[Bug 469833] Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Use the GMP library for Math::BigInt routines
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Nov 7 14:30:35 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469833
Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu
Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2008-11-07 09:30:33 EDT ---
I followed the URL as usual when doing reviews and failed to notice that I had
ended up at the Math-GMP page, which confused the hell out of me. I think you
want
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Math-BigInt-GMP/
instead.
That's really the only thing I see wrong with this package; I'll approve it and
you can fix up the URL when you check in.
* source files match upstream:
3f00fb0191b4343745b99f104a50f50a49fa7424fe70cc002f000465161a8eb4
Math-BigInt-GMP-1.24.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
GMP.so()(64bit)
perl(Math::BigInt::GMP) = 1.24
perl-Math-BigInt-GMP = 1.24-1.fc10
perl-Math-BigInt-GMP(x86-64) = 1.24-1.fc10
=
libgmp.so.3()(64bit)
perl >= 0:5.006002
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
perl(XSLoader)
perl(strict)
perl(vars)
* %check is present and all tests pass:
All tests successful.
Files=7, Tests=5530, 3 wallclock secs ( 0.51 usr 0.03 sys + 2.50 cusr
0.07 csys = 3.11 CPU)
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.
APPROVED, just fix up the URL.
The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package
reviews recently, please consider doing one.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list