[Bug 454408] Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408


Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #16 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de>  2008-11-03 03:50:46 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #14)
> 
> > Finally, I would have approved this package, if it wasn't providing this:
> > mingw32-binutils(x86-64) = 2.18.50_20080109_2-8.fc10
> > 
> > What is this meant to mean? IMO, it's meaningless.
> 
> It's added automatically as far as I'm aware.  In this package
> we don't override RPM's normal dependency generation.

Yes, I meanwhile also noticed. It's FC10's rpm adding more rpm-database bloat
and redundancy. IMO, the rpm devs are outsmarting itselves.

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.