[Bug 464049] Package Review Request for libprojectM-qt
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Nov 6 04:42:54 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464049
Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <orcanbahri at yahoo.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com
Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <orcanbahri at yahoo.com> 2008-11-05 23:42:53 EDT ---
Ok, this package is next. Here are my notes:
* rpmlint on the SRPMS or SPEC gives:
libprojectM-qt.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab:
line 10)
which can be fixed easily.
* There is no file containing the license text. Please inform the upstream. The
license as of it is should be GPLv2+, which is correct.
* Source0 must be corrected
* The package does not (directly or indirectly) depend on another package that
owns on /usr/share/pixmaps (please verify this). Thus it must own
/usr/share/pixmaps
* The empty doc line
%doc
can be taken off, if there's no reply to the license query from upstream.
* I find the description (*) for the devel package insufficient. What it says
is true for any devel packages.
I would copy the contents of the description from the main package and paste it
to the beginning of the devel's description, and after that add the (*) to the
end.
* You must BR: cmake
I recommend you using "mock" to figure out BR's.
* No headers in devel? (just checking)
* The pc file needs patched as you did for the libprojectM package (to fix the
/usr/lib(64) issue)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list