[Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402





--- Comment #4 from Levente Farkas <lfarkas at lfarkas.org>  2008-11-03 06:26:32 EDT ---
for #2 epel build already break:-(

for #3 i assume all fedora packages should have to follow the guidelines eg:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag
the purpose of such guidelines that the same spec file should have to be build
on _both_ fedora X and epel (or at least try to keep fedora and epel spec file
as close to each other as possible).
my goal was to create such packages which is working on both fedora X and epel.
most production software are build on rhel/centos and if it's build for that
the the windows binary of the same source would be useful to build on the same
host with the same gtk, glib, gcc etc. i know the main purpose of these
packages to build virt-manager and friends on fedora and windows and that the
current rhel/centos is almost unusable with the shipped virt-manager, kvm etc.
(that's the point i rebuild many of them on epel from fedora), but the goal
should have to be that this packages when stabilized be included in rhel too.
still most of the people wouldn't like to use fedora as their server, but may
be rhel-5.x eg: 5.4 can contain a newer virt-manager and kvm (although it
require newer kernel module too).
and yes i know you make no claims to be able to use these packages on epel, but
wouldn't be nice? as it's require only a little effort...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.