[Bug 447368] Review Request: schroot - Execute commands in a chroot environment
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Nov 6 18:47:52 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447368
--- Comment #6 from Zach Carter <z.carter at f5.com> 2008-11-06 13:47:50 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I don't feel competent to fully review this package but I can make a few
> comments:
thanks :)
> You shouldn't duplicate all of those %doc files between the various
> subpackages.
will fix.
>
> I'm curious as to which guideline you believe mandates that you split off the
> libsbuild package. Generally library splits are only required to prevent
> multilib conflicts, but I don't believe this is a multilib package. (For one
> thing, it has no -devel subpackage.)
I can't find it anymore, but I was pretty sure it existed. I'll change it
back.
> schroot.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/schroot
> ['/usr/lib64']
> These are problematic.
I'll fix these.
> The tarball seems to include a large amount of doxygen-generated documentation.
> Is that of any use to end-users? If so it should probably be packaged,
> although a subpackage might be useful.
It looks mostly like developer docs, indexed source code, etc. I would think
developers would probably have downloaded the source code anyway, so I'm not
sure how useful it would be to individual users.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list