[Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471





--- Comment #9 from D Haley <mycae at yahoo.com>  2008-11-28 19:09:20 EDT ---
Spec: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/skinlf-4.spec
SRPM: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/skinlf-6.7-4.fc9.src.rpm

* Sat Nov 29 2008 <mycae(a!t)yahoo.com> 6.7-4
- Updated BuildRequires to inlcude laf-plugin
- Silence several rpmlint errors
 - ASL 2.0 vs Apache Source Licence 2.0
 - Fix arch
 - Fix EOL on docs.

>build seems to error out aswell without laf-plugin installed so shouldnt that
>also have a BuildRequires on it?

Fixed

rpmlint:

$ rpmlint -iv ../SRPMS/skinlf-6.7-4.fc9.src.rpm 
skinlf.src: I: checking
$ rpmlint -iv ../RPMS/noarch/skinlf-6.7-4.fc9.noarch.rpm 
skinlf.noarch: I: checking
$ rpmlint -iv skinlf.spec 

Known issues :

comment 3
>>skinlf.i386: W: invalid-license Apache
>Not fixed -- I am unsure how to proceed here. If you examine the LICENSE file
>in the source, it isn't Apache, contrary to what's on their website [2]. Its a
>redistributable with attribution licence, which doesn't appear up in the
>rpmlint -iv output. Which licence should I select??

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.