[Bug 471527] Review Request: SNMP++ - SNMP C++ library

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527





--- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>  2008-11-15 11:28:43 EDT ---
Well,

* You set the soname of libsnmp++.so by yourself, however this may become
  confusing even the upstream begins to name the soname of this library
  differently in the future. For example the upstream may set soname
  as libsnmp++.so.0.0.0 at first.
  Also, there is no guarantee that the API of this library won't change
  when the major version of the tarball doesn't change.
  c.f.
 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PatriceDumas#On_not_shipping_shared_libraries_when_upstream_doesn.27t

  Usually I think when the upstream does not set the soname of the library
  properly, we should not ship the library. How do you think?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.