mAOFq4P1008099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-24 10:52:02 EDT --- Well, although your another review request was closed as duplicate, your spec file itself seemed in good shape to some extent. And as this package itself is now good, I will approve this package. --------------------------------------------------------- This package (rancid) is APPROVED by mtasaka --------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 16:00:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:00:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241600.mAOG0FbB014936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #5 from Adam Huffman 2008-11-24 11:00:13 EDT --- Have updated to the latest versions of clipper and ssm as of today - 2.1-2 and 0.1-11 respectively. Seeing some different build errors now - posting as an attachment since the log is quite long. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 16:00:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:00:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241600.mAOG0vC4010318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #6 from Adam Huffman 2008-11-24 11:00:56 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=324492) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=324492) rpmbuild -ba log showing build failure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 16:24:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:24:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241624.mAOGOTxw014870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 Bug 472639 depends on bug 472736, which changed state. Bug 472736 Summary: Update batik to 1.7 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472736 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 17:14:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:14:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472791] New: Review Request: fontbox - A Java library for parsing font files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fontbox - A Java library for parsing font files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472791 Summary: Review Request: fontbox - A Java library for parsing font files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/fontbox.spec SRPM URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/fontbox-0.1.0-2.src.rpm Description: Fontbox is an open source Java library for parsing font files and providing low level data structures for accessing font information. Upstream seems pretty much dormant, but this is an indirect dependency of some other things I want to package ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 17:16:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:16:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472792] New: Review Request: jempbox - A Java library that implements Adobe's XMP specification Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jempbox - A Java library that implements Adobe's XMP specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472792 Summary: Review Request: jempbox - A Java library that implements Adobe's XMP specification Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/jempbox.spec SRPM URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/jempbox-0.2.0-2.src.rpm Description: JempBox is an open source Java library that implements Adobe's XMP specification. Its features include: - Reading/Writing XMP streams - High level API to standard XMP schemas (NB: I don't really know what XMP is, but this is an indirect dependency of another Java package I want to get in ...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 17:17:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:17:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472793] New: Review Request: jgraph - Java graph visualization and layout Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jgraph - Java graph visualization and layout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472793 Summary: Review Request: jgraph - Java graph visualization and layout Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/jgraph.spec SRPM URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/jgraph-5.12.1.1-2.src.rpm Description: JGraph is the most powerful, easy-to-use, feature-rich and standards-compliant open source graph component available for Java. Features: - 100% pure Java, integrates into Swing component class hierarchy, based on Swing MVC pattern - Fully standards-compliant, code complies with the Java Code Conventions - Fully documented with many examples demonstrating the various features - Can be used in rich clients and on the server-side - Operates on various backends, XML files to databases or other systems, such as LDAP, JMX, J2EE - Provides zooming, folding, undo, drag and drop and much more... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 17:19:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:19:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472794] New: Review Request: onemind-commons-java - A common library used to support other onemind libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: onemind-commons-java - A common library used to support other onemind libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472794 Summary: Review Request: onemind-commons-java - A common library used to support other onemind libraries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/onemind-commons-java.spec SRPM URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/onemind-commons-java-1.5.5-2.src.rpm Description: This is a common library used to support other onemind libraries. (Upstream seems sort of dormant, but this is an indirect dependency of some other Java packages ...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 17:24:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:24:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241724.mAOHOCAg031800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID|FreeDesktop.org 17078 | --- Comment #10 from Michal Nowak 2008-11-24 12:24:10 EDT --- The license problem is now resolved upstream. Will publish xcb-util-0.3.1 with the patch (http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xcb/util/commit/?id=7ba0d2c98a6fc033dc1edfd791cfacdace4eab51) soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 17:48:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:48:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468539] Review Request: sugar-jukebox - Media player activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241748.mAOHmt7O031116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468539 --- Comment #11 from Kushal Das 2008-11-24 12:48:54 EDT --- Ah, Bryan I am not sure when I can do a new release :( Can you approve it for now ? Sebastian can update it when I will make the new release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 17:56:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:56:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468539] Review Request: sugar-jukebox - Media player activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241756.mAOHuS4a005348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468539 --- Comment #12 from Bryan Kearney 2008-11-24 12:56:26 EDT --- Actually..if Sebastian changes it to a checkout script, then I would be good. -- bk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 18:36:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:36:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468539] Review Request: sugar-jukebox - Media player activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241836.mAOIa5Ck012961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468539 --- Comment #13 from Sebastian Dziallas 2008-11-24 13:36:04 EDT --- Okey dokey... sorry for the late reply, but I was a bit busy during the weekend. The new version here now includes a checkout script. Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/sugar-jukebox.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/sugar-jukebox-5-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 18:45:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:45:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241845.mAOIjgNg015070@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #11 from Matt Domsch 2008-11-24 13:45:40 EDT --- DMTF considers the MOFs to be content, not code. As this license is acceptable for content, dropping legal blocker. Tom agrees. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 18:53:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:53:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241853.mAOIrehP016531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 --- Comment #12 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-11-24 13:53:39 EDT --- After talking with Matt some more, we've determined that these schema chunks are not code, but rather, content. Thus, we can include it under the existing (modified) content license. Use: License: DMTF Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 19:13:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:13:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468539] Review Request: sugar-jukebox - Media player activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241913.mAOJDOSI014814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468539 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462625 Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Bryan Kearney 2008-11-24 14:13:23 EDT --- APPROVED Please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSAdminProcedure and import the package. Close this bug as RAWHIDE once it's been successfully imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 19:48:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:48:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some car accros the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241948.mAOJmH94022043@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 --- Comment #8 from Simon Wesp 2008-11-24 14:48:16 EDT --- okay! you know, this is not an official review... This "MUST"-Checklist is from: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines --------------------------------------------------------- MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. + rpmlint is silence - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + OK - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines + OK - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. + OK - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. + OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. + OK - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. + OK - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. + OK - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). + OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. + OK - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. + OK - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 + OK -> short run-test on x86 / N/A -> no run-test on x64 + OK -> short run-test on ppc (without speakers) / N/A -> no run-test on ppc64 +OK build on all architectures http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=948460 - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. +OK - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. / N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: / N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. / N/A - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. + OK - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + OK - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. + OK - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). + OK - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . + OK - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . + OK - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) / N/A - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. / N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. / N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. / N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). / N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. / N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} / N/A - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. / N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. + OK - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. +OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. + OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. + OK Just a little thing: your URL should be in my opinion: URL: http://seehuhn.de/pages/moon-buggy perhaps thios is completly irrelevant. another little tipp: to ?allure? (i don't know, if this word is suitable) a sponsor you should create one or two packages, which you have in your personal wishlist. we spoke about it, if you remember. make the package and create a review request and link the the request of package1 in your request of package2 and reverse. so he or she can see that you are determined and that you have an understanding of process and of the packaging guidelines. Just another tipp: i am sure you can win points of sympathy if you help Sandro Mathys with the dependencies of TV-Browser. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 speak with him and you can take care of one or two dependecies, if you want to do it. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 20:03:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:03:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468539] Review Request: sugar-jukebox - Media player activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811242003.mAOK3JN9030349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468539 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Sebastian Dziallas 2008-11-24 15:03:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sugar-jukebox Short Description: Media player activity for Sugar Owners: sdz Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: kushal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 20:34:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:34:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472819] New: Review Request: rubygem-rufus-scheduler - Scheduler for Ruby (at, cron and every jobs) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rufus-scheduler - Scheduler for Ruby (at, cron and every jobs) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472819 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rufus-scheduler - Scheduler for Ruby (at, cron and every jobs) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dpierce at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-rufus-scheduler.spec SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-rufus-scheduler-1.0.11-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Scheduler for Ruby (at, cron and every jobs), formerly known as 'openwferu-scheduler' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 21:15:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:15:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811242115.mAOLFAmk007217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #4 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-11-24 16:15:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Definitely test and retry. No reason to only to 32-bit if it works. Yes, it seems to work. I saved an unmounted /boot partition of a second disk, and had no problem. I think as long as people do not mix client x server architectures (e.g., when booting from a rescue CD), it should work (and without any patch, as was necessary in the past). I have updated the links. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 21:19:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:19:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811242119.mAOLJceX008028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2008-11-24 16:19:36 EDT --- Is maintaining arch parity a requirement documented by upstream, or something you observed in testing? If it's not upstream, you'll want to include it in a partimage-README.txt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 22:45:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:45:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811242245.mAOMjSFH024600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(dwmw2 at infradead.o | |rg) | --- Comment #17 from David Woodhouse 2008-11-24 17:45:24 EDT --- Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/anyconnect.spec SRPM URL: http://david.woodhou.se/openconnect-0.98-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 22:51:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:51:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811242251.mAOMpEJo025885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 Bug 472639 depends on bug 472736, which changed state. Bug 472736 Summary: Update batik to 1.7 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472736 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 23:11:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:11:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464049] Package Review Request for libprojectM-qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811242311.mAONBcUD002939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464049 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-24 18:11:37 EDT --- libprojectM-qt-1.2.0-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libprojectM-qt-1.2.0-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 23:16:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:16:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811242316.mAONGUDG003827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #20 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-24 18:16:28 EDT --- Probably be good to add i18n-team too to initialcc next time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 23:24:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:24:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464050] Package Review Request for projectM-libvisual In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811242324.mAONOeOX005206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464050 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-24 18:24:39 EDT --- projectM-libvisual-1.2.0-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/projectM-libvisual-1.2.0-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 00:26:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:26:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472842] New: Review Request: pytagger - ID3 Tag Reader and Writer Library for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pytagger - ID3 Tag Reader and Writer Library for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472842 Summary: Review Request: pytagger - ID3 Tag Reader and Writer Library for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orcanbahri at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/pytagger.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/pytagger-0.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: pytagger is a ID3 tag reader and writer implemented purely in Python. It supports all the current ID3 tag implementations including ID3v1, ID3v1.1, ID3v2.2, ID3v2.3 and ID3v2.4. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ rpmlint is silent. I didn't run the test scripts because they need some extra audio files which are not provided by upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 00:42:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:42:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811250042.mAP0gCGG012125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 --- Comment #18 from David Woodhouse 2008-11-24 19:42:11 EDT --- Oops, sorry. Make that... Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/openconnect.spec SRPM URL: http://david.woodhou.se/openconnect-0.98-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 02:03:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:03:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811250203.mAP2361D031623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-24 21:03:05 EDT --- Few minor tweaks to bring package in line with latest updated draft revised guidelines. The package is now equivalent to generating with the cabal2spec script being adding in ghc-6.10.1-5.fc11. Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-HTTP/ghc-HTTP.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-HTTP/ghc-HTTP-3001.1.4-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 02:22:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:22:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811250222.mAP2M6Id027976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #10 from Brennan Ashton 2008-11-24 21:22:04 EDT --- I am currently packaging Jeuclid there are a few java oddities that I am still trying to sort out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 03:17:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:17:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460886] Review Request: libnetdude - a libpcap trace file manipulation library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811250317.mAP3HrtZ011693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460886 Bug 460886 depends on bug 460887, which changed state. Bug 460887 Summary: Review Request: libpcapnav - a libpcap trace file navigation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460887 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW Resolution| |NOTABUG Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 03:17:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:17:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460887] Review Request: libpcapnav - a libpcap trace file navigation library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811250317.mAP3Hohj011632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460887 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841 |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(christian at whoop.o | |rg) | --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-24 22:17:47 EDT --- Why return this to the queue? Why not just close it and save someone else the hassle of dealing with it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 03:19:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:19:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460885] Review Request: netdude - a libpcap trace file manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811250319.mAP3JTFq005230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460885 Bug 460885 depends on bug 460886, which changed state. Bug 460886 Summary: Review Request: libnetdude - a libpcap trace file manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460886 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NOTABUG Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 03:19:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:19:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460886] Review Request: libnetdude - a libpcap trace file manipulation library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811250319.mAP3JQ9j005162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460886 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks|177841 |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-24 22:19:24 EDT --- Since the submitter hasn't responded to the libpcapnav review after many weeks and multiple pings, it has been closed and thus this must be closed as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 03:20:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:20:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811250320.mAP3KYDq005720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #41 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-24 22:20:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > There's no reason to include the LICENSE file twice, is there? Yes, probably not, but I think actually the -prof subpackage should not require the main package (just ghc-prof), so it would be possible to install -prof alone. Does that change anything? I am adding a little shell script called cabal2spec in ghc-6.10.1-5.fc11 which generates a ghc library spec files for a hackage tarball argument from cabal-lib-template.spec. It could also generate ghc-zlib.spec with build_doc and build_prof switches. See http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/ghc/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 03:21:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:21:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460885] Review Request: netdude - a libpcap trace file manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811250321.mAP3LGqg012627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460885 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-24 22:21:14 EDT --- Since the tickets this depends on have all been closed due to non-response, I suppose this should be closed as well. I'll let the assigned reviewer take care of that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 03:37:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:37:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811250337.mAP3bvg3015978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #42 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-24 22:37:56 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=324561) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=324561) ghc-zlib.spec-2.patch Update to ghc-6.10.1 and latest draft revised guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 03:41:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:41:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811250341.mAP3fZu4016776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #43 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-24 22:41:34 EDT --- Built in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=949251 with ghc-6.10.1-4.fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 04:15:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:15:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811250415.mAP4F49q022769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |472848 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 04:15:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:15:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid-core - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811250415.mAP4F2OI022691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841, 472639 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 04:13:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:13:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] New: Review Request: jeuclid-core - MathML rendering solution Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jeuclid-core - MathML rendering solution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 Summary: Review Request: jeuclid-core - MathML rendering solution Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bashton at brennanashton.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/jeuclid-core.spec SRPM URL: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/jeuclid-core-3.1.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is the core package for JEuclid a complete MathML rendering solution. I am in need of a sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 04:37:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:37:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811250437.mAP4b5AN026151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #44 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-24 23:37:01 EDT --- The opinion from the legal folks is that even if a srpm creates subpackages that are not related in name or dependency chain, it is still only necessary to include the license file in one of them. It's been discussed, however, and it's also not a blocker if that's really what you want to do. Honestly I would suggest that any templates or automated tools not have %files lists with duplicated files so that less experienced packagers don't get the impression that it is necessary to duplicate the license file or acceptable in general to have duplicate entries in %files lists. I believe that with the patch in comment 42, this package is fine, and I'm happy to see this through. APPROVED I guess we need another guideline update to handle the changed scriptlets, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 05:29:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:29:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid-core - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811250529.mAP5T72g028032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #1 from Brennan Ashton 2008-11-25 00:29:06 EDT --- The koji scratch builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=949406 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 06:27:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 01:27:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811250627.mAP6RQZU004731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #45 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-25 01:27:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #44) > Honestly I would suggest that any templates or automated tools not have %files lists with > duplicated files so that less experienced packagers don't get the impression > that it is necessary to duplicate the license file or acceptable in general to > have duplicate entries in %files lists. Right - I will remove it. > I believe that with the patch in comment 42, this package is fine, and I'm > happy to see this through. Thanks for reviewing the first new haskell library package. :-) > I guess we need another guideline update to handle the changed scriptlets, though. Yep. Planning to rework the text, then rfc, and submit to FPC again for review. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 06:46:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 01:46:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470792] Review Request: eclipse-shelled - Shell script editor plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811250646.mAP6kMjg007894@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470792 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-25 01:46:21 EDT --- I made a quick check. There is this issue that needs to be corrected before we can do a full review: * Source0 must be given in full URL from upstream's website. A few other things that I caught were: * For the Group tag pick something from /usr/share/doc/rpm-*/GROUPS Development/Tools or Development/Languages maybe? * %eclipse_base must be %define eclipse_base %{_datadir}/eclipse Check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/EclipsePlugins Otherwise the package will not build. * No %doc files? Check the source thoroughly. Please list every applicable file in %doc. * Use CPL for the license * There shouldn't be both spaces and tabs in the same SPEC file. Please use one or the other. rpmlint is a good application which will warn you about such things and many other issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 09:40:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 04:40:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470792] Review Request: eclipse-shelled - Shell script editor plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811250940.mAP9eZHm008888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470792 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2008-11-25 04:40:34 EDT --- Updated with the comments Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-shelled.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-shelled-1.0.3-1.fc9.src.rpm (In reply to comment #1) > I made a quick check. There is this issue that needs to be corrected before we > can do a full review: > > * Source0 must be given in full URL from upstream's website. Done: Fetch script added. > > > A few other things that I caught were: > > * For the Group tag pick something from > /usr/share/doc/rpm-*/GROUPS > Development/Tools or Development/Languages maybe? Done: Development/Tools > > * %eclipse_base must be > %define eclipse_base %{_datadir}/eclipse > Check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/EclipsePlugins > Otherwise the package will not build. Not valid for Fedora 10. > > * No %doc files? Check the source thoroughly. Please list every applicable file > in %doc. There is really no doc provided. > > * Use CPL for the license Done. > > * There shouldn't be both spaces and tabs in the same SPEC file. Please use one > or the other. rpmlint is a good application which will warn you about such > things and many other issues. Fixed. Rpmlint do not show any warning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 09:41:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 04:41:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470354] Review Request: noip - A dynamic DNS update client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811250941.mAP9fLpK009056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470354 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-25 04:41:20 EDT --- Updated to 2.1.9. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/noip.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/noip-2.1.9-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 10:14:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 05:14:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid-core - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251014.mAPAE5ZC014828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #2 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-11-25 05:14:04 EDT --- Some quick notes: % rpmlint jeuclid-core-* jeuclid-core.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/jeuclid-core-3.1.3/NOTICE jeuclid-core.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 3.1.3 ['3.1.3-1.fc9', '3.1.3-1'] You need to put the package release in a changelog entry, too. jeuclid-core.x86_64: E: no-binary jeuclid-core-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings. This should be a noarch package, because it contains no binaries (as rpmlint tells you). That'll also fix the empty debuginfo. Use BuildArch: noarch. BuildRequires: java-devel BuildRequires: java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel One of these is redundant. Please add comments to patches, i.e. # this patch fixes foo, Fedora specific Patch0: jeuclid-core-build.patch # this patch fixes bar, submitted upstream Patch1: jeuclid-core-FreeHep.patch I could sponsor you if you can demonstrate knowledge of our packaging guidelines, i.e. by submitting another package or two for review and doing a couple of package reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 10:31:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 05:31:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472274] Review Request: atari++ - Unix based emulator of the Atari eight bit computers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251031.mAPAV9os011781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472274 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Dan Hor?k 2008-11-25 05:31:07 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: atari++ New Branches: EL-5 Owners: sharkcz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 10:53:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 05:53:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464013] Review Request: findbugs-bcel - Byte Code Engineering Library with findbugs extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251053.mAPArmPp022780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464013 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mefoster at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-11-25 05:53:47 EDT --- Not officially reviewing this yet -- because I'm not sure about the issues of letting this package in in the first place -- but there are a couple of quickie rpmlint warnings that are probably easy to fix. findbugs-bcel.i386: W: non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java (should probably be "Development/Libraries") findbugs-bcel-javadoc.i386: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation (should probably be "Documentation") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 12:40:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:40:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459153] Review Request: ann - Library for searching Approximate Nearest Neighbors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251240.mAPCeiES009029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459153 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Dan Hor?k 2008-11-25 07:40:42 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ann New Branches: EL-5 Owners: sharkcz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 12:42:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:42:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 366011] Review Request: ultimatestunts - 3D racing game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251242.mAPCg1ZQ002990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=366011 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Dan Hor?k 2008-11-25 07:41:59 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ultimatestunts New Branches: EL-5 Owners: sharkcz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 12:40:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:40:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251240.mAPCe2cg002444@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #6 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-11-25 07:40:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Is maintaining arch parity a requirement documented by upstream, or something > you observed in testing? If it's not upstream, you'll want to include it in a > partimage-README.txt Yes, Jon. According to my tests, the interface hangs when I use a 32 bit client (from system-rescuecd) connected to a 64 bit server. Since the normal usage is booting from a CD, so all partitions are unmounted (and making the image) the server, in general, will have to be 32 bits. Also, the server options have to match the client compilation options. Since the client from system-rescuecd use no login and no ssl, the server has to disable those options in /etc/sysconfi/partimaged. Note that partimage is developed by the team from System-rescuecd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 12:42:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:42:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 442280] Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251242.mAPCgsi4009416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442280 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Dan Hor?k 2008-11-25 07:42:51 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: squirrel New Branches: EL-5 Owners: sharkcz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 12:41:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:41:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471863] Review Request: garmindev - Drivers for communication with Garmin GPS devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251241.mAPCfOZk009214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471863 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Dan Hor?k 2008-11-25 07:41:23 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: garmindev New Branches: EL-5 Owners: sharkcz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 12:43:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:43:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216322] Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251243.mAPChkN4009517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216322 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Dan Hor?k 2008-11-25 07:43:44 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: tailor New Branches: EL-5 Owners: sharkcz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 12:45:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:45:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471662] Review Request: qlandkartegt - GPS device mapping tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251245.mAPCjdFO003832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471662 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Dan Hor?k 2008-11-25 07:45:38 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: qlandkartegt New Branches: EL-5 Owners: sharkcz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 13:00:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:00:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460885] Review Request: netdude - a libpcap trace file manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251300.mAPD04b7013251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460885 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2008-11-25 08:00:03 EDT --- Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 13:03:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:03:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462580] Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251303.mAPD3IgJ014052@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462580 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mefoster at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-11-25 08:03:17 EDT --- This package didn't build in mock for me (fedora-9-i386); amid a lot of warnings was the following error: [javac] 98. ERROR in /builddir/build/BUILD/wstx/src/java/com/ctc/wstx/evt/WAttribute.java (at line 97) [javac] public String getDTDType() { [javac] ^^^^^^ [javac] The return type is incompatible with Attribute.getDTDType() If I build (locally) with OpenJDK instead of GCJ, it builds fine, so this seems to be an incompatibility in the signature of that method. Not sure what the solution is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 13:12:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:12:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462580] Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251312.mAPDC73i016141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462580 --- Comment #2 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-11-25 08:12:05 EDT --- While I'm at it, here are some rpmlint warnings on the OpenJDK-built packages: wstx.i386: W: no-documentation (probably not an issue, but should some of the files from the "manual" subpackage maybe be included as documentation in the main package?) wstx.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/wstx (should it be marked %config(noreplace) ?) wstx.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency msv-xsdlib (false positive because of the package name matching "*lib*") wstx.i386: W: non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java (should be "Development/Libraries"?) wstx-j2me.i386: W: no-documentation (no big issue) wstx-j2me.i386: W: non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java (==> "Development/Libraries" ?) wstx-javadoc.i386: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation (==> "Documentation" ?) wstx-manual.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/wstx-3.1.1/CREDITS (run iconv on it during the build: inside %prep: iconv -f CREDITS > tmp.utf8 mv tmp.utf8 CREDITS ) wstx-manual.i386: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation (==> "Documentation" ?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 13:22:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:22:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462560] Review Request: xmlpull-api - XmlPull v1 API is a simple to use XML pull parsing API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251322.mAPDM6Ht012566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462560 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mefoster at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-11-25 08:22:05 EDT --- Dunno about the version naming; your rationale sounds plausible to me but I could also see it going the other way. A few rpmlint issues: xmlpull-api.i386: W: non-standard-group Development/Java (==> Development/Libraries ?) xmlpull-api.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1.4b-2 ['0:1.1.4b-2.fc9', '0:1.1.4b-2'] This goes away if you remove the "Epoch: 0" from the spec file. Is the epoch actually necessary? If so, the changelog entry should be 0:1.1.4b-2 xmlpull-api-javadoc.i386: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation (==> Documentation ?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 13:29:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:29:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469968] Review Request: Vala - a programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251329.mAPDTd2a020136@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469968 Paul F. Johnson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 13:44:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:44:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251344.mAPDi7tI017750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2008-11-25 08:44:05 EDT --- Ok. Also, probably best to use NoArch instead of BuildArch, so sparc, alpha, etc can take a crack at it later. rpmlint on SRPM: partimage.src: W: strange-permission create_certificates.sh 0775 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. partimage.src: W: strange-permission partimaged-passwd 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. Should these not be 700, or at least 744? rpmlint on RPMS: partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid /etc/partimaged partimag partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /etc/partimaged partimag partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid /home/images partimag partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /home/images partimag partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/partimaged partimag partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/partimaged partimag partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid /etc/partimaged/create_certificates.sh partimag partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /etc/partimaged/create_certificates.sh partimag partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid /etc/partimaged/partimagedusers partimag partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /etc/partimaged/partimagedusers partimag partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid /etc/partimaged/partimage-certs.cnf partimag partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /etc/partimaged/partimage-certs.cnf partimag OK. partimage-server.i386: E: dir-or-file-in-home /home/images What's going on here? This cannot be in /home, maybe /usr/share/partimage-server or /var/lib/partimage-server. partimage-server.i386: E: incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/partimaged partimage-server.i386: W: incoherent-init-script-name partimaged Probably fine, but could be patched to be partimage-server, or possibly the sub-package renamed partimaged. partimage-server.i386: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/partimaged/create_certificates.sh Should be in /usr/share/partimaged/ partimage-server.i386: E: non-readable /etc/partimaged/partimagedusers 0600 Probably fine. Full review in progress. . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 14:10:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:10:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226493] Merge Review: tix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251410.mAPEA4gK024376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226493 Vitezslav Crhonek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW CC| |vcrhonek at redhat.com AssignedTo|vcrhonek at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #3 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2008-11-25 09:10:02 EDT --- I don't think that doing Merge Review to package owned by myself is good idea. Changing to NEW, adding myself to CC list. Hope that somebody will take it and go through Merge Review process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 14:33:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:33:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251433.mAPEX09w029215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2008-11-25 09:32:58 EDT --- License is GPLv2+. Fix Source0 URL. . . https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL Send gcc-4.3 patch upstream if not already done, document that you did and how in the spec. The DOCS are duplicated in the main and server packages. Usually redundant, but since they don't require each other, it's OK here. Need to BuildRequires zlib-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 16:15:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:15:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469955] Review Request: fprintd - D-Bus service for Fingerprint reader access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251615.mAPGFtNM023578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469955 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Matthias Clasen 2008-11-25 11:15:53 EDT --- Here is what rpmlint says on the rpms: fprintd.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/fprintd.conf You said you wanted to make this conf ? fprintd.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/net.reactivated.Fprint.conf This is ignorable fprintd-devel.i386: W: summary-not-capitalized fprintd development documentation I always use a more-or-less standardized summary of "Development files for %{name}" for -devel packages. fprintd-devel.i386: W: invalid-license GFDLv1.1+ No + there, I think. printd-pam.i386: W: no-documentation Thats sad, but ignorable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 16:16:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:16:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251616.mAPGG520023620@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 Torsten Rausche changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(trausche at fedorapr | |oject.org) | --- Comment #23 from Torsten Rausche 2008-11-25 11:16:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > This depends on how this perl script is related to the rest part of nxtvepg. > If this perl script "uses" (i.e. depends on) the rest part of nxtvepg, then > the license conflict cannot be resolved only by moving it into a subpackage > and this script must be removed completely. Are you sure? After reading http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ I even think it would be enough to add GPLv3+ to the License tag: Q: How should I handle multiple licensing situations? A: It depends on the situation. Here are some common cases: # A package has multiple binaries, some of them are GPLv2, some are GPLv3, and some are MIT licensed. In this case, you do need to list all of the individual licenses of the compiled binaries in the License tag, so it should read: License: GPLv2 and GPLv3 and MIT If this is possible for binaries, it should also be possible for scripts, shouldn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 16:23:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:23:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468539] Review Request: sugar-jukebox - Media player activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251623.mAPGN2eL018796@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468539 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-25 11:23:01 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 16:29:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:29:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469955] Review Request: fprintd - D-Bus service for Fingerprint reader access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251629.mAPGTnrV025910@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469955 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Clasen 2008-11-25 11:29:47 EDT --- Taking a first look at the spec file: Requires: %{name} = %{version} Not sure if theres a policy about this, but I always do Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} to avoid surprises Going to do a formal review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 16:31:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:31:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251631.mAPGVI1k026531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-25 11:31:16 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 16:32:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:32:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472685] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext - Return a new instance a component on each request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251632.mAPGW2Ot026610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472685 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-25 11:32:00 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 16:35:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:35:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454412] Review Request: mingw32-runtime - MinGW Windows cross-compiler runtime and root filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251635.mAPGZawn021156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454412 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-25 11:35:35 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 16:34:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:34:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251634.mAPGYbJZ020683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-25 11:34:36 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 16:40:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:40:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472165] Review Request: perl-Test-Strict - Check syntax, presence of use strict/warnings, and test coverage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251640.mAPGerpH028404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472165 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #7 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-25 11:40:52 EDT --- please make a new CVS request with the correct summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 16:36:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:36:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469955] Review Request: fprintd - D-Bus service for Fingerprint reader access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251636.mAPGahfw027602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469955 --- Comment #6 from Bastien Nocera 2008-11-25 11:36:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Here is what rpmlint says on the rpms: > > fprintd.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/fprintd.conf > > You said you wanted to make this conf ? No, I added a comment about it: # This file should be marked as config when it does something useful > fprintd.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc > /etc/dbus-1/system.d/net.reactivated.Fprint.conf > > This is ignorable > > fprintd-devel.i386: W: summary-not-capitalized fprintd development > documentation > > I always use a more-or-less standardized summary of "Development files for > %{name}" for -devel packages. OK, will change. > fprintd-devel.i386: W: invalid-license GFDLv1.1+ > > No + there, I think. But the docs say: "Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or any later version [...]" > printd-pam.i386: W: no-documentation > > Thats sad, but ignorable. I'll write a little something to go upstream and in the package. (In reply to comment #5) > Taking a first look at the spec file: > > Requires: %{name} = %{version} > > Not sure if theres a policy about this, but I always do > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} > to avoid surprises Yes, will fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 16:37:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:37:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454414] Review Request: mingw32-w32api - MinGW Windows cross-compiler Win32 header files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251637.mAPGbmBT021675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454414 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-25 11:37:47 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 16:39:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:39:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251639.mAPGd5mP021878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #39 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-25 11:39:03 EDT --- CVS Done, no need to put an owner in the initialCC list -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 16:44:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:44:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472664] Review Request: perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple - Easy to use HTML::TokeParser interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251644.mAPGiNFh028989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472664 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-25 11:44:22 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 16:46:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:46:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472666] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural - Create machine readable date/time with natural parsing logic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251646.mAPGkBRV029614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472666 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-25 11:46:10 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 16:43:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:43:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472348] Review Request: hunspell-no - Norwegian hunspell dictionaaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251643.mAPGhhlq023091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472348 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-25 11:43:42 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 16:42:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:42:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472170] Review Request: perl-Check-ISA - DWIM, correct checking of an object's class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251642.mAPGgBOi022873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472170 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-25 11:42:09 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 16:42:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:42:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251642.mAPGg70S022743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-25 11:42:05 EDT --- This is the case in which GPLv2 part of the codes does not depend on GPLv3 part (i.e. GPLv2 part binaries can be rebuilt even if the codes licensed under GPLv3 are completely removed from the tarball and GPLv2 binaries does not use GPLv3 binaries in essence). So the question is how this perl script is tied to nxtvepg binary. - If this perl script can be used without nxtvepg binary (i.e. with this binary removed), then multiple licensing situation can be applied. - If this perl script essencially uses nxtvepg binary, then license needs fixing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 16:47:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:47:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472165] Review Request: perl-Test-Strict - Check syntax, presence of use strict/warnings, and test coverage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251647.mAPGllBh029977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472165 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-25 11:47:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-Strict Short Description: Check syntax, presence of use strict/warnings, and test coverage Owners: cweyl Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 16:50:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:50:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471863] Review Request: garmindev - Drivers for communication with Garmin GPS devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251650.mAPGop1L024749@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471863 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-25 11:50:49 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 16:48:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:48:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472668] Review Request: perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA - Perl implementation of the reCAPTCHA API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251648.mAPGm4rT024099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472668 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-25 11:48:03 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 16:51:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:51:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 366011] Review Request: ultimatestunts - 3D racing game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251651.mAPGpval030734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=366011 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-25 11:51:55 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 16:53:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:53:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216322] Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251653.mAPGrUTM030924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216322 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-25 11:53:30 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 16:54:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:54:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472274] Review Request: atari++ - Unix based emulator of the Atari eight bit computers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251654.mAPGsEfN031013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472274 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-25 11:54:12 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 16:56:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:56:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 242228] Review Request: ps2eps - PS-to-EPS converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251656.mAPGuFLn025933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242228 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-25 11:56:14 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 16:54:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:54:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471662] Review Request: qlandkartegt - GPS device mapping tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251654.mAPGslo1025377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471662 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-25 11:54:46 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 16:56:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:56:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459153] Review Request: ann - Library for searching Approximate Nearest Neighbors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251656.mAPGuqEN026003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459153 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-25 11:56:51 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 16:52:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:52:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 442280] Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251652.mAPGqa06025211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442280 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-25 11:52:35 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 16:59:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:59:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472165] Review Request: perl-Test-Strict - Check syntax, presence of use strict/warnings, and test coverage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251659.mAPGx8q6032100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472165 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-25 11:59:07 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 17:11:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:11:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472348] Review Request: hunspell-no - Norwegian hunspell dictionaaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251711.mAPHBNKu029237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472348 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|472342 | CC| |libbe at stefansen.net --- Comment #4 from Caolan McNamara 2008-11-25 12:11:21 EDT --- *** Bug 472342 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 18:08:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:08:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468539] Review Request: sugar-jukebox - Media player activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251808.mAPI88N8012253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468539 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-25 13:08:07 EDT --- sugar-jukebox-5-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-jukebox-5-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 19:00:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:00:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251900.mAPJ0MrN023157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #25 from Torsten Rausche 2008-11-25 14:00:21 EDT --- We have following situation: [1] Nxtvepg (GPLv2) does not need the Perl script (GPLv3+). It can use the script if it is there but also runs fine without it. Both communicate with each other and exchange data. But there is no hard link between both. Nxtvepg simply pipes preprocessed data from /dev/vbi to the script, the script parses the data and gives XML as output, which in turn nxtvepg reads via pipe. My opinion is that if this is not legal then no GPLv2 UNIX tool could interact with a GPLv3+ one. Upstream also does not seem to see a problem here. [2] The Perl script (GPLv3+) can also run without nxtvepg. But it needs preprocessed input data to do something useful. This data has to come from a file or standard input. Optionally it can use the VBI device directly -- if the Perl module Video-ZVBI (GPLv2+) is available. This module is not packaged for Fedora yet. But this could be done... Because of [1] the script is included in the nxtvepg tarball. Because of [2] it is also available in its own tarball under http://nxtvepg.sourceforge.net/tv_grab_ttx I think it is enough to set License to GPLv2 and GPLv3+ and keep the script in the nxtvepg package. But I admit that my knowledge about licensing is pretty low. There is also the way to introduce two new packages (no subpackages, one for the script and one for the Video-ZVBI Perl module) and remove the script from the nxtvepg package. Of course this also means two more package reviews to work on ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 19:05:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:05:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251905.mAPJ5cb7024630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #9 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-11-25 14:05:37 EDT --- > rpmlint on SRPM: > partimage.src: W: strange-permission create_certificates.sh 0775 > A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. > Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. I put the script that creates the certificates in the same directory the certificates are going to be. It has been moved to /usr/share/partimaged. > > partimage.src: W: strange-permission partimaged-passwd 0755 > A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. > Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. > The idea behind this script is that users do not need to have a local account on the server in case a login is needed. It has been moved to /usr/share/partimaged. This script creates a db file (user, passwd), which can be used by pam for authentication purposes. The problem is that pam is ignoring this file and using only the /etc/partimaged/partimagedusers, which lists only local users (no passwords). Therefore, my pam rules are not working the way I wanted, but I do not know how to fix them ... For now, only local users can authenticate. Any suggestion? Do you know how pam works? > > Should these not be 700, or at least 744? > > rpmlint on RPMS: > > partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid /etc/partimaged partimag > partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /etc/partimaged partimag > partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid /home/images partimag > partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /home/images partimag > partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/partimaged partimag > partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/partimaged partimag > partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid > /etc/partimaged/create_certificates.sh partimag > partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid > /etc/partimaged/create_certificates.sh partimag > partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid /etc/partimaged/partimagedusers > partimag > partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /etc/partimaged/partimagedusers > partimag > partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid /etc/partimaged/partimage-certs.cnf > partimag > partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /etc/partimaged/partimage-certs.cnf > partimag > > OK. > > partimage-server.i386: E: dir-or-file-in-home /home/images > > What's going on here? This cannot be in /home, maybe > /usr/share/partimage-server or /var/lib/partimage-server. I used a %bcond_without home because it is where I save my images (all my free space is always in /home). This has been changed to %bcond_with home which makes the spec to put the images in /var/partimaged. > > partimage-server.i386: E: incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/partimaged > partimage-server.i386: W: incoherent-init-script-name partimaged > > Probably fine, but could be patched to be partimage-server, or possibly the > sub-package renamed partimaged. > The process name is partimaged. I think is counter-intuitive to use partimage-server. The sub-package could be renamed, but everybody else uses partimage-server. Only Fedora would be different ... > partimage-server.i386: E: executable-marked-as-config-file > /etc/partimaged/create_certificates.sh > > Should be in /usr/share/partimaged/ Already moved. > > partimage-server.i386: E: non-readable /etc/partimaged/partimagedusers 0600 > > Probably fine. > License is GPLv2+. Fixed. > Fix Source0 URL. . . > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL Changed. > Send gcc-4.3 patch upstream if not already done, document that you did and how > in the spec. It is in the changelog section. The patch is very simple, and just changed some include files for C++: -#include +#include > The DOCS are duplicated in the main and server packages. Usually redundant, > but since they don't require each other, it's OK here. > Need to BuildRequires zlib-devel. Done. Links updated. A README.fedora will be added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 19:08:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:08:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472170] Review Request: perl-Check-ISA - DWIM, correct checking of an object's class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251908.mAPJ8U4Y025003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472170 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 19:08:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:08:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472165] Review Request: perl-Test-Strict - Check syntax, presence of use strict/warnings, and test coverage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251908.mAPJ8r2d018510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472165 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 19:33:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:33:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251933.mAPJX2Uj030623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-25 14:33:01 EDT --- edb-0.9.6-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/edb-0.9.6-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 19:33:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:33:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251933.mAPJXSE2030747@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2008-11-25 14:33:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > > rpmlint on SRPM: > > partimage.src: W: strange-permission create_certificates.sh 0775 > > A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. > > Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. > > I put the script that creates the certificates in the same directory > the certificates are going to be. It has been moved to /usr/share/partimaged. > > > > > > partimage.src: W: strange-permission partimaged-passwd 0755 > > A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. > > Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. > > > > The idea behind this script is that users do not need to have a local account > on the server in case a login is needed. It has been moved to > /usr/share/partimaged. Good. > This script creates a db file (user, passwd), which can be used by pam for > authentication purposes. The problem is that pam is ignoring this file > and using only the /etc/partimaged/partimagedusers, which lists only > local users (no passwords). > > Therefore, my pam rules are not working the way I wanted, > but I do not know how to fix them ... > For now, only local users can authenticate. > > Any suggestion? Do you know how pam works? Not sure. Is this something you're adding on, or functionality of the original code? > > > > Should these not be 700, or at least 744? > > > > rpmlint on RPMS: > > > > partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid /etc/partimaged partimag > > partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /etc/partimaged partimag > > partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid /home/images partimag > > partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /home/images partimag > > partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/partimaged partimag > > partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/partimaged partimag > > partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid > > /etc/partimaged/create_certificates.sh partimag > > partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid > > /etc/partimaged/create_certificates.sh partimag > > partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid /etc/partimaged/partimagedusers > > partimag > > partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /etc/partimaged/partimagedusers > > partimag > > partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid /etc/partimaged/partimage-certs.cnf > > partimag > > partimage-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /etc/partimaged/partimage-certs.cnf > > partimag > > > > OK. > > > > partimage-server.i386: E: dir-or-file-in-home /home/images > > > > What's going on here? This cannot be in /home, maybe > > /usr/share/partimage-server or /var/lib/partimage-server. > > I used a > > %bcond_without home > > because it is where I save my images (all my free space is always in /home). > > This has been changed to > > %bcond_with home > > which makes the spec to put the images in /var/partimaged. Good. > > > > > partimage-server.i386: E: incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/partimaged > > partimage-server.i386: W: incoherent-init-script-name partimaged > > > > Probably fine, but could be patched to be partimage-server, or possibly the > > sub-package renamed partimaged. > > > > The process name is partimaged. I think is counter-intuitive to use > partimage-server. The sub-package could be renamed, but everybody else uses > partimage-server. Only Fedora would be different ... Then we can leave it -server. > > partimage-server.i386: E: executable-marked-as-config-file > > /etc/partimaged/create_certificates.sh > > > > Should be in /usr/share/partimaged/ > > Already moved. > > > > > partimage-server.i386: E: non-readable /etc/partimaged/partimagedusers 0600 > > > > Probably fine. > > > > > License is GPLv2+. > > Fixed. > > > Fix Source0 URL. . . > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL > > Changed. > > > Send gcc-4.3 patch upstream if not already done, document that you did and how > > in the spec. > > It is in the changelog section. > The patch is very simple, and just changed some include files for C++: > > -#include > +#include Should be commented next to patch in spec. Changelog is good to have as well. > > > The DOCS are duplicated in the main and server packages. Usually redundant, > > but since they don't require each other, it's OK here. > > > Need to BuildRequires zlib-devel. > > Done. > > > Links updated. A README.fedora will be added. Probably best to update the release and repost new links, as an additional indicator of exactly when the above has been completed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 19:34:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:34:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251934.mAPJYAi8024042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-25 14:34:09 EDT --- edb-0.9.6-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/edb-0.9.6-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 19:35:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:35:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251935.mAPJZKOD024533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-25 14:35:19 EDT --- edb-0.9.6-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/edb-0.9.6-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 22:56:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:56:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472348] Review Request: hunspell-no - Norwegian hunspell dictionaaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811252256.mAPMuAuX029179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472348 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Caolan McNamara 2008-11-25 17:56:08 EDT --- Built into rawhide (i.e. F11) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 22:58:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:58:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472992] New: Review Request: hunspell-gu - Manx hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-gu - Manx hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472992 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-gu - Manx hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-gv.spec SRPM URL: Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 23:02:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 18:02:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472994] New: Review Request: hunspell-gv - Manx hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-gv - Manx hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472994 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-gv - Manx hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-gv.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-gv-0.20040505-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Manx hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 23:02:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 18:02:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472997] New: Review Request: hunspell-ny - Chichewa hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ny - Chichewa hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472997 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ny - Chichewa hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-ny.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-ny-0.20050108-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Chichewa hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 23:02:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 18:02:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472995] New: Review Request: hunspell-hil - Hiligaynon hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-hil - Hiligaynon hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472995 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-hil - Hiligaynon hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-hil.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-hil-0.20050406-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Hiligaynon hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 23:02:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 18:02:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472996] New: Review Request: hunspell-ia - Interlingua hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ia - Interlingua hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472996 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ia - Interlingua hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-ia.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-ia-0.20050226-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Interlingua hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 23:46:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 18:46:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid-core - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811252346.mAPNklOi014043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #3 from Brennan Ashton 2008-11-25 18:46:46 EDT --- Thank you, I did not realize that I needed to run rpmlint on the rpm as well, I had run it on the SRPM and the spec. The changes are now made, and it compiles cleanly in koji. See: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=951853 I have another ReviewRequest going here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472724 that was off the wishlist. And I will start reviewing a few packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 23:53:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 18:53:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472724] Review Request: xjparse - wrapper for the Xerces XML Schema validator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811252353.mAPNrugM014854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472724 --- Comment #2 from Brennan Ashton 2008-11-25 18:53:56 EDT --- Just updated the spec and SRPM for a couple of build issues. There are now no rpmlint errors except for one that is complaining about missing doc. There are no licence or readme files included in the src zip what do I do? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 00:12:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:12:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 448717] Review Request: gnome-rdp - rdesktop front end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260012.mAQ0Cd3n009630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448717 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-25 19:12:36 EDT --- gnome-rdp-0.2.3-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-rdp-0.2.3-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 01:01:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:01:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468116] Review Request: sugar-analyze - Analysing tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260101.mAQ11vI0025916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468116 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-25 20:01:56 EDT --- sugar-analyze-8-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-analyze-8-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 01:45:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:45:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472842] Review Request: pytagger - ID3 Tag Reader and Writer Library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260145.mAQ1jSm0000621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472842 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com --- Comment #1 from Brennan Ashton 2008-11-25 20:45:27 EDT --- Note, I am unsponsored so I cannot approve this MUSTS: *rpmlint -- passes cleanly in mock on rpm srpm and spec 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. *Package name correct *Spec name correct *Licensed fedora safe and correct *Licence files is not in its own file so %doc is ok without it *spec in english *spec is readable *md5sum is same as source file 0af47e825f510204d839cb190743ad40 *builds in mock *builds in mock so buildrequires are good *locales N/A *library files N/A *not designed to be relocatable *owns created dirs *permissions set *no large docs *%docs not runtime *no devel needed *no static libs *no .pc files *no .la files *not gui app *does not take ownership of other packages files *buildroot cleaned at start of %install *all file names valid UTF-8 SHOULDS: I did not see the licence as a separate file has upstream been notified? Any spec descriptions available? Builds fine in mock. Builds for all arch (noarch) I have not done a functionality test. No scriptlets. No subpackages. This package looks good to me, may want to look into the two questions I put in the SHOULDS section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 02:11:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:11:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470792] Review Request: eclipse-shelled - Shell script editor plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260211.mAQ2BqLv004955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470792 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-25 21:11:51 EDT --- * Whenever you are uploading a new release, don't forget the bump the release number. This applies even during the review process. * rpmlint says eclipse-shelled.noarch: W: no-documentation eclipse-shelled.src: W: strange-permission fetch-shelled.sh 0764 ** At least these files need to go to %doc. ./com.something.eclipse.shelled-feature/license.html ./com.something.eclipse.shelled-feature/cpl-v10.html ./com.something.eclipse.shelled.resources/about.html (Check the sample spec file at the eclipse guidelines) The other about.html files have the same content. Other than this, what are all those manpages for? ** Afaik, we use 644 for source files. * You do not need BuildRequires: zip BuildRequires: lzma * We prefer %defattr(-,root,root,-) * Use the %{version} macro whenever applicable (e.g. source0). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 02:36:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:36:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472842] Review Request: pytagger - ID3 Tag Reader and Writer Library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260236.mAQ2aKcv032117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472842 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-25 21:36:20 EDT --- Hi. Thanks for your time. I hope you get sponsored soon. - Actually, the license file is there. It is the COPYING file. The name "COPYING" is a common name for license files. - Spec descriptions... I think I strictly followed the python guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python Do you think there is something that is not clear? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 02:42:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:42:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472994] Review Request: hunspell-gv - Manx hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260242.mAQ2gWEP009695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472994 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-25 21:42:30 EDT --- *** Bug 472992 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 02:42:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:42:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472992] Review Request: hunspell-gu - Manx hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260242.mAQ2gVkl009666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472992 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |panemade at gmail.com Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-25 21:42:30 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 472994 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 02:57:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:57:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461454] Review Request: lordsawar - Turn-based strategy game in a fantasy setting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260257.mAQ2vibC012450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461454 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-25 21:57:43 EDT --- lordsawar-0.1.3-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lordsawar-0.1.3-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 03:09:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:09:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472842] Review Request: pytagger - ID3 Tag Reader and Writer Library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260309.mAQ39YoP014528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472842 --- Comment #3 from Brennan Ashton 2008-11-25 22:09:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Hi. Thanks for your time. I hope you get sponsored soon. > > - Actually, the license file is there. It is the COPYING file. The name > "COPYING" is a common name for license files. I remember reading that file, not sure why I said that. > > - Spec descriptions... I think I strictly followed the python guidelines: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python > Do you think there is something that is not clear? I was referring to this part of the review guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. But as it says if available, so by no means is that a blocking issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 03:51:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:51:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471829] Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260351.mAQ3pJIZ013737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 Hayden James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 04:25:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:25:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462163] Review Request: checkdns - A Domain Name Server analysis and reporting tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260425.mAQ4PQP0019548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462163 --- Comment #9 from John Guthrie 2008-11-25 23:25:25 EDT --- I apologize for the late reply. Life stepped in and I wasn't able to look at this when you started looking at it. I am going to submit a new version to correct the blockers. One quick question though. When I was going through all of the Fedora packaging guidelines, I don't recall seeing anything about the %{optflags} variable. Could you refer me to the page that discusses this variable, so I can make certain that I use it correctly? Thank you very much. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 04:38:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:38:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470792] Review Request: eclipse-shelled - Shell script editor plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260438.mAQ4ceuF021354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470792 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 04:49:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:49:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472995] Review Request: hunspell-hil - Hiligaynon hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260449.mAQ4n4ZY031884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472995 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-25 23:49:02 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=952087 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 6ce553007a773a1c2ffd68b660ddb60b aspell5-hil-0.11-0.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 04:48:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:48:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472997] Review Request: hunspell-ny - Chichewa hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260448.mAQ4mZ0q022853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472997 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-25 23:48:34 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=952089 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. ce2d9a52eb814bc4d4107cf8d05f32f3 ny_MW.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 04:48:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:48:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472996] Review Request: hunspell-ia - Interlingua hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260448.mAQ4moOl022901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472996 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-25 23:48:49 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=952091 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 1b3705c8ca3de449fe28e109ee86adf4 ia_myspell.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 04:53:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:53:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472994] Review Request: hunspell-gv - Manx hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260453.mAQ4rXgH000311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472994 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-25 23:53:32 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=952132 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 139b5aa1f5ea85fb7a4be0338039e959 aspell-gv-0.50-0.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 05:06:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:06:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462163] Review Request: checkdns - A Domain Name Server analysis and reporting tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260506.mAQ56S0j026434@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462163 --- Comment #10 from John Guthrie 2008-11-26 00:06:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > - I did not examine carefully the program, but I think that you can eliminate > the need of suid group for the checkdns folder if - in %post - you create a > checkdns user and use > chown checkdns.apache /var/www/html/checkdns > chmod 755 /var/www/html/checkdns > make sure that the checkdns program is run as the checkdns user (which is > extremely easy to do in cron) > The only drawback is that if the program is run by another user (in a console), > the HTML files will not be created with the correct ownership. But as the > output is sent to the console, it can be redirected anywhere. I'm a little confused. Why would I want to do all of that in %post? Why not in %pre, and just set the ownership and permissions in the %files section? Unless I'm mistaken, what you are proposing would require changing perms/ownership after they have been placed into the RPM database, with the result that rpm -V will always flag them as having been changed. Am I missing something? (In addition, every other package that I have seen add users or groups has done so in %pre.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 05:06:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:06:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472027] Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260506.mAQ56a5J002819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472027 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2008-11-26 00:06:35 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:09:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:09:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472079] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Copy - Copy Regexp objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260609.mAQ69kcf012740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472079 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 01:09:45 EDT --- perl-Regexp-Copy-0.06-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:10:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:10:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472085] Review Request: perl-HTML-Tiny - Lightweight, dependency free HTML/XML generation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260610.mAQ6AGpG013204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472085 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 01:10:15 EDT --- perl-HTML-Tiny-1.03-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:10:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:10:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472085] Review Request: perl-HTML-Tiny - Lightweight, dependency free HTML/XML generation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260610.mAQ6AdEV004724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472085 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 01:10:39 EDT --- perl-HTML-Tiny-1.03-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:10:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:10:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468299] Review Request: jabberpy - Python xmlstream and jabber IM protocol libs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260610.mAQ6AWqQ004686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468299 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 01:10:31 EDT --- jabberpy-0.5-0.17.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:09:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:09:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472079] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Copy - Copy Regexp objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260609.mAQ69mqN004191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472079 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:10:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:10:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472085] Review Request: perl-HTML-Tiny - Lightweight, dependency free HTML/XML generation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260610.mAQ6AJ6Z004585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472085 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:15:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:15:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472072] Review Request: perl-Sub-Override - Perl extension for easily overriding subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260615.mAQ6FZmb014974@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472072 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 01:15:34 EDT --- perl-Sub-Override-0.08-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:15:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:15:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472072] Review Request: perl-Sub-Override - Perl extension for easily overriding subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260615.mAQ6FcA8015009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472072 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:11:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:11:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447104] Review Request: qdevelop - development environment for QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260611.mAQ6Bj4U013545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447104 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 01:11:44 EDT --- qdevelop-0.26.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update qdevelop'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-10236 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:12:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:12:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464049] Package Review Request for libprojectM-qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260612.mAQ6CBsg005263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464049 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 01:12:10 EDT --- libprojectM-qt-1.2.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:14:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:14:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472096] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Assemble - Assemble multiple Regular Expressions into a single RE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260614.mAQ6EQq7005905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472096 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 01:14:25 EDT --- perl-Regexp-Assemble-0.34-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:14:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:14:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472096] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Assemble - Assemble multiple Regular Expressions into a single RE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260614.mAQ6ET6M005941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472096 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:15:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:15:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260615.mAQ6Fhht006574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 01:15:42 EDT --- edb-0.9.6-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update edb'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-10266 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:18:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:18:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472083] Review Request: perl-boolean - Boolean support for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260618.mAQ6I2WM016043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472083 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 01:18:01 EDT --- perl-boolean-0.20-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:20:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:20:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446563] Review Request: rubygem-rspec - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260620.mAQ6KxFM017229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446563 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 01:20:58 EDT --- rubygem-rspec-1.1.11-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:20:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:20:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429882] Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260620.mAQ6Kkrd017139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429882 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:17:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:17:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472096] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Assemble - Assemble multiple Regular Expressions into a single RE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260617.mAQ6Hm3R015977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472096 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 01:17:47 EDT --- perl-Regexp-Assemble-0.34-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:18:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:18:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472083] Review Request: perl-boolean - Boolean support for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260618.mAQ6I43U016077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472083 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:17:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:17:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260617.mAQ6H1Od015813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 01:17:00 EDT --- edb-0.9.6-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update edb'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-10293 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:16:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:16:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260616.mAQ6GwGP015774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 01:16:57 EDT --- edb-0.9.6-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update edb'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-10291 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:18:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:18:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469955] Review Request: fprintd - D-Bus service for Fingerprint reader access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260618.mAQ6IgZw007718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469955 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:18:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:18:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471527] Review Request: snmp++ - SNMP C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260618.mAQ6IJi7007614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 01:18:18 EDT --- snmp++-3.2.23-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:18:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:18:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446563] Review Request: rubygem-rspec - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260618.mAQ6IeRs007683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446563 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 01:18:39 EDT --- rubygem-rspec-1.1.11-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:17:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:17:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446563] Review Request: rubygem-rspec - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260617.mAQ6HNWS007410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446563 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 01:17:22 EDT --- rubygem-rspec-1.1.11-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:20:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:20:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429882] Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260620.mAQ6KhmR008618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429882 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 01:20:40 EDT --- python-Levenshtein-0.10.1-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:17:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:17:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446563] Review Request: rubygem-rspec - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260617.mAQ6HQ0J007461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446563 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:20:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:20:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468539] Review Request: sugar-jukebox - Media player activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260620.mAQ6KOns008520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468539 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 01:20:22 EDT --- sugar-jukebox-5-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sugar-jukebox'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-10338 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:24:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:24:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471527] Review Request: snmp++ - SNMP C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260624.mAQ6OqNe018422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 01:24:51 EDT --- snmp++-3.2.23-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:25:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:25:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447104] Review Request: qdevelop - development environment for QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260625.mAQ6P7U0018762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447104 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 01:25:06 EDT --- qdevelop-0.26.1-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update qdevelop'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-10411 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:24:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:24:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472083] Review Request: perl-boolean - Boolean support for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260624.mAQ6OaTZ010009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472083 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 01:24:35 EDT --- perl-boolean-0.20-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:24:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:24:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472079] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Copy - Copy Regexp objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260624.mAQ6OJtg009958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472079 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 01:24:18 EDT --- perl-Regexp-Copy-0.06-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:23:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:23:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472072] Review Request: perl-Sub-Override - Perl extension for easily overriding subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260623.mAQ6NUSN009876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472072 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 01:23:29 EDT --- perl-Sub-Override-0.08-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:25:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:25:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447104] Review Request: qdevelop - development environment for QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260625.mAQ6PAJF010412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447104 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 01:25:10 EDT --- qdevelop-0.26.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update qdevelop'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-10413 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:46:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:46:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469955] Review Request: fprintd - D-Bus service for Fingerprint reader access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260646.mAQ6kRQu022044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469955 --- Comment #7 from Matthias Clasen 2008-11-26 01:46:25 EDT --- two more informal comments on the spec before I run down the checklist: - I don't think the explicit Requires: PolicyKit is needed, library deps should take care of that - The Conflicts: pam_fprint should probably have a comment explaining your rationale from comment #2 rpmlint run: see above package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: not ok the license field says GPLv2+, and the source files say so too, but the license file is GPL3. What gives ? license file: ok spec file language: ok spec file legible: ok upstream sources: ok buildable: ok ExcludeArch: ok BuildRequires: ok locale handling: ok shared libs: ok relocatable: ok directory ownership: not ok -devel should require gtk-doc, for /usr/share/gtk-doc/html -pam should require pam, for /lib/security duplicate files: ok permissions: not ok the %files sections for pam and devel need %defattr %clean: ok macro use: ok permissible content: ok large docs: ok %doc content: ok headers: ok static libs: ok pc files: ok shared libs: ok devel deps: ok libtool archives: ok gui apps: ok file ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok summary: some small fixes left -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:54:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:54:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472842] Review Request: pytagger - ID3 Tag Reader and Writer Library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260654.mAQ6s1pw023771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472842 --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-26 01:54:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > I was referring to this part of the review guidelines > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines > - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should > contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. > > But as it says if available, so by no means is that a blocking issue. Yes, you're right. There's been an ongoing discussion about this in the mailing list. We need more translators. While the guidelines suggest it, unfortunately, it never became a common exercise among packagers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:56:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:56:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260656.mAQ6uxQ1017087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #46 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-26 01:56:58 EDT --- For completeness here is the final package: Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-zlib.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-zlib-0.5.0.0-2.fc10.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-zlib Short Description: Haskell compression and decompression library Owners: petersen bos Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 07:12:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 02:12:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461575] Review Request: openvas-libraries - Support libraries for Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260712.mAQ7C9fK021888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461575 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #12 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-11-26 02:12:08 EDT --- build now, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 07:25:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 02:25:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260725.mAQ7PxY6000940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review+, fedora-cvs+ |fedora-review-, fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Lucian Langa 2008-11-26 02:25:58 EDT --- There is a problem with this package name, edb already exists in fedora: edb -- A database convenience library wrapped around BDB EDB is a database convenience library wrapped around the Berkeley DB 2.7.7 by Sleepycat Software. It is intended to make accessing database information portable, easy, fast and efficient. cvs was already granted for this package, but it is conflicting with the above package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 08:16:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:16:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473037] New: Review Request: tcc - small c compiler that can run c scripts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tcc - small c compiler that can run c scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037 Summary: Review Request: tcc - small c compiler that can run c scripts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bashton at brennanashton.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/tcc.spec SRPM URL: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/tcc-0.9.24-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: I am not yet sponsored. Very small c compiler (about 100KB for x86 TCC executable, including C preprocessor, C compiler, assembler and linker). Also allows c files to be run as scripts ./acfile.c I have a spec file that seems to work, but I was unsure about a lot of it. I am still not sure about the debug rpm. I have tested the tcc bin and libs in mock with a few of the examples and they work fine. I also have only been able to get it to compile on i386, it is a little hard as I only have koji to test other arch. rpmlint is almost happy. rpmlint tcc.spec ../RPMS/i386/tcc* ../SRPMS/tcc-0.9.24-1.fc9.src.rpm tcc.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/tcc.1.gz tcc-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package tcc-devel.i386: W: no-documentation tcc-static.i386: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. Do I need documentation in those packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 08:18:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:18:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473037] Review Request: tcc - small c compiler that can run c scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260818.mAQ8IRsP016543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037 --- Comment #1 from Brennan Ashton 2008-11-26 03:18:26 EDT --- oh and a koji scratch build here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=952263 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 08:17:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:17:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473037] Review Request: tcc - small c compiler that can run c scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260817.mAQ8HImO016295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 08:32:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:32:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473037] Review Request: tcc - small c compiler that can run c scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260832.mAQ8W23Z014497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |konrad at tylerc.org --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2008-11-26 03:32:01 EDT --- Some problems: Any reason the Summary isn't "Tiny C Compiler"? You should convert Changelog to UTF-8 during prep, not build. Also, please use touch -r to keep the original timestamp. The perl in %install can be trivially replaced with sed, part of the default build root (i.e. no extra BuildRequire). Also I'm not 100% sure that's doing the right thing there (probably you mean to replace just the install dir with DESTDIR+installdir, then pass DESTDIR to the make install? In %files devel "%{_libdir}/%{name}/*.o" looks *very* wrong to me, the only things that should include straight object files are cross compilers IMO (maybe I'm wrong?). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 08:46:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:46:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472994] Review Request: hunspell-gv - Manx hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260846.mAQ8k81J025386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472994 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Caolan McNamara 2008-11-26 03:46:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-gv Short Description: Manx hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 08:49:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:49:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472997] Review Request: hunspell-ny - Chichewa hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260849.mAQ8n3WI026448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472997 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-11-26 03:49:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-ny Short Description: Chichewa hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 08:48:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:48:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472996] Review Request: hunspell-ia - Interlingua hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260848.mAQ8mEGf026247@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472996 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-11-26 03:48:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-ia Short Description: Interlingua hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 08:47:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:47:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472995] Review Request: hunspell-hil - Hiligaynon hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260847.mAQ8lC2E025991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472995 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-11-26 03:47:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-hil Short Description: Hiligaynon hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 08:46:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:46:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473037] Review Request: tcc - small c compiler that can run c scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260846.mAQ8kKKX025571@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-11-26 03:46:19 EDT --- tcc had been the name of a Borland product (turbo c compiler) for a very long time (ca. a decade). That said, I consider this package's name to be VERY misleading, if not illegal to use. To circumvent such misunderstandings, I would advice upstream to rename their package. For now, blocking FEDORA-LEGAL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 08:57:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:57:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473037] Review Request: tcc - small c compiler that can run c scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260857.mAQ8vsCi029429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037 Thomas Moschny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomas.moschny at gmx.de --- Comment #4 from Thomas Moschny 2008-11-26 03:57:52 EDT --- Why not name the package TinyCC or tinycc? That are names the author also seems to use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 09:16:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:16:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462163] Review Request: checkdns - A Domain Name Server analysis and reporting tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260916.mAQ9GBZ6029912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462163 --- Comment #11 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-26 04:16:09 EDT --- You are right, %pre is more suitable -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 09:19:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:19:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462163] Review Request: checkdns - A Domain Name Server analysis and reporting tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260919.mAQ9JPhs004270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462163 --- Comment #12 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-26 04:19:24 EDT --- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags is the answer to comment #9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 09:33:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:33:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473046] New: Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 Summary: Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: avi at unix.sh QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://avi.alkalay.net/software/miniupnpc/ SRPM URL: http://avi.alkalay.net/software/miniupnpc/ Description: Your home router (Linksys, D-Link, Netgear, etc) can be remotely controlled through UPnP. MiniUPnP is a library and command line tool to help you execute this task. It lets you list and define NATs in your router. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 09:36:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:36:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473037] Review Request: tcc - small c compiler that can run c scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260936.mAQ9aIKj004348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037 --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-11-26 04:36:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Why not name the package TinyCC or tinycc? Sounds reasonable to me. What the actual executable called (Pardon, but I haven't looked into the actual package yet)? It had been "tcc" for TurboC. So if that also applies to TinyCC, this would be problematic, too. IIRC (It's been many years since I used it) tcc also internally had used defines name __TCC__ etc. It would be technically very problematic, if TinyCC was doing the same, because such defines would likely clash with TurboC defines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 09:38:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:38:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260938.mAQ9ccK9011530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #11 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-11-26 04:38:37 EDT --- >> Therefore, my pam rules are not working the way I wanted, >> but I do not know how to fix them ... >> For now, only local users can authenticate. >> >> Any suggestion? Do you know how pam works? > Not sure. Is this something you're adding on, or functionality of the original > code? I borrowed the idea from Gentoo and Ubuntu. They created this script so people do not need to have a local account on the server. By what I have read about Pam, it can use this scheme. # partimaged user database auth sufficient pam_userdb.so db=/etc/partimaged/passwd But I always get a "password mismatch". I added a README.Fedora.html (I chose html, because it has some useful links). I have updated the release: Spec: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/partimage.spec SRPM: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/partimage-0.6.7-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 09:36:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:36:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470792] Review Request: eclipse-shelled - Shell script editor plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260936.mAQ9amSp011093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470792 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2008-11-26 04:36:34 EDT --- Updated : Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-shelled.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-shelled-1.0.3-2.fc9.src.rpm (In reply to comment #3) > * Whenever you are uploading a new release, don't forget the bump the release > number. This applies even during the review process. > > * rpmlint says > eclipse-shelled.noarch: W: no-documentation > eclipse-shelled.src: W: strange-permission fetch-shelled.sh 0764 > > ** At least these files need to go to %doc. > ./com.something.eclipse.shelled-feature/license.html > ./com.something.eclipse.shelled-feature/cpl-v10.html > ./com.something.eclipse.shelled.resources/about.html > (Check the sample spec file at the eclipse guidelines) > The other about.html files have the same content. > Other than this, what are all those manpages for? > > ** Afaik, we use 644 for source files. Fixed. > > * You do not need > BuildRequires: zip > BuildRequires: lzma Fixed. > > * We prefer %defattr(-,root,root,-) Fixed. > > * Use the %{version} macro whenever applicable (e.g. source0). Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 09:42:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:42:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226317] Merge Review: procinfo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260942.mAQ9g8Fj013019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226317 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-26 04:42:07 EDT --- Bill Nottingham suggested to make procinfo obsolete if procinfo-ng is commandline-compatible and somewhat-output-compatible. Any thoughts on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 09:44:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:44:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471145] Review Request: procinfo-ng - System monitoring application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260944.mAQ9i2uR013536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471145 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-26 04:44:01 EDT --- I added a note about a replacing of procinfo in the 'Merge Review' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226317 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 09:51:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:51:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469080] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - plugin for Pidgin which displays the music track currently playing in the status message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260951.mAQ9pCxL016211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469080 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-26 04:51:11 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 09:50:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:50:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226317] Merge Review: procinfo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260950.mAQ9oWkr016028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226317 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr --- Comment #5 from Patrice Dumas 2008-11-26 04:50:30 EDT --- What about Ville comment Comment #2 regarding lsdev and socklist? Otherwise I think it would be right. If somebody really wants the old procinfo he could resubmit it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 09:59:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:59:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260959.mAQ9x3xh012188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|pjones at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 09:57:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:57:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469527] Review Request: tcping - Check of TCP connection to a given IP/Port In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260957.mAQ9viFg011872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469527 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-26 04:57:43 EDT --- Still no answer from upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 10:25:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:25:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429444] Review Request: libmspack - A library for compression and decomepression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261025.mAQAP9bc021564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429444 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bradh at frogmouth.net --- Comment #13 from Patrice Dumas 2008-11-26 05:25:06 EDT --- *** Bug 427638 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 10:44:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:44:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473046] Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261044.mAQAiseJ004166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |felix at fetzig.org --- Comment #1 from Felix Kaechele 2008-11-26 05:44:53 EDT --- Obviously you do not have a sponsor. Thus your Bug should block FE-NEEDSPONSOR. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored for more information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 11:12:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 06:12:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471829] Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261112.mAQBCtgr015552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 Hayden James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 11:14:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 06:14:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471829] Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261114.mAQBE7rA006800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 --- Comment #1 from Hayden James 2008-11-26 06:14:06 EDT --- Hello, anyone there? (*crickets chirping*) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 11:13:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 06:13:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid-core - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261113.mAQBD3UL006563@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rpm at greysector.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-11-26 06:13:02 EDT --- Good, but you should post the link to the updated spec file and src.rpm after you've made the changes (also increase the Release: tag and describe your changes in %changelog). You still haven't addressed this: jeuclid-core.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/jeuclid-core-3.1.3/NOTICE It is admittedly minor, but please fix that by converting the file using tr, sed or perl in %prep. Remember to preserve the original file's timestamp using touch. I will try and complete the review tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 11:24:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 06:24:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261124.mAQBOtrP019689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 --- Comment #18 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-11-26 06:24:54 EDT --- :( What can I do ? must I rename my package ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 11:25:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 06:25:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473046] Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261125.mAQBPsne010631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 --- Comment #2 from Avi Alkalay 2008-11-26 06:25:53 EDT --- Both links: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Are not specific on how to get a sponsor. The "Join" one says: "When the package is APPROVED by the reviewer, you must separately obtain member sponsorship in order to check in and build your package. Sponsorship is not automatic and may require that you further participate in other ways in order to demonstrate your understanding of the packaging guidelines. Key to becoming sponsored is to convince an existing sponsor-level member that you understand and follow the project's guidelines and processes. See PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored for more information on the process of becoming sponsored." And the HowToGetSponsored doc is purely philosophical and has no practical information that I could find. Need guidance on getting sponsorship. Thanks in advance -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 11:31:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 06:31:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473046] Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261131.mAQBVunn021535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 --- Comment #3 from Felix Kaechele 2008-11-26 06:31:54 EDT --- Okay so one crucial step is to enter either 177841 or FE-NEEDSPONSOR into the "Blocks" field at the top of the bugreport and commit it. This will signalize that the contributer who filed this bug needs a sponsor. That makes it easier for sponsors to find your review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 13:31:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 08:31:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473046] Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261331.mAQDVOfS011926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-26 08:31:23 EDT --- 'Source0: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz' should be changed to 'Source0: http://miniupnp.tuxfamily.org/files/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz' https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 14:22:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:22:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472685] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext - Return a new instance a component on each request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261422.mAQEMZ9t022447@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472685 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 09:22:34 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 14:22:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:22:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472685] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext - Return a new instance a component on each request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261422.mAQEMWrC013044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472685 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 09:22:31 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 14:30:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:30:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472668] Review Request: perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA - Perl implementation of the reCAPTCHA API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261430.mAQEUCAE023901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472668 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 09:30:11 EDT --- perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA-0.92-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA-0.92-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 14:30:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:30:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472668] Review Request: perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA - Perl implementation of the reCAPTCHA API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261430.mAQEU9ek014604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472668 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 09:30:08 EDT --- perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA-0.92-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA-0.92-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 14:33:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:33:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472664] Review Request: perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple - Easy to use HTML::TokeParser interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261433.mAQEXp5Y024451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472664 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 09:33:50 EDT --- perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple-3.15-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple-3.15-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 14:32:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:32:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472666] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural - Create machine readable date/time with natural parsing logic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261432.mAQEWkNI015209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472666 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 09:32:46 EDT --- perl-DateTime-Format-Natural-0.73-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DateTime-Format-Natural-0.73-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 14:32:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:32:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472666] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural - Create machine readable date/time with natural parsing logic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261432.mAQEWhOK015173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472666 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 09:32:42 EDT --- perl-DateTime-Format-Natural-0.73-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DateTime-Format-Natural-0.73-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 14:33:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:33:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472664] Review Request: perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple - Easy to use HTML::TokeParser interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261433.mAQEXsne015422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472664 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 09:33:54 EDT --- perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple-3.15-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple-3.15-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 16:15:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:15:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261615.mAQGFpnW005866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org --- Comment #23 from Kevin Kofler 2008-11-26 11:15:49 EDT --- Hmmm, Debian's copyright file: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/ace/ace_5.6.3-5/libace-5.6.3.copyright lists more stuff under non-Free Sun licenses. :-( I don't know how this passed debian-legal, as those licenses are clearly non-Free and blatantly spelled out in the copyright file. :-/ As you can see in the Debian copyright file, some of the core IIOP files carry this notice: > You may copy, modify, distribute, or sublicense the LICENSED PRODUCT > without charge as part of a product or software program developed by > you, so long as you preserve the functionality of interoperating with > the Object Management Group's "Internet Inter-ORB Protocol" version > one. However, any uses other than the foregoing uses shall require > the express written consent of Sun Microsystems, Inc. which is clearly non-Free (because it bans using the software to implement a different protocol). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 16:40:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:40:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473046] Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261640.mAQGee0v021689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 Avi Alkalay changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 --- Comment #5 from Avi Alkalay 2008-11-26 11:40:39 EDT --- OK, I'll change that. But just be aware that I copied this Source0 line format from the official Fedora rdesktop spec file. Before I send a new version, I need some guidance with the group. The spec file I used as a base had "User Interface/Desktops" but this is not the case for this package. Where I can find a list of valid groups ? BTW, this FE-NEEDSPONSOR tag is documented somewhere? I couldn't find a single line in the documentation about it. I would like to update the documentation to include that, after this package is accepted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 16:50:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:50:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471829] Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261650.mAQGoAud023537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-26 11:50:09 EDT --- Dude, there are seven hundred pending package review tickets. Please be patient. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 18:15:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:15:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226317] Merge Review: procinfo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261815.mAQIFkLm012023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226317 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-26 13:15:45 EDT --- Those tools are definitely missing in the new version. I'm thinking that perhaps placing lsdev and socklist in separate packages to obtained the functionality could be an option. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 18:21:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:21:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462163] Review Request: checkdns - A Domain Name Server analysis and reporting tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261821.mAQILWVq031431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462163 --- Comment #13 from John Guthrie 2008-11-26 13:21:31 EDT --- I have just uploaded new versions of the spec file and srpm that should satisfy all of your concerns: Spec URL: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f9/checkdns.spec SRPM URL: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f9/checkdns-0.5-6.fc9.src.rpm - License tag should be fixed - I have adjusted ownership and permissions of stuff in /var/www/html - %{optflags} is now being used - I have installed a cron file Let me know what you think. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 18:30:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:30:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470830] Review Request: open64 - The Open64 compiler suite (C, C++, Fortran) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261830.mAQIUa8T000753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-26 13:30:35 EDT --- Changed optimization memory limit, path preference and summary. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/open64.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/open64-4.2-6.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 18:40:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:40:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473046] Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261840.mAQIerD2002633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-26 13:40:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > OK, I'll change that. But just be aware that I copied this Source0 line format > from the official Fedora rdesktop spec file. The rdesktop spec file is not reviewed so far. The 'Merge Review' is pending. Your Source0 is acceptable if there is no source code available from a online/upstream location or only out of a VCS. But in this case it has to be documented in the spec file. Basically all source must come from upstream. > Before I send a new version, I need some guidance with the group. The spec file > I used as a base had "User Interface/Desktops" but this is not the case for > this package. > Where I can find a list of valid groups ? less /usr/share/doc/rpm-*/GROUPS > BTW, this FE-NEEDSPONSOR tag is documented somewhere? I couldn't find a single > line in the documentation about it. I would like to update the documentation to > include that, after this package is accepted. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Create_Your_Review_Request -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 19:37:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:37:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473077] [RFE] Add package Equalizer - Parallel Rendering Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261937.mAQJbpat027920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473077 Bill Nottingham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-package-review at redha | |t.com, notting at redhat.com Component|new |Package Review AssignedTo|extras-orphan at fedoraproject |nobody at fedoraproject.org |.org | --- Comment #1 from Bill Nottingham 2008-11-26 14:37:50 EDT --- Are you volunteering to maintain the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 19:37:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:37:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261937.mAQJbR25027875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla 2008-11-26 14:37:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > >> Therefore, my pam rules are not working the way I wanted, > >> but I do not know how to fix them ... > >> For now, only local users can authenticate. > >> > >> Any suggestion? Do you know how pam works? > > > Not sure. Is this something you're adding on, or functionality of the original > > code? > > I borrowed the idea from Gentoo and Ubuntu. They created this script so people > do not need to have a local account on the server. By what I have read about > Pam, it can use this scheme. > > # partimaged user database > auth sufficient pam_userdb.so db=/etc/partimaged/passwd > > But I always get a "password mismatch". I'm not sure I like the security implications of this. This would mean that if you run partimage-server on your network, anyone on your network with a Fedora LiveCD with this installed can dump images on your server. > > I added a README.Fedora.html (I chose html, because it has some useful links). Good idea. But rename to partimage.README.html to avoid use of the word Fedora and SRPM clobbering. > I have updated the release: > > Spec: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/partimage.spec > > SRPM: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/partimage-0.6.7-3.fc8.src.rpm Also, for partimaged-certs.cnf, you should mention in the README that this file should be customized. Not everyone is in Rio. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 20:00:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:00:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet capturing library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811262000.mAQK0hJM032179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 Patrick Dignan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 20:01:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:01:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid-core - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811262001.mAQK1NlX019183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #5 from Brennan Ashton 2008-11-26 15:01:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Good, but you should post the link to the updated spec file and src.rpm after > you've made the changes (also increase the Release: tag and describe your > changes in %changelog). Fixed. > > You still haven't addressed this: > jeuclid-core.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/jeuclid-core-3.1.3/NOTICE > > It is admittedly minor, but please fix that by converting the file using tr, > sed or perl in %prep. Remember to preserve the original file's timestamp using > touch. Done. SRPM: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/jeuclid-core-3.1.3-3.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/jeuclid-core.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 20:11:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:11:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811262011.mAQKBcgL002083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 Stefan Ruppert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stefan.ruppert at myarm.de --- Comment #17 from Stefan Ruppert 2008-11-26 15:11:36 EDT --- I stumbled over this Review Request and I'm happy to see that the arm4.org ARM is in process to be included into Red Hat distribution. Just a comment about static libraries. I do not think a static library should be build. ARM is designed as a dynamic library which can be linked to an application implicitly by using -larm4 during link time. But the main usage is to dlopen() the libarm4.so. Just like the Apache mod_arm4 does. See section "1.7 Linking to an ARM Implementation" of the standard documents for ARM 4.0 or ARM 4.1! I don't know the Red Hat policies for libraries. But we should not encourage users of ARM to link statically! Any comments? Regards, Stefan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 20:13:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:13:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472724] Review Request: xjparse - wrapper for the Xerces XML Schema validator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811262013.mAQKDAdJ021514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472724 --- Comment #3 from Brennan Ashton 2008-11-26 15:13:09 EDT --- Location of new files Spec URL: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/xjparse.spec SRPM URL: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/xjparse-1.0-2.fc9.src.rpm rpmlint xjparse.spec ../SRPMS/xjparse-1.0-2.fc9.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/xjparse-1.0-2.fc9.noarch.rpm xjparse.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 20:30:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:30:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811262030.mAQKUDkB024895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla 2008-11-26 15:30:12 EDT --- RH/Fedora discourages, but does not outright forbid static libraries. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exclusion_of_Static_Libraries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 21:04:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:04:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473037] Review Request: tinycc - Tiny C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811262104.mAQL4kFo013559@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: tcc - small |Review Request: tinycc - |c compiler that can run c |Tiny C Compiler |scripts | --- Comment #6 from Brennan Ashton 2008-11-26 16:04:45 EDT --- Ok I have changed the summary, you are right that is better. On the topic of the name tinytcc could be the name of the package, but what happens to the libtcc* and tcc*.h files? That *.o pulls the bcheck.o part that give the "compile with built-in memory and bounds checker" option. Remove it and you will get: tcc -b onemore.c tcc: file '/usr/lib/tcc/bcheck.o' not found it is for debug only so that is why I put it in the devel package, is that wrong? a grep check shows nothing like __tcc__ or __tinycc__ in any of the files the executable is /usr/bin/tcc Updated: Spec URL: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/tcc.spec SRPM URL: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/tcc-0.9.24-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 21:11:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:11:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459800] Review Request: python-py - Innovative python library containing py.test, greenlets and other niceties In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811262111.mAQLBHxG015022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459800 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Moschny 2008-11-26 16:11:16 EDT --- Problems reported upstream, see https://codespeak.net/issue/py-dev/issue66 and https://codespeak.net/issue/py-dev/issue67 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 21:19:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:19:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473046] Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811262119.mAQLJLOq016453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 --- Comment #7 from Avi Alkalay 2008-11-26 16:19:20 EDT --- Suggestions incorporated into spec. Please recheck http://avi.alkalay.net/software/miniupnpc/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 21:53:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:53:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - Maze for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811262153.mAQLrk9P022433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-26 16:53:45 EDT --- Bryan, thanks for your check and the hint about the requirement. Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-maze.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-maze-6-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 22:49:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:49:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471041] Review Request: diffpdf - PDF files comparator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811262249.mAQMnS8w032070@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471041 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 22:49:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:49:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471041] Review Request: diffpdf - PDF files comparator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811262249.mAQMn8Ho032016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471041 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-26 17:49:06 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: F9/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i diffpdf-0.3.8-1.fc8.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPMs: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint -i diffpdf* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM upstream: 0eda6f63f85ed454718bf4565a08d9a0 SHA1SUM of package: 0eda6f63f85ed454718bf4565a08d9a0 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [-] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [!] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [1] [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [-] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F9/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. Tested F9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=929672 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [1] The .desktop file is missing. Please add a .desktop file and I will be happy to approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 23:15:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:15:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811262315.mAQNFZJk022267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 --- Comment #2 from Simon Wesp 2008-11-26 18:15:34 EDT --- i have a little problem with consolehelper and need a little help. Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/sbackup-0.10.5/sbackup.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/sbackup-0.10.5/sbackup-0.10.5-3.fc10.src.rpm i can't integrate consolehelper on this way, i can't get authentication as root. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 23:19:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:19:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473180] Review Request: lzip - LZMA compressor with integrety checking (needed to update pam_mount) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811262319.mAQNJmC6004849@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473180 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #1 from Till Maas 2008-11-26 18:19:48 EDT --- Koji scratch build for F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=953814 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 23:18:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:18:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473180] New: Review Request: lzip - LZMA compressor with integrety checking (needed to update pam_mount) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lzip - LZMA compressor with integrety checking (needed to update pam_mount) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473180 Summary: Review Request: lzip - LZMA compressor with integrety checking (needed to update pam_mount) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: opensource at till.name QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/lzip.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/lzip-1.1-1.tillf8.src.rpm Description: Lzip compresses data using LZMA (Lempel-Ziv-Markov chain-Algorithm). It supports integrity checking using CRC (Cyclic Redundancy Check). To archive multiple files, tar can be used with lzip. Please note, that the lzip file format (.lz) is not compatible with the lzma file format (.lzma). Upstream of pam_mount changed to use this to compress their tarballs, therefore I need it to update pam_mount in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 23:29:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:29:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473184] New: Review Request: clamz - Amazon Downloader Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: clamz - Amazon Downloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473184 Summary: Review Request: clamz - Amazon Downloader Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: radford at blackbean.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://blackbean.org/review/clamz-1.spec SRPM URL: http://blackbean.org/review/clamz-0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Clamz is a little command-line program to download MP3 files from Amazon.com's music store. It is intended to serve as a substitute for Amazon's official MP3 Downloader, which is not free software (and therefore is only available in binary form for a limited set of platforms.) Clamz can be used to download either individual songs or complete albums that you have purchased from Amazon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 23:40:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:40:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206134] Review Request: guiloader-c++ - C++ Binding to GuiLoader Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811262340.mAQNe9KA008890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206134 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-26 18:40:07 EDT --- This packages was never build for Fedora and then it was marked as 'dead'. Project URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/crow-designer/ Current version: 2.12.1 Can you please update the spec file and build it for Fedora? Thanks. P.S. - The license has changed from GPL to MIT. - Devel requirement 'Requires: pkgconfig' is still missing - There are translation (at least in the latest version) 'BuildRequires: gettext' is missing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 23:40:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:40:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811262340.mAQNeqxI009067@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #13 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-11-26 18:40:51 EDT --- > > > Not sure. Is this something you're adding on, or functionality of the original > > > code? > > > > I borrowed the idea from Gentoo and Ubuntu. They created this script so people > > do not need to have a local account on the server. By what I have read about > > Pam, it can use this scheme. > > > > # partimaged user database > > auth sufficient pam_userdb.so db=/etc/partimaged/passwd > > > > But I always get a "password mismatch". > > I'm not sure I like the security implications of this. This would mean that if > you run partimage-server on your network, anyone on your network with a Fedora > LiveCD with this installed can dump images on your server. Not really. This script has to be run as root on the server. Therefore, only an administrator can add users. It is like using "pserver" authentication for CVS. But without any protection, you are right. Furthermore, without login enabled (on the server it is just a question of removing --nologin from/etc/sysconfig/patimage), and using the default port (and no firewall), anyone knowing the name of the image can download it. I have downloaded in the past a whole fedora image from a server in another city. It took some time, but worked. > > > > > I added a README.Fedora.html (I chose html, because it has some useful links). > > Good idea. But rename to partimage.README.html to avoid use of the word Fedora > and SRPM clobbering. Done > > Also, for partimaged-certs.cnf, you should mention in the README that this file > should be customized. Not everyone is in Rio. :) Changed the README. Also, I changed the name of the default city to Smallville. :) (I kept the same releae). Spec: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/partimage.spec SRPM: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/partimage-0.6.7-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 23:49:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:49:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid-core - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811262349.mAQNneNY027931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au --- Comment #6 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-11-26 18:49:39 EDT --- #001 one line would do the job : sed -i 's/\r//' NOTICE #002: add a -verbose to ant: e.g ant -verbose #003: update the url of the source0 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL #004: visual only: add more spaces between various sets of lines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 23:54:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:54:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473046] Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811262354.mAQNsrJm028846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-26 18:54:52 EDT --- You bumped the release of the spec file but there is no entry in the %changelog section. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs rpmlint is complaining about several things. rpmlint output [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint miniupnpc* miniupnpc.src:59: E: files-attr-not-set miniupnpc.src:60: E: files-attr-not-set miniupnpc.src:61: E: files-attr-not-set miniupnpc.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 6) miniupnpc.src: E: summary-too-long Library and command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 1 warnings. [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint mini* miniupnpc.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libminiupnpc.so miniupnpc.i386: E: summary-too-long Library and command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc miniupnpc.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.2 ['1.2-2.fc9', '1.2-2'] miniupnpc.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libminiupnpc.so.3 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Common_Rpmlint_Issues -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 00:05:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:05:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470792] Review Request: eclipse-shelled - Shell script editor plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270005.mAR05BCo012749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470792 --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov 2008-11-26 19:05:10 EDT --- Updated : Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-shelled.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-shelled-1.0.3-3.fc9.src.rpm FIx %%doc handling. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 00:34:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:34:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470354] Review Request: noip - A dynamic DNS update client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270034.mAR0YiYd017151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470354 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-26 19:34:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Updated to 2.1.9. And fixed missing init file patch. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/noip.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/noip-2.1.9-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 00:53:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:53:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226187] Merge Review: nc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270053.mAR0rSPH020110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226187 ben at scurvy.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ben at scurvy.net --- Comment #9 from ben at scurvy.net 2008-11-26 19:53:26 EDT --- The version of netcat that is in fedora now has a bug where it refuses to connect to proxies that return "HTTP/1.1 200" messages (it only accepts ("HTTP/1.0 200" as valid). I discovered this bug when attempting to ssh out through a web proxy using openssh's ProxyCommand directive like this: ProxyCommand = /usr/bin/nc -X connect -x proxy:8080 %h %p Looking at the OpenBSD repository it looks like socks.c was patched to fix this over 2 years ago. Would be nice if this change got pulled down into the Fedora package. http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/nc/socks.c.diff?r1=1.16;r2=1.17;f=h -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 01:36:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:36:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid-core - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270136.mAR1aA1S027158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #7 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-11-26 20:36:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > #001 > one line would do the job : sed -i 's/\r//' NOTICE You can't preserve the timestamp that way, so no. > #002: > add a -verbose to ant: > e.g ant -verbose Produces copious output indeed. Won't hurt. > #003: update the url of the source0 > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL Indeed. > #004: visual only: add more spaces between various sets of lines :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:05:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:05:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473205] Review Request: gPlanarity - puzzle game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270205.mAR2569g031570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473205 --- Comment #1 from Adam Tulinius 2008-11-26 21:05:05 EDT --- The package has also been through koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=953888 -Adam -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:02:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:02:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473205] New: Review Request: gPlanarity - puzzle game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gPlanarity - puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473205 Summary: Review Request: gPlanarity - puzzle game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adam at antistof.dk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://antistof.dk/pub/fedora/gplanarity.spec SRPM URL: http://antistof.dk/pub/fedora/gplanarity-svn11496-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: gPlanarity is clone of the flash-game Planarity written by John Tantalo. gPlanarity implements gameplay identical to the original Planarity but adds some UI and game extras around the basic game, such as multiple board generation algorithms,puzzle boards, complete backing state, group select/drag and so on. This website http://web.mit.edu/xiphmont/Public/gPlanarity.html contains some screenshots etc. :-) -- This is my first package ever, so i'm also seeking a sponser. Finally I would like to thank comphappy for helping me out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:09:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:09:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473205] Review Request: gPlanarity - puzzle game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270209.mAR29ICa032181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473205 Adam Tulinius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:09:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:09:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469590] Review Request: cpuid - Dumps information about the CPU(s) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270209.mAR29mtD032343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469590 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 21:09:47 EDT --- cpuid-20060917-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:10:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:10:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472664] Review Request: perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple - Easy to use HTML::TokeParser interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270210.mAR2ABo5032708@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472664 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 21:10:10 EDT --- perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple-3.15-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:10:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:10:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472666] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural - Create machine readable date/time with natural parsing logic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270210.mAR2AlIm000478@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472666 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 21:10:46 EDT --- perl-DateTime-Format-Natural-0.73-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:09:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:09:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472685] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext - Return a new instance a component on each request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270209.mAR29IWu032228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472685 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 21:09:17 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-10442 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:09:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:09:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470140] Review Request: nettee - Network "tee" program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270209.mAR29tso017851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470140 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 21:09:54 EDT --- nettee-0.1.9-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:08:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:08:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469494] Review Request: xlcrack - Recover lost and forgotten passwords from XLS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270208.mAR28nXK017582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469494 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 21:08:48 EDT --- xlcrack-1.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:12:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:12:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472668] Review Request: perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA - Perl implementation of the reCAPTCHA API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270212.mAR2C11J018670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472668 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 21:12:00 EDT --- perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA-0.92-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:10:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:10:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472664] Review Request: perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple - Easy to use HTML::TokeParser interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270210.mAR2AEdp018213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472664 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:10:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:10:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472666] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural - Create machine readable date/time with natural parsing logic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270210.mAR2AoP2018337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472666 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:12:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:12:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472664] Review Request: perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple - Easy to use HTML::TokeParser interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270212.mAR2CbHt001144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472664 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 21:12:36 EDT --- perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple-3.15-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:12:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:12:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468116] Review Request: sugar-analyze - Analysing tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270212.mAR2CL3t001083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468116 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:12:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:12:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472668] Review Request: perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA - Perl implementation of the reCAPTCHA API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270212.mAR2CAOO001025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472668 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 21:12:09 EDT --- perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA-0.92-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:12:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:12:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472668] Review Request: perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA - Perl implementation of the reCAPTCHA API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270212.mAR2C3WO000976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472668 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:11:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:11:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461454] Review Request: lordsawar - Turn-based strategy game in a fantasy setting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270211.mAR2Bbma000866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461454 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 21:11:36 EDT --- lordsawar-0.1.3-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update lordsawar'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-10466 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:12:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:12:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468116] Review Request: sugar-analyze - Analysing tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270212.mAR2CJcX018986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468116 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 21:12:17 EDT --- sugar-analyze-8-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:12:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:12:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 448717] Review Request: gnome-rdp - rdesktop front end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270212.mAR2CRF5019045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448717 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 21:12:25 EDT --- gnome-rdp-0.2.3-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:13:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:13:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472666] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural - Create machine readable date/time with natural parsing logic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270213.mAR2DaRH019373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472666 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 21:13:36 EDT --- perl-DateTime-Format-Natural-0.73-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:12:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:12:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472685] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext - Return a new instance a component on each request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270212.mAR2Cvns019209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472685 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 21:12:56 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-10481 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:18:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:18:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid-core - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270218.mAR2Iwbr002340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #9 from Brennan Ashton 2008-11-26 21:18:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > #001 > > one line would do the job : sed -i 's/\r//' NOTICE > > You can't preserve the timestamp that way, so no. That is why I did it that way > > > #002: > > add a -verbose to ant: > > e.g ant -verbose > > Produces copious output indeed. Won't hurt. Added > > > #003: update the url of the source0 > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL I looked at that, but it looks like when I tested it, it did a redirect on me. Fixed Now. > > Indeed. > > > #004: visual only: add more spaces between various sets of lines > > :) Done New files Spec URL: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/jeuclid-core.spec SRPM URL: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/jeuclid-core-3.1.3-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:17:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:17:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid-core - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270217.mAR2Hfm9020284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #8 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-11-26 21:17:40 EDT --- Full review, relevant items only (OK'd items omitted). MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. rpmlint output clean - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . The project is named "jeuclid". Why is the package named jeuclid-core? The Java packaging guidelines (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java) say that you should follow the project's name and provide a symlink if the commonly used jar name is different. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . Group: Applications/Text License: ASL 2.0 The above lines have trailing whitespace at the end. # this patch points the ant to the correct jars Patch0: jeuclid-core-build.patch You could use build-classpath or build-jar-repository instead of the above patch. # this patch removes FreeHep support as per the build README Patch1: jeuclid-core-FreeHep.patch You don't have to say "this patch", it's redundant. What you should say, instead, is whether or not the patches have been sent upstream (and if not, why). - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . The following files have no licensing information, please ask upstream to provide it (not a blocker). $ licensecheck.pl -r . | grep -v Apache ./jeuclid-core/src/test/java/net/sourceforge/jeuclid/test/LayoutTest.java: *No copyright* UNKNOWN ./jeuclid-core/src/test/java/net/sourceforge/jeuclid/test/ViewerTest.java: *No copyright* UNKNOWN ./jeuclid-core/src/test/java/net/sourceforge/jeuclid/test/ConverterTest.java: *No copyright* UNKNOWN ./jeuclid-core/src/test/java/net/sourceforge/jeuclid/test/DOMBuilderTest.java: *No copyright* UNKNOWN The rest seems to be under ASL 2.0, thus OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK: ff3690e649bf0ead5fd2a03c732dc1ce jeuclid-parent-3.1.3-src.zip - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. You should use %{_javadir}/%{name}-%{version}.jar instead of %{_javadir}/* in %files section. It'll let you detect stray files if they ever make their way into buildroot in some future release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:27:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:27:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206134] Review Request: guiloader-c++ - C++ Binding to GuiLoader Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270227.mAR2Rufk021965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206134 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-26 21:27:55 EDT --- To Fabian: Denis seemed to have some reason not to build this package (see the content of dead.package in Fedora CVS). As it is already long time since this package is not build, if this package is to be imported into Fedora again a new review request is needed and it must be reviewed newly. If you want to maintain this package please submit a new review request and mark this review request a duplicate of the new one. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:35:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:35:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet capturing library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270235.mAR2Z2tC004848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:36:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:36:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473180] Review Request: lzip - LZMA compressor with integrety checking (needed to update pam_mount) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270236.mAR2a5DF023152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473180 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-26 21:36:04 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [!] Rpmlint output: (see note 1) source RPM: lzip.src: W: spelling-error-in-summary integrety integrity binary RPM: lzip.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/lzip-1.1/TODO (see note 2) lzip.x86_64: W: spelling-error-in-summary integrety integrity [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv3+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, conta ining the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 81e920830239a6769164946e6466ff7386e7ce8e lzip-1.1.tar.bz2 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [-] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section o f Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane: === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English lang uages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=953814) [x] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [-] %check is present and the test passes. (see note 3) === Final Notes === 1. please do not forget to fix the typo in %summary before uploading 2. the TODO file is empty hence useless; I suggest to ditch it 3. there is a check test provided, would be nice to integrate it if possible ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:38:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:38:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472995] Review Request: hunspell-hil - Hiligaynon hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270238.mAR2cvKa005323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472995 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-26 21:38:56 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:40:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:40:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472996] Review Request: hunspell-ia - Interlingua hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270240.mAR2etNG005891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472996 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-26 21:40:54 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:38:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:38:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472994] Review Request: hunspell-gv - Manx hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270238.mAR2cMYt023403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472994 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-26 21:38:20 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:37:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:37:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270237.mAR2bPed023325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #19 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-26 21:37:20 EDT --- since the package review is - cvs can not be done. please rerequest cvs when the review is sorted out -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:42:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:42:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270242.mAR2gSQ5006209@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #47 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-26 21:42:27 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:41:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:41:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472997] Review Request: hunspell-ny - Chichewa hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270241.mAR2fZwZ006086@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472997 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-26 21:41:34 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:41:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:41:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid-core - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270241.mAR2fMQ7006033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #10 from Brennan Ashton 2008-11-26 21:41:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . > > The project is named "jeuclid". Why is the package named jeuclid-core? > > The Java packaging guidelines (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java) > say that you should follow the project's name and provide a symlink if the > commonly used jar name is different. > jeuclid is a larger project that contains more modules. This is the only core module. Should I package the project in one spec file and have the sub projects like core in it? http://jeuclid.sourceforge.net/jeuclid-core/index.html > - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . > > Group: Applications/Text > License: ASL 2.0 > > The above lines have trailing whitespace at the end. Fixed > # this patch points the ant to the correct jars > Patch0: jeuclid-core-build.patch > > You could use build-classpath or build-jar-repository instead of the above > patch. Yes and know, the main reason that I patch is that the build.xml file expects them to be symbolic linked to a lib folder in it that does not exist. It will not build if this is not there. I though while I was patching that, I might as well put the links to the jars in the file. I could do it with build-classpath, but the patch will have to stay for the lib dir issue. This is not really an upstream issue. > # this patch removes FreeHep support as per the build README > Patch1: jeuclid-core-FreeHep.patch > > You don't have to say "this patch", it's redundant. What you should say, > instead, is whether or not the patches have been sent upstream (and if not, > why). Took those extra words out. Added that FreeHep was an optional feature and would not be passed upstream. > > - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet > the Licensing Guidelines . > > The following files have no licensing information, please ask upstream to > provide it (not a blocker). > $ licensecheck.pl -r . | grep -v Apache > ./jeuclid-core/src/test/java/net/sourceforge/jeuclid/test/LayoutTest.java: *No > copyright* UNKNOWN > ./jeuclid-core/src/test/java/net/sourceforge/jeuclid/test/ViewerTest.java: *No > copyright* UNKNOWN > ./jeuclid-core/src/test/java/net/sourceforge/jeuclid/test/ConverterTest.java: > *No copyright* UNKNOWN > ./jeuclid-core/src/test/java/net/sourceforge/jeuclid/test/DOMBuilderTest.java: > *No copyright* UNKNOWN > > The rest seems to be under ASL 2.0, thus OK. I will file an upstream bug and post. > > - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, > as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no > upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL > Guidelines for how to deal with this. > > OK: > ff3690e649bf0ead5fd2a03c732dc1ce jeuclid-parent-3.1.3-src.zip > > - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not > create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does > create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. > > You should use > %{_javadir}/%{name}-%{version}.jar > instead of > %{_javadir}/* > in %files section. It'll let you detect stray files if they ever make their way > into buildroot in some future release. Fixed Sorry for the intermediate post, we had a mid-air bz collision. Spec URL: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/jeuclid-core.spec SRPM URL: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/jeuclid-core-3.1.3-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:50:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:50:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270250.mAR2oKPj025589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tibbs at math.uh.edu | |) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:52:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:52:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid-core - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270252.mAR2qdP1008416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #11 from Brennan Ashton 2008-11-26 21:52:38 EDT --- license bug filed: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2352779&group_id=44862&atid=441104 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:52:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:52:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270252.mAR2q6VL008346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us Flag| |needinfo?(cooly at gnome.eu.or | |g) --- Comment #20 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-26 21:52:04 EDT --- I do not see any rpms with the name edb or anything in fedora providing /usr/bin/edb Lucian can you please give more info on what the conflict is? because i do not see it. [root at athosian ~]# yum install /usr/bin/edb Setting up Install Process Parsing package install arguments No package /usr/bin/edb available. Nothing to do [root at athosian ~]# yum install /usr/sbin/edb Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit Setting up Install Process Parsing package install arguments No package /usr/sbin/edb available. Nothing to do [root at athosian ~]# yum install edb Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit Setting up Install Process Parsing package install arguments No package edb available. Nothing to do -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 03:17:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 22:17:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270317.mAR3HQ1t013056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 --- Comment #21 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-26 22:17:25 EDT --- The older edb was not included in fedora since version FC-6. Compare http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/edb/FC-3/edb.spec?revision=1.8&view=markup with http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/edb/devel/edb.spec?view=markup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 03:44:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 22:44:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270344.mAR3itG3018396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dgilmore at redhat.com --- Comment #22 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-26 22:44:53 EDT --- judging by http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/edb/ the old package has not been in fedora since Fedora Core 5 in which case i think the new package is ok. We can always bring it up with FESCo if people disagree with that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 03:48:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 22:48:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270348.mAR3mg3T019218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 --- Comment #23 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-26 22:48:41 EDT --- It's a bit confusing to have the same name refer to two completely different applications, depending on which version of the distribution you are. Especially as the older application has not been formally abandoned / orphaned / whatever. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 04:15:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 23:15:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270415.mAR4FfcW023740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tibbs at math.uh.edu | |) | --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-26 23:15:39 EDT --- Did I miss a comment from you which answered my question? I was going to set needinfo to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 04:18:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 23:18:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226187] Merge Review: nc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270418.mAR4IGq5024099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226187 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-26 23:18:15 EDT --- Ben, you should open a ticket for your issue as it is not relevant to this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 04:18:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 23:18:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270418.mAR4IhdG024188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 --- Comment #24 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-26 23:18:42 EDT --- https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/edb says that its orphaned and its not been in fedora since FC-5 It was not marked as dead in cvs but has not had a branch which means it did not exist in the release. sure someone updating from FC-5 may be surprised. I still think that it will be ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 04:18:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 23:18:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270418.mAR4Ip9h008969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 --- Comment #19 from Kevin Kofler 2008-11-26 23:18:50 EDT --- What question? The library versioning issue? Is the evidence provided by Conrad and me not enough to prove that it's working fine? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 04:25:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 23:25:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid-core - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270425.mAR4PwIp025598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #12 from Brennan Ashton 2008-11-26 23:25:57 EDT --- I will package the other modules tonight as part of this so it will fit the naming correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 04:27:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 23:27:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270427.mAR4ROw0025804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 --- Comment #25 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-26 23:27:23 EDT --- Indeed, I have not noticed the "orphan" status. For the record, I am fine with the current situation. But for the sake of the discussion, let's presume I want to resurrect the old program. Now what ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 04:30:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 23:30:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270430.mAR4UP9w010941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 --- Comment #26 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-26 23:30:24 EDT --- And in any case, IF the new application retains the "edb" name, the description from https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/edb must be fixed, as currently it references the older application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 04:31:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 23:31:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270431.mAR4VxNW026535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 --- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 23:31:58 EDT --- tasque-0.1.7-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tasque-0.1.7-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 04:34:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 23:34:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270434.mAR4YGou026737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(cooly at gnome.eu.or | |g) | --- Comment #27 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-26 23:34:15 EDT --- If someone was to resurrect it since its not been in fedora for as long as it has been out it would need a new review. At which point it could be named bdb-edb or db4-edb or something else. the harder part is that the binaries will need renaming also. since im assuming both would provide /usr/bin/edb the same is true of any upstream projects that have clashing names. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 05:58:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:58:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270558.mAR5wlQG008744@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review+ --- Comment #28 from Lucian Langa 2008-11-27 00:58:45 EDT --- Thanks for sorting this out. The description in pkgdb still points to old package. I am going to close this review as APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 06:14:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:14:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473215] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-FormFu - HTML Form Creation, Rendering and Validation Framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-FormFu - HTML Form Creation, Rendering and Validation Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473215 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-FormFu - HTML Form Creation, Rendering and Validation Framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-HTML-FormFu.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-HTML-FormFu-0.03005-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: HTML::FormFu is a HTML form framework which aims to be as easy as possible to use for basic web forms, but with the power and flexibility to do anything else you might want to do (as long as it involves forms). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 06:30:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:30:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471429] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache - Catalyst Apache Engines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270630.mAR6UP4A014480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471429 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 06:30:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:30:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462254] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap - FastMmap session storage backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270630.mAR6Umag030324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462254 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 06:40:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:40:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473218] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl - Log::Log4perl logging for Catalyst Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl - Log::Log4perl logging for Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473218 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl - Log::Log4perl logging for Catalyst Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl-1.00-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module provides a Catalyst::Log implementation that uses Log::Log4perl as the underlying log mechanism. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 06:59:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:59:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270659.mAR6xfIO019063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-27 01:59:38 EDT --- Thanks for the explanation for the situation on this package. >From your explanation the license fix is not needed. (But the license tag on the spec file needs fixing, it should be "License: GPLv2 and GPLv3+". Would you fix that? I will check the other issues on your srpm (if any) later, however as currently I am on semi- vacation and the response from me may be less frequent.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 07:04:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 02:04:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid-core - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270704.mAR74kLs019978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #13 from Brennan Ashton 2008-11-27 02:04:45 EDT --- I have changed it to the correct naming scheme. I am only going to package the core package as that is all that is needed right now, the others modules can be added later, but will require a lot of patching on the build and working with upstream to get around some font issues. Core uses ant while the rest uses mvn which adds another layer to the complexity as well. I was able to use build-jar-repository to work with there build.xml file so that patch has been removed. The other patch has to stay for FreeHep, the patch is right out of the readme for how to disable FreeHep. If someone wants to package FreeHep, then it can be added, but it is not really necessary. Hopefully this is the last bit: Spec URL: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/jeuclid-core.spec SRPM URL: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/jeuclid-core-3.1.3-6.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 07:07:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 02:07:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid-core - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270707.mAR77H6s020729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #14 from Brennan Ashton 2008-11-27 02:07:16 EDT --- sorry the new spec is Spec URL: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/jeuclid.spec per the naming scheme -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 07:08:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 02:08:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270708.mAR78iQr020841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: core - |Review Request: jeuclid - |MathML rendering solution |MathML rendering solution -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 07:07:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 02:07:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: core - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270707.mAR77fRh004114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: core - |jeuclid-core - MathML |MathML rendering solution |rendering solution | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 07:23:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 02:23:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473222] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-File - File storage backend for session data Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-File - File storage backend for session data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473222 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-File - File storage backend for session data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-File.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-File-0.13-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Catalyst::Plugin::Session::Store::File is an easy to use storage plugin for Catalyst that uses an simple file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache. It is based on Cache::FileCache. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 07:23:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 02:23:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206134] Review Request: guiloader-c++ - C++ Binding to GuiLoader Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270723.mAR7NSL8006840@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206134 --- Comment #6 from Denis Leroy 2008-11-27 02:23:27 EDT --- Right, crow/gideon was abandoned by upstream before it was completed. It was abandoned after the author went on a insulting spree on the gnome mailing list, then later apologized. A very weird story all in all. There have been some sporadic updates since then, but the upstream website still claims the project is "no longer under active development". I've just released ownership of both guiloader's in packagedb. Feel free to reclaim them and submit a new review if you're interested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 07:23:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 02:23:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473205] Review Request: gPlanarity - puzzle game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270723.mAR7NeOI006875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473205 --- Comment #2 from Brennan Ashton 2008-11-27 02:23:39 EDT --- A few things that need to be fixed: * This is a GUI app so: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Desktop_files * You need to have the requires in there, wont run with out the X stuff * Your build root looks odd should be: BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * Just remove #%%configure And remember to put a change log entry and +1 the release when you submit the new spec and SRPM Also if you want I can co-maintain this when you get it approved. Glad I was able to help you though this one, the first always seems to take forever to write. You will still need to wait for a sponsor to come by and do the full review for you. In the meantime you will need to package at least one more package and do a review or two, they will not just sponsor you for one package. Feel free to pull something off the wish list https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList if you do not have anything in mind. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 07:39:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 02:39:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473077] [RFE] Add package Equalizer - Parallel Rendering Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270739.mAR7dbfX009388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473077 --- Comment #2 from Stefan Eilemann 2008-11-27 02:39:37 EDT --- Yes, of course. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 07:41:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 02:41:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mz - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270741.mAR7fQDB010046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #18 from vivek shah 2008-11-27 02:41:25 EDT --- I am currently considering of changing the package name to mausezahn and all associated files like manpages. Since upstream is not keen to change the package name which I do not see as happening in near future, I think the best foot forward would be to rename the package on our side and push it into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 07:47:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 02:47:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471829] Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270747.mAR7ljQw010874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-27 02:47:44 EDT --- Fails to build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=954051 By the way as you are already sponsored, you can check if your package actually builds using koji as below: $ koji build --scratch where can be dist-f11, dist-f{10,9,8}-updates-candidate and so on. If the build is successful, the built binary rpms and some logs are saved (about one week) on http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch//task_/ . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 07:57:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 02:57:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270757.mAR7vl7A028747@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-27 02:57:45 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 07:57:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 02:57:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270757.mAR7v5Km028670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(boni.vivek at gmail. | |com) --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-27 02:57:03 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 07:59:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 02:59:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270759.mAR7xiFm028958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(seefeld at sympatico | |.ca) --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-27 02:59:42 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 08:00:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 03:00:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470694] Review Request: rubygem-rack - Common API for connecting web frameworks, web servers and layers of software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270800.mAR80j0Q013008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470694 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-27 03:00:43 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 08:01:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 03:01:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270801.mAR81eoT029757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Thomas Moschny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomas.moschny at gmx.de --- Comment #23 from Thomas Moschny 2008-11-27 03:01:37 EDT --- Ping? Btw, there's an updated X11 package out there, 1.4.4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 07:58:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 02:58:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465897] Review Request: Judy - General purpose dynamic array library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270758.mAR7wksR012457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-27 02:58:45 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 08:11:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 03:11:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270811.mAR8Bil8031497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #15 from Thomas Moschny 2008-11-27 03:11:42 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 10:02:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 05:02:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271002.mARA2qSZ002789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #15 from Brennan Ashton 2008-11-27 05:02:51 EDT --- upstream license bug now fixed will be in 3.1.4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 10:09:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 05:09:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473235] New: Review Request: system-config-date-docs - Documentation for setting the system date and time Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: system-config-date-docs - Documentation for setting the system date and time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473235 Summary: Review Request: system-config-date-docs - Documentation for setting the system date and time Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nphilipp at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-date-docs.spec SRPM URL: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-date-docs-1.0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This package contains the online documentation for system-config-date, with which you can configure date, time and the use of timeservers on your system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 10:13:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 05:13:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271013.mARADghJ021634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #14 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-11-27 05:13:40 EDT --- I understood why the authentication using partimaged-passwd was not working. The rpm has to be created with login and pam enabled and the rule pam_unix.so has to be removed. Doing this, the server authenticates using the db45 database created by the script. The authentication is logged in the file /var/log/secure. On the other hand, compiling with pam disabled and login enabled makes the authentication work using only the /etc/partimaged/patimagedusers file. Partimage does not use pam for this type of authentication. Therefore, the files /etc/pam.d/partimaged /usr/share/man/man8/partimaged-passwd.8.gz /usr/share/partimaged/partimaged-passwd are only included in the package when pam support is on. One has to rebuild the package for getting pam support, and as a consequence, get a (weaker) non-local user type of authentication. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 10:30:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 05:30:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472994] Review Request: hunspell-gv - Manx hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271030.mARAUuLi025444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472994 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 10:29:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 05:29:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472997] Review Request: hunspell-ny - Chichewa hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271029.mARATUsh024886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472997 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 10:30:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 05:30:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472996] Review Request: hunspell-ia - Interlingua hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271030.mARAU5Dj008649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472996 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 10:30:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 05:30:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472995] Review Request: hunspell-hil - Hiligaynon hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271030.mARAUZph008713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472995 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 10:51:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 05:51:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461429] Review Request: zsync - Incremental file-transfer program without special server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271051.mARApAkq013177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461429 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(ianburrell at gmail. | |com) --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert 2008-11-27 05:51:08 EDT --- Ian, is there anything we can do for you to get this review going again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 11:47:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 06:47:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 448661] Review Request: u-boot-tools - contains mkimage a tool to create kernel bootable images for u-boot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271147.mARBlcch008848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448661 --- Comment #11 from David Woodhouse 2008-11-27 06:47:37 EDT --- I'll sponsor Kumar... if we can work out how. He's not in the 'TODO queue' of people who need sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 11:56:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 06:56:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271156.mARBu1XS010583@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart at gmail.com --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-11-27 06:55:14 EDT --- Thx for taking care of this package. Just one note: BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1:1.6.0 instead of BuildRequires: java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel There is a typo in the last changelog entry that weren't update to release 6. I'm trying to do runtime test now. Nice works -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 12:04:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 07:04:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271204.mARC4Ej9012399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 --- Comment #27 from Denis Leroy 2008-11-27 07:04:11 EDT --- Uwe, now that the package was pushed to the testing repo, you should close this ticket. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 12:01:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 07:01:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473180] Review Request: lzip - LZMA compressor with integrity checking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271201.mARC1Ppi012020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473180 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: lzip - LZMA |Review Request: lzip - LZMA |compressor with integrety |compressor with integrity |checking (needed to update |checking |pam_mount) | Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Till Maas 2008-11-27 07:01:23 EDT --- Thank you very much for this fast review. I will address all your notes. But I am a little bit uncertain about the TODO file, because I would like to have some mechanism to add it only if it is not empty, e.g. if some contents are added in a future release. I asked in fedora-devel whether this is possible. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lzip Short Description: LZMA compressor with integrity checking Owners: till Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 12:10:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 07:10:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271210.mARCA5wj029878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 --- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-27 07:10:01 EDT --- protobuf-2.0.2-5.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/protobuf-2.0.2-5.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 12:17:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 07:17:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271217.mARCHLH2031446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 --- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-27 07:17:19 EDT --- protobuf-2.0.2-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/protobuf-2.0.2-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 12:19:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 07:19:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462163] Review Request: checkdns - A Domain Name Server analysis and reporting tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271219.mARCJHDM031686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462163 --- Comment #14 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-27 07:19:15 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: checkdns.src: E: unknown-key GPG#84490216 --> ignorable binary RPM: checkdns.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/www/html/checkdns checkdns checkdns.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/www/html/checkdns apache --> both are intended and hence ignorable checkdns.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun userdel --> see Note 1 [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: cb6b51995f44857427f4467d815405b978bba1f7 checkdns-0.5.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [!] Package consistently uses macros. --> see note 2 [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane: === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [x] Package functions as described. [!] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. -> see note 1 [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [-] %check is present and the test passes. === Final Notes === 1. Please do not use userdel in %post. The Fedora policy is to allow the sysadmin to clean at will, if/when needed. 2. Since you are using RPM_BUILD_ROOT in a lot of places, please replace %{optflags} with its uppercase equivalent. Technically we are OK, but estethically we are not. Please make the above mentioned 2 modifications and we are good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 12:22:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 07:22:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271222.mARCM8i0016271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 --- Comment #42 from Lev Shamardin 2008-11-27 07:22:07 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: protobuf New Branches: F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 12:23:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 07:23:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271223.mARCNJ7l032711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 Lev Shamardin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 12:51:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 07:51:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 448661] Review Request: u-boot-tools - contains mkimage a tool to create kernel bootable images for u-boot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271251.mARCpquH005458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448661 Josh Boyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 12:51:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 07:51:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 448661] Review Request: u-boot-tools - contains mkimage a tool to create kernel bootable images for u-boot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271251.mARCpba5022119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448661 --- Comment #12 from Josh Boyer 2008-11-27 07:51:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > I'll sponsor Kumar... if we can work out how. He's not in the 'TODO queue' of > people who need sponsorship. That's because I already sponsored him. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 13:13:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 08:13:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271313.mARDDoIf027847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 --- Comment #3 from Simon Wesp 2008-11-27 08:13:50 EDT --- > Spec URL: > http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/sbackup-0.10.5/sbackup.spec > > SRPM URL: > http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/sbackup-0.10.5/sbackup-0.10.5-3.fc10.src.rpm ah, i found the problem and updated the spec above. no new changelog, just a non-mentionable typo. I hope this would do the job. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 13:19:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 08:19:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271319.mARDJV12029068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 --- Comment #16 from Permaine Cheung 2008-11-27 08:19:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Here are my justifications for rpmlint warnings. If it's the same warning/error > I don't list it twice. > > [pcheung at tonka result]$ rpmlint jbossweb2-2.1.1-4.2.fc10.src.rpm > jbossweb2.src:86: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/lsb/init-functions > jbossweb2.src:87: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/lsb/init-functions > > This file is in /lib on both i386 and x86_64. > > jbossweb2.src:145: W: unversioned-explicit-provides jsp21 > jbossweb2.src:173: W: unversioned-explicit-provides servlet6 > jbossweb2.src:174: W: unversioned-explicit-provides servlet25 > > The versions are in the names. > > jbossweb2.src: W: non-standard-group Networking/Daemons > > Fedora allows any Group tag. > > [pcheung at tonka result]$ rpmlint jbossweb2-2.1.1-4.2.fc10.noarch.rpm > jbossweb2.noarch: E: non-standard-gid /var/cache/jbossweb2/temp jbossweb > jbossweb2.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/cache/jbossweb2/temp 0775 > jbossweb2.noarch: E: non-standard-gid /var/lib/jbossweb2/webapps jbossweb > jbossweb2.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/jbossweb2/webapps 0775 > > This is correct since it's a daemon, if we agree on the perms. Should the perm be 0755? > > jbossweb2.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/jbossweb2/webapps > /var/lib/jbossweb2/webapps > jbossweb2.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/jbossweb2/conf > /etc/jbossweb2 > jbossweb2.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/jbossweb2/lib > /usr/share/java/jbossweb2 > jbossweb2.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/jbossweb2/work > /var/cache/jbossweb2/work > jbossweb2.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/jbossweb2/temp > /var/cache/jbossweb2/temp > jbossweb2.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/jbossweb2/logs > /var/log/jbossweb2 > > I am not sure how to fix these, or what the actual problem is. > These seems to be ok. > jbossweb2.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/jbossweb2/tomcat-users.xml 0660 > > This file contains passwords, so it should not be world readable. > > jbossweb2.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm > > # clean tempdir and workdir on removal or upgrade > /bin/rm -rf /var/cache/jbossweb2/work/* /var/cache/jbossweb2/temp/* > > This allows the rpm to be removed cleanly, but it's not typical to do this. > What do you think? Hmm... ff the content of these directories are not cleaned, do they just sit there and the rpm can't be removed? > > jbossweb2.noarch: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/init.d/jbossweb2 ${NAME} > jbossweb2.noarch: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/init.d/jbossweb2 ${NAME} > jbossweb2.noarch: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/init.d/jbossweb2 ${NAME} > jbossweb2.noarch: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/init.d/jbossweb2 ${NAME} > > This uses a variable in case the name of the script is changed, but since NAME > is NAME="$(basename $0)", it is fine. > > [pcheung at tonka result]$ rpmlint > jbossweb2-admin-webapps-2.1.1-4.2.fc10.noarch.rpm > jbossweb2-admin-webapps.noarch: W: no-documentation > > Documentation is in the main package. > > [pcheung at tonka result]$ rpmlint jbossweb2-lib-2.1.1-4.2.fc10.noarch.rpm > jbossweb2-lib.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/share/java/jbossweb2/jbossweb2-servlet-2.5-api-2.1.1.jar > ../jbossweb2-servlet-2.5-api-2.1.1.jar > jbossweb2-lib.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/share/java/jbossweb2/jbossweb2-jsp-2.1-api-2.1.1.jar > ../jbossweb2-jsp-2.1-api-2.1.1.jar > > This is because the links are actually in another package, but jbossweb2-lib > Requires that package, so it's fine. > > jbossweb2-lib.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm > > if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then > /bin/rm -f /usr/share/java/jbossweb2/\[commons-collections-tomcat5\].jar \ > /usr/share/java/jbossweb2/\[commons-dbcp-tomcat5\].jar \ > /usr/share/java/jbossweb2/\[commons-pool-tomcat5\].jar \ > /usr/share/java/jbossweb2/\[ecj\].jar >/dev/null 2>&1 > fi > > This is to clean dangling symlinks. Is it valid? Do they need to be removed explicitly? don't they get removed automatically during rpm -e? One thing that's still there is the shell for jbossweb is /bin/sh instead of /sbin/nologin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 14:02:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:02:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471041] Review Request: diffpdf - PDF files comparator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271402.mARE21lo006660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471041 --- Comment #5 from Rafa? Psota 2008-11-27 09:01:59 EDT --- I knew i forgot about something. ;) Thanks for review! Here's new version with .desktop file: Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.fedorapeople.org/review/diffpdf/diffpdf.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.fedorapeople.org/review/diffpdf/diffpdf-0.3.8-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 14:41:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:41:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470792] Review Request: eclipse-shelled - Shell script editor plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271441.mAREfR0K030669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470792 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-27 09:41:26 EDT --- Thanks! Good to go. --------------------------------------------------------- This package (eclipse-shelled) has been APPROVED by oget. --------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 14:50:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:50:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471829] Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271450.mAREo5Ht032436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 --- Comment #4 from Hayden James 2008-11-27 09:50:04 EDT --- Thanks for the tip, that helped a lot. Here's the updated files: http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/log4cxx.spec http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/log4cxx-0.10.0-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 15:03:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:03:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470792] Review Request: eclipse-shelled - Shell script editor plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271503.mARF3gmT002749@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470792 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Alexander Kurtakov 2008-11-27 10:03:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-shelled Short Description: Eclipse Shell script editor Owners: akurtakov Branches: F-10 InitialCC: akurtakov -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 15:18:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:18:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271518.mARFI0RB005438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #7 from Adam Huffman 2008-11-27 10:17:58 EDT --- Just built Coot successfully with the latest clipper and ssm updates on an F9 x86_64 box. The program starts and is able to open a .pdb file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 15:45:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:45:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473205] Review Request: gPlanarity - puzzle game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271545.mARFj6Sl010871@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473205 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-11-27 10:45:05 EDT --- Just some another comment on your spec file. - License is GPLv2+. Take a look at the haeders of the source: "or (at your option) any later version" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 15:51:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:51:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473205] Review Request: gPlanarity - puzzle game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271551.mARFpXl8028658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473205 --- Comment #4 from Adam Tulinius 2008-11-27 10:51:32 EDT --- Thank you for the comments. Most is fixed as i write, except for the application-icon being slightly weird. New spec- and srpms will be added when i figure that out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 16:37:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:37:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470694] Review Request: rubygem-rack - Common API for connecting web frameworks, web servers and layers of software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271637.mARGbUbh003592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470694 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(kanarip at kanarip.c | |om) | --- Comment #6 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-11-27 11:37:29 EDT --- Sorry this one has slipped through the cracks; I've resolved the %% issue now ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 16:37:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:37:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470694] Review Request: rubygem-rack - Common API for connecting web frameworks, web servers and layers of software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271637.mARGbnbq020082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470694 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-11-27 11:37:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-rack Short Description: Common API for connecting web frameworks, web servers and layers of software Owners: kanarip Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 16:47:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:47:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468462] Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271647.mARGlk40021665@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 --- Comment #4 from Simon Wesp 2008-11-27 11:47:45 EDT --- Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=954509 rpmlint output: [cassmodiah at schafwiese SPECS]$ rpmlintsetuptree sbackup.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 4, tab: line 75) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. the columns in the pam-files are seperated with tabs. the spec itself is tabfree... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 17:06:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:06:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471829] Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271706.mARH6VrK008458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-27 12:06:30 EDT --- Well, * Summary - Usually on Summary beginning with the package name (Log4cxx -) is redundant * Group - Usually this type of package has "System Environment/Libraries" Group for main package. * SourceURL - For SourceURL, using %name, %version (especially %version) is recommended: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_.25.7Bversion.7D * rpath - Using chrpath to remove rpath should be considered as the last resort: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Removing_Rpath Please don't use chrpath unless avoidable (and usually it is avoidable). * I usually use -------------------------------------------------------------- sed -i.libdir_syssearch -e \ '/sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec/s|/usr/lib |/usr/lib /usr/lib64 /lib /lib64 |' \ configure -------------------------------------------------------------- and this works for this package * Timestamp - Please consider to use -------------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" -------------------------------------------------------------- to keep timestamps on installed files. This method usually works for Makefiles generated by recent autotools. * Installed doxygen html files - All these files should be marked as %doc. Moreover, I suggest that these html files must be moved under %_datadir/doc/ * Macros - Requires: log4cxx = %{version}-%{release},pkgconfig I suggest to use %name for consistency * Requires for -devel subpackage - For example %_includedir/%name/helpers/aprinitializer.h contains: -------------------------------------------------------------- 25 #include 26 #include 27 #include -------------------------------------------------------------- This file requires apr-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 17:11:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:11:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473205] Review Request: gPlanarity - puzzle game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271711.mARHBqha025482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473205 --- Comment #5 from Adam Tulinius 2008-11-27 12:11:51 EDT --- Now i got everything working, i think. I still haven't added "Require", because i'm not sure it's really needed. I tried poking around in a few other packages, which didn't put any X-stuff in there either. RPM should pick up X as a requirement, due to the build-req on some x-stuff, i think. (?) SPEC: http://antistof.dk/pub/fedora/2/gplanarity.spec SRPM: http://antistof.dk/pub/fedora/2/gplanarity-svn11496-2.fc10.src.rpm Koji-run: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=953888 #Brennan: co-maintaining the package with you would be nice. Feedback much appreciated. - Adam -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 17:14:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:14:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473318] New: Review Request: system-config-nfs-docs - Documentation for configuring an NFS server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: system-config-nfs-docs - Documentation for configuring an NFS server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473318 Summary: Review Request: system-config-nfs-docs - Documentation for configuring an NFS server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nphilipp at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-nfs-docs.spec SRPM URL: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-nfs-docs-1.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This package contains the online documentation for system-config-nfs which is a graphical user interface for creating, modifying, and deleting nfs shares. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 17:16:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:16:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465897] Review Request: Judy - General purpose dynamic array library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271716.mARHGSq0026601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897 Charles R. Anderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(cra at wpi.edu) | --- Comment #6 from Charles R. Anderson 2008-11-27 12:16:26 EDT --- BTW, I'm already a sponsored packager now. Analyzing the license: The README file actually says LGPLv2.1 and refers to COPYING which is a copy of the LGPL v2.1: 4. LICENSE ---------- The user library is licensed under the GNU Lesser Public License (LGPL) Version 2.1, February 1999. The full text of the LGPL is located at: COPYING ------------------ Looking in COPYING it says LGPL v2.1 or later: Judy - C library functions for creating and accessing dynamic arrays Copyright (C) 2004 Doug Baskins This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. ------------------ The source files have headers that mention the license as LGPLv2 or later, for example: ./src/JudyCommon/JudyMemUsed.c-// Copyright (C) 2000 - 2002 Hewlett-Packard Company ./src/JudyCommon/JudyMemUsed.c-// ./src/JudyCommon/JudyMemUsed.c-// This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it ./src/JudyCommon/JudyMemUsed.c:// under the term of the GNU Lesser General Public License as published by the ./src/JudyCommon/JudyMemUsed.c:// Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your ./src/JudyCommon/JudyMemUsed.c-// option) any later version. ./src/JudyCommon/JudyMemUsed.c-// I'll check with upstream which license they intended. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 18:35:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:35:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271835.mARIZUxU021794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #9 from Tim Fenn 2008-11-27 13:35:29 EDT --- Sorry, wrong SRPM link: SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/coot-0.5-3.f10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 18:34:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:34:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271834.mARIYMaw005680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #8 from Tim Fenn 2008-11-27 13:34:21 EDT --- I've included the latest spec/srpm that should pull in all the proper buildreqs here: Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/coot.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/coot-0.5-3.f8.src.rpm note: I've added guile support as well to the build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 18:51:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:51:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465897] Review Request: Judy - General purpose dynamic array library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271851.mARIpTIF024214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897 Charles R. Anderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl --- Comment #7 from Charles R. Anderson 2008-11-27 13:51:28 EDT --- Spec URL: http://cra.fedorapeople.org/Judy/Judy.spec SRPM URL: http://cra.fedorapeople.org/Judy/Judy-1.0.4-2.fc10.src.rpm Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=954819 * Thu Nov 27 2008 Charles R. Anderson 1.0.4-2 - patch tests to run with shared library - run tests in check section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 19:28:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 14:28:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471829] Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271928.mARJSPnU014353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 --- Comment #6 from Hayden James 2008-11-27 14:28:24 EDT --- Here's an updated version that fixes most of the above: http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/log4cxx.spec http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/log4cxx-0.10.0-3.fc9.src.rpm rpmlint generates an error now with the above sed script to remove the rpaths instead of using chrpath. Also, I didn't move the doxygen files as of yet, there's no way to do it that I can see without manually 'mv' the files, do you think it should be done anyhow? Everything else should be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 19:44:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 14:44:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473330] New: Review Request: ecm - Elliptic Curve Method for Integer Factorization Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ecm - Elliptic Curve Method for Integer Factorization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473330 Summary: Review Request: ecm - Elliptic Curve Method for Integer Factorization Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/ecm.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/ecm-6.2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Programs and libraries employing elliptic curve method for factoring integers (with GMP for arbitrary precision integers). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 20:59:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 15:59:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465897] Review Request: Judy - General purpose dynamic array library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811272059.mARKxKVf028294@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897 --- Comment #8 from Erik van Pienbroek 2008-11-27 15:59:19 EDT --- Why'd you CC me? You want me to continue with this review? (As I already started reviewing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464429 before it was pulled back) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 21:58:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:58:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473348] New: Review Request: drraw - Web based presentation front-end for RRDtool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drraw - Web based presentation front-end for RRDtool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473348 Summary: Review Request: drraw - Web based presentation front-end for RRDtool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xavier at bachelot.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/drraw.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/drraw-2.2-0.1.b1.fc8.src.rpm Description: drraw is a simple web based presentation front-end for RRDtool that allows you to interactively build graphs of your own design. A graph definition can be turned into a template which may be applied to many Round Robin Database files. drraw specializes in providing an easy mean of displaying data stored with RRDtool and does not care about how the data is collected, making it a great complement to other RRDtool front-ends. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 22:10:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:10:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469892] Review Request: examiner - Utility to disassemble and comment foreign executable binaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811272210.mARMAlY3007203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469892 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 00:24:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 19:24:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811280024.mAS0OV9c011358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-27 19:24:30 EDT --- I can update the submission but we need to get ghc-X11 reviewed first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 01:53:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:53:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811280153.mAS1rXxA023925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Bug 471003 depends on bug 425882, which changed state. Bug 425882 Summary: Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 01:53:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:53:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811280153.mAS1rWtK023905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #48 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-27 20:53:28 EDT --- Thanks. ghc-zlib-0.5.0.0-2.fc11 has been built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 02:20:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 21:20:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473367] New: Review Request: autotrust - DNSKEY trust anchor update utility that uses RFC-5011 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: autotrust - DNSKEY trust anchor update utility that uses RFC-5011 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473367 Summary: Review Request: autotrust - DNSKEY trust anchor update utility that uses RFC-5011 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at xelerance.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/autotrust/autotrust.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/autotrust/autotrust-0.2.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: autotrust takes care of keeping your DNSSEC trust anchors up to date. It is RFC5011 compliant, except for the query intervals and the retry timers. autotrust is meant to run from commandline or in a cron job. If we want to follow the values recommended by RFC5011, autotrust should run as daemon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 03:13:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 22:13:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465897] Review Request: Judy - General purpose dynamic array library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811280313.mAS3DP3M020195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897 --- Comment #9 from Charles R. Anderson 2008-11-27 22:13:24 EDT --- Re: Comment #8, I thought you'd like to be Cc'd since you were on the original review which was CLOSED/DUPLICATE--bugzilla usually does this automatically, but didn't in this case. If you'd like to help, extra eyes for review are always helpful. No worries either way. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 03:44:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 22:44:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470178] Review Request: perl-MooseX-ConfigFromFile - An abstract Moose role for setting attributes from a configfile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811280344.mAS3i1W3025654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470178 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ Bug 470178 depends on bug 469627, which changed state. Bug 469627 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class - A Path::Class type library for Moose https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469627 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-27 22:44:00 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 4da080e6a4a5b44acabbaa71db018af105aeaf3b MooseX-ConfigFromFile-0.02.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: noarch, perl module [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [-] %check is present and the test passes. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 03:56:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 22:56:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470178] Review Request: perl-MooseX-ConfigFromFile - An abstract Moose role for setting attributes from a configfile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811280356.mAS3unQh011284@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470178 --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-27 22:56:49 EDT --- Actually I meant [x] %check is present and the test passes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 04:11:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 23:11:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470179] Review Request: perl-MooseX-App-Cmd - Mashes up MooseX::Getopt and App::Cmd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811280411.mAS4BLx9013698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470179 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ Bug 470179 depends on bug 469627, which changed state. Bug 469627 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class - A Path::Class type library for Moose https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469627 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 470179 depends on bug 469816, which changed state. Bug 469816 Summary: Review Request: perl-App-Cmd - Write command line apps with less suffering https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469816 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-27 23:11:20 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 385e09b2d525502c4edc0eda3a0de24e3f3e2079 MooseX-App-Cmd-0.04.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: noarch, perl module [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [!] %check is present and the test passes. -> see Note 1 Note 1: The build logs says a test has failed with t/basic.................Can't locate Test/Output.pm in @INC (@INC contains: t/lib /builddir/build/BUILD/MooseX-App-Cmd-0.04/blib/lib /builddir/build/BUILD/MooseX-App-Cmd-0.04/blib/arch /usr/lib64/perl5/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0 /usr/local/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/local/lib64/perl5/site_perl) at t/basic.t line 81. Please add perl(Test::Output) as BuildRequires to fix that. I have just checked locally and make test is happy after that. ================ *** APPROVED *** but fix the missing BR before commit ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 04:45:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 23:45:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811280445.mAS4jFBJ018523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 vivek shah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(boni.vivek at gmail. | |com) | --- Comment #19 from vivek shah 2008-11-27 23:45:12 EDT --- Yes the trial patch successfully worked and the guile prompt loaded up. I will be uploading the new SRPM and spec file tomorrow. Sorry for the delay -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 05:46:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:46:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462163] Review Request: checkdns - A Domain Name Server analysis and reporting tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811280546.mAS5kl5E028173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462163 --- Comment #15 from John Guthrie 2008-11-28 00:46:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > === Final Notes === > 1. Please do not use userdel in %post. The Fedora policy is to allow the > sysadmin to clean at will, if/when needed. > 2. Since you are using RPM_BUILD_ROOT in a lot of places, please replace > %{optflags} with its uppercase equivalent. Technically we are OK, but > estethically we are not. > > Please make the above mentioned 2 modifications and we are good to go. I have made both of these modifications: Spec URL: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f9/checkdns.spec SRPM URL: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f9/checkdns-0.5-7.fc9.src.rpm Thank you very much. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 05:54:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:54:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811280554.mAS5sUYB028890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-28 00:54:30 EDT --- - don't include license file in -prof subpackage Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-HTTP/ghc-HTTP.spec SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-HTTP/ghc-HTTP-3001.1.4-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 06:11:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 01:11:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811280611.mAS6B3lS014952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(loupgaroublond at gm | |ail.com) | --- Comment #24 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-28 01:11:00 EDT --- I hear Yaakov is busy with his studies, so let me take over the submission: Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-X11/ghc-X11.spec SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-X11/ghc-X11-1.4.4-1.fc10.src.rpm (requires f11 rawhide to build) Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=955786 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 08:19:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 03:19:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811280819.mAS8JV9D018211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |473373 --- Comment #17 from Brennan Ashton 2008-11-28 03:19:30 EDT --- This build contains more fixes, as well as including the jeuclid-fod and jeuclid-mathviewer subpackages. I cannot build the jeuclid-cli until commons-cli is updated bug 473373 . I have had to write a new build script based on the Debian one as the ones included do not work well with fedora package build structure. I still need to do the GUI stuff for jeclid-mathviewer. SRPM: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/jeuclid-3.1.3-7.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/jeuclid.spec I did a runtime test with jeuclid-mathviewer and it did not look all that great i got: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/example5.png When it should look like http://jeuclid.sourceforge.net/images/example5.png Nicolas did your runtime test work? This problem could be due to fonts or the viewer. I have not written a test that goes directly to the jeuclid-core, and as I said the command line tools are dead until commons-cli is updated in fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 08:23:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 03:23:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811280823.mAS8NOhX018962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #18 from Brennan Ashton 2008-11-28 03:23:23 EDT --- Upstream also did not put the javadocs in the build script, while it is in the code, so I am adding that in as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 09:04:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 04:04:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462163] Review Request: checkdns - A Domain Name Server analysis and reporting tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811280904.mAS941Sp026073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462163 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-28 04:04:00 EDT --- great job. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 10:58:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 05:58:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473406] New: Review Request: system-config-users-docs - Documentation for administering users and groups Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: system-config-users-docs - Documentation for administering users and groups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473406 Summary: Review Request: system-config-users-docs - Documentation for administering users and groups Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nphilipp at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-users-docs.spec SRPM URL: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-users-docs-1.0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This package contains the online documentation for system-config-users which is a graphical utility for administrating users and groups. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 11:06:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 06:06:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473367] Review Request: autotrust - DNSKEY trust anchor update utility that uses RFC-5011 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281106.mASB6C45012357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473367 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |atkac at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Adam Tkac 2008-11-28 06:06:11 EDT --- I'm going to review this package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 11:06:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 06:06:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473367] Review Request: autotrust - DNSKEY trust anchor update utility that uses RFC-5011 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281106.mASB6N7j017158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473367 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 11:50:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 06:50:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462163] Review Request: checkdns - A Domain Name Server analysis and reporting tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281150.mASBoRva025662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462163 John Guthrie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from John Guthrie 2008-11-28 06:50:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: checkdns Short Description: A Domain Name Server analysis and reporting tool Owners: guthrie Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 11:55:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 06:55:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281155.mASBtxoX026899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |473241 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 11:53:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 06:53:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] New: Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 Summary: Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jreznik at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/kopete-cryptography/kopete-cryptography.spec SRPM URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/kopete-cryptography/kopete-cryptography-1.3.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Kopete cryptography plugin encrypts and signs messages using the OpenPGP standard. It also handles incoming messages that are encrypted or signed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 12:08:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 07:08:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473413] New: Review Request: system-config-samba-docs - Documentation for configuring a Samba server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: system-config-samba-docs - Documentation for configuring a Samba server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473413 Summary: Review Request: system-config-samba-docs - Documentation for configuring a Samba server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nphilipp at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-samba-docs.spec SRPM URL: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-samba-docs-1.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This package contains the online documentation for system-config-samba which is a graphical user interface for creating, modifying, and deleting samba shares. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 12:35:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 07:35:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281235.mASCZcTR002279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-11-28 07:35:37 EDT --- Actually, instead of runtime test, I've failed at scilab buildtime with a missing Symbol at configure check (whereas jeuclid-core.jar is already available in the classpath): checking jeuclid-core... no configure: error: Could not find or use the Java package/jar jeuclid-core used by MathML rendering solution (looking for package net.sourceforge.jeuclid.MathBase) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 12:32:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 07:32:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473046] Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281232.mASCWvrO028377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 --- Comment #9 from Avi Alkalay 2008-11-28 07:32:54 EDT --- Suggestions incorporated into spec. Please recheck http://avi.alkalay.net/software/miniupnpc/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 13:48:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 08:48:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281348.mASDmxS4017731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 --- Comment #29 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-11-28 08:48:56 EDT --- Hi, As cvs and build have already been done, must I ask again a cvs request ? How can I change summary in pkgdb page ? Thx -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 13:57:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 08:57:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281357.mASDvGA5013637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|dgilmore at redhat.com | Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #30 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-28 08:57:14 EDT --- im setting cvs back to + and im told that the summary and description in pkgdb will automatically be fixed when the package hits rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 15:44:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 10:44:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473447] New: Review Request: vim-perl-support - Perl-IDE for VIM Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vim-perl-support - Perl-IDE for VIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473447 Summary: Review Request: vim-perl-support - Perl-IDE for VIM Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/vim-perl-support.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/vim-perl-support-3.9.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Perl Support implements a Perl-IDE for Vim/gVim. It is written to considerably speed up writing code in a consistent style. This is done by inserting complete statements, comments, idioms, code snippets, templates, and POD documentation. Reading perldoc is integrated. Syntax checking, running a script, running perltidy, running perlcritics, starting a debugger and a profiler can be done with a keystroke. note that rpmlint reports a false error: vim-perl-support.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/perl-support/templates/perl-file-header 0644 perl-file-header is a template for a perl script; the shebang is required, but the file should not be executable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 15:56:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 10:56:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473452] New: Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473452 Summary: Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nphilipp at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-services-docs.spec SRPM URL: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-services-docs-1.1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This package contains the online documentation for system-config-services is a utility which allows you to configure which services should be enabled on your machine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 16:54:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 11:54:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281654.mASGsSAS013688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 --- Comment #19 from Gerd Hoffmann 2008-11-28 11:54:27 EDT --- Done. SPEC: http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/osm/perl-Set-Object/perl-Set-Object.spec SRPM: http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/osm/perl-Set-Object/perl-Set-Object-1.26-2.fc9.src.rpm TEXT: http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/osm/perl-Set-Object/license.txt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 17:16:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 12:16:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281716.mASHGXE4022817@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 18:01:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 13:01:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281801.mASI1HjU030272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #20 from Brennan Ashton 2008-11-28 13:01:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Actually, instead of runtime test, I've failed at scilab buildtime with a > missing Symbol at configure check (whereas jeuclid-core.jar is already > available in the classpath): > checking jeuclid-core... no > configure: error: Could not find or use the Java package/jar jeuclid-core used > by MathML rendering solution (looking for package > net.sourceforge.jeuclid.MathBase) Did you try the latest SRPM I posted? It has the system links for jeuclid-core.jar. It looks like the rendering error is due to an issue with OpenJDK. I am talking with upstream about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 18:25:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 13:25:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473077] [RFE] Add package Equalizer - Parallel Rendering Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281825.mASIPjMP028840@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473077 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-28 13:25:44 EDT --- Then you need to follow the package review procedure. Please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join, start at the beginning, and open a proper package review ticket as indicated on that page once you have an actual package to submit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 18:29:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 13:29:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281829.mASITvsE029388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841 |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(nsheridan at gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-28 13:29:52 EDT --- I guess not. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 18:45:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 13:45:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473475] Review Request: python-relatorio - A templating library able to output odt and pdf files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281845.mASIj0BQ004404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473475 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |473476 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 18:44:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 13:44:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473476] Review Request: trytond - Server for the Tryton application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281844.mASIixhA004383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473476 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |473475 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 18:44:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 13:44:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473476] New: Review Request: trytond - Server for the Tryton application framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: trytond - Server for the Tryton application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473476 Summary: Review Request: trytond - Server for the Tryton application framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/tryton/trytond.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/tryton/trytond-1.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Tryton is a three-tiers high-level general purpose application framework written in Python and use PostgreSQL as database engine. It is the core base of an Open Source ERP. It provides modularity, scalability and security. The core of Tryton (also called Tryton kernel) provides all the necessary functionalities for a complete application framework: data persistence (i.e an ORM with extensive modularity), users management (authentication, fine grained control for data access, handling of concurrent access of resources), workflow and report engines, web services and internationalisation. Thus constituting a complete application platform which can be used for any relevant purpose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 18:43:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 13:43:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473475] New: Review Request: python-relatorio - A templating library able to output odt and pdf files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-relatorio - A templating library able to output odt and pdf files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473475 Summary: Review Request: python-relatorio - A templating library able to output odt and pdf files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/tryton/python-relatorio.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/tryton/python-relatorio-0.4.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: A templating library which provides a way to easily output all kind of different files (odt, ods, png, svg, ...). Adding support for more filetype is easy: you just have to create a plugin for this. relatorio also provides a report repository allowing you to link python objects and report together, find reports by mimetypes/name/python objects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 18:46:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 13:46:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473477] New: Review Request: tryton - Client for the Tryton application framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tryton - Client for the Tryton application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473477 Summary: Review Request: tryton - Client for the Tryton application framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/tryton/tryton.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/tryton/tryton-1.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Tryton is a three-tiers high-level general purpose application framework written in Python and use PostgreSQL as database engine. It is the core base of an Open Source ERP. It provides modularity, scalability and security. The core of Tryton (also called Tryton kernel) provides all the necessary functionalities for a complete application framework: data persistence (i.e an ORM with extensive modularity), users management (authentication, fine grained control for data access, handling of concurrent access of resources), workflow and report engines, web services and internationalisation. Thus constituting a complete application platform which can be used for any relevant purpose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 19:08:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:08:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470976] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-EndOfScope - Execute code after scope compilation finishes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281908.mASJ8MOi008513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470976 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-28 14:08:21 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 85416947f5536a6415a850edc645806cc416e557 B-Hooks-EndOfScope-0.04.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: noarch, perl module [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the test passes. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 19:25:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:25:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470976] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-EndOfScope - Execute code after scope compilation finishes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281925.mASJPP09011602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470976 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 19:25:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:25:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470976] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-EndOfScope - Execute code after scope compilation finishes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281925.mASJPOX2011585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470976 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-28 14:25:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-B-Hooks-EndOfScope Short Description: Execute code after scope compilation finishes Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 19:24:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:24:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281924.mASJO6GB005916@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 Bug 472848 depends on bug 473373, which changed state. Bug 473373 Summary: commons-cli need to be upgraded to 1.1 from 1.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473373 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 19:25:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:25:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472335] Review Request: perl-rpm-build-perl - Perl compiler backend to extract Perl dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281925.mASJPlwh006407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472335 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-28 14:25:46 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: be731dd4ad39987738098fff6c38d6a89ec717be rpm-build-perl-0.6.8.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: noarch, perl module [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the test passes. Note: This package overlaps ownership of /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/B with perl-B-Hooks-EndOfScope (and maybe others). We are in the situation described at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership ("Multiple packages have files in a common directory but none of them requires others.") so this is OK. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 19:27:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:27:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281927.mASJRZ3f011812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |453018 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 19:29:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:29:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472335] Review Request: perl-rpm-build-perl - Perl compiler backend to extract Perl dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281929.mASJTXiY011977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472335 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-28 14:29:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-rpm-build-perl Short Description: Perl compiler backend to extract Perl dependencies Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 19:29:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:29:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472335] Review Request: perl-rpm-build-perl - Perl compiler backend to extract Perl dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281929.mASJTZgF006867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472335 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 19:32:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:32:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470179] Review Request: perl-MooseX-App-Cmd - Mashes up MooseX::Getopt and App::Cmd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281932.mASJWnlX012665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470179 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-28 14:32:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-App-Cmd Short Description: Mashes up MooseX::Getopt and App::Cmd Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 19:34:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:34:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470178] Review Request: perl-MooseX-ConfigFromFile - An abstract Moose role for setting attributes from a configfile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281934.mASJYKsI012828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470178 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 19:34:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:34:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470178] Review Request: perl-MooseX-ConfigFromFile - An abstract Moose role for setting attributes from a configfile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281934.mASJYIex012811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470178 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-28 14:34:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-ConfigFromFile Short Description: An abstract Moose role for setting attributes from a configfile Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 19:32:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:32:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470179] Review Request: perl-MooseX-App-Cmd - Mashes up MooseX::Getopt and App::Cmd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281932.mASJWpZR007532@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470179 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 19:32:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:32:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470179] Review Request: perl-MooseX-App-Cmd - Mashes up MooseX::Getopt and App::Cmd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281932.mASJWeLT007503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470179 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-28 14:32:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > Please add perl(Test::Output) as BuildRequires to fix that. I have just > checked locally and make test is happy after that. > > ================ > *** APPROVED *** but fix the missing BR before commit > ================ Will do. Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 19:46:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:46:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472726] Review Request: perl-Test-Dependencies - Ensure that your Makefile.PL specifies all module dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281946.mASJkoA3009712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472726 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 19:43:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:43:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472726] Review Request: perl-Test-Dependencies - Ensure that your Makefile.PL specifies all module dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281943.mASJhSaS009015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472726 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-28 14:43:26 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, co ntaining the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 67eede2875c8468440461b2640a3d9e491fe48f7 Test-Dependencies-0.11.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions sectio n of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: noarch, perl module [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the tests pass. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 19:46:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:46:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472726] Review Request: perl-Test-Dependencies - Ensure that your Makefile.PL specifies all module dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281946.mASJkmJK014924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472726 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-28 14:46:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-Dependencies Short Description: Ensure that your Makefile.PL specifies all module dependencies Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 19:51:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:51:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281951.mASJpMnU010639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|473241 | --- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler 2008-11-28 14:51:20 EDT --- *** Bug 473241 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 20:41:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:41:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473330] Review Request: ecm - Elliptic Curve Method for Integer Factorization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811282041.mASKfnpj023975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473330 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-28 15:41:48 EDT --- I've just taken a quick glance at a mock build and there are several problems which must be fixed and also some improvements which I recommend MUSTFIX: according to the build log (and to your %files section), you are not compiling the shared libs, but you do compile static libs: [...] checking whether to build shared libraries... no checking whether to build static libraries... yes + %files devel %{_libdir}/lib%{name}.a You should do the exact opposite ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exclusion_of_Static_Libraries ), unless you have a very clear motif (in which case a note should be added to the spec). Plus, static libs do not go into -devel.rpm but into -static.rpm. If you need both static and shared, then package both. MUSTFIX ecm-devel should require the base package RECOMMENDED please try to preserve the timestamps of the included files. probably make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" should do I have also noticed that configure complains about a missing xsltproc. Is it intentional or a missing BR? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 20:48:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:48:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473330] Review Request: ecm - Elliptic Curve Method for Integer Factorization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811282048.mASKmfe1024846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473330 --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-28 15:48:40 EDT --- You should also use a different name for the package, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Use_of_common_namespace for details. Taking into consideration upstream's website and the documents bundled in the source tarball (starting with the very first line of README), I think that gmp-ecm is a better suited name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 21:03:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 16:03:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473330] Review Request: ecm - Elliptic Curve Method for Integer Factorization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811282103.mASL3NTd027502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473330 --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer 2008-11-28 16:03:22 EDT --- Yes, I thought of gmp-ecm as a name but the tarball goes by ecm. I'm ok with either. I'll fix the problems you mention when I get home tonight. Thanks for spotting the problems! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 21:11:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 16:11:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473330] Review Request: ecm - Elliptic Curve Method for Integer Factorization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811282111.mASLBK1A028984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473330 --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer 2008-11-28 16:11:17 EDT --- Also Debian's version of this package is also named gmp-ecm. So I am happy to change the name to that when I get home. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 21:16:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 16:16:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473330] Review Request: ecm - Elliptic Curve Method for Integer Factorization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811282116.mASLGxeB029967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473330 --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-28 16:16:58 EDT --- The name of the tarball is not that relevant as the name of the project is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 21:47:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 16:47:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811282147.mASLlYcb029128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |opensource at till.name AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 22:03:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:03:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470720] Review Request: gdnet - Demonstration tool for the libdnet interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811282203.mASM33UG004502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470720 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-28 17:03:02 EDT --- works for me in fedora 7, so... Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) ) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type according to spec: GPLv2+ License type according to source files: unspecified, hence GPL+ according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ See note 1 at the end of the review. [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: fba4329092363cb9f60ad09c9e72ab1f546281f7 gdnet-0.5.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 and Fedora-7/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [X] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. Notes 1. Please get in touch with upstream, clarify the license and ask for inclusion of license info in all the source files 2. The desktop file has an ending space on the first line which makes my desktop-file-validate choke. Could you please fix it ? 3. There are some duplicate BuildRequires:gtk2-devel (by libglade2-devel), glib2-devel (by gtk2-devel) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 22:20:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:20:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473367] Review Request: autotrust - DNSKEY trust anchor update utility that uses RFC-5011 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811282220.mASMKPb9007289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473367 --- Comment #2 from Paul Wouters 2008-11-28 17:20:24 EDT --- Thanks Adam! I fixed a typo in the config file. Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/autotrust/autotrust.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/autotrust/autotrust-0.2.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 22:57:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:57:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463217] Review Request: gnuplot-py - Python interface to Gnuplot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811282257.mASMvmSB012699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463217 --- Comment #11 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-28 17:57:47 EDT --- Sorry, I was never notified that you updated the package. Anyways, I found a few issues: * There are broken links in the %doc html files. For example, in your browser, go to /usr/share/doc/gnuplot-py-1.8/gp_unix.html . The Gnuplot link on the top left is broken, which is the case for pretty much all other %doc files. Can you fix those? * I also ask you the include the other relevant doc files (*.txt) in the %doc . These .txt files are referred to within the .html files (see Gnuplot.html) and therefore we need to keep them. You can put those happydoc generated .html files in a subdirectory inside /usr/share/doc/gnuplot-py-1.8/ if you think that having everything in the main %doc directory makes things confusing. * This python package does not use setuptools. Therefore in order to create the proper python egg, you need to follow the guideline at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs#Providing_Eggs_for_non-setuptools_packages * You don't need to package: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Gnuplot/setup.py* /usr/share/doc/gnuplot-py-1.8/setup.html files. There are also mac, win32 etc related .py and .html files. Those aren't very necessary either. I leave these up to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 23:23:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:23:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811282323.mASNNpgY016924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #2 from Till Maas 2008-11-28 18:23:50 EDT --- [NEEDSWORK] rpmlint output: kopete-cryptography.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/uk/kopete-cryptography/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/uk//common kopete-cryptography.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/uk/kopete-cryptography/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/uk//common kopete-cryptography.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/it/kopete-cryptography/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/it//common kopete-cryptography.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/it/kopete-cryptography/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/it//common kopete-cryptography.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/fr/kopete-cryptography/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/fr//common kopete-cryptography.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/fr/kopete-cryptography/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/fr//common kopete-cryptography.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kopete/plugins/cryptography/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common kopete-cryptography.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kopete/plugins/cryptography/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common kopete-cryptography.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/pt/kopete-cryptography/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/pt//common kopete-cryptography.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/pt/kopete-cryptography/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/pt//common kopete-cryptography.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/sv/kopete-cryptography/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/sv//common kopete-cryptography.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/sv/kopete-cryptography/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/sv//common I believe that adding somethin like this to the HTML doc loop in %install should fix this, but the second line breaks the build currently and I am too tired to see why. :-/ test -L $lang_dir/kopete-cryptography/common && ln -sf ../common $lang_dir/kopete-cryptography/common test -L $lang_dir/kopete/plugins/cryptography/common && ln -sf ../../../common $lang_dir/kopete/plugins/cryptography/common [OK] Spec in %{name}.spec format [OK] license allowed: GPLv2+ [OK] license matches shortname in License: tag [OK] license in tarball and included in %doc: [OK] package is code or permissive content: {N/A} patches sent to upstream and commented [OK] Source0 is a working URL {N/A} Sourceforge URL is Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name} [OK] Source0 matches Upstream: 25697c1b7f85c660f4cfc73b27c2e4c8 kopete-cryptography-1.3.0-kde4.1.3.tar.bz2 [OK] Package builds on all platforms: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=956882 [N/A] ExcludeArch bugs are filed and commented: [OK] BuildRequires are complete (mock builds) (OK) No file dependencies outside of /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileDeps [OK] %find_lang used for locales [N/A] Every (sub)package containing libraries runs ldconfig %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig [N/A] .h (header) files are in -devel subpackage [N/A] .a (static libraries) are in -static subpackage [N/A] contains .pc (pkgconfig) files and has Requires: pkgconfig (N/A) .pc files are in -devel subpackage [N/A] contains .so.X(.Y) files and .so is in -devel [N/A] -devel subpackage has Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [N/A] .la files (libtool) are not included [N/A] Has GUI and includes %{name}.desktop [N/A] Follows desktop entry spec [N/A] Valid .desktop Name [N/A] Valid .desktop GenericName [N/A] Valid .desktop Categories [N/A] Valid .desktop StartupNotify [N/A] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install [OK] Prefix: /usr not used (not relocatable) [NEEDSWORK] Owns all created directories: /usr/share/kde4/apps/kopete_cryptography/ should probably be owned [OK] no duplicates in %files [OK] %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [OK] Does not own files or dirs from other packages [OK] included filenames are in UTF-8 [OK] %clean is rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [NEEDSWORK] Consistent macro usage https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#macros $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} are used [OK] large documentation is -doc subpackage [TODO] %doc does not affect runtime {OK} no pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) {OK} well known BuildRoot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) {OK} PreReq not used {OK} RPM_OPT_FLAGS honoured Only visibile when VERBOSE=1 is used. {OK} Useful debuginfo generated {OK} no duplication of system libraries {OK} no rpath {TODO} Timestamps preserved with cp and install https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps {OK} Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) {OK} Requires(pre,post) style notation not used {OK} only writes to tmp /var/tmp $TMPDIR %{_tmppath} %{_builddir} (and %{buildroot} on %install and %clean) {OK} no Conflicts {OK} nothing installed in /srv {OK} Changelog in allowed format {OK} does not use Scriptlets Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch Sane Provides: and Requires: {OK} Follows Naming Guidelines {NEEDSWORK} follows special guidelines Cmake https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/cmake VERBOSE=1 is missing at the make commandline in %build Btw. are there any KDE specific guidelines available? At the KDE SIG page there is a "best practices" headline, but there is no content available: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE#Best_Practices I will check the two missing items tomorrow, but I am too tired now. Please fix or comment the items marked with NEEDSWORK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 23:35:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:35:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811282335.mASNZ4Ms019021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 --- Comment #11 from Michal Nowak 2008-11-28 18:35:02 EDT --- License issue fixed, patch included in package & upstream git repo. * http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/xcb-util/xcb-util-0.3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm * http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/xcb-util/xcb-util.spec Known problem: xcb-util.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libxcb-aux.so.0.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 see: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18808 Runs fine with awesome. Ready for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 00:09:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 19:09:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811290009.mAT09MCK017998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 --- Comment #9 from D Haley 2008-11-28 19:09:20 EDT --- Spec: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/skinlf-4.spec SRPM: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/skinlf-6.7-4.fc9.src.rpm * Sat Nov 29 2008 6.7-4 - Updated BuildRequires to inlcude laf-plugin - Silence several rpmlint errors - ASL 2.0 vs Apache Source Licence 2.0 - Fix arch - Fix EOL on docs. >build seems to error out aswell without laf-plugin installed so shouldnt that >also have a BuildRequires on it? Fixed rpmlint: $ rpmlint -iv ../SRPMS/skinlf-6.7-4.fc9.src.rpm skinlf.src: I: checking $ rpmlint -iv ../RPMS/noarch/skinlf-6.7-4.fc9.noarch.rpm skinlf.noarch: I: checking $ rpmlint -iv skinlf.spec Known issues : comment 3 >>skinlf.i386: W: invalid-license Apache >Not fixed -- I am unsure how to proceed here. If you examine the LICENSE file >in the source, it isn't Apache, contrary to what's on their website [2]. Its a >redistributable with attribution licence, which doesn't appear up in the >rpmlint -iv output. Which licence should I select?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 00:22:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 19:22:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473330] Review Request: gmp-ecm - Elliptic Curve Method for Integer Factorization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811290022.mAT0MQoI020207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473330 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ecm - |Review Request: gmp-ecm - |Elliptic Curve Method for |Elliptic Curve Method for |Integer Factorization |Integer Factorization --- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer 2008-11-28 19:22:26 EDT --- New spec, srpm: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/gmp-ecm.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/gmp-ecm-6.2.1-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 01:45:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 20:45:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811290145.mAT1jsSO000419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(dennis at ausil.us) | --- Comment #41 from Conrad Meyer 2008-11-28 20:45:50 EDT --- Apparently CVS issue was resolved. Built in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=957127 and closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 02:09:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 21:09:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811290209.mAT29C8A003601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |kwizart at gmail.com Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #42 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-11-28 21:09:11 EDT --- I haven't seen discussed why upstream only provides a static library instead of a Shared Object ? Which Package will use this one (does a runtime test was done) ? There is no needs to export CFLAGS before the %configure macro (as already done within the %configure). Headers got installed in /usr/include which is the standard path. Does someone checked if there is possible namespace issue ? Also, headers should have been installed using install -p to prevent timestramp changes. Just quick notes... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 02:18:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 21:18:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811290218.mAT2IFZY005013@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #43 from Conrad Meyer 2008-11-28 21:18:14 EDT --- I don't know why upstream chooses static v. shared. No packages depend on this one *yet*, though sage will when it is packaged. The other issues will be addressed in the next update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 04:42:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 23:42:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473530] Review Request: constantine - Platform Constants for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811290442.mAT4gSTc032731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473530 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |473451 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 04:42:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 23:42:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473530] New: Review Request: constantine - Platform Constants for Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: constantine - Platform Constants for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473530 Summary: Review Request: constantine - Platform Constants for Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/constantine.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/constantine-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Provides java values for common platform C constants (e.g. errno). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 07:14:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 02:14:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473537] Review Request: jcodings - Java Libraries for Ruby String Encodings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811290714.mAT7ELT5021893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473537 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |473451 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 07:13:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 02:13:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473537] New: Review Request: jcodings - Java Libraries for Ruby String Encodings Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jcodings - Java Libraries for Ruby String Encodings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473537 Summary: Review Request: jcodings - Java Libraries for Ruby String Encodings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/jcodings.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/jcodings-1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Java libraries for handling JRuby string encodings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 07:27:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 02:27:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811290727.mAT7RRLj023977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 Bug 455426 depends on bug 467029, which changed state. Bug 467029 Summary: please update the package version to 3.0.7 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467029 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 07:47:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 02:47:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473530] Review Request: constantine - Platform Constants for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811290747.mAT7lCZZ021371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473530 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2008-11-29 02:47:12 EDT --- New URLS: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/constantine.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/constantine-0.4-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 09:28:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 04:28:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473222] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-File - File storage backend for session data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811290928.mAT9SiU9010044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473222 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-29 04:28:42 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 9c907665627c78e7e485525c27f4777be82363fb Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-File-0.13.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English l anguages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: noarch, perl module [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the tests pass. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 09:42:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 04:42:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811290942.mAT9gvYn012363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #44 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-11-29 04:42:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #42) > I haven't seen discussed why upstream only provides a static library instead of > a Shared Object ? Some people still prefer static libraries. > Which Package will use this one (does a runtime test was done) ? All the examples have been run. > There is no needs to export CFLAGS before the %configure macro (as already done > within the %configure). Agreed, but this is just redundant. > Headers got installed in /usr/include which is the standard path. Does someone > checked if there is possible namespace issue ? All the identifiers in the includes have prefixes, such as dd_ , ddd_ , ddf_ Very unlike they will conflict with anything else. > Also, headers should have been installed using install -p to prevent timestramp > changes. > What headers? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 10:10:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 05:10:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473218] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl - Log::Log4perl logging for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291010.mATAA7x1017290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473218 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-29 05:10:06 EDT --- preliminary notes: koji scratch build fails (see https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-November/msg02144.html ) but I suspect a problem in rawhide. See also https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-November/msg02144.html F10 scratch build is just fine ( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=957691 ) Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 5cde4f9699a52d683097a3464609ae779a36034c Catalyst-Log-Log4perl-1.00.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English l anguages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F-10. See also the preliminary notes. [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: noarch, perl module [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the tests pass. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 10:55:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 05:55:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473218] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl - Log::Log4perl logging for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291055.mATAtfNC025673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473218 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |473550 --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-29 05:55:39 EDT --- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473550 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 10:58:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 05:58:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473218] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl - Log::Log4perl logging for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291058.mATAw5fM025987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473218 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-29 05:58:04 EDT --- 473550 explains why build in rawhide fails. see also the thread started at https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-November/msg02144.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 11:11:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:11:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473218] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl - Log::Log4perl logging for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291111.mATBBgjl028778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473218 Bug 473218 depends on bug 473550, which changed state. Bug 473550 Summary: rrdtool has a dependency on dejavu-lgc-fonts which no longer exists https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473550 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 13:04:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 08:04:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473077] [RFE] Add package Equalizer - Parallel Rendering Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291304.mATD45t7011321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473077 --- Comment #4 from Stefan Eilemann 2008-11-29 08:04:04 EDT --- I'ld love to do this, but I do not have root access to test the package. I assume there are some minor modifications to the existing spec file, hence I was hoping to find some volunteer for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 13:25:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 08:25:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473215] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormFu - HTML Form Creation, Rendering and Validation Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291325.mATDPBWl020721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473215 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-29 08:25:09 EDT --- Could you please review the list of perl modules explicitly required? As far as I can see the rpmbuild depchecker picks some of the requirements that you have chosen to add. For this reason "rpm -qp --provides" lists a lot of duplicates: [wolfy at wolfy ~]$ rpm -qp --requires perl-HTML-FormFu-0.03005-1.fc11.noarch.rpm /usr/bin/perl perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Captcha::reCAPTCHA) perl(Captcha::reCAPTCHA) >= 0.92 perl(Carp) perl(Class::Accessor::Chained::Fast) perl(Class::C3) perl(Class::C3) perl(Config::Any) perl(Config::Any) >= 0.10 perl(Crypt::CBC) perl(Crypt::DES) perl(Cwd) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Data::Visitor::Callback) perl(Data::Visitor::Callback) perl(Date::Calc) perl(DateTime) perl(DateTime) >= 0.38 perl(DateTime::Format::Builder) perl(DateTime::Format::Builder) >= 0.7901 perl(DateTime::Format::Natural) perl(DateTime::Format::Natural) perl(DateTime::Format::Strptime) perl(DateTime::Format::Strptime) perl(DateTime::Locale) perl(DateTime::Locale) perl(Email::Valid) perl(Email::Valid) perl(Encode) perl(Exporter) perl(Fatal) perl(File::Copy) perl(File::Find) perl(File::ShareDir) perl(File::ShareDir) perl(File::Spec) perl(File::Temp) perl(HTML::FormFu) perl(HTML::FormFu::Attribute) perl(HTML::FormFu::Constants) perl(HTML::FormFu::Constraint) perl(HTML::FormFu::Deploy) perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::_Field) perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::_Group) perl(HTML::FormFu::Exception) perl(HTML::FormFu::Exception::Constraint) perl(HTML::FormFu::Exception::Inflator) perl(HTML::FormFu::Exception::Transformer) perl(HTML::FormFu::Exception::Validator) perl(HTML::FormFu::FakeQuery) perl(HTML::FormFu::Filter) perl(HTML::FormFu::Inflator) perl(HTML::FormFu::Literal) perl(HTML::FormFu::Localize) perl(HTML::FormFu::ObjectUtil) perl(HTML::FormFu::UploadParam) perl(HTML::FormFu::Util) perl(HTML::Scrubber) perl(HTML::Scrubber) perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple) perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple) >= 3.14 perl(HTTP::Headers) perl(HTTP::Headers) >= 1.64 perl(List::MoreUtils) perl(List::MoreUtils) perl(List::Util) perl(Locale::Maketext::Simple) perl(Module::Pluggable) perl(Module::Pluggable) perl(Readonly) perl(Readonly) perl(Regexp::Assemble) perl(Regexp::Common) perl(Regexp::Common) perl(Regexp::Copy) perl(Regexp::Copy) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Storable) perl(Task::Weaken) perl(Template) perl(YAML::Syck) >= 1.05 perl(base) perl(defaults) perl(model_config) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(utf8) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 Otherwise things are OK, come back with a revised spec and I'll gladly approve the package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 13:42:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 08:42:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473215] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormFu - HTML Form Creation, Rendering and Validation Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291342.mATDgWOM023832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473215 --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-29 08:42:31 EDT --- While you are at it, could you also please recheck if the explicit BR for perl is really needed ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 14:03:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:03:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473330] Review Request: gmp-ecm - Elliptic Curve Method for Integer Factorization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291403.mATE3JCb027811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473330 --- Comment #8 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-29 09:03:18 EDT --- And last but not least, I strongly suggest to install the binary and the manpage under the name gmp-ecm. See comment #2 why. (Yes, I know that Debian uses ecm, but we are not Debian). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 14:01:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:01:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473330] Review Request: gmp-ecm - Elliptic Curve Method for Integer Factorization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291401.mATE1JC9027466@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473330 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-29 09:01:18 EDT --- Looks much better now. However, I suggest to add AUTHORS, ChangeLog, NEWS and TODO to the %doc line of the main package and README.lib in -devel rpmlint of gmp-ecm gives: gmp-ecm.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libecm.so.0.0.0 gmp-ecm.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libecm.so.0.0.0 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. which probably needs fixing, too -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 14:25:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:25:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472684] Review Request: electric - Sophisticated Java based VLSI CAD System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291425.mATEPOjW026618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472684 Paul F. Johnson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk --- Comment #1 from Paul F. Johnson 2008-11-29 09:25:23 EDT --- I'll take this :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 14:27:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:27:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472684] Review Request: electric - Sophisticated Java based VLSI CAD System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291427.mATERBps026896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472684 --- Comment #2 from Paul F. Johnson 2008-11-29 09:27:10 EDT --- Niggle : javadoc \ As this is the last on the list, the trailing \ should be omitted -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 14:31:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:31:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473046] Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291431.mATEVMYe027639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 --- Comment #10 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-29 09:31:20 EDT --- What is the purpose of the line mv LICENCE LICENSE from the %build section ? Please do not compress the manpages yourself. rpmbuild will do this for you (and might also accomodate other forms of compression than gzip) Please use macros instead of explicit directories. This also goes for %{_mandir} which should be used instead of /usr/share/man in %install Also, please do not manually strip the binaries. rpmbuild will use these pieces of info to build a separate package with debugging information (and strip them from the final binaries afterwards Please make sure that Fedora's mandatory compilation flags are used (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags ). Your spec uses "-fPIC -O -Wall -DNDEBUG" instead. Mock build fails on x86_64: RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/miniupnpc-1.2-3.fc11.x86_64/usr/lib64/lib*.so.* I have not examined the Makefile closely, but I suspect that the culprit is the INSTALLDIRLIB line, which makes the generated libs to always be installed in /usr/lib instead of using the correct path depending on architecture. And last but not least, do not be shy and ADD changelog entries each time you modify the spec, leaving the older entries in place. For instance now, by looking at version "3" of the spec one could believe that this is the first attempt (because of the "initial build" line). But I know this is not true, because there exists a revision labeled "2". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 14:34:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:34:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472684] Review Request: electric - Sophisticated Java based VLSI CAD System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291434.mATEYMYI000506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472684 Paul F. Johnson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Paul F. Johnson 2008-11-29 09:34:21 EDT --- Builds cleanly with no rpmlint warning Builds fine in mock (x86) Spec file is clean, UTF-8 Other than the niggle in #2, I can't see a problem with this. It's not missing any deps from what I can see. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 14:38:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:38:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473205] Review Request: gPlanarity - puzzle game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291438.mATEcdba028707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473205 --- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-29 09:38:38 EDT --- Since the package uses a snapshot version of the sources, please read https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages and adjust the value from the version field accordingly. Please also ditch "vendor=fedora " from the desktop-install line, it has been deprecated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 14:49:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:49:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462163] Review Request: checkdns - A Domain Name Server analysis and reporting tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291449.mATEnIFY003143@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462163 --- Comment #18 from John Guthrie 2008-11-29 09:49:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: checkdns Short Description: A Domain Name Server analysis and reporting tool Owners: guthrie Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: guthrie I am adding myself to the InitialCC list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 14:56:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:56:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469972] Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291456.mATEuku7031974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 Paul F. Johnson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 14:56:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:56:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469969] Review Request: Tao Framework - C# bindings for many different libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291456.mATEukt0032000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469969 Bug 469969 depends on bug 469972, which changed state. Bug 469972 Summary: Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 15:14:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 10:14:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473215] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormFu - HTML Form Creation, Rendering and Validation Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291514.mATFEw4v002450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473215 --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2008-11-29 10:14:57 EDT --- I've removed the unversioned duplicate requires and the br for perl. Obscure requires (Task::Weaken, Crypt:CBC, etc.) and versioned required remain. New SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-HTML-FormFu-0.03005-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 15:19:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 10:19:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: WordNet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291519.mATFJF1F008381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 steve changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 15:17:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 10:17:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: WordNet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291517.mATFHmB5008252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 steve changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: WordNet - A |Review Request: WordNet - A |lexical database for th |lexical database for the |english language |english language -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 15:16:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 10:16:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473583] New: Review Request: WordNet - A lexical database for th english language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: WordNet - A lexical database for th english language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 Summary: Review Request: WordNet - A lexical database for th english language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at lonetwin.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lonetwin.net/WordNet.spec SRPM URL: http://lonetwin.net/WordNet-3.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: >From the WordNet site: http://wordnet.princeton.edu/ WordNet is a large lexical database of English, developed under the direction of George A. Miller. Nouns, verbs, adjectives and adverbs are grouped into sets of cognitive synonyms (synsets), each expressing a distinct concept. A couple of things about this package: a. This is my first package submission, and although I have tried to package this to confirm to the Fedora packaging guidelines, please forgive me for any obvious mistakes. b. The original package is licensed under it's own specific license named 'WordNet 3.0 license' (http://wordnet.princeton.edu/license) which is an open source license. Although I have packaged this application using the upstream license and have included the license file unmodified from the upstream, this license is not listed in the fedora licensing list at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#SoftwareLicenses. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 16:15:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:15:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473222] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-File - File storage backend for session data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291615.mATGFCwX016739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473222 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2008-11-29 11:15:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-File Short Description: File storage backend for session data Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 16:20:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:20:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473590] Review Request: libiphone - A library for connecting to Apple iPhone and iPod touch In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291620.mATGKBhL017457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473590 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |473591 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 16:20:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:20:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473591] New: Review Request: iFuse - Mount Apple iPhone and iPod touch devices Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: iFuse - Mount Apple iPhone and iPod touch devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473591 Summary: Review Request: iFuse - Mount Apple iPhone and iPod touch devices Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 473590 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/ifuse.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/ifuse-0.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm A fuse filesystem for mounting iPhone and iPod touch devices -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 16:18:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:18:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473590] New: Review Request: libiphone - A library for connecting to Apple iPhone and iPod touch Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libiphone - A library for connecting to Apple iPhone and iPod touch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473590 Summary: Review Request: libiphone - A library for connecting to Apple iPhone and iPod touch Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/libiphone.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/libiphone-0.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm libiphone is a library for connecting to Apple's iPhone or iPod touch devices -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 16:18:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:18:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473218] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl - Log::Log4perl logging for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291618.mATGIdCU012051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473218 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2008-11-29 11:18:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl Short Description: Log::Log4perl logging for Catalyst Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 16:37:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:37:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291637.mATGb4ki019991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #27 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-29 11:37:02 EDT --- For 2.8.1-1: * License tag - As said above, the license tag should be "GPLv2 and GPLv3+" * desktop file prefix - Desktop file install guidelines changed and now for new packages "--vendor=fedora" must be removed on Fedora. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/DesktopFileVendor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 17:00:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 12:00:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467644] Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291700.mATH0VVX018272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467644 Marco Pesenti Gritti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mpg at redhat.com --- Comment #15 from Marco Pesenti Gritti 2008-11-29 12:00:30 EDT --- Awesome, this is something we would like to have for Soas: http://dev.sugarlabs.org/ticket/65 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 17:08:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 12:08:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471829] Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291708.mATH89sb019548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-29 12:08:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > rpmlint generates an error now with the above sed script to remove the rpaths > instead of using chrpath. - Please just ignore it. > Also, I didn't move the doxygen files as of yet, there's no way to do it that I > can see without manually 'mv' the files, do you think it should be done anyhow? > > Everything else should be fixed. - Moving files manually meets the demand. By the way * Requires - It does not seem that -devel subpackage needs "Requires: apr-util-devel". Would you check this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 17:27:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 12:27:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473215] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormFu - HTML Form Creation, Rendering and Validation Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291727.mATHRPGm027631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473215 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-29 12:27:24 EDT --- Are you sure that all those versioned requires are needed ? After a quick glance in the source I've only found a reference to DateTime > 0.38. Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: f1bfd8c13b8c0949eefe3e99f6c8e93c41fb6970 HTML-FormFu-0.03005.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: rawhide/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: noarch, perl module [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the tests pass. ================ *** APPROVED *** but please examine again if those version restrictions are really needed, as they will block inclusion of this package in EPEL ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 17:58:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 12:58:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226299] Merge Review: pkgconfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291758.mATHwwgg032339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226299 Bug 226299 depends on bug 224148, which changed state. Bug 224148 Summary: pkgconfig: Requires.private creates unnecessary depencencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224148 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 18:10:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:10:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465897] Review Request: Judy - General purpose dynamic array library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291810.mATIAGNN001890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-29 13:10:15 EDT --- For -2: * License tag - So until README file is fixed (or COPYING may be fixed) stay the license tag as "LGPLv2" ! Anyway on Fedora the license tag "LGPLv2.1+" is invalid. * Source0 - Using %name, %version (especially %{version}) is preferred: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_.25.7Bversion.7D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 18:15:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:15:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472684] Review Request: electric - Sophisticated Java based VLSI CAD System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291815.mATIFV7N002728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472684 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-11-29 13:15:30 EDT --- Ok thanks, I'll update the spec before committing: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: electric Short Description: Sophisticated Java based VLSI CAD System Owners: chitlesh Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 18:12:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:12:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291812.mATICeSi028783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #28 from Torsten Rausche 2008-11-29 13:12:39 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.torsten.rausche.net/fedora/review/nxtvepg/nxtvepg.spec SRPM URL: http://www.torsten.rausche.net/fedora/review/nxtvepg/nxtvepg-2.8.1-2.fc10.src.rpm %changelog * Sat Nov 29 2008 Torsten Rausche - 2.8.1-2 - The Teletext grabber is licensed under GPLv3+, changed License tag - New packages should not use "--vendor=fedora" for desktop files anymore The package should be in good shape again. I noticed Tom's proposal some time ago. But I didn't notice a change in the guidelines. Anyway I think the change is a good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 18:19:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:19:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189482] Review Request: pcb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291819.mATIJ4Ao029606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189482 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-11-29 13:19:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pcb Short Description: An interactive printed circuit board editor Owners: chitlesh Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 18:32:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:32:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473215] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormFu - HTML Form Creation, Rendering and Validation Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291832.mATIWLf6005302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473215 --- Comment #5 from Iain Arnell 2008-11-29 13:32:19 EDT --- According to Makefile.PL, three are really required: requires 'Config::Any' => '0.10'; # supports multi-doc config files requires 'DateTime' => '0.38'; # required for string overloading requires 'DateTime::Format::Builder' => '0.7901'; # fixes memory leaks And one more that I'd missed and will add: # this is the lowest version of Exporter I can identify that exports import() # it's bundled with perl 5.83 # version 5.567 that ships with perl 5.82 is no good requires 'Exporter' => '5.57'; Two don't really matter since they only exist in fedora since last week at compatible versions - no problem to remove these two: requires 'Captcha::reCAPTCHA' => 0.92; requires 'HTML::TokeParser::Simple' => '3.14'; HTTP::Headers seems to be an incredibly old version - no problem to remove this requires 'HTTP::Headers' => '1.64'; And finally, YAML::Syck would also block inclusion in F-9. But it doesn't seem to be a direct requirement - more like strongly recommended for Config::Any. Will tentatively drop the version from this one since I don't see any strict need for 1.05. requires 'YAML::Syck' => '1.05'; New spec and SRPM uploaded in case you want to re-review these changes: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-HTML-FormFu-0.03005-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 20:36:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 15:36:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473037] Review Request: tinycc - Tiny C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811292036.mATKa2NF018145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-11-29 15:36:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > That *.o pulls the bcheck.o part that give the "compile with built-in memory > and bounds checker" option. Remove it and you will get: > > tcc -b onemore.c > tcc: file '/usr/lib/tcc/bcheck.o' not found > > it is for debug only so that is why I put it in the devel package, is that > wrong? I think it should be in the main package, since you should be able to be able to compile with debug flags without having extra packages installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 21:18:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:18:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473215] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormFu - HTML Form Creation, Rendering and Validation Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811292118.mATLIQbX024182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473215 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-HTML-FormFu --- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-29 16:18:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > And finally, YAML::Syck would also block inclusion in F-9. But it doesn't seem > to be a direct requirement - more like strongly recommended for Config::Any. > Will tentatively drop the version from this one since I don't see any strict > need for 1.05. > > requires 'YAML::Syck' => '1.05'; I just filed bug 473669 asking that it be updated in F-9, as 1.05 is already in F-10/rawhide. If Steve doesn't respond within a day or two (and he's been non-responsive for months as near as I can tell, even to a private email), I'll build and push it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 21:22:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:22:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473046] Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811292122.mATLMWvE025040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 --- Comment #11 from Avi Alkalay 2008-11-29 16:22:31 EDT --- OK, I'll incorporate all suggestions. I am also preparing an initscript and /etc/sysconfig configuration file to setup NATs on boot. Just give me a few days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 21:54:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:54:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473330] Review Request: gmp-ecm - Elliptic Curve Method for Integer Factorization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811292154.mATLs47I029335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473330 --- Comment #9 from Conrad Meyer 2008-11-29 16:54:03 EDT --- New spec, srpm: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/gmp-ecm.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/gmp-ecm-6.2.1-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 23:45:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 18:45:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811292345.mATNjIdN019867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 Bug 452427 depends on bug 465759, which changed state. Bug 465759 Summary: Build cairo with XCB support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465759 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 00:02:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 19:02:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473679] New: Review Request: xfburn - Simple CD/DVD burning tool based on libburnia Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xfburn - Simple CD/DVD burning tool based on libburnia https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473679 Summary: Review Request: xfburn - Simple CD/DVD burning tool based on libburnia Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfburn.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfburn-0.3.91-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Xfburn is a simple CD/DVD burning tool based on libburnia libraries. It can blank CD-RWs, burn and create iso images, as well as burn personal compositions of data to either CD or DVD. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 03:45:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:45:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473716] New: Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper - Improved replacement for Data::Dumper Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper - Improved replacement for Data::Dumper Alias: perl-Data-TreeDumper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473716 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper - Improved replacement for Data::Dumper Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Data-TreeDumper OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Data-TreeDumper.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Data-TreeDumper-0.35-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Data::Dumper and other modules do a great job of dumping data structures. Their output, however, often takes more brain power to understand than the data itself. When dumping large amounts of data, the output can be overwhelming and it can be difficult to see the relationship between each piece of the dumped data. Data::TreeDumper also dumps data in a tree-like fashion but hopefully in a format more easily understood. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 03:46:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:46:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473716] Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper - Improved replacement for Data::Dumper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811300346.mAU3kX6T021747@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473716 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-29 22:46:32 EDT --- This package is a dependency of App::Asciio. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=962901 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 03:52:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:52:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473716] Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper - Improved replacement for Data::Dumper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811300352.mAU3qBc5022604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473716 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |473718 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 03:52:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:52:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473718] Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch-Structured - Creates temporary files and directories from a structured description In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811300352.mAU3q9kv022534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473718 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|1 |473716 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 03:51:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:51:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473718] New: Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch-Structured - Creates temporary files and directories from a structured description Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch-Structured - Creates temporary files and directories from a structured description https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473718 Summary: Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch-Structured - Creates temporary files and directories from a structured description Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Directory-Scratch-Structur ed OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 1 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Directory-Scratch-Structured.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Directory-Scratch-Structured-0.03-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This module adds a _create_structured_tree_ subroutine to Directory::Scratch. This method is useful to create a directory structure needed for temporary purposes, e.g. for testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 04:04:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 23:04:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473716] Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper - Improved replacement for Data::Dumper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811300404.mAU44cPL024318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473716 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |473718 Depends on|473718 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 04:04:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 23:04:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473718] Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch-Structured - Creates temporary files and directories from a structured description In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811300404.mAU44bBA024297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473718 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|473716 | Depends on| |473716 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 04:05:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 23:05:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473723] New: Review Request: perl-Eval-Context - Evalute perl code in context wraper Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Eval-Context - Evalute perl code in context wraper Alias: perl-Eval-Context https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473723 Summary: Review Request: perl-Eval-Context - Evalute perl code in context wraper Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Eval-Context OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 1 Blocks: 473716 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Eval-Context.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Eval-Context-0.07-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This module defines a subroutine that let you evaluate Perl code in a specific context. The code can be passed directly as a string or as a file name to read from. It also provides some subroutines to let you define and optionally share variables and subroutines between your code and the code you wish to evaluate. Finally there is some support for running your code in a safe compartment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 04:06:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 23:06:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473723] Review Request: perl-Eval-Context - Evalute perl code in context wraper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811300406.mAU46iku018489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473723 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|473716 | Depends on|1 |473716 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 04:06:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 23:06:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473716] Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper - Improved replacement for Data::Dumper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811300406.mAU46juQ018554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473716 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |473723 Blocks| |473723 Depends on|473723 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 04:20:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 23:20:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473727] New: Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper-Renderer-GTK - Gtk2::TreeView renderer for Data::TreeDumper Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper-Renderer-GTK - Gtk2::TreeView renderer for Data::TreeDumper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473727 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper-Renderer-GTK - Gtk2::TreeView renderer for Data::TreeDumper Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Data-TreeDumper-Renderer-G TK OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 473716 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Data-TreeDumper-Renderer-GTK.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Data-TreeDumper-Renderer-GTK-0.02-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: GTK-perl renderer for *Data::TreeDumper*. This widget is the gui equivalent of Data::TreeDumper; it will display a perl data structure in a TreeView, allowing you to fold and unfold child data structures and get a quick feel for what's where. Right-clicking anywhere in the view brings up a context menu, from which the user can choose to expand or collapse all items. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 04:25:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 23:25:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473727] Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper-Renderer-GTK - Gtk2::TreeView renderer for Data::TreeDumper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811300425.mAU4P6LH027766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473727 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2008-11-29 23:25:05 EDT --- This package is a dependency of App::Asciio. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 05:01:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 00:01:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811300501.mAU51ucZ000662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |473734 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 05:44:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 00:44:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464054] Package Review Request for projectM-pulseaudio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811300544.mAU5i6MM006661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464054 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-30 00:44:06 EDT --- projectM-pulseaudio-1.2.0-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/projectM-pulseaudio-1.2.0-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 05:52:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 00:52:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464051] Package Review Request for projectM-jack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811300552.mAU5qaPH001612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464051 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-30 00:52:35 EDT --- projectM-jack-1.2.0-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/projectM-jack-1.2.0-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 06:17:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 01:17:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473744] New: Review Request: flint - Fast Library for Number Theory Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: flint - Fast Library for Number Theory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473744 Summary: Review Request: flint - Fast Library for Number Theory Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/flint.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/flint-1.0.17-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: FLINT is a C library for doing number theory, written by William Hart and David Harvey. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 07:02:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 02:02:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471829] Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811300702.mAU72k59017549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 --- Comment #8 from Hayden James 2008-11-30 02:02:45 EDT --- Ok, above should be fixed: http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/log4cxx.spec http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/log4cxx-0.10.0-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 09:32:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 04:32:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473754] Review Request: nopaste - Command-line interface to rafb.net/paste In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811300932.mAU9W91i001887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473754 Philipp Baum changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |rafb.net/paste -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 09:33:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 04:33:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473754] Review Request: nopaste - Command-line interface to rafb.net/paste In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811300933.mAU9XHXN008559@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473754 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 09:31:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 04:31:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473754] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473754 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: phil at linuxeinsteiger.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://thinkcoding.org/Fedora/nopaste.spec SRPM URL: http://thinkcoding.org/Fedora/nopaste-2835-1.fc10.src.rpm This is a simple script to facilitate sharing text through http://rafb.net/paste/. Like most UNIX utilities, it can take stdin or files on the command-line. Additionally nopaste can use the X cut buffer for input, designed to be used with a window-manager key binding or panel launcher. The resulting URLs are printed to stdout and additionally placed in the X cut buffer for quick pasting. I still need a Sponsor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 09:44:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 04:44:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473754] Review Request: nopaste - Command-line interface to rafb.net/paste In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811300944.mAU9iXO4003719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473754 --- Comment #1 from Simon Wesp 2008-11-30 04:44:33 EDT --- first package review of phil is: Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 moon-buggy the package is assigned to nobody. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 09:43:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 04:43:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some car accros the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811300943.mAU9hUSL003565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #9 from Simon Wesp 2008-11-30 04:43:28 EDT --- secound package review of phil is: Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473754 nopaste -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 09:52:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 04:52:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some car accros the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811300952.mAU9qIKR005261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 10:11:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 05:11:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472542] Review Request: afuse - An automounter implemented with FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301011.mAUABfBq014933@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472542 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-11-30 05:11:40 EDT --- REVIEW: MUST Items: + rpmlint is silent + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ md5sum afuse-0.2.tar.gz* 97b58a768ecb30696fb6c33dd8435b83 afuse-0.2.tar.gz 97b58a768ecb30696fb6c33dd8435b83 afuse-0.2.tar.gz.from_srpm [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture (ppc). + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires + The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). + The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . + The package contains code, or permissable content. + Everything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 11:15:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 06:15:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438452] Review Request: java-gnome: Java GNOME bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301115.mAUBFjLK020160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438452 Martin Garton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin at stupids.org --- Comment #12 from Martin Garton 2008-11-30 06:15:42 EDT --- What is still remaining to do before this can move forward? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 12:24:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 07:24:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473764] New: Review Request: xvidcap - An X-Windows screen capture tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xvidcap - An X-Windows screen capture tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473764 Summary: Review Request: xvidcap - An X-Windows screen capture tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thedangercobra at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.desi4club.com/rpms/xvidcap.spec SRPM URL: http://www.desi4club.com/rpms/xvidcap-1.1.7-11.fc10.src.rpm Description: xvidcap is a screen capture tool for creating videos off an X-Window desktop for illustration or documentation purposes. It is intended to be a standard-based alternative for commercial tools, such as Lotus ScreenCam or Camtasia Studio. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 12:29:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 07:29:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473765] Review Request: xvidcap - An X-Windows screen capture tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301229.mAUCTtj7005626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473765 Kashif Ahmad Khan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thedangercobra at yahoo.com Platform|All |i386 Version|rawhide |10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 12:27:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 07:27:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473765] New: Review Request: xvidcap - An X-Windows screen capture tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xvidcap - An X-Windows screen capture tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473765 Summary: Review Request: xvidcap - An X-Windows screen capture tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thedangercobra at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.desi4club.com/rpms/xvidcap.spec SRPM URL: http://www.desi4club.com/rpms/xvidcap-1.1.7-11.fc10.src.rpm Description: xvidcap is a screen capture tool for creating videos off an X-Window desktop for illustration or documentation purposes. It is intended to be a standard-based alternative for commercial tools, such as Lotus ScreenCam or Camtasia Studio. Review Description: This is my first package and i need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 12:45:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 07:45:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473765] Review Request: xvidcap - An X-Windows screen capture tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301245.mAUCjDNT008326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473765 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-30 07:45:11 EDT --- *** Bug 473764 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 12:45:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 07:45:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473764] Review Request: xvidcap - An X-Windows screen capture tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301245.mAUCjCcQ008299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473764 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-30 07:45:11 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 473765 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 12:51:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 07:51:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473765] Review Request: xvidcap - An X-Windows screen capture tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301251.mAUCpqxx009702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473765 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-30 07:51:51 EDT --- mplayer cannot be on Fedora (currently on rpmfusion), so this package cannot be approved unless the dependency for mplayer can be removed. If this cannot be done, please consider to move to rpmfusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 12:52:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 07:52:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473765] Review Request: xvidcap - An X-Windows screen capture tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301252.mAUCqcmQ003898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473765 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Platform|i386 |All Version|10 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 13:01:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 08:01:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473754] Review Request: nopaste - Command-line interface to rafb.net/paste In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301301.mAUD1nJs011829@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473754 --- Comment #2 from Simon Wesp 2008-11-30 08:01:48 EDT --- [cassmodiah at schafwiese ~]$ yum deplist rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/nopaste-2835-1.fc10.noarch.rpm Suche Abh?ngigkeiten: Paket: nopaste.noarch 2835-1.fc10 Abh?ngigkeit: /usr/bin/ruby provider: ruby.i386 1.8.6.287-2.fc10 rpm will requires ruby by reading of from nopaste script. this is okay, the further requires will be shipped with ruby itself. [cassmodiah at schafwiese ~]$ rpmdev-rpmlintsetuptree 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. nopaste.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. no documentation, okay, you haven't one. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=964022 This is frightfully boring. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 13:11:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 08:11:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473046] Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301311.mAUDB0V3013766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 --- Comment #12 from Avi Alkalay 2008-11-30 08:10:59 EDT --- Suggestions incorporated. Please recheck http://avi.alkalay.net/software/miniupnpc/ Some notes: - The LICENCE file is still being renamed due to wrong spelling. - Package now includes an initscript and a sysconfig conf file. - To avoid a patch and to make it install correctly on x86_64, I included the following on %install: %ifarch x86_64 mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir} %endif Can't test this. I don't have a x86_64 build system. rpmlint still outputs the following which I need some guidance on how to solve: miniupnpc.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libminiupnpc.so.3 miniupnpc.i386: E: shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libminiupnpc.so.3 miniupnpc.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/sysconfig/upnpnats miniupnpc.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/upnpnats miniupnpc.i386: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/upnpnats upnpcnats miniupnpc.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/upnpnats miniupnpc.i386: W: incoherent-init-script-name upnpnats -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 13:35:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 08:35:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301335.mAUDZahq018500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #3 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-11-30 08:35:35 EDT --- [NEEDSWORK] rpmlint output: According to other KDE packages reviews it's safe to ignore rpmlint warnings. [NEEDSWORK] Owns all created directories: Ok, I'm quite desoriented in this area of owning directories, I have to study more :) [NEEDSWORK] Consistent macro usage Ok, I'll repair template to use macros consistently {NEEDSWORK} follows special guidelines Ok, I'll take a look -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 13:44:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 08:44:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467644] Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301344.mAUDiJmk019690@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467644 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-30 08:44:18 EDT --- sugar-memorize-29-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-memorize-29-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 13:42:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 08:42:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301342.mAUDgHTB019515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #19 from David Carter 2008-11-30 08:42:15 EDT --- Good point Stefan. Truth is, I hadn't realized they were in there until review. Now that life's little annoyances are out of the way, I should be able to get an update in the next couple of days. BTW Jon, Stefan is one of the stakeholders in that extra license file :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 14:20:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 09:20:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473775] Review Request: gpshell - GPShell is a script interpreter which talks to a smart card In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301420.mAUEKQkU026721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473775 Fran?ois Kooman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |463266 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 14:20:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 09:20:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301420.mAUEKRNj026755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 Fran?ois Kooman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |473775 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 14:19:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 09:19:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473775] New: Review Request: gpshell - GPShell is a script interpreter which talks to a smart card Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gpshell - GPShell is a script interpreter which talks to a smart card https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473775 Summary: Review Request: gpshell - GPShell is a script interpreter which talks to a smart card Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fkooman at tuxed.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://users.tuxed.net/fkooman/rpmbuild/SPECS/gpshell.spec SRPM URL: http://users.tuxed.net/fkooman/rpmbuild/SRPMS/gpshell-1.4.2-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: GPShell is a script interpreter which talks to a smart card. It is written on top of the GlobalPlatform library, which was developed by Karsten Ohme. It uses smart card communication protocols ISO-7816-4 and OpenPlatform 2.0.1 and GlobalPlatform 2.1.1. It can establish a secure channel with a smart card, load, instantiate, delete, list applets on a smart card. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 14:20:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 09:20:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473775] Review Request: gpshell - GPShell is a script interpreter which talks to a smart card In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301420.mAUEK0do020037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473775 --- Comment #1 from Fran?ois Kooman 2008-11-30 09:19:59 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=325126) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325126) SUN license for included HelloWorld.cap file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 14:26:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 09:26:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473775] Review Request: gpshell - GPShell is a script interpreter which talks to a smart card In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301426.mAUEQ8O1027613@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473775 --- Comment #2 from Fran?ois Kooman 2008-11-30 09:26:07 EDT --- There is problem with this package with regard to the included HelloWorld.cap file from Sun's JavaCard SDK. The attachment shows the license text you need to agree to when downloading the SDK (http://java.sun.com/javacard/devkit/). I guess this needs to be removed (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code) but I wanted to have some feedback on this before doing this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 14:28:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 09:28:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301428.mAUESWct021472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 Fran?ois Kooman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(fkooman at tuxed.net | |) | --- Comment #15 from Fran?ois Kooman 2008-11-30 09:28:30 EDT --- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473775 Review request for GPshell (which depends on globalplatform). My apologies for the delay... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 14:39:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 09:39:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473046] Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301439.mAUEdO9Q029433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 --- Comment #13 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-30 09:39:23 EDT --- UNless you want to be sure the Americans are very very happy, you can remove the mv. "licence" is valid English (British English).See http://www.thefreedictionary.com/LICENCE Your pseudo fix for the %{_libdir} problem does not work and you still need to address the problem of Fedora's mandatory compilation flags. Quoting from the end of the build log: testigddescparse.c:51: warning: ignoring return value of 'fread', declared with attribute warn_unused_result gcc minixmlvalid.o minixml.o -o minixmlvalid gcc testminixml.o minixml.o igd_desc_parse.o -o testminixml gcc testupnpreplyparse.o minixml.o upnpreplyparse.o -o testupnpreplyparse gcc testigddescparse.o igd_desc_parse.o minixml.o -o testigddescparse minixml validation test ./minixmlvalid 14 events touch validateminixml ar crs libminiupnpc.a miniwget.o minixml.o igd_desc_parse.o minisoap.o miniupnpc.o upnpreplyparse.o upnpcommands.o minissdpc.o upnperrors.o gcc -shared -Wl,-soname,libminiupnpc.so.3 -o libminiupnpc.so miniwget.o minixml.o igd_desc_parse.o minisoap.o miniupnpc.o upnpreplyparse.o upnpcommands.o minissdpc.o upnperrors.o gcc -o upnpc-static upnpc.o libminiupnpc.a /usr/bin/ld: miniwget.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC miniwget.o: could not read symbols: Bad value collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [libminiupnpc.so] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.jzb5MU (%build) >From the above you can see that gcc is called without any flags and that linking fails. I'll look at the other problems after you solve these two. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 14:48:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 09:48:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301448.mAUEmGpQ024848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #21 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-11-30 09:48:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > This build contains more fixes, as well as including the jeuclid-fod and > jeuclid-mathviewer subpackages. I cannot build the jeuclid-cli until > commons-cli is updated bug 473373 . I have had to write a new build script > based on the Debian one as the ones included do not work well with fedora > package build structure. I still need to do the GUI stuff for > jeclid-mathviewer. > > SRPM: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/jeuclid-3.1.3-7.fc9.src.rpm > SPEC: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/jeuclid.spec This specfile is older than the one in the src.rpm. Requires: fop = 0.95 Does it work only with this version? Will it have to be rebuilt when fop is upgraded to a newer version? (cd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir} && for jar in *-%{version}*; do ln -sf ${jar} `echo $jar| sed "s|-%{version}||g"`; done) This could be rewritten as: pushd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir} for jar in *-%{version}*; do ln -sf ${jar} `echo $jar| sed "s|-%{version}||g"` done popd Which is more readable IMHO, but I'm not insisting on it. Also, the usage of '|' in sed expression is a bit unusual. I suggest plain slash ('/') instead. It looks very nice otherwise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 15:56:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 10:56:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473716] Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper - Improved replacement for Data::Dumper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301556.mAUFuxXU003542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473716 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 15:56:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 10:56:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473716] Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper - Improved replacement for Data::Dumper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301556.mAUFuQKY009786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473716 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |473727 --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-30 10:56:25 EDT --- Almost there... [wolfy at wolfy]$ rpmlint perl-Data-TreeDumper-0.35-1.fc11.noarch.rpm perl-Data-TreeDumper.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-Data-TreeDumper-0.35/tie_bless.pl perl(AutoLoader) perl-Data-TreeDumper.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-Data-TreeDumper-0.35/tie_bless.pl perl(Tie::Handle) perl-Data-TreeDumper.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-Data-TreeDumper-0.35/tie_bless.pl perl(Tie::Array) perl-Data-TreeDumper.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-Data-TreeDumper-0.35/tie_bless.pl perl(Devel::Peek) perl-Data-TreeDumper.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-Data-TreeDumper-0.35/tie_bless.pl perl(Tie::Scalar) perl-Data-TreeDumper.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-Data-TreeDumper-0.35/tie_bless.pl perl(Tie::Hash) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. [wolfy at wolfy]$ rpm -qpv --requires perl-Data-TreeDumper-0.35-1.fc11.noarch.rpm perl >= 0:5.006 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(AutoLoader) perl(Carp) perl(Check::ISA) perl(Class::ISA) perl(Data::TreeDumper) perl(Devel::Peek) perl(Exporter) perl(Sort::Naturally) perl(Text::Wrap) perl(Tie::Array) perl(Tie::Handle) perl(Tie::Hash) perl(Tie::Scalar) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 the above are triggered by http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=962902&name=perl-Data-TreeDumper-0.35-1.fc11.noarch.rpm (and after a local mock build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 16:11:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 11:11:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472724] Review Request: xjparse - wrapper for the Xerces XML Schema validator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301611.mAUGBbSf012277@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472724 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rpm at greysector.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-11-30 11:11:36 EDT --- MD5 sum matches upstream. $ md5sum xjparse-src-1.0.zip 8722e59eb5b7b1d1adebd8f39b8f93db xjparse-src-1.0.zip Some comments: Group: Applications/Text License: ASL 2.0 These two lines have trailing whitespace. %description The xjparse tool is a simple command-line wrapper for the Xerces XML Schema validator. It accepts several options, notably one which specifies the set of schemas to be used during validation. Nitpick: move "of" to the beginning of the following line. cp -p build/xjparse.jar \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir}/%{name}-%{version}.jar You might also need this: ln -s %{name}-%{version}.jar $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir}/%{name}.jar Otherwise you need to specify xjparse-1.0 instead of just xjparse in build-classpath call to run it: java -cp `build-classpath xjparse-1.0 xml-commons-resolver` com.nwalsh.parsers.xjparse But if that's intentional then I have no objection. Most .jars installed in %{_javadir} do have such symlinks though. %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{_javadir}/* I know the template has this, but I'd rather you put the full path of the files that get installed here, i.e. %{_javadir}/%{name}-%{version}.jar %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar * Tue Nov 25 2008 Brennan Ashton 1.0-2 - Now noarch - Fixed discription line length * Sun Nov 23 2008 Brennan Ashton 1.0-1 - Created spec file Put an empty line between changelog entries. You were asking what to do if there's no licence text included in the source archive: - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. Please do this then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 16:23:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 11:23:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473330] Review Request: gmp-ecm - Elliptic Curve Method for Integer Factorization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301623.mAUGNTBH007509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473330 --- Comment #10 from manuel wolfshant 2008-11-30 11:23:28 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPMs: rpmlint of gmp-ecm: gmp-ecm.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/gmp-ecm-6.2.1/AUTHORS --> please use the same iconv/touch -r trick as on README gmp-ecm.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 6.2.1-3 ['6.2.1-2.fc11', '6.2.1-2'] --> you forgot to increase the release tag rpmlint of gmp-ecm-devel: empty rpmlint of gmp-ecm-static: gmp-ecm-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation --> ignorable [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: bb08c4f1b412110ef64572c387baa5bc45ae8a60 ecm-6.2.1.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [x] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Static libraries in -static subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [x] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [!] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [x] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the test passes. === Issues === 1. Please use iconv to convert the AUTHORS file 2. You forgot to increase the release tag (you only modified the changelog). And btw, you did not upload the new src.rpm, I used only the new spec and rebuilt the src.rpm locally. 3. Are you sure that the -static package needs the -devel? I would test, but I am not sure that I know how to do it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 17:45:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 12:45:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473775] Review Request: gpshell - GPShell is a script interpreter which talks to a smart card In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301745.mAUHjtjb019513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473775 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jkeating at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Jesse Keating 2008-11-30 12:45:54 EDT --- Driveby comment, the summary is a bit wrong. You shouldn't repeat the name of the package in the summary. "Script interpreter which talks to smart cards" or even "Smart Card script interpreter" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 18:11:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 13:11:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473330] Review Request: gmp-ecm - Elliptic Curve Method for Integer Factorization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301811.mAUIBW46030374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473330 --- Comment #11 from Conrad Meyer 2008-11-30 13:11:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > 3. Are you sure that the -static package needs the -devel? I would test, but I > am not sure that I know how to do it Yes. Think about it. Just because you're statically linking against a library doesn't mean you don't need the header files when compiling your code. New URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/gmp-ecm.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/gmp-ecm-6.2.1-4.fc9.src.rpm (Actually, I did upload the new SRPM last time, it was just to the old URL, because I forgot to bump the Release. I have an automated script to upload specs/srpms/rpms to fedorapeople.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 18:39:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 13:39:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301839.mAUId4FV028206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #22 from Brennan Ashton 2008-11-30 13:39:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #17) > > This build contains more fixes, as well as including the jeuclid-fod and > > jeuclid-mathviewer subpackages. I cannot build the jeuclid-cli until > > commons-cli is updated bug 473373 . I have had to write a new build script > > based on the Debian one as the ones included do not work well with fedora > > package build structure. I still need to do the GUI stuff for > > jeclid-mathviewer. > > > > SRPM: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/jeuclid-3.1.3-7.fc9.src.rpm > > SPEC: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/jeuclid.spec > > This specfile is older than the one in the src.rpm. looks like I forgot to dump the spec file over sorry for that. > > Requires: fop = 0.95 > > Does it work only with this version? Will it have to be rebuilt when fop is > upgraded to a newer version? > Yes, upstream highly recommends this as this fop plugin development is so closely tied to fop development. > (cd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir} && for jar in *-%{version}*; do ln -sf ${jar} > `echo $jar| sed "s|-%{version}||g"`; done) > > This could be rewritten as: > pushd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir} > for jar in *-%{version}*; do > ln -sf ${jar} `echo $jar| sed "s|-%{version}||g"` > done > popd > > Which is more readable IMHO, but I'm not insisting on it. Also, the usage of > '|' in sed expression is a bit unusual. I suggest plain slash ('/') instead. > > It looks very nice otherwise. It is going to be a busy week for me, but I will try to get the latest out with the GUI and Javadocs stuff done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 18:49:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 13:49:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301849.mAUInfqV029810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #26 from Ville Skytt? 2008-11-30 13:49:39 EDT --- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 18:51:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 13:51:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some car across the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301851.mAUIpNmt004367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 Christopher Stone changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: moon-buggy |Review Request: moon-buggy |- Drive and jump with some |- Drive and jump with some |car accros the moon |car across the moon --- Comment #10 from Christopher Stone 2008-11-30 13:51:22 EDT --- The word "across" is misspelled in the Summary tag, please fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 19:02:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:02:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469134] Review Request: deco-archive - Extraction scripts for various archive formats for use of deco In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301902.mAUJ2Z18032514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469134 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 19:02:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:02:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469134] Review Request: deco-archive - Extraction scripts for various archive formats for use of deco In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301902.mAUJ2Jiq032455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469134 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ville.skytta at iki.fi --- Comment #3 from Ville Skytt? 2008-11-30 14:02:18 EDT --- I'm not sure about the dependencies for the default archivers - wouldn't things just work for them with triggers as well? I'd personally remove them and do everything with triggers, but if you want to keep the default set, I think it would be good to add rpm to it - it's quite likely that it is installed on Fedora systems. In any case, it would be good to own everything that is not actually installed as usual in /var/lib/deco using %ghost. See the bash-completion package for an example how to do this. There's something wrong with for example the tar.lzma trigger. For me it installs a symlink: "/var/lib/deco/tar.lzma -> ../../../usr/share/deco-archive/tar.lzma" which is broken - there's no "tar.lzma" in /usr/share/deco-archive here. "tar\.lzma" on the other hand is there, and I suppose "tar\.lzma" should be in /var/lib/deco instead of "tar.lzma" as well. At least the unrar and p7zip triggers could have a similar problem, maybe others with special chars as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 20:41:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 15:41:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473775] Review Request: gpshell - Manage applets on GlobalPlatform and OpenPlatform smart cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811302041.mAUKf08u022504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473775 Fran?ois Kooman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: gpshell - |Review Request: gpshell - |GPShell is a script |Manage applets on |interpreter which talks to |GlobalPlatform and |a smart card |OpenPlatform smart cards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 20:43:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 15:43:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473775] Review Request: gpshell - Manage applets on GlobalPlatform and OpenPlatform smart cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811302043.mAUKhZDD016037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473775 --- Comment #4 from Fran?ois Kooman 2008-11-30 15:43:34 EDT --- Fixed summary: Spec URL: http://users.tuxed.net/fkooman/rpmbuild/SPECS/gpshell.spec SRPM URL: http://users.tuxed.net/fkooman/rpmbuild/SRPMS/gpshell-1.4.2-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 21:48:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 16:48:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473046] Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811302148.mAULmfbF032596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 --- Comment #14 from Avi Alkalay 2008-11-30 16:48:38 EDT --- I was passing the compilation flags on %build like this: make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="%{optflags} -DNDEBUG" But in some gcc calls it was not working. Apparently miniupnpc Makefile is not very robust. So I did this: make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="%{optflags} -DNDEBUG" CC="gcc %{optflags} -DNDEBUG" About the x86_64 issues, I can't really help because I don't access to this platform to test it. Hope you won't ask me to build it on an s390x too :-) Seriously, how I can get access to a x86_64 machine to fix it? Does Fedora Project provides one for build purposes ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 22:10:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:10:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473822] New: Review Request: terminator - easily allows multiple terminals in 1 window Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: terminator - easily allows multiple terminals in 1 window https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473822 Summary: Review Request: terminator - easily allows multiple terminals in 1 window Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sharms at ubuntu.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.sharms.org/files/terminator.spec SRPM URL: http://www.sharms.org/files/terminator-0.11-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Multiple GNOME terminals in one window This is a project to produce an efficient way of filling a large area of screen space with terminals. This is done by splitting the window into a resizeable grid of terminals. As such, you can produce a very flexible arrangements of terminals for different tasks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 22:21:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:21:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473822] Review Request: terminator - easily allows multiple terminals in 1 window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811302221.mAUMLBrB005576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473822 Robert 'Bob' Jensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bob at fedoraunity.org --- Comment #1 from Robert 'Bob' Jensen 2008-11-30 17:21:11 EDT --- This application has a bug open for review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173 This request should be closed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 22:18:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:18:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465897] Review Request: Judy - General purpose dynamic array library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811302218.mAUMI6Ta004957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897 --- Comment #11 from Charles R. Anderson 2008-11-30 17:18:05 EDT --- Spec URL: http://cra.fedorapeople.org/Judy/Judy.spec SRPM URL: http://cra.fedorapeople.org/Judy/Judy-1.0.4-3.fc10.src.rpm Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=964814 * Thu Nov 30 2008 Charles R. Anderson 1.0.4-3 - fix Judy1 man page symlinks - use valid tag License: LGPLv2+ confirmed with upstream - use version macro in Source0 - remove Makefiles from installed doc tree Regarding the license, upstream has confirmed that the current license is LGPL v2.1 or later. Also, the source code is really the final say on this, and it says "GNU Lesser General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version." Either way, Fedora spec files don't distinguish between v2.1 and v2, so this is specified as LGPLv2+ for the spec file. "From dougbaskins at yahoo.com Thu Nov 27 21:45:54 2008 From: Doug Baskins To: Chuck Anderson Cc: judy-devel at lists.sourceforge.net Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 18:45:47 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Judy license confusion - (LGPL v2.1 or later applies) Reply-To: Doug Baskins Chuck: I did not know a new version of LGPL existed. You are correct, the COPYING file is correct (LGPL v2.1 or later applies). I will change the README file to reflect that in the next release of Judy. ..." However, the author has noted that the license may change in a future release to just LGPLv2. I'll be sure to update the License tag and notify fedora-devel-list if/when such a new release is imported into Fedora: "From dougbaskins at yahoo.com Fri Nov 28 19:09:55 2008 From: Doug Baskins To: Chuck Anderson Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 16:09:48 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Judy license confusion Reply-To: Doug Baskins Chuck: I have been requested by Hewlett-Packard to REMOVE the "or (at your option) later version" part of the wording from Judy sources. Apparently the v3 License is not acceptable to a lot of people and companies with regard to the patent section. If I do not do this, HP personnel cannot support me in the future. Sorry about that. I suspect that this problem will get sorted out in the future. (Sometimes I hate politics or perhaps Lawyers). Doug Doug Baskins " -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 22:27:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:27:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473822] Review Request: terminator - easily allows multiple terminals in 1 window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811302227.mAUMRb6f032652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473822 --- Comment #2 from Steven Harms 2008-11-30 17:27:37 EDT --- I have submitted my SPECFILE to upstream, and this one actually builds on FC10. Original spec submitted was for 0.10, which is an older release. This is for 0.11, and is tested working. I am not very familiar with the Fedora process, but I believe that the spec file I have created should replace the former. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 23:01:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 18:01:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811302301.mAUN1lra005582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 --- Comment #31 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-11-30 18:01:46 EDT --- Perhaps I've build edb for rawhide "to early". Summary and description are still the old ones. May be it will change when I'll build an update for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 23:14:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 18:14:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473205] Review Request: gPlanarity - puzzle game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811302314.mAUNEXnf013553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473205 --- Comment #7 from Adam Tulinius 2008-11-30 18:14:32 EDT --- - Version-scheme has been adjusted to match the kismet-example on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages , more or less. - vendor="fedora" has been removed from the install-desktop-file call. spec: http://adamt.fedorapeople.org/pkg/gplanarity/gplanarity.spec srpm: http://adamt.fedorapeople.org/pkg/gplanarity/gplanarity-0-0.1.20081130svn11946.fc10.src.rpm koji-run: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=964888 I also ditched most of the changelog-entries, because it seemed silly :-) - Adam -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 23:25:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 18:25:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469134] Review Request: deco-archive - Extraction scripts for various archive formats for use of deco In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811302325.mAUNPMas009444@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469134 --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-30 18:25:21 EDT --- Thanks, (In reply to comment #3) > I'm not sure about the dependencies for the default archivers - wouldn't things > just work for them with triggers as well? I'd personally remove them and do > everything with triggers, but if you want to keep the default set, I think it > would be good to add rpm to it - it's quite likely that it is installed on > Fedora systems. > I opted to make a "default archivers" list for simplicity. The script has to be more complicated for such cases as: - the user has tar and gz but not bz2 In such a case I have to use smart nested if-clauses for the trigger functions of bz2 and tar. Since a user who wants to deal with archives will probably have all of these archivers anyways and they are all loaded by most installations, I don't think it is worth the trouble to make the code to so complicated. > In any case, it would be good to own everything that is not actually installed > as usual in /var/lib/deco using %ghost. See the bash-completion package for an > example how to do this. I tried doing this. But I couldn't figure out how to escape the special characters such as [ { ) in the filenames in the %files section. The obvious \[ \{ etc. escapes don't work. Here is what I did: SPEC: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/deco-archive.spec SRPM: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/deco-archive-1.2-4.fc10.src.rpm Note that this SRPM does not build. It fails with: RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /home/orcan/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/deco-archive-1.2-4.fc10.x86_64/var/lib/deco/7z\.[0-9]{2,} File not found by glob: /home/orcan/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/deco-archive-1.2-4.fc10.x86_64/var/lib/deco/ace|[c0-9][0-9]{2} File not found by glob: /home/orcan/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/deco-archive-1.2-4.fc10.x86_64/var/lib/deco/part[0-9]+\.rar File not found by glob: /home/orcan/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/deco-archive-1.2-4.fc10.x86_64/var/lib/deco/rar|[rst][0-9]{2} File not found by glob: /home/orcan/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/deco-archive-1.2-4.fc10.x86_64/var/lib/deco/t7z\.[0-9]{2,} File not found by glob: /home/orcan/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/deco-archive-1.2-4.fc10.x86_64/var/lib/deco/tar\.7z\.[0-9]{2,} I asked about this to many people but nobody could figure this out. Any suggestions? Also the SPEC file is kind of ugly right now. I don't know how to simplify the part with ( if x$i="xbz2" || x$i="xcpio" ||...|| x$i="xtar" ) in the %install section and also the %{_var}/lib/deco/bz2 %{_var}/lib/deco/cpio ... %{_var}/lib/deco/tar part in the %files section. > > There's something wrong with for example the tar.lzma trigger. For me it > installs a symlink: "/var/lib/deco/tar.lzma -> > ../../../usr/share/deco-archive/tar.lzma" which is broken - there's no > "tar.lzma" in /usr/share/deco-archive here. "tar\.lzma" on the other hand is > there, and I suppose "tar\.lzma" should be in /var/lib/deco instead of > "tar.lzma" as well. At least the unrar and p7zip triggers could have a similar > problem, maybe others with special chars as well. Thanks for the catch. Yes, there was a problem with tar\.lzma. The others are fine as far as I tested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.