[Bug 469972] Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972





--- Comment #2 from David Nielsen <gnomeuser at gmail.com>  2008-11-08 09:05:10 EDT ---
bad rpmlint output:

glfw.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/glfw-2.6/glfwug.tex
glfw.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/glfw-2.6/glfwrm.tex
glfw.x86_64: E: no-binary
(if it has no binary wouldn't libglfw be a better name - also documentation
goes in the documentation package)

glfw-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package
(see below)

glfw-devel.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libglfw.so
glfw-devel.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libglfw.so

glfw.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 9)

according to
http://glfw.sourceforge.net/license.html
license is zlib/libpng not bsd

and as usual a few comments on your voodoo is nice for those who maintain your
packages while you are unable.

You should split out all the documentation into a subpackage or at the very
least put it in the -devel package (though there seems to be a lot of it, a doc
package would be preferable)

Good news though, it builds in mock (x86_64 f10)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.