[Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Nov 20 21:20:30 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366





--- Comment #23 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <orcanbahri at yahoo.com>  2008-11-20 16:20:28 EDT ---
Hi Ville,
I wasn't very sure what to put for the license tag since no source file that
contains code specifies a license in its header. There is only the LICENSE file
that claims GPL3, even that file just mentions it in two lines and does not
give the full text of GPL3.

I have seen in some reviews that whenever the source code files do not specify
a specific version of GPL, a generic version (like GPL+ ot GPLv2+) was picked.

So do you think that whatever says in that LICENSE file, is enough to specify
that the package is GPL3?

I'm doing the other changes you asked and update the packages soon. Thanks for
the review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list